Is the Bloom Off Kamala?

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Jeff Cohner, Boston's Bulldozer. Let's go to vow in Franklin.
Thanks for holding val and welcome.

Speaker 2 (00:08):
Thank you so much for taking my call, Jeff, I
wanted to talk about how Barack Obama used brainwashing method
that's being used by Kamela as well, Like the hope
and change are intangible things, like my hope for something
is different than your hope for something. And you might
want to change houses, and I want to change my
car or change the oil, and they're different. So you

(00:31):
have this dreamy state. I'll vote and I'll get those things.
So they're using joy, so your joy might be something
different than my joy than the person down the street
and the next day and Joy seems so hopeful and
oh my gosh, Joy, but really, after you vote for her,
the joke's on you, Joy Jay, Oh why because it's
not real. And another thing that I'm afraid that they're using,

(00:54):
because I keep hitting this over and over again, and
I hope you can give me a way to combat
it or others are facing it. As a woman, I'm
being hit with shame, like, oh, how shameful he's a sexist.
How shameful he's a convicted felon, how shameful he's not
going to let your daughter or your or you have
an abortion when you need it for health reasons and

(01:15):
all these things. So I don't know how to combat
the shamed thing. So maybe you have some tools that
can be used, well, vow.

Speaker 1 (01:22):
I mean the way you combat first of all, when
they try to shame you into voting for someone, that
tells you that's coercion, that's a totalitarian tactic. So that
tells you right away that these aren't champions of democracy
and freedom, but they're very opposite, and you combat that.
You always combat propaganda, And this is how I always

(01:45):
debate liberals, and it's why I always beat them, because
I combat their lives with the truth and facts and evidence.
So Donald Trump on abortion, believes that the issue should
go to the States, which is exactly how our founding
felt intended. So if you live in Massachusetts like u val,
no one is going to touch anyone's abortion rights. In fact,

(02:08):
in most parts of the country, abortion is still going
to be legal. So if you know on the abortion issue,
these people, by the way, do you remember when the
decision to overturn the Dobbs decision to overturn Roe versus way.
It came out all these idiot democrats said, millions of
women are going to die. There's going to be so

(02:29):
many back alley abortions. Oh, the bodies are going to
be piling up, left, right and center. What happened? Nothing?
Literally nothing nothing. You had some southern states that imposed
more restrictions on abortion. A few imposed, you know, almost
a complete ban. Even then they have exceptions for rape

(02:49):
in the life of the mother. But even in places
like Kansas and Iowa, they have very loose restriction, very
loose laws on abortion. So in most of the country
it's legal. So that's lie number one, Lie number two.
As a woman, why should you vote for a far

(03:10):
left wing fanatic as a woman, Why should you want
more crime? Why should you want a border invasion? Why
should you want skyrocketing inflation? Why should you want high
interest rates? Why should you want an economy that's on
the verge of literally tipping into a great depression? So look,

(03:32):
I was a big admirer of Margaret Thatcher. Had I
lived in Britain at the time, I would have voted
for her every single time, and proudly why because she
was good for the country, and she'd be good for
me and my family. I don't vote based on plumbing.
To me, it's the stupidest argument I've ever heard. You
know what, all due respect, whether it dangles or doesn't dangle,

(03:54):
is irrelevant to me. The color of your skin is
irrelevant to me. The color of your eyes, the color
of your hair, I don't care. What I care about
are your policies, your record, your ideas, and your character.
So to me, that transcends. You know, you're not a woman.

(04:16):
I mean, of course you're a woman, Val, But when
you vote, you're a citizen. See, they're always trying to
break us down, and that's what democrats do. It's tribalism.
It's always you're well, you're gay, or you're a lesbian,
or you're black, or you're white, or you're young or
you're old. No, you're a citizen. That's why we vote.

(04:41):
And as a citizen, you should look at yourself as
a citizen and your fellow Americans as citizens. What's best
for the country, and what's best for the country, without
a doubt, is Donald J. Trump. I hope that helps Val.
Val thank you so much for that call. Bill in Sudbury.

