June 9, 2025 • 36 mins
Musk bails, ICE fights back, and Dems go deeper into denial about Biden. The truth is out there in our "did they really just say that" clips from this week.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Musk Bales.
Speaker 2 (00:01):
Ice fights back and the Dems go deeper into denial
about President Biden. The truth is out there and are
did they really just say that?
Speaker 1 (00:09):
Clips from this week. I'm Nancy Shack.
Speaker 3 (00:11):
Denial is not just a river in Egypt. I'm Ben Parker.
Speaker 4 (00:27):
So look forward to continuing to be a Brendan adviser
to the president, continuing to support those team. And uh
and we're relentlessly pursuing eight trillion dollars in waste board productions.
Speaker 5 (00:40):
Then in a second incident yesterday, I says they were
surveilling a murderer's home in their car when a crowd
surrounded their vehicle, blew their cover and they had to
pull off the target again a murderer.
Speaker 6 (00:53):
I thought it was a good president. The only concern
I thought he had to deal was was good They
do that job until they were eighty six, so I
had never seen him and walk away thinking he can't.
Speaker 3 (01:06):
Do this anymore.
Speaker 2 (01:09):
Uhhh, that's Bill Clinton leading the charge saying there's no
problem with Joe.
Speaker 1 (01:14):
What are you talking about? I mean, I don't know.
Speaker 2 (01:17):
I mean I appreciate the fact that you know, Bill
has had a long road to become an elder statesman
and not you know, the guy with the intern in.
Speaker 1 (01:26):
The blue dress.
Speaker 2 (01:27):
But seriously, does he honestly think that that was helpful
for the Democrat you know, the Democrat Party, because let's
face it, Joe Biden is a mess.
Speaker 3 (01:40):
Everybody knew, Yeah, he was a mess. Here's the problem, right,
not only did everybody know he was a mess, and
just half the people were hiding it. Now even if
you didn't think he was a mess or didn't know
he was a message, now you know he was. So
there's no defending Look again, Joe Biden great guy, right,
I mean not necessarily a great guy, but I mean
he's somebody's grandfather, somebody's fine. Oh blah blah blah. That
(02:00):
we didn't want anything bad to happen to the poor man,
but he shouldn't have been president. And to try to
defend that part, defend that he's eighty six, I mean,
he's eighty six. He's sick, no kidd, And so is
my father, so was my grandfather's so was a lot
of people. Don't defend that he oh he's probably to
be president.
Speaker 2 (02:16):
No, you know, you know what it sounded like to me,
And we'll play the the music undernathing. But you know
what it sounded like to me, like he was trying
to say that this is not it's not Joe Biden's fault.
Anybody would have had a problem, okay, but not everybody's president.
Speaker 7 (02:31):
So I get that.
Speaker 2 (02:32):
Would any eighty six year old the answer would probably
be no, he shouldn't be president. But you're the guys
who put him up there, so you know that's that's
my issue.
Speaker 1 (02:43):
Cut ten A.
Speaker 8 (02:44):
Speaking of aging, there's this book that came out that
talks about Joe Biden and the people around him seeing
that he had cognitive and physical decline. Did you ever
have a moment with him where you thought maybe he
was unfit to run for the president.
Speaker 3 (03:03):
No.
Speaker 6 (03:04):
I thought he was a good president. The only concern
I thought he had to deal with was could anybody
do that job? Until they were eighty six and we
did several long talks. I had never seen him and
walked away thinking he can't do this anymore. He was
always on top.
Speaker 1 (03:24):
Of his brief You never saw any decline.
Speaker 6 (03:28):
So I didn't know anything about any of this, and
I haven't read the book. I saw President Biden not
very long ago, and I thought he was in good ship.
Speaker 2 (03:37):
Either he hasn't read the book, so he's doing a
denial denial there, and he talks about being eighty six
president like it's the choice of suit. The only problem
he had was what suit to choose in the morning.
Speaker 1 (03:48):
It was eighty six. Either or almost eighty six.
Speaker 3 (03:51):
Either Bill Clinton is losing his mind, which is possible, yeah,
or he's lying you didn't see any decline. Look again,
forget though he's a person in somebody's grandfather. It was obvious.
I mean, we saw the decline before he became president,
and as president it was like going down the big
hill on the roller coaster.
Speaker 2 (04:11):
And this was an interview on CBS, and then what
they try to say was, well, how do you reconcile
what you're saying basically to the book that it was
written by Jake Tapper and the Axios reporter. And he
basically said, I didn't want to read it. And he
can tell you why cut eleven A.
Speaker 8 (04:30):
Why didn't you read the book?
Speaker 6 (04:31):
I didn't want to because he's not president anymore. And
I think he did a good job. And I think
we are facing challenges today without president in our history,
and some people are trying to use this as a
(04:51):
way to blame him for the fact that Trump was reelected.
Speaker 7 (04:55):
It is his fault, absolutely, I mean, what the hell, Bill.
Speaker 2 (05:00):
I mean, I didn't read it because he wasn't president
more so, therefore it has no validity anymore.
Speaker 7 (05:04):
You know that is that is utter a bulb believe.
Speaker 3 (05:08):
Well, it's like plausible deniability. If I read the book
that I'll have to admit that Joe Biden.
Speaker 7 (05:13):
I don't want to know about.
Speaker 1 (05:13):
If I close my eyes, it didn't happen.
Speaker 3 (05:15):
By the way, just to let you know, I also
haven't read the Bible. That's why I don't think adultery
is wrong. I mean, that's come on, please, jeez Wese.
I mean, and by the way, again, you don't need
to read the book. All you needed to do was
paid attention for the last four years. Four years. Yeah.
Speaker 2 (05:31):
Yeah, But then the Democrats are doing and their water
carriers in the mainstream media are doing what they always
do when they think that there was they did something inexcusable,
they turn around and try to blame the Republicans.
Speaker 1 (05:45):
For it, and they're doing that here.
