Steve Bannon Goes Full Eric Cartman

Steve Bannon Goes Full Eric Cartman

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Three and forty two, three hundred and twenty four. It's

(00:03):
too many. Let's shrink it. We need doge on that
real quick.

Speaker 2 (00:06):
How does that?

Speaker 1 (00:06):
How's that? Even a thing? Does that? Is that different?
Like dialects of the same language or full on different languages,
because Ukrainian and Russian are very close in language, but
they're not quite the same. I'm only asking because I
just cannot imagine there being eight thousand different things, like
different words for the same like same thing. I don't know, Yeah,

(00:28):
what determines a language? That's a good question. I don't
know anyway. It's International Mother Language Day is essentially the
idea of trying to preserve as many of these languages
as possible, right, because there are some dead languages, as
we know. Latin. Latin is the big one, right, and
so many of our current languages kind of spawned out
of Latin. And apparently we're just better than Latin, and

(00:49):
so nobody's like, well, you won't even eat Latin anymore?
How about pig Latin? I like pig Latin. I don't
know how useful it is. It's kind of like to
twisters as much as anything else, right, So I don't
know This first segment's gonna be pretty short because I'm
gonna have Sean Callahan join us to explain what happened
to the Nebraska football schedule. Did you see what happened?

(01:11):
Is this? I knew what was happening. I knew it
was going to happen. That those Tennessee games are off
the schedule. We are done with the non conference power
team matchups. It's it's over with. It's done because because
and I don't disagree with it. And I'll tell you
why the concept of winning games is more important than

(01:32):
the concept of beating good teams. And that was and
I don't think that's wrong, right, I don't think it's
wrong because if on your schedule you're playing in a
power conference and you win eleven games like Indiana did,
you can't tell me that that doesn't matter, no matter
what eleven teams that they beat, Going eleven to one
in a power conference should matter. Do you agree with

(01:54):
that assessment? Yeah? It matters less if your competition was
deemed to be and that's why eleven and one, they
were what like the eight seed or something like that, right,
it's kind of the eight or the nine seed. Yeah,
So I guess my point is that that team still
you can't tell me that's not a team that shouldn't
be in the top twelve a power for a conference

(02:18):
eleven in one team, Well, Alabama is going to suggest that, well,
we were nine to three, and yeah, we lost two
more times. But the teams that we were playing and
the teams that we lost to are much better than
most of the teams that Indiana beat, and they're not
necessarily wrong. But at the same time, you can't really

(02:38):
say that when you also are playing teams like Mercer
and Indiana's playing Western Illinois. So how do you solve
this problem? Matt Woll very quick answer. You play teams
that you're going to beat, and when you're in conference play,
you know what makes a power conference a power conference?
High quality teams. That means a conference game is going
to be hot, tough, probably in some way, no matter what.

(03:00):
Why would you make the other three or four games
hard games if you already knew you were going to
have eight or nine really hard games. In Nebraska and
Tennessee are probably looking at each other with the current
playoffs setup and say, look, the goal isn't to just
like have good games and win good games, high profile games. No,
the goal is to have the best record possible. And

(03:21):
if we're already playing really good teams within our conference
and the SEC plays one less conference game than the
Big Ten does right now, I don't know if that's
going to change, and we're probably going to get like
an expanded playoff coming soon. But I just I look
at this and it's like a shame for college football
fans for a lot of different reasons, because we're not
going to get those really fun crossover matchups unless they
end up in the playoff for I guess in bowl

(03:42):
games where a bunch of guys opt out. But it
makes all the sense in the world. I mean, there
is no good reason why you would play that game,
because if you lose that game, you know what's going
to be held against you when it comes to trying
to get an at large bid to the college football Playoff.
And isn't the whole point to make the playoff so
we can win national title these days?

Speaker 2 (04:01):
Now?

Speaker 1 (04:01):
Back in the day, that's not That's not what everything was. Yeah,
you wanted to win championships, but you wanted to win
game to game, and you wanted your fans to know
that every game was a big game, and then the
bowl game at theme was just kind of like a bonus. Nowadays,
it's like we're trying to make college football as closely
resembling other sports as possible, with a legitimate national champion
that we decide on the field. So I have to

(04:22):
wonder if they weren't looking out for the kids too.
You wouldn't want to have to zoom in the camera
on Josh Hipel too many times. Dang, the guy looks
like a gnome. Dang, dude, what Tennessee was in the
playoff last year? Yeah, it doesn't change the fact that
he looks like a gnome. Yeah, he looks like the

