February 1, 2025 • 44 mins
*There are many people who want to harm the United States and unfortunately many of them are now living within our borders
*The United States has been really good at protecting other countries.... but just not our own
*Different and better way conflicts are handled under Trump versus Biden (ex...how Trump dealt with Columbia saying they weren't going to take our repatriation flights)
*Trump signs executive orders designating certain drug cartels as global terrorists
*18 months after wildfires destroyed 2,000 homes on Maui, only 3 have been rebuilt
*Newson vetoed a bill to enhance fire mitigation so he could grab the land for affordable housing
*President Trump wasted no time in signing a slew of executive orders on day 1 working to get America back on track
*Biden scandal deepens post-term after "accidental" pardon ended up pardoning a drug lord who murdered an eight-year-old boy and his mother to stop them from testifying..child murderer and drug lord set to be released in July
*Canadian doctors demonstrate evils of MAID program with ghoulish organ donation idea
*The United States has been really good at protecting other countries.... but just not our own
*Different and better way conflicts are handled under Trump versus Biden (ex...how Trump dealt with Columbia saying they weren't going to take our repatriation flights)
*Trump signs executive orders designating certain drug cartels as global terrorists
*18 months after wildfires destroyed 2,000 homes on Maui, only 3 have been rebuilt
*Newson vetoed a bill to enhance fire mitigation so he could grab the land for affordable housing
*President Trump wasted no time in signing a slew of executive orders on day 1 working to get America back on track
*Biden scandal deepens post-term after "accidental" pardon ended up pardoning a drug lord who murdered an eight-year-old boy and his mother to stop them from testifying..child murderer and drug lord set to be released in July
*Canadian doctors demonstrate evils of MAID program with ghoulish organ donation idea
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:08):
With over thirty years in the auto industry, he has
decided to pull back the curtain and show you what's
really inside. This is Bowen's Cars, brought to you by
Chevrolet Buick GMC of Murphreysborough. For all of your automotive
needs call six one five six four five one zero
seven five or online Chevrolet Buick GMC of Murphreysboro dot com.
Speaker 2 (00:29):
Here's your host, bow Triven. All right, good morning everybody.
At the end of January, beginning of February, we're turning
the corner here on the weather hopefully and start getting
some warmed up weather able to enjoy the beautiful springtime
(00:49):
all of the other wonderful things that are going on.
And uh, you know, America's back to winning again. And
I am I for one, am excited about it. I
like winning. But you know, winning is not when we're
talking about winning in the context that we're talking about
it now, it's not a zero sum game. It doesn't
mean that I win, you lose. There are win win
(01:13):
situations and a lot of these things that can help
benefit the entire world. The problem that we have, obviously
is bad actors that want to control the world. Right
and look I don't care who you are. If you
can rise to the top of a political party or
remotely close to the top of a political party in
(01:35):
any country in the world, I don't care what country
it is, any country in the world. You have to
have something other people don't have. You possess some sort
of personality trait. You possess some inherent confidence in yourself.
You establish that you are willing to do things other
(01:57):
people aren't willing to do. You're willing to put yourself
out there when other people aren't willing to do that.
And so anybody that attains a political position of power
in any country in the world, they all have certain
traits that are that are equal and alike. And one
of those is the thirst for power. They like it,
(02:17):
and you can get drunk off power, right, I mean,
I get it, But I also understand that there are
people that want to do good with that power, and
then there are people who want to do bad with
that power. And our problem in the United States is
we have a lot of people who are unwilling to
understand that there are people who want to do bad
to us. The people for whatever reasons, religious reasons, in doctrination, reasons,
(02:43):
it doesn't matter what the reasoning is. They want harm
to come to the United States, and there are a
lot of them who are now in the United States
of America. And if that doesn't scare you, it should,
you know. But we are back to doing things that
make common sense. And I have heard if you listened
to the show at any point in time in the
last few years, you probably have heard me mention the
(03:05):
Common Sense Coalition or the Coalition for Common Sense. It
was brought up by my controller, Ashley, and she mentioned
it to me one day. She said, a lot of
other things you say on the radio shows seemed to
be just pure common sense. And I said, well, so
she came up with a name. Credit to her. But
the reality is I've been listening to President Trump recently
(03:25):
and he's saying the same thing. Look, this is just
common sense stuff. One of those things that happened this
past week that really for me, I went, wow, wow,
it makes perfectly good sense. I don't know why we
haven't in the past, but he signed an executive order
this past week that establishes the desire, the need. I
don't know exactly what it's calling for, but for us
(03:47):
to build an iron dome over the United States, just
like Israel has. And if you've watched any of the
videos of when Hamas and Hezbala and everybody was attacking
Israel here recently and firing rockets off and was sponsoring
all of that, they blocked ninety nine percent of them.
They didn't get through. For us to not have, for
us to have that technology available and not be using it,
(04:10):
sounds like a complete farce to me. You know, when
President Trump signed the executive order, he made a statement
that stuck with me, and it should stick with all
of you. We're really good at protecting other people. We're
not very good at protecting ourselves, right, we protect other
people's borders. I don't know how many billions of dollars
(04:31):
we've spent protecting the border of Ukraine from Russia, but
we didn't protect the border of the United States from Mexico.
But he has. He has come in and he has
done a massive amount of work in a very very
short period of time. The Ice arrests. Look, I know
it was voted for. There was a mandate out there
from the United States, from US our citizenry, that said, hey,
(04:57):
we need to round up these criminals and get them
out of here. We don't have to put up with
this anymore. It's not our duty to take every criminal
from every country out of here. And if you listened recently,
I was talking about a statistic where Venezuela, Venezuelan prisons,
the population of the Venezuelan prisons went down almost fifty
or sixty percent, maybe seventy percent from the time that
(05:18):
Joe Biden took office to the time that Joe Biden
left office. Where do you think they put all of
those bad criminals. They turned them loose and sent them
to the United States. And if you think that hasn't
happened in a number of countries where they figured out, hey,
if we just send our criminals to the United States,
they'll let them in. They can deal with them, and
we don't have to house them, we don't have to
feed them, we don't have to do all the other
things that were necessary for us to maintain a prison system.
(05:40):
So it'll save us a bunch of money too. It's
wrong on every level, every level, and it was allowed.
And all of you people out there that are bleeding
hearts for all of the people that are being rounded up,
I want you to Remember, there are human beings that
a lot of these people that have been rounded up
up have wronged in serious senses like pedophilia, child molestation,
(06:08):
rape of adult women, child trafficking, drug dealing, all kinds
of bad things that wreak havoc on our communities here
in the United States. And anybody that's not okay with
getting them out of our country when they're here illegally
to begin with. I don't know what your argument could
possibly be. It absolutely astounds me, and I don't know
(06:35):
about you, but I'm kind of out of compassion rights.
Compassion is that thing that's easy to abuse, and it
leads to that next emotion, which is guilt, and they
want to guilt you into feeling like you should have
compassion for everybody. Well, I'm telling you that people that
use that compassion, there have been many people who have
talked themselves out of doing something they should have done
(06:58):
because they thought they were being compassion. It's like the
old adage about the scorpion that was asked the frog
for a ride across the river. Right, so the frog says, no,
you'll sting me, and the scorpion says, no, I wouldn't.
Why would I sting you. I don't want to sting you.
If I sting you're gonna drown. I'm gonna drown. We're
both gonna die. And so the frog agrees to take
the scorpion across the river. And halfway across the river,
(07:20):
the scorpion stings the frog and they both start to
sink and they're gonna both gonna drown. And the frog says,
why would you do that? He said, well, it's in
my nature. I'm still a scorpion. I just didn't have
a choice. I had to. It's in people's nature to
be bad. It's in people's nature to do bad things.
We need to understand that those people who want to
commit that that kind of harm to the United States
(07:42):
need to be out of here. It's that simple. They
don't deserve to be here, all right. This is Bonos Cars,
brought to you by Chevrolet Buick GMC of Murvery's Borough.
Come on back after the break.
Speaker 1 (08:08):
It's over thirty years in the auto industry. He has
deciding to pull back the curtain and show you what's
really inside. This is Bowen's Cars, brought to you by
Chevrolet Buick GMC of Murphreysborough. For all of your automotive needs,
call six one five six four five one zero seven
five or online Chevrolet Buick GMC.
Speaker 2 (08:27):
Of Murphreysboro dot com. Here's your host, bow Driven. All right,
welcome back, everybody. I UHM so looking forward to the springtime,
getting out sunshine and enjoying life. And your time kills me.
I hate it. I get older, I hate it even
more so. I found this. I don't have X, I'm
(08:50):
not on Twitter or X. I'm not on Facebook, I'm
not on Instagram, I'm not on I just have never
really been a big uh social media. First of all,
I think nobody gives a crap what I have to
say or think. And uh, they certainly don't want to
have to turn see me in their feet every day.
