Are All the Shootings Connected?

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Six one seven two six six sixty eight sixty eight
is the number. Okay, Listen now to the el Presidente,
the president of Brown University, Christina Paxton, who is coming
under immense criticism, not just from the media, not just
from people who are you know, across the country who

(00:24):
are sickened by the incompetence of what they're watching, but
from donors at Brown, from many professors and administrators at Brown,
and especially from the student body. Listen to her now
very defensive roll cut fourteen, Mike.

Speaker 2 (00:47):
The primary point that I wanted to address before we
get to questions is that Brown is deeply committed to
the safety and security and wellbeing of our community, and
I've been deeply saddened to see people questioning that. We
understand that as time goes on, there is maybe a
natural instinct to assigned responsibility for a tragic event like this.

(01:11):
Anxiety in view is very natural. But the shooter is responsible.
Horrific gun violence took the lives of these students and
hospitalized others, and it's deeply sad and tragic that schools
across the country are targets of violence.

Speaker 3 (01:27):
Brown is no exception, you know, can you I mean
to me. I sense it.

Speaker 1 (01:33):
Maybe I'm overreacting here, but the arrogant condescension in her voice.
This again, this liberal elitism that these Ivy League institutions
in particular are so known for, where it's almost like,
how dare you blame me? How dare you? This is

(01:55):
the fault of the shooter and of gun violence again,
the guns, and it's happening on campuses all across the country.
And sure it's natural to want to escapegoat somebody, you know,
like everybody is stupider than she is, more reactionary, you know,

(02:15):
we're all a bunch of Neanderthals.

Speaker 3 (02:18):
But don't blame me.

Speaker 1 (02:20):
I have nothing to do with this, Okay, So let
me just a couple of basic questions. Why was campus police,
Why did they arrive? Why did they respond twenty minutes
after the shooting began twenty minutes? How come the emergency

(02:45):
alert system, the emergency sirens.

Speaker 3 (02:48):
We you we you we you we you were never
activated ever.

Speaker 1 (02:57):
Ever, throughout the entire massacre, even after the massacre. No, okay,
how about the fact that the door was completely unlocked. No,
how about the fact that there weren't cameras allegedly outside.

Speaker 3 (03:17):
The door of the building.

Speaker 1 (03:20):
How come the cameras don't work on campus. I'm just
going by what you're saying and the police are saying.
If we're to believe them, how come the security was
so lax and so incompetent, and you're telling me that
there's no blame, Like, I'm sorry. If I'm a parent

(03:45):
of a student, I'm sorry, think about this. What am
I paying you eighty grand a year for? And that's
your tuition. I'm not talking about food, room and board,
blah blah books. You're looking at to one hundred and
twenty one hundred and forty thousand dollars a year. Okay,
so I'm paying you eighty thousand dollars a year for.

Speaker 3 (04:07):
I'm sorry. What you mean?

Speaker 1 (04:10):
You can't put a couple of cops, a couple of
resource officers in a building. No, you can't lock the door.
No you can't have an alert system that actually works.

Speaker 3 (04:21):
No you can't. No, you can't do that.

Speaker 1 (04:23):
Like you're that incompetent, you're that cheap. No, I'm sorry.
What You've got cameras that haven't been working, according to you,
ten fifteen, twenty years. So what you can't fix, you
can't change a camera. The text alert system only alerted

(04:45):
the students that there was a shooting and a mass
shooter on campus twenty minutes after the shooter began to
open fire. Twenty minutes there was pandemonium everywhere, and twenty

(05:05):
minutes is when they on their phones shooter on campus,
and then they were told forty minutes later that everything
is fine. They had apprehended the shooter at five o'clock,
so the students are thinking, well, okay, everything's fine now,

(05:25):
and then they were told twenty minutes later on the
text alert system, sorry scratch, that there's still a shooter
out on the loose.

Speaker 3 (05:34):
And then in that same one they said, well, okay,
now you're talking.

Speaker 1 (05:37):
It's an hour twenty minutes after the massacre, an hour
twenty run, hide, barricade, walk, fight, Well, which is it?
And then at six o'clock another text alert saying there's

(05:57):
a second shooter on campus.

Speaker 3 (06:00):
Now think about it.

