Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Hey, it's Justin Barklay at Protech Keeping and Cooling. Their
goal is to provide high quality, reliable HVAC services to
their customers. Protech puts a focus on customer service because
they want every customer to be a Protech customer for life.
In addition to providing great customer service right now, Protech
is both manufacturer and utility rebates available to help you
(00:21):
save money. So this summer, if you find yourself in
need of a new AC for your home or business,
I recommend you call Protech Heating and Cooling online protech
gr dot com. Get ready to strap, Benny. It's going
to be a heck of a riot. It's like drinking
from a fire hose. Never a dull moment. But yes,
you'll hear the stories you won't hear anywhere else, and
we appreciate you being here with us form today. I'm
(00:43):
justin Barclay. It's the after show, the show, after the show, folks.
We are full speed ahead on a fantastic after show.
By the way, do you see this at elon Muss
News Tesla share dropping seven percent. It's okay, So he
(01:04):
says he was a third party, a third political party,
Elon says, what I think is really going on there.
Maybe we'll try and get into that in a little
bit here, in just a moment. Oh, excuse me, now
they've updated the headline. Tesla's shares have dropped eight percent
after he says he wants to launch a third political party.
Is it paro two point zero? Only one thing that
(01:26):
this does third parties is take votes away from Republicans,
the people who want to save Western civilization. That people
who want to make America great again and give votes
really to a third party is not going to mount
to anything.
Speaker 2 (01:41):
Now.
Speaker 1 (01:41):
I hate to say that, but that's just the absolute
truth on it. I'm just looking. I'm using experience here,
added by wisdom. It's it's not hard to tell you
how that's going to play out. We also have the
story about Comparently there's nothing to see here, folks. That's
what we're being told yesterday the report coming out on Axios.
(02:02):
No whether the report is feel or not, or there's
more to the story, that's a whole nother question. Axios
says they have obtained memos inside from the FBI the
Department of Justice talking about this story, saying that there's
nothing to see here, Jeffrey Epstein didn't blackmail powerful figures,
(02:24):
didn't keep a client list, was he wasn't murdered, he
didn't kill himself. Bye. By the way, all of this
is going to get really interesting. I'm gonna tell you
what we know, and we're gonna bring all of these
details into a little bit better perspective here in just
(02:48):
a little bit, I'm asked the same question, do you
buy I saw this last night? Can we just get it?
Can we get a break? Can we get a break?
They say, this one big beautiful bill that passed this week,
and we got lots of great things happening today. President Trump,
I believe, has said in the next couple of days,
we're supposed to start seeing some of the some of
(03:09):
the uh the letters going out for terrafs in some
of that. So that's that's awesome about them. You know,
lots of wins stacking up. Now we get this, we
got to deal with. I just I mean, I'm I'm
about to go join elon. I know I joke about this,
(03:31):
but it's true. It's it's uh, it's it's enough to
make people feel and you're just frustrated by it all,
you know, like what in the world. When are we
ever going to Are we ever going to get the truth?
And I know there's a lot of that already out there,
and so that's that's why I'm just I'm just careful
(03:51):
about all this and would warn you too, just wait
till we don't react right away. I know there's a
tendency for us to that anyway, But don't react right away.
Just take a breath, give it a moment. Let's let's
see if we can figure this all out, and let's
make sure we are getting all of the news before
(04:13):
we we dive in full speed ahead. All right, diving
in full speed ahead. I want to say thank you
to my good friend Mike Lindell, my patriot, my friend,
my pillow guy, my pillow, MyPillow dot com, slash justin,
mystore dot com, slash justin. Still take advantage time, still
(04:34):
to take advantage right now of that fourth of July,
the big patriotic cell they did, by the way, I
know there is some good news out there.
Speaker 3 (04:42):
Well.
Speaker 1 (04:42):
They got the Energy drinks, a three pack of the
Energy drinks and the Perkow sheets. They're doing a big
sale right now twenty nine to ninety eight to close
out sale. Get your free three pack. That's really cool
again promo code justin when you go online. But I
saw some election integrity information that came out over the weekend,
and I thought that was really fascinating. I'm gonna have
(05:06):
to give you up to speed on this. Maybe even
have our good friend Pat Collback come back on for
an update. He had the he had the story this weekend.
It's worth a look. We'll dig into that too, election integrity.
I know the investigations have already begun. But then again,
you said, well, but jeff we get this Jeffrey Epstein story.
(05:26):
Why why should we have any hope that anything's gonna
happen on any with anything? All right, let's go through
the Axios story together here. I just wanted to make
sure that we gave this time. Hang on, let me
get this off the screen. Here is this gonna make
us subscribe to it to get the stupid story? Oh
(05:50):
my goodness, Really, there's another way to pull this stuff out?
There we go? All right, the Axio story exclusive doj
FBI concluded Epstein had no client list, died by suicide.
(06:12):
Now there was even a video that was released. Anyway,
it looks like it was like last night, I think
they put this out. It was even a video that
was released that came out that had like the jail cell.
Now it's granny footage, but it shows this jail cell
(06:33):
that nobody went into it and all that, and again
with AI and everything else, You've got to say to yourself, well, like,
how are we supposed to believe that that's not doctored?
How are we supposed to believe in any and that's real?
And I get it. I mean, I'm just as frustrated
as many of you. The FBI and an Apartment of
(06:53):
Justice VI had newly released memo under the Trump administration
have officially confirmed there is no existing Jeffrey Epstein client
list and found no credible evidence Epstein blackmailed high profile individuals.
