Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Six one seven two six six sixty eight sixty eight
is the number. Okay, just super quick because I want
to go right back to the phone lines. A couple
lines are open if you do want to jump on.
Six one seven two six six sixty eight sixty eight
is the number. So there was talk about a sonic boom,
(00:22):
and you know that you hear these sonic booms, and
the media comes out and says, don't worry about it,
and and you know, and I know the previous caller,
but others are saying, Jeff, I think that's you know,
they're building these underground bases, these underground tunnels, uh, these
underground cities twenty one trillion dollars worth so far and counting,
according now to a whistleblower. And by the way, how
(00:45):
has this story not gotten bigger attention? But let that
go anyway. So Catherine Austin Fitz, former Assistant Secretary of
Housing and Urban Development, a member of Congress, has blown
the whistle saying it's there. It's obvious. It's been going
on for years and years and years. So another conspiracy
theory proven correct. My bigger point is this, whether it's
(01:08):
sonic booms or not, okay, And I'm not discounting what
she said. I'm just saying, just leave that aside for
a second. How could this have been done in the shadow?
In the shadows, forgive me behind, you know, behind closed doors,
(01:30):
literally underground, where they were siphoning twenty one trillion dollars.
Not at once, obviously, I know what happened over a
long period of time. But a trillion here, a trillion there,
five hundred billion here, a trillion there, and before you
know it, we're a twenty one trillion dollars. It's the secrecy.
(01:51):
It's the fact that this was all done in the dark.
It's our money, that twenty one trillion. In a way, that's
even a bigger scandal than the thirty six thirty seven
trillion dollar national debt. The national debt, and I can't
stand the national debt. And I think it was criminal
what they did to us. But it was public. It
(02:12):
was there. You know, the budget deficit. Every year you
have the debt clock, so you can see it going
up and up and up and up and up. But
this was twenty one trillion dollars, as they say, off
the books. This was behind our back. This wasn't done
with our consent. This wasn't done without it, you know,
(02:33):
with our knowledge. So you know, this was to me
grossly illegal, grossly unconstitutional, because they want to have underground
bases and underground cities for the most powerful, wealthy of
the elites in our society, and I bet around the world.
(02:55):
But I don't think it's just for Americans. I'll tell
you this. I think sorrow and his son are covered.
Let's just put it this way, in case there's a
nuclear war. So I e as you know, Jerry, Comrade Jerry,
I thought rightly, said Jeff, if they have a nuclear
war with Russia, in a way, they don't care because
(03:15):
they think they can survive underneath the ground. They've been
prepping for this for thirty forty years, so they can
be cavalier or whatever, reckless of it or irresponsible with
the whole thing, because we're just fodder.
Speaker 2 (03:31):
Now.
Speaker 1 (03:32):
I'm not saying it's gonna happen. I'm not saying there's
going to be a nuclear war. Obviously, you know this
is it was an expose. A She came out and said, yeah,
look I got news for you man. I'll tell you
what I saw, and it's an open secret. In Washington.
So there's underground infrastructure that they've been building over many decades,
(03:53):
and it's been funded off the books our money, twenty
one trillion dollars in counting. Where they've got under you know,
they've got tunnels, they've got underground military bases, they've got
underground cities in case there is a nuclear war or
some as she put it, near extinction event. Now I'm sorry,
(04:18):
but there should be congressional hearings. I want to know
where they're located exactly. I want to know when this began,
who authorized it. I want to know who knew about it,
what did you know? And when did you know it?
And I'm sorry, I want a tour, I think you know.
(04:39):
I want cameras down there, and I want to see
how extensive is it? What the hell are you guys
building down there? And why was this not told to
us and revealed? Why was this not transparent? And look,
to me, this is an obvious point. I'm almost saying,
(05:01):
like the sky is blue, how is this not a
massive scandal? And and and and crime? Twenty one twenty
one trillion dollars off the books. That's illegal money, that's
that's your that's stuffed. I don't care what it was
(05:25):
used for. The fact of the matter is you took
the money off the books, our money, which wasn't there
to benefit us. It was benefit to, as you put it,
the powerful, wealthy elites. So no, I want to see
these cities. I want to see these tunnels. I want
to see these bases, and I want the truth, the
(05:48):
whole truth, and nothing but the truth. When did this
exactly begin, who gave it permission or authorization? And who
covered up for it all these years? I don't I'm
looking around like, am I crazy? Am I missing something here?
