Fallout from the White House Admin from Epstein Info Fumble

Fallout from the White House Admin from Epstein Info Fumble

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Plenty of other things that are happening and percolating in
the newscast today. One thing that I didn't need to
mention here as we get into the news of the day,
even though it's a Friday and we're gonna have a
lot of fun here, I wanted to talk about Donald
Trump's trip down to the.

Speaker 2 (00:18):
Area that is flooded in Texas.

Speaker 1 (00:20):
And I think that there's quite a bit of response
that people are going to have as it relates to
this on Donald Trump and what even the federal government
can do, because he took a ton of heat. Even
by the time we got from you know, to like
last Friday, when this stuff was starting to come out,

(00:41):
people on the political left wanted to make it pretty
clear that they wanted to blame Donald Trump for what
was happening. I made it very clear when I got
sat down here on Monday that that makes no sense,
has absolutely nothing to do with what was taking place
in Texas. And I made my plight pretty clear that
we should be kind of looking more locally before we

(01:04):
start blaming the president of the United States. This is
a very large country. It's one of the largest countries
in area in the world. It is one of the
largest countries in population in the world. The president of
the United States and the federal government have certain responsibilities,
and you can make the argument that FEMA and federal
Aid and stuff like that. Donald Trump saying like there
was a way that they could have gotten federal aid

(01:25):
even faster if things had been done properly. It is
a strange administration, and it's strange, not in a bad way,
but strange in a way that they are very everyone
around him, but especially him, the President, very vocal and
very blunt about the things that he is seeing. So
that kind of creates this whole thing of well, now

(01:46):
there's a little bit of room for interpretation as to
what this means. Let's say, if Joe Biden or even
Barack Obama would have been in the presidency at this
point and this would have happened, there would have been
some social media posts, there would have been probably probably
like a statement from the White House, there would have
been an organized visit, but you would have heard very

(02:06):
little about it. The White House has been very clear
in Caroline Levitt, you know, kind of the conduit to
the media through that earlier this week, saying it's an
absolute joke and it's kind of crazy that people are
blaming the United States president for something that's happening in
a small area of central Texas along one singular river.
Then we have, you know, the people out there that

(02:28):
there's a lot of people that are blaming the global
warming on the political f saying global warming is creating
some of these downpours and stuff. Man, I just read
a huge article on Wikipedia. There's an article on Wikipedia
about the twenty eleven super outbreak of tornadoes. There was
like a three and a half day span where like
three hundred and fifty plus tornadoes, like just we're everywhere

(02:50):
in the United States and into southern Canada. And then
a month after that was the big FEFI from Joplin, Missouri.
That was the costliest tournad know in American history. Like
I was in college when that was going on, so
I don't really remember what all the political chatter was,
but that was fourteen years ago. You know, are we
going to blame global warming on that? And if global

(03:11):
warning is to blame, why aren't we seeing more of those?
We really haven't even had EF five tornadoes. I mean,
we had a couple of bad ones in this area
last year, but eeah five tornadoes really haven't really been
a thing over the last fourteen years. You know, like
they could happen, but that's not to say that they
are happening. You know, people blaming you know, surf tides,

(03:34):
you know, global warming is to blame for that. I
found that all very strange. I found it very strange
in a lot of ways that the conversation was all
about that instead of trying to figure out, well, okay,
so this is an area that has flooded before. They
had a really bad flood in this area in nineteen
eighty seven. I don't know if we're going to blame
the president in eighty seven, which would have been round Reagan,

(03:55):
or we're going to blame you know, global warming for
what happened, you know, forty eight years ago.

Speaker 2 (04:00):
But you know there were floods even before that.