And they don't care what I had for lunch and
(09:11):
how many plants I've watered today. I don't know, it
doesn't matter. Anyways. I found this article on or a
tweet on X that I thought was appropriate because if
you remember, if you were listening and paying attention this week,
you saw that we started the deportation flights, and apparently
the big bad leader of Columbia decided he was going
(09:34):
to uh push back on the flights of the Colombian
illegal immigrants that are here that that have committed crimes,
and they didn't want to take them back. So Trump
got on the Twitter and said, if you don't take them,
I'm gonna started imposing tariffs on you at twenty five percent.
Next week, I'm gonna take them fifty percent, and then
(09:54):
I'm gonna kick all of your diplomats out of the
United States. Within a couple an hour, the president of
Columbia had not only backtracked, but had offered the plan
the presidential plane for Columbia, his own plane to come
get some of the illegal aliens that were at criminal
(10:15):
records and bring them back to Columbia himself. So not
only did he fold, and apparently this was done on
a Sunday while Trump was playing golf, so it was
between the fifth and the eighth holes that he was
able to get the Columbian president to completely change his
mind and go back to doing what he was supposed
to do. So I found this thing from a poster
by the name he goes by the handel Cynical Hugh Publius.
(10:38):
It's p U B l I U S. Publius I'm
not sure how he pronounces it, but he uh. He
wanted to talk about how remarkable that exchange was in
the context of leadership and the way things have been
going in the United States and around the world for
quite some time, especially the United States, because we've had
such weak, feckless leaders that have done nothing to try
to deter the aggress that's coming on all from either
(11:01):
Putin or Jjinping or any of the other ones that
are out there that want to be aggressive. And so
I'm just going to read it to you because it
makes complete sense. He goes on to say, to fully
understand just how remarkable today's exchange with Columbia was, you
need to understand how Washington, DC has traditionally worked through
these sorts of issues and the different way it now
works under Trump. He says, I'll illustrate the traditional approach,
(11:24):
the way normally was handled. Number One, Columbia announces it
will not take our repatriation flights. Number two. On Monday,
the State Department convenes an intern agency task force with
god nsc DEA, nis or I, ins ICE, Commerce, Treasury,
and Homeland Security. Number three of the task force meets
for four days and develops a position paper. The position
(11:44):
paper is rejected by the Secretary of State, who is
unhappy that insufficient equity considerations are built into the process.
Then the task force reconvenes a week later to redevelop
three new equity centric courses of action and create a
new position paper. Then the process of delayed a week
because Washington, DC gets three inches of snow. Then the
Secretary of State approves the new position paper for interagency circulation,
(12:06):
and considerable input is received from the heads of other departments,
so the task force must reconvene. Then the original task force,
the original three proposed responsive responsive courses of action are
scrapped in favor of a new fourth course of action
that achieves the worst aspects of the three prior courses
of action but satisfies the inner agencies. Then someone in
(12:26):
State who disagrees leaks to the Washington Post, who writes
a story about how ineffective the presidential administration is. Then
the White House Chief of Staff sets up a session
three days later to brief the President, who approves the
new fourth course of action. Over a month after the
issue is first raised, the State Department Public Affairs officer
holds a press conference announcing that Columbia has agreed to
send a few to try to send fewer criminals into
(12:48):
the US, and everyone declares victory. That's a traditional approach,
And you can see he's kind of making all that up.
But what he's saying is that it's his study after study,
and people get together and talking, meet and let's figure
it out. And a month goes by, and then all
of a sudden, Columbia says, well, we'll just send you
less criminals than we've been sending you. Never goes all,
look we win. Look how great the United States has
(13:09):
we negotiating. So here's the Trump approach. Colombia announces it
will not take our repatriation flights. After a par five
third hole, where he goes one under par, Trump uses
his iPhone to post on social media as to how
the USA will destroy Columbia's economy if they do not
do what the USA demands. By the time Trump gets
to the par for sixth hole, Columbia's president has agreed
(13:32):
to repatriate all of the illegal Colombians in his own plane,
which he will pay for. Then Trump finishes US three
under par, finishes three under par and goes to the
clubhouse for a diet coke where he posts a gangs
to a AI image of himself and the new FAFO
doctrine and then winning. You see the difference. You see
the difference between the way things used to get handled
(13:54):
in the way things are being handled. That's how a
businessman handles the business. It doesn't take seventeen different agents.
He's getting together to talk about what might happen and
what couldn't happen. Here's the deal. You turned illegal criminals
loose out of your prisons. They made it into the
United States. We're sending them back to you. Well, no,
we're not taking them back. Okay, then we're going to
(14:14):
destroy your economy because we're not going to let you
bully us around. That is strength that deters other countries
from trying to do the same thing. You know, I've
said this before and people have given me static about
it because my way of parenting and my wife and
(14:35):
I've had this discussion was if you punish them when
they're younger, if you established the rule set young, you
don't have to do all of that. I have three
kids that I am extremely proud of that have are
raising well. My daughters are raising great kids, and I'm
proud of the choices they made for their husbands, and
I'm proud of all of that. But I don't think
(15:00):
think they got there just on their own. Some of
that had to do with parenting styles, and some of
that had to do with making sure that they understood
that respect matters, and that you're going to say yes
sir and no sir, and yes ma'am and no ma'am,
and you're going to say please, and you're going to
say thank you, because all of those things are respectful
to your fellow humans, and that's the way you need
to be. But I'm not going to tolerate you just
(15:22):
determining on your own you're going to do things that
are against the rules. That's not tolerated. Tolerated in my house.
But I can tell you that after the age of
about three, I don't remember ever having to really spank
them or even raise my voice hardly because they just
understood the rules. That's the same thing Trump is establishing
(15:44):
right now. These are the rules. We're the big dog.
We get to make the rules, not you guys. And
if you want our help, if you want us to
continue to send billions of dollars to your economies every
year and use all of the resources that you have,
because our economy, feet the American economy is an amazing thing,
and we do not use it enough as a means
(16:05):
for negotiating. Our economy is massive compared to every other
economy in the United in the world, that includes China's.
They may catch us some day, but they're not there yet.
And so the American consumer is our club to use
to get what we want. And for far too long
we've allowed other people to take advantage of that, with
(16:29):
up to and including China. For a while, Japan was
getting the better into the bargain. But we can't continue
to do that. We have to be able to establish strength,
and we have to be able to establish that we
are willing to back up our threats with actions, and
if we don't, we are absolutely in for it. One
(16:53):
of the other things that Trump did recently, and I'm
gonna mention the New York Times here for a second,
which I can't stand for whatever reason. But so Trump,
when he first got into office, one of the other
executive orders that he signed was that he was going
to designate the drug cartels as terrorist organizations. Now I
(17:13):
don't know about you, but by definition of terrorist organizations,
they're terrorizing. The drug cartels are killing more people than
dang near any wars ever killed in the United States
last time, where I saw was like one hundred thousand
people a year or something from drug overdoses. They're getting
by with impunity, and they just kept doing it and
doing it doing, especially when we had the open border.
(17:34):
Now the drug cartels think they're so big and bad
that they can just take shots at our border patrol,
which happened this week also, so designated them as drug
cartels made perfectly or the drug cartels as terrorist organizations
made perfectly good sense to me, and it would probably
make perfectly good sense to most people that had any
common sense. But the U the classification apparently drew the
(17:59):
New York Times and made a med and they say
it's going to hurt our economy. The so it goes on,
I'm running out of times, so I'm gonna do it
very quickly. New York Times goes on talks about how
it could have a major effect on both countries given
their deep economic independence. Even more complicated, these criminal networks
(18:20):
have extended their operations far beyond drug trafficking and humans smuggling.
They're now embedded in a wide swath of the legal economy,
from avocado farming to the country's billion dollar tourism industry,
making it hard to be absolutely sure that American companies
are isolated from cartel activities. So let me get this right.
You want to coddle them because they have a little
bit of legal money in the system, but ignore all
(18:44):
the other stuff they do. I think not. That's why
The New York Times is losing readership. All right, this
is Bonos Cars brought to you by Chevrolet Buick GMC
of murders bro coming back after the break.
Speaker 1 (19:08):
With over thirty years in the auto industry, he has
deciding to pull back the curtain and show you what's
really inside. This is Bowen's Cars, brought to you by
Chevrolet Buick GMC of Murphreysborough. For all of your automotive
needs called six one five six four five one zero
seven five or online Chevrolet Buick GMC of Murphreysboro dot com.
Speaker 2 (19:29):
Here's your host, bow Driven. All right, welcome back, everybody.
