Trump Links Prenatal Tylenol to Autism

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
And they pump so much stuff into those beautiful little babies.
It's a disgrace. I don't see it. I think it
has I think it's very bad. They're pumping It looks
like they're pumping into a horse. You have a little child,
a little fragile child, that he had a vat of
eighty different vaccines I guess eighty different blends, and they

(00:23):
pump it in. So ideally a woman won't take kyl
and all and on the vaccines, it would be good.
Instead of one visit where they pump the baby loaded
up with stuff, you'll do it over a period of
four times or five times. I was to this issue
for so many years just because I couldn't understand how

(00:46):
a thing like this could happen. And you know, it's
artificially induced. It's not like something that when you go
from all of those, you know, healthy babies to a
point where I don't even know structurally if country can
afford it. And that's the least of the problems. To
have families destroyed over this, it's just so terrible. I also,

(01:09):
and we've already done this. We want no mercury in
the vaccine, we want no aluminum in the vaccine. The
MMR I think should be taken separately. This is based
on what I feel the mumps, measles, and or the
three should be taken separately. And it seems to be

(01:34):
that when you mix them there could be a problem,
so there's no downside in taking them separately. In fact,
they think it's better, so let it be separate. The
chicken pox is already separate because when that got mixed in,
I guess they made it for for a while it
really was bad. So they make chicken pox individually, they're okay.

(01:55):
When you mix them, something maybe happens. So there's no
down side in doing it. It's not like, oh, if
you do it, bad things. No, it's only good size
and it may not have that much of an impact,
but it may have a big impact. So let those
be taken separately. And then hepatitis B is sexually transmitted.

(02:18):
There's no reason to give a baby that's almost just
born hepatitis B. So I would say, wait till the
baby is twelve years old and formed and take hepatitis B.
And I think if you do those things, it's going
to be a whole difference. It's going to be a
revolution in a positive sense. In the country, the FDA

(02:42):
will be updating the label of an existing drug to
reflect potential benefits in reducing some autism symptoms symptoms. This
gives hope to the many parents with autistic children that
it may be possible to improve their lives. That's one
of the things that I'm very, very happy about. This
was mostly going to be on how not to have

(03:04):
the child affected, but we've learned some pretty good things
about certain elements of genius that can be given to
a baby, and the baby can get better and in
some cases maybe substantially better. Not going to be easy,

(03:24):
but be a lot easier if it didn't happen in
the first place. As these great parents fully understand. They
fully understand. I feel so terribly for I have so
many friends with autistic children. It's just it's a tough situation. Finally,
to help reach the ultimate goal of ending the autism fever,

(03:44):
the NIH will be announcing thirteen major grant awards from
the Autism Data Science Initiatives. And to be honest with you,
to me, that's the least important. It's not even a
money thing at this point. There's so much money, but
they have to do and they have to move quick
when the alternative is that nothing bad can happen. Let's

(04:05):
do it now. I was just saying to Bobby and
the group, let's do it now. Nothing bad can happen.
It can only good happen. But with Thailand oil, don't
take it. Don't take it. And if you can't live,
if your fever is so bad, you have to take one,
because there's no alternative to that. Sadly, first question, what

(04:25):
can you take instead? It's actually there's not an alternative
to that. And as you know, other of the medicines
are absolutely proven bad. I mean they've been proven bad
with the aspirins and the ad bills and others, right,
and they've been proven bad.

Speaker 2 (04:40):
Now RFK Junior being called to the podium by President
Trump to continue this conference at the White House.

