Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:13):
With over thirty years in the auto industry, he is
deciding to pull back the curtain and show you what's
really inside. This is Bowen's Cars, brought to you by
Chevrolet Buick GMC of Murphreysborough. For all of your automotive
needs call six one five six four five one zero
seven five or online Chevrolet Buick GMC of Murphreysboro dot com.
Speaker 2 (00:34):
Here's your host, bow Triven.
Speaker 3 (00:38):
All right, good morning everybody. I hope everybody's having a
wonderful day.
Speaker 4 (00:44):
Wonderful. Uh.
Speaker 3 (00:46):
One of the last few weekends of summer, school started back.
Speaker 4 (00:49):
Man.
Speaker 3 (00:49):
I don't know about you guys, but ruther Ford Counting
started school back on a Friday, and like the first
day of schools a Friday, I thought, Man, I.
Speaker 4 (00:57):
Was in his class. If I was in school, I
don't know if i'd be up. You're sad.
Speaker 3 (01:00):
I'd be mad that I had a whole week and
then I had to go to school on a Friday,
but then I had two more days off.
Speaker 4 (01:04):
But I'd also be happy that I.
Speaker 3 (01:07):
Only had to go for one day and then had
two more days off. I don't know which way I feel,
but it was odd, but I hope everybody had a
great summer. Is I'm going to move into fall here
soon and things could be going good, and I'm going
to give you you know.
Speaker 4 (01:22):
I was reading two stories.
Speaker 3 (01:23):
The other day about the difference in the previous two administrations,
and while one of them is about New York in general,
it's the same thing. New York's Democratic Party runs the
state of New York just like the Biden administration, and
all the leftists ran.
Speaker 4 (01:40):
The country and with incredible.
Speaker 3 (01:47):
Government overreached, incredible stupidity and ignorant as to.
Speaker 4 (01:52):
What the policies were going to do.
Speaker 3 (01:54):
Either they were intentionally doing it to screw everything up,
or they were just stupid.
Speaker 4 (01:59):
I don't which one it was, but one of them was.
Speaker 3 (02:01):
I don't know if you guys remember the story about
Peanut the squirrel and Fred the raccoon. But Peanut the
squirrel and Fred the raccoon were with this couple in
New York. They had an animal sanctuary where they kept
animals that they had rescued, and Peanut had gotten some
notoriety on the internet for doing tricks and that kind
of stuff, And for whatever reason, the state of New
(02:23):
York decided that this Peanut and Fred the raccoon had
to go, and so they raided the animal sanctuary and
they took Peanut and they took Fred the raccoon from
their owners and nobody knows why. But then they claimed
that that Peanut bit one of the officers and so
(02:44):
that they had to put the animals down, kill the animals,
and behead them in an effort to make sure that
they didn't have rabies. Turns out they didn't have rabies.
Also turns out they were lying their butts off. That's
not what happened. So Tom fitting from Judicial Watch has
been staying on the story and the people are now
(03:05):
suing the state of New York for ten million dollars.
And this is one of those times where I hope
they get it and treble the damages. They deserve everything
they get because it turns out that there was one
hundred and sixty three page report that nobody wanted to release,
but Tom Fitten from Judicial Watch filed a Foyer request
of Freedom of Information Act request and finally got the information,
(03:26):
and it turns out it wasn't due to.
Speaker 4 (03:28):
Fear of rabies. Here's what the report read.
Speaker 3 (03:33):
And by the way, despite the unnecessary depth of the animals.
Nobody from the state has apologized to these people or
tried to make amends in any way. But the report
said the killing of Pea, Nut and Fred was not
due to fear of rabies, but a senseless act of
violence and obscene demonstration of government abuse. That's a charge
from the new court documents, which lists the State, the DC,
and Department of Homeland Security.
Speaker 4 (03:54):
I think is defendants. It's doh whatever that is.
Speaker 3 (03:57):
The allegations echoed those outlined in a separate lawsuit by
long Ago and Bitner, who were the two people that
owned the animals. It goes on to say, in this
one hundred and sixty three page report, the documents show
an abuse of power where twelve officers were sent in
on a raid to seize Peanut and Fred, who the
bureaucrats had decided beforehand would be killed. The documents showed
(04:21):
the killing of Peanut the squirrel and Frea the raccoon
was the result of pure government abuse and insanity. So,
for no reason whatsoever, the government just decided they needed
to take this animal and these two animals from these people,
and they had already predetermined they were going to have
them put down for no reason, and then they made
up a lie and said one of the animals bit
one of the officers, and so they had no choice
(04:42):
but to put it down. That is no different than
jailing the person because they were praying outside of an
abortion clinic, but choosing to not look the or not
to try to find the people who were bombing the
pro life clinics, right, we didn't try to find any
of those. None of those cases got solved, but several
(05:03):
people who were praying in front of an abortion clinic
were put in jail. That's the old administration. So here's
one from the new administration that very few people heard of.
