All Episodes

May 10, 2025 44 mins
*Trump wants to reopen Alcatraz.....let's goooo!
*Colorado's 'deadnaming' bill
*Former GREAT cities have been destroyed and are being destroyed by Democratic policies
*Illegal flow of border crossings have been stopped by Trump administration, even after years of Biden saying it couldn't be done or he had done it but had not.  The media seems to be worried about how it will affect drug cartels?!?
*Why birth rates have declined and what that means going forward
*How the Biden administration tried to take a family farm that had been in the family since 1907 (five generations of famers) from the Maude family in South Dakota.
Mark as Played
Transcript

Episode Transcript

Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:25):
With over thirty years in the auto industry, he is
deciding to pull back the curtain and show you what's
really inside. This is Boweno's Cars, brought to you by
Chevrolet Buick GMC of Murphreysborough. For all of your automotive
needs call six one five six four five one zero
seven five or online Chevrolet Buick GMC of Murphreysboro dot com.

Speaker 2 (00:46):
Here's your host, bow Triven.

Speaker 3 (00:50):
All right, good warning everybody. I hope everybody's having a
wonderful day here in the back to being stupidly cold
weather for middle of May. I don't know where all
these climatologists are with their global warming and stuff, but
it's mid May. Can we get some warm weather that
just stays sixty degrees May? Nuts? Anyways, how about Trump

(01:15):
wanted to reopen Alcatraz. I think that that is a
great idea. We've got a maximum security prison sitting on
a rock that we've all heard the stories about how
hard it is to escape from. That we could put
some of the worst of the worst criminals, and it
used to house the worst of the worst when we
had common sense being used for our justice system and

(01:36):
not siding with the criminals and thinking that it's going
to be somehow better if we just let the criminals
criminal it. Yeah, I'm all for it. I'm all for
harsh justice. I'm all for punishments fitting the crime and
being harsher than the actual crime. See, I think the
punishment shouldn't fit the crime. I think the punishment should

(01:57):
be worse than the crime. Because the punishment's worse in
the crime, it serves as a deterrent if it's the
risk reward in crime is Hey, I don't think it's
going to be that bad if something happens doesn't necessarily
serve as a deterrent. You see those kids that apparently
twelve thirteen eleven, twelve thirteen years old, attacking cops in
New York City the other day, two cops that were

(02:18):
trying to stop somebody, two kids from stealing from another person.
It's completely out of hand. But then you know, you
got things like Colorado. I don't know if you guys
have been paying attention, but Colorado passed a bill that
would make dead naming their child, who is supposedly in

(02:39):
this kit particular case, transitioning dead naming the child legal
child abuse. Now, I don't know about you but that
sounds like a slippery slope to me. So if that's
child abuse, you know, I remember back in the day.

(03:01):
I don't remember when it was and it turned, but
I remember back at a certain point where kids thought
it would be best to call child services on their
parents who spanked them and call it an abuse. I
happen to believe in the punishment should be slightly worse

(03:23):
than the crime. But what if your child You tell
your child to go mow the grass and they find
that to be child abuse and they tell you no,
and then you punish them, take away their phone, and
all of the other things that go along with being
a parent and trying to teach some sort of discipline
to your children so that they understand that life is

(03:43):
a series of choices and making good ones will benefit
your life much more than making bad ones. That's what
parenting is. It's that short period of time that you
get in order to teach your children right from wrong.
And if you're trying to do that using whether it's
corporal punishment, I'm not talking about beating a child. I'm

(04:05):
talking about three licks with a wooden spoon or something whatever.
I don't know, But at what point if nothing else works,
what do you do? And you just give up and
just let the kid be whatever they want to be
and do whatever they want to do. Well, now, in Colorado,
if you dead name your child, that's child abuse. And

(04:26):
somehow that I feel like at some point that's going
to start going down this slippery slope where children think
that they run everything. And we all know that a
fifteen year old, twelve year old, fifteen year old, they
all feel things from a scale of one to ten.
At a twelve, if they can't go out with their
friends tonight, if they don't have their phone, everything in
their soul is going to die. I don't understand these

(04:53):
politicians thinking that they can replace parenting. It just makes
no sense to me. Also, in the height of stupidity,
we've got the UK government, So I don't know about
you guys, but I pay attention to this stuff. And
the UK has just as big of a problem with

