Will Democrats Ever Find Their Own Donald Trump?

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Does it count that Greensboro, North Carolina and Greenville, South
Carolina went back to back. It's not quite exactly what
the phenomenon was, but Greensboro and Greenville. Yeah, now Greensboro
in Greenville. What's the difference since a borough in a
vill one Carolina or the other Carolina. I guess, I
don't know. I'm gonna count that in our in our
the phenomenon, the double phenomenon that's happening. Yeah, what's what's

(00:23):
with the doubles? Huh Yeah, I'm going to count that
because it helps my argument. That's what we do around here,
don't we. We Uh, we make an argument and we
change the rules of whatever we're talking about to Uh.
I think that's how Yeah that that I mean, that
is how you do it. Sure, yeah, it's politics one
on one right, Yeah. Yeah. Anyway, there's a awful lot

(00:44):
of things going on in my brain as I wrap
up my week. I'm gone tomorrow, so I'm thinking like,
I'm kind of into this Friday. Uh, I'm into this
Friday state of mind. So I I do feel like
at a couple of moments last night and Biden's farewell speech,

(01:06):
I just kind of found myself just thinking, m yeah,
I knew he was going to say that. I knew
he was going to state that. You know, you've got
to give it a few years for you to really
understand what you know is happening, what isn't happening. But
then the one thing that kind of stuck is the
oligarchy of these elite people that are getting into politics

(01:26):
and buying their way to the top.

Speaker 2 (01:28):
Olga Garky No, yeah, I see. It's a dictatorship and
Olga's at the top. Bill knows what I'm talking about.

Speaker 1 (01:36):
Oh, why do you have to Outbill like that? Did
that out? Bill? You just did? We're live on the radio,
Earth to Earth, Hello, McFly anybody home?

Speaker 2 (01:46):
Sorry?

Speaker 1 (01:46):
Bill? Nobody even knows what you're talking about. It, Oh exactly,
and me.

Speaker 2 (01:50):
It's a very specific inside joke based on a guy
who's been calling me for months. And I bet he's
laughing in his truck right now, shouts out the Bill.

Speaker 1 (01:58):
Shout out Bill, I don't have the phones open, so
don't try to call us. Come on, all right, the
uh huh oh boy I have I don't know. There's
if you were to if you were to run, what

(02:21):
rule involving millionaires? Would you create to protect our government
from big money? Like, let's let's brainstorm this right now,
Let's say Joe Biden's right, maybe maybe Elon Muskin, the
vakra Amaswamian types like that, million millionaire type, people who
are out there and about making big money, and then

(02:43):
after they make their millions and trillions or whatever, they
decide I want to be in charge of this thing
kind of following the Donald Trump plan, is there a
way we can protect ourselves from the money being able
to govern us for the rest of forever?

Speaker 2 (02:57):
Why didn't this happen before? Like where all the rich people?
Why didn't Rockefeller run for something back in the day.
I'm sure he did, don't they maybe? Or well they
just didn't want the hassle?

Speaker 1 (03:07):
Well, yeah, was it easier just to fund the right
person and say, hey, here is a you know, a
fifteen million dollars. I'll keep you elected. We'll use this
money to you know, fund your election process. Make sure
everybody knows you're doing a really good job. You just
got to do everything I say.

Speaker 2 (03:23):
From my industry and with what's that thing that let's
corporations act as people when they donate the thing I
mean with that that got past a couple decades ago
or whenever it was like, yeah, why are billionaires getting
in politics now when they can just kind of do
the whole puppet master thing that they've been doing for
the longest time.

Speaker 1 (03:43):
Yeah, I don't know. It's a good question.

Speaker 2 (03:45):
Rybe the puppet master thing isn't working as well as
it used to.

Speaker 1 (03:49):
Or maybe we just know too much now. M uh huh.

Speaker 2 (03:52):
That's a common problem a lot of people who think, oh,
things are so crazy now it's like, no, you just
know too much.

Speaker 1 (03:56):
We just know more. Right. Social media in like the
curtain has been pulled back considerably because we just have
more media, We have more people that are reporting on
this stuff and we're learning about this. Yeah. Yeah.

Speaker 2 (04:09):
People who are like, there's so much more hate in
the world than there used to be, it's like, well,
technically that's true, but the only difference is your uncle
didn't used to have a Twitter account. That's the difference.

