All Episodes

June 23, 2025 • 38 mins
Mark as Played
Transcript

Episode Transcript

Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Six one seven two six six sixty eight sixty eight
is the number Keith in North Carolina. Thanks for holding Keith,
and welcome.

Speaker 2 (00:12):
Hi Jeff.

Speaker 3 (00:13):
Yeah, at first, I was a little uncertain about the strike,
But the more I think about it, the more it
was probably a good risk prevention. And I don't think
many other countries are really going to do much, even
putting himself that last weekend that half of Israel speaks
Russian and so I don't really think they'll get involved.

(00:35):
And if the Ayahtolas and the Molas make more mistakes
saying hitting an American base, that's just gonna enraged the
thirty two other NATO countries and get everyone else to really,
you know, push for regime change.

Speaker 1 (00:53):
Well, you know, I gotta say, Keith, if look, the
Molas are so weak now that it would be an
of suicide. I think if they hit American bases or
you know, we're behind terrorist attacks, say on American embassies
or consulates or even here on the homeland, I think

(01:14):
Trump has now shown himself, proven himself that he would
use massive, overwhelming, decisive military force. And with the regime teetering,
I mean, it's they're almost begging to be overthrown. So
you know, I agree with you the only wild card, Keith,

(01:35):
because again, look, you're a rational man. I'm a rational man.
People who listen to this show are rational. But you're
not dealing with rational people in Tehran. I mean, you
know these are they are irrational. They are We're dealing
with medieval, seventh century religious fanatics in fact, Keith, Look,

(01:57):
don't even take my word for it. There is a
clip going around. It's from a female political analyst in
Tehran on Iranian state media. She's crazy. I mean, how
do I She's like, consider one of their big political
experts or analysts, so you know, think of somebody that
you watch on Fox or you know, whoever, highly respected,

(02:21):
and you got to see her. She's crazy. She's going
on and on about how she thanks us for blowing
up four dough because now the Iranian people are going
to rise up and we're going to Iran is now
going to become a great global power, and that this

(02:42):
is now going to bring about the doom of the
United States, that this is now going to be an
eternal war and Americans are going to die, and like
her eyes are almost rolling in her skull and She's like,
down with America, down with imperialism, down with the Jews,
down with Zionism. I mean, you just listen to this,

(03:04):
and I'm like, I don't think they're gonna back down.
I mean, these are the people they have on TV. Honestly,
she didn't say it, but the insinuation is that the
Molas haven't been crazy enough. And the other thing, Keith

(03:24):
that people. I'm telling you have to see this even
in her monologue. Now, remember Trump killed Cassim Solemoni five
years ago. Hey, that was five years ago, the head
of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps. In the middle of
her insane rant, she stops and says, how could you

(03:45):
have killed our solemnony, our dear Solemony And she grabs
her head and she's looking at the sky like God Allah,
how could you have allowed that to happen? So you
can tell her reaction that Solemony was sort of like,

(04:05):
really their chief military strategist, you know, he was there.
I don't know, they're Eisenhower, they're MacArthur, their patent. He
was almost the indispensable military man, and that they've never
recovered from that blow that Trump delivered by taking out Solemony.

(04:27):
It's almost like she's not saying it, but it's almost
like we don't have anybody competent enough, a great general
who can lead us in this holy war against America.
But then right away she's back to you're gonna see
suicide bombers, You're gonna have no peace in the Middle East,
You're gonna have no peace in America. So I'm looking

(04:48):
at this and I'm like, ah, she's she's a crazy fanatic.
Like I'm telling you, you strap bombs onto her, she'll
be happy go on a bus full of school children,
or and just blow herself up and take everybody with her. So, Keith,
my only point is when you're dealing with people like this, yeah, rationally,

(05:14):
you're completely right, but we're not dealing with rational people.
These people are primitive savages. Final word to you, Keith.

Speaker 3 (05:25):
Yeah, it was that the same reporter from the r
IRGC news headquarters. They got bombs.

Speaker 1 (05:30):
Second, No, that was a different one.

Speaker 3 (05:33):
But well, I gotta say I looked at the metrics
and eighty of the diaspora that left around into like
America and many these other countries are are overwhelmingly against
the the Molas and the Iola regime. And they want back,

(05:54):
you know, something like the Shahs or the more pro West.

