Democrats dare the DOJ to arrest them, the Media cant believe they have to apologize for lying, and President Biden is on a come back tour. How can we miss you if you won't go away Joe... This week's "did they really just say that" moments will either make you laugh or make you cry.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Democrats, dare the DOJ to arrest them. The media can't
believe they have to apologize for a lying and President
Biden is on a comeback tour. How can we miss
you if you won't go away, Joe? This week's Did
they really just say that moments will either make you
laugh or make you cry? I'm Nancy Shack or both.
Speaker 2 (00:17):
I'm Ben Parkner.
Speaker 3 (00:18):
This is a news bite.
Speaker 4 (00:32):
He was going to threaten to refer me to DOJ
because I'm using my free speech rights in order to
advise people of their constitutionally guaranteed protection.
Speaker 3 (00:43):
And so that I say, come for.
Speaker 2 (00:45):
Me, So Lucy said the FBI director, Cash Pateel has
reportedly been more visible at nightclubs than at his office
at FBI headquarters.
Speaker 5 (00:53):
This was a misstatement.
Speaker 6 (00:54):
Should you have withdrawn earlier giving someone else a bigger job, I.
Speaker 7 (00:59):
Don't think it would have mattered. And what happened was
I become so successful in our agenda it was hard
to say now I'm gonna stop.
Speaker 2 (01:09):
Now, stop, please please stop this.
Speaker 1 (01:12):
There he is Uncle Joe doing an interview with the
bb scene.
Speaker 2 (01:19):
The only thing that makes it easier to see him
speaking now is that even though you go what the hell? Uh,
he doesn't have a pen to sign bills or anything,
and he's just he's just a guy. Now, he's just
a guy.
Speaker 1 (01:31):
Well he never did actually sign anything, and he had
an auto pen and that took care of everything.
Speaker 3 (01:36):
But but yeah, no.
Speaker 1 (01:37):
I mean, he was it was It was painful to
watch this because there were so many cough stop stutters,
awkward pauses, and and this is a guy that thought
he would have another four years in the Oval office
right up until you know, last spring a year ago.
So it's like, ah, oh wow, and he is Can
(01:59):
I just point out delu usional? He thought he was
so successful that they told me was well this is
you know, this is my question. We'll play cut one
in a second, but this is my question for you.
Do you think he's just this is a shine on
lying thing or do you think he is in fact delusional.
He believes what he says because.
Speaker 3 (02:17):
I believe he believes.
Speaker 1 (02:19):
I think he thinks this is true because he was
fed lies and he doesn't have enough compass mentis to
be able to distinguish reality from the truth from from
the fairy tale that he's been given.
Speaker 2 (02:32):
Right, Well, I mean I guess it's all semantics anyway.
But I don't know if he's lying or he just
believes the lies he's been told, so therefore he thinks
he's speaking the truth.
Speaker 1 (02:42):
That's what I'm saying, and that's what I think is
going on. And I think it's I think he believes
what he's saying. He doesn't know that he's wrong, that
he's so wrong.
Speaker 3 (02:51):
It's not even funny. Cut number one.
Speaker 6 (02:53):
Should you have withdrawn earlier giving someone else a big
a job.
Speaker 7 (02:57):
I don't. I don't think it would have h mattered.
We left at a time when we had a good candidate,
she had fully funded. And what happened was I had
become what we had set out to do no one
(03:20):
thought we could do. I become so successful our agenda
it was hard to say now, I'm going to stop now.
I meant when I said when I started that I
think it's I'm prepared to hand this to the next generation.
It's a transition government. But things moved so quickly that
(03:40):
it made it difficult to walk away.
Speaker 1 (03:46):
Harris was a good candidate and they were so successful.
If those two things were true, wouldn't she have won
the election? And the Democrat Party still be in charge
of the White House. I'm pretty sure that if anything
he just said it was true, then Trump would not
have won.
Speaker 2 (04:03):
Correct, that is one hundred percent correct. I think the
only part of that statement that he made that is
actually true and really true is the very very beginning
where he says, I don't think it would have made
a difference if he left earlier or he'd stayed to
the end. He's right, it wouldn't made a difference. Donald
Trump would still be president. That's the only part of
(04:24):
that statement that really is factual. I don't think that's
the way he meant it, but nonetheless it is.
Speaker 3 (04:30):
But it was the truth.
Speaker 2 (04:32):
Yes, I believe it was.
Speaker 1 (04:33):
We were the only times were truth and reality married
in that sentence, and it was only accidental. Yeah, it
wasn't deliberate. Then the BBC asked him.
Speaker 3 (04:41):
If he's worried about you know, Donald Trump? Basically nine c.
Speaker 6 (04:47):
And you see things to worry about, do you when
you talk of a threat to democracy? Worry about a
threat to democracy here at home here in the United States?
Speaker 7 (05:00):
Turned about than I was, because I think the Republican
Party is waking up to what Trump is about.
Speaker 1 (05:07):
Actually, I agree with that statement, I think the Republican
Party has woken up to what Donald Trump is about
and what you know, what Donald Trump is about, success
fulfilling his promises, doing exactly what he said he would do,
and achieving those goals and those aims. That's actually a
truthful statement.
Speaker 8 (05:25):
I know.
Speaker 2 (05:25):
There are a lot of people, and you can call
it whatever you want to, just hate Donald Trump Trump
arrangement syndrome. Paul. Political difference is whatever with Trump, and
I get that. That's fine. We've said that. Everybody's had
political differences with someone else forever. But here's the problem
I have with the whole democracy thing. First of all,
it's a democratic republic and people don't even mention that.
But the fact is, Look, even if I'm gonna play
(05:48):
Devil's advocate here for a second, let's assume that Donald
Trump truly wants to take away democracy and become Lord
and Emperor of the United States of America and invade Canada,
Greenland and every other country in the world and take
them over to Let's assume that that was even remotely true.
There are far more than enough people, myself included, who
(06:13):
won't let that happen. Look, we are not a monarchy.
We are we got away from one. I mean, it'll
throw out whatever you want.
Speaker 8 (06:20):
Right.
Speaker 2 (06:20):
If Donald Trump decided he wanted to take over the
country or the world, I think there are enough, way
more than enough rational people who could stop that from happening.
And I don't think Donald Trump wants to do that,
That's why I'm saying. But if he did, it's they
talk about it like it's a done deal. Well, Donald
Trump's president, he'll be the king pretty soon, and then
he'll take over the world and build a death star. No, no, no,
(06:42):
it's not gonna happen. I mean, look, yes, a president
and or the government in charge at any particular time
can mold the country or move the country in this
direction or the other, you know, based on their political
leanings or wants. But nope, stop, just stop, because it's
all scare tactic and there are people hiding under their
bed going Donald Trug's gonna kill me and shut the
(07:06):
hell up. It isn't gonna happen ever, ever, and certainly
not in one. Look. If this country ever goes to
hell and falls apart and somebody takes over as the
lord and ruler of these lands, it's going to happen
over a period of time, a long period of time,
and it ain't gonna be Donald Trump. I don't care
if you like him or hate him or whatever. Donald
Trump is not going to be king of the world
(07:27):
or pope for that matter, because we have pictures of
him as pope. I guess now you have.