Speaker 1 (04:03):
There are ways that we can go back and look
at how dangerous this area is in how much water.
It doesn't take much in this area for it to flood.
And this was my contention, and not to beat a
dead horse over this, but it's like, we have this
horrible tragedy, but it's in an area that even the
local officials admit this is the most dangerous floodplain in

(04:26):
all of the United States, and yet we have actual
written evidence from city or you know, county commissioner meetings
where the county commissioners in this area basically said we
don't need sirens on our warning systems. We don't need
to upgrade this stuff. Like how like what good is
that going to do? And again I will reiterate, we

(04:48):
have no idea if updated or a better version of
a warning system was going to make any difference here
at all or not. We don't have the capability of
living a multiple universes at the same time to kind
of try to figure that out. What I do know
is that all we can do at this point is
try to figure out where we can be better next

(05:10):
time the Texas Hill Country, what can we do better
next time? Donald Trump with his visit, they did a
big roundtable discussion with a lot of you know officials,
local officials. Greg Abbott was also there. Milania was there
and she was talking about what she was seeing. It's
good to see, you know, that kind of communication. But
it's a matter of, you know, instead of talking about

(05:31):
how great all of the first responders are and they are,
and I talked about, you know, we need to uplift
some of the heroes that are you know, going out
there in these dangerous situations to try to save lives
one hundred percent. But while we're talking about those people,
and while we are attempting to have that conversation in
a productive way for people to you know, understand that

(05:54):
they're appreciated and we shouldn't take people like that for
granted in our nation. At the same time, I hope
out of those conversations today that there was what are
we going to do better next time? Donald Trump already
talking about how much federal aid and how they can
help this area with this issue. Hopeful that maybe, you know,

(06:15):
the recovery isn't going to be a super painful situation.
Certainly there's going to be a lot of healing that's
going to need to take place. But even beyond that,
we're stepping over one more step to the next thing,
which would be we need to know what is going
to be done in the future. I want from Greg Abbott,
and I want from the people of Kerr County, Texas

(06:36):
in the surrounding area and the city of Kerrville in
that area I want to hear from them what they think,
after some thought, what could be done not in the past.
We don't have to look backwards. We don't have to
hold people's feet to the fire and hold them accountable
for their lackadaisical attitude toward trying to update the flood

(06:59):
warning system or any of the other infrastructure that could
have potentially saved some lives in this particular situation.

Speaker 2 (07:06):
But what are we going to do tomorrow?

Speaker 1 (07:07):
What are we going to do a month from now,
a year from now, What are we going to do
five years from now when we have torrential rains in
this floodplain that we know is super dangerous. What changes
are going to be made by the people who live here,
the people that want to live here, the people that
work here. What investment is going to be made, not
just financially, but also thinking using our brain power to

(07:30):
come up with real solutions to prevent this type of
tragedy from happening again. That's what I'd like to hear
from these people, And hopefully our administration at the federal
level will hold them to that kind of standard to
make sure that there is no stone unturned, because there
shouldn't be. This is a natural disaster that hopefully is
once in a lifetime and the people of Kirk County,

(07:53):
they will have this in their history books, they will
have it in their video documentaries, will have this well
documented for the future, so we do not have the
same thing happen again when more weather comes that direction.
In the alleged inevitability of the Guadaloupe River flooding in
this area, once again fingers crossed. But that's what we

(08:16):
have to see and hopefully we do see it. Four
seventeen is the time. I also have another bit of
national news that I'm going to need to talk to
you about, and it is in relation to a question
I got earlier today about maybe some friction between the FBI,
the leaders like Dan Bongino, Cash Pttel, but also the
Attorney General Pambondi on the fallout this week of the
Jeffrey Epstein files. I will explain the latest of what

(08:37):
I know coming up on News Radio eleven to ten Kfab.

Speaker 3 (08:39):
And Marie Sunger.

