President Trump faces down the President of South Africa and the press in the oval office, President Biden was worse than anyone even guessed, and the liberal tolerance for antisemitism and violence comes home to roost in a most horrible way. The gloves are off in our "did they really just say that" moments this week.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
President Trump faces down the President of South Africa and
the press both same time in the Oval office. President
Biden was worse than anyone even guessed, and the liberal
tolerance for anti Semitism and violence comes home to roost
in a most horrible way. The gloves are off and are
did they really just say that? Moments this week?
Speaker 2 (00:21):
I'm Nancy Shack, I'm Ben Parker.
Speaker 3 (00:23):
This is news bite, mister president.
Speaker 4 (00:37):
The Pentagon announced it would be accepting a Katari jet
to be used as Air Force one or what.
Speaker 5 (00:42):
Are you talking about it?
Speaker 6 (00:47):
You know, we're talking about a lot of other things.
Speaker 5 (00:50):
It's NBC trying to get off the subject of what
you just saw.
Speaker 1 (00:53):
And and so what was happening now?
Speaker 7 (01:00):
Went on?
Speaker 8 (01:00):
Both guys fifteen?
Speaker 2 (01:18):
I guess who's coming to dinner? Wow? That was that?
Just a sense of shiver down my spine.
Speaker 1 (01:24):
That was Elias Rodriguez, the guy from Chicago, has been
charged with murdering the two those two beautiful, uh young
people from the Israeli embassy. One was a they're both
staff members. One was from Israel, one was from the
US and they were set to be engaged next week
(01:45):
when Rodriguez waited for them outside there was a it
was a big function at the Jewish Museum in d C.
And he waited outside for I think it was anybody
who looked like they were part of the group that
was in there, and open fire and I mean at
one point she God bless her, was trying to crawl
(02:08):
away and he shot her twenty one times. I mean,
they were riddled with bullets and pronounced dead at the scene.
But this is him upon being caught and by the
police and arrested twelve bree s.
Speaker 2 (02:33):
I have no words for that.
Speaker 1 (02:34):
I mean, it's just it sends it is creepy because
he sounds I don't know if you agree with me, Ben,
but it sounds like he's like in a playground. He
sounds like, you know, he's just like like skipped to
the little my darling, almost after he's murdered in cold blood,
two innocent people who he had no connection with.
Speaker 2 (02:54):
It also saw you know the thing that when I
first heard it, and of course by now we've heard
in a million times, but you know, when I first
heard it, it sounds an awful lot like the college protests.
That's exactly what it sounds. And if you didn't know
the context, and you just heard that, you'd be like, oh,
where's that college protest or where you know, where's that
(03:16):
woke city protest has?
Speaker 1 (03:17):
And since you mentioned it, I mean specifically that this
is just my opinion. I believe that this horrific crime
is the direct result of the tolerance of both anti
Semitism and violence on our campuses on Columbia, Harvard, n YU,
Penn Yale USC. You know, this is what they have
(03:40):
made possible by supporting people who are anti Semites. It's
not just that they tolerate a viewpoint of the Prohamas,
it's that they literally supported them, just tolerated them, supported them,
and supported their hatred and physical abuse of a particular
(04:03):
race of the Jewish people.
Speaker 2 (04:04):
It is.
Speaker 1 (04:06):
Mind boggling to me. And the fact that they did
that and they allowed this to fester. And I want
you to remember something we had this cut before this
was half of the people at these protests don't even
know why they're there. They have no concept of why
they are why they are protesting. If you remember, this
(04:26):
was a protester at NYU in twenty twenty four cut
three hundred.
Speaker 9 (04:31):
What would you say is the main goal with tonight's protest.
Speaker 10 (04:35):
I think the goal is just showing our support for
Palestine and demanding that NYU stops.
Speaker 11 (04:40):
I honestly don't know.
Speaker 12 (04:41):
What NYU is doing.
Speaker 2 (04:43):
Is there something that NYU's doing. I really don't know.
Speaker 13 (04:45):
I'm pretty sure there.
Speaker 2 (04:46):
Do you know what I do about Israel?
Speaker 13 (04:49):
Why are we protesting here?
Speaker 2 (04:53):
Sounds more educated.
Speaker 3 (04:54):
I'm not either.
Speaker 1 (04:55):
I'm they have no idea where they're there. But here's
the thing, so they don't even know why they're there,
but they've turned their hatred towards Jews and pro Palestine.
You know, even after October seventh, three years ago, We're
innocent women and children were murdered, babies had their heads
knocked off by these people. And that's who that girl
(05:18):
is there in support and she doesn't even know it.
Speaker 2 (05:21):
That's what's happened.
Speaker 1 (05:22):
Pam Bondi and Jenine Piro, who are our new ag
and US Attorney General, were on the scene. And this
was Pam Bondi's response to the murder and arrest Cut fourteen.
Speaker 12 (05:38):
B Ambassador, our hearts go out to you and your staff.
I spoke to the President of the United States multiple
times tonight on behalf of the President, his prayers are
with all of us, all of the Jewish community, everyone
in Washington, d C. State, local and federal agencies, and
our great US Attorney Janine Piro, who will be prosecuting
(06:02):
this case. We'll be doing everything in our power to
keep all citizens safe, especially tonight our Jewish community. Our
prayers go out. We have the FBI, all of our
federal agencies will work hand in hand with you, Chief,
as we have done, and you mayor to do everything
(06:22):
we can to keep our citizens safe. We will follow
the facts, we will follow the law, and this defendant
charged will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
Speaker 1 (06:34):
Here's the thing. I appreciate what she said. I appreciate
their response. I don't think that's much comfort to the
families that lost those two people, or the pregnant woman
who was on the Jewish pregnant woman who was on
our way to give birth, who was murdered earlier this
week as well. And here's my personal perspective. I live
in a building where people from the Israeli Embassy live.
(06:56):
There are a huge number of them in the building
that I live in. Massad has set up security at
that building on a regular day so they have security.
Last two days, my building has been surrounded by freaking
police cars, state troopers, and FBI agents because they are
worried about more violence against Jews and specifically Israelis. That
(07:18):
is horrific in the United States of America.
Speaker 2 (07:21):
That was horrific anywhere, yes, but I mean this is.
Speaker 1 (07:24):
We're supposed to be the land of the free. We're
supposed to be the And I thought that the Democrats
and the Liberals who are in control of these universities
were all about diversity and tolerance.
Speaker 2 (07:35):
They have bred this.
Speaker 1 (07:37):
They have bred this horrific, horrific anti Semitism that results
in violence because they have been so blase about violence.
You have Congress people who are not just tolerating violence,
but committing violent acts themselves.
Speaker 2 (07:55):
Or calling for it or calling for it way, and
We've said it. They are responsible for this. I've said
it before, you know, because I know that there's this whole,
big underbelly of people who think their free speech is
taken away and all this other crap. But look, I'm
all for free speech. You can say anything you say,
first of all, say anything you want, but you know,
to condone or incite violence, or to do it yourself
(08:18):
as this jackass did. It's just unacceptable. It's like, look,
if you don't like chocolate, you can go out in
the free street corn and say I hate chocolate. I'm
with you. You know what, brother, you go and preach.
You don't get to blow up the Hershey factory. These
people need to stomp with the either allowing, inciting or
(08:38):
in some cases carrying it out themselves the violence. Listen,
if you support Palestine, look, I try to support everybody.
I don't want to placate people. Obviously have my own
feelings and opinions about everything. But look, if you support Palestine,
Palestinians Hamas, go ahead. You have the right to say
you do. If you like or don't like gay people,
(08:59):
you have the right to say and do that. These
people are taking all of this to the super uber
extreme and well you know again Chicken's coming home to
roost kind of thing.
Speaker 1 (09:10):
Yeah, yeah, absolutely, positively that's what's happened. Meanwhile, you have,
you know, President Trump who points out violence in South
Africa and a genocide that's going on there. And granted,
you know, President Trump is not exactly a subtle guy.
He tends to do things full on in your face,
you know the thing. Yeah, he's you know, it's part
(09:31):
of his charm. Really, he's more aggressive than probably any
president I've ever seen. And when he does it, though,
because it doesn't involve a protected class within the Progressive
Party or some of the progressives don't care about, he's
labeled a racist. And he did that this week, specifically
with the issue of genocide in South African racism. When
(09:54):
he had the President of South Africa, Romifoso, was in
his office in the Oval office with him, and President
Trump talked to him about the genocide where the white
farmers are being killed off cut one hundred.
Speaker 14 (10:10):
Well, for you to consists that there's no white genocide
in South.
Speaker 4 (10:15):
Africa, well I can answer that for Chresident, it's for you.
It will take President Trump listening to the voices of
South Africa, some of whom are his good friends, like
(10:38):
those who are here when we have talks between us on.
Speaker 14 (10:42):
The quiet on the quiet table. It will take President
Trump to listen to them. I'm not going to be
repeating what I've been saying. I would say if that
was Africana farmer genocide, I can bet you these three
gentlemen would not be here, including my Minister of Agriculture,
he would not be with me. So it'll take him,
(11:05):
President Trump listening to their stories, to their perspective.