Speaker 3 (07:32):
To be unmarried to be pope.
Speaker 2 (07:34):
It's just I get Look, it's a great talking point,
and when you're trying to undercut your opponent, you use
every you know, everything in your arsenal. And that's what
they're doing. So everybody just sit back and breathe and
relax and calm ball.
Speaker 1 (07:51):
The problem with that and telling people to relax and
calm down is that Democrats are apparently delusional or stupid
for you know, to think that they're delusional than stupid.
Speaker 3 (08:03):
But maybe I'm wrong. Who's more stupid, Well, it's more stupid,
not stupid.
Speaker 2 (08:08):
Sorry, who's stupider? I'm gonna use that's stupid the the the.
Speaker 1 (08:12):
People embrace the mistakes. Y.
Speaker 2 (08:15):
Who's dumberer? The people who tell the lies or the
people who believe them.
Speaker 1 (08:25):
Well, you see, that's a very I like that question
a great deal. But here's the thing. I don't think
because somebody believes your lives they're stupid. I think they're naive.
That's different than being, yes, more naive. I think that
the I think the people who tell the lies are
either stupid or evil, manipulative, whatever, that's a better word.
(08:47):
And I think that's what we have going on here.
I think these the Democrats that I hear really believe.
They've gotten to the point, to make your earlier point,
where they believe what they're saying. And the problem is
they're the ones who started these lies and now they
bought into it. They've convinced themselves that what they were
saying was truth. And it's there's a huge there's a
(09:10):
bunch of them this week that were just bizarre where
you can ask yourself, are they stupid or is this
just you know, a case of starting to become delusional
or remaining delusional. And one instance of this is Congressman
the Maxine Waters I was hearing this week and she
was asking Secretary of Treasury Scott.
Speaker 3 (09:33):
How do you pronounce it?
Speaker 9 (09:33):
Is it?
Speaker 1 (09:34):
I think that's what I think it is too And
I have to get better at pronouncing names at a
house hearing, and she was berating him for letting, she
put it, strangers go into the Treasury to access data.
Speaker 3 (09:48):
But they weren't strangers Cut twelve B.
Speaker 10 (09:50):
Did all the individuals working were those who were given
access to treasuries and CFPB's computer databases receive all of
the required clearances and security training before they were granted access.
Speaker 8 (10:03):
They were granted read only access at treasury. There were
two No.
Speaker 10 (10:09):
Let me just say, those employees. You can't fillibus to hear.
This is not the phillibus to playground. And so what
you did was you let these strangers into our treasury
with access to all of the data, all of the
personnel information, and you just opened the door. Why'd you
do that?
Speaker 8 (10:26):
No, man, they were treasury employees.
Speaker 10 (10:29):
Oh are you saying today in front of this committee
that all of them were treasure employees. That the twenty
five year old who's being identified, who worked for Elon
Musk was not allowed was allowed into the treasury? Was
that person there?
Speaker 8 (10:44):
He was a treasury employee, as was Tom Krause, the
senior person on the dose team.
Speaker 1 (10:50):
They were employed by the treasures, by the way they
keep making it sound, and not all of them and
not about everybody.
Speaker 2 (10:56):
But let's let's just dissect this one for a quick second.
She says, Maxine Waters says that this person was employed
by Elon Musk. The fact of the matter is these
employees who were doing work for or as part of
the Doze thing, they're not in this case. They're employed
by the Treasury. They may be working doing stuff that
(11:19):
Elon Musk is doing.
Speaker 3 (11:20):
But don't employed by the trasy.
Speaker 2 (11:22):
Elon Musk didn't sit them down to have an interview
and hire them. So they make it sound like, yeah,
they make it sound like they're all working for SpaceX
or something.
Speaker 1 (11:30):
Well, that's the point she's trying to She's trying to
put that out there, and the Secretary of Treasuries have
none of it. He's like they were treasure employees. Treasure
employees have access to treasury data.
Speaker 3 (11:40):
That's their job.
Speaker 1 (11:42):
And she is either lying knowing that that's trying to
catch them up, or she's stupid and doesn't know that
these people, I don't know which one it is. Then
you've got Congress from Nidia I think it's how you
pronounce it Velaquez. And she's again asking the Secretary of
Treasury to tell people, what countries are close to striking
trade deals and best It's like we're in the middle
(12:04):
of negotiating these deals. I can't tell you what's happening
because that would maybe impact the deals. This seems to
be like rocket science to her, cut fourteen.
Speaker 11 (12:16):
Tell us tell the American people, tell small businesses and consumers.
Tell retirees specifically, which countries are you close to striking
deals with.
Speaker 8 (12:31):
I'm sorry, Congresswoman, but that would not benefit the United States.
Speaker 11 (12:36):
No, no, no, I'm asking you a question based on
the statement that you may on CNBC.
Speaker 8 (12:44):
And I am telling you that it would be detrimental
to the interests of the United States for me to
answer that question.
Speaker 12 (12:50):
Why will that be detrimental because as the negotiations may
still be in process as we speaks, we are not
at the end of the week yet.
Speaker 8 (13:02):
I am sure that you threw your question. Would not
want to compromise us to go reclaiming my.
Speaker 1 (13:08):
Time reclaiming her time. She didn't like her answer, so
she wanted the time to time back.
Speaker 2 (13:13):
I WT the time.
Speaker 3 (13:14):
Oh, oh my god.
Speaker 2 (13:15):
By the way this happens, this isn't unique to to
what Besson is talking about or anything else. Here's the deal.
If and we've had it happen, we're we're in the
news in the media, and we had to talk to
law enforcement about things. If you ask law enforcement which
criminals are you close to arresting, they're not going to
tell you because again.
Speaker 3 (13:34):
Time is the raid. No, I mean, this is just like,
oh my god.
Speaker 1 (13:38):
And then you had you have a Congressman Madlan Deane,
and she started just basically casting basically slandering Cash Pattel
as he sat there in front of her, and he
was not taking it. Cut fifteen A.
Speaker 13 (13:51):
You repeatedly denied having any involvement as a private citizen
in the firing of FBI officials who engaged in the
prosecution against January sixth insurrectionists, the violent rioters who beat
and killed Capitol police officers, and whom you referred to
as political prisoners. Since then, multiple whistleblowers have come forward,
and we know that you likely committed perjury. At the
(14:13):
same hearing, you claimed you were not familiar with Stu
Peters and anti Semitic Holocaust denier, despite the fact that
you appeared on mister Peter's podcast eight separate times, and
you claimed not to recall mister Patel, My second question
is should we worry more about your memory or your veracity?
Speaker 14 (14:30):
We should worry more about your lack of candor you're
concusing me of committing perjury. Tell the American people how
I broke the law, committed of felony, Have the audacity
to actually put the facts forward answer stead of lying
for political banter so you can have a twenty second
donation hit.
Speaker 13 (14:46):
The answer is both.
Speaker 3 (14:48):
I believe that the.
Speaker 14 (14:49):
Answer is your failing, not me.
Speaker 2 (14:52):
There you go.
Speaker 3 (14:53):
I mean, he's not putting up with it. But this
is what they've been trying to do.
