New Details Emerge About Man Deported to El Salvador

New Details Emerge About Man Deported to El Salvador

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Congratulations. This is a day that we celebrate you. We
celebrate you and everything that you do. We really do
appreciate it. Great, great job. I'm so happy that we
have this day to commemorate you and what you do
and the people that do what you do.

Speaker 2 (00:16):
I don't think that day. I don't think today is
for that. It is good Friday. So yeah, this is
a part of a weekend of a celebration and reflection
of course for Christians, you know, myself included. I'm sorry
I ruined it because you were trying to make this
about what is this National Producer's Day.

Speaker 3 (00:32):
No, it's World Amateur Radio Day. Oho, there it is.

Speaker 2 (00:37):
Hey, folks, he got me. You know I always say
what do I don't always say stuff? Yeah, sure, why
not Amateur hour over here is I was just saying
it was a joke.

Speaker 1 (00:47):
It was a joke, and you ruined it because a
good person, because you started you change it to the
religious part of what this weekend is, which again you
know we're gonna do that, and yeah, we'll do all that.
You know you don't sound very enthusiastic. Well, it's just,
you know, my amateur radio joke got ruined.

Speaker 2 (01:06):
I ruined it. I ruined the joke you were just
supposed to get.

Speaker 3 (01:09):
You want to do it again?

Speaker 2 (01:10):
No, nope, but again, and I'll do something bad and
I'll make a mistake and then it'll be apropos.

Speaker 3 (01:14):
Nope, that's even worse. Hold on, I'll pretend not that
would be bad. We don't want that.

Speaker 1 (01:22):
To get this right, It was supposed to be a joke,
and you just you talked about Easter instead, so you know.

Speaker 3 (01:29):
It is what it is.

Speaker 1 (01:29):
But happy Good Friday, I mean for real, happy uh
happy Easter day everybody.

Speaker 2 (01:35):
Yeah, happy Easter this Sunday. Happy Good Friday today, and
happy amateur radio Day to you. Emory Songer. Oh yeah, no, no,
it doesn't work that way.

Speaker 1 (01:44):
It doesn't work No, no, nope. All right, So let's
dip into the news here to start things off first
and foremost. You're the Florida State shooter. Did you hear
about what I know about this guy?

Speaker 3 (02:01):
Now?

Speaker 2 (02:01):
I am uninformed?

Speaker 1 (02:03):
Yeah, so though his mother is not his biological mother,
who's the sheriff's deputy. I just wanted to get through
this because we talked about it a lot yesterday. We're
not going to spend a ton of time on this.
He's twenty years old. His name's Phoenix Eicher Eichner, right,
and that's what they said. What if I told you
his name's not actually Phoenix.

Speaker 2 (02:20):
Ackner, Well, Phoenix, you know, I could see that being
a nickname.

Speaker 1 (02:25):
It's a name that he goes by. He was born
Christian Erickson. His dad's name is Eichner, Christopher Eichner. His mother,
Anne Marie Erickson. Anne Marie is his biological mother. Anne
Marie got in a very bad split with Christopher Eichner,

(02:47):
and in the custody battle, Christopher Eichner had the main
custody of his son. His son, Christian Erickson, now known
as Phoenix Eichner Christian Erickson at the time, was taken
to Norway by his biological mother when he was eleven
in an effort to run away from Christian Eichner, his

(03:10):
biological father, because she was crazed and wanted to get
away and take her son with her, even though that
was completely illegal, completely illegal, crazy situation that one eleven
year old should never have.

Speaker 3 (03:27):
To deal with.

Speaker 1 (03:27):
He was taken out of the country, out of the
country because of a stuff that had nothing like he
had no responsibility for right something between his two biological parents.
His biological father finds out about this, and there's a
lawsuit and everything. In the suit, they say this eleven
year old is going to need therapyst No eleven year

(03:49):
old's going to need help. He is, for what we know,
on antidepressants and different types of medication for different things
that he had gone on. Not that this is any
sort of excuse for what he did in Tallahasse yesterday.
The parent that is the eighteen year veteran of the
Leon County Sheriff's office. The sheriff's deputy, that's his stepmother.