Speaker 2 (11:10):
So here's the thing.
Speaker 1 (11:11):
So he says, you gotta listen to them, and then
you'll know there's no there's no jenison. Do you know
what President Trump did? President Trump played a montage video
of the guy you just heard threatening the white farmers
and calling for violence on them.
Speaker 2 (11:28):
Basically, cut one or two.
Speaker 15 (11:30):
There's nothing you can do. There's nothing this Parliament can
do with or without you. People are going to occupy
land will require no permission from you, from the President,
from no one.
Speaker 2 (11:43):
We don't care.
Speaker 15 (11:44):
We can do whatever you want to do. Who are
you to tell us whether we can occupy Lent or not.
We are going to occupy land South African occupy Lent.
Speaker 2 (11:53):
That's who we are want to do.
Speaker 7 (11:56):
Can we draw.
Speaker 15 (12:01):
Yes, Honorable Member, must never.
Speaker 7 (12:03):
Be scared to kill, and evolution demands that at some
point that must be killing, because that killing is part
of a evolution act.
Speaker 2 (12:15):
So t your.
Speaker 15 (12:17):
Masa the pooor the farmer, the poor, the farmer.
Speaker 2 (12:28):
Bah.
Speaker 1 (12:30):
That's the same guy who said President Trump doesn't listen
calling for killing the white farmers. That was him saying
the same thing. I think President Trump was listening. As
a matter of fact, I.
Speaker 2 (12:39):
Wish were By the way, I well, actually I'm kind
of glad I don't. But I was gonna say I
wish I knew more about the things that were going
on in South Africa because I feel kind of like
a dummy. Look, you can't keep tabs on everything. I mean,
I'm not the president for starters or so. And this
is this is something that I think for many people,
we remember apartheid and all of the things that went
(12:59):
on there, and but but I think most of this
is flown under the radar for most people, most Americans,
I really do.
Speaker 1 (13:08):
Okay, I understand that, and you know what, I agree
with you people need to learn more about it. But
there's a difference in going, hey, I don't know about that,
I need to find out more and denying it ever happen.
Speaker 2 (13:18):
I well, I agree, I agree with That's.
Speaker 1 (13:19):
What we have happening now. We have mainstream media democrats
denying it ever ever happened. And for instance, I want
you to hear this is Yamichi al Sindoor of NBC
asking Caroline Lovett, the White House Press Secretary, why Trump
showed video of genocide in South Africa but it isn't.
Speaker 2 (13:37):
True, not true, It's not true. Eleven B.
Speaker 11 (13:40):
President showed a video that he said showed more than
a thousand burial sites of white South Africans and he said,
we're murdered. We know that that what's not true and
that the video wasn't doing that. So I wonder why
did the President choose to show that It's not true
that the video was showing a burial site and it's
unsubstantiated that that's the case.
Speaker 13 (13:58):
No, it's it is true that that video showed the
crosses that represents the claimed The video showed images of
crosses in South Africa about white farmers who have been
killed and politically persecuted because of the color of their skin,
and those crosses are representing their lives. Those crosses are
(14:21):
representing their lives and the fact that they are now
dead and their government did nothing about it.
Speaker 1 (14:26):
So Yamichi isn't buying it? Cut eleven C.
Speaker 13 (14:30):
Are you disputing that there's no the fact that the
video showed what the President claimed it showed, because it
did not show that.
Speaker 11 (14:36):
But even more, what I'm asking you.
Speaker 13 (14:37):
Is who they did show that white cross is representing
people who have perished because of racial persecution.
Speaker 11 (14:43):
The videos that the president shows, and what protocols are
in praise when there's unsubstantiated information being put out for
the world and world leadership.
Speaker 13 (14:50):
Give me what's unsubstantiated about the video. The video shows
crosses that represent the dead bodies of people who were
racially persecuted by their government. In fact, the Associated Press,
of all places, has a picture of that very monument,
and the caption from the Associated Press is each cross
marks a white farmer who has been killed in a
(15:10):
farm murder. So it is substantiated. It's not just by
that video and the physical evidence that everybody saw on
display in the Oval office, but also by another outlet
in this from the Associated Press. So you should take
it up with them if you believe the claim is unsubstantiated.
And that's a ridiculous line of questioning.
Speaker 1 (15:26):
Yeah, I agree with her, it is ridiculous. I mean,
Associated Press is not exactly known as Trump levers, So yeah, no,
that's true.
Speaker 2 (15:32):
Well, I think, and look again, I don't know enough
about this to get deep into the weeds or even
shallow into the weeds. However, the one thing I will say,
and I kind of was trying to piece together, Okay,
what's going on here? Who's saying this and who's saying this?
So the argument I guess is it's not a burial site,
its crosses representing those who were killed. Then there is
(15:53):
a distinction between the two. I mean, the cemetery has
dead bodies, whereas a point, no, no, no, I understand. But
what I'm saying is going down.
Speaker 1 (16:00):
A rabbit hole, because that's not the point. The point
is that those people died, and that's what you meet.
She said, I agree, she switched tactics. What happened was
what you're responding to is that she switched tactics after
the first cut when when Kelin Levins said, yeah, that
represents everybody that died.
Speaker 2 (16:17):
So she went to but.
Speaker 1 (16:18):
It's not a burial site. Nobody claimed it was a
burial site. It was a memorial with a cross for
each person white farmer that had been killed. So she
changed it to burial site because she'd realized that she'd
cut her legs off underneath herself, and that's what that was.
Speaker 2 (16:30):
Which of course, by the way, when you look at
hundreds or thousands or however many you know, people were killed,
does it really matter if it's a cross or there's
a body ten feet down. I mean, I get it.
It is that exactly the right.
Speaker 1 (16:41):
So and then but not only are they denying that
it happened, but okay, here this was actually kind of
this was an amazing exchange. This was President Trump back
in the Oval office. NBC's Peter Alexander decided to try
to change He just watched this video about this genocide,
what's happening with the white farmers. And he's got the
(17:01):
president of South Africa there, So what does he ask
when he's called upon by the president? He asked about
the plane gift from Qatar Cut one O six.
Speaker 2 (17:11):
Mister President.
Speaker 4 (17:11):
The Pentagon announced that they would be accepting a Katari
jet to be used as Air Force one or.
Speaker 2 (17:16):
What are you talking about?
Speaker 5 (17:20):
What you know, what does this have to do with
the quitar jet? They're giving the United States Air Force
a jet? Okay, and it's a great thing. We're talking
about a lot of other things. It's NBC trying to
get off the subject of what you just saw.
Speaker 2 (17:37):
I think that's the key right there. He's exactly right.
Speaker 1 (17:40):
That was NBC trying to switch the narrative because they
didn't like the fact that they'd been caught out lying
about whether there was a genocide or not, and the
President was not finished.
Speaker 5 (17:50):
Allow you are a real you know, you're a terrible
report number one. You don't have what it takes to
be a reporter. You're not smart enough. But for you
to go into was subject about a jet that was
given to the United States Air Force, which is a.
Speaker 6 (18:04):
Very nice thing.
Speaker 5 (18:05):
They also gave five point one treation dollars worth of
investment in addition to the jet. Go back, you have
to go back to your studio at NBC because Brian
Roberts and the people that run that place, they are
to be investigated. They are so terrible the way you
run that network. And you're a disgrace. No more questions
(18:27):
for me, No more.
Speaker 1 (18:28):
Questions than you, except that Peter Alexander wouldn't shut up.
I think there's one more cut there, one of six.
Speaker 4 (18:35):
Talk about that.
Speaker 5 (18:36):
His name is Peter something.
Speaker 2 (18:38):
He's a terrible there. I'll be quiet.
Speaker 16 (18:43):
That's my question.
Speaker 3 (18:43):
Now let's go Thank you so much.
Speaker 17 (18:45):
President.
Speaker 2 (18:47):
You know crew with President Trump seriously.
Speaker 1 (18:49):
But I'll give him credit, to be honest with you,
most other presidents, who are so very much caught up
in the dignity of the office, so to speak, would
just move on. He actually said why it was, why
this was a bad question, and he was calling out
a manipulation of the media right in front of him.
I very really have seen presidents do that, and I
(19:10):
completely agree with him. It was to switch the story.
The Qatar airline thing is from last week one and two.
It's already been put into Congress. That was Congress's issue
with it to take it or not, and they've decided
to take it. But that was Congress's decision, not his.
And he's asking it there when they're saying a video
regarding genocide in South Africa with the South African president,
(19:33):
why other would you bring it up except.
Speaker 2 (19:35):
What point it's agenda? And he called him out on it.
And by the way, I've never interviewed a president. I've
interviewed through candidates for president. I've never interviewed a president.
I've never been to the Oval Office for a presser
or anything like that. However, as a reporter, I have
been to numerous pressures with numerous politicians who were either
with somebody else or talking about something else, and your
(19:57):
newsroom will say, hey, make sure you ask him about this,
or make sure you're asking about that. My policy, not
everybody else is necessarily was all listen, I'm gonna stay
on topic until we get the story covered. Then we're
going to do a couple of off topic things, exactly.
