Is Crime Just a Mind Set?

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Six one seven two six six, sixty eight sixty eight
is the number. Okay, just very quickly, since we're on
the top end of Jasmine Crockett, what the hell, let
me play one more her greatest hits, as they say,
so she's asked because you know, she keeps comparing Trump
to Hitler again and again and again, as you know,

(00:22):
as did Joe Biden, as does Kamala Harris, as does
Tim Waltz, as does Gavin Newsom, as does Michelle Woo.
As I could just run down the whole list Pritzker
in Illinois. It just the media. It's the same tape
over and over again. Hitler, Hitler, Hitler. And so even
this liberal prodcaster is like, well, you know, like it

(00:44):
really is. We're not living in the Third Reich. Like
don't you think you guys should tone it down a
little bit, like, you know, don't you think this is
getting a little bit like a little crazy here? Listen
to her response roll cut one hundred twenty seven. A, Mike.

Speaker 2 (01:05):
Do you have a responsibility as an elected official not
to raise the temperature but rather lower the temperature? Particularly
when there are people out there who listen to elected
officials all over the place, who are not well, who
use that as a way to instigate the political violence
that you are calling out.

Speaker 3 (01:25):
I think that my responsibility is to be transparent and
to be honest. And the reality is that we are
living in a time in which this administration, in this
regime is not interested in making sure that people understand history.
We need to understand why they are so problematic. And
so I am using that language because it is accurate language.
When we see the consolidation of power, when we see

(01:47):
them trying to chill speech of jokesters, when we're seeing
all of this, that is a playbook out of Hitler,
and I won't deny it, like these are the fact.

Speaker 1 (01:59):
So Jimmy Kimmel, I mean, he's back on the air now,
But taking Jimmy off the air, that's Hitler. So I
guess we're no longer seriously now that he's back on
the air, by her insane logic, Well we're no longer Hitler. Hey,
it's no longer the fourth Reich. Why well, Jimmy's back

(02:19):
on the airy ay ya yayi, ay ya yayie okay,
very quickly, this is from Mark on Messenger, and as usual,
hit the nail right on the head, So Jeff. According
to Jasmine Crockett's philosophy, if I commit a crime, it

(02:40):
doesn't make me a criminal, then I'm not a racist.
Stupid we you know, I didn't even look at it
that way, Mark, But that is so true. I swear

(03:01):
I'd love to have her on just for thirty seconds. Well,
you know, according to your thinking, if I call you
the N word now, but doesn't mean I'm a racist, right,
I'm mean, I'm just according to your logic, Like hello
Bill in Medfield, thanks for holding Bill and welcome.

Speaker 4 (03:24):
Yeah, it's gonna do in honker Mania, go wild on you. Hey,
j Yes, yes, yes, and roll tied roll of fact.

Speaker 5 (03:45):
And I got three things I want to say.

Speaker 1 (03:48):
Go ahead, go ahead.

Speaker 4 (03:49):
Bill Number one.

Speaker 5 (03:51):
Trump is gonna go to every city in America and
show the papers from when Clinton and Obama were president
on off more, how many were deported this year? Well,
this week or this month or whatever? Right? Not's number one?
Number two? Can't there be a trial in the House

(04:12):
in the Senate if you want to seceede from the Union,
from the United States, and you keep your sanctuary city.
But if you want to keep your sanctuary city. You
have to seceede from the union. And the third thing
and final thing I got to say is, uh, yeah,

(04:36):
I forgot my point.