So I'm a big I really love the Little League
World Series.
Speaker 4 (05:17):
I don't know why. I've always loved it. I think
it's cool.
Speaker 3 (05:19):
I think it's the innocence of the game and the
kids that are playing. But the Venezuelan Little League team
had made it through all of the tournaments in South
America to represent part of South America in.
Speaker 4 (05:33):
The Little League World Series.
Speaker 3 (05:35):
Unfortunately, right now, visas from Venezuela are not approved. People
cannot travel to the United States from Venezuela basically because
of trendy Aragua and all.
Speaker 4 (05:48):
Of the other.
Speaker 3 (05:50):
Issues we're having with people moving here from Venezuela, and
so they basically the State Department under Rubio has just
basically shut it down. These kids were not going to
be able to play the World Series Little League World
Series due.
Speaker 4 (06:02):
To some political stuff that they had nothing to do with.
Speaker 3 (06:04):
These are eleven and twelve year olds that just wanted
to go play ball, and very quietly, with no fanfare,
no photo ops, no press releases, no nothing to pat
themselves on the back, Marco Rubio approved all of their
visas so they could come play in the Little League
World Series and do everything they can to make their
(06:26):
dreams come true. That's the contrast between the two parties,
the way people think, the way people operate. Marco Rubio
is a man of God and is not afraid to
flash his faith out there and tell you about it.
And because he wanted to just do the right thing,
(06:48):
and he wasn't doing it for any type of political capital,
he wasn't doing it for any reason other than.
Speaker 4 (06:55):
It was just the right thing to do, and.
Speaker 3 (06:59):
So very quietly approves all of their visas and those
kids get a chance to go do something that they
will never probably well certainly. Most certainly they'll never get
another chance because they'll age out and won't be able
to go play in the Little League World Series again.
I don't know about you, but those two stories absolutely
(07:23):
tell the entire truth about the parties in my brain
and what they're both trying to accomplish. And I think
that it is sad what's being done to our country.
And I'm going to talk about Trump federalizing the DC
Police here on the next segment, but it is absolutely
amazing the difference in six months, and that the Dems
(07:43):
are still out there screaming and yelling about trying to
stop crime. Why are you on the side of the
criminals all the time? It makes no sense to me.
All right, This is Bonos Cars, rants about lots and
lots of other stuff and got more to rant about
later on. Brought you by Chevrolet. You at GMC of Murphysboro,
come on back.
Speaker 4 (08:02):
After the break.
Speaker 1 (08:18):
With over thirty years in the auto industry, he has
deciding to pull back the curtain and show you what's
really inside. This is Bowen's Cars, brought to you by
Chevrolet Buick GMC of Murphreysborough for all of your automotive needs.
Call six one five six four five one zero seven
five or online Chevrolet Buick GMC of Murphreysboro dot com.
Speaker 2 (08:39):
Here's your host, Bow Triven.
Speaker 3 (08:43):
All right, welcome back, everybody. I UH sincerely appreciate your
tuning in, sincerely appreciate you listening during the weeks, and
UH hope that I at least bring some perspective to
some of the things that are going on. So this week,
if you haven't heard about it, if you haven't read
(09:04):
about it, if you don't pay attention to it, Trump
decided to finally federalize the DC Police Department, the Metropolitan
Police Department, because crime is out of control in the
nation's capital. And it is, and it's mostly out of
control because of policies that the Democratic Commission has put
in place. And everybody on the left is up in
(09:26):
arms about it and saying that it's authoritarianism.
Speaker 4 (09:29):
It's just by the way the Constitution gives the.
Speaker 3 (09:33):
Congress and the President power over the district of Columbia.
Speaker 4 (09:37):
Right.
Speaker 3 (09:38):
It wasn't until I think the nineteen sixties or seventies
that somebody decided that to let it be run by
other politicians. But I just don't understand why you're upset
about him trying to do everything he can to stop crime.
And the crime is there because they've got a bunch
of young thugs that are out there committing crimes because
(09:58):
they know they can't be prosecut The laws need to
be changed. But let me give you And by the way,
I don't know who thinks that putting people in jail
for committing crimes is a bad idea. I heard some
moron from the attorney general or the district attorney or
(10:20):
the attorney general or something for Washington, DC district last
year made a comment and said, we cannot put people.
We cannot fix the crime problem by putting people in prison.
And I'm like, I think it pretty much fixes a
lot of the crime problem. As a matter of fact,
I want to give you a perspective that I found
(10:40):
the other day that I thought you got to be
kidding me when somebody had tweeted it out and I
went and looked it up, and it's true. So in
nineteen ninety eight, the New York Times printed a headline
that said prison population growing, although crime rate drops. That
was August ninth of nineteen ninety eight. Here was the
firstning sentence of the article. The nation's prison population grew
(11:05):
by five point two percent in nineteen ninety seven, according
to the Justice Department, even though crime has been declining
for six straight years.