And a lot of times, a lot of times, and
I can't speak for the White House because again I
have never interview to president, but a lot of times
even the press people will be like, hey, we'd like
(20:19):
you to stay on topic, you know, for a while,
but then we'll do some off topics stuff at the end.
They will do that now exactly. The White House probably
does that, maybe not at every single event pretty much,
but if you also, if you know these people, and
of course a little different animal between Trump and the
media than other people in the media, but but you know,
you can sometimes talk to the press person and say, listen,
(20:39):
I know he's talking about so so and so today,
but at the end, I'd like to get a question
in about this, And they will usually say if we
have some time, or yes or no or whatever. Exactly,
not just slam it into the middle of a frickin'
press or on something different. Was the beginning, right at
the beginning. Okay, even yeah, so that's that exist.
Speaker 1 (20:58):
That is the perfect point because exactly, and President Trump
was like, what the bleep were to here? I just
showed everybody what I'm talking about. I approve of what
I'm talking about. I've got the guy responsible sitting right
here with me, and you're asking me about the plane
from last week.
Speaker 2 (21:13):
I mean, it's it was.
Speaker 1 (21:15):
It was an obvious manipulation, and I was fascinated that
President Trump called him on it. And the other thing
is these people who want you to believe there's no genocide,
or who want to distract you away from the genocide.
These are the same people that would have you believed
that there was nothing wrong with Joe Biden when he
was an aumoust. But it was perfectly they were perfectly fine.
Speaker 2 (21:35):
I just want to interject here because what you said
about the genocide, and I know that's the point of
this particular story. The media of some of the media
don't care what the other topic. Like, this was genocide.
It could have been nuclear this, it could have been
Ukraine it could have been. It doesn't matter what. All
they want to do is steer the boat back to
(21:57):
kick Donald Trump in the in the in the nuts.
That's what it is. So it's not with I don't
think in a lot of cases it's it's because of
topic A that they want to ask something else. They
just want to beat the crap out of the press.
So in this case, it was genocide, it could be
something else next week, it'll be abortion next week. We
don't want to stay whatever to narrative is.
Speaker 1 (22:18):
They don't want to be on it.
Speaker 2 (22:19):
We want to be over here because that's over here
is where your narrative helps you. We don't want to
help you. Right over here is where we can need
him in the stomach.
Speaker 1 (22:27):
Over here, doesn't I completely agree. I completely agree with that.
But to my point I made just before you you
said that, is that these people have no credibility because
these are the same people that said Joe Biden was
fine and was abusive to anybody. They were abusive to
anybody who said, wait a minute, the Emperor has no
clothes on, and they could they could keep up that
(22:48):
narrative right up until the her tapes came out this week.
Speaker 2 (22:52):
And it's in your face. Now, cut one a.
Speaker 8 (22:57):
This is what twenty seventeen eighteen, that period.
Speaker 9 (23:04):
Remember, in this timeframe, my son is either been deployed
or is dying.
Speaker 2 (23:14):
And and so.
Speaker 10 (23:20):
If it was.
Speaker 8 (23:24):
And by the way, there were still a lot of
people at the time when I got out of the
Senate that were.
Speaker 9 (23:32):
Encouraging me to run in this period, except the president.
Speaker 2 (23:39):
I'm not not at me, say.
Speaker 6 (23:41):
Man, he just thought that she had a better shot
of winning the president.
Speaker 1 (23:47):
Than I did. Okay, first of all, in twenty seven,
twenty eighteen, bo had been dead for three years. He
wasn't deployed or dying. And President Biden wasn't getting out
of the Senate. He was vice president of the United States,
So he has no concept of time that's going on there.
This is what we're we're you know, this is and
(24:10):
that's just a tiny fraction of the It was so
obvious that there were issues, and you had all of
a sudden, the Democrats are going, uh oh, and now
they're playing. Now they're trying to play duck and cover
because they can't hide from the fact that they have lied.
So some of them are out there going I don't
know what you're talking about cut ten. This is gret
(24:30):
Gretchen Whitmer, Governor of Michigan, my.
Speaker 17 (24:33):
Colleagues book with Alex Thompson on President Biden's physical and
cognitive decline during his time in the White House. You
were a co chair of the Biden Harris campaign. You
stuck with Biden until he dropped out of the race.
Given your position in the campaign, what signs of decline
did you notice?
Speaker 8 (24:50):
You know, I've not read the book. I can tell
you this that if, as the book reports, cabinet members
and have access, that tells you that, you know, as
a governor in a state, you know halfway across the country,
who was working her tail off one hundred and sixty
stops on a bus tour that I headlined through swing states,
(25:12):
I didn't, you know. I was busy working. I was
busy doing the connection and the voter registration, and so directly,
I heart I didn't see the president frequently. And I
can tell you I can't speak to that directly.
Speaker 2 (25:29):
Did you have a TV because we all saw, yeah,
we did.
Speaker 1 (25:32):
You know, She's too busy to notice, is what that was.
I was too busy to notice the fact that the
president had turned into cabinet.
Speaker 2 (25:38):
She's not the only one who said this, And again,
we don't want to go down the rabbit hole again.
But here's the thing. If you were around the president
at all, or if you got a TV, yeah, you saw.
By the way, you don't need to wait for the book. Well,
I haven't read the book, so I don't know if
he was What do you mean you read the book either.
You don't need a excerpts you, but you don't need
(25:58):
a book to know that something was off. And if
you were around the president, you know, you and I
and other pundits and people who didn't see him daily,
I get it. We're just looking at sex little snippets
of his life and trying to make a determination, which
is not hard to do. However, there were people are
people who were around him constantly. You don't need a
(26:20):
damn book to tell you what he was like or
how he was falling apart or whatever. I haven't read
the book. Well, so there.
Speaker 1 (26:31):
Are some in the media actually are who are coming
to grips with reality and realize the part they played
and are sorry about it and are admitting that there
is a problem. This is Abby phillips On CNN. She
admits that to her report that came out actually undersold
what the problem is after she listened to the tapes
Cut twelve.
Speaker 2 (26:50):
We have to own this.
Speaker 9 (26:51):
The stuff is coming out now, the election's over, it
doesn't matter. Now's the time for the analysis part of
this of how future administrations don't hide the fact the
one right now with a seven eight year old man
that potentially in a couple of years this could be
happening to. We can't kill them if they start, Oh,
I mean, we can't kill them if they start covering
up things like this. Like I like that this information
is coming on out. Obviously we would have liked for
(27:12):
it to come out earlier on so could have given
the Democratic Party a true chance to somebody.
Speaker 16 (27:16):
But these clips were in from February. I mean, if
Democrats had taken seriously, which by the way, in a
way Robert Hurr kind of undersold this. He kind of
threw Joe Biden a lifeline. It was an opportunity actually
for Democrats to take it seriously, maybe change gears at
that point and maybe given a potential nominee more time.
Speaker 1 (27:37):
Now and of all the people have seen and this
is Jake Tapper. He wrote the book that they're talking about,
and he was on a Megan Kelly show, and he's
the one that was abusive to Lara Trump when she
said I'm worried about the president or something wrong, and
he got snarky, Sure, sure you're I mean, he was
nasty to her, and he has in fact apologized to
Lara about Biden's decline.
Speaker 2 (27:58):
Now cut eight C. Do you want to apologize to
Lara Trump?
Speaker 18 (28:01):
Now, I've already apologized to her. I called her months ago,
and what does she say? I mean, I don't want
to disclose the contents of a private conversation, but I
thought the conversation went well, and she said she has
said this publicly, so I feel fine of sharing it.
She said that she would never mock anybody's stutter. But
(28:21):
I mean, I you know, after we did the research
for this book and I realized how bad his acuity
issues were, I like, I mean, I called Laura Trump
and I said, you were you were right by the way.
Speaker 2 (28:38):
I'm sure he did his well, his due diligence in
researching the book and talking to people and whatever. But
you really don't or didn't have to do much research
to question the acuity of Joe Biden for the last
half decade.
Speaker 1 (28:53):
And even if you didn't agree with her with Lara
when she said there's a problem, we can all see
it on TV.
Speaker 2 (28:58):
You don't attack her.
Speaker 1 (28:59):
You can say I don't agree with you if you don't,
but to attack her and make fun of her and
mock her, which is what he did. He was abusive
to her on the air. And she's a strong woman
and could take it. But I mean, she she knew
how to handle She handled herself beautifully in that situation.
But okay, like you said, if you don't, even if
you don't agree with whether you're lying, eyes are telling
(29:19):
you on TV, you don't become abusive over it.
Speaker 2 (29:22):
And that's what he was.
Speaker 1 (29:22):
He's an abusive jackass, even if he is even if
he has apologized right.
Speaker 2 (29:26):
Part by the way, part of the problem. And we've
as we talked about Biden over over the years here
on this this very show, you know we both said
the same thing. Look, you know, here's meganisms we did
Biden every week we did. But here's here's a growing problem. Right,
I mean, this is a guy who's getting old. Imagine
it was your grandfather it's sad, it's this, it's that,
and it is and it still is. And I don't
(29:48):
you know, political disagreements aside. This is still a a
an elderly human being who could be your grandfather. I mean,
your grandfather could have the same acuity of my grandfather.
