Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Six seven two six six sixty eight sixty eight is
the number okay lines are loaded. Shocking new revelations. Whistleblower
has now come out signed an affi David saying that
there was massive rigging taking place between ABC News and
(00:20):
the Harris campaign. They gave her sample questions ahead of
the debate, which resembled very closely the actual questions, plus
certain topics were negotiated that they would not discuss, and
that Harris is asked specifically for the moderators to constantly
(00:42):
so called fact check Trump, debate him, bicker with him,
undermine him, while making sure that this never happened to her.
In short, ABC News colluded with Harris and her entire campaign,
and now the media is trying to cover it up.
Harris is now also asking for a final debate on CNN.
(01:06):
Trump has said, no way, Jose. The media is out
to get me. It's not going to be fair. And
as he put it, they won an October twenty third date.
By then over half the country will have voted. It
is too little, too late. Trump says, no more debates agree, disagree.
(01:31):
Denise in Beverly, Thanks for holding Denise, and welcome.
Speaker 2 (01:38):
Better today.
Speaker 3 (01:40):
You know, like I don't know.
Speaker 2 (01:42):
I would just watch the movie God Is Dead. That's
the kind of debate that should be going on in
this world, not the time they have. She lies, She
lied and lied the fact checking, the fact checking. I
called Disney Disney ABC, and I gave them hell about
a fact checking. When else I wanted to tell my God,
(02:06):
I get too nervous.
Speaker 1 (02:08):
That's okay, Denise, let me ask you, should Trump agree
to a final debate with Kamala.
Speaker 3 (02:15):
In Trump unless it's on news Maps or Fox, because Jeff,
when she was when she knew, we knew that she
was getting those answers, We knew, we knew how that
she was getting the questions for her because we all
knew it. We all talked about it.
Speaker 2 (02:30):
We were at a debate, Patty, we all talked about it.
We knew that this was going to happen. And what
happened to her after that? And on Oprah she sounded
like a lunatic. She couldn't answer anything, So I don't
know how anybody could believe it. And then the questions
they asked Trump, you know, January sixth, the abortion thing.
You know, they didn't ask him any really important things
(02:52):
that we need to know. I'm just, oh my god,
I think that Congress should do something about that whistle
blow a thing and Trump shooting debate unless it's my NEWSMAC.
Speaker 1 (03:09):
News, I agree, or or on X or what. In
other words, it's going to be neutral. It's going to
be a fair debate. You want to fare one on
one debate. Yeah, if I'm Trump, I'm like, of course,
I take it any day because she's a moron. No, really,
she's got nothing's in their head, she's got nothing between
her ears, So I'd be like, yeah, I mean, I'm
off the floor with her.
Speaker 4 (03:30):
But if it's going to be this.
Speaker 1 (03:31):
CNN or ABC or you know, CBS or whatever, forget it.
Speaker 4 (03:37):
It's just it's.
Speaker 1 (03:38):
We're wasting everybody's time. And after this scandal, look going forward,
no Republicans should ever agree to do any debate with
any of these legacy media networks. I mean, how much
more obvious do they have to make it?
Speaker 4 (03:55):
Now?
Speaker 1 (03:56):
They're in the tank for the Democrats, So to me,
why bother? You're wasting everybody's time. Denise, thank you very much.
Speaker 4 (04:04):
For that call. I really appreciate it.
Speaker 1 (04:07):
Six one seven two six six sixty eight sixty eight. Like, look,
this is where the Republican National Committee, the RNC has
got to earn their money. When you got a scandal
like this, you got to go in front of the
TV cameras, you got to bang the table, you gotta
raise hell, you got to raise hell.
Speaker 4 (04:27):
Man.
Speaker 1 (04:29):
I mean, you gotta know, you got to put ABC
up to the wall. You got to nail them to
the wall on this. And you know, say, this is
the corrupt media, this is the Democrat media industrial complex.