Speaker 2 (05:48):
They're now trying to persuade people that while Biden's mental
decline was not an issue that President Trump's is. This
is Simone Sanders on ms B Tree, MSNBC trying to
suggest that no one knows who's really running the Trump
White House, because you know, we don't know if it's
(06:08):
Trump or not cut twenty two.
Speaker 9 (06:10):
I have to ask who was actually making the decisions,
who was actually.
Speaker 1 (06:13):
Running the country. Everybody wants to say Joe Biden was
running the country.
Speaker 8 (06:16):
I know for a fact, you know, like.
Speaker 9 (06:17):
Read his President's Daily Brief.
Speaker 1 (06:18):
He was engaged in the meeting, He asked questions that
he gave directives.
Speaker 10 (06:21):
Donald Truck can't even get to it, can't even won't even.
Speaker 2 (06:23):
Bother to read that bad Now, that's why why is
she doing that? Why she because it's not just about
Biden being non compassmentus while in off it's it's the
question now about the auto pen, and that is somebody
hit the go button on the auto pen and had
President Biden's signature on a lot of stuff that we're
(06:47):
not really quite sure whether that's he knew about it
or not. And one of the reasons why we say
that is here is Speaker Johnson. Last January, he was
on something called the Fruit Press and he was talking
about how Biden didn't remember signing an executive order.
Speaker 1 (07:05):
Cut thirty two, Sir.
Speaker 11 (07:07):
Why did you pause LNG exports to Europe? Like I
don't understand. You know, liquified natural gas is in great
demand by our allies. Why would you do that because
you understand we just talked about Ukraine. You understand your
fuel in Vladimir Putin's war machine because they got to
get their gas from him, you know. And he looks
at me, stunned with this, and he said, I didn't.
I didn't do that. And I said, miss President, you yes,
(07:29):
you did. It was an executive order, like you know,
three weeks ago, and he goes, no, I didn't do that,
and he's arguing with me. He genuinely did not know
what he had signed.
Speaker 2 (07:36):
That's that's the issue, and it has direct implications on
things like executive orders, as Speaker Johnson was talking about,
or pardons, and in this cut, Peter Doucey from Fox
is asking White House Press Secretary Carolyn Lovett if the
Trump administration is putting forth that only pardons signed by
Biden himself are legitimate, because it would appear that most
(07:59):
of them were signed by the autopen cut thirty.
Speaker 12 (08:02):
When you look at these last minute Biden pardons, the
big ones, Biden siblings Fauci January sixth Committee right, most
of the big ones had the same, very neat signature.
We would expect that probably to be the auto pen.
There is one that looks different. It looks authentic. In fact,
(08:23):
if you look at the last name, it almost looks
like the President was having a hard time spelling his
last name. There is this White House of the opinion
that the only pardon that would count is one that
the president signed himself.
Speaker 13 (08:36):
Very interesting, very interesting props. If you want to bring
them to my office later so I can take a
closer look, I would like to do that. The President
is making a good point when he discusses the usage
of the autopen. Who was running the country for the
past four years. Perhaps those documents were signed with the autopen.
Something that this I believe the Department of Justice is
(08:57):
looking into. As you saw Ed Martin made an announcement
the Department of Justice this morning to launch an investigation
because the American people deserve answers.
Speaker 1 (09:06):
So they're looking into it. But here's the thing.
Speaker 7 (09:10):
The auto pen.
Speaker 2 (09:11):
The president is allowed to use the autopen or the
staff can use the autopen at the president's direction. Those
are the rules were around the auto pen. But in
this case, it doesn't appear that President Biden gave any
direction to use it. First of all, you had that
moment with Speaker Johnson doesn't even know that that executive
order was signed. And two I have a montage of Biden.
Speaker 1 (09:33):
Basically.
Speaker 2 (09:34):
These are cuts are from twenty twenty one through twenty
twenty four, referencing how his staff controls him, not the
other way around.
Speaker 1 (09:41):
Cut thirty one.
Speaker 14 (09:42):
I'm sorry, I'm going to get in trouble with staff.
I don't do this the right way. Now, I'm going
to get in trouble with my staff. Yeah, go ahead,
but pretend that you didn't answer you my.
Speaker 10 (09:51):
A lot of taking any questions.
Speaker 15 (09:56):
Anybody here, you know.
Speaker 14 (10:00):
Oh, and I got to be president. I get to
do things that I want to do, but my staff
tells me what I can't do.
Speaker 1 (10:05):
Yeah, wow, yeah exactly.
Speaker 3 (10:09):
By the way, this couldn't be worse if Steve Erkele
was the president. Did I do that? Can I do that? Yeah?
Who sawned this executive order? Can I do that?
Speaker 1 (10:19):
Well? And then he was just he was.
Speaker 2 (10:21):
He stuck his head up out of the basement this
past week and he was in a to do some
memoral day stop up in Delaware and he got caught
in a media scrum and he was asked about his
mental and physical health cut number twelve.
Speaker 9 (10:33):
There's also been a lot of discussion recently about your mental,
mental and physical capabilities while you were in office.
Speaker 14 (10:39):
You can see that I'm mentally incompetent and I can't walk,
and I can beat the hell out of both of them.
Speaker 9 (10:44):
Do you want to reply to any of those reports?
And also to the fact that there are some Democrats
who are now questioning whether you should have run for
reelection in the first place.
Speaker 14 (10:54):
Run against me that.
Speaker 3 (10:57):
Because they'd have beaten it.
Speaker 2 (10:59):
Okay, does any of that make you feel better about
Joe Biden?
Speaker 1 (11:02):
Seriously make you feel bad about Joe Biden in office?
Any of it?
Speaker 2 (11:06):
You know? Oh?
Speaker 1 (11:06):
Yeah, I'm mentally incompetent. Yeah, I could beat them all.
What why didn't they run? It's like, oh my god.