Speaker 1 (06:01):
These students have been barricaded now for two hours, so
now they get it. Oh my god, there's another one.
Can you imagine the tarrort these students are going through.
And then twenty minutes later they go no, no, it's almost
six thirty. Now, no, No, that was a shooting in
Providence a couple blocks away, nothing to do with what

(06:21):
happened on campus. And this forgive me, this arrogant b
of a president. I can understand why some people are
trying to escape count me, but dec I didn't impound
that younger.

Speaker 3 (06:42):
Geiseious people's fear acting.

Speaker 1 (06:44):
Now I'm I'm so woke, I'm so smart, I'm a
moon back. Okay, I'm gonna go right back. Lines are jammed.
Uh But first one very quick text. You can text
the coner man as always seven zero four seven zero

(07:07):
seven zero four seven zero. This is from six h three. Jeff,
have you seen the picture of the Providence mayor's quote
unquote husband. He's trans? Oh, I didn't know that he's trans,
and he's a rabid free Palestine nut. Are we talking

(07:33):
about now, sympathy for the gie hottist question Mark? Well,
that's the question I'm starting to ask.

Speaker 3 (07:40):
One.

Speaker 1 (07:41):
I have seen pictures of him, and I see him
with the Palestinian flag apparently at protest after protest, and
you know, with a placard or a sign no justice,
no peace, which is by the way, a call for violence,
or there's apparently another one of him globalized the Intifada.
Globalize the Intifada is what they did in in in

(08:04):
sid in Bondi Beach in Sydney. That's what globalized the
inta Fada means. It means killing people who happened to
be Jewish or pro Jewish. And that's the that's the
that's the mayor's quote unquote husband I I ya yai
ai ya yay six one seven two six six sixty

(08:27):
eight sixty eight. But no, no, hey, no no, according
to the liberals and the moonbats, I'm the extremist. Okay,
let's go to Harry in Bridgewater. Thanks for holding Harry,
and welcome.

Speaker 4 (08:46):
Good morning, Jeff.

Speaker 5 (08:47):
I think these officials are making the Keystone Cops look
like an elite police force. I'm a retired cop and
a private investigator, and this thing reeks of cover up.
They know who the person is and they just scramble
in big time to try to keep it hidden, and
they're failing visibly. So I think once they come out

(09:09):
with the forensics and everything, they should have a much
better idea who this person is. But when you're dealing
with people like this, the police chief, the mayor, and
people like that. I mean, there's just nothing but a
complete circle.

Speaker 1 (09:20):
Jerk, Harry, I got to ask you, what is the
ultimate game plan if this is a cover up? In
other words, Okay, we know who the person is. We're
trying to protect that person for whatever reason. Do they
just think, well, in a week or in two weeks
or in three weeks, you know, we can just run
the clock out. Eventually people will lose interest. Is that

(09:43):
what they're hoping happens.

Speaker 5 (09:45):
No, I think they're just going to bide your time
and then they're suddenly, all of a sudden, out of
the blue, this person's going to materialize, and they're going
to say, oh, we're heroes, we found this guy. They're
covering up their competence is what they're trying to do
right now. And the way it sounds, and I know,
pease don't look.

Speaker 3 (10:04):
Much better than me every day.

Speaker 1 (10:06):
Interesting, Okay, No, I thought they were covered trying to
cover up you know, the actual person who did it.
You're saying, no, no, no, no, Jeff. Eventually they'll get them.
They you know, they know who the person is. They're
just trying to cover up their own tracks because this
could have easily have been prevented.

Speaker 3 (10:23):
Correct.

Speaker 1 (10:25):
Yes, interesting Harry, Look as a as a police officer,
as a seasoned investigator, what is your gut, what are
your instincts, what is your experience? Tell you was this
done from someone within the faculty, someone within the Brown
University community as they say, or does this have Islamic

(10:49):
terrorists but someone from the outside doing the killing or
something else. I know you're speculating now, but if you
had to speculate, spitball, what would what would your theory be?

Speaker 4 (11:05):
I mean, definitely an inside job.

Speaker 5 (11:06):
I mean it's it's the writing is right on the wall,
you can't miss it, and the no camera in the
back door, and to target this one particular individual, Guard
Rosser soul Uh. Yeah, somebody is from the inside, and
I think some of these people that are part of
the investigative team, I believe they're involved. That's what looks

(11:27):
like to me.

Speaker 1 (11:28):
Interesting. Interesting, Harry, Thank you very I'm telling your best
best audience in the business. Harry, Thank you very much
for that call, and Merry Christmas to you and your family.
Six one seven two sixty six sixty eight sixty eight.
Maestro Mike, who would you like me to go to
next Mike Tom in Boston. Thanks for holding Tom, and

(11:54):
welcome agorioh jeez, it's happening again.

