Biden's DOJ Exposed

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
It is a complete abuse of judicial power. And I've
called on the House of Representatives to impeach Judge Bosburg
the Constitution when Judge Bosburg decided to become a partisan
warrior and be part of the most egregious abuse of power.
This is Richard, this is Joe Biden's Watergate, and I

(00:20):
believe the House should impeach Judge Boseburg. And I also
think we are going to get to the bottom of
every partisan who signed off on surveilling and spying on
twenty percent of the Republicans in the Senate. That's what
Joe Biden and their DJ did.

Speaker 2 (00:38):
That was Senator Ted Cruz. From your lips The God's
Ears seven twenty on the Great WRKO Jeff Kooner, Boston's
Bulldozer sixty one seven two six six, sixty eight sixty eight. Okay,
lines are loaded. Let's go to Bill in Sudbury. Bill,

(01:00):
this is a very unique honor, my friend. You are
gonna kick off the phone calls today, So go ahead, Bill,
and as always.

Speaker 3 (01:09):
Welcome, Hello, good morning, good morning everyone. Of course they
will well. First of all, the FBI always operates in secret.
They never call you on the phone and say By
the way, we're gonna be looking at you the next
few months. It's always a secret. So I don't get
the whole spy and thing. Do you really think the
FBI shouldn't be watching us senators? Kind of Especially you

(01:32):
don't acknowledge that Ted Cruz is a key figure in
January sixth. He's the one you guys always point to.
He's the one who was gonna stand up and explain
it all away. By the way, we've never heard that,
I mean five years later, we've never heard this magic
speech he was gonna give to reverse the election.

Speaker 2 (01:55):
Well, Bill, I gotta say again, very troubling, very troubling
phone call, because it shows again the totalitarian mindset of
liberals and the left. Number one, Ted Cruz has released
the speech that he was going to deliver. It was
one of the states where he was going to show
rampant voter fraud. Now, what does that have to do

(02:18):
with what took place outside on the steps of January six?
And you know, even after a while, even the Democrats
admitted Ted Cruz had nothing to do with January six
The FBI had nothing to say, admitted he had nothing
to do with January six. So what you know your

(02:40):
your point, I don't I don't understand your point. You
can't investigate someone unless you have probable cause. This is
not the Stazi. We're not living in a dictatorship. This
is not the Gestapo or the KGB, where people can
surveil you illegal, where people can investigate you illegally. I mean,

(03:05):
are you telling me that you want the FBI to
go through your phone records without probable cause and listen
in on your conversations without a warrant, without probable cause,
or go and get through all your personal information without
for just for the hell of it, because they're looking

(03:25):
to destroy political opponents. Is this now the I guess
you are a supporter of Zoron Mamdani because that's what
he believes, and that's what Antifa believes, and that's what
communism and communists and Marxists belief. So Bill, I guess
I have to ask you again. It's a shocking call.

(03:46):
Do you believe that the FBI has the right to
spy and listen in on people's phone calls or get
their phone records, which is a gross violation of their
privacy without any kind of probab cause. Yes or no?

Speaker 3 (04:03):
Had an order from a judge. Jeff, you would just
talking about the judge and how he issued the order wrongly.

Speaker 2 (04:10):
Yes, but the order. No, but the order was illegal.
But Bill, the order was illegal, and AT and T
didn't comply with the order because it was illegal, and
the U and what's even more outrageous is that the
order specifically told AT and T, which is against the law.
You can't notify someone that the FBI is calling through

(04:32):
their phone call through their phone records. Bill. If the
FBI is going through your phone records behind your back
without you knowing it, the phone company, your carrier has
a legal obligation to tell you, you know, because it's
supposed to be private. Hey, I want you to know
law enforcement, for whatever reason, is going through your phone records.

(04:54):
Are you were aware of that? Right?

Speaker 4 (04:57):
Eva?

Speaker 3 (04:57):
You that you think the FBI calls you ahead to
tell you that they're looking at you?

Speaker 5 (05:02):
Okay?

