December 9, 2025 • 34 mins
Always revealing and often entertaining, it’s The Sounds of The Day!
Russian-Ukrainian peace talks have stalled, bombing resumed, and now Trump Jr is saying his dad is ready to abandon Ukraine. Colonial Steven Bucci will walk us through how to get this back on a trajectory towards peace??!
The Federal Reserve Board begins meeting Tuesday at a time when higher prices are forcing more people to steal from self-checkout kiosks. National Correspondent RORY O’NEILL will take a look at what the Fed is expected to do, and why the economy is forcing people to steal things without paying for them.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Hi, I'm Michael del Jorno and your morning show can
be heard live as it's happening five to eight am
Central and six to nine Eastern on great stations like
six twenty WJDX and Jackson, Mississippi, or Akrons, News Talk
six forty WHLO and Akron, Ohio and News Radio five
seventy WDAK and Columbus, Georgia. We'd love to be a
part of your morning routine, but we're glad you're here now.
(00:22):
Enjoy the podcast.
Speaker 2 (00:25):
Starting your morning off right. A new way of talk,
a new way of understanding because we're in this togad.
This is your morning show with Michael del.
Speaker 1 (00:38):
John Welcome morning one and all, seven minutes after the hour,
Welcome into your morning show. It belongs to you and
we're honored to serve you. I'm Michael. Jeffrey's got the sound,
Red's got the content. I got a Keronel on deck.
It's seven minutes after the hour, and welcome to Tuesday, December,
the ninth year of Our Lord, twenty twenty five. The
President is off to Pennsylvania. He's also out with a
(01:00):
billion dollar farm made package for farmers to offset some
of the unintended consequences of the tariffs, and I think
Kurtz had more interceptions last night than he had all
season long. I think they literally doubled fourt's in the game.
Chargers steal it at home at so Far twenty two
(01:21):
nineteen over the Eagles on Monday Night football. Meanwhile, we
were all, many of us prayerful and hopeful and starting
to get optimistic about peace with Russia and Ukraine, and
wouldn't have been great to have it before the holidays. Well,
the peace talks themselves seemed to have stalled. The bombing
(01:45):
has resumed. Now Trump Junior is indicating his father's ready
to abandon Ukraine. Colonel Stephen Bouchi is joining us from
the Heritage Foundation with the largest think tanks of the world.
And the questions pretty simple, how do we get this
back in the trajectory towards peace and from bombing. It's
looking harder and harder, especially when Ukraine's not interested in
giving up any land.
Speaker 3 (02:08):
Well, it's tough.
Speaker 4 (02:11):
You know, we looked at this right from the beginning
that Russia invaded the Ukraine, and you know, we've worked
and worked, and Putin has told some heavy lies along
the way about his willingness to cooperate and try and
(02:31):
come up with some sort of plan, and he constantly
backs out on it. And I'm afraid right now that
President Trump realizes he's not going.
Speaker 3 (02:42):
To be able to get Putin to move, so in.
Speaker 4 (02:44):
His desire for peace, he's switched to, well, let's try
and make the Ukrainians move, And I don't know if
that's a good idea. I heard Don Junior's comments over
in Europe. I hope those are not you know, that's
not him sort of being a mouthpiece for his dad.
(03:05):
I hope he's talking, frankly, out of another part of
his body besides his mouth, because I thought it was reprehensible. Basically,
he has said this is all Ukrainian's fault. Ukraine needs
to change. They're the bad guys. That was essentially the
gist of what he said, and I don't think that's accurate,
and I hope that's not what the President believes now,
(03:26):
but I guess we'll see.
Speaker 1 (03:28):
Well, it's one of the other though, right to make
sure analysis so astute. It's either he's not talking out
of that other side of the body, he's speaking for
his father. His father's actions kind of coincide with those thoughts. Look, Putin,
I don't think he could think for a moment that
(03:48):
he's eventually going to win and occupy all of Ukraine.
So but he has to say and if he wants
to keep fighting Ukraine and was invaded initially, they've lost
a portion of land. Do you think there's any way
to negotiate something that could please both of them? And
then because if we can't think of it, well, then
(04:10):
that's why the president's playing a push for compromise on
this side, can't get anywhere, push for compromise on that side.
And at that point, are you really solving anything.
Speaker 4 (04:21):
No, I don't think that will be a good solution because,
to be honest with you, if you let Putin keep
what he's already gotten, and I'm not saying, you know,
the Ukrainians are going to get back their entire country
that Putin has stole.
Speaker 3 (04:35):
Over the last decade. But if they let.
Speaker 4 (04:40):
Him, you know, determine the parameters, you know what Ukraine
can do in the future that he gets to keep
everything he has now in more because really he wants
more than just what he has now. He wants to
at least get some additional gains that as opposed to
know them giving up ground to make a demilitarized zone,
(05:05):
so it's less likely for him to do something in
the future to put restrictions on Ukraine about what weapons
they can get that sort of thing. All he's doing
is set in the stage for another round of all
this in the future, and anybody who thinks differently is
either you know, delusional from Jump Street or has completely
(05:28):
swallowed the Russian propaganda. Putin does not want this to stop.
He really wants all of Ukraine, and he's he is
sort of, I guess, delusional enough to think he can
eventually get it if he keeps playing this smart game.
And I hope President Trump doesn't aid him in that
(05:51):
effort by falling for this and saying, you know, claiming
victory or claiming success in his efforts. If that's the
conditions that are at the end of this.
Speaker 1 (06:01):
Colonel Stephen Buchi joining us, we were so close to peace,
or so it was sold and appeared and seemed that
has stalled. Bombing has resumed, and now there's indications the
president is frustrated with Ukraine and not Putin and Russia.
What is another year? What does the next year of
war look like, because you know when you talk about
the inevitability if you make the goal. I want to
(06:23):
get a peace deal so I can get my peace prize. Well,
the bad players are still on stage and the conflict
is still there, and you're right, it would happen again
eventually after he regrouped and rebuilt, and the stakes would
be even higher than it would seem like. You got
to continue to isolate Russia. You got to continue to
(06:45):
make the bad behavior of punishment. And boy, I've never
said this out loud to you, I don't think but
hope that China gets so fed up they start pressuring Putin.
I mean, I don't. I am really I'm pretty good
at these things. But this does not look like it's
going in the right direction and will be resolved.
Speaker 4 (07:04):
Yeah, I'm not optimistic. I mean I was cautiously optimistic
before because it I'm with you, it appeared like we
were making some progress. It would not be a wonderful
solution for either side, but it looked like we.
Speaker 3 (07:19):
Get a solution.
Speaker 1 (07:20):
Now we're back.
Speaker 4 (07:22):
Basically to this idea that Russia is going to dictate
that the conditions of a piece, if they're even willing
to do that or are they just stringing us along. Now,
even further than that optimistic assessment, I don't think China
is going to be helpful in this because China really
(07:45):
wants to see Russia be successful, not for any ideological
reason or because they love brutin the Russians, but because
they want a precedent set that a big country in
a region has the right to set international boundaries because
they feel it's the right thing to do. And it's
because they plan to do it in time law though exactly.
(08:09):
That's why they want the Russians to set this precedent
in the international community, so that when they do it
and everybody screams bloody murder, they go, wait a minute,
look what Russia did. That's the new president, that's the
way we do business.
Speaker 3 (08:23):
Now.
Speaker 4 (08:24):
This idea that you know, you can tell a big
country what to do in their sphere of influence outside
of their borders, that's just wrong. This this is ours
to form as we see fit because we are the
big country in the region.
Speaker 3 (08:42):
Close hit. Let that happen.
