Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Hey, Matt, what's this sound like? Why that sounds like
the opening of a can of soda pop. It's a
lot of soda pop, don't it's not Tell people what
it is. Oh, would you look at that? It's an
Arnold Palmer. It's all Arnold Palmer in a can. I
like making my own ornies. But you know, my wife's
been buying him in the can recently and they go
down easy. If you put your ear right up close
(00:22):
to the lip there, you can hear him screaming for help.
That's not that's not true. That's what I would do
if I was stuck in a can. Yeah, he's dead,
so he's not stuck in a can. He's been dead
for a while. Now, what if that's his purgatory inside
the can. I don't know how it's designed, but that
could be one way to do it. I mean, he's
a golfer, right and he passed away in twenty sixteen.
That's a while ago, man, I think we would have
(00:43):
heard him by now. Rip to a legend. Yeah what
a legend? Big bigger legend in like Arnold Palmer golfer
or drink entrepreneur. Hmm, Oh, you know what that's kind
of like George Foreman's right, How does he get remembered?
Is he the great world champion boxer or is he
the portable grill guy, the countertop grill guy. You ask me,
(01:05):
it's the portable grill guy. Well, he's affected more lives
as the portable grill guy. But what I'm sure he'd
much more like to be remembered as the guy who's
one of the very few people in the history of
planet Earth to win the world heavyweight championship in boxing.
He also had like seventeen kids and named him all George.
That is seventeen. Do you dispute my scientific facts? Seventeen
(01:27):
sounds like a lot. Now, I'm not sure about the number.
Seventeen chilldrin. Okay, let's see here. Hold that thought, Hold
that thought. Here we go. We're gonna we're gonna figure
this out personal life. There we go. He had four
previous marriages before he got married to Mary Martelli in
nineteen eighty five. He has twelve children okay, I was
(01:48):
closed twelve, five sons and seven daughters. Okay. His five
sons are George Junior, George the Third, George, the fourth,
uh huh, George the fifth, There we go, and George
the sixth. Sure. On his website, Foreman explains, I named
all my sons George Edward Foreman so they would always
have something in common, I mean, besides them having the
(02:10):
same dad. I guess. I say to them, if one
of us goes up, then we all go up together,
and if one goes down, we all go down together.
Huh wow. That is some profound stuff that only a
guy that's been punched in the face a few thousand
times could come up with. Ah, oh boy, his seven daughters,
(02:36):
for whatever it's worth. Her name Natalia, Liola Frieda Mietzsche, Georgietta.
There we go, is Abella and Courtney, Isabella and Courtney. Yeah, okay,
he's also adopted a daughter and another. So he's adopted
two and Freda actually five and one as a pro boxer.
(02:57):
Uh so she she boxed. Yeah. I don't know how
we got on this, but that is some fascinating stuff. George,
George Foreman. Ladies and gentlemen, seventy six years old, still
doing well, Big George Foreman, George. Only one thing I
gotta say to you, please save your brain for science.
Absolutely CTI man cte. But good try, Matt Case. I
(03:21):
have one thing to say to you, save your brain
for science. I'd love to. Can I get paid now
for my brain later? I'm gladly pay you tuesday for today.
Oh boy, oh boy. All right, anyway, we got Donald Trump,
(03:41):
scorch darts guy. Sometimes he just decides to open up
a cannon, and you never know who might land on
on a day to day basis. In the process of
the negotiations out there in Saudi Arabia, of all places,
which are housing negotiations between Marco Rubio representing the United
States among other delegates, and the delegation from Russia the aggressors,
(04:03):
it seems as though, and even though a lot of
Republicans have said on multiple occasions that Ukraine started it,
Donald Trump included, and there are varying factors there, and
it just kind of depends politically where you land. Most
people who are politically right say that's all Ukraine's fault,
and people on the political left say it's all Russia's fault.
And I just don't get why we're so tribal in
(04:25):
this stuff anymore. Nobody really cares about the facts. It's
all about just cheering on our favorite team. But Donald
Trump has made it pretty clear today how he feels
about one Volodimir's Alenski, who, by the way, congratulated President
Trump when he won and was inaugurated as the President
of the United States and seemed to welcome him coming
into office. Well, Zelenski got a little hot about the
(04:48):
idea that Marco Rubio and the United States delegation was
only talking to Russia. Which think about it. If you
have a couple of children fighting on the playground, and
you're a conflict manager out there monitoring these tenure, and
two of them get in a fistfight, what are you
gonna do? Separate them. I'm gonna put one of them
over here, and I'm gonna put the other one over there.
I'm gonna talk to them separately, figure out their side
(05:09):
of the story, and see how I can help resolve
the issue. That's what you do. You don't just let
him stand next to each other within you know, arms range,
and let him keep punching each other. So it makes
sense that you talk to one side and then the
other side. Well, obviously Zelenski didn't really like how this
was going down, and in the meantime, Donald Trump today
unleashed another can of you know what on old Volodimir,
(05:32):
Are you ready for this? Yeah? And I quote think
of it. A modestly successful comedian, Volodimir z Olenski talked
to the United States of America and to spending three
hundred and fifty billion dollars to go into a war
that couldn't be won, that never had to start, but
a war that he without the US and Trump, will
(05:54):
never be able to settle. The United States has spent
two hundred billion dollars more than in Europe, and Europe's
money is guaranteed, while the United States will get nothing back.
Why didn't sleepy Joe Biden demand equalization? In that this
war is far more important to Europe than it is
to us. We have a big, beautiful ocean as separation.
(06:18):
On top of this, Zelensky admits that half of the
money we sent him is missing. He refuses to have elections,
is very low in Ukrainian polls, and the only thing
he was good at was playing Biden like a fiddle.
A dictator without elections, Zelensky better move fast or he
is not going to have a country left. In the meantime,
(06:41):
we are successfully negotiating an end to the war with Russia,
something all admit only Trump and the Trump administration can do.
Biden never tried, Europe has failed to bring peace, and
Zelensky probably wants to keep the gravy train going. I
love Ukraine, but Zelensky has done a terrible job. His
(07:03):
country is shattered, and Milligans have unnecessarily died, and so
it continues end quote Wolf. That is from Donald J. Trump. Wolf.
I mean George Foreman would call that a tko. Zelensky
probably reads that it's just like, oh, modestly successful, because
he calls him a modestly successful comedian. Yeah. I don't
(07:24):
know what the Ukrainian pools are. We already talked about this.
