Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
I gotta let to talk about By the way that
(00:02):
Mali Vera's stuff I talked about they're not paying me,
but they should. My summer. I basically don't feel it anymore.
Speaker 2 (00:08):
That's wild. Took two days, it's gone.
Speaker 1 (00:11):
And I mean like, like, look, look, how look how
normal my skin looks already. Stuff's miracle. It's a miracle. Anyway,
when I say Wall, what do you think of?
Speaker 2 (00:23):
I think of many things.
Speaker 1 (00:26):
If I told you wall, with the context of politics,
what do you say, Like? What what is your understanding
of that term in American politics? I just say wall,
not the wall, not a wall by this person, not
the wall at the southern border. Literally, if I say wall,
do you know what I'm talking about?
Speaker 3 (00:44):
Yeah, you can give me a couple more context clues
than I'd probably get there.
Speaker 2 (00:48):
Wall.
Speaker 1 (00:49):
Who likes the wall? We're talking about Paul Wall? No,
he's irrelevant. Hey, something we've been told that we are
in the afternoon by a certain person.
Speaker 2 (00:57):
Oh that guy.
Speaker 1 (00:58):
Yeah, I wonder what he's up to today. Anyway, when
I say Wall, who do you associate that with?
Speaker 2 (01:04):
Paul? I just wanted to talk about Paul Wall a
little bit more. Well, I think of tim Walls.
Speaker 1 (01:10):
Nice didn't think of that one. No, I mean, like
I say, Wall, who do you associate that within politics?
Speaker 2 (01:16):
Well, a lot.
Speaker 3 (01:17):
It's been a talking point and well on the Republican
side to build a wall at the sudden border for quite.
Speaker 1 (01:23):
A while, probably like almost eight nine years now, when
Trump started doing his thing, you know, the build a
wall thing. That was one of his first real li
like things. Right, I didn't get that wall done while
he was there. What if I told you Kamala Harris
said that she would spend hundreds of millions of dollars
on a wall at the southern border.
Speaker 3 (01:41):
Would that surprise you? I would be surprised. I'd probably
want to source check that.
Speaker 2 (01:46):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (01:47):
Well, I'm staring at a story that I mean, it's
being reported in multiple places. The unfortunate thing is that
there's no way to every publican that reads this is
going to be upset that this is possibly being neutralized.
But there's an easy way to make it seem like
this isn't that big of a deal, because she basically
(02:08):
is going to be running with the wall in mind
as part of the bipartisan bill that basically was the
same thing that the Republicans helped kill earlier this year
that had a ton of other stuff in it. Remember that,
I remember that bipartisan border bill that they were working
on in Congress in like February I think it was,
And it was the Republicans that ended up like yanking
(02:30):
it out because there was like a ton of foreign
aid money that was kind of smushed in into the bill. Well, basically,
she says, she said that she would sign the bipartisan
Border Security Bill, which that was negotiated in part by
James Langford of Oklahoma or a Republican Democrat, Chris Murphy
of Connecticut. And basically it said hundreds of millions of
(02:53):
dollars of unspent funds need to be used to continue
building that wall on the border. Now again, say about
this when the wall was being talked about when Trump
was in office. Well, the words that we heard from
her were Unamerican. Is there a bigger insult to a
policy than calling it un American? Well, now she's back
(03:14):
on board, and she says, actually, you know, she is
an immigration hardliner. There's a new ad out saying as
an attorney general, a border state prosecutor, she has boosted
the number of border patrol agents. Okay, let's just buy
this for what it is. Let's say that she goes
and she campaigns and says she says, we are going
to secure the southern border. I am going to be
(03:35):
a border hardliner. We're gonna build that wall. What does
that mean? Can the Republicans do what the Democrats are
doing and lie or say that they're lying? I guess
you know how they do? With Trump and abortion. Trump
has said multiple times that he doesn't want a federal
ban on abortion. However, people are like, oh, wait, wait, no,
(03:58):
no he actually does. He's just telling you he doesn't
want it, so you'll elect him. I mean, you could
play that card here too, right. The Republicans could just say, like, no,
she's just saying that he doesn't care about this. She
wants open borders in this country. But now it's becoming
more and more public that she is actually going to
support funding at the southern border wall. I guess my
(04:19):
question to you, the ladies and gentlemen of the KFAB audience,
what say you about Kamala Harris the new hardline immigration
borders are who wants to be president of the United States?
Speaker 2 (04:31):
Yeah?
Speaker 1 (04:31):
Buying this or is this just a ruse to try
to get us to vote for and by us, I
mean the American public. Don't don't look at me. Please
don't put that on me. Two fourteen, I'm going to
open the phone lines before we take calls on the
Kamala thing, and we will. I want to give away
two tickets to this Reagan thing. So what do you say, Matt,
give me a number between forty and seventy. I'll pick
(04:53):
a solid sixty eight. Sixty eight, that's a good one.
Sixty eight, how about sixty eight? The caller gets two
tenickets to our showing at the Marcus Majestic Theater Reagan,
the brand new movie with Dennis Quaid. And you can
get two tickets by being the sixty eighth color at
four ROH two five five eight eleven ten four ROH
two five five eight eleven ten. We'll give you the
winner of that next and talk more about Kamala in
(05:14):
the Borderwall next on news radio eleven in KFAB and
we'll be giving those away during the show. We got
plenty more of those, and that is, of course at
Marcus Majestic Theater on one forty fourth in Maple. There
will be actually two screenings one will be at seven
to fifteen. One will be at seven twenty five. Matt
de who is our winner this time?
Speaker 2 (05:31):
Around this hour?
Speaker 3 (05:32):
Well Mark was our winner there from Omaha. Is it
Marcus Majestic. It is at the Marcus Majestic Theater there
one hundred and forty third and West Maple Road.
Speaker 2 (05:41):
This Thursday.
Speaker 1 (05:42):
No I thought Mark Marcus Majestic was the winner.
Speaker 3 (05:46):
The theater one, Well, the theater will be a winner
because they'll have so many winners within their confines.
Speaker 2 (05:53):
You can't help but feel like a winner. When you're there.
You feel like a winner.
Speaker 1 (05:56):
Oh, by the way, big thanks to Sergeant Peffer's Cafe,
Italian Saddle Creek, Fallen Giant Films, Shapiro Reha Law, Patriotic Productions,
Marcus Theaters, and of course US at news Radio eleven
ten KFAB for putting this bad boy together. Also celebrating
one hundred years of us uh yeah yeah, good good
thoughts also on Ronald Reagan on the news Radio eleven
(06:17):
ten kfa b facebook page. Today the four horsemen of
the Talk Apocalypse, which of course is Gary, Jim Roscott,
Vorhees and myself, and we all had our own memories
of Ronald Reagan. You all remember Reagan? You you would
have been too little to like really know what the
heck was going on.
Speaker 3 (06:37):
Yeah, I was a little too little. I don't really
remember I have. Did he get sick one time? Or
was that George h W No, he got shot one time?