Speaker 1 (08:43):
Closing moments with Stephen Bouchie from the Heritage Foundation. You know,
in a lifetime, I've seen so much change. The biggest
is the loss of understanding and awareness of history that
gives you perspective. We don't really revised history, we don't
study history, and it tends to repeat itself when you
(09:05):
do that. I mean, as you were talking, all I
could think of was toe how we all criticized when
the Obama administration and then later the Biden administration did
it negotiated the end of the war in Afghanistan with
the Taliban, the cause of the war. As we're about
to repeat something similar to that, What a big mistake
(09:27):
it would be to negotiate the end of this war
on the terms of Russia, who is the creator of
the war. But in addition to that, we don't realize
that military moves have diplomatic consequences, some that are unthinkable.
I mean, that just doesn't seem to be I don't
know what the word is balance in the footing of this,
(09:49):
in the narratives from those who cover it. I think
we cover these things worse, I think administrations do things
based on agendas. Worse. It's just very discoura uraging how
much foreign policy has changed in just my lifetime. I
guess you got me by a couple of years, but
not many. You must be feeling the same thing.
Speaker 3 (10:08):
Oh absolutely.
Speaker 4 (10:09):
And you know I've lived it as a military officer
and a government official and then a think anker for
most of my adult life, for this whole period we're
referring to, and it has changed for the worst. There's
you know, I'm all about the art of the deal.
I get that, but the deal has to be have
some elements of fundamental fairness and morality.
Speaker 3 (10:33):
And this isn't okay, we got a deal.
Speaker 1 (10:35):
This isn't tax credits. This isn't tax credits for building
a building renovation. You know, here's the simple truth. If
if Zelensky does not like these terms, and he wants
all of his country back, then you got to defeat Russia. Russia,
if you want any portion or all of Ukraine, you
(10:56):
got to defeat Ukraine. In other words, at some point
when the war to get exactly your way, or to
realize neither can win and get out of this mess,
someone's gonna have to make a compromise. I do think
you nailed it when you said the president's trying a tactic,
and right now he's back to bullying and pressuring Zelensky
and at some point, you know, got to keep an
(11:18):
eye on this because there's a lot of bad players
on the stage and many of them are looking to
do the same thing, and the next one could be
a world war. So how we handle this is as
important as what we're handling. Does that make sense to
anybody other than me?
Speaker 3 (11:33):
Yeah, it does one hundred percent.
Speaker 4 (11:35):
And those that say we have no interest in this,
there's no connection to America.
Speaker 3 (11:41):
I'm sorry.
Speaker 1 (11:41):
That's just wrong.
Speaker 4 (11:43):
It's intellectually wrong, it's actually wrong, historically right, wrong.
Speaker 3 (11:48):
Yeah, I just I don't know.
Speaker 4 (11:50):
I'm going to keep praying and keep watching it and
hopefully something will turn a corner.
Speaker 3 (11:56):
But I'm not really saying about it, Michael, not at all.
Speaker 1 (12:01):
All right, Stephen Butch. You can read his great work,
is Collie's great work at Heritage dot org. God bless you,
my friend. And we'll talk again sooner if conditions weren't otherwise,
probably next week, one last time before the end of
the year, Stephen Butchi, thank you. All right. Coming up,
this is probably the most appalling thing. It kind of
falls under foreign policy, this debriefing interview with Tammy Duckworth,
(12:32):
and it's with I'm Stalin because I can't remember her name,
now help me the one from CNN. I can't. Not
a big fan Dana Bash, and I want you to
listen to what she claims. I want you to hear
the firm, vivid, detailed opinion, and then how it is
(12:56):
revealed it's based on something she's never seen, describe something.
And then when Dana Bash comes back and goes have
you seen the video, she tries to act like she did.
And then when later she stops the interview cold and
reconfronts her. I want to make this clear. Have you
(13:16):
seen the Oh no, no, I just saw other videos.
Do you remember me Earlier in the week, we were
talking about everybody's describing these Democrat senators and house members
and talking heads on television. Oh, it was two innocent
children clinging to debris and we just blew them up
(13:36):
instead of rescuing them. And all while they're having these conversations,
they're showing you footage of some small white boat getting
blown up. But that's not the vote boat we're talking about,
but it creates the illusion that it is. And that's
what this woman's basing all of her opinions. She's a
(13:57):
senator from Hawaii of the United sis States of America.
But it's just pure talking points. She fakes even seeing
the actual video. It's everything wrong with politics. It's coming
up in your sounds in the day, next half hour,
and then Rory's got the final story on the FED.
Sure looks like they're going to lower interest rates tomorrow.
(14:18):
This Christmas, we're gonna be celebrating the gift of life.
God's loved the world that he sent has only begotten son.
You have the opportunity to share and celebrate that by
sharing the same gift of life for a mother and
her baby. Imagine a young woman facing an unplanned pregnancy,
feeling all alone, pressured to make a certain choice and
(14:40):
unsure of what to do or unsure of having the
support if she makes the right choice. She's searching for hope,
and that's exactly what she finds when she walks into
preborn ministries. The ultrasound is everything. It's the game change. Oh,
(15:02):
Mary and Joseph had Gabriel. But a woman today will
have an ultrasound and when she sees her baby, here's
its heartbeat. It changes everything. And then you just have
to walk side by side with them and give them,
the assurances from formula to diapers that you're going to
stand with them. Every mother that walks into a preborn
clinic is facing an ultimate life and death decision and
(15:27):
the game changer that's the ultrasound, and that's where you
come in. Twenty eight dollars provides an ultrasound, and thanks
to a matching partner, your twenty eight dollars is really
fifty six dollars, which is two ultrasounds, and that's how
you start getting to the numbers of saving lives. So
it's the end of the year, giving time. It's doubling
(15:50):
down and celebrating life, improving it beyond words with action.
Once you join me by dialing pound two fifty using
the keyword baby pound two to fifty, keyword baby, or
securely online at preborn dot com. Forward slash yms consider
a donation for life, an honor of the life that
created eternal life. That's preborn dot Com. Forward slash Yms
(16:14):
sponsored by Preboring. God bless you as you get.
Speaker 2 (16:18):
Hey, this is Jeff from Tulsa, Oklahoma, and my morning
show is your morning show with Michael dev Jorno.
Speaker 1 (16:33):
Hey, gang, it's me Michael. You can listen to your
morning show live. Make us a part of your morning
routine or your drive to work companion on great stations
like Talk Radio ninety eight point three and fifteen ten
WLAC and Nashville Tupelos News and Talk one oh one
point one and ten sixty WKMQ, and how about Talk
six fifty KSTE and Sacramento, California. Love to have you
(16:54):
listen live, but are grateful you're here now for the
podcast enjoy. Thank you so much for bringing us along
with you on the drive. The President is off to
Pennsylvania today. The Fed is expected to announce an interest
rate cut tomorrow and hopefully between now and all of that,
a twelve billion dollar farm meat package to offset some
(17:15):
of the unintended consequences of the tariff program. And the
Chargers benefited from four interceptions. Defense was everything last night,
really on both sides of the ball, but turnovers played
a big factor and that's why the Chargers win at
twenty two to nineteen over the Eagles on Monday Night Football.
And that Charger win may have ended any dashes of
(17:35):
hopes to see is tarylor Swift at the playoff game?
Speaker 2 (17:39):
You can I really don't know what he said at
the end of this, and I don't think he knows
what he said either.
Speaker 1 (17:50):
It's got to be a big bits understanding.
Speaker 3 (17:51):
I'm going in.
Speaker 1 (17:53):
I'm going in always reveal like b I love your
garbage truck, always revealing, often entertaining time for your sounds
of the day. And I don't know that I'll get
more than two win because I want to do these
so thoroughly. So you have Illinois Democrat Senator Tammy Duckworth.