We're not talking twenty one million. We're not even talking
(06:08):
twenty one billion, which to me alone, that would be
a massive scandal. We're talking twenty one trillion dollars with
a tea holy shimoli. And I'm telling you right now
a lot of it was stolen. You're dealing with that
kind of money. Wow. No, No, I'm telling you, yeah,
(06:28):
twenty one million, sorry, twenty one trillion, Yes, was diverted.
Not all of it went to that underground infrastructure, to
these underground cities. Dad, I can guaran that kind of cash,
that kind of obscene, almost unimaginable amounts of money. No, no,
that's all un accounted for. So who lined their pockets,
(06:49):
who got a cut, who wet their beak as they say,
who came in there and grabbed a little bit of it,
grabbed a slice here, grabbed the slice there. Now we'll
never know. I mean, I don't know what else to
tell you. I mean, seriously, I'm just like, you know,
I saw the story last night. I couldn't believe it.
(07:12):
Then the New York Post had a story on it,
so I knew, oh, this is starting to get serious.
And look, I believe her. She's got a lot of credibility.
Catherine Austin Fitz and you know by and then when
I heard a good chunk of that podcast, and I
just I said to myself, this is this is incredible.
(07:33):
Now again, that's why you don't fund PBS and NPR.
They won't touch this story with a ten foot poll.
This is from t Edward on Messenger, and he makes
an interesting point. Jeff Truckers have been posting these underground
tunnels and food deliveries for years now. There is supposedly
(07:58):
an underground highway system that goes across the entire country
is it a conspiracy or is it real? The minions
will never know, so I wasn't aware of that. To
be honest, I did not know about truckers posting these
(08:20):
kinds of pictures. And again, this needs to be investigated.
I think there's no question. So let me just quickly
because many were saying, Jeff, can you play the cut
one more time? So again, this is not some bomb thrower.
It's a very highly respected person, very intelligent, former Assistant
Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, member of Congress, really
(08:41):
a very smart woman. There's nobody disagrees with that. Smart
intelligent has been right very often. Catherine Austin Fitz she
was on Tucker Carlson's podcast and dropped this bombshell that
for over the last couple decades, the UN the United
States has spent off the books twenty one trillion dollars
(09:05):
to create underground tunnels, underground military bases, underground cities in
case there is a near extinction event roll cut twenty
one A Mike.
Speaker 3 (09:20):
There is a history of near extinction events. And one
of the things that I've looked at because I'm trying
to figure out, you know, between nineteen fiscal nineteen ninety
eight and fiscal twenty fifteen, there were twenty one trillion
of undocumentable adjustments in the US government. If you go
to our website missing Money dot slayer dot com, we
have years and years of documentation, including the government financials
(09:43):
that show this. So the question is where's all this
money going? And one of the things I've looked at
in the process of looking at where all this money
is going is the underground base and city infrastructure and
transportation system that's been built. And I'm sorry, yes so
so we have built an extraordinary number of underground bases
(10:05):
and supposedly transportation systems. Some of these are a record
of Some of these are documented as part of the
national security infrastructure. I think there are many more so
in the United States, in the United States, on all
over the world.
Speaker 1 (10:21):
Wow. Wow, that was full credit. That was on Tucker
Carlson's podcast. And this is one of many reasons why
Fox got rid of them, because you don't see this
kind of stuff on Fox. You don't see it anywhere
in the corporate media, because the corporate media is not
about news, it's about money. Six one seven two, six,
(10:42):
six sixty eight sixty eight Ken in New Hampshire. Thanks
for holding Ken, and welcome.
Speaker 2 (10:52):
Good morning, Jeff hi Ken. Yes, on your latest topic,
all I can do is sort of put a pin
in it because we need to know a lot or
very least. It sounds like congressional hearings and needed, but
on the primary topic of the day. You know, we
watch what's going on in politics, and I haven't seen
(11:13):
anybody on the Democratic side that has any promise of
the future except this. NTR CEO Catherine Maher did some
research on her. She was connected to Signal, which was
a controversy a couple of months ago, and the way
she presents herself in her background. Folks, you got to
(11:36):
put her name down as someone to watch because the
Left she checks off all of the boxes and she
could be about to become a matyr and even elevate
her profile at a very least within four eight years,
if there's a Democratic administration, she's going to either be
(11:57):
a cabinet member, president or vice president.