(05:13):
illegal immigrants trampling their constitutional or whatever rights they have
and taking over their country. And I've told you about
the grooming gangs that the Pakistani men that would take
the young ladies or young girls, underage girls and groom them,
and nobody in Parliament or any of the law enforcement

(05:36):
in the UK wanted to do anything simply because they
didn't want to be branded as racists. That's the kind
of people we're dealing with. Well, now they've chosen. So
one of the biggest issues in the UK right now
is housing. They are there was a report I read
that said that they needed to build one and a
half million more houses in order to stay ahead of

(05:56):
the game because people that live in the UK without
all of them illegal immigrants coming in, but people living
in the UK just can't afford houses. There's just not
enough of them. It's just why and demand issue. Their
regulations are way worse than ours. So there is that.
But now the government higher Stormer or however you say
his name, Stormer has decided that the government is going

(06:18):
to start paying for housing for thirty thousand asylum seekers.
And the way they're gonna do it is by by
giving landlords a five year lease with no default. So
the landlords are like, hey, wait a minute, I can
get a five year lease from the government. I know
they're gonna pay me no matter what because they sign
the contract and I can house these illegal immigrants. All right,

(06:38):
I'll do that that they're taking market. They're taking the
housing market in the UK and destroying it by competing
with their own citizens. That's the level and height of
stupidity that we're dealing with in some of these governments.
You know what that's gonna do drive the price up

(06:59):
even higher for everything. When the government gets involved and
starts manipulating the markets, which is what that is, it
creates market imbalances that just drive the price higher. It's
like printing too much money. It's what causes inflation. And
they just continue to do it and over and over

(07:20):
and over again and expect to get a different result. Look,
I'd like to feel sorry for all of them, but
some of them are voted for this. Lots of them
voted for this. It's just like in New York or
California or Chicago. They continue to vote for this, at
least a large portion enough of them do to continue

(07:44):
to keep these politicians in place. You want to change something,
it all starts at the ballot box. You've got to
be able to vote them out. You've got to be
able to come to your senses and do something that
benefits the country. Not all of the people trying to
take over the country. All right. That uh, that's the

(08:06):
end of this one. I got a bunch of other
stuff to talk about, though, so come on back after
the break. This is Bonos Cars, brought you by Chevrolet
Buick GMC of Murphysboro.

Speaker 4 (08:13):
Come see us.

Speaker 1 (08:30):
With over thirty years in the auto industry, he is
deciding to pull back the curtain and show you what's
really inside. This is Boweno's Cars, brought to you by
Chevrolet Buick GMC of Murphreysborough. For all of your automotive
needs call six one five six four five one zero
seven five or online Chevrolet Buick GMC of Murphreysboro dot com.

Speaker 2 (08:51):
Here's your host, bow Triven.

Speaker 3 (08:54):
All right, come back, everybody. I sincerely appreciate you guys
tuning in and listening because if you're like me, you
love this country and you are bound and determined to
try to find some way to make a difference, even
if it's just a small difference. It just can't be.

(09:16):
I heard something yesterday or the other day that disturbed
me that I wasn't sure. I guess the mayor of Nashville. Look,
I live in Murfreesboro. I come to Nashville when I
have to. I love the city, I love the vibe.
But the mayor apparently said something about not working with
ICE and not wanting to help Ice, and I didn't

(09:38):
see all of it, so don't hold me to it exactly.
But if we start going down that path, Tennessee will
not be what Tennessee currently is. Tennessee currently is what
it is simply because of the policies that are meant
to take care of Tennessee and the United States of
America and follow the rule of WAW. When we get

(09:59):
away from that and we start promoting all of the
values that we know have destroyed cities after cities after cities,
it's going to be a problem. So I was reading
this article the other day speaking of all of these
Democratic controlled enclaves, these cities that have been they've been
controlled by one party rule for decades and decades and decades, Chicago,

(10:22):
New York, California as a whole. There's just Atlanta. There
are cities after city after city that have been controlled
by the Democratic Party for all forever at this point.
And you can look through all of these cities and
you can see once great cities. I remember when my

(10:45):
stepfather took me to Baltimore in like the mid seventies.
I was like twelve years old, so I guess it
was seventy five or seventy six, seventy seven, and it
was a nice town. You go to Baltimore now and
it's just run down and dilapidated. So Chicago's got all
the problems that we know about, But why do people