Speaker 3 (12:00):
Tom.

Speaker 1 (12:01):
Hang on, We're going to try to re establish connection
with you. You sound like, you know, like a kidnapper,
you know when they use that warped voice. You know,
we have your wife or we have your child or whatever,
and you know you won't get them. You know, you
don't get them back unless you give us one hundred
you know whatever, one hundred thousand dollars or a million dollars.
So let's see if we can talk to an actual person.

Speaker 3 (12:25):
Tom. Are you there?

Speaker 4 (12:28):
Yeah's I'm here.

Speaker 3 (12:29):
Oh my god, you sound like a human being.

Speaker 4 (12:31):
Go ahead, Tank you so long time, first time, Well
the way. Fifty years ago, I was a managing editor
of the Harvard Crimson and worked at the Boston Globe
in the New York Times whether they were still real newspapers.
So I've been through lying university professors, professionals, and line
city people many many times. In any events, this one

(12:55):
fact that you have not mentioned, which I think is
also important, is that apparently I've been wondering for the
last few days why there was students that indicated they
were getting texts about a shift through and through a
student website for contact, which had nothing to do with
the official university notification. I was wondering why they were

(13:16):
getting their texts from that source versus the universe. And
you've just explained that with a twenty minute delay. So
many students actually knew because they're informally part of text
groups chat groups. That's number one and number two on
a totally separate matter of just I know you don't

(13:36):
want to talk about Brookline, but interestingly enough, this was
a particle physicist, a laser physicist. And as you may
or may not know, the entire Iranian nuclear program is
based upon particle physics. It's based upon using what's known
as a laser isotope separation technique, one of four ways
to rip uranium. The reason I know all about this
is my father actually invented it with Hans Beta, who

(13:59):
was a Nobel Prize winner and one of the key
scientists down at during the Manhattan project. So the fact
that this that this physicist was a particle physicist. You
might note all of the Mosad assassinations in Tehran, and
the papers always call them a nuclear physicist. Actually, everyone
assassinated is always a particle physicist. I think a very

(14:20):
important distinction that most people would not be aware of.

Speaker 3 (14:23):
Oh I wasn't here.

Speaker 1 (14:24):
You just taught me something, right now, Tom, Tom, So
what you think this may have been a Mosad hit?

Speaker 4 (14:30):
Is that what you're saying, I think it could No,
I think it could be. I think it's a hit
by somebody. It's the least expensive way to enricheranium is
using lasersotope separation, and that means you have to be
a particle physicist. So somebody had an incentive. I'm not
saying it's Mosad. Somebody had an incentive to take out
just particular physicists.

Speaker 1 (14:50):
Well, I mean, Tom, I don't see. The thing is, look,
I'm going to bear my soul to you now. One
of the reasons why the show has lasted so long,
against all the odds, and I'm not bragging, I'm just
stating a fact we have such sky high ratings and
there are streaming numbers people listen to us millions around
the country and even around the world, is because I'm

(15:11):
not saying I always get it right. Sometimes you're a
prisoner of information that you get, say from the media
or law enforcement and it turns out to be false,
say within twenty four or forty eight hours of a shooting.
But what I don't do, right is I don't start
making wild accusations or spread wild crazy, you know, unbased

(15:34):
conspiracy theories. Okay, I just I don't do that. That's
not my thing. So I don't like to say things
that I really don't know there's any factual basis to it.
What I am hearing a lot of and I'm just
going to put it out there, is is this someone
in other words, are the two murders tied or are

(15:54):
the two shootings tied? Is this someone who's offing let's say,
a faculty member or an attempted offering of a faculty
member because she didn't show up at the study session.
The TA ended up showing up, but she was a
Jewish professor who ran the class. So is somebody there

(16:15):
trying to go after either Jewish professors or pro Israel professors,
you know, whether it be at Brown or now whether
at MIT. That's the scuttle butt. That's what many people
are saying. That's what they believe could possibly be the connection.
As a former investigative reporter and editor, Is this something

(16:39):
you would be examining and looking into Do you think
it should be looked into.

Speaker 4 (16:44):
Look, I'm far from a conspiracy theorist, and I hope
you understood. I didn't go there.