(05:02):
Thanks for holding Bill and welcome.

Speaker 3 (05:06):
Hello, good morning, Good morning, Jeff.

Speaker 1 (05:07):
Hi Bill.

Speaker 3 (05:08):
I don't think the I don't think the IRFK endorsement
will have a significant effect. It's too late. Six months
ago maybe, but now it's late. It feels like piling on.
I don't think it. I don't think it has much
effect at this point.

Speaker 1 (05:20):
Hold on, you're telling me with a straight face. I mean, Bill,
you always outdo yourself. I gotta tell you that. I mean,
it's just incredible you are. I got, Bill, I have
to say this, No, really, I'm gonna be brutally honest
with you. Okay. You remind me of Tom McDevitt. Who's
Tom McDevitt. He was once the president of the Washington Times,

(05:41):
and our nickname for him was mcmron and we all
said this about him. There was like an inverted perverse
genius to the man. He was always wrong, like always,
like even a stopped clock is right twice a day.
Bernie Sanders, I'm telling you, Bernie, once in a while

(06:01):
is right.

Speaker 4 (06:02):
You know, there's two options that we're looking at, and
one is staying in forming that new party. But we
run the risk of a Kamala Harris Kamala Harrison and
Waltz presidency because we draw votes from Trump, or we
draw somehow more votes from Trump, or we walk away

(06:26):
right now and join forces with Donald Trump, and you know,
we walk away from that and we explain to our
base why we're making this decision.

Speaker 1 (06:39):
That was Nicole Shanahan. She's the VP nominee for the
RFK Junior Independent ticket. Absolute bombshell yesterday eight thirty three
on the Great WRKO. Apparently now there's even more media
reports coming out now RFK is on the verge of
not only quitting his presidential but more importantly endorsing Donald Trump. Liberals, Democrats,

(07:07):
the media are in full meltdown mode. All the polls
show that an endorsement by RFK Junior would be an
immense boost to Trump, especially in the battleground states Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin.
But Bill in Sudbury is saying no, now, all of

(07:28):
a sudden, his endorsement means nothing. So Bill, please tell
us why an endorsement by RFK Junior, who's got about
nine ten percent in the polls. A lifelong Democrat, a
principled liberal, Nicole Shanahan is even more to the left
than he is. She's very well known out on the

(07:50):
West Coast, has millions of followers herself. Why an endorsement
from these two means nothing for Trump? Go ahead?

Speaker 3 (07:59):
Bill be too late in the process. Like I said
six months ago, it might have meant something. I predict
if he does that, if he comes out, it will
be one point or less. What's your prediction, I beg it.
Trump would gain maybe one point?

Speaker 1 (08:15):
Well, number one?

Speaker 3 (08:16):
Your prediction?

Speaker 1 (08:17):
Number one? One point in Michigan and Wisconsin and Pennsylvania
is the ballgame.

Speaker 3 (08:22):
Okay, So what's your prediction?

Speaker 1 (08:24):
Well, I just see well, I mean, hold on, I
just whoa Bill one point. If you go by the
lowest possible, it's going to be more, obviously more. But
one point is the ballgame in Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin,
which is the ballgame for the election. That's why the
Democrats are in full panic, and it's why the Democrats

(08:48):
have been trying to sabotage the RFK campaign. These are
your people, this is who you support, This is who
you've been a lifelong Democrat. You blindly follow them, blindly
support them, no matter what they do. You support. I mean,
we've been calling this show now for over ten years,

(09:10):
so you know you have this blind allegiance and these
are your people. So listen now to what Nicole Shanahan
said that the Democrats, led by Biden and Harris have
done everything in their power to destroy the Kennedy campaign.
And in fact, RFK and Nicole Shanahan have said they
are political thugs, that these are tyrants and gangsters. Quote.