It's hard of trust polls. But Zelensky probably knows if
this gets settled in that Russia Ukraine border has to
move around a little bit to make this thing go
away for good. It's probably not a bad idea for
Ukraine to take that deal at this point, but it
also probably looks terrible for him that you basically lost, right,
(07:45):
I mean, it was either except this deal or just
keep this going, killing a bunch of people, eventually letting
the Russians take Keev anyway, Eventually, Now I'm not here
to say what Russia is doing is good. It's not
something that I generally support. Donald Trump even said he
loves Ukraine, and I think that we can come to
some sort of economic deal with Ukraine to you know,
keep trade relations good and ope enim and that be
(08:07):
a part of what they receive as a you know,
as a gesture of good faith if they agreed to
end this war and stop the killing and get things
peaceful around the world. Donald Trump is also right, man,
We've had an awful lot of interest financially and what's
going on over there for us not really having anything
to do with it. It is quite strange how involved
(08:28):
we became in that conflict over the last three years.
And it makes sense for it to end, and it
makes sense for us to pull our resources out of
there if we can. You know, I don't know how
much we can of that missing stuff that Zelenski talks
about that we can actually do anything with, but you know,
there's something there's something to be said there for Donald
(08:48):
Trump just laying the smacketh down on Zelensky, on his
candy behind, on his truth social app and he transposed
it over to X two for that audience as well.
And I don't know if I'm Zelensky and I read that.
It's just like I'm getting a Trump on the phone
real quick and saying, okay, okay, I'll help play ball,
but you have to compliment me on the way out.
Speaker 2 (09:09):
Now.
Speaker 1 (09:10):
I don't know if he'll do that, but you know,
something worth keeping an eye on four eighteen if you
got thoughts on what Donald Trump had to say about
Ukraine Russia, Zelensky on this truth social post, I'm here
for you. Four oh two, five five eight to eleven ten.
Four oh two, five five eight to eleven ten, News
Radio eleven ten, kfab em Re Sunger. No, you know
what I'm just saying. All this stuff is just like
(09:32):
it's not related to the story that we were talking
about with the dry queens and all and stuff. I'm
just saying, it's interesting that that was the mascular like
a masculine style look that was attractive to women in
like the seventies and eighties. But could you say that
what is masculine today may not beat tomorrow from what
I understand. Yeah, Like, well, it's true because the masculine
guys in the nineties were generally the grungier guys in
(09:54):
the early portion of the decade. It was just a
huge backswing to the opposite reaction, Like girls all of
a sudden really wanted a bad boy that looked like
he was a you know, a little bit grittier than
the glam guys, you know. And you know, for whatever
it's worth, the boy band thing came on, and young
girls really fell in love with the justin Timberlakes and
(10:15):
Brian Latrell's and Nick Carter's of the world and Nick
de Lache's of the world. But you know, that's a
completely different style. I mean, those guys didn't look feminine
per se, but they just looked kind of like regular
crew cut dudes, you know, for the most part, I
don't know. It's a fascinating it's a fascinating case study
on what was viewed as masculine or provocative in different
(10:36):
eras of the modern world. I mean, remember Elvis and
his hip gyrations. Nowadays, it's like whatever. Back then, like
that was controversial. He didn't want to see his hips
because of the way that he danced, But that was
a man and the ladies loved him. Everybody's just like,
stop comparing like metal bands, hair metal bands to to
you know, dry queens. I'm not comparing them. I'm just
(10:57):
a conversation piece. I don't know I'm jealous of. But
more than anything, I'd love to go back to the
eighties and have big, fluffy, you know hair, dried hair,
sprayed hair, and be able to wear those sport coat
those those power suit coats and be able to, I
don't know, listen to all that eighties music all the time.
That's the dream Man. That's why I have it in
my show. I wouldn't put it there if I didn't
(11:17):
like it. Anyway. It's four twenty five before I moved
too far away from this. Just the Donald Trump Zelensky
thing just real quick, A ton of people, like almost
a half million people have liked this and it's growing
very quickly on x. But a lot of people in
the comments are you know, just really debating on who
(11:39):
started the war? And I guess it just kind of
depends on what your point of view is. Here's my question.
The more I thought about this, does it matter who
started it? Does it matter who the aggressors were? At
this stage, they've both been actively fighting for three years now,
at some point you have to blame both sides for
this thing keeping going. Do we care who started? What?
Does it matter? War has been happening since the beginning
of time. I mean, heck, war fair technically was happening
(12:01):
between groups of animals over territories before man was even
a thing. To Reannosaurus rex man, it would wreck you
if you were in its area. I'm just throwing that
out there. Do we care who started or ended? What?
The fact that it ends is I think the most
important thing that we're looking at here. And the more
I see all this bickering about who started what, and
like I said, it's very political. If you're generally an
(12:22):
anti Trump and very left liberal, you're going to be
in support of Ukraine and you're going to say Russia
started it all needlessly. You're going to feel the opposite
if you're a Trump supporter or somebody on the far right.
That's just what we've come to terms to learn about.
We don't think critically enough about what actually happened to
discern what was different or why certain things occurred and
what led to what my contention is, after three years,
(12:44):
does it matter at all who started this war? We
know what the status of the war is now. It's
still going on. We know where the borders look right now,
based on where the militaries are. Let's draw up an
agreement where Russia feels like okay, I'm willing to accept
that straw up where Ukraine says okay, I'm willing to
accept that in this thing, move on with our lives
(13:05):
and hopefully never have to deal with this again. My
mom always said this to me. I don't care who
started that fight between you and your sister, but I'll
end it if you don't. Donald Trump's my mom in
this situation. Not that my mom and Donald Trump have
anything else in common. The momled that felt weird, wasn't
I don't like that. I tried it out, felt weird.
Don't like that? No, no good try though. Anyway, very
(13:26):
fascinating post also was released, and this is by the
White House, not his personal account. But I will try
to explain that to you when we come back, and
if you'd like to be a part of the conversation,
I'm here for you. I'm always here for you. Four
oh two, five, five, eight to eleven ten is the
number if you want to chat on news radio eleven ten.
Kfab E Rais Songer put them on notice, if you will,
(13:47):
on his social media saying, look, you're your con artists.
You have extorted the United States and all of Europe
for a bunch of money, nobody more than the United
States in terms of how much in the way of
resources we have provided for this war that you know,
Donald Trump says Ukraine started and just seems to be
unwilling to end. I proposed the question at this point,
(14:09):
does it actually matter who started the war? Is that
like a point of contention? Does that change how we're
going to resolve the issue, because it seems like that's
all anybody's arguing about in the comments section of this
post about Vladimir Zelensky, is like, no Russia started it,
No Ukraine started it, And it just seems to me like,
(14:31):
I don't know how much that actually matters to what
we're going to agree to to get this thing to end.