Speaker 3 (11:12):
Yeah, But here's the thing, And of course he did
drop out and eventually Kamala became the candidate. But look,
you got beat I mean not you specifically because you
didn't run directly against Donald Trump, but your whole administration,
your whole everything, your agenda, all the stuff that you
(11:33):
were that got carried over to Kamala for the last
handful of months. You got beat by Donald Trump. Who
cares if you you could have beat some third wing
Democrat who decided to run at the last minute, which,
of course, by the way, we all know damn well,
if any Democrat jumped out of the woodwork and said
I'm gonna run against the incumbent president, that democrat would
(11:55):
have been hung up by his toenails on Capitol Hill.
So nobody was gonna do it. For Joe to say, well,
they should have run against me, they've learned their lesson
over the Nobody was going to run against you because
you don't do that. So it's easy to say after
the fact, will they should have run against me? I
would have beat them? Well, I don't know. Maybe you
(12:15):
wouldn't have. But Kamalak, who was your choice, your right
hand woman, couldn't beat Donald Trump, which, by extension, you
couldn't beat Donald Trump. So who cares what you may
or may not have been able to beat In some
fantasy democratic primary.
Speaker 2 (12:31):
Well, that's a very good point, I have to say.
But you know this, the auto pen thing is going
to turn into a huge scandal, and who was in
control of the White House is becoming a massive question.
And even with that, the Trump administration is a little
busy right now, has focusing on other things. So they've
turned you know, the Department of Justice will look into
(12:52):
the auto pen and President Biden's decline. Meanwhile, the Trump
administration is having to focus on things like Crawt's trying
to make ICE officers the enemy even when they're you know,
trying to bring in a murderer.
Speaker 1 (13:08):
And you heard this in the open.
Speaker 2 (13:11):
This is Bill Millusion of Fox reporting on ICE having
to pull off a surveillance of a murderer.
Speaker 1 (13:17):
Cut one hundred.
Speaker 5 (13:19):
Then in a second incident yesterday, I says they were
surveilling a murderer's home in their car when a crowd
surrounded their vehicle, blew their cover and they had to
pull off the target again a murderer.
Speaker 3 (13:31):
Wow.
Speaker 2 (13:31):
Yeah, And here's an activist who was there, one of
the people that caused that crowd and having them to
let go a murderer. He's a social media post from
an activist telling people to show up and block ICE.
Speaker 1 (13:44):
Cut one hundred a ICE.
Speaker 16 (13:46):
Just tried to abduct a bunch of kids and parents
right here at Somerville High School, and so many community
members showed up that ICE just left. Remember, you are
the major power in your community. If you show up
with people you trust, you can protect kids, You can
protect families. So form information networks, know where ICE is
(14:06):
in your community, and show up.
Speaker 3 (14:08):
They will just leave.
Speaker 16 (14:10):
They are not brave enough to steal kids when an
entire community comes around to protect them.
Speaker 3 (14:16):
So show up for the kids.
Speaker 1 (14:18):
Yeah, here's the thing. Here's what's happening.
Speaker 2 (14:20):
Nobody was showing up to kidnap parents and children. That's
not what happens.
Speaker 1 (14:24):
Here's what happens.
Speaker 2 (14:25):
Sanctuary cities, which you know Somerville is, which Cambridge is,
and many you know Massachusetts is a sanctuary state. They
have these policies whereby if an ICE a law enforcement
officer shows up at the courthouse with a warrant a
detainer for somebody who's been arrested, who's in legal alien,
(14:47):
the courts and with the support of the governor and
the local mayors will not turn that person over to
legal law enforcement who have warrants to arrest that person
for usually a crime.
Speaker 1 (14:59):
So this is what happens.
Speaker 2 (15:00):
So because they're not getting them in a nice, safe
environment where they're already in custody, they're let go by
the courts, they go back into the community, and now
ICE is now forced because of those sanctuary policies, to
go into the community to find them in a much
more dangerous situation. And what happens on top of that
is that if they happen across another illegal alien when
(15:23):
they're not looking for, but one that happens to be
an illegal alien, whether they have a criminal record or not,
they scoop them up too, because they've already told everybody,
if we come across you, even by mistake, and you're illegal,
we're taking you. Whereas if you just give us the
guys we're looking for, we're not in the communities and we're.
Speaker 1 (15:38):
Not going to pick you up by mistake. But they
don't do it.
Speaker 2 (15:41):
So what happened is in Massachusetts, in particular, a eighteen
year old guy was on his way to volleyball high
school volleyball practice. He's a junior at high school. Why
he's a junior at high school and he's eighteen. I
don't know, but he is, and he's going off to
and ICE wants his dad. They have a warrant for
their dad, and instead of turning the dad over, they
(16:01):
had to go looking for him and they see the dad.
The car registered to the dad was being driven by
the son on his way to volleyball practice with some
other kids in the car, so they stop him. They
discover he too is an illegal alien, and they take
him into custody. But all of a sudden, they're kidnapping
this guy. And by the way, the kid is still
in The eighteen year old is still in custody.
Speaker 7 (16:20):
His father knows that the ICE was.
Speaker 1 (16:22):
Looking for him.
Speaker 2 (16:23):
Has the father gone to turn himself in to get
his kid out, No, he hasn't, So the kid is
still still in being held because he too isn't illegal.
This is ICE Acting director Todd Lyons who is who
is asked about this about this particular arrest over the
weekend cut one oh five.
Speaker 17 (16:42):
They made a traffic stop on that vehicle, which was
the father's vehicle. He was driving that vehicle. But like
any local law enforcement officer, if you encounter someone that
has a warrant or like I said, is here illegally,
we will take action on that. It happens every day,
every day, doesn't There are multiple eighteen year olds arrested,
but yet we are focused on this one. And I
will say, his dad hasn't turned himself in yet, and
(17:03):
his dad knows he's the target of it.
Speaker 3 (17:05):
Yeah, so yeah, what I was gonna say is, I mean,
the whole argument, or part of the argument people are
making is well, he was just driving his dad's car.
And right, So here's the thing. Let's just change the
scenario a tiny bit for our brand new movie we're doing.