Speaker 3 (04:48):
To meet the President's challenge, I ordered hh AS to
launch un presidented all agency effort to identify all cause
of autism, including toxic and farm parmaceutical exposures. At President
Trump's urging, nih FDA, CDC, and CMS are turning over
every stone to identify the ideology of the autism epidemic

(05:13):
and how patients and parents can prevent and reverse this
alarming trend. We have broken down the traditional silos that
have long separated the agencies, and we have fast tracked
research and guidance. Historically, NIH has focused almost solely on
politically to save and entirely fruitless research about the genetic

(05:34):
drivers of autism. And that would be like studying the
genetic drivers of lung cancer without looking at cigarettes, and
that's what NIH has been doing for twenty years. As
a result, we don't have an answer to this critical question.
Despite the cataclysmic impact of the epidemic on our nation's children,

(05:55):
we are now replaced that we are now replacing the
institutional culture of politicized science and corruption with evidence based medicine.
NIH research teams are currently testing multiple hypotheses with no
area off limits. We promise transparency as we uncover the
potential causes and treatments, and we will notify the public

(06:18):
regularly of our progress. Today, we are announcing two important
findings from our autism work that are vital for parents
to know as they make these decisions. First, HHS will
act on a set of metaphine. The FDA is responding
to clinical and laboratory studies. It suggests a potential association

(06:39):
between cinemataphin used during pregnancy and advertise ner developmental outcomes,
including later diagnosis for ADHD and autism. Sciences are proposed
biological mechanisms linking prenatal acido MEDPIN exposure to altered brain development.

(06:59):
We have all to evaluate the contrary studies that show
no association. The FDA will issue physicians notice about the
risk of a seed of metaphine during pregnancy and begin
the process to initiate a safety label change. HHS will
launch a nationwide public service campaign to inform families and

(07:20):
protect public health. FDA also recognize that ced of metaphine
is often the only tool for fevers in pain in pregnancy,
as other alternatives have well documented adverse effects. AHHS once
therefore to encourage clinicians to exercise their best judgment and

(07:41):
the use of a metaphine for fevers and pain and
pregnancy by prescribing the lowest effective dose for the short
is necessary to duration and only when treatment is required. Furthermore,
thanks to also to the politicization of science, the safety
of a say a metaphine against the risk of neurodevelopmental

(08:02):
disorders and young children has never been validated prudent medicine
therefore suggests caution and a set of metaphine use young children,
especially in strong evidence also has associated it with liver toxicity.
Some stead he has also found the use of a

(08:23):
set of metaphant and children can potentially prolong viral illnesses.
F the able to drive new research to safeguard mothers,
children and families. In addition to a possible as set
of metaphant connection for autism for pregnant women, infants in toddlers,
our research has revealed that folate deficiency in a child's

(08:45):
brain can lead to autism. We have also identified an
exciting therapy that may benefit large numbers of children who
suffer from autism. Beer reviewed literature has documented that up
to sixty percent of folate deficient children with ASD and
if improve verbal communications if given. Luca foreign I have

(09:06):
instructed nih FDA and CMS helped doctors to treat children appropriately.
JA will help tell that story which started with sound science,
the kind that restores faith in government. The announcement of
this announcement also represents the historic collaboration between nih FDA,

(09:28):
CDC and CMS. We expect to be this to be
the first many announcements over the coming years that deliver
actuable information to parents on underlying cause of autism and
the potential paths for prevention and reversal. Finally, autism is
a complex disorder with multifactorial eteology. We are continuing to

(09:51):
investigate multiplicity potential causes no areas of taboo. One area
that we are closely examining as the president is vaccines.
Some forty to seventy percent of mothers who have children
with autism believe that their child was injured by a
vaccine as and Trump believes that we should be listening

(10:15):
to these mothers instead of gas lighting and marginalize them,
marginalizing them like prior administrations. Some of our friends like
to say, we should believe all women. Some of these
same people have been silencing and demonizing these mothers for
three decades because research on the potential link between autism

(10:37):
and vaccines has been actively suppressed in the past. It
will take time for an honest look at this topic
by scientists, and I want to reassure the people in
the autism community we will be uncompromising and relentless in
our search for answers. We will perform the studies that

(10:58):
should have been performed twenty five years years ago. Whatever
the answer is, we will tell you what we find.
We are researching this issue to all three agentsies. Jay,
we'll discuss one of our research initiatives at ihe this
model of unleashing unbiased, deep politicized, gold standard scientific research

(11:18):
and academic freedom to deliver actionable information to prevent and
reverse disease will be a model for the framework to
deliver similar results for many other chronic conditions that plague Americans.