Speaker 1 (08:41):
First, I wanted to mention this. I got an email
from keV earlier in the show, and I think I
just missed this this note, but he was kind of
asking what about the possibility of Pam Bondi or one
of the FBI guys kind of stepping aside out of
the fallout from the I mean disappointment I think is
for a lot of people with the handling of the

(09:01):
Epstein files in the way that you know, it feels
like the Department of Justice as it sits right now
in this administration a little bit of egg on the
face because of all of the promises, all of the
you know, chatter about what could end up taking place,
and what could end up you know, being on a
list and who would be implicated, and we were asking
for this, and then they had that big photo op
with all those right wing influencers at the White House

(09:25):
and they were holding these giant binders that said Epstein
file released, Phase one, and then there was nothing until
like almost midnight on Sunday into Monday this week, when
the Office of the Attorney General in the Department of
Justice came to the conclusion that there's no other news here.
Jeffrey Epstein did kill himself, Jeffrey Epstein did not have

(09:48):
a client list, there is no further implication to this,
and this is the end of our investigation. Well, this
has led to a lot of you know, fractious conversation
over the last few days, and that includes with Donald Trump,
who scoffed at a reporter asking a follow up question
about Jeffrey Epstein earlier this week, when you know all
this stuff is going on. But again, I would blame

(10:09):
the DOJ. I'd blame the Attorney General's Office for releasing
this kind of information at midnight in the middle of
the news cycle as it was so Yeah, I think
that it was important to ask questions like that to
get some clarifications. I was happy to see ag Pambondi
actually answer the questions. And I was a bit disappointed
that Donald Trump kind of has that attitude toward this situation,

(10:29):
because he, as much as anybody, campaign on the idea
that he's going to get this stuff released, these type
of classified files with the Epstein deal in MLK and
JFK and all that stuff, and we just haven't seen
a lot of that stuff, right, So you've got to
understand it from our perspective too.

Speaker 2 (10:48):
Well.

Speaker 1 (10:48):
Now, there is a source that is talking to national
news including Fox News, that Deputy Director of the FBI
Dan bond Gino, is apparently considering resigning and it's all
about the handling of this particular situation. And they say,
according to this source, he hasn't been in the office
for at least two full days and has yet to

(11:11):
make a final decision on his future. Again, I said
this earlier in the show, and I'm going to say
this again. I'll reiterate this. I think it's really important
for this administration to stay together as long as possible,
with as many people sticking to their guns. Here it's
not been six months since Donald Trump has been you know, inaugurated.
It is incredibly important, I think for the legacy of
what this administration is hoping to create that you do

(11:35):
not have that kind of relationship breaking that we would
see in the first four years that Donald Trump served
in twenty seventeen through twenty one. There were a lot
of different people that were in and out of that administration,
and that's not completely unusual, but they're still felt like
it was a bit more than usual. And then even
by the end when it came time for you know,
the vice president to you know, help with the transfer

(11:57):
of power, Mike Penson Donald Trump not on the same
page there, and obviously their relationship fractured to an unrepairable
situation from there, and then of course you know all
of the hubbub about some of the people that were
being suggested for some of these jobs, like Cash Bettel.
Remember back Gates was supposed to be the attorney general

(12:18):
for Pam Bondi took over and I think she was
the attorney general for Florida. She's well thought of in
that community, a really strong prosecutor. And then you look
at you know, Pete haig Seth and some of the
other people that were pretty maligned through the process of
trying to get them through the appointment and to get
them approved.

Speaker 2 (12:37):
Tulci Gabbart is another one.

Speaker 1 (12:38):
He had Mike Waltz, who was the National Security Advisor,
he's already gone. You've seen Elon Musk, who's not even
an official government capacity. But the breakup that they had
after just about four months or so was pretty terrible.
And the Epstein files came up when you know, Elon
said that Trump's on the list and that's why you're

(12:59):
not seeing this lee. It lends to a lot of questions.
Now there are reports from other sources that say that
some of the video was actually edited and saved a
couple of times. So there's as many questions now, I think,
to just different questions as there was before this government release.
And now I think a lot of people for this
specific topic, this is giving them some questions like can