President there to the point A correct and b Look
how they propped him up and turned him into basically
(30:09):
a puppet. That's elder weekend at Bernie' that's this is
not just oh my grandfather's losing a step. Yeah, all
of us have has a lot to answer for. The hell.
It's like you're just like you're just puppeting him along.
It's like a ventriloquist show and and you're all going,
everything's right, nothing to see here. It's elder abuse. This
(30:32):
is the thing. Look, I have my issues with Joe
Biden and his politics and other things, and have issues
with a lot of people, but this is again, it
could be your grandfather and these people were abusing him.
Speaker 1 (30:44):
Yeah, absolutely positively. And they panicked this past week because
the Herd tapes were coming out and we knew that
there was now there is an exposay that was going
to show all those people that said, we were delusional
for thinking there's something wrong with Biden. Now have egg
all over their face.
Speaker 2 (31:01):
So what did the.
Speaker 1 (31:02):
Biden camp do? Which was really interesting. They essentially announced
that President Biden has prostate cancer, which is not just
prostac cancer, but very advanced prostate cancer. And it, you know,
and it's fantastasized to his bones, which is extraordinarily painful.
And I don't wish sat on anybody, including Joe Biden exactly,
(31:25):
I don't. But why was that done? Well, it appears
to have been done. They're saying, well, we just found out.
That's bull bleep. There's no way they just found out.
And I'm not the only person that thinks this. This
is President Trump going why didn't we know this before?
Speaker 2 (31:38):
Cut to c When you.
Speaker 6 (31:41):
Take tests medical as a male, that test is very standard.
I don't know if it's given to everybody, but it's
given just about and it takes a long time to
get to that situation. Now, I think, you know, to
get to a stage nine. I think that if you
take a look, it's the same doctor that said that
(32:02):
Joe was cognitively fine, there was nothing wrong with him. Well,
he said, if it's the same doctor. He said there
was nothing wrong there, and that's being proven to be
a sad situation.
Speaker 2 (32:13):
But I think he's right. They did know.
Speaker 1 (32:16):
They released it for one reason at the same time
the Herd tapes came out, and that was to deflect
from the Herd tape.
Speaker 2 (32:20):
They may have by the way, I agree they veryone
may have known. But I want to say this because
I was someone who got diagnosed with cancer who didn't
have cancer, thank God. But here's the thing. Look, doctors
miss stuff, right, I mean stuff gets missed all the time.
I mean sometimes it's small, sometimes it's large, but it
gets missed. Yeah, but guess what this isn't you or
me or bobbed down the stairs present with the best
(32:43):
healthcare on the planet.
Speaker 1 (32:45):
Not only that has basically a mandated exam every year
by done by Walter Reid and by the physicians at
Walter Reid, which are the best anywhere. And so that's ridiculous.
Of course they knew.
Speaker 9 (33:00):
Now.
Speaker 1 (33:01):
A CNN reporter came out with report saying a Biden
spokesperson said that he hadn't been tested for prostay cancer
since twenty fourteen, which meant, you know, before he was
vice president, you've got to be that's not possible. But
this is what the claim was. And then you'll hear
a cut afterwards. The CNN, who you know, always propped
Biden up going what cut fifteen?
Speaker 10 (33:23):
Biden spokesperson tells me that former President Joe Biden his
last known PSA, which is a screening that could be
used for prostay cancer, was conducted in twenty fourteen and
that he was never diagnosed with cancer before the Friday
diagnosis that was handed from his doctors.
Speaker 2 (33:43):
And that's bull bleep.
Speaker 1 (33:44):
We all know it's bull bleep, and CNN called it
when uh really, what cut fifteen A.
Speaker 17 (33:49):
I want to discuss this with our panel, Jamie Gangel.
We're getting this news in it. It was twenty fourteen
the last time he was tested, and yes, there are
these medical guidelines recommending against age seventy eight up, but
he was president of the United States.
Speaker 16 (34:03):
I find it very surprising.
Speaker 2 (34:05):
Then go, yeah, exactly, this is your point. Who might
who might have yeah, hey, or or by the way,
not only sometimes there's guidelines. Sometimes, Look, we're regular folks, right,
Sometimes we're like, ah, screw it, too busy, not gonna
go do it. This is the president doesn't have a
choice to come and get him surprised. They don't test
him every other day, for Freakin's Even Donald.
Speaker 1 (34:25):
Trump tried to get out of it. They came and
got him in a helicopter.
Speaker 2 (34:29):
There is nothing you can do about. This is not
me and you your neighbor. This is the president of
the United States. They they'll sorry, Joe, gotta test you,
gotta do it. Yeah, I mean I don't get it,
but you know, I mean, look, I'm busy, Joe, get
in the room. That's I mean, that's kind of basically
what exactly what happens. Again, listen, I'm gonna play devil
(34:49):
with that can hit it, just just for a moment.
Could doctors have missed this even if they had screened,
I guess maybe not over and over and over again.
Speaker 1 (34:56):
It was given every year, and that test had to
been given every year, right, And I think they're pointing
the last time his test was clear.
Speaker 2 (35:02):
I think that meant to me that in twenty fifteen
it was.
Speaker 1 (35:05):
No longer clear. So they've known for a long time
that he had prostay cancer.
Speaker 2 (35:09):
That's that's what happened. Well, and you know, you look
at the prostate cancer, which of course is one thing.
This is not just like one thing. This is the
prostate cancer. The fact that he was, you know, his
acuity was long gone. He didn't know where he was
half the time. And the doctor's going, yeah, he's fine.
Speaker 1 (35:24):
That doctor needs to be taken up in front of
the medical boards because he has no idea what he's doing.
Speaker 2 (35:27):
Because, first of all, and I've known a lot of
people with cancer, and sadly, I've known a lot of
people have died from cancer, and I mean at the
very very end, when they're basically on their deathbed. Sure
they're not in their right mind, but almost to the tee,
everybody I've known who's had cancer wasn't walking around like
they were lost. Where do I go? Should I fall
off the stage? What should I do? So it's you know,
(35:49):
to sahaking.
Speaker 1 (35:50):
Hands with invisible people right right, So it isn't shaken
hands with there's nobody there.
Speaker 2 (35:55):
So the cancer is an issue, but there's so many
other issues, and you can't push him back to cancer
or not having cancer. You know, the fact that he
that he didn't have cancer didn't make him fall on
stage and not know who he was shaking hands with
or if he had cancer. So there's there's more that.
That's that's the thing. There's more that. There's a lot
of moving parts.
Speaker 7 (36:13):
Here, folks.
Speaker 2 (36:13):
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Speaker 1 (36:15):
So we end every week with a truth control now
since we don't do Bidenisms anymore. And this week our
truth control is from President Trump. Pie's in the Oval Office.
He's talking about the Golden Dome. See if you can
detect the needle to Canada, cut one bee.
Speaker 5 (36:30):
Canada has called us and they want to be a
part of it.
Speaker 6 (36:32):
So we'll be talking to them. They want to have
protection also, so as usual, we help Canada the best
we can.
Speaker 1 (36:41):
Okay, is he is he just you know? Is he
seriously needling Canada? You've you've been bitching about the goddamn Taris,
but no, you want to be under the Golden Dome now,
you want to be our friend. That's what I heard.
I heard a little bit of a trolling of Canada.
Speaker 2 (36:54):
I think I think he's doing a little bit of both.
I mean, look, if we have a golden Dome, we're
going to help our neighbors, right. But but yeah, we're
gonna we're gonna, we're gonna poke in the ribs. A
couple of times because you know, yeah, of course they
want to protection you. You know, it's a Canada, you
know well.
Speaker 1 (37:05):
And they won't pay for it themselves, so they want
to They want us again to foot the bill, is
what he's saying. And we're happy to do it because
it's not that big an expansion to cover Canada. But
knock the crap off with the tariffs and so forth.
Do what you're supposed to do, and yes, you could
be under our Golden Dome.
Speaker 2 (37:20):
He should have said. This would have totally been trolling,
I think. But what he should have said is, well,
you know, we'll have all of our states under the
Golden Dome. I love that.
Speaker 1 (37:29):
That would be excellent. That would have been you know,
I think you need to send him an email. I think, hey,
next time.
Speaker 2 (37:34):
Don don listen this. This was what you should have said.
Of course, add this to your repertoire. Of course you
would have seen heads explode in the media. That would
have been so good, though.
Speaker 1 (37:42):
It would have been so we'd.
Speaker 2 (37:43):
Like to have all of our states under the Golden Dome.
So Canada is welcome.
Speaker 1 (37:46):
So let me know, do you agree with me that
the President Trump should go down that hole?
Speaker 2 (37:50):
I think he should.
Speaker 1 (37:51):
I think Ben is right on the money with that.
You can contact Ben and I on X at news
Bye three or on Facebook at news Bye. We upload
a new episode every single Monday, so check back next
week and see what new offerings we have. Meanwhile, I
hope you're under the Golden Dome. This is Nancy Shack,
This is Newspite.