The review of surveillance footage from the Metropolitan Correctional Center
reaffirms that Epstein did die by suicide in August twenty nineteen.
(07:17):
It concludes that no further charges will be brought beyond
those already filed against Gilain Maxwell. Now here's my question,
why is she in jail if there are no clients,
if there is no list, what is Maxwell doing in jail?
Right now, Am I missing something? I think it's pretty
(07:40):
obvious to me if you take a full look at
all of this, isn't it pretty obvious that something happened.
I mean, it's just obvious. It's possible that he did
kill himself. I'll give you that, but there's too much
intrigue all the facts that we have about this. Now.
(08:03):
I always say it's probably likely that you know, he
either was this discarded, let me put it that way,
or that he was compelled to discard himself in these situations.
So there's still questions for me on this. And just
(08:26):
because there's a memo out here doesn't close the case
for me. I don't know about you, It just doesn't
close the case for me. President Trump's Justice Department FBIF
concluded they have no evidence that convicted sex offender and
disgraced finance here Jeffrey Epstein blackmailed powerful figures, kept a list,
or was murdered, according to a memo detailing the findings
(08:47):
obtained by Axios, the administration releasing a video in both
raw and enhanced versions, it says indicates no one entered
the area the Manhattan prison where Epstein was held that
night when he died. The video supports and medical examiners
finding Epstein died by suicide. Two page memo claims why
(09:08):
it matters. The findings represent the first time Trump administration
is officially contradicted. They say, conspiracy theorists, critical thinkers is
where I put it about Epstein's activities and his death,
theories that had been pushed by the FBI's top two
officials before Trump appointed them to the bureau as social
(09:29):
media influencers, axios rights and activists. Cash Betel, now the
FBI's director, and Dan bon Geno, now deputy director, were
among those in the MAGA world who questioned the official
version of how Epstein died. Now, Glenn Beck, you just
saw it. I showed you earlier and said, I sure
would like to have some answers to this. I don't
(09:50):
understand it. I hope they come on and talk to us.
I hope so too, because they got some splainet to do.
They got some answering. Now, I want to give you
another piece of this because there is more. First, let
me another possibility of what's really going on here, and
I'm just saying it's a possibility. I don't know for sure.
(10:13):
Let's read through this first, and I'll give you the latest.
According to the memo, investigators closely examined footage of Epstein's
Manhattan prison cell between ten forty pm on August ninth,
twenty nineteen, when Epstein was locked in its cell around
six thirty the next day, when he was found unresponsive.
The footage, which were viewed by axios but couldn't be
verified independently. Yeah, because no, who's going to be able
(10:35):
to do that? Showed no one entering the area. The
FBI enhanced the relevant footage by increasing its contrast, balancing
the colored improvising its sharpness for greater clarity and viewability.
The memo says investigators found no incriminating list of Epstein's
no credible evidence that Epstein blackmailed prominent individuals, and no
(10:57):
evidence that could be could predicate they say, anyway, an
investigation against uncharged third parties, that's probably the biggest piece.
There's nothing that could predicate an investigation against unchurched price.
Here's the actual PDF. Okay, so I'm just gonna I'm
(11:21):
gonna put this out there, and it's it's proposed to
be from the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Justice Department,
and I don't see any signature on this, but there
are video files. Okay, so I'm going to show you
this is This is that grainy footage that I just
talked about. And again, hang on, let me get riddle
(11:45):
the lower third here so you could see the time
on here, timestamp seven forty eleven PM. And so you're
supposed to believe, now we heard at long point the
video cameras went down too. Do you remember that we're
supposed to believe that we can look at this and say, well, say, look,
there's nothing happened here. So I don't really think that
(12:07):
that's going to clear it for many people. I just
don't think that that that's going to do it. Yeahs.
But in the beginning they didn't. They say the cameras
weren't working. How would they know, See, that's exactly what
I'm saying. So I don't know. There's a couple of possibilities.
(12:28):
Number one, the cameras, uh, we're working, but fog of
war kind of stuff. They just told us that in
the beginning, and and that information wasn't correct. That that's all.
That's not uncommon that does happen. So that's you know
that's part of the the you know, the possibilities anyway,
(12:54):
you know that that could have could have played out. Yeah,
but there's a whole you know, there's another piece of
this too. All right, hang on one second, let me
do this as well. Since joining the government, Trumps so
(13:14):
Acxios really is using this as an opportunity to hit
at Bongino and Patel's that's what they're mainly doing. In
the first part of this article mag Is Media Universe
and some of its voices on Capitol he express frustration
with the Trump administration handling the Epstein case since February
when DJ released a tranche of Epstein files. Remember that
(13:39):
there were the influencers right that went to the White
House and they were given these binders and they were
told by the DJ, oh, there's all kinds of information
in it, but it was it was all stuff that
had been out before. They felt bad for these guys
because they don't know what do they know it's inside
(14:01):
of it and these are these are some high profile
people like you would you would recognize and probably know
some of these people. I wonder how they're feeling today,
high profile people. And by the way, I would have gone.
How would you know? You just trust the White House
is going to give you information or whatever. So they
walk out cameras get them with these binders. That says
(14:23):
the Ebstein files Phase one. How do we go from
the Abstein files Phase one? Folks to ah, there's nothing
to see here. Trust us in this memo, this was
back in February, What the heck happened? Okay, a little
bit more of the article that I'm going to tell
(14:43):
you what I think also could be a possibility here,
and I I don't know. What I'm about to tell
you is just as much Tenofoil had it as anything else.