Speaker 6 (16:49):
All I said was that this gentleman, sadly now assassinated,
would have been highly talented had laser isotope separation, which
is the premier mechanism by which the Alpians are riching iranium.

Speaker 4 (17:06):
That is a fact, and therefore it's just that it
would be a target.

Speaker 1 (17:13):
Yeah, if you want, it would be a prime target.
Six one seven two six six sixty eight sixty eight
is the number.

Speaker 3 (17:22):
Rick in Raynham.

Speaker 1 (17:24):
Thanks for holding Rick, and welcome. Sorry, I'm battling a
bit of a cold. My apologies.

Speaker 7 (17:30):
Go ahead, Rick, Hi, Jeff, good morning, Good morning. Uh.
I just watched that film last night that they released
with the people walking and him walking in the neighborhood,
and one thing just popped into my head right away
when I saw it. He's going around for hours without
the bag. All of a sudden, they have a video

(17:51):
in coming from the direction with the black bag. Why
didn't they go back to the house where they got
that film and go backwards to find out where he
got the bag. They may have found come up with
his car. And if the Providence PD has plate readers
and their cruisers go to the time he would have
been by that car and maybe they read the plate

(18:12):
on his car. There's just so many the worst investigation
I've ever seen in my life, and I was a
police officer for a long time.

Speaker 1 (18:21):
Do you think this is deliberate or are we just
dealing with people who really are clueless fools? In other words,
you hire enough hacks, enough dei people, this is what
you get. You get essentially a clown show. Is it
incompetence or is it a cover up?

Speaker 8 (18:43):
What do you think could be both? I think myself
and you know if all the police officers allegedly on
the investigation, who couldn't have seen what I saw? You
know that black bag is important. That's there's information back
where that came from because he went around for hours

(19:05):
without it.

Speaker 3 (19:08):
Oh, I agree with you.

Speaker 1 (19:09):
No, Look, this thing stinks, it smells, and everybody can
tell it stinks and smells, even the students. And I'm
not trying to put down the students, but you know
they're not you, They're not you. Know police officers, seasoned investigator,
years and years of experience on the job. They're just
kids essentially, and they're like asking the most basic questions

(19:33):
because it's been a disaster from beginning to end. Rick,
thank you very much for that call. I really appreciate it.
Here here's a student, just an ordinary Brown student, asking
an obvious question. Listen to this roll cut twenty one, Mike.

Speaker 9 (19:53):
When the shooting happened, it took four hours to get
even a single video of the perpetrator released. And the
fact that we're in such a surveillance state but that
wasn't used correctly at all, it's just so deeply frustrating.

Speaker 1 (20:10):
Yeah, I mean it's, you know, in other words, just
cameras everywhere you look left.

Speaker 3 (20:15):
You look right, you look upped up, you look up,
you look down.

Speaker 1 (20:18):
Everywhere you look, there's a freaking camera, especially a in
Providence and B it's really true at Brown University. And
it took four hours after the massacre to get any
kind and it's all grainy video, it's garbage video. To
get any kind of video of the gunman. Well, like,

(20:43):
how incompetent can you be?

Speaker 3 (20:44):
Now?

Speaker 1 (20:45):
I don't mean to make your blood boil. But you
got you gotta hear this. You gotta hear this the
university president. Okay, Christine Paxson, as I said. Another DEI
hire was asked by a reporter at a press conference recently,
listen to this. Do you believe Brown University had the

(21:08):
right precautions in place? Her answer, quote unquote, I do what,
you had the right precautions in place. You had no
precautions in place. And by the way, she makes three

(21:28):
point two million dollars a year. Three point two million
a year.

Speaker 3 (21:36):
Boy, until I'm in the wrong line of work. Let
me just tell you. I'm in hey. I could do this.

Speaker 1 (21:42):
I could lie right through my teeth. I could be clueless.
I could Uh, Jeff, person just walked in. No, I
mean unlocked door cameras everywhere, According to you, none of
them work.

Speaker 3 (21:55):
Walked right on in.

Speaker 1 (21:57):
Uh. Campus police nowhere to be seen. The text alert
system failed, the emergency sirens failed. Everything failed. Classroom gets
shot up. You think there were enough security percussions, like
you think they were the right ones were in place?
I ah, yes, sixty one thousand dollars a week, che ching.

Speaker 3 (22:27):
Thanks, Next next question, I could do the job.

Speaker 5 (22:31):
I could do it.