(04:42):
type of guy who's hiding in my garden throwing rocks
at me when I'm not looking. Oh boy, well that's
something else. Well congratulations there, pal. You definitely put an
image in my brain. Take a look for yourself. Do
some independent and you'll see what I mean. I don't
think I need to do that. Two fourteen. Okay, So

(05:04):
when we come back, Sean Calla Hanill joined us to
tell us who Nebraska will play instead of the high
profile SEC opponent Tennessee in a home and home series
that was already previously scheduled for not this coming season,
but the season after that and the season after that,
And we'll tell you all about it when we come
back on news radio eleven ten KFAB And it was

(05:25):
an interesting headline, but not one. I was super surprised
to see Tennessee and Nebraska no longer will play in football.
And we know how big of a couple of matchups
that could end up being in the non conference. Well,
Sean Callahan's joining us to talk about what the exactly
the situation is and who's going to replace Tennessee on
the Nebraska schedule. Sean, first of all, thanks so much
for being on the show today.

Speaker 3 (05:44):
Yeah, it's great to be on. You know, kind of
a thing that we thought about for a long time
and came to fruition, like you said, But what was
interesting is it wasn't that long back for you know,
this game. Twortanen said that they had still planned to
play the game and twenty twenty six. Having the stadium
at full capacity for that game was, you know, a priority.

(06:07):
And I think now though the two things. We just
interviewed Troy danna and on the Huskar online channel about
a half hour forty five minutes ago, and he said
they gave They did give Tennessee the option to play
this later, because remember it was Tennessee that moved this
series first. Nebraska and Tennessee were scheduled to play in

(06:28):
twenty sixteen and twenty seventeen. That was set up by
former a D Steve Peterson back in six Tennessee requested
to move it back then because they wanted to play
a game in Bristol Motor Speedway and they had one
hundred and fifty thousand fans there against Virginia Tech. Well, here,
Nebraska had its own dilemma for twenty twenty seven. Memorial

(06:51):
Stadium is going to be at a twenty percent estimated
reduction in capacity, so the revenue that they're going to
lose with seven home games is basically equal to one
home game. And Nebraska's justification is, we need to add
an eighth home game in order to even out our
books for the year that we are going to lose

(07:12):
twenty percent capacity. Like it or not, that that was
their reasoning. And I think they gave Tenness the option
to play this later and it didn't even get off
the ground. I don't think I think that both parties
were done because it's been a frustrating deal. I mean,
this is a kind of been a twenty year thing
to get this series going, and here we are now
it's not going to happen.

Speaker 1 (07:31):
Yeah, So in that context, it really does kind of
make you wonder. And Danny White, who's the athletic director
for Tennessee, kind of made it pretty clear that it
was Nebraska who was the initiators on trying to finish
this thing off. Now, do you believe you're kind of
in a tough situation because you know, you got to

(07:52):
be friendly with the people there, But as a as
a reporter and a guy who knows the sport, is
that really what's going on here? Or is this more
along the lines of it makes a lot more sense
for us to not play high profile, top fifteen level, right,
I mean teams in the non con.

Speaker 3 (08:07):
Well, it makes a lot of sense, especially when the
SEC only plays eight conference games and you play nine,
and you know, there's just a lot of differences. I mean,
until there's equity with league scheduling across the board, big
ten teams are at a disadvantage. They were able to
break through and still get four bids, which is very
hard to do with the disadvantage they're at. But until

(08:28):
the playoff goes to guaranteed auto bids, which I think
is sooner rather than later, you know that's that's going
to be something to watch. And if they do that,
you know, the thought is instead of having a conference
championship game, you would have almost like a play in game.
So if you had four guaranteed playoff spots in the

(08:48):
Big Ten, maybe teams four and five would meet and
kind of a play in game where the winner got
the playoff spot. Or you could have two games the
four to five and the three six and the one
and two make the playoffs and the next four teams
battle on what would have been championship weekend. Just a
way to make those games interesting because let's face it,

(09:09):
this year Oregon in Penn State wasn't all that interesting
because you knew both were in Georgia and Texas, you
knew both were in There wasn't a lot of interest
in those championship games like that. Maybe you had been before.
So we're seeing a lot of things change in the sport.
But the guaranteed playoff access and the scheduling equity and
some other things need to get on the same page

(09:29):
between these two leagues. And you know, yeah, it's unfortany.
I would have loved to go on to Knoxville to
play that game. I mean, I've had been covering the
series for twenty years now. I mean I remember writing
about it in six when it was scheduled Yard today
joining twenty five.