But it is a possibility, and so it's it's one
that you know can't be completely discarded. This is not
what we are the American people asked for. In a
(15:04):
completed disappointment rep at a Poline, Allumin posted, then get
us the information we asked for, Trump posting on social
media a statement from former Epstein lawyer David Sean saying
Trump was not implicated. Now, I don't think that's it.
There are people on the left that believe maybe that
is why, and there's probably something more right. I believe
that's why You're not saying this, well, Trump said he
(15:25):
his name was in there. Well, if his name was
in there, the Biden the Democratic crime family will he
used it a long time ago. Questions about whether Trump's
name is in the government's Epstein files that persisted in
twenty seventeen the interview with Michael Wolfe. Epstein even claimed
that at one point he was Donald Trump's closest friend.
(15:45):
I don't buy that either. Trump, however, said in twenty
ninety he was not a fan of Epstein. Remember, he
kicked him out of more Longo. He hadn't spoken to
him for fifteen years. He also said he had bart
Epstein from his golf resorts in the early two thousand. Democrats, meanwhile,
have demanded to know more about the Epstein Trump relationship.
The memo. By the way, the DOJ and the FBI
(16:07):
say the memo that no further disclosure Epstein or lated
material would be appropriate or warranted. Memo says much of
the material relates to child sexual abuse, details of Epstein's victims,
and information that would expose innocent individuals to allegations of wrongdoing.
Through this review, we found those basis to revisit the
disclosure of those materials and will not permit the release
(16:31):
of child pornography. The memo says, So there might be
some of this is understandable or warranted, and in a look,
we don't want to put things out there that might
harm people today victims, not people that are accused. And
(16:52):
maybe a lot of that was just centered around Epstein himself.
Now all of that being said, there is another possibility here,
and this is one that I believe we need to consider.
(17:13):
It's one we need to give a full glimset and
it's a very real possibility. And what I want to
get to and walk you through coming up after this.
Speaker 4 (17:27):
I'm doctor Kirk Elliott, founder of Kirk Elliott Precious Metals.
After being in the industry for more than a decade,
I knew there was a better way. It's an exciting
time to invest in gold and silver with the most
significant bull market I've ever seen. But please don't overpay
for your stuff. At k EPM, we focus on low
cost bullion only and we don't charge a commission when
(17:49):
you sell. We would love to connect with you, so
call our office at seven two oh six oh five
thirty nine hundred or.
Speaker 1 (17:56):
Go to Gold with Justin dot com today. Hey there,
you know this is a good question too, Uh locals
this morning, Hemmy says, remember Pam BONDI said they found
tens of thousands of documents that they were sifting through,
and a lot of it, they said, you know a
lot of this is gonna be you know, child sexual
(18:17):
and things that they you know, were just she said,
very very disturbing. So that being said, and I've got
a this is something I just want to walk you through.
It's a possibility. I'm not saying that this is exactly
what's going on, but I am saying it's a possibility.
(18:41):
You notice how everything's coming into alignment now. I think
everyone's capitulating the Trump. Is it possible all these trade
deals coming through? You know, the big beautiful bill we
told we were told there were ten held outs, so
people weren't going to come through it at at a
certain time. And I mean, this thing may not get passed.
(19:04):
You know. I went to the Senate that finally came
back to the House. We're atching that this weekend. Thought
maybe yeah, maybe maybe it won't get passed. Will you
notice that all of a sudden it did. It got
through and easily, which is kind of funny too. It
(19:25):
got through easily. Is it possible that someone else, someone new,
now has possession of this material and has decided to
use it so instead of and I'm just just playing
(19:46):
this out here, instead of coming out and saying we're
gonna have trials or we're gonna put these people on trial,
and you know, we're risking the chance that they get off,
just like Diddy did. Is it possible that what they're
doing is saying, Okay, someone anyway, maybe it's Trump, maybe
someone else's just in the white hat sort of category, saying, look,
we're going to use this information to our advantage, and
(20:09):
we're going to use it now to control the same
people who were being controlled by other forces at one point.
Of course, it's also possible that people that have always
controlled this information, the people that always had the black
mail information, that they are still in control and they're
controlling everyone. I don't know. I mean, both of those
are in control. Both those are situations rather than I
(20:31):
think are possible. I just don't know if one has
more likelihood than the other. And that being said, again,
it's just a scenario. It's a possible scenario. I don't
know how likely I don't know how likely we're going
(20:58):
to see any of this come out and see the
light of day. But again, we got Diddy get enough,
and then we got this story like like in the
same like within a week. I don't know, Sherry say
it's a little premature to jump to Dan that Trump
should tire Dan, Pam and Cash. I mean they're good people.
(21:23):
I don't know as much about Pam as they do
Dan and Cash, and and you know, lots of folks
listened to Dan for a long time thought he was
a great guy. Cash, Betel Sam wev talked to Cash
number of times. I'm with Glenn, I don't understand this,
and I would love to ask, you know, have the
opportunity to ask these questions. I'd love for glad the
(21:45):
people to ask these questions. I'd love to have some
real answers. So there you have it. That's just that's
just part of part of what we're looking at here today.
And again it's a story that it just it's another one.