Either way, I'm here to take gear thoughts on this.
Four h two five five eight eleven ten four roo
two five five eight eleven ten. Kevin's on the phone line.
Welcome in, Kevin, what do you think about this?
Speaker 3 (14:45):
Good afternoon? Every again, Thanks for taking my call. Yeah, problem,
I normally I agree with you. I in fact, I
can pretty much just blanket agree with everything you say
and understand it. But I got to argue this deal
about who started this war and why it's important. Look,
because I don't think it started in between Ukraine and Russia.
I think it started on Rothschild Boulevard and the offices
(15:07):
of Van Guard or State Street, whichever one of them
has the controlling shareholder, instance in interests in raith Yon
and Boeing, and well we'll call them the military industrial
Complex or the MIC going forward. Those are the people
that like the like I talked about the other day
with Daz of the perpetual arena of war, the launder
money away from the American people and out of our economy.
(15:30):
And the more Doge gigs, the more evidence there is
to support my theory on this. So how do we
That's why? Yeah, how already Lindsey is up. They're saying
we need to fund the war in Ukraine until twenty thirty. Well,
here's a big middle finger for mister Graham, because no,
we don't need to fund the war over there. All
we're doing is funding Lindsey Graham's kickbacks from one of
(15:52):
the MIIC or a bunch of the MIC contractors.
Speaker 1 (15:55):
Right, And I guess my thing, Kevin, because you're one
hundred percent right. And there have been people that have
cried foul about this sort of thing for a long
time and how it relates to what is going on
and why war is economically beneficial for you know, several.
Speaker 3 (16:09):
People, and if it is the military industrial complex, it
is fomenting these conflicts and using our bought and pay
for elected representatives to do it, which I do believe
is exactly what has happened since they killed Kennedy. I know,
I bring it up a lot. I'm sorry, that's right,
but I think that's what's been going on because well,
just to just all we've done is destabilized governments to
(16:31):
install private banking cartels into every country we've made war
on since I was born in sixty eight.
Speaker 1 (16:37):
Well, and that's the thing, just to just to like
punctuate your point that you're making here. So if we
can go back and figure out between Ukraine and Russia,
and obviously Putin had a reason that he wanted to
take parts of Ukraine, we know that, and we certainly
know that Zelenski. You know, the Ukraine was operating an
out of agreement of something that had been signed decades ago,
(16:58):
and that got Russia angry. Those two, you know, they
have a reason to be fighting with each other, but
we certainly were putting gasoline on it. If we can
prove that the mic, if you will, was a big
part of this thing actually happening and continuing to happen
for three years. If we figure out, we.
Speaker 3 (17:15):
Tie it in for you now, okay, go ahead, Okay.
The military industrial complex has a corner on their market.
They have a controlled commodities market in the form of
the NATO nations, and what are they trying to do
with Ukraine. They're kind of absorb thement in NATO. As
soon as you join NATO, you get an itemized grocery
list of the weapons and armaments and military gear that
(17:37):
you have to now that you can that you have
to buy from our military industrial complex. That is why
they want to warn Ukraine. That is why they want
to put NATO over there so they can sell them
more weapons. And we have encroached next to Russia. Ever
since NATO was created at the end of World War Two.
Russia has never wanted NATO next to them, and now
(17:58):
they have that are bordering Russia. That's the only reason
that Vladimir Putin has ever pushed back. He doesn't want
NATO next to him because they're warmongers.
Speaker 1 (18:08):
Yeah, And honestly, he I think has been from his
vantage point, been disrespected by the Western culture just generally because.
Speaker 2 (18:16):
They don't agree with that.
Speaker 1 (18:18):
They just don't see him as a leader of that caliber.
They see him like a lot of people view Donald
Trump just kind of this sideshow guy that happens to
be in charge, and they see him as a bit
unhinged and they don't agree with anything that he does, when.
Speaker 3 (18:29):
All he just happens to be a nationalist and a
patriot and one of the most intelligent people that's ever
stepped into power. And if you look at what he does, Trump,
You're right, if you look at what those two men do. Yeah,
the television doesn't tell you the truth. They tell you
the opposite, don't they.
Speaker 1 (18:43):
Well, yeah, but that's the thing with Russia, right, there's
a lot of stuff that had happened so far away
from us that people in our country feel like they
know everything that's happening, But it is coming through different filters,
which you know, makes it difficult to discern, Kevin, if
they can prove that the MIIC has you know, a
lot to do with the funding, not the funding, but
really the starting and the perpetuating of this conflict, how
(19:04):
do we resolve this so it doesn't happen in the future.
Speaker 3 (19:07):
Well, we divorce ourselves from the people that control the
military industrial complex. And by doing that, and this is
what I have hoped for most of my life, and
divorcing ourselves from the people that are funding and financing
and control of the m m C, we would also
be divorcing ourselves from the International Money Fund and the
(19:27):
Federal Reserve.
Speaker 1 (19:28):
Very interesting, I'll help.
Speaker 3 (19:30):
And all one fell swoop. No more dual citizen, no
more dual citizen legislatures. I mean, we would have to
end all of that to get rid of the m
C and get them out of That's how firmly entrenched
they're in our government. I'm owned those politicians both sides
of the aisle. They have owned them lot, stock and barrel.
Speaker 1 (19:47):
Yeah, for sure, Kevin. Hey, I appreciate the call as always, man,
thanks for listening to our show, bet buddy by So Yeah,
let's go to Phil Real Quick. Phil, welcome to our
show today on news radio elevenon KFAB.
Speaker 2 (19:57):
Hey, thanks for taking my call.
Speaker 1 (19:58):
Yeah, what was on your mind?
Speaker 2 (19:59):
I I'm just wondering what you think, since you're pretty
involved in media and you'll host the show. Why is
it that more liberal people think it's such a bad
thing that Donald Trump is on good terms with other
world leaders, like like Putin and like the leaders of
North Korea and maybe even in the future the leaders
of China. Why has that seen such a negative thing
(20:21):
in the media.
Speaker 1 (20:22):
Because Donald Trump is who he is, and he's a
Republican and.
Speaker 2 (20:25):
Yeah, but beyond that, do you think there's any other
reason or is it just that it's it's it's a
one side fighting the other thing.