(04:12):
It's not blood relation, but she has been around him
for many years. As you could tell. He's twenty years old.
He was in at Florida State as a student, and
there's this. You know, he had something going on, and
it seems by all accounts the more that we learn
about him that he tends to lean write or conservative.

(04:36):
But I don't think this has anything to do with that.
We're still slow to get more information about the victims
and what maybe would be the motivation for what he
attempted to do or what he did do. Killed two people,
six were injured, including him. The shooter. So and of
course I couldn't imagine what she's going through right now,
knowing especially that her step son used one of the

(05:00):
weapons she had been using on the force that had
since been retired. But she had in her personal what
do you say in personal collection? I guess like she
had it for personal use at her home. And uh, yeah,
not great. Sean denied as the executive director of Community
and Media Relations for the Leon County Sheriff's Office, and
she said, and a quote, this is a rough time

(05:21):
for the Leon County Sheriff's Office, our entire community, and
of course the victims and their families. As it relates
to Deputy Eichner. She has opted to take personal leave
as and she is not in office of course as
a result of that, And we do not have a
return date as of this point. She's taking some time
to obviously process this tragic situation. End quote. You would

(05:44):
think that this, Yeah, it's never going to be simple
to understand this. It be simple to try to figure
out what makes people want to do this stuff, but
there seems to be a very complicated history for this
specific individual. And yeah, hopefully we get more answers. We
always say that we never really get answers that make

(06:05):
us feel like we know anymore than we did before.
But this specific situation not great. But you could almost
based on this person's history, see some sort of crazed
behavior coming from years down the line, almost a decade
worth of real sketchy stuff that on this individual has
unfortunately been subject to. And it's just a matter of

(06:29):
why the gun, why to try to make permanent damage
to people that are not involved. And well, we could
have done differently to maybe get this person to help
they needed, if there was any signs to do so.
But as of right now, that's all we got for you.
If there is more out there, we will let you
know about it. Right now it is two fifteen on

(06:51):
your Friday when we come back. Fox News has a
very exclusive report here about the Kilmar Abrago Garcia. This
guy from Maryland who was accused of being an MS
thirteen gang member got basically deported and listed as a
dangerous person and sent to l Salvador. Between the L

(07:11):
Salvador government and the United States government, they did not
want to allow him to come back. People trying to
figure out why Maryland senator goes down there says hey
to them, sees them, knows that he's okay. But now
Fox News has gotten an exclusive report about something that
might have people changing their opinion about this guy, if
they think that he's a good dude and should be

(07:32):
coming back to the United States. We will let you
know that next on News Radio eleven to ten kfab
and raise. That's my prediction. That's not going to happen.
Not true.

Speaker 3 (07:41):
There's no such thing, no such thing as too much fun,
No such things too much fun, no such thing.

Speaker 2 (07:46):
Okay, so we'll have just the right amount of fun.

Speaker 3 (07:48):
It'll be great fun. It'll be great fun.

Speaker 1 (07:50):
This segment maybe not fun as much as it's informative. Okay,
Sound and quizzed in quizzed in quiz inquisitive jock quiz
rogers Sound who went to college where Oregon State?

Speaker 3 (08:04):
Well done?

Speaker 2 (08:04):
That's right, Never forget that time they beat USC.

Speaker 1 (08:07):
All right, So inquisitive, sound inquisitive, Like you need to
learn more about this and you're surprised at what you're learning.
You want like live reactions from you, Yes, okay, Kilmar
Obrago Garcia. This is the guy who was deported from
Maryland to l Salvador It's been the subject of a
heated political debate about is this humane, is this the

(08:28):
right decision, the wrong decision, And there seems to be
some questions about where he should be. A lot of
people say he's got a wife and a family in
the United States. There was an order to keep him here.
Maybe he was an informant. Maybe he needs to be,
you know, protected, because some of these m S thirteen
game members might be out for this guy. There's an
order in twenty nineteen to keep him safe here. In

