Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Six one seven two six six, sixty eight sixty eight
is the number. Okay, let's go right back to Natalie
and Lunenburg. Natalie, you asked a really good question. Can Trump, sorry,
can Obama use the Trump famous Supreme Court case about
presidential immunity to get out of it? Can he somehow
(00:20):
wiggle away from going to jail over this? Now we'll see.
I don't think he can. I don't think how this
falls under his core responsibilities. But Natalie, let's just say,
for the sake of argument, he has to rely on
presidential immunity. He's it's a damning admission of guilt on
his part, even if he's not, you know, doesn't go
(00:43):
to jail. If he's got to say, okay, fine, I'm guilty,
but you just can't touch me because I was president
at the time, he'll his reputation will never recover. And
number one number two, it doesn't prevent Hillary. She's not
covered under presidential immunity. Or Brennan or call Mey or
(01:05):
Clapper or mckab or Susan Rice. You can run down
the list. So what I'm saying is they can still
lock a lot of people up. The question is does
Pam BONDI have what it takes to do it. Natalie,
what say you?
Speaker 2 (01:22):
I'm skeptical on that, and that leads to my second
skepticism of any justice in this matter. Don't do Am
I incorrect? Or am I correct? Do these charges not
have to be brought forth before grand jury in the
District of Columbia because do you think just a grand
jury in that district would ever ever indict any of
(01:44):
these characters. I don't.
Speaker 1 (01:48):
Well, I think they would try to move it to
Florida or Texas or you know, get it out of
Virginia or wherever. You're right. I think they don't want
to keep it in DC. But you're saying, even if
we had someone that was eager, you think this will
probably end up in front of a DC grand jury.
(02:08):
And it is so partisan, so pro Democrat, that they
wouldn't indict. I mean, they wouldn't indict at till of
the hunt if they had, you know, if they if
they could, if if Attila was a Democrat. Correct.
Speaker 2 (02:22):
Yeah, this is like you know, going after Trump for
eating a slice of pepperoni on Good Friday. You know,
they'll go after him with everything they have. These guys
and the weight of evidence. I'm Jeff, tell me I'm wrong.
But every cyber of my being a saying no, it'll
be buried, suppressed. And these guys are going to skate
and they're gonna laugh about it, and the media is
(02:43):
just going to bury it. They're gonna suppress it like
they always have. What's gonna change?
Speaker 1 (02:49):
Just honestly, Natalie, what's this is? I mean, this is
what's moving the needle right now. Trump wants indictments. Trump
is ready to put these people to jail. He controls
through Pambondi and cash Betel, obviously, but he controls the
Department of Justice, he controls the FBI, and he now
(03:12):
controls the intelligence community through Tulsa Gabbard. And she has
served them up on a silver platter. This I mean,
you want to talk about a slam dunk, She's given
them now a slam dunk. So what I'm saying is
if Trump, you know he's going to war, If Trump
wants to go to war and he wants to finish
(03:34):
off his enemies, she's given them all the ammunition he
needs to do it. So that's that's why they're worried.
See Nowally, the thing is you can tell by their reaction.
They're panicking. Obama's in a full panic. Here, I'll play
you the cut. James Clapper is already lawyered up. Clapper
is scared out of his mind. Clapper knows it. They
(03:54):
got him on perjury, just on perjury alone, They've got him,
never mind the more serious crimes. Camy is now white
as a ghost. He's he's going berserk on social media.
Apparently Brennan's already developed an ulcer. I'm not kidding, they say,
apparently he's got stomach issues. He's got a bad ulcer now.
So they're panicking because she delivered it. You know, this
(04:18):
is what's different this time is you've got the documents, emails, memos,
I mean, she's You've got it all declassified documents, You've
got their signatures. You just you know, really, it's it's
(04:39):
the only thing they didn't say was we are guilty.
I mean, it's she's got him six ways to Sunday.
That's why they're nervous. That's why, to be honest, Natalie,
the talk in Washington now is someone may be willing
to cop a plea. There could be talk of a
plea deal, and I think Trump would even take that,
(05:02):
even if it meant say, like no prison time, but
just the admission of guilt alone would savage the Democratic
Party and the deep state.