(09:35):
They have banned US, shadow banned US, kept US off stages,
used law fair against US, suit US in every possible state.
They even planted insiders into our campaign to sabotage our campaign.
That's why they saying they have to support Trump because

(09:58):
Kamala Harris is a Marxist and a want to be dictator.
The guy you're calling dictator is treated them infinitely better
and much more fairly than the Democratic Party. So let
me ask you, Bill, do you think it's okay to
be suing our FKA junior and preventing him from getting

(10:19):
on the ballot in places like New York and Pennsylvania
and Michigan. Aren't you all for democracy? So why not
let a third party candidate contest the election? Your party
has blocked them? Why are you censoring them. Why are
you banning them, Why are you threatening them? Why are

(10:39):
you intimidating them in their families? Why won't Biden give
him Secret Service protection only until Trump was an attempted assassination.
Why are they planting people to sabotage them from within?
This is what fascists do, This is what totalitarian communists do.

(11:00):
This is not what you do in a free country
and in a free society. So Bill, tell me, if
he's such a non factor, why are the Democrats so
desperate to destroy his campaign? Can you explain that to me?
Bill Less?

Speaker 3 (11:19):
I heard you say a lot of talking there, but
I did not hear you say what you predict your look.

Speaker 5 (11:24):
Would be heard.

Speaker 1 (11:26):
You do it, Bill, Bill, Bill, Bill, it's my show.
I asked the questions, you don't ask the questions now.
As I said in the beginning, I'm going by the
New York Times poll, just a New York Times poll.
They say that if this endorsement takes place, the battleground
states will flip decisively to Donald Trump. He will get

(11:50):
a minimum three to four percent point bump, which was decisive.
So I'm just going by what the polls say. But
I've already answered that fifteen times. I'm asking you a
different question. The Democrats have used vicious, authoritarian, dictatorial tactics

(12:10):
against RFK Junior. If he's such a non threat, why
are they doing it? Explain it to me.

Speaker 3 (12:18):
But he is a giant conspiracy against you, I mean
every single if thrill.

Speaker 1 (12:23):
Can you answer the question, Bill, Bill, can you answer
my question or I'm going to hang up on you.

Speaker 3 (12:31):
It's the rhetorical device.

Speaker 1 (12:34):
Do you support Do you support the Democrat tactics against RFK?
This is what they're saying. And if they don't fear him,
why are they trying to destroy him? Why are the
Democrats trying to destroy RFK? Can you explain that for
the last time?

Speaker 3 (12:53):
Go to the polls from the New York Times that
will fake yesterday on your show, But now that they.

Speaker 1 (13:00):
Rickage Emerson Rasmusen associated Press.

Speaker 3 (13:06):
Days ago on your show. They were all fake on
your show like two days ago, and now you're pointing
to them.

Speaker 1 (13:11):
Well, I'm pointing to you that the media is petrified
because they're polling shows. I don't need to use the polls.
I'm giving you the courtesy of answering your question, so
I don't need to use the polls. I can do
basic math. If someone is getting nine to ten percent
in the polls and that's what he's getting, and he

(13:34):
decides to endorse one of the two major candidates, it's
a massive boost of that candidate. Two plus two equals four. Okay,
So I'm not going to debate with you whether the
sky is blue. Now let's move on. I'm asking you
now a different question for the last freaking time. If
the Democrats are not worried, then why are they trying

(13:54):
to destroy RFK go.

Speaker 3 (13:58):
He doesn't have to win, Jeff only has to pretend.
He want you guys have a loaded the bill.

Speaker 1 (14:02):
Okay, bye Bill bye. You see, you can't have a debate.
You can't answer a basic factual question. That's liberalism for you.
That's the problem. That's that's why they have to do
what they're doing in Chicago to appeal to idiots like this. Ooh,
the hope and change. Oh so you know this is

(14:26):
so When Val says, Jeff, how do you deal with
a liberal facts, the truth, common sense, it's like a
cross to a vampire or garlic to a vampire. And
then they're off into left field. Then they just spin
their wheels, and the tape is starting to unravel, as
you can tell when Bill starts talking, then he's going

(14:48):
on about also, you can't. He can't. He can't answer
your question because he knows the answer is obvious. If
he wasn't a threat, they wouldn't be trying to destroy him,
and he can't defend their tactics. So you just don't
answer the question. Who can defend sabotaging a third party
candidate and you're claiming to be the Party of democracy?

