"The President Has Never Been In Business With His Son."

KJP claims she has answered the same question over and over and her answer is that "The President has never been in business with his son." However, that isn't the original question. Looks like they've been caught. 

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Periods of the White House, and the President still stand
behind his comment that he's never been involved and has
never even spoken to his son about his So I've
been asked this question a million times. The answer is
not going to change.

Speaker 2 (00:12):
The answer remains the same.

Speaker 1 (00:13):
The President was never in business with his son. I
just don't have anything else to add. No, Wow, so interesting,
So over and over and go over again. I and
the President have given the same answer. I've never talked
to my son about his business dealings. And when you're
asking about it, all of a sudden yesterday you say, look,
I've answered this a million times, the President was not

(00:33):
in business with his son.

Speaker 2 (00:36):
A second.

Speaker 1 (00:36):
Oh care, wait, wait a second, that's a different answer
to a slightly different question.

Speaker 2 (00:42):
It is utterly undeniable. They've realized they've been caught in
a lie. The President regularly discussed business with Hunter. Devin.
Archer is about to testify under oath in front of
Congress to that effect, and they can no longer.

Speaker 1 (00:55):
Hang on to that.

Speaker 2 (00:56):
So they're saying, hey, same answer as always, he wasn't
in business with his son formally, you know, on the
incorporation paperwork.

Speaker 1 (01:05):
Really much now, Peter Baker of The New York Times
tweeted that out yesterday, seeing that as interesting, didn't write
a big article about it. Though. Here's the question. Well,
the fact that he tweeted it is progress. Yeah, it
caught his attention. He was aware of it, right right.

Speaker 2 (01:25):
He was not so ideologically committed that he wouldn't admit it.

Speaker 1 (01:30):
And I appreciate that.

Speaker 2 (01:32):
Here's the perfect question for Jillian Turner or one of
the New York Post reporters to ask, has the President
ever benefited financially directly or indirectly from Hunter Biden's business transactions?
That is the they don't dare answer it question.

Speaker 1 (01:53):
Well, they'd just say no, right probably, But then they're
on the record as having said no.

Speaker 2 (02:00):
And then when Devon Archer, Tony Bobolinski, whomever else comes
before Congress and testifies under oath that yeah, we paid
them five million dollars and it went through a series
of LLCs to several members of the Biden family. Of course,
you know, they worked very hard and in a smart way.
I mean, like you know, the best mobsters are very.

Speaker 1 (02:21):
Good at their jobs.

Speaker 2 (02:22):
They worked very hard to obfuscate any direct flow of
cash from Hunter to Joe. Joe is nonetheless fabulously wealthy
and has many homes.

Speaker 1 (02:33):
And everyone knows it. So thank you, Marjorie. I'll be
interested to see if in the White House briefing room today,
if Peter Baker of the New York Times, and whether
you like it or not, the New York Times covering
a story matters. If they get on it, it changes
the importance of it. If Peter Baker says that answer
you gave yesterday was different, what gives I feel like
he has to follow up having the floodgates will have opened.

(02:56):
Oh absolutely. I also wonder how many other people in government,
Republicans and Democrats, are a little uncomfortable with all this
because influence Pedlin is a big business and everybody does
it a little, well, not everybody, but a lot of
people do it enough to get wealthy.