(22:08):
I just go what I saw it last night and
I just said, this is a last It was it
was late, I was about ready to turn in and
I just saw this can't be Hey, I got good news.
I want to get to you as well, despite all
(22:34):
the insanity, all the craziness CNN last I guess it
was over the weekend insisting in some point that Trump
was responsible for what happened. He wanted to blame climate change,
and they wanted to blame President Trump at least a
guest ad at least one point on CNN for all
the flooding in Texas. Here's that video.
Speaker 5 (22:56):
How much do you think the changing climate is part
of what we are seeing go on here, not just
what we're seeing in the pictures that were showing on
the screen.
Speaker 1 (23:06):
But remember, against that question, as ridiculous as it might be,
we know even now, since we had Bill stephan on earlier,
that they had flooding in nineteen twenty one, some sort
of thing in that area. So changing climate again today
is because it's not that the climate changes or that
things change on the Earth because of things like possibly
the sun and cycles that we go through and all
(23:29):
of that. Now's your you. This is what she's saying again,
She's saying, how likely is it that people the fact
that people still drive SUVs and vote for President Trump,
how likely is it that disc caused that.
Speaker 5 (23:42):
The flood that you talked about in San Antonio in June.
Speaker 6 (23:46):
I think climate change is obviously a part of it.
These floods are happening more often in more parts of
the country and really all over the world, and so
we have to face that reality and be better for
for it and combat it.
Speaker 5 (24:02):
And just talking about the federal government and even the
local government. Two Texas National Weather Service offices involved in
forecasting and warning about flooding on the Guadalupe River are
missing some key staff members. A director of the NWS
union told CNN that the Austin, San Antonio office is
(24:25):
missing a warning coordination meteorologist due to the Trump administration's buyouts.
Do you have any indication whether those or other cuts
helped play a role in the fashion?
Speaker 1 (24:38):
People are evil? Just look how evil. She don't even
know what she's saying. She's just so evil.
Speaker 5 (24:42):
That the people in the flood zone were not prepared
and certainly not evacuated.
Speaker 6 (24:51):
No, I can't say that conclusively, but I do think
that it should be and I don't think it's helpful
to have missing key personnel from the National Weather Service
not in place to help prevent these tragedies and you know.
Speaker 1 (25:07):
Not the case. They were overly staffed. They were extra staffed.
We know that now, Okay, I just had to show
you that because to show you that, that's going to
make this next clip even more spicy and special because
Dana Bash, wearing the same weird yellow that she's gone
looking like a lemon in the next very next clip,
(25:28):
gets taken to school by Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bissent,
who just mails it.
Speaker 5 (25:35):
I'm sure you've seen and heard a lot of the concern,
including and especially from Republicans who are the most vocal
in Congress, about the fact that those work requirements are
going to be very cumbersome to actually prove, and it
will inevitably force the people who need that Medicaid coverage
(25:56):
off the rolls.
Speaker 1 (25:57):
All right now again, just let me tell you what
she's talking about. One big deal a bill talking about
medicaid fraud, waste, fraud abuse. Okay, Now, this this is
the question in the bill that says, look, if you're
if you're like, if you need a connecticaire and you
can work, you ought to work, and you ought to
tell us that you're working. Now, I don't know any
right minded person because this medicaid. Remember, is this supposed
(26:19):
to be the safety not to catch people is if
you at the end of the day, you all have fails.
We want to make sure you're taking care of It's
coming from a kind advantage a situation, but don't be
taking advantage of it. Is essentially what the bill said,
bill saying, if you can work, you ought to show
us that you're trying, you're actively trying to get work,
or you ought to volunteer twenty hours whatever whatever. The
(26:41):
full detailed statistics laid out there, and I have to
I have to break it down, but that's essentially what
the bill said. Now she's saying, are you are you
concerned that some people who need it won't get it?
This is the Democrat leftist talking once throughout the weekend,
as we've heard too. Now, this is the same person
that believes your SUV caused a tragedy in Texas. I
(27:03):
just had to play you that to set this up.
Watch out was sent hand on.
Speaker 3 (27:08):
Well, first of all, it's the Republicans are not the
most vocal on this. It is a group of Democrats
who unfortunately seem to think that poor people are stupid.
I don't think poor people are stupid. I think they
had agency, and I think to have them register twice
a year for these benefits that is not a burden.
(27:29):
But these people who want to infantilize the poor and
those who need these Medicaid benefits are alarmist.
Speaker 5 (27:38):
Yeah, but my impression of the Republican Party is that
historically wanted to cut through the red tape and not
create more red tape.
Speaker 3 (27:46):
But I do want to move on because we no, no, no,
But we've also.
Speaker 1 (27:50):
I do want to move on because you've just proven
me wrong on that point, and I wanted to just
make sure that I didn't give you another chance to
prove you wrong more. The scent comes back after.
Speaker 3 (28:00):
It wanted to put in work requirements, which somehow that
was very popular under Bill Clinton, was popular in the
President Obama and this Democratic Party blew out the depth
of set in twenty twenty and they never want to
bring it back. But work requirements even pull well with
the median Democratic voter, maybe not the fringe.
Speaker 1 (28:22):
Beautiful, it's just so beautiful, the whole thing. Here he
is again, Dana Bass talking points, getting immediately smacked down
once again talking about this Yale budget lab I don't
know if you saw this, but the sent handles this well. Well,
the Yale Budget Lab says that this is what's going to.
Speaker 5 (28:38):
Richest Americans will see their income rise by nearly two percent.