(13:20):
I really trust the people that are in charge here?
I thought I could, I'm not so sure anymore. But
I still think it's important for there to be like
a pretty united front here. And if people like Dan
Mongino or Cash Betel or Pam Bondi are being told
to leave or they resign for one reason or another,
especially this early in a four year term, I think
that's a bad look optically for this administration. I think
it's a bad, you know look, not necessarily just the optics,

(13:43):
but also it's going to stunt the growth of the
agenda that Donald Trump is trying to institute here as
as part of his presidency. And you have to have
good people in place. He thought he had a dream
team kind of assembled here, and we can't be seeing
this fall apart because of the handling of certain things
at the same time, and a lot of people want

(14:03):
different people held accountable for not getting the answers they
were hoping to see. With something like these Epstein files.
So there you go. We'll see what the next step is.
But if we come back on Monday and Dan Bongino's
gone from, you know, being the deputy director of the FBI,
it's going to leave a lot of questions out there,
and then a lot of people are going to be like, okay,
so what exactly is going on with those Epstein files?

(14:24):
Still Still we'll have to talk about it. It's four
twenty nine. We'll come back a Friday four. Matt and
I we got an interesting one. I've been mulling over
for the last little bit, and we will tell you
about it next on news radio eleven ten KFAB. We
don't have a winner since the one o'clock hour. Usually
they updated, you know, thirty minutes after we should having
a couple more winners announced. So maybe we do have

(14:45):
a winner and we just don't know yet. That's the
optimistic man in me. That case is, my producer got
a winner yesterday. You weren't here, So can I take
full credit for that? Like one hundred percent credit?

Speaker 3 (14:57):
I generally take zero percent when I I am here.
Oh well, I give you credit like you could take
two hundred percent for yesterday's if you'd like.

Speaker 1 (15:06):
Is that even a thing? People say that now give
two hundred percent of effort. Yeah, but that doesn't even
make any sense. It's like when people say, you know.

Speaker 3 (15:13):
You only use ten percent of your brain, so you
don't want to be used in all of your brain
at the same time. That thing would overheat and it
probably explode and oohs out your ears?

Speaker 2 (15:23):
Is that what people with add that?

Speaker 1 (15:25):
Other people with adderall it when they take adderall, do
they think they're using all of their brain? Does it
do unlock like other parts of your brain?

Speaker 2 (15:31):
I don't know. I don't take it.

Speaker 3 (15:32):
I don't know, but I don't think you want to
use the whole thing all at once.

Speaker 2 (15:35):
Yeah, I don't know.

Speaker 1 (15:36):
Yeah, my phone gets really hot sometimes and it just
stops working, so you know, don't want that anyway.

Speaker 2 (15:42):
Friday four time, Matt, tell the people what a Friday
four is.

Speaker 3 (15:45):
A Friday four is four of something on a Friday.
It could be four of this, It could be four
of that.

Speaker 2 (15:53):
You can get with this or you can get with that, right.

Speaker 3 (15:56):
It could be four of anything. Really. Oh, over time,
there's been all kinds of different Friday fours, and you
could look at it as a mount rushmore of something
that's four, or you could just look at it as
four distinguished. I started that sentence without knowing how to
finish it. I was gonna see if I could pull
it out like the Fab four.

Speaker 1 (16:17):
But that doesn't even make sense because if you had
like the best for musicians of all time, it wouldn't
be the Beatles, right, would any of the Beatles be?

Speaker 2 (16:24):
Yeah?

Speaker 3 (16:24):
Are any one of the Beatles the best at what
they do? Or collectively? Do people consider them? I don't
consider them the best regardless, Well, they're one of the best. Yeah,
there are.

Speaker 2 (16:32):
They're certainly the most influential.

Speaker 3 (16:34):
I think, well, they people liked them, let's put them
in that category. Can we at least agree that people
like the Beatles? Well, I think I think everyone would
agree on that. I think that's a pretty.