Speaker 1 (14:56):
They they are getting caught in their lives and being
held accountable for actually in that case slandering cash Betel
and in another case this week with Alexandria Acasio Cortez,
the New York congresswoman, she's being held accountable for breaking
the law. And in this particular case, she was giving
(15:18):
advice to illegal aliens on how to evade ice and
how to get away from ice. Even if there's somebody
a marshall or a sheriff or a police officer has
a warrant. She's telling them not to obey and to
run someplace else. Well, this has caused some consternation, and
Tom Holman, who is our Borders are and who works
(15:40):
with our homelandn Security Secretary Christin nom has said, we
are going to hold these officials who break the law accountable.
Speaker 3 (15:50):
And yeah, cut thirteen.
Speaker 1 (15:53):
She's continuing her resist efforts against your efforts, Tom.
Speaker 15 (15:58):
I forgot more about the constitution immigration enforcements.
Speaker 2 (16:01):
You ever know.
Speaker 15 (16:01):
I mean I had to educate her during congressional testimony.
Entering the country illegally is a crime. So whatever, But
what she needs to do is read the statues and
acted by Congress Title eight, and I says Code thirteen
twenty four, United States Title Late United States Code thirteen
twenty four and twenty five. That's what she needs to
read because they were legal interest country. It's a crime,
(16:24):
termist country illegally. Not only that, when you harbor and
conceal and impede law enforcement, that's a felony. So what
she's doing, she says, she's give educating measure the constitutional rights.
And we all know they got constitutional rights. But what
she's really doing you and I and the rest of
the country knows. She's trying to teach them how invade
law enforcement.
Speaker 1 (16:43):
So that's what he said about what she's doing. She
heard that response, and this is what she announced to
her constituency in a town hall literally a day later.
Speaker 3 (16:52):
Cut number twelve.
Speaker 4 (16:54):
Tom Holman, then acting director of ICE, said that he
was going to threaten to refer me to do Jay
because I'm using my free speech rights in order to
advise people of their constitutionally guaranteed protections. And he may
want to do it again today. And to that, I say,
come for me. You're gonna have to come for me.
Speaker 3 (17:15):
Do I look like I care.
Speaker 1 (17:17):
Here's the thing about that. You have absolutely free speech rights,
but those are limited. You can't commit a crime with
your free speech rights. And that means, for instance, as
we know, and you know, my one that I hate
more than anything is when somebody sells it says you know,
you can't yell a fire in a theater. You can't
(17:37):
unless there actually is a fire.
Speaker 3 (17:39):
Then you can't.
Speaker 1 (17:40):
But in this case too, you cannot tell somebody how
to evade the law without being an accessory to their crime.
That makes you toxcay. You have the free speech to
tell them, absolutely, but telling helping somebody aiding somebody commit
a crime. Is aiding in that crime and makes you
liable for that crime as well, makes you criminally liable
(18:01):
for that crime.
Speaker 3 (18:02):
I know, and that's what she's done.
Speaker 2 (18:04):
I know that some people, a lot of people, some politicians,
some regular folk, don't really think that this whole illegal
is really illegal, it's not really a crime. But I
just want to just think about this for a second.
And it doesn't matter whether it's shoplifting or rape, or
murder or robbing a bank. Just imagine if any of
(18:25):
these people you just heard, or any of these people
you have heard giving advice on how to evade law enforcement,
were doing that to someone who had committed any of
the crimes I just mentioned. And I understand people don't think, well,
comment here, illegally is not a crime. Well, you use
the word I legally, and so it is illegal. But
just imagine that. Imagine if AOC went to a town
(18:47):
meeting full of child rapists and murderers and said, let
me tell you how you can avoid getting arrested for
those crimes. Just imagine that for a second. Imagine if
I did it. Imagine if if.
Speaker 3 (18:57):
They exactly what she did.
Speaker 2 (18:58):
That's exactly because it is still a crime. Look this
is the whole thing, right and this will know, this
argument's going to go on forever because there's going to
be people on both sides forever. But if you want
to not have coming here illegally be a crime, then
change the laws. But as the laws are written, they
are committing a crime. We can have these semantic arguments
(19:19):
about whether it's you know, it's not really a crime.
And you know, a lot of these people who are
being targeted first aren't just here illegally. They're here illegally,
and then oh, by the way, they did some other stuff.
Speaker 3 (19:32):
So yeah, no, I feel your parents.
Speaker 2 (19:36):
This is why I have to take high blood pressure back.
Speaker 1 (19:38):
And Alexandria Casio Cretaz is not the only elected government
official doing this, literally putting out there in public how
to avoid ice. And it got really bad in Wisconsin
with Governor Tony Evers, who didn't just this this is
the deal. He didn't just give illegal aliens a memo
as to how to avoid ice, published a memo to
(20:02):
government employees in his state on how to not obey
ICE officers even with a warrant, even if they had
a warrant, how to avoid obeying the law, or how
to not basically a directive to not obey the law.
If Ice came looking for somebody in their office, how
not to help Ice to how.
Speaker 3 (20:22):
To basically break the law.
Speaker 1 (20:24):
And so Holman's like, okay, add Tony Evers to the
list of people.
Speaker 3 (20:28):
We need to arrest.
Speaker 1 (20:29):
And this was Governor Ever's response cut thirty.
Speaker 16 (20:32):
Yesterday, as Trump administration official, in not so many words,
apparently threatened to arrest me for distributing guidance that as
state agency employees to consult with an attorney of federal
agents show up at state buildings with legal documents. The
goal of this guidance was simple to provide clear, consistent
(20:54):
instructions to state employees and ensure they have a lawyer
to help them comply with all things federal and state laws.
Nothing more, nothing less.
Speaker 1 (21:04):
Actually it was a lot more than what he said,
Cut thirty A.
Speaker 16 (21:09):
Republicans and their right wing allies, including Elon Musk, lied
about this guidance, spread misinformation, accused me of doing things
I didn't do or say, and fueled the fake controversy
of their own creation. Now I'm used to Republicans and
the right wing lying about me. It comes with a job,
(21:30):
But this time, these lies came at a cost. I
haven't broken the law. I haven't committed a crime, and
I've never encouraged or directed anyone to break any laws
or commit any crimes.
Speaker 5 (21:44):
He has.
Speaker 1 (21:44):
In fact, I've read the memo. Nobody lied about it,
and he had to get his dig in about Elon
Musk for someone own reason. But no, he absolutely told
his people do not obey, which is in fact flying
in the face of what the federal directives are.
Speaker 3 (21:59):
Don't obey ice.
Speaker 1 (22:00):
If they show up, call somebody who'll come get rid
of them for you. Basically that's what his memo said.
So Tom Homan has a plan for Governor evers cut
twenty nine.
Speaker 12 (22:12):
Your comments on the Wisconsin governor sending directives to state
agencies to knock comply with Yes, actually stop your deportation.
Speaker 15 (22:22):
Efforts, wait to see what's coming.
Speaker 8 (22:23):
Any updates on the mill.
Speaker 10 (22:25):
I remember what I said.
Speaker 15 (22:25):
You can you cross You cannot support what we're doing,
and you can support.
Speaker 8 (22:29):
Sant Shorn City.
Speaker 15 (22:30):
That's what you wanted to do. If you cross that
line on paiedmat or annoyingly Harvard concealing imgo inland, that
is a felon and we're.