Speaker 1 (04:17):
Yeah, and there's there was a lot of hate in
the world. I mean, right, they just kept it to themselves.
They sat in their couch and they angrily muttered it
instead of tweeting it. You go back. There's a lot
of violent things that have happened historically that we just
you know, we read about after the fact. This is
now now. It's like you just hate actively on social media.

Speaker 2 (04:36):
Right, you kind of get it out, you get it
out of your system so you don't do something crazy, although.

Speaker 1 (04:41):
There are people who still do crazy stuff. Yeah, unfortunately. Yeah,
I don't know. It's a good question. Why why didn't
this keep happening? I get did Donald Trump become the
guy who kind of broke through that glass ceiling for businessmen?
Is that why they're kind of appending themselves to him now? Again,
Elon Musk not an American birst citizen. He can't be

(05:04):
president of the United States unless they change the constitution
to allow him to be. But I mean, he's still
kind of put himself in position to be fundamentally influential
during this administration, has he not? Has there been a
more influential foreign man, like singular foreign man on American government?

(05:25):
I mean, besides, you know, King George and you know
the revolution which kickstarted our own government being born all together.
But since then, has there been a foreign guy from
a different country have more influence than Elon Musk? Seems
to have right now on our government. I'm trying to think.
I don't think so. Like you could look at other
world leaders and say they were influential and what ended

(05:48):
up happening like a Churchill type and like how you
know important they were in playing ball during important times
in American history. Right, But Elon's kind of a new guy.
Ooh with these guys buying all these social media platforms,
Like what if Elon buys TikTok, So Elon not only
has X, but he has TikTok potentially. Well, I mean

(06:10):
is that healthy? Is it healthy? For the same like
the same thing with Zuckerberg having Facebook and Meta I
mean Facebook is in meta Facebook and Instagram and all
the other stuff that he has. Like is it healthy
to just have the same six giant companies owning and
running all of these other little companies in America?

Speaker 2 (06:27):
Well, I mean, you know what I've said before, I
certainly don't think so. I'd like to keep everything free.
I'd like to keep the press free. I think that
we're all a part of the press now with how
that works, And that's something that Elon says a lot,
that you are the news now. He wants to embolden
his Twitter users that you're the news, we can't trust
the news and all this stuff. You know, I don't know,
I mean, but.

Speaker 1 (06:47):
Yeah, that's liberating. At the same time, though, is that
are we setting ourselves up to disenfranchise ourselves with that liberty.
I'm not saying that it's not good to have the
ability to you know, see things, report things, watch things,
read things, and have that freedom. I mean, it's in
the First Amendment. The freedom of the press exists. But

(07:08):
I just I wonder if it's good that, you know,
the same like five people have all that power on
what is or isn't operational. Yeah, you see, Zuckerberg, he's
kind of adopting the X format of community notes all
of a sudden instead of trying to censor things. That's good.
I think that's a positive move. How much of that
is fundamentally I think this is better for America versus

(07:31):
I need to make sure that people don't leave my
platform because they don't like the way that I operate it.
How much of that is a business move versus a
principal move. Is there a way that we can protect
our society from the same five or six people from
having all this influence on us. I mean, it's it's
easy for us to say we're sitting here, we're paid
by a corporation. I mean, I'd be one that has

(07:52):
the type of governmental power as you know some other
people do. But I don't know. There's something about the
oligarchy comment that was made by Biden last night that
actually got me thinking about it. And we talked a
couple hours ago, and I had I took some calls,
and I don't disagree that. You know, well, maybe the
lefts just met. It's not there billionaires that are in charge.
That's fair, but I don't think that it still isn't

(08:15):
worth us kind of making sure, like thinking to ourselves,
just like the veak Ramaswami can make billions of dollars
as a young entrepreneur and then at thirty eight years old,
just decide, oh, he wants to he wants to be
president of the United States, and he's just got all
the means to be able to achieve that even without
having any governmental experience. Oh okay, is that just like
what politics is going to become now? It certainly could,

(08:37):
because it's just like if you're bored and you want
to be in charge of something, or you got a
lot of money and you think that you want to govern,
you can just buy your way to the like to
the finish line. I don't think that burgh Bergham too.
Doug Bergham did, did giant rich guy? Yeah?

Speaker 2 (08:54):
Well yeah, I mean there's a lot of points to
be to be made with the examples you're given. I
think the one thing to me that I go back
to is that I just I mean, I don't know
the thing is is okay? So Donald Trump broke the
mold in a lot of ways, definitely, But is his
mold something someone else can follow? He feels like kind

(09:15):
of a is he a unique right unique enough that
like there might be people who try to be like him,
but they'll never be him there, You're right, they're not
gonna be able to fill that same void that he
has that he's created. But he certainly has changed the game,
There's no doubt about that. You don't think that people
on the left are not searching for their own Donald Trump.
They absolutely are. They gotta be.