This is propaganda. And just hammer them and hammer them
(04:49):
and hammer them, because what it exposes is not just
the corruption of the media. It exposes what a joke,
what a lightweight of a candidate Kamulin is that she's
completely phony, completely manufactured, just like Joe Biden. She has
to be propped up at all costs. Six one seven
(05:13):
two six six sixty eight sixty eight. Jim in the
Great State of Florida. Thanks for holding Jim, and welcome.
Speaker 5 (05:23):
Hey Jeff Elsey, going good?
Speaker 4 (05:25):
How are you, Jim?
Speaker 5 (05:27):
I'm doing good. I'm I'm gonna take I'm gonna go
a little contrarian with you on both of these situations. Yes,
go ahead, okay, I follow real clear politics very closely,
and they do. They do aggregate polling, which I think
is the closest you can get because they're they're you know,
they're taking every poll out there and they're averaging it.
(05:49):
And I don't I'll tell you what, I'm not as
bullish as you are, because some of these states do
not look good, like like Georgia doesn't look good. The
Pennsylvania looks good. But she's she has trended up if
you you know, if you look at the charts on
(06:09):
that she's made it very close and she's trended up
and and then in the overall aggregate popular vote, so
you know that that that here's my I have always
thought that if Trump doesn't win, I felt like I
was unreal clear. If he's not above two percentage points
(06:29):
one to two percentage let's say, two percentage points going
into the election, then the mail and sheat mail harvesting,
and and the other state that's very bothersome is Georgia,
and you know that's the state they're gonna cheat in.
Speaker 6 (06:42):
So I'm just.
Speaker 5 (06:45):
I think if it was all fair, yeah, he would win,
but it I think it's very close, closer than I
think that you know, we we kind of live in
our own thing here, but you know, because we we
listened to each other. But man, you get out and
talk to people. There's still a lot of there's still
a lot of Trump paid out there. And then as
far as the polling, going to the media will work,
(07:06):
I mean the I'm sorry, the debate, the media is
going to work that against Trump because he came out
and said CNN was very fair.
Speaker 1 (07:16):
Jim, can you just hang off six one seven two
six six sixty eight sixty eight. Okay, let's go right
back to Jim in Florida. Jim is being a contrarian,
which is fine. He's saying, look, Jeff, I think you're
over confident. Real clear politics average has Kamala in some
ways winning Georgia is it looks like it's in her column.
(07:41):
Pennsylvania's a toss up. Nationally, things are starting to trend
towards Kamala. There's a lot of anti Trump hatred out there,
and he says this may not be a victory for
Trump come November. Furthermore, he also says that Trump's this
decision not to agree to a debate on CNN could
(08:03):
be used against them, and we got cut off at
the break, Please Jim pick up where you left off.
Speaker 5 (08:10):
Ship for keeping me on. Yeah. My My point is
we Trump unfortunately does not He does not control the
mainstream media narrative. So what Bill If he goes against CNN,
They're gonna They're gonna flit on him. They're gonna say, look,
you you said a while back that CNN was great.
Now you're saying they're not. And so they'll play so
(08:31):
they'll play him like he's a chicken. What he what
he is saying is real and the truth, but perception
is a whole other game. And the other thing is
I think, and I also think CNN, in fairness to them,
I think they they I don't think they will cheat
because I think that they are gonna see a chance
(08:52):
to differentiate themselves against ABC and that is getting some
traction in the mainstream media. And so I think I
think they'll They surprised me last time they ran a
pretty good debate. I would think they would do the
same thing. I think if Trump does not do this debate,
it will hurt them. It will hurt him because he'll
(09:13):
they'll play that, They'll say he's chicken, and they'll they'll
play that, and like I said, on this polling, you
know truck, Look if he can get it above two percent,
I think he's gonna win. But this male harvesting thing
really scares me in a lot of these states, and
all they need is plausible deniability. So if you go
into the election and are real clear, it's a one
(09:34):
percent you know difference, and let's say he's ahead one percent,
they can cheat it and say, look one percent, you
know that's close. She surge you lose too bad.