Speaker 8 (22:38):
Treated as such.
Speaker 1 (22:40):
They're coming for you, governor.
Speaker 2 (22:41):
But by the way, I'm gonna go over the top here,
So calm down, everybody, brace yourself. So so what Holman
just said, which makes sense, right, you can Hey, you
want to do that, guy, you can do that. Go ahead,
you want us support this? Well, blah blah. Okay. Look,
if you want to sit in your house on a
Saturday night with a freshly popped open beer and root
for people to get murdered or robbed or raped or whatever,
(23:04):
you have that right. Sadly and twisted as it may be,
you have that right. You do not have the right
to then put your beer down and go out and
help people murder and rob and rape. So this is
the difference between it. If you don't agree with the law,
that's fine, or for some reason you're just twisted and demented.
But once you start breaking the law yourself, you go
(23:28):
from being twisted, which you probably still are, to now
being a criminal or a felon or a whatever. So
in this country, you can think anything you want, even
if it offends the hell out of me. But once
you start doing what you're thinking, you have crossed a
huge line. In the sand you.
Speaker 1 (23:48):
Have and the thing that AOC and Governor evers and
I want to play a cup for you. That's Congressman
Jasmine Crockett too. What they're doing now is they're not
just advocating, you know, resistance to the law. They're advocating
actually breaking the law. And in this case, we're in
this cut with Jasmine Crockett. Congressman Crockett, she's actually advocating
(24:11):
violence to a bunch of graduates at Tuglu College, telling
them that they need to figure out how to use
a chair as a weapon.
Speaker 3 (24:20):
Cut eighteen.
Speaker 17 (24:21):
For going to be people that tell you that you
don't belong, and I am here to tell you over
and over and over that you absolutely belong. There are
people that are going to tell you that there is
not a table in which there is a seat for you.
But I am here to remind you of Montgomery and
those folding chairs. Let me tell you, did we know
(24:43):
how to use a chair? Whether we pulling it up,
are we doing something else with it?
Speaker 8 (24:52):
Here?
Speaker 17 (24:52):
Let me be the first one to tell you that
I know that y'all are ready to put your boots on.
Speaker 3 (24:59):
The She's advocating violence.
Speaker 1 (25:03):
This is what these are elected officials who are not
just advocating breaking the law, and in the case of
Jasmine Crockett, but they're advocating violence, and they are breaking
the law themselves.
Speaker 2 (25:13):
I feel I feel like some of these people don't
know where I mentioned the line in the sand. They
don't know where the line is. And there are people
like that. You know, you probably know some of yourself.
Speaker 3 (25:23):
They know where the line is, they've chosen to ignore
the line.
Speaker 2 (25:26):
Think it applies to We'll go with that then. But
so here for example, right, and I get what she
was saying right about Montgomery and all that, and I
get I kind of get where she's coming from because
they do talk about that a lot. And that's fine.
But here's the thing. So I, I myself don't want
something to happen. So I am going to reference remember
back in the American Revolution, Remember when they all got
(25:47):
guns and went out and started shooting people to stop
them from you know, telling us what to do. I
think you should all go out with guns and shoot people.
You can't do that. You can talk about history. You know,
we fought independence, and we fought for this, and we
fought for civil rights, and we fought for this great,
I agree, and you should, but then you don't get
to say, and we did it with guns, so you
(26:09):
should go home and get your gun and stop shooting people. Now.
It's the same as saying, well, we got the chairs.
If they don't want you to pull out and sit
in a chair, pick up the chair and smash them
in the face with it, you can't. Again, there's a line,
and you just said screw it. I'll jump right over
that thing and ball with it. It's just this is
the and you're probably more right than I am. Like
(26:29):
I said, they don't know where the line is. Yeah,
maybe in many cases they do know, and they just
want to instigate and make more and more people come
onto their side of the line.
Speaker 1 (26:39):
I think though, that instead of coming on to their
side of the line, what's happening is they're just alienating people.
And I think that was evident by I don't think
that the election last November, right, and you know you
one would think and a few Democrats figured it out
and have and a lot of Americans figured it out
and said, yeah, we don't want to be part of
this anymore. But they or nothing, and so they're they're
(27:02):
doomed to repeat their own failure over and over again.
So we end each week now with a truth or
troll since you know, today is the first day we've
actually had a Biden in a long time. But we're
not going to get used to Bidenisms again, please God.
Speaker 10 (27:16):
So.
Speaker 1 (27:17):
But we've been doing truth or trolls, and this week
the majority of the truth or trolls are the world
class troller himself, President Trump. But they're not always, but
this week it is. He was on a on NBC
with Kristin Walker doing an interview when he said this
cut number five.
Speaker 9 (27:36):
I asked you if you would rule out military force
to take Greenland, and you said, no, you don't rule
out anything. Would you rule out military force to take Canada?
Speaker 5 (27:44):
Well, I think we're not going to ever get to
that point. It could happen. Something could happen with Greenland.
I'll be honest. We need that for national and international security. No,
I think it's highly unlikely. I don't see it with Canada.
I just don't see it.
Speaker 1 (27:58):
I have to be host with Okay, he's laughing at
this point. I don't see it with Canada. But he's
not ruling it out with Greenland. But she's not smiling. Okay,
she is not small. She's taking him dead serious. So
he continues, Cup five B, you.
Speaker 9 (28:11):
Are not ruling out military force to take Greenland.
Speaker 5 (28:14):
I don't rule it out. I don't say I'm going
to do it, but I don't rule out anything. No,
not there. Do you need that? We need Greenland very badly.
Greenland is a very small amount of people which will
take care of and will cherish them and all of that,
but we need that for international security.
Speaker 1 (28:31):
Now do you think that The question is do you
think he really thinks that that is an option? He's saying,
never rule it out, but he's saying is it a
viable option for him? Or is he responding to the
fact that she is humorless and in this particular interview
with him. I think he has no intention of ever
invading Greenland. I think he just wanted to bat her
(28:52):
around because she did not want Did she crack a
smile during that interview.
Speaker 2 (28:56):
I am tempted to agree completely with you, but I'm
going to just tweak it a tiny, tiny bit, you see.
And I think from being a businessman and being the
guy that he's been in a real estate man and
all the stuff that he's done in his life. You know,
I think he does kind of believe never say never.
I think he doesn't want to invade Greenland. I think
(29:17):
most of what he said was right, but I think
in the way back of his head because of where
he comes from, you never say never, and I almost
believe that he kind of believes that I may be wrong.
I mean, Donald and I haven't talked lately. You know,
we don't hang out like we used to. But so yeah,
I think he was trolling. But again, you never say never,
(29:40):
never saying.
Speaker 1 (29:40):
You can let us know what you think about President Trump.
Does he have it in the back of his mind?
Do you think he or was he just toying with
Welker because she just was such a cold hearted Well,
you know what. Anyway, you can contact Ben and I
on x at newsby three or on Facebook at Newsbyite.
We upload a new episode every single Monday, so please
check back next week and see what new offerings we have. Meanwhile,
(30:02):
have a great week. I would stay out of Canada
and Gerland ifire you. I'm Nancy Shack.
Speaker 2 (30:06):
Never say never, I'm Ben Parker.