Speaker 1 (05:57):
Well that's the wild card is how are the people
of Iran going to respond? Now again, Trump, maybe maybe
he has intelligence, you know, he's got intelligence that I
don't have, you don't have, we don't have. So maybe
he's hearing about rumblings or does a political organization or
a dissident movement now that's reaching out to him, and
maybe now he's pushing that's why he's pushing for regime

(06:19):
change or at least talking about regime change. So look, Keith,
if the Molas fall and it doesn't descend into like
what happened in Iraq where it's a free for all,
where it's sectarian bombings, killings, chaos, anarchy, if there's any
kind of a stable, viable government, it doesn't even have

(06:44):
to be pro Western, honest to God, I mean, it'd
be nice if it's just sane, just sane, just a
sane government, a neutral, sane government, and says no, we're
not interested in nuclear bomb we don't want to wipe
Israel off the face of the earth. We don't want
to bring about the end of days. We're not looking

(07:06):
at bringing India, the Shia Messayah, okay, my friends. As
you know, Trump's people listen to this show, and the
last two i'd say ten days in particular, they've been
listening very very closely, not just me, but other conservative
you know, influential conservative talk show hosts, maga influencers, podcasters,

(07:28):
to just get a sense a temperature of where the
base is, where Trump's supporters and voters are. And one
of the things now that they're concerned about, or at
least they want to find out more, is where do
Trumps supporters stand on the issue of regime change in Iran? Now,

(07:49):
as you know, initially Trump and his entire national security
team said that this bombing strike, spectacular successful, devastating, was
essentially a one and done. However, Trump has now opened
the door that if Iran does retaliate, there will be

(08:10):
even more massive and deadly strikes to come. Now. On
Sunday yesterday, Vice President jd. Vance, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth,
and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, all three of them
did the media rounds and all of them said, unconditionally,
we are not interested in regime change. Listen, I'll just

(08:35):
as an example, listen now to JD Vance. He was
on Meet the Mess with Kristin Welker and she asked
the all important question, are we now at war with Iran?
Listen to JD's response, Roll cut twenty two A Mike.

Speaker 4 (08:57):
Mister Vice President, is the United States it's now at
war with Iran? No, Kristen, We're not at war with Iran.
We're at war with Iran's nuclear program. And let me
just say Kristin that we're incredibly grateful and proud of
the American Air Force pilots who did an incredible job
last night. The operation was really extraordinary. These guys flew

(09:19):
from Missouri, they didn't land a single time. They dropped
thirty thousand pound bombs on a target the size of
a washing machine, and then got back home safely without
ever landing in the Middle East or ever stopping other
than to briefly refuel. And of course they did that
in the air.

Speaker 1 (09:37):
So it's really an.

Speaker 4 (09:38):
Incredible operation, a testament to the power of American military.
And I think what shows what can happen when you
have that great American military in the hands of capable
presidential leadership.

Speaker 1 (09:50):
I agree with him and not one hundred is I
like to say one thousand percent. But noticed what he said.
We're not at war with the Iran We're at war
with the Iran nuclear program. In other words, you end
the program and let the mullustay. We don't care. That's
for the Iranian people to decide. This though changed, or

(10:12):
at least it's now muddy the waters. After all of this,
Trump then went on True Social and he now left
the door open for bringing about the end of Iran's government,
not just its nuclear program, but literally the Ayatola's regime itself.

(10:34):
Now here is what he wrote. I'm gonna read it
to you completely. He wrote it on True Social quote.
It's not politically correct to use the term regime change.
But if the current Iranian regime is unable, and he
puts it on the caps to make Iran great again,

(10:58):
why wouldn't there be a regime change? And then he
writes mega instead of maga Mega only caps m IgA.
Three exclamation points after that, make Iran great again. Now

(11:20):
let me throw this on the table. Is Trump moving
the goalpost? This is what I mean. That's why to
be fair to ban In andto others. That's why Bannon
is a worried. I'm not saying he's right, but that's
why Bannin is worried. Are we getting pulled into a

(11:40):
larger war? Almost piece by piece by piece? First Trump
said no, we're gonna let Israel handle it. Then maybe
we'll bomb. Now we're bombing. Now it's we may continue
to bomb if Iran doesn't come back to the peace table.
And now it's well, maybe it's time for regime change.