Speaker 1 (22:34):
Six one seven two six six sixty eight sixty eight. Okay.
The other thing just very quick, is it? It's so
much more is now coming in. Apparently now many students
are now complaining that there are several professors at Brown

(22:55):
that were not just rapidly pro Palestinian and pro Hamas,
but that some of them were actually brought in from
the Palestinian territories, and that they had known links to
Palestinian terrorists back in the Old Country, and that what

(23:19):
the students are saying is that centrally Brown University.

Speaker 3 (23:24):
Was an eight or is an eight.

Speaker 1 (23:27):
Billion dollar terror supporting network that poses as a campus.
That that's how many Palestinians they had teaching there, That's
how many pro Palestinians they had teaching there. That's how
many the anti Semitism, the Jew hatred, the support for

(23:47):
globalized the Intifada, the coddling of terrorism or justification for terrorism,
Islamic terrorism. That it was notorious at Brown University and
still and maybe this explains why they still are not
telling us, why they're refusing to tell us what the

(24:11):
shooter yelled or shouted just prior to opening fire and
gunning down two and wounding nine other students six one,
seven two, six, six, sixty eight sixty eight. You invite
the inta Fada, you then become the Intifada Forest on

(24:35):
the north Shore. Thanks for holding forest, and welcome.

Speaker 10 (24:40):
Good morning, Jeff, hi Forest. Happy holiday to you and
everybody at the studio.

Speaker 1 (24:45):
Merry Christmas, all the best to you. Happy New Year
to you and your family.

Speaker 10 (24:50):
And Merry Christmas, my friend. Yes, so did I hear
that the president of Brown admit.

Speaker 7 (24:56):
That it was the shooter?

Speaker 10 (24:58):
It was the actual shooter, and the when had the
Democrat ever said it was the shooter? She's panicking so much.
I don't think she was thinking what she was saying
when the words came out of her mouth. But it
has to be the only university in a country, Jeff,
where there are cameras everywhere and every building on a campus.

(25:22):
That just that makes no sense at all.

Speaker 3 (25:25):
Well, they have.

Speaker 1 (25:26):
Over eight hundred cameras. They have almost one thousand cameras
on campus. Now the claim and that's the other thing
to show you how Again, I don't want to be insulting,
but I'm sorry, this is how stupid they are. This
is what I mean when I say it's a clown show.
They first said that they don't have many cameras. Then
it came out and said, well, no, you have nearly

(25:47):
a thousand. What do you think we're dumb? Okay, well
we do have cameras. So then they said, well the cameras,
many of them don't work. Now, of course that could
lead to lawsuits, and I think they're legal team said no, no,
you don't want to say that, are you stupid? They're
they're going to sue the pants off of us. Oh okay,
so now they say no, no, sorry, they do work. They

(26:09):
just for whatever reason, it's just one hell of a coincidence.
There were so few in that engineering building, and there
were so few on the direct path that the shooter
took that they just for ut They just they couldn't
get a good shot. So they that's why they're not
releasing it. So there, there you go.

Speaker 9 (26:32):
For us.

Speaker 3 (26:33):
That's that's what they're telling us now.

Speaker 10 (26:36):
And it's that just that makes zero sense that they're
hiding something and eventually it's going to have to come out.

Speaker 7 (26:43):
You know.

Speaker 10 (26:43):
The other thing that sits in your back, in ther
back of your mind now is after all this time
and and all these mixed up answers and excuses. Is
the person they find actually going to be the person
that did it or is it going to be an
escape go just to close the case.

Speaker 1 (26:59):
Well, that's the thing that I thought was most disgusting
is when they tried to pin it on that guy,
Benjamin Rickson, you know, this white military guy, and that
was within twenty four hours. They said, no, no, that's him,
that's him, that's him, And of course they were clearly
framing him. So you're right, you try to frame one
man before if they make an arrest. Now I'm going

(27:22):
to look and say, this is very suspicious. Are they
trying to frame a second man? And my other fear
for us and I want to give you the final
word is so much time is now elapsing. If this
wasn't act of a foreign terrorist or say a student
or a faculty member. But they say they come from
a foreign country like in the Middle East. Now they've

(27:43):
had plenty of time to leave, so they could escape,
they could literally return to whatever. I'm just gonna you know,
the Palestinian territories, let me just make that place up,
or Egypt or Syria or wherever they're from. Nothing we
won't be able to get him. We won't be able
to catch them, so this person could slip through the cracks.