Speaker 1 (09:46):
Well, Jim, look you make a lot of very interesting points.
What I would just say is this, you look at
real clear politics. I don't trust the polling. I've never
trusted the polling. And the reason why is I know
how these polling firms work. None of them have been accurate,
with the exception of Rasmussen and a few others, And
(10:09):
so these polls built in they over sample Democrats at
least two to four percentage points. So when you look
at all these polls on real clear remember they're all
tilted against Trump automatically. There are more Democrats being asked
(10:29):
questions than Republicans. There are more Democrat leaning independents being
asked questions than Republicans. So they're trying to create a
sense of momentum for Kamala. They're not trying to be accurate. See,
they're being political. So that's why I never take the
real clear average seriously. You may disagree with me. I'm
(10:49):
just giving you my honest opinion. Now, as for the
national polling, if it's a dead heat, nationally, Trump wins
one hundred percent, literally one hundred percent, And the reason
is Kamala is going to rack it up in California,
in Washington, in Oregon, in Illinois, in a lot of
(11:12):
these big blue states New York, although that's starting to
close now for Trump. But what I'm saying is nationally,
Democrats always do well because they have certain big blue
states where they blow out the Republicans by twenty thirty
percentage points. What matters is the electoral college. It's the
(11:36):
battleground states, and there she's weak. I mean, even her
own campaign admits that she's weak. You say you're worried
about Georgia. I just read a story over the weekend.
They're worried about Georgia. So if Kamala's people are worried
about Georgia, then they should be worried about Georgia. And see, Jim,
(11:57):
this is their problem and you can't square this circle.
Their record has been horrific. I mean, I know you
know that. But what I'm saying is you can spin
all you want, you can hate Trump all you want.
Hate ultimately doesn't put food on the table. Hate doesn't
(12:21):
pay the rent. Hate doesn't pay the mortgage. Hate doesn't
fill up your tank. So the problem is they have
such a horrible record, especially on the economy, inflation, and
the border. And Kamala is a terrible campaigner. I mean
she just is. Objectively, she's a horrible campaigner. She's a
(12:43):
terrible campaigner. She's not popular with voters, she never has been.
So we're not dealing with someone with real natural charisma.
She doesn't have. That we don't have. We're not dealing
with someone we say, well, I may disagree with them,
but boy man, are they good on the stump. She
runs from the media, she runs from the press. She's dislikable. Objectively,
(13:09):
she's just dislikable. She's a real phony. So against all
of this, yes, you're right, the ballad harvesting the phantom voting.
I'm very concerned. To me that's the only way now
they can win. So you know, we've got what is
(13:29):
it now, five weeks or six weeks left. We got
one more big debate coming up jd Vance and Tim Walltz,
and we'll see what happens now. As for calling him
chicken on CNN, I think the ABC News debate changed everything.
I honestly do, Jim. I think people looked at that
and said that was a travesty. And you say, well,
(13:50):
but they were fair to him the last time. CNN
was fair to him the last time because their goal
was to take out Joe Biden. Remember, the media made
a core need it push the second that debate was over,
every single one of them like a parrot. Joe Biden's
gotta go. Joe Biden has to be dropped from the ticket.
(14:10):
So the only reason why they were semi fair to
Trump was it because CNN has journalistic ethics or cares
about distinguishing themselves from ABC. They're losing money, CNN loses money.
Their job is to take out Trump, and they reasoned
Biden can't do it, so let Trump take out Biden.
(14:35):
We'll just make it a fair debate, and then we
replace Biden with Kamala because they were hoping Kamala would
be able to take out Trump. So I don't trust
CNN as far as I can throw them. No way
would I have him do another debate on CNN. No
Trump can plausibly turn around and say this, here's the
(14:55):
ultimate comeback. I'm chicken. Okay, let's do Fox News. CNN
had their debate. How many times are we going to
go to CNN? ABC News had their debate. Now I
offered you NBC News on September twenty fifth, you turn
me down. So you want to do a debate, Let's
(15:16):
do it on Fox. Different platform, different outlet, different venue.
