Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:01):
Good Jesse Kelly Shaw. Let's have some fun on a Monday.
Speaker 2 (00:11):
The week is just getting going, Isn't that amazing? It's
officially December, it's Christmas season. I am in a wonderful mood,
and we have a gigantic show tonight. There's no chance
whatsoever I'm going to get to everything. So I'm gonna
get the two big things out of the way that
(00:32):
we are definitely going to tackle, and then we'll deal
with everything else. Well, I should say three big things.
Medal of honor Monday, of course, is one of those
that's an hour from now. Will honor a hero? You
get that. To open the show, Pete heggscheth war crimes.
You've been seeing all these things for twenty four forty
eight hours. We are going to discuss who's doing it,
(00:55):
why they're doing it, communist ops, how to recognize them,
how do they pull them off.
Speaker 1 (01:01):
It's going to be a long talk in the open.
Speaker 2 (01:04):
Then we're going to discuss this refugee stuff Afghanistan bringing
people here. If by the time I'm done with that
and I get to some of your emails, which I
will do if I get done with all that, we
have things about judges that are trained by communists in
this country. What the left's plans are if they take
(01:28):
power back a race the right ignored that's now going
to be costly smartphones.
Speaker 1 (01:34):
College degrees, food stamps.
Speaker 2 (01:37):
I mean, by the way, that's not even close to
all of it. It's just going to be a big
week on the Jesse Kelly Show. You want to be
here for every single second or you'll die. Now. I
don't want you to take any time to text, all right,
So let's first discuss this. This is going to be
(01:58):
giving away the game right now. This is going to
come to the Pete Hegseeth op the communists are running
right now designed to destroy Pete hegseeth, delegitimize the Trump administration,
and several other things. But it's going to take us
a while to get there. So sit there, get comfortable,
put your robe on, and let's talk war crimes. You've
(02:22):
seen this term a lot. You've heard this term a
lot if you've been reading the paper, you've been watching
the news, there's lots of talk about war crimes. Did
Pete hag Seth, Secretary of war, did he order a
strike on a drug boat? And then if there were
survivors in the water. Did he order a seal team
(02:43):
six in there to put one in all their skulls
as they're limping through the water. Wow, I mean, I've
heard the term on the news war crimes, on.
Speaker 3 (02:55):
What CNN is reporting, with the Washington Post is reporting.
Do you believe if there was a second strike to
eliminate any survivors, that that constitutes a war crime?
Speaker 4 (03:08):
It seems to if that is true, if what has
been reported is accurate, I've got serious concerns.
Speaker 2 (03:17):
Well.
Speaker 5 (03:17):
First, if that reporting is true, it's a clear violation
of the DoD's owned laws of war as well as
international laws about the way you treat people who are
in that circumstance, and so this rises to the level
of a war crime if it's true.
Speaker 2 (03:34):
Do you think there was a war crime committed?
Speaker 4 (03:37):
Oh?
Speaker 6 (03:37):
I think it's very possible there was a war crime committed.
Speaker 2 (03:40):
Of course, you got it. We'll come back to that. Now.
Let's get something out of the way first, because this
is so important in life. It's important for you, It's
important for me, always has been, it always will be
figuring out the angle of the person you're talking talking to,
(04:00):
the person you're dealing with is there an angle? What's
the angle? The other day? This was last week? I
think it was Tuesday or Wednesday. Now my son's whatever
they're doing. AB will order them to come give me
a hug and greet me when I get home. They
usually don't need encouragement. I'm glad my boys love me,
But usually it consists of, hey, Dad, love you, welcome home,
(04:24):
give you a hug, and then they'll go back to
homework or doing whatever the things they're doing while I
talk with OB. Last week, my youngest doesn't just give
me a hug and leave. Starts to ask me in
depth about my day, starts to really dig into the
how I'm doing good day at work. I don't know
(04:46):
that he's ever at once asked me if I had
a good day at work. It didn't take a genius
to figure out there's an angle. There wasn't long after
that he asked for twenty bucks to buy a video game.
There's your angle, right, All these people in the media
United States senators on the Democrat side talking about war crimes?
(05:07):
Are these people worried about war crimes? Is that legitimate?
