Would You Support President Trump for a 3rd Term?

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Six one seven two six six sixty eight sixty eight
is the number. Okay, it's the question everyone, and I
mean everyone is asking should President Trump run for a
third term?

Speaker 2 (00:15):
Yes?

Speaker 3 (00:16):
No?

Speaker 1 (00:16):
What say you? Audience is on fire today. This is
from Charles on Messenger and he makes a very interesting point, Jeff,
when you start messing with constitutional amendments, you're just asking
for trouble. What other constitutional amendments would then be looked

(00:38):
at to change the first Amendment? Maybe the second Amendment?
Where would it end? Very good point. In other words,
they'd have to change the twenty second Amendment for Trump
to run for a third term. And do do we
really want to do that? That's a very good point.

(00:59):
This is from John and I think and this is
something Sandy and I were talking about off air during
the break. Jeff, without doubt, president Trump's influence will be
ever president. In a JD Vance presidency, President Trump will
be the conciliary of the Vance presidency. His unerring influence

(01:25):
will remain. As Rush Limbaugh used to say, don't doubt
me on this. You know it's funny you should use
the term conciliary because Sandy said, you know the way
you make it seem at the end when from that
last caller almost as if j D would be a
puppet president with Trump pulling the strings behind the background.

(01:49):
And you know, she made the point, and it's a
very good point. If that's the case, that's not a
president I want. I want a president who's going to
be his own man, who has his own mind, who
has his own case character, who's certain of his own decisions,
who wants to take the country in a decisive direction.
I don't want essentially another Biden who's just going to be,

(02:10):
you know, at the mercy of somebody yanking his chain
a la Obama. And I'm like, well, if I made
that sound like that, then I misspoke. No, I think
clearly JD would be his own man. He should be
his own man. By the way, he and Trump are
ideological soulmates, so I think on all the key issues

(02:32):
they agree. But what I said to Sandy was I said, no,
it's like The Godfather. You know, if you remember the
first one where the son Michael Corleone their eventually becomes
the Godfather, But who does he keep as his top
conciliary The Marlon Brando character the Dawn, Because he says, look,

(02:53):
who's a better adviser than the Dawn. I mean, he's
older now, doesn't have the quite same vigor and energy
like he used to. But if I need advice, if
I need to, you know, call upon someone's wisdom and experience.
Who better than him? And you know, And what I
was telling Sandy was, by the way, it's not just
you know JD. Calling Trump presidents if they're smart and

(03:18):
will call other presidents for advice, there's nothing wrong with that.
For example, Reagan called Nixon often. Clinton called Nixon often,
especially when it came to issues like Russia and China.
Now it doesn't mean you know, you just you know,
like a poodle, you obey everything a former president says.

(03:41):
But both Reagan and Clinton said over and over again,
his breadth of knowledge, his experience, the people that he
knows there, the command of that country and what's happening there.
He goes, I'm just taking notes, and I'm like this,
you knows, you know, half an hour forty five minutes

(04:02):
on the phone, and he goes, you have no idea.
His counsel was invaluable. So what I'm saying is long
story short. I could see JD. Vance honestly, calling Trump
mar A Lago and saying, you know, hey, Donald, what
do you think I should do here?

Speaker 2 (04:20):
You know?

Speaker 1 (04:21):
Or I'm inclined to do this? But what say you?
You know? Or well, look, you know Gi better than anybody,
says Ji Jinping is still in power. You know, I'm
thinking of countering China with a Should I do A?
Or do you recommend B? Whatever? So what I'm saying is,
it's not like Trump is just gonna disappear in twenty

(04:41):
twenty eight. So what I'm saying is you groom an air.
Let him be the heir. It's to me, it's almost
part of your greatness as a president. A great president
is not just successful in his two terms, but it's
also the that he basically ushers in after him who

(05:04):
you know, he anoints his successor. And I've got to
tell you, from everything I've been reading, everything I've been seeing,
everything I've been hearing, and Trump himself keeps saying this
over and over again. He goes, I couldn't ask for
a vetter VP of vice president and JD. He's great,
he says it. He goes, I give him everything, what's
his portfolio? Everything? Why? Because he just he's a workhorse.

(05:28):
He delivers and delivers and delivers. So what I'm saying is,
after a certain point, you know you're the king. You've
done your job, You've rescued and saved the country. Now
let someone else build upon your achievements. And look, I
like Gabbard more than Rubio for the exact same reason.