She's an Iraqi war veteran, and that's what they like
to do. That's what they did in the video. They
surround themselves as foreign military people as they're encouraging people
(18:15):
to disobey orders. Of course, nobody should take an illegal order,
but they didn't have any illegal orders that they were
accusing anyone of. And then all this controversy over this boat.
All right, I'd like everybody to be able to see
the video. That way, nobody can do exactly what you're
(18:35):
gonna hear Senator Duckworth do. Now, don't be shocked, because
here she's just being a part of politician. So the
fact that you've got to turn your little microphone off
red or I'm going to hear your breathing in my sleep.
You know this isn't a military operation, it's a political operation.
(18:56):
This is in a military weapon. This is a political weapon.
Watch how certain she is of what America did, how
wrong it is, and she hasn't seen any of it.
(19:16):
This is I can't believe Dana Bash did this. I'm
surprised you didn't let her get away with it. But
if you think they were talking out of the wrong
side of their body during that sixty second video, watch
her do this on CNN. It's going to be long,
but it's worth it. Listen to the witnesses testimony and
(19:40):
watch where the credibility goes.
Speaker 5 (19:42):
Under the laws of war.
Speaker 6 (19:44):
If as a pilot bails out, he gets shut down,
he bails out, he's in a rubber diggy in the
middle of the ocean. Under all the international laws of warfare,
you are supposed to help render aid to that individual.
Even if they have a radio and they're calling for
their side to come pick them up. You're not allowed
to go back in and kill them, even if you
know that they're going to conduct future operations against you.
(20:04):
That's the Geneva Convention, and so everything that they did
hear was really good.
Speaker 5 (20:08):
In fact, the two servis.
Speaker 1 (20:09):
Everything they did here was illegal. And now she's going
to talk about the two survivors.
Speaker 6 (20:16):
Fibers were clinging to half of a boat in the
middle of the ocean and have no access to a radio,
per the Admiral US briefing, and so I guess all
of the you know it, there's been The whole operation
is illegal to begin with.
Speaker 7 (20:29):
Senator, have you seen the video?
Speaker 5 (20:34):
I have seen the video.
Speaker 1 (20:36):
I have seen the video. Stop right there, I think, Senator,
have you seen the video. You're describing people floating on
debris with no access to radio and an illegal kill. Senator,
(20:59):
have you seen the video? And her answer is yes,
the first time.
Speaker 6 (21:06):
I have seen the video, and it is deeply disturbing.
I am mostly concerned with the fact that we are
putting our American servicemen and women in jeopardy here.
Speaker 1 (21:15):
I have seen the video and it is deeply disturbing.
Now she's going to go into more Rhetorican talking points
about putting our military in this situation. Read, most of
these are drone strikes, aren't they. If you shoot down
a drone, you don't kill anybody. There's somewhere far, far
(21:39):
away in a building like a video game. But never
mind all that, just follow this. Yes, I've seen the video.
It's horrifying the illegal things that she saw, and I
am a letter.
Speaker 5 (21:52):
I have seen the video and it is deeply disturbing.
Speaker 6 (21:56):
I am mostly concerned with the fact that we are
putting our American servicemen and women in jeopardy here. We're
putting them in jeopardy in case they ever get shot down.
We're putting them in legal jeopardy. They could be brought
up in international criminal courts. And so what we're doing
here is taking those professionals, or utmost professionals and putting
them into harm's way. And that's what bothers me the
(22:17):
most about what Hegseth is doing. He is the least
qualified secrety defense in our nation's history, and he's very
cavalier about.
Speaker 1 (22:23):
At least qualified defensive secretary defense secretary in US history.
See how it always comes back to that. I am
thoroughly convinced this is all about they have it out
for Hegseth. He's the one they hated, he's the one
they didn't want getting approved. He got approved. This is
all about taking out Hegseth, which shocked me the most.
(22:47):
You could see the look on Dana Bashi's face. And
then there's like these moments during this long, ridiculous rhetoric
about how they're jeopardizing our military in the future and
Hegseth and you can tell she's battling in her mind.
This woman just lied to me. Thank god Dana bash
(23:09):
didn't just let it lie. Here's how it plays.
Speaker 5 (23:11):
Out doing things.
Speaker 6 (23:12):
The fact of the matter is only Congress can decide
that we can go to war, and there was no
such declaration made.
Speaker 7 (23:18):
I just want to make sure that I get this accurate.
Speaker 8 (23:22):
You have seen the classified video of this particular strike,
the first strike and then the double tap as it's known.
Speaker 6 (23:33):
No, I've just seen what's been available in the media.
I've read the food report.
Speaker 1 (23:36):
But I've seen what's available in the media. This is
what I'm talking about, and I thought this was a
ploy to dupe the American people. They'll often talk about
this particular case, and the left has this very exact narrative.
I remember when I first started, it was they were
(23:57):
like children, children that were killed. Then it was two
people just clinging to a piece of debris. They had
no access to it, they couldn't get anywhere, and we
just took them out with a double tap. She says, Yes,
I saw it. It was deeply she was deeply disturbed
by it. And then when asked, wait a minute, I
just want to make this clear.
Speaker 7 (24:18):
Did you see it or that I get this accurate?
Speaker 8 (24:22):
You have seen the classified video of this particular strike,
the first strike and then the double tap as it's known.
Speaker 5 (24:32):
No, I've just seen what's been available in the media.
Speaker 6 (24:35):
I've read the food report, but I've not seen the
actual video.
Speaker 1 (24:38):
What did she think? She was asking her.
Speaker 6 (24:40):
And had no access to a radio briefing, and so yes,
all of the you know it's been the whole operation
is illegal to begin with.
Speaker 7 (24:49):
Senator, have you seen the video.
Speaker 6 (24:53):
I have seen the video and it is deeply disturbing.
Speaker 7 (24:57):
I have seen double tap as it's known.
Speaker 5 (25:02):
No, I've just seen what's been available in the media.
Speaker 1 (25:04):
About twenty five seconds, I thought Clinton, we had to
wait months. I did not have relations with that woman.
At least they'd wait a couple months before I did
have relationships with them.
Speaker 9 (25:17):
Well, then, I mean it's with Michael. This is the
game they play. The difference between her saying the video
and the classified video. This is the game the senators
play with semantics.
Speaker 1 (25:30):
All right, I want you to hear this game. This
didn't go well for a progressive commentator. Look. Bill Maher
is always logical. He often says, I'd rather talk to conservatives.
That's how unreasonable and ridiculous the left has gotten. This
woman is all narrative. What he's trying to get to
is a simple question, how can you be so blindly
(25:51):
supportive of Palestine and against Israel when they treat women
in Muslim nations like this? Watch how hard it is
to pull teeth just to get her to have the conversation.
But this is Bill Maher. I wouldn't call this a clash.
I would call this with a very revealing exchange of
just how deep the thoughtful waters flow for the far left.
Speaker 10 (26:14):
Listen, Bill, Let's say our country was occupied by Mexico.
Speaker 11 (26:19):
Right.
Speaker 10 (26:19):
We have a bunch of people who are occupying our
land and then they decide, you know, let me finish.
Let's say Mexico decides, you know what, we're going to leave,
but we're going to control their electricity, What goes in, what.
Speaker 3 (26:32):
Comes out, because.
Speaker 10 (26:33):
Atacking, We're going to mow the lawn and just like
randomly decide we're going to slaughter people because they allegedly
threw rocks. They have literally, I mean Israel.
Speaker 3 (26:44):
Has nuclear weapons.
Speaker 10 (26:45):
Bill, they have nuclear and they have the world military
superpower backing.
Speaker 1 (26:51):
Then then he has the exchange where they they're basically
discussing where would you go live in the Middle East?