(12:04):
So my question to you, are we being slowly sucked
into a larger war against Iran in which if we
do push for regime change, then we will own the
country the way we owned it after Iraq, Meaning you
break it, you own it, You have to fix it,
You have to somehow provide the stability that you promised

(12:26):
after overthrowing a regime. And so my question to you,
are we going down the road of regime change? Is
this now going to become not a bombing to end
the nuclear program, but a regime change war like we
saw in Afghanistan, like we saw in Iraq? And if

(12:48):
the President does take us down this road and mix
this now about regime change, do you think it's good
or bad for America? In other words, could we be
slowly sleepwalking into Iraq? Two point zero six one seven
two six six sixty eight sixty eight is the number.

(13:12):
You know. My position on this. I don't like regime
regime change wars. I think it's very hard to predict
what's gonna happen after you overthrow a regime. Yes, the
Ayatolas are hated, no question. Saddam was hated as well,
but what came after was in some ways even worse. Anarchy, chaos,

(13:35):
civil war. And on top of all of this, JD
Vance has now said the uranium enrichment stockpile, the Iranian
regime was able to get that out, so they can't
make any more. Their program has been destroyed, but they
still have that stockpile of uranium enriched fissile material, which

(14:00):
is enough to make a nuclear bomb. It's a small bomb,
but it's still there. If the country descends into pure anarchy,
terrorists can get hold of it, and my god, what
can they do with it? So I say no, not
that I don't want the Mullis to fall, but I
want the Iranian people to topple them from within. I

(14:26):
don't think you know, I don't want us to go
in there and force the regime change, because then we're
all in and we're completely involved, and this could lead
to a long whether Trump wants it or not. Then
it leads to an occupation. Then it leads to ground troops,
boots on the ground, and Iran is a big country,

(14:47):
a mountainous country, and you can see guerrilla warfare like
we saw in Iraq and Afghanistan. So my position, as
you know, is crystal clear, no regime change.

Speaker 4 (14:59):
War.

Speaker 1 (15:00):
If the mullus fall, let it come from the Iranian
people themselves. But that's me. I want to hear it
from you. Six one seven two six six sixty eight
sixty eight is the number. William in Lexington. Thanks for
holding William, and welcome.

Speaker 3 (15:20):
Hey Jeff, how you doing.

Speaker 1 (15:21):
I'm good?

Speaker 3 (15:22):
How are you?

Speaker 1 (15:22):
Ay?

Speaker 2 (15:23):
I'm good. I just want to say I hope everyone
understands that when there is an October seventh attack here
on American soil, it has nothing to do with Trump
dropping bombs on nuclear facilities. That was already going to happen,
and it would have happened four years earlier if Hillary
got into office.

Speaker 1 (15:45):
Uh, William, are you are you anticipating something of that scale?
Is that what? You fear.

Speaker 2 (15:51):
Have you not listened to Sarah Adams at all?

Speaker 1 (15:55):
Well, just for our audience, William, who is Sarah Adams.

Speaker 2 (15:59):
Sarah Adams is a CIA targeter that has worked with
many military personnel in Afghanistan when we left there and
left all our weapons for them to well for one
do there October seventh attack, and left all our intel
that was Afghany there our military that was no longer

(16:22):
in the military.

Speaker 1 (16:24):
Hum, William, please do me a favor, hang on him
up against a heartbreak. Okay, I want to go right
back to William in Lexington. He says, if there is
an October seventh style massacre, an Islamic terrorist attack sponsored
by Iran on American soil, don't blame Trump for dropping

(16:46):
those bombs at Fordeaux Natons and Isfahan. It has nothing
to do with Trump. This has been years in the
making because of our abandonment of Afghanistan, all of the
weapons that Biden left behind, as well as vital national
security and intelligence information. William, I just got to say

(17:09):
this before I come back to you. I have on
my phone screen or board, I've got obviously full lines
and the way we do it here on the cooner
report is its name and then town. So I'm just
gonna make it up. It's like Jim in Drake it

(17:30):
with you and you're the only one, and I don't
know why. It's a bit creepy. It's your phone number
and there's your name in very like small in small
letters beside Lexington, and Mike is telling me that's because

(17:51):
there was a glitch in the computer. And here you
are warning about a possible October seventh. So I'm not
gonna lie to you. William. I'm I'm getting some chills
down my back, you know. And anyway, I'm just so
when you make a prediction like this, I'm getting a

(18:12):
little nervous. But Mike and Sandy are reassuring me that
I'm making too much out of this. But still so, anyway, William,
you're talking about Sally Adams. She is a CIA insider
who blew the whistle on how badly Biden left behind

(18:33):
all of these weapons, all of this very sensitive intelligence.
Please pick up where you left off, William.