Is that a concern for them? Because it matters otherwise
there's an angle. If they're not actually worried about war crimes,
then we have to figure out what they're doing. And
we're going to get to what they're doing. So we're
gonna rewind. This isn't going to be the only time
Afghanistan comes up tonight, And we're going to just talk
(05:30):
briefly again about a story you know very well because
we discussed it at length on this show. It will
always bother me. We were in Afghanistan for far too long,
twenty years, but we did have Bagram Airbase secured. We
were not facing any more deaths on our side. That
just wasn't something that was happening. We were approaching in
(05:51):
the Biden administration, the twentieth anniversary of nine to eleven.
The Biden administration wanted a boost in the poll numbers,
and so they had the State Department order the military
to get out of Afghanistan. And the military said, we
now know all this because it all came out afterwards.
General said, wait a minute, we can't just leave right now.
(06:13):
We did to do this step by step. We have
it's a proz no leave now, pack up leave. So
they had to do what they were told. They packed
up and they left. Surprise surprise that Taliban immediately start
taking over the country. Afghan security forces are falling. And
what should have been a public a public win for
(06:35):
the Biden administration, a nice little pr boost, little goosen
up the poll numbers, well it turned into a loss.
Now the world's watching as the country's collapsing, and we
had Afghani civilians falling from C one thirties. It was
a nightmare, so much so that the Biden administration was
(06:55):
getting asked hard questions about it. Why aren't you getting involved?
What are you doing? Biden administration freaked out and sent
the troops right back in. Only Bogram was gone by then,
and so we had to secure a civilian air base
that was not secure at all. We didn't have the facilities.
And before you know it, an Isis suicide bomber one
(07:15):
that was almost undoubtedly in our possession in Bogram had
gotten outstrapped the suicide bomb to his vest, to his chest,
I mean full of ball bearings, and incinerated our troops
at Abby Gate. You know the story. Well, well, now
the bid deministration looks really bad, don't they.
Speaker 1 (07:35):
This was supposed to be a big win We're supposed
to look good.
Speaker 2 (07:39):
Ool. Now we got dead troops and dead civilians, and
now the public's mad. We look bad and competent. Gotta
do something, And they did something. They sent a reaper
drone out, a reaper drone that incinerated ten people, ten Afghanis.
(08:06):
Seven of those people were children. I know you probably
don't have a deep, deep heart for the Afghan people.
Neither do why I'd be lying if I said otherwise.
But innocent is innocent? What would you think if someone
sent a reaper drone? You just had Thanksgiving? Your families
(08:27):
gathered around, picture that moment, that table, kids, adults, and
someone incinerates it and kills you all. That's bad? Isn't
it about as bad as it gets? Seven children murdered
by our military. In the wake of that murder, the
(08:49):
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, Mark Millie, stood up in
front of the American public said it was an Isis
guy we got and there were some others, of course,
and then called it a righteous strike. The truth comes
out eventually, the public finds out that it was ten
completely innocent people murdered, and then John Kirby, Pentagon spokesman,
(09:11):
goes on the news. You've heard this one hundred times
on the show, and they asked them about it. Hey,
ten people, seven kids, who's going to jail or getting fired?
Speaker 7 (09:22):
Does it strike you that no one is held accountable?
Because I know how it strikes a lot of people
around the world that you can get away with murder
and nobody's punished for it.
Speaker 8 (09:29):
I do understand that we appreciate that not everybody's gonna
support this decision. What I can tell you is we
looked at this thing very, very comprehensively, and again we
acknowledge that there were procedural breakdowns, processes were not executed
the way they should have been, but it doesn't necessarily
indicate that an individual or individuals have to be held
to account for that.
Speaker 7 (09:50):
But look, this is more discipline inside the Pentagon at all.
I mean, maybe they're no charges brought up, but is
anyone demoted or disciplined for what happened, then.
Speaker 2 (09:58):
Well, what we are going to do.
Speaker 8 (10:00):
There's not going to be individual discipline as a result
of this, really, but what we are going to do
is learn from this, and we're going to enact and
improve our procedures in our processes to try to make
sure this doesn't happen again.
Speaker 2 (10:13):
Seven children murdered, Nobody sent to prison, nobody fired, nobody
even got a stern letter. So rewinding, do the people
crying about war crimes right now actually care about war
(10:35):
crimes because not one of these people had a word
of complaint for the Biden administration. Well, let's go ahead
and set that argument aside, because now we know these
are not people who actually care about war crimes being committed.