Speaker 1 (09:45):
That's crazy, Sean Callahan joining us our Husker insiders. So
in response, Tennessee wanted to get this game or the
series in and Nebraska said no. According to you know,
athletic director Danny White, if you're looking at the teams,
that will then take the place of these two games
that are happening, and how that's going to affect the

(10:08):
Nebraska schedule, Like you said, that will tack on an
additional home game in twenty twenty seven, which they say
they need for revenue, which okay, I mean, I guess
I don't look at the books, but that's kind of
interesting that it will take eight games to make that happen.

Speaker 3 (10:23):
Yeah, it will because they have twenty percent less capacity.
So to make up that twenty percent less in ticket sales,
you'll get it back by having the eight home game
and they balance their budget annually on seven home games,
they won't have the traditional revenue of seven home games
when the stadium is cut down twenty percent capacity, So
the eighth game gets you that back.

Speaker 1 (10:44):
Okay. So with that being said, then what is the
outlook for the new teams and how did the process
go to trying to get those teams lined up? Was
that an easy thing just to find teams that were
willing to come to Lincoln and play.

Speaker 3 (10:59):
Oh, I mean, I think the MAC teams are always
anxious to because look, scheduling, opportunities to get paid over
a million dollars two million dollars are not there always.
So for Northern Illinois and Ohio and Bowland Green, you
know that that was a no brainer in my opinion.
And then Dannon did tell us that, you know, he

(11:22):
used the phrase we had an FCS so buteny so,
I think Nebraska wants to always have one FCS game
kind of a developmental roster game on their team schedule
every year. This year was Northern Iowa. They added Northern
Iowa back to the schedule. They already have North Dakota.
So yeah, you're going to see two games like two
standard non conference games and one FCS game every year.

(11:43):
That's the model. But look, if you want to be
real critical, Indiana did not play a Power for non
con game. Ohio State did not play a powerfol non
con game. They both played in the playoffs. A year ago,
Michigan won the national title without playing a powerfour non
con game. So the RASK is doing it may not
be popular, but the teams that have won, I mean,

(12:05):
to get to a three to zero start, it's a
really big deal to get the momentum role in for
your program. So there is an advantage to doing this,
but obviously it's not really you know, exciting for the
fans to see games like this.

Speaker 1 (12:17):
Sean Callahan joining us, I guess the real question, you know,
I look at games like Colorado, I look at games
that you know, Tennessee obviously is a really really good program.
I look at this from a standpoint like you mentioned,
and the President was kind of set this year that,
you know, it's more important to win as many games

(12:39):
as possible than to have the best schedule possible. And
I don't know if I disagree with that. I just,
like you said, without the proper equity of like all
of the conferences kind of operating by the same scheduling rules.
It's difficult to know whom has the better you know,
twelve games, and how we should judge or rank those things.

(13:00):
I know the toothpace is out of the tube, but
this isn't better, is it? Like? Is this better college football?
And is the playoff? What we're seeing with the playoff
is that really just kind of ruined a lot of
what we loved about, you know, the regular season in
college football on a Saturday. A Saturday basis.

Speaker 3 (13:23):
Lessen No. I mean, look, Nebraska still has their other
non conference series schedule. They have Oklahoma State, they have Arizona,
they have Cincinnati, they have some other I believe Oklahoma.
They have some other games though on the schedule for
the future. Oklahoma State e sees me. I know he's
on there, and those are those haven't gone away. I
mean they're only doing it because of I mean the
one year of the stadium. I mean they're going to

(13:45):
have a year where over twenty thousand seats are going
to be removed from the stadium and they're going to
lose that revenue, which is a significant amount of money.
So that's why this is happening, and unfortunately the game
against Tennessee, you know, is the cost of it, and
it's something that we've been looking at, but Nebraska hasn't
like canceled other series. Moving forward, the SEC two, I

(14:07):
do believe they will get to nine games. Could it
be twenty six, could it be twenty seven. A lot
of it will depend on the networks, and you know,
for ABC in ESPN, these networks, adding an inventory lineup
of sixteen additional SEC games is worth a lot of money,
and I think they're going to get to that point.