Speaker 1 (12:01):
Oh, Ken, that's interesting. I didn't even see that angle
at all. I don't know, maybe because I thought her
congression I mean, I've seen her in the past. I
thought her congressional testimony was horrible. Honestly, I don't think
she's that smart. I think she's a liar. I think
she's been exposed as a liar. So you may be right.
(12:22):
I'm not saying you're wrong. I'm just I never thought
of it that way. You're right. They're gonna make her
now into a martyr. The media is already doing it.
The left's already trying to do it. I don't know
if it's gonna work or not. And I think overall,
the Democrats have a crisis. There's no air apparent. The
Obamas are not going to ride to their rescue, the
(12:42):
Clintons aren't coming, no one is coming. And when they
are floating ideas like running Kamala Harris again, this is
what they've been reduced to. Go ahead, She's gonna lose
even worse the second time. If Kamala Harris is your answer,
or aos Se or Gavin Newsom or Gretchen Whitmer or
(13:06):
Healey or Michelle Wu, I could run down the whole list.
If this is their bench, if these are their perspective
presidential candidates, the Democrats are going to get destroyed. And
I think ultimately can the problem. They keep thinking it's
a personality issue. It's a communications issue. It's a pr issue.
(13:29):
It's about finessing the messaging. No, it's a substance issue.
It's a policy issue. You're talking now about a radical
Marxist anti American communist party. That's the problem. That is
so far to the left on so many issues that
(13:52):
the American people can't stand them and have thoroughly rejected them.
And I think that's their problem. Their problem is not,
you know, the right person, the right voice, the right tone,
the right slogan. No on transgenderism. They're insane on Russia.
They're insane on China. They're insane on the border. They're
(14:16):
insane on MS thirteen and trend deur Araguan deportations. They
are insane on taxes, they're insane on spending, they're insane
on crime. They're insane. So I could run down issue
after issue after issue after issue. So when you're that radical,
(14:36):
that extreme, that out of touch, I don't care who
you put up there. Really, it doesn't matter. You can
put anybody up there. Sure you can put on these
ideas on this program, on that program, on that policy.
You can run Franklin Delano Roosevelt. You can run John F. Kennedy.
(14:57):
I don't care who you run, you're gonna get wiped out.
No matter how much liftstick you put on. A pig,
it's still a pig and the Democratic Party is a pig. Ken.
Thank you for that call. Bill in Sudbury. Thanks for
holding Bill and welcome.
Speaker 4 (15:18):
Hello, Hello, good morning, Good morning, Jack. How are you today.
Speaker 1 (15:21):
I'd hurry when you.
Speaker 4 (15:22):
Were talking about when you were talking about these underground sites,
and you said who knew about them? It's pretty much everyone, Jeff,
Absolutely everyone. I'm not sure what year they came down,
but probably like the mid seventies. They took down the
fallout shelter signs they used to be on courthouses and
fire stations and schools. And I'm not shocked that there
might be an underground apartment for the governor to jump
(15:46):
into in the event of catastrophic nuclear war. I'm also
not surprised that they might not want to talk about
how that gets funded. I feel like everybody knows that.
I'm surprised that you didn't. I'm surprised that you're surprised
by just knew.
Speaker 1 (16:00):
Yeah, Bill, I gotta tell you you never fail to disappoint, well, really,
I don't know if you can't, Yeah, that there's only
the rich and the wealthy that are going into these
underground cities and underground military bases, and that this was
twenty one trillion dollars that they took off the books,
and you're saying it's all okay. And first of all,
(16:22):
I don't know how you knew about it, because no
one else knew about it. And we're not talking about
some little nuclear underground shelter or you know, everybody knows
the President has an underground shelter at the White House
in case there's a nuclear attack. We're not talking about
that bill. We're talking about massive cities and tunnels, almost
another civilization. I mean that's a bit strong, but almost
(16:45):
another world underneath. And that twenty one trillion dollars was
used of our money, funneled off the books. You really
are a communist, like I'm telling you to your face.
I mean, that's theft, that's the theft of taxpayer money.
(17:06):
These are high crimes and misdemeanors. Frankly, half of me
still doesn't quite believe it because of the scale of
the money and the scale of the secrecy involved. That's
why you need I think clearly a massive congressional investigation
into this. But no, we've been lied to, my friend
now as a totalitarian thug, you don't mind being lied to,
(17:30):
you know. Sandy and I were actually having a very
interesting off air conversation during the break and I said
to Sandy, I said, is Bill really that stupid? I said, no, really,
is he that dense?