Speaker 1 (04:39):
Well, you got so excited for the first two that
that's why you forgot the third. But no, look, Bill,
your fundamental point is dead on. They're committing treason. There
is no such thing as a sanctuary city. They just
made that up. It's a legal fiction. There's no such
thing as a sanctuary state. That's a legal fiction. What

(05:00):
that really means in plain English is it's an insurrection.
We refuse to abide by the law, and we refuse
to respect the government that's in power and the civil
authority that's in power, and the laws of the country.
And look, I have to say this about Michelle Wu.
She's no different than Mom Donnie, and she's no different

(05:24):
than Brandon Johnson, that crazy mayor in Chicago, or the
Karen Bass, that Tommie mayor in Los Angeles. She's the
one who has compared Ice. I'm talking about Marxist Michelle Wu.
Now she's compared Ice explicitly saying they're neo Nazis. When

(05:45):
you see them in Boston, they are neo Nazis. She's
the one that said they're Trump's secret police, and they're kidnapping,
disappearing people, torturing people, detaining people illegally sending them off
to all these torture dungeons. So no one has done
more to incite violence and to incite this hatred for

(06:10):
ice and for law enforcement than Michelle Wu. And so
if no one else in Boston's gonna say it, I'm
gonna say it. She has blood on her hands. She
has blood on her hands, and I'm with you, Bill,
It's time to start locking these traders up. The last

(06:31):
time I checked, if you want to secede, that's called treason.
And that's what Michelle Wu is. She's a trader. Agree, disagree?
Six one seven two six six sixty eight sixty eight.
Six one seven two six six sixty eight sixty eight
is the number? Okay? Is democrats or you know? Is?

(06:56):
Is the violent rhetoric, the anti ice rhetoric from Democrats?
Is it now inciting and fomenting violence? I say yes,
what say you? Six one seven two six six sixty
eight sixty eight? And what should we do about it?

(07:16):
What can we do about it? What should Americans do
about it? And honestly, what should the Republicans and the
Trump administration do about it? Okay, before I go back
to the blazing phone lines six one seven two six
six sixty eight sixty eight. As I discussed earlier in
the show, James call Me now is telling everyone around him,

(07:38):
including the media, that he will be indicted any day now.
There are multiple reports coming Trump has said he's had enough.
He's basically told Pambondi fish or cut bait. I want
these deep state criminals indict it, and I want them
in jail. Start with call Me, Start with Brennan, start
with Clapper. I don't care who use start with, but

(08:01):
start arresting people. And so apparently now the US District
Attorney for Eastern Virginia is now preparing an indictment against
call Me. Any day now it should be handed down,
and so the Kooner Country Pole Question of the Day

(08:21):
sponsored by Marios Marios Quality Roofing, Siding and Windows. Will
James call Me go to trial on perjury charges? What
they're apparently, according to these reports, they're going to go
after call Me on perjury where in front of Congress

(08:43):
he lied under oath, if you remember we covered it
at the time and he blatantly lied saying that he
never authorized any leaks to the media, which is not true.
That he never authorized aids underneath him or people close
to him to leak against Trump regarding Russia, Russia, Russia

(09:04):
and the Russia collusion hoax. There are a ton of emails,
text messages. He authorized it, It's obviously authorized it. He
lied under oath. So they're going to start with a
perjury case against Comy and then build from there. So
my question to you, will James Comy, will he go

(09:28):
to trial on perjury charges? In other words, are we
going to see any semblance of justice A yes, B No.
You can vote on our web page wrko dot com
slash cooner wrko dot com slash Coooner. Kuh And is

(09:54):
in national Er. You can also vote via x and
again last night peractive on x my handle all one
word at the Kooner Report. Kuh And is in national
Er at the Kooner Report. Right now, about thirty eight
percent of you say yes, over sixty percent sixty one

(10:18):
to be more accurate, say no. Look my heart wants
to say yes. There's nothing I'd love more than to
see that deep state criminal and traitor get his comeuppance
and go to trial. I don't know if I've just
become too cynical to jaded because so many times over

(10:41):
the years I've gotten my hopes up and then it
all fizzles and it comes to nothing. But if I
was voting, I'd probably vote no. I don't know. There's
just I look at Pambondy, I look at her team,
and do they have the stuff to see this thing
all the way to the end. I know Trump does.

