Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Hi, It's Michael. Your morning show airs live five to
eight am Central, six to nine Eastern in great cities
like Memphis, Tennessee, Telsa, Oklahoma, Sacramento, California. We'd love to
be a part of your morning routine, but we're happierre
here now. Enjoy the podcast.
Speaker 2 (00:14):
Two three starting your morning off right.
Speaker 3 (00:19):
A new way of talk, a new way of understanding.
Speaker 2 (00:22):
Because we're in this together.
Speaker 3 (00:25):
This is your Morning.
Speaker 2 (00:27):
Show with Michael Bill.
Speaker 3 (00:29):
Jordan seven minutes after the hour.
Speaker 4 (00:31):
Good morning, and thanks for listening to your morning show
on this Thursday, October sixteenth, twenty twenty five. If you're
just waking up, several things to talk about. Mom. Donnie
on Fox basically would not acknowledge Amas should disarm, says
it's far too early to celebrate lasting peace. And ultimately, yeah,
(00:56):
if not ya who came to New York City, he'd
arrest him.
Speaker 3 (00:58):
You tell me who's high.
Speaker 4 (01:00):
He's on the big debate tonight in the New York
City mayor's race. Things have already flipped in Virginia when
that Attorney General's race Jay Jones with those terrible text messages,
violent text messages against party opposition. He is now losing
forty nine to forty three in that race, and I
don't think it's going very much better in the governor's
(01:20):
race there. And we'll have more on Katie Porter in
our Sounds of the Day still to come. Well, we
had huge market gains this in the midst of day
sixteen of shut down. This in the midst of tariff uncertainties.
A lot of it was bank earnings reports, chipstock rebounds,
possible looming fed cuts. Our economist and money was David Snati.
(01:44):
David Boson is joining us from the Bonson Financial Group.
You know, it is kind of remarkable that the market
keeps going up despite shut down, despite traff uncertainty.
Speaker 3 (01:57):
Care to explain, Well, the market was.
Speaker 5 (02:00):
Down almost a thousand points.
Speaker 6 (02:02):
Friday and it hasn't come back to that level yet.
So the tariff issue is still weighing on markets, but
it's not really remarkable, meaning surprising that markets don't take
the threats of trade war. That's serious because markets are
pretty smart and markets have.
Speaker 5 (02:21):
Gone through this multiple times.
Speaker 6 (02:24):
The problem for the US is that China's gone through
it multiple times too, and so as they go through
this kind of back and forth jocking for leverage, you know,
I think China is well aware that the President does
not want the market impact of re escalated trade war.
So you're right, that does help hold markets in. But no,
(02:47):
I mean, things just lower than they were last Thursday.
They've come back from the lows, but there's volatility and
that's not government shutdown related at all.
Speaker 5 (02:57):
As we've talked about the last couple of weeks. It's
tariff issues. And you know, we live in a a
crazy world right now, That's what I would say, Yes.
Speaker 4 (03:06):
It is crazy, all right. So our White House correspondent
John Decker had quite the exchange with Scott percent yesterday
and it was over tariffs and tariffs being a tax
to which percent you know, got all nasty with him
and basically said, you go get a driver's license and
you pay a fee. You know, now he's comparing tariffs
(03:28):
are not taxation, it's you know, and it was just,
I know, I thought of you immediately, because we now
have estimates that fifty five percent of all this revenue
that's coming in from all of these new negotiated deals
and that money is one hundred percent going to the government,
(03:49):
fifty five percent of the costs of the tariffs will
be picked up by we the consumer. You've said from
the very beginning, no one should be really pro tariff
necessarily because it's being pro tax.
Speaker 5 (04:00):
Yes, and you know.
Speaker 6 (04:01):
Who has told me that word for word multiple times.
Speaker 3 (04:07):
Yes, sir.
Speaker 7 (04:09):
So.
Speaker 6 (04:09):
The Secretary is in a very unenviable position of having
to go along with the party line, and that is
his job is to implement the president's agenda.
Speaker 3 (04:21):
But yes, I do.