These aren't even human beings. These are soulless communist demons.
(10:55):
So if that's not the angle, what is the angle
that we will discuss next? It is the Jesse Kelly
Show on a wonderful, wonderful Monday. Member, you can email
us Jesse at Jesse kellyshow dot com. You love, your hate,
your death threats. I will get to your emails at
(11:16):
some point during the show. There's just big things we
have to talk about. So what we did a couple
minutes ago, was we eliminated this, well we care about
war crimes lie that they're selling you. None of these
people care about war crimes. None of these people shed
a single tear for any innocent person killed under any
Democrat administration. So what is going on now, Let's before
(11:39):
we get into the specifics of that, let's discuss the
importance of institutions and specifically a network. And we're talking
about this because communists use their network of institutions to
run operations, to run ops, that's what they do. So
(12:01):
what kind of network are we talking about here? Well,
there are NGOs, as you're well aware, non government organizations.
Let's drill into that for a moment. There's a lot
of use, almost all of it really bad for NGOs.
But an organization, let's say, just as an example, the CIA.
(12:24):
Why would the Central Intelligence Agency ever have a use
for an NGO? Well, okay, what if what if I
want something done? What if I want a movement something,
but I can't have my fingerprints on it. It's illegal,
(12:48):
it's immoral, it would be unpopular, just would look bad. Well,
here's what I do. I create or find they usually
create them. I create or find a non government organization
and I have them do it. I find ways to
(13:12):
get them money, and I have them handle what I
want handled me. I love red lobster. I eat red
lobster cheddar baby biscuits every chance I get. Maybe red
Lobster doesn't sponsor the show. Maybe corporate would pitch a
(13:32):
fit because of how much I talk about Red Lobster,
by the way, Corporate would never I can talk about
them all I want, but maybe corporate would pitch a fit.
But I want you to go eat at Red Lobster.
So if I want to get around corporate's glare, talk
to Chris. We work something out. Chris arranges a little
wire transfer to a non government organization up by.
Speaker 1 (13:57):
A former employee of.
Speaker 2 (13:59):
The show started his own ENNGO, and he is going
to run a pro Red Lobster campaign. That's part of
how these networks work, another part of the networks, And
you really need to understand this. This is majorly, majorly important.
Is the media now stop? I know you already hate
(14:19):
the media, so do I. We don't need any more
help to hate the media. It's not about hatred, it's
about understanding sometimes what we're seeing. Do you have any
idea how often evil deep state organizations like the CIA
and FBI work hand in hand with the media to
run operations. Half the time at these organizations, a media organization,
(14:44):
it's a former FBI employee, former a former FBI employee,
a former employee at the CIA, who's running the stories,
running the newsrooms. Do you have any idea how long?
For example, the wash Rington Post has had to deal
with allegations that they work directly with the Central Intelligence
(15:07):
Agency for things the Central Intelligence Agency wants put out
into the world that hasn't been known in Washington circles forever.
Now again, I know you hate the Washington Post, but
have you ever opened up the Washington Post or read
a headline from the Washington Post and said to yourself
(15:28):
that looks like that looks like the spy agency wanted
that story out there. Maybe you have, maybe you haven't.
Either way, that's how it is. You create and infiltrate
various institutions, media organizations, NGOs that work with existing government
(15:51):
institutions and existing government politicians. And it goes beyond this.
By the way, Hollywood's been involved in this in the past.
That's well known, in documented, and beyond that, you have
this intricate network of institutions, some created, some infiltrated. And
what that gives you the power to do is once
you let's say I'm the central commander. I'm the central commander,
(16:13):
and I have this newspaper. I have this university, I
have this politician in my pocket. I have this, I
have that, and now I want to run an operation.
I can use the power in money and influence of
the institutions I have created and infiltrated to push the
story the scandal I want pushed, to promote what I
(16:35):
want promoted, to destroy what and who I want destroyed,
If that makes sense. I didn't want to make that
needlessly complicated. But they work with each other all the time,
and it's happening as we speak. And I wanted to
give you that zoomed out version of a network before
we zoom in, which is what we're about to do.
(16:56):
What's the deal with this heg Seth Venezuela story. Next,
it is the Jesse Kelly Show on a Monday night.