If you could go live in the Middle East, where
would you go? And it's it's how unreasonable she is
(27:14):
in refusing to even answer the hypothetical to where he
was ultimately going listen to this, So.
Speaker 11 (27:20):
Tomorrow and you got to go live in the Middle East,
where would you live? Yeah, you can pick one city,
any city you can, you know as far away.
Speaker 1 (27:29):
Wait, these examples go on for quite a bit. I'm
just going to fast forward a little bit. But he's
making the point and ultimately asking where would you go
to wonderful for like a little in the fall? It's lovely?
Where would you live? What city would you live in?
You'd be comfortable in that dress?
Speaker 10 (27:44):
I sure would not be comfortable in this dress in
any of the various Middle Eastern countries that have been
destabilized by you're not.
Speaker 1 (27:53):
Really blaming it on whitey.
Speaker 11 (27:55):
Listen, are you you're blaming Islam on whitey.
Speaker 7 (27:59):
I'm not blaming on a whitey.
Speaker 11 (28:01):
What you're saying we destabilize.
Speaker 1 (28:04):
That's why you can't wear that.
Speaker 10 (28:05):
Did not stabilize are terrorist organizations in Syria during the
Syrian Civil War starting under the Obama administration. That's what
did that not destabilize Syria?
Speaker 1 (28:16):
Know what's stabilized by the way you see this talking
over and this side tracking of Siri and all that
when he's you know, because Bill Maher sitting there thinking
of the prophet Mohammed, He's thinking of the Hidith, He's
thinking of the Surahs in the Qur'an. He's thinking of
(28:38):
fifteen hundred years of history. He knows the difference between
a peace loving Muslim and a political Islamist, and he
knows the difference between to all of them and a
gi hottest. This one is just all on the bandwagon
of anti Israel, pro Palestine. He's trying to have a logic.
This is why he's frustrated with the Left. He can't
even converse with them anymore. Watchword, and we're talking your dress.
(29:01):
Why it looks good?
Speaker 11 (29:02):
I know why you're saying you can't wear that dress
and Syria because of whitey destabilizing.
Speaker 1 (29:08):
I didn't see that. Okay, that's what it's okay, Okay, great,
that's what I say.
Speaker 10 (29:12):
Did destabilize very.
Speaker 11 (29:15):
And I asked the dress and you went right to destabilize.
So is that why you couldn't wear their dress? Why
couldn't you wear that dress? Why could you want?
Speaker 10 (29:24):
You want me to talk about ism, but like.
Speaker 1 (29:29):
Why won't you? Why won't you?
Speaker 10 (29:32):
I mean I won't. I don't believe in hotism, which
is why I'm furious that the United States.
Speaker 11 (29:41):
Terrorism that is preventing you from wearing that dress?
Speaker 1 (29:45):
Right there?
Speaker 11 (29:46):
Are you saying every Muslims I don't think they are?
Speaker 1 (29:49):
Okay, why can't you wear that dress? Let's focus person.
Speaker 3 (29:53):
You won't you answer this question?
Speaker 1 (29:56):
Every look right next to me is a flag made
of wood with the inscription Too often we enjoy the
comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought. Boy, isn't
that two of the greatest examples you've ever heard? Replied
(30:20):
to stop it. Don't you ever let anybody take your
power from you? God?
Speaker 3 (30:25):
No, No, it is the motto keep come, come along.
Speaker 2 (30:33):
It's your morning show with Michael del Jorno.
Speaker 1 (30:37):
Well, there's two ways to say it. We're all in
this together, and then, oh, thank god, we're all in
this together. This is an example of the latter. Dallas
writes us, Michael, I listened to your show daily here
in Detroit. Oh how I wish again, Nah, I was
back in Mish. I was born in Flint. It truly
feels like a family event every morning. If great topics,
(30:59):
informative guest, funny stories, laughs, heart touching moments that affect
everyone around the virtual radio table, and one way or another. Boy,
I'm so glad you guys get that visual of the
kitchen table. I actually I think the vision one step further.
I can see them coming down the later, people that
got up a little bit later, coming down the stairs
and going to the coffee pop joining us in progress.
(31:21):
Thanks for a great morning show every morning. Cheers and
Merry Christmas. Oh that's that, my friend, is better than
a paycheck, all right. Fifty five minutes after the hour,
President Trump set it to Pennsylvania. The FED is going
to start having meetings. We expect, and I think it's
pretty much widely expected. An interest raight cut will come
tomorrow and the Chargers benefiting from four Philadelphia interceptions now
(31:45):
nine to four, beating the Eagles last night twenty two
to nineteen. Let me see if I get this straight,
because it couldn't be more worthy. Roy O'Neil Arnish corresponded
his ear The FED begins meeting today at a time
when higher prices they are forcing more people to steal
from checkout self checkout kiosks. National Correspondent Royal O'Neil will
(32:07):
take a look at what the FED is expected to do.
Where they gonna go start arresting? Is everybody stealing from kiosks?
And what will the FED do? Yeah?
Speaker 12 (32:15):
So again, I suggest so many great topics. My boss
doesn't know what to do with nation all together. And
you know where were you are going. You don't have
to do any of this. You know, you and I
are very free to just talk about it right now.
Let's take it one bite at a time. We do
expect them to cut.
Speaker 1 (32:30):
It's widely expected they're going to cut the interest rate tomorrow,
and I guess it'll be another quarter point right right.
Two day meetings starts today. We get the announcement tomorrow.
Speaker 12 (32:39):
As you said, we're expecting a quarter point but we're
expecting a bit more dissent. Some board members may be saying,
let's keep things as they are because they're concerned that
we are on the cusp of inflation returning. Others saying
we got to be more aggressive here, perhaps a half
a point cut. And it looks like the land in
the middle with a quarter point cut announced tomorrow. Let's
(32:59):
hear what the chairman has to say and get his
opinion about the economic outlook for twenty twenty six. And
that may be not worth much of anything, considering he's
not to be around.
Speaker 1 (33:09):
He's walking.
Speaker 12 (33:11):
Isle, unmeasured the drapes, whatever that compare.
Speaker 1 (33:15):
You know they measured the drapes. Yeah, he's unmeasuring the drapes.
And we're talking about March or May. It's one of
the m's March, I think March. Yeah. So he's yeah,
he's not gonna be around. But remember that seat in
The Godfather, Oh, Pauli. You won't see Pauli no more?
All right. The other is why we're gonna blame Donald
Trump for why everybody and affordability for why we're all
stealing at Kiosks. Is that well, I didn't insure him
(33:38):
at all.
Speaker 12 (33:39):
I'm just saying it's this thing with lending Tree out
with the survey finding that since twenty twenty three, there's
been a sharp increase in the percentage of Americans who
admit to using the self checkout kiosk at the supermarket
or store or whatever store uh, and then admit to
not scanning everything and essentially stealing. It's a fifteen percent increase,
(33:59):
So fifteen point increase. Twenty seven percent now say they've
purposely taken an item without scanning it. That's up from
from fifteen percent twenty twenty three.
Speaker 3 (34:09):
Twelvey.
Speaker 1 (34:10):
It's as if we, you know, justify looting during times
of crisis, and if this is an economic crisis, why
not just deal with the kiosk. Well, that's disheartening, all right,
Royal'll have more tomorrow. We'll try to word things better
for the rest of us. One chance to live this Tuesday,
December ninth, twenty twenty five. It will never happen again.
Go make a difference in someone's life, Cherish your own.
(34:33):
See how we didn't see you back here tomorrow morning.
We're all in this together.
Speaker 2 (34:37):
This is your Morning Show with Michael Nhild Joyo
Hi, I'm Michael del Jorno and your morning show can
be heard live as it's happening five to eight am
Central and six to nine Eastern on great stations like
six twenty WJDX and Jackson, Mississippi, or Akrons, News Talk
six forty WHLO and Akron, Ohio and News Radio five
seventy WDAK and Columbus, Georgia. We'd love to be a
part of your morning routine, but we're glad you're here now.