Speaker 5 (04:22):
Think that he is speaking things he knows to not
be true.
Speaker 6 (04:27):
But I believe that what he has done, apart from
the things he said, he has repositioned the terriff issue
has more about trying to get more deals done, as
opposed to the insanity that Pete Navarro and Howard Lutnik
and others were proposing, which is, we just have to
(04:49):
simply stop buying things from other countries because it isn't
fair when we do. And that line of reasoning was
termeating the American economic consciousness and it was driving people
like me crazy.
Speaker 5 (05:04):
And I do think the Secretary.
Speaker 6 (05:05):
Has done a good job of walking back from that
mental insanity.
Speaker 5 (05:09):
Now, look, we have a lot of problems here. Fifty
six percent be passed on a consumer.
Speaker 6 (05:15):
Is generous, but then people act like the thirty percent
that corporations are eating is a good thing. Those corporations
are where your jobs come from, there, where wages.
Speaker 5 (05:27):
Come from, there, where capital investment comes from. So to
the extent that.
Speaker 6 (05:32):
The fifty six number went lower and the US corporate
number went higher, that would not be good either. And
this is what we have always known about taxes. You know,
the government getting money from other parts of the productive economy.
Speaker 5 (05:47):
Period, that's the end of it.
Speaker 4 (05:50):
What was the biggest problem with COVID was all the
money shelled out unearned, which was inflationary. Is this not
inflationary too? When you take all this money into the
government and take it out of the people, out of
the corporations, and out of the economy, what kind of
an effect does that have.
Speaker 6 (06:09):
Well, to the extent it's inflationary, it's because of the
downward pressure.
Speaker 5 (06:13):
It puts on supply.
Speaker 6 (06:14):
Inflation is always, in forever a monetary phenomenon. So what
happened with COVID was the money supply increased, but the
supply of bits and services decreased.
Speaker 5 (06:25):
But what we're dealing with here.
Speaker 6 (06:26):
Is not an increase in money supply. So higher tariff
now makes something more expensive, and that may make that
thing go higher, but then it theoretically makes something else
go lower because there's no new money. The problem that
makes it inflationary is if it puts downward pressure on production.
All right, And I know we're getting a little wonky here,
(06:48):
but I just want to answer honestly, I really don't
like the idea of US judging tariffs only on their
inflationary impact.
Speaker 5 (06:56):
That is a bad thing. It's politically terrible.
Speaker 6 (06:59):
I know, no customer wants to know the store and
have to pay more for pencils or Christmas presents or
whatever the case may be. But beyond that, we have
to understand that what's harriffs do is decrease total trains
and that or make.
Speaker 5 (07:14):
The cost of trade higher. And that's whether we're.
Speaker 6 (07:17):
Exporting services or we're importing goods. Either way, it puts
downward pressure on healthy economic activity, and it's being picked
up by the consumer and by the companies who hire
the consumers to get a paycheck to pay for these things.
Speaker 4 (07:35):
All right, David, bottom line is we're day sixteen of
a shutdown. Even if they solved it today, we'd be
literally three and a half weeks from the next shutdown,
What does because it's looking more and more like the
shutdown may last through the end of the year, what
kind of effect does that have if it doesn't give yourself.
Speaker 6 (07:53):
Sure that it Yeah, Mike, I'm not sure that it
is looking that way. Because we open up the New
York Times right now or the Washington Post or turn
on MSNBC. It's not on the paper, it's not on
the cding. No one's even talking about it. Why is
the left wing media not talking about it? Because they
are having a very difficult time at this point sticking
(08:16):
it to the administration as their causation. If this were
politically sticking, and maybe that'll switch around a little bit,
you know, the political optics can move. But they would
love to talk about this if it were politically toxic
for the Trump administration.
Speaker 3 (08:33):
I think that.
Speaker 6 (08:34):
The Democrats have no choice but to reopen, and I
also think the Republicans are going to give them the
healthcare subsidies because candidly, I don't think the President minds
the healthcare subsidies, and I don't think a certain amount
of Republicans in the Senate mind them. So now the
question is what the Democrat political fallout would be and
(08:54):
it's probably.