Speaker 2 (18:41):
Jeff, I'm not actually William Wallace from Lexington, so that
might explain why it comes up different on your computer.

Speaker 1 (18:57):
William. Please, So you're saying you think it's almost inevitable
that we're gonna have this kind of an attack on
American soil, William.

Speaker 2 (19:04):
I believe it is. I mean, right down to the
Chinese with a bio lab in California. Oh, I don't know.
I would say what three or four years ago or whatever,
right down to letting in all these immigrant gangs, right,
don't get me wrong, seventy five percent of the people
that crossed the border. I mean, after all, they did

(19:25):
tell us it was only gonna be families and women
and children. Meanwhile, you can literally see train cars coming
over the border, like freight trains with people all in
the back wave and flagged mostly men. By the way,
this is all part of the democratic globalist plan to
destroy America. I mean, I don't know. I don't know
why you people can't play the puzzle, like have you

(19:47):
never used the puzzle before? Like all the pieces are
there like that, it's not gonna be good.

Speaker 1 (19:55):
And but if you don't mind, William, just tie it
back to Afghanistan, because you that's where you were going
with prior to the break. Please, so you're saying, ultimately
what happened in Afghanistan, you're saying is going to trigger
an October seventh here, correct.

Speaker 2 (20:10):
It goes back further than that. It goes back to
Obama dismantling our military. It goes back to Joe Biden
gets selling our oil in the strategic Reserve. It's everything,
It's every little piece. It's like, okay, so yes, the whole.
It ain't just eighteen hundred. You know, Iranians, there's the Taliban,

(20:33):
there's Isis. There's eight thousand terrorists in this country that
just so happened to walk across our border without what
We're not gonna We're not gonna, you know, do research
on people who's coming over the border. No, just everybody
come on over. Do you really think they came here
to get free welfare and medicaid? I mean, come on, well,

(20:55):
you know, William.

Speaker 1 (20:56):
What I played a cut It was maybe a year
ago now, I mean, don't quote me, but it was
a man from the Middle East, and it was Bill
Malugiin who I think tracked him down, but he crossed across.
He came across the border completely unvetted, just you know,
he just walked in. He Wallstonton and the reporter asked

(21:16):
it may not have been Bill Malugian. But anyway, the
reporter said, well who are you? And he said, you
don't know who I am. Well, soon you and everyone
is going to know who I am and what my
name is. And I haven't forgotten that. It was a
clear threat. He was basically saying as much as he

(21:39):
could possibly say, I am a terrorist and I'm here
to kill Americans, and it's going to be a massive
terrorist attack. It's going to be so big. You're going
to remember my name like the Sarnaevs for example, Like
you will know my name by the time I'm done.
You will know who I am. Now, that's just one

(22:00):
that Biden let in. That's just one. And you've got
Tom Holman here if you want, William, I know you
know this better than I do. But here here's Tom
Holman stating unequivocally, if we let me see if I
can track it down here. But here's Tom Holman saying,
oh no, at least one three hundred Iranian nationals we're

(22:23):
allowed to come into the United States under Biden that
we know of, that we know of. I can't find
that cut right now, but anyway, when I find it,
I promise I am going to hear it. Is, I
got it, I got it. Um here it is. He
was on Fox World, cut fifty one, Mike.

Speaker 5 (22:46):
How many Iranians are in the country that are in
sleeper cells trying to do bad to America?

Speaker 2 (22:51):
Right now?