Speaker 2 (11:34):
Well, we'll take this for a bit still, as long
as we're getting good information here. So here's doctor j Bodicharia,
Director of the NIH.

Speaker 4 (11:42):
Thank you Sector Kennedy, and thank you President Trump.

Speaker 5 (11:45):
Thank you very much. I'm proud to announce today that
the NIH has launched the Autism Data Science Initiative to
turbocharge autism research, devoting an additional fifty million dollars to
the cause of studying autism. Nearly two hundred and fifty
research teams from across the country applied, sent in their applications,
and were peer reviewed by the NIH review panels. The

(12:09):
peer reviews chose the thirteen best projects focused on root
causes and therapies with replication and validation studies to guarantee
gold standard science. The studies feature a new kind of
science called exposomics, where scientists consider environmental and medical factors,
nutrition events during pregnancy in combination with biology and genetics
to answered vital questions about autism. Science like this, conducted

(12:32):
in partnership with families and physicians is the best way
to arrest and reverse the autism epidemic. Autism spectrum disorder
encompasses a very wide range of symptoms, ranging from mild
difficulties with social interactions to profoundly autistic children who experienced
severe disabil disabilities in speech and behavior. Given this wide
range of symptoms across the spectrum, it seems certain that

(12:55):
there will be a wide range of biological contributors to
explaining the cause. The great thing about the new ANIH
Initiative on Autism is that scientists will use rigorous, advanced
methods and causal inference, machine learning, organize and other fresh
approaches to the problem. The sharp rise in the prevalence
of autism deserves an urgent response by the scientific community.

(13:16):
As Bobby said, the NIH has invested a lot of
money to study autism over the years, but the research
has not produced the answers that families and parents of
autistic children deserve and autistics children themselves deserve. For too long,
it's been taboo to ask some questions for fear the
scientific work might reveal a politically incorrect answer, because if
the restricted folks in scientific investigations, the answers for families

(13:39):
have been similarly restricted, often pointing families to behavioral therapies
that don't work for every kid, or suggest non modifiable
genetic factors is the cause. The genetics alone can't explain
such a sharp rise in autism prevalence over just a
few decades.

Speaker 4 (13:54):
As the President said, in.

Speaker 5 (13:55):
Coming months and years, as NIH scientists learn more, they
can help autistic children families. We won't delay like scientists
often like to do. I can say as a scientist,
myself is really tempting to delay, but you have to.
But in face of a problem like this, you have
to move fast. But we're telling that we will not
delay before telling American people about what we find, and
we will win the public trust with transparency and rigor. Already,

(14:18):
our broad and focus on autism research has pointed to
two items that will help families prevent and treat some
cases of autism. I'll leave the good news on these
two items to my close friends and colleagues, doctor McCarey
and doctor Oss. We've been working together closely on this
problem for the past six months, and our cooperation represents
an unprecedent collaboration with the Secretary Kennedy's Department of Health

(14:38):
Union Services, and with President Trump. I'm delighted to introduce
doctor Marty Mcarey, Commissioner the Food and Drug Administration, will
tell you about these announcements of practical help for families
with autism.

Speaker 6 (14:50):
Great thank you, Dr Barticharia. Mister President. This is the
start of a historic shift in medical culture. This administration
is working together to ask big questions about why our
nation's children are getting sick so fast, too often. Medicine
is doing small little studies giving us answers we already knew,

(15:10):
but we've got to make a difference. So you've given
us a charge to identify root causes, and we are
not going to stop so that we can end the
suffering we are watching. And if you've seen a kid
with autism, with severe autism, it's hard to watch kids
get frustrated, they get angry, they can be crying because
they want to speak and they can't speak. It's hard