President Trump faces down the President of South Africa and
the press both same time in the Oval office. President
Biden was worse than anyone even guessed, and the liberal
tolerance for anti Semitism and violence comes home to roost
in a most horrible way. The gloves are off and are
did they really just say that? Moments this week?
Speaker 2 (00:21):
I'm Nancy Shack, I'm Ben Parker.
Speaker 3 (00:23):
This is news bite, mister president.
Speaker 4 (00:37):
The Pentagon announced it would be accepting a Katari jet
to be used as Air Force one or what.
Speaker 5 (00:42):
Are you talking about it?
Speaker 6 (00:47):
You know, we're talking about a lot of other things.
Speaker 5 (00:50):
It's NBC trying to get off the subject of what
you just saw.
Speaker 1 (00:53):
And and so what was happening now?
Speaker 7 (01:00):
Went on?
Speaker 8 (01:00):
Both guys fifteen?
Speaker 2 (01:18):
I guess who's coming to dinner? Wow? That was that?
Just a sense of shiver down my spine.
Speaker 1 (01:24):
That was Elias Rodriguez, the guy from Chicago, has been
charged with murdering the two those two beautiful, uh young
people from the Israeli embassy. One was a they're both
staff members. One was from Israel, one was from the
US and they were set to be engaged next week
(01:45):
when Rodriguez waited for them outside there was a it
was a big function at the Jewish Museum in d C.
And he waited outside for I think it was anybody
who looked like they were part of the group that
was in there, and open fire and I mean at
one point she God bless her, was trying to crawl
(02:08):
away and he shot her twenty one times. I mean,
they were riddled with bullets and pronounced dead at the scene.
But this is him upon being caught and by the
police and arrested twelve bree s.
Speaker 2 (02:33):
I have no words for that.
Speaker 1 (02:34):
I mean, it's just it sends it is creepy because
he sounds I don't know if you agree with me, Ben,
but it sounds like he's like in a playground. He
sounds like, you know, he's just like like skipped to
the little my darling, almost after he's murdered in cold blood,
two innocent people who he had no connection with.
Speaker 2 (02:54):
It also saw you know the thing that when I
first heard it, and of course by now we've heard
in a million times, but you know, when I first
heard it, it sounds an awful lot like the college protests.
That's exactly what it sounds. And if you didn't know
the context, and you just heard that, you'd be like, oh,
where's that college protest or where you know, where's that
(03:16):
woke city protest has?
Speaker 1 (03:17):
And since you mentioned it, I mean specifically that this
is just my opinion. I believe that this horrific crime
is the direct result of the tolerance of both anti
Semitism and violence on our campuses on Columbia, Harvard, n YU,
Penn Yale USC. You know, this is what they have
(03:40):
made possible by supporting people who are anti Semites. It's
not just that they tolerate a viewpoint of the Prohamas,
it's that they literally supported them, just tolerated them, supported them,
and supported their hatred and physical abuse of a particular
(04:03):
race of the Jewish people.
Speaker 2 (04:04):
It is.
Speaker 1 (04:06):
Mind boggling to me. And the fact that they did
that and they allowed this to fester. And I want
you to remember something we had this cut before this
was half of the people at these protests don't even
know why they're there. They have no concept of why
they are why they are protesting. If you remember, this
(04:26):
was a protester at NYU in twenty twenty four cut
three hundred.
Speaker 9 (04:31):
What would you say is the main goal with tonight's protest.
Speaker 10 (04:35):
I think the goal is just showing our support for
Palestine and demanding that NYU stops.
Speaker 11 (04:40):
I honestly don't know.
Speaker 12 (04:41):
What NYU is doing.
Speaker 2 (04:43):
Is there something that NYU's doing. I really don't know.
Speaker 13 (04:45):
I'm pretty sure there.
Speaker 2 (04:46):
Do you know what I do about Israel?
Speaker 13 (04:49):
Why are we protesting here?
Speaker 2 (04:53):
Sounds more educated.
Speaker 3 (04:54):
I'm not either.
Speaker 1 (04:55):
I'm they have no idea where they're there. But here's
the thing, so they don't even know why they're there,
but they've turned their hatred towards Jews and pro Palestine.
You know, even after October seventh, three years ago, We're
innocent women and children were murdered, babies had their heads
knocked off by these people. And that's who that girl
(05:18):
is there in support and she doesn't even know it.
Speaker 2 (05:21):
That's what's happened.
Speaker 1 (05:22):
Pam Bondi and Jenine Piro, who are our new ag
and US Attorney General, were on the scene. And this
was Pam Bondi's response to the murder and arrest Cut fourteen.
Speaker 12 (05:38):
B Ambassador, our hearts go out to you and your staff.
I spoke to the President of the United States multiple
times tonight on behalf of the President, his prayers are
with all of us, all of the Jewish community, everyone
in Washington, d C. State, local and federal agencies, and
our great US Attorney Janine Piro, who will be prosecuting
(06:02):
this case. We'll be doing everything in our power to
keep all citizens safe, especially tonight our Jewish community. Our
prayers go out. We have the FBI, all of our
federal agencies will work hand in hand with you, Chief,
as we have done, and you mayor to do everything
(06:22):
we can to keep our citizens safe. We will follow
the facts, we will follow the law, and this defendant
charged will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
Speaker 1 (06:34):
Here's the thing. I appreciate what she said. I appreciate
their response. I don't think that's much comfort to the
families that lost those two people, or the pregnant woman
who was on the Jewish pregnant woman who was on
our way to give birth, who was murdered earlier this
week as well. And here's my personal perspective. I live
in a building where people from the Israeli Embassy live.
(06:56):
There are a huge number of them in the building
that I live in. Massad has set up security at
that building on a regular day so they have security.
Last two days, my building has been surrounded by freaking
police cars, state troopers, and FBI agents because they are
worried about more violence against Jews and specifically Israelis. That
(07:18):
is horrific in the United States of America.
Speaker 2 (07:21):
That was horrific anywhere, yes, but I mean this is.
Speaker 1 (07:24):
We're supposed to be the land of the free. We're
supposed to be the And I thought that the Democrats
and the Liberals who are in control of these universities
were all about diversity and tolerance.
Speaker 2 (07:35):
They have bred this.
Speaker 1 (07:37):
They have bred this horrific, horrific anti Semitism that results
in violence because they have been so blase about violence.
You have Congress people who are not just tolerating violence,
but committing violent acts themselves.
Speaker 2 (07:55):
Or calling for it or calling for it way, and
We've said it. They are responsible for this. I've said
it before, you know, because I know that there's this whole,
big underbelly of people who think their free speech is
taken away and all this other crap. But look, I'm
all for free speech. You can say anything you say,
first of all, say anything you want, but you know,
to condone or incite violence, or to do it yourself
(08:18):
as this jackass did. It's just unacceptable. It's like, look,
if you don't like chocolate, you can go out in
the free street corn and say I hate chocolate. I'm
with you. You know what, brother, you go and preach.
You don't get to blow up the Hershey factory. These
people need to stomp with the either allowing, inciting or
(08:38):
in some cases carrying it out themselves the violence. Listen,
if you support Palestine, look, I try to support everybody.
I don't want to placate people. Obviously have my own
feelings and opinions about everything. But look, if you support Palestine,
Palestinians Hamas, go ahead. You have the right to say
you do. If you like or don't like gay people,
(08:59):
you have the right to say and do that. These
people are taking all of this to the super uber
extreme and well you know again Chicken's coming home to
roost kind of thing.
Speaker 1 (09:10):
Yeah, yeah, absolutely, positively that's what's happened. Meanwhile, you have,
you know, President Trump who points out violence in South
Africa and a genocide that's going on there. And granted,
you know, President Trump is not exactly a subtle guy.
He tends to do things full on in your face,
you know the thing. Yeah, he's you know, it's part
(09:31):
of his charm. Really, he's more aggressive than probably any
president I've ever seen. And when he does it, though,
because it doesn't involve a protected class within the Progressive
Party or some of the progressives don't care about, he's
labeled a racist. And he did that this week, specifically
with the issue of genocide in South African racism. When
(09:54):
he had the President of South Africa, Romifoso, was in
his office in the Oval office with him, and President
Trump talked to him about the genocide where the white
farmers are being killed off cut one hundred.
Speaker 14 (10:10):
Well, for you to consists that there's no white genocide
in South.
Speaker 4 (10:15):
Africa, well I can answer that for Chresident, it's for you.
It will take President Trump listening to the voices of
South Africa, some of whom are his good friends, like
(10:38):
those who are here when we have talks between us on.
Speaker 14 (10:42):
The quiet on the quiet table. It will take President
Trump to listen to them. I'm not going to be
repeating what I've been saying. I would say if that
was Africana farmer genocide, I can bet you these three
gentlemen would not be here, including my Minister of Agriculture,
he would not be with me. So it'll take him,
(11:05):
President Trump listening to their stories, to their perspective.
Speaker 2 (11:10):
So here's the thing.
Speaker 1 (11:11):
So he says, you gotta listen to them, and then
you'll know there's no there's no jenison. Do you know
what President Trump did? President Trump played a montage video
of the guy you just heard threatening the white farmers
and calling for violence on them.
