Comey's January 6th FBI Lie

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Jeff Kooner, Liberalism's worst nightmare. Baby. It is now breaking.
You can see now the dam is about to just
bust wide open. FBI bombshell. Nearly three hundred FBI agents,
to be exact, it has now been exposed. It's now

(00:20):
been revealed. Two hundred and seventy four FBI agents were
sent to the capital on January sixth, two hundred and
seventy four, almost all of them quote unquote undercover. And
not only were they undercover, but many of them later

(00:43):
Now their complaints are now going to become out. They're
going to be made public. Many of them later complained
that they were being used by the Department of Justice
and by the FBI as quote unquote political pawns. Again,
Donald Trump, the FBI and the federal government was involved

(01:10):
in January sixth, and they helped to create and incite
what happened on j six And the FBI, the deep state.
They've been lying to us now for years. Remember Chris
Ray that pos to me, he's almost as bad as Camy. Okay,
Then that FBI director, he went to Congress and under

(01:34):
oath replied repeatedly, kept denying it all the time. I
had no idea. What what FBI agents were undercover? What
posing as Trump supporters? What calling for people to storm
the capitol? What calling for Mike Pence to be hanged?

Speaker 2 (01:53):
What?

Speaker 1 (01:53):
No, No, that wasn't. No, that wasn't my FBI, that
wasn't You're a liar. You're a liar. Look, I'm telling
you right now. It's almost as if every conspiracy theory
turns out to be true. So now we have definitive proof.

(02:19):
This is beyond an argument. We have the FBI's own
internal files now that are being exposed, unmasked, that are
being now revealed. Two hundred and seventy four FBI agents
were sent in undercover as Trump supporters to incite trouble
and violence on that day, many of them James Comy loyalists,

(02:45):
all under the full knowledge of Christopher Ray, who also
obstructed justice, led under oath, committed perjury when asked repeatedly
in hearing after hearing, we're there FBI undercover agents. No
did you know about it? No? Nothing, not of my knowledge. Nothing,

(03:07):
I knew nothing. I knew nothing, I saw nothing, I
hear nothing. It's like Sergeant Schultz, all it's all now
coming out six one, seven, two six six sixty eight
sixty eight lines are loaded. Mark in Lowell, Thanks for
holding Mark, and welcome.

Speaker 3 (03:30):
Hi deth Hi.

Speaker 4 (03:33):
So what I wanted to bring up was the whole
concept of I understand why Trump was saying that something
has to be done now, because the low fruit is
everything that's within that five year period.

Speaker 5 (03:50):
The question I have.

Speaker 3 (03:51):
In general is why is the statue of limitations available
to these people If they had another four years, let's
say Kamala Harris, all their lives would be buried because
of that rule. It seems like the rule should change

(04:11):
if it's a political issue, should change when the policy,
when the political party changes and starts chicking at that time,
because more of his stuff would be in questions than
just simply lying to Congress.

Speaker 1 (04:28):
You're right, I mean, you're right, You're in theory, You're
completely right. Mark. Look, they wanted Kamala to win to
cover up not just their crimes but Joe Biden's crimes,
and ultimately they're Obama's crimes. Okay, that's let mean, let's
just you know, let's put our cards on the table.
As the Germans would say, let's just be honest with

(04:48):
each other. So you're completely right. Look the disappointing and
you're right about this five year you know, statute of limitations.
It should be longer. I agree, especially when it comes
to lying to Congress, lying under oath in Congress, obstructing justice,
obstructing a congressional proceeding, these as you put in our
political crimes. I agree, but you know, to be fair,

(05:13):
Pam Bondy did not have to wait three or four
days before the statute of limitation. I mean she could
have done this in March. She could have done this
in April. She could have done this in May and
June and July and August. I mean that was Trump's point, like,
how long does it take You've got them on perjury?