Speaker 1 (20:31):
And it's I just I think it's tribalism. I mean,
I remember when you know, Barack Obama was trying to
repair relations with Cuba. This is a while ago, obviously now,
but when that was going on, you know a lot
of Republicans were crying foul that that was something that
they shouldn't be doing. And I at the time, I
remember me thinking, like, why would that be a problem.
(20:52):
It doesn't it make sense for our leader to be
as friendly as they possibly could with as many types
of leaders in the world as possible. And I guess
feel the easiest answer to your question there is I
just think it's just an extension of the tribalism that
exists in our two party system.
Speaker 2 (21:07):
All right, That's all I got for you.
Speaker 1 (21:08):
Thank you a man, appreciate the call. If you want
to call in four, two, five, five, eight, eleven ten,
we'd love chatting with you here on news Radio eleven ten.
Kfabe talking about Ukraine and Russia and the relationship lack thereof,
of Ukraine and Donald Trump, at least at this point.
And Brian, what are your thoughts on this.
Speaker 4 (21:24):
I think that there's any debate on X shows just
how much Russia has taken over X and the American
conservative movement. And I think that NATO and Ukraine should
tell Donald Trump and his ally Vladimir Putin to go
to Hell and even kick them out of NATO and
Europe and Ukraine could defend against Russia on their own,
(21:47):
and that all those who were our allies should consider
the US to be now an ally of Russia and
an enemy state.
Speaker 1 (21:54):
How exactly, because all of.
Speaker 4 (21:57):
This administration, they are all very loyal to Russia.
Speaker 1 (22:02):
You say that all the time, Brian. But Brian, you
say that all the time, but you don't really give
me But you say it's true. But I have literally
not seen one ounce of evidence that says, oh, yeah,
they're just going to give Russia everything that they want
in this conflict. They're negotiating, They're they're there to negotiate.
And I'm sure before la Zelenski got his panties in
(22:23):
a bunch over the meetings that they were having in
Saudi Arabia, he was going to get a meeting next.
But he just wants everybody to know, Oh, they're meeting
without me. Whatever they say or agree on, I do
not agree to. Well, that wasn't the point of the meeting.
The point was to see exactly what Russia needed or
wanted for them to be okay, getting this thing over
with Ukraine was going to have to have the exact
same thing we had. I don't know if you remember this, Brian,
(22:44):
the the Scott Beiscent or best sent sorry, who is
the Secretary of the Treasury, which by the way, is
a former Soros guy who happens to be a homosexual man. Okay,
all these things that allegedly Trump hates. He's the guy
that Donald Trump not. They needed to be treasury or
the secretary of the Treasury. He was just in Ukraine
two weeks ago talking to Zelensky and the people of
(23:06):
Ukraine about ways that we can build a relationship for
some of the raw materials that they have and help
their trade, our trade in our relationship. How can you
tell me that all these people are Russian allies?
Speaker 4 (23:18):
Oh like, we're going to say they, oh's five hundred
billion dollars in minerals and we'll volunteer to guard the
minds as though we were the Wagner Group. And how
they move into African countries and prop up the strong
man and take all the minerals back to Russia. And
I'll provide you some evidence. Look up Trump sanctions Russia.
(23:38):
Now you might think that might be about how much
he sanctioned Russia and how are you're tougher on Russia
than anyone? And the first article that comes up says that. However,
it also has a disclaimer saying it comes from the
Trump campaign, because if you look beyond that, you'll see
how all he ever did was resist sanctioning Russia and
lift sanctions on Russia. And yeah, he's a Russian ally,
(23:59):
as is Polsy, as is Kennedy, as is this whole
damn administration and the US conservative movement, And it really
is Vladimir Putin who is head, the worldwide head of
the conservative movement, and they all if you look up
like Russia Today or spot mcnews, you will see all
(24:20):
the articles cover the exact same things as the conservative
movement in the US does in exactly the same way.
You are allies with Russian. You've got holdouts like Don
Bacon who actually support Ukraine. And that's why you want
a primary um because he actually supports.
Speaker 1 (24:38):
Saying you okay, because generalizing everybody's perspective on this is
probably not the way to go. What I'm all I'm
saying is you have a right to every opinion that
you have. I am saying that you could look at
any country that operates as a republic or a democracy,
or any variation of the type, and if they have
(24:58):
conservative politicis or liberal politicians, which basically every single one
of them do, the news on either side is going
to be very close to the news that we get
here saying that Vladimir Putin somehow is this overt overpowering
figure in conservatism around the world, and Donald Trump is
just one of his cronies. I think you're taking it
(25:19):
like five steps too far. And again, I don't think
that Donald Trump would say, I love Ukraine and send
Scott Bessant to negotiate about ways that we can help
our trade further between their country and our country and
try to strengthen things. From a general perspective, just because
he's willing to have some sort of relationship with Vladimir
(25:40):
Putin does not make him a Russian ally. This war
started under the nose of Joe Biden and his administration,
who decided, like we talked about earlier, within the military
industrial complex, that it made sense to keep this war
going for as long as possible. Mostly nothing is happening.
The fighting continues, yet the borders don't change. There's no
(26:02):
offensive from either side that's really going to determine this thing.
It's just fighting happening, so money is spent, resources are used,
and people die. That's all that is happening right now.
For anybody to say that trying to go negotiate this
conflict to a long overdue end is somehow being a
Russian ally is somebody that's just generally missing the point. So, Brian,
(26:24):
I do appreciate that the thoughts today. I always like
it when you call here because I do like talking
to people that have different opinions or perspectives. But there's
just no way I can agree with you on the
way that you're seeing this. And I don't know, like,
I don't want to tell you to touch grass. I
don't want to tell you to like watch cartoons or
something and cheer yourself up. But you are just seeing
this from two dents of a lefty liberal perspective. There's
(26:47):
no way all this stuff happens if they were Russian allies.
It just doesn't make sense. Anyway, Sorry about that, Ladies
and gentlemen. Have a good day, Brian. Anyway, it's a
four fifty five. I ran myself or on time here,
But if you want to call in and you're willing
to hold, I will take your call when I come back,
and we'll chat about different things. That's what we do
(27:07):
here on this show. Call us at four oh two
five five eight eleven ten. Four oh two, five five
eight eleven ten. You can also email me Emeri at
kfab dot com as we chat about different things that
are happening in and around the world today. Sometimes it's
good just to get some stuff off your chest. Keep
listening to us on news radio eleven ten kfab
Hey, Matt, what's this sound like? Why that sounds like
the opening of a can of soda pop. It's a
lot of soda pop, don't it's not Tell people what
it is. Oh, would you look at that? It's an
Arnold Palmer. It's all Arnold Palmer in a can. I
like making my own ornies. But you know, my wife's
been buying him in the can recently and they go
down easy. If you put your ear right up close
(00:22):
to the lip there, you can hear him screaming for help.