Speaker 5 (08:55):
Not going to be great.
Speaker 6 (08:56):
But now I imagine that they will.
Speaker 3 (08:58):
Reopen before the end of the year.
Speaker 5 (09:00):
But in the meantime, what has the damage been? Almost
none whatsoever.
Speaker 3 (09:04):
Now we've got to see.
Speaker 6 (09:05):
What the courts do, because if they're not going to
let russ fire people.
Speaker 5 (09:11):
Then that's gonna change thing too. So there's some moving
pieces here.
Speaker 4 (09:16):
If the polls, and of course are polls accurate, who knows.
But if there any indication as time ticks on, the
attention and blame is turning to the Democrats and away
from Trump and the Republicans, which we talked about yesterday,
would put pressure on the Democrats to cut a deal.
Speaker 3 (09:31):
Oh, from your lips to God's ears.
Speaker 4 (09:33):
As we move forward in thirty seven cheerfully thirty seven
trillion dollars of debt? What's coming up tomorrow on the
dividend cafe?
Speaker 5 (09:40):
Oh, I can't tell.
Speaker 6 (09:41):
You how important it is. AI and the future of jobs.
What is really to be expected in the future from
artificial intelligence? Are the hand ringers right that AI is
about to eliminate ends and millions of jobs, and computers
are going to do every thing we're used to doing
ourselves or is there a total fundamental economic misunderstanding here, which,
(10:07):
by the way, is a theological misunderstanding.
Speaker 5 (10:11):
The Dividend Cafe is about tomorrow.
Speaker 3 (10:13):
Dividendcafe dot com. It's my favorite read of the week
and we'll talk to you next week.
Speaker 4 (10:18):
David Bonson with a Bonson Financial Group, our money was
an economist and theologian.
Speaker 3 (10:22):
Thanks for joining us.
Speaker 2 (10:24):
This is your morning show with Michael del Chna.
Speaker 4 (10:29):
Well, day sixteen of the shutdown. You just heard David
Bonson say he thinks the silence from the left in
the media is a sign that things aren't going well
for the Democrats in this fight and that they make
cave soon. Time will tell big debate New York City
and the mayor's race. And we got two more remains
(10:49):
of hostages yesterday, but Hamas is saying we need a
lot of help finding these bodies, so that brings the
total to nine because remember one turned out to be
a Palestinian. Can't have your morning show without your voice,
and thank god we never have to. Let's go to
Joseph in Columbus, Georgia.
Speaker 8 (11:05):
What amazes me is if the United States is so
terrible and our way of life here is so terrible?
Why do they all these people want to come here
to this country and then when they get here they
want to try to change it. If it's so terrible,
why come here at all? Why don't you stay there
and make your land into the utopia that you think
(11:28):
that you ought to make? The United States be.
Speaker 3 (11:32):
Well?
Speaker 4 (11:33):
I think that's a rhetorical statement, doesn't need anything other
than any man. What's interesting I saw I love memes.
Memes are like these little signs of truth in the
midst of logic chaos.
Speaker 3 (11:46):
And it's similar to that.
Speaker 4 (11:48):
It's got the old fashioned picture of a guy in
the fifties in his suit, sipping his hot coffee, and
it says Democrats today are saying no one, even the president,
is above the law. So our question is, how come
I legal aliens are? You know, we have a lot
of these inconsistencies, And that happens when your narrative driven
(12:09):
and not really intent historic, historically accurate, and critical thinking,
fact based. So yeah, those those are obvious questions to ask.
And I wish it was as simple as just speaking
the truth and that would make it so. But on
(12:31):
a very deep note, it is God's word that never
returns void, not ours. Ours can return void, which reminds
me of an email I got, which was, I listened
to your show every morning since you Hewitt changed to show.
For the most part, I love them. They always the
all start the way. For the most part, I agree
(12:51):
with a lot of your opinions. Well that's life. For
the most part. My wife agrees with a lot of
my opinions, so you don't have to apologize for when
you having a disagree. For the most part, I agree
with all of your opinions, but I am so disappointed
about your negativity about the prediction of where the future
of the country is going. I am not predicting anything.