(15:09):
Check mate, mal and pepperol thanks for holding.

Speaker 6 (15:13):
Mel Obama's not being called out about his insults and.

Speaker 1 (15:18):
Things like that.

Speaker 6 (15:19):
I mean, it's obvious that ninety percent of the press
is favorable to Democrats, so when Trump does it, it's
going to get a lot more exposure. And honestly, the
Democratic base likes it. When Obama does it, it's going
to fire up his base. They love it. Look at
the riots and things like that. Conservatives just being better

(15:44):
people are turned off by it. And I think that's
the biggest thing is when a conservative he has Trump
say flop adopolis or I'm entitled to personal attack.

Speaker 1 (15:57):
Okay, A lot of reaction coming in are both about
the DNC and Obama's speech last night, as well as
obviously now the looming potential imprisonment of Trump by Judge
Juan Mershaan. So this is Mary Anne on Messenger. Good morning, Jeff. Yes,

(16:19):
the Democrats are desperate, but they are also extremely childish,
and they are playing to their base of low information
voters that love this type of rhetoric because their voters
are unable to think critically. Well, you just saw the
exchange between me and Bill and Sudbury. I mean, let's

(16:42):
think about it. They're so in denial of reality. You know, no,
even if Barbie f k in doorst Trump, it's no impact,
no impact. It's like, you know, Hitler and the Bunker. Okay,
if you want to believe that, go ahead. I don't
know what else to tell you. So millions of votes
going to one candidate over another, Ah, makes no defference.

(17:07):
This this is the mind that they're you know, that
they're playing to. Anyway, I continue, Jeff, they are unable
to think critically, so this propaganda is all they have.
I pray to God that this time around there are
fewer low information voters and more that have been starting

(17:28):
to critically think over the past four years when they
look at their wallets, bingo, and there's nothing, nothing, that
the last two days will improve with you know, what's
in your wallet, or what you pay at the grocery store,
or what you pay at the gas pump, or what
you pay for rent or your mortgage, or what you

(17:50):
pay for your monthly utility and energy bills, nahing nothing.
Now as for putting Trump behind bars, this is an
absolutely brilliant, brilliant point. Uh and it's from sixty one seven, Jeff.

(18:16):
The timing of ourfk's endorsement is crucial. It needs to
come on the afternoon before Comrade Kamala's acceptance speech. I agree,
I completely agree. This will really throw off her speech.
It'll take away all the momentum of her speech, and

(18:37):
all the talk will now be is Trump's victory inevitable,
especially in those key battleground states. Now, this is another
six one seven, and this is the one I really
wanted to focus on. Mershawn Will one hundred percent. Will
one hundred percent sentence Trump to rikers in the hope
that Trump's supporters demonstrate violently. I am sure that Obama's

(19:03):
minions are ready to mascarade as Trump's supporters and become violent.
That's why the drum beat at the convention is Trump
is a violent dictator who must be stopped by any means. Bingo.
I think there's no question that one of the reasons
why they are trying to jail Trump is they want

(19:27):
to incite or elicit a reaction among Trump's supporters. They
want us to do something violent so that they can
portray us as terrorists, so that then they can brand
us as a terrorist movement or as a threat to
the country and then either declare martial law or impose

(19:51):
what they've always wanted, which is what Obama always wanted,
which is a widescale crackdown. And so I think there's
no question and that's going into their thinking. And do
I put it beyond the deep state and especially these
FBI undercover agents to pose as Trump supporters. I bet
even with white hoods an tiki torches, I'm saying Trump, Trump, Trump,