(11:05):
continue to vote for the things that they watch. They
voted for Lori Lightfoot in Chicago. They all agreed she
was a complete disaster in destroying the city, and so
they voted in the next election for a guy that's
even worse when it comes to that type of policies

(11:26):
than Lori Lightfoot was, and he's destroying the city even faster.
So the article I was reading was likening it to abuse,
where you wonder why people who suffer abuse, male or female,
continue to allow themselves to accept it and accept the

(11:48):
abuse from somebody that they've proven who they are. You
know they're going to do it again, and yet you
continue to go back to these people and allow them
them that opportunity. And once you've allowed them the opportunity
once or twice, it becomes acceptable. I know, I'm I'm

(12:09):
allowed now and they but they also control your mind
through all of that abuse. They these cities, these once
great cities, these bastions of industry, now they they've got
vacant lots, abandoned buildings, crime drugs, open air drug dealing.

(12:34):
And they were created by Democrats. That's who's been running
all of it. The educational systems are broken, and you
can argue that that the destruction was an unintended consequence
of the policies. But once once all of this started
to happen, they've never reversed course and went, hey, we've
got to we've got to change policies. We've got to

(12:54):
figure out a new way, because this didn't work. Everything
that we thought was going to happen with this kumbaiyat
not in forcing the laws, allowing people to take drugs,
all of those things went to hell, and now we've
got a problem. They don't do that. They just continued
to double down on the policies that have created the
problems and continued to be voted. In California, had a

(13:17):
bill or they California Democrats just tried to block a
bill or they did block a bill that would make
it a felony to buy that's right. By a child
sixteen or seventeen for sex, it's already a felony in
the state, right, So it's already felay in the state

(13:38):
to sell a child up to the age of seventeen
for sex. I don't know why it's not a felony
to sell any human being for sex, but it's a
felony to sell a child up to seventeen for sex.
But to buy a child was only guaranteed a felony
up to the age of fifteen, So it when it
came to somebody that was seeing sixteen or seventeen, it

(14:00):
could be a felony or it could be a misdemeanor.
They actually blocked a bill. There were headlines that There
were headlines in a number of publications out in California.
One of them was California Democrats reject push for harsher
penalties for soliciting sex from older teams. That was one
of the headlines. Another headline was California Democrats block another

(14:22):
attempt to ramp up penalties for sex solicitors of sixteen
to seventeen year olds. Didn't stop them, They just continued
right on down the path, thinking that it was okay
to sell a sixteen or a seventeen year old for
sex and not be a felony charge, and people continue
to vote for these people. How is that possible that

(14:44):
you can continue to vote for somebody that continues to
do the same thing with complete and total disregard for
what the failures are creating, and they don't have to
worry about it because they don't live in those parts
of the city. So New York, I'm gonna take that
one as another example. So New York just had I

(15:06):
had no idea they did it this way. If I
did and I lived in New York, I'd be just
like all the other people in New York that left
that said I'm not doing this anymore. You know, we
fought a revolution against taxation without representation, we went to
war over it. And in New York they just passed

(15:27):
a two I think it was a two hundred and
thirty two billion dollar budget for the state of New
York with three people in a room, Governor Kathy Hokeel.
They had I guess they had Democrat and they had Republican.
I'm guessing, but I know there were three people that
were in there that negotiated a two hundred and thirty

(15:47):
billion dollar budget, and Kathy Hokeel came out and said
that she insists she's not going to negotiate in public.
That's the way it's supposed to be. This is not
your money. This is taxpayer money that you are a
student of, not your money. You shouldn't get to be
the sole arbiter of what's going to be spent and
how it's going to be spent. With you and two

(16:08):
other people. Why do you have two hundred and thirteen
legislatures legislators if you're not going to give them the
power to start with the negotiations and at least have
some input that represents their particular districts or whatever it
is in New York that they vote with. I've got
a representative. I voted for that representative. That representative represents

(16:29):
me and the constituents that are in this area.

Speaker 2 (16:31):
And he doesn't get.

