Friday 4: Historical Facts You've Always Questioned

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
I'm looking to where you would be sitting, and you're
not there. So unless we've really advanced technology and some
sort of like cloaking device, oh yeah, like or maybe
it's cataracts. I guess it's possible. I have cataracts.

Speaker 2 (00:11):
No, but you're seeing everything fine. Otherwise, though, like.

Speaker 1 (00:13):
Is this a prank? Could this be a prank? Because
is today international prank? The producer day? Now there's like
a series of mirrors over there and you're just like
behind there, it's just mirrors.

Speaker 2 (00:21):
Oh yeah, they'd be too much work, if any I
get told all the time by people that you know, like,
I work pretty hard. I got six hours of radio
a day. I'm not a physical labor guy. So the
biggest prank I'd ever do is probably like talking a
weird voice, like, hey, hey, everybody, welcome Denbrie Songer Showers.

Speaker 1 (00:43):
Is this a face from Nickelodeon? Kind of sound of
like face there Union, Hey everybody, it's face.

Speaker 2 (00:50):
See the Spiales face, And that's me.

Speaker 3 (00:54):
You know.

Speaker 1 (00:54):
I do feel like though that if, if if we
do end up having like a total nineteen eighty four
communist dystopia, face is gonna make a comeback. I think
I think Big is gonna bring face back.

Speaker 2 (01:06):
I was gonna say, fa' is gonna just become like
the dictator of the world.

Speaker 3 (01:10):
Yeah, Hey, everybody, don't forget to bow to your mastards.

Speaker 2 (01:16):
Uh, somebody needs to make that movie. That's what that
You know how it was like Chucky, right, Child's play Chucky?
Yeah that is. There's something about like kids stuff that
is incredibly creepy, isn't that kind of how what's his
face penny Wise? Like he's a clown. There's there's things
that are meant for children that I think when put
into contexts that are not for children, they become incredibly

(01:39):
scary or creepy.

Speaker 3 (01:40):
Yeah.

Speaker 2 (01:41):
Anyway, speaking of revisionist history here, Matt, you came to
me for a Friday for today, and you had an idea.

Speaker 3 (01:47):
What was it? I did? I I was I was
laying in bed last night.

Speaker 2 (01:51):
I don't need to know what you're doing in your
bed thing.

Speaker 3 (01:53):
I was wearing my pajamas.

Speaker 2 (01:55):
I don't need to know that. And I just had
this idea. It just came to me. I couldn't sleep.
I really just want you to tell me the idea.
I'm sad that I even asked you, and you you
don't want any more ixt no context? Please please, please.

Speaker 3 (02:10):
Well, let me play the bed here.

Speaker 1 (02:12):
Oh, you know, history is an interesting thing. It's basically
agreed upon facts that we've verified through agreeing upon them.

Speaker 3 (02:25):
But what if I told you.

Speaker 1 (02:26):
That everything you know, everything you think you know everything
you think you think you know everything your neighbor Randy
thinks he knows is a lie. Well, maybe not everything,
but some things, right, Like for example, you're really gonna
tell me that someone was blind and deaf but then
learned how to communicate with others.

Speaker 3 (02:49):
Helen Keller, I don't buy it, never have.

Speaker 1 (02:51):
Oh there's a lot of other things out there that
people tell you all the time to your face, and
you just have to odd and say, sure, is that
the common knowledge we're going with in today's world?

Speaker 3 (03:04):
I don't buy it. What are the things that you
don't buy? Is that? How you say that in a sentence?
I don't know. I guess I feel like I dropped
some syntax there. Yeah, anyways, that's one of them for me.
That's my example.

Speaker 1 (03:16):
My only parameters here that I thought emory is that, like,
let's not let this go fully off the rails and
turn into a QAnon message board and just only have
things that you could read in a history book.

Speaker 2 (03:28):
Yeah, okay, So I say we have to put a
year on this. Okay, it has to happen before two thousand,
like like commonly noted historical events that if we talked
about them, you would be at least somewhat familiar that
it happened, or it may have been in your history book.

(03:50):
But it's old enough to where it's not overtly political
or controversial to talk about it.

Speaker 3 (03:55):
Now, right?

Speaker 2 (03:57):
Is that fair? Yeah? You know?

Speaker 1 (03:59):
And no shit directed Helen Keller. It's just every time
I hear that story, I think, really.

Speaker 2 (04:05):
But people saw her. I know people saw her or
do you think what's her face? The lady that was
with her all the time? Was her name Abigail something?

Speaker 3 (04:13):
You mean you mean her accomplice?

Speaker 2 (04:16):
No, not her accomplice, I think. Okay. So Helen Keller
is like, she's the person, right, and she lived to
be eighty seven years old. Did you know that she
didn't pass away until the nineteen sixties. Okay, she wrote
fourteen books, hundreds of essays. Yeah, she knew what was
going on in the world.

Speaker 3 (04:36):
That's my problem.

Speaker 2 (04:37):
Okay, but Anne Sullivan was the person, like Anne Sullivan
is the person. Okay, Anne Sullivan who was basically all
An Sullivan is noted for for the most part, is
she taught what's her face Helen Keller how to communicate.
She was the instructor and companion. Basically she was math emery.

(05:01):
She was fourteen years older than Helen Keller.

Speaker 3 (05:04):
Okay.

Speaker 2 (05:05):
She became Keller's teacher when she was twenty. Okay, and Sullivan,
I've got it up on Wikipedia right now, so I'm
sorry if anybody doesn't like Wikipedia, but this is the
easiest thing I can do to try to, you know,
talk about this. She had an eye disease, she was
partially blind and didn't have reading or writing skills. I'm
talking about a Sullivan here, and so.

Speaker 3 (05:26):
See, Okay, this is all illogical.

Speaker 2 (05:30):
She was a student at the Perkins School for the Blind,
and it was she who helped teach Helen Keller, also
blind and deaf, how to fully communicate.

Speaker 1 (05:41):
Or it was her who concocted this brilliant scheme with
her accomplice Helen Keller, to dupe the public and to
become famous and make millions in.

Speaker 2 (05:52):
I don't think they made millions.

Speaker 3 (05:54):
Yeah, probably not Helen Keller.

Speaker 2 (05:57):
Also, you can find her signature online. She signed things.
It's definitely like she she's machine. It's almost like a machine.
Like all of the ease there's a four e's in
her name. They are the exact same, so she obviously
is doing it by feel. But it is interesting. She
is reported to have lost her sight in her hearing

(06:18):
when she was nineteen months old. So I don't know how.
I don't know. You're right. I mean like, I don't
want to be uh. I don't want to be that
guy that just enables you to have these weird conspiracy theories.
But there's something missing here.