Speaker 3 (05:14):
A final word to you, Natalie Ears on Watergate is
this horrible, horrible scandal.
Speaker 2 (05:20):
It brought down Nixon. The Democrats are still crowing about it.
What did he do? I mean, seriously, think about it
with the hindsight of fifty years. It's like he did
what he was in trouble for, what, you know, covering
up a two bit breaking that he didn't know about
anything about at the time. And it's like, this is
unbelievable what we just regularly accept right now. We've been conditioned,
(05:44):
like that slowly boiling frog to just accept all of
this corruption. And I'm thinking that maybe Collapper, maybe Brennan McCabe,
they might get indicted. You know, they're all out to
pasture white men and nobody cares anymore. Yeah, we'll sacrifice
them to preserve the deer later. Yeah, that's that's my
(06:06):
best case scenario. I hope I'm wrong. Jeff, tell me
I'm wrong.
Speaker 1 (06:10):
Uh, Natalie, I don't want to say you're wrong, because
I look, I'm where I don't have confidence in the
in either cash, Ptel or Pambondiu. But look, let's to me,
if we could get Brennan call me and Clapper, that
would be incredible. Look, I want the dear leader. Don't
get me wrong, but even that, you know, who's been
(06:33):
arrested ever for the Democrats, whoever goes to jail? Nobody.
So you know, I'm like, can't we just arrest and
put somebody in jail, somebody so that the least people
in the deep state, these criminals know there are some
possible consequences, so they'll think twice the next time and
won't do it again. Six one seven two six, six
(06:55):
sixty eight sixty eight is the number. Okay, very very quick.
You got to hear this. You got to hear it
to believe it. So ironically, you want to see how
dumb they were, Like, you know, if you want, call
me Brannan Clapper, the Three Stooges. Okay, you want to
see how dumb the Three Stooges were. This is Clapper
(07:18):
on CNN in twenty eighteen, where he inadvertently actually admits
that Obama ordered the intelligence community assessment that we now
know was a massive lie. And that Obama was setting
(07:40):
Trump up as an agent of Russia, that this was
the order that set up this false narrative of the
Russia collusion hoax. Now, of course he doesn't say it's false,
but he actually says, oh, yeah, no, no, this was
all Obama. This was all everything. I think we're talking
a Russia collusion, it's all because of Obama. He actually
(08:06):
dams Obama. Now in retrospect, listen now to this roll
cut for Mike.
Speaker 3 (08:18):
At one point I'd like to make Anderson, I don't
think has come up very much before, And I'm alluding
now to the President's criticism of President Obama for all
that he did or didn't do before he left office
with respect to the Russian meddling. If it weren't for
President Obama, we might not have done the intelligence community
(08:40):
assessment that we did that set off a whole sequence
of events which are unfolding today, notably a Special Council
Molors investigation. President Obama is responsible to that, and was
he who tasked us to do that intelligen community assessment
in the first place. I think that's an important point
when it comes to critiquing person Obama.
Speaker 1 (09:02):
This is incredible. This isn't great. So he's even admit,
that's how dummy is. So he's like, no, no, that's
not Hey, hey, the reason why we're even talking about
Trump Russia collosion, it's because of the dear Leader. He's
the one that said, do the intelligence community assessment. Guys.
(09:23):
You got Hey, this is what I want you guys
to do. You ordered us to do this. I swear
you can't make this up. Now the evidence is now,
it's it's damning, it's overwhelming, it's clearly irrefutable. There's no
question now. So this is how the media is now
(09:44):
attacking Tulsi Gabbard. If you don't have the facts, if
you don't have the evidence, if you don't have the law,
then you have to go after character. You gotta go
ad hominem. You've got to go personal, you gotta go low,
you gotta go dirty. Soh CNN rolls out Caitlin Collins
and what she is is she's a political assassin. All
(10:08):
she does now, that's all she does is hit job
after hit job. So they roll out this liar and
this propagandist CNN does at the Tulsi Gabbard White House
presser yesterday. And if you remember, there was a clash
between Tulsi and Trump during the Israel Iran War, whereby
(10:29):
initially Tulsi said, well, I'm not so sure that we
have the evidence that Iran is now fully committed to
a nuclear weapons program, and then she explained it more
in detail, but there was a bit of friction between
her and Trump for about twenty four forty eight hours.