(15:33):
to watch and it may be entirely preventable. For an epidemiologist,
that child is an expanding statistic, but for a child,
it can be brutal to have autism. Today, the FDA
is taking action to update the label on a seat
of benefit and sending a letter to all US doctors
letting them know about the risks and pregnancy. We now

(15:56):
have data we cannot ignore. There's a very large study.
The Boston Birth Cohort with researchers that have from Johns Hopkins,
my former institution in Boston University, found quote unquote consistent
associations between the cinamtafin and pregnancy and autism. And the
Nurses Health Study with researchers from Yale, Columbia and Harvard

(16:17):
looking at nine thousand kids, found that a cena metaphin
use in pregnancy was associated with neuro developmental disorders, and
four weeks ago, a Mount Sini Harvard study reviewed all
the existing literature and found the overwhelming body of evidence
points to an association. Sure you'll be able to find it,
as study to the contrary, that's how science works. But

(16:41):
to quote the dean of the Harvard School of Public Health,
there is a causal relationship between prenatal aceta metafin use
and neurodevelopmental disorders of ADHD and autism spectrum disorder. We
cannot wait any longer. And honestly, there's in this perfunctory,

(17:01):
reactionary mindless practice in medicine. I learned it in medical
school and residency. Just treat all fevers, low grade fever's
treatom with the scene of menifit.

Speaker 4 (17:11):
Why what are we doing?

Speaker 6 (17:12):
A study out of Hopkins actually showed that treating a
fever can prolong the duration of illness and a young kid.
Maybe that's because a fever is a body's natural way
of ridding an infection. When my wife was pregnant and
delivered our son a few months ago, they pushed her
to take a set of menifit for a low grade fever.

(17:33):
She said no, and then they looked to me and
I said, absolutely new. I'm also here to renounce good news. Today,
the FDA is filing a Federal Register notice to change
the label on an exciting treatment called prescription luk of orn,
so that it can be available to children with autism.
You know, autism may also be due to a autoimmune

(17:56):
reaction to a folate receptor on the brain, not allowing
that important vitamin to get into the brain cells. It's
a fairly established mature pathway. Again, we have a duty
to let doctors in the public know we are going
to change the label to make it available. Hundreds of
thousands of kids, in my opinion, will benefit. One study
found that with kids with autism and chronic FOL eight deficiency,

(18:19):
two thirds of kids with autism symptoms had improvement and
some market improvement.

Speaker 2 (18:25):
All right, we're going to stop it right there, Doctor
Marty McCarey, are hearing there, the director of the FDA,
And what an interesting day we have had today. The
big news in the last hour plus is Donald Trump,
Robert F. Kennedy, junior doctor Mehmet Oz along with the

(18:45):
FDA Director Marty McCarey, NIH director doctor j Batichario. They
all are there talking about autism and its link to
see the meta or tail and all. Well, if you
go to social media right now, and by the way,

(19:06):
they were still talking as of just a few minutes ago.
We're not going to carry the rest of it. If
you're interested in hearing more different information from different people
which is related to the same thing, you can find
it very easily on social media. I find it interesting.

(19:27):
I have three different news sources up in news channels up,
and they dumped out of this thing so fast, like
they Donald Trump spoke and then Robert F. Kennedy Junior spoke,
and they basically dumped out of it right there. So
I don't know if that had something to do with
the fact that they just didn't the information wasn't good

(19:49):
enough or sensational enough. And if you go online and
here we go tail and all in people with their
opinions about time All and people on both sides talking
about these different things that thiland All can cause.

Speaker 4 (20:15):
I don't know. I don't know what's next.