So not too long ago, a few months ago, six
eight twelve, maybe between about a year and a half
to you, and more recently, up till November, Gavin Newsom's
(19:53):
name had been floated as a excuse me as a
possible candidate for president. I know he's got designs on
running for president. He thinks because he's got that slick
back pat Riley nineteen nineties hair, that he can just
do whatever he wants with impunity and he can continue
(20:14):
to turn what is one of the greatest states in
the nation, if not the grace and I mean that
from a resources beauty, everything from mountains to beaches, it's huge.
The economy is huge. It really truly is a gorgeous state,
great weather, more oil than Texas from what I understand, minerals,
(20:38):
they have everything. And he's taken a state that should
be its own little country. I mean, it's the fifth
largest economy in the nation in the world right now
and turned it into an absolute hell hole and getting
worse by the year, and most of it under the
leadership of blue leaning politicians. LA is the same way right,
(21:06):
So these LA fires, I'm really, really, really truly sorry
for the people that are affected by it. But as
Obama said one time, elections have consequences, and you're finding
out the consequences of voting for people who have utopian
thought processes that don't understand how the real world actually works,
(21:26):
and that you can't just do that. So I talked
about recently the fact that some of these fires were
basically because an amateur botanist said that they were trying
to do some fire prevention techniques and some things a
few years ago. This botanist, amateur botanist photographer takes a
picture and says, it's going to kill this one plant.
(21:48):
There's only three thousand of them left, some milk thistle barriers.
I don't remember what it was. In any event, because
they undid the fire mitigation techniques that they had done.
The fires started, they jumped into Pacific Palisade. All of
those plants that they were trying to say, if any ways,
are burned to the ground. But now it turns out
that Governor k Newsom also vetoed a chance for some
(22:11):
fire mitigation so he could get the land for some
affordable housing. Right, let me see if I can see
it here, let's see yep. So he went on. He
wanted to keep the he wanted to keep this land
(22:35):
that he had. I'm gonna bypass it. For a second,
but he wanted to keep this land that they had
designated as fire break breaks and said, no, we're trying
to get the people to move closer into the city,
so we're going to designate this land out here, essentially
again screwing it up completely and using the resource that
(23:00):
he was supposed to use to take care of the
people who were paying the taxes to do something that
was completely counterintuitive to helping those people. And they're going
to end up in the same, the same exact situation.
If you listen to the show, you've heard me talk
about Lohina High Lahina, Hawaii. Right. So Leahina had the
(23:22):
fires a year and a year and a half ago
and there were two thousand homes that got destroyed in Lahina.
Eighteen months after the wildfires, there have been three houses rebuilt,
three in Lahina because now they all have to bring
these all of the buildings up to the new codes
and new standards if you're going to rebuild. And the
(23:46):
same exact thing is about to happen in Pacific palis
Age and up and down California. One of the other
things that these morons did was put a price control
in place when it came to rent, right, So a
lot of people out there were renting their homes and saying, hey,
we're gonna rent our homes out because there's people that
(24:07):
have been displaced by the fires. But the government did
exactly the opposite of what the free market should do
out in California, and they went in and said, you
can't lease anything. You can't have a higher than ten
thousand dollars a month rent. Right now, I don't know
if you know, but the housing prices in California are
a little steep, and ten thousand dollars a month isn't
going to cover a lot of the nut that people
(24:29):
have for their houses that they wanted to rent them.
So by putting that market that number out there and
saying you can't have anything over ten thousand dollars, guess
what happened. The thing you'd expect price controls to do.
It kept the market for housing. It kept houses off
the market. People didn't want to put them on the
market because they needed to get fifteen thousand to eighteen
thousand dollars a month in rent. There were people willing
(24:50):
to pay it, and there were people willing to lease
their house. But because the government got involved and decided
to put a cap on the pricing and put price
controls on rent out in the state of California during
the wildfires. All of a sudden, it's we're just keep
them off the market. We're not even going to put
them out there. Then, so they've made the supply even worse,
causing even more problems by trying to fix a problem
(25:12):
that wasn't a problem to begin with. Let the market
do what the market's going to do. If people are
willing to pay for it, then that's the game. I
said this while while the chip shortage was going on
for a year year and a half. In the car business,
do not buy a car right now. It is a
bad deal. But sellers do not determine the price of anything.
Buyers do if nobody's willing to pay the price somebody
(25:35):
has on any particular products. I don't care what it is,
a house for rent, a car for sale. If somebody
is willing to pay that price, then that's the market.
Because if nobody's willing to pay the price somebody has
something listed for then they'll lower the price or they
won't bother selling it. It's just that simple. It's econ
one oh one. But for whatever reason, all of these
blue cities think that they can engineer the market to
(25:56):
do better and they know better than the actual market,
and they don't absolutely astounding to me. But they're going
to also cause the other problem with permitting. I guarantee
you a year and a half from now, I'm going
to be sitting here talking about the fact that the
housing problems in California have been exacerbated by the fact
(26:17):
that nobody can get permits pulled, and all of those
people that owned houses, those beautiful houses along that stretch
of Rocky Cliff in Malibu and all of that where
they're trying to keep them from rebuilding those houses on
those rocky cliffs. If I bought a house for twenty
million dollars, and eighteen million dollars of that house was
the view of the ocean, I'm not just going to
go easily into that good night when they say I
(26:38):
can't rebuild my twenty million dollar crib. That's not going
to happen. But that's about what's going to happen. But
I have some hope because I've been reading some articles
recently that say that there are a large number of
people out in the California market that are possibly reconsidering
their voting habits and have come to see that some
(27:05):
of those habits might have gotten them in the fix
that they're in. All right, So I never have enough
time to cover everything I wanted to cover. I did
want to cover this before the end of this particular segment, though,
So if you've been paying any attention, you know that
President Trump and his administration has been absolutely on fire,
busy doing everything they can to try to mitigate some
(27:27):
of the damage, try to get us through what is
going to be a tougher economic period, because you can't
continue to spend trillions of dollars of government money without
at some point you have to stop, and when you stop,
that could cause an economic slowdown. So they're trying to
navigate through there. But one of the things he did
on the first day, I'm going to read some of
the executive orders that he signed on day one. So
(27:52):
he signed an executive order to halt seventy eight Biden
era executive actions. He withdrew from the Paris Climate A
Court again, which I think is a brilliant move since
it doesn't do anything but limit us and doesn't do
anything to change China or India, or all of the
carbon that they're spewing out that they say is causing
all of the climate change. He signed a executive order
(28:16):
to end all federal cases and investigations of any Trump supporters.
He revoked the protections for transgender troops, pardoned about fifteen
hundred criminally charged in the January sixth attack, while commuting
sentences for six overhauled the refugee had had admission program
to better align with American principles and interest, declared a
national emergency at the US Mexico border, designated trug Guard,
(28:37):
drug cartels, and trendy Aragua as foreign terrorist organizations. He
reversed several immigration orders from the Biden administration, including one
that narrows deportation priorities to people who commit serious crimes,
are deemed national security threats, or were stopped at the border.
He rescinded a policy created by the Biden administration that
sought to guide the development of AI to prevent misuse.
(29:00):
He revoked Biden's recent removal of Cuba from US State
Sponsors of Terrorism list. I don't understand that why all
of a sudden, what did Cuba do that was different
to all of a sudden remove themselves from the state
sponsor of terrorism list. There's a by the way, there's
something out there that talking about all of the last
(29:22):
minute pardons that Biden threw in front of him or
did as he was going out the door, turns out
he might have accidentally pardoned somebody who didn't need to
be pardoned. There was a let me just read it
to you, so part of an article here that I
(29:44):
was reading. I'm gonna try to get through it quickly.
Relatives of an eight year old boy and his mother
who were murdered by a Connecticut drug gang are outraged
that a man convicted in those killings was one of
nearly twenty five hundred people whose drug related prison sentences
were commuted by JEFF President Joe Biden. Adrian Peeler served
a twenty year state prison sentence for murder conspiracy in
the nineteen ninety nine shootings of Leroy BJ Brown and
(30:05):
his mother, Karen Clark in Bridgeport, killings that shocked the
city and led to improvements in state witness protection. Prosecutor
said Brown and his mother were assassinated to prevent the
child from testifying in another murder case. So that's one
of the people that Joe Biden decided to commute the
sentence and pardon, and nobody understands why, and I least
(30:27):
of which Joe Biden. I don't think he even knew
what he was signing. But there should be a full
investigation of whoever vetted that list from the ACLU as
to somebody had something coming to try to get that
man out of jail. I don't know what's going on,
but it's another one of those scandals that we need
to be looking into. All right, this is Bonos Cars
(30:48):
Roger by Chevrolet Buick GMC of Murphy's Broom. We're gonna
do this again right after the break.