Speaker 3 (16:32):
A say so and how my tax paid, my tax
dollars are going to be spent, And nobody else does either,
Just you three guess who else does that backroom negotiating
like that? Those backroom budget deals California, they do the
exact same thing. They they locked the people out of

(16:53):
the budget process. So New York, by the way, is
one of the worst governed states in the nation. New
York workers pay the most in taxes, according to the
Tax Foundation, but they're rated fiftieth dead last in economic
outlook in a Rich State's Poor States survey. But I'm
going to tell you how stupid these people are. There

(17:16):
was a guy, I think budget Okay Hockel, Kathy Hochele's
budget director, Blake Washington, And I'm going to give you
his quote about the budget. Here's what the guy who
is the budget director said, quote. We want to deal
with facts as they are today, not what we could

(17:36):
or could not be two months from now. So let
me get this right. You don't want to plan for
the federal government to cut off any of your funding.
You don't want to plan when you're not going to
get as much money in because your tax receipts aren't
going to be as high because a lot of high
income earners have left the state of New York and
are now in the state of Florida. You don't want

(17:58):
to plan for that. You want to plan for how
much you have right this second. That sounds like a
terrible way to run not only a business or a household,
but a government. You have to deal with things in
the future the way they're going to be, not what's
sitting in front of you right this second. That's no
way in God's green earth to create a budget for anything.

(18:22):
If I don't predict how many cars I'm going to
sell and at least have some idea of what that's
going to look like, the revenues are going to look like,
How in the world do I create a budget for
advertising or payroll or anything else. I can't. I have
to know what I'm dealing with and what I think
it's going to be three months from now, for five
months from now, in order to not be behind. But
they just do it willing nilly and don't care, and

(18:43):
people continue to vote for these people over and over
and over again. It is brainwashing we have. I told
you about Cloward Piven last week. That's exactly what happens.
They've overwhelmed the system so much that people they give
up and they just they feel like it doesn't matter anymore,
and that is when the power switches. We can't let

(19:05):
them have that. We've got to continue to care, We've
got to continue to fight all right. I'm just getting
wound up now. I got a bunch of other stuff
to talk about coming up after the break. This is
Bonos Cars, brought to you by Chevrolet Buick GMC of Murphysboro.

Speaker 1 (19:35):
With over thirty years in the auto industry, he is
deciding to pull back the curtain and show you what's
really inside. This is Baenos Cars, brought to you by
Chevrolet Buick GMC of Murphreysborough. For all of your automotive needs,
call six one five six four five one zero seven
five or online Chevrolet Buick GMC of Murphreysboro dot com.

Speaker 2 (19:56):
Here's your host, bow Driven.

Speaker 3 (19:59):
All right, Welcome back everybody, so very quickly. There's so
much to talk about. I just I can't quite get
it all in. And there's so many things that you
look at and you go, oh my god, how can
that possibly be? At least I do. But one of
the good notes is apparently the sky is falling down.

(20:23):
Chicken Littles, the Pannikins, as President Trump likes to call them,
we're all wrong because it looks like China's economy is
having some serious issues right now. And I guarantee you
whatever they're saying in public is not what's happening in
the back channels, because they are. They've got some serious problems.
Workers that are rioting, and factories are collapsing, and it's

(20:44):
all happening in real time really fast, and so stay
tuned for that because I'm not sure how it's going
to shake out. But the tariffs are having their desired impact,
which is will show you what the consumer end of
this process and situation looks like, because you can produce

(21:06):
all you want, but if we're not willing to buy it,
shut those factories down pretty quickly. So I don't know
if you guys caught this. The other day, the Associated
Press and CNN both were completely deranged in two separate

(21:30):
shot stop or shows, two steparate interviews where they were
they literally took so the border crossings we know have
come to a complete halt. There are some reports that
is ninety nine point nine percent, some reports ninety five percent. Whatever,
it's a lot, and they have stopped the illegal flow

(21:50):
of people coming across our border, which is the way
it should have been. All while Biden kept saying, you
got you gotta pass legislation. I've done everything i can
the border secure. Knowing that ten to two million people
came into our border. Cloud Piven. They have tried to
overwhelm the system, and they did a pretty good job.
But now CNN and the AP, they actually are trying

(22:10):
to paint that the fact that that's that the ill
illegal migration of people stopped has now somehow affected the
cartels and their business, and it's affected some people down
of Panama who dealt in all of the made their
money off of trafficking people up to the United States.
So CNN had an interview that they conducted with a