Speaker 1 (16:43):
They're generally liked. I'm just saying, like, I don't know
how many people like. There are people that hate them
just to hate them, But I mean, like, I don't
hate legas legacy wise, I mean, there's never been a
band better. But is Ringo Star the best drummer now?
Is Paul McCartney the best basis now? Is John Lennon
the best guitar player or singer now? And is George

(17:04):
Harrison the best guitar player? No?

Speaker 3 (17:06):
Was Yoko Ono the best partner to a front man? Yes,
that is not true.

Speaker 1 (17:12):
In fact, you could make the great argument that she
was the worst partner for a front man ever. And
there have been some bad ones, but they say, even
to this day, she's the reason the band blew up,
it broke up.

Speaker 2 (17:23):
Yeah.

Speaker 1 (17:24):
Now, this isn't to say that they couldn't be like
some of the great songwriters of all time, because McCartney
and Lennon together, I mean, they wrote amazing songs. And
George Harrison, for whatever it's worth, had some great songs
that he wrote too. While my guitar gently weeps in
my opinion, one of the best songs from a Beatle ever.
And then Ringo of course, you know he did his
thing too, and he's still incredibly popular.

Speaker 3 (17:44):
Yeah, yeah, see, you can't help it. Everybody does the
Ringo thing? Were they, you know? And then and then
Ringo was there too. We can't forget about him.

Speaker 2 (17:51):
He was there.

Speaker 3 (17:52):
Remember he was breathing oxygen too.

Speaker 1 (17:55):
There's a family guy bit And I just love this one.
And I don't know if you've seen this one. And
this isn't a knock Ringo because he was just here
in Omaha. It's really cool.

Speaker 2 (18:04):
You know.

Speaker 3 (18:05):
It wasn't that wonderful, Yeah it was.

Speaker 2 (18:06):
It was great.

Speaker 1 (18:06):
He was here, is a family guy.

Speaker 2 (18:10):
Bit.

Speaker 1 (18:10):
It's just like it's that I feel worse than that
time when Ringo, you know, showed the Beatles he wrote
a song and then it shows to flashback and it's
all the guys in the studio and Rio comes in, Hey, guys,
I wrote a song. And then Paul mccartny's like, wow, Ringo,
that's awesome. We'll put it right here, right on the fridge.

Speaker 3 (18:31):
He had some hits though, Ringo did all by himself.

Speaker 2 (18:34):
That's fun.

Speaker 1 (18:34):
It's because he was Ringo, right, No, no, no disrespect.
You know, he's just not a great he's not the
best drummer and all that stuff. They're a great band collectively.
Are they a better band musically than the Eagles? Zero
percent chance, none, zero, But they the Eagles don't exist
without the Beatles, And that's why it matters. I mean,
Don Felder's a better guitar player than George Harrison is
Joe Walsh is a better guitar player than George Harrison

(18:56):
is thought Himley's a better vocalist than John Lennon or
Paul mccarr. Is Glenn Frye in that mix too, Glenn
fry and Don Henley's songwriting you could put right next
to the songwriting. I think of Lennon and McCartney. Now,
certainly they had the inspiration of being after the Beatles
and the Beach Boys and some of the other great
songwriters of that era. But to me personally, I mean,

(19:19):
I'll put some of the Eagles great songs up against anybody,
and then throw in Randy Meiser on bass, like sure,
not like the biggest, craziest, best bass guy, but like
he could sing really well. And then Timothy be Schman
is a good bassis too, I mean he fits the
music right. And Don Hiley not the greatest drummer ever,
but to drum and sing the way he did for

(19:41):
all those years that has to count for something too.
That's just one example. Sometimes it's the collection of the
four instead of just being the best four. Although it
would be fun to figure out what the best for
people different instruments, what that would sound like if we
put them together.

Speaker 3 (19:55):
And let's have AI simulate what that would sound like.
We can do this. We can do it.