Speaker 2 (17:42):
Like?
Speaker 1 (17:43):
Is he that low? Iq? And she said, look, I
think you're doing him and your audience at disservice. Is
what she said to me by referring to him as stupid.
He just doesn't make certain basic connections and it's almost
she says, it's almost like willful blindness on his part.
(18:03):
So she says, as an example, he just can't deal
with reality. So when Biden was mentally disintegrating, it's too
scary for him and liberals like him to acknowledge the
fact that there's a president who mentally psychologically is falling
apart and has dementia and just can't do the job.
(18:24):
They can't deal with that, so they pretend they play stupid.
They just don't want to face reality. And then she says, well,
about this particular topic, I mean, of course, everybody knows
that governors have underground nuclear shelters, or the president has
an underground nuclear shelter. Even in places like Nebraska, you know,
(18:48):
in Omaha or whatever around Omaha, you have these missile
silos where they will build condominiums half you know whatever,
half a million dollars and is basically underground in case,
God forbid, there's a war or something. So in Bill's mind,
this is what Sandy was telling me. In Bill's mind,
(19:11):
it's like, well, how can you're not in all this, oh, no,
tent nineteen seventies. But that's not what we're talking about.
What we're talking about is entire cities underground, constructed by
(19:32):
our government in our military, to the tune of trillions
and trillions and trillions of dollars, where they literally apparently
have this underground massive subway system and a highway system
and military bases and cities and tunnels. And it's like
that's too scary for him. He can't grasp it, he
(19:53):
can't deal with it. It threatens his whole worldview. And so,
I don't you know, if it's just a refusal to
acknowledge your face reality, or if it really is seriously
low iq I don't know what it is, but the
most you know you I played the cut twice in
(20:16):
ninety nine point nine percent of the audience get it.
He doesn't, So I mean, I don't know what else
to say. Dave in New Hampshire, Thanks for holding Dave,
and welcome.
Speaker 5 (20:32):
Hey Jeff, good morning, Hi on PBS. I mean a
couple of things. A few callers back, she was talking
about how she learned to read and write. I mean,
and poor kids. First of all, you've got to be
able to afford cable now. Secondly, they claim they don't
need our taxpayer dollars. We've made the Sussime Street people millionaires, right,
those people that own that company are multimillionaires, and that
(20:55):
Bland woman you were talking about doesn't. Isn't her salary
four hundred some O?
Speaker 1 (21:01):
Yes?
Speaker 5 (21:02):
Yeah, So if they don't need taxpayer dollars, fine, I
can think of a lot of other places to spend it.
Speaker 1 (21:09):
Oh Dave, I'm with you all the way. No, the
only point I was just trying to make is, you know,
the woman was saying one of the callers, and she's
a very good caller, said, you know, I remember what
it did for me when I was younger, and I
came from a more poor background. And I didn't come
from a poor background, working class but not poor. But no,
I said, no, I can see. I really I thought
(21:29):
Sesame Street was very good for me when I was young.
It was very good for my sister. I think there
were some excellent programs on PBS years and years ago.
But Dave, we're talking now about a very different animal.
I mean, this is not the PBS to forget my
youth of you know, twenty years ago. Even so, I'm
with you. Look, I think in principle, no network, no channel,
(21:55):
no media outlet should be funded or paid by taxpayers period. NPR,
PBS should be able to survive on their own. And
to your point, Dave, I wish it was millions. Sesames
Street has made them hundreds, if not hundreds of millions,
if not billions, of dollars. Sesame Street alone could fund
(22:18):
PBS and NPR if they wanted to, so, Dave, Honestly,
if they need extra money, go to Sesame Street, go
to Hollywood, go to the billionaires that you know, the
Democrat left wing billionaires. Go to their viewers and ask
them to give even more money. Charge more for advertising,
(22:40):
there's a million ways, but they don't have a right
to claim our money anymore. Final word to you, Dave.
Speaker 5 (22:47):
No, one hundred percent agree. I mean, if you're claiming
you don't need it proven, Like I said, we could.
You know, there's a million other places we could spend
the taxpayer dollar, including not contributing towards that four hundred
thousand dollars a year salary of that CEO.
Speaker 1 (23:05):
Amen, brother, Amen, Dave, thank you very much for that call.
Can I squeeze in Peter and Wister? I can't squeeze
in Peter and Worcester.