The lowest earning Americans will see their income drop by
three percent when factoring in cuts to Medicaid and food stamps.
You argue that the benefits will really be aimed at
the middle class. How does that.
Speaker 3 (28:56):
Square Well, first, let's have a look at the l
Budget Lab, because I was looking at their findings and
this week I actually went on their website. They're all
ex Biden officials, so I think we can discount everything
they say. I'd encourage all your viewers to look at
the composition of both the board and the staff. And
it's just not right that what we had here is
(29:20):
a middle class and working class bill that we we
are going to see wages accelerate, and we are going
to see, just as we saw with President Trump's first
tax bill, we are making permanent these.
Speaker 1 (29:40):
Tax cuts.
Speaker 3 (29:41):
And what happened in twenty and seventeen twenty and eighteen
was the highest wage journers went from paying thirty seven
percent of all taxes to forty five percent, So that's
going to be permanent now, so permanently the highest ten
percent will pay a higher percent of the taxes.
Speaker 1 (30:01):
Wow, oh you just just you know I'm saying things
say about that, do we No, No, we don't. Another
TDS moment. A lot of information out there. He calls
it TDS. I would tend to agree with him, by
the way, about this bill.
Speaker 3 (30:20):
There's a lot of misinformation out there. I think TDS.
Trump de arrangement syndrome has turned into tariff arrangement syndrome.
As soon as you call them the Trump tariffs, ninety
percent of Democrats hate them. And I'm going to have
to disagree with Goldman, Sachs and JP Morgan. The empirical
data shows that we have seen no inflation thus far,
(30:43):
and we'll see over the coming months. And there's a
big difference in inflation a one time price adjustment. Also,
inflation is a generalized monetary phenomenon. We're not going to
see that, and thus far we haven't even seen the
one time price adjustment. What we are, the business model
for many of our trading partners, especially in Southeast Asia,
(31:05):
is to produce produced produce, and the manufacturers in those
countries are taking the price increases into or the teriff
tariffs into their margins. There's a lot of misinformation out there.
Speaker 1 (31:20):
By the way, the tarriffshol do it. So do you
see how much income a billions and billions and billions
of dollars, billions and billions and billions of dollars come
in on tariff tariff income. It's uh, it's really is.
It's really beautiful to see. Speaking of terraffs, he got
(31:41):
more of the letters are going out. I think this
week he made the announcement.
Speaker 3 (31:47):
I did.
Speaker 1 (31:47):
I saw it. Some letters. They'll go out on Monday,
probably twelve.
Speaker 5 (31:53):
Twelve different well different.
Speaker 1 (31:55):
And different amounts of money, different amounts of tariffs and
somewhat different says you can't do it. So watch for
that today because they're gonna be talking more about that
over the over the weekend. What else do we want
(32:19):
to make sure I get to be sent in there?
Oh oh yeah, the one big beautiful bill he believed.
This is another Democrat talking point, which I find to
be really interesting, because you know, these people are almost
they're almost as deranged as some of the other folks
(32:40):
who are constantly saying just wait you know this, this
next thing is gonna bring Trump down. He's one of
the worst of them, by the way, Carvel James Carve,
because now they're saying this, why this one big beautiful bill,
it's so unpopular, which I don't I don't see source
on this. Trump's one big beautiful mill is so unpopular.
(33:04):
This is going to be the thing that brings him down. Well,
if it was a thing that was going to bring
Trump down, why did Hakimu Hakeem Jefferies, why do you
get up in filibuster in front of the House for
so long the other day? What you just said, all right,
let's get this vote on two so we can win
the midterms. Yeah, why did he do that? Wether it's
(33:29):
so sure of it? Why not? What tell me? Carvil says,
this is going to be the thing that brings Republicans
and the Trump administration down.
Speaker 2 (33:38):
I mean, you know, political anthropologists are going to look
back at this and it's going to be called a
mass extinction event because a lot of them going to
be extinct when people go to the polls voting for this.
I promise you, I promise you. This thing is from
really it's like twenty five twenty six points underwater already,
and we had even started our education program.
Speaker 1 (34:00):
Education is men's prop again, the folks, is what he's saying. Again.
That pulling that is like trying to that third percent,
not of Warrow Warra. I don't even know. I don't
even know where they get that. Uh, you're telling me
tax cuts aren't unpopular. People making more money unpopular and
(34:23):
in fact, one big beautiful bills check this out. Question
about this last week. Eighty percent excuse me, eighty eight
percent of seniors won't pay taxes on Social Security thanks
to the one big beautiful bill. Eighty eight percent, eighty
eight percent of seniors won't pay taxes. Talk to a
(34:43):
guy this week and he said, you know how much
overtime I work? So excited about that. That's on top
of the Trump tax cuts, no tax on tips included.
That's on top of the Trump tax cuts from twenty
seventeen that they've extended. This economic jet fuel is what
Speaker of the House Mike Johnson calls it. Economic jet fuel.
(35:07):
This is what it's going to do for folks in
massive ways, going to put money back in their pocket.
Speaker 7 (35:12):
They are overlooking the actual facts. All that is nonsense, Shannon.
What we did in this bill is we made permanent
the twenty seventeen Trump's tax cuts, and that was geared
for lower and middle class Americans. In spite of everything
they said that the bottom twenty percent of earners saw
their lowest federal tax rate in forty years. Now we're
building upon that. We just made that permanent, and we're
(35:32):
building upon it because now we cut tax on overtime
and tips and had more tax relief for seniors, and
we're giving everybody a tax cut, and that's going to
help the economy. That's going to be jet fuel.