Speaker 1 (31:08):
With over thirty years in the auto industry, he has
deciding to pull back the curtain and show you what's
really inside. This is Bowen's Cars, brought to you by
Chevrolet Buick GMC of Murphreysborough. For all of your automotive
needs call six one five six four five one zero
seven five or online Chevrolet Buick GMC of Murphresboro dot com.
Speaker 2 (31:29):
Here's your host, bow Triven. All right, welcome back, everybody.
So I ended the last segment talking about a the
Biden pardons and commutations, he by far was the the
(31:53):
president that signed the most pardons and commutations of any
president in I think in the history of the of
the presidency. Some of them slipped through the crack. Some
of them just weren't supposed to be pardoned, some of
them shouldn't have been pardoned. But for everybody to get
up in arms about President by or President Trump pardoning
(32:16):
the J six a lot of the JA six participants,
it's a two way street. The reality is that, Look,
I think all normal right thinking people, right thinking meaning
not right of the political spectrum, but right thinking in
that we have common sense and we want anybody who
(32:37):
did anything criminal on January sixth, twenty twenty one to
have to pay some sort of price for their criminal actions,
whatever that was, whether it was trespassing. But a normal
trespassing sentence is you pay a fine and you're told
not to trespass again. It is not four years in
jail for trespassing. And we all know we've seen the tapes.
(32:59):
If you've want it with any sort of open mind,
there are just as many people being walked around the
Capitol during that time with police officers and escorts and
that kind of stuff, as there are people who are
carrying e lectern through there. Look, if you did something wrong,
you should be punished. No problem with that. What I
have a problem with is continually doing it and using
(33:20):
the sledgehammer of the government to try to keep people
from ever doing anything again. Now with that said, there
was an article the other day that I was reading.
It was talking about Jade Vance that was he had
highlighted a particular case and I'm going to read some
of the highlights of this case to you. It was
(33:42):
a post by Insurrection Barbie and she posts on Twitter apparently,
so it just goes on and says she picked a
random case that they wanted to see to just went
through some of the cases, picked a random case just
to see how bad it really was. And here's what
(34:02):
she says. He didn't break anything, he didn't hurt anybody,
and yet he was sentenced by a jury to nineteen
months in prison. He was overcharged by the prosecutor at
the point where he should be called malicious prosecution, and
a judge rubber stamped every single thing the prosecutor asked for.
The most egregious part of the filings was that the
government introduced a twenty two minute video montage that spliced
(34:22):
together key breaches that occurred that day. They introduced that
video to a jury even when the defendant in question
is only shown on that video for less than six seconds.
The judge allowed them. Let me repeat that, the judge
allowed them to play a twenty two minute video montage
of things going on in the capitol even though the
(34:43):
person that was on trial was only in that video
montage or six seconds. The remaining twenty one minute shows
the most violent portions of the event spliced together. Luckily,
the defendant seems to have had competent attorneys who filed
a motion to exclude the video. Venness lawyers argued that
this video montage is highly prejudicial because it shows a
(35:05):
jury a twenty two minute video where all they see
is the most extreme parts of the whole day, but
the defendant in question is only on that videotape for
six seconds and is seen walking around peacefully. Further, attorneys
for the defendant argue that the majority of the jury
in DC is made up of federal employees, this video
is meant to inflame the jury, It has no probate
of value, and is therefore a violation and federal rule
(35:25):
of evidence, which they teach you on the first day
in criminal law procedure in law school. District. Judge Bates
declined the motion allowed the prosecutor to include the video montage.
She goes on to say, I'd be willing to bet
everything I own that's submitting a twenty two minute video
montage that shows the most egregious acts of violence you
can you can find from that day. When the defendant
in question is only on the video for six seconds
(35:48):
and is seen walking calmly, is a highly prejudicial and
violation is highly prejudicial and a violation of the defendants
due process rights. But the person will still found guilty
and send it to nineteen months in prison. He walked.
He was sentenced to nineteen months in prison for walking
through the capitol for eight minutes. So she goes on
(36:11):
and says, it took two hours to read all the documents.
They turned a trespassed misdemeanor that would have resulted in
a fifty dollars ticket into five misdemeanors and a felony
charge by charging the defendant with a statute that would
have required the Secret Service to rope off the section
he was in, which they did not. They also charged
him with a statute that would have required him to
move to prove Mike Pence was in the building at
(36:32):
the time he walked through the corridor, which he was not.
And finally they used an run statute that the Supreme
Court is already struck down. The defendant spent two years
and probably hundreds of thousand dollars in attorney's fees for
spending twenty minutes in a building and walking through the corridors.
And that was just the first case. And they want
to complain because a man that walked through the Capitol
(36:53):
for six or for eight minutes was sentenced to almost
two years in prison. And yet the man who killed
a nine year old and his mother to keep them
from testifying in another drug trial gets commuted and crickets
from the main street media. That is the height of
(37:19):
hypocrisy if I've ever seen it. So with that in mind,
let me also tell you that recently so there was
a Department of Homeland Security memo that that was detailing
which domestic groups might turn violent, and it popped up
(37:39):
on AX the other day. The memo, this Department of
Homeland Security memo appears to be from Barack Obama's first term,
and it references the right Wing Extremism Report that was
written in two thousand and nine. But so I thought
it was interesting when I started reading this list. Want
(38:00):
to know who is on the list of the right
wing extremism and who they thought might turn violent. This
again is from Department of Home and that Security. Here
they go anti war groups or individuals. Now it doesn't
say which war, but who knows. I'm against a lot
of wars right. Anti tax persons are groups. Well, I'm
(38:23):
anti tax. Don't make me violent or extreme. I just
think you waste my money. I'm not anti paying the tax,
I'm anti used spending my tax money. By the way,
quick statistic. Since twenty nineteen, the population of the United
States of America has grown by two percent. Since twenty nineteen,
we've grown two percent. Our spending has grown fifty five
(38:44):
percent in that same timeframe. We do not have a
revenue problem. We have a spending problem because they are
addicted to spending money that gets back into their coffers
in some way, shape or form guaranteed. All right, So
moving on, anti war groups are into it viduals, anti
tax groups or persons. Number three militia, but you know,
(39:05):
the Constitution does say something about a militia being necessary.
But I guess forget about the constitution alternative media, which
is basically all I ever read. I don't read the
mainstream media at all. Opponents of open border policies, which,
by the way, according to the last election, was like
two thirds of the entire country single issue voters. I'm
(39:27):
not even sure what that means. I don't know about you,
but that was on the list single issue voters. Is
one of the Department of Homeland Security said that it
was a domestic group that could turn violent. And here's
the last one that was on the list, patriots. They
actually listed patriots as the name of a domestic group
(39:49):
who might turn violent. I thought we were all patriots,
if you want, well, those of us that love the
country are patriots. Yep. Military vets too, especially the ones
who are disgruntled by what felt like of a trail
from our government. So that's who our government back during
the Obama years at least thought were groups that could
(40:14):
turn violent. And I'm telling you they're looking for every
way they can to suppress and squash every one of
our rights, because if they can control us, they can
keep us doing whatever they want us to do. But
we have to resist that. It cannot we cannot let
it stand. Otherwise we're going to end up like Canada.
(40:36):
And let me get finished the show off with this. So,
if you've listened to me in the past, I talked
about the MADE program in Canada. It's m AI D
and it stands for Medical Assistance in Dyeing and it
literally it state sanctioned. It's Kavorkian, right, we all remember
(40:58):
doctor Kvorkan getting going to jailvic as assistant in suicide.
Now Canada is not only sanctioning it, they are readily
pushing it to the point that the uh let me see. Yeah,
it is the fifth largest or the fifth highest leading
(41:22):
cause of death in Canada. In Canada, this MADE program
or assisted living or assisted dying program claims more lives
per capita than gun violence does in the United States.
So now they've they've kind of and that in the
(41:42):
last three or four years, it's moved up into the
I think it's like the number one cause of death
between nineteen and fifty four years old. And they've moved
up to starting to promote it to people to as
a way to save lives by harvesting their organs. So
it goes on. This was from the Federalists I was
reading the other day. Canadian doctors have suggested killing euthanasia
(42:04):
victims by taking their organs. According to multiple reports, whistleblowers
and public talks, medical freedom advocates are documenting emerging ties
between medical assistance and dying are made and organ harvesting.
The best use of my organs if I'm going to
receive a medically assisted death, might be to not first
kill me and then retrieve my organs, but to have
(42:24):
my mode of death as we medically consider death row
to be to retrieve my organs, said Rob Siebold, who
is an ethicist at the London Health Sciences Center in Ontario. So,
whoever this guy is, he's an ethicist that is actually
advocating for the removal of your organs as being a
(42:46):
cause of death. But that you're going to save so
many other people. I don't know about you, but when
the state starts getting into and if you listen to
the show where I talked about it recently, they were
coaching people who were depressed, they were coaching people who
were homeless, they were coaching people who all other sorts
(43:08):
of things that it might be in their best interest
to just go ahead and participate in the MAID program
and have some medically assisted dying. I don't know, there
just seems to be something seriously ethically wrong with that.