(20:18):
and then you know, start looting or rioting, or you know,
blowing up cars or burning up cars in order to
say look at this, Look what Trump supporters are on
the streets. They're engaging in straight violence and political terrorism.
I wouldn't put anything beyond this criminal regime. That's why

(20:42):
you don't do law fair. That's why you don't have
judges impose prison sentences two months before an election against
the leading presidential candidate. This is direct election interference. And
I don't think the Democrats fully understand that they're going

(21:06):
to reap the whirlwind politically if they go down this road.
The country will not accept a presidential candidate being locked
up for blatantly political reasons. And again, this is all
coming from the Party of quote unquote democracy. David in Brookline,

(21:31):
Thanks for holding David, and welcome.

Speaker 7 (21:35):
Morning, Jeff, Hi David, and the cliche again, the Twilight
Zone episodes get thicker and thicker.

Speaker 8 (21:43):
You know, debating with Bill is absolutely pointless other than
to expose the fact that these people are brainwashed and
is absolutely no hope to get through to them.

Speaker 7 (21:58):
But you just made one of my points a moment ago.
How can six months ago an endorsement have helped, But
it won't help now when theoretically, at least we haven't
made up any ballots yet, we haven't started manufacturing ballots yet,
We don't know what the Democrats are doing. But if

(22:20):
even if RFK JR had five percent of the Democratic
vote that doesn't include independence. I don't know what's that
about three or four million votes based on the last election.
So how could three or four million votes being cast
on election day or leading up to it not be

(22:42):
of help. There's all the evidence you need that these
people are crazy.

Speaker 1 (22:46):
Well you, David, I promise I'll let you finish well, Like,
I mean, I could have made that point as well,
and you're dead on. I'm like, well, one vote technically
hasn't been cast yet, so who cares if RFK endorses him?
Frankly to me, no, the RFK endorsement now much more
impactful than six months ago because in about a month

(23:07):
people are going to start voting. We still got presidential
debates coming up. What are these people talking about? So,
of course, if he endorses Trump now it's at the
worst possible moment for the Democrats. And yeah, and the
argument he couldn't rebut is well, if it's so innocuous,

(23:27):
if it's so, it'll have no impact whatsoever. Then why
are they trying to destroy his campaign? Why are they
all melting down? Why are they trying to keep him
off the ballet and RFK has said repeatedly, it's Democrat lawyers,
the Biden Harris regime. They're blocking our access. They don't
want us on the ticket in New York or Pennsylvania

(23:48):
or Michigan or Wisconsin. You know it's not Trump. Trump
hasn't filed one lawsuit against us. We want to get
on the ballot. He doesn't care. Now all of a sudden,
it makes no difference. No, because they're scared. They're scared
they got to keep up the lie that the momentum
is behind Kamala when it isn't. Now it's changed completely.

(24:12):
So you're dead on, David. No, And look just simple math.
I mean, I know this is not Bill strong suit.
Two plus two equals four. You have a candidate that
has this support of literally millions and millions and millions
of voters, many of them by the way, in the
kee Key battleground states. And he's going to endorse and

(24:34):
his vice presidential nominee who's a progressive, so a lifelong Democrat,
diehard liberal, and Shanahan a die hard progressive. And they're
saying Kamala is so extreme and so radical and frankly
so authoritarian and dictatorial. We're urging all liberals, Democrats, progressives,

(25:00):
hold your nose. Vote for Trump. Believe me, he's a
hell of a lot better than the alternative. You're gonna
tell me that millions and millions of voters shifting to Trump,
that's gonna have no impact whatsoever. I guess if you're
manufacturing twenty thirty forty million votes, I guess if you're
planning to steal it and you're willing to, you know,

(25:23):
fabricate as many ballots as you need to win. But
if it's going to be a free and fair election
and they keep telling us the election is safe, then
this is it. It's the mother of all blows. And
by the way, that's what everybody else in the world thinks.
Everybody's reporting it's a fundamental game changer, But not Bill

(25:46):
and Sudbury, because that's the you want to know, the
Hitler and the bunker type mentality. That's what he embodies.
And that's the people at the convention, those lemmings that
cheer no matter matter what they say. That's the Bills
in Sudbury. And the question is are there more of

(26:07):
us or are there more of them? David, please continue.