Six one seven two six six sixty eight sixty eight
is the number. Okay, just super quick because I want
to go right back to the phone lines. A couple
lines are open if you do want to jump on.
Six one seven two six six sixty eight sixty eight
is the number. So there was talk about a sonic boom,
(00:22):
and you know that you hear these sonic booms, and
the media comes out and says, don't worry about it,
and and you know, and I know the previous caller,
but others are saying, Jeff, I think that's you know,
they're building these underground bases, these underground tunnels, uh, these
underground cities twenty one trillion dollars worth so far and counting,
according now to a whistleblower. And by the way, how
(00:45):
has this story not gotten bigger attention? But let that
go anyway. So Catherine Austin Fitz, former Assistant Secretary of
Housing and Urban Development, a member of Congress, has blown
the whistle saying it's there. It's obvious. It's been going
on for years and years and years. So another conspiracy
theory proven correct. My bigger point is this, whether it's
(01:08):
sonic booms or not, okay, And I'm not discounting what
she said. I'm just saying, just leave that aside for
a second. How could this have been done in the shadow?
In the shadows, forgive me behind, you know, behind closed doors,
(01:30):
literally underground, where they were siphoning twenty one trillion dollars.
Not at once, obviously, I know what happened over a
long period of time. But a trillion here, a trillion there,
five hundred billion here, a trillion there, and before you
know it, we're a twenty one trillion dollars. It's the secrecy.
(01:51):
It's the fact that this was all done in the dark.
It's our money, that twenty one trillion. In a way, that's
even a bigger scandal than the thirty six thirty seven
trillion dollar national debt. The national debt, and I can't
stand the national debt. And I think it was criminal
what they did to us. But it was public. It
(02:12):
was there. You know, the budget deficit. Every year you
have the debt clock, so you can see it going
up and up and up and up and up. But
this was twenty one trillion dollars, as they say, off
the books. This was behind our back. This wasn't done
with our consent. This wasn't done without it, you know,
(02:33):
with our knowledge. So you know, this was to me
grossly illegal, grossly unconstitutional, because they want to have underground
bases and underground cities for the most powerful, wealthy of
the elites in our society, and I bet around the world.
(02:55):
But I don't think it's just for Americans. I'll tell
you this. I think sorrow and his son are covered.
Let's just put it this way, in case there's a
nuclear war. So I e as you know, Jerry, Comrade Jerry,
I thought rightly, said Jeff, if they have a nuclear
war with Russia, in a way, they don't care because
(03:15):
they think they can survive underneath the ground. They've been
prepping for this for thirty forty years, so they can
be cavalier or whatever, reckless of it or irresponsible with
the whole thing, because we're just fodder.
Speaker 2 (03:31):
Now.
Speaker 1 (03:32):
I'm not saying it's gonna happen. I'm not saying there's
going to be a nuclear war. Obviously, you know this
is it was an expose. A She came out and said, yeah,
look I got news for you man. I'll tell you
what I saw, and it's an open secret. In Washington.
So there's underground infrastructure that they've been building over many decades,
(03:53):
and it's been funded off the books our money, twenty
one trillion dollars in counting. Where they've got under you know,
they've got tunnels, they've got underground military bases, they've got
underground cities in case there is a nuclear war or
some as she put it, near extinction event. Now I'm sorry,
(04:18):
but there should be congressional hearings. I want to know
where they're located exactly. I want to know when this began,
who authorized it. I want to know who knew about it,
what did you know? And when did you know it?
And I'm sorry, I want a tour, I think you know.
(04:39):
I want cameras down there, and I want to see
how extensive is it? What the hell are you guys
building down there? And why was this not told to
us and revealed? Why was this not transparent? And look,
to me, this is an obvious point. I'm almost saying,
(05:01):
like the sky is blue, how is this not a
massive scandal? And and and and crime? Twenty one twenty
one trillion dollars off the books. That's illegal money, that's
that's your that's stuffed. I don't care what it was
(05:25):
used for. The fact of the matter is you took
the money off the books, our money, which wasn't there
to benefit us. It was benefit to, as you put it,
the powerful, wealthy elites. So no, I want to see
these cities. I want to see these tunnels. I want
to see these bases, and I want the truth, the
(05:48):
whole truth, and nothing but the truth. When did this
exactly begin, who gave it permission or authorization? And who
covered up for it all these years? I don't I'm
looking around like, am I crazy? Am I missing something here?