(05:48):
Previous callers have said, I've never trusted Rubio since the
Gang of Eight, But on this point, Trump is right.
A Vance Rubio ticket unstoppable. I don't care who the
Democrats put up. I don't care. Take your pick, pick
anybody you want. Gavin usim Pete, butdage Age, Michelle Obama,

(06:11):
I don't put up anybody you want. A Vance Rubio
ticket is a political juggernaut. It would be an effective
third Trump term. To me, we're gonna have trump Ism
without Trump. Six one seven two six, six sixty eight

(06:34):
sixty eight is the number. Okay, should Trump run for
a third term? Do you think he will run for
a third term or do you think he's just trolling
the Democrats and the media and by the way they
are melting down, I mean the way he's playing you know,
foot set with him. Oh oh, h J D and Rubio.

(06:57):
Oh my god, they'd be you know, the dynamic duo. No,
nobody could beat him, you know, nobody could beat him. Nobody.
But on the other hand, boy, I'd love to run. Yeah,
And they're like, he's a ducktator. So I mean, he's
playing him beautifully. And let me just say this because

(07:18):
I haven't I know, I'm getting the texts, I'm getting
the emails. Nobody's called in yet. I want to hear
from people who would like to see Trump run for
a third term. And I won't be hostile. I promise
I'll be very nice and respectful. I just want to
hear your argument to me, the strongest argument, at least

(07:41):
for me, and the one I'm very sympathetic to. Now,
I'm a constitutionalist, so the twenty second Amendment applies, so
I'm a no on a third term. But the argument
that they basically robbed him of his first term, which
they did, and so because of that, and only be
because of that, he should get a chance to run

(08:03):
for a third term. In other words, he really didn't
have a first term. And so you know, if the
Supreme Court blesses it, there's a legal opinion or a
legal ruling, then he can run again for a third term.
To me, I'm sympathetic to that argument. Now, is he
going to get that ruling? I doubt it, And I

(08:25):
still think that's to me what's incredible about Trump. Look
at how much he succeeded in his first term despite
all the subversion, despite all the conspiracy against him, and
how hard they undermined him, and then they tried to
put him in jail, and then they tried to bankrupt him,
and then they tried to keep him off the ballot,

(08:47):
you know, and they waged law fair against him while
he was and they stole the election from him. And
when everything they did to him while he was out
of power, and then he comes back again and within
nine months he's like a force of nature. He's done
more in nine months than most presidents have done in
an entire term objectively. And he's in Asia now when

(09:11):
he's rocking up deal after deal, and the big one
maybe on Thursday with Jijinping apparently now with both sides
are saying, both Trump's people and Beijing is that they're
very close to an historic trade deal. So if he
pulls that off, holy Shamoli I mean, the stock market

(09:32):
is going to boom. So it's incredible what he's managed
to achieve. It really is so. But I want to
hear from people who think that Trump should run for
a third term. I'd love to hear your arguments and
why six one seven, two six x sixty eight sixty
eight Nancy in Framingham, Thanks for holding Nancy, and welcome.

Speaker 2 (09:58):
Good morning, jeffin Divided States of America. Because of no
term limits with Congress, I'd say no.

Speaker 1 (10:07):
Why.

Speaker 2 (10:09):
Roosevelt was a very good Franklin D. Roosevelt was a
very likable, very popular, and he was a good president
for the first two terms that he had in office.
The problem you had with the third term, he did
a lot of damage, and I think a third term
doesn't work well. I would like to see Trump go

(10:30):
off of the sunset, but still be around. One can
play the game, two can play the game. Look at
a bomber on how he had a third term. He
doesn't need to do that to anyone who becomes like
fans whoever becomes president in twenty twenty eight, But be
around for a lot of advice and be around for

(10:51):
a lot of help. Underneath. Quietly, I think that would
be the better way to go. And I think that
Congress should be two terms. Absolutely, you can't get rid
of them. They go in with good intelligence and they
become very greedy and very wealthy.

Speaker 1 (11:08):
I become You're right, Nancy, it becomes like a lifetime appointment.