Speaker 4 (11:13):
Well, don't you think that if.
Speaker 3 (11:15):
We're continuing to round up the people who are committing
crimes and not letting them back out on the streets
and the jails are starting to fill up with people
who are actual criminals.
Speaker 4 (11:23):
That crime will go down. Can you not see the
cause and effect?
Speaker 3 (11:27):
How does that make any sense that you're printing that
headline like there's something wrong with it. Criminals committed crimes,
they get put in jail. The criminals aren't on the
streets anymore to commit more crimes. By the way, the
recidivism rate of criminals is something like ninety percent. And
(11:47):
when you get kids that are eight, sixteen, fifteen, fourteen, twelve,
sometimes younger, committing crimes and there's no retribution, there's no
consequences for their actions, and they know they can get
away with it. Guess what they're gonna do keep doing it.
You have to have consequences for your actions. If you
(12:07):
have no consequences for the actions, then people bad people
are going to continue to commit the same actions. It's
just normal behavior. They'll push the limit to see what
they can get away with. Absolutely makes no sense to me.
And speaking of making no sense, I don't know how
many of you guys know who James Carville is, but
(12:28):
James Carville was the guy that ran Bill Clinton's campaign
and did a great job. And he's the one that
coined the phrase it's the economy stupid, because it was
about the economy in nineteen ninety one when Clinton was.
Speaker 4 (12:43):
Trying to.
Speaker 3 (12:45):
He was running for president and he was trying to
beat Bush and unseat the current president, and we had
just come out of the war and the goal War,
and the economy was having problems. I remember I was
in the car business and you could fire a cannon
off in a dealership and not hit a customer. It
is absolutely one of the worst times we had. And
so Carville knew what he was doing. He's a dem strategist.
Speaker 4 (13:08):
But the other day, and he has typically been fairly
soundly mid right and left.
Speaker 3 (13:17):
He's definitely a Democrat, but he has some common sense
to him. But he's out there the other day and
he actually said that Democrats, here's a quote, they are
just going to have to unilaterally add Puerto Rico and
(13:40):
District of Columbia states.
Speaker 4 (13:41):
Carville said, they're going to have to do it.
Speaker 3 (13:43):
They're just going to have to do it, and they
may have to expand the Supreme Court to thirteen members. Now,
that was a Democratic strategist who's saying that when the
Democrats get back in power, they have to turn Puerto
Rico and the District of Columbia into states. By the way,
he's also supposedly pretty smart. The Constitution forbids them from
(14:04):
turning the District of Columbia into a state. They can't
do that according to the Constitution, and nobody knows for
sure that Puerto Rico wants to be a state, but
they are trying to do it just simply to make
sure that they have complete and total power and they
can't be voted out. Why would you have to pack
the Supreme Court, Oh, I know, because you want to
make sure you have enough left voices on the Supreme
Court to make sure things go your way.
Speaker 4 (14:25):
These are the same exact people continuing to say that
democracy is under attack. You're literally trying to put your
finger on the scale so hard that you can't undo
it in future. Generations simply because there's not enough. It
goes back to the gerrymandering thing if you've been following
(14:47):
it at all.
Speaker 3 (14:48):
The Texas Republicans have decided to redraw new districts for
their congressional map, and it supposedly is going to add
five Republican seats. The problem with some of that is,
according to all of the reports that I've read, that
these new districts are heavily Hispanic, which tells you if
(15:09):
they're heavily Hispanic and they're planning on it being Republican seats,
the Democratic block has lost or the Democratic Party has
lost a huge voting block. If the Hispanics in Texas
are starting to swing to the Republican side, that is
not a good side for the Democratic Party.
Speaker 4 (15:31):
But they go out and actually have problems. I listened
to JB.
Speaker 3 (15:34):
Pritzker the other day, who, by the way, is a billionaire.
He inherited it, but he's a billionaire, and somebody asked him,
how do you reconcile mam Donnie, the guy that's supposedly
this young up and comer in your Democratic Party saying
there shouldn't be billionaires with the fact that you're a billionaire.
He didn't answer the question. He stumbled around it. He
(15:54):
gave another word s out of like Kamala does. But
then they asked him how he can be up in
arms about the Texas maps being redrawn and saying that
they're jerrymandering When Illinois, Trump got forty percent of the
vote in Illinois forty percent. So if things were drawn
(16:17):
perfectly and the way that it should be represented, then
theoretically forty percent of the House of Representatives from the
state of Illinois should be Republican. Right, if Trump gets
forty percent, should be forty percent in there, there's three
out of seventeen.
Speaker 4 (16:32):
It's not even close.