Speaker 3 (06:30):
Well, I don't want to be that guy either, full disclosure.

Speaker 1 (06:32):
I you know, like I'm probably wrong, but every time
I hear that story, there's always this voice in my
head that says, really, is that really true? How is
that possible?

Speaker 3 (06:41):
Yeah?

Speaker 1 (06:41):
So that's basically what I wanted to That's that's the
idea for you today, Emory.

Speaker 3 (06:46):
That's my pitch.

Speaker 1 (06:47):
Like one of the things that you see and you
hear of and you've read in your history books or
you read and heard in history class, and you've always
been like, is that really how that happened?

Speaker 2 (06:55):
Yeah, okay, So do you have more than just the one?

Speaker 3 (06:58):
Yeah? I got a couple others.

Speaker 2 (06:59):
All right, let's do that. We'll do your listen, my listen,
we come back. Start thinking about this historical events, historical people,
things in your history books that happened pre two thousand
that seemingly, you know, we've all kind of been taught
at least a little bit about, or you're aware of that.
You just question the information as to whether or not
it's fully accurate or we've been told the full story.

(07:21):
Think about that. We'll talk more about it next. We're
having fun on a Friday on news radio eleven ten kfab.

Speaker 4 (07:28):
Emery Sunger on news radio eleven ten kfab.

Speaker 2 (07:33):
Here, you know, one hundred and fifty years later or whatever,
we're reading about it and we're just like, is it
really how that happened? Matt? You said, uh, Helen Keller,
which is one. I mean, let's be honest, without being there,
it's hard to believe. It's a hard story to believe.
But what are the other ones that you have written
down here?

Speaker 1 (07:50):
I feel bad about Helen Keller, by the way, but
it's just just literally I've always felt that way. Like
I I'm not saying that it's a complete fiction, but
there i'd it's one of those where I feel like
there's some things about that that we don't know about
that would make that more plausible.

Speaker 2 (08:05):
So somebody needs to explain exactly how it was done,
That's all I'm saying. And on top of that, maybe
they did. Maybe there are plenty of documentations out there,
but it was just before like television and stuff like that,
that she was like still living and when Anne Sullivan died,
Like how I mean she wrote all these books. Okay,
how like you can't tell me that I don't know,
we already went over it. You're right, I mean somebody needs,

(08:27):
somebody needs to do a bigger case study on this
because there's definitely some missing details. All right, what else
you got?

Speaker 3 (08:32):
Well?

Speaker 1 (08:33):
I got The other one is have you ever heard
any of the interesting theories around Amelia Earhart's death?

Speaker 2 (08:41):
Okay, I Bermuda triangle, transatlantic attempt. I think these were
when airplanes, you know, we're still like biplanes nineteen thirties.
She was super famous because she was a woman doing
things that really only Charles Lindberg had ever done before.
Really kind of a dared devil of her time, but
just never found. The wreckage of the plane was never found,

(09:02):
her body was never found, and all we know is
what we've been told about, like the Bermuda Triangle.

Speaker 1 (09:08):
I think, right, well, yeah, all we know is that, right,
the wreckage was never found, and there are there are
theories that she actually survived and basically lived out the
rest of her days marooned on an island, and there's
interesting evidence that suggests that there's also interesting theories out
there with some with some evidence out that suggests that
she possibly may have been mistaken for or maybe she

(09:30):
really was an American spy and shot down in over
Japanese territory.

Speaker 3 (09:35):
What yes, what?

Speaker 2 (09:36):
Yeah, all right, I just put it in chatter, GBT,
tell me what happened to Melia Earhart. She disappeared July second,
nineteen thirty seven. She was trying to go around the world,
not just transatlantic. Nobody found anything. Most widely accepted theory
is that her plane ran out of fuel and crashing
the Pacific Ocean. Don't you think that would have been
an issue?

Speaker 5 (09:56):
Right?

Speaker 2 (09:56):
Like you would have thought about before circumnavigating the glow
that hey, I'm not gonna have enough fuel to do
all this and have something set up that you just missed,
like a navigation point or something. I don't know.

Speaker 3 (10:07):
Yeah, there's more there, you know, I don't know.

Speaker 2 (10:11):
Radio transmissions suggests they possibly could have survived on Gardner Island.
There are artifacts in the online suggesting they could have
been there and passed away because of hunger thirst eventually,
and then you start getting in the deep one of
survival under a new identity. Back in the United States,
historians think that's kind of insane, and why would that

(10:31):
even happen unless she was like trying to protect her identity,
or that she was, like you said, captured by the Japanese.
So I don't know who knows. You're right, I have
no idea, but that's an interesting thing. You got anymore
on there?

Speaker 1 (10:43):
Another one, This is a big one. I'm sure this
will be on other people's lists, but I gotta put
jfk Assassination on there.

Speaker 2 (10:50):
Did you watch the movie JFK.

Speaker 1 (10:51):
I've not seen the movie, but I've watched plenty of
documentaries that support either side. I've watched the prominent documentary
that came out when I was a kid that supported
the loan shooter. Uh, you know Lee Harvey side, Lee
Harvey oswald'side, and then I've watched plenty of others that
that take the other side, and to me, the Grassy
Knoll theory, yeah, like to me, this is this is

(11:13):
where I come out on it. I think Lee Harvey
Oswald was the one who did it, but I think
there's a lot more about that we don't know, because
why in the world did Jack Ruby do what he
did unless there was some tracks that needed to be
covered up quickly.

Speaker 2 (11:26):
So yeah, well or Jack Ruby. There's some evidence that
Jack Ruby was kind of like a semi mob type
figure with the police department, Like he was like a
major like police supporter and all that stuff, and really
just hated what Lee Harvey Oswold did and wanted to
avenge JFK's death, which obviously was the wrong thing to do,
and he had a presence around police officers. I don't know,

(11:49):
there's there's there's there's something missing about all that, and
obviously Jack Ruby ruined any chance of us figuring out
why whatever happened happened.

Speaker 1 (11:57):
I think JFK ticked off the wrong people, That's what
I think.

Speaker 2 (12:00):
Yeah, well, he's not the first and only guy to
be assassinated as president of the United States. There are
a few others. I mean, James Garfield was basically shot
by a crazy guy, like a guy who was literally insane,
right right, right, So there you go. All right, So
those are a couple for you. I got four, I
got four. I'll get to those four. You keep thinking,

(12:20):
we're gonna take your calls four O, two five, five,
eight eleven ten. You can start getting in lines so
you can give us your list or your even just one.
If you have one historical event pre two thousand, no
current things pre two thousand that you just don't believe
happened the way that we're told it happened, or you
question how historically accurate it is, call in four two, five, five,

(12:41):
eight eleven tin and we'll get you lined up. I'll
give my list coming up next. You can also email
Emory at kfab dot com with your list. Right now,
it's four twenty seven on news radio eleven ten KFAB.