So Dad is a wanted rapist, murderer, whatever. Dad's gonna
(17:29):
warrant out for some some crime he did. So Junior
borrows the car. Junior is driving down the street. Junior
gets stopped and has a bunch of cocaine and a
couple of guns on him. Junior's gonna get arrested even
though they weren't looking for Junior, because they were looking
for Dad. Dad wasn't there and Junior was breaking the law.
So you know, take the immigration icing on the cake, right, Well,
(17:53):
take all the immigration stuff out of it, and just
imagine they were looking for a murderer and they found
a kid who was the murderer's son, and he had
all kinds of guns and weapons and drugs on him.
They're going to arrest him. Nobody's going to I wouldn't
see a protest going. He wasn't the target. Let him
go with his guns and his drugs. So this is
(18:14):
we're looking for one criminal. We weren't looking for this guy.
But oh, by the way, he was here I legally,
so we're taking him. So I don't I don't get well,
there is a valuable lesson here by the way you
write this down. Don't borrow your dad's car. Yeah, that's it.
Speaker 1 (18:29):
Yeah, absolutely positively.
Speaker 2 (18:31):
And the other thing is, you know, if you live
in a city with sanctuary policies, I think you need
to start standing up and saying stop this when you're
creating a public safety issue. One people who don't have
a criminal warrant, who may be here illegally, are going
to get scooped up while they look for the ones
to too, because you are hiding them in the middle
of It's kind of like the terrorists in the Middle
(18:52):
East to hide among civilians and then everybody's horrified when
the civilians get killed. I am horrified too. But here's
a problem. It's not the fault of the people who
drop the bombs. It is the fault of the people
who hit among them. And that's what you have here.
You have basically the bad guys hiding among people who
aren't so bad, and everybody's getting caught up in him.
And this is explained a little bit by the Ice
(19:15):
Field director Patricia Hyde. This is about that Milford team
cut one oh six.
Speaker 15 (19:19):
He was not the target of the investigation, but, like
we have repeatedly said, sanctuary policies put us in a
position to go out into communities. Unfortunately, we had to
go to Milford to look for someone else and we
came across him and he was arrested.
Speaker 8 (19:32):
He's eighteen years old.
Speaker 15 (19:33):
He's unlawfully in this country.
Speaker 2 (19:35):
So what is the order of the Democrats response to this?
Instead of saying, Okay, we'll help you get the bad
guys so we can we can at least protect the
people who are haven't done anything wrong except they're here illegally,
so maybe we can try to find a way to
legalize them.
Speaker 1 (19:48):
But will help you get the bad guys out? Do
they do that? No? You know what they do.
Speaker 2 (19:51):
This is Hakeem Jeffries, Minority Leader, House Minority Leader, Hakim Jeffries.
He has a press conference and he vows to what
get the bag uh huh, identify I e. Docs every
single ICE agent that is on the streets. In other words,
put them in fear of their life and in danger
cut eighteen.
Speaker 18 (20:11):
Every single ICE agent who's engaged in this aggressive overreach
and am trying to hide their identities from the American
people will be unsuccessful in doing that. This is America,
so not the Soviet Union. We're not behind the Iron curtain.
(20:34):
This is not the nineteen thirties. And every single one
of them, no matter what it takes, no matter how
long it takes, will of course be identified.
Speaker 3 (20:43):
That in fact is the law.
Speaker 7 (20:46):
These are undercover agents.
Speaker 18 (20:50):
We're gonna make sure that the American people have the
transparency necessary to hold people accountable when they're folks who
cross the line here in America.
Speaker 9 (21:07):
That's what's going to happen.
Speaker 1 (21:09):
It's rich to hear a Democrat talking about transparency enforced.
Speaker 3 (21:12):
People could insist on doing your job, We're going to
have to have you killed.
Speaker 1 (21:16):
Yeah, basically that's what he did.
Speaker 3 (21:17):
The hell is that, you know what, you know what
he said, it's not the nineteen thirties. But you know,
the first thing I thought is, of course, back in
the day, back in Prohibition and back when al Capone
was running the world and everything else, right, a lot
of these organizations and it still happens today, but a
lot of these organizations back then, they were paying off everybody, right,
the judges, the cops, the whoever. If you were a
(21:38):
cop and you didn't want to take the payment and
you wanted to be a cop, you were going to
end up dead in the Chicago River. And this is
kind of that, Hey you don't want to play our game,
We're coming for you. That come on.
Speaker 2 (21:49):
Yeah, So the Democrats have set up a system where
it's those that enforce the law that are to blame
as opposed to those that break the law. And we
saw that actually on another level, not with immigration, but
with Elon musk In in heading up Doge. You know
that's it was. It was pretty bad. And he says
(22:12):
that and he's now left. He has left now. He
says that it was time to go because he was only.
Speaker 1 (22:20):
There as a as a what is it, a.
Speaker 2 (22:23):
Short term guy? You know, they he's independent contractors.
Speaker 3 (22:28):
With the government, temporary employee.
Speaker 2 (22:30):
Well, yeah, independent contractors, temporary employees can only uh, with
the federal government can only do a four month stint
because after that you have to hire them as a
full time So he's he's basically done his his four
month stint stint. So that's you know, that's where he is.
But he talks about how he felt that people were
(22:51):
turning Doge into the whipping boy for all of their frustrations,
all of their and particularly he means the Democrats for
their frustrations about losing power and so forth.
Speaker 1 (23:01):
Cut fourteen.
Speaker 19 (23:02):
You've spoken about how much of a grind in the
stress it was on you, and you know, Tesla's reputation
took a hit. Your reputation took a hit. People are
very upset about security and national parks and air traffic
and food safety and cancer research all the time of
the research. Now that you've had a chance to look
at it, Yeah, might there have been a different approach.
Speaker 10 (23:28):
Yeah, I think the I mean what was saying to
happen was that, like, uh, it's a bit unfair because
like Doge became the whooping boy for everything. So if
there was some cut real or imagined. Everyone would blame
those I've had people think that like somehow doge is
going to stop them from getting their Social Security check,
which is completely untrue.