If you miss any part of the show, you can
download at iHeart, Spotify iTunes. So we just discussed a
couple of different things. I can't catch you up on everything.
The people putting out this war crime story don't care
about war crimes, but they do have There is a
(17:20):
communist network in this country, many of them actually. But
we're going to talk about the communist network. What it's
being used for right now. So let's go through this chronologically,
because I think chronologically helps helps us understand the op
that's currently being run. And this is not necessarily about
the Pete hag Seth or something like that. This is
(17:43):
so we can recognize these things in the future. And
before I go into any of that, let me just
give away this portion of it. This is what you
really need to understand. You need to look for patterns.
Patterns will tell you if you're seeing an operation, patterns
(18:06):
what pattern You're busy, You have a job, you have
a life, you have school, but you have time to
dissect every media story, what kind of patterns? So let's
dumb it down to the dumbest possible way you can
put it, because this is how I understand it. Language terms.
If you're starting to see this outlet use a certain
(18:29):
term or certain word, and then this senator is using
a certain term or certain word, and then they see
that same term or word here, or same term of
word there. If they're all using the same terminology about something,
any subject. It's not about Venezuela, any subject, you are
most likely watching a communist op. Look I played it
for you in the beginning, I'll play it. This is
(18:50):
an entire minute before I go into the specifics of it.
You turned on the news programs on Sunday, you saw
Democrat politicians all saying the same thing. By the way,
and medium.
Speaker 3 (19:02):
Based on what CNN is reporting, what the Washington Post
is reporting, do you believe if there was a second
strike to eliminate any survivors, that that constitutes a war crime?
Speaker 4 (19:17):
It seems to if that is true, if what has
been reported is accurate, I've got serious concerns.
Speaker 2 (19:26):
Well.
Speaker 5 (19:26):
First, if that reporting is true, it's a clear violation
of the DoD's own laws of war as well as
international laws about the way you treat people who are
in that circumstance, and so this rises to the level
of a war crime if it's true.
Speaker 2 (19:42):
Do you think there was a war crime committed?
Speaker 6 (19:46):
Oh, I think it's very possible there was a war
crime committed. Of course, it's either murder from the first
strike if their whole theory is wrong, and I think
you know, the weight of the legal opinion here is
that they've concocted this ridiculu list legal theory. But even
if you accept their legal theory, that it is a
war crime, and so I do believe that the Secretary
(20:07):
of Defense should be held accountable for giving those kind
of orders.
Speaker 2 (20:12):
That's always a dead giveaway on an op a war crime. Chronologically,
before the Seditious six put up that video, which i'll
play for you again in a moment before they put
up that video, did you know that billboards started to
appear around the country. Maybe you've seen one of these,
(20:32):
Maybe you have not. If you'd like, you can go
on social media and look them up. Billboards started to
appear that had a website on them. What these billboards
were were essentially messages to people inside the United States
military talking about refusing illegal orders. Hey, have you been
(20:54):
given an illegal order? Reach out? You can reach out anonymously.
I've seen multi to pull reporters quote reporters say something
like that publicly. Hey, if you have any knowledge of
any legal order, you can reach out to me publicly
if you have any knowledge of this. This is before
this video comes out, and before I have Jewish producer
(21:17):
Chris press play on the video, I want to remind
you of a little tidbit that might be important. One
of the voices you'll hear, the female voice in this video.
One of the female voices I should say is United
States Senator Alissa Slotkin of Michigan. Former CIA employee Alissa Slotkin,
(21:43):
Didn't it seem so odd, almost out of nowhere, that
you woke up one morning and someone had cut, edited,
even put a fancy music background on this video after
the billboards had gone up.
Speaker 4 (21:59):
Americans trust their military, but that trust is at risk.
Speaker 9 (22:02):
This administration is pitting our uniform military.
Speaker 3 (22:05):
And intelligence community professionals.
Speaker 9 (22:07):
Against American citizens like us. You all swore an oath
to protect and defend this constitution.
Speaker 2 (22:13):
Right now, the threats to our constitution aren't just coming
from a broad but from right here at home.
Speaker 9 (22:18):
Our laws are clear. You can refuse illegal orders.
Speaker 10 (22:22):
You can refuse illegal orders.
Speaker 2 (22:24):
You must refuse illegal orders.
Speaker 3 (22:26):
No one has to carry out orders that violate the
law or our constitution.