Speaker 2 (05:03):
And now Bill, Bill, please stop stop. Bill. I'm trying
to have a rational conversation with you. It's not the
FBI that calls you. If the FBI is going through
a phishing expedition, here I run the FBI. Just humor me.
I say, not that I would ever do it. Let's
get Bill in Sudbury. Let's just get them. So the

(05:25):
FBI says okay, and they start looking through your phone records.
Say you use Verizon. I don't know who your carrier is.
Verizon has a legal obligation to tell you, Bill, just
so that you know. Law enforcement is asking us to
hand over your phone records. And they got a warrant.
And in this case, we felt we had no choice

(05:46):
but to hand over your phone records. You have to
be told you have rights as a citizen. This is
not a police state. So again I have to ask
you you you don't want us to have rights? Seriously,
I'm asking a serious question.

Speaker 5 (06:04):
Go have two things.

Speaker 3 (06:06):
You're mixing up two things. You're saying that your agreement
with the United States is the same as your agreement
with AT and T. We have learned over and over
and over again. You don't have an agreement with the
USA about your phone records. You have an agreement with
AT and T. And have you ever tried to read
that document, your phone agreement? Are you seriously telling me

(06:27):
you don't think that this how when you immediately say
if they're going on a fishing expedition. How about if
they're going after legitimately dangerous people. Okay, you think they
should call him and tell.

Speaker 2 (06:38):
Them Ted Cruse hold on, Ted Cruz is a legitimate
dangerous person. I'm going to say something now. Honestly, I
don't think I've ever said and all the years I've
been on the air, and it's not an order. I
never order Sandy or Mike to do anything. I respect
their spheres of authority and their's spheres of autonomy. So
when it comes, for example, to you know, Friday call

(07:00):
Dollar of the Week, I leave that up to Mike
and to Sandy. We have a best of the best
of the Kooner Report that runs on the weekends. That
is something that Mike is it either puts it together
or Sandy, it's you. I've Mike, have I ever told you? Seriously,
have I ever told you play this play that you know,
take this monologue, play that phone call. I leave that.

(07:27):
Mike is saying, you may try to, but the moment
you said, you say, do this or do that, I say,
that's not happening. Okay, But Mike, really, I've never right,
I've never asked you to do something. This time it's
just a request. You can do whatever you want.

Speaker 5 (07:43):
Mike.

Speaker 2 (07:44):
I'd like you to uh in the best of include
this phone call with Bill and Sudbury. And I'll tell
you why. I want to read this from Mark. It's
a message that Mark sent to me on messenger. Jeff,
it's time him to come clean and admit that Bill
from Sudbury is a plant for your show or he's

(08:07):
like an AI creation, because there is no way in
hell somebody can be that stupid. Come on, Jeff, fess up,
laugh out loud, Come on, Jeff, and look, I give
you my word to all of you. Really, I give
you my word. Bill is not a plant. He's a

(08:30):
real person and he's been calling this show for many
years now. The reason why this I want the phone call.
If Mike would, you know, it's up to him, But
why I think it's so illustrative. Do you see how
authoritarian and tyrannical these moonbats are Democrats Liberals? That's what

(08:53):
Bill is. He's just a hack for the Democratic Party
according to them, and that's what was laid out in
the last phone call. The deep state can do whatever
it wants in the service of the Democratic Party and
a democratic president. So if they want to spy on you,

(09:14):
you what, what's the problem. They can do whatever they want.
If the FBI wants to go on a fishing expedition,
let them go. If they want to spy on Ted
Cruz or Chuck Grassley or Marshall Blackburn, or spy on
the political opposition, go ahead. You want to look for

(09:34):
some fake crime to get him over, go ahead. That's totalitarianism,
that's literally communism. That's what the Left has now devolved
and generated into. And that was on full display in
that conversation. The deep state, the FBI, the CIA, whatever,

(09:58):
As long as you're doing on behalf of a Democrat
Joe Biden and a Democrat administration and the Democratic Party,
do whatever you want, do whatever you want. You have
no experience. It doesn't matter that the law says you
have an expectation of privacy. It doesn't matter what the
constitution says. It doesn't matter that every telephone cell phone

(10:19):
carrier is legally obligated to let you know if you
if law enforcement or the FBI is collecting or the
government is collecting your phone data without your knowledge. It
doesn't matter. Because the party does what the party wants.