(08:49):
twenty twenty five, he's been deported back to El Salvador.
The Al Salvador president came to town, and by town,
I mean Washington, DC and the White House visited with
Donald Trump. That was on Tuesday. I believe he basically said,
that's not me. Between Donald Trump and I, you know,
we have a good working relationship. There's absolutely nothing here
that we need to know. He's not coming back to

(09:11):
the United States. And so we had a guy from Maryland,
Maryland senator, who decided he was going to go down
there and check him out. And this was a He
went down there and Chris van Holland is his name,
Chris van Holland ran down there and didn't see him,

(09:32):
didn't get accepted by the government of l Salvador, but eventually,
based on his social media, he did post and say
I've been able to meet with kill Mar Abrago Garcia
and said on his social media, I said the main
goal of this trip was to meet with Kilmar tonight
I had that chance. I've called his wife Jennifer to
pass along his message of love. I look forward to

(09:52):
providing a full update on my return. Well, you're saying
all this stuff, but what if this guy actually is
a terrible person. Now we have some evidence to say
that he has gotten into some domestic arguments, domestic altercations
with his significant other, and we also know that this
guy skid a little bit of a checkered past people.
You know, I don't know if it's legitimate proof, but
people seem to have some paper trail, including the tattoos

(10:14):
that he wears him being a member of MS thirteen. Okay,
and that's listed and they labeled his terror organization. Well,
Fox News has pulled a report and this is from
Fox News. It's a homeland security investigation. This is in
twenty twenty two. He was suspected of partaking in labor
and human trafficking. This report says that a Tennessee Highway

(10:37):
Patrol trooper stopped kilmar Abrego, Garcia after he was observed
speeding and was unable to stay in his lane. The
trooper then noticed eight individuals in the car with him,
who said he began driving three days prior from Houston,
Texas to Temple Hills, Maryland, via Saint Louis, Missouri, to
perform what was called at the time construction work. But

(11:00):
this report states that the trooper suspected this was a
human trafficking incident because they didn't have any luggage in
the vehicle. If you're traveling from Houston to Maryland and
going to Saint Louis, and you're doing this construction work,
and there's eight of you in the car, don't you
think you'd see some bags of people's luggage around? Generally,

(11:21):
I don't usually travel. I mean I go to de
Mone with some frequency. I always have some luggage, unless
you just forgot. That'd be a tough forget. AnyWho the
individuals in the car, they're asked where they live to
identify themselves. They gave the same address as to where
he lives as to where they lived. It's a little
odd anyway. Bregio Garcia, in this back and forth, pretended

(11:45):
to speak less English than he seemed to be capable of.
He attempted to put the encountering officer off track by
responding to questions with additional questions.

Speaker 3 (11:53):
Have you ever done that?

Speaker 1 (11:54):
Right? Get in an argument with somebody and they really
got you on your heels. But you're answering questions with
question just like, well, what do you mean by that?

Speaker 4 (12:02):
Well?

Speaker 1 (12:02):
What if this happened? Instead, you're not really answering the question.
Here's kind of trying to like create kind of a
path away from maybe what the question initially was. Yeah,
all right, so anyway that is a thing. Of course,
the violence that occurred previously, let's say all this is true,
all of this actually occurred and happen. You have all

(12:24):
these Democrats who are trying to say that this is
some sort of violation of humane rights. They have made
Kilmar Albrego Garcia kind of the focal point of the
deportation efforts by this president and the administration, attempting more
to make this a safe country, public safety, while you
have the political rights saying this is what we have

(12:47):
to do to make that happen. Political left says, no,
you don't. You're taking a man away from his wife
and his kids while ignoring all of the evidence that
states this man actually seems to be a violent member
of the terrorist gang as it is called MS thirteen,
and he's in a very I mean, this is a
tough prison down there in El Salvada. They talk about

(13:08):
this being one of the most dangerous prisons in all
the world. So there is probably a balance for the
moment at least that needs to be kind of leveled here.
We don't know exactly why he was given the past
to stay here in twenty nineteen, especially if he was
identified as that maybe he was an informant for the government.
That would be weird because Donald Trump would have been
the president at that time, and you would have figured

(13:30):
he would have known this stuff about this guy before
they deported him. And also you have to keep in
mind what has taken place in the interim between twenty
nineteen and twenty twenty five. I just told you about
something that allegedly happened in twenty twenty two where there
was suspected human trafficking or labor trafficking that was occurring
for whatever.