So listen now how CNN and the media now is
trying to spin this roll cut three A. Oh, and
(10:55):
just that you know, Caroline Levitt is right beside Tulsi
and she will jump in to defend Tulsi because now
the argument is you're just trying to suck up the Trump.
Isn't that why you're releasing all the disclassified information. It's
because you weren't in good graces with Trump and now
(11:16):
you want to get back into his good graces. This
is all about you wanting Trump's approval, isn't it. Roll
cut three A.
Speaker 4 (11:26):
Mike, what would you say to people who believe that
you're only releasing these documents now to improve your standing
with the president after he said that your intelligence assessment
were wrong.
Speaker 5 (11:36):
The only people who are suggesting that the Director of
National Intelligence would release evidence to try to boost her
standing with the president. Are the people in this room
who constantly try to sew distrust and chaos amongst the
president's cabinet and it is not working.
Speaker 1 (11:51):
I mean, this is unbelievable. This is unbelievable. So this
is about improving your standing with Trump? Now notice, okay again,
what does this have to do with the overwhelming evidence
that she presented yesterday? Whatever TWLSA Gabbard's motives are. She
wants to suck up the Trump, she wants to re
(12:14):
establish a warm relationship with him, whatever, who cares. Who
cares whether she's doing it out of noble patriotic reasons
or because she wants her boss to like her. Again,
the facts are the facts, The evidence is the evidence.
The crimes are the crimes. The treason is the treason. Hello,
(12:40):
but this is what I mean, This is what passes
for journalism today. So I want to ask all of you.
It is the Kooner Country Pole Question of the Day
sponsored by Marios Mario's Quality Roofing, Siding and Windows. Did
DNI Tulsia Gabbard release the Russia Gate intelligence reports because
(13:05):
A she believes in transparency or B she is trying
to get in good with President Trump, which is what
now the media is trying to claim. So a transparency
B sucking up to Trump. To me, I think it's
pretty obvious she's basically putting her entire life on the
(13:28):
line and the media is going to eat this poor
woman alive. I don't think it's to suck up to Trump.
I think it's clear she's a patriot who is speaking
truth to power. But that's me transparency. I think it's
a all the way. But I want to hear from
you a transparency B sucking up to Trump? You can
(13:51):
vote on our web page wrko dot com slash cooner
wrko dot com slash cooner kuh n in national Er.
As always, you can vote on X again. Last night
I was very active on X exposing what Tulsi had
revealed and Obama's and Hillary's nefarious role in all of this.
(14:15):
So if you want to vote via X, my handle
there at the Kooner Report all one word k u
h and as in national Er, Alex in the Freedom State, Florida.
Thanks for holding Alex and welcome.
Speaker 6 (14:32):
Hey Jeff, thanks for taking my call again, I appreciate it, my.
Speaker 1 (14:36):
Pleasure, the fact that you take my call.
Speaker 6 (14:39):
No matter what I have to talk about from previous calls.
But the thing is Trump.
Speaker 4 (14:45):
I don't know.
Speaker 6 (14:46):
It's like he keeps making horrible decisions on attorney generals.
I just don't get it. And I don't know if
you recall back to the OJ Simpson trial where he
once they acquitted him, the juror came out and I
(15:07):
can remember it like it was yesterday and I'm still
gagging from it, where she came out and she said,
I think we made the right decision. You could she
was a horrible actor, Pam BONDI is the same thing
when I heard her say, oh, this is President Trump
(15:29):
and we are going to release all the documents because.
Speaker 1 (15:34):
He Alex, please hang on. I'm up against the break.
Alex is basically, you know, arguing, and I think it's
a very good, you know, very very valid concern. Six
one seven two six six sixty eight sixty eight is
the number. Okay, my friends, I want to go right
back to Alex in Florida. But just before I do,
(15:57):
brilliant text, absolutely brilliant text. You can text as seven
zero four seven zero seven zero four seven zero. And
I think this is what Obama now is really relying on.