(10:45):
That's why Democrats now are so are too extreme, too radical, frankly,
too anti democratic to ever be allowed to come back
to power again. That is the real shocking truth. I
forget Bill and Sudbury. He's just an example, but that's
how they think. And now it's all coming out of

(11:08):
their disgusting, grotesque abuses of power under Biden and under Obama.
And imagine, had we lost in twenty twenty four, none
of this would be coming out. They would have gotten
worse and worse and worse. Joe in Abington, Thanks for
holding Joe, and welcome.

Speaker 6 (11:29):
Jeff. I want to tell you about a very public
feud Obama had with General Petraeus. It was about Obama
wanted to remove all the troops. Portrayus publicly disagreed and
embarrassed Obama because they left five thousand and there was

(11:50):
instability with attacks and bombings, and Patrius was right. They
left five thousand troops there, and after embarrassing Obama, it
came out that Portrayus was in this long term affair
that I believe the same tools they used on the

(12:12):
senators were used on Portrayus.

Speaker 5 (12:15):
It was never proven, but there's.

Speaker 6 (12:17):
A lot of mysterious stuff like that throughout Obama's total
reign of power.

Speaker 2 (12:26):
You're completely right, and Joe, and just furthermore, this is
I look, there's so many stories I could do every day, Okay,
I just I don't have time. I can only focus
on the biggest ones and to me, what I think
are the most important. Tulca Gabbard, now she's incredible. So
she's now disclosed this. Joe, just so all of you

(12:48):
know the intelligence communities within our government, and this began
under Bush through the Patriot Act, and it got much
worse under Robot Obama really put it all on steroids
that have now infiltrated porn sites. Now you're gonna say, well,

(13:08):
what does this have to do what we're talking about. Apparently, now,
if they want to get you, what they do is
they track you. And if you have let's say you
go to a porn website or whatever, they can literally
have the technology to not only watch what you're doing,
to not only know what you're doing, but forgive me,
they have cameras that can take picture of you if

(13:31):
you're you know, pleasuring yourself as you're watching, say a
porn video. And what they do is they then use
that to blackmail people. Well, we'll let your wife know,
we'll let your boyfriend know, or whatever, vice versa. We'll
let your girlfriend know, we'll let your you know, sorry,
we'll let your boyfriend know. We'll let your husband know.

Speaker 4 (13:54):
You know.

Speaker 2 (13:54):
Like it goes both ways. So what I'm saying is,
now I'm telling you that if you go on any
of these sites, you're most likely the government is watching you.
This is by Tulsi Gabbart that now you know, especially
the big porn sites. According to Tulci, she said, the
big porn sites are hand in glove with the CIA,

(14:17):
with the NSA, with the FBI, with all of these
deep state agencies. Now, that to me is a disgusting,
grotesque abuse of power. It's a disgusting violation of privacy.
Whatever you think about porn, and I'm a big opponent
of pornography, okay, but that's another topic for another time.

(14:39):
That's your business, that's not the state's business, and they
shouldn't be, you know, recording you and tracking you on
what you watch and what you don't watch. But they
use that potentially as blackmail. So I'm just giving you
an example. Not only are they going out after generals

(15:01):
Not only are they going after Republican senators, not only
are they going after Charlie Kirk or ts Turning Point USA,
or if you want, I can name you the talk
you know, radio talk show hosts and journalists and social
media influencers that Jack Smith was. You know, I want
to know their files, I want to know their phones,
I want to know their conversations. Who are they talking to?