(05:33):
You know, a college freshman or someone just out of
law school could could prosecute this case on perjury and
making false statements, Like what is taking so long? And no,
I'll tell you what's taking so long. Pam Bondy doesn't
like to be attacked and vilified. She doesn't She likes

(05:55):
to be liked. She likes to be in the media.
She doesn't like to have the New York Times of
the Washington Post co after her or CNN or MSNBC.
So she was deliberately dragging her heels and Trump is like, look,
the clock is ticking. It's either now or never. And finally,

(06:17):
you know, he told her, basically, he told her, do
it or you're gone. And so she did it. Now
I'm happy that it was done. But you know, Mark, look,
let's put it this way. I've been calling for Pam
Bondi to be let go to be fired. Nothing has
changed my mind. Nothing Again, she put the president in

(06:39):
a bad position. Six one seven two six, six sixty
eight sixty eight is the number. Okay, let me ask
you that James call Me has now been indicted on
two counts, false statements to Congress and obstructing a Congressional proceeding,
essentially obstruction of justice. He now will face up to

(07:01):
five to ten years in prison if found guilty on
both counts. A. Do you support the indictment? Do you
think Comy should go to jail? And is this the
beginning of the end of the deep state? Is the
dam about to break? Or like many of you, are

(07:23):
you very cynical and think this will be a huge, big,
fat nothing burger. Six one seven two six six sixty
eight sixty eight, Dan in Plymouth, Thanks for holding Dan
and welcome.

Speaker 6 (07:41):
Hey Jeff, do you think COBE's defense is going to
be I had a false memory because we know how
well that worked out for the late disgraced xboss. I'm
gonna get the answer to is.

Speaker 7 (07:53):
What did Comy and the FBI know and when did
they know it? Because if you listen for four years,
the narrative was Trump colluded with Russia. Now you hear
the Democrat Party through the conglomerate media say Russia tried

(08:14):
to influence the election, those don't line up the accusation.
The original accusation was that Trump colluded with Russia. And
so I want to get the answer to what did
they know, when did they know it?

Speaker 6 (08:32):
And who knew it?

Speaker 7 (08:33):
Did Bob Muller know it?

Speaker 6 (08:35):
Did Adam Shiff know it?

Speaker 8 (08:38):
Right?

Speaker 7 (08:38):
Did Obama know it? Did Biden know it? And what
did they know and when did they know it? I'm
not holding my breath for a conviction. I just want
Komy to go down in history as the liar that
we all know he is.

Speaker 1 (08:54):
Well, you know, Dan, You're brilliant, absolutely brilliant, And the
answers to all your quot questions are in the documents,
the classified documents that Tulsi Gabbard released, And you want
some fascinating reading over the weekend and or whenever you're free,

(09:15):
just go through some of those documents. It gives you
dates hours literally, the hours that they met, the conversations
that they had. Obama is ordering them, We're going to
frame this guy as an agent of Russia. He's telling
Brennan and Clapper and Komy, we're going to take this

(09:38):
guy out. And he's told at the meeting. But this
is information from Hillary, this is from her political campaign.
In fact, they knew there were Russia experts, you know,
permanent Russia experts in the CIA who were saying this
is garbage. There was no collusion between Trump and Putin.
In fact, they're saying, you don't understand. Putin doesn't want

(10:02):
Trump to win. He would rather have Hillary for many reasons,
but the biggest one saying that Putin has more quote
unquote compromitt compromise on Hillary, the Uranium deal being exhibit A.
Putin was saying, no, get her in there. We can
blackmail or Trump we can't blackmail. So they knew the

(10:24):
whole time. This was in twenty in November and especially
December December twelfth, twenty sixteen. If you want to look
at the files, then that's the date. December twelfth, twenty sixteen.
That was the key meeting. That was if you want
to you know, it's like getting a mob boss. That's
when the hit was ordered, you know, to use a