(11:04):
I know, let's say J. D Vance does. Or let's
say if Stephen Miller was the attorney general but her,
I'd have to vote no. I don't want to vote no,
but I'd have to vote no. But that's me. I
want to hear from you. Six one seven two six
six sixty eight sixty eight. Okay, let's go back to

(11:27):
the phone lines. Nick in Weymouth. Thanks for holding Nick,
and welcome.

Speaker 6 (11:35):
I have a few other things to say that as
time went on, and just localized a few things here
right to Massachusetts. Do you remember the judge I believe
his name was Joseph Newton judge where she conspired with
the clerk to let an illegal alien who was being
released out of the back door. So with it Ice, Okay,

(11:58):
I don't owe uh. Who was running the US Attorney's
Office at the time, Republicans and Democrats, I don't remember,
but I do not believe. And what I saw was
what you would call an obstruction of justice. Okay. For instance,
if that lunatic supposedly killed himself at twenty nine years

(12:22):
old amongst the many chargers, if he lived, it would
have been levied against him, would be obstruction of justice.
Nobody did that with her. I think it was simple,
simply decided by the court system that she was not
to be found in fault.

Speaker 5 (12:38):
She should have.

Speaker 6 (12:38):
Been prosecuted, investigating, prosecuted by the US Attorney's office. I'll
give you another one. There was a two bit low
level bank robber convicted twice from Africa, I believe, and
a judge, a magistrate whatever, appointed by a not a

(13:00):
malignant dwarf, the small devail Patrick. He released him or
gave him a release date to cover him for like
one extra day where Ice couldn't get a hold of him.
Within two weeks, she murdered two anesthesiologists. He murdered two anesthesiologists,

(13:21):
I believe in the back bank. It's a vicious murder. Okay,
that judge should have gone before. Okay, she should have
gone before a federal investigation with the US Attornity's office
in Boston for dereliction of duty. She caused the murders
of those two people. These are the kinds of things

(13:42):
that have to happen to make people say pay attentions.

Speaker 1 (13:49):
Nick, You're completely right. And look, let me just put
an exclamation point on your excellent points. We have a
judicial system, a justice system that is populated with rabbid
anti Trump, Obama or Clinton or Biden appointed judges who

(14:10):
have been pushing open borders, who have been coddling not
just illegal aliens, we're talking some of the scum, criminal,
violent illegals. And you're right. They let them back out
on the street. They do everything in their power not
to notify ICE so that they continue to be a

(14:32):
menace to the public. And notice they live in very
privileged neighborhoods. The thing about these Massachusetts liberals, I'm telling you,
these democrats, they're the biggest hypocrites on the planet. Notice
in their communities, let's say Wellesley Brookline. Not to pick
on them, they're beautiful neighborhoods, they're the illegals, aren't there.

(14:57):
They don't have illegals where they live, but they have
illegals where we live. And so we get to deal
with the murderers who are released, and the gang bangers,
and the drug dealers, and the child molesters and the
sex traffickers. So if they actually had to live with
the consequences of their decisions, if their homes were being burglarized,

(15:21):
if their streets were being polluted with drugs, if their
daughters were being raped, if their family members were being
murdered or killed, believe me, it wouldn't be a revolving
door for for illegal aliens. Okay, very very quick reset,
and I want to go right back to the jammed
phone lines. Another left wing terrorist attack, this time at

(15:46):
an ICE facility in Dallas, Texas. A twenty nine year
old anti ICE leftist Joshua John his mother in particular,
rapidly anti Trump, rabidly liberal, hates anything that's Republican conservative. Anyway,

(16:07):
we pretty much know where he got his politics from. Anyway,
According to the FBI, he took a rifle. He went
on a rooftop, very similar to Tyler Robinson, who assassinated
and murdered Charlie Kirk, and then began to indiscriminately, almost wildly,

(16:28):
shoot up the ICE detention facility. He began to shoot
at the building. He shot up the windows. In fact,
they said bullets reached all the way into the lobby.
And then he spotted a van and ICE, an unmarked
van which had ICE agents in it as well as
several illegal alien detainees. He then began to spray bullets,

(16:53):
shot after shot after shot into the white van as
they were trying to transfer the detailed the illegals into
the ICE facility. By the grace of God, and only
by the grace of God, ICE agents were not injured,
shot or killed. However, one of the detainees was murdered.