Speaker 2 (20:00):
Yeah, that's actually genius.

Speaker 3 (20:01):
We can do this.

Speaker 2 (20:02):
We should do that.

Speaker 1 (20:03):
At some point, I need a singer, and I need
a bassis, and I need a drummer, and I need
a guitarist, and I want the best at all of these.

Speaker 3 (20:14):
So who's the greatest singer of all time?

Speaker 1 (20:16):
We need to get to this Friday for but we will.
This is too important to not talk about the greatest
singer of all time, and it would have to be
You'd have to like genre specific this. It's like rock music.
I'll give you a couple of options. Robert Plant from
led Zeppelin, Freddie Mercury from Queen.

Speaker 3 (20:30):
He might take the cake, just range, the range that
he had the power to right.

Speaker 1 (20:37):
Yeah, it may not fit with the band we're building,
but he may be the best rock front man ever.

Speaker 3 (20:42):
Well, and the best is subjective, I mean, what's the criteria.

Speaker 1 (20:46):
But I think if we're talking about range and just
singing ability of this genre, it's got to be him. Well, yeah,
you could say Robert Plant, but their sound kind of like, eh,
it's a little rock here. You mean, do you go
like Roger Rott Waters, I don't know, let's go Freddy.
Just for simplistic case, we can, you know, get through
this conversation. Best guitarist ever, I'd say Jimmy Hendrix. I

(21:09):
will always say Jimmy Hendrix. But I know some people
have their own, like I would say Eddie van Halen
has to be considered, and some people are gonna say
Eric Clapton has to be considered. I think Jimmy Hendrix
because he was left handed. He played a right handed
guitar upside down and just the things he did on
guitar are just unbelievable. Yeah, and he's saying along with it.

Speaker 2 (21:27):
Yeah.

Speaker 1 (21:28):
And even Clapton, who was a contemporary of his kind
of says he's the best.

Speaker 2 (21:32):
I mean that means something, doesn't.

Speaker 1 (21:33):
It When other greats of your industry say you're the best.

Speaker 2 (21:38):
That's that's something, right.

Speaker 3 (21:39):
Another one of those where you wish he could get
in the time machine or one of those like you know,
parallel universes, like Jimmy Hendrix doesn't pass away at twenty
seven the way he did, and just just imagine the
music that he would have made or what band like
you know, he goes into this phase where he just
wants to be like in a band and like who
he hooks up with. Yeah, at the height of his
powers in like the mid seventies, when you know, FM
music starts to kind of become a thing.

Speaker 2 (22:02):
Yeah. I think that's a really good point.

Speaker 1 (22:04):
Okay, So let's go Freddie Mercury is a singer and
Jimmy Hendrix is the guitar player.

Speaker 3 (22:09):
Who's the bassist this one? I'm not going to be
an expert in. I know there's a lot of great
bassists out there.

Speaker 2 (22:14):
And there there are people.

Speaker 1 (22:15):
There are people that would say Paul McCarney is objectively
like one of the great bassists of all time, But
I don't think so. I mean, like he's good, But
I would say it's got to be somebody like Geddy
Lee from Rush. Now I'm gonna also say Neil Peart
should be the drummer, because I think he's the greatest
drummer of all time in rock music. Do we want
two Rush guys? Probably not. Do you go with like

(22:37):
John at Whistle, who was amazing, he's the legendary bassist
from the Who Do you go with somebody a little
bit more modern? With all the different you know, Shenanigans
like somebody like Flee or you know, like some of
those guys in what they can bring technically. You know,
it comes decades later and has all that inspiration and

(22:57):
all this stuff that he can work on it trying
to do it Van Halen stuff now on the bass guitar.
So you know, like that changes how you view these people.

Speaker 2 (23:05):
What do you think?

Speaker 3 (23:07):
I think that we may have just changed the Friday
for because I guarantee you there's people sitting there yelling
at the radio right now the names that are not
being mentioned.