Speaker 3 (16:34):
In Massachusetts, Trump got forty I think it was forty
two percent of the vote in Massachusetts. Massachusetts does not
have a single Republican congressperson in Congress and hasn't for
many years. And yet these are the same people out
there telling you that what Texas is doing is somehow
(16:55):
a threat to democracy. You guys have been jerrymandering your
blue states for so that you don't have any You
have no amo left. You can't do it anymore because
you gerrymandered every Republican out of your House or out
of the House of Representatives in your state. It is
absolutely amazing to me the continuation of saying democracy is
(17:19):
under threat because Trump federalizes the DC police long enough
to get crime under control, when they admit that putting
people in jail and having consequences for their actions is
what causes crime to go down, and yet they don't want.
Speaker 4 (17:35):
To do that. I also heard somebody the other day,
Oh it's Chris Murphy.
Speaker 3 (17:39):
He's a senator and he's a goofball say something along
the lines of this is just another distraction. There are
some of the highest crime rate cities are in red states.
Speaker 4 (17:52):
What he failed to say was.
Speaker 3 (17:54):
Because he's right, Memphis, Saint Louis, some of the other
there are some others. But those cities are run fully
and totally by Democrats and have been for years and
years and years. So yes, they're in red states. And
if you have a problem with Trump federalizing the DC police,
do you think the states should go into those cities.
(18:15):
Do you think the state of Tennessee should take over
the city of Memphis to try to get the crime
rate under control. Do you think the state of Missouri
or Kansas should do what they have to to get
the Saint Louis crime under control. They talk out of
both sides of their mouth more than anybody I've ever seen.
(18:38):
They absolutely just don't care. They will say whatever they
have to say to try to rile up their base
and to continue to maintain power. Like you're just gonna
have to to turn Puerto Rico and the District of
Columbia into states, and you're gonna have to pack the court.
Speaker 4 (18:53):
That is not democracy, fool, That's not how this works.
Speaker 3 (18:58):
All right, this is bos Cars brought you by Chevrolet
Buick GMC of Murphysboro.
Speaker 4 (19:03):
Come on back. After the break.
Speaker 1 (19:23):
With over thirty years in the auto industry, he has
deciding to pull back the curtain and show you what's
really inside. This is Boeno's Cars, brought to you by
Chevrolet Buick GMC of Murphreysborough. For all of your automotive
needs call six one five six four five one zero
seven five or online Chevrolet Buick GMC of Murphreysboro dot com.
Speaker 2 (19:44):
Here's your host, bow Driven.
Speaker 3 (19:48):
All right, Welcome back, everybody. So I've been thinking about
this for a while and I don't know the answer
to the question, and I hope maybe maybe I do
know the answer, and I don't want to accept it.
But the question in my brain is why is it
(20:11):
okay to mock Christianity as a religion but no other
religion can be mocked? And I don't necessarily understand why
that is. I think maybe it's the Bible tells us
that it's going to be that way, that you know,
they're gonna they're gonna mock you, They're going to.
Speaker 4 (20:37):
They're gonna mock you.
Speaker 3 (20:38):
And I was thinking about it the other day in
the context of why is it now that Australia, the UK,
I think France, and I think there was another country
out there stating that they're going to recognize Palestine as
(20:58):
a state at the next UN meeting, even though even
though the hostages that were taken on October seventh, two
years ago are starving, and that Hamas has no problems
putting videos out showing them starving, showing one of them
(21:20):
having to dig his own grave, showing them doing all.
Speaker 4 (21:24):
Of the atrocities.
Speaker 3 (21:25):
We all know, if you paid any attention two years
ago on October seventh, you saw the atrocities that had happened.
Why is it that they're willing to recognize them as
a state right now and take away all leverage and
negotiating power for the They've walked away from the table
every single solitary time Israel has said, we're trying to
(21:47):
get to a peace agreement here, We're trying to stop this,
but we cannot have Hamas launching rockets at us every day.
It just can't keep happening. And these other countries are
not willing to stand tall with Israel and say, look,
you're our ally, you will continue to be our ally,
and we cannot back down. Trump is the only one
(22:08):
passing this moral litmus test right now. He is the
only one out there staying consistently. Look, we're not negotiating
with terrorists. We're not going to continue to do this.
We're not going to let them get away with whatever
they want to get away with. And I think that
it's going to come back to bite a lot of
these countries in the butt. I think that they're going
to be proven to be on the wrong side of history.
(22:29):
Look what is happening in Gaza. First of all, you
can't always believe everything you hear out of Hamas, right,
So are there people that are hungry, Yes, But there
are also organizations in there. I saw the other day
where one of the organizations that Trump is helping is
skip bypassing the United Nations because a lot of the
(22:50):
United Nations food and aid is getting stolen.
Speaker 4 (22:53):
So one of the organizations has.
Speaker 3 (22:54):
Passed out over one hundred million meals to Gazans, the
Palestinians in Gaza, one hundred million, and he said, we
could do a lot more if they'd untie our hands
and let us just get this job done and quit
having to go through the UN.