(13:12):
I am concerned with the dysfunction, and I think the
cause of it is a partisan matrix. You have half
the country believing one way, watching one thing, reading one thing,
sharing with each other one thing, and totally oblivious to
the other side.
Speaker 3 (13:32):
And the other side's doing the same.
Speaker 4 (13:36):
And now we're seeing this cold civil war start having gunshots.
Speaker 3 (13:42):
I e. Charlie Kirk.
Speaker 4 (13:45):
And as we celebrate two hundred and fifty years of
our founding and intent, and we go to the Atlantic,
not to highlight the Atlantic, but that's the opposition playbook.
That's who in forms. If you read The Atlantic today,
you know what's being taught in our universities tomorrow, in
(14:05):
r K through twelve tomorrow. You know what the stories
are going to be in legacy mainstream media. That's the
only reason we're pointing it out. We're not here to
sell that. There is a good portion of America that
has fallen so far left it's now socialist, Islamist, and revolutionary,
(14:29):
and we can't afford another civil war. Of course, I
want to focus on our founding documents.
Speaker 3 (14:34):
They don't. Of course, we are incapable.
Speaker 4 (14:40):
Of being a republic until we each individual is self governed,
and we're incapable of being self governed without faith. This
is what Charlie was trying to explain to everybody before
he was shot to death. So I'm not being doom
and gloom. I'm being honest and calling ball and strikes.
(15:03):
It goes back to what Pam Bondi was saying, do
you love America as much as you hate Trump? Because
that's going to become the issue now. I know I'm
talking about it.
Speaker 3 (15:12):
Early.
Speaker 4 (15:13):
You'll learn to love that, You'll learn to appreciate my
heads up, because most of what I did today will
be what everybody's trying to figure out in three four
months from now or shortly after the ball drops and
strikes in the new year. To Saint Louis, one of
my favorite cities, Austin.
Speaker 3 (15:31):
Good morning, Michael.
Speaker 9 (15:32):
I was just wondering if anyone's interested that Trump has
activated ten thousand.
Speaker 4 (15:37):
US troops to head to surrounding areas around Venezuela. Yeah,
and he's also authorized the CIA to take action in Venezuela.
Speaker 3 (15:45):
And I'm sure those troops are in the region to
back up that. We'll have more on that and more.
Speaker 4 (15:50):
Keep those comments coming, Michael d at iHeartMedia dot com
or use the talk back button on your iHeart app.
It's a little microphone. You press it and you instantly
take your place at this morning's kitchen table again when
you disagree, that's part of the beauty. Nothing to apologize for.
Speaker 3 (16:07):
My name is Stuart.
Speaker 6 (16:08):
I'm from Monkeytown, Tennessee, and my morning shows your Morning
Show with Peter.
Speaker 1 (16:13):
Boy Hi, It's Michael. Your Morning show can be heard
live weekday mornings five to eight am six to nine
am Eastern in great cities like Tampa, Florida, Youngstown, Ohio,
and Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. We'd love to join you on
the Drive to Work Live, but we're glad you're here now.
(16:35):
Enjoyed the podcast. Thank you for bringing us along with you.
This is your morning show. I am Michael del Journal,
Honored to serve you. President Trump is going to withhold
forty million dollars from California over the Trucker English proficiency rules. Again,
states can defy, States can experiment, but that doesn't entitle
(16:56):
them to federal funding to bail it out.
Speaker 4 (16:59):
And if they want to go rogue, great, that's their right.
Their citizens can take that up in their state and
local elections. The President can also withhold forty million dollars.
Same could be set for Brown University, who is rejecting
the President's offer. They too can teach whatever they want,
but they'll do so without federal funding. Mom Donnie appeared
(17:21):
with Martha McCallum more on that and Sounds of the Day. Tonight,
he'll appear on stage the Big New York City Debate.
Did I mention Sounds of the Day, because boy are
they revealing and entertaining today.