(22:31):
Mexican cartel member to discuss the adverse effects of Trump's
border policy and how what it's having on their operations.
They literally are putting that on American television, and there
was a reporter names Isabelle Young literally asked for impressions
from the criminal on how they've been described by the president.
So here was her quote, The cartels have been labeled

(22:53):
a foreign terrorist organization. What do you make of that?
That that's like saying the President called you a bad name?
How do you feel to a cartel member that's trying
to destroy our country? Then the AP came back out
and they had a sympathetic look at how some Central
American towns now that have been adversely impacted by the

(23:18):
drop in illegal migrant traffic. So they went down there
and interviewed a few people that said they used to
make their money off of they grew their own crops
and that kind of stuff, but then they started making
money off of taking people through the I think it's
the Darien Gap whatever. It was, some gap that was
down there that they had to go through in the

(23:38):
forest or the jungle, and they can't make their money
anymore because we've shut down illegal migration. When you start
sympathizing with people for not being able to traffic human beings,
you flip the script. You have lost your marbles. You're
out of your mind. I don't care what it does.

(24:00):
The cartels. We should be bombing the cartels now. We
should have destroyed them twenty years ago, before they got
this strong, and before the Mexican government became afraid of
the cartels running their country. So I didn't come up
with this, but I thought it was very interesting. So

(24:22):
Elon Musk, I'm switching gears here. Elon Musk has been
one of those people talking about the birth Dearth that,
as one guy described it, back in nineteen eighty seven
and how population. We're not going to have an overpopulation problem,
we have a severe We're going to have a severe
underpopulation problem within a generation or two. And so this

(24:48):
this gentleman that was writing about it talked about panda
bears and he said he likened it to panda bears.
He said, you know, panda bears are very frustrating creatures.
They're cute, they're cuddly, they're adorable. They look like living
t eddy bears that every kid in the world wants
to have, but they refuse to breed. Scientists have tried,
and I'm going to read part of the article real quick.

(25:09):
Scientists have tried everything short of sticking a couple of
pandas in a hot tub after stuffing them full of
oysters and putting berry white on the panda on the
Panda's Loving Panda Spotify channel. But it's still easier to
find a blind guy paying extra for the IMAX screen
than a baby panda. So we've kind of encroached on
their habitat, which causes them to not want to breed.

(25:36):
So he likened it to that. But now we've got
a problem in the world with not making enough babies,
and it comes down to societal issues. So Japan, they
if Japan doesn't start making babies, the population will shrink
by almost two thirds over the next seventy five years,
and there won't be enough young people to pay to

(25:57):
care for the old people. Two thirds seventy five years,
two thirds I'm sixty years old in my lifetime, just
about it would. It would cause the entire Japanese population
to shrink by two thirds. Russia, it's even worse off, right,
So life under Soviet rule was toxic. It was politically toxic,

(26:18):
it was culturally toxic, it was environmentally toxic. And Russian
women sixty years ago quit making enough babies to keep
the population going. And Russia also achieved the distinction of
becoming the first industrialized nation that had a declining life
expectancy because they weren't having enough babies. So goes on

(26:43):
to talk about the figures for shocking for anyone who
hasn't been following the birth thirth has been. Wattenberg named
it in his book in nineteen eighty seven. Back in
nineteen eighty seven, when he published this book, the total
fertility rate in the United States was two point two
women or two point two babies per woman, which is
just above the two point one babies per woman that
it takes to sustain a population. Takes two point one

(27:08):
babies per woman to sustain the population. Anything over that
the population is growing. Anything under that the population is shrinking.
That was in nineteen eighty seven. Today it's one point
sixty three, one point sixty three babies per merit per
woman in the United States, and that if you don't
have at one point sixty three, the predictions are that

(27:30):
the population of the workforce is going to shrink by
twenty percent in the next thirty years, and the population
of retirees, by the way, regardless of whether we have
any more babies or not, the population of retirees in
the next thirty years is going to increase by fifty percent.
So if we have twenty percent reduced workforce and a
fifty percent higher retiree rate, there's an imbalance there that's

(27:51):
coming and it's going to hit us faster than you
can imagine if we don't fix this. So it goes
on to talk about that there's not a country on
earth that's figured it out yet they have they nobody's
figured out how to turn it around and have babies.
But we've got to figure something out because South Korea,