Speaker 2 (11:11):
And I don't think we want lifetime appointment. We have
lifetime appointments, and that's the problem if you had if
you didn't have lifetime applotments, we wouldn't be in this
fix of a divided country that we have now. And
Trump has got a lot for the next three years
to do, and he's got to get rid of every

(11:31):
single illegal, whether they committed a crime or they didn't
commit a crime. That's the first thing that has to happen,
because now you're seeing all these illegals everywhere voting, and
that's what's happening in New York, that's what's happening in
all your greatest states of the country.

Speaker 1 (11:50):
Nancy, you hit the nail right on the head. Nancy,
I want to ask you this. I could not agree
with you more. Okay, not one hundred one thousand percent,
ask you this. Generally in history, I'm painting with a
broad brush okay, but so you know I'm not getting
all the nuances, and because you know, I don't want
to keep you here forever. But generally in history there's

(12:12):
a rhythm. There's an ebb and a flow. There's a rhythm.
You look at Trump if you ask most of the people,
even those who love him and support him. Now, I
love his personality. I love the fact that he's plays
smash mouth football. I think he's funny. I love how
he trolls the media and the Democrats. I think he's hilarious.

(12:33):
But a lot of people who support him say I
don't like it. I love his policies, I love his achievements.
I don't like his personality. It's too loud, it's too brash.
The term to use is quote unpresidential. You hear this
all the time, even from his own supporters. What you
have in JD Vance personality wise, not the conviction conviction

(12:57):
character principles. They're the same. But personality is the antithesis
of Trump. He's not a smash mouth football personality. He's
not a street brawler. You know, he's presidential. He's polished,
he's very intelligent, he's very well spoken, he's very articulate.

(13:20):
So what I'm saying is it's almost as if say
that the country is a bit fatigued of Trump's personality,
not his policies. Well, now you're going to get JD
where he can legitimately go to people and say, look,
you like Trump's policies. Oh yeah, you like what he's
done to the border, oh yeah, immigration, oh yeah, the economy,

(13:41):
oh yeah, peace and prosperity, oh yeah, crime, Oh yeah,
that's me. But I'm going to do it in my way,
and I'm going to do it in a more genteel,
polished way, the way I speak, the way I deliver
my remarks, and it's going to have a bit of
a soothing influence on the country. So what I'm saying

(14:02):
is sometimes you need a certain leader for certain times
and a different style of leader for another era. Agree, disagree, Nancy.

Speaker 2 (14:13):
Agree with you. I know that he's brash, I know
that he's got a big mouth. But however, I love
everything he's doing. I think he's funny. I think he's brilliant.
He's got it all the looks, the money, the brains,
He's got it. There's no question. I think there's a
lot of jealousy because they can't do what he could do.

(14:34):
And by the way, he's done more and just I
think the first time month that he took office, he
did more than any president could do in eight years.

Speaker 1 (14:44):
Nancy, what You're completely right. What I'm going to do,
I promise this week next week, when we get a
bit of a lull in the news cycle, I'm going
to go through all of his achievements. I'm going to
go through him. I'm going to do a whole monologue
and I'm just going to say here's what he's done.
And I'm telling you, by the time I'm done, you're
gonna go, oh my god, OMG, like like, and I'm like,

(15:08):
and it's nine months. You're right, He's done in nine
months with most what most presidents you know, weren't able
to accomplish in one term, and some even in two terms.
The guy is a force of nature. There's just no
other way to say it. Nancy, Thank you so much
for that call. Six one seven two six, six sixty

(15:31):
eight sixty eight is the number. Okay, let me also
throw this log on the fire. What do you think
of Trump essentially essentially anointing Vance as his heir apparent
now he keeps throwing Rubio out there as well. But
you know it's just a few times now he said this,

(15:52):
A vance Rubio ticket would be invincible. He said this
over and over again, almost as if it's like, I
don't want even a primary. We know who it should be.
It should be Vents at the top of the ticket.
Rubio number two six one seven two six six sixty

(16:14):
eight sixty eight is the number. Okay. I don't know
if it's the callers or if it's Maestro mic I
don't know if Mike is just deliberately keeping those that
want Trump to serve a third term not on it's
just not putting them on the air, or they're just
not calling in. Okay, So I'm just going to assume,

(16:37):
because Mike would never do this to me, you know,
you know, you would never sabotage me like this. So
I'm going to assume that, for whatever reason, the forty
forty five percent of Cooner country that wants Trump Trump
to run for a third term. It's all you're all
responding and giving me your opinions via text and email