Speaker 3 (30:08):
This is news Bite
Democrats, dare the DOJ to arrest them. The media can't
believe they have to apologize for a lying and President
Biden is on a comeback tour. How can we miss
you if you won't go away, Joe? This week's Did
they really just say that moments will either make you
laugh or make you cry? I'm Nancy Shack or both.
Speaker 2 (00:17):
I'm Ben Parkner.
Speaker 3 (00:18):
This is a news bite.
Speaker 4 (00:32):
He was going to threaten to refer me to DOJ
because I'm using my free speech rights in order to
advise people of their constitutionally guaranteed protection.
Speaker 3 (00:43):
And so that I say, come for.
Speaker 2 (00:45):
Me, So Lucy said the FBI director, Cash Pateel has
reportedly been more visible at nightclubs than at his office
at FBI headquarters.
Speaker 5 (00:53):
This was a misstatement.
Speaker 6 (00:54):
Should you have withdrawn earlier giving someone else a bigger job, I.
Speaker 7 (00:59):
Don't think it would have mattered. And what happened was
I become so successful in our agenda it was hard
to say now I'm gonna stop.
Speaker 2 (01:09):
Now, stop, please please stop this.
Speaker 1 (01:12):
There he is Uncle Joe doing an interview with the
bb scene.
Speaker 2 (01:19):
The only thing that makes it easier to see him
speaking now is that even though you go what the hell? Uh,
he doesn't have a pen to sign bills or anything,
and he's just he's just a guy. Now, he's just
a guy.
Speaker 1 (01:31):
Well he never did actually sign anything, and he had
an auto pen and that took care of everything.
Speaker 3 (01:36):
But but yeah, no.
Speaker 1 (01:37):
I mean, he was it was It was painful to
watch this because there were so many cough stop stutters,
awkward pauses, and and this is a guy that thought
he would have another four years in the Oval office
right up until you know, last spring a year ago.
So it's like, ah, oh wow, and he is Can
(01:59):
I just point out delu usional? He thought he was
so successful that they told me was well this is
you know, this is my question. We'll play cut one
in a second, but this is my question for you.
Do you think he's just this is a shine on
lying thing or do you think he is in fact delusional.
He believes what he says because.
Speaker 3 (02:17):
I believe he believes.
Speaker 1 (02:19):
I think he thinks this is true because he was
fed lies and he doesn't have enough compass mentis to
be able to distinguish reality from the truth from from
the fairy tale that he's been given.
Speaker 2 (02:32):
Right, Well, I mean I guess it's all semantics anyway.
But I don't know if he's lying or he just
believes the lies he's been told, so therefore he thinks
he's speaking the truth.
Speaker 1 (02:42):
That's what I'm saying, and that's what I think is
going on. And I think it's I think he believes
what he's saying. He doesn't know that he's wrong, that
he's so wrong.
Speaker 3 (02:51):
It's not even funny. Cut number one.
Speaker 6 (02:53):
Should you have withdrawn earlier giving someone else a big
a job.
Speaker 7 (02:57):
I don't. I don't think it would have h mattered.
We left at a time when we had a good candidate,
she had fully funded. And what happened was I had
become what we had set out to do no one
(03:20):
thought we could do. I become so successful our agenda
it was hard to say now, I'm going to stop now.
I meant when I said when I started that I
think it's I'm prepared to hand this to the next generation.
It's a transition government. But things moved so quickly that
(03:40):
it made it difficult to walk away.
Speaker 1 (03:46):
Harris was a good candidate and they were so successful.
If those two things were true, wouldn't she have won
the election? And the Democrat Party still be in charge
of the White House. I'm pretty sure that if anything
he just said it was true, then Trump would not
have won.
Speaker 2 (04:03):
Correct, that is one hundred percent correct. I think the
only part of that statement that he made that is
actually true and really true is the very very beginning
where he says, I don't think it would have made
a difference if he left earlier or he'd stayed to
the end. He's right, it wouldn't made a difference. Donald
Trump would still be president. That's the only part of
(04:24):
that statement that really is factual. I don't think that's
the way he meant it, but nonetheless it is.
Speaker 3 (04:30):
But it was the truth.
Speaker 2 (04:32):
Yes, I believe it was.
Speaker 1 (04:33):
We were the only times were truth and reality married
in that sentence, and it was only accidental. Yeah, it
wasn't deliberate. Then the BBC asked him.
Speaker 3 (04:41):
If he's worried about you know, Donald Trump? Basically nine c.
Speaker 6 (04:47):
And you see things to worry about, do you when
you talk of a threat to democracy? Worry about a
threat to democracy here at home here in the United States?
Speaker 7 (05:00):
Turned about than I was, because I think the Republican
Party is waking up to what Trump is about.
Speaker 1 (05:07):
Actually, I agree with that statement, I think the Republican
Party has woken up to what Donald Trump is about
and what you know, what Donald Trump is about, success
fulfilling his promises, doing exactly what he said he would do,
and achieving those goals and those aims. That's actually a
truthful statement.
Speaker 8 (05:25):
I know.
Speaker 2 (05:25):
There are a lot of people, and you can call
it whatever you want to, just hate Donald Trump Trump
arrangement syndrome. Paul. Political difference is whatever with Trump, and
I get that. That's fine. We've said that. Everybody's had
political differences with someone else forever. But here's the problem
I have with the whole democracy thing. First of all,
it's a democratic republic and people don't even mention that.
But the fact is, Look, even if I'm gonna play
(05:48):
Devil's advocate here for a second, let's assume that Donald
Trump truly wants to take away democracy and become Lord
and Emperor of the United States of America and invade Canada,
Greenland and every other country in the world and take
them over to Let's assume that that was even remotely true.
There are far more than enough people, myself included, who
(06:13):
won't let that happen. Look, we are not a monarchy.
We are we got away from one. I mean, it'll
throw out whatever you want.
Speaker 8 (06:20):
Right.
Speaker 2 (06:20):
If Donald Trump decided he wanted to take over the
country or the world, I think there are enough, way
more than enough rational people who could stop that from happening.
And I don't think Donald Trump wants to do that,
That's why I'm saying. But if he did, it's they
talk about it like it's a done deal. Well, Donald
Trump's president, he'll be the king pretty soon, and then
he'll take over the world and build a death star. No, no, no,
(06:42):
it's not gonna happen. I mean, look, yes, a president
and or the government in charge at any particular time
can mold the country or move the country in this
direction or the other, you know, based on their political
leanings or wants. But nope, stop, just stop, because it's
all scare tactic and there are people hiding under their
bed going Donald Trug's gonna kill me and shut the
(07:06):
hell up. It isn't gonna happen ever, ever, and certainly
not in one. Look. If this country ever goes to
hell and falls apart and somebody takes over as the
lord and ruler of these lands, it's going to happen
over a period of time, a long period of time,
and it ain't gonna be Donald Trump. I don't care
if you like him or hate him or whatever. Donald
Trump is not going to be king of the world
(07:27):
or pope for that matter, because we have pictures of
him as pope. I guess now you have.
Speaker 3 (07:32):
To be unmarried to be pope.
Speaker 2 (07:34):
It's just I get Look, it's a great talking point,
and when you're trying to undercut your opponent, you use
every you know, everything in your arsenal. And that's what
they're doing. So everybody just sit back and breathe and
relax and calm ball.