Speaker 4 (23:11):
So while there is hunger.
Speaker 3 (23:12):
War creates a lot of atrocities. War creates problems for everybody.
But the reality is the war could be stopped tomorrow
if Amas would release the hostages and agree to put
down their arms. They won't absolutely astounding to me that
these people are willing two years later to continue to.
Speaker 4 (23:37):
Back up against Israel.
Speaker 3 (23:40):
I don't understand. So I read a bill the other
day in California that if they pass it in California.
I talk about California a lot because it is an example.
And look, California's huge, California's gorgeous. By the way, it
is one of the most beautiful places I've ever been.
From top to bottom. It has got great it's got
(24:01):
incredible forests, it's got incredible cities, it's got California is
a beautiful place being destroyed by leftist policies, and it
is going to continue to get worse. And if you
think it's bad, now, if they passed the bill I'm
about to tell you about you're going to have, you'd
(24:23):
be a mazed.
Speaker 4 (24:25):
So it's called HB four five.
Speaker 3 (24:29):
And there's a pastor who brought it to the attention
of people the other day. His name is Jack Hibbs,
and he is with the Calvary Chapel Chino Hills, and
he told his parisoners last week, I'm just gonna read
it to you. If this bill passes, I'm going to
ask you parents to leave the state of California. You're
going to have to pack up and you're gonna have.
Speaker 4 (24:49):
To get out. You gotta get out. You got to
run with your kids. You gotta go. So the bill
that the Democrats are trying to push through, and they're.
Speaker 3 (24:58):
Going all in on it, by the way, supposedly to
save the children who are in on the country illegally,
which is going but it's going to endanger every other
child that's here. Basically, any child here illegally or illegally
could be kidnapped or trafficked under the bill, they say,
let me see if I can make sure I get
this right. Um, so there's an NGO out there that's
(25:28):
trying to get the bill pushed through. They want to
allow NGOs or non governmental organizations, you know, the same
ones that lost the three hundred thousand kids under the
Biden administration that we're finding now have been trafficked all
over the place and they allowed them to be disappeared.
Speaker 4 (25:44):
They're going to allow people.
Speaker 3 (25:46):
Without parental permission or notification to pick these kids up
from schools. As long as they know the child's name
and the date of birth. All they would have to
do is fill out a one page caregiver author This
is the name of it, a Caregivers Authorization affidavit, in
which they attest that they are granting themselves permission to
(26:07):
take custody of a child of their choosing, provided they
have the child's name and.
Speaker 4 (26:11):
Date of birth.
Speaker 3 (26:13):
Schools at that time would have to take the arranger's
word for it because no identification, parental notification, or background
check is required to find out who they are.
Speaker 4 (26:24):
Or if they're a pervert or a pedophile or have
a record, a criminal record of pedophilia.
Speaker 3 (26:31):
They literally are trying to allow these people to sign
you are going to attest to yourself.
Speaker 4 (26:38):
I have to fill out.
Speaker 3 (26:39):
This caregivers Authorization form and say yes, I'm allowed to
take care of that kid, and they can pick your
child up from school without your notification.
Speaker 4 (26:47):
Or your knowledge and literally kidnap your child. And there
are people.
Speaker 3 (26:54):
In California in the state House that think that's a
good idea, that think that they should pass this bill.
Who in God's name is talking to these people. You
cannot be kidding me. If I found out that somebody
that somebody had allowed my children, my five year old
or six year old or seven year old, anybody, I
(27:15):
don't care, because once they get to a certain age,
they're gonna go no, I'm not going with you.
Speaker 4 (27:20):
But they have a five or six or seven year
old and somebody just.
Speaker 3 (27:23):
Comes in there and you turn them loose without my
knowledge or my notification or my consent.
Speaker 4 (27:30):
I can't promise you I won't go postal.
Speaker 3 (27:32):
I would lose my mind if somebody did that and
I found out you turned my kid loose.
Speaker 4 (27:36):
To somebody, you allowed them.
Speaker 3 (27:38):
To kidnap my child? Who thinks that's a good idea?
And who wrote the bill?
Speaker 4 (27:45):
And why it?
Speaker 3 (27:49):
When I read about that the other day, and I
read about that passion, and I thought, you gotta be
kidding me. People got to know people in California. The
problem is people don't pay attention to politics enough. People
don't pay attention.
Speaker 4 (27:59):
To what's actually happened.
Speaker 3 (28:00):
There's only like twenty percent of the people out there
that truly understand what's happening and are up to date
on what's going on in their state, in their local
governments or federally.
Speaker 4 (28:10):
And I get that people have lives, they don't have time.
Speaker 3 (28:13):
I happen to enjoy it and read about it, and
I feel like it affects my life quite a bit,
and so I pay attention to it.
Speaker 4 (28:19):
But look, my wife doesn't she if she doesn't come
through on her feed, she's not paying attention. She gets
it from me.