(17:00):
and messenger, but for some reason you don't want to
call in. So let me play Scott Adams. He's a cartoonist,
very funny guy, comedian, Trump supporter America first all the way.
And when he heard James Carvill and we played the cut.
Was it I think last week where Carvel said we're
gonna take back power in twenty twenty eight. And I've

(17:23):
spoken to many Democrats and we're gonna go after every
quote unquote Trump collaborator, especially those who are leaders, influencers,
talk radio hosts, cartoonists like Scott Adams. We're gonna shave
their heads. We're gonna parade them down Pennsylvania Avenue. We're
gonna spit on them. This is what they did in

(17:45):
France after World War Two, those that collaborated with the Nazis.
We're gonna throw tomatoes at him. We're gonna throw them
in jail. We're gonna persecute him, harass them, We're gonna
ruin him. Scott Adam said, oh yeah, well, you know
what I was for the twenty second Amendment ten minutes ago.
Now roll cut sixteen.

Speaker 4 (18:08):
Mike, James Carvel, if that's what you're really promising us,
if you're promising us that you and your clan are
going to come after Trump collaborators and you're not going
to define an advance of what a collaborator is. Well,
you just flipped me to a third term. I'm going
to make the change right now. As long as this

(18:31):
was talking like this, I'm in favor of a third term.
If you can calm down this, I'll be on your side.
No third terms for anybody. That's where I was ten
minutes ago. Now look at this, and I'm saying you,
you if you're going to give this vague threat that

(18:52):
when Trump leaves, people like me are going to be victimized, Yeah,
we're gonna go for a third term. And that's on you.
That's all on you, because I was absolutely against the
third term until right now.

Speaker 1 (19:11):
Agree, disagree. Jake in New Hampshire. Thanks for holding Jake,
and welcome.

Speaker 5 (19:19):
Good morning, Jeff.

Speaker 6 (19:20):
How you doing good?

Speaker 1 (19:21):
How are you?

Speaker 6 (19:22):
Jake? Ought too bad? If you were to asked me today,
I would ultimately say yes, I'd want to run for
a third term.

Speaker 1 (19:30):
Oh my god, Jake, God, God bless you. I've been
waiting two hours for somebody on the other side to
call in. Mike. I take it back, Mike, you weren't
sabotaging me. I was teasing Mike Jake, please go ahead,
give me your reasons why go yes?

Speaker 6 (19:47):
Yes, Well, first I want to say, let's pump the
brakes in his first year, in his second term, you know,
the economy's still crap. The deep state hasn't been locked up.
The Russia Ukraine War is still going on, right, Jeff.
If he were to get rid of income taxes, which
he says he's you know, thinking about doing, I would

(20:08):
be like Epstein, Epstein, who ever heard of the guy?
I don't know what you're talking about. I mean, I'm kidding,
but I might be able to be bought.

Speaker 5 (20:17):
Jeff.

Speaker 6 (20:21):
This rush of Ukraine War, I want it to end,
or I want our involvement to be zero, just to
back way, wipe our hands clean of it and the
deep state.

Speaker 3 (20:32):
Right.

Speaker 6 (20:33):
I keep hearing that Todd blanche is a turd in
the punch bowl, that he keeps slowing down this process.
I mean, I know he's dealing with these corrupt district judges,
but I hear he's the one in his administration that's
kind of slow in this process. So he's still got

(20:53):
a lot of work to do. I mean, I want
to be energy independent completely. I want to be food independent,
want all of our food to come here. What he's
talking about getting beef from Argentina, I mean, what's the
quality of that going to be? Like, I have no idea.
I want, you know, full force with RFK and what
he's doing. I want all the evidence to come forward

(21:16):
on these vaccines. I want our skies to stop being
poisoned with the stratospheric aerosol injections. And so there's still
so much work to be done.

Speaker 5 (21:26):
Jeff.

Speaker 1 (21:28):
Now, Jake, is your argument, and I don't want to
put words in your mouth, you'd like to see a
third term because you don't think he can get all
of this accomplished by the end of his second term,
So he'll need another four years after that to finish
the Trump Revolution. Is that what you're is that your
argument essentially.