And I think it's Brennan, it's Clapper, it's Comy Biden
to a lesser extent, Hillary. There's no question now which
(16:18):
is the propaganda media or the state run media, whatever
you want to call it. And this is what five
O eight says Jeff. Remember when under the Obama administration,
the Smith Month Act was gutted, which then made it
lawful for the government, which includes the CIA or the
(16:41):
Intelligence community, to propagandiz i e. Lie within the United
States and to its citizens, including directly employing the media.
I believe this was Obama's foresight into the future when
he might need an insurance policy a legal defense for
(17:05):
his crimes to come. And I agree. I think there's
no question. There's no question now they're not arguing the evidence.
If you've noticed now, they're trying to avoid it, ignore it,
bury it, sweep it under the rug, pretend it's not happening,
or just call it a conspiracy theory, or attacked Tulca
(17:28):
Gabbart her motives. Remember Hillary called her a Russian asset.
She also called remember Jill Stein, the Green Party candidate.
She was also a Russian asset. Remember Tucker Carlson was
a Russian asset. Steve Bannon was a Russian asset. Do
you remember I was a Russian asset? Do you remember that?
So that's all they have now are these slanderous, libelous,
(17:54):
defamatory attacks. But that can only go so far. Now
what are they going to do now when you have
whistleblowers coming out today and tomorrow. What are they going
to say then? In other words, it's just going to
get worse and worse very quickly. Because Alex is holding
(18:14):
and I want to go to him. You want you
want to know how serious this is now getting. I
want you to listen to this. They're running on CNN.
Okay Clapper is now former DNI James Clopper goes on
CNN and says, I've already got a lawyer. He goes,
(18:37):
I'm going to get prosecuted by the dj I can
see it. It's coming. Roll cut seven. Mike, do you.
Speaker 5 (18:46):
Have concerns that they will attempt to prosecute you?
Speaker 7 (18:49):
Well, certainly, I do. You know after eight and a
half years of this, and I don't know of an
intelligence product that was more scrutinized, more investigated than that
product was, by numerous people. You know, it's very disconcerting,
(19:10):
it really is. And I take seriously when president of
the United States accuses me of being a participant in
a treason, this conspiracy, which is ridiculous.
Speaker 1 (19:20):
Yeah, what's your reaction to that?
Speaker 7 (19:22):
Tradiculous? It just is, it is untrue.
Speaker 4 (19:26):
So what will you do if they come after you?
What is your plan?
Speaker 7 (19:29):
Well, I'll lawyer up. I suppose already.
Speaker 5 (19:33):
Have you've already hired attorneys in case of an anticipation
that this Trump storm I could.
Speaker 4 (19:39):
Try to prosecute.
Speaker 7 (19:39):
We've had sort of perpetual attorneys since I left the
government in twenty seventeen.
Speaker 1 (19:45):
So there you go. Listen and notice, does this guy
look to you like an innocent Does he sound you're
like an innocent man? By the way, this guy who's
repeatedly light under oath, there's no question. Does this incorrigible,
pathological liar? Nah? And I gotta tell you, he looks defeated,
He sounds defeated. Ah. You can break Clapper. You're gonna
(20:08):
break McCabe. You can break call Me, you can break Brennan,
you can break Clapper. So one of them is gonna flip,
and all you need is one. And when one flips,
it's like a it's like a domino. Then they all
the first one falls and everyone else starts to fall
after it. All right, let's go back to Alex in Florida.
Thank you for holding Alex. Alex, you are making some
(20:31):
very very good points. A will a jury have the
common sense and the courage to make a conviction. And
even more than that, Pam Bondi, is she a serious prosecutor,
because this is the greatest scandal in American history? Does
she have the depth, the fortitude, the intelligence, the courage,
(20:58):
the skills, the low yerly skills to go through with
this prosecution and win it? Or are we going to
look at another OJ Simpson fiasco? Please, Alex, pick up
where you left off.