(17:17):
Two others are in very critical condition, a stable condition,
but very critical condition. As law enforcement closed in on
Joshua John the shooter, he then took his gun and
shot himself, committing essentially suicide, killing himself with a self
inflicted gun wound. At the scene of his dead body,

(17:42):
they found unspent bullet casings with anti ICE messages engraved
on them. In fact, one of the bullets literally just
had anti ICE written on it. This was a targeted,
deliberate attack. His goal was to kill ICE personnel and

(18:05):
ICE agents. Only because he couldn't have a clean line
of sight and shot up a van, he inadvertently ended
up killing the very people he was trying to quote
unquote rescue and save. ICE now says this is part
of a growing pattern. It's in Texas, it's all over where.

(18:27):
You now have left wing lunatics incited by Democrat leaders,
the media and politicians who are villainizing, demonizing, vilifying ICE
in which now here just in northern Texas. A couple
months ago, on July fourth, another anti ICE leftist set

(18:49):
up an ambush and shot and injured ICE agents in
a premeditated terrorist attack. In another part of Exis, another
ICE facility was shot up. Throughout the country. Now, ICE agents,
as they conduct their raids and seek to arrest violent, criminal,

(19:11):
illegal aliens, they are being pelted with rocks, bottles, They
are being assaulted, shots are being fired at them, their
cars are being attacked. They say that ICE agents now
are under siege. And furthermore, you now have some Democrat
politicians who are calling Leg Gavin Newsom for their masks

(19:33):
to be taken off, and many of them want these
ICE agents to be what's called docks, their names given out,
their addresses, their homes, their families where they live, and
some are openly encouraging to go after ICE agents and
their families. Now Newsome in particular is now taking a

(19:57):
public beating, and rightly so, for some of the most outlandish,
inflammatory rhetoric I've ever heard used against law enforcement in
this country. And it's Gavin Newsom now who is trying
to push a bill through the state legislature in California

(20:17):
that says ICE agents who are trying to conduct operations
on California soil must have their masks forcibly removed by
either state police or local police. In other words, he
wants them identified, He wants people to see their faces

(20:41):
because he wants them to be threatened in their homes,
and thereby they will no longer conduct ICE raids for
fear that they or their families will be killed, threatened,
or attacked. Now, according to constitutional legal experts, that is

(21:01):
unconstitutional and illegal. Federal law trump's state or local law
when it comes to the issue of ICE and enforcement
of federal immigration law. So Gavin Newsom can pass all
the legislation he wants. He does not have the legal,
constitutional authority to force ICE agents to take off their masks.

(21:28):
But if you want to know why they wear masks,
this is exactly why, because democrats like him have put
a target right on their back. I mean, they're essentially
putting out a hit telling people here are their names,
here are their faces, here's where they live in their families,

(21:52):
go get them. So, if you want to know why
ICE agents are forced to wear masks, this is why
they are being hunted as they try to enforce the
law and enforce the will of the American people who
elected Donald Trump. He has an electoral mandate to deport

(22:14):
illegal aliens, especially violent criminal illegals. Six one seven two
six six sixty eight sixty eight. This is a revolt
against law and order. It is a revolt against the
federal government, which is in fact the definition of insurrection.

(22:35):
And this is a revolt against democracy itself. What should
Trump and his administration do as the violence, like a cancer,
spreads and spreads and spreads. George in Berkeley, Thanks for
holding George, and welcome.