(15:22):
But I'm telling you, they're also looking at the porn
sites that people go to. So yeah, they they use blackmail.
That's how they do it. Or they try to humiliate you,
and they'll that's how they hold leverage over people. It's
even okay, well, we know it won't cost you your marriage,
but boy boy, you really got into that video. I

(15:46):
you are really into it. Well we could just you know,
we could leak that on into the dark web and
this thing will go viral. Oh, everybody will be making
fun of you. Is that what you want? That's how
they blackmail and control people. It's nineteen eighty four, It's
George Orwell. And that's why I've been saying this for

(16:08):
a long time. We have to destroy the deep state. Okay,
worse than Watergate. That's what now Republicans in Congress are
saying about these bombshell revelations about the Arctic frost investigation
led by Special Counsel at the time Jack Smith under
Joe Biden's Department of Justice. Attorney General Merrick Garland signed

(16:33):
off as well as Christopher Wray, FBI Director. They signed
off on the illegal spying and surveillance of leading Republican senators,
many of them pro Trump MAGA senators, members of Congress,
but also conservative organizations, business organizations, high profile donors, journalists,

(16:58):
social media influencers. They were looking to dig up as
much dirt as possible by using January sixth as the
excuse the fig leaf to try to get phone records, spy,
get data, all of it illegal, and now it's all

(17:18):
come to the surface. So let me ask all of
you the judge that gave the green light to all
of this, and now there's calls for him to be impeached,
Judge James Boseberg. The Kooner Country Poll Question of the
Day sponsored by Marios Marios quality, roofing, sighting and windows.

(17:44):
Will Judge James Boseberg still be on the bench in
a year? A yes, b no? Right now? Kooner Country
is very split. Basically, forty nine percent of you say
yes and fifty one percent of you say no. In

(18:06):
other words, forty nine percent of you basically say the
Republicans are all talking no action. They're just blowing steam.
They're just venting, yelling, screaming, shouting like they always do
after Democrats are caught committing crimes and then nothing comes
of it. Fifty one percent of you say this time

(18:29):
could be different. And I think the reason why is
because no, they were the direct victims. The spying now
was done on them. The violations of their rights and
their privacy and the abuse of power that was unleashed
was done to them. And so maybe this time there's

(18:50):
going to be some real follow through. Anyway, I want
to hear from you aes b no, Will Boseburg still
be on the bench in a year? You can vote
on my web page WRKO dot com slash cooner wrko
dot com slash cooner. Kuh and is in national Er.

(19:11):
You can also vote via x and man was I
active on X last night? My handle There all one
word at the Kooner Report k u h n e
r okay is Arctic frost. Worse than Watergate? This spying

(19:33):
on Ted Cruz, on Chuck Grassley, on Marshall Blackburn, on
Lindsey Graham, on Senator Eric Schmidt, on other Republican members
of Congress, on Charlie Kirk, when I could go on,
if you want to name you the the journalists at
Fox and Newsmax and talk radio hosts and social media
influencers and conservative organizations. Is this scandal worse than Watergate?

(19:59):
Are the Republicans correct? And do you believe we will
see Watergate style hearings? Should we see Watergate style hearings?
Billy in debtam, thanks for holding Billy, and welcome.

Speaker 5 (20:20):
Is let me ask you a question. Can you'll give
me the chapter in such of the law that says
that the phone company's mandated to advise you if your
phone is being looked into.

Speaker 2 (20:32):
I can definitely look that up for you, Billy, and
Ted Cruz is going to use that. It's going to
be also in the articles of impeachment for Bosberg. And
it's why the if you want to play you the
cut at and T refuse to comply with the subpoena

(20:53):
from Jack Smith. They said, well that's illegal. What you're
asking us to do is literally illegal. Now, if there's
probable cause, and let's say not that you would do this, Billy,
but just for the sake of argument, if there's probable cause,
then yes, then they would, you know, they would give

(21:15):
that that information over. But if there's no probable cause,
and that's the problem, there was zero evidence, there was
no probable cause. If they, Billy, if for the hell
of it, your phone carrier decides to give your information
to anybody, not just law enforcement, anybody, it's a crime.