Speaker 7 (26:13):
Points in all these years, including at the convention or
any liberals that call so called liberals, I call them communists. Now,
just like that's the word. What policy did President Trump
put forward, not whether you liked him or not. What
policy has he ever put forth or talked about that's

(26:35):
bad for America? One, just one, any liberal caller call in,
tell us I'd like to hear it at their convention.
And finally, Jeff, I cannot watch that convention. I have
a blood pressure issue like you. I cannot watch an
altered reality, watching trained sealed collap and be brainwashed. But

(26:58):
I heard one news clip which I thought was rich
Hillary Clinton going on and on how if Trump was elected,
he could use the FBI to go after his I'm
paraphrasing his political opponent.

Speaker 1 (27:18):
Talk about the pot calling the kettle black. David. So
you can't make this up. You just can't make it up, David.
As always, thank you so much for that call. Okay,
joining me now as she always does at this time,
doctor Grace putting liberals in their place, Grace Vuoto. She's

(27:40):
got a fresh column out. Oh it is a dagger,
political dagger aimed at the heart of Kamala Harris. It's
called Kamala Harris enemy of free markets, and you can
read it right now. We just posted it a couple
hours ago on WRKO dot com slash coooner Kua and
is in national Er wrko dot com slash cooner Grace.

(28:06):
How are you?

Speaker 5 (28:08):
I am very welcome, Thank you for having me.

Speaker 1 (28:10):
Well, congratulations again on an absolutely outstanding column. RFK Junior
and will get the Kamala and the convention very soon,
I promise. But first, OURFK Junior has now dropped a bombshell.
He now says he is seriously considering dropping out of
the race along with his VP Nicole Shanahan. As you know,

(28:30):
they're both, you know, principled leftists. They're both people of
the left. They're no conservatives, I'll tell you this, But
they say the Democrats have now gone so far to
the left, they have become so authoritarian and so politically
thuggish that they stay the country has no option but

(28:51):
to support Donald Trump, and they are seriously considering dropping
or quitting their bid, dropping out of the race, and
endorsing Trump.

Speaker 5 (29:00):
What say you, I think that they should drop out
as soon as possible. They should join forces with Donald
Trump because they are best poised right now to explain
to the public the real Democratic Party right now what
we're hearing on the convention floor, and for the last
few weeks, I call it sugar sugar, candy candy. They're

(29:24):
giving us a utopian vision of what America is going
to be when she is elected, and they're telling us
everything that you would think someone wants to hear. So
they are presenting Disneyland. That's really what this convention is.
And the media is not challenging a lot of the

(29:45):
preposterous premises that they are standing on. But somebody like RSK,
he knows the dark side of the Democratic Party, especially
coming from a family that has been celebrated within that party,
his voice would be extremely powerful to contrast the difference
between the sugar sugar candy that they're promoting and the

(30:08):
darkness that they actually enact.

Speaker 1 (30:11):
I take it. You saw Michelle Obama speech Barack Obama speech.
They both played the race card heavy, especially Michelle Obama.
Michelle Obama came out and said, maybe the presidency is,
you know, the ultimate black job, taking a shot at
Trump and his comments about black jobs, and of course

(30:32):
Obama went on about Trump being a threat to democracy,
Obama that Obama said that Trump is a political lunatic,
a bomb thrower. He even made fun of his private parts,
and the audience laughed and jeered, what did you make
of both their speeches? And do you think they're going

(30:54):
to turn black voters back to the Democratic Party?