Speaker 2 (11:28):
Basically, cut one or two.
Speaker 15 (11:30):
There's nothing you can do. There's nothing this Parliament can
do with or without you. People are going to occupy
land will require no permission from you, from the President,
from no one.
Speaker 2 (11:43):
We don't care.
Speaker 15 (11:44):
We can do whatever you want to do. Who are
you to tell us whether we can occupy Lent or not.
We are going to occupy land South African occupy Lent.
Speaker 2 (11:53):
That's who we are want to do.
Speaker 7 (11:56):
Can we draw.
Speaker 15 (12:01):
Yes, Honorable Member, must never.
Speaker 7 (12:03):
Be scared to kill, and evolution demands that at some
point that must be killing, because that killing is part
of a evolution act.
Speaker 2 (12:15):
So t your.
Speaker 15 (12:17):
Masa the pooor the farmer, the poor, the farmer.
Speaker 2 (12:28):
Bah.
Speaker 1 (12:30):
That's the same guy who said President Trump doesn't listen
calling for killing the white farmers. That was him saying
the same thing. I think President Trump was listening. As
a matter of fact, I.
Speaker 2 (12:39):
Wish were By the way, I well, actually I'm kind
of glad I don't. But I was gonna say I
wish I knew more about the things that were going
on in South Africa because I feel kind of like
a dummy. Look, you can't keep tabs on everything. I mean,
I'm not the president for starters or so. And this
is this is something that I think for many people,
we remember apartheid and all of the things that went
(12:59):
on there, and but but I think most of this
is flown under the radar for most people, most Americans,
I really do.
Speaker 1 (13:08):
Okay, I understand that, and you know what, I agree
with you people need to learn more about it. But
there's a difference in going, hey, I don't know about that,
I need to find out more and denying it ever happen.
Speaker 2 (13:18):
I well, I agree, I agree with That's.
Speaker 1 (13:19):
What we have happening now. We have mainstream media democrats
denying it ever ever happened. And for instance, I want
you to hear this is Yamichi al Sindoor of NBC
asking Caroline Lovett, the White House Press Secretary, why Trump
showed video of genocide in South Africa but it isn't.
Speaker 2 (13:37):
True, not true, It's not true. Eleven B.
Speaker 11 (13:40):
President showed a video that he said showed more than
a thousand burial sites of white South Africans and he said,
we're murdered. We know that that what's not true and
that the video wasn't doing that. So I wonder why
did the President choose to show that It's not true
that the video was showing a burial site and it's
unsubstantiated that that's the case.
Speaker 13 (13:58):
No, it's it is true that that video showed the
crosses that represents the claimed The video showed images of
crosses in South Africa about white farmers who have been
killed and politically persecuted because of the color of their skin,
and those crosses are representing their lives. Those crosses are
(14:21):
representing their lives and the fact that they are now
dead and their government did nothing about it.
Speaker 1 (14:26):
So Yamichi isn't buying it? Cut eleven C.
Speaker 13 (14:30):
Are you disputing that there's no the fact that the
video showed what the President claimed it showed, because it
did not show that.
Speaker 11 (14:36):
But even more, what I'm asking you.
Speaker 13 (14:37):
Is who they did show that white cross is representing
people who have perished because of racial persecution.
Speaker 11 (14:43):
The videos that the president shows, and what protocols are
in praise when there's unsubstantiated information being put out for
the world and world leadership.
Speaker 13 (14:50):
Give me what's unsubstantiated about the video. The video shows
crosses that represent the dead bodies of people who were
racially persecuted by their government. In fact, the Associated Press,
of all places, has a picture of that very monument,
and the caption from the Associated Press is each cross
marks a white farmer who has been killed in a
(15:10):
farm murder. So it is substantiated. It's not just by
that video and the physical evidence that everybody saw on
display in the Oval office, but also by another outlet
in this from the Associated Press. So you should take
it up with them if you believe the claim is unsubstantiated.
And that's a ridiculous line of questioning.
Speaker 1 (15:26):
Yeah, I agree with her, it is ridiculous. I mean,
Associated Press is not exactly known as Trump levers, So yeah, no,
that's true.
Speaker 2 (15:32):
Well, I think, and look again, I don't know enough
about this to get deep into the weeds or even
shallow into the weeds. However, the one thing I will say,
and I kind of was trying to piece together, Okay,
what's going on here? Who's saying this and who's saying this?
So the argument I guess is it's not a burial site,
its crosses representing those who were killed. Then there is
(15:53):
a distinction between the two. I mean, the cemetery has
dead bodies, whereas a point, no, no, no, I understand. But
what I'm saying is going down.
Speaker 1 (16:00):
A rabbit hole, because that's not the point. The point
is that those people died, and that's what you meet.
She said, I agree, she switched tactics. What happened was
what you're responding to is that she switched tactics after
the first cut when when Kelin Levins said, yeah, that
represents everybody that died.
Speaker 2 (16:17):
So she went to but.
Speaker 1 (16:18):
It's not a burial site. Nobody claimed it was a
burial site. It was a memorial with a cross for
each person white farmer that had been killed. So she
changed it to burial site because she'd realized that she'd
cut her legs off underneath herself, and that's what that was.
Speaker 2 (16:30):
Which of course, by the way, when you look at
hundreds or thousands or however many you know, people were killed,
does it really matter if it's a cross or there's
a body ten feet down. I mean, I get it.
It is that exactly the right.
Speaker 1 (16:41):
So and then but not only are they denying that
it happened, but okay, here this was actually kind of
this was an amazing exchange. This was President Trump back
in the Oval office. NBC's Peter Alexander decided to try
to change He just watched this video about this genocide,
what's happening with the white farmers. And he's got the
(17:01):
president of South Africa there, So what does he ask
when he's called upon by the president? He asked about
the plane gift from Qatar Cut one O six.
Speaker 2 (17:11):
Mister President.
Speaker 4 (17:11):
The Pentagon announced that they would be accepting a Katari
jet to be used as Air Force one or.
Speaker 2 (17:16):
What are you talking about?
Speaker 5 (17:20):
What you know, what does this have to do with
the quitar jet? They're giving the United States Air Force
a jet? Okay, and it's a great thing. We're talking
about a lot of other things. It's NBC trying to
get off the subject of what you just saw.
Speaker 2 (17:37):
I think that's the key right there. He's exactly right.
Speaker 1 (17:40):
That was NBC trying to switch the narrative because they
didn't like the fact that they'd been caught out lying
about whether there was a genocide or not, and the
President was not finished.
Speaker 5 (17:50):
Allow you are a real you know, you're a terrible
report number one. You don't have what it takes to
be a reporter. You're not smart enough. But for you
to go into was subject about a jet that was
given to the United States Air Force, which is a.
Speaker 6 (18:04):
Very nice thing.
Speaker 5 (18:05):
They also gave five point one treation dollars worth of
investment in addition to the jet. Go back, you have
to go back to your studio at NBC because Brian
Roberts and the people that run that place, they are
to be investigated. They are so terrible the way you
run that network. And you're a disgrace. No more questions
(18:27):
for me, No more.
Speaker 1 (18:28):
Questions than you, except that Peter Alexander wouldn't shut up.
I think there's one more cut there, one of six.
Speaker 4 (18:35):
Talk about that.
Speaker 5 (18:36):
His name is Peter something.
Speaker 2 (18:38):
He's a terrible there. I'll be quiet.
Speaker 16 (18:43):
That's my question.
Speaker 3 (18:43):
Now let's go Thank you so much.
Speaker 17 (18:45):
President.
Speaker 2 (18:47):
You know crew with President Trump seriously.
Speaker 1 (18:49):
But I'll give him credit, to be honest with you,
most other presidents, who are so very much caught up
in the dignity of the office, so to speak, would
just move on. He actually said why it was, why
this was a bad question, and he was calling out
a manipulation of the media right in front of him.
I very really have seen presidents do that, and I
(19:10):
completely agree with him. It was to switch the story.
The Qatar airline thing is from last week one and two.
It's already been put into Congress. That was Congress's issue
with it to take it or not, and they've decided
to take it. But that was Congress's decision, not his.
And he's asking it there when they're saying a video
regarding genocide in South Africa with the South African president,
(19:33):
why other would you bring it up except.
Speaker 2 (19:35):
What point it's agenda? And he called him out on it.
And by the way, I've never interviewed a president. I've
interviewed through candidates for president. I've never interviewed a president.
I've never been to the Oval Office for a presser
or anything like that. However, as a reporter, I have
been to numerous pressures with numerous politicians who were either
with somebody else or talking about something else, and your
(19:57):
newsroom will say, hey, make sure you ask him about this,
or make sure you're asking about that. My policy, not
everybody else is necessarily was all listen, I'm gonna stay
on topic until we get the story covered. Then we're
going to do a couple of off topic things, exactly.
And a lot of times, a lot of times, and
I can't speak for the White House because again I
have never interview to president, but a lot of times
even the press people will be like, hey, we'd like
(20:19):
you to stay on topic, you know, for a while,
but then we'll do some off topics stuff at the end.