Speaker 3 (13:51):
This guy was doing.

Speaker 1 (13:52):
Right, My question is, are these politicians and all of
your keyboard warriors out there that are saying that they
think this is inhumane? If this stuff is found to
be true, are they going to backtrack what they said
and say, you know what, maybe this guy doesn't need
to be in this country. Maybe this guy's a little
bit of a bad dude. Maybe okay, he's been accused
of labor and human trafficking and you know, domestic violence.

(14:14):
Maybe we don't need to have him be the martyr
of this, you know, issue of deportation of illegal immigrants.
Maybe he's the wrong guy to have as the figurehead of,
you know, the innocent man that has been ripped from
his family because of his immigration status, or what I
think is probably going to happen. More so them saying

(14:35):
it's still wrong what the government is doing to these people.
And even though this guy kill mar Abrego Garcia happens
to be a bit of a dangerous man, and maybe yes,
he deserves to be deported, doing it the way that
they're doing it and ripping people from their families is
the wrong way to go. They're going to try to
backtrack and make this not about kill maar, but about
what the principles were that they were trying to instill

(14:57):
when they made the argument, even though the reason they
were made in that argument was specifically for this guy
in this situation. You think I'm right or am I wrong?
My Honissan thing here.

Speaker 2 (15:07):
As far as how the two sides will interpret this news, yeah, well,
and just what they do if he's found to be
guilty of this stuff?

Speaker 1 (15:14):
I suppose, you know, like Chris van Nola, I mean,
does he like Okay, Well, I wasted a trip to L.
Salvador in the attempt to, you know, have performative politics,
very dramatic grand standing.

Speaker 3 (15:27):
I flew to L.

Speaker 1 (15:28):
Salvador to see this guy so my constituents could call
me a hero of some kind. Yet here we are
learning while this is happening that this guy could be
a human trafficker or a labor trafficker at least, I
just how do you backtrack on this if this guy
really is a violent guy. Right, we seemingly have enough

(15:48):
evidence this guy probably fits the bill for a man
who shouldn't be in the United States. Now again, then
the debate the Democrats are going to say is maybe
we should just do this differently.

Speaker 3 (15:56):
Though.

Speaker 1 (15:56):
We shouldn't be ripping a man who believed he was
here safely after that twenty nineteen court order from his
wife and his family, and he was a legal citizen,
not legal, but well he came here illegally, but they
said he could stay. And we're trying to figure out
exactly why is that. Because they felt like he was
in danger. And when you're affiliated with some of these gangs,

(16:18):
you know how the mob works, right, You saw the Sopranos,
You've seen The Godfather. I mean, sometimes you fall out
of favor for one reason or another. Maybe he was
acting as an informant for law enforcement to try to
clean something up and that made him a target and
he couldn't go back. Well, it's difficult right to say
what the right thing to do in that moment is.
But obviously since twenty nineteen when that happened, some other

(16:40):
stuff has happened. This guy's been accused of domestic violence,
this guy has been at least accused or pulled over
with the idea maybe he was stopped for human or
labor trafficking seems to be a little bit more of
the story. Here than this law abiding citizen who's trying
to clean up his act after being affiliated with a
dangerous terrorist gang, trying to get his life back together.

Speaker 3 (17:02):
It's hard.

Speaker 1 (17:03):
It's hard for me to say, you know, like we
know everything, but we have a lot of breadcrumbs that
since twenty nineteen, this guy has been doing some very
sketchy things and it's been you know, at least observed
by police in multiple calls against them. So it's hard
for me to think, Okay, yeah, this is just a
guy that should just be allowed to stay in the country.
If he's an illegal alien in this country and he

(17:26):
continues to break the law or be skirting around the law.
I don't know, that's my thought. I'm just gonna be
interesting to see the backtrack of the Democrats, I suppose,
who are going out of their way to make this
their big item of the week.