Speaker 1 (09:34):
I got one. I'll tell you next. On He's Radio
eleven ten.

Speaker 3 (09:36):
Kfab Emery's songer What's going on here? On News Radio
eleven ten kfab they keep doubling up and I don't
like it. Now, how would you define Donald Trump? Not
like him as a guy, but like what's his profile,
like if he's got the LinkedIn of like describing not
where he's worked, but like what his background is.

Speaker 1 (09:59):
What would you put in there? Like what would be
the way you would describe him to people of like
the things that he had done before or what you know,
like just just how do you describe who he is? Well?

Speaker 2 (10:11):
I would say that if okay, if you're a Democrat
and you're looking for that same profile profile that you
get that can give you the same sort of political
wins that that that you are jealous of, it would
be find somebody who can just basically plow through what
normally I mean, there's a lot of things.

Speaker 1 (10:30):
What would how would that what would be what would
be the like what you have one word to describe
Donald Trump as? Like his like his job? Right? Like
why is he famous? What would that be? Or or
why what? Why? Why is he powerful? Like I think
the word I would think is like celebrity. It's such

(10:50):
a catch all term, but it's just like he was
just kind of a celebrity.

Speaker 2 (10:54):
He was kind of you know what, he was kind
of an influencer before social media. Yeah, He's like because
before before The Apprentice, he was still very commonly in
the public eye, whether it was interviews, business deals. But
he was always kind of floating around.

Speaker 1 (11:07):
Everyone knew who he was movies, right, Like it was
like it was like a thing to have him show
up in your movie. Right, But he was also kind
of just this fairly lovable business guy, right, he just
was a he was a he was a celebrity.

Speaker 2 (11:23):
Almost like a movie caricature of an ultra successful businessman
who also happens to be real.

Speaker 1 (11:29):
Yeah, and liked the cameras, like the attention.

Speaker 2 (11:32):
So who's the version on the left of that, because
I feel like that's the perfect version of someone for
a Republican Dwayne the Rock Johnson for the Democrats yep, hmm. Now,
I don't know if Dwayne would ever like decide to
put the movies behind and become a political figure.

Speaker 1 (11:50):
But remember we talked about this. He says, both sides
have been approaching him and his people because of the
influence he has. Now, I don't know if that means
they want him to run for president, but for him
to be involved in politics at all. Remember, because Donald
Trump and the left and Kamala Harris had a bevy
of celebrities on both sides that jumped on. Right on

(12:12):
Trump's side, Joe Rogan and Dana White from the UFC,
and you had Hulk Hogan. I mean, there's so many
celebrities that jumped on the Trump train. And then of
course he had all of these like music and movie
stars from Hollywood that were jumping on with Kamala Harris.
I'm just thinking to myself, if Dwayne the Rock Johnson

(12:34):
says I'm willing to ruin my movie career to be
a politician, which side would he pick? And I can't
imagine he'd pick anything other than the Democrats at this point.
He just loves to be loved by that our audience,
like in the younger kind of crowd. Now, I could
be wrong. Dwayne also is getting ready to wrestle in

(12:57):
the WWE for the next few months. You know, he
showed up on Raw last week and he's certainly setting
something up to be at WrestleMania this year. I'm gonna
go ahead and guess he's not really thinking about politics
at this point, but he kind of profiles the right way. Megastar,
super notable. There isn't anybody in the world that doesn't

(13:17):
know who he is. He's got money, he's got power,
his highest paid guy in Hollywood. Generally well liked by
most people, even though there are some things that you
could ask, you know, you good it. Everybody's got skeletons
in the closet. See.

Speaker 2 (13:31):
But that's the thing, though, You're I feel like I
feel like a lot of the things you said there
already went off the track to find their own Donald Trump.
Because Donald Trump, before he ran for office, was liked
by plenty of people, but not generally. I would say
that he generally in the public sphere was dislike Yeah, generally, yeah.

Speaker 1 (13:52):
I guess.

Speaker 2 (13:53):
And I think that he kind of ran as that
sort of like anti hero to the press, hero to
the people kind of archetype. You know of a politician
that's very unique, and how how do you copy that?