Speaker 7 (22:56):
Jeff. I just wanted to go back to your conversation
regarding Pam BONDI I agree with you one hundred percent.
I think she's way out of her league. I think
she's afraid to take any significant action. I believe that
Trump's first pick was his best pick, and that was
Matt Getz. We're not going to see him back, but
I believe if he was there, he would be tearing
these people upot But I don't think we're going to

(23:19):
see him anytime soon. But you did say something about
a legacy, legacy that we may have in the future,
about different people to become president. You said, you know
Trump's there, and then we'll get Jay d Vance. Hopefully.
I would hope we'd see Telsey Gavitt. I know you've
been real high on her. I was high on her
when she was a Democrat. I could see something in her,
and I think she's doing a great job. But the

(23:40):
one person you mentioned that I disagree with you one
hundred percent is Maco Rubio. And I'll tell you why,
and maybe you can explain it to me, because I've
heard nobody in the media explain this. Maco Rubio was
a unanous pick. Every single Democrat voted to affirm him.

(24:01):
That's impossible when's the last time the Democrats had done
anything like that. What makes Maco Rubio so special that
you have Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders vote for him
every single vote, Every single candidate that Trump put up there,
whether they were good or bad, they had to destroy
him them. They wanted to put Trump in jail. They

(24:23):
would have sentenced to death if they could have. Why
would they give him one ounce of deference on a pick?
What makes Maco Rubio so special? And I'll tell you
back in the twenty sixteen election, I watched all these
debates and when Trump was slaying Republican after Republican as
I did at the time, I was a registered Democrat,

(24:45):
by the way, when he was slaying these people, I
told my wife, I said, Marco Rubio is the one
that the powers that be, the deep State want, They
want him. He is their guy. He's basically the Republican
version I think of Obama. He's been created, he's been supported,

(25:07):
he's been financed throughout his political career to get to
this point. I wouldn't trust him as far as I
could throw him. And I'll tell you all you have
to do is watch the video when Trump advanced masterfully
basically broke Zelensky down in the Oval office. You watch
Rubio's body language, his face, facial expressions. He didn't like

(25:30):
what they were doing. He had fear in his eyes.
He was incredibly uncomfortable. Just watch the video you'll see
he did. He didn't chime in at all of any significance.
He was not happy to even be there and be
associated with what they were doing and what they what
they did, I believe was magnificent. So when you when
you promote Maka Ruby and say, oh, he'd be a
great president, No, we wouldn't. That's what they wanted back

(25:53):
in twenty sixteen, and that's what they're going to get
if people fall for this guy. Could you explain to
me why all these democrats of them would support a
pick of Donald Trump. Not because even if the guy
was good, even if he was the greatest candidate in
the world, they still wouldn't do it. Because the only

(26:13):
answer is, well, they like Maco Ruby and he'd be
good for the country. They don't want things that are
good for the country. They want to destroy the Trump
administration and destroy Magar and destroy any conservative that believes
that this country should be going in the direction fin
so please if you can't explain it to.

Speaker 1 (26:28):
Me, well, no. The only reason why I mentioned Rubio,
and maybe I should have explained it a little bit more,
is that the betting right now is the way it
works in American politics, right and you know this as
well as I do. George is usually the VP is
the heir apparent, So JD is the air apparent to Trump.

(26:50):
And even Trump said, you know, I think JD is
going to be my heir apparent. But he was praising Rubio,
saying Rubio is doing a very good job, et cetera,
so saying he goes, I think they'll a horse race
between the two of them. He goes. But I expect
JD to be my successor in twenty twenty eight. Now,
the betting odds are that it'll be a JD Marco
Rubio ticket. I'm not saying I like that ticket. I'm

(27:14):
not saying I want Rubio as the VP. All I'm
just saying is, if you just play it out the
way it's normally played out, it'll be JD and Rubio.
Then JD does his eight years, and of course he'll
pass the baton off to Marco Rubio. My only point
was you're staring at eight, twelve, sixteen more years. And

(27:37):
I didn't mean Maga ruled in the sense that Rubio
is maga. I don't believe he is maga. What I
mean is this is these are the offspring of Trump
right from his administration. So the Democrats will be in
the political wilderness. You know, they won't be occupying the
lighthouse for sixteen, maybe twenty twenty four more years. Even

(27:59):
even FDR and his New Deal wasn't able to do that.
If you remember, FDR wins in thirty two and then
Eisenhower comes back in fifty two. So the Republicans are
out of power in terms of the presidency for twenty years.
That's pretty much what the Democrats are staring at, and
they know that.