Why does CNN get to do all the debates? So
I'll debate you. We're just gonna do it on a
different network. And in the wake of ABC, a network
that's more fair and more neutral. Nobody would disagree with that.
Everybody saw what happened at ABC News.
Speaker 4 (15:40):
Look.
Speaker 1 (15:40):
ABC News is never going to recover from this, and
they shouldn't. And now with this whistleblower coming out now,
I mean, to me, who the hell watches ABC News?
Speaker 4 (15:51):
Really?
Speaker 1 (15:53):
It's like reading Pravda or Azvestia in Russia. I mean,
you're just getting state media propaganda. So, Jim, I'll be
honest with you, why am I so confident? Because they've
been so bad and horrible in office. Their record is
their record is their record. They can run, but they
(16:17):
can't hide, and that's Trump's ultimate ace in the hole.
What say you, Jim?
Speaker 5 (16:25):
I agree with you on the Here's what I would say.
I think he needs to do a debate. I do
agree that that would be the strategy to say, look,
give it, it's either Fox or I'm not going to
do it. Then he could probably say I think he
would save face. So I agree with you there. I
disagree with you though on real clear. Of course, all
(16:45):
these polls have a built in bias, there's no doubt.
But they're aggregating all of them, and I'd say there's
if you look at real clear. I looked at the
last I looked at the last two elections, and I
watched it really close. I'd say they're off about two
percent off the truth, one and a half to two
percent on the aggregate. So that's that's what my biggest
(17:08):
fear is. If Trump cannot get this aggregate over to
over two percent, then then they're gonna cheat him and
then they'll have plausible they'll have plausible deniability. They'll say, hey,
it was close and she searched and too bad, and
there'll be nothing, you know, and at that point there's
nothing you can do. I think he's got I think
(17:29):
he can do. I think it's doable if he gets
momentum here the next month. He's got to get momentum
and get these pulls up, because then they can't. Part
of them cheating is the ability to say it was close,
and if it's close going in, then they'll cheat. So
he needs to get over two percent.
Speaker 1 (17:45):
That's interesting, Jim, Look, I really enjoyed this discussion. Six
one seven two six sex sixty eight. Sixty eight is
the number. Feeling much better, by the way, thank you
to all of you, a lot of times and emails
and people on messenger saying Jeff, please get better, get
well anyway, much better than last week. Not one hundred percent,
(18:09):
but I'm getting there okay, very quickly because the lines
are jammed.
Speaker 4 (18:15):
The Kooner Country.
Speaker 1 (18:16):
Poll Question of the Day sponsored by Marios Marios Quality Roofing,
siding and windows. Do you trust the pulse? Do you
believe the poles in general? Do you believe the opinion polls,
whether they show Trump with a slight lead or Kamala
(18:39):
with a slight lead, or how the race is shaking out.
Do you have confidence? Do you believe in the polls? A?
Speaker 4 (18:49):
Yes, B no.
Speaker 1 (18:51):
I am a know all the way, I've never trusted
the polls. I think they oversample Democrats and those independents
that lean Democrat by at least, as I said, two
to four percentage points. I think it's been shown now
over many many election cycles that they overestimate the strength
(19:13):
of the Democrats and the Democratic candidate. So personally, I
think Trump is leading, and I think he's at the
gates of victory. Now again they're going to try to
steal it. That's to me where the election is going
to be one or lost. But in terms of gauging
the lay of the land, I think there's no question now.
(19:37):
Trump clearly has all the momentum and he should win most,
if not all, of the battleground states. But that's me
I want to hear from you. A yes, do you
trust these polls? B?
Speaker 7 (19:51):
No?