I am an advocate of being able to help people
(43:30):
die with dignity and not have to go through suffering
all the pain that they have to suffer at the
end of their lives. But this might be a bridge
too far. I don't know. Anyways, all Right, well that's
the end of the show, guys. It really appreciates you
guys listening. And that's it. This is Bonos Cars answer
about a lot of other stuff, brought to you by
(43:51):
Chevrolet Buick GMC of Murphysborough. Coming back next week.
With over thirty years in the auto industry, he has
decided to pull back the curtain and show you what's
really inside. This is Bowen's Cars, brought to you by
Chevrolet Buick GMC of Murphreysborough. For all of your automotive
needs call six one five six four five one zero
seven five or online Chevrolet Buick GMC of Murphreysboro dot com.
Speaker 2 (00:29):
Here's your host, bow Triven. All right, good morning everybody.
At the end of January, beginning of February, we're turning
the corner here on the weather hopefully and start getting
some warmed up weather able to enjoy the beautiful springtime
(00:49):
all of the other wonderful things that are going on.
And uh, you know, America's back to winning again. And
I am I for one, am excited about it. I
like winning. But you know, winning is not when we're
talking about winning in the context that we're talking about
it now, it's not a zero sum game. It doesn't
mean that I win, you lose. There are win win
(01:13):
situations and a lot of these things that can help
benefit the entire world. The problem that we have, obviously
is bad actors that want to control the world. Right
and look I don't care who you are. If you
can rise to the top of a political party or
remotely close to the top of a political party in
(01:35):
any country in the world, I don't care what country
it is, any country in the world. You have to
have something other people don't have. You possess some sort
of personality trait. You possess some inherent confidence in yourself.
You establish that you are willing to do things other
(01:57):
people aren't willing to do. You're willing to put yourself
out there when other people aren't willing to do that.
And so anybody that attains a political position of power
in any country in the world, they all have certain
traits that are that are equal and alike. And one
of those is the thirst for power. They like it,
(02:17):
and you can get drunk off power, right, I mean,
I get it, But I also understand that there are
people that want to do good with that power, and
then there are people who want to do bad with
that power. And our problem in the United States is
we have a lot of people who are unwilling to
understand that there are people who want to do bad
to us. The people for whatever reasons, religious reasons, in doctrination, reasons,
(02:43):
it doesn't matter what the reasoning is. They want harm
to come to the United States, and there are a
lot of them who are now in the United States
of America. And if that doesn't scare you, it should,
you know. But we are back to doing things that
make common sense. And I have heard if you listened
to the show at any point in time in the
last few years, you probably have heard me mention the
(03:05):
Common Sense Coalition or the Coalition for Common Sense. It
was brought up by my controller, Ashley, and she mentioned
it to me one day. She said, a lot of
other things you say on the radio shows seemed to
be just pure common sense. And I said, well, so
she came up with a name. Credit to her. But
the reality is I've been listening to President Trump recently
(03:25):
and he's saying the same thing. Look, this is just
common sense stuff. One of those things that happened this
past week that really for me, I went, wow, wow,
it makes perfectly good sense. I don't know why we
haven't in the past, but he signed an executive order
this past week that establishes the desire, the need. I
don't know exactly what it's calling for, but for us
(03:47):
to build an iron dome over the United States, just
like Israel has. And if you've watched any of the
videos of when Hamas and Hezbala and everybody was attacking
Israel here recently and firing rockets off and was sponsoring
all of that, they blocked ninety nine percent of them.
They didn't get through. For us to not have, for
us to have that technology available and not be using it,
(04:10):
sounds like a complete farce to me. You know, when
President Trump signed the executive order, he made a statement
that stuck with me, and it should stick with all
of you. We're really good at protecting other people. We're
not very good at protecting ourselves, right, we protect other
people's borders. I don't know how many billions of dollars
(04:31):
we've spent protecting the border of Ukraine from Russia, but
we didn't protect the border of the United States from Mexico.
But he has. He has come in and he has
done a massive amount of work in a very very
short period of time. The Ice arrests. Look, I know
it was voted for. There was a mandate out there
from the United States, from US our citizenry, that said, hey,
(04:57):
we need to round up these criminals and get them
out of here. We don't have to put up with
this anymore. It's not our duty to take every criminal
from every country out of here. And if you listened recently,
I was talking about a statistic where Venezuela, Venezuelan prisons,
the population of the Venezuelan prisons went down almost fifty
or sixty percent, maybe seventy percent from the time that
(05:18):
Joe Biden took office to the time that Joe Biden
left office. Where do you think they put all of
those bad criminals. They turned them loose and sent them
to the United States. And if you think that hasn't
happened in a number of countries where they figured out, hey,
if we just send our criminals to the United States,
they'll let them in. They can deal with them, and
we don't have to house them, we don't have to
feed them, we don't have to do all the other
things that were necessary for us to maintain a prison system.
(05:40):
So it'll save us a bunch of money too. It's
wrong on every level, every level, and it was allowed.
And all of you people out there that are bleeding
hearts for all of the people that are being rounded up,
I want you to Remember, there are human beings that
a lot of these people that have been rounded up
up have wronged in serious senses like pedophilia, child molestation,
(06:08):
rape of adult women, child trafficking, drug dealing, all kinds
of bad things that wreak havoc on our communities here
in the United States. And anybody that's not okay with
getting them out of our country when they're here illegally
to begin with. I don't know what your argument could
possibly be. It absolutely astounds me, and I don't know
(06:35):
about you, but I'm kind of out of compassion rights.
Compassion is that thing that's easy to abuse, and it
leads to that next emotion, which is guilt, and they
want to guilt you into feeling like you should have
compassion for everybody. Well, I'm telling you that people that
use that compassion, there have been many people who have
talked themselves out of doing something they should have done
(06:58):
because they thought they were being compassion. It's like the
old adage about the scorpion that was asked the frog
for a ride across the river. Right, so the frog says, no,
you'll sting me, and the scorpion says, no, I wouldn't.
Why would I sting you. I don't want to sting you.
If I sting you're gonna drown. I'm gonna drown. We're
both gonna die. And so the frog agrees to take
the scorpion across the river. And halfway across the river,
(07:20):
the scorpion stings the frog and they both start to
sink and they're gonna both gonna drown. And the frog says,
why would you do that? He said, well, it's in
my nature. I'm still a scorpion. I just didn't have
a choice. I had to. It's in people's nature to
be bad. It's in people's nature to do bad things.
We need to understand that those people who want to
commit that that kind of harm to the United States
(07:42):
need to be out of here. It's that simple. They
don't deserve to be here, all right. This is Bonos Cars,
brought to you by Chevrolet Buick GMC of Murvery's Borough.
Come on back after the break.
Speaker 1 (08:08):
It's over thirty years in the auto industry. He has
deciding to pull back the curtain and show you what's
really inside. This is Bowen's Cars, brought to you by
Chevrolet Buick GMC of Murphreysborough. For all of your automotive needs,
call six one five six four five one zero seven
five or online Chevrolet Buick GMC.
Speaker 2 (08:27):
Of Murphreysboro dot com. Here's your host, bow Driven. All right,
welcome back, everybody. I UHM so looking forward to the springtime,
getting out sunshine and enjoying life. And your time kills me.
I hate it. I get older, I hate it even
more so. I found this. I don't have X, I'm
(08:50):
not on Twitter or X. I'm not on Facebook, I'm
not on Instagram, I'm not on I just have never
really been a big uh social media. First of all,
I think nobody gives a crap what I have to
say or think. And uh, they certainly don't want to
have to turn see me in their feet every day.
And they don't care what I had for lunch and
(09:11):
how many plants I've watered today. I don't know, it
doesn't matter. Anyways. I found this article on or a
tweet on X that I thought was appropriate because if
you remember, if you were listening and paying attention this week,
you saw that we started the deportation flights, and apparently
the big bad leader of Columbia decided he was going
(09:34):
to uh push back on the flights of the Colombian
illegal immigrants that are here that that have committed crimes,
and they didn't want to take them back. So Trump
got on the Twitter and said, if you don't take them,
I'm gonna started imposing tariffs on you at twenty five percent.