(10:45):
mafia analogy. It's December twelfth, twenty sixteen. And by the way,
Susan Rice was there, Jean Francois, John Kerry was there.
It wasn't just Joe Biden. It wasn't just you know,
I mean it all of them. It was Komi, it
was Brennan, it was Clapper, McCabe, they were all there.
There's about twelve of them in the room, and they're like,

(11:08):
are we gonna go ahead with this? Like all the
way and they're like, yeah, let's go. Let's go. And
if you look at it, look at the media reports,
it's after December twelveth it goes as you put it.
The conglomerate media, the corporate media, the deep state media,
they go into overdrive. Then you're right, Dan, it's Trump

(11:30):
Putin Trump. Putin Trump colluded with Putin Russia, helped get
Trump elected. Trump stole the election with the help of
the Russians. Now they're lying by saying, oh, all we
were saying is that Russia influenced the election. No, that's
not what you guys were saying.

Speaker 2 (11:47):
And you know that.

Speaker 1 (11:48):
And by the way, what was the big influence. And
you know what the big influence was. I swear to
you five hundred thousand dollars in Facebook ads, by the way,
in states that were, like, for example, Texas, that Trump
was gonna win no matter what. So some of these

(12:10):
Russian bots and Russian trolls were putting out some Facebook ads,
and these were like, you know, Russian hackers or online people,
and they spent about five hundred thousand in all, and
all of it went to states that were completely inconsequential
in the sense that either Trump had won him or

(12:30):
Hillary was gonna win him. Not even one of them
was a swing state. But we're looking at half a
million dollars in Facebook ads in a campaign that spent
billions of dollars. So five hundred thousand dollars literally it's peanuts.
You laugh at five hundred and that kind of a
presidential campaign, You laugh at five hundred thousand dollars so

(12:54):
the whole argument they're making is absurd, it's laughable. No,
they lied, they know that they lied, they know that
we know that they lied, and now they don't want
to be held accountable. And that's why you want to
talk about circling the wagons. Dan. I'm telling you here,

(13:15):
I'm going to go out on a limb. Somebody in
the media this weekend is going to call for Trump
to be jfkid. They're going to openly call for it.
I'm telling you, I was watching this last night and
I'm like, you can't get you cannot get more hysterical,
more in singiary, more inflammatory, more unhinged than what I'm

(13:39):
watching now. And I said, they're the only thing they're
not doing is saying, you know, take them out, like
just somebody take them out this time. Finish it, you know,
unlike Butler or Florida, this time, finish it. Pull a
Charlie Kirk on this guy. And it's gonna it's inevitable.

(14:02):
Now it's gonna happen. And the reason you you just
nailed it, it's all gonna be unmasked. What credibility will
these people ever have again, ever, ever, ever, ever? They've
now they're mired, they're caught, they're trapped, and they're implicated

(14:25):
in the biggest scandal in American history. And I'm sorry,
I gotta say this, the only guy, in fact, there
were three people, three people, two guys in one gal
the only three people that have the balls, the balls

(14:47):
to go to war and expose these criminals for who
and what they are in the deep State. Donald J. Trump,
the President, Vice President J. D. Vance, who's been and
fending off people in the administration saying I'm backing Trump
one thousand percent on this. And Folsey Gabbard, you want

(15:10):
to talk about individuals changing history, Individuals can change history. Dan,
final word to you, my friend.

Speaker 9 (15:18):
Well, first of all, let's put five hundred thousand dollars
in perspective. That was Kamala Harris's Campaign's burn rate for
every sixty seconds, literally a drop in an ocean. But
at all seriousness, I think the best we can hope
for is.

Speaker 6 (15:32):
That James call me his and his cohorts.

Speaker 7 (15:35):
Get the oj Simpson treatment, and that is they are
uninvited in polite society. And if we can get that,
then that to me.

Speaker 1 (15:46):
Dan, I love you like a brother from another mother.
Six one seven, two, six, six, sixty eight sixty eight
is the number Ellie in Worcester. Thanks for holding Ellie
and welcome.