Speaker 2 (20:17):
Tiland Will probably is gonna sue, I mean, of course,
but this is the next big political situation we're going
to have to battle through. And if you are a
woman who is going through pregnancy and you want answers,

(20:38):
you don't want to risk your child having autism, but
you also want to, you know, try it to be
as healthy with your pregnancy as possible. You know who
i'd ask. I wouldn't ask the President of the United States,
I wouldn't ask the Director of Health and Human Services.
I'd ask my trusted personal physician. So so, if there

(21:00):
are people out there who are listening and they're saying, well,
that tailand all can't possibly explain this autism situation, Well
maybe it's the vaccines that were brought up, right, Well,
how does that explain all the people that don't have
autism who had all that stuff done? Is it just
like are we guestimating? Had a email come in with

(21:27):
a person that says, if a set of metaphine is
the cause of autism, then at sixty five years old,
why am I on the spectrum? And a seedam medaphine
was not readily available until after I was already born.
Could autism be hereditary just like your eye color? Well,
sure could, couldn't it. Anything that's a part of you

(21:52):
realistically could be passed on to the kids that you have,
couldn't it. Isn't that like a huge thing. Even recessive
traits can be passed on. Uh so maybe we need
to take better biology classes, but sure, sure it can
be passed on. Is this now, for whatever it's worth?

(22:15):
Donald Trump and the administration never once said this is
all autism. It falls under this, So I want to
make that also clear. It's going to be ridiculously blown up.
And people are going to be saying every possible thing
that they can about autism and this tail and All thing,

(22:37):
and then of course the response from Thailand all, and
then there's going to be this political back and forth
from physicians. We have doctors here, I mean doctor j
badicharias a PhD. Yeah, doctor Martin McCarey, he's a doctor's
those guys are in charge of NIH and FDA. These
are the big companies here. And yeah they're working in

(22:58):
the Trump administration, but they still got the education. There's
still doctors. Doctor mmet Oz too. Right, people disagree with
his politics, but he was pretty celebrated at least for
his prowess as a television personality and the way that
he could help people as a doctor. Right, even if

(23:20):
his politics aren't the same. Is this going to get
to a point where people who dislike Donald Trump are
gonna say, forget about it, Tailandhall is still perfectly fine
for you. And then the people who are Trump supporters
saying you should not take tailand all under any circumstance,
don't do it. Our pharmaceutical situation, right, like we already

(23:41):
know that big pharma and the medical field in this country,
not a lot of people have a lot of trust
in the system. And I think for pretty good reason,
we're gonna go from top to bottom and all this stuff.
But I remember the ivermectin situation. How politicized that got.
Or people in the political right said, ivermectin is a

(24:03):
great treatment for this. You can get ahold of ivermectin.
We should be able to get that because it treats
COVID nineteen much better than anything else does. And people
on the political left says, no, ivermectin is not for that.
You shouldn't be able to do that. This is pretty
much chapter two of that book, isn't it. Now.

Speaker 4 (24:22):
It's just like a really readily available thing.

Speaker 2 (24:28):
If I say I have taken Thailand all, or I
have Thailand all in my car or in my home
to deal with my fevers or whatever. Right, And they
made the good argument that, well, maybe it's good to
have fevers because that's what your body's reaction is. Trying
to get stuff out. Well, to keep in mind, if
you got too high of a fever, they tell you

(24:49):
to go to the emergency room. So I don't want
people to get too cavalier with just having fevers because
they heard one guy in the Trump administration say that
it was a good idea. Talk to your personal physician.
I'm not gonna tell you what to do. But if
you take Tyler all, is that all of a sudden
kind of like a variation of bud Light. Remember in
the fallout a couple of years ago of bud Light,

(25:11):
the beer showing up in a video on TikTok with
Dylan mulvaney, a transgender young person who apparently they hire
to be some sort of influencer for them, even though
that makes absolutely no sense. People rebelled against bud Light
in for months, maybe even still. Depending on who you

(25:32):
are and how much you care about this stuff, you
would be maligned for just having a bud Light in public,
or a Budweiser or anything Innheuser Busch, which is funny
because people didn't associate it with Bush or bush Light,
even though the same company makes those beers. I don't
understand it, right, Like we get so wrapped up into

(25:52):
the politics that we let that determine, like what we
like or what we don't like. And if tyland All
works for you as a person in your not audistic,
or you're not pregnant with a child, I don't know
how this would change your life at all or make
your life any different. I think I probably got tilent
all when I was a kid. I don't really remember.