(21:37):
It's illegal. Your phone records are private. I don't have
any business, Billy. I mean, it's not nothing personal, but
I have no business knowing you know who you call,
when you call, what you call. That's none of my business.
That's your right that you as a private citizen. And

(21:58):
law enforcement can't just say, okay, hand over the records
because we want to see if who's Billy talking to? Well, why,
well we just want to see. Well, no, you don't
have the right to do that, so but I will
I will look that up for you specifically, Billy. Billy,
is there anything else you want to ask?

Speaker 5 (22:17):
If your producer is a lawyer, Sandy, you don't know
what you're talking about what's the chapter in section? That's
what I asked you.

Speaker 2 (22:28):
Well, I just told you I don't know the specific
chapter and why you think they can.

Speaker 5 (22:35):
They don't have to tell you your phone's being looked
into if it's under investigation. They don't have to.

Speaker 2 (22:40):
Tell you without probable cause.

Speaker 5 (22:47):
You have an investigation to establish probable cause.

Speaker 2 (22:51):
No, you need probably are you are you serious?

Speaker 5 (22:56):
You don't know what you're talking about?

Speaker 2 (22:57):
Yeah, yeah, you're right. I'm sorry, buddy. Have you read
the Constitution?

Speaker 5 (23:02):
Yes? I have?

Speaker 2 (23:03):
Okay, Where does it say in the Constitution that the
police can just access your phone records? Willy nilly?

Speaker 5 (23:11):
Where if you're under investigation they have a right to research.

Speaker 2 (23:17):
Well, to have investigation, you have to have a probable cause.
There's no probable cause.

Speaker 5 (23:22):
An investigation establishes probable cause.

Speaker 2 (23:26):
But they didn't establish probable cause. That's what you're not
getting for the sixth time.

Speaker 5 (23:33):
You twist the facts, sir.

Speaker 2 (23:35):
No, I don't twist the facts, sir. With all due respect,
they were spying on cruise and they were spying on
Chuck Rasseley. Tell me what grounds would the FBI have
to spy on Chuck Rassley go tell me.

Speaker 5 (23:50):
Go depends on their investigation.

Speaker 2 (23:53):
What do you mean, depends on their investigation.

Speaker 5 (23:56):
They must be looking into someone doing what that's the wrongdoing.
That's what they're trying to look into.

Speaker 2 (24:03):
They're not going to No, no, look, look, look look
it up. Look honestly, billy, I know you're a hack,
but come on, man, we still live in a free country.
When point blank asked, When Jack Smith was asked, what
did Chuck Grassley do wrong? What specific crime did he commit?

(24:23):
He could not give an answer. That's why in the end,
AT and T didn't comply. He never got access to
the records because they wouldn't let him get access to
the records. Because you're not allowed to give him access
to the records. Are you this? I'm sorry man, am

(24:46):
I in the Soviet Union?

Speaker 5 (24:48):
Like?

Speaker 2 (24:48):
Is this now the new Democratic Party? Because this is chilling,
this is frightening. You mean to tell me that if
the let's leave out the FBI, let's just talk the police.
You mean to tell me that the police can go
to the phone company and say, hey, I have Verizon,
Hey give us Kooner's records. Yeah, sure, here it is okay, thanks,

(25:13):
And you're okay with that?

Speaker 5 (25:18):
Hello, the facts, yes, you twist the No.

Speaker 2 (25:21):
No, no, forget twisting the facts. I'm asking you a
specific question. No facts have been twisted. I've just told
you again. Jack Smith was denied at and t said,
go fly a kite. We're not giving you Ted Cruz's
phone records. It's illegal. That's why Boseburg now is going
to get impeached over this, because he broke the law

(25:45):
in issuing that subpoena. You can't in no democracy, forget
the United States. You can't do it in Canada, you
can't do it in France, you can't do it in Britain,
you can't do it in Japan. This is to meet
honest to God, This to me is chilling. This is
nineteen eighty four. So I'm asking you now a direct question,

(26:06):
which you're not answering. All you keep saying is I
twitched the fox. I twitched the fox, I touched the fox.
Can the police order the phone carrier, Verizon to hand
over my phone records? Yes or no?