Speaker 3 (17:39):
Oh no, we got to save this guy.

Speaker 1 (17:41):
He's in El Salvador in a dangerous prison and he
should be in the United States with his wife and
his kids.

Speaker 3 (17:45):
Like, oh, is that right?

Speaker 1 (17:45):
You know, the wife that he is allegedly beat twice,
that they've called the police and not actually press charges.
But you know, you know, a lot of that goes.

Speaker 3 (17:53):
Maybe she's happy he's gone.

Speaker 1 (17:55):
Well, if she's getting enough money from the right side
of the aisle, if you know what I'm saying, not
the right right, but like the left right, the correct
side of the aisle. Little people on the left are like, look,
we'll give you a bunch of money if we can
use him as this big victim of this, you know,
horrific administration trying to pluck Americans out of their holes

(18:15):
and send them back to the countries of their origin.
I don't know.

Speaker 3 (18:19):
It's two thirty.

Speaker 1 (18:19):
If you've got some thoughts on this or anything else,
open phone line Friday, it is alive. Four h two
five five eight eleven ten four h two five five
eight eleven ten, News Radio eleven ten kfab.

Speaker 3 (18:30):
And raise songer.

Speaker 1 (18:31):
Get that keyword in there and best of luck to you,
all right. So we were talking about this guy kilmar
Abrego Garcia. This is a guy with pretty complicated and
checkered past too. The United States federal government says he
belongs to the MS thirteen gang. He is the kind
of person we do not want in the United States.
He has been deported to El Salvador, which from winth

(18:52):
he came years and years ago, and yeah, in a
dangerous place, and he has become kind of the and
a crux of an argument about deportation between the Democrats
and the Republicans are discussing that today, among other things.
You can call us four h two five five eight
eleven ten. Four two five five eight eleven ten. Let's
start with John on the phone line today. John, welcome

(19:15):
to the show.

Speaker 4 (19:15):
It's up, Hey man, I ain't talk to you in
a while. How you been doing, hey man?

Speaker 3 (19:19):
Pretty good? How are you doing?

Speaker 4 (19:21):
I've been doing falling men and you know, it's all
good out here. Just trying to keep my head above water.
But anyway, let me get to my point that I
want to make with you. I don't think it's no
real disagreement with the Constitution. And that's all I want
to deal with is the Constitution. I don't know if
this guy needs to be shipped back to Africa, Honduras,

(19:44):
el Salvador, I don't really care. Okay, if he did
something and he then went through the system, get him
out of here. So's let's get that point out the way.
My thing is the Republican Party have brownbeated me? And
my people with the constitution for years. How about the
rule of law, the rule of law, the rule of law.

(20:06):
I done heard that so much, but it seemed like
since Donald Trump has taken over this country and the
rule of law that he's trying to destroy, the Republican
Party is going along with them, hook line and sacred.
And that's what I just don't understand. I don't care
if you send this guy to town. But the only

(20:26):
thing that I'm saying is that there's a due process
of law that he should have went through, and the
court and the courts have said all you need to
do is come to the court, show us the proof,
and you can then take him out and do what
you want to that Donald Trump has being bought up
with some of the lawyers and being bought up on

(20:48):
contempt now because they didn't want to turn the planes back.
Do you accept this of going against the rule of
law just to say this man should be gone? Yeah,
well you're a smart man.

Speaker 1 (20:58):
Well I appreciate that, John, I'll be honest with you.
The reason I haven't talked too much about it is
because I haven't. I don't have a big obvious opinion
about it, because there are so many things that I
think are nuanced in this conversation. It's not as simple as, oh,
well this guy has due process and constitutional rights. Well
he's an illegal immigrant. Still Now, there was something that
said he could stay in the United States in twenty nineteen.