We're not talking twenty one million. We're not even talking
(06:08):
twenty one billion, which to me alone, that would be
a massive scandal. We're talking twenty one trillion dollars with
a tea holy shimoli. And I'm telling you right now
a lot of it was stolen. You're dealing with that
kind of money. Wow. No, No, I'm telling you, yeah,
(06:28):
twenty one million, sorry, twenty one trillion, Yes, was diverted.
Not all of it went to that underground infrastructure, to
these underground cities. Dad, I can guaran that kind of cash,
that kind of obscene, almost unimaginable amounts of money. No, no,
that's all un accounted for. So who lined their pockets,
(06:49):
who got a cut, who wet their beak as they say,
who came in there and grabbed a little bit of it,
grabbed a slice here, grabbed the slice there. Now we'll
never know. I mean, I don't know what else to
tell you. I mean, seriously, I'm just like, you know,
I saw the story last night. I couldn't believe it.
(07:12):
Then the New York Post had a story on it,
so I knew, oh, this is starting to get serious.
And look, I believe her. She's got a lot of credibility.
Catherine Austin Fitz and you know by and then when
I heard a good chunk of that podcast, and I
just I said to myself, this is this is incredible.
(07:33):
Now again, that's why you don't fund PBS and NPR.
They won't touch this story with a ten foot poll.
This is from t Edward on Messenger, and he makes
an interesting point. Jeff Truckers have been posting these underground
tunnels and food deliveries for years now. There is supposedly
(07:58):
an underground highway system that goes across the entire country
is it a conspiracy or is it real? The minions
will never know, so I wasn't aware of that. To
be honest, I did not know about truckers posting these
(08:20):
kinds of pictures. And again, this needs to be investigated.
I think there's no question. So let me just quickly
because many were saying, Jeff, can you play the cut
one more time? So again, this is not some bomb thrower.
It's a very highly respected person, very intelligent, former Assistant
Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, member of Congress, really
(08:41):
a very smart woman. There's nobody disagrees with that. Smart
intelligent has been right very often. Catherine Austin Fitz she
was on Tucker Carlson's podcast and dropped this bombshell that
for over the last couple decades, the UN the United
States has spent off the books twenty one trillion dollars
(09:05):
to create underground tunnels, underground military bases, underground cities in
case there is a near extinction event roll cut twenty
one A Mike.
Speaker 3 (09:20):
There is a history of near extinction events. And one
of the things that I've looked at because I'm trying
to figure out, you know, between nineteen fiscal nineteen ninety
eight and fiscal twenty fifteen, there were twenty one trillion
of undocumentable adjustments in the US government. If you go
to our website missing Money dot slayer dot com, we
have years and years of documentation, including the government financials
(09:43):
that show this. So the question is where's all this
money going? And one of the things I've looked at
in the process of looking at where all this money
is going is the underground base and city infrastructure and
transportation system that's been built. And I'm sorry, yes so
so we have built an extraordinary number of underground bases
(10:05):
and supposedly transportation systems. Some of these are a record
of Some of these are documented as part of the
national security infrastructure. I think there are many more so
in the United States, in the United States, on all
over the world.
Speaker 1 (10:21):
Wow. Wow, that was full credit. That was on Tucker
Carlson's podcast. And this is one of many reasons why
Fox got rid of them, because you don't see this
kind of stuff on Fox. You don't see it anywhere
in the corporate media, because the corporate media is not
about news, it's about money. Six one seven two, six,
(10:42):
six sixty eight sixty eight Ken in New Hampshire. Thanks
for holding Ken, and welcome.
Speaker 2 (10:52):
Good morning, Jeff hi Ken. Yes, on your latest topic,
all I can do is sort of put a pin
in it because we need to know a lot or
very least. It sounds like congressional hearings and needed, but
on the primary topic of the day. You know, we
watch what's going on in politics, and I haven't seen
(11:13):
anybody on the Democratic side that has any promise of
the future except this. NTR CEO Catherine Maher did some
research on her. She was connected to Signal, which was
a controversy a couple of months ago, and the way
she presents herself in her background. Folks, you got to
(11:36):
put her name down as someone to watch because the
Left she checks off all of the boxes and she
could be about to become a matyr and even elevate
her profile at a very least within four eight years,
if there's a Democratic administration, she's going to either be
(11:57):
a cabinet member, president or vice president.