(28:13):
South Korea's birth rate right now, the total fertility rate
in South Korea's point seven two. They're predicting that in
the next thirty to forty years, the entire South Korean
population will have dissipated by almost fifty percent. They're at
point seventy two. They're not replacing young people at a
fast enough rate to take care of all the old
people that are aging out. We've got and by the way,

(28:38):
they've done everything they can. They're doing everything they can
to try to reverse it. They've got a policy out
there that in the second largest city of Busan in
South Korea, that offers singles who match at its events
around thirty hundred and forty dollars to spend on a date.
Those who get married receive roughly fourteen thousand dollars up
front and then are feedted with housing subsidies and more

(28:59):
cash cover pregnancy related expenses and international travel. So if
you if you meet at one of these singles places
where they're trying to get people to date, they give
you three hundred and forty dollars to go out on dates.
That sounds like a lot of money go out on
a date, but then if you actually end up getting married,
you get fourteen thousand dollars plus other subsidies for housing,
international travel, raising your children. You know how many people

(29:22):
they've had to take them up on the offer. Zero
Not one couple has gotten married from it yet, not one.
So I don't know why. I can tell you some
of the reasons why our birth rates declined. One we
easy access to abortion, easy acces to us to abortion pills.

(29:42):
But also culturally, we've decided that the nuclear family was bad.
We've been being told this by once again. Forty five
stated goals of communism. One of them was to destroy
the nuclear family. And if you keep talking about it
all the time, you keep beating feeding young women tiktoks
that tell you tell them how bad it is to

(30:03):
have children, and they shouldn't have children, they shouldn't have children.
At some point, a lot of them believe that, and
they get away from the real connection in humans that
we need in order to sustain our population. It's a
problem that if we don't get a hold of very quickly,

(30:26):
we don't have any choice but to have immigration. We've
got to fix our broken immigration system, or there's not
going to be a country here. In one hundred hundred
and fifty years. We have figured out a way to
have complete and total destruction of the population of the earth.
You're climate change isn't going to get it. Global warming
isn't going to get us. We got us. We've destroyed

(30:49):
our entire population of the world simply. The guy continuing
to tell everybody that the nuclear family is somehow bad.
I don't know how you fix it. I've got three children.
My two daughters both have two kids, and I hope
they have some more. My son, he hasn't figured it out.
He's in that one that has to chase those young
girls that are skewing to the left. So I don't

(31:12):
know where we go. We gotta fix it, all right.
This is Boonos Cars, brought to you by Chevrolet Buick
GMC of Murphysborough. We're on exit seventy six on Interstate
twenty four with a big car tower.

Speaker 4 (31:24):
Come see us.

Speaker 1 (31:45):
With over thirty years in the auto industry, he is
deciding to pull back the curtain and show you what's
really inside. This is Boueno's Cars, brought to you by
Chevrolet Buick GMC of Murphreysborough.

Speaker 2 (31:56):
For all of your automotive.

Speaker 1 (31:57):
Needs call six one five or five one zero seventy
five or online Chevrolet Buick GMC of Murcurysboro dot com.

Speaker 2 (32:06):
Here's your host boat driven.

Speaker 3 (32:10):
All right, Welcome back, everybody. So one of the differences
in the old administration, and there are lots and lots
of differences, one of the differences that between the old
administration and the new administration is the transparency when it
comes to cabinet meetings. I don't know if you guys
caught it, but recently Trump had a cabinet meeting and

(32:31):
all of the cabinet secretaries were there and he had
them go around. He led the meeting, but he went around, Hey,
what's been going on for the last hundred days. So
two things emerged from that particular meeting. I watched part
of it and listened to another part while I was
in my truck. But Marco Rubio, who is a Secretary

(32:51):
of State and doing an incredible job getting a bunch
of he's already had forty Americans that have been wrongfully
detained in their countries released. All of these people, by
the way, have been been detained by these other countries
during the entire or at least a large portion of
the Biden administration. How many of them did you hear about,

(33:12):
because I didn't hear about any of them. But somehow,
in just one hundred days, he's gotten forty of them
released and sent back to the United States of America
to be reunited with their families. That's just one of
the things. But during this cabinet meeting, he said some
things that were pretty shocking. One of which was he said,
and I'm quoting him here, it wasn't widely reported, or