(00:22):
Enjoy the podcast.
Speaker 2 (00:25):
Starting your morning off right. A new way of talk,
a new way of understanding because we're in this togad.
This is your morning show with Michael del.
Speaker 1 (00:38):
John Welcome morning one and all, seven minutes after the hour,
Welcome into your morning show. It belongs to you and
we're honored to serve you. I'm Michael. Jeffrey's got the sound,
Red's got the content. I got a Keronel on deck.
It's seven minutes after the hour, and welcome to Tuesday, December,
the ninth year of Our Lord, twenty twenty five. The
President is off to Pennsylvania. He's also out with a
(01:00):
billion dollar farm made package for farmers to offset some
of the unintended consequences of the tariffs, and I think
Kurtz had more interceptions last night than he had all
season long. I think they literally doubled fourt's in the game.
Chargers steal it at home at so Far twenty two
(01:21):
nineteen over the Eagles on Monday Night football. Meanwhile, we
were all, many of us prayerful and hopeful and starting
to get optimistic about peace with Russia and Ukraine, and
wouldn't have been great to have it before the holidays. Well,
the peace talks themselves seemed to have stalled. The bombing
(01:45):
has resumed. Now Trump Junior is indicating his father's ready
to abandon Ukraine. Colonel Stephen Bouchi is joining us from
the Heritage Foundation with the largest think tanks of the world.
And the questions pretty simple, how do we get this
back in the trajectory towards peace and from bombing. It's
looking harder and harder, especially when Ukraine's not interested in
giving up any land.
Speaker 3 (02:08):
Well, it's tough.
Speaker 4 (02:11):
You know, we looked at this right from the beginning
that Russia invaded the Ukraine, and you know, we've worked
and worked, and Putin has told some heavy lies along
the way about his willingness to cooperate and try and
(02:31):
come up with some sort of plan, and he constantly
backs out on it. And I'm afraid right now that
President Trump realizes he's not going.
Speaker 3 (02:42):
To be able to get Putin to move, so in.
Speaker 4 (02:44):
His desire for peace, he's switched to, well, let's try
and make the Ukrainians move, And I don't know if
that's a good idea. I heard Don Junior's comments over
in Europe. I hope those are not you know, that's
not him sort of being a mouthpiece for his dad.
(03:05):
I hope he's talking, frankly, out of another part of
his body besides his mouth, because I thought it was reprehensible. Basically,
he has said this is all Ukrainian's fault. Ukraine needs
to change. They're the bad guys. That was essentially the
gist of what he said, and I don't think that's accurate,
and I hope that's not what the President believes now,
(03:26):
but I guess we'll see.
Speaker 1 (03:28):
Well, it's one of the other though, right to make
sure analysis so astute. It's either he's not talking out
of that other side of the body, he's speaking for
his father. His father's actions kind of coincide with those thoughts. Look, Putin,
I don't think he could think for a moment that
(03:48):
he's eventually going to win and occupy all of Ukraine.
So but he has to say and if he wants
to keep fighting Ukraine and was invaded initially, they've lost
a portion of land. Do you think there's any way
to negotiate something that could please both of them? And
then because if we can't think of it, well, then
(04:10):
that's why the president's playing a push for compromise on
this side, can't get anywhere, push for compromise on that side.
And at that point, are you really solving anything.
Speaker 4 (04:21):
No, I don't think that will be a good solution because,
to be honest with you, if you let Putin keep
what he's already gotten, and I'm not saying, you know,
the Ukrainians are going to get back their entire country
that Putin has stole.
Speaker 3 (04:35):
Over the last decade. But if they let.
Speaker 4 (04:40):
Him, you know, determine the parameters, you know what Ukraine
can do in the future that he gets to keep
everything he has now in more because really he wants
more than just what he has now. He wants to
at least get some additional gains that as opposed to
know them giving up ground to make a demilitarized zone,
(05:05):
so it's less likely for him to do something in
the future to put restrictions on Ukraine about what weapons
they can get that sort of thing. All he's doing
is set in the stage for another round of all
this in the future, and anybody who thinks differently is
either you know, delusional from Jump Street or has completely
(05:28):
swallowed the Russian propaganda. Putin does not want this to stop.
He really wants all of Ukraine, and he's he is
sort of, I guess, delusional enough to think he can
eventually get it if he keeps playing this smart game.
And I hope President Trump doesn't aid him in that
(05:51):
effort by falling for this and saying, you know, claiming
victory or claiming success in his efforts. If that's the
conditions that are at the end of this.
Speaker 1 (06:01):
Colonel Stephen Buchi joining us, we were so close to peace,
or so it was sold and appeared and seemed that
has stalled. Bombing has resumed, and now there's indications the
president is frustrated with Ukraine and not Putin and Russia.
What is another year? What does the next year of
war look like, because you know when you talk about
the inevitability if you make the goal. I want to
(06:23):
get a peace deal so I can get my peace prize. Well,
the bad players are still on stage and the conflict
is still there, and you're right, it would happen again
eventually after he regrouped and rebuilt, and the stakes would
be even higher than it would seem like. You got
to continue to isolate Russia. You got to continue to
(06:45):
make the bad behavior of punishment. And boy, I've never
said this out loud to you, I don't think but
hope that China gets so fed up they start pressuring Putin.
I mean, I don't. I am really I'm pretty good
at these things. But this does not look like it's
going in the right direction and will be resolved.
Speaker 4 (07:04):
Yeah, I'm not optimistic. I mean I was cautiously optimistic
before because it I'm with you, it appeared like we
were making some progress. It would not be a wonderful
solution for either side, but it looked like we.
Speaker 3 (07:19):
Get a solution.
Speaker 1 (07:20):
Now we're back.
Speaker 4 (07:22):
Basically to this idea that Russia is going to dictate
that the conditions of a piece, if they're even willing
to do that or are they just stringing us along. Now,
even further than that optimistic assessment, I don't think China
is going to be helpful in this because China really
(07:45):
wants to see Russia be successful, not for any ideological
reason or because they love brutin the Russians, but because
they want a precedent set that a big country in
a region has the right to set international boundaries because
they feel it's the right thing to do. And it's
because they plan to do it in time law though exactly.
(08:09):
That's why they want the Russians to set this precedent
in the international community, so that when they do it
and everybody screams bloody murder, they go, wait a minute,
look what Russia did. That's the new president, that's the
way we do business.
Speaker 3 (08:23):
Now.
Speaker 4 (08:24):
This idea that you know, you can tell a big
country what to do in their sphere of influence outside
of their borders, that's just wrong. This this is ours
to form as we see fit because we are the
big country in the region.
Speaker 3 (08:42):
Close hit. Let that happen.
Speaker 1 (08:43):
Closing moments with Stephen Bouchie from the Heritage Foundation. You know,
in a lifetime, I've seen so much change. The biggest
is the loss of understanding and awareness of history that
gives you perspective. We don't really revised history, we don't
study history, and it tends to repeat itself when you
(09:05):
do that. I mean, as you were talking, all I
could think of was toe how we all criticized when
the Obama administration and then later the Biden administration did
it negotiated the end of the war in Afghanistan with
the Taliban, the cause of the war. As we're about
to repeat something similar to that, What a big mistake
(09:27):
it would be to negotiate the end of this war
on the terms of Russia, who is the creator of
the war. But in addition to that, we don't realize
that military moves have diplomatic consequences, some that are unthinkable.