Speaker 9 (22:30):
We know this is hard and that it's a difficult
time to be a public.
Speaker 3 (22:33):
Servant, but whether you're serving in the CIA.
Speaker 9 (22:36):
The Army, or Navy, the Air Force, your vigilance is critical.
And know that we have your back because now more
than we got it, we got American people.
Speaker 2 (22:45):
You know who funded that video? An NGO? Did you
know that wasn't funded out of a Democrat senator's office.
An NGO funded that video. Did you know that? So
we're just going chronologically. Huh. There are billboards. Then Democrats
(23:07):
get up in an edited video paid for by an
NGO talking about illegal orders. You should refuse these illegal orders,
don't give up the ship. And then over Thanksgiving break,
if you're a news nerd, and I know you are,
you woke up to a story from the Oh, look
at that the Washington Post. Hey, Chris, what organization does
(23:30):
the Washington Post work with all the time? Starts with
a seeds three letters that you woke up to a
story from the Washington Washington Post with an accusation that
the Secretary of War Pete hag Seth ordered the execution
of wounded drug dealers in the wake of one of
(23:50):
these strikes on the drug boats. The drug boats do,
remember they're going, They go from Venezuela to Mexico and
then they traffick the drugs up into America through mex Anyway,
then we wake up to a Washington Post story. Billboard first,
then video, then Washington Post story. Then almost gosh, it's
(24:12):
almost as if it was all coordinated. Every Democrat United
States senator they could possibly find, got an invite to
command the communist news networks on Sunday and spread the
exact same term. First you were talking about illegal orders
and illegal orders and illegal orders and illegal orders. And
(24:34):
then we hear.
Speaker 3 (24:36):
This based on what you what CNN is reporting, what
the Washington Post is reporting. Do you believe if there
was a second strike to eliminate any survivors, that that
constitutes a war crime.
Speaker 2 (24:52):
I'm not going to play the whole thing again. My
point is not about this story specifically. It's really, really
genuinely not This is very clearly a communist op. It
is an op designed to wound the Trump administration. Possibly. Look,
if you're a communist, all you can do is try
(25:15):
maybe you get Pete hagg Seth fired if you're a communist.
If you can't, by the way, I don't think that's
gonna happen. But if you can't get Pete hagg Seth fired,
maybe you drive a little bit of a wedge between
Trump and Pete hagg Seth. After all, Trump's Trump's already
starting to have to answer questions about the whole thing
Pete had got. Hey, are you still with Pete, maybe
(25:37):
you drive a wedge. Maybe maybe maybe if you can't
get any of that done, maybe you just hurt Trump's
pull numbers a little bit. The reason is not important.
What is important is that you me that we recognize
communist ops when they're happening, and that we always understand
(25:59):
the point of the op is to hurt you and
the things you love. And this is easy. That's easy
to recognize and easy to accept when the target of
the op is someone you like. But what if the
target of the communist op is someone you don't like?
(26:20):
That will talk about in a moment and then we'll
finish this up and move on through Medal of Honor
Monday and other things. It is the Jesse Kelly Show
on a Wonderful Monday talking about communist ops and the
one they're running against, Pete haig Seth. Remember about ten
minutes from now, we have Medal of Honor Monday, where
we honor a hero who did heroic things for this country.
(26:41):
I'm going to get to emails, We're going to get
to this Afghan refugee stuff. There's just so much to
get to now. Final words on this communist op thing
I just laid it all out for you. If you
missed it, you got to go back listen to the podcast.
You can never ever, ever, ever, ever ever participate in
(27:01):
a communist op ever, And the reason you don't ever
participate in a communist op is because you understand the
communist is running the OP to hurt you and the
things you love. You are never going to align on something.
He's never going to have your best interests at heart.