(33:33):
maybe it was, we had an office in the Department
of State whose job it was to censor Americans. But
then he went on and talked about something else. He said,
not only was the Biden administration keeping files on US citizens,
but one of the people was sitting there at the table,
a member of the actual cabinet. The Biden administration had
started files Dozzier's, which brings back memories of j Edgar Hoover,

(33:59):
who kept Dozzier's on all of the people in the
government and wanted to know that he had dirt on
all of them just in case. So he had the
FBI spying on people in government, but apparently the Biden
administration was doing the exact same thing. So it goes
on and says but just think about it. The State
Department or the Department of State of the United States
had set up an office to monitor the social media

(34:20):
posts and commentary of American citizens to identify them as
vectors of disinformation when we know that the best way
to combat disinformation is freedom of speech and transparency. They
literally they had dozens of files that were kept by
Joe Biden's State Department that classified American citizens as vectors

(34:42):
of disinformation with the intention of censoring them. All that
is absolutely these are the same people that allowed criminals
and terrorists to come across our border free, just walk
across the border. They're here now we're trying to figure

(35:02):
out a way to get rid of them, but they're
here in our country. So you let terrorists come across
the border, but you're keeping files on American citizens for
their posts online. And if you don't think that leads
to seriously bad stuff, go read about all of the
cases in the UK where people have been put in
jail for online posts. In jail for posting something on

(35:28):
social media not posting I'm going to kill the president. No, no,
just something that might offend somebody. It's absolutely insane. But
the problem with it is this isn't an isolated case
that administration and I have a feeling that it was
the same thing with the Barack Obama administration weaponized the

(35:52):
DOJ against Americans. There was another story that came out
that should just absolutely drive you nuts. It's about the Mauds.
So it's a family that Charles and Heather Maud are
in their thirty years are in their thirties. Back when
he was seventeen years old, he bought this farm from

(36:15):
his grandfather and this farm has been in the family
since nineteen o seven, right, so they're hog farmers and
cattle ranchers, and goes on talks about Charles. Charles himself,
the grandson that bought it, has been a part of
the business throughout his entire life. He even received his

(36:36):
own cow as a gift before he was born. He
purchased the ranch from his grandfather in two thousand and
two and two thousand and three, so they had all
come over here in nineteen oh seven. Maud hog and
cattle began in nineteen oh seven when Thomas Maud purchased
the land on the Chyenne River in eastern Custer County.
This is all on their website. By the way, his
two sisters at homesteaded a few miles south and were

(36:58):
and are likely who suggested he by the land in
the area. He was an absentee landowner, and then somebody
else in his family came in Bill. I think his
son Bill arrived in the area in nineteen seventeen at
homestead at another one hundred and sixty acres within a
mile of his land. They raised their kids and continued
to farm the land on and on and on. All right,
so they have this land that they've been farming since

(37:20):
nineteen oh seven, seventy five years ago. They put up
somebody put up a fence, and according to a twenty
twenty four letter in June from South Dakota Senator Mike
Rounds to the then US Department of Agricultures, Thomas or
Agricultural Secretary Thomas Filsak, Special Agent Travis Lunders, and US

(37:44):
Forest Service Patrol Captain Jeff Summers told the Mauds they
received a complaint from a hunter that no trespassing no
trespassing sign was posted on a fence not built upon
the correct boundary. The mods removed the sign from the
fence and then and the families owned the property adjacent
to the US four Service. So there's this buffalo gap.

(38:05):
National Grasslands is managed by the US Forest Service and
this family has owned the land next to that since
nineteen ten. Okay, so the fence that was in question,
that was assumed to be in question anyways, was accepted.
So I'm trying to make sure you guys understand this.

(38:26):
The USDA had annually, through certification of acres by the
USDA Farm Service Agency, every year, the USDA had accepted
as the property boundary that fence. Every year since nineteen sixty,
for sixty four years, the USDA has accepted that fence
as the property boundary. So they met with on May first,

(38:49):
with this lenders and a Julie Wheeler, who's a district ranger.
The conclusion they reached was that that day was a
land survey would be the first step, and that it
would take up to a year, according to Wheeler. The
mods scheduled a meeting at the allotment so Wheeler could
see the fence and move toward a resolution. Five days
later without informing the mods. Lunders, the first guy, arrived

(39:10):
with the survey crew to complete the survey on the
mod's private property and public property. So they told him
we're gonna do a survey. It's going to take up
to a year. Five days later, unannounced, without saying anything
to the mods or anybody else, they show up with
the survey crew. Neither the survey nor the original complaint
so far that was made by the hunter has been

(39:31):
made available to the press or to the mod, so
nobody's got the survey or the original complaint that's supposedly
one hunter made so he arrived. By the way, it
gets worse. Lunders arrived unannounced at the mod's home on
June twenty fourth, twenty twenty four. So this all started.