Well that was before you were born, that was before
I was born. I was Yeah, I was kind of
born in the middle of the Reagan years. But was
I One of my earliest memories of politicians enough presidents
is I just have this memory I was pretty little
(06:59):
of seeing this newsblurb about a president who got the
stomach flu and had to like postpone what they were doing,
and I can't remember it. Would that have been Reagan
or was that George hw Because it wasn't Clinton. I
think it was the first Bush president.
Speaker 1 (07:13):
Well that's interesting, yeah, But other than that, Yeah, I
have no memory of I learned.
Speaker 2 (07:17):
Of Reagan in the history books as well. Same. Yeah.
Speaker 1 (07:20):
Sorry, we're a little young, but I still know a
lot about Reagan, like he is mentioned in Back to
the Future Ronald Reagan the actor. Yeah, it's funny. Anyway,
let's get back to the conversation at hand. Here do
the Democrats win anything by saying, Hey, we're going to
(07:41):
do a border wall now. Jd Vance this morning went
on his ex account and he says Kamala Harris is
a fake. If she wants to build the border wall,
she could start right now. Is he wrong? Is he wrong?
It's not like they're waiting to take office to do stuff.
You know what I mean, She's been the vice president
for almost four years. Now what are we talking about here?
(08:02):
And now all the Democrats are in his mentions right
talking about how he was among the people who voted
against the bipartisan border bill. But again, nobody's talking about
all the extra additional billions of dollars that were in
it that were not related at all to the southern
border and were everything to do about giving more money
to Ukraine and other foreign places.
Speaker 2 (08:23):
What do you say?
Speaker 1 (08:24):
What do you say, Matt, Kamala Harris is a fake
if she wants to build a border ball, if she
wants to build the border wall, she could start right now.
What do you think realistic or can you really hold
that against her because she's not technically the person in charge.
Speaker 2 (08:36):
What do you say?
Speaker 1 (08:38):
Uh, this is Jade Vance Now he's being fact checked
and basically said, Kamala hasn't proposed a new border wall project. Rather,
she's backing the bipartisan border bill that would require millions
of unspent funds to continue building a wall at the border.
A lot of people are saying she's actually shifted her
thoughts on this throughout the four years in off because
(09:00):
everybody's just quoting her from twenty nineteen when she was
in those debates and everything's saying that the border wall
was an American, you know, trying to pander to the
far left. Could she start right now she wanted to
prove something like but again, would that also be weird
because that kind of would cut Congress out of the mix,
both ends of Congress.
Speaker 2 (09:18):
This is a tough one. This is a tough one. Yeah,
I don't even know.
Speaker 3 (09:26):
Usually when I don't know what to say, I think
it's something dumb to say. I can't even think of
something dumb to say.
Speaker 1 (09:31):
Well, it's an interesting topic, right because this is a
person that said it was un american build a border
wall just five years ago, saying that it's an American
to like have a physical barrier there, and now something
that involves a border wall, something that she is now
openly supporting in in ads showing off, you know, like
structurals of the wall, saying she is going to be
(09:53):
a hardliner on the border. She's running on stuff as
like she was a border state prosecutor. Like that matters
in some way, shape or form. It is she trying
to change the narrative that she's this real like open border,
everybody come across that kind of person. And if she's
able to do this over the next couple of weeks
ahead of this debate that they're supposed to have on
(10:14):
September tenth, does that neutralize like the biggest thing that
the Democrat or the Republicans had to run against her on.
I mean, that's the play here, right for her. It's
just kind of like what Trump and abortions. Trump's saying
the states should decide abortion. Well, that neutralizes the federal
government or people like the president from ever having a
say in that sort of thing. So it shouldn't be
(10:35):
a conversation as far as this particular race. Is she
doing this to neutralize or is she doing this to
prove that, Hey, you know what, we are making mistakes
in the southern border, and I want to fix them.
That's the question. Is this a campaign ploy or does
she mean this? And if she does mean it, is
there something she can do now while she's still technically
a part of the White House, to prove that she
(10:56):
wants to do something about it. And even if she
does do that, would they would people still believe that
this was not a ruse or a stunt to help
her for the election.
Speaker 3 (11:05):
You know what would help? Crazy idea? Okay, maybe she
took a question from the press.
Speaker 4 (11:12):
That might help short some of this up. Can you imagine?
But you know what, that's a crazy idea. That's too crazy,
that would never work. Let's just keep thinking about it.
You're right, you're right. She hasn't done that yet, has she.
(11:32):
Maybe we should take some crawl steps before we start
running here. Well, it's the one thing at a time.
Got a bunch of thoughts coming in. If you got thoughts,
let's pop those phone lines back up and we'll get
more Reagan tickets away later. But if you have thoughts
on the strategy, not just like do you believe her
or not? The strategy of bringing this up, the strategy
of saying, hey, you know what, she's going to actually
(11:53):
run by talking about helping complete that border wall. All
sorts of different like scenario that could go on in
the back and forth to neutralize potentially one of the
big issues that Republicans feel like they can win the
middle on. That's the thing that we have to figure out,
and that's what I want to talk to you about.
(12:13):
So if you have thoughts on I'm getting some emails now.
Four oh two five five eight eleven ten. Four h
two five five eight eleven ten, and uh, we'd love
to chat with you before I go, though, did have
Mitch and in an email say he shared with me
a Wikipedia article that's called the George hw Bush vomiting incident.
There it is well, while attending a banquet hosted by
(12:36):
Japanese Prime Minister Kichi Maya Zawa on January eighth, nineteen
ninety two, American President George HW. Bush fainted after vomiting
in Miyazawa's lap. What Doctors attributed the incident to a
case of acute gastro enteritis.
Speaker 2 (12:54):
Yeah, I've been there.
Speaker 1 (12:55):
Apparently there's some footage of him up chucking in the
lap of the Japanese Prime minister. Okay, that can't be
good for foreign relations and that was the end of
our friendship and relationship with the Japanese. Anyway, you got
thoughts on the border wall controversy involved Kamala Harris, who
now all of a sudden says she wants to do that.
You can call us at four h two, five five, eight,
(13:16):
eleven ten, News Radio eleven ten KFAB.
Speaker 2 (13:19):
And Larie's song on news Radio eleven ten KFAB.
Speaker 1 (13:24):
Kamala Harris now saying that she would back and she's
showing that like she's going to back congressional support basically
for and sign a bill that would help move things
along the border wall and a bipartisan like kind of
in the shape of that bipartisan bill at Republicans shot.
Speaker 2 (13:45):
Down earlier this year.
Speaker 1 (13:46):
Now, there are some debate as to exactly what all
of that means, but there is no denying that she
is running as somebody who is going to take care
of the immigration as an issue in America in some way,
because she has multiple ads now out in certain states
talking about it. Let's go to the phone lines. Your
thoughts not just about her saying this, but also the
strategy of trying to neutralize this as a topic that
(14:09):
the Republicans want to run this campaign on Sherry is
on the line of four h two five, five, eight
eleven ten. Hello, Sherry, what's going on?