That's not that's not true. That's what I would do
if I was stuck in a can. Yeah, he's dead,
so he's not stuck in a can. He's been dead
for a while. Now, what if that's his purgatory inside
the can. I don't know how it's designed, but that
could be one way to do it. I mean, he's
a golfer, right and he passed away in twenty sixteen.
That's a while ago, man, I think we would have
(00:43):
heard him by now. Rip to a legend. Yeah what
a legend? Big bigger legend in like Arnold Palmer golfer
or drink entrepreneur. Hmm, Oh, you know what that's kind
of like George Foreman's right, How does he get remembered?
Is he the great world champion boxer or is he
the portable grill guy, the countertop grill guy. You ask me,
(01:05):
it's the portable grill guy. Well, he's affected more lives
as the portable grill guy. But what I'm sure he'd
much more like to be remembered as the guy who's
one of the very few people in the history of
planet Earth to win the world heavyweight championship in boxing.
He also had like seventeen kids and named him all George.
That is seventeen. Do you dispute my scientific facts? Seventeen
(01:27):
sounds like a lot. Now, I'm not sure about the number.
Seventeen chilldrin. Okay, let's see here. Hold that thought, Hold
that thought. Here we go. We're gonna we're gonna figure
this out personal life. There we go. He had four
previous marriages before he got married to Mary Martelli in
nineteen eighty five. He has twelve children okay, I was
(01:48):
closed twelve, five sons and seven daughters. Okay. His five
sons are George Junior, George the Third, George, the fourth,
uh huh, George the fifth, There we go, and George
the sixth. Sure. On his website, Foreman explains, I named
all my sons George Edward Foreman so they would always
have something in common, I mean, besides them having the
(02:10):
same dad. I guess. I say to them, if one
of us goes up, then we all go up together,
and if one goes down, we all go down together.
Huh wow. That is some profound stuff that only a
guy that's been punched in the face a few thousand
times could come up with. Ah, oh boy, his seven daughters,
(02:36):
for whatever it's worth. Her name Natalia, Liola Frieda Mietzsche, Georgietta.
There we go, is Abella and Courtney, Isabella and Courtney. Yeah, okay,
he's also adopted a daughter and another. So he's adopted
two and Freda actually five and one as a pro boxer.
(02:57):
Uh so she she boxed. Yeah. I don't know how
we got on this, but that is some fascinating stuff. George,
George Foreman. Ladies and gentlemen, seventy six years old, still
doing well, Big George Foreman, George. Only one thing I
gotta say to you, please save your brain for science.
Absolutely CTI man cte. But good try, Matt Case. I
(03:21):
have one thing to say to you, save your brain
for science. I'd love to. Can I get paid now
for my brain later? I'm gladly pay you tuesday for today.
Oh boy, oh boy. All right, anyway, we got Donald Trump,
(03:41):
scorch darts guy. Sometimes he just decides to open up
a cannon, and you never know who might land on
on a day to day basis. In the process of
the negotiations out there in Saudi Arabia, of all places,
which are housing negotiations between Marco Rubio representing the United
States among other delegates, and the delegation from Russia the aggressors,
(04:03):
it seems as though, and even though a lot of
Republicans have said on multiple occasions that Ukraine started it,
Donald Trump included, and there are varying factors there, and
it just kind of depends politically where you land. Most
people who are politically right say that's all Ukraine's fault,
and people on the political left say it's all Russia's fault.
And I just don't get why we're so tribal in
(04:25):
this stuff anymore. Nobody really cares about the facts. It's
all about just cheering on our favorite team. But Donald
Trump has made it pretty clear today how he feels
about one Volodimir's Alenski, who, by the way, congratulated President
Trump when he won and was inaugurated as the President
of the United States and seemed to welcome him coming
into office. Well, Zelenski got a little hot about the
(04:48):
idea that Marco Rubio and the United States delegation was
only talking to Russia. Which think about it. If you
have a couple of children fighting on the playground, and
you're a conflict manager out there monitoring these tenure, and
two of them get in a fistfight, what are you
gonna do? Separate them. I'm gonna put one of them
over here, and I'm gonna put the other one over there.
I'm gonna talk to them separately, figure out their side
(05:09):
of the story, and see how I can help resolve
the issue. That's what you do. You don't just let
him stand next to each other within you know, arms range,
and let him keep punching each other. So it makes
sense that you talk to one side and then the
other side. Well, obviously Zelenski didn't really like how this
was going down, and in the meantime, Donald Trump today
unleashed another can of you know what on old Volodimir,
(05:32):
Are you ready for this? Yeah? And I quote think
of it. A modestly successful comedian, Volodimir z Olenski talked
to the United States of America and to spending three
hundred and fifty billion dollars to go into a war
that couldn't be won, that never had to start, but
a war that he without the US and Trump, will
(05:54):
never be able to settle. The United States has spent
two hundred billion dollars more than in Europe, and Europe's
money is guaranteed, while the United States will get nothing back.
Why didn't sleepy Joe Biden demand equalization? In that this
war is far more important to Europe than it is
to us. We have a big, beautiful ocean as separation.
(06:18):
On top of this, Zelensky admits that half of the
money we sent him is missing. He refuses to have elections,
is very low in Ukrainian polls, and the only thing
he was good at was playing Biden like a fiddle.
A dictator without elections, Zelensky better move fast or he
is not going to have a country left. In the meantime,
(06:41):
we are successfully negotiating an end to the war with Russia,
something all admit only Trump and the Trump administration can do.
Biden never tried, Europe has failed to bring peace, and
Zelensky probably wants to keep the gravy train going. I
love Ukraine, but Zelensky has done a terrible job. His
(07:03):
country is shattered, and Milligans have unnecessarily died, and so
it continues end quote Wolf. That is from Donald J. Trump. Wolf.
I mean George Foreman would call that a tko. Zelensky
probably reads that it's just like, oh, modestly successful, because
he calls him a modestly successful comedian. Yeah. I don't
(07:24):
know what the Ukrainian pools are. We already talked about this.