Speaker 8 (28:17):
No.

Speaker 1 (28:18):
Look, I don't like Rubio. I mean, I think he's
doing a fine job. He's doing an okay job. He's
a warmonger, he's a neo conservative, he's very pro Ukraine.
You're right, he was very uncomfortable in that meeting, which
I agree with you. I think it broke Zelenski that
Trump and JD. Vance and Zelensky had. He is now

(28:40):
in the saddle when it comes to Ukraine policy. He's
now one out over JD for now. It's basically what
Rubio wanted, full military financial aid to Ukraine and fight
this war against Putin for years. So he's a warmonger.
And look, I've never forgotten this about Rubio and this

(29:02):
as you mentioned twenty sixteen, and you're right, the Weekly
Standard endorsed them. They were a very big neo conservative magazine.
Bill Crystal, a diehard anti never Trumper, endorsed them. The
deep state loves him, the military industrial complex loves him.
So I think he would betray the Trump Revolution if

(29:22):
he was to become president. I don't trust him as
far as I can throw him. And the biggest one
for me of everything is I'll never forget this. He
was part of the Gang of Eight. This was under Obama.
Four Republicans, four Democrats. They came together and they pushed
for a massive amnesty bill. And I'm the way he

(29:45):
argued for that amnesty bill. He went on Rush Limboss Show,
when Rush was still alive. He went on Fox, he
went everywhere. He was willing to expand all of his
political capital to give amnesty. It over twenty million illegals,
and of course the Bill failed, there was massive conservative backlash.

(30:09):
To be honest, I think it's one, not the only,
but one of the big reasons why Trump beat him,
because everybody remembered the Gang of Eight. So you know
what does Rubio truly believe? In his heart of hearts,
I'll tell you he's for open borders, he's for amnesty,
he's for mass third world illegal immigration, he's for endless

(30:30):
forever wars. And he's a creature fundamentally of the deep
state and the military industrial complex. In other words, he's
a globalist who's now a chameleon, who's changed his and
he's disciplined. To give him his due, he's very disciplined.
So he knows if I'm going to succeed as Trump's

(30:52):
secretary of State, let me do my bosses bidding to
the t. To the t, Trump says, you know what
we're gonna get China, kick him off the Panama Canal.
There's Rubio pushing China out of the Panama Canal. Let
you whatever Trump asks him to do, he does so.

(31:12):
In that sense, he's very disciplined because he's extremely ambitious.
So that was my only point. No, Look, I'll say
it right now, I'll say it right now, I'm backing
JD in twenty twenty eight. I love JD. I've always
loved JD. I think he's a brilliant America first conservative.
I think ideologically, philosophically, morally, his character, his core, he

(31:39):
is MAGA through and through and up to now, I
think he's been a magnificent vice president. Really, Trump could
not ask for a better right hand man, which is
what a VP should be. Now, if you're asking me,
who should be JD's VP, Tulci Gabbard. If you're asking
me now, Jeff okay, after after JD Vance, who does

(32:02):
the cooner man like? I will take Tulci Gabbard over
Marco Rubio any day of the week. I want her
as Vance's VP. Let's say it doesn't happen and it
ends up being Rubio just for the sake of argument,
and then it's Rubio who then wants to contest for
the presidential nomination. I would back Gabbard over Marco Rubio

(32:25):
without hesitating because what she's done now as DNI, and
what she unmasked and exposed regarding the Russia collusion hoax,
and how she did it and how gutsy and courageous
and patriotic. She's demonstrated herself to be. She's America first man. Now,

(32:49):
I don't agree with her on everything. I'm maybe more
to the right than you are, but those are little
tiki tac issues as far as I'm concerned, on the
big issues with Tulci and Tulsi's with us, and to me,
she's a thousand times better than Marco Rubio. I don't
know if that answers your question, George, but that's how

(33:09):
I feel.