Speaker 1 (07:51):
The problem with that and telling people to relax and
calm down is that Democrats are apparently delusional or stupid
for you know, to think that they're delusional than stupid.
Speaker 3 (08:03):
But maybe I'm wrong. Who's more stupid, Well, it's more stupid,
not stupid.
Speaker 2 (08:08):
Sorry, who's stupider? I'm gonna use that's stupid the the the.
Speaker 1 (08:12):
People embrace the mistakes. Y.
Speaker 2 (08:15):
Who's dumberer? The people who tell the lies or the
people who believe them.
Speaker 1 (08:25):
Well, you see, that's a very I like that question
a great deal. But here's the thing. I don't think
because somebody believes your lives they're stupid. I think they're naive.
That's different than being, yes, more naive. I think that
the I think the people who tell the lies are
either stupid or evil, manipulative, whatever, that's a better word.
(08:47):
And I think that's what we have going on here.
I think these the Democrats that I hear really believe.
They've gotten to the point, to make your earlier point,
where they believe what they're saying. And the problem is
they're the ones who started these lies and now they
bought into it. They've convinced themselves that what they were
saying was truth. And it's there's a huge there's a
(09:10):
bunch of them this week that were just bizarre where
you can ask yourself, are they stupid or is this
just you know, a case of starting to become delusional
or remaining delusional. And one instance of this is Congressman
the Maxine Waters I was hearing this week and she
was asking Secretary of Treasury Scott.
Speaker 3 (09:33):
How do you pronounce it?
Speaker 9 (09:33):
Is it?
Speaker 1 (09:34):
I think that's what I think it is too And
I have to get better at pronouncing names at a
house hearing, and she was berating him for letting, she
put it, strangers go into the Treasury to access data.
Speaker 3 (09:48):
But they weren't strangers Cut twelve B.
Speaker 10 (09:50):
Did all the individuals working were those who were given
access to treasuries and CFPB's computer databases receive all of
the required clearances and security training before they were granted access.
Speaker 8 (10:03):
They were granted read only access at treasury. There were
two No.
Speaker 10 (10:09):
Let me just say, those employees. You can't fillibus to hear.
This is not the phillibus to playground. And so what
you did was you let these strangers into our treasury
with access to all of the data, all of the
personnel information, and you just opened the door. Why'd you
do that?
Speaker 8 (10:26):
No, man, they were treasury employees.
Speaker 10 (10:29):
Oh are you saying today in front of this committee
that all of them were treasure employees. That the twenty
five year old who's being identified, who worked for Elon
Musk was not allowed was allowed into the treasury? Was
that person there?
Speaker 8 (10:44):
He was a treasury employee, as was Tom Krause, the
senior person on the dose team.
Speaker 1 (10:50):
They were employed by the treasures, by the way they
keep making it sound, and not all of them and
not about everybody.
Speaker 2 (10:56):
But let's let's just dissect this one for a quick second.
She says, Maxine Waters says that this person was employed
by Elon Musk. The fact of the matter is these
employees who were doing work for or as part of
the Doze thing, they're not in this case. They're employed
by the Treasury. They may be working doing stuff that
(11:19):
Elon Musk is doing.
Speaker 3 (11:20):
But don't employed by the trasy.
Speaker 2 (11:22):
Elon Musk didn't sit them down to have an interview
and hire them. So they make it sound like, yeah,
they make it sound like they're all working for SpaceX
or something.
Speaker 1 (11:30):
Well, that's the point she's trying to She's trying to
put that out there, and the Secretary of Treasuries have
none of it. He's like they were treasure employees. Treasure
employees have access to treasury data.
Speaker 3 (11:40):
That's their job.
Speaker 1 (11:42):
And she is either lying knowing that that's trying to
catch them up, or she's stupid and doesn't know that
these people, I don't know which one it is. Then
you've got Congress from Nidia I think it's how you
pronounce it Velaquez. And she's again asking the Secretary of
Treasury to tell people, what countries are close to striking
trade deals and best It's like we're in the middle
(12:04):
of negotiating these deals. I can't tell you what's happening
because that would maybe impact the deals. This seems to
be like rocket science to her, cut fourteen.
Speaker 11 (12:16):
Tell us tell the American people, tell small businesses and consumers.
Tell retirees specifically, which countries are you close to striking
deals with.
Speaker 8 (12:31):
I'm sorry, Congresswoman, but that would not benefit the United States.
Speaker 11 (12:36):
No, no, no, I'm asking you a question based on
the statement that you may on CNBC.
Speaker 8 (12:44):
And I am telling you that it would be detrimental
to the interests of the United States for me to
answer that question.
Speaker 12 (12:50):
Why will that be detrimental because as the negotiations may
still be in process as we speaks, we are not
at the end of the week yet.
Speaker 8 (13:02):
I am sure that you threw your question. Would not
want to compromise us to go reclaiming my.
Speaker 1 (13:08):
Time reclaiming her time. She didn't like her answer, so
she wanted the time to time back.
Speaker 2 (13:13):
I WT the time.
Speaker 3 (13:14):
Oh, oh my god.
Speaker 2 (13:15):
By the way this happens, this isn't unique to to
what Besson is talking about or anything else. Here's the deal.
If and we've had it happen, we're we're in the
news in the media, and we had to talk to
law enforcement about things. If you ask law enforcement which
criminals are you close to arresting, they're not going to
tell you because again.
Speaker 3 (13:34):
Time is the raid. No, I mean, this is just like,
oh my god.
Speaker 1 (13:38):
And then you had you have a Congressman Madlan Deane,
and she started just basically casting basically slandering Cash Pattel
as he sat there in front of her, and he
was not taking it. Cut fifteen A.
Speaker 13 (13:51):
You repeatedly denied having any involvement as a private citizen
in the firing of FBI officials who engaged in the
prosecution against January sixth insurrectionists, the violent rioters who beat
and killed Capitol police officers, and whom you referred to
as political prisoners. Since then, multiple whistleblowers have come forward,
and we know that you likely committed perjury. At the
(14:13):
same hearing, you claimed you were not familiar with Stu
Peters and anti Semitic Holocaust denier, despite the fact that
you appeared on mister Peter's podcast eight separate times, and
you claimed not to recall mister Patel, My second question
is should we worry more about your memory or your veracity?
Speaker 14 (14:30):
We should worry more about your lack of candor you're
concusing me of committing perjury. Tell the American people how
I broke the law, committed of felony, Have the audacity
to actually put the facts forward answer stead of lying
for political banter so you can have a twenty second
donation hit.
Speaker 13 (14:46):
The answer is both.
Speaker 3 (14:48):
I believe that the.
Speaker 14 (14:49):
Answer is your failing, not me.
Speaker 2 (14:52):
There you go.
Speaker 3 (14:53):
I mean, he's not putting up with it. But this
is what they've been trying to do.
Speaker 1 (14:56):
They they are getting caught in their lives and being
held accountable for actually in that case slandering cash Betel
and in another case this week with Alexandria Acasio Cortez,
the New York congresswoman, she's being held accountable for breaking
the law. And in this particular case, she was giving
(15:18):
advice to illegal aliens on how to evade ice and
how to get away from ice. Even if there's somebody
a marshall or a sheriff or a police officer has
a warrant. She's telling them not to obey and to
run someplace else. Well, this has caused some consternation, and
Tom Holman, who is our Borders are and who works
(15:40):
with our homelandn Security Secretary Christin nom has said, we
are going to hold these officials who break the law accountable.