It's hard of trust polls. But Zelensky probably knows if
this gets settled in that Russia Ukraine border has to
move around a little bit to make this thing go
away for good. It's probably not a bad idea for
Ukraine to take that deal at this point, but it
also probably looks terrible for him that you basically lost, right,
(07:45):
I mean, it was either except this deal or just
keep this going, killing a bunch of people, eventually letting
the Russians take Keev anyway, Eventually, Now I'm not here
to say what Russia is doing is good. It's not
something that I generally support. Donald Trump even said he
loves Ukraine, and I think that we can come to
some sort of economic deal with Ukraine to you know,
keep trade relations good and ope enim and that be
(08:07):
a part of what they receive as a you know,
as a gesture of good faith if they agreed to
end this war and stop the killing and get things
peaceful around the world. Donald Trump is also right, man,
We've had an awful lot of interest financially and what's
going on over there for us not really having anything
to do with it. It is quite strange how involved
(08:28):
we became in that conflict over the last three years.
And it makes sense for it to end, and it
makes sense for us to pull our resources out of
there if we can. You know, I don't know how
much we can of that missing stuff that Zelenski talks
about that we can actually do anything with, but you know,
there's something there's something to be said there for Donald
(08:48):
Trump just laying the smacketh down on Zelensky, on his
candy behind, on his truth social app and he transposed
it over to X two for that audience as well.
And I don't know if I'm Zelensky and I read that.
It's just like I'm getting a Trump on the phone
real quick and saying, okay, okay, I'll help play ball,
but you have to compliment me on the way out.
Speaker 2 (09:09):
Now.
Speaker 1 (09:10):
I don't know if he'll do that, but you know,
something worth keeping an eye on four eighteen if you
got thoughts on what Donald Trump had to say about
Ukraine Russia, Zelensky on this truth social post, I'm here
for you. Four oh two, five five eight to eleven ten.
Four oh two, five five eight to eleven ten, News
Radio eleven ten, kfab em Re Sunger. No, you know
what I'm just saying. All this stuff is just like
(09:32):
it's not related to the story that we were talking
about with the dry queens and all and stuff. I'm
just saying, it's interesting that that was the mascular like
a masculine style look that was attractive to women in
like the seventies and eighties. But could you say that
what is masculine today may not beat tomorrow from what
I understand. Yeah, Like, well, it's true because the masculine
guys in the nineties were generally the grungier guys in
(09:54):
the early portion of the decade. It was just a
huge backswing to the opposite reaction, Like girls all of
a sudden really wanted a bad boy that looked like
he was a you know, a little bit grittier than
the glam guys, you know. And you know, for whatever
it's worth, the boy band thing came on, and young
girls really fell in love with the justin Timberlakes and
(10:15):
Brian Latrell's and Nick Carter's of the world and Nick
de Lache's of the world. But you know, that's a
completely different style. I mean, those guys didn't look feminine
per se, but they just looked kind of like regular
crew cut dudes, you know, for the most part, I
don't know. It's a fascinating it's a fascinating case study
on what was viewed as masculine or provocative in different
(10:36):
eras of the modern world. I mean, remember Elvis and
his hip gyrations. Nowadays, it's like whatever. Back then, like
that was controversial. He didn't want to see his hips
because of the way that he danced, But that was
a man and the ladies loved him. Everybody's just like,
stop comparing like metal bands, hair metal bands to to
you know, dry queens. I'm not comparing them. I'm just
(10:57):
a conversation piece. I don't know I'm jealous of. But
more than anything, I'd love to go back to the
eighties and have big, fluffy, you know hair, dried hair,
sprayed hair, and be able to wear those sport coat
those those power suit coats and be able to, I
don't know, listen to all that eighties music all the time.
That's the dream Man. That's why I have it in
my show. I wouldn't put it there if I didn't
(11:17):
like it. Anyway. It's four twenty five before I moved
too far away from this. Just the Donald Trump Zelensky
thing just real quick, A ton of people, like almost
a half million people have liked this and it's growing
very quickly on x. But a lot of people in
the comments are you know, just really debating on who
(11:39):
started the war? And I guess it just kind of
depends on what your point of view is. Here's my question.
The more I thought about this, does it matter who
started it? Does it matter who the aggressors were? At
this stage, they've both been actively fighting for three years now,
at some point you have to blame both sides for
this thing keeping going. Do we care who started? What?
Does it matter? War has been happening since the beginning
of time. I mean, heck, war fair technically was happening
(12:01):
between groups of animals over territories before man was even
a thing. To Reannosaurus rex man, it would wreck you
if you were in its area. I'm just throwing that
out there. Do we care who started or ended? What?
The fact that it ends is I think the most
important thing that we're looking at here. And the more
I see all this bickering about who started what, and
like I said, it's very political. If you're generally an
(12:22):
anti Trump and very left liberal, you're going to be
in support of Ukraine and you're going to say Russia
started it all needlessly. You're going to feel the opposite
if you're a Trump supporter or somebody on the far right.
That's just what we've come to terms to learn about.
We don't think critically enough about what actually happened to
discern what was different or why certain things occurred and
what led to what my contention is, after three years,
(12:44):
does it matter at all who started this war? We
know what the status of the war is now. It's
still going on. We know where the borders look right now,
based on where the militaries are. Let's draw up an
agreement where Russia feels like okay, I'm willing to accept
that straw up where Ukraine says okay, I'm willing to
accept that in this thing, move on with our lives
(13:05):
and hopefully never have to deal with this again. My
mom always said this to me. I don't care who
started that fight between you and your sister, but I'll
end it if you don't. Donald Trump's my mom in
this situation. Not that my mom and Donald Trump have
anything else in common. The momled that felt weird, wasn't
I don't like that. I tried it out, felt weird.
Don't like that? No, no good try though. Anyway, very
(13:26):
fascinating post also was released, and this is by the
White House, not his personal account. But I will try
to explain that to you when we come back, and
if you'd like to be a part of the conversation,
I'm here for you. I'm always here for you. Four
oh two, five, five, eight to eleven ten is the
number if you want to chat on news radio eleven ten.
Kfab E Rais Songer put them on notice, if you will,
(13:47):
on his social media saying, look, you're your con artists.
You have extorted the United States and all of Europe
for a bunch of money, nobody more than the United
States in terms of how much in the way of
resources we have provided for this war that you know,
Donald Trump says Ukraine started and just seems to be
unwilling to end. I proposed the question at this point,
(14:09):
does it actually matter who started the war? Is that
like a point of contention? Does that change how we're
going to resolve the issue, because it seems like that's
all anybody's arguing about in the comments section of this
post about Vladimir Zelensky, is like, no Russia started it,
No Ukraine started it, And it just seems to me like,
(14:31):
I don't know how much that actually matters to what
we're going to agree to to get this thing to end.