Speaker 1 (14:07):
How do you copy that? Well, that's what I'm saying.
It is lightning in a bottle. But if you can
find somebody that kind of has that same portfolio of background,
even if it's not generally in government, but you're just famous,
you're notable, and you have the ability to connect to
people because you've been in front of the cameras. That
will give you an advantage. And I'm wondering if the

(14:27):
Democrats just feel like we can either let the Republicans
have all their billionaires and then run is like the
middle class answer to that, which I don't think works
when you have all of Hollywood backing you, or you
find a way to fight fire with fire and you
find celebrities to be your figurehead that have an elevated
presence beyond just having good law experience or government experience.

(14:51):
I don't know how long this can last, but kind
of feels like like, is mister Beast like one day
going to like wake up and decide, when he's forty
five years old, I want to be a president of
the United States. It's not insane to think about, is it?

Speaker 3 (15:04):
Not?

Speaker 1 (15:04):
At all? I participate something like that happening eventually. I mean,
you think whether or not the American public falls for it.
Who knows.

Speaker 2 (15:11):
If it's not him, it'll be somebody else who Right
now is mister Beast for people who don't know, is
he's a larger than life? Social media influencer who is
exists on all the different social media platforms, and he's.

Speaker 1 (15:23):
Got he's got his own show, The Beast games are
on Prime Video now.

Speaker 2 (15:27):
He's got his own food, he's got his own show.
He's a one man store of all kinds of different
media and merch and merchandise.

Speaker 1 (15:36):
And he's kind of like the final boss of influencers.
And he's like, what twenty six years old, and he's
certainly perfected the game. And I'm sure everyone else looking
at him, Okay, that's how you do it kind of thing,
you know. I don't know, but he got to wait
a decade before he can even run for presidents, so
you know, for whatever that's worth, all right, four thirty,
We'll got more coming up on news Radio eleven ten
Kfab and Marie Sunger. The strong media presidents and controversial

(16:00):
or polarizing public image, that's kind of what that like,
that was the bullet points that they use.

Speaker 2 (16:06):
I understand that, but I want to add a stipulation
based on my personal opinion. I do not think that
the democratic Donald Trump needs to or even should have
a background in business. I think that's a unique thing
to the right side of the aisle that fits perfectly
with their sort of like mold breaker on their side
of the aisle. I actually think it's the opposite for
the left. I think they need somebody either from the

(16:27):
nonprofit realm or maybe even from the clergy or something
completely different. I really think that this is an apples
and orangest thing that we need to find the perfect.

Speaker 1 (16:36):
So you don't think, you don't think it needs to
be like him. It really just needs to be somebody
that has an elevated profile.

Speaker 2 (16:43):
Essence, the essence needs to be there. He needs to
be able to basically be uncancellable. He or she on
the left, that's who I'm talking about, or she needs
to be completely uncancellable. Does that exist, though, yes it does.
Donald Trump is not a you can't cancel him. They
were gonna throw him in jail a couple of months ago.
Now he just won the President's You can't know Donald Trump.

(17:03):
Every single time you try to cancel him, he grows stronger,
that's true. Yeah, every indictment. He is the perfect villain
to the left. He really is. So that's what we're
looking for the left. We're looking on the left, We're
looking for the perfect villain the right.

Speaker 1 (17:14):
Does the right cancel or does the right troll? I
have can people on the right cancel? Somebody just feels
like it's kind of the like it's the left, he's rinsel.

Speaker 2 (17:23):
It goes against it, It kind of goes against their
sort of like stated modus of OPERENDI.

Speaker 1 (17:30):
Was that was that English? I don't know.

Speaker 2 (17:32):
I think it's pig Latin, but I do have I
have my own personal answer before you get the chat GPT.
I have my personal answer of who I think, and
it actually is someone who has tried to get into politics.

Speaker 1 (17:42):
Okay, fire away. David Hogg, the guy who survived as
the Sandy Hook Yep, yep, wow.

Speaker 2 (17:49):
Yeah, he's like twenty two, I know, but I think
that that works for the left. The younger younger, the better.

Speaker 1 (17:55):
Yeah, but he can't run for office until twenty five.
I mean, maybe he's close to twenty.

Speaker 2 (18:00):
I'm just I'm just positing him as as someone.

Speaker 1 (18:04):
He's twenty four. He was born in April twelve, two thousand.
He'll be twenty five in April. I mean, if he
wanted to get really involved into politics and run for office,
he could be in politics and run for the House
of Representatives for the twenty six mid term. He could
You could be twenty five and go to the House
of Representatives. By thirty it could be a senator. I
would say by thirty five. You know, if he elevates

(18:25):
high enough, he's been active enough, that's a pretty good poll.