Speaker 2 (23:48):
Yeah, among other things. And it's gone so far that
Chuck Schumer, Senator Schumer from New York, he's here, He's
going to be on MSNBC. He demands that Musk apologize
to the American people for finding fraud Cut thirteen A.
Speaker 20 (24:02):
He says he's in a bind. The American people are
in a bind because of what Musk did his DOGE,
which you know, didn't go It didn't do as much
as he wanted it to do, but still did huge
amounts of damage in terms of the firing of employees,
the decimation of agencies like health care, like going after
(24:26):
making sure drugs and food is safe, nuclear energy is safe,
the FAA we need to bolster, and he I believe
they put a freeze on it. They didn't hire new people.
Over and over again. What Musk did with his DOGE
is going to cause lasting damage to the American people.
And just saying now he's out of the administration and
(24:46):
he's in a bind.
Speaker 3 (24:48):
That's ridiculous.
Speaker 20 (24:48):
He ought to be apologizing to the American people for
what he has done, if for some reason he sees
the light. I don't know if he does or not,
but that's what we need. An apology and him to
tell Trump to undo the damage that he has done.
Speaker 2 (25:02):
We need an apology from Schumer for lying about Joe
Biden for four years?
Speaker 1 (25:05):
How about that?
Speaker 2 (25:06):
And to say that the administration agencies were decimated is
bizarre because less than one percent of employees were fired. Nobody,
nobody decimated any of the agencies.
Speaker 7 (25:18):
He ferreted out.
Speaker 2 (25:18):
Fraud, for God's sakes, and for that, humor is domating
that he apologized. Meanwhile, they're not just attacking him for
what they the lies that they're saying. They're now making
up crap about Hey, did you know that Elon Musk
was a drug user? Cut number six?
Speaker 1 (25:34):
Please?
Speaker 16 (25:35):
Were you aware of Elon Mussin's regular drug use?
Speaker 6 (25:39):
No?
Speaker 14 (25:39):
I was.
Speaker 21 (25:40):
I think he's fantastic. I think Elon is a fantastic guy.
And I hold by these support not troubled.
Speaker 3 (25:47):
By anything with Elon.
Speaker 21 (25:48):
I think he's fantastic. Did a great job, and you know,
doge continues and by the time it's finished, you will
have numbers that will knock the shops off.
Speaker 1 (25:57):
It's gonna be uh.
Speaker 21 (25:58):
He did a fantastic yeah, and he didn't need it.
Speaker 2 (26:01):
He didn't need to do it. He didn't need it.
He didn't need And so the question becomes was he
leaving because his four month tenure was up at DOGE
or was he just sick of the bleep? And one
could hardly blame him. He was asked about that by
Peter Doocey when he was in the Oval Office with
President Trump.
Speaker 1 (26:18):
Cut three please.
Speaker 12 (26:19):
The President mentioned that you had to deal with all
the slings and arrows during your time at DOGE.
Speaker 4 (26:23):
There's this other people, you know, some of the media
reporganizations in this room with the slingers.
Speaker 3 (26:28):
Well, so.
Speaker 12 (26:30):
There is a New York Times before today that accuses
you of blurring way between.
Speaker 10 (26:35):
Is the New York Times?
Speaker 4 (26:36):
Is that the same publication that got a Pulitzer Prize
for a false recording on the Russia Gate? Is it
the same organization?
Speaker 3 (26:46):
Blitzer?
Speaker 4 (26:47):
What Bulletzer counter is?
Speaker 6 (26:50):
So?
Speaker 4 (26:50):
I think they I think the judge just ruled against
New York Times for their lies about the Russia Gate
hoax and that they might have to give back that
Fulitzer Prize that New York Times.
Speaker 1 (27:00):
Let's move on a little snarky. I don't blame him.
He's getting a little snarky there.
Speaker 3 (27:06):
I think you can well, you know, it's pretty good.
I'm gonna have to work on my lines because I
would like a Pulitzer and I just probably haven't lied enough.
Speaker 1 (27:13):
No, I think that's right. I think that's right.
Speaker 3 (27:15):
Don't they have awards for for fiction writing. I'm sure
that's maybe what they should have got. I don't know
what's called because I don't read, so how would I know,
But uh, yeah, it's god.
Speaker 2 (27:26):
Yeah, I think I think Elon's, you know, working on
his last nerve right here after everybody's attacking.
Speaker 3 (27:31):
And by the way, if he wasn't on drugs, he
should be there. Yeah, I would be on drugs.
Speaker 2 (27:35):
Well, what he is doing, unfortunately, is that you know.
And now that he's escaped DC, he's getting a little
nasty in tweets regarding things that Congress is doing.
Speaker 1 (27:46):
Like he called the.
Speaker 2 (27:47):
Big Beautiful Bill, which has gone through the House and
is now it's now in the Senate, an abomination because
it didn't go far enough as far as he's concerned,
and it there's still a lot of spending in it,
and so that's a little bit of a divergence for
him from President Trump. In fact, again Peter Doocy, who's
(28:08):
been on fire this week, was asking Caroline Lovett about
it cut twelve.
Speaker 12 (28:12):
See how mad do you think President Trump is going
to be when he finds out that Elon Musk said,
I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous,
pork filled congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame
on those who voted for it. You know you did wrong.
Speaker 14 (28:26):
You know it.
Speaker 13 (28:28):
Look, the President already knows where Elon Musk stood on
this bill. It doesn't change the president's opinion. This is
one big, beautiful bill and he's sticking to it.
Speaker 2 (28:36):
Yeah, but you know, there's a little bit so people
are thinking, is there is the honeymoon over? I don't know.
Speaker 3 (28:42):
I think I think Elon Musk will still get a
Christmas card from the White House.
Speaker 1 (28:48):
I think you will. So, I think you will.
Speaker 3 (28:49):
It's okay everybody, So I think so.