Speaker 3 (15:50):
And yeah, cut thirteen.
Speaker 1 (15:53):
She's continuing her resist efforts against your efforts, Tom.
Speaker 15 (15:58):
I forgot more about the constitution immigration enforcements.
Speaker 2 (16:01):
You ever know.
Speaker 15 (16:01):
I mean I had to educate her during congressional testimony.
Entering the country illegally is a crime. So whatever, But
what she needs to do is read the statues and
acted by Congress Title eight, and I says Code thirteen
twenty four, United States Title Late United States Code thirteen
twenty four and twenty five. That's what she needs to
read because they were legal interest country. It's a crime,
(16:24):
termist country illegally. Not only that, when you harbor and
conceal and impede law enforcement, that's a felony. So what
she's doing, she says, she's give educating measure the constitutional rights.
And we all know they got constitutional rights. But what
she's really doing you and I and the rest of
the country knows. She's trying to teach them how invade
law enforcement.
Speaker 1 (16:43):
So that's what he said about what she's doing. She
heard that response, and this is what she announced to
her constituency in a town hall literally a day later.
Speaker 3 (16:52):
Cut number twelve.
Speaker 4 (16:54):
Tom Holman, then acting director of ICE, said that he
was going to threaten to refer me to do Jay
because I'm using my free speech rights in order to
advise people of their constitutionally guaranteed protections. And he may
want to do it again today. And to that, I say,
come for me. You're gonna have to come for me.
Speaker 3 (17:15):
Do I look like I care.
Speaker 1 (17:17):
Here's the thing about that. You have absolutely free speech rights,
but those are limited. You can't commit a crime with
your free speech rights. And that means, for instance, as
we know, and you know, my one that I hate
more than anything is when somebody sells it says you know,
you can't yell a fire in a theater. You can't
(17:37):
unless there actually is a fire.
Speaker 3 (17:39):
Then you can't.
Speaker 1 (17:40):
But in this case too, you cannot tell somebody how
to evade the law without being an accessory to their crime.
That makes you toxcay. You have the free speech to
tell them, absolutely, but telling helping somebody aiding somebody commit
a crime. Is aiding in that crime and makes you
liable for that crime as well, makes you criminally liable
(18:01):
for that crime.
Speaker 3 (18:02):
I know, and that's what she's done.
Speaker 2 (18:04):
I know that some people, a lot of people, some politicians,
some regular folk, don't really think that this whole illegal
is really illegal, it's not really a crime. But I
just want to just think about this for a second.
And it doesn't matter whether it's shoplifting or rape, or
murder or robbing a bank. Just imagine if any of
(18:25):
these people you just heard, or any of these people
you have heard giving advice on how to evade law enforcement,
were doing that to someone who had committed any of
the crimes I just mentioned. And I understand people don't think, well,
comment here, illegally is not a crime. Well, you use
the word I legally, and so it is illegal. But
just imagine that. Imagine if AOC went to a town
(18:47):
meeting full of child rapists and murderers and said, let
me tell you how you can avoid getting arrested for
those crimes. Just imagine that for a second. Imagine if
I did it. Imagine if if.
Speaker 3 (18:57):
They exactly what she did.
Speaker 2 (18:58):
That's exactly because it is still a crime. Look this
is the whole thing, right and this will know, this
argument's going to go on forever because there's going to
be people on both sides forever. But if you want
to not have coming here illegally be a crime, then
change the laws. But as the laws are written, they
are committing a crime. We can have these semantic arguments
(19:19):
about whether it's you know, it's not really a crime.
And you know, a lot of these people who are
being targeted first aren't just here illegally. They're here illegally,
and then oh, by the way, they did some other stuff.
Speaker 3 (19:32):
So yeah, no, I feel your parents.
Speaker 2 (19:36):
This is why I have to take high blood pressure back.
Speaker 1 (19:38):
And Alexandria Casio Cretaz is not the only elected government
official doing this, literally putting out there in public how
to avoid ice. And it got really bad in Wisconsin
with Governor Tony Evers, who didn't just this this is
the deal. He didn't just give illegal aliens a memo
as to how to avoid ice, published a memo to
(20:02):
government employees in his state on how to not obey
ICE officers even with a warrant, even if they had
a warrant, how to avoid obeying the law, or how
to not basically a directive to not obey the law.
If Ice came looking for somebody in their office, how
not to help Ice to how.
Speaker 3 (20:22):
To basically break the law.
Speaker 1 (20:24):
And so Holman's like, okay, add Tony Evers to the
list of people.
Speaker 3 (20:28):
We need to arrest.
Speaker 1 (20:29):
And this was Governor Ever's response cut thirty.
Speaker 16 (20:32):
Yesterday, as Trump administration official, in not so many words,
apparently threatened to arrest me for distributing guidance that as
state agency employees to consult with an attorney of federal
agents show up at state buildings with legal documents. The
goal of this guidance was simple to provide clear, consistent
(20:54):
instructions to state employees and ensure they have a lawyer
to help them comply with all things federal and state laws.
Nothing more, nothing less.
Speaker 1 (21:04):
Actually it was a lot more than what he said,
Cut thirty A.
Speaker 16 (21:09):
Republicans and their right wing allies, including Elon Musk, lied
about this guidance, spread misinformation, accused me of doing things
I didn't do or say, and fueled the fake controversy
of their own creation. Now I'm used to Republicans and
the right wing lying about me. It comes with a job,
(21:30):
But this time, these lies came at a cost. I
haven't broken the law. I haven't committed a crime, and
I've never encouraged or directed anyone to break any laws
or commit any crimes.
Speaker 5 (21:44):
He has.
Speaker 1 (21:44):
In fact, I've read the memo. Nobody lied about it,
and he had to get his dig in about Elon
Musk for someone own reason. But no, he absolutely told
his people do not obey, which is in fact flying
in the face of what the federal directives are.
Speaker 3 (21:59):
Don't obey ice.
Speaker 1 (22:00):
If they show up, call somebody who'll come get rid
of them for you. Basically that's what his memo said.
So Tom Homan has a plan for Governor evers cut
twenty nine.
Speaker 12 (22:12):
Your comments on the Wisconsin governor sending directives to state
agencies to knock comply with Yes, actually stop your deportation.
Speaker 15 (22:22):
Efforts, wait to see what's coming.
Speaker 8 (22:23):
Any updates on the mill.
Speaker 10 (22:25):
I remember what I said.
Speaker 15 (22:25):
You can you cross You cannot support what we're doing,
and you can support.
Speaker 8 (22:29):
Sant Shorn City.
Speaker 15 (22:30):
That's what you wanted to do. If you cross that
line on paiedmat or annoyingly Harvard concealing imgo inland, that
is a felon and we're.
Speaker 8 (22:38):
Treated as such.
Speaker 1 (22:40):
They're coming for you, governor.