Speaker 3 (17:31):
All right, everybody look them out.
Speaker 6 (17:33):
Look you just gotta try harder, not the saw.
Speaker 3 (17:35):
So I'm going after the opportunity for a brief Pa
Cifics lesson. Sure, perhaps you'd like to be alone with
you in mental condition.
Speaker 4 (17:46):
All right, let's start with Zoran, Mom, Donnie. We did it,
and this is in the platinum. If you want to
go listen to the podcast, it'll be up by nine
Central this morning, right after the show, and you can
just listen to our one and catch up if you
need that link. By the way, go to your Morning
Show online dot com. That's also our website.
Speaker 3 (18:05):
Anyway.
Speaker 4 (18:06):
You know, we talked about no matter what Martha would ask,
he would just answer free childcare, free uses, an ability
for the middle class to afford to live in New
York City.
Speaker 3 (18:20):
I mean, he just there was no substance whatsoever.
Speaker 4 (18:24):
Now, when it got to Hamas, that was a little
bit of a different story. A he wouldn't answer, and
then B when he did, sounded pretty pro Hamas and
ant Dinette, YEAHO to me listen.
Speaker 10 (18:42):
So you've denounced Israel and the United States for the
response to the slaughter on October the seventh. In fact,
at times you called it a lasting stain the response,
and at times you have left October seventh out of
your statements completely around this issue.
Speaker 3 (18:59):
Right now.
Speaker 10 (19:00):
You just talked about Israeli is killing some Palestinians, but
Hamas is killing Palestinians within Gaza, and they have not
returned the bodies that they promised to return, including two
Americans each, Chen and Omer Neutra, whose families we have
interviewed over these months. So what is your response to
what Hamas is doing now?
Speaker 11 (19:20):
I think those are bodies and remains that should absolutely
be returned. And I think that I have no issue
with critiquing Hamas or the Israeli government because my critiques
all come from a place of universal human rights. And
my focus, however, is right here in New York City
and transforming the most expensive city in America into one
that's affordable for each and ever New Yorker.
Speaker 10 (19:38):
Okay, and I want to get to it absolutely, But
do you believe that Hamas should lay down their weapons
and leave the leadership in Gaza.
Speaker 11 (19:46):
I believe that any future here in New York City
is one that we have to make sure that's affordable
for all, and as it pertains to Israel and Palestine,
that we have to ensure that there is peace, and
that is the future that we have to fight for.
Speaker 10 (19:57):
But you won't say that Hamas should lay down their
arms and give up lead in Gaza.
Speaker 11 (20:00):
I don't really have opinions about the future of Hamas
and Israel beyond the question of justice and safety and
the fact that anything has to abide by international law,
and that applies to Hamas, that applies to Israeli military,
applies to anyone you could ask me about.
Speaker 10 (20:13):
Okay, one last thought on that you have said that
you would arrest Netnyahu if he came to the United States.
You've been very outspoken in your criticism of him. Do
you stand by that you would arrest him if he
came here if you were Mayre.
Speaker 11 (20:23):
I've said that this is a city that believes the international law,
and this is a city that wants to uplift and
uphold those beliefs.
Speaker 10 (20:30):
The prime Missus State doesn't stand by the International Criminal Court.
Speaker 11 (20:33):
It hasn't signed the Treaty for the International Criminal Court.
The National Criminal Court, however, has issued a warrant for
the arrest of Benjamin.
Speaker 5 (20:38):
At Yahoo NS in the United States.
Speaker 11 (20:40):
Could you arrest on as it has for Vladimir Putin?
I've said that I believe that we should uphold arrest
warrants by the National Criminal Court, and that we would
you should do so only in abiding with all of
the laws in.
Speaker 3 (20:51):
Front of us. I'm not going to make a new
law to ensure that we.
Speaker 5 (20:53):
Can act think that, Commissioner.
Speaker 3 (20:55):
I mean.
Speaker 4 (20:56):
The bottom line is if you can't figure out that
Mandani is first and foremost an Islamist, and by the way,
by being an Islamist, that would make him anathetical to
everything America stands for, including its allies. It's clearly anti Israel.