Speaker 1 (35:44):
Listen, just listen to the stats here. Just want you
to see if you can wrap your ad around this.
Thirteen thousand more dollars in your pocket, four million new jobs,
incredible economic growth. Is it perfect? Is there spending in there?
I wish was it in there? Yeah, but there's nothing
they could do about a lot of that. This wasn't
(36:04):
a recision bill. It was a different sort of process.
And again I don't want to get into it and
write that, but I do believe it was a big
win if we just got the tax cuts alone, big
win if we just got the funding for the border
and ice alone big win it. It's so it's this
(36:24):
whole idea that Carlo is pushing, that this thing is
going to be a problem for Republicans there for Trump
himself is just wild. It's weird. Now again, it's the
same guy that said back in February that Trump and
the administration was going to have a massive collapse in
the first thirty days. That never happened.
Speaker 2 (36:44):
But what I've said very publicly, Democrats need to play possum.
This whole thing is collapsing. It doesn't need Elizabeth Warren
in somebody screaming to pacify some progressive adversy groups in Washington.
I wish these people were just useless. They're actually worse
than useless. That they're detrimental and they never ever learned
(37:07):
to shut up. And so Dan, this is what I believe.
I believe that this administration in less than thirty days,
in the midst of a massive collapse.
Speaker 1 (37:19):
Yep, that didn't happen. That didn't happen. The guy does
not have a great track record lately. Apparently it's the
same guy that said Kamalo was going to pull it out. Folks,
do you remember this is the same guy so I
love that he's come out and said that this is
going to be end of the Trumpet Republican part. I
love it because I don't think his odds are great.
Speaker 2 (37:38):
Would say, take Harris over two hundred and seventy electoral vote.
Let these foods in these pal markets do something. Let
them drive the betting line into a favorable place and
then take advantage of it. That's what I would do.
Speaker 1 (37:50):
Yeah, didn't happen. Did not happen. More good news. Over
the weekend, Democrats have a hard time coming to grips
with the fact that Republicans are taking all of their voters.
According to Scott Jennings from CNN, one of the guys
I actually enjoy watching now I don't watch CNN, and
as much as I used it, I just can't. It's
(38:13):
of course I'm not the only one, but I do
love watching these clips just like you know, I love
sharing them with you. Here's what he had to say
this weekend on the whole subject.
Speaker 8 (38:24):
I mean, there is so diverse that in one corner
you have the socialists and in the other classic communists.
It's really wid Thanks are having hard time coming to
grips with the fact that We're taking all of their voters,
working class Americans, multi racial, multi ethnic, multi generational, working
class Americans all over this country who heretofore have almost
uniformly voted Democrat and mass came towards the Republican Party
(38:47):
of last November, and Trump did win the national popular
vote because of it. It is an ideologically diverse party.
Speaker 1 (38:52):
By the way, that's a problem with elon third party
is that there already is a third party. It's a
maga party. They took over the Republican Party. I'm gonna
probably save this for another day to get really to
get into the weeds on it and tell you what
I really think is happening with with Elon and I.
(39:14):
Some people say they think it's the electric vehicle stuff,
and there there's a possibility that that that that some
of that is is what you know, is what's driving this.
But I think that I actually think it's bigger. I
think there's something else. I think it's it's Elon. I do.
(39:38):
I think it's Elon who is upset about I think
something up do with Ai and I. And I don't
know this for a fact, I couldn't you know. I'm
just telling you this I my gut on this that
that he's upset folks are going to be involved in
this AI race and he's not going to have. He
(40:00):
thought by electing Trump be getting in Trump's quarter, that
he could be like the AI kingmakers, so to speak.
And I think that's his I think that's it. I
think there's something there now. I have to work that
theory out and give you more on it at a
later date. But Tesla's share is dropping eight percent, probably
good time to buy. I don't think he's going anywhere,
(40:20):
and I don't think the Tesla's going anywhere. But if
he gets into this game, is back and forth with
Trump too much? Yeah, yeah, And we watch a little
bit there. Elon. I'm just you know, the contracts with
X and SpaceX and all that, that could become an
(40:41):
issue too. I don't know. Again, I don't want to
see these two at odds with each other. I really
want to see them working together. Who knows, Maybe they
are Honestyes, I don't know, But President Trump said this.
I am sad to watch Elon Musk go completely off
the rails, essentially becoming a train wreck over the past
five weeks. He even wants to start a third political party,
despite the fact they had never succeeded in the United States.
(41:03):
The system seems not designed for them. The one thing,
third parties are good for his creation of complete and
total disruption and chaos, and we have had enough of
that with the radical left Democrats who have lost their
confidence and their minds. Republicans, on the other hand, or
a smooth running machine that just passed the biggest bill
of its kind in the history of our country. It
is a great bill, but unfortunately for Elon, eliminates the
(41:24):
ridiculous electric vehicle mandate, which would have forced everyone to
buy an electric car in a short period of time.
I've been very strongly since I've been strongly opposed to
that from the very beginning. People are now allowed to
buy whatever they want, gasoline powered hybrids which are doing
very well, or new technologies as they come out. No
more EV mandate. I have campaigned on this for two years,
(41:47):
and quite honestly, when Elon gave me his total and
unquestioned endorsement, I asked him whether or not he knew
that I was doing or going to terminate the EV mandate.