Speaker 3 (28:26):
But to allow something like that to go through as
a state law without people actually knowing about it is
sad to me that that's the kind of thing that
will destroy lives and I cannot. I used to say, look,
you voted for it, you deal with it. That's too far.
(28:47):
That's a bridge too far for me. I cannot You've
got to pay attention. You cannot just expect the lawmakers
to be smarter, better and.
Speaker 4 (28:58):
In it for you. You can't.
Speaker 3 (29:01):
There may be some of those lawmakers, I'm just gonna
say it, there may be some of those lawmakers trying
to get that House bill passed because they're parts of
the cartel.
Speaker 4 (29:07):
You don't know.
Speaker 3 (29:07):
You don't know where they're implanted from, or who's got
to them, or who's paying them off. You can't just
expect every politician to be lily white and doing the
right thing because it's the right thing to do, and
wanting to be a public servant. If you think that
there's not people out there from the cartels that are
trying to influence judges trying to influence politicians trying to
influence and a lot of money will make a lot
(29:28):
of things happen. And child trafficking and human trafficking is
one of.
Speaker 4 (29:33):
The most profitable endeavors that the cartels have and you're
literally going to legalize it.
Speaker 3 (29:44):
On another note, here's some common sense for you. One
of the things that Trump did in his first term
that I thought was one of the most the best
pieces of legislation we've ever passed was called the Right
to Try, and it basically gave people who were on
their last leg the ability to as long as it
had passed FDA Phase one studies and you had tried
(30:05):
everything else, and whatever disease you have wasn't being cured,
you were allowed to start trying these other medications. You
shouldn't have to go to other countries just to try
to stay healthy when we invented the drugs and with
their right here anyways, and so.
Speaker 4 (30:18):
Trump got it passed into law. Turns out it worked
that well.
Speaker 3 (30:22):
There was a lady the other day that was given
months to live after she had a brain fatal brain
cancer diagnosis, and she had a new miracle therapy that
came out that they without the Right to Try law,
the lady would have died.
Speaker 4 (30:35):
She's alive today five.
Speaker 3 (30:36):
Years later, four years later because she got the opportunity
to try an experimental drug here in the United States
based on that piece of legislation. That's good legislation.
Speaker 4 (30:46):
That helps people.
Speaker 3 (30:48):
HB four ninety five in California is bad legislation that's
going to get a lot of young people hurt and
a lot of families destroyed. All right, this is Bonos
Cars brought you by Chevrolet View GMC of Murphysboro. And uh,
I really hope you guys come see us.
Speaker 4 (31:04):
We could use the business. Come on back. After the break.
Speaker 1 (31:28):
With over thirty years in the auto industry, he is
deciding to pull back the curtain and show you what's
really inside. This is Bowen's Cars, brought to you by
Chevrolet Buick GMC of Murphreysborough. For all of your automotive
needs call six one five six four five one zero
seven five or online Chevrolet Buick GMC of Murphreysboro dot com.
Speaker 2 (31:49):
Here's your host, bow Triven.
Speaker 3 (31:53):
All right, welcome back everybody. So there was a recent
Pew pole that came out and it said that only
forty percent.
Speaker 4 (32:08):
This should scare you to death if you're older than this.
Speaker 3 (32:11):
But only forty percent of eighteen to twenty nine year
olds have a positive view of capitalism, while forty four
percent viewed socialism positively. And then in another poll, thirty
four percent one out of every three young people reported
a favorable view of communism. Okay, so with that, my
(32:34):
mother in law Janis and I were having a conversation
not too long ago, and she taught me something I
didn't know. But apparently in the world of psychology there
is this thing called outer locusts and inner locusts, and essentially,
outer locus is let me see if I can get
you the definition, that'll make it easier.
Speaker 4 (32:56):
Let's see here, Yeah, okay.
Speaker 3 (33:00):
Locus is an external locus of control or external locus
of control refers to the belief that outside forces like luck, fate,
or other people determine what happens in one's life, rather
than one's actions or choices. So inner locus, which is
what I feel like people on the right are, have
(33:21):
completely opposite. They feel like they're in control of their
own agency. They have their their agency over their own life.
They have their their actions and their what they do
determines a lot of what happens in their life. It's
not just luck or other people or whatever. But Dems,
especially young Dems, are eat up with outer locus.
Speaker 4 (33:42):
The problem is, though, that they blame it on capitalism.
Speaker 3 (33:45):
Right, So, if you're unhappy, you're lonely, you're unfulfilled, they
say that's capitalism. I've read an article the other day,
gen Z blames it on capitalism If you're unhappy. They
don't have to take any agency over their own lives, right.
They also don't want to admit that the creature comforts
that they all enjoy are products of capitalism. They want
(34:06):
to sit there on their phones and order food to
come straight to them while they don't get off the
couch and wonder how that happened, and then blame it
on capitalism.