(14:29):
But what happens if the Big ten and the SEC
create another scheduling agreement down the road as well, where
they create sixteen more games a year with the two
leagues with you know, eight on their properties and eight
on the SEC's properties, that would be thirty two more
pieces of television inventory that are highly valued, more valuable
than what the ACC or BIT twelve could produce in

(14:49):
most weeks other than maybe Notre Dame, than Independent. So
these two leagues are really putting themselves in a position
to continue to pull away from college football as they
create more inventory. But the SEC's got to get to that,
and there's also some other loops with Kentucky plays Louisville
and South Carolina plays Clemson. I mean there's some non
conference games as well that mean a lot, just like

(15:12):
Iowa and Iowa State that you know, you can't really
get rid of, and you might have to if the
SEC were to go to that model.

Speaker 1 (15:21):
I don't know, Sean, that Boston College Texas Tech non
con game is going to be on the big screen
for me when it happens. Forget this SEC big tens.
I'm just kidding, all right, Sean, good stuff. I'm glad
that they're keeping you sharp here in the middle of
February and that we are able to have some breaking
news to talk about. Can't let you get into comfortable
over there in your office, So we appreciate you being

(15:44):
a part of the show today. Thanks for the updates,
and I'm sure we'll talk to you again soon.

Speaker 3 (15:47):
Hey.

Speaker 1 (15:47):
Thanks, Yeah, there is Sean Callahan. I don't know. Boston
College and Texas Tech. Let's sign me up for some
of that. That's a good matchup right there. All right,
it's two twenty eight, it's a Friday. We're gonna have
some fun. We'll probably talk about this thing that's going around.
I didn't pay attention to it because it's a Friday
and I'm trying not to. But Steve Bannon was a
speaker at Sea Pack and I think we just need
to talk about it because it's going everywheres and we

(16:11):
know you We should probably also talk about Luigi Mangioni,
who made a court appearance today and how many people
are still saying, go Luigi go. A lot of stuff
going on here on news radio eleven ten kfab. Em
Re Sunger on news radio eleven ten kfab. Yeah, we
have a long radio show four hours every day. People
people underestimate how much work it is to sit here

(16:33):
and come up with four hours worth of stuff to
talk about every day. Not that we have a bad job,
it's just, you know, I have to I have to
wrack my brain and I have two other hours that
I do in the mornings for IOWA, so it's like,
you know, I can reuse some of this stuff, but man,
sometimes my brain is just you know what I'm saying,

(16:54):
So sometimes I need some help. Steve Bannon. We know
Steve Bannon is right. It is super hardcore concerned guy.
You know, you got into some trouble for January sixth.
Now you know he's the Democrats would say he's on
the loose again, Old Steve. Steve can get himself into
some trouble, much like Alex Jones. I think in the
way that they talk and they say stuff that really

(17:17):
is that will rile people up, and there's an art
to doing that. I'm very much the opposite. I'm kind
of like, let's have just like a discussion and nobody
get riled up. I guess, you know, I can respect
people who you know, dedicate their life to their craft
like that. And Steve and Alex have a following for
you know, the way that they talk about things. And
I'm not here to judge them, but Steve is saying

(17:41):
some things that could be and Sea pack is for
conservative people, right, we have to keep into context who
he's talking to. Unfortunately for Steve, there are cameras and
everybody on the political opposition is just waiting for opportunities
to pick apart every single thing that the people who
are at Sea Packer saying. And Steve is saying something

(18:02):
here and I'll share this is from earlier today at
Seapac and it's one of those things that Donald Trump
he's got to dismiss this fast. I think he really
has to. Like, if you want the Republicans to be successful,
you want the Republicans to avoid this talk of oh,
they're just trying to be dictators. They really want Donald

(18:24):
Trump to be a dictator. You want to avoid this
whole thing of we want to make America truly great.
You have to get away from this idea that you
were going to buck against the American Constitution at every
possible turn. And I'm going to play this audio. This
is from Steve Bannon. This is actually from yesterday. My bad,
but this is something I saw today. And this is

(18:47):
a thing that conservative people might just say, hey, it's
not that big a deal, or oh well, or I
agree with this. As soon as you start saying we're
going to change the constitution to appease this current president
in this current political movement, no matter how you feel
about it, it is a dangerous situation to line up.
It could cost you seats in the Senate and in

(19:10):
the House in twenty six it could cost you the presidency,
whether it is jd Vance or somebody else who elevates
and wins a fair primary, which of course we have
all been talking about that being a fair primary. I
don't think anybody with their mind straight is thinking, well,
Donald Trump is going to run for reelection in twenty
eight because he's ineligible to do so based on the

(19:31):
American Constitution. Well, Steve Vanner doesn't seem to care too
much about that. And here's what he said yesterday in
the Future of MAGA is Donald J.

Speaker 2 (19:41):
Trump.