Speaker 2 (18:31):
I would also, I would say him, but if you
could combine him, if you could combine, because we're creating
someone who doesn't exist, if you could combine him with
the characteristics I'm gonna say name. People are gonna be like,
who the heck are you talking about? Cut this guy
off my radio. But have you heard of Eckhart tole No,
he's like a modern day sort of like deep thinker, almost.

Speaker 1 (18:49):
Like guru type guy like like the Row.

Speaker 2 (18:53):
No, he's more of like a motivational speaker, but with
a almost like guru tint. Think Tony Robbins. But if
Tony Robbins was kind of like chill about it, and
that's Eckart meditated.

Speaker 1 (19:03):
Yeah, there's meditation in there.

Speaker 2 (19:05):
So you combine him with David Hog if you find
that template, I think that is your sort of like
mold breaker on the left.

Speaker 1 (19:13):
That could stand up to the alleged oligarchy of billionaire
powerhouses that are siding on the right.

Speaker 2 (19:20):
Now, they need to be someone who basically is of
the religion of wokeness. It needs to be because because
there are a lot of tenets of of to be
woken and a lot of things like that. There there
are a lot of religious aspects to it.

Speaker 1 (19:32):
Yeah, but the wokeness part of it, I think is
a turnoff to Middle America. Right, you have to almost
turn the wokeness into mainstream, but nobody wants to accept that.
We may be a full generation or two before you
get to a point where the general population sees what
we now would call wokeness as just you know, commonplace. Right,

(19:53):
if you go a generation or two back, let's just
go LGBTQ, like gay marriage, for instance, Like that was
a major talking point and something that people ran campaigns
on in the nineties and early two thousands. By twenty ten,
we weren't really even talking about that anymore, and we
just consider a commonplace that gay people have the right
to marry each other in most places, I mean every

(20:16):
place for the most part now, right, It's like there
there are you can go back and watch TV shows
from the mid two thousands, where that was like a
thing like that was like a conversation, it was controversial.
A decade later it wasn't anymore, right, So, like, yeah,
you could say that that's like a level of wokeness.
Right I'm not saying that this is going to happen,
but does the transgender conversation kind of enter that realm

(20:38):
at some point one way or the other. Right now,
we're kind of in this gray area that there are
people trying to figure out what should or shouldn't be allowed,
and at the same time, right like we haven't. Like
it's kind of a tug of war right now, Like, oh, well,
the NCAA is letting this transgender female play girls sports,
but now the Congress is drawing up legislation to try

(20:59):
to prevent that from happening. Oh, there's only like a
few different people. There's really not that many people that
are actually transgender that are interested in sports. Oh, but
we know at least of two or three people in
NCAA sports that have tried to win by transitioning and
like trying to win championships by being a transgender female
playing girl sports. Right, Like, we're in a tug of

(21:21):
war right now on that, But in a generation, will
we be by the time David Hogg gets himself like,
let's just use him as a real person. By the
time David Hogg powers up and gets able to like
run for the Senate or run for president in you know,
fifteen years, is he like, is this even a conversation anymore?
Is whatever wokeness is like for us now woke? This

(21:45):
will be completely different by then when gen Z and
Jen Alpha are like all of a sudden, you know,
in their thirties and like twenties, instead of being children, Like,
what's the world going to look like by that point?
We have no idea we're forecasting down the line here,
because right now it's the musks of the world that
are running it. Let's be realistic.

Speaker 2 (22:03):
Well but h okay, I think you're making well, you
might be making an assumption that things are only that everything,
that there's a downstreamness to everything, and that there's this
idea that whatever is being positive as a new idea
today that's new and scary is going to be normalized
in thirty years, I mean, or at.

Speaker 1 (22:22):
Least we'll have an answer to it. Like transgenderism. We
don't really have that answer, because that's the conversation gay marriage.
We didn't have the good, though, a good answer for
that in two thousand and five. Generally, by twenty fifteen,
no one was talking about it anymore. You know what
I'm saying. Okay, Yeah, Well, like through time, It's like
through time and through experience and through multiple election cycles,

(22:43):
eventually that got phased out of being an issue that
anybody cared about or was running an election on. It
just didn't happen anymore. What I'm saying is wokeness in turn,
I think lost to left this election. But that's not
to say by twenty twenty eight or twenty thirty two
presidential elections that whatever was woke this time around isn't

(23:04):
just totugh, that isn't even being debated anymore by then,
Like I think there's a chance of that happening. By then,
we're gonna be putting people who eat meat and jail
correct different thing, right like that. I absolutely like, if
you go down the line far enough, I could see
a conversation of that, like of something that sounds that
ridiculous but legitimately could be a thing that becomes a debate.