Speaker 6 (21:13):
Harry Jeff. What I was trying to say is I
recall the juror from the OJ Simpson trial, and I'm
comparing her to Bondy. When after they gave oj an acquittal,
she said, I think they interviewed her and she said,
I think we made the right decision, and you could
(21:33):
tell she was insincere. And when I heard the media
ask bond Pam Bondy, if they're going to release the
Epstein files. This was a month ago. She said, yes,
Donald Trump's going to keep to all his campaign promises,
and it's Donald Trump, and yes, we are going to
release them. She seems so insincere, like she was a
(21:57):
very bad actress. And I can't help but to believe
that they that they already showed her the evidence of
Obama and them with all the Russia Russia hoax, and
she is not going after it and after them, and
I would. I can't help but to think that possibly
(22:21):
Tulsea Gabbert is now taking it on herself to show
the evidence to everybody. But it's not going to matter.
And I'm disappointed that Trump can't seem to get a
good attorney general. I don't know what his problem.
Speaker 1 (22:36):
No, I agree, No, Alex, listen, I think you put
your finger right on it. Look, you know, I love
the guy, and I think he's one of the greatest,
maybe even now the greatest president in American history. I
don't know, it's still debatable, but he's certainly way at
the top. I've never seen the first six months. We
just passed a six month mark. The only other president.
They're comparing him to his FDR. And I don't want
(22:57):
to get sidetracked. I want to stay on topic. But
look at the first six months, you know, the first
hundred days. They said, oh my god, what did have
you know? FDR passed all this flurry of legislation, but
most of it didn't work. Like I'm sorry, I don't
want to get into the Great Depression now, but just
give me ten seconds. The New Deal never got us
out of the depression. The New Deal was an absolute failure.
(23:22):
It never restored growth, it never restored on a high employment.
It never got us out of it, never gave us
economic recovery. The New Deal was a disaster. It failed.
I'm telling you just I'm stating the facts. Look at
unemployment when FDR came into power. Look at unemployment nearly
eight years later, when we go to war, actually nine
(23:44):
years later, when we go to war, you know, World
War two. To say, the unemployment rate never got higher,
I mean sorry, never got lower. Forgive me, employment never
got higher. So, yes, a lot of things were passed.
If you're just looking for volume, yeah, okay. But if
you're looking for volume and effectiveness, this is Trump it's
(24:09):
not just that he's done a lot, it's almost everything
he's done is incredibly successful and incredibly effective. So what
I'm saying is I love the guy. I think he's
another I can you imagine We've got three and a
half more years of this. But he's got a weakness.
(24:30):
He's got an achilles heeled. There's a weakness. You know,
every strength has a weakness, every weakness has a strength.
For whatever reason, that ag slot continues to haunt him.
And frankly, FBI director, I don't know what it is,
whether it was Sessions and then Bill Barr and now PAMBONDI. Now,
(24:52):
to be fair, I'm not going to close the book
on her. I'll tell you why, because she may go
ahead and issue indictments, she may go ahead and actually
charge people.
Speaker 4 (25:04):
To me.
Speaker 1 (25:04):
I look at this in a sports analogy. This is
her super Bowl. Now, she's the starting quarterback. Can she
take her team to victory? Can she get the job done? Now?
If she blinks on this, she has to go. She
has to go. And this is not even a tough call.
(25:26):
And let me just say one other thing, because this
is very important. Tulca Gabbart is not just bringing the
receipts a tremendous personal cost, and at really the risk
of her life. You know, you asked who's willing to
take on the entire deep state?
Speaker 4 (25:41):
She is.
Speaker 1 (25:42):
Who's willing to take on the entire Obama Clinton Biden
machine and the entire media to boot she is. That's
one tough lady man. That's a tough cookie. I admire her,
I respect her, but it's almost like you can never
(26:03):
do overkill, right, when you have evidence of treason, you
always want more and more. But what I'm saying is
there's so much now that she's laying putting on the table.
It's almost like she's shaming Bondie. As I said earlier,
it's almost like like she's pushing her, like come on,
And it's not just the evidence that she's rolling out.