Speaker 4 (12:52):
Emery Sunger on news Radio eleven ten KFAB.

Speaker 3 (12:57):
Hi again, Gary Sadlmay are here for NFM.

Speaker 1 (13:00):
Basically, the premise is, what are those four things if
you can come up with four your Friday four. What
are those four things? You're mount rushmore of historical facts?
Quote that you've always wondered, is that really true? Nothing current?
So I know you set the parameters of pre two thousand. Yeah,

(13:20):
pre two thousand. Nothing that happened after two thousand. So
let's go nine to eleven everything that's after that. We're
not trying to get super duper controversial here in terms
of what people think of stuff right in this moment.
It's the stuff that you would have read in your
history books growing up that you were just like, did
it really happen that way?

Speaker 2 (13:37):
And you question that sort of thing? Right? What were
your examples?

Speaker 1 (13:41):
My example was questioning all the details around Helen Keller,
wondering how that works. I think honestly, my questions around
that generate around the fact that I just think that's
so amazing that I don't even know how that's possible,
and so I've always just heard that story and thought like, how.

Speaker 2 (14:00):
There's something else going on here? Yeah, okay, so that's
one of them. You had a few more, but I'll
just go ahead and I'll do mine here, okay, and
then we'll get to the peoples. If the people have one,
here's my first one. This one always bugged me. Paul
Revere's ride. Hmmm, you're familiar with Paul Revere, right, yeah,
tell the people what you know about Paul Revere.

Speaker 1 (14:20):
Well, he took a famous ride around the town to
warn everybody that the British were coming.

Speaker 2 (14:24):
The British were coming, The British were coming, and he
was apparently the guy. He's a hero because he rode
around on his horse and told people that the British
were coming ahead of the battles of Lexington and conquered,
which literally started the Revolutionary War. Right at least the
fighting of the Revolutionary or the revolution was well underway
from the American citizens or colonists, if you will. Paul

(14:49):
Revere is the luckiest man in American history because there's
no reason for us to know his name. Quite literally,
I've read multiple sources in books that we just remember
or Paul Revere became the legend because they basically took
every single person that was a part of the network
of writers to alert the citizens in the militia about
the Redcoats making their way to Lexington. Then they kind

(15:13):
of intercepted them or they ranking their way to Concord
and they intercepted. They basically were ready to go and
get to them. But it wasn't just him. It was
a big network of intelligence that alerted these writers to
tell everyone in town that this was happening. And he
was one of several, several And for some reason, we
have just kind of aggregated all of these people into

(15:35):
one guy because history does that, and Paul Revere became
the guy. And I don't know, man, something doesn't sit
right with me that Paul Revere is the only guy
that we celebrate, despite the fact that there were very,
very obviously many people in these communities that got those
militia guys ready to go, those minutemen ready to go
in a minute, for that first skirmish against the British.

(15:58):
Am I right? Or am I right?

Speaker 3 (16:00):
Makes sense to me?

Speaker 2 (16:02):
I got beef with whoever started that Paul Revered nonsense,
And it's happened so long ago, seventeen seventy five, right,
was the beginning of the Revolutionary War seventeen seventy five.
I mean like the documentation of the events at the
time were already being turned legendary because they wanted to
sell pamphlets they wanted to sell books. I'm sure the
legend of Paul Revere was really underway before George Washington

(16:23):
was ever even president of the United States. And the
further away we got from the actual facts of what happened,
the less people were around to really know what happened,
the less information we really received that we could actually trust.
That's to me a messed up deal. The Paul Revere's ride.
Not to say Paul Revere isn't partially a hero. I'm
just saying there were others that were involved. Straight up

(16:46):
Hands to the sky number two. I'm owing even further
back the Crusades. You know the Crusades, Yeah, you're familiar
with those abottom the Battle of the Holy Land, basically
between the Christians and the Muslims at the Karn of
the original millennium back. You know, it was like a
two hundred year thing of the Crusades, battles and wars

(17:06):
over the Holy Land, right, But I'm not buying that
it was only about religion. I know, people we are
looking to fight wars for a lot of different reasons,
and the land that they were fighting over in various
spots were absolutely important. Factors to them, maybe their religion
as well. I just have questions were a revisionist history,

(17:26):
and again the history is told by those who win.
But we have all of these things that are still
going on a thousand years later, a thousand years after this,
we still have issues permeating in the Middle East with
people from various backgrounds, Jewish, Christian, Muslim, you name it,
different type of I mean, Zoroastrianists are certainly going out

(17:49):
of their way and probably have issues with people of
different religions. When religion is the most important thing to you,
you have, you know, very strong opinions about other religions
that might not lined with your beliefs. I can understand that,
but you can't tell me they were fighting these battles,
in these wars over only religious aspects and one very
small area of land for two hundred years. There had

(18:11):
to be a variety of factors that were going in there,
not just you know, trying to recapture their like basically
planting their flag on the holy land for their religion.
I think there's a lot more to the history of
that than we probably are privy to. But again, they
were being fought for generations of people not just you know,
like the Revolution, there is pretty much a set cast

(18:33):
of characters over the eight years, which is a pretty
long war. The eight years that we were fighting battles
in the Revolution with the British and the American colonists
and the Continental Army. There's absolutely no way you can
tell me that a two hundred year war, if you will,
with the Crusades, there wasn't more factors than just battling
over one space of land. Like our history books tell

(18:55):
us another one. Here's one, the Great Chicago Fire. Are
you familiar with the Great chicag Iago Fire?

Speaker 3 (19:00):
I heard about that.

Speaker 2 (19:01):
Yeah, yeah, So the Great Chicago Fire happened back in
eighteen seventy one, absolutely destroys Chicago. Three hundred people abouts
perish in this fire across the city. Do you know
what the legend is as to what started the Chicago fire?

Speaker 3 (19:18):
Well, don't they blame it on a dairy.

Speaker 2 (19:19):
Cow, missus O'Leary's cow kicking over a lantern in her barn. Now,
I don't know how many barns there are in central Chicago,
even back in eighteen seventy one, but the legend has it,
and it grew from basically the immediate aftermath of the
Great Chicago Fire, where most of I mean, look, there

(19:40):
were a baseball team called the Chicago White Stockings back
in the eighteen seventies. They have two years missing, Like,
they didn't play baseball, they didn't have anything to play
baseball with because they lost. The Chicago Fire drastically impacted
the city of Chicago and all the entities within it.