(28:05):
The more this goes on, the more the likelihood is
that this person will escape.

Speaker 3 (28:10):
I mean, Forrest, am I wrong.

Speaker 7 (28:13):
Totally agree.

Speaker 10 (28:16):
You can't challenge that at all. And you would think
that with the technology the FBI has with satellites and
phones in all these other things that they did it.
You know, down in Washington they claimed people were there
through phone use and so on and so forth. You know,
you got satellites that can see an ant walking on

(28:36):
the ground. I just don't understand it. It's just something
that they're hiding.

Speaker 7 (28:41):
It just has to be.

Speaker 3 (28:43):
There's no question. It's a bad cover up.

Speaker 1 (28:46):
It's an incompetent cover up, you know, but it's it's
a cover up. It's like the three Stooges. We're told
you got to cover this up. Like that's what we're
watching in real time, except I think there's five stooges.
But anyway, you know what, I'm Forrest, all the best
to you and your family. Thank you very much for
that call. Okay, quick text Grace's doctor. Grace's right now

(29:09):
waiting in the bullpen. So this is it. Here it is.
You can text us seven zero four to seven zero.
This is from seven to eight one. Holy shimoi, Jeff,
I have a daughter who goes to Brown University. Your
audience needs to know certain basic facts. It costs one

(29:33):
hundred and two thousand dollars a year to attend.

Speaker 8 (29:40):
Wow.

Speaker 1 (29:42):
Wow, Okay, one hundred and two thousand dollars a year
to attend. It has an eight billion dollar endowment. It
pays President Packson three point one seven million dollar a year,
so they rounded it off to three point two million. Okay,

(30:04):
three point one seven million a year. This I did
not know, and this is disgusting. And you want to
talk about highway robbery. It receives one hundred and eighty
four million dollars in tax money a year. So we
the taxpayers are funding them with an eight billion dollar
endowment and they're they're charging one hundred and two thousand

(30:27):
dollars a year just to attend.

Speaker 3 (30:31):
But the only reward offered to catch the shooter.

Speaker 1 (30:38):
Is fifty thousand dollars from the FBI. It's not even
from Brown, it's from the FBI. Fifty k.

Speaker 3 (30:48):
Oh Man. I mean, boy, you really want to get them. Huh,
I could see that boy.

Speaker 1 (30:53):
You guys are itching to get them down there at
Brown all right, joining me now as she always does,
this time, doctor Grace, putting liberals in their place. Grace
woto full disclosure, my better half, my wonderful wife, and
yes I definitely married up.

Speaker 3 (31:14):
Grace.

Speaker 1 (31:15):
I got to ask you, is this colossal incompetence? Are
we talking about the mother of all clown shows? Or
is this a deliberate cover up?

Speaker 3 (31:28):
What say you?

Speaker 11 (31:30):
Well, Jeff, I think that the incompetence is just so stark.
I mean what they have failed to do, which other
police departments would have done right away, is staggering. As
you've mentioned many times, the communication with the public has
been horrendous. They failed to block, you know, do a

(31:52):
ten block perimeter just immediately. This is something that any
other police department would have done to prevent the shooter
from getting any further away. They only started looking for
videos two days after the shooting, and they were only
interviewing students witnesses a day and a half later. I mean,

(32:15):
this is staggering incompetence. But at the same time, we
have our esteemed FBI Director Cash Patel well, we got
good news. He's got a girlfriend, Jeff, and he's doing
podcast interviews with her.

Speaker 1 (32:29):
No, I've noticed that he's been doing a lot of
podcasts lately, and he's getting a lot of criticism for that.

Speaker 3 (32:33):
We've got a.

Speaker 1 (32:34):
Shooter on the loose, we've got all kinds of deep
state criminals that still haven't been arrested, and on and on.
But he's doing podcasts with his girlfriend. Our esteem FBHI director.

Speaker 11 (32:48):
Why do we know that he has a girlfriend? Like,
why do we know this? I don't care about his
private life.

Speaker 1 (32:55):
Well, he's very proud of her. He finds her very attractive.
She's much younger than him. Correct me if I'm wrong.
Isn't she like almost twenty years younger. She's a country
music star. He's very proud of her. And you know,
he's in love and he wants everybody to know that
he's in love. So he's doing podcasts about her and
with her while all this is going place. And by

(33:18):
the way, great not to cut you off. And by
the way, just to remind everybody, there's an armed, dangerous
mass shooter on the loose. I'm just saying, but you're
on a roll.