(21:20):
What changed between the government saying she could stay here
in twenty nineteen and then shipping him to El Salvador
on a whim in twenty twenty five. Now we do
have some evidence that there have been police interactions that
he has had from things he's been accused of doing.
And yes, he has not been charged with anything. So theoretically,
even if he was charged, he would have theoretical due

(21:41):
process in this country to defend himself on those charges.
But he hasn't been charged with anything, So how can
he have due process if he hasn't been charged. It's
a very it's a very complicated issue, John, is what
I'm getting to.

Speaker 4 (21:52):
It's not complicated. I don't know why you keep saying
that it's not complicating. All they need to do is
and see you going back and Donald Trump with President
of to twenty nineteen. But see, I don't like, I
don't like to go back that far. I want to
deal with it now, and then this is right now,
only thing that the judges are saying. And then the

(22:13):
fourteenth Amendment, the fifteenth Amendment, every citizen, every person that
reaches the United States of American land, whether you're a
SETUS or not, you have the right to do process
of law for anything of being judicated towards you. So
that's what we need to deal with. And I don't
think we need to muddy the water with all of

(22:33):
this other crap that we're throwing in there. That don't
mean nothing.

Speaker 3 (22:37):
They don't mean a thing, all right.

Speaker 1 (22:38):
So, John, essentially what you're saying is is the deportation
process that isn't allowing people to defend themselves before their deporter.

Speaker 3 (22:45):
That you're having an issue with that.

Speaker 4 (22:47):
But that's the Constitution. It ain't got nothing to do
with meet mop and you. That's the constitution. Man. Do
you want to throw the constitution out to let Donald
Trump have his way?

Speaker 1 (22:57):
I'm just saying, John, there has been multiple things in
the Constitution that needed to be identified.

Speaker 3 (23:04):
I mean, heck, we're in the middle of trying to figure.

Speaker 4 (23:05):
Out what Wait. Wait, like I told you a smart man.
But now, if you want to change the constitution. What
do you have to do to change that?

Speaker 1 (23:14):
John, I'm not saying I want to change and I'm
just saying some of this stuff is left for interpretation,
and there is like things that the executive branch can
do and say, this makes whatever is said in this
part of the constitution Nolan void. There are things with interpretation. Heck,
I mean, and you would know this, John, And I'm
not trying to bring this whole thing back up, but

(23:36):
Domas Jefferson and all of the founding fathers wrote all
men are created equal? But what did that actually mean?
They didn't know what it meant. We had to fight
a war over in the eighteen sixties, almost one hundred
years later.

Speaker 3 (23:48):
Right.

Speaker 1 (23:49):
But that's what I'm saying, though, John, is just it's
like it's written down, but it's not as simple as
just like, well this is what it says.

Speaker 4 (23:55):
Well, wait a minute, do you know how all of
those things got ratified and got changed and got put
in that to be looked at from the constitutional perspective
and as it is and not as somebody else wanted
it to be. They took them to court. They took
them to court. It wasn't anything like my opinion, your opinion,
because that's what a problem comes in at. You've got

(24:16):
the goal to we got three branches of government, and
once we start circumvented either one of them, probable one
of them. Yep, we have a problem in the United States.

Speaker 3 (24:24):
I agree, John.

Speaker 1 (24:26):
This is where I'm going to end this conversation because
I want to get to the next color. But but
I one hundred percent agree that this executive branch is
doing way too much without telling us exactly why they're
doing it. That way too much power coming from one
branch incent of the others. And I understand that maybe
there's a reason for that. They need to be able
to be transparent about it. And I agree with you there, John.
I appreciate the call. Happy story.

Speaker 4 (24:46):
We can agree. We can agree on that. Hey, I
told you it was a smart man you would listen
to me up.

Speaker 1 (24:51):
Well, thank you, Thanks, John, appreciate the call. All Right,
Mike's on the phone line. Mike, welcome to the show.
What's going on?