Speaker 4 (14:16):
Hey?
Speaker 5 (14:16):
Imri my call.
Speaker 2 (14:18):
Yeah.
Speaker 5 (14:18):
First of all, Kamala and her running partner are a
match made in heaven. Neither one of them know that
the definition of truth and honesty. She's gonna say whatever
she thinks she needs to say just to get elected,
but mark my words, she will do one hundred percent
the opposite when she gets in office. She's already said
(14:41):
she wants to make all illegal citizens.
Speaker 2 (14:44):
Right.
Speaker 1 (14:45):
Well, I think that's kind of the war within herself
over the last couple of years, right, And that's what
people are pointing at right now, is like this is
just one of several topics she's flip flopped on because
now she's being told, hey, you have to talk to
this section of America if you want to win elections.
So like in twenty nineteen when she was talking about
the wall being an American, she was trying to like
(15:05):
reach the far left, lefty liberal people that you need
to win the nomination the right way, And now they're saying, Heykamalo,
if we're going to win the election, we got to
win the people in the middle. They care about immigration.
We have to step up our game. And now they're
they're changing their tune. It's one hundred percent of play
to try to win the election. You're one hundred percent right, Sherry.
Speaker 5 (15:25):
I agree with you, one hundred percent. Just God help
the country.
Speaker 1 (15:29):
If she wins, well, Jerry, America is going to have
a chance to have it say for sure. Thanks so
much for the call.
Speaker 6 (15:36):
Thank you.
Speaker 1 (15:37):
Mike's on the line at four h two, five, five,
eight to eleven ten. Hey, Mike, what's going on?
Speaker 7 (15:43):
Hello?
Speaker 8 (15:43):
Hey, can you hear me?
Speaker 6 (15:45):
Yes, sir, Okay, I've never called in before, but you know,
the first time I saw Harris was when she was
debating Biden about the bus.
Speaker 4 (15:54):
No.
Speaker 6 (15:54):
Yeah. A month later, she was being questioned if they
were getting along, and she cackled and said, oh, that's
just politics. So I wanted to say the same thing
what Cherry said. But you just can't believe this woman.
She will say and do anything just to get the votes.
And I'm just shocked that the American people they're just
(16:16):
stuck and they just watch CNN, ABC, MSNBC. I watch
both channels, maybe three or four, and they just cover
up everything. They don't express or show all these faults
about Harris.
Speaker 2 (16:31):
Yeah.
Speaker 6 (16:31):
I mean, we all put our pants on together. We
all are suffering, and it's just.
Speaker 9 (16:35):
Mind boggling that we are delighted.
Speaker 6 (16:37):
I want to thank you and God bless America.
Speaker 9 (16:42):
Let's get Trump in there.
Speaker 2 (16:44):
You hey, thanks for calling my call again some time. Yeah.
Speaker 1 (16:47):
So on his thoughts not to be confrontational or to
be what not confident that's the wrong word. Not to
be a devil's advocate here, But I'm just kind of like,
is this really that crazy of a thing for Kamalo
to do or is this just the political parties doing
what the political parties do. The left says the exact
(17:09):
same thing about Trump and abortion. They are saying the
same thing. He is saying he wouldn't sign a federal
abortion ban into law. He says it's a state's rights issue.
We as American citizens have to make the determination. If
we believe him, which I do. Republicans generally, I think
want less federal governmental regulations.
Speaker 2 (17:29):
I believe that.
Speaker 1 (17:31):
However, the left knows they can win on an abortion issue,
so they are manufacturing this as an issue despite Donald
Trump saying it's a state's rights issue. Jd Vance has
even said he would veto Donald Trump would veto a
federal abortion ban bill. Now, these are things they're saying.
These are words, not actions. So there is that thing
(17:51):
left up for interpretation that maybe if a federal abortion
ban did land on the desk of Donald Trump, if
the Republicans won the House, the Senate, the White House,
they were able to get an abortion band bill through
Congress and get it on his desk, the moment of
truth would be would Donald Trump signed that? And the
left is telling you, yes, he would. You can't get
(18:13):
him in the White House if you care about abortion
or women's rights or like whatever you want to talk
about it. The same thing is what we're talking about
now with the immigration in Kamala Harris. Now that she's
running these new ads and talking about how strong she
is going to be on the border and how she's
going to help use funding to build that border wall,
you have to make the determination as an American do
you believe her? Do you think that what she's saying
(18:35):
is right? Is she gonna like all the make the
lefty liberals really poded by saying this, but at the
same time winning over more people in the middle that
care about immigration because they just want to believe her.
They're more apt to believe her than they are to
believe Donald Trump. Only those people can answer for themselves,
and there's a lot of time between now and the
(18:56):
election for us to figure that out. So at the
end of the day, it's up to us to try
to decipher whether or not these candidates are speaking the
truth on these issues we care about, and then you
have to kind of aggregate all of the issues into
one thing and one decision. If you're an independent voter,
do I care more about the things that Kamala Harris
says she'll do versus the saying that Donald Trump says
(19:19):
he'll do. Those are the things we're talking about here.
Rich is on the phone line in four h two, five, five,
eight eleven ten. Rich, thanks so much for calling our
show today. What's on your mind?
Speaker 9 (19:27):
Hey, Emery, thanks for taking my call. I love this
red meat topic for your audience. I heard earlier today
on Clay and Buck that she and the Democrats are
already chartering flights by passing the border with planes full
of illegals, and they're flying the Mento States where they
can reposition the pawns on the chessboard to get as
(19:48):
many quotes as they possibly can. So the old argument,
if you don't like the scenery, change the view. She
doesn't like the border, the black eye she's getting on that,
she'll just go around it. Say she's a star borders
are which she's never been. She's never even been down there. Yeah,
and repopulate the United States with illegals in the right
places to help them press. When what I'd like to
(20:09):
see this for the journalists to do some research on
her educational background.
Speaker 2 (20:15):
You know she went to law school.
Speaker 9 (20:16):
Yeah, little bit of reporting on that that's come out.
She had to get tutoring in law school through a
diversity program because she was flunking out and that tutoring
program was not available to non minority students. She's still
nearly flunked out. I think she actually has a learning disability.
That's why you get the word salads up on stage
(20:38):
that she has. That's why they're not letting her talk
to the press because I think they're acutely aware that
she is not a right person well and probably struggles
to intake material and spit out intellect rich.
Speaker 1 (20:50):
I think a lot of this is questionable and people
are going to like go back and they're going to
rewrite history. However, they'd like the last part you just said.
That's the most concerning thing of all this to me,
Like she will not sit down and take any questions
from anybody, regardless of what the conversation is she she
I mean the fact that that has not happened yet.
And remember we've only had one press conference essentially with
(21:13):
the candidate for the Democrats, and that was Joe Biden
after the NATO summit deal, where they asked him half
of the questions were NATO related. Even though this guy
was on his way out, we knew what was happening.