Speaker 5 (26:23):
Yes?

Speaker 2 (26:24):
And you're okay with that?

Speaker 5 (26:27):
To conduct an investigation to establish probable cause, yes.

Speaker 2 (26:31):
To conduct an investigation to establish probable cause, so they
don't have probable cause. So, in other words, they have
the right to a phishing expedition. They have the right
to go through my private things in the hope that

(26:51):
they'll find probable cause to charge me with something. I
hate to tell you this. That's the KGB, that's the STAZI.
That's illegal. What you're advocating is illegal. What you're advocating
for is literally totalitarianism. You've got it backwards, buddy. You've

(27:14):
got to have a probable cause. Listen to me. I'm
educating you. This isn't our constitution, This isn't our Bill
of rights. By the way, this is in every western
democracy in the world. The police cannot go through forget
your phone records. They can't go into your home. They
can't go through your private things. They can't go through

(27:36):
your personal records. They can't go through your health records
unless they have probable cause and then get a warrant
from a judge with probable cause. They don't have the
right to just go into your home and say, well,
we're going to go into this home and we're going

(27:58):
to look through everything, and if we find some thing,
we'll establish probable cause and then we'll go to a
judge and then we'll launch an investigation. That's literally what
they do in fascist, communist, dictatorial countries. So are you
that desperate to get ted Cruz? And and and and

(28:18):
I asked you, And that's why they that's why they,
everybody told this clown Jack Smith to go fly a kite.
What did Marshall Blackburn do? He couldn't name anything. So
then why you want what do you want her records?

Speaker 5 (28:31):
Well?

Speaker 2 (28:32):
January sixth? Well, I don't care. What did you do
on January sixth that warrants this? He couldn't give an answer. Okay,
what did Chuck Grassley do, the ninety year old senator
from Iowa. Well, I want to look at his records?
Why what did he do?

Speaker 5 (28:45):
I don't know.

Speaker 2 (28:46):
I just want to look at him. Go fly a kite.
So you're so desperate to spy on Republicans. And it
wasn't just the senators, hundreds of organizations, hundreds of individuals
because you want to find something to get him on.
And you tell me you're a small d Democrat, and

(29:08):
you tell me you believe in our constitution. I want
to tell you to your face, you're another bill in Sudbury.
You're a totalitarian thug. Literally, that's Castro's Cuba, that's Soviet Union,
that's Nazi Germany, that's North Korea, that's Venezuela. The police

(29:30):
do what the hell they want. The citizens have no rights.
This is I mean a ya yai ai ya yai.
This Now, now you know why Biden got away with
all of his crimes. Look at this. This is the
Democratic Party and you want to know why Zoron Mamdani

(29:54):
is rising. By the way, I've got to say this,
you know, I'm sorry, but here we are. I mean,
I can't believe we're having this conversation. By the way,
this is what happens when you don't teach the Constitution
in schools, when you don't teach the Bill of Rights
in school This is this is the kind of people
you end up with. Congressman Heims, you can look this up. Okay,

(30:17):
Congressman from Connecticut, rabid Democrat is now attacking Trumps. It
seems off topic, but trust me, I'll bring it back
to the topic, saying that whoa Trump is engaging in
these so called extra judicial killings by going after these
narco terrorists you know in the in the Caribbean, with
their drug trafficking and their there the ships that they're

(30:38):
smuggling this fentanyl in from He says, you know, you
guys aren't gonna like it when you have a president
AOC and she starts going after our opponents. And in
other words, if we get power, we're gonna start killing you.
In other words, if you're going to have extra judicial

(31:00):
killings as they call them, quote unquote against by the way,
Venezuelan trend or Aragua narco terrorists, well hell, then we're
gonna come after you. Here, We're gonna go after our
Republican opponents. We'll start ordering assassinations against you. And now
I'm starting to understand where all the logic is coming from. Hey,