Speaker 3 (19:55):
It was that bad.

Speaker 2 (19:56):
It was a horrible thing. That baseball team didn't operate
for two years as a result of the Chicago Fire. Okay,
so you can look back and it was a devastating
event in the history of Chicago, right, But there's no
evidence at all that a cow kicked over a lantern
and started a city wide fire, the Great Chicago Fire,
burning much of the important parts of the city. And

(20:19):
I don't know, Like, to me, I just feel like
that is an insane thing to blame a fire on. Now,
some people say, if you look back, it was probably
started from an unknown source in an alley somewhere, caught
one building on fire. And back in the day, I mean,
we didn't have the kind of technology or the ability

(20:40):
to quell fires at that point. When a fire started,
it was hard to put out. A lot of our
structures were made of wood back in the in the day,
so there were There are a lot of theories about
exactly what happened. Probably somebody created it by accident, but
it wasn't a dairy cow in middle of Chicago kicking
over a lantern, setting a barn on fire, and basically

(21:01):
burning down half of the town. So that one bothers
me too. And here's one I'm gonna say, probably the
most questionable for me for last. Are you ready?

Speaker 3 (21:09):
Yeah?

Speaker 2 (21:10):
The First Thanksgiving? The first Thanksgiving? You really think, do
you really think the first Thanksgiving is what we know
it to be? We think about it sixteen twenty one,
This is four hundred and three years ago, the first Thanksgiving.
The Pilgrims, the Native Americans. They have this big meal
and they clang glasses and trade some things together. Do

(21:32):
you think exactly what happened is what we are told
happen on that day. I'm not saying that the tradition
doesn't evolve from something like that. There were Thanksgiving type
holidays in other European countries that predate the Pilgrims landing
on Plymouth Rock. But I'm just kind of questioning the
relations that the Pilgrims probably had with the Native American

(21:53):
tribes in New England. I just don't think it was
that harmonious, if you will. I don't think the First
Thanksgiving went off without a hit with the cornucopia fruit
and all the meat, the turkey, the venison and whatever
else that they were chowing down on and everything was
just fine and dandy. There's too much evidence and about
the same time frame of colonists in Virginia just to

(22:14):
the south that had settled Jamestown, We're just trying to survive,
and about the same time frame they were getting murdered
and had to worry about their their you know, families'
lives from a lot of the Native American tribes who
didn't like that they were living on their land. I
just don't think it was all rosy sunshines and daisies
at that point. Still, am I wrong? Am I? Am
I taking this too far? Or is it okay to

(22:37):
question this story we're told about the First Thanksgiving?

Speaker 3 (22:40):
It's a fair question.

Speaker 1 (22:41):
It makes me sad, but I you know, it's a
very fair question.

Speaker 2 (22:44):
It makes you wonder, you really think the First Thanksgiving
the Pilgrims are just sitting there hanging out with the
Native American tribes, whom they certainly had a hard time
communicating with for a while, and all of a sudden
they're just like, yeah, let's have this big meal, and
somebody will write down what happened, and then we're just
gonna pass down through the generations. So you know, two
hundred years from now, Abraham Lincoln can create Thanksgiving as

(23:05):
a holiday or whatever happened.

Speaker 1 (23:07):
Maybe Anne Sullivan was the interpreter.

Speaker 2 (23:08):
Oh, come on, and or back to Helen Kell. Full circle.
All right, So that's my four. The First Thanksgiving, the
Great Chicago Fire, the Crusades, and Paul Revere's ride. I
question all of those things. I think we've been told
maybe half truths in all of them at best. If
you got one of these or multiple of these, call
us four h two, five, five, eight to eleven ten

(23:29):
as well. We're roll on with the Friday four on
news Radio eleven ten.

Speaker 6 (23:32):
Kfab Okay, My number one fraud has to be Bruce
Lee M.

Speaker 7 (23:37):
Bruce specifically the nun Chuck video playing ping pong.

Speaker 8 (23:42):
Oh yeah, no way.

Speaker 2 (23:43):
That happened, No way, no way. Agreed on this guy's
an actor, right, Like not to say that he's bad
at like kung fu, but don't you think somebody who
is that good at combat would actually have competed in
some things that we would have video of.

Speaker 5 (23:56):
Yeah, exactly, like UFC or something today. He would totally be.

Speaker 2 (24:00):
Yeah, for sure. Hey, that's a good one, Mike. Thanks
for calling in. All right, Paul's on the line. Paul,
what do you got on this?

Speaker 9 (24:06):
Well, it's been over sixty years since they are fascinated
President Kennedy and every president since then has refused to
release the classified documents from the war and report.

Speaker 2 (24:17):
Well what do you think that means?

Speaker 9 (24:19):
I mean, there's been a lion. They're not telling us
all the whole truth, CIA, FBI secrets or I don't
know who did it, but somebody's lying and they're among
the documents.

Speaker 2 (24:29):
Well, what would both political parties have and what would
John F. Kennedy have done for them to want to
cover that up? Would be my question.

Speaker 9 (24:36):
Well, they want to cover up something. Yeah, maybe they
refused to release the classified documents.

Speaker 2 (24:42):
We should we should sign a petition or make another
Kevin Coster movie about it that I think would help. Hey, Paul,
thanks for the call. Thanks for listening to our show.
All right, Joe is on our phone line four oh
two five five eight eleventon. You've got a historical event
you're kind of skeptical of, there, Joe.

Speaker 10 (24:57):
Well, a couple of them they're president, but they're from
both sides of the aisles. So even here, Okay, I
have to go back to the first one being I
am not a crook.

Speaker 2 (25:10):
Oh yeah, they're not getting they're not getting the whole
you're not getting the whole story on Watergate. It's what
you're saying. I doubt it, You're probably right.

Speaker 10 (25:21):
And and the other one being I did not have
sexual relations.

Speaker 2 (25:27):
I think we were all being lied to multiple times
in that episode there, Joe. All right, thanks, Joe, appreciate
the call. You bad, Yeah, yeah, I don't know, man,
what do you think, Matt you're the president of the
United States. You kind of mess around with another woman?
Is there is there something else? Like like why would

(25:49):
you hide that? Like don't you think you would? Don't
you think we'd figure out eventually that you did it?
You know what I mean?

Speaker 3 (25:59):
I thought we knew that he did, Like.

Speaker 2 (26:01):
Dude, we do now, But you know, like the rumors
leading up to it and him denying it and all
that stuff, right, Like what are you gained by denying it?
I mean, in gosh, you know, if you're willing to
like cheat on your wife, is she really your wife anymore?