They didn't ask him any hard questions about it, but
it had been like eight months since he had talked
to the press. I don't know why why they're letting
kareein John Pierre take all of the questions for these
people who are still in front of microphones and cameras
(21:34):
all day, Like they couldn't take a few questions from
the press.
Speaker 9 (21:38):
Yeah, we've had one dumb presidents in the office for
the last three and a half almost four years. We
don't need another one. We need someone who's smart, someone
who can speak without a telepropter, somebody who went to
Penn and got an econ degree. And this doesn't he
free forms it at all his ballots. He's the part
guy finished twell. At ten, Tamala UMBs the box of rocks.
(21:58):
That's all I got, saying.
Speaker 1 (22:00):
Hey, Rich, thanks for the call. Call again, Yeah, this
is good stuff. Uh, Brian, Joe, Mike, stick around. We're
going to get you on the line as well, because
this is an interesting conversation. Again, I'm not saying I'm
not here to say that Kamala Harris, without a doubt,
is going to be building more wall. I'm saying it's
an interesting strategy ploy to now all of a sudden
use immigration as something that they are going to fix
(22:22):
as well, not that they necessarily will, but that they
think that they can maybe win a little bit more
of the middle if they neutralize that topic. We'll take
your calls at four h two five to five eight
eleven ten on News Radio eleven ten. KFAB back to
the phones. Four oh two five five eight eleven ten.
Let's go ahead and start with Brian. Brian, thanks for
calling in today. What's on your mind today?
Speaker 10 (22:42):
Tell you want policy? There's policy supported in the biparties
in Borgerville. It has wall in it, building wall. So
she signs its, not like she can go back on that.
And who's stopping it. Well, that's Donald Trump telling Mike
Johnson not bring it to the floor because he did
would pass and saying that as orders are, the job
(23:05):
was to negotiate with what American countries to send fewer
people here, which is why have to show video from
last here when they want to show crowds of people
and this whole idea, Okay, all we have is emotion.
The policy was like a limbas line that wild those
rely on emotion. Conservatives look to facts and logic.
Speaker 8 (23:27):
Yeah, I guess.
Speaker 10 (23:28):
Why they saw off and say you don't care what
the numbers are. Doesn't feel that way.
Speaker 1 (23:32):
Okay, Yeah, I mean I'm understanding what you're bringing up here, Brian.
There's actual documentation of the actual numbers though, and it's
still like until the Biden executive order, which came, you know,
months after it was called for, there's like a regular enforcement.
There really was a ton of people that were being
you know, we're being caught and then released into the
(23:53):
country based on the rules of the administration. That was
what they were saying, and it was an incredible amount
of people on a day to day basis. Now, I'm
not going to compete with you exactly on what I
guess the bigger question of his call there was is
that Republicans are no better in the way that they
(24:14):
are judging something like this because they just want to
paint things through a certain lens. Well, that's true, He's
right about that. But Democrats do the exact same thing
about everything anyway, and that's also part of trying to
overcome I guess as a voter, you're trying to overcome
those barriers of Okay, so who exactly is telling the truth?
(24:35):
And am I being manipulated by one or both of
these candidates to think a certain way about a certain
topic so I'll vote for them? The answer is likely
yes on multiple levels. You just have to figure out
which one you'd prefer. Right, there is not a single
candidate out here that is telling the one hundred percent
truth on any race at all. Okay, these are work
Joe's on the line of four h two, five, five, eight, eleven, ten,
(24:56):
Hey Joe, what's up?
Speaker 7 (24:58):
Emory? Hey, I just want to say that Kamila Harris
is a liar, and the proof of that is pretty simple.
Just a couple of months ago, she was saying that
Joe Biden was fit as a fiddle and sharp as attack,
and so she's she lies for her benefit. But the
biggest problem is is media. I mean, as soon as
(25:21):
she comes out and says she's going to build border walls,
the media should be hounding her, why are you changing
your position?
Speaker 10 (25:29):
But they won't.
Speaker 7 (25:30):
They don't.
Speaker 1 (25:30):
Well, it's but again, even if they did, Joe, she
hasn't answered a single question from the media for what ever, Like.
Speaker 7 (25:38):
I mean, you could still put it. Yeah, I know,
you're right. She hasn't since what thirty eight days.
Speaker 1 (25:42):
Or something like that, well, since she got the and
since she got handed the baton. Basically she hasn't done
anything with the press.
Speaker 7 (25:49):
Yeah. But when they get their little media groups on
all those TV channels and they sit around their table, Yeah,
shouldn't they be throwing that around? Why is she changing
her position? Why won't she come and talk to us?
Report liar?
Speaker 2 (26:02):
Yeah, well, whatever it's worth.
Speaker 1 (26:04):
Axios, who I find to be a little bit more
on the liberal side than the democratic side. The literal
headline here, and it was the same article that was
shared by j d Vance today says Harris flip flops
on building the border wall.
Speaker 2 (26:16):
So I don't know.
Speaker 1 (26:17):
I think the question is there. Will she actually answer
a question if asked? I have no idea. But like
we always talk about, Joe, there's still going to be
those same people, the same forty percent of America that
is going to support the left no matter what they say,
and everything they say is gospel, and they are going
to follow them to the ends of the yearth no
matter how much they are lying.
Speaker 2 (26:37):
And that's just a fact that you live with.
Speaker 7 (26:39):
Yeah, they won't change, But it's not those people that
need to hear the truth.
Speaker 2 (26:44):
You're right, it's the.
Speaker 7 (26:45):
People in the middle that are undecided and they aren't
getting the facts. That's you know, they're being lied to also.
Speaker 1 (26:54):
For sure, Joe, thanks so much for the call, man,
We appreciate it. Let's go to Mike on the line. Mike,
welcome to the show today. What's on your mind?
Speaker 8 (27:01):
Hey, guys, just kind of rewinding back to a couple
of previous callers. I do not believe Kamala Harris is
a total mental dust. Her policies are extremely alarming. But
I have seen her in the past. I've watched her
speak as Attorney General in California, and I've noticed the
(27:23):
decline that looks very similar to some close family and
friends of mine. I truly believe, and I'm not a
clinical doctor, so I'm not making a diagnosis, but I
truly believe what we are seeing is an alcohol and
an opiate issue that she has, and it kind of
resembles a little bit of what we've seen with Nancy
(27:46):
Pelosi for the last five years. So now, I do
not think she's a mental dunce. I think she's having
a substance abuse problem, for sure, and that is coming
from personal experience.
Speaker 1 (27:58):
Well, Michael, we appreciate your perspective on this today and
thanks for calling in. Thank you, And I'm glad that
he prefaced that by saying he's not diagnosing, just something
heeps observing. I've seen that with some people too, and
I've had those same questions on this. Surely politicians only,
but people that just seem to be running on something else.
Speaker 2 (28:16):
I don't know.
Speaker 1 (28:16):
Maybe that'll come out eventually, but it's quite the grind
halving a campaign like she's campaigning for the whatever that's worth.