Speaker 2 (28:52):
But I think there was also an example this week
of a cut that just reminded us what we could
have almost had last November. This is Tim Way on
a Grounded podcast saying his son told him that the
reason why young men didn't vote Democrat this past election is,
you know, for giggles cut sixteen A.
Speaker 22 (29:10):
I say this because I'm proud to say it looks
like as of next Tuesday, I'm going to have a
high school graduate with my son, Gus, and he's pretty
in tune to this. But when he said this, he said, Dad,
a lot of these young guys especially, said that they're
not voting on the policy issues, and he wasn't dissing them.
He said, they may know the policy issues, but most
of them don't. They're doing it because there's a sense
of excitement, a sense of thrill in this. It's entertainment
(29:32):
or whatever. We all dismiss that Donald Trump's a clown.
You know, Donald Trump's rallies are a clown. This mma
fighting stuff and this, you know, and look, you start
veering into the Andrew Tate stuff, which is is dangerous
misogyny and you know, assault issues and all of that,
but there's a peripheral side of that that that is
not criminal, but is still going down the same road
(29:53):
of saying you've got a place to belong And I
think this is me just pontificating for what it's worth.
Social media and other things have disc connected people more
than they were.
Speaker 3 (30:01):
We were more connected in my generation.
Speaker 22 (30:03):
It was easier to be a kid when I was
growing up. And I've always said this as a teacher,
if you don't give a kid a place to belong,
they'll go find one.
Speaker 2 (30:10):
Yeah, I think more along lines of people looked at
Kamala Harris and Tim Wilson realized that stupidity was the
name of the game, right. I just didn't want to
go there.
Speaker 3 (30:17):
Well, there's two there's two sides of that. There's that.
But I do agree with Tim Walls. Look, social media
has obviously changed the world that we live in. The
one that yeah, that was stupid.
Speaker 2 (30:27):
Part of his comments, part of his comment is that
people voted for Forgivebs.
Speaker 3 (30:30):
Well that's what I'm saying. I mean, like, I can
disagree with Tim Walls and also agree with him when
he says something that I agree with, which was there
at the end. But here's the here's the thing. I
the thing that I picked up because I pick up
stupid things out of people people commenting should we should
Kamlo Harris have done some m m A, maybe some
some mixed martial arts to pick up the some support
(30:52):
he was talking about m m A. Right, Yeah, So
I just wondered if would that would that have helped her?
Should she have I don't know.
Speaker 1 (30:58):
I don't think so.
Speaker 3 (30:59):
Should she have m made.
Speaker 1 (31:01):
Anything she could have done.
Speaker 2 (31:03):
I appreciate you being creative and thinking outside the box.
I try to do that, but I think I think
she's like, well, she was done.
Speaker 3 (31:09):
She was damaged goods out of the gate.
Speaker 2 (31:11):
Because she's never won an election that was anything bigger
than her state election for.
Speaker 3 (31:16):
Whatever it is, even a private and I know, I
know the race issue played into like why people wanted
her in, the gender issue and all that, but the
reality is she came. First of all, she was pushed
out of the gate because Joe Biden couldn't get out
of the gate, and then she had a very short
period of time, which does affect this. I mean, I'm
not saying they would have voted for Kamala Harris if
she had three years to prepare, but you know, look
(31:36):
they looked at her and went, what the heck is this?
I don't think it was so much what Tim Walls
was basically alluding to her record one no look she
it was bad from start to finish. And you can
throw in in the middle of that whole story of Kamala,
Kamala Wall's, Kamala Walls, Kamala Harris's failure to win the
White House. In that big story of Kamala Harris, there
(31:58):
are so many sub lots you can put in about
why people didn't vote for her, aside from the fact
that they just didn't like her. I mean that, I
think that right there is part of the reason she
didn't win, on top of the three hundred and seventy
three thousand other reasons they didn't vote for her.
Speaker 1 (32:14):
I agree with you.
Speaker 2 (32:16):
So we end every week with a truth or troll
these days, and we have yet again President Trump, because
let's face it, he is the king of the trolls.
Ande Well, yes, in this particular cut, he's in the
Oval office and he's asked by again Peter Doocey, who
asked President Trump if he has some marital advice for
(32:37):
French President Emmanuel lacrou after he was bitch slapped by
his wife in public and publicly humidiated, humiliated, and it
gave an interesting response cut for this week, there.
Speaker 12 (32:48):
Was a video on morda Plane that showed the First
Lady of France slapping her husband Emmanuel mccron. Do you
have any world leaders, world leader marital life.
Speaker 23 (33:03):
Make sure the door remains close. I spoke to him
and he's he's fine. They're fine. They're two really good people.
I know him very well, and I don't know what
that was all about. But I know him very well
and they're fine.
Speaker 1 (33:23):
So close the door. No, was he was?
Speaker 17 (33:26):
He?
Speaker 1 (33:26):
Really? Was he trolling me? Crow there? Do you think?
Speaker 6 (33:29):
Well?
Speaker 3 (33:29):
I think I think closing the door is a good idea,
but I don't know. And a lot of times I
do think I know, but I don't know. Look, here's
the thing about the whole slap anyway, And any guy
who's been married for any amount of time, if you're
deeply in love with your wife, I mean, if she
hates you, then hitting you is probably a part of
(33:50):
her agenda. But like my wife, for example, we have
a relationship. I make fun of her, I poke fun
at her, I say stupid things, I do stupid things,
kind of like on the show, and occasionally she'll give
me a whack, like not get off kind.
Speaker 1 (34:01):
Of thing, and he'll give you a whack well.
Speaker 3 (34:04):
You know, on the shoulder or the arm. I mean,
she's not punching me the face.
Speaker 1 (34:07):
Well, I think that's different than slapping somebody in the face.
Speaker 3 (34:09):
No, I understand, but I'm just saying, you know, maybe
it was for show.
Speaker 2 (34:13):
I think that you don't slap somebody in the face
for show. That's you may you may knock him in
the arm, just like you were talking about for that's
that's different. That's not giving somebody a whack. That's tapping you,
slapping them in the face when there's.