Speaker 2 (22:41):
But by the way, I'm gonna go over the top here,
So calm down, everybody, brace yourself. So so what Holman
just said, which makes sense, right, you can Hey, you
want to do that, guy, you can do that. Go ahead,
you want us support this? Well, blah blah. Okay. Look,
if you want to sit in your house on a
Saturday night with a freshly popped open beer and root
for people to get murdered or robbed or raped or whatever,
(23:04):
you have that right. Sadly and twisted as it may be,
you have that right. You do not have the right
to then put your beer down and go out and
help people murder and rob and rape. So this is
the difference between it. If you don't agree with the law,
that's fine, or for some reason you're just twisted and demented.
But once you start breaking the law yourself, you go
(23:28):
from being twisted, which you probably still are, to now
being a criminal or a felon or a whatever. So
in this country, you can think anything you want, even
if it offends the hell out of me. But once
you start doing what you're thinking, you have crossed a
huge line. In the sand you.
Speaker 1 (23:48):
Have and the thing that AOC and Governor evers and
I want to play a cup for you. That's Congressman
Jasmine Crockett too. What they're doing now is they're not
just advocating, you know, resistance to the law. They're advocating
actually breaking the law. And in this case, we're in
this cut with Jasmine Crockett. Congressman Crockett, she's actually advocating
(24:11):
violence to a bunch of graduates at Tuglu College, telling
them that they need to figure out how to use
a chair as a weapon.
Speaker 3 (24:20):
Cut eighteen.
Speaker 17 (24:21):
For going to be people that tell you that you
don't belong, and I am here to tell you over
and over and over that you absolutely belong. There are
people that are going to tell you that there is
not a table in which there is a seat for you.
But I am here to remind you of Montgomery and
those folding chairs. Let me tell you, did we know
(24:43):
how to use a chair? Whether we pulling it up,
are we doing something else with it?
Speaker 8 (24:52):
Here?
Speaker 17 (24:52):
Let me be the first one to tell you that
I know that y'all are ready to put your boots on.
Speaker 3 (24:59):
The She's advocating violence.
Speaker 1 (25:03):
This is what these are elected officials who are not
just advocating breaking the law, and in the case of
Jasmine Crockett, but they're advocating violence, and they are breaking
the law themselves.
Speaker 2 (25:13):
I feel I feel like some of these people don't
know where I mentioned the line in the sand. They
don't know where the line is. And there are people
like that. You know, you probably know some of yourself.
Speaker 3 (25:23):
They know where the line is, they've chosen to ignore
the line.
Speaker 2 (25:26):
Think it applies to We'll go with that then. But
so here for example, right, and I get what she
was saying right about Montgomery and all that, and I
get I kind of get where she's coming from because
they do talk about that a lot. And that's fine.
But here's the thing. So I, I myself don't want
something to happen. So I am going to reference remember
back in the American Revolution, Remember when they all got
(25:47):
guns and went out and started shooting people to stop
them from you know, telling us what to do. I
think you should all go out with guns and shoot people.
You can't do that. You can talk about history. You know,
we fought independence, and we fought for this, and we
fought for civil rights, and we fought for this great,
I agree, and you should, but then you don't get
to say, and we did it with guns, so you
(26:09):
should go home and get your gun and stop shooting people. Now.
It's the same as saying, well, we got the chairs.
If they don't want you to pull out and sit
in a chair, pick up the chair and smash them
in the face with it, you can't. Again, there's a line,
and you just said screw it. I'll jump right over
that thing and ball with it. It's just this is
the and you're probably more right than I am. Like
(26:29):
I said, they don't know where the line is. Yeah,
maybe in many cases they do know, and they just
want to instigate and make more and more people come
onto their side of the line.
Speaker 1 (26:39):
I think though, that instead of coming on to their
side of the line, what's happening is they're just alienating people.
And I think that was evident by I don't think
that the election last November, right, and you know you
one would think and a few Democrats figured it out
and have and a lot of Americans figured it out
and said, yeah, we don't want to be part of
this anymore. But they or nothing, and so they're they're
(27:02):
doomed to repeat their own failure over and over again.
So we end each week now with a truth or
troll since you know, today is the first day we've
actually had a Biden in a long time. But we're
not going to get used to Bidenisms again, please God.
Speaker 10 (27:16):
So.
Speaker 1 (27:17):
But we've been doing truth or trolls, and this week
the majority of the truth or trolls are the world
class troller himself, President Trump. But they're not always, but
this week it is. He was on a on NBC
with Kristin Walker doing an interview when he said this
cut number five.
Speaker 9 (27:36):
I asked you if you would rule out military force
to take Greenland, and you said, no, you don't rule
out anything. Would you rule out military force to take Canada?
Speaker 5 (27:44):
Well, I think we're not going to ever get to
that point. It could happen. Something could happen with Greenland.
I'll be honest. We need that for national and international security. No,
I think it's highly unlikely. I don't see it with Canada.
I just don't see it.
Speaker 1 (27:58):
I have to be host with Okay, he's laughing at
this point. I don't see it with Canada. But he's
not ruling it out with Greenland. But she's not smiling. Okay,
she is not small. She's taking him dead serious. So
he continues, Cup five B, you.
Speaker 9 (28:11):
Are not ruling out military force to take Greenland.
Speaker 5 (28:14):
I don't rule it out. I don't say I'm going
to do it, but I don't rule out anything. No,
not there. Do you need that? We need Greenland very badly.
Greenland is a very small amount of people which will
take care of and will cherish them and all of that,
but we need that for international security.
Speaker 1 (28:31):
Now do you think that The question is do you
think he really thinks that that is an option? He's saying,
never rule it out, but he's saying is it a
viable option for him? Or is he responding to the
fact that she is humorless and in this particular interview
with him. I think he has no intention of ever
invading Greenland. I think he just wanted to bat her
(28:52):
around because she did not want Did she crack a
smile during that interview.
Speaker 2 (28:56):
I am tempted to agree completely with you, but I'm
going to just tweak it a tiny, tiny bit, you see.
And I think from being a businessman and being the
guy that he's been in a real estate man and
all the stuff that he's done in his life. You know,
I think he does kind of believe never say never.
I think he doesn't want to invade Greenland. I think
(29:17):
most of what he said was right, but I think
in the way back of his head because of where
he comes from, you never say never, and I almost
believe that he kind of believes that I may be wrong.
I mean, Donald and I haven't talked lately. You know,
we don't hang out like we used to. But so yeah,
I think he was trolling. But again, you never say never,
(29:40):
never saying.
Speaker 1 (29:40):
You can let us know what you think about President Trump.
Does he have it in the back of his mind?
Do you think he or was he just toying with
Welker because she just was such a cold hearted Well,
you know what. Anyway, you can contact Ben and I
on x at newsby three or on Facebook at Newsbyite.
We upload a new episode every single Monday, so please
check back next week and see what new offerings we have. Meanwhile,
(30:02):
have a great week. I would stay out of Canada
and Gerland ifire you. I'm Nancy Shack.
Speaker 2 (30:06):
Never say never, I'm Ben Parker.
Speaker 3 (30:08):
This is news Bite
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
Ridiculous History
History is beautiful, brutal and, often, ridiculous. Join Ben Bowlin and Noel Brown as they dive into some of the weirdest stories from across the span of human civilization in Ridiculous History, a podcast by iHeartRadio.