You're listening to the news radio elevnton KFAB
I gotta let to talk about By the way that
(00:02):
Mali Vera's stuff I talked about they're not paying me,
but they should. My summer. I basically don't feel it anymore.
Speaker 2 (00:08):
That's wild. Took two days, it's gone.
Speaker 1 (00:11):
And I mean like, like, look, look, how look how
normal my skin looks already. Stuff's miracle. It's a miracle. Anyway,
when I say Wall, what do you think of?
Speaker 2 (00:23):
I think of many things.
Speaker 1 (00:26):
If I told you wall, with the context of politics,
what do you say, Like? What what is your understanding
of that term in American politics? I just say wall,
not the wall, not a wall by this person, not
the wall at the southern border. Literally, if I say wall,
do you know what I'm talking about?
Speaker 3 (00:44):
Yeah, you can give me a couple more context clues
than I'd probably get there.
Speaker 2 (00:48):
Wall.
Speaker 1 (00:49):
Who likes the wall? We're talking about Paul Wall? No,
he's irrelevant. Hey, something we've been told that we are
in the afternoon by a certain person.
Speaker 2 (00:57):
Oh that guy.
Speaker 1 (00:58):
Yeah, I wonder what he's up to today. Anyway, when
I say Wall, who do you associate that with?
Speaker 2 (01:04):
Paul? I just wanted to talk about Paul Wall a
little bit more. Well, I think of tim Walls.
Speaker 1 (01:10):
Nice didn't think of that one. No, I mean, like
I say, Wall, who do you associate that within politics?
Speaker 2 (01:16):
Well, a lot.
Speaker 3 (01:17):
It's been a talking point and well on the Republican
side to build a wall at the sudden border for quite.
Speaker 1 (01:23):
A while, probably like almost eight nine years now, when
Trump started doing his thing, you know, the build a
wall thing. That was one of his first real li
like things. Right, I didn't get that wall done while
he was there. What if I told you Kamala Harris
said that she would spend hundreds of millions of dollars
on a wall at the southern border.
Speaker 3 (01:41):
Would that surprise you? I would be surprised. I'd probably
want to source check that.
Speaker 2 (01:46):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (01:47):
Well, I'm staring at a story that I mean, it's
being reported in multiple places. The unfortunate thing is that
there's no way to every publican that reads this is
going to be upset that this is possibly being neutralized.
But there's an easy way to make it seem like
this isn't that big of a deal, because she basically
(02:08):
is going to be running with the wall in mind
as part of the bipartisan bill that basically was the
same thing that the Republicans helped kill earlier this year
that had a ton of other stuff in it. Remember that,
I remember that bipartisan border bill that they were working
on in Congress in like February I think it was,
And it was the Republicans that ended up like yanking
(02:30):
it out because there was like a ton of foreign
aid money that was kind of smushed in into the bill. Well, basically,
she says, she said that she would sign the bipartisan
Border Security Bill, which that was negotiated in part by
James Langford of Oklahoma or a Republican Democrat, Chris Murphy
of Connecticut. And basically it said hundreds of millions of
(02:53):
dollars of unspent funds need to be used to continue
building that wall on the border. Now again, say about
this when the wall was being talked about when Trump
was in office. Well, the words that we heard from
her were Unamerican. Is there a bigger insult to a
policy than calling it un American? Well, now she's back
(03:14):
on board, and she says, actually, you know, she is
an immigration hardliner. There's a new ad out saying as
an attorney general, a border state prosecutor, she has boosted
the number of border patrol agents. Okay, let's just buy
this for what it is. Let's say that she goes
and she campaigns and says she says, we are going
to secure the southern border. I am going to be
(03:35):
a border hardliner. We're gonna build that wall. What does
that mean? Can the Republicans do what the Democrats are
doing and lie or say that they're lying? I guess
you know how they do? With Trump and abortion. Trump
has said multiple times that he doesn't want a federal
ban on abortion. However, people are like, oh, wait, wait, no,
(03:58):
no he actually does. He's just telling you he doesn't
want it, so you'll elect him. I mean, you could
play that card here too, right. The Republicans could just say, like, no,
she's just saying that he doesn't care about this. She
wants open borders in this country. But now it's becoming
more and more public that she is actually going to
support funding at the southern border wall. I guess my
(04:19):
question to you, the ladies and gentlemen of the KFAB audience,
what say you about Kamala Harris the new hardline immigration
borders are who wants to be president of the United States?
Speaker 2 (04:31):
Yeah?
Speaker 1 (04:31):
Buying this or is this just a ruse to try
to get us to vote for and by us, I
mean the American public. Don't don't look at me. Please
don't put that on me. Two fourteen, I'm going to
open the phone lines before we take calls on the
Kamala thing, and we will. I want to give away
two tickets to this Reagan thing. So what do you say, Matt,
give me a number between forty and seventy. I'll pick
(04:53):
a solid sixty eight. Sixty eight, that's a good one.
Sixty eight, how about sixty eight? The caller gets two
tenickets to our showing at the Marcus Majestic Theater Reagan,
the brand new movie with Dennis Quaid. And you can
get two tickets by being the sixty eighth color at
four ROH two five five eight eleven ten four ROH
two five five eight eleven ten. We'll give you the
winner of that next and talk more about Kamala in
(05:14):
the Borderwall next on news radio eleven in KFAB and
we'll be giving those away during the show. We got
plenty more of those, and that is, of course at
Marcus Majestic Theater on one forty fourth in Maple. There
will be actually two screenings one will be at seven
to fifteen. One will be at seven twenty five. Matt
de who is our winner this time?
Speaker 2 (05:31):
Around this hour?
Speaker 3 (05:32):
Well Mark was our winner there from Omaha. Is it
Marcus Majestic. It is at the Marcus Majestic Theater there
one hundred and forty third and West Maple Road.
Speaker 2 (05:41):
This Thursday.
Speaker 1 (05:42):
No I thought Mark Marcus Majestic was the winner.
Speaker 3 (05:46):
The theater one, Well, the theater will be a winner
because they'll have so many winners within their confines.
Speaker 2 (05:53):
You can't help but feel like a winner. When you're there.
You feel like a winner.
Speaker 1 (05:56):
Oh, by the way, big thanks to Sergeant Peffer's Cafe,
Italian Saddle Creek, Fallen Giant Films, Shapiro Reha Law, Patriotic Productions,
Marcus Theaters, and of course US at news Radio eleven
ten KFAB for putting this bad boy together. Also celebrating
one hundred years of us uh yeah yeah, good good
thoughts also on Ronald Reagan on the news Radio eleven
(06:17):
ten kfa b facebook page. Today the four horsemen of
the Talk Apocalypse, which of course is Gary, Jim Roscott,
Vorhees and myself, and we all had our own memories
of Ronald Reagan. You all remember Reagan? You you would
have been too little to like really know what the
heck was going on.
Speaker 3 (06:37):
Yeah, I was a little too little. I don't really
remember I have. Did he get sick one time? Or
was that George h W No, he got shot one time?