Speaker 6 (21:51):
Term? Yes, just because from what I've seen already from him,
who knows what he can get done? You know in
this in this term, with who he's finding against and
you know, deep states still in power, you have I'm
sure a corrupt people within the FBI and CIA, and
you're still dealing with these judges. So who knows what

(22:12):
he's going to be able to get done in this term.
But just from going what he's he's you know, what
he's done and what he's promised. I would ultimately say yes.

Speaker 5 (22:23):
But interesting, like you said, as does.

Speaker 6 (22:26):
Come into a factor that's a big Jake, let me ask.

Speaker 1 (22:29):
You two questions. Okay, two questions. Number one, I just
I'm just curious. I want to get your take on this.
Is it that you don't trust JD vance to finish
what Trump started? Say he doesn't complete and I look,
I love your list, I love your list, and it's
a big list, and it's a daunting list. But say
he doesn't get everything that you want him to do,
and I want him to achieve all of that by

(22:50):
the end of his second term. But say he doesn't.
Is are you saying, Jake, And again I don't want
to put words in your mouth. Are you concerned that
JD will betray that Trump revolution or that JD won't
finish what Trump started? I'm just curious. In other words,
do you think Jeff I don't think he is the
heir apparent. I think it's Trump and only Trump. And

(23:13):
then the second argument that I want to hear from you, Jake,
is the twenty second Amendment. How do you get around
the twenty second amendment?

Speaker 6 (23:20):
Go Jake, Well, I don't know if I've seen enough
from JD the Crown on the next president, Jeff, I
mean I trust him over at Rubio, I can tell
you that. But to get around the second, the twenty
second Amendment, you may have to go to the Supreme Court,
like you said. He says he doesn't want to run

(23:40):
as vice president, but that's the only avenue I see.
And then again you're probably right as far as not
being able to change the Constitution within time during this term.

Speaker 1 (23:53):
Interesting, Interesting, Jake. I'm very happy you called. Really, and
I got to say you've summed up beautifully. Uh and
again eloquently, articulately. Uh. I think about forty five percent
of the audience, you know, because the audience and MAGU
is split on this. So really, Jake, again, outstanding call, Jake,
Thank you very much. See this is what I'm talking about.

(24:16):
You see, when we have a debate in a discussion,
how intelligent, how civilized, how articulate, it is compared to
when you argue with moonbats and liberals, it's like a
different dimension. Six one seven two six six sixty eight
sixty eight. Bob in Rainom. Thanks for holding Bob and welcome.

Speaker 3 (24:38):
Hey Jeff, how's it going good?

Speaker 5 (24:40):
How are you, Bob good?

Speaker 3 (24:44):
I'm going to go ask this in a different avenue.
I'm wondering if President Trump is getting the topic of
term limits on the table so that, you know, when
they're so fervently against him running for it third term,
he can turn it on them, either in the midterms
or maybe the next election, to say, you know, if

(25:10):
it's so bad for me to have all these extra terms,
how is it good that you people have all these
extra terms and get the subject of term limits for all?
And as a previous caller stated, maybe changed the twenty
second amend Amendment to include all these guys sen it

(25:31):
is Congress people, because as of yet, I've never heard
President Trump speak of term limits. And in my opinion,
we really need term limits for all too kind of
save the country really, because they're the kings and queens,
not President Trump.

Speaker 1 (25:53):
That's an excellent point. It's an angle I didn't even
think of, Bob. I love it, really, I love it.
And if that is Trump's strategic thinking, I think it's
a masterstroke. Uh, and think about it. Look he's doing
I know politically because the White House essentially has admitted
this that you know, he keeps going on about playing.

(26:13):
You know, he's playing cutesy, right, he's playing you know Hamlet.
Well should I shouldn't tie? You know, Oh JD's great,
Rubio's great. But you know, I'd love to run. I'd
love to run, so and that keeps all the attention
on him. So politically it's very beneficial for him. But
that other angle, I didn't even see. That's three that's
really three D chess. And you keep mentioning and the meeting,

(26:36):
the Democrats will say, twenty second Amendment, you're term limited,
you're term limited, you're term limited, and then Trump can
do a jiu jitsu and just say, okay, all right,
all right, I'm term limited. But what about you, like,
why do I have to be term limited? And you
what you the swamp? No, you're never term limited. Senators
can't serve only two terms. I mean that's two sixier terms.