Speaker 6 (22:52):
Well, look, you and I talked about this many times.
I said the last four years, my biggest concern was
this open border was the biggest national security vulner this
country's ever seen. So I put numbers this morning just
from a CBP under Joe Biden, there was one thy
two hundred and seventy two nationals Iran releasing the country
between OFO and and the Board show. And you compare

(23:13):
that the Trump administration zero right, zero releases and right now,
because of President Trump's leadership, we have the most secure
border in my lifetime, most secure border in history of
this nation. So we have a secure border. So that
was a President Trump's big win on securing in this nation.
So we're not releasing people in this country, especially interest aliens.
I aren't crossing that border undetected.

Speaker 5 (23:33):
Now.

Speaker 1 (23:33):
The point is that's we caught. It was catch and release.
We caught them and we released them. So we know
of thirteen one, two hundred and seventy two to be exact,
thirteen hundred, so we know it's almost thirteen hundred that
we know of how many others Like that guy saying,
you know you're gonna know you don't know who I am. Well,
you're gonna know who I am soon, So you're right, William,

(23:58):
they opened the floodgates, and man, we've got terrorist sleeper
cells all over the country, William, final word to you.

Speaker 2 (24:07):
For one, Jeff, I actually sent that cliff of that
terrorist coming over the border to my liberal friends and
they said to me, Mexicans are terrorists.

Speaker 1 (24:15):
Now.

Speaker 2 (24:17):
Meanwhile, there's like one hundred and seventy seven countries that
were coming across our border too. This is this is
such a long term plan. This is so deep, right
down to framan Trump in bed with Russia, you know,
so you know he's putin was trying to win the
first election for Trump. Meanwhile, then it went into a

(24:39):
war with Afghanistan only because you know, we took over
their Russian country, you know, their Russian pro Russian government
and installed our own little people. It's our own government
that's doing this to us, and you know, I don't know,
you know. So then therefore, when the Ukraine war starts up.
Now all of a sudden, you got all these morons
thinking that Putin's he's a bad guy. Now, don't get

(25:01):
me wrong, I don't want to be confused as a
Putin supporter. But when he had that interview with Tucker
and it was like two hours long, the only thing
I thought to myself when we had Joe Biden charged
was could you imagine if we had a president that
could speak for two hours?

Speaker 1 (25:17):
William, thank you very much for that call. Six one
seven two six six sixty eight sixty eight is the
number Brooks in North Carolina. Thanks for holding Brooks and welcome.

Speaker 7 (25:31):
Thanks to Jeff. Your last caller did an excellent, excellent
review of how scary things are. But I would remind
him that General Keene, for example, you know, who was
head of our intelligence, has come out and said, look,
during complicated times, you need a leader to make a
simple choice. And we did not have a choice. These

(25:56):
mulahs were days, months, hours away from It's not the uranium,
it's the launch capability. And that's what people have to understand.
You can you can enrich uranium, I mean we can.
You know that that's not the complexity. The complexity is
giving a GPS guidance and launch. That's what we just
blew up people. We just blew up their ability to launch. Now,

(26:22):
can we get the uranium? Probably? Does it mean that
we have to enforce regime change? No, but look, I
think the.

Speaker 5 (26:32):
Byproducts of that naturally could happen.

Speaker 7 (26:34):
Let's pray that the next person in line, that is
after Trump, like our vice president, continues on this campaign.
We have to pound it into these moves that not
welcome anymore. They're going to be in the dust in
its history. And hopefully we can pray that the Iranian

(26:55):
people get their country back. I love what he posted
on his I love what Trump posted, make Iran great again.
God bless him. You know, Jack Hibbs just did a
beautiful Sunday sermon. He he and he played for everybody
in Chino, California, Trump's message to his entire Sunday service.

(27:18):
And you know again he's calling it providential. You just
watched a president of the United States address the nation
and address God directly. He addressed yahweh our Creator. That
takes hutzba and God love him.

Speaker 5 (27:36):
Man.