Speaker 2 (23:25):
We're all gonna be eating lab grown meat, and all
the animals are just gonna be roaming free, and we're
gonna be inside because the animals are gonna own the
outside kingdom. We're all gonna be inside, locked with our
doors locked, never going outside, and living in wally existence
while we plug into the mainframe and live our little
online lives on these meta platforms that we create avatars

(23:47):
for and eat our lab grown meat and drink our
green shakes that are full of all the nutrients you need.

Speaker 1 (23:53):
That's dystopian. You should make that movie, you know what.
I think that we are are soiling Green. That's a
soiling Green level movie you just made in like two
sins is. I feel like we already are making that
movie together as we go. Although Soiling Green was the
opposite of what we're talking about, it was not lab grown.
Me be right back.

Speaker 2 (24:15):
I'm gonna grab a spear and throw it out of ELK.
I like my normal human life. I don't want to
be stuck inside with the animals roaming free and me
having to live my life on the internet until someone
unplugs me and I die in real life.

Speaker 1 (24:28):
This took a very dark four I'll give you this
list that Chad Gpt says, of profiles that line up
for Donald Trump, both generally and that could be more
liberal thinking. We'll talk about it next here on news
radio eleven ten kfab Chad Gpt. Who is a celebrity
that has a similar profile to Donald Trump? Just like

(24:49):
for the background, So here are the public figures that
I have, and they say beware, here are some examples,
each with varying degrees of similarity. Silvio Burl luskone. Have
you heard of that that guy? No?

Speaker 2 (25:02):
Never heard of a Silvio Berlisconi.

Speaker 1 (25:05):
Yeah, he's a former Prime Minister of Italy, also a
media mogul and a billionaire businessman. Interesting, so he's got
a lot of influence. But he already kind of just
like the Italian Donald trumpet sounds like. So that's not
really a guy that would fit the profile. What we're
looking for a Democrat version in the United States of
Donald Trump. Vince McMahon. Now Vince Vince has his own

(25:30):
problems that he's dealing with, but he does as a
celebrity kind of profile like the mogul type. Right, He's
keep going to Kanye West. Okay, this list is it's interesting. Right.
They threw Elon and Richard Branson in here as the
last two. Did you put a stipulation that for this

(25:51):
is for a Democrat candidate? No, I had to do
that after the words, but I was fascinated by that list. Now,
I said, is there a Democrat who files like Donald Trump?
And here are the ones that came back? Mark Cuban, Okay, sure, yeah,
and he was pretty like visible throughout the election process
this time around, I.

Speaker 2 (26:10):
Said some pretty controversial things towards the end too.

Speaker 1 (26:12):
Yeah, he kind of got himself into trouble and that,
you know, was like smart women are not around Donald Trump.
And then every woman who was like, you know, like
rat Dodd Trump's like, how how dare you? Yeah? Pretty misogynistic. Yeah,
Michael Bloomberg, he gave it a go. Didn't work out, right,
that's right, you know, it didn't work out. Andrew Yang,
he gave it a go. It didn't work out. That's

(26:34):
one of those, right, I mean yeah. And then the
last one that they gave me was Elon Elon and
they said he's not affiliated with the political party, but
he has supported Democratic candidates in the past, and that
is true. It wasn't until Trump that Elon kind of
switched to sides. What if they have a falling out, Well,
it doesn't matter, They're not gonna They're too powerful. Do

(26:54):
you want to keep your friends close? Like, what would
it take to make that a breakup at some point
of the next four years. Well, Donald Trump, when he's
eighty one years old and in the last you know,
year of his presidency, all of a sudden, just be like, Yeah,
that Elon he stinks.

Speaker 2 (27:08):
You know what, what happened to make him have a
falling out? He catches Elon sitting on Twitter all day
when he's supposed to be doing his doge stuff. Because
I wonder, how's that guy gonna make things more efficient
when he's tweeting every five seconds.

Speaker 1 (27:19):
I'm I have no idea. That's crazy. He literally is
is on that thing all day. Yeah, you can get
like he's just it's all the time. Take a rest man, anyway,
we got another hour for you. We'll have fun here
on memory