Well that was before you were born, that was before
I was born. I was Yeah, I was kind of
born in the middle of the Reagan years. But was
I One of my earliest memories of politicians enough presidents
is I just have this memory I was pretty little
(06:59):
of seeing this newsblurb about a president who got the
stomach flu and had to like postpone what they were doing,
and I can't remember it. Would that have been Reagan
or was that George hw Because it wasn't Clinton. I
think it was the first Bush president.
Speaker 1 (07:13):
Well that's interesting, yeah, But other than that, Yeah, I
have no memory of I learned.
Speaker 2 (07:17):
Of Reagan in the history books as well. Same. Yeah.
Speaker 1 (07:20):
Sorry, we're a little young, but I still know a
lot about Reagan, like he is mentioned in Back to
the Future Ronald Reagan the actor. Yeah, it's funny. Anyway,
let's get back to the conversation at hand. Here do
the Democrats win anything by saying, Hey, we're going to
(07:41):
do a border wall now. Jd Vance this morning went
on his ex account and he says Kamala Harris is
a fake. If she wants to build the border wall,
she could start right now. Is he wrong? Is he wrong?
It's not like they're waiting to take office to do stuff.
You know what I mean, She's been the vice president
for almost four years. Now what are we talking about here?
(08:02):
And now all the Democrats are in his mentions right
talking about how he was among the people who voted
against the bipartisan border bill. But again, nobody's talking about
all the extra additional billions of dollars that were in
it that were not related at all to the southern
border and were everything to do about giving more money
to Ukraine and other foreign places.
Speaker 2 (08:23):
What do you say?
Speaker 1 (08:24):
What do you say, Matt, Kamala Harris is a fake
if she wants to build a border ball, if she
wants to build the border wall, she could start right now.
What do you think realistic or can you really hold
that against her because she's not technically the person in charge.
Speaker 2 (08:36):
What do you say?
Speaker 1 (08:38):
Uh, this is Jade Vance Now he's being fact checked
and basically said, Kamala hasn't proposed a new border wall project. Rather,
she's backing the bipartisan border bill that would require millions
of unspent funds to continue building a wall at the border.
A lot of people are saying she's actually shifted her
thoughts on this throughout the four years in off because
(09:00):
everybody's just quoting her from twenty nineteen when she was
in those debates and everything's saying that the border wall
was an American, you know, trying to pander to the
far left. Could she start right now she wanted to
prove something like but again, would that also be weird
because that kind of would cut Congress out of the mix,
both ends of Congress.
Speaker 2 (09:18):
This is a tough one. This is a tough one. Yeah,
I don't even know.
Speaker 3 (09:26):
Usually when I don't know what to say, I think
it's something dumb to say. I can't even think of
something dumb to say.
Speaker 1 (09:31):
Well, it's an interesting topic, right because this is a
person that said it was un american build a border
wall just five years ago, saying that it's an American
to like have a physical barrier there, and now something
that involves a border wall, something that she is now
openly supporting in in ads showing off, you know, like
structurals of the wall, saying she is going to be
(09:53):
a hardliner on the border. She's running on stuff as
like she was a border state prosecutor. Like that matters
in some way, shape or form. It is she trying
to change the narrative that she's this real like open border,
everybody come across that kind of person. And if she's
able to do this over the next couple of weeks
ahead of this debate that they're supposed to have on
(10:14):
September tenth, does that neutralize like the biggest thing that
the Democrat or the Republicans had to run against her on.
I mean, that's the play here, right for her. It's
just kind of like what Trump and abortions. Trump's saying
the states should decide abortion. Well, that neutralizes the federal
government or people like the president from ever having a
say in that sort of thing. So it shouldn't be
(10:35):
a conversation as far as this particular race. Is she
doing this to neutralize or is she doing this to
prove that, Hey, you know what, we are making mistakes
in the southern border, and I want to fix them.
That's the question. Is this a campaign ploy or does
she mean this? And if she does mean it, is
there something she can do now while she's still technically
a part of the White House, to prove that she
(10:56):
wants to do something about it. And even if she
does do that, would they would people still believe that
this was not a ruse or a stunt to help
her for the election.
Speaker 3 (11:05):
You know what would help? Crazy idea? Okay, maybe she
took a question from the press.
Speaker 4 (11:12):
That might help short some of this up. Can you imagine?
But you know what, that's a crazy idea. That's too crazy,
that would never work. Let's just keep thinking about it.
You're right, you're right. She hasn't done that yet, has she.
(11:32):
Maybe we should take some crawl steps before we start
running here. Well, it's the one thing at a time.
Got a bunch of thoughts coming in. If you got thoughts,
let's pop those phone lines back up and we'll get
more Reagan tickets away later. But if you have thoughts
on the strategy, not just like do you believe her
or not? The strategy of bringing this up, the strategy
of saying, hey, you know what, she's going to actually
(11:53):
run by talking about helping complete that border wall. All
sorts of different like scenario that could go on in
the back and forth to neutralize potentially one of the
big issues that Republicans feel like they can win the
middle on. That's the thing that we have to figure out,
and that's what I want to talk to you about.
(12:13):
So if you have thoughts on I'm getting some emails now.
Four oh two five five eight eleven ten. Four h
two five five eight eleven ten, and uh, we'd love
to chat with you before I go, though, did have
Mitch and in an email say he shared with me
a Wikipedia article that's called the George hw Bush vomiting incident.
There it is well, while attending a banquet hosted by
(12:36):
Japanese Prime Minister Kichi Maya Zawa on January eighth, nineteen
ninety two, American President George HW. Bush fainted after vomiting
in Miyazawa's lap. What Doctors attributed the incident to a
case of acute gastro enteritis.
Speaker 2 (12:54):
Yeah, I've been there.
Speaker 1 (12:55):
Apparently there's some footage of him up chucking in the
lap of the Japanese Prime minister. Okay, that can't be
good for foreign relations and that was the end of
our friendship and relationship with the Japanese. Anyway, you got
thoughts on the border wall controversy involved Kamala Harris, who
now all of a sudden says she wants to do that.
You can call us at four h two, five five, eight,
(13:16):
eleven ten, News Radio eleven ten KFAB.
Speaker 2 (13:19):
And Larie's song on news Radio eleven ten KFAB.
Speaker 1 (13:24):
Kamala Harris now saying that she would back and she's
showing that like she's going to back congressional support basically
for and sign a bill that would help move things
along the border wall and a bipartisan like kind of
in the shape of that bipartisan bill at Republicans shot.
Speaker 2 (13:45):
Down earlier this year.
Speaker 1 (13:46):
Now, there are some debate as to exactly what all
of that means, but there is no denying that she
is running as somebody who is going to take care
of the immigration as an issue in America in some way,
because she has multiple ads now out in certain states
talking about it. Let's go to the phone lines. Your
thoughts not just about her saying this, but also the
strategy of trying to neutralize this as a topic that
(14:09):
the Republicans want to run this campaign on Sherry is
on the line of four h two five, five, eight
eleven ten. Hello, Sherry, what's going on?