(26:58):
That's a lot. Maybe Congress, I don't know, if you know,
it's if they only serve two years, so I don't
know four years is fair, so maybe three, you know,
maybe three terms or I guess four terms max, but
you know, give them term limits as well. May not
have to be you know, two terms, it could be
three or four terms, but basically six or eight years.

(27:21):
If you can't get the legislation that you claim you
want past, it's time for someone else. And so I
think Trump can then turn around and say, no, okay,
you love the twenty second Amendment. I love it too,
let's now expand it. And you're right, if you really
want to rein in the swamp, if you want to

(27:42):
break the back of the swamp, you have to go
term limits, because they just it's it's the power. They
just keep voting themselves more money and more power, and
they stay in forever and they never leave and it
you know, and then they're in with the lobbyists and
they've become a ruling class, which is not what our

(28:06):
founding fathers intended. You know, this was supposed to be
you serve your country for a couple of terms and
then you go back to do what you were doing
in the private sector. This wasn't supposed to be, you know,
as I said earlier, a lifetime appointment where you walk in,

(28:26):
you know, you make one hundred thousand dollars a year
or whatever. It's some job. And you know, you walk
in with a small house and with a high mortgage,
and you walk out fifty sixty seventy eighty one hundred
million dollars, you know, and some of them, like Pelosi,
over four hundred, five hundred million dollars. And if you're

(28:47):
the Clintons, you're talking of billion dollars. So that's not
what it was supposed to be about. It's not about
coming in there and making your you know, making yourself,
you know, a gazillionaire. What a millionaire? A gazillionaire off
of the people's back and the fat of the land.
So I'm with you, Bob, I think. And by the way,

(29:09):
term limits, you want to talk about another eighty twenty issue.
Term limits immensely popular, Like you know we were talking earlier. Well,
would there be support to change the twenty second Amendment
to allow say Trump or anybody to get an extra term,
a third term, And there'd be a lot of resistance.

(29:30):
I don't know if you can get two thirds of
Congress three quarters of the states, Bob, let me tell
you what would get two thirds of Congress and three
quarters of the states with the in terms of the
popular support, and that's term limits. If Trump made that
issue front and center. There is eighty to eighty five
percent support in the country for term limits for members

(29:54):
of Congress. So you know, you want to dismantle the swamp,
you want to drain that swamp. There's no better tool
than term limits. So, Bob, if that's Trump's strategy, I
think it's genius, absolute genius. Bob, Thank you very much
for that call. Really good call. Tood in Cambridge. Thanks

(30:18):
for holding Tood and welcome.

Speaker 5 (30:21):
Hey, good morning, Jeff, Thanks for taking a call. My
pleasure term limits. Who's chomping at the bit more to
get rid of term limits for presidents more than Trump?
That would be Obama, So be careful what you wish for.
He would be the first one to jump on that boat.
And I think he's got a couple of moors more

(30:42):
years left of productivity in them than Trump would have,
So be careful what we wish for. Second of all, Ah,
that seems to all the people who support term limits
keep voting for the same politicians anyways, So don't just
talk about it, go out and do it. Vote for
somebody new this time. But my main point in one
of the talk about this morning was the Republicans have

(31:03):
a big problem. We have too deep of a bench,
and by that we have your Tulsi, Gabbert, DeSantis, Ted Cruz.
We have such a line up of people that would
make good presidential material. I don't want to see a
dirty primary that's knocked down, drag out, and people are
damaged even if they become the nominee. So who would
you where would you send these other people to. I

(31:26):
would send DeSantis to become secretary of State, and I
would send ted Cruz to the Supreme Court. What do
you think about that?

Speaker 1 (31:33):
I like, I like both of them. I like DeSantis
as secretary of State. I think it's a very good pick, Todd.
And I think Cruz, although he keeps saying he doesn't
want it, but he's got a very good legal mind.
And I think he's a solid conservative on many many issues.
He is a constitutionalist, the strict you know, a strict
a strict constructionist, as they say. I think he'd be

(31:55):
amazing on the High Court. So I agree with you, Todd.
I think there's a lot of talent there. Look personally,
and I don't want to get sidetrack because it's a
different discussion. I like Jadvance. I've met Jadvance. I honestly
believe he's the real deal. I think he'd be an
incredible president. I think he's been an incredible vice president.