Next week, I'm gonna take them fifty percent, and then
(09:54):
I'm gonna kick all of your diplomats out of the
United States. Within a couple an hour, the president of
Columbia had not only backtracked, but had offered the plan
the presidential plane for Columbia, his own plane to come
get some of the illegal aliens that were at criminal
(10:15):
records and bring them back to Columbia himself. So not
only did he fold, and apparently this was done on
a Sunday while Trump was playing golf, so it was
between the fifth and the eighth holes that he was
able to get the Columbian president to completely change his
mind and go back to doing what he was supposed
to do. So I found this thing from a poster
by the name he goes by the handel Cynical Hugh Publius.
(10:38):
It's p U B l I U S. Publius I'm
not sure how he pronounces it, but he uh. He
wanted to talk about how remarkable that exchange was in
the context of leadership and the way things have been
going in the United States and around the world for
quite some time, especially the United States, because we've had
such weak, feckless leaders that have done nothing to try
to deter the aggress that's coming on all from either
(11:01):
Putin or Jjinping or any of the other ones that
are out there that want to be aggressive. And so
I'm just going to read it to you because it
makes complete sense. He goes on to say, to fully
understand just how remarkable today's exchange with Columbia was, you
need to understand how Washington, DC has traditionally worked through
these sorts of issues and the different way it now
works under Trump. He says, I'll illustrate the traditional approach,
(11:24):
the way normally was handled. Number One, Columbia announces it
will not take our repatriation flights. Number two. On Monday,
the State Department convenes an intern agency task force with
god nsc DEA, nis or I, ins ICE, Commerce, Treasury,
and Homeland Security. Number three of the task force meets
for four days and develops a position paper. The position
(11:44):
paper is rejected by the Secretary of State, who is
unhappy that insufficient equity considerations are built into the process.
Then the task force reconvenes a week later to redevelop
three new equity centric courses of action and create a
new position paper. Then the process of delayed a week
because Washington, DC gets three inches of snow. Then the
Secretary of State approves the new position paper for interagency circulation,
(12:06):
and considerable input is received from the heads of other departments,
so the task force must reconvene. Then the original task force,
the original three proposed responsive responsive courses of action are
scrapped in favor of a new fourth course of action
that achieves the worst aspects of the three prior courses
of action but satisfies the inner agencies. Then someone in
(12:26):
State who disagrees leaks to the Washington Post, who writes
a story about how ineffective the presidential administration is. Then
the White House Chief of Staff sets up a session
three days later to brief the President, who approves the
new fourth course of action. Over a month after the
issue is first raised, the State Department Public Affairs officer
holds a press conference announcing that Columbia has agreed to
send a few to try to send fewer criminals into
(12:48):
the US, and everyone declares victory. That's a traditional approach,
And you can see he's kind of making all that up.
But what he's saying is that it's his study after study,
and people get together and talking, meet and let's figure
it out. And a month goes by, and then all
of a sudden, Columbia says, well, we'll just send you
less criminals than we've been sending you. Never goes all,
look we win. Look how great the United States has
(13:09):
we negotiating. So here's the Trump approach. Colombia announces it
will not take our repatriation flights. After a par five
third hole, where he goes one under par, Trump uses
his iPhone to post on social media as to how
the USA will destroy Columbia's economy if they do not
do what the USA demands. By the time Trump gets
to the par for sixth hole, Columbia's president has agreed
(13:32):
to repatriate all of the illegal Colombians in his own plane,
which he will pay for. Then Trump finishes US three
under par, finishes three under par and goes to the
clubhouse for a diet coke where he posts a gangs
to a AI image of himself and the new FAFO
doctrine and then winning. You see the difference. You see
the difference between the way things used to get handled
(13:54):
in the way things are being handled. That's how a
businessman handles the business. It doesn't take seventeen different agents.
He's getting together to talk about what might happen and
what couldn't happen. Here's the deal. You turned illegal criminals
loose out of your prisons. They made it into the
United States. We're sending them back to you. Well, no,
we're not taking them back. Okay, then we're going to
(14:14):
destroy your economy because we're not going to let you
bully us around. That is strength that deters other countries
from trying to do the same thing. You know, I've
said this before and people have given me static about
it because my way of parenting and my wife and
(14:35):
I've had this discussion was if you punish them when
they're younger, if you established the rule set young, you
don't have to do all of that. I have three
kids that I am extremely proud of that have are
raising well. My daughters are raising great kids, and I'm
proud of the choices they made for their husbands, and
I'm proud of all of that. But I don't think
(15:00):
think they got there just on their own. Some of
that had to do with parenting styles, and some of
that had to do with making sure that they understood
that respect matters, and that you're going to say yes
sir and no sir, and yes ma'am and no ma'am,
and you're going to say please, and you're going to
say thank you, because all of those things are respectful
to your fellow humans, and that's the way you need
to be. But I'm not going to tolerate you just
(15:22):
determining on your own you're going to do things that
are against the rules. That's not tolerated. Tolerated in my house.
But I can tell you that after the age of
about three, I don't remember ever having to really spank
them or even raise my voice hardly because they just
understood the rules. That's the same thing Trump is establishing
(15:44):
right now. These are the rules. We're the big dog.
We get to make the rules, not you guys. And
if you want our help, if you want us to
continue to send billions of dollars to your economies every
year and use all of the resources that you have,
because our economy, feet the American economy is an amazing thing,
and we do not use it enough as a means
(16:05):
for negotiating. Our economy is massive compared to every other
economy in the United in the world, that includes China's.
They may catch us some day, but they're not there yet.
And so the American consumer is our club to use
to get what we want. And for far too long
we've allowed other people to take advantage of that, with
(16:29):
up to and including China. For a while, Japan was
getting the better into the bargain. But we can't continue
to do that. We have to be able to establish strength,
and we have to be able to establish that we
are willing to back up our threats with actions, and
if we don't, we are absolutely in for it. One
(16:53):
of the other things that Trump did recently, and I'm
gonna mention the New York Times here for a second,
which I can't stand for whatever reason. But so Trump,
when he first got into office, one of the other
executive orders that he signed was that he was going
to designate the drug cartels as terrorist organizations. Now I
(17:13):
don't know about you, but by definition of terrorist organizations,
they're terrorizing. The drug cartels are killing more people than
dang near any wars ever killed in the United States
last time, where I saw was like one hundred thousand
people a year or something from drug overdoses. They're getting
by with impunity, and they just kept doing it and
doing it doing, especially when we had the open border.
(17:34):
Now the drug cartels think they're so big and bad
that they can just take shots at our border patrol,
which happened this week also, so designated them as drug
cartels made perfectly or the drug cartels as terrorist organizations
made perfectly good sense to me, and it would probably
make perfectly good sense to most people that had any
common sense. But the U the classification apparently drew the
(17:59):
New York Times and made a med and they say
it's going to hurt our economy. The so it goes on,
I'm running out of times, so I'm gonna do it
very quickly. New York Times goes on talks about how
it could have a major effect on both countries given
their deep economic independence. Even more complicated, these criminal networks
(18:20):
have extended their operations far beyond drug trafficking and humans smuggling.
They're now embedded in a wide swath of the legal economy,
from avocado farming to the country's billion dollar tourism industry,
making it hard to be absolutely sure that American companies
are isolated from cartel activities. So let me get this right.
You want to coddle them because they have a little
bit of legal money in the system, but ignore all
(18:44):
the other stuff they do. I think not. That's why
The New York Times is losing readership. All right, this
is Bonos Cars brought to you by Chevrolet Buick GMC
of murders bro coming back after the break.
Speaker 1 (19:08):
With over thirty years in the auto industry, he has
deciding to pull back the curtain and show you what's
really inside. This is Bowen's Cars, brought to you by
Chevrolet Buick GMC of Murphreysborough. For all of your automotive
needs called six one five six four five one zero
seven five or online Chevrolet Buick GMC of Murphreysboro dot com.
Speaker 2 (19:29):
Here's your host, bow Driven. All right, welcome back, everybody.
So not too long ago, a few months ago, six
eight twelve, maybe between about a year and a half
to you, and more recently, up till November, Gavin Newsom's
(19:53):
name had been floated as a excuse me as a
possible candidate for president. I know he's got designs on
running for president. He thinks because he's got that slick
back pat Riley nineteen nineties hair, that he can just
do whatever he wants with impunity and he can continue
(20:14):
to turn what is one of the greatest states in
the nation, if not the grace and I mean that
from a resources beauty, everything from mountains to beaches, it's huge.
The economy is huge. It really truly is a gorgeous state,
great weather, more oil than Texas from what I understand, minerals,
(20:38):
they have everything. And he's taken a state that should
be its own little country. I mean, it's the fifth
largest economy in the nation in the world right now
and turned it into an absolute hell hole and getting
worse by the year, and most of it under the
leadership of blue leaning politicians. LA is the same way right,
(21:06):
So these LA fires, I'm really, really, really truly sorry
for the people that are affected by it. But as
Obama said one time, elections have consequences, and you're finding
out the consequences of voting for people who have utopian
thought processes that don't understand how the real world actually works,
(21:26):
and that you can't just do that. So I talked
about recently the fact that some of these fires were
basically because an amateur botanist said that they were trying
to do some fire prevention techniques and some things a
few years ago. This botanist, amateur botanist photographer takes a
picture and says, it's going to kill this one plant.