Speaker 4 (14:16):
Hey?
Speaker 5 (14:16):
Imri my call.
Speaker 2 (14:18):
Yeah.
Speaker 5 (14:18):
First of all, Kamala and her running partner are a
match made in heaven. Neither one of them know that
the definition of truth and honesty. She's gonna say whatever
she thinks she needs to say just to get elected,
but mark my words, she will do one hundred percent
the opposite when she gets in office. She's already said
(14:41):
she wants to make all illegal citizens.
Speaker 2 (14:44):
Right.
Speaker 1 (14:45):
Well, I think that's kind of the war within herself
over the last couple of years, right, And that's what
people are pointing at right now, is like this is
just one of several topics she's flip flopped on because
now she's being told, hey, you have to talk to
this section of America if you want to win elections.
So like in twenty nineteen when she was talking about
the wall being an American, she was trying to like
(15:05):
reach the far left, lefty liberal people that you need
to win the nomination the right way, And now they're saying, Heykamalo,
if we're going to win the election, we got to
win the people in the middle. They care about immigration.
We have to step up our game. And now they're
they're changing their tune. It's one hundred percent of play
to try to win the election. You're one hundred percent right, Sherry.
Speaker 5 (15:25):
I agree with you, one hundred percent. Just God help
the country.
Speaker 1 (15:29):
If she wins, well, Jerry, America is going to have
a chance to have it say for sure. Thanks so
much for the call.
Speaker 6 (15:36):
Thank you.
Speaker 1 (15:37):
Mike's on the line at four h two, five, five,
eight to eleven ten. Hey, Mike, what's going on?
Speaker 7 (15:43):
Hello?
Speaker 8 (15:43):
Hey, can you hear me?
Speaker 6 (15:45):
Yes, sir, Okay, I've never called in before, but you know,
the first time I saw Harris was when she was
debating Biden about the bus.
Speaker 4 (15:54):
No.
Speaker 6 (15:54):
Yeah. A month later, she was being questioned if they
were getting along, and she cackled and said, oh, that's
just politics. So I wanted to say the same thing
what Cherry said. But you just can't believe this woman.
She will say and do anything just to get the votes.
And I'm just shocked that the American people they're just
(16:16):
stuck and they just watch CNN, ABC, MSNBC. I watch
both channels, maybe three or four, and they just cover
up everything. They don't express or show all these faults
about Harris.
Speaker 2 (16:31):
Yeah.
Speaker 6 (16:31):
I mean, we all put our pants on together. We
all are suffering, and it's just.
Speaker 9 (16:35):
Mind boggling that we are delighted.
Speaker 6 (16:37):
I want to thank you and God bless America.
Speaker 9 (16:42):
Let's get Trump in there.
Speaker 2 (16:44):
You hey, thanks for calling my call again some time. Yeah.
Speaker 1 (16:47):
So on his thoughts not to be confrontational or to
be what not confident that's the wrong word. Not to
be a devil's advocate here, But I'm just kind of like,
is this really that crazy of a thing for Kamalo
to do or is this just the political parties doing
what the political parties do. The left says the exact
(17:09):
same thing about Trump and abortion. They are saying the
same thing. He is saying he wouldn't sign a federal
abortion ban into law. He says it's a state's rights issue.
We as American citizens have to make the determination. If
we believe him, which I do. Republicans generally, I think
want less federal governmental regulations.
Speaker 2 (17:29):
I believe that.
Speaker 1 (17:31):
However, the left knows they can win on an abortion issue,
so they are manufacturing this as an issue despite Donald
Trump saying it's a state's rights issue. Jd Vance has
even said he would veto Donald Trump would veto a
federal abortion ban bill. Now, these are things they're saying.
These are words, not actions. So there is that thing
(17:51):
left up for interpretation that maybe if a federal abortion
ban did land on the desk of Donald Trump, if
the Republicans won the House, the Senate, the White House,
they were able to get an abortion band bill through
Congress and get it on his desk, the moment of
truth would be would Donald Trump signed that? And the
left is telling you, yes, he would. You can't get
(18:13):
him in the White House if you care about abortion
or women's rights or like whatever you want to talk
about it. The same thing is what we're talking about
now with the immigration in Kamala Harris. Now that she's
running these new ads and talking about how strong she
is going to be on the border and how she's
going to help use funding to build that border wall,
you have to make the determination as an American do
you believe her? Do you think that what she's saying
(18:35):
is right? Is she gonna like all the make the
lefty liberals really poded by saying this, but at the
same time winning over more people in the middle that
care about immigration because they just want to believe her.
They're more apt to believe her than they are to
believe Donald Trump. Only those people can answer for themselves,
and there's a lot of time between now and the
(18:56):
election for us to figure that out. So at the
end of the day, it's up to us to try
to decipher whether or not these candidates are speaking the
truth on these issues we care about, and then you
have to kind of aggregate all of the issues into
one thing and one decision. If you're an independent voter,
do I care more about the things that Kamala Harris
says she'll do versus the saying that Donald Trump says
(19:19):
he'll do. Those are the things we're talking about here.
Rich is on the phone line in four h two, five, five,
eight eleven ten. Rich, thanks so much for calling our
show today. What's on your mind?
Speaker 9 (19:27):
Hey, Emery, thanks for taking my call. I love this
red meat topic for your audience. I heard earlier today
on Clay and Buck that she and the Democrats are
already chartering flights by passing the border with planes full
of illegals, and they're flying the Mento States where they
can reposition the pawns on the chessboard to get as
(19:48):
many quotes as they possibly can. So the old argument,
if you don't like the scenery, change the view. She
doesn't like the border, the black eye she's getting on that,
she'll just go around it. Say she's a star borders
are which she's never been. She's never even been down there. Yeah,
and repopulate the United States with illegals in the right
places to help them press. When what I'd like to
(20:09):
see this for the journalists to do some research on
her educational background.
Speaker 2 (20:15):
You know she went to law school.
Speaker 9 (20:16):
Yeah, little bit of reporting on that that's come out.
She had to get tutoring in law school through a
diversity program because she was flunking out and that tutoring
program was not available to non minority students. She's still
nearly flunked out. I think she actually has a learning disability.
That's why you get the word salads up on stage
(20:38):
that she has. That's why they're not letting her talk
to the press because I think they're acutely aware that
she is not a right person well and probably struggles
to intake material and spit out intellect rich.
Speaker 1 (20:50):
I think a lot of this is questionable and people
are going to like go back and they're going to
rewrite history. However, they'd like the last part you just said.
That's the most concerning thing of all this to me,
Like she will not sit down and take any questions
from anybody, regardless of what the conversation is she she
I mean the fact that that has not happened yet.
And remember we've only had one press conference essentially with
(21:13):
the candidate for the Democrats, and that was Joe Biden
after the NATO summit deal, where they asked him half
of the questions were NATO related. Even though this guy
was on his way out, we knew what was happening.