Speaker 10 (16:01):
Hey buddy, Hi Ellie.

Speaker 1 (16:03):
How are you? How are you doing? Uh?

Speaker 2 (16:06):
The Zolensky wants to say something, Yes, I love you
a non sensu way, Yes, I love you.

Speaker 1 (16:15):
Send money, Ellie? What do you make of call me? Uh?
He could be facing up to ten years in prison?

Speaker 2 (16:27):
Well what do I make of it? You know, he's
looking pretty innocent, you know, he's got the innocent eyes.
And what you've been talking about really the last hours.
So I was like, it's all on the ten stages
of genocide, and the tenth stage is denial. Government denies

(16:48):
it has committed any crime. They're already denying stuff. And
we're already in stage eight, beginning of murders and the
governm in broadcast propaganda to turn the populace against a
group which is usually Christian tea, piety, Magotyite people. That's

(17:09):
stage six. So been there, done that. So he's already denying.
Everybody's already denying that they've done anything, you know, anything.

Speaker 10 (17:20):
Wrong in that that includes the past few years with arrests,
you know, and imprisonment of innocent people.

Speaker 2 (17:31):
I don't think that this is probably all about Trump.
I mean you have to think about what's been done
to the citizens too. You know, I think Trump is
just in the way. But they did an awful lot
of bad things to you know, doctors and pastors, throwing
him at the old ladies, throwing him in shackles from

(17:54):
head to foot. I mean, it's the These are the people,
you know, Mike Lindell, Tim Allen Rose in PA. These
are the people who really should be.

Speaker 11 (18:12):
Being defended because I see, I know what happened to
Trump was really really bad, but he is representing the
you know, freedom of speech people.

Speaker 1 (18:27):
Well, you know, Ellie, look, Trump has said this repeatedly,
and I think you're really onto something where he says, look,
I know they're after me. Obviously they try to you know,
what is it five indictments. You know, they've tried to
assassinate me, bankrupt me, take me off the ballot, uh,
you know, kill me, and then send me to jail
again and again. But he said, honestly, he goes, I'm

(18:49):
telling you they're not really after me. They're after you, Mai,
the American people. I'm just in the way. Once they
get rid of me, they've they can go after all
of us. And that's what we saw under Biden for
four years. He went after us. That's what I find

(19:09):
is so disgusting about the entire Democrat media reaction. They're
claiming somehow like this is lawfair. Really, you guys invented lawfair.
That's what you guys did to us for years under Biden.
And look, let's just cut to the chase. You've got
the media now freaking out, You've got Democrats freaking out.

(19:32):
And you know when Letitia James, now she's gonna have
to face the music. So when you charge Letitia James
for mortgage fraud, Oh, that's Trump going after his political opponents.
Oh yeah, Or now it's it's James call mey. Oh,
he's see. He's weaponizing the Justice Department, he's weaponizing law
enforcement to go after his critics. You were the ones

(19:58):
that went after Trump on nothing, literally nothing on manufactured, manufactured, fabricated,
made up charges. You were the ones that said how
many times? Literally, if I had a dollar for every
time they said it, I'd be a multimillionaire. No one

(20:19):
is above the law. Well, as I said, on X
last night. I'm sorry. If you can indict a former
president of the United States on garbage, literally on made up,
trumped up charges, don't tell me now a former director
of the FBI suddenly is above the law. So if

(20:42):
you can indict a former president, you can indict a
former director of the FBI again to use their words
and throw it right back in their face. No one
is above the law now. They're the ones that set
the ground rules. They set up this entire lawfare system.
Now they have to learn to live with it. The

(21:02):
difference is this, they went after purely innocent people. Trump
was innocent, all those people that were censored and canceled innocent,
the j sixers innocent. Especially now in the wake of
this bombshell everybody. They went after Peter Navarro they put