Speaker 1 (23:18):
Okay, well maybe we should maybe we should do this right,
We're building a four man team, and then I'll Neil
Peart's the drummer I'm making for my band. I think
I want to go with John int Whistle just because
he's of the era. He's more of the era sixties
and seventies that we're talking about.

Speaker 2 (23:35):
If I not not a.

Speaker 1 (23:36):
Guy that was like a nineties guy or a two
thousands guy like Flee, even though I think you could
make the argument he's a great basis for a band,
I think I'd probably more so lean toward a guy
from that era. So it would be uh, Freddy Mercury
with Jimmy Hendrix, John Entwhistle and Neil Peart on the drums.

Speaker 2 (23:54):
Okay, now see that's.

Speaker 1 (23:56):
The heck of a band.

Speaker 2 (23:57):
Yeah, what a band that is now?

Speaker 3 (23:58):
Put AI to work?

Speaker 1 (24:01):
Well, I don't know what it would sound like, but
I will ask what it would kind of music it
would come out of it? Because you have four different
people from four bands. Could you imagine Neil Perk trying
to argue with Jimmy Hendrix like this song.

Speaker 2 (24:11):
Should be in seven eight time?

Speaker 3 (24:12):
Yeah, they may never actually get a complete song altogether.

Speaker 1 (24:15):
Yeah, and then Hendrix is just like, you gotta be
kidding me. And then Freddy Mercury is just like, you know,
I'm going to sing this in like two ranges high
and I'm writing the lyrics, and Neil Perk's like, I'm
supposed to write the lyrics, all right? So call us
we just made a band. I guess this is what
we're doing here. Four h two, five, five eight to
eleven ten correctus greatest classic rock ish type band of

(24:36):
all time, but not with like the Fab four is
like the perfect mix of four guys together but literally
like the best people at those positions possible hit us
up four h two, five five, eight to eleven ten,
News Radio eleven ten kfab Nancy says, what about John
Fogerty to be the lead singer of this band is
sent of Freddy Mercury. Now, I would say Freddy Mercury
objectively is a better singer, but the better kind of

(24:59):
fit for the era that we're talking sixties seventies mostly.
It's hard to say that John Fogerty's not in that conversation,
because I think he is, especially if we're writing the
songs right like, think about all the different songs that
he wrote too. Could you imagine Hendrix having to play
on a queen song? No disrespect to Brian May, who's
also an incredible guitarist. So, but that does feel like
a weird mix. It does feel like, you know, it'd

(25:20):
be interesting to see what that would have sounded, and
then have like the poly rhythm drumming of Neil Pierre
back there for rush. And then I put John intwhistle
at base and I guess he's fairly interchangeable to the
point where Jamie went in. I think that's how you
say this name best. Bassis was led Zeppelin's bassist John
Paul Jones. But I also agrees with the Rush nominees.
If you listen to Zeppelin lately. I listened to Saraway

(25:44):
to Heaven again, and you know, we have such great
quality of this stuff these days. You know, like you
put this in like a speaker or your headphones and
you can really start hearing all the different sounds, even
the stuff that they were building and making in the
sixties and seventies. That is a song that can really
make a person feel And if you really like guitars
and you like bass, you like good rock music, great drumming,

(26:07):
you know, get yourself a good set of headphones, put
it on. I think it sounds better when you plug
your headphones in. I'll be honest, yeah, because you know
the sound of the way it goes through the chord.
Or if you're lucky enough to have like a really
good like vinyl player and you have the vinyls and
you can throw the vinyls on. There's something about hearing

(26:29):
songs and just having it immerse you, like you're just
totally immersed in what that song is trying to tell you.
With all the instruments and everything, it is an experience
unlike anything else. I think it's good for the body
to do. It does some good to do that from
time to time. As far as the real Friday for
I promise you will get to that, coming back after
the top of the five o'clock hour here on news

(26:50):
radio eleven to ten KFAB