They didn't ask him any hard questions about it, but
it had been like eight months since he had talked
to the press. I don't know why why they're letting
kareein John Pierre take all of the questions for these
people who are still in front of microphones and cameras
(21:34):
all day, Like they couldn't take a few questions from
the press.
Speaker 9 (21:38):
Yeah, we've had one dumb presidents in the office for
the last three and a half almost four years. We
don't need another one. We need someone who's smart, someone
who can speak without a telepropter, somebody who went to
Penn and got an econ degree. And this doesn't he
free forms it at all his ballots. He's the part
guy finished twell. At ten, Tamala UMBs the box of rocks.
(21:58):
That's all I got, saying.
Speaker 1 (22:00):
Hey, Rich, thanks for the call. Call again, Yeah, this
is good stuff. Uh, Brian, Joe, Mike, stick around. We're
going to get you on the line as well, because
this is an interesting conversation. Again, I'm not saying I'm
not here to say that Kamala Harris, without a doubt,
is going to be building more wall. I'm saying it's
an interesting strategy ploy to now all of a sudden
use immigration as something that they are going to fix
(22:22):
as well, not that they necessarily will, but that they
think that they can maybe win a little bit more
of the middle if they neutralize that topic. We'll take
your calls at four h two five to five eight
eleven ten on News Radio eleven ten. KFAB back to
the phones. Four oh two five five eight eleven ten.
Let's go ahead and start with Brian. Brian, thanks for
calling in today. What's on your mind today?
Speaker 10 (22:42):
Tell you want policy? There's policy supported in the biparties
in Borgerville. It has wall in it, building wall. So
she signs its, not like she can go back on that.
And who's stopping it. Well, that's Donald Trump telling Mike
Johnson not bring it to the floor because he did
would pass and saying that as orders are, the job
(23:05):
was to negotiate with what American countries to send fewer
people here, which is why have to show video from
last here when they want to show crowds of people
and this whole idea, Okay, all we have is emotion.
The policy was like a limbas line that wild those
rely on emotion. Conservatives look to facts and logic.
Speaker 8 (23:27):
Yeah, I guess.
Speaker 10 (23:28):
Why they saw off and say you don't care what
the numbers are. Doesn't feel that way.
Speaker 1 (23:32):
Okay, Yeah, I mean I'm understanding what you're bringing up here, Brian.
There's actual documentation of the actual numbers though, and it's
still like until the Biden executive order, which came, you know,
months after it was called for, there's like a regular enforcement.
There really was a ton of people that were being
you know, we're being caught and then released into the
(23:53):
country based on the rules of the administration. That was
what they were saying, and it was an incredible amount
of people on a day to day basis. Now, I'm
not going to compete with you exactly on what I
guess the bigger question of his call there was is
that Republicans are no better in the way that they
(24:14):
are judging something like this because they just want to
paint things through a certain lens. Well, that's true, He's
right about that. But Democrats do the exact same thing
about everything anyway, and that's also part of trying to
overcome I guess as a voter, you're trying to overcome
those barriers of Okay, so who exactly is telling the truth?
(24:35):
And am I being manipulated by one or both of
these candidates to think a certain way about a certain
topic so I'll vote for them? The answer is likely
yes on multiple levels. You just have to figure out
which one you'd prefer. Right, there is not a single
candidate out here that is telling the one hundred percent
truth on any race at all. Okay, these are work
Joe's on the line of four h two, five, five, eight, eleven, ten,
(24:56):
Hey Joe, what's up?
Speaker 7 (24:58):
Emory? Hey, I just want to say that Kamila Harris
is a liar, and the proof of that is pretty simple.
Just a couple of months ago, she was saying that
Joe Biden was fit as a fiddle and sharp as attack,
and so she's she lies for her benefit. But the
biggest problem is is media. I mean, as soon as
(25:21):
she comes out and says she's going to build border walls,
the media should be hounding her, why are you changing
your position?
Speaker 10 (25:29):
But they won't.
Speaker 7 (25:30):
They don't.
Speaker 1 (25:30):
Well, it's but again, even if they did, Joe, she
hasn't answered a single question from the media for what ever, Like.
Speaker 7 (25:38):
I mean, you could still put it. Yeah, I know,
you're right. She hasn't since what thirty eight days.
Speaker 1 (25:42):
Or something like that, well, since she got the and
since she got handed the baton. Basically she hasn't done
anything with the press.
Speaker 7 (25:49):
Yeah. But when they get their little media groups on
all those TV channels and they sit around their table, Yeah,
shouldn't they be throwing that around? Why is she changing
her position? Why won't she come and talk to us?
Report liar?
Speaker 2 (26:02):
Yeah, well, whatever it's worth.
Speaker 1 (26:04):
Axios, who I find to be a little bit more
on the liberal side than the democratic side. The literal
headline here, and it was the same article that was
shared by j d Vance today says Harris flip flops
on building the border wall.
Speaker 2 (26:16):
So I don't know.
Speaker 1 (26:17):
I think the question is there. Will she actually answer
a question if asked? I have no idea. But like
we always talk about, Joe, there's still going to be
those same people, the same forty percent of America that
is going to support the left no matter what they say,
and everything they say is gospel, and they are going
to follow them to the ends of the yearth no
matter how much they are lying.
Speaker 2 (26:37):
And that's just a fact that you live with.
Speaker 7 (26:39):
Yeah, they won't change, But it's not those people that
need to hear the truth.
Speaker 2 (26:44):
You're right, it's the.
Speaker 7 (26:45):
People in the middle that are undecided and they aren't
getting the facts. That's you know, they're being lied to also.
Speaker 1 (26:54):
For sure, Joe, thanks so much for the call, man,
We appreciate it. Let's go to Mike on the line. Mike,
welcome to the show today. What's on your mind?
Speaker 8 (27:01):
Hey, guys, just kind of rewinding back to a couple
of previous callers. I do not believe Kamala Harris is
a total mental dust. Her policies are extremely alarming. But
I have seen her in the past. I've watched her
speak as Attorney General in California, and I've noticed the
(27:23):
decline that looks very similar to some close family and
friends of mine. I truly believe, and I'm not a
clinical doctor, so I'm not making a diagnosis, but I
truly believe what we are seeing is an alcohol and
an opiate issue that she has, and it kind of
resembles a little bit of what we've seen with Nancy
(27:46):
Pelosi for the last five years. So now, I do
not think she's a mental dunce. I think she's having
a substance abuse problem, for sure, and that is coming
from personal experience.
Speaker 1 (27:58):
Well, Michael, we appreciate your perspective on this today and
thanks for calling in. Thank you, And I'm glad that
he prefaced that by saying he's not diagnosing, just something
heeps observing. I've seen that with some people too, and
I've had those same questions on this. Surely politicians only,
but people that just seem to be running on something else.
Speaker 2 (28:16):
I don't know.
Speaker 1 (28:16):
Maybe that'll come out eventually, but it's quite the grind
halving a campaign like she's campaigning for the whatever that's worth.
You're listening to the news radio elevnton KFAB
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.