Speaker 1 (19:44):
We want Trump in twenty eight.

Speaker 3 (19:47):
That's why they can't stand a man like Trump comes
along only.

Speaker 1 (19:50):
Once or twice in the country's history. Right, we want Trump,
we want Trump, we want Trump, we want all right,
and then they cham for a little bit, so you know,
it's a short clip, but you could pick up what
he's putting down there. Steve is saying, forget everybody else
and forget the American Constitution. And again who he's speaking

(20:13):
to a group of people in the audience that are
generally going to agree with what he says. But at
the beginning of a four year term in twenty twenty five,
this is the kind of thing you got to be
real careful about. So that's my perspective. I know that
there will be some very hardcore conservative right wing people

(20:34):
who are listening to this and saying I don't see
the problem in this. I do want Trump to be
the president in twenty twenty eight. I'm just telling you
right now. You can't then come back to me and say, well,
the American Constitution is the most important thing that we
have in our country, because you always say that the
political lefts always trying to violate the Constitution and they
won't follow the rules of the constitution. And look what

(20:55):
they do the Southern Border Constitution, this constitution, that, and
then come back to me and say, oh, yeah, Nald
Trump should be the president twenty eight. Let's change the
constitution to make that happen. Can't tell me that. You
cannot tell me that, Okay. And this is the other
thing too, if you start doing stuff for having people
like Steve and again he is not in the government.
For whatever it's worth, Yeah, I mean, he's a powerful

(21:15):
man because of his allegiances or his alliances and who
he's friends with and how close he is to the
people who are in the government. But he's not in
the cabinet and he's not the vice president or anything
like that, which this would be super damaging. This is
the guy that just you know, he talks for a living.
He talks to people that are conservative for a living.
He's not really trying to since you know, reaching olive

(21:37):
branch to the other side. He would much rather, you know,
get into hardcore arguments with anybody who disagrees with him.
I get that, and there's an art to that. I'm
not like him. He can do what he wants and
makes a living to do what he wants. However, when
you start building this kind of rhetoric, this is not
good in a society where we vote, and you can't

(21:58):
start to build this idea that Donald Trump feels like
he's completely invincible to our American constitution when we just
are trying to start having a four year term that
we hope is going to be incredibly successful, so Republicans
can be voted in in twenty six and we can
improve on those margins. You can get another president in
there in twenty eight who is going to continue to
have conservative values and try to push America into the

(22:19):
future through that conservative movement. That's what you're looking for
right now, is Steve Bannon. You know, just saying this
out loud this early on, even if it is just
for kicks, even if it is in that moment to
get cheered. It's a bit I don't know, it's a
bit risky for me. We'll take a break and we'll

(22:41):
set the phone lines open, so if you want to
call in now is a good time. Four h two
five five eight eleven ten. Four h two five to
five eight eleven ten. It's early to be thinking about this,
but it's worth talking about. After Steve talked about this
last night, Donald Trump he suggests should run for president
again in twenty twenty eight. What do you think oral
two five five eight eleven ten, News Radio eleven ten

(23:01):
kfab Emery Sunger on news Radio eleven ten kfab. This
guy who isn't in government, which we have to say,
this is not a government guy. This is an entertainment guy,
Steve Bannon, who talks to people like this in the
sea pack for a living. And his whole the whole
bit is, you know, just trying to trying to get cheers.

(23:23):
I guess in a room, I'll just say, I don't
think you should feel like an idiot. Unfortunately, the person
who should is not going to and it's Steve Bannon
to say something stupid like that. But again, yeah, I
don't know, because you're right, it's rock and a hard place.
So we should violate the Constitution to get what I
want or we shouldn't, right, I think there's reliest answer
there is, no. Let's not violate the constitution. And you

(23:44):
can't be okay violating the Constitution in this regard and
not be okay with violating the Constitution and other regards.
It's a it's kind of one of those weird little
things that you're just trying to like balance, like, Okay,
is this something I want or is this not something
I want? Or if it is something that I want,
is it something I want to the point where I
want to make an amendment that essentially is going to

(24:06):
end another amendment which did happen. You know, you can
have the idea of eliminating you know, term limits for
the President of the United States and for whatever reason,
I mean, like Louis can talk about this. The executive
branch has this term limit thing. You can talk about

(24:26):
why that is in Congress does not because I think
that's also a fair conversation. We talk about it here
in Nebraska. Term limits actually are in place, and how
different things are. Let's go to the phones we do
have a couple of calls now four h two, five, five, eight,
eleven ten. Jay is on the line. Held low, Jay,
what's going on?