(21:18):
It's clearly pro Hamas. He's also making a lot of
promises he can't keep. It's seven billion dollars to make
all the buses free and childcare free. That's before you
get into seizing private property for rent control. And the
governor Hokel is running on the promise she will not
(21:39):
raise taxes. You can't raise taxes in New York City
without the governor's approval.
Speaker 3 (21:43):
So somebody's lying.
Speaker 4 (21:45):
We'll see if that, along with the direct question are
you as an Islamist comes up in the debate. If
his strategy tonight in the debate is the same as Fox,
it'll be very interesting to see if New York City
wakes up before it's too late. I've often said from
the beginning, and this isn't playing talk radio or shirts
(22:09):
and skins. The Sergeant of Arms is in charge of
security of the Capitol. The Sergeant of Arms in fact,
went to Nancy Pelosi with the same intelligence reports that
the President received from Secret Service. I have been kind
to say both handled it poorly, because if you're the
(22:33):
President of the United States and you know Nancy Pelosi
is setting a trap, why do you go out in
front of that White House and do a rally and
do it in the way you did it and say
it in the way you said it. I was live
on the air, So I don't think Donald Trump is
without some blame, But the majority of the blame goes
(22:55):
to Nancy Pelosi. She's the one that, when they saw
of arms came to her, chose not to bring in
the National Guard and support security. I believe intentionally to
set the trap for the insurrection narrative, Boy did Donald
Trump walk into it?
Speaker 3 (23:17):
Now?
Speaker 4 (23:17):
That, along with what is life like every day for
any republican leftist talking points being thrown at you and
criticism and indictment or as facts. Put those two together
and you talk about bigger than a giraffe. Here's Nancy
(23:39):
Pelosi being carried down the Capitol steps because she stayed
so long she can't walk. And here's how she responds
to maybe one of the lone conservative reporters.
Speaker 12 (23:50):
Congress, Are you at all concerned that the new January
sixth committee will find you liable to that?
Speaker 8 (23:56):
I am right here?
Speaker 3 (23:57):
Are you at all.
Speaker 12 (23:58):
Concerned about the new January sixth committee finding you wiable
for that day?
Speaker 5 (24:02):
Why did you.
Speaker 12 (24:03):
Refuse the National Guard on January sixth?
Speaker 9 (24:06):
Thank you?
Speaker 5 (24:07):
Shut up.
Speaker 13 (24:08):
I did not refuse the national Guard. The President didn't
send it. Why are you coming here with Republican talking
points as if you're as serious journal.
Speaker 12 (24:16):
The American people want to know, we still have questions.
Speaker 3 (24:19):
Shut up.
Speaker 13 (24:22):
I did not refuse the national Guard. The President didn't
send it. Why are you coming here with republican talking
points as if you're as serious journalist?
Speaker 4 (24:30):
Uh?
Speaker 3 (24:32):
They're in fact both true. A.
Speaker 4 (24:35):
You did not request them because you were setting a trap,
and the President didn't set him send them because he
didn't see a trap was being set. Oh, there's always
the latest from Kamala Harris. Again, we followed this disastrous
quote unquote book tour, which is just trying to keep
her candidacy a lie. But in this one she goes
(24:56):
so far as to say she had the best she
was the most qualified person ever that ran for president.
Ike step aside Washington, Quincy Adams, stop beside, it's common.
Speaker 3 (25:18):
Here's how it sounded.
Speaker 14 (25:19):
I've done in the fact that I was elected district
attorney for two terms as the first woman elected attorney
general of the state of California, ran the second largest
Department of Justice in the United States, second only to
the United States Department of Justice.
Speaker 5 (25:33):
I was the.
Speaker 14 (25:34):
United States Senator, a second black woman elected.
Speaker 5 (25:36):
In the history of the United States senator.
Speaker 14 (25:39):
And I was the first woman Vice President of the
United States. So there are those things that I needed
to make sure that people knew.
Speaker 5 (25:48):
That decent But that is a decent resume.