(21:24):
him in jail, innocent. Steve Bannon innocent, they put him
in jail. So notice they could go after Trump's allies,
their political opponents. No problem, you mentioned Roseanne bar fired,
no problem, no problem, Mike Allen, no problem, or Steve
Allen forgiving no problem, no problem. But now when you

(21:50):
give him a taste of their own medicine, and they're
guilty that's the difference. Our people were innocent. Their people
are guilty as sin. Suddenly they're crying like five year
old school children. And I just want to remind everybody,
this is James. Comey. It's not even twenty four hours

(22:18):
since Biden's inaugurated. This is January twenty one, twenty twenty one.
So Biden was inaugurated January twentieth, twenty twenty one. It's
not even twenty four hours, and he runs on I
believe it was MSNBC. Now pay attention to this. He

(22:39):
was already giving the game away that they had a
plaut they had an organized conspiracy, that they were going
to put Trump in jail, and they were gonna do
it through the state court system, which is how they
ended up doing it with Letitia James and Alvin Bragg,
and how they went after Trump in the state of
New York. Listen now to Camy. So Biden was just

(23:03):
sworn in the previous afternoon. This is the morning, the
morning after what is it sixteen eighteen hours. Listen to
what he says, roll cut one hundred. Mike can victim
bar him from future service?

Speaker 12 (23:21):
Have the prosecutors, the local prosecutors in New York. Pursue
him for the fraudster that he was before he ever
became president. Lock him up for the garden variety Florence
he did there, but don't give him that center stage,
that dominant role in our national life.

Speaker 1 (23:39):
Take him out, law fair, take them out. Convictim, convictim
on what well, just get them garden variety stuff, Just
get them, get them, use the local courts in New York.
Get them, which is exactly what they ended up doing.

(24:00):
So this I'm sorry, but this piece of you know what.
Now he's claiming he's a martyr, he's a victim after
calling for Trump's scalp on nothing. So they were out
to get Trump no matter what, and he was one
of the top people involved. But hold on when they

(24:23):
finally level charges against Trump, these bogus charges, he then
ran to the meeting and he was saying, well, put
him in sing sing, just throw him in here trum
and jail. And then one of the whole it was
JENSACKI Jen Saki says, well, you know, he is a
former president. We got to try to protect him. I mean,

(24:47):
we don't want to get you know, the guy to
get his throat slit right to cut his throat. So
what are we going to do to protect him? Well,
listen to call mey COMI said, that's no problem. Roll
cut one hundred and one a mic.

Speaker 12 (25:03):
So a lot of people have suggested that there are
a range.

Speaker 2 (25:06):
Of factors that would make it difficult to put a
former there's not The system has not been tested in
this way.

Speaker 11 (25:10):
Do you agree with that that it would be difficult.

Speaker 13 (25:12):
Or nearly impossible for the law enforcement institutions to put
him in actual jail. No, they would just put him
in a double wide somewhere out near the fence, out
in the grass, and he would eat there, he'd shower there,
he'd exercise there, he'd be away, as Donia Perry said,
from general population.

Speaker 12 (25:28):
But it's obviously doable.

Speaker 1 (25:30):
Yeah, like a dog, Like a dog. Put him on
the grass right beside the prison outside double wide, double
white fence. Yeah, and he can pee, and he can
go to the bathroom, the toilet, and he can shower
and whatever, exercise whatever. That's how we're going to treat
I'm like a dog, and I could play you hundreds

(25:53):
of cuts. I'm just giving you just a taste of
what this animal was saying. Okay, this polytical savage. So, okay,
here's my answer. Well, Jeff, he's a former FBI director.
How are we going to guarantee you safety in prison?
Put him outside on the grass with a double wide,

(26:14):
nice double wide, out of the general population, and he
can go to the bathroom and he can exercise and
you know, do what he needs to do. Yeah, they
can serve food, he can eat, and put him in
a double wide. There you go, there's the answer. So
this is what the Democrats created. And remember I said