(39:52):
They got a letter in March twenty ninth. It's all started.
By June of twenty twenty four, Slunder's guy shows up,
armed and in tacticled gear to serve the couple with
separate federal indictments. The indictments were for the alleged theft
of government property stemming from the placement of a fence
built seventy five years before they each faced The husband

(40:18):
and wife each face ten years in prison and two
hundred and fifty thousand dollars in fines over the fifty
acres in question, and they were told not to speak
to anyone about it, including the media, or they would
be the penalties would be more severe. Now, think about that.
There's a fence that was put up seventy five years ago.

(40:39):
For the last sixty four years, the USDA has certified
that they accepted that as the boundary. Some guy makes
an anonymous complaint from a hunter, they go remove the sign.
Then they show up and do a survey. Don't allow
the madge to have any way to fight whether the
survey's right or not. Just say that it does and
the survey needs to be moved. And so all of

(41:01):
a sudden, you're going to arrest these people and find
them almost half a million dollars in jail for ten
years for stealing public land that they had no intention
of stealing. All while we want to let criminals actually
run the country. You talk about the weaponization of the DOJ,
You talk about going after the same DOJ that showed

(41:25):
up with armed tactical gears or armed tactical gear agents
to arrest a man who allegedly had pushed somebody to
the ground on a sidewalk in front of an abortion clinic.
These are the same people that arrested people for praying
silently in front of abortion clinics. The more we learn

(41:45):
about what happened over the last four years, the more
you should be frightened. You should be scared to death
about what they were doing, what they're trying to do.
Democrats are spending all of their time defending criminals because
they think that hardworking US Americans and parents are the
true criminals. Let's don't forget. They also said that the
real terrorists were parents at PTA meetings or school board meetings.

(42:13):
They classified they were watching over parents at school board
meetings because they wanted to silence them. They were going
after a family who had some offense put up seventy
five years ago, and you're trying to break them for what.
What is your end goal here other than just gestapo

(42:34):
like control. They think the US citizens that are hardworking
with the real criminals, and they see us as their enemies.
If you're in the country illegally and have a shady
pass that includes you know, gang affiliation. Multiple accounts of
domestic violence Ki kil Obrego Garcia or whatever his name is. So,

(42:57):
if you're in the country shady Pass gang affiliate domestic violence,
or you're here on a visa pretending to be a
student who's really just spreading anti Semitism or trashing campuses
or threatening Jewish students, they'll fight to the death for you.
They will absolutely fight to the death for you. But
if you're a hard working business owner or just someone

(43:17):
who has an opinion on social media, they'll fight you
to the death and make you the bad guy. Keep
that in mind every time you vote. Keep that in mind.
Keep that in mind when you think about what we
avoided just about one hundred and something days ago when
they almost elected Kamala Harris again. They've done everything they

(43:39):
can to overwhelm the system. They've done everything they can
to destroy our way of life, the things that we
have built, our ancestors built and fought for for centuries. Now.
That is still the greatest country on earth, and they
are doing everything they can to destroy it for their
own power. It makes me sick to my stomach. It

(44:05):
should make you sick to your stomach. I mean, what
they did to those people. They can come after anybody.
By the way, the Trump administration dropped the charges and
put it back, but they said that there are many
many more cases just like this that they're under review
right now trying to get to Thank god that we
avoided the train wreck that could have been the next administration.

(44:28):
It's a problem. So anyways, that's the end of the show.
This is Bonos Cars brought you by Chevrolet Buick GMC
of Murphysborough. Thanks for tuning in.
Advertise With Us

Popular Podcasts

Crime Junkie

Crime Junkie

Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.

24/7 News: The Latest

24/7 News: The Latest

The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.

Stuff You Should Know

Stuff You Should Know

If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.

Music, radio and podcasts, all free. Listen online or download the iHeart App.

Connect

© 2025 iHeartMedia, Inc.