Speaker 3 (25:51):
But go ahead, they're.
Speaker 14 (25:54):
Well, some people have actually said I I was the
most qualified candidate ever to run for president.
Speaker 3 (26:01):
Ever, I like Jose. I like this. Some people say,
very nice, but go ahead, Dougie, is my guess.
Speaker 4 (26:10):
We talked earlier about well you knew Jay Jones was
I mean, the guy should have just apologized and withdrawn
from the race, but he didn't. He apologized, it just
kept running, and Democrats kept standing by his side, including
the candidate for governor, which will probably be the her demise,
(26:31):
just like all those I mean, think about this. Why
is Hokul endorsing Mom Donnie when he's planning to raise
corporate tax rates and individual tax rates as she's running
for governor and pledging no tax increases and you can't
raise taxas in New York City without the governor's approval
or Now, think of all the Jewish people in New York,
(26:53):
let alone New York City, and this guy's on Hamasa's side.
He's anti America, anti Israel, will arrest not in Yahoo.
He will not call Hamas to disarm, and she's endorsing him.
You know, eventually this is going to get to her
race too. Well, that's already happened in Virginia, where things
(27:14):
have completely flipped for Jay Jones. He is now trailing
forty nine to forty three. That will only get worse,
and I suspect the governor's race is going to go
the same way. Meanwhile, in California, you remember Katie. She's
having a hard time after a video is pretty much
well a couple of videos won the live interview with
(27:37):
CBS and how that one's out, and then be an
old COVID video and how she treated her co workers.
It's been a disaster for her, just a matter of time,
but she decided to go right back and do an interview.
You tell me if you think this will heal her
future in California.
Speaker 11 (27:59):
Listen, should California voters feel confident that there aren't any
more Katie Porter videos out there?
Speaker 9 (28:07):
Well, what I know is that I could have done
better in those moments. I'm going to be focused on
earning their votes and earning their trust. That's true in
every election. I've only ever had tough elections. So I'm
absolutely aware that I'm going to have to continue to
show them. I'm going to have to answer every question.
I'm glad I got to continue that interview.
Speaker 4 (28:25):
Well, Rad, there's some progress, so she will.
Speaker 3 (28:27):
Allow follow ups moving forward. Well, at least she didn't
say she was going to make New York affordable as well.
That's what mom Donnie always defaults.
Speaker 5 (28:35):
To shut out.
Speaker 4 (28:36):
Boy, if we could get a video of her putting
the hot potatoes on her ex husband's head.
Speaker 3 (28:42):
That we're in the divorce pace. I would love to
see the potato.
Speaker 9 (28:46):
Head Faly finish that interview and answer all her questions.
And That's what I'm going to continue to do, to
show Californians not only that I understand their problems, but
that I have the will and the strength of character
to actually get something done with it.
Speaker 4 (28:59):
That strength character I pleasure. All Right, I was wrong.
I'll answer all the questions. Boy Red hit this right
on the head. With the far left, they think they
can pull a Biden. They think all they have to
do is announce their running for office. They're entitled to win,
and anybody questions it in any way, Well, then you're
the one with the problem and I can hide and
(29:20):
be elected.
Speaker 3 (29:21):
No, you can't.
Speaker 4 (29:23):
And when you act like a goofball in an interview,
people see that. Getting back to Kamala though, didn't Obama
say that Hillary's the most quota?
Speaker 1 (29:33):
Oh my gosh, don't start another fight.
Speaker 6 (29:39):
People who majored in online activision with a minor and
puberty board a little bit.
Speaker 4 (29:46):
Any of you in the media clearly miss the art
of the tachers.
Speaker 5 (29:50):
It's going to work out.
Speaker 2 (29:51):
It's Your Morning Show with Michael del Choino.
Speaker 3 (29:56):
Our tribute to Nancy Pelosi. Do we have it ready?
Speaker 5 (29:59):
Shut up? Shut up, Sit up?
Speaker 3 (30:06):
I love it fifty four minutes after the hour.