Speaker 5 (24:58):
Well, I got a migraine now, But let me expand
on that he was afforded due process. His mother of
his child had police dispatched on two occasions for domestic
assault with bodily injury. She chose not to press charges,

(25:20):
which then under Biden's FBI Christopher Wray and his DHS
everybody obviously they don't deport. But so he was not
deported for those charges because he was not charged. Had
he been charged, he may have been deported. That is
part of due process, whether it's pre trial, criminal trial,
post trial. He had all that due process. Secondarily, what

(25:43):
did this guy actually do? So we know he did
abuse his wife, I guess it can't be held against
him because there were no convictions. Secondarily to that, in
twenty twenty two, he was stopped in Tennessee driving unlicensed.
He is not a light driver with seven illegal immigrant
passengers that he was in fact intending to bring them

(26:06):
to a place to work. That does meet the definition
of the federal statutes of human trafficking. Now the wording
on that whatever, maybe there's a little nuance, but he
was stopped for human trafficking, and he was in fact
already on a terror watch list. So I think there's

(26:26):
plenty of standing to say, yes, this man should be
deported because he originally committed a crime, whether you consider
it civil or actual criminal offense. He entered the country illegally. Now,
if we want, everyone's worried about the collateral damage, you
know where's he going. El Salvador. The president of El

(26:46):
Salvador has turned El Salvador from the most dangerous country
in the Western Hemisphere to the most safe country in
the Western Hemisphere. Now he has done so with a
lot of collateral damage. That is not the problem of
the United States. The reason why there's a lot of
collateral damage is because he is taking people off the

(27:07):
streets left and right. There are tens of thousands innocent
El Salvadorians in prison because there are millions of gang
members also in prison. That the collateral damage is happening
in El Salvador. He is home, that is his home.
He was not a good person while he was here.
He was committing crimes and that's not our problem. And know,

(27:31):
the president of El Salvador cannot smuggle him back into
the United States because of some bleeding heart liberal congressman
who wants to go and make a name for himself.

Speaker 1 (27:43):
Mike, I couldn't say better than you said it right there.
I really appreciate you dropping in on the show today.
Thanks so much, Thank you, all right, we'll take a break,
and who knows. I had some tickets to give away
till you coming up on news radio eleven to ten kfab.

Speaker 3 (27:56):
I need a Toyota Supra by.

Speaker 1 (27:58):
Tomorrow is the name of the handle, right, I don't
know why, but they had a hit tweet that's been
viewed one hundred and sixty eight point two million times,
one hundred and sixty eight point two million times, and
he said, SpongeBob really will have you on the floor
in tiers dog o mg bruh, Right, okay, and he

(28:19):
needs a Toyota super for context. That's just the name
of the account. But he said SpongeBob really will have
you on the floor in tears, dog o MG bra.
But thousands of people and I'm seeing them all because
I've liked them all, and it's really just dominating my algorithm.
And it's been the greatest thing ever all week long,
people sharing their favorite jokes and scenes from SpongeBob, especially

(28:42):
the early seasons, and this stuff will last forever. I
have been on record in saying SpongeBob SquarePants is easily
the greatest cartoon ever. It is the perfect amount of absurdity,
of jokes, of dialogue of character development that a cartoon
can possibly have. I mean, you have a squirrel from
ten is down there trying to do science experiments for

(29:02):
crying out loud and half of the stuff they get
themselves into. I mean, it's just the most random, ridiculous
things ever and it's never ending laughs and entertainment. So
thank you Twitter, slash x, and thank you to I
need a Toyota Superbyte tomorrow for putting this out into
the ether and giving me a ton of positivity this week.

Speaker 3 (29:20):
It's great.

Speaker 1 (29:20):
Speaking of positivity, I got four tickets to the Omaha
Supernova's match they play tomorrow against Atlanta.

Speaker 3 (29:25):
This is a massive game. Six o'clock C. Chi Helsoner Omaha.
I'll take the fiftieth caller.

Speaker 1 (29:30):
Caller fifty will win a four pack to the Omaha
Supernova's one versus two match up tomorrow. So calling now
four h two, five, five, eight, eleven, ten News Radio
eleven ten Kfab