Speaker 5 (26:18):
Like?

Speaker 2 (26:18):
What are you trying to do to fix that? Aliciall together?
I guess so, I guess whatever he did was Okay,
who knows what's going on there? Hey, pre two thousand,
we're not talking post two thousands, pre two thousand. We'll
come back if you want to call in with your
historical events you're skeptical of. Four h two five five
eight eleven ten. Four h two five five eight eleven ten,
we're having fun, head to the five o'clock hour on

(26:39):
your Friday news radio eleven ten kfab.

Speaker 1 (26:46):
Those four topics or as many as you can come
up with. But those four topics that you heard in
history class, you learned about in history, or maybe you
read it in a book that you think, is that
really what happened? Basically, the four things you're most skeptical
of historical conspiracy theories all to like anything pre two thousand,
so nothing current.

Speaker 2 (27:05):
Yeah, pre two thousand disputed historical events that you're just
too skeptical of to believe it happened the way we
were told it happened, and are like, uh Matt said,
Helen Keller was one that really stood out to him.
I had like the Great Chicago Fire and how that
started the First Thanksgiving. We didn't learn about the First Thanksgiving.
I think in the way it probably went down the Crusades,

(27:27):
the two hundred Year War, and you're telling me it
was just about religion in the Holy Land. There's something
else that's missing there. And Paul Revere's ride. There were
way more guys that were doing exactly what he did
that night, but for some reason, history remembers only him. Well,
if we got the phones full, let's go ahead and
go to Steve four, two, five, five, eight, eleven ten
is that number, Steve? What do you got for me?

Speaker 8 (27:46):
Yeah, I'm just Thanksgiving celebration, hear me?

Speaker 2 (27:54):
Yeah, go ahead, Steve.

Speaker 8 (27:56):
Yeah, I'm talking about the Thanksgiving celebration. Well, at some point,
accordiate history books, the peace pipe was introduced. And I'm told,
not from personal experience, but when you get through with
the peace pipe, you're gonna need something to eat. So
I think the monkeys came into play and they were
looking around and said, hey, we'll up with them turkeys
and them pumpkins over there. So that's all I got

(28:16):
on that there was a Thanksgiving celebration after the peace pipe.

Speaker 2 (28:21):
A so so so we we needed. What you're saying, Steve,
is we need to add part of the tradition in here,
like we're missing part of the tradition.

Speaker 7 (28:28):
Yeah.

Speaker 8 (28:28):
Yeah, the peace pipe was introduced at some point and
at some point after the peace pipe.

Speaker 2 (28:33):
That that was when you use so so so so Steve,
next time we do Thanksgiving, what you're saying is we
need to introduce peace pipe and then we can eat dinner.

Speaker 5 (28:42):
That's what happened.

Speaker 8 (28:43):
They got they was hungry after the peace pipe, and
they saw and some pumpkins laying around and they went
for it.

Speaker 2 (28:49):
So, oh, don't pumptous. Hey, Steve, thanks, I'm appreciative if
you called and listening to Shell buddy. Thanks for listening.
All right, Yeah, you can't make this stuff up, folks,
or maybe you can't. Brian's on a phone line four
or two, five, five, eight, eleven, ten, Brian, what you
got for me?

Speaker 11 (29:06):
All right? So I got a few, so Kurt Cobain
did not commit suicide.

Speaker 7 (29:09):
Uh really, OJ, OJ did it?

Speaker 2 (29:15):
OJ killed Kirk Cobain.

Speaker 11 (29:17):
No, no, no, Oh J did what he was accused of.

Speaker 2 (29:20):
Oh oh, okay, the way you said that, I was like,
OJ killed Kirk Cobain. I mean the timeline real quick, Okay,
all right, keep going.

Speaker 7 (29:31):
Uh, Pearl Harbor.

Speaker 11 (29:32):
I think was allowed to happen to get us into
the war.

Speaker 5 (29:35):
Oh.

Speaker 11 (29:36):
I think they knew it was coming and they let
it happen.

Speaker 2 (29:39):
Oh gosh.

Speaker 11 (29:41):
And then uh, prohibition, this is a new one. I
actually just recently heard.

Speaker 5 (29:46):
Uh.

Speaker 11 (29:47):
It wasn't about actual drinking. It was about people being
able to easily make this alcohol fuel that they could
use in their homes to cook their food, keep their
homes running, their cars, all that stuff. Well, if you
look at thee in and yeah.

Speaker 2 (30:08):
Well, I tell you what, Brian, when you talk about crohavision,
I just watched a couple of videos about this because
I'm always fascinated as to how they came to that
conclusion that we need to outlaw alcohol and that's going
to fix things. There are a few factors, and it
was kind of a slow burn for a few decades
that there was a small coalition of people who really
were pushing that it was a degenerative thing that was

(30:29):
ruining our cities, our societies, and our families. And there
had to have been a mechanism behind that. You can't
tell me all the bad things people were. They were
putting cocaine in soda in this era, and people and
they and they wanted to ban alcohol. That there's something
else there, And I think you're onto something. We'll have
to we'll have to get our investigation thing on that.

(30:50):
I appreciate the call, Brian, thanks so much for dropping
some of those bombs on us quite literally here on
the show. It that's good Trial fas is on our
phone line trial as You're with Memory on news Radio
eleven T and kfab what you got Hey?

Speaker 6 (31:03):
I got enough now, I'm just kidding. I saw it
well when I dropped the expensive channels recently streaming, I
was addicted to all the Pluto and all the freebee
streaming services. But they have some crazy documentaries on. There's
a couple of them makes sense, like a JFK. I
was actually accidentally killed by a secret Service agent that

(31:27):
was whipping out a rifle after see Harvey Osseold was
taking its for shot. Tea was the only guy there
with a long rifle and kind of explains why the
Secret Service stuck to the President's body like glue even
though they were not supposed to be in you know,
autopsy and everything. Another conspiracy is that the Titanic was

(31:49):
actually the Olympic and they switched him out because the
year before sister ship Olympic had had gotten some damage
and they needed to think it on purpose in order
to collect the insurance on that. But whoa, whoa, Yeah,
that's pretty crazy, isn't it, Because I said, when you
count the portals on between the Titanic and the Olympic,
plus they were bolts part dixed to each other in.

Speaker 5 (32:11):
Dry dock one.

Speaker 2 (32:12):
Yeah, No, they didn't they build them together. They yeah,
they didn't they build them together.