(21:48):
There's only three thousand of them left, some milk thistle barriers.
I don't remember what it was. In any event, because
they undid the fire mitigation techniques that they had done.
The fires started, they jumped into Pacific Palisade. All of
those plants that they were trying to say, if any ways,
are burned to the ground. But now it turns out
that Governor k Newsom also vetoed a chance for some
(22:11):
fire mitigation so he could get the land for some
affordable housing. Right, let me see if I can see
it here, let's see yep. So he went on. He
wanted to keep the he wanted to keep this land
(22:35):
that he had. I'm gonna bypass it. For a second,
but he wanted to keep this land that they had
designated as fire break breaks and said, no, we're trying
to get the people to move closer into the city,
so we're going to designate this land out here, essentially
again screwing it up completely and using the resource that
(23:00):
he was supposed to use to take care of the
people who were paying the taxes to do something that
was completely counterintuitive to helping those people. And they're going
to end up in the same, the same exact situation.
If you listen to the show, you've heard me talk
about Lohina High Lahina, Hawaii. Right. So Leahina had the
(23:22):
fires a year and a year and a half ago
and there were two thousand homes that got destroyed in Lahina.
Eighteen months after the wildfires, there have been three houses rebuilt,
three in Lahina because now they all have to bring
these all of the buildings up to the new codes
and new standards if you're going to rebuild. And the
(23:46):
same exact thing is about to happen in Pacific palis
Age and up and down California. One of the other
things that these morons did was put a price control
in place when it came to rent, right, So a
lot of people out there were renting their homes and saying, hey,
we're gonna rent our homes out because there's people that
(24:07):
have been displaced by the fires. But the government did
exactly the opposite of what the free market should do
out in California, and they went in and said, you
can't lease anything. You can't have a higher than ten
thousand dollars a month rent. Right now, I don't know
if you know, but the housing prices in California are
a little steep, and ten thousand dollars a month isn't
going to cover a lot of the nut that people
(24:29):
have for their houses that they wanted to rent them.
So by putting that market that number out there and
saying you can't have anything over ten thousand dollars, guess
what happened. The thing you'd expect price controls to do.
It kept the market for housing. It kept houses off
the market. People didn't want to put them on the
market because they needed to get fifteen thousand to eighteen
thousand dollars a month in rent. There were people willing
(24:50):
to pay it, and there were people willing to lease
their house. But because the government got involved and decided
to put a cap on the pricing and put price
controls on rent out in the state of California during
the wildfires. All of a sudden, it's we're just keep
them off the market. We're not even going to put
them out there. Then, so they've made the supply even worse,
causing even more problems by trying to fix a problem
(25:12):
that wasn't a problem to begin with. Let the market
do what the market's going to do. If people are
willing to pay for it, then that's the game. I
said this while while the chip shortage was going on
for a year year and a half. In the car business,
do not buy a car right now. It is a
bad deal. But sellers do not determine the price of anything.
Buyers do if nobody's willing to pay the price somebody
(25:35):
has on any particular products. I don't care what it is,
a house for rent, a car for sale. If somebody
is willing to pay that price, then that's the market.
Because if nobody's willing to pay the price somebody has
something listed for then they'll lower the price or they
won't bother selling it. It's just that simple. It's econ
one oh one. But for whatever reason, all of these
blue cities think that they can engineer the market to
(25:56):
do better and they know better than the actual market,
and they don't absolutely astounding to me. But they're going
to also cause the other problem with permitting. I guarantee
you a year and a half from now, I'm going
to be sitting here talking about the fact that the
housing problems in California have been exacerbated by the fact
(26:17):
that nobody can get permits pulled, and all of those
people that owned houses, those beautiful houses along that stretch
of Rocky Cliff in Malibu and all of that where
they're trying to keep them from rebuilding those houses on
those rocky cliffs. If I bought a house for twenty
million dollars, and eighteen million dollars of that house was
the view of the ocean, I'm not just going to
go easily into that good night when they say I
(26:38):
can't rebuild my twenty million dollar crib. That's not going
to happen. But that's about what's going to happen. But
I have some hope because I've been reading some articles
recently that say that there are a large number of
people out in the California market that are possibly reconsidering
their voting habits and have come to see that some
(27:05):
of those habits might have gotten them in the fix
that they're in. All right, So I never have enough
time to cover everything I wanted to cover. I did
want to cover this before the end of this particular segment, though,
So if you've been paying any attention, you know that
President Trump and his administration has been absolutely on fire,
busy doing everything they can to try to mitigate some
(27:27):
of the damage, try to get us through what is
going to be a tougher economic period, because you can't
continue to spend trillions of dollars of government money without
at some point you have to stop, and when you stop,
that could cause an economic slowdown. So they're trying to
navigate through there. But one of the things he did
on the first day, I'm going to read some of
the executive orders that he signed on day one. So
(27:52):
he signed an executive order to halt seventy eight Biden
era executive actions. He withdrew from the Paris Climate A
Court again, which I think is a brilliant move since
it doesn't do anything but limit us and doesn't do
anything to change China or India, or all of the
carbon that they're spewing out that they say is causing
all of the climate change. He signed a executive order
(28:16):
to end all federal cases and investigations of any Trump supporters.
He revoked the protections for transgender troops, pardoned about fifteen
hundred criminally charged in the January sixth attack, while commuting
sentences for six overhauled the refugee had had admission program
to better align with American principles and interest, declared a
national emergency at the US Mexico border, designated trug Guard,
(28:37):
drug cartels, and trendy Aragua as foreign terrorist organizations. He
reversed several immigration orders from the Biden administration, including one
that narrows deportation priorities to people who commit serious crimes,
are deemed national security threats, or were stopped at the border.
He rescinded a policy created by the Biden administration that
sought to guide the development of AI to prevent misuse.
(29:00):
He revoked Biden's recent removal of Cuba from US State
Sponsors of Terrorism list. I don't understand that why all
of a sudden, what did Cuba do that was different
to all of a sudden remove themselves from the state
sponsor of terrorism list. There's a by the way, there's
something out there that talking about all of the last
(29:22):
minute pardons that Biden threw in front of him or
did as he was going out the door, turns out
he might have accidentally pardoned somebody who didn't need to
be pardoned. There was a let me just read it
to you, so part of an article here that I
(29:44):
was reading. I'm gonna try to get through it quickly.
Relatives of an eight year old boy and his mother
who were murdered by a Connecticut drug gang are outraged
that a man convicted in those killings was one of
nearly twenty five hundred people whose drug related prison sentences
were commuted by JEFF President Joe Biden. Adrian Peeler served
a twenty year state prison sentence for murder conspiracy in
the nineteen ninety nine shootings of Leroy BJ Brown and
(30:05):
his mother, Karen Clark in Bridgeport, killings that shocked the
city and led to improvements in state witness protection. Prosecutor
said Brown and his mother were assassinated to prevent the
child from testifying in another murder case. So that's one
of the people that Joe Biden decided to commute the
sentence and pardon, and nobody understands why, and I least
(30:27):
of which Joe Biden. I don't think he even knew
what he was signing. But there should be a full
investigation of whoever vetted that list from the ACLU as
to somebody had something coming to try to get that
man out of jail. I don't know what's going on,
but it's another one of those scandals that we need
to be looking into. All right, this is Bonos Cars
(30:48):
Roger by Chevrolet Buick GMC of Murphy's Broom. We're gonna
do this again right after the break.
Speaker 1 (31:08):
With over thirty years in the auto industry, he has
deciding to pull back the curtain and show you what's
really inside. This is Bowen's Cars, brought to you by
Chevrolet Buick GMC of Murphreysborough. For all of your automotive
needs call six one five six four five one zero
seven five or online Chevrolet Buick GMC of Murphresboro dot com.
Speaker 2 (31:29):
Here's your host, bow Triven. All right, welcome back, everybody.
So I ended the last segment talking about a the
Biden pardons and commutations, he by far was the the
(31:53):
president that signed the most pardons and commutations of any
president in I think in the history of the of
the presidency. Some of them slipped through the crack. Some
of them just weren't supposed to be pardoned, some of
them shouldn't have been pardoned. But for everybody to get
up in arms about President by or President Trump pardoning
(32:16):
the J six a lot of the JA six participants,
it's a two way street. The reality is that, Look,
I think all normal right thinking people, right thinking meaning
not right of the political spectrum, but right thinking in
that we have common sense and we want anybody who
(32:37):
did anything criminal on January sixth, twenty twenty one to
have to pay some sort of price for their criminal actions,
whatever that was, whether it was trespassing. But a normal
trespassing sentence is you pay a fine and you're told
not to trespass again. It is not four years in
jail for trespassing. And we all know we've seen the tapes.