(26:25):
If you listen now to some of her press conferences,
in her media interviews, it's like, well, yeah, no, no,
I'm going to the DJ. She keeps saying it, I'm
miss youing a criminal referral. Yes, I have. There needs
to be prosecutions, there needs to be indictments. Then she's
saying no, no, and on Obama, there needs I've issued a
criminal referral. She's got to invite them. So it's almost
(26:48):
like I'm going to push her and push her and
push her or at least shame her that come on,
do the right thing and start inviting people. So, I mean,
we'll see if it works. But you can tell Bondie's reluctant,
there's no question, and Cash Ptel and Dan Bongina, all
(27:09):
all those guys. I mean, you know, seriously, I mean,
you know, I don't think you know, I don't think
much of them. But it's clear Trump and Gabbert and JD.
Vance in the back, Just to let you know, in
the back J D Vance is backing Trump and Tulsi
Gabbert all the way, but publicly it's Trump and Tulsi
(27:30):
they're driving this. Six one seven two six six sixty
eight sixty eight is the number. Susan in Ashland. Thanks
for holding. Oh sorry, Suzanne, my bad. Suzanne in Ashland.
Thanks for holding, Suzanne, and welcome, Jeff.
Speaker 6 (27:49):
Good morning.
Speaker 4 (27:49):
How are you today?
Speaker 1 (27:50):
I'm very good? How are you? Suzanne?
Speaker 4 (27:52):
Couldn't be better? Jeff? This feels different to me in
so many ways. You know, one of your callers that
are earlier where everyone's conditioned for things to be the
way they've been, you know, the lying and the and
the covering up, and it's led to disappointment on the right,
and it's led to you know, the left is going
(28:14):
along with the headline and the lies. This to me
feels like there's some empathy involved for for for Americans
in that their spoons they have the goods. This little different.
It's it's lock stock and barrel dung in terms of
the evidence. But it feels to me like they are
(28:34):
gently introducing this evidence and let people get comfortable and
people who have been you know, have the trumped arrangement
syndrome to get their heads around the fact that they
have been lied to as we all know, the Maga
Maga and the Kuna crowd for the last ten years plus.
(28:57):
So it's it's really a conditioning for the turn around
that's about to come. And I would say this, I
wonder if we're with the Congress going on break that
this is so serious. And when you listen to Trump,
if you're really listening to Trump, he's throwing signals to
Maga country every day. You know, you know what he
(29:19):
is common about Hillary? You know, we let her go
the first time, I just felt it wasn't right. And
now he's signaling otherwise. So what if this is condition
them with the proof, condition them with the proof. And
I still feel that they have somewhere somehow, very soon
the emails from Hillary's illegal server are going to come
(29:43):
come to the front burner. But let that go. I
think they're conditioning everybody for what's about to happen in
the month of August. Well, Congress is on vacation.
Speaker 1 (29:54):
Well, I think, Susanne, I think you're making absolutely outstanding points.
And just I can only piggyback off of what you're saying.
You know who else is pushing the email server, Hillary's
email server and says, no, we're going to go back
and we got to revisit this, Taulci Gabbard. And so
(30:15):
now I just want to ask everybody this, this, this
is what many of you are saying on the text line,
and I'm starting to agree with you objectively. Now just
stand back. Who is Donald Trump? Yes, maga America first
I two times, you know, second term, very successful president.
(30:37):
But remember, for most of his life, what was he
He was a Democrat. He was a Democrat. He's only
been a Republican much later in his life. Now, Tulca Gabbard.
What's Tulci Gabbard? Another one former Democrat? She's been a
Democrat for most of her life.
Speaker 6 (30:56):
Now.
Speaker 1 (30:56):
I don't want to get sidetracked, but you know, Robert F.
Kennedy Jr. Because this is such a massive manumental scandal.
I haven't had a chance to get into everything that
Robert F. Kennedy's accomplishing as Health and Human Services Secretary.
You know, Maha, make America healthy again. But man, this
guy is delivering. This guy is a closer. He doesn't
(31:17):
mess around. What's what's Robert F. Kennedy Junior? It's a
former Democrat. What I'm saying is you always ask, we
always say, well what would democrats do? And say what
you want? Democrats play smash mouth football. Democrats today. When
they say they're going to indict, they indict. When Democrats
(31:37):
say they're going after you, they go after you. It's
only the Republicans talk talk, talk, and nothing comes of it.