(26:36):
this for years. I warned the left again and again.
I said, be careful what you're doing against Trump, because
it's going to come back to haunt you. What sauce
for the goose is sauce for the gander. And I
kept saying to them, because they're so unhinged, they're so
deranged in their hatred for this man. I said, watch

(26:57):
what you're doing. If you can put a former president
of the United States in jail, in prison for nothing,
you don't think we can come after you. You don't
think it's going to be used against you. And they

(27:19):
were so arrogant and so cocky and so consumed with
power and hubris. Nah it'll never be used against us
never never. Well, now the whip is, on the other hand,
now you don't like it so much. Uh, okay, this

(27:40):
is breaking now. Brennan appears is now going to be next.
He's now telling people around him he's been investigated, that
he's had to answer some questions. He's lwering up. He
believes now that he is going to be next. Either
today or early next week it will be announced. According

(28:02):
to him that he believes now that he is going
to be indicted as well. So the dam is starting
to break. Six one seven two, six six sixty eight
sixty eight agree, disagree. Tom in Framingham, Thanks for holding Tom,
and welcome.

Speaker 8 (28:25):
Acting Jeff Hi Tom the uh. I wanted to just
get some of these technical details about the indictment clear.
I had to go on Axios first of all, to
read the indictment. The DOJ website didn't even at least
and I just looked didn't even have the text of

(28:45):
the indictment, which I thought was stupid. But one of
the things was the the.

Speaker 5 (28:55):
Leaking, lying about leaking, about authorizing leaking. That was a
McCabe versus Comy thing. What happened was Comy according to McCabe,
call me authorized. After the the DOJ called up McCabe's

(29:15):
office and told him to quash the UH the investigation
into the Clinton Foundation slash Clinton Global Initiative. According to McCabe,
where he can believe it, he was mad about that
because it was going to make the FBI look bad.
So he authorized two of his agents, one of them

(29:37):
was Struck and I think Paige was the other one
to go to the Wall Street Journal and leak that
they were ordered to kill that investigation by the DOJ.
And according to McCabe, Comy authorized him. Cally authorized McCabe
to authorize this leak. And that's what I think this

(30:01):
was about. If we're talking about the December thirtieth, twenty
twenty hearings, this is one of the things that they were.
They were trying to pick Comy and the Cave against
each other, and McCabe insisted that he was authorized to leak,
and Comy Colly got on and said, I didn't know
such things, but they You know, this is during those

(30:24):
Lindsey Graham hearings. I don't know if you remember them
in twenty twenty, which which really were ineffective. They were
lousy hearings. There were the ones where Rod Rosenstein got
up and started spinning in everyone's face. Basically, the other
thing is the Daniel Richmond leak, if that is, if

(30:45):
that is one, and I mean you can't you can't
tell by the indictment exactly what leak they're talking about,
which is really a pitiful when I read it was
a two page indictment. So the if the Daniel Richmond
leak was involved, Richmond league was just was call me
Me had a meeting with Trump, a one on one
meeting with Trump. He immediately went into his car to

(31:09):
his laptop and started to cry type to his his
gay friend Daniel Richmond about uh about what went on
during the meeting. And I don't know if you remember it.
Trump at the time intimated that he was taping that
conversation with Callmy, and call Me started to back off
on some of the claims he he was making the

(31:32):
Trump send during the meeting. But so I don't know,
you know, I don't know if if if Andrew McCabe
there's going to be your chief witness in this uh,
in this case against callmy belying about leaking case, then
I'm a little worried about it. To me, there seems

(31:53):
to be a lot of other stuff you could get
call me on uh, the obstruction of justice. Ill, I
couldn't even tell what the obstruction was, but it was
the count was from December thirtieth, excuse me, September thirtieth,
twenty twenty, which means it was it was related to
laning to Congress.