I mean, that just doesn't seem to be I don't
know what the word is balance in the footing of this,
(09:49):
in the narratives from those who cover it. I think
we cover these things worse, I think administrations do things
based on agendas. Worse. It's just very discoura uraging how
much foreign policy has changed in just my lifetime. I
guess you got me by a couple of years, but
not many. You must be feeling the same thing.
Speaker 3 (10:08):
Oh absolutely.
Speaker 4 (10:09):
And you know I've lived it as a military officer
and a government official and then a think anker for
most of my adult life, for this whole period we're
referring to, and it has changed for the worst. There's
you know, I'm all about the art of the deal.
I get that, but the deal has to be have
some elements of fundamental fairness and morality.
Speaker 3 (10:33):
And this isn't okay, we got a deal.
Speaker 1 (10:35):
This isn't tax credits. This isn't tax credits for building
a building renovation. You know, here's the simple truth. If
if Zelensky does not like these terms, and he wants
all of his country back, then you got to defeat Russia. Russia,
if you want any portion or all of Ukraine, you
(10:56):
got to defeat Ukraine. In other words, at some point
when the war to get exactly your way, or to
realize neither can win and get out of this mess,
someone's gonna have to make a compromise. I do think
you nailed it when you said the president's trying a tactic,
and right now he's back to bullying and pressuring Zelensky
and at some point, you know, got to keep an
(11:18):
eye on this because there's a lot of bad players
on the stage and many of them are looking to
do the same thing, and the next one could be
a world war. So how we handle this is as
important as what we're handling. Does that make sense to
anybody other than me?
Speaker 3 (11:33):
Yeah, it does one hundred percent.
Speaker 4 (11:35):
And those that say we have no interest in this,
there's no connection to America.
Speaker 3 (11:41):
I'm sorry.
Speaker 1 (11:41):
That's just wrong.
Speaker 4 (11:43):
It's intellectually wrong, it's actually wrong, historically right, wrong.
Speaker 3 (11:48):
Yeah, I just I don't know.
Speaker 4 (11:50):
I'm going to keep praying and keep watching it and
hopefully something will turn a corner.
Speaker 3 (11:56):
But I'm not really saying about it, Michael, not at all.
Speaker 1 (12:01):
All right, Stephen Butch. You can read his great work,
is Collie's great work at Heritage dot org. God bless you,
my friend. And we'll talk again sooner if conditions weren't otherwise,
probably next week, one last time before the end of
the year, Stephen Butchi, thank you. All right. Coming up,
this is probably the most appalling thing. It kind of
falls under foreign policy, this debriefing interview with Tammy Duckworth,
(12:32):
and it's with I'm Stalin because I can't remember her name,
now help me the one from CNN. I can't. Not
a big fan Dana Bash, and I want you to
listen to what she claims. I want you to hear
the firm, vivid, detailed opinion, and then how it is
(12:56):
revealed it's based on something she's never seen, describe something.
And then when Dana Bash comes back and goes have
you seen the video, she tries to act like she did.
And then when later she stops the interview cold and
reconfronts her. I want to make this clear. Have you
(13:16):
seen the Oh no, no, I just saw other videos.
Do you remember me Earlier in the week, we were
talking about everybody's describing these Democrat senators and house members
and talking heads on television. Oh, it was two innocent
children clinging to debris and we just blew them up
(13:36):
instead of rescuing them. And all while they're having these conversations,
they're showing you footage of some small white boat getting
blown up. But that's not the vote boat we're talking about,
but it creates the illusion that it is. And that's
what this woman's basing all of her opinions. She's a
(13:57):
senator from Hawaii of the United sis States of America.
But it's just pure talking points. She fakes even seeing
the actual video. It's everything wrong with politics. It's coming
up in your sounds in the day, next half hour,
and then Rory's got the final story on the FED.
Sure looks like they're going to lower interest rates tomorrow.
(14:18):
This Christmas, we're gonna be celebrating the gift of life.
God's loved the world that he sent has only begotten son.
You have the opportunity to share and celebrate that by
sharing the same gift of life for a mother and
her baby. Imagine a young woman facing an unplanned pregnancy,
feeling all alone, pressured to make a certain choice and
(14:40):
unsure of what to do or unsure of having the
support if she makes the right choice. She's searching for hope,
and that's exactly what she finds when she walks into
preborn ministries. The ultrasound is everything. It's the game change. Oh,
(15:02):
Mary and Joseph had Gabriel. But a woman today will
have an ultrasound and when she sees her baby, here's
its heartbeat. It changes everything. And then you just have
to walk side by side with them and give them,
the assurances from formula to diapers that you're going to
stand with them. Every mother that walks into a preborn
clinic is facing an ultimate life and death decision and
(15:27):
the game changer that's the ultrasound, and that's where you
come in. Twenty eight dollars provides an ultrasound, and thanks
to a matching partner, your twenty eight dollars is really
fifty six dollars, which is two ultrasounds, and that's how
you start getting to the numbers of saving lives. So
it's the end of the year, giving time. It's doubling
(15:50):
down and celebrating life, improving it beyond words with action.
Once you join me by dialing pound two fifty using
the keyword baby pound two to fifty, keyword baby, or
securely online at preborn dot com. Forward slash yms consider
a donation for life, an honor of the life that
created eternal life. That's preborn dot Com. Forward slash Yms
(16:14):
sponsored by Preboring. God bless you as you get.
Speaker 2 (16:18):
Hey, this is Jeff from Tulsa, Oklahoma, and my morning
show is your morning show with Michael dev Jorno.
Speaker 1 (16:33):
Hey, gang, it's me Michael. You can listen to your
morning show live. Make us a part of your morning
routine or your drive to work companion on great stations
like Talk Radio ninety eight point three and fifteen ten
WLAC and Nashville Tupelos News and Talk one oh one
point one and ten sixty WKMQ, and how about Talk
six fifty KSTE and Sacramento, California. Love to have you
(16:54):
listen live, but are grateful you're here now for the
podcast enjoy. Thank you so much for bringing us along
with you on the drive. The President is off to
Pennsylvania today. The Fed is expected to announce an interest
rate cut tomorrow and hopefully between now and all of that,
a twelve billion dollar farm meat package to offset some
(17:15):
of the unintended consequences of the tariff program. And the
Chargers benefited from four interceptions. Defense was everything last night,
really on both sides of the ball, but turnovers played
a big factor and that's why the Chargers win at
twenty two to nineteen over the Eagles on Monday Night Football.
And that Charger win may have ended any dashes of
(17:35):
hopes to see is tarylor Swift at the playoff game?
Speaker 2 (17:39):
You can I really don't know what he said at
the end of this, and I don't think he knows
what he said either.
Speaker 1 (17:50):
It's got to be a big bits understanding.
Speaker 3 (17:51):
I'm going in.
Speaker 1 (17:53):
I'm going in always reveal like b I love your
garbage truck, always revealing, often entertaining time for your sounds
of the day. And I don't know that I'll get
more than two win because I want to do these
so thoroughly. So you have Illinois Democrat Senator Tammy Duckworth.
She's an Iraqi war veteran, and that's what they like
to do. That's what they did in the video. They
surround themselves as foreign military people as they're encouraging people
(18:15):
to disobey orders. Of course, nobody should take an illegal order,
but they didn't have any illegal orders that they were
accusing anyone of. And then all this controversy over this boat.
All right, I'd like everybody to be able to see
the video. That way, nobody can do exactly what you're
(18:35):
gonna hear Senator Duckworth do. Now, don't be shocked, because
here she's just being a part of politician. So the
fact that you've got to turn your little microphone off
red or I'm going to hear your breathing in my sleep.
You know this isn't a military operation, it's a political operation.
(18:56):
This is in a military weapon. This is a political weapon.
Watch how certain she is of what America did, how
wrong it is, and she hasn't seen any of it.