(27:25):
The OP is always designed to move the revolution forward
and destroy what you love. Now, that's very simple, right,
I'm sure you're sitting there nodding your head. Now, yeah,
of course I got it. But what if the communist
op is against someone you hate, against something unsavory. Even
(27:49):
A good example of this actually is it was recently
a couple months ago. You probably already forgot about it,
but Politico Ransom story about some local gop op produce
who were making Nazi jokes and stuff like that in
some private chat. You know, I love Hitler just saying
stupid it stupid, horrible stuff like that. Well, Hitler's going
(28:12):
to create emotions in people, being as how he was
a freaking monster. And the second you hear the word Hitler,
you think to yourself. I better condemn that. I have
to stand out, I have to say something. But you're
not understanding it. It's not about Hitler. It's about understanding
(28:33):
that it's an op you're looking at, and if you participate,
you are aiding the communist in his revolution. So for
this example, maybe you love Pete hegg Seth. Maybe you
hate Pete heg Seth. I know him personally, so I
can't really speak to that. It's not my business. I
like him, but maybe you hate him. Let's say you
(28:56):
hate Pete hegg Seth. Maybe you genuinely do. That's fine,
you have your opinion. You still can't participate in this op.
Not because of Pete Hechseth. It's not about Pete Hexseth.
It's not even specifically about what did or didn't happen
in international waters. It's not even about that either. You,
(29:20):
because you are a thinking person, an anti communist who
understands what we're up against, you recognize the pattern. You
see the billboards, you know about the NGOs, you see
the media, you see the coordinated terminology, the coordinated communist response,
and you immediately recognize that's a communist op and op
(29:43):
designed to hurt me. Therefore, I will not put up
the Facebook posts saying.
Speaker 1 (29:49):
If this is true, he needs to resign.
Speaker 2 (29:54):
That's why you don't participate, unlike this loser Mike Turner
is his name, who goes on CBS face the nation
and this is the Republic and listen to this.
Speaker 10 (30:06):
Washington Post is reporting that before the strike on the
very first suspected drug boat in September, Defense Secretary Pete
hag Seth ordered that everyone on board be killed, and
then when two of the eleven people on board survived,
a follow on strike was ordered to finish them off
in the water. Now, some law of war experts are
(30:27):
saying that that was illegal, that killing people who are
no longer able to fight is a war crime. What
is your view and what questions do you have for
the Pentagon.
Speaker 11 (30:38):
Congress does not have information that that had occurred. Both
the chairmen of the Center Arm Services Committee, Chairman of
the House Arm Services Committee, and ranking members have opened investigations. Obviously,
if that occurred, that would be be very serious, and
I agree that that would would be an illegal act.
Speaker 2 (30:57):
Had to throw it in at the end to do
it instead of just saying no, you're a liar. No,
this is an operation. No, I can recognize this for
what it is. Instead has to play foot see with
the communist media. Hey, Mike, why do you think Sonny
Hustin said this to him.
Speaker 12 (31:16):
I can't speak to the law of it.
Speaker 2 (31:17):
I don't know.
Speaker 12 (31:18):
You know, I'm not a geopolitical expert. But in terms
of the law of it, you're right, Sarah. That is
why those army vets explained, do not follow. You do
not have to follow illegal orders. You know why, because
if this is deemed to have been war crimes, which
by all accounts right now there are seven sources that
said Pete Hexath did say kill them all, even after
(31:39):
there were two survivors, which are supposed to do under
international law. You are supposed to take those fighters as
war criminals prisoners of war, and you're supposed to give
them refuge, and you're supposed to take care of them,
and then you are supposed to put them into a
court of law.
Speaker 2 (31:58):
Don't take part in communist ops ever. Recognize them. See
the patterns, see the consistent terminology. Recognize what is happening,
Recognize why it is happening, and either defend your side
(32:18):
or sit them out. Don't ever, under any circumstances, participate
in communist ops, even if you hate the target of
the ops, even if it looks bad, and don't. And
by the way, you know what participation includes if this
is true, Well, if this is true, the second you
(32:42):
hear yourself saying that about a communist op, you should
know you're participating. Part of the point of the communist
op is to get you to participate in it. Did
you know that the op itself, if you never participated,
would never be able to escape the bubble. It would
(33:03):
never be able to escape the communist news democrat bubble. Ever,
the communist op is designed to have you participate in it,
one way or the other. They want you telling your
friends about it, They want you putting up that tweet
about it. They die and go to heaven. When you say,
(33:23):
if this is true, it's really bad. They love that.
Do not participate in communist ops. All right, not now,
not ever now, Enough of that garbage. We're moving on.
We're moving on because we have to honor a hero.
We will get to some Venezuela stuff. Actually, what is
(33:46):
happening there. I'm gonna try to get to that next hour.
We'll get to some of his refugee stuff, but it's
medal of honor. Monday time next