It was in every speech I made and in every
conversation I had, he said he had no problems with that.
I was surprised. Additionally, Elon asked that one of his
close friends run NASA, and while I thought his friend
(42:09):
was very good, I was surprised to learn that he
was a blue blooded Democrat who had never contributed to
Republicans before. Elon probably was also also. I also thought
it inappropriate that a very close friend of Elon who
was in a space business run NASA when NASA is
such a big part of Elon's corporate life. My number
(42:30):
one charge is to protect the American public. Exclamation. Again,
I think there's more here. I don't think it's either
one of those things. It possibly could maybe be all
of the things. But I think there's more to the
Elon the story than meets the eye. So I just
(42:51):
I will tell you to keep your powder dry, to
hold off on some of the things that we're hearing,
and and just just hang out there. I'm not getting
all excited about third party anyway already. I'll give it
some time. The Coastguard hero who saved two hundred in
the Texas flood rescue. Again, I told you about Coast
(43:13):
Guard swimmer Scott Ruskin This is an incredible story, folks.
It's good news and story that I love to see
more of. We need more stories like this. In fact,
this guy ought to be on a front page of
every paper. I'll be on the nightly news, elite story, everywhere.
He's an American hero. Scott Ruskin is speaking out. He says, honestly,
(43:36):
I'm mostly just a dude. I'm just doing a job.
This is what I signed up for. And I think
any single Coastguard rescue swimmer, or any single Coast Guard pilot,
flight mechanic, whoever it may be, would have done the
exact same thing. Again, he saved almost two hundred in
those floodwaters. That's just what we're asked to do, and
we're going to do it any one of us. If
(43:57):
anyone else was on duty that day, they would have
done the same thing. We just happened to be the
crew that got the case. I don't know if you've
seen the story, but it really is incredible, the full
story about this guy. And I think it was his
first mission on the ground, by the way, first mission
(44:18):
Petty Officer third Class Scott Ruskin, twenty six singled out
by the US Department of Homeland Security Secretary of Christie
Down for his efforts saving one hundred and sixty five victims.
It's the only triage coordinator at the scene on the floods.
United States Coast Guard swimmer Scott Ruskin directly saved an
astonishing one hundred and sixty five victims. And I think
(44:44):
if I'm if I'm correct, I think we might even
have some vidal. That's let me see if I can,
and let me see if I can share it with
you hang out, and I.
Speaker 9 (44:57):
Want to focus on the rescue mission and joining us
now from the US Coast Guard Air Station and CORPUS
Christy is Lieutenant Ian Hopper, AMT three Seth Reeves, Lieutenant
Blair ogujafor and AST three Scott Ruskin. Thank you all
so much for joining us and for helping out in
this mission to find these twenty three young little girls
(45:18):
and the families who are also impacted by the storm. So,
Lieutenant Hopper, I'll start with you. How is the Coast
Guard responding to this flood in Texas right now.
Speaker 2 (45:29):
Mornin?
Speaker 10 (45:29):
Yeah, So primarily we're using our helicopter assets. So the
MH sixty five echo is primarily a maritime search and
rescue assets, so we're used to going offshore, but right
now we are using it for inland search and rescue,
so operating using our our hooics capability, or just landing
(45:52):
and picking people up and transiting them in the MAH
sixty five dolphin.
Speaker 11 (45:58):
So I don't know who's best to answer this question,
but you all figure that out. You know, obviously, you
look at the video. You see these incredible floodwaters. You
see the incredible efforts to rescue people, and hundreds of
people have been rescued. What are the additional complications that
you all have to deal with that you have to
(46:18):
kind of you know, obviously you have a lot of
people who want, you know, civilians who want to help out,
but you know you don't want them to get in
the way. What are the additional complications that you want
to kind of warn civilians about not getting in your way.
Speaker 10 (46:36):
Yeah, well, there's there's a there's a lot of different
complications up primarily a lot of civilians.
Speaker 1 (46:41):
Are This is a long video, by the way, I'm
just gonna fast forward a little bit if I can't
hear talking about the one that's done in the middle.
Speaker 10 (46:52):
There's multiple one. He's still out there.
Speaker 1 (46:54):
Let me see if I can find a place where
he's talking our aircraft.
Speaker 5 (47:00):
You know, you're united with their families, so I know.
Speaker 3 (47:03):
And folks at the hotel too, they had them.
Speaker 12 (47:05):
I'm probably got about two hundred people out of there
alone and it was just yeah, we just sobbed. Honest,
we were at Mystic yesterday for a long period of time.
Probably got about two hundred people out of there alone,
and it was just, yeah, we just sobbed a huge crowd,
about two hundred kids at a campsite. So we're like, cool,
that's where we're that's where we're going to go, and
we're just going to get as many people out as
we can until they were all gone. They were all
(47:27):
we all got them all out yesterday that Mystic.
Speaker 13 (47:29):
So wow, Well listen first and foremost, we know this
isn't easy for you all. You're doing God's work out
there and sometimes results aren't what you want them to be.
It's rescue and recovery, and we just want you to
know we're praying for you and we thank God every
day there people like you out there. We're willing to
show up and do this.
Speaker 1 (47:47):
Amen. I agree, there's some heart wrenching story this. This
story came out Texas Cirl breaking down in tears that
she honors her friend who she lost in the flash floods.
They were both staying at at the camp Camp Mystic.