Speaker 1 (19:52):
You can vote on our web page wr KO dot com.
Slash coooner k u h and is in national Er
wrko dot com slash cooner.
Speaker 4 (20:03):
You can also vote via X very active on X.
Speaker 1 (20:07):
As you saw last night, my handle there at the
Kooner Report all one word.
Speaker 4 (20:13):
Kuh and is in national Er super quick.
Speaker 1 (20:22):
They're so worried about their record, Kamala and Waltz, that
they are now trying to pretend that the last three
and a half years I kid you not were Trump's fault. Basically,
what they're trying to insinuate now is that Trump was
(20:42):
really in charge the last three and a half years.
That's how bad their record is on the economy, on inflation,
on the border, you name it. Listen now to Tim Waltz, Okay, Tienamin,
Tim that underhead. This is him at a rally in
Pennsylvania over the weekend. You can't make this up. Roll
(21:06):
cut twenty three, Mike.
Speaker 4 (21:10):
We can't afford.
Speaker 8 (21:13):
We can't afford four more years of this.
Speaker 4 (21:19):
Yeah, yeah, I agree with you, Tim, We can't. We can't.
Speaker 1 (21:26):
Yeah, who's been in power the last four years, Kamala,
Biden and soon you if you guys win in November.
We can't afford four more years. It is there, it is.
That's their problem. In a nutshell, that's what has him
in a vice. And Trump now is just squeezing and
(21:48):
squeezing and squeezing. Listen to him in North Carolina. He
is on fire. Roll cut eighteen, Mike.
Speaker 9 (22:03):
This election is about the economy. This election is about
the border.
Speaker 8 (22:07):
That's what it is. And I am your border president,
your border president. Kamalo would be your invasion president. She
would be your country destroying president.
Speaker 1 (22:22):
See it's not just that their record is terrible. It's
that under Trump, people remember, the economy was better, inflation
was much better, the border was secure. In other words, Trump,
you want low inflation, he did it already. You want
(22:43):
a booming economy, he did it already. You want rising wages,
he did it already. You want border security, he did
it already. That's the fundamental problem the Democrats have. I
want to play one more cut, then go right to
the phone lines. This is Trump on fire in North Carolina,
(23:07):
saying Kamala created the mess that we're in, So how
can she be the solution?
Speaker 4 (23:15):
She is the problem? Roll cut nineteen, Mike.
Speaker 9 (23:21):
Everyone knows that Kamala Harris cannot explain how she would
make your life better because it's really her policies that
have destroyed this country in the last three years. She
was the borders are now, she says she wasn't the
borders art.
Speaker 4 (23:35):
It doesn't matter.
Speaker 9 (23:36):
She was in charge of the border put there by
sleepy Joe Biden. He wanted to go to the beach,
She said, I don't have time. I got to go
to the beach and sleep. Who the hell sleeps on camera?
You have cameras watching. I don't want to ever fall
asleep on live television. Kamala Harris cost your family twenty
eight thousand dollars in higher prices last month alone.
Speaker 4 (23:58):
She lost.
Speaker 9 (24:00):
Think of this last month, they lost in this country
four hundred and thirty eight thousand full time job that's
a government number, including twenty four thousand manufacturing jobs.
Speaker 4 (24:11):
That's last month.
Speaker 9 (24:12):
And the interest rates are lowered for political reasons, but
they're also lowered because the country is not doing well.
Speaker 1 (24:19):
He's completely right. I mean they've they have buried. Let's
use Elizabeth Warren's term, they've hammered the middle and working
class for the last four years. You can run, but
you can't hide. Six one seven two six six sixty
eight sixty eight. Mike in Long Island, thanks for holding Mike,
(24:43):
and welcome.
Speaker 4 (24:46):
Jeff.
Speaker 6 (24:46):
I have two quick points in one question.
Speaker 4 (24:49):
Yes.
Speaker 6 (24:49):
The first point is I don't believe the polls at all.