Speaker 2 (24:46):
Is it possible that maybe Steve Bannon inadvertently left off
the word junior for.

Speaker 1 (24:53):
Twenty eight I mean, I don't think so, because he's
talking about the one guy. But I mean maybe, I
guess tech the one.

Speaker 2 (25:01):
No, no, no, no, he said Donald J. Trump. There
isn't just one. There is Donald J. Trump and Donald J.
Trump Junior who would be eligible to run for office
as president.

Speaker 1 (25:17):
But he says twenty eight. Yeah, but he says in
the quote, and I guess within the context, you could
interpret it that way. But he does have a sentence
that says, a man like Trump comes along only once
or twice in the country's history. We want Trump once
or twice. Okay, Joe, I mean, I guess if you
if you don't think is go ahead.

Speaker 2 (25:37):
Hold on, give me, give me a second.

Speaker 3 (25:38):
Here.

Speaker 2 (25:39):
Isn't Steve Bannon notorious for being a provocateur?

Speaker 1 (25:44):
Oh yeah, big time?

Speaker 2 (25:45):
Okay, So would this not be an opportunity for him
to kind of poke that left bear?

Speaker 1 (25:52):
Oh yeah, because for sure? All right, yeah, you're right.

Speaker 2 (25:55):
So kind of give a little bit of a Okay,
well he stabbed him with the knife, is he gonna
twift it right?

Speaker 3 (26:01):
Twist?

Speaker 1 (26:02):
So so what you're saying, Jay, is he's kind of
doing this with a little half wink to you know,
because he knows what he's doing, and he knows what
they're gonna do, and they're doing it. I mean, he's
got him.

Speaker 2 (26:11):
He knows he's gonna stir something up and it's just
gonna make them earn.

Speaker 1 (26:16):
Uh fair enough, Jay, I can't argue with that sentiment
on that. So I appreciate your call and thanks for
adding some context to this for us today.

Speaker 2 (26:24):
I'm great day guys.

Speaker 1 (26:25):
Yep, you too, man, Jeffrey's underliable. Squeeze Jeffrey in here.
Hey Jeffrey, what do you think?

Speaker 4 (26:30):
Oh? I think Steve Bennon is making this Christmas wish
to Santa Claus. I mean, everybody wants certain things. I
want to afford wraptor pickup truck, but he wants Trump
in twenty eight. I mean, let's put it back a
few years. The left wanted Obama for a third term.
They didn't get it. We would have liked maybe Reagan
for a third term. It probably not a real good idea,
but it's still one of those things people say, Oh,

(26:52):
this is a great president, this is the third term.
It's it's all a Christmas wish to Santa Claus. So
until Santa comes down the chim with a four raptor
pickup truck, I'm not going to believe. Steve Bannon.

Speaker 1 (27:03):
Yeah, uh, Jeffrey, that's really well put. Actually, thanks so
much for listening to our show and being a part
of the show today. By bye, yeah, there you go.
I mean I want to go back to Jay's call
Matt in that context of the way that he describes it,
he is kind of right because Trump is also a
little bit like this. He says stuff knowing it's just
going to get a rise out of people. And this
happens to me sometimes because I'm kind of an intense person.

(27:25):
Some of my friends will start saying stuff just to
rile me up, and I don't know it until halfway
through my ranting. It's like, oh, I've been had. There's
a chance. Steve Bannon is just the best in the
world at doing that. So you think the whole thing
was just basically just a troll job. I think Steve
Bannon is a he's got his PhD and trolling liberals.
This is exactly something that he and maybe one or

(27:49):
two other people would do when we'd believe that he
meets it. But there's a chance, there's a chance. Like
Jay said, the way that he talked is kind of like, oh,
I didn't specify which Donald Trump I was talking about. Well,
given that in the thing that also is going around
today that he did that, which was And by the way,
I didn't mention this because it's hard to describe, but
it's like a half Nazi salute thing. And yeah, you
can look up the photo or the video of it,

(28:10):
but it is like in that it's kind of in
the same way that he gestures all the time. It's interesting.
So the best thing maybe you could say about this
guy is that he's a real life Eric Cartman. Maybe
that's the nicest thing you could say. A well spoken
conservative Eric Cartman who has it like a radio show
and gets on TV. Interesting. Maybe he needs to take

(28:32):
his catchphrase and say forget you guys, I'm going home. Wow.
Eric Cartman reference on news radio eleventh in KFAB