Speaker 1 (12:01):
Oh, Ken, that's interesting. I didn't even see that angle
at all. I don't know, maybe because I thought her
congression I mean, I've seen her in the past. I
thought her congressional testimony was horrible. Honestly, I don't think
she's that smart. I think she's a liar. I think
she's been exposed as a liar. So you may be right.
(12:22):
I'm not saying you're wrong. I'm just I never thought
of it that way. You're right. They're gonna make her
now into a martyr. The media is already doing it.
The left's already trying to do it. I don't know
if it's gonna work or not. And I think overall,
the Democrats have a crisis. There's no air apparent. The
Obamas are not going to ride to their rescue, the
(12:42):
Clintons aren't coming, no one is coming. And when they
are floating ideas like running Kamala Harris again, this is
what they've been reduced to. Go ahead, She's gonna lose
even worse the second time. If Kamala Harris is your answer,
or aos Se or Gavin Newsom or Gretchen Whitmer or
(13:06):
Healey or Michelle Wu, I could run down the whole list.
If this is their bench, if these are their perspective
presidential candidates, the Democrats are going to get destroyed. And
I think ultimately can the problem. They keep thinking it's
a personality issue. It's a communications issue. It's a pr issue.
(13:29):
It's about finessing the messaging. No, it's a substance issue.
It's a policy issue. You're talking now about a radical
Marxist anti American communist party. That's the problem. That is
so far to the left on so many issues that
(13:52):
the American people can't stand them and have thoroughly rejected them.
And I think that's their problem. Their problem is not,
you know, the right person, the right voice, the right tone,
the right slogan. No on transgenderism. They're insane on Russia.
They're insane on China. They're insane on the border. They're
(14:16):
insane on MS thirteen and trend deur Araguan deportations. They
are insane on taxes, they're insane on spending, they're insane
on crime. They're insane. So I could run down issue
after issue after issue after issue. So when you're that radical,
(14:36):
that extreme, that out of touch, I don't care who
you put up there. Really, it doesn't matter. You can
put anybody up there. Sure you can put on these
ideas on this program, on that program, on that policy.
You can run Franklin Delano Roosevelt. You can run John F. Kennedy.
(14:57):
I don't care who you run, you're gonna get wiped out.
No matter how much liftstick you put on. A pig,
it's still a pig and the Democratic Party is a pig. Ken.
Thank you for that call. Bill in Sudbury. Thanks for
holding Bill and welcome.
Speaker 4 (15:18):
Hello, Hello, good morning, Good morning, Jack. How are you today.
Speaker 1 (15:21):
I'd hurry when you.
Speaker 4 (15:22):
Were talking about when you were talking about these underground sites,
and you said who knew about them? It's pretty much everyone, Jeff,
Absolutely everyone. I'm not sure what year they came down,
but probably like the mid seventies. They took down the
fallout shelter signs they used to be on courthouses and
fire stations and schools. And I'm not shocked that there
might be an underground apartment for the governor to jump
(15:46):
into in the event of catastrophic nuclear war. I'm also
not surprised that they might not want to talk about
how that gets funded. I feel like everybody knows that.
I'm surprised that you didn't. I'm surprised that you're surprised
by just knew.
Speaker 1 (16:00):
Yeah, Bill, I gotta tell you you never fail to disappoint, well, really,
I don't know if you can't, Yeah, that there's only
the rich and the wealthy that are going into these
underground cities and underground military bases, and that this was
twenty one trillion dollars that they took off the books,
and you're saying it's all okay. And first of all,
(16:22):
I don't know how you knew about it, because no
one else knew about it. And we're not talking about
some little nuclear underground shelter or you know, everybody knows
the President has an underground shelter at the White House
in case there's a nuclear attack. We're not talking about
that bill. We're talking about massive cities and tunnels, almost
another civilization. I mean that's a bit strong, but almost
(16:45):
another world underneath. And that twenty one trillion dollars was
used of our money, funneled off the books. You really
are a communist, like I'm telling you to your face.
I mean, that's theft, that's the theft of taxpayer money.
(17:06):
These are high crimes and misdemeanors. Frankly, half of me
still doesn't quite believe it because of the scale of
the money and the scale of the secrecy involved. That's
why you need I think clearly a massive congressional investigation
into this. But no, we've been lied to, my friend
now as a totalitarian thug, you don't mind being lied to,
(17:30):
you know. Sandy and I were actually having a very
interesting off air conversation during the break and I said
to Sandy, I said, is Bill really that stupid? I said, no, really,
is he that dense?