Speaker 7 (27:36):
This is he had to do it. He had to
do it. We listen everybody just needs to relax. If
we can find these January six ers with this high
tech capability, call it the good bad guys. Trump's got
a wold of the agencies. Now we're going to find
these you know, Iranians here. He's not stupid. He knows

(27:58):
how to do this stuff, and he's got the right
intelligence to do it. Trump is going to turn this
country around, and he had to show force. Look what
Look at the effect that's going to have on China.
Look at the effect that's going to have on Lelenski's.
Lensky's dreaming about the relationship Trump has with net and Yahu.
It's providential. Trump Jet addressed God directly. We ought to

(28:21):
be thanking God for Trump because Trump is is you know,
he's got it right. This is a very complex condition.
General Keene had it right. He had to do it.
He looked, I mean, we either little were dead man.
These these mulas are going to launch, So we just
took out their ballistic capabilities. That's what I want people

(28:43):
to understand. The enriching of the iranium. Yes, of course
they've moved it, but you know, in order to put
uranium fifteen hundred miles into the air. You need GPS
launch systems. Those are very very complex guided missiles. We
just obliterated those. You know, welding systems, the encasements, the nuts,

(29:03):
the bolts, the satellite all of that is you know
in rubble.

Speaker 1 (29:10):
Well, we've set them back for many years. I think
there's no question, Brooks. Let me ask you this, because
this is what's developed now. Just in the last twenty
four hours, the Russia's number two, Medvedev, the former President
of Russia, has come out apparently speaking on behalf of
the Russian government ie Putin, that the Russians, or the Chinese,

(29:35):
or maybe even the Pakistanis, but he says because of
this bombing strike, which the Russians claim is illegal, they
say it's criminal, that it violates international law. I'm just
giving you their argument that this was quote, a war
of aggression. That's what they're saying. That now either the
Russians or the Chinese or the Pakistanis are going to

(29:58):
give Iran the bomb, They're gonna give them the nuclear
missiles with the missile launchers to potentially launch them. So
you've got and the Uranian foreign minister is apparently in
Moscow now meeting directly with Putin, consulting what Putin wants
them to do next, and apparently she now is coordinating

(30:21):
with the Supreme Leader. So my point is just this,
or my question is this, Brooks, what if one of
their backers, I don't care if it's China, Russia, Pakistan,
take your pick. Say you know what, they don't have
to make it. We're gonna give it to them. We're
gonna give it to them on a silver platter. Now
we're not giving it to them for them to use it,

(30:42):
but we're gonna give it to them. So if Israel
ever attacks them again, or the United States ever attacks
them again, then the Mullus can reign death and destruction
and wipe out millions of people. That will be the
ultimate deterrence. What do we do then that's the question.

Speaker 2 (31:00):
What say you, Brooks, I'll tell you what we do.

Speaker 7 (31:05):
Then the Chinese are going to learn, and they're going
to learn real good. This is not Joe Biden they're
dealing with. They're gonna sit there and posture this this
incestuous relationship between it's not just China and Russia. You know,
you might as well add North Korea into the mix.
I think that they're going to try to push this

(31:25):
as far as they can, but ultimately Trump will pound
China with tariffs. Ultimately he will destroy relationships with Putin,
and he's going to put extreme pressure to end the
Ukrainian conflicts. So I don't look, let's let's just break
it down to brass tacks. The only country that could
really really get a nuclear call it facility into Iran

(31:50):
at this point would would would be that unholy alliance.
And I think Trump is going to use his tariffs
to answer your question, to break it, to destroy that
possibility through China. China that does not want. China is
on economic on the deathbed with your economy. And if
Trump as much raised as the tariffs just a few points,

(32:11):
that's going to be the negotiating pokership to answer your question.

Speaker 1 (32:17):
Interesting. Interesting, Brooks, thank you very much for that call.
So Brooks is basically saying Trump's and by the way
he is working the phones, I mean, as I speak,
he's talking to Putin, talking to g He's saying, don't
do it. I'm telling you don't do it. Just don't
do it, because then I'm going to have to escalate
against you. And you know, the comeback to Putin. Is

(32:39):
you know what I can send Zelenski another two hundred
billion dollar package. I mean, if you want to go,
I don't want to do it. But if you're going
to force me, Vladimir, you know you want a lot
more Russians to die. You want this war to go
on for a couple more years, Is that what you want?
Just don't give them Allas the mom That's it. And
you mentioned g G. I can. I can tear your

(33:00):
economy down. I can tear if you guys into a
great depression. Don't do it. It's not worth it. So it's
but what I'm saying is now it's it's really three
D jess. That's what I'm saying. And that's why if
we can just you know, quiet everything down and for

(33:21):
the next couple of weeks this, then we're out. I
think then the Molas are going to be so consumed
with the massive domestic opposition and dissidence the dissidents in
their country, they may not even be able to launch
a counter attack if they wanted to. Thank you very
much for that call, Brooks six one seven two six

(33:44):
six sixty eight sixty eight Liam in Charlestown. Thanks for
holding Liam and welcome Liam. Okay, let's go to Bob
in Wooburn. Thanks for holding Bob, and welcome today.