I think the deep state uses the polls to manipulate
and influence the elections. Second, Harrison Walls are the two
worst candidates in history, so they have to cheat. And
my other point is why doesn't Trump's people cheat? I
don't want him to know, but why should cheating just
(25:13):
be exclusive to the Democrats and we're supposed to accept it?
And I have one more question before you go ad
to that one. The other thing is I lived in
New York my whole life, and New York without the
four to five boroughs is pretty much a purple dark,
purple red state. Why is New England, especially Massachusetts and
(25:34):
Vermont always blow You can never count on them to
ever be fair in any election. The row revote for
the Democrats. What is it? The Kennedy effect? What's the
matter with the people?
Speaker 1 (25:47):
Well, you nailed it, Mike. Part of it is the
Kennedy effect, which had a huge impact on Massachusetts.
Speaker 4 (25:53):
The unions.
Speaker 1 (25:55):
Very powerful and always lean Democrat. And I think what
people tend to underestimate are the universities Massachusetts has a
ton of universities, and those students, that's Elizabeth Warrens people,
that's who come ed Markey. Ed Markey defeated A. Kennedy
(26:17):
because he basically got the college students to come out
and vote for him, the Green New Deal, AOC, the squad,
they rallied to Markeye. They went to the universities. It's
not just Harvard and MIT. I mean there's Boston University,
There's University of Massachusetts, UMass, There's a Boston College, there's
(26:38):
Holy Cross, There's I mean, I could go on and on.
There are so many of them. Hell, there's a actually
a pretty good one, what maybe seven minutes from where
I live. I mean, in Massachusetts, there's universities everywhere. And
so what you have is you have a lot of
students who come from out of state, but they're radicalized
(26:59):
by their professors and they vote. You know, I've said
this many times. Take away the students. Just take away
the students. Massachusetts is a purple state. You really it's competitive.
It's like what you just said about New York. You know,
get out of the four or five bureaus, you're looking
at a purple state.
Speaker 4 (27:18):
In New York.
Speaker 1 (27:20):
But it's the students. People really don't realize the impact
that the students have. Vermont just very quickly, Mike, that
was a plan by the radical left forty fifty years ago. Literally,
the hippies said, we want to invade one state. Let's
take over one state. We can do all the free love,
(27:42):
get stoned marijuana, live in communes. And they picked Vermont,
and they invaded Vermont and they just you know, Ben
and Jerry's is really they were hippies or whatever, ex hippies.
And so that's why Vermont went left. The basically all
the hippies from around the country said, let's go resettle
(28:04):
in Vermont. But to answer your New England question, that's
what it is. And the last stronghold was for the
Republicans was New Hampshire. New Hampshire held out. And now
all these Massachusetts refugees who were fleeing the high taxes
caused by liberal rule and democratic rule and all the
(28:26):
wasteful spending and the high crime and the high illegal immigration,
and you know, and the lousy roads and because all
the mismanagement and waste, and what do you think they do, Mike,
Do they go up to New Hampshire and vote Republican. No,
they're like the California refugees who are going into Arizona
(28:46):
and Nevada and New Mexico. They bring their politics with them,
so they flee the consequences of liberalism, but they keep
voting liberal. And that's what's starting to happen to New Hampshire.
New Hampshire is now a purple state and soon maybe
even trending blue.
Speaker 4 (29:13):
I hope that answers your question, Mike.
Speaker 3 (29:15):
Yes, thank you, Jeff, thank you.
Speaker 1 (29:17):
And you made excellent points all across the board. Excellent points, Mike,
thank you very much for that call. Six one seven
two six six sixty eight sixty eight is the number.
That's why, to be honest with you, if I'm a
lifelong New Hampshire, you know, resident, if you know the
freedom state, you know, live free or die, I'd be
(29:39):
really pissed off at these Massachusetts refugees, I really would.