(31:22):
we can do whatever we want with the Democratic Party,
the deep state and the service of the party can
do whatever you want. There are no checks and balances.
We can spy on you. We can get your phone records,
we can surveil you, we can we can go through
your home. We can. By the way, have you ever
heard of the Fourth Amendment? I'm just you know, never

(31:44):
mind the first Amendment? Have you ever heard of the
fourth Amendment? I'm just you know, I'm just you know,
the tabillion detum a ya yai a ya yaie. No,
it's worse than Watergate. There's no question it's worse than Watergate.
But I look, let me tell you now where we are. Okay,

(32:08):
I'm not gonna sugarcoat it. This is where we are.
And that's why if the Republicans know what's good for
them and when they what's good for the country, they're
now going to have to follow through. They're gonna have
to start putting Jack Smith in jail. They're gonna have
to put Merrick Garland in jail. They're going to have
to teach these people a lesson. This is not a dictatorship.

(32:30):
This is a constitutional republic. And yes, we are also
a democracy. And you can't just willy nilly override the
fundamental civil liberties of your citizens and especially your political
opponents because you hate them. But this is now what
we're waking up to. And this is not an original

(32:52):
point on my part. Like in Germany, Like in Germany,
one third of Americas US conservatives, patriots Trump supporters. We
are now waking up to the fact that one third
of our countrymen and women, want to kill us, and

(33:18):
the other third are indifferent. They want to spy on us,
they want to lock us up, they want to put
us in prison, they want to assassinate us. It's so obvious,
and so now they're openly saying, yeah, we don't care.
You can be a senator, you can be a member
of Congress. We don't care. You could be the head

(33:39):
of a major charity or a nonprofit or whatever. We
want your records, you better hand them over, no questions asked.
You don't have any privacy you want. We're going to
listen to your phone calls. Of course, we're going to eavesdrop.
We have every right to eavesdrop. This is like he's
Germany under the Stasi. Shut up and we'll establish probable

(34:01):
cause and we'll see if there's a crime, we'll find it.
That's socialism, that's communism, that's fascism, that's totalitarianism. Six one
seven two six six sixty eight sixty eight. Bruce in

(34:24):
woo Burn, Thanks for holding Bruce, and welcome who Bruce.
They're out in forced today, my friend.

Speaker 4 (34:35):
All right, Jeff, you're you're on with this clown for
a long time. But I want to say Bill and
dead him. And that's where he's from. Bill and Sudbury,
Frank and Glossa. I hate you in a non communist way.

(34:55):
So I know we're gonna go. You're gonna go into
a break pretty soon. I'm gonna get cut off. But
I want to just go from what's going on right now.
And I know Cash Betel's kicking some butt. Damn Bongino.
Pam better step up to the plate. I say fire,
the judges go after because what's going on right now,

(35:21):
I'll bet you they open up the Pearly gates. Jeff
with what's going on after Trump went on his trip
and he's coming back. Now, these people have to wake up.
These Republicans have to wake up and smell a coffee. Unfortunately,
Charlie Kurk can't wake up and smell a coffee because

(35:44):
he got dead. They try to kill our president. And
what's going on right now? I bet you this is
a smoke screen. The swamp is muddy in the waters,
trying to make everything look like it's all Trump's fault.

Speaker 5 (36:00):
It's not.

Speaker 4 (36:01):
But I'll bet you Congress opens up the gates, and
because if they don't, there's gonna be like unbelievable bad
things happen. And with these weirdos that don't get there
free money, Bruce.

Speaker 2 (36:19):
Look you're absolutely dead on and look even you know,
I used to like the show in its early years.
I thought the first couple of seasons were very good.
I thought afterwards it just got very woke and very
predictable and very liberal. So I haven't watched the later seasons,
and I haven't watched the later seasons period. But even

(36:40):
if you watch Law and Order, literally Law and Order,
you know how many episodes I mean, just a basic
TV show