Speaker 8 (34:06):
Jeff, Hi Bob. I'm very I'm very disappointed you. I
always like to see Bannon, but I turned out now
he's a puke. He's a scared puke. And I'm just
I'm not diblomatic. I'm not and I'm a Vietnam Bedford
of Marine and and that be said beside the point.
But can I see my opinion is from a just

(34:29):
from a period of viewers, China will do nothing, Russa
will do nothing when it kept be good, another begin
to say, all right, hey, I get the back, bring
a lot, bring it up, see what you gotta do.
That's my opinion.

Speaker 1 (34:46):
So you think, Bob, I think I.

Speaker 8 (34:49):
Think Rascha will do nothing, China will do.

Speaker 1 (34:53):
Okay for some I don't know why, Bob, you just
literally dropped on us. Uh, But basically you think Bannon
is basically chickening out or he's lost his nerve. Let's
you know, you called him a puke, but you know
that basically he's lost his nerve, and that you know
that China in the end will take it Russia will
take it. The Pakistan will take it because they have

(35:17):
so much more to lose by giving youran any kind
of a nuclear weapon or nuclear missile delivery capability, and
that in the end, Trump made the exact right decision.
Do we still have, Bob or did we lose? Bob?
I think yes, there you want you back? Go ahead, Bob.

Speaker 8 (35:40):
What are you gonna do? As long as these people
will usually be with a fukla, what are you gonna do?
I always admise you better, but he's sure to be
a puke. That's my opinion, Bob.

Speaker 1 (35:53):
Thank you very much for that call. I really appreciate it.
Six one seven two six six sixty eight sixty eight
is the number Tom, Red white and blue dynamite baby
in New Jersey. Thanks for holding Tom, and.

Speaker 5 (36:08):
Welcome Jeff Cooner disabling Iranian nuclear weapons. That's red, white
and blue dynamite baby.

Speaker 1 (36:20):
So Tom can just by your intro, I take it.
You back Trump all the way.

Speaker 5 (36:25):
Correct on a limited military campaign. I backed at Jeff.
I gave it a lot of thought and prayer, and
my thoughts were being that this is not Iraq two
point zero and Afghanistan two point zero. For the simple
reason that Trump is and never will be in the

(36:45):
military industrial complex, and by the fact that Obama sent
the cargo plane full of billions of dollars that told
me that this is real. Those lefty traders just kicked
the can down the road, including our good friend, a

(37:06):
peanut farmer who started all as Jimmy Carter and left
it for our ace, our F thirty five pilot, Donald J. Trump,
President of the United States of America, and the conservative
constitutional Republicans that had to deal with this, Jeff. But yeah,
I know the escalator, possibility of escalation is clear. They

(37:29):
closed the Gulf of Hormu's escalation. If China and Russia
try to assist them, like Michael Savage, our friend said,
and lend them nukes, they'll just have to be under
constant surveillance and as soon as they get close, we'll
bomb them out again. Jeff. It's a sad way to live,

(37:50):
and I'm praying this is where God in prayer comes
that regime James, regime regime change diatola that Lucifer incarnate
uh needs to be Oh, he is.

Speaker 1 (38:06):
The devil, There's no question. Tom. I want to ask
you a very important follow up
Advertise With Us

Popular Podcasts

Cold Case Files: Miami

Cold Case Files: Miami

Joyce Sapp, 76; Bryan Herrera, 16; and Laurance Webb, 32—three Miami residents whose lives were stolen in brutal, unsolved homicides.  Cold Case Files: Miami follows award‑winning radio host and City of Miami Police reserve officer  Enrique Santos as he partners with the department’s Cold Case Homicide Unit, determined family members, and the advocates who spend their lives fighting for justice for the victims who can no longer fight for themselves.

Dateline NBC

Dateline NBC

Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com

Stuff You Should Know

Stuff You Should Know

If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.

Music, radio and podcasts, all free. Listen online or download the iHeart App.

Connect

© 2025 iHeartMedia, Inc.