I'd be like, it's bad enough you ruined your own state,
but now you in mass you know, you guys got
to come up here and ruin hours six one seven
two six six sixty eight sixty eight. Then in Plymouth,
(29:59):
thanks for holding Van and welcome.
Speaker 10 (30:03):
Hey, good morning. Jefferson's nurse stand for Congress Jefan Trump
needs one more debate. Okay, if you look at the
sequence at events, notwithstanding the rigging by ABC, Camilla's debate
performance was pathetic because her answers were so incredulous. Then
(30:25):
she does the inframercial with Oprah and clearly that went
over like a lead balloon because she came off as
completely vapid. So Trump should debate her one more time.
It should be a town meeting type forum where the
candidates select the topics and there'll be no moderator. The
(30:45):
questions will come directly from the audience. Even if the
audience is stacked against Trump. Trump is a better extemporaneous thinker,
and he'll do He'll do better then then Camilla will
because she will not be able to anticipate the questions
from the audience. As far as the student effect, Trump
(31:06):
should brand himself as the candidate of peace. The Democrat
Party is the party of war. I'm going up against
an incumbent Democrat, Bill Keaton that's never voted against a
single war. He looks at war as an investment opportunity.
And Trump can get out there and appeal to the
students out there and show them that he is the
(31:29):
candidate of peace and that they do not have to
live in fear of fighting and dying in a useless,
endless no when war.
Speaker 1 (31:41):
I love it, Dan, I love it. I think that's
the anti war plank of his platform. I think can
be extremely appealing to a lot of young people, especially
if he turns around and says, you know, I don't
want to send you to the Middle East. I don't
want to send you or your friends to Ukraine. I
don't want you to send you I want to send
(32:02):
you to some foreign war where you're going to be
killed or be maimed or crippled to you know, to
line the pockets of the military industrial complex.
Speaker 4 (32:12):
So I agree with you completely, Dan.
Speaker 1 (32:15):
I think Trump should really play up the anti war
angle of his entire agenda because none of it have
mass appeal, but it really resonates with the youth.
Speaker 4 (32:27):
Dan, great point. Thank you very much for that call.
Speaker 1 (32:30):
Six one seven two six six sixty eight sixty eight.
Speaker 8 (32:33):
No.
Speaker 1 (32:34):
Look, many of you have been texting into the cooner
Man saying, Jeff, why not have Trump, you know, counter
with a town hall like what you know what Nurse
Dan just mentioned. I love the idea of a town
hall and no moderators. No, no, no, no, no moderators. Let
it be the hall is fifty percent Commalist supporters, fifty
(32:58):
percent Trump supporters, or if you want better yet, they're
all undecideds. Just pack the place with undecided voters. And
even if they get a couple of Kamala surrogates in there,
it still doesn't matter. No questions ahead of time. The
audience asks the questions.
Speaker 4 (33:18):
That's it.
Speaker 1 (33:20):
That's it. Ninety minutes. I'd rather do two hours, but
ninety minutes and let the audience ask fire away. You
can't give the questions ahead of time because you don't
know who they're gonna ask the questions, and they just
come on in, raise their hands, ask a question, period,
full stop. Kamala would never agree to that. She would
(33:45):
get destroyed, I mean I viscerated, she would be humiliated.
Speaker 4 (33:52):
So there's no way in.
Speaker 1 (33:53):
Hell she would ever agree to that. But if I'm Trump,
that's the ultimate counter. You turn around and say, no,
I want Why should I do CNN all the time. No,
let's do a town hall. Not these elitists in Washington
or New York, not the media elites, not these moonbats.
Speaker 4 (34:12):
No, the American people.
Speaker 1 (34:15):
Let's take questions from them, and in particular those that
are still on defence, those that are undecided. We do
issues topics, not specific questions, and nothing is off the table.
Nothing hell would freeze over before Kamala would agree to
(34:40):
anything like this. Six one seven two six six sixty
eight sixty eight. Brooks in Florida, Thanks for holding Brooks
and welcome.