Speaker 4 (34:16):
How do they think it's possible to sit.
Speaker 3 (34:18):
On your How do you think it's possible to sit
on your butt, play on your phone, order whatever you
want and have it delivered straight to your door without
ever having to do anything.
Speaker 4 (34:26):
Who invented all of those things, who developed the delivery systems?
Speaker 3 (34:32):
It was people who had a motive for profit and
were willing to risk everything to chase it.
Speaker 4 (34:36):
That's what capitalism is.
Speaker 3 (34:41):
Why do they not understand that no company bigger than
home Depot has been born in.
Speaker 4 (34:46):
Europe in the last forty years.
Speaker 3 (34:49):
It's because socialist regulations and policies that take away the
profit motive and with it.
Speaker 4 (34:56):
The willingness to risk everything to chase it.
Speaker 3 (35:00):
I defy any of them to actually name a company
that was started in any African nation, not because they
lack the intelligence, but because they don't have the motivation
to take any risk. The problem is by the way,
I think the problem was in parenting. Too many of
these spoiled Antifa morons had everything handed to them since
(35:22):
they were toddlers. They never had to experience any pain,
They never had to experience any issues. Mommy was always
there to cut the crust off their bread, make sure
they had a sippy cup, make sure that there was
no effort that they need to be put in. They
could dangle their legs at the end of the bench,
swinging it while eating some chicken McNuggets, and everybody else
is out there on the field playing and working their
(35:43):
butts off. But they get the same trophy as those
kids because it's wrong to make them feel bad because
they didn't get a trophy. They didn't get a trophy
because they didn't do the same put in the same
effort that the other people did.
Speaker 4 (35:53):
Why should they get a trophy?
Speaker 3 (35:59):
Whatever happened to earning a weekly allowance? Right when I
grew up, I got fifty cents a week. Now, look,
obviously crap was a lot cheaper back then. But I
got fifty cents a week, and if I wanted to
buy a loaf of bread, which was like twenty five
cents to go fishing with because we lived on the river,
then I had to pay for it out of my
own allowance.
Speaker 4 (36:17):
It wasn't just go in and grab bread. Nope, that
breads to eat.
Speaker 3 (36:21):
I also had to start working for a dollar a
day when I was like nine or ten years old.
It was child labor, but they look it was what
it was, whatever happened to that, whatever happened to not
getting everything you wanted constantly from your parents. And by
the way, they also think because their parents gave them everything,
(36:41):
that the government should continue to do that after they
after they grow up, and they shouldn't have to suffer
any of the consequences of their own actions or decisions.
Go to college, sign the note, say you want to
borrow the money, go study something stupid that's not going
to have any value in the open market. To be
able to make a living, and then expect everybody else,
(37:02):
the taxpayers that are out there busting their hump, to
pay off your loan. The government doesn't pay off anything
it doesn't take from somebody else. Morons. The money's not
just the governments. It was somebody else's before it was
the governments. They took it from those people out of
their paychecks in the form of taxes. And why should
those taxes be used to pay off something for you.
(37:24):
I didn't go to college for you.
Speaker 4 (37:25):
I went and got a job, just like millions of
hard working Americans. But why do you get it when
we don't.
Speaker 3 (37:36):
And so there's a growing resentment towards capitalism and then
younger generations, and it should worry all of us. And
I don't understand how people on the left don't see
the irony when they continually talk about needing to bring
the cost of living down.
Speaker 4 (37:51):
I have heard this man, Donnie Guy, continually going, we
got to bring the cost of living down.
Speaker 3 (37:55):
We've got to bring the cost of housing down, we
got to bring the cost of food down. We got
to bring the cost of this down. When it's the
left that's been running those cities for the last two
decades or three decades. If crime is high in left
run cities, it's the policies. If the housing is too
high and cost of living is too high in New
(38:17):
York City, it's because of leftist policies. You want to
know why the cost of living is too high because
rent control departments. And by the way, this man, Donny guy,
you know, the socialist out there, the one whose mom
is a Hollywood director and whose dad is a professor
a Marxist teaching Marxism.
Speaker 4 (38:36):
He grew up.
Speaker 3 (38:37):
He got married the other day in a three day wedding,
and some compound in Guyana, I think it was that
was this huge, beautiful place. This guy lives in a
rent control department. Why do you need rent control? You
obviously come from families that are well off. You don't
need the rent control apartment, but you won't give it up.
(38:57):
Gas is over five dollars a gallon in Cali. Why
because the left has demonized oil companies and regulated them
to the point that they were willing to walk away
from refineries that they have hundreds of millions of dollars
invested in.
Speaker 4 (39:11):
I saw, we're Valero. The other day you got an
oil refinery.
Speaker 3 (39:14):
I don't know how much those things cost to make
or build, but it's not cheap. I would say hundreds
of millions of dollars to make one, to build one,
and they're willing to walk away from it and let
it just sit there idle and say, yeah, the policies
in this state cause us to not be able to
be profitable.