Speaker 6 (32:16):
They well, the Olympic was sailing the year before the
Titanic was out on the season, but the Olympic Olympic
had a an accident and they couldn't It wasn't ensured
for that. So the theory gohoes that they sank out
on purpose. And uh, I think it was the the
Carpasian Or of the California and the ship that was
on the other side of the ice flow was supposed

(32:36):
to pick them up, but they accidentally got trapped on
the wrong side and they didn't see the rockets that
the Titanic was putting off. So there was a ship
sitting there waiting they were supposed to be waiting to
rescue them. But yeah, that one's kind of crazy, but yeah, yeah.

Speaker 2 (32:51):
The only thing, the only issue I have with that
is if that was intentionally going to happen, uh and
and not just not. I think it's funny, and I think, well,
not funny, but I I think it's an interesting conversation
because the Olympic is exactly an identical twin essentially of
the Titanic in a lot of ways. But they would
have had a leugh life boats if they thought about

(33:11):
putting that thing in the water, you know what I mean, You.

Speaker 6 (33:13):
Thought, well, that's why that other ship was supposed to
be there to rescue them before they actually thank but
because they were both sitting next to each other in drydock.
And then the story goes that the workers one day
came back and they said, hey, they said, no, that's
the Olympic, that's the Titanic. And they switched all the
you know, the naming and everything on the ships, and
then they told they threatened all the workers if you

(33:33):
dare tell a soul that this ship is this ship
you know, will come after you and your family and everything.
So I don't know, that sounds kind of.

Speaker 2 (33:40):
Crazy, but it's interesting to talk about for sure.

Speaker 6 (33:43):
Yeah, it's an interesting documentary on that. But also on
the death of Marilyn Monroe. I do believe that she
would did not commit suicide. She was actually it was
a hit job. She was murdered by unfortunately Kennedy because
after she was dating John Kennedy and then Bobby, she
was calling the White House and they realized she was
gonna be a problem because she wasn't going away, and

(34:05):
they found, uh, they said, in her body, an overdose
of sleeping pills, meaning somebody gave her like they drugged
her and then gave her an enema with like an
overdose of all the drugs. So plus it was just
really people said, she she didn't really, she was on
the phone with a friend and then she said hello,
and I hear noise. I got to go, and the
next thing you know, they just find her dead the

(34:26):
next morning. So it was kind of a really weird circumstance.

Speaker 2 (34:29):
Yeah, it sounds like you've thought about this a little bit.
Trout Fast, Well, I think there was.

Speaker 6 (34:33):
There was some documentaries too, so I didn't go out
and research it myself, although I had.

Speaker 2 (34:37):
Hey, all I'm saying is it's it's interesting and fun
discussion to talk about, and that's what we're here for.
Trout Fest. Thanks for calling in and being a part
of the show today.

Speaker 6 (34:45):
Man, thanks have a good one.

Speaker 2 (34:46):
Yeah, you too. That's awesome. If you got an historical
event or two or four that you are thinking about,
you need to talk to us, because if you are
skeptical of something that you learned about in the UH,
in the history books on the History Channel, you just
kind of like the common knowledge that one gains being
an American citizen, I suppose, or growing up in our

(35:09):
school system, or even if you're not an American and
you happen to be hearing my voice and listening to this,
if there's something non American that you remember and you
had and there was something in your brain of like
you know what, I'm not sure that happened the way
that we were told before two thousand. Nothing's super serious,
nothing super current. Go ahead and call us four h
two five five eight eleven ten. Four H two five
five eight eleven ten would love to keep chatting about

(35:31):
this pretty fun conversation right here on news radio eleven
ten kfab.

Speaker 4 (35:34):
Em Marey's songer Shammick with someone you on news radio
eleven ten kfab.

Speaker 2 (35:42):
The one that I want to mention again is the
Titanic that he said, and he's prefaced it by saying
it's a total conspiracy theory. Most likely Titanic was just
the Titanic which was notably built, filled up, shipped out
to sea, going an insane amount of speed faster than
it should have been into an iceberg field, ran into
an iceberg, tore up the side of it for some reason,

(36:06):
they didn't have all of the rivets or compartments closed.
It gets full of water to a point where it
starts to sink. This unsinkable ship is starting to sink
on its made in voyage. And then they don't have
enough lifeboats on deck. A lot of the lifeboats deploy
without even being totally full, complete chaos. They're not ready
and prepared for it, and a bunch of people pass
away and die. He mentioned this conspiracy theory that maybe

(36:28):
that's not the Titanic, maybe it was an already damaged
ship called the Olympic, which is very similar to the Titanic.
It's a very similar ship. But also that it was
kind of like a He mentioned that it was kind
of a pre planned disaster, if you will, that they
wanted to try to sink it, but there was supposed
to be a ship there to rescue people. There's no
way this is true. There's no way to actually happened

(36:49):
that way. However, however, do we have one hundred percent
full on proof about the Carpathia, which was the ship
nearby and the reason why it did not have the
ability to get to the uh to the Titanic to
help people. It was pretty close and nearby. The Titanic
was sending distress signals. I know this is like pre radio,

(37:12):
But do we have like like why didn't the Carpathia
help faster? Is my question. There are tons of people
and also the geniuses that say this is unsinkable, right?
Why was were those compartments open to begin with? You know,
like you remember how the Titanic worked, like the way
there there was a way that shut off the compartment,
so if it took on water, the water wouldn't get

(37:32):
all the way into the ship. It would just kind
of like get into the sides of the ship if
it like took on some damage, but the water wasn't
going to be able to rush right in. They would
have had to be in a catastrophic head on collision
essentially for that thing to sink. If those compartments were closed,
Why was there even an option for the compartments to
not close. Why wouldn't they just be closed all the
time so water wouldn't get in even at the slightest

(37:53):
contact with an iceberg?

Speaker 5 (37:55):
Right? Am?

Speaker 2 (37:55):
I am I crazy for thinking this?

Speaker 3 (37:57):
It's good questions.

Speaker 2 (37:58):
Well, thanks for the elaboration there, sure, Lock.

Speaker 1 (38:01):
Are you sorry? I'm editing the pod while I talk? Oh,
why are you implying nefariousness?

Speaker 2 (38:08):
I'm just saying that there are a lot of unanswered questions.
I'm not nefariousness, mostly just incompetence, I would guess, I mean,
I guess nefariousness are people who were intentionally trying to
be destructive for some reason. I don't know if there's
a true conspiracy. Too many people that were important died
on that ship. And there were too many risks to
be involved. And if you really wanted to sink that ship,

(38:29):
you would have had the compartments open, which they did
and they didn't even close fast enough. But also you
would have had enough life boats for everybody to get
off that ship. Neither of those things happened, so obviously
I don't think they intentionally sank the ship. I just
think that they're really stupid. How did we think this
was a good idea? How did they let this ship
become so famous before it even had its made in
voyage despite all of these irregularities and the incompetence with

(38:54):
the White Star Line who built this ship and put
it on the water.