Speaker 5 (34:52):
Good morning, Jeff.
Speaker 7 (34:53):
You sound great, Thank.
Speaker 4 (34:54):
You, Brooks. I feel much better.
Speaker 7 (34:57):
So earlier today you were talking about whistled and recently
Matt Gates, I'm gonna I'm gonna do a small detour here,
but I'll tie it all in together. Recently, Matt Gates
came out with some earth shattering information and this was
late Friday, and he's indicated that he also has a
whistleblower with extreme credibility, and he's indicating that he's getting
(35:22):
information to Trump's team his family that they've got five
five assassination teams going after him. Recently, Trump's at a
rally and Mike played some of the clips from North
Carolina and just to show people like Jim from Florida,
you know who had some call it Debbie Downer, you know,
reasons why he might not be able to win. The
(35:44):
hand of God is in this. Trump literally had his
grandchildren on that stage in his arms, and it was
it was just almost terrifying to see because Laura Trump,
Eric Trump were there. They passed over the grand children
and I thought, what you know this is, this is
just absolutely courageous. This country has gone through almost what
(36:08):
I would consider a mini case of revival. This is
no longer political. This is life and death. Recently Trump
put on his ex account zero and two. This is
way beyond polls. The polls are the polls are you know,
demonstrated by the scumbag media. Those are the people over
(36:31):
sampling Democrats, as you often said. And I thought that,
you know, rath Mussen coming on Info Wars recently did
a very stand up job and he said, look, you know,
I'm in this to tell the truth or I'm out
of business. He's up two percent minimum you spend that
two percent out across the country. We've got him. We've
(36:54):
got him. But the hand of God is in this,
The hand of the Lord is in this. We're going
to win.
Speaker 1 (37:01):
Brooks, You sound like me at dinner last night. I'm
telling you really almost almost verbatim, almost verbatim, Brooks, I
want to play a cut, and I want to get
your reaction. This was Trump recently interviewed with Cheryl Atkinson,
and she's asking him, Hey, look, if you come up
(37:22):
short in November, if for whatever reason you don't win
in November, is this your last run for the presidency?
And listen to what Trump said, Roll cut twenty one.
Speaker 5 (37:36):
Mike, if you're not successful this time, do you see
yourself running again in four years?
Speaker 4 (37:43):
No, I don't. No, I think that that will be
that will be it. I don't see that at all.
Speaker 9 (37:49):
I think hopefully we're going to be successful.
Speaker 1 (37:52):
So number one, Brooks, so much for Trump the dictator,
because dictators always won power, dictators always want to keep running.
Speaker 4 (38:02):
Until they achieve power.
Speaker 1 (38:03):
So number one, that pretty much throws the dictator narrative
out the window. But number two what struck me was
Trump is saying, Hey, look, this is really it. This
is for all the marbles. This is the whole ballgame.
Either we win and save our country or if not,
I'll be eighty two into twenty twenty eight, probably in jail,
(38:28):
may be dead. Who knows what they're going to do
to me if they win in November. So this is
my last hurrah, this is our last chance, and we
better get it right. It's now or never, what say you?
Speaker 7 (38:42):
Brooks A very very powerful moment for him. I feel
strongly that he understands this intuitively, and he's philanthropically. He's
putting his life on the line, and he's putting his
heart earned money on the line, his reputation, and Trump's
(39:03):
been visited by the Lord. Trump realizes that, you know,
his position right now is to save this country, but
more importantly is to counter the communism that's taken us over.
So it's you know, he's he's purposely been put here
and I feel that I feel that he's going to win.
Speaker 1 (39:25):
Brooks, That's exactly how I feel. People say to me, Jeff,
why are you so confident? Why are you so confident?
My own wife Grace again last night, But why are
you so confident? I go, I don't know. I don't
want to speak for God. It's blasphemous. I just sense
the hand of God. I don't know.
Speaker 4 (39:44):
He's a man marked by destiny,