And that's why, as you were mentioning, Suzanne, we're always
constantly disappointed. But this time, as you put it, something
feels different. I want to read to you Suzanne, a
brilliant text that I got nine one seven, And I
(31:59):
think this is checkmate argument, Jeff. If baraq Hussein, Obama
and his seditious administration don't get indicted, arrested, and prosecuted
for treason, then we are no longer a serious country.
(32:24):
Just ask yourself, to all of you, please listen to this.
Just ask yourself if this situation was reversed and it
was Trump not Obama, what do you think would happen
to Trump? Let me seriously, nine one seven. You're a genius.
(32:46):
Do you understand that you're a genius? Okay, IQ guaranteed
one forty and above. I'm telling you you're a genius.
Now just let me ask you, Susanne, Let me ask
everybody in the audience. Flip it. It's all all the
same information, everything except it wasn't Obama who ordered it,
it was Trump. Everything else the same, everything else. What
(33:11):
do you think the Democrats would do to Trump? Smash
mouth football? He would be in handcuffs, They'd hang him
from the freaking White House. They'd lunched a guy. He
would be arrested. His vice president would be arrested. His
(33:32):
National security advisor would be arrested his CIA director, FBI
director is DNI. They would all be swinging from the
legal trees, like, who are we kidding? Oh my god?
Remember they drove Nixon out of office over nothing, a
third rate burglary. He didn't even order, didn't even know
(33:54):
it took place until after it happened, and they drove
the guy out of office. What do you think they
would do if this was Trump? It's finished, it's finished.
So why this time does this smell different? Sense just
seems different. You sense it's different. You got a former
(34:15):
Democrat who's now in the White House. You've got a
former Democrat who's the DNI, and they're not coming to play.
In other words, if this was Trump, the Democrats would
have finished him. Now Trump and Tulsi they're playing to win.
(34:39):
They're going for the throat. And I think that's what's
starting to seem different to everybody. And it's the same
old rhino establishment Republicans who speak out of both sides
of their mouth, who are unwilling to go through with this. Right,
it's cash Btel, it's a Dan Bongino, It's uh, you know,
(35:02):
it's it's Pambondie, always big mouth, big talk. You know,
Jim Jordan, he's a classic to me, biggest mouth on
Capitol Hill. Nothing nothing, this guy ever doesn't do a thing.
But no, no, you want something done, you want to
take somebody out, have a Democrat do it, because they're serious.
They don't play around. It's smash mouth football. Okay, I
(35:25):
just punched you know what punch? I punched my hand
like they it's it's a contact sport. Now, it's not
just the evidence, it's the intensity of the evidence. It's
the seriousness of the evidence. It's the determination behind the evidence.
(35:46):
You can tell the Democrat for the first time, I've
never seen it like this. The Democrats and the media
are genuinely afraid. Suzanne. Final word to.
Speaker 4 (35:54):
You, Jeffrey, I just I envisioned that this is so
like you said, it's so serious and so it is different.
You know, Congress is on vacation coming up. What's to
say that Trump, you know, has the goods, takes it
off Pin Bondi's plate and just calls in the military
(36:15):
to make these arrests in military tribunal because it's it's
it's treason in the highest order.
Speaker 1 (36:23):
Susanne to the to the Texter's point. If it wasn't
Obama who ordered this, just indulge me. It was Trump.
Everything else is the same. What do you think would
have happened to him? By now?
Speaker 4 (36:35):
You put away for life?
Speaker 1 (36:36):
For sure, Suzanne, thank you very much for that call.
Six one seven two six six sixty eight sixty eight?
Is the number? Is the texture wrong? Am I wrong?
All of you? Honestly you're listening to the show, same
exact thing. Just flip it Trump instead of Obama? The Democrats?
(36:57):
Now what would they have done by now? By now?
Just what is it? Six days? Remember she declassified everything
late last week, So what is that a week from now?
A week past? Forgive me, it's been a week. What
do you think in one week would have happened? There
would have been indictments, charges, arrests, up, penats, Mike, I mean,
(37:19):
you'd be they'd be all beginning rounded up,