They will do that now exactly. The White House probably
does that, maybe not at every single event pretty much,
but if you also, if you know these people, and
of course a little different animal between Trump and the
media than other people in the media, but but you know,
you can sometimes talk to the press person and say, listen,
(20:39):
I know he's talking about so so and so today,
but at the end, I'd like to get a question
in about this, And they will usually say if we
have some time, or yes or no or whatever. Exactly,
not just slam it into the middle of a frickin'
press or on something different. Was the beginning, right at
the beginning. Okay, even yeah, so that's that exist.
Speaker 1 (20:58):
That is the perfect point because exactly, and President Trump
was like, what the bleep were to here? I just
showed everybody what I'm talking about. I approve of what
I'm talking about. I've got the guy responsible sitting right
here with me, and you're asking me about the plane
from last week.
Speaker 2 (21:13):
I mean, it's it was.
Speaker 1 (21:15):
It was an obvious manipulation, and I was fascinated that
President Trump called him on it. And the other thing
is these people who want you to believe there's no genocide,
or who want to distract you away from the genocide.
These are the same people that would have you believed
that there was nothing wrong with Joe Biden when he
was an aumoust. But it was perfectly they were perfectly fine.
Speaker 2 (21:35):
I just want to interject here because what you said
about the genocide, and I know that's the point of
this particular story. The media of some of the media
don't care what the other topic. Like, this was genocide.
It could have been nuclear this, it could have been
Ukraine it could have been. It doesn't matter what. All
they want to do is steer the boat back to
(21:57):
kick Donald Trump in the in the in the nuts.
That's what it is. So it's not with I don't
think in a lot of cases it's it's because of
topic A that they want to ask something else. They
just want to beat the crap out of the press.
So in this case, it was genocide, it could be
something else next week, it'll be abortion next week. We
don't want to stay whatever to narrative is.
Speaker 1 (22:18):
They don't want to be on it.
Speaker 2 (22:19):
We want to be over here because that's over here
is where your narrative helps you. We don't want to
help you. Right over here is where we can need
him in the stomach.
Speaker 1 (22:27):
Over here, doesn't I completely agree. I completely agree with that.
But to my point I made just before you you
said that, is that these people have no credibility because
these are the same people that said Joe Biden was
fine and was abusive to anybody. They were abusive to
anybody who said, wait a minute, the Emperor has no
clothes on, and they could they could keep up that
(22:48):
narrative right up until the her tapes came out this week.
Speaker 2 (22:52):
And it's in your face. Now, cut one a.
Speaker 8 (22:57):
This is what twenty seventeen eighteen, that period.
Speaker 9 (23:04):
Remember, in this timeframe, my son is either been deployed
or is dying.
Speaker 2 (23:14):
And and so.
Speaker 10 (23:20):
If it was.
Speaker 8 (23:24):
And by the way, there were still a lot of
people at the time when I got out of the
Senate that were.
Speaker 9 (23:32):
Encouraging me to run in this period, except the president.
Speaker 2 (23:39):
I'm not not at me, say.
Speaker 6 (23:41):
Man, he just thought that she had a better shot
of winning the president.
Speaker 1 (23:47):
Than I did. Okay, first of all, in twenty seven,
twenty eighteen, bo had been dead for three years. He
wasn't deployed or dying. And President Biden wasn't getting out
of the Senate. He was vice president of the United States,
So he has no concept of time that's going on there.
This is what we're we're you know, this is and
(24:10):
that's just a tiny fraction of the It was so
obvious that there were issues, and you had all of
a sudden, the Democrats are going, uh oh, and now
they're playing. Now they're trying to play duck and cover
because they can't hide from the fact that they have lied.
So some of them are out there going I don't
know what you're talking about cut ten. This is gret
(24:30):
Gretchen Whitmer, Governor of Michigan, my.
Speaker 17 (24:33):
Colleagues book with Alex Thompson on President Biden's physical and
cognitive decline during his time in the White House. You
were a co chair of the Biden Harris campaign. You
stuck with Biden until he dropped out of the race.
Given your position in the campaign, what signs of decline
did you notice?
Speaker 8 (24:50):
You know, I've not read the book. I can tell
you this that if, as the book reports, cabinet members
and have access, that tells you that, you know, as
a governor in a state, you know halfway across the country,
who was working her tail off one hundred and sixty
stops on a bus tour that I headlined through swing states,
(25:12):
I didn't, you know. I was busy working. I was
busy doing the connection and the voter registration, and so directly,
I heart I didn't see the president frequently. And I
can tell you I can't speak to that directly.
Speaker 2 (25:29):
Did you have a TV because we all saw, yeah,
we did.
Speaker 1 (25:32):
You know, She's too busy to notice, is what that was.
I was too busy to notice the fact that the
president had turned into cabinet.
Speaker 2 (25:38):
She's not the only one who said this, And again,
we don't want to go down the rabbit hole again.
But here's the thing. If you were around the president
at all, or if you got a TV, yeah, you saw.
By the way, you don't need to wait for the book. Well,
I haven't read the book, so I don't know if
he was What do you mean you read the book either.
You don't need a excerpts you, but you don't need
(25:58):
a book to know that something was off. And if
you were around the president, you know, you and I
and other pundits and people who didn't see him daily,
I get it. We're just looking at sex little snippets
of his life and trying to make a determination, which
is not hard to do. However, there were people are
people who were around him constantly. You don't need a
(26:20):
damn book to tell you what he was like or
how he was falling apart or whatever. I haven't read
the book. Well, so there.
Speaker 1 (26:31):
Are some in the media actually are who are coming
to grips with reality and realize the part they played
and are sorry about it and are admitting that there
is a problem. This is Abby phillips On CNN. She
admits that to her report that came out actually undersold
what the problem is after she listened to the tapes
Cut twelve.
Speaker 2 (26:50):
We have to own this.
Speaker 9 (26:51):
The stuff is coming out now, the election's over, it
doesn't matter. Now's the time for the analysis part of
this of how future administrations don't hide the fact the
one right now with a seven eight year old man
that potentially in a couple of years this could be
happening to. We can't kill them if they start, Oh,
I mean, we can't kill them if they start covering
up things like this. Like I like that this information
is coming on out. Obviously we would have liked for
(27:12):
it to come out earlier on so could have given
the Democratic Party a true chance to somebody.
Speaker 16 (27:16):
But these clips were in from February. I mean, if
Democrats had taken seriously, which by the way, in a
way Robert Hurr kind of undersold this. He kind of
threw Joe Biden a lifeline. It was an opportunity actually
for Democrats to take it seriously, maybe change gears at
that point and maybe given a potential nominee more time.
Speaker 1 (27:37):
Now and of all the people have seen and this
is Jake Tapper. He wrote the book that they're talking about,
and he was on a Megan Kelly show, and he's
the one that was abusive to Lara Trump when she
said I'm worried about the president or something wrong, and
he got snarky, Sure, sure you're I mean, he was
nasty to her, and he has in fact apologized to
Lara about Biden's decline.
Speaker 2 (27:58):
Now cut eight C. Do you want to apologize to
Lara Trump?
Speaker 18 (28:01):
Now, I've already apologized to her. I called her months ago,
and what does she say? I mean, I don't want
to disclose the contents of a private conversation, but I
thought the conversation went well, and she said she has
said this publicly, so I feel fine of sharing it.
She said that she would never mock anybody's stutter. But
(28:21):
I mean, I you know, after we did the research
for this book and I realized how bad his acuity
issues were, I like, I mean, I called Laura Trump
and I said, you were you were right by the way.
Speaker 2 (28:38):
I'm sure he did his well, his due diligence in
researching the book and talking to people and whatever. But
you really don't or didn't have to do much research
to question the acuity of Joe Biden for the last
half decade.
Speaker 1 (28:53):
And even if you didn't agree with her with Lara
when she said there's a problem, we can all see
it on TV.
Speaker 2 (28:58):
You don't attack her.
Speaker 1 (28:59):
You can say I don't agree with you if you don't,
but to attack her and make fun of her and
mock her, which is what he did. He was abusive
to her on the air. And she's a strong woman
and could take it. But I mean, she she knew
how to handle She handled herself beautifully in that situation.
But okay, like you said, if you don't, even if
you don't agree with whether you're lying, eyes are telling
(29:19):
you on TV, you don't become abusive over it.
Speaker 2 (29:22):
And that's what he was.
Speaker 1 (29:22):
He's an abusive jackass, even if he is even if
he has apologized right.
Speaker 2 (29:26):
Part by the way, part of the problem. And we've
as we talked about Biden over over the years here
on this this very show, you know we both said
the same thing. Look, you know, here's meganisms we did
Biden every week we did. But here's here's a growing problem. Right,
I mean, this is a guy who's getting old. Imagine
it was your grandfather it's sad, it's this, it's that,
and it is and it still is. And I don't
(29:48):
you know, political disagreements aside. This is still a a
an elderly human being who could be your grandfather. I mean,
your grandfather could have the same acuity of my grandfather.