Speaker 7 (33:11):
Well it does, Jeff, and I can tell you thank
you for letting your thousands and thousands of listeners here
your explanation, because I agree with you one hundred percent
the way you're speaking now. I think we're blood brothers
on this issue, and I'm really happy you've enlightened people
about Maco Rubio because everything you said is exactly to

(33:33):
the point. It's exactly what I would have said, except
I think you've said it better than I could have.
And I really hope that what you're hoping for and
what I'm hoping for what comes to in the future.
So thanks a lot for letting me get that out.

Speaker 1 (33:45):
There well, and thank you for your call, really, Georgia,
very intelligent call. Seriously, George, thank you again. I appreciate it. Really. Look,
I know, I know I sound like a broken record,
but the audience, the callers take the show to a
different level. Best audience in the business. I'm telling you,
best audience in the business. And it's not even close.

(34:06):
Six one seven two six six sixty eight sixty eight. Now,
Rubio is doing a very nice job as Secretary of State.
Please you know, hey, Jeff, what are you doing ripping
on Rubio? I'm not He's done a very nice job.
He's done everything and look Trump is very happy with him.
You're just you know, you're asking me for you know,

(34:26):
the top job. Who would I back JD? Vance and
after j D would be Toulsi Gabbard. That's just how
I feel. Six one seven two six six sixty eight
sixty eight. Anthony in New Hampshire. Thanks for holding Anthony, and.

Speaker 9 (34:45):
Welcome well, Jeff, thank you for having me. As always,
I'd like to address why the Democrat politicians and leaders
are being so violent with their rhetoric, and that's because
their base is violent.

Speaker 10 (35:00):
If you think about it. This has been going on
for over thirty forty years the Rodney King riots where
Democrats pulled a white Reginald Denny out of a gas
truck it beat him to death.

Speaker 9 (35:12):
Okay, you've said it.

Speaker 11 (35:15):
In the past.

Speaker 12 (35:15):
If I had that perhavial magic wand and I could
wave it across the country, if I could take away
guns from Democrats, there'd be a lot less.

Speaker 10 (35:26):
Gun debts and violence in this country. It's just a
fact that Democrats have a violence problem and they just
don't want to address it. The top nine cities, I
mean the top ten cities in this country. Now, I'm
not saying there's no violent Republicans, because there are, but
the majority of the violence in this country is on

(35:47):
the left.

Speaker 11 (35:48):
The nine top cities in the country are Democrats run cities.

Speaker 10 (35:53):
That means that the people that live in those.

Speaker 9 (35:56):
Cities are Democrats.

Speaker 8 (35:58):
Black violence on blacks is through the roof unbelievable, and
eighty three percent of Black African Americans vote Democrat.

Speaker 10 (36:11):
So people, I'm sorry.

Speaker 11 (36:12):
That means that the Democrats are the ones that are
causing all these problems. So if you want to know
why the leaders of their party are being so violent
with their rhetoric, it's because that's what their base feeds upon.

Speaker 1 (36:28):
Anthony, Look, you're right. I don't want you to think
that I disagree with you. You're one hundred In fact,
you're one thousand percent correct what I find. This is
what I'm trying to And you tell me if you
agree or disagree. You're right. You mentioned Rodney King, the
Rodney King riots. I won't forget that they burn Downtown
LA to the ground. I'll never forget what they did

(36:49):
to that a white truck driver. You're completely right. That
mob just pulled them out of that truck and they
beat him senseless. They beat him an inch to his life.
I mean they were taking his life really, So you're right.
They've been very violent for a long time, but something
has changed in the party. And you tell me if
you agree or disagree. Take tip O'Neill, right, you know,

(37:11):
he was always about, you know, like he was, you know,
Reagan's arch nemesis. Timp O'Neill was not a guy who
incited violence and murder. Jimmy Carter, he was incompetent, but
he didn't incite murder.