(32:16):
I think he and Tulsi Gabbard, I am very, very
confident that the MAGA America First movement will live on
for eight years, maybe even sixteen years. I could legitimately
see Tulci Gabbard and you know me, I don't care
for racial identity, gender identity. I want the best person

(32:37):
for the job. But I truly believe Tulsi Gabbert could
be the first female president of the United States. I've
met her, I've interviewed her. She's a really I mean,
she's a political talent, and she's a woman of real
core convictions. She's a patriot, she served in the military.
This is she's the real deal. And what she's done now,

(33:01):
remember Obama is on the ropes because of her. Call
me Brennan Clapper, the deep state. It's all because of
Tulsa Gabbard and all of that classified information that she declassified,
and she was under tremendous pressure not to do it,

(33:22):
even within the administration. Pam BONDI can't stand her for
what she's done Cash Pateel Dan Bongino. She's made their
lives miserable because now they have to put up or
shut up. She's the one that walks in the room,
and she doesn't just talk the talk, she walks the walk.
So personally, who would I like to see one heart

(33:42):
beat away from the presidency. It would be Tulsa Gabbard.
And you know, look, Rubio, I think has been very
strong so far. A Secretary of State, he's also National
Security advisor. He could stay on his National Security advisor
and an advanced administration. But it seems that Trump, for
whatever reason, is really pushing a vance Rubio ticket. And

(34:07):
I think Todd, I think one, he's been impressed by
Rubio's loyalty to him so far. And two and I
think there's no question Rubio is a Latino and Trump
is very shrewd politically, and Latinos now are the fastest
voting block in the country. They're also now the fastest

(34:29):
Republican voting bloc in the country. And so Trump, you know,
he plays three D chests and he's saying I got
vance who I know is going to further my legacy.
And I got a guy like Rubio who in the
Latino community is a rock star, and so I can
really consolidate the Latino vote. Because remember if if they

(34:51):
can consolidate the Latino vote, in other words, have Latinos
keep voting for the Republicans in the numbers that they
did in twenty twenty four. Trump is comparing himself to
FDR privately. I'm just I'm gonna you know, I shouldn't
be saying this, but Trump doesn't just want us beat
the Democrats for two terms and save the country, which

(35:15):
is of course important. He wants a lasting political coalition.
He wants something that will last for sixteen years, twenty years,
twenty four years. And that's what FDR did with his
New Deal coalition. It lasted decades and decades and decades.
It lived way beyond him. That's what Trump wants because

(35:39):
this fear is, sure, we win a couple of elections,
we save the country, then the radical left comes back
and they destroy and undo everything that we've done. So
what he wants is he wants to change the voting
patterns of key voting blocks. So now you have a
majority Maga coalition and the Democrats will be in the

(36:02):
wilderness for a generation or two generations to come. And
so what he's saying in private is, if we win
over the Latinos, it's over. I mean demographically, it's over.
The Democrats simply cannot beat us. So that's why if
you want to know why, Jeff he's always throwing Rubio,
That's why he's throwing Rubio. A he likes what he's

(36:24):
doing as Secretary of State. He's a worker, and he's
been loyal and he's been executing what Trump's wanted to
a t But also he goes, look the guy kills
it in front of Latino in front of Latino audiences.
They love him. They love him in Texas, they love
him in Florida, they love him in swing states. So

(36:44):
he's thinking, I put Vance at the top, Rubio as
his number two. We're looking at eight, maybe sixteen years
now of Magarule. He goes, that will cement all of
our achievements. We haven't just saved the country, kept it saved.
Todd final word to you, what say you?

Speaker 5 (37:05):
I mostly agree with what you just said. I just
don't want to see a knockdown drag out primary, but
on the same token, I agree with Tulsi being a
very strong pick. I would just put her third in
line that when jd Vance has done it for eight years,
then it becomes a Rubio Tulsi ticket with a Latino
and a female unstoppable keep it going for another sixteen years.

(37:28):
Thanks your time, Jeff.

Speaker 1 (37:29):
I like the way you think, Todd. You think big,
My friend six oneths, you know I'm thinking just I'm
thinking let's just win twenty twenty eight and keep this
baby going. Not Cooner Country. You guys are thinking eight
years out, sixteen years out, twenty four years out. You

(37:52):
want to keep this going at twenty fifty, you know,
go big or go home,