I've got I've got some good news.
Speaker 14 (48:06):
Really good friends lost a daughter. It was at Camp Mystic.
They've just tuched so much loss that I mean, it's unimaginable.
And then you know they're still pulling people out of
the river and we don't even know to the extent
of who we know if it has lost their lives.
Speaker 15 (48:27):
My friend Nanny was so funny.
Speaker 16 (48:30):
I've been scrolling. I've been strolling through videos and pictures.
Speaker 10 (48:34):
On my mom's phone and watching it over and over again.
Speaker 16 (48:39):
For dancing when she's excited. Yeah she was.
Speaker 1 (48:46):
She was so nic I just missed her so much.
Speaker 16 (48:51):
I've been.
Speaker 1 (48:53):
Again. I keep coming back to this. But Democrats, folks
in the least, some of the craziest people are using
this moment to make can you imagine. I saw one
woman share had a friend of hers it's lost a daughter,
was being inundated by the media and the press, and
the comment was just leave her alone. She says, do
not reach out there and try and get her comments
(49:15):
on it. Of course that's what they want. They want,
they want people on TV comments about this stuff. And surely,
like the left right now, rapidly, there's nothing more they
go really want is somebody take advantage of somebody that's
servating that lost a child and say, you know it's
because of these cuts. It's President Trump's fault. Can we
get you to comment on that? That's just I mean,
(49:35):
that's what they're looking for. These stories are just just
absolutely heartbreaking. I mean, I can't even fathom. I'll tell
you this, don't go with my life. My wife this
week and I said, you know, we hold our girls
a little tighter because of all this. There's a moment
another girl talked about how she survived put a tag
(49:57):
on herself in case she got swept away.
Speaker 15 (50:01):
I put on my name tag because I didn't. I'm
scared that if water's coming out next to our other cabins,
that our cabin might be next. And I would just
put it on just for safe keeping, saying if in
my head, I was saying, if if something does happen,
I do get swept away, at least I'll have my
(50:22):
name on my body.
Speaker 1 (50:24):
Gosh, I can't imagine your daughters after and I actually
have to think about that. Here's another one National Guard
going through evacuating, rescuing folks there at camps. Good news
(50:44):
as those folks made it out, made it out alive.
The girls here all right. I want to leave you
with this. There's one video that just touched me. I
can't even. I can't even. It's just just why hell
to think about? But it was emotional video of the
girls who were on a bus on their way out
(51:06):
being evacuated at the moment, and it looks like a
school bus. And as they're being evacuated and this tragedy
is unfolding all around them, they've taken the moment to sing.
And what are they singing?
Speaker 17 (51:22):
Experience? Do you want to pass it on?
Speaker 16 (51:27):
Let measure you, my friend.
Speaker 17 (51:30):
It is not abound on it that, it's not your bounds.
Speaker 18 (51:41):
I'll shot from the mountaintops God.
Speaker 16 (51:45):
I want my world to know the Lord.
Speaker 17 (51:48):
Of Love has come to me. I want to pass it.
Speaker 18 (51:52):
On all shot it from the mountaintops.
Speaker 17 (51:56):
Praise God.
Speaker 18 (51:57):
I want my world to know the Lord of has
gone to me. I want to pass.
Speaker 1 (52:17):
You see another reminder. When you hear the headlines and
the stories that are unfolding on a daily basis, there
are real people behind them. They are real lives that
hang in abouts and in the middle of it all.
(52:37):
I think we lose that because of social media and
everything else. You're watching this video, which is over four
minutes long, and I'll put on the stack today just
incredible and I'm gonna let it play out today as
(52:59):
the show ups up. Folks, I you loved one's tight
Oh be, spend time focusing on what matters most day.
Any who, God bless you make it a great one.
Speaker 18 (53:15):
Okay, Oh my God, it is righteous. All these things
shall be to you. Are seeds from them mount.
Speaker 16 (53:44):
All lay.
Speaker 7 (53:51):
Hi, I can serve Tamillian MAXI.
Speaker 16 (53:56):
I know one's son so hard on the crime. I
R okay, God, So I won't restart next year.
Speaker 1 (54:06):
Nice, he's got my coup for me?
Speaker 16 (54:09):
Was lost?
Speaker 17 (54:12):
I found was fline but no, seem.
Speaker 16 (54:36):
You don't want the main the rain turtle for no.
Speaker 17 (55:29):
And so so.
Speaker 1 (55:37):
I got good news and bad news. The good news
is it's a deal and a steal for you. The
bad news is I missed out. Well, I just bought
a bunch of betting. I just bought a bunch of
new pillows and cheets and things from Mike Lindella at
my Pillow, and I didn't get this good of a
deal for a little bit of time. Mike is selling
his pillows the classic fourteen eighty eight. That's it, the
(55:58):
my pillow, the thing it started it all, just fourteen
eighty eight. He had one of these big box stores
that canceled on them. You know how they do well.
This is actually your win. It's a win for everyone,
win for my because he can unload the pillows at
a great price. It's a win for you because you
get a good deal and you can help support this
program at the same time. Get your pillows for fourteen
(56:19):
eighty eight. When you go to my pillow dot com
slash justin, use code justin at checkout. That's my pillow
dot com slash justin, and why you're there. Shop for
all kinds of great things. I love the towels, the
best towels I've ever used in my entire life. Mike's
got all kinds of great goodies at my pillow dot
com slash justin. Do it today,