(26:13):
I know that I got like robotussin. Anybody get that
when they had like a cough or something. I remember
how bad that tastes, and I hated that stuff. But
like I probably got til on olivery once in a
while for a fever or for some sort of ailment.
Maybe some people would disagree with this, but I feel
like it turned out okay. You know, I don't know.

(26:35):
There's certainly not like an end all, be all answer
to this, and you're gonna just walk online or for
all of the people that for the news, for the
news stations that are going to decide to talk about this,
it doesn't look like many of them are, at least
right now. It's really just gonna be on social media.
They honed in on the announcement itself, and then after
like five or ten minutes they're like, Okay, that was

(26:57):
enough for that, and they've moved on, Which is what
that tells you that people either don't really care about
this topic that much, or they don't feel like this
topic is really in much of a sensational needle mover.
I think it's an important thing to talk about. I
just think that whatever your doctor, your personal trusted doctor says,
is what I would suggest, that's the person you should
talk to about it. You shouldn't be just like willy

(27:18):
nilly being like, oh well, politicians told me that I
should do this instead for whatever that purpose is. But
it's going to be interesting if somebody takes tailan on now.
Is that all of a sudden like a dog whistle
to them being like some sort of liberal is like
do I have to be afraid of like popping a
tailing all every once in a while and people finding

(27:39):
out about it?

Speaker 4 (27:40):
Is that? Like? Is that what it's going to become?

Speaker 2 (27:42):
Like the Democrats did with anybody who's taking ivermectin, you know,
just like, oh wow, I can't believe you're taking ivermectin.
You obviously don't know anything about medicine. It's like, I'm
just trying to get better. Man, I don't know. I
don't know what you like. I don't know why you
care so much about Like how I do that with myself?
Like what about you know your doctor? Did your doctor
say it was a bad idea? Then okay, fine, how

(28:05):
about you live your life and I'll live my life.

Speaker 4 (28:08):
I don't know.

Speaker 2 (28:09):
I don't know, but certainly Donald Trump in his administration
wanted to get to the bottom of autism. This was
a step in that direction. Today, even if you're going
to run into people online that are saying there's absolutely
no evidence, or people saying there's a ton of evidence,
the waters are invariably even murkier now for the general
public than they were before this took place.

Speaker 4 (28:30):
Today, it's just.

Speaker 2 (28:31):
The reality of the America we live in. I'm kind
of doom scrolling now and just fairly entertained. I know
how I'm going to live my life.

Speaker 4 (28:38):
You know what I'm gonna do.

Speaker 2 (28:39):
I'm I'm going to live my life by talking to
my doctor if I have anything going on, if there's
something that I need to address in my own personal health.
The people I trust, the doctor that I have, They're
gonna tell me what I need to do. If I
have questions for them, whether it's politically related or not,
then that's another thing for you. You know, you could
ask them if you still feel like you cannot trust

(29:02):
them because what their advice is somehow against your political beliefs.

Speaker 4 (29:05):
That's a decision you have to make.

Speaker 2 (29:08):
It's not something that I am that concerned with when
it comes to a doctor, but I also don't have
the ability to be pregnant. I also don't have the
ability to be a part of this this scenario where
if you're looking at what happens next as far as
what goes on for this topic of conversation, that is

(29:33):
one of the things that we are going to try
to unpack and figure out with the changing political climate.
So as it relates to your life, Please take my
advice and heed my advice, and research and read and
learn about as much as you can because you're going
to need to. But also understand that people who go

(29:56):
to school to be doctors have to do that for
a long time, and then they have to practice for
a long time. Then they get a chance to be
a physician. And you have made a determination as to
whom you can trust and if you need a physician
that fits in your political beliefs, if that's something that's
that important to you. I'm sure those people exist out there,

(30:17):
but I would trust my physician to give me the
best possible advice and it not be related to politics.
But maybe I'm too naive. I guess we'll find out
what the rest of America thinks.