Speaker 4 (39:34):
Even at the gasoline.
Speaker 3 (39:35):
That's five dollars, six dollars a gallon, because you've regulated
them so hard that they gas here's two dollars and
seventy five cents a gallon. Three bucks a gallon if
you go downtown. And the stupidity of it is they
keep talking about continument continually talking about the rich paying
(39:57):
their fair share. They don't understand that the rich can leave.
You keep talking about wanting to We'll just going to
tax the rich a little bit more, tax the rich
a little bit more.
Speaker 4 (40:07):
By the way, fool, they have the chance to get
up and leave.
Speaker 3 (40:10):
I guarantee you with one phone call, one phone call
from Jamie Diamond, the head of JP Morgan Chase, to
Ron DeSantis, and the entire headquarters of JP Morgan Chase
moves from New York City.
Speaker 4 (40:22):
To Miami Palm Beach, somewhere.
Speaker 3 (40:24):
In Florida where there's a lot lower tax burden on
all of the people that work there and all of
the people.
Speaker 4 (40:31):
Who generate the incomes. Then what are you gonna do.
Speaker 3 (40:36):
I told you guys a story about David Tepper, the
guy that owns the Carolina Panthers in the state of
New Jersey. When he decided it was time for him
to go. As the story goes in the reporting that
I've read, he took almost one percent of the state's
budget with him, one percent. They had to call an
emergency budgets meeting because when he said I'm done paying
(40:59):
the taxes and moved to Florida, it took one percent
with him of their entire state budget.
Speaker 4 (41:04):
One guy, what do you think is going to happen?
Speaker 3 (41:07):
I've heard somebody ask Elizabeth Warren the other day, you
know Focahantas. I heard somebody ask her the other day,
what are you going to do with the rich people leave?
And she literally couldn't answer the question because there is
no answer. When you all the rich people who are
paying the bills leave, guess what happens. You don't have
anybody left to pay the bills. Eric Adams who's currently
(41:28):
the mayor of New York, and God help us, I
hope he wins again because I never thought I'd be
rooting for somebody that's on the left, but I am
rooting for him to win, because if Ma'm Donnie wins,
it's going to destroy that city and.
Speaker 4 (41:40):
It will take decades to get it back.
Speaker 3 (41:43):
But Eric Adams said the other day that it's a
handful of taxpayers that pay most of the budget for
New York City.
Speaker 4 (41:48):
So I looked it up.
Speaker 3 (41:50):
In twenty twenty two, two and a half percent of
the taxpayers two and a half percent paid fifty one
percent of the income taxes in the city. Fifty one
percent of the income taxes. But guess what, that's not
where they get all their money. Those rich people are
also the ones living in those high rise penthouse apartments
that are worth ten, fifteen to twenty million dollars that
pay property taxes on all of those.
Speaker 4 (42:11):
Do you how many.
Speaker 3 (42:13):
Four hundred thousand dollars five hundred thousand dollars houses does
it take to pay the same taxes as one ten
million dollar house.
Speaker 4 (42:20):
Pretty simple as twenty.
Speaker 3 (42:24):
Those people are the ones that are financing everything that
you want to give away for free. When you've gone
too far, they will say no more, and they'll move
to Florida or Tennessee or Texas or someplace where they
don't have to live. There one hundred and eighty one days. Right,
So the way it works is you don't have to
live there the entire home three hundred and sixty five days.
(42:44):
In order to call be called a resident of a state,
you got to live there one hundred and eighty one days.
The other one hundred and seventy nine or whatever it is.
You can be back in the other state doing your thing.
And by the way, those people have jets. They can
jet back and forth and do what they want and
call them. They can fly to work on Monday and
fly home on Thursday night and still work from home.
Everything is everybody wants work from home now, I don't
(43:08):
understand it, and it's it's by the way, it's also
a war on fun, right. I saw something the other
day that was enough fun of good note. There was
a bunch of sororities in the Southeastern Conference did some
videos the other day that I think there were recruitment videos,
but there were videos that were really fun, happy, excitement
(43:31):
or exciting, and it contrasted the hatefulness and the bitterness
and the un fun of the left.
Speaker 4 (43:42):
It is it contrasts.
Speaker 3 (43:44):
They were all draped in red, white and blue celebrating
their country, being excited about being an American, versus the
I hate everything.
Speaker 4 (43:52):
You guys are all fascists, the world socks. Everybody is terrible.
And that's the contrast between the two thought processes.
Speaker 3 (44:02):
We'll talk about that more next week, but they are
definitely in a war against fun, and I'm all for
having fun.
Speaker 4 (44:08):
All right.
Speaker 3 (44:09):
This is Bonos Cars, rants about a lot of other stuff,
brought to you by Chevrolet Buick GMC of Murphysboro.
Speaker 4 (44:15):
Come on back next week.