(19:16):
This is I can't believe Dana Bash did this. I'm
surprised you didn't let her get away with it. But
if you think they were talking out of the wrong
side of their body during that sixty second video, watch
her do this on CNN. It's going to be long,
but it's worth it. Listen to the witnesses testimony and
(19:40):
watch where the credibility goes.
Speaker 5 (19:42):
Under the laws of war.
Speaker 6 (19:44):
If as a pilot bails out, he gets shut down,
he bails out, he's in a rubber diggy in the
middle of the ocean. Under all the international laws of warfare,
you are supposed to help render aid to that individual.
Even if they have a radio and they're calling for
their side to come pick them up. You're not allowed
to go back in and kill them, even if you
know that they're going to conduct future operations against you.
(20:04):
That's the Geneva Convention, and so everything that they did
hear was really good.
Speaker 5 (20:08):
In fact, the two servis.
Speaker 1 (20:09):
Everything they did here was illegal. And now she's going
to talk about the two survivors.
Speaker 6 (20:16):
Fibers were clinging to half of a boat in the
middle of the ocean and have no access to a radio,
per the Admiral US briefing, and so I guess all
of the you know it, there's been The whole operation
is illegal to begin with.
Speaker 7 (20:29):
Senator, have you seen the video?
Speaker 5 (20:34):
I have seen the video.
Speaker 1 (20:36):
I have seen the video. Stop right there, I think, Senator,
have you seen the video. You're describing people floating on
debris with no access to radio and an illegal kill. Senator,
(20:59):
have you seen the video? And her answer is yes,
the first time.
Speaker 6 (21:06):
I have seen the video, and it is deeply disturbing.
I am mostly concerned with the fact that we are
putting our American servicemen and women in jeopardy here.
Speaker 1 (21:15):
I have seen the video and it is deeply disturbing.
Now she's going to go into more Rhetorican talking points
about putting our military in this situation. Read, most of
these are drone strikes, aren't they. If you shoot down
a drone, you don't kill anybody. There's somewhere far, far
(21:39):
away in a building like a video game. But never
mind all that, just follow this. Yes, I've seen the video.
It's horrifying the illegal things that she saw, and I
am a letter.
Speaker 5 (21:52):
I have seen the video and it is deeply disturbing.
Speaker 6 (21:56):
I am mostly concerned with the fact that we are
putting our American servicemen and women in jeopardy here. We're
putting them in jeopardy in case they ever get shot down.
We're putting them in legal jeopardy. They could be brought
up in international criminal courts. And so what we're doing
here is taking those professionals, or utmost professionals and putting
them into harm's way. And that's what bothers me the
(22:17):
most about what Hegseth is doing. He is the least
qualified secrety defense in our nation's history, and he's very
cavalier about.
Speaker 1 (22:23):
At least qualified defensive secretary defense secretary in US history.
See how it always comes back to that. I am
thoroughly convinced this is all about they have it out
for Hegseth. He's the one they hated, he's the one
they didn't want getting approved. He got approved. This is
all about taking out Hegseth, which shocked me the most.
(22:47):
You could see the look on Dana Bashi's face. And
then there's like these moments during this long, ridiculous rhetoric
about how they're jeopardizing our military in the future and
Hegseth and you can tell she's battling in her mind.
This woman just lied to me. Thank god Dana bash
(23:09):
didn't just let it lie. Here's how it plays.
Speaker 5 (23:11):
Out doing things.
Speaker 6 (23:12):
The fact of the matter is only Congress can decide
that we can go to war, and there was no
such declaration made.
Speaker 7 (23:18):
I just want to make sure that I get this accurate.
Speaker 8 (23:22):
You have seen the classified video of this particular strike,
the first strike and then the double tap as it's known.
Speaker 6 (23:33):
No, I've just seen what's been available in the media.
I've read the food report.
Speaker 1 (23:36):
But I've seen what's available in the media. This is
what I'm talking about, and I thought this was a
ploy to dupe the American people. They'll often talk about
this particular case, and the left has this very exact narrative.
I remember when I first started, it was they were
(23:57):
like children, children that were killed. Then it was two
people just clinging to a piece of debris. They had
no access to it, they couldn't get anywhere, and we
just took them out with a double tap. She says, Yes,
I saw it. It was deeply she was deeply disturbed
by it. And then when asked, wait a minute, I
just want to make this clear.
Speaker 7 (24:18):
Did you see it or that I get this accurate?
Speaker 8 (24:22):
You have seen the classified video of this particular strike,
the first strike and then the double tap as it's known.
Speaker 5 (24:32):
No, I've just seen what's been available in the media.
Speaker 6 (24:35):
I've read the food report, but I've not seen the
actual video.
Speaker 1 (24:38):
What did she think? She was asking her.
Speaker 6 (24:40):
And had no access to a radio briefing, and so yes,
all of the you know it's been the whole operation
is illegal to begin with.
Speaker 7 (24:49):
Senator, have you seen the video.
Speaker 6 (24:53):
I have seen the video and it is deeply disturbing.
Speaker 7 (24:57):
I have seen double tap as it's known.
Speaker 5 (25:02):
No, I've just seen what's been available in the media.
Speaker 1 (25:04):
About twenty five seconds, I thought Clinton, we had to
wait months. I did not have relations with that woman.
At least they'd wait a couple months before I did
have relationships with them.
Speaker 9 (25:17):
Well, then, I mean it's with Michael. This is the
game they play. The difference between her saying the video
and the classified video. This is the game the senators
play with semantics.
Speaker 1 (25:30):
All right, I want you to hear this game. This
didn't go well for a progressive commentator. Look. Bill Maher
is always logical. He often says, I'd rather talk to conservatives.
That's how unreasonable and ridiculous the left has gotten. This
woman is all narrative. What he's trying to get to
is a simple question, how can you be so blindly
(25:51):
supportive of Palestine and against Israel when they treat women
in Muslim nations like this? Watch how hard it is
to pull teeth just to get her to have the conversation.
But this is Bill Maher. I wouldn't call this a clash.
I would call this with a very revealing exchange of
just how deep the thoughtful waters flow for the far left.
Speaker 10 (26:14):
Listen, Bill, Let's say our country was occupied by Mexico.
Speaker 11 (26:19):
Right.
Speaker 10 (26:19):
We have a bunch of people who are occupying our
land and then they decide, you know, let me finish.
Let's say Mexico decides, you know what, we're going to leave,
but we're going to control their electricity, What goes in, what.
Speaker 3 (26:32):
Comes out, because.
Speaker 10 (26:33):
Atacking, We're going to mow the lawn and just like
randomly decide we're going to slaughter people because they allegedly
threw rocks. They have literally, I mean Israel.
Speaker 3 (26:44):
Has nuclear weapons.
Speaker 10 (26:45):
Bill, they have nuclear and they have the world military
superpower backing.
Speaker 1 (26:51):
Then then he has the exchange where they they're basically
discussing where would you go live in the Middle East?
If you could go live in the Middle East, where
would you go? And it's it's how unreasonable she is
(27:14):
in refusing to even answer the hypothetical to where he
was ultimately going listen to this, So.
Speaker 11 (27:20):
Tomorrow and you got to go live in the Middle East,
where would you live? Yeah, you can pick one city,
any city you can, you know as far away.
Speaker 1 (27:29):
Wait, these examples go on for quite a bit. I'm
just going to fast forward a little bit. But he's
making the point and ultimately asking where would you go
to wonderful for like a little in the fall? It's lovely?
Where would you live? What city would you live in?
You'd be comfortable in that dress?
Speaker 10 (27:44):
I sure would not be comfortable in this dress in
any of the various Middle Eastern countries that have been
destabilized by you're not.
Speaker 1 (27:53):
Really blaming it on whitey.