Speaker 1 (38:57):
It seems kind of like a whole lot of hubrist
to me.

Speaker 2 (38:59):
What's that supposed to me?

Speaker 1 (39:01):
Like they like, you know, they were a little bit
too confident, they were over confident.

Speaker 2 (39:05):
Okay, that's fair. I asked chat GPT. Why didn't the
Carpathia health the Titanic, you know, because what does AI
think about this? And Ai said, guess what, You're wrong.
The Carpathia did help the Titanic.

Speaker 3 (39:18):
Oh.

Speaker 2 (39:18):
The Carpathia was the first ship to respond and was
fifty eight miles away when it received the first distress call.
That's a little further away than I thought we had
established the Carpathia fifty eight miles according to chat GPT.
The Carpathias captain Arthur Rostrawan ordered the ship to change
course and head towards the Titanic as soon as they
received the first message, but the Carpathia could only go

(39:41):
about seventeen knots, very slow ship compared to the Titanic.
Carpathia arrived at the sinking two hours after it had
gone completely underwater. Titanic was gone, but they did rescue
seven hundred and five survivors from the lifeboats. So I
guess I'm putting too much, putting too much jonas on
the carpathia Is role as to not helping the people
the Titanic. The CHAGPT says, I'm mixing the Carpathy up

(40:06):
with the Californian. The Californian was closer to the Titanic,
but failed to respond to the distress signals, did not
properly interpret them. So apparently that was the thing.

Speaker 6 (40:15):
All right.

Speaker 2 (40:15):
Well, if you got thoughts on anything that we're talking about,
Titanic or other events that you think may have been
misinterpreted or underreported or just kind of messed up in
the history timeline as we were learning about them. You
can call us a four h two five five eight
eleven ten. Four h two five five eight eleven ten,
News Radio eleven ten kfab.

Speaker 4 (40:33):
Emery Songer on news Radio eleven ten KFAB.

Speaker 2 (40:39):
I see myself as a pretty skinny person just compared
to like a normal person. But I definitely put on
a little bit of wait in the last couple of years.
So yeah, probably I probably just looked like a regular
person with long hair, now that you say that, Yeah,
you're probably right. I'll probably be wearing Hawaiian shirt tomorrow.
On the next day though, So yeah, okay, Hawaiian shirt,
regular looking guy with long blonde hair.

Speaker 1 (40:57):
There you go, the guy spewing conspire here is he theories?
That's what you could say.

Speaker 2 (41:01):
No, I won't be doing that. This is a discussion
in a safe space, you jerk. We saw John on
the line. Yeah, all right, John on the phone line
four h two five five eight elevens and we're talking
about not conspiracy theories per se, but historical events that
happened before two thousand and we're just not sure we
actually were told the whole truth. Thought, John, what do
you got for me?

Speaker 5 (41:20):
I am mariy. I love your show, Thanks Blend. I
don't believe that John McCain was the hero that he
was portrayed, as he single handedly destroyed more US aircraft
in Vietnam than any Chinese or North Vietnamese pilot. First
one was in the Gulf of Mexico. He flew his

(41:41):
plane into the gulf because he wasn't paying attention to
his ultimeter. The second one was the incident on the
USS Forestall where he was messing around and he did
what they called a wet start and dumped fuel into
the engine, which is for pilots that have a flame

(42:01):
out in the air. But he was on a deck
of the carrier and destroyed several aircraft on the deck
of the carrier. But his father was the admiral of
the Navy at the time, so that got pushed under
the table. And then when he was captured, he lost
his were shot down and you can find online a

(42:21):
lot of his prisonmates said that he got wined and
dined by the North to Vietnamese and that he may
have broken and given secrets says to flight patterns for
incoming naval bombers.

Speaker 2 (42:35):
Well, that is quite the laundry list of mistakes there.
Well here's the other thing too. You know, none of
us were actually there specifically, but we have heard a
lot of things about what this guy looked like and
sounded like when he was doing his service. I'm in
no position to because I'm not a member of our military.

(42:56):
I don't feel like I'm in a position to try
to guestimate anybody and their service or anything. That's why
I've kind of I'm letting the details come out about
Tim Watson, jd Vance and their military histories, and then
I'll come to maybe a conclusion. But it's interesting information,
that's for sure. I really appreciate you calling in, John,
and thanks so much for listening to our show.

Speaker 5 (43:16):
You bet all right?

Speaker 2 (43:17):
Well, yeah, dang, yeah, that's here. That's a tough one.
That's a tough one, he said, John mccainna. I was
afraid he was going to go post two thousand, you know,
because that's when he ran for president. But alas he
did not, Harry emailed in. He had a few Civil
War not just about slavery as we were taught for
many years that I know is correct, that it is
not just about slavery. Slavery was the backbone of the problem,

(43:40):
but there were several economic factors and geographical barriers between
the two sides that basically the South had had enough.
It wasn't even political parties anymore. Political parties didn't matter
as much as where you were from. North was voting
North more than they were voting you know, Whigs and
at the time Republicans or Democrats, sorry, Democrats, And it

(44:01):
just kind of devolved itself to a point where the
Whig Party just kind of disbanded and it birthed into
the Republican Party that eventually would evolve into the party
we know today. So that is true. The jfk assassination
a political cover up. Again, so many people have different
theories as to why it was covered up though, and
then Jimmy Hoffin covered up due to out of power

(44:22):
he attained and was attaining and maybe Tom says he's
got one. Today, the eighteen sixteen year without a summer
seems like we're we are not getting the full story,
considering what we know now about how climates and weather
patterns work. I believe some of the first hand accounts
are exaggerated. Yeah, so weather patterns or weather reports from
a variety of accounts. Remember that winter at Valley Forge

(44:44):
you heard about that from the Revolutionary War there.

Speaker 3 (44:46):
Matt Petbridge Farm remembers.

Speaker 2 (44:48):
Yeah, it apparently it wasn't nearly as like awful and
crazy cold as you know, historical record, like the story goes,
they survived this insanely cold winter at Valley Forge in
in the middle of the Revolutionary War when they didn't
have a lot of technology, a lot of the guys
didn't have shoes and all this stuff. But a lot
of historical records have gone back and looked and it
didn't seem like that. You know, it was like the

(45:10):
mid to late seventeen seventies that that was happening. Didn't
seem like it was really all that cold comparatively, you know,
the story goes, you know it's like twenty to twenty
below zero. That's not necessarily the case. So, you know,
I feel like anything that goes into the weather records
unless we have obvious like deaths or records of death

(45:31):
being caused or injuries caused by weather related factors. Those
are the things we could probably more rely on. But
going back, I mean, like what we've only been keeping
track of, like record temperatures and all that stuff since
like the eighteen eighties, So going back to eighteen sixteen,
like the year without a summer, I'm not so sure.
But again a lot of people in the history book

(45:52):
the way that you would get famous is by making
something into legend and it gets remembered and you get
attached to it. We got Dan on a flown phone
line four with two five five, eight eleven ten. Hello Dan,
what do you got in your mind today?