Either way, I'm here to take gear thoughts on this.
Four h two five five eight eleven ten four roo
two five five eight eleven ten. Kevin's on the phone line.
Welcome in, Kevin, what do you think about this?
Speaker 3 (14:45):
Good afternoon? Every again, Thanks for taking my call. Yeah, problem,
I normally I agree with you. I in fact, I
can pretty much just blanket agree with everything you say
and understand it. But I got to argue this deal
about who started this war and why it's important. Look,
because I don't think it started in between Ukraine and Russia.
I think it started on Rothschild Boulevard and the offices
(15:07):
of Van Guard or State Street, whichever one of them
has the controlling shareholder, instance in interests in raith Yon
and Boeing, and well we'll call them the military industrial
Complex or the MIC going forward. Those are the people
that like the like I talked about the other day
with Daz of the perpetual arena of war, the launder
money away from the American people and out of our economy.
(15:30):
And the more Doge gigs, the more evidence there is
to support my theory on this. So how do we
That's why? Yeah, how already Lindsey is up. They're saying
we need to fund the war in Ukraine until twenty thirty. Well,
here's a big middle finger for mister Graham, because no,
we don't need to fund the war over there. All
we're doing is funding Lindsey Graham's kickbacks from one of
(15:52):
the MIIC or a bunch of the MIC contractors.
Speaker 1 (15:55):
Right, And I guess my thing, Kevin, because you're one
hundred percent right. And there have been people that have
cried foul about this sort of thing for a long
time and how it relates to what is going on
and why war is economically beneficial for you know, several.
Speaker 3 (16:09):
People, and if it is the military industrial complex, it
is fomenting these conflicts and using our bought and pay
for elected representatives to do it, which I do believe
is exactly what has happened since they killed Kennedy. I know,
I bring it up a lot. I'm sorry, that's right,
but I think that's what's been going on because well,
just to just all we've done is destabilized governments to
(16:31):
install private banking cartels into every country we've made war
on since I was born in sixty eight.
Speaker 1 (16:37):
Well, and that's the thing, just to just to like
punctuate your point that you're making here. So if we
can go back and figure out between Ukraine and Russia,
and obviously Putin had a reason that he wanted to
take parts of Ukraine, we know that, and we certainly
know that Zelenski. You know, the Ukraine was operating an
out of agreement of something that had been signed decades ago,
(16:58):
and that got Russia angry. Those two, you know, they
have a reason to be fighting with each other, but
we certainly were putting gasoline on it. If we can
prove that the mic, if you will, was a big
part of this thing actually happening and continuing to happen
for three years. If we figure out, we.
Speaker 3 (17:15):
Tie it in for you now, okay, go ahead, Okay.
The military industrial complex has a corner on their market.
They have a controlled commodities market in the form of
the NATO nations, and what are they trying to do
with Ukraine. They're kind of absorb thement in NATO. As
soon as you join NATO, you get an itemized grocery
list of the weapons and armaments and military gear that
(17:37):
you have to now that you can that you have
to buy from our military industrial complex. That is why
they want to warn Ukraine. That is why they want
to put NATO over there so they can sell them
more weapons. And we have encroached next to Russia. Ever
since NATO was created at the end of World War Two.
Russia has never wanted NATO next to them, and now
(17:58):
they have that are bordering Russia. That's the only reason
that Vladimir Putin has ever pushed back. He doesn't want
NATO next to him because they're warmongers.
Speaker 1 (18:08):
Yeah, And honestly, he I think has been from his
vantage point, been disrespected by the Western culture just generally because.
Speaker 2 (18:16):
They don't agree with that.
Speaker 1 (18:18):
They just don't see him as a leader of that caliber.
They see him like a lot of people view Donald
Trump just kind of this sideshow guy that happens to
be in charge, and they see him as a bit
unhinged and they don't agree with anything that he does, when.
Speaker 3 (18:29):
All he just happens to be a nationalist and a
patriot and one of the most intelligent people that's ever
stepped into power. And if you look at what he does, Trump,
You're right, if you look at what those two men do. Yeah,
the television doesn't tell you the truth. They tell you
the opposite, don't they.
Speaker 1 (18:43):
Well, yeah, but that's the thing with Russia, right, there's
a lot of stuff that had happened so far away
from us that people in our country feel like they
know everything that's happening, But it is coming through different filters,
which you know, makes it difficult to discern, Kevin, if
they can prove that the MIIC has you know, a
lot to do with the funding, not the funding, but
really the starting and the perpetuating of this conflict, how
(19:04):
do we resolve this so it doesn't happen in the future.
Speaker 3 (19:07):
Well, we divorce ourselves from the people that control the
military industrial complex. And by doing that, and this is
what I have hoped for most of my life, and
divorcing ourselves from the people that are funding and financing
and control of the m m C, we would also
be divorcing ourselves from the International Money Fund and the
(19:27):
Federal Reserve.
Speaker 1 (19:28):
Very interesting, I'll help.
Speaker 3 (19:30):
And all one fell swoop. No more dual citizen, no
more dual citizen legislatures. I mean, we would have to
end all of that to get rid of the m
C and get them out of That's how firmly entrenched
they're in our government. I'm owned those politicians both sides
of the aisle. They have owned them lot, stock and barrel.
Speaker 1 (19:47):
Yeah, for sure, Kevin. Hey, I appreciate the call as always, man,
thanks for listening to our show, bet buddy by So Yeah,
let's go to Phil Real Quick. Phil, welcome to our
show today on news radio elevenon KFAB.
Speaker 2 (19:57):
Hey, thanks for taking my call.
Speaker 1 (19:58):
Yeah, what was on your mind?
Speaker 2 (19:59):
I I'm just wondering what you think, since you're pretty
involved in media and you'll host the show. Why is
it that more liberal people think it's such a bad
thing that Donald Trump is on good terms with other
world leaders, like like Putin and like the leaders of
North Korea and maybe even in the future the leaders
of China. Why has that seen such a negative thing
(20:21):
in the media.
Speaker 1 (20:22):
Because Donald Trump is who he is, and he's a
Republican and.
Speaker 2 (20:25):
Yeah, but beyond that, do you think there's any other
reason or is it just that it's it's it's a
one side fighting the other thing.