Speaker 11 (27:55):
Listen, are you you're blaming Islam on whitey.
Speaker 7 (27:59):
I'm not blaming on a whitey.
Speaker 11 (28:01):
What you're saying we destabilize.
Speaker 1 (28:04):
That's why you can't wear that.
Speaker 10 (28:05):
Did not stabilize are terrorist organizations in Syria during the
Syrian Civil War starting under the Obama administration. That's what
did that not destabilize Syria?
Speaker 1 (28:16):
Know what's stabilized by the way you see this talking
over and this side tracking of Siri and all that
when he's you know, because Bill Maher sitting there thinking
of the prophet Mohammed, He's thinking of the Hidith, He's
thinking of the Surahs in the Qur'an. He's thinking of
(28:38):
fifteen hundred years of history. He knows the difference between
a peace loving Muslim and a political Islamist, and he
knows the difference between to all of them and a
gi hottest. This one is just all on the bandwagon
of anti Israel, pro Palestine. He's trying to have a logic.
This is why he's frustrated with the Left. He can't
even converse with them anymore. Watchword, and we're talking your dress.
(29:01):
Why it looks good?
Speaker 11 (29:02):
I know why you're saying you can't wear that dress
and Syria because of whitey destabilizing.
Speaker 1 (29:08):
I didn't see that. Okay, that's what it's okay, Okay, great,
that's what I say.
Speaker 10 (29:12):
Did destabilize very.
Speaker 11 (29:15):
And I asked the dress and you went right to destabilize.
So is that why you couldn't wear their dress? Why
couldn't you wear that dress? Why could you want?
Speaker 10 (29:24):
You want me to talk about ism, but like.
Speaker 1 (29:29):
Why won't you? Why won't you?
Speaker 10 (29:32):
I mean I won't. I don't believe in hotism, which
is why I'm furious that the United States.
Speaker 11 (29:41):
Terrorism that is preventing you from wearing that dress?
Speaker 1 (29:45):
Right there?
Speaker 11 (29:46):
Are you saying every Muslims I don't think they are?
Speaker 1 (29:49):
Okay, why can't you wear that dress? Let's focus person.
Speaker 3 (29:53):
You won't you answer this question?
Speaker 1 (29:56):
Every look right next to me is a flag made
of wood with the inscription Too often we enjoy the
comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought. Boy, isn't
that two of the greatest examples you've ever heard? Replied
(30:20):
to stop it. Don't you ever let anybody take your
power from you? God?
Speaker 3 (30:25):
No, No, it is the motto keep come, come along.
Speaker 2 (30:33):
It's your morning show with Michael del Jorno.
Speaker 1 (30:37):
Well, there's two ways to say it. We're all in
this together, and then, oh, thank god, we're all in
this together. This is an example of the latter. Dallas
writes us, Michael, I listened to your show daily here
in Detroit. Oh how I wish again, Nah, I was
back in Mish. I was born in Flint. It truly
feels like a family event every morning. If great topics,
(30:59):
informative guest, funny stories, laughs, heart touching moments that affect
everyone around the virtual radio table, and one way or another. Boy,
I'm so glad you guys get that visual of the
kitchen table. I actually I think the vision one step further.
I can see them coming down the later, people that
got up a little bit later, coming down the stairs
and going to the coffee pop joining us in progress.
(31:21):
Thanks for a great morning show every morning. Cheers and
Merry Christmas. Oh that's that, my friend, is better than
a paycheck, all right. Fifty five minutes after the hour,
President Trump set it to Pennsylvania. The FED is going
to start having meetings. We expect, and I think it's
pretty much widely expected. An interest raight cut will come
tomorrow and the Chargers benefiting from four Philadelphia interceptions now
(31:45):
nine to four, beating the Eagles last night twenty two
to nineteen. Let me see if I get this straight,
because it couldn't be more worthy. Roy O'Neil Arnish corresponded
his ear The FED begins meeting today at a time
when higher prices they are forcing more people to steal
from checkout self checkout kiosks. National Correspondent Royal O'Neil will
(32:07):
take a look at what the FED is expected to do.
Where they gonna go start arresting? Is everybody stealing from kiosks?
And what will the FED do? Yeah?
Speaker 12 (32:15):
So again, I suggest so many great topics. My boss
doesn't know what to do with nation all together. And
you know where were you are going. You don't have
to do any of this. You know, you and I
are very free to just talk about it right now.
Let's take it one bite at a time. We do
expect them to cut.
Speaker 1 (32:30):
It's widely expected they're going to cut the interest rate tomorrow,
and I guess it'll be another quarter point right right.
Two day meetings starts today. We get the announcement tomorrow.
Speaker 12 (32:39):
As you said, we're expecting a quarter point but we're
expecting a bit more dissent. Some board members may be saying,
let's keep things as they are because they're concerned that
we are on the cusp of inflation returning. Others saying
we got to be more aggressive here, perhaps a half
a point cut. And it looks like the land in
the middle with a quarter point cut announced tomorrow. Let's
(32:59):
hear what the chairman has to say and get his
opinion about the economic outlook for twenty twenty six. And
that may be not worth much of anything, considering he's
not to be around.
Speaker 1 (33:09):
He's walking.
Speaker 12 (33:11):
Isle, unmeasured the drapes, whatever that compare.
Speaker 1 (33:15):
You know they measured the drapes. Yeah, he's unmeasuring the drapes.
And we're talking about March or May. It's one of
the m's March, I think March. Yeah. So he's yeah,
he's not gonna be around. But remember that seat in
The Godfather, Oh, Pauli. You won't see Pauli no more?
All right. The other is why we're gonna blame Donald
Trump for why everybody and affordability for why we're all
stealing at Kiosks. Is that well, I didn't insure him
(33:38):
at all.
Speaker 12 (33:39):
I'm just saying it's this thing with lending Tree out
with the survey finding that since twenty twenty three, there's
been a sharp increase in the percentage of Americans who
admit to using the self checkout kiosk at the supermarket
or store or whatever store uh, and then admit to
not scanning everything and essentially stealing. It's a fifteen percent increase,
(33:59):
So fifteen point increase. Twenty seven percent now say they've
purposely taken an item without scanning it. That's up from
from fifteen percent twenty twenty three.
Speaker 3 (34:09):
Twelvey.
Speaker 1 (34:10):
It's as if we, you know, justify looting during times
of crisis, and if this is an economic crisis, why
not just deal with the kiosk. Well, that's disheartening, all right,
Royal'll have more tomorrow. We'll try to word things better
for the rest of us. One chance to live this Tuesday,
December ninth, twenty twenty five. It will never happen again.
Go make a difference in someone's life, Cherish your own.
(34:33):
See how we didn't see you back here tomorrow morning.
We're all in this together.
Speaker 2 (34:37):
This is your Morning Show with Michael Nhild Joyo
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
My Favorite Murder with Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark
My Favorite Murder is a true crime comedy podcast hosted by Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark. Each week, Karen and Georgia share compelling true crimes and hometown stories from friends and listeners. Since MFM launched in January of 2016, Karen and Georgia have shared their lifelong interest in true crime and have covered stories of infamous serial killers like the Night Stalker, mysterious cold cases, captivating cults, incredible survivor stories and important events from history like the Tulsa race massacre of 1921. My Favorite Murder is part of the Exactly Right podcast network that provides a platform for bold, creative voices to bring to life provocative, entertaining and relatable stories for audiences everywhere. The Exactly Right roster of podcasts covers a variety of topics including historic true crime, comedic interviews and news, science, pop culture and more. Podcasts on the network include Buried Bones with Kate Winkler Dawson and Paul Holes, That's Messed Up: An SVU Podcast, This Podcast Will Kill You, Bananas and more.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com