Speaker 5 (31:00):
Yeah, you know, I got to say, I was really
disappointed in both of their speeches. They have both lost
their ability to deliver effectively. Michelle Obama was very obnoxious
in her phraseology. I don't think she connected at all.
I don't know what she's doing. Is she's taking acting classes,

(31:20):
poetry classes, I don't know what it is. But she
was not speaking directly, and Obama was jittery. Obama was
not looking straight at the camera. What surprised me the
most is how much their political skills have declined. They've
obviously been not very engaged and they're just rusty. I

(31:42):
don't think they were effective at all, believe it or not.
The person that I think was more effective for this
election season was Hillary Clinton. Hillary Clinton actually delivered a
very strong speech for her base, especially for female voters,
especially to galvanized all those who had previously voted for

(32:02):
her and expand that base. I don't think Michelle and
Barack connect at all to people in general. I don't
think they connect to black people anymore, and they certainly
don't connect to the black working class overall.

Speaker 1 (32:18):
Where Now, tonight's going to be night three. We're already
halfway past the Democratic or through the Democratic National Convention.
Tonight is going to be night three. Tim Waltz is
going to be accepting the vice presidential nomination. How do
you feel the DNC is going so far?

Speaker 5 (32:37):
Well? I think their production quality is outstanding. I think
that I'm just amazed at how smooth it seems when
you're watching it. The music is great, the energy level
is great, and I get more and more disturbed as
I watch it because what I'm seeing as a fantasy
land being created. And my concern is that the low

(33:00):
information voters are going to swallow this uphold because this
fantasy land is not being regularly challenged by our media,
and it's their job to expose all of this as
a big giant pot of lies.

Speaker 1 (33:17):
What, in particular, if you don't want me drilling down
a bit, what's the fantasy that they have been peddling
the last two nights?

Speaker 5 (33:25):
Well, the fantasy is that Harris is going to solve
the nation's problems, especially that she is a friend of
the working class, and that she is a promoter of freedom.
And if you look at what's happened over the last
few years, the economy has been very challenging for the
working and the middle class. And that's what my column

(33:45):
is all about. Enemy of free markets. If you look
at their record, everything they quote unquote try to fix,
they actually ruined. They increased deficits, They have increased obviously,
as we know inflation. Forevery had they done nothing when
they assumed office, the economy would have been better off.
So all of their policies, these are facts. This is

(34:09):
nothing to argue about. These are facts. Their policies did
two things. They made it harder for working people to survive,
to live, to have a disposable income on a regular basis,
and they put more controls on the economy. They stifle
the economy. So Harris does not understand entrepreneurship, she does

(34:31):
not understand free markets, she does not understand freedom, and
therefore she is going to be devastating for the economic
prospects of the American people. But the big lie that
they're peddling, is that somehow she's this great savior for
our pocket books when she clearly has not been. They

(34:51):
have messed up the economy for most people.

Speaker 1 (34:54):
Grace, let me ask you one final ultimate question. When
you look at their race right now, and they're running
essentially on an openly communist platform, She's talking about Soviet
style price controls. She says now that we need to
have price controls on food production, on grocery stores. When

(35:16):
you look at what she's offering, and Tim Waltz, who
has repeatedly openly praised communist China and communism itself, saying
it's the greatest system and ideology in the world, and
I'm going to blow that wide open tomorrow after his
speech tonight. Do you believe that this radical left wing

(35:36):
ticket can win in November?

Speaker 5 (35:39):
Unfortunately, I think it can win in November because the
voices that are sounding the alarm are not large enough.
They're not big enough. There's not enough of them. Trump
needs to seize this talking point, Jeff, you are brilliant
in exposing her. He needs to take these talking points
and be consistent and stay on message. And the media,

(36:02):
especially at least the conservative media, needs to do the same. Instead,
our media is scattered, it's not focused. Their media is
in lockstep with their party. So the question is is
the truth going to get out? And that's my grave concern.

Speaker 1 (36:19):
We have been talking with Grace Vuoto, doctor Grace putting
liberals in their place. Full disclosure. Yes, I'm married up
my wonderful wife. Please check out our call um trust me,
it's absolutely brilliant. It is You want to know what
Kamala Harris stands for, it's Kamala Harris, enemy of free markets.

(36:41):
By Grace Voto