(32:59):
If you've want it with any sort of open mind,
there are just as many people being walked around the
Capitol during that time with police officers and escorts and
that kind of stuff, as there are people who are
carrying e lectern through there. Look, if you did something wrong,
you should be punished. No problem with that. What I
have a problem with is continually doing it and using
(33:20):
the sledgehammer of the government to try to keep people
from ever doing anything again. Now with that said, there
was an article the other day that I was reading.
It was talking about Jade Vance that was he had
highlighted a particular case and I'm going to read some
of the highlights of this case to you. It was
(33:42):
a post by Insurrection Barbie and she posts on Twitter apparently,
so it just goes on and says she picked a
random case that they wanted to see to just went
through some of the cases, picked a random case just
to see how bad it really was. And here's what
(34:02):
she says. He didn't break anything, he didn't hurt anybody,
and yet he was sentenced by a jury to nineteen
months in prison. He was overcharged by the prosecutor at
the point where he should be called malicious prosecution, and
a judge rubber stamped every single thing the prosecutor asked for.
The most egregious part of the filings was that the
government introduced a twenty two minute video montage that spliced
(34:22):
together key breaches that occurred that day. They introduced that
video to a jury even when the defendant in question
is only shown on that video for less than six seconds.
The judge allowed them. Let me repeat that, the judge
allowed them to play a twenty two minute video montage
of things going on in the capitol even though the
(34:43):
person that was on trial was only in that video
montage or six seconds. The remaining twenty one minute shows
the most violent portions of the event spliced together. Luckily,
the defendant seems to have had competent attorneys who filed
a motion to exclude the video. Venness lawyers argued that
this video montage is highly prejudicial because it shows a
(35:05):
jury a twenty two minute video where all they see
is the most extreme parts of the whole day, but
the defendant in question is only on that videotape for
six seconds and is seen walking around peacefully. Further, attorneys
for the defendant argue that the majority of the jury
in DC is made up of federal employees, this video
is meant to inflame the jury, It has no probate
of value, and is therefore a violation and federal rule
(35:25):
of evidence, which they teach you on the first day
in criminal law procedure in law school. District. Judge Bates
declined the motion allowed the prosecutor to include the video montage.
She goes on to say, I'd be willing to bet
everything I own that's submitting a twenty two minute video
montage that shows the most egregious acts of violence you
can you can find from that day. When the defendant
in question is only on the video for six seconds
(35:48):
and is seen walking calmly, is a highly prejudicial and
violation is highly prejudicial and a violation of the defendants
due process rights. But the person will still found guilty
and send it to nineteen months in prison. He walked.
He was sentenced to nineteen months in prison for walking
through the capitol for eight minutes. So she goes on
(36:11):
and says, it took two hours to read all the documents.
They turned a trespassed misdemeanor that would have resulted in
a fifty dollars ticket into five misdemeanors and a felony
charge by charging the defendant with a statute that would
have required the Secret Service to rope off the section
he was in, which they did not. They also charged
him with a statute that would have required him to
move to prove Mike Pence was in the building at
(36:32):
the time he walked through the corridor, which he was not.
And finally they used an run statute that the Supreme
Court is already struck down. The defendant spent two years
and probably hundreds of thousand dollars in attorney's fees for
spending twenty minutes in a building and walking through the corridors.
And that was just the first case. And they want
to complain because a man that walked through the Capitol
(36:53):
for six or for eight minutes was sentenced to almost
two years in prison. And yet the man who killed
a nine year old and his mother to keep them
from testifying in another drug trial gets commuted and crickets
from the main street media. That is the height of
(37:19):
hypocrisy if I've ever seen it. So with that in mind,
let me also tell you that recently so there was
a Department of Homeland Security memo that that was detailing
which domestic groups might turn violent, and it popped up
(37:39):
on AX the other day. The memo, this Department of
Homeland Security memo appears to be from Barack Obama's first term,
and it references the right Wing Extremism Report that was
written in two thousand and nine. But so I thought
it was interesting when I started reading this list. Want
(38:00):
to know who is on the list of the right
wing extremism and who they thought might turn violent. This
again is from Department of Home and that Security. Here
they go anti war groups or individuals. Now it doesn't
say which war, but who knows. I'm against a lot
of wars right. Anti tax persons are groups. Well, I'm
(38:23):
anti tax. Don't make me violent or extreme. I just
think you waste my money. I'm not anti paying the tax,
I'm anti used spending my tax money. By the way,
quick statistic. Since twenty nineteen, the population of the United
States of America has grown by two percent. Since twenty nineteen,
we've grown two percent. Our spending has grown fifty five
(38:44):
percent in that same timeframe. We do not have a
revenue problem. We have a spending problem because they are
addicted to spending money that gets back into their coffers
in some way, shape or form guaranteed. All right, So
moving on, anti war groups are into it viduals, anti
tax groups or persons. Number three militia, but you know,
(39:05):
the Constitution does say something about a militia being necessary.
But I guess forget about the constitution alternative media, which
is basically all I ever read. I don't read the
mainstream media at all. Opponents of open border policies, which,
by the way, according to the last election, was like
two thirds of the entire country single issue voters. I'm
(39:27):
not even sure what that means. I don't know about you,
but that was on the list single issue voters. Is
one of the Department of Homeland Security said that it
was a domestic group that could turn violent. And here's
the last one that was on the list, patriots. They
actually listed patriots as the name of a domestic group
(39:49):
who might turn violent. I thought we were all patriots,
if you want, well, those of us that love the
country are patriots. Yep. Military vets too, especially the ones
who are disgruntled by what felt like of a trail
from our government. So that's who our government back during
the Obama years at least thought were groups that could
(40:14):
turn violent. And I'm telling you they're looking for every
way they can to suppress and squash every one of
our rights, because if they can control us, they can
keep us doing whatever they want us to do. But
we have to resist that. It cannot we cannot let
it stand. Otherwise we're going to end up like Canada.
(40:36):
And let me get finished the show off with this. So,
if you've listened to me in the past, I talked
about the MADE program in Canada. It's m AI D
and it stands for Medical Assistance in Dyeing and it
literally it state sanctioned. It's Kavorkian, right, we all remember
(40:58):
doctor Kvorkan getting going to jailvic as assistant in suicide.
Now Canada is not only sanctioning it, they are readily
pushing it to the point that the uh let me see. Yeah,
it is the fifth largest or the fifth highest leading
(41:22):
cause of death in Canada. In Canada, this MADE program
or assisted living or assisted dying program claims more lives
per capita than gun violence does in the United States.
So now they've they've kind of and that in the
(41:42):
last three or four years, it's moved up into the
I think it's like the number one cause of death
between nineteen and fifty four years old. And they've moved
up to starting to promote it to people to as
a way to save lives by harvesting their organs. So
it goes on. This was from the Federalists I was
reading the other day. Canadian doctors have suggested killing euthanasia
(42:04):
victims by taking their organs. According to multiple reports, whistleblowers
and public talks, medical freedom advocates are documenting emerging ties
between medical assistance and dying are made and organ harvesting.
The best use of my organs if I'm going to
receive a medically assisted death, might be to not first
kill me and then retrieve my organs, but to have
(42:24):
my mode of death as we medically consider death row
to be to retrieve my organs, said Rob Siebold, who
is an ethicist at the London Health Sciences Center in Ontario. So,
whoever this guy is, he's an ethicist that is actually
advocating for the removal of your organs as being a
(42:46):
cause of death. But that you're going to save so
many other people. I don't know about you, but when
the state starts getting into and if you listen to
the show where I talked about it recently, they were
coaching people who were depressed, they were coaching people who
were homeless, they were coaching people who all other sorts
(43:08):
of things that it might be in their best interest
to just go ahead and participate in the MAID program
and have some medically assisted dying. I don't know, there
just seems to be something seriously ethically wrong with that.
I am an advocate of being able to help people
(43:30):
die with dignity and not have to go through suffering
all the pain that they have to suffer at the
end of their lives. But this might be a bridge
too far. I don't know. Anyways, all Right, well that's
the end of the show, guys. It really appreciates you
guys listening. And that's it. This is Bonos Cars answer
about a lot of other stuff, brought to you by
(43:51):
Chevrolet Buick GMC of Murphysborough. Coming back next week.
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Special Summer Offer: Exclusively on Apple Podcasts, try our Dateline Premium subscription completely free for one month! With Dateline Premium, you get every episode ad-free plus exclusive bonus content.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.