Speaker 1 (34:24):
A press corps outside.
Speaker 3 (34:25):
That was either that's dumb.
Speaker 7 (34:27):
That's either stupid or very calculated.
Speaker 2 (34:30):
Because she was so angry with him, she wanted to
hurt him and so but I think Trump going, you know, yeah,
close the door.
Speaker 3 (34:36):
Or maybe she didn't. Maybe she didn't want to hurt
him as much as she she wanted to put on
a show.
Speaker 2 (34:41):
Well, I don't think she was many was hauling off
to give him stitches.
Speaker 3 (34:44):
I think she was.
Speaker 2 (34:45):
I don't think she's giving him a show because he
had a lot of backpedaling to do after that. It
was I think I think she was really angry, and
I can honestly say I've been very angry with my husband.
I've never hit him, not ever, nor has he ever
hit me. I mean, you don't hit somebody even the
I mean, obviously ever, you don't hit them period. So
it's I don't care if it's in the face or
whatever else. What you were talking about was tapping.
Speaker 6 (35:06):
You call the.
Speaker 2 (35:07):
Wapping, Yeah, but it's but no, you don't hit people ever.
And it's and in this particular case, I think Donald
Trump was trolling my wells.
Speaker 1 (35:17):
My guess, well, I do.
Speaker 3 (35:18):
I do too, I guess you know, at that level,
and you know from listening to the show, I'll make
funny comments that I'm not really one hundred percent serious about,
just just just for for showmanship. I think him saying
you should shut the door is kind of a control. Yeah.
Speaker 1 (35:34):
Well, you can agree with this or not agree with this.
You can.
Speaker 2 (35:37):
You can tell Ben and I on X if you
think we're right it's a troll. You can contact us
at uh at news Byte three that's where our handle
is on X or on Facebook at news Byte. We
upload a new episode every single.
Speaker 3 (35:51):
By the way, I got to interrupted here, who's got
news Bite, news Byte one and news Byte two.
Speaker 1 (35:56):
I don't know. I don't know the answer to that question,
but we don't. We have him for years, So there
you go.
Speaker 2 (36:02):
We upload a new episode every single Monday, so you
can check back next week and see what new offerings
we have and we'll have a great week. And whatever
you do, you know, don't hit your wife or a
husband in front of a press corps.
Speaker 1 (36:13):
Hit him anywhere else, then you'll get trolled by Donald Trump.
I'm Nancy Shack. This is news Bite
Musk Bales.
Speaker 2 (00:01):
Ice fights back and the Dems go deeper into denial
about President Biden. The truth is out there and are
did they really just say that?
Speaker 1 (00:09):
Clips from this week. I'm Nancy Shack.
Speaker 3 (00:11):
Denial is not just a river in Egypt. I'm Ben Parker.
Speaker 4 (00:27):
So look forward to continuing to be a Brendan adviser
to the president, continuing to support those team. And uh
and we're relentlessly pursuing eight trillion dollars in waste board productions.
Speaker 5 (00:40):
Then in a second incident yesterday, I says they were
surveilling a murderer's home in their car when a crowd
surrounded their vehicle, blew their cover and they had to
pull off the target again a murderer.
Speaker 6 (00:53):
I thought it was a good president. The only concern
I thought he had to deal was was good They
do that job until they were eighty six, so I
had never seen him and walk away thinking he can't.
Speaker 3 (01:06):
Do this anymore.
Speaker 2 (01:09):
Uhhh, that's Bill Clinton leading the charge saying there's no
problem with Joe.
Speaker 1 (01:14):
What are you talking about? I mean, I don't know.
Speaker 2 (01:17):
I mean I appreciate the fact that you know, Bill
has had a long road to become an elder statesman
and not you know, the guy with the intern in.
Speaker 1 (01:26):
The blue dress.
Speaker 2 (01:27):
But seriously, does he honestly think that that was helpful
for the Democrat you know, the Democrat Party, because let's
face it, Joe Biden is a mess.
Speaker 3 (01:40):
Everybody knew, Yeah, he was a mess. Here's the problem, right,
not only did everybody know he was a mess, and
just half the people were hiding it. Now even if
you didn't think he was a mess or didn't know
he was a message, now you know he was. So
there's no defending Look again, Joe Biden great guy, right,
I mean not necessarily a great guy, but I mean
he's somebody's grandfather, somebody's fine. Oh blah blah blah. That
(02:00):
we didn't want anything bad to happen to the poor man,
but he shouldn't have been president. And to try to
defend that part, defend that he's eighty six, I mean,
he's eighty six. He's sick, no kidd, And so is
my father, so was my grandfather's so was a lot
of people. Don't defend that he oh he's probably to
be president.
Speaker 2 (02:16):
No, you know, you know what it sounded like to me,
And we'll play the the music undernathing. But you know
what it sounded like to me, like he was trying
to say that this is not it's not Joe Biden's fault.
Anybody would have had a problem, okay, but not everybody's president.
Speaker 7 (02:31):
So I get that.
Speaker 2 (02:32):
Would any eighty six year old the answer would probably
be no, he shouldn't be president. But you're the guys
who put him up there, so you know that's that's
my issue.
Speaker 1 (02:43):
Cut ten A.
Speaker 8 (02:44):
Speaking of aging, there's this book that came out that
talks about Joe Biden and the people around him seeing
that he had cognitive and physical decline. Did you ever
have a moment with him where you thought maybe he
was unfit to run for the president.
Speaker 3 (03:03):
No.
Speaker 6 (03:04):
I thought he was a good president. The only concern
I thought he had to deal with was could anybody
do that job? Until they were eighty six and we
did several long talks. I had never seen him and
walked away thinking he can't do this anymore. He was
always on top.
Speaker 1 (03:24):
Of his brief You never saw any decline.
Speaker 6 (03:28):
So I didn't know anything about any of this, and
I haven't read the book. I saw President Biden not
very long ago, and I thought he was in good ship.