Speaker 4 (30:08):
If you didn't get that joke, you didn't hear Sounds
of the day, don't forget the podcast. You'll find the
link at your Morning Show online dot com. All right,
if you're just getting rock and unrolling this morning, we
got two more bodies. That brings the total to nine,
and Hamas is saying we're gonna need a lot of
help finding anymore.
Speaker 3 (30:23):
It's day sixteen of the shutdown? Will it ever end?
Speaker 4 (30:26):
And the big debate for the New York City mayors
races tonight. We'll see how Mom Donnie follows up his
Big a Fox his Big Fox appearance. Is the Gaza
peace deal having a little turbulence or is it beginning
to fall apart with the reports of a Maas not
holding up to the end of the bargain on returning bodies,
as well as violence in the Gaza city, Are Your
Morning Show? National correspondent Rory O'Neil takes a look at
(30:48):
the latest of what's happening in the Middle East and
if peace is holding.
Speaker 3 (30:52):
Good morning, Rory.
Speaker 7 (30:53):
Yeah, I wouldn't go as far as saying it's unraveling,
just to making clear a reminder that this path to
piece is not going to be a straight line. And
right now a little bit of frustration with the fact
that Hamas now says it cannot find or recover the
nineteen remaining hostages bodies and turn them over to Israel.
So Israel is getting very frustrated the US taking sort
(31:15):
of a deeper breath than saying, look, let's believe they're
acting in good faith and see what we can do
to try to facilitate the return of all the hostages,
keeping in mind this realization that likely not all will
be returned.
Speaker 4 (31:27):
Yeah, they we kind of knew that they didn't know
where all the bodies were from the beginning. Again, priority
number one was to bring the living out of the
hell of those tunnels and back to their families.
Speaker 3 (31:39):
Achieved.
Speaker 4 (31:39):
Check next, forclosure sake, get the remains of those who
were killed in captivity.
Speaker 3 (31:46):
Well, we got four. That wasn't good.
Speaker 4 (31:49):
Then we got four more and only three of them
were Israeli, and then we got two more yesterday.
Speaker 3 (31:53):
Now Hamas is saying.
Speaker 4 (31:54):
We need help locating these We presume there's somewhere in
the tunnel. I would think there's some kind of a
equipment that could probably scan what's underground. I don't know,
but they need more people digging, that's for sure.
Speaker 7 (32:09):
Well, right, and they're still by the way, and you
know there's growing chaos now inside Gaza as well.
Speaker 3 (32:15):
We've all seen the videos, right, We've all.
Speaker 7 (32:17):
Seen the videos of these executions that are happening by
what looks like roving gangs, you know, and trying to
bring a law enforcement presence, I don't know if that's
the right word, some security there. President Trump still confident
Hamas will disarm, said that in the Oval Office last night,
adding the US will not put boots on the ground
to make that happen, but he was still hopeful and
(32:39):
confident that it ultimately will happen, or that Israel and
perhaps other partners in the region will make it happen,
because getting that area secured is necessary for anything else
to move forward.
Speaker 3 (32:52):
Yeah, and that's kind of more yesterday.
Speaker 4 (32:53):
Today, I would be turning the attention to Okay, Hamas
says they're complying, So either they're not complying or they
can't control their thugs in the Gaza. Either way, that's
a problem. I think the opportunity is, this is where
it needs to be. The Arab coalition of reasonable Muslim
nations that are the forces. I think if Israel goes
(33:14):
back in, that's a different level of turbulence than whatever
else can be a coalition of policing.
Speaker 3 (33:21):
But somebody's gonna have to go in and kill them.
Speaker 4 (33:23):
That's just the bottom line, right, And that's the not
so straight line.
Speaker 7 (33:27):
And you've just released, right, and you've just released nineteen
hundred bout more who might want to join them?
Speaker 4 (33:33):
Now you're talking mind language. Yeah, that's a disaster waiting
to happen. All right, We're a great reporting is always.
We'll talk again tomorrow.
Speaker 2 (33:39):
We're all in this together. This is your Morning Show
with Michael Nhild. Join now.