Speaker 7 (46:05):
You say my name? But a little insight on John McCain. Uh,
my dad served with him in the Navy. He worked
on the flight deck and everybody on the flight crew
despised him. And I did not know this. He really
talked of his time in the service. When McCain was
running for president. He would go on rants about how
bad he despised John McCain and this and that, and

(46:27):
I'd ask him why and he never would go into detail.
Finally he went into detail that he treated everybody on
the flight deck just like crash, like belittling them and
doing everything they could make their lives horrible. He said,
as to the fact that when he crashed and got captured,
the entire crew cheered.

Speaker 2 (46:43):
Oh man, wow, Well that sounds like.

Speaker 7 (46:46):
That's how much he would love by his fellow navy.

Speaker 2 (46:48):
Well, I tell you what he's coming. Sounds like it's
coming from a pretty reliable source there, Dan. I appreciate
you sharing that with us today. Thanks for calling. Uh,
let's go to Tony real quick. Tony, thanks for being
a part of our show today. You're with Themory song
Or on news Radio eleven ten kfab Emory.

Speaker 12 (47:04):
It's just a question, So why is that society believes
in all this history like Napoleon existed in Genghis Khanan,
but they don't believe in the Bible because they say, oh,
it was written by men.

Speaker 5 (47:16):
It's strange.

Speaker 12 (47:16):
What it's none of those people existed. It's just it's fake.
Can it be fake? Just when people say the Bible's fake?

Speaker 2 (47:24):
Tony? This is a really interesting question, right, because different
societies report things in different ways, and the Bible isn't
necessarily treated as a historical document as much as it
is kind of a guideline to a faith. Right, Does
that make sense? Kind of the way that I explained
that like it so the Bible itself. There are a
lot of people who are non Christians that question a

(47:45):
lot of the facts, if you will, about the Bible
or the quotes that are taken from the Gospels that
Jesus or people around Jesus had said. And Tonia, thanks
for the call today. I think we appreciate that. I
think the bigger question about all of that, right is
there are four Gospels, four different dudes. You know, Matthew

(48:09):
forgetting one of them, Matthew Luke, John, Mark Mark, Thank you, Matthew, Mark, Luke, John.
Those four guys all wrote about basically the life that
Jesus had. They have like the parables in there, all
the little episodes of things that went on, and they
all are written differently, but a lot of them revolve

(48:29):
around some of the same stuff that happened. I'm not
saying the Bible was written in a conspiracy, but it
would take a conspiracy for somebody to get enough of
that stuff about the same. All of it happened a
long time ago. I think we have a lot of
legitimate evidence. You go back to like Cleopatra, you got
people from way before BC that aren't necessarily biblical figures

(48:52):
that are reported. I know there's a lot of historians
out there that say Moses was never in Egypt or
something like that. They've never been able to pinpoint like
the timeline that that would happen.

Speaker 3 (49:02):
A lot of it's hypocryphal.

Speaker 2 (49:05):
I'm not going to come and challenge people like directly
to that, because I wasn't there either, But there are
enough historical documents to say enough of that stuff was true.
Whether or not you like. It's not a historical document
as much as it is a handbook basically to a
person's relationship with God in the religion of Christianity. And

(49:27):
that's what I think the Bible, why it means so
much is because it really is an interpretation of people
who were prophets, are people who purported to have, you know,
spoken with God or feelings with God. And if you
are a Christian, those things are in the Bible for
a reason, and it is to help you be a
better Christian, have a stronger relationship with God, and to
be a better person here on earth. And I think

(49:49):
all of that is you know, I don't know anybody
that would have a problem with that. At the same time,
I have no evidence that Genghis Khan existed or didn't exist.
Does anybody have his skeleton or his DNA? And half
of the stuff he probably did was probably manufactured or overstated?
How much evidence do we have of any of this stuff?
That's mostly what this whole exercise that we've done over

(50:09):
the last couple of hours is about who the heck
knows what to believe in history or not until we
get a time machine and see it for ourselves. I
feel like it's okay to question anything that doesn't have
proper documentation in the modern era. We wrap up the
show next on news radio eleven tin KFAB. You can
find it on the Emory Songer podcast page. Just find
it on the free iHeartRadio apps or Jemory Songer E

(50:29):
M E R Y. You'll find it right there. You
can also find all sorts of stuff on kfib dot
com as Matt uploades all those podcasts. It's a good one, Matt,
good job, you've earned your cookie for the week.

Speaker 5 (50:41):
Hey.

Speaker 1 (50:42):
Thanks, Yeah, Hey, every once in a while, blind nutt
get the squirrel.

Speaker 3 (50:45):
You know what I mean?

Speaker 2 (50:46):
Yeah? Cookie revoked? Now? Thanks? Come on, what are you
doing this weekend.

Speaker 1 (50:51):
Well, I am gonna be enjoying some outside time. Don't
really have a whole lot on the books, but we'll see.
Might end up driving to the iri State Fair. You
know what that's in the cards. It certainly is do it?

Speaker 3 (51:01):
Do it?

Speaker 2 (51:01):
Come to the Iowa State Fair. Come say hey, we'll
take some social media photos and whatnot and have a
great time and enjoy what is the great Iowa State Fair,
which is going on through next Sunday. I am into
Moin still for that. If you want to catch up
with my exploits, follow me on social media. Emory Songer
eleven ten kfab on Facebook, Emory Songer on x or Instagram.

(51:23):
I am posting there regularly every day that I'm at
the Iowa State Fair. Be sure to check that out.
And if you are coming to the Iowa State Fair
and you see me, just say hey, you know what
I look like, Tap me on the shoulder, give me
a high five. You can talk to me about what
you think the Huskers are gonna do this year, all
sorts of good stuff. But if you're not at the
Iowa State Fair, I'll be missing you and I'll talk

(51:44):
to you on Monday and the same time like I
always do for my friend Matt Case. My name is
Emory Sunger. We thank you so much for being a
part of our family every afternoon, and you have a nice,
safe and enjoyable, healthy weekend. We'll reconvene on Monday. Been
listening to Nebraska's news, weather and traffic station News Radio
eleven ten kfa B.