Speaker 1 (32:14):
Well, Tom, look, they don't even need to put mccab
on the stand because I know McCabe.

Speaker 4 (32:19):
Now.

Speaker 1 (32:20):
McCabe is not going to turn on callbe now, absolutely not,
because mccab is that's the problem. You see McCabe now
he's a media pundit. Now he's paid millions of dollars
to shill for the media and to shill against Trump.
So McCabe is making money hand over fist. He's not
going to bite the hand that feeds him. And he

(32:41):
and coll me now have formed an alliance, an unholy alliance,
to bring down Trump. So there's no way mccab is
going to, you know, rat his friend out. But they
have his testimony under oath, and they also have his
written responses under oath, so all they have to do
is bring in his prior testimony, and that's it. It's game,
set and match. Look Tom, to be honest, they could

(33:04):
get call me on perjury on so many things. It's
like shooting fish in a barrel. So to me, the
question is not the case. It's not whether call me
is guilty. He's clearly guilty. He lied in that hearing.
He lied when he testified to Chuck Grassley. I played
the cut earlier in September twenty sorry, in May of

(33:28):
twenty seventeen. He lied then, So look, every time he
opens his mouth, he lies. That's call me. And he
perjured himself. This was under oath, and yes, he was
clearly obstructing a congressional proceeding. They were not able to
get at the truth because this guy was lying to them.
I think there's no question. The only question now is

(33:50):
is the judge going to allow this evidence in because
it's a Biden appointed judge or is he going to
rig the trial? And and you trust the jury in
Northern Virginia because I'm telling you, Northern Virginia is a
Democrat stronghold. Now it's not as bad as Washington DC,
but it's almost as bad as Washington d C. So

(34:13):
I think that's the problem that they have. On the
other hand, and you got you know, Jonathan Turley, you
got many other legal experts saying the problem you see, look,
usually you don't go for a perjury charge or a
false statement charge is because usually usually people are smart
when they give statements. It's vague, it can be interpreted

(34:38):
several ways. You have a little bit of wiggle room,
you know, or you do the whole My memory is
failing me, or I just I just can't quite remember,
you know, or I think so it's just it's my
memory is playing tricks on me. So that's that's really
hard to make that stick. He was so certain in

(35:01):
his answers, He was so deliberate in his answers. He
was so black and white, so categorical in his answers,
and look to be candid. If you lie even once
or twice, they usually don't go after you. But he
kept lying again and again and again and again. They

(35:25):
got him. I mean, they got him. I know the
liberal media is trying to paint this as amateur hour,
but no, they got him. The only question now is
are we going to have a serious fair trial. That's
the only question. Six one, seven, two, six, six sixty
eight sixty eight. Tom, thank you very much for that call.

(35:46):
I really appreciate it. Okay, let me ask all of you,
do you think this is too low hanging fruit? They
want to go after a low hanging fruit, you know,
I mean they didn't. They're not going after him at
least so far, on treason and you know, conspiracy to
overthrow an election. There are much more serious charges they

(36:07):
could have gone after him on. They're going now for
false statements to Congress and obstructing justice anyway. That's it's
a carries about a five to ten year penalty if
convicted on both counts. Six one seven two six six
sixty eight sixty eight. My answer, you got to start somewhere.

(36:29):
Mike in Malden. Thanks for holding Mike and welcome.

Speaker 8 (36:34):
Hi.

Speaker 1 (36:34):
You doing, Jeff good, very good after last night, Mike
fuck final Lee.

Speaker 5 (36:42):
Oh get my blood boiling every morning.

Speaker 3 (36:45):
I love you, Joe, Thank you.

Speaker 1 (36:48):
I'm your daily espresso, my friend. I'm saving you that
six seven bucks at Starbucks. Mike, can you hang on,
I'm gonna come right back to you. Mike is telling
me we've got to go to a heartbreak