Speaker 1 (20:31):
And it's I just I think it's tribalism. I mean,
I remember when you know, Barack Obama was trying to
repair relations with Cuba. This is a while ago, obviously now,
but when that was going on, you know a lot
of Republicans were crying foul that that was something that
they shouldn't be doing. And I at the time, I
remember me thinking, like, why would that be a problem.
(20:52):
It doesn't it make sense for our leader to be
as friendly as they possibly could with as many types
of leaders in the world as possible. And I guess
feel the easiest answer to your question there is I
just think it's just an extension of the tribalism that
exists in our two party system.
Speaker 2 (21:07):
All right, That's all I got for you.
Speaker 1 (21:08):
Thank you a man, appreciate the call. If you want
to call in four, two, five, five, eight, eleven ten,
we'd love chatting with you here on news Radio eleven ten.
Kfabe talking about Ukraine and Russia and the relationship lack thereof,
of Ukraine and Donald Trump, at least at this point.
And Brian, what are your thoughts on this.
Speaker 4 (21:24):
I think that there's any debate on X shows just
how much Russia has taken over X and the American
conservative movement. And I think that NATO and Ukraine should
tell Donald Trump and his ally Vladimir Putin to go
to Hell and even kick them out of NATO and
Europe and Ukraine could defend against Russia on their own,
(21:47):
and that all those who were our allies should consider
the US to be now an ally of Russia and
an enemy state.
Speaker 1 (21:54):
How exactly, because all of.
Speaker 4 (21:57):
This administration, they are all very loyal to Russia.
Speaker 1 (22:02):
You say that all the time, Brian. But Brian, you
say that all the time, but you don't really give
me But you say it's true. But I have literally
not seen one ounce of evidence that says, oh, yeah,
they're just going to give Russia everything that they want
in this conflict. They're negotiating, They're they're there to negotiate.
And I'm sure before la Zelenski got his panties in
(22:23):
a bunch over the meetings that they were having in
Saudi Arabia, he was going to get a meeting next.
But he just wants everybody to know, Oh, they're meeting
without me. Whatever they say or agree on, I do
not agree to. Well, that wasn't the point of the meeting.
The point was to see exactly what Russia needed or
wanted for them to be okay, getting this thing over
with Ukraine was going to have to have the exact
same thing we had. I don't know if you remember this, Brian,
(22:44):
the the Scott Beiscent or best sent sorry, who is
the Secretary of the Treasury, which by the way, is
a former Soros guy who happens to be a homosexual man. Okay,
all these things that allegedly Trump hates. He's the guy
that Donald Trump not. They needed to be treasury or
the secretary of the Treasury. He was just in Ukraine
two weeks ago talking to Zelensky and the people of
(23:06):
Ukraine about ways that we can build a relationship for
some of the raw materials that they have and help
their trade, our trade in our relationship. How can you
tell me that all these people are Russian allies?
Speaker 4 (23:18):
Oh like, we're going to say they, oh's five hundred
billion dollars in minerals and we'll volunteer to guard the
minds as though we were the Wagner Group. And how
they move into African countries and prop up the strong
man and take all the minerals back to Russia. And
I'll provide you some evidence. Look up Trump sanctions Russia.
(23:38):
Now you might think that might be about how much
he sanctioned Russia and how are you're tougher on Russia
than anyone? And the first article that comes up says that. However,
it also has a disclaimer saying it comes from the
Trump campaign, because if you look beyond that, you'll see
how all he ever did was resist sanctioning Russia and
lift sanctions on Russia. And yeah, he's a Russian ally,
(23:59):
as is Polsy, as is Kennedy, as is this whole
damn administration and the US conservative movement, And it really
is Vladimir Putin who is head, the worldwide head of
the conservative movement, and they all if you look up
like Russia Today or spot mcnews, you will see all
(24:20):
the articles cover the exact same things as the conservative
movement in the US does in exactly the same way.
You are allies with Russian. You've got holdouts like Don
Bacon who actually support Ukraine. And that's why you want
a primary um because he actually supports.
Speaker 1 (24:38):
Saying you okay, because generalizing everybody's perspective on this is
probably not the way to go. What I'm all I'm
saying is you have a right to every opinion that
you have. I am saying that you could look at
any country that operates as a republic or a democracy,
or any variation of the type, and if they have
(24:58):
conservative politicis or liberal politicians, which basically every single one
of them do, the news on either side is going
to be very close to the news that we get
here saying that Vladimir Putin somehow is this overt overpowering
figure in conservatism around the world, and Donald Trump is
just one of his cronies. I think you're taking it
(25:19):
like five steps too far. And again, I don't think
that Donald Trump would say, I love Ukraine and send
Scott Bessant to negotiate about ways that we can help
our trade further between their country and our country and
try to strengthen things. From a general perspective, just because
he's willing to have some sort of relationship with Vladimir
(25:40):
Putin does not make him a Russian ally. This war
started under the nose of Joe Biden and his administration,
who decided, like we talked about earlier, within the military
industrial complex, that it made sense to keep this war
going for as long as possible. Mostly nothing is happening.
The fighting continues, yet the borders don't change. There's no
(26:02):
offensive from either side that's really going to determine this thing.
It's just fighting happening, so money is spent, resources are used,
and people die. That's all that is happening right now.
For anybody to say that trying to go negotiate this
conflict to a long overdue end is somehow being a
Russian ally is somebody that's just generally missing the point. So, Brian,
(26:24):
I do appreciate that the thoughts today. I always like
it when you call here because I do like talking
to people that have different opinions or perspectives. But there's
just no way I can agree with you on the
way that you're seeing this. And I don't know, like,
I don't want to tell you to touch grass. I
don't want to tell you to like watch cartoons or
something and cheer yourself up. But you are just seeing
this from two dents of a lefty liberal perspective. There's
(26:47):
no way all this stuff happens if they were Russian allies.
It just doesn't make sense. Anyway, Sorry about that, Ladies
and gentlemen. Have a good day, Brian. Anyway, it's a
four fifty five. I ran myself or on time here,
But if you want to call in and you're willing
to hold, I will take your call when I come back,
and we'll chat about different things. That's what we do
(27:07):
here on this show. Call us at four oh two
five five eight eleven ten. Four oh two, five five
eight eleven ten. You can also email me Emeri at
kfab dot com as we chat about different things that
are happening in and around the world today. Sometimes it's
good just to get some stuff off your chest. Keep
listening to us on news radio eleven ten kfab
Popular Podcasts
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.