President there to the point A correct and b Look
how they propped him up and turned him into basically
(30:09):
a puppet. That's elder weekend at Bernie' that's this is
not just oh my grandfather's losing a step. Yeah, all
of us have has a lot to answer for. The hell.
It's like you're just like you're just puppeting him along.
It's like a ventriloquist show and and you're all going,
everything's right, nothing to see here. It's elder abuse. This
(30:32):
is the thing. Look, I have my issues with Joe
Biden and his politics and other things, and have issues
with a lot of people, but this is again, it
could be your grandfather and these people were abusing him.
Speaker 1 (30:44):
Yeah, absolutely positively. And they panicked this past week because
the Herd tapes were coming out and we knew that
there was now there is an exposay that was going
to show all those people that said, we were delusional
for thinking there's something wrong with Biden. Now have egg
all over their face.
Speaker 2 (31:01):
So what did the.
Speaker 1 (31:02):
Biden camp do? Which was really interesting. They essentially announced
that President Biden has prostate cancer, which is not just
prostac cancer, but very advanced prostate cancer. And it, you know,
and it's fantastasized to his bones, which is extraordinarily painful.
And I don't wish sat on anybody, including Joe Biden exactly,
(31:25):
I don't. But why was that done? Well, it appears
to have been done. They're saying, well, we just found out.
That's bull bleep. There's no way they just found out.
And I'm not the only person that thinks this. This
is President Trump going why didn't we know this before?
Speaker 2 (31:38):
Cut to c When you.
Speaker 6 (31:41):
Take tests medical as a male, that test is very standard.
I don't know if it's given to everybody, but it's
given just about and it takes a long time to
get to that situation. Now, I think, you know, to
get to a stage nine. I think that if you
take a look, it's the same doctor that said that
(32:02):
Joe was cognitively fine, there was nothing wrong with him. Well,
he said, if it's the same doctor. He said there
was nothing wrong there, and that's being proven to be
a sad situation.
Speaker 2 (32:13):
But I think he's right. They did know.
Speaker 1 (32:16):
They released it for one reason at the same time
the Herd tapes came out, and that was to deflect
from the Herd tape.
Speaker 2 (32:20):
They may have by the way, I agree they veryone
may have known. But I want to say this because
I was someone who got diagnosed with cancer who didn't
have cancer, thank God. But here's the thing. Look, doctors
miss stuff, right, I mean stuff gets missed all the time.
I mean sometimes it's small, sometimes it's large, but it
gets missed. Yeah, but guess what this isn't you or
me or bobbed down the stairs present with the best
(32:43):
healthcare on the planet.
Speaker 1 (32:45):
Not only that has basically a mandated exam every year
by done by Walter Reid and by the physicians at
Walter Reid, which are the best anywhere. And so that's ridiculous.
Of course they knew.
Speaker 9 (33:00):
Now.
Speaker 1 (33:01):
A CNN reporter came out with report saying a Biden
spokesperson said that he hadn't been tested for prostay cancer
since twenty fourteen, which meant, you know, before he was
vice president, you've got to be that's not possible. But
this is what the claim was. And then you'll hear
a cut afterwards. The CNN, who you know, always propped
Biden up going what cut fifteen?
Speaker 10 (33:23):
Biden spokesperson tells me that former President Joe Biden his
last known PSA, which is a screening that could be
used for prostay cancer, was conducted in twenty fourteen and
that he was never diagnosed with cancer before the Friday
diagnosis that was handed from his doctors.
Speaker 2 (33:43):
And that's bull bleep.
Speaker 1 (33:44):
We all know it's bull bleep, and CNN called it
when uh really, what cut fifteen A.
Speaker 17 (33:49):
I want to discuss this with our panel, Jamie Gangel.
We're getting this news in it. It was twenty fourteen
the last time he was tested, and yes, there are
these medical guidelines recommending against age seventy eight up, but
he was president of the United States.
Speaker 16 (34:03):
I find it very surprising.
Speaker 2 (34:05):
Then go, yeah, exactly, this is your point. Who might
who might have yeah, hey, or or by the way,
not only sometimes there's guidelines. Sometimes, Look, we're regular folks, right,
Sometimes we're like, ah, screw it, too busy, not gonna
go do it. This is the president doesn't have a
choice to come and get him surprised. They don't test
him every other day, for Freakin's Even Donald.
Speaker 1 (34:25):
Trump tried to get out of it. They came and
got him in a helicopter.
Speaker 2 (34:29):
There is nothing you can do about. This is not
me and you your neighbor. This is the president of
the United States. They they'll sorry, Joe, gotta test you,
gotta do it. Yeah, I mean I don't get it,
but you know, I mean, look, I'm busy, Joe, get
in the room. That's I mean, that's kind of basically
what exactly what happens. Again, listen, I'm gonna play devil
(34:49):
with that can hit it, just just for a moment.
Could doctors have missed this even if they had screened,
I guess maybe not over and over and over again.
Speaker 1 (34:56):
It was given every year, and that test had to
been given every year, right, And I think they're pointing
the last time his test was clear.
Speaker 2 (35:02):
I think that meant to me that in twenty fifteen
it was.
Speaker 1 (35:05):
No longer clear. So they've known for a long time
that he had prostay cancer.
Speaker 2 (35:09):
That's that's what happened. Well, and you know, you look
at the prostate cancer, which of course is one thing.
This is not just like one thing. This is the
prostate cancer. The fact that he was, you know, his
acuity was long gone. He didn't know where he was
half the time. And the doctor's going, yeah, he's fine.
Speaker 1 (35:24):
That doctor needs to be taken up in front of
the medical boards because he has no idea what he's doing.
Speaker 2 (35:27):
Because, first of all, and I've known a lot of
people with cancer, and sadly, I've known a lot of
people have died from cancer, and I mean at the
very very end, when they're basically on their deathbed. Sure
they're not in their right mind, but almost to the tee,
everybody I've known who's had cancer wasn't walking around like
they were lost. Where do I go? Should I fall
off the stage? What should I do? So it's you know,
(35:49):
to sahaking.
Speaker 1 (35:50):
Hands with invisible people right right, So it isn't shaken
hands with there's nobody there.
Speaker 2 (35:55):
So the cancer is an issue, but there's so many
other issues, and you can't push him back to cancer
or not having cancer. You know, the fact that he
that he didn't have cancer didn't make him fall on
stage and not know who he was shaking hands with
or if he had cancer. So there's there's more that.
That's that's the thing. There's more that. There's a lot
of moving parts.
Speaker 7 (36:13):
Here, folks.
Speaker 2 (36:13):
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Speaker 1 (36:15):
So we end every week with a truth control now
since we don't do Bidenisms anymore. And this week our
truth control is from President Trump. Pie's in the Oval Office.
He's talking about the Golden Dome. See if you can
detect the needle to Canada, cut one bee.
Speaker 5 (36:30):
Canada has called us and they want to be a
part of it.
Speaker 6 (36:32):
So we'll be talking to them. They want to have
protection also, so as usual, we help Canada the best
we can.
Speaker 1 (36:41):
Okay, is he is he just you know? Is he
seriously needling Canada? You've you've been bitching about the goddamn Taris,
but no, you want to be under the Golden Dome now,
you want to be our friend. That's what I heard.
I heard a little bit of a trolling of Canada.
Speaker 2 (36:54):
I think I think he's doing a little bit of both.
I mean, look, if we have a golden Dome, we're
going to help our neighbors, right. But but yeah, we're
gonna we're gonna, we're gonna poke in the ribs. A
couple of times because you know, yeah, of course they
want to protection you. You know, it's a Canada, you
know well.
Speaker 1 (37:05):
And they won't pay for it themselves, so they want
to They want us again to foot the bill, is
what he's saying. And we're happy to do it because
it's not that big an expansion to cover Canada. But
knock the crap off with the tariffs and so forth.
Do what you're supposed to do, and yes, you could
be under our Golden Dome.
Speaker 2 (37:20):
He should have said. This would have totally been trolling,
I think. But what he should have said is, well,
you know, we'll have all of our states under the
Golden Dome. I love that.
Speaker 1 (37:29):
That would be excellent. That would have been you know,
I think you need to send him an email. I think, hey,
next time.
Speaker 2 (37:34):
Don don listen this. This was what you should have said.
Of course, add this to your repertoire. Of course you
would have seen heads explode in the media. That would
have been so good, though.
Speaker 1 (37:42):
It would have been so we'd.
Speaker 2 (37:43):
Like to have all of our states under the Golden Dome.
So Canada is welcome.
Speaker 1 (37:46):
So let me know, do you agree with me that
the President Trump should go down that hole?
Speaker 2 (37:50):
I think he should.
Speaker 1 (37:51):
I think Ben is right on the money with that.
You can contact Ben and I on X at news
Bye three or on Facebook at news Bye. We upload
a new episode every single Monday, so check back next
week and see what new offerings we have. Meanwhile, I
hope you're under the Golden Dome. This is Nancy Shack,
This is Newspite.
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
Ridiculous History
History is beautiful, brutal and, often, ridiculous. Join Ben Bowlin and Noel Brown as they dive into some of the weirdest stories from across the span of human civilization in Ridiculous History, a podcast by iHeartRadio.