Speaker 2 (17:42):
Like?
Speaker 1 (17:43):
Is he that low? Iq? And she said, look, I
think you're doing him and your audience at disservice. Is
what she said to me by referring to him as stupid.
He just doesn't make certain basic connections and it's almost
she says, it's almost like willful blindness on his part.
(18:03):
So she says, as an example, he just can't deal
with reality. So when Biden was mentally disintegrating, it's too
scary for him and liberals like him to acknowledge the
fact that there's a president who mentally psychologically is falling
apart and has dementia and just can't do the job.
(18:24):
They can't deal with that, so they pretend they play stupid.
They just don't want to face reality. And then she says, well,
about this particular topic, I mean, of course, everybody knows
that governors have underground nuclear shelters, or the president has
an underground nuclear shelter. Even in places like Nebraska, you know,
(18:48):
in Omaha or whatever around Omaha, you have these missile
silos where they will build condominiums half you know whatever,
half a million dollars and is basically underground in case,
God forbid, there's a war or something. So in Bill's mind,
this is what Sandy was telling me. In Bill's mind,
(19:11):
it's like, well, how can you're not in all this, oh, no,
tent nineteen seventies. But that's not what we're talking about.
What we're talking about is entire cities underground, constructed by
(19:32):
our government in our military, to the tune of trillions
and trillions and trillions of dollars, where they literally apparently
have this underground massive subway system and a highway system
and military bases and cities and tunnels. And it's like
that's too scary for him. He can't grasp it, he
(19:53):
can't deal with it. It threatens his whole worldview. And so,
I don't you know, if it's just a refusal to
acknowledge your face reality, or if it really is seriously
low iq I don't know what it is, but the
most you know you I played the cut twice in
(20:16):
ninety nine point nine percent of the audience get it.
He doesn't, So I mean, I don't know what else
to say. Dave in New Hampshire, Thanks for holding Dave,
and welcome.
Speaker 5 (20:32):
Hey Jeff, good morning, Hi on PBS. I mean a
couple of things. A few callers back, she was talking
about how she learned to read and write. I mean,
and poor kids. First of all, you've got to be
able to afford cable now. Secondly, they claim they don't
need our taxpayer dollars. We've made the Sussime Street people millionaires, right,
those people that own that company are multimillionaires, and that
(20:55):
Bland woman you were talking about doesn't. Isn't her salary
four hundred some O?
Speaker 1 (21:01):
Yes?
Speaker 5 (21:02):
Yeah, So if they don't need taxpayer dollars, fine, I
can think of a lot of other places to spend it.
Speaker 1 (21:09):
Oh Dave, I'm with you all the way. No, the
only point I was just trying to make is, you know,
the woman was saying one of the callers, and she's
a very good caller, said, you know, I remember what
it did for me when I was younger, and I
came from a more poor background. And I didn't come
from a poor background, working class but not poor. But no,
I said, no, I can see. I really I thought
(21:29):
Sesame Street was very good for me when I was young.
It was very good for my sister. I think there
were some excellent programs on PBS years and years ago.
But Dave, we're talking now about a very different animal.
I mean, this is not the PBS to forget my
youth of you know, twenty years ago. Even so, I'm
with you. Look, I think in principle, no network, no channel,
(21:55):
no media outlet should be funded or paid by taxpayers period. NPR,
PBS should be able to survive on their own. And
to your point, Dave, I wish it was millions. Sesames
Street has made them hundreds, if not hundreds of millions,
if not billions, of dollars. Sesame Street alone could fund
(22:18):
PBS and NPR if they wanted to, so, Dave, Honestly,
if they need extra money, go to Sesame Street, go
to Hollywood, go to the billionaires that you know, the
Democrat left wing billionaires. Go to their viewers and ask
them to give even more money. Charge more for advertising,
(22:40):
there's a million ways, but they don't have a right
to claim our money anymore. Final word to you, Dave.
Speaker 5 (22:47):
No, one hundred percent agree. I mean, if you're claiming
you don't need it proven, Like I said, we could.
You know, there's a million other places we could spend
the taxpayer dollar, including not contributing towards that four hundred
thousand dollars a year salary of that CEO.
Speaker 1 (23:05):
Amen, brother, Amen, Dave, thank you very much for that call.
Can I squeeze in Peter and Wister? I can't squeeze
in Peter and Worcester.
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.