Speaker 11 (33:31):
Keep going, have you actually took the words right out
of my mouth. We have been told this guy is
still a threat.

Speaker 9 (33:41):
Right.

Speaker 11 (33:41):
There is a fifty thousand dollars reward for anybody that
has information because it is urgent that we catch this
guy and cash Pateel. Well, he had enough time to tweet.
We have a person of interest in custody. La la la.
You know, he's somebody that likes to like act the part.
You know, I'm the FBI die right here. Let me
do what they do in the movies. Let me make

(34:03):
it seem like I'm doing my job, and all the
time he's just gag up for this girlfriend. I mean,
for God's sakes, this is serious. We have two young
people that were killed, nine others injured, and the rest
of the student body terrorized. You know, we're talking about
some of these kids are going to be trauma traumatized

(34:24):
for years to come dealing with PTSD and who knows
what even those that weren't actually injured. This is serious
stuff and I don't see the level of seriousness, urgency,
or confidence that is required. And what's extremely upsetting Jeff
is again an unsecured door. Come on, I mean, it's

(34:45):
one thing to have a big discussion about gun violence
in this society. Fine, you can have, you know, a
discussion about that, But about doors not being secured, we're
well beyond that. That's completely unaccepted. And limited cameras. I mean,
you mentioned the statistics. Parents are paying one hundred and
two thousand dollars a year, and we have cameras everywhere,

(35:08):
but we don't have cameras where we can see the
guy's face, a clear shot of him. But we have
cameras of the children of these teens, these young adults
being victimized, being killed, being shot at, but we don't
have enough cameras to get a clear view of the perpetrator.
This is completely unacceptable, Grace.

Speaker 1 (35:30):
Do you believe, obviously to me, when you commit an
active mass shooting like this, it's an act of terrorism
as far as I'm concerned. But was this an Islamic
terrorist attack? Was this a deliberate targeted terrorist attack?

Speaker 3 (35:46):
In your view?

Speaker 1 (35:48):
You have students one after another saying they heard him
explicitly shout Allahu akbar and then began to empty his gun.
Yet when the police chief is pressed, he refuses to
answer the question. He just says it's part of the investigation,

(36:08):
The state attorney general refuses to answer the question. The
mayor that crazy moonbat refuses to answer the question. In
your view, are we staring at an act of Islamic terror?
And is this why the moonbats in Providence and in
Rhode Island who don't want this narrative to go out

(36:28):
because it destroys everything they claim to believe in. That
Islam is a religion of peace and that there is
no problem, and it doesn't matter how many of these
Muslims you import or you actively encourage them protesting on campuses,
that they are peaceful and will.

Speaker 3 (36:44):
Never do anything wrong.

Speaker 1 (36:46):
Multiculturalism is great, diversity is great. It's only the right
wing that engages in acts like this, only maga. So
are we looking now at an act of Islamic terror
that they're desperately trying to cover or do you think
there's something else?

Speaker 11 (37:03):
Well, Jeff, you know what, At this point, I want
to wait to allow all the facts to come forward,
but I would want them to answer the question. Answer
the question confirmed these reports, like officially from them? They
should be telling us have some students heard that or not?
I want official statements on it, not just that we're

(37:24):
hearing it outside of the police department investigation. Tell Us,
is this one of the avenues that you're asking questions about,
because this is important for the public to know. Is
this on the table? Are these comments credible by these witnesses?
They should be able to answer that. So I still
see it as overwhelming just incompetence. And what usually happens

(37:49):
when there's early signs of incompetence, then there's a cover
up to cover up the incompetence because people will be
fired soon afterwards. So the cover up often when we're
seeing such massive, massive failures is to save people's jobs.
At a minimum. That acts to the confusion.

Speaker 3 (38:08):
And this has been race thirty seconds.

Speaker 1 (38:11):
You go to Rhode Island quite a bit. Obviously we
live in Massachusetts. It's almost a yes or no answer.
Who's crazier the moonbats in Rhode Island or the moonbats
in Massachusetts.

Speaker 11 (38:25):
You know, I still think the Massachusetts moonbats take the cake.

Speaker 1 (38:30):
Really, even after all over seeing now in Providence and
had Brown really okay, well on this one because I
agree with you throughout the entire hit today, but on
this last final point we agree to disagree.