Speaker 2 (03:37):
Either he hasn't read the book, so he's doing a
denial denial there, and he talks about being eighty six
president like it's the choice of suit. The only problem
he had was what suit to choose in the morning.
Speaker 1 (03:48):
It was eighty six. Either or almost eighty six.
Speaker 3 (03:51):
Either Bill Clinton is losing his mind, which is possible, yeah,
or he's lying you didn't see any decline. Look again,
forget though he's a person in somebody's grandfather. It was obvious.
I mean, we saw the decline before he became president,
and as president it was like going down the big
hill on the roller coaster.
Speaker 2 (04:11):
And this was an interview on CBS, and then what
they try to say was, well, how do you reconcile
what you're saying basically to the book that it was
written by Jake Tapper and the Axios reporter. And he
basically said, I didn't want to read it. And he
can tell you why cut eleven A.
Speaker 8 (04:30):
Why didn't you read the book?
Speaker 6 (04:31):
I didn't want to because he's not president anymore. And
I think he did a good job. And I think
we are facing challenges today without president in our history,
and some people are trying to use this as a
(04:51):
way to blame him for the fact that Trump was reelected.
Speaker 7 (04:55):
It is his fault, absolutely, I mean, what the hell, Bill.
Speaker 2 (05:00):
I mean, I didn't read it because he wasn't president
more so, therefore it has no validity anymore.
Speaker 7 (05:04):
You know that is that is utter a bulb believe.
Speaker 3 (05:08):
Well, it's like plausible deniability. If I read the book
that I'll have to admit that Joe Biden.
Speaker 7 (05:13):
I don't want to know about.
Speaker 1 (05:13):
If I close my eyes, it didn't happen.
Speaker 3 (05:15):
By the way, just to let you know, I also
haven't read the Bible. That's why I don't think adultery
is wrong. I mean, that's come on, please, jeez Wese.
I mean, and by the way, again, you don't need
to read the book. All you needed to do was
paid attention for the last four years. Four years. Yeah.
Speaker 2 (05:31):
Yeah, But then the Democrats are doing and their water
carriers in the mainstream media are doing what they always
do when they think that there was they did something inexcusable,
they turn around and try to blame the Republicans.
Speaker 1 (05:45):
For it, and they're doing that here.
Speaker 2 (05:48):
They're now trying to persuade people that while Biden's mental
decline was not an issue that President Trump's is. This
is Simone Sanders on ms B Tree, MSNBC trying to
suggest that no one knows who's really running the Trump
White House, because you know, we don't know if it's
(06:08):
Trump or not cut twenty two.
Speaker 9 (06:10):
I have to ask who was actually making the decisions,
who was actually.
Speaker 1 (06:13):
Running the country. Everybody wants to say Joe Biden was
running the country.
Speaker 8 (06:16):
I know for a fact, you know, like.
Speaker 9 (06:17):
Read his President's Daily Brief.
Speaker 1 (06:18):
He was engaged in the meeting, He asked questions that
he gave directives.
Speaker 10 (06:21):
Donald Truck can't even get to it, can't even won't even.
Speaker 2 (06:23):
Bother to read that bad Now, that's why why is
she doing that? Why she because it's not just about
Biden being non compassmentus while in off it's it's the
question now about the auto pen, and that is somebody
hit the go button on the auto pen and had
President Biden's signature on a lot of stuff that we're
(06:47):
not really quite sure whether that's he knew about it
or not. And one of the reasons why we say
that is here is Speaker Johnson. Last January, he was
on something called the Fruit Press and he was talking
about how Biden didn't remember signing an executive order.
Speaker 1 (07:05):
Cut thirty two, Sir.
Speaker 11 (07:07):
Why did you pause LNG exports to Europe? Like I
don't understand. You know, liquified natural gas is in great
demand by our allies. Why would you do that because
you understand we just talked about Ukraine. You understand your
fuel in Vladimir Putin's war machine because they got to
get their gas from him, you know. And he looks
at me, stunned with this, and he said, I didn't.
I didn't do that. And I said, miss President, you yes,
(07:29):
you did. It was an executive order, like you know,
three weeks ago, and he goes, no, I didn't do that,
and he's arguing with me. He genuinely did not know
what he had signed.
Speaker 2 (07:36):
That's that's the issue, and it has direct implications on
things like executive orders, as Speaker Johnson was talking about,
or pardons, and in this cut, Peter Doucey from Fox
is asking White House Press Secretary Carolyn Lovett if the
Trump administration is putting forth that only pardons signed by
Biden himself are legitimate, because it would appear that most
(07:59):
of them were signed by the autopen cut thirty.
Speaker 12 (08:02):
When you look at these last minute Biden pardons, the
big ones, Biden siblings Fauci January sixth Committee right, most
of the big ones had the same, very neat signature.
We would expect that probably to be the auto pen.
There is one that looks different. It looks authentic. In fact,
(08:23):
if you look at the last name, it almost looks
like the President was having a hard time spelling his
last name. There is this White House of the opinion
that the only pardon that would count is one that
the president signed himself.
Speaker 13 (08:36):
Very interesting, very interesting props. If you want to bring
them to my office later so I can take a
closer look, I would like to do that. The President
is making a good point when he discusses the usage
of the autopen. Who was running the country for the
past four years. Perhaps those documents were signed with the autopen.
Something that this I believe the Department of Justice is
(08:57):
looking into. As you saw Ed Martin made an announcement
the Department of Justice this morning to launch an investigation
because the American people deserve answers.
Speaker 1 (09:06):
So they're looking into it. But here's the thing.
Speaker 7 (09:10):
The auto pen.
Speaker 2 (09:11):
The president is allowed to use the autopen or the
staff can use the autopen at the president's direction. Those
are the rules were around the auto pen. But in
this case, it doesn't appear that President Biden gave any
direction to use it. First of all, you had that
moment with Speaker Johnson doesn't even know that that executive
order was signed. And two I have a montage of Biden.
Speaker 1 (09:33):
Basically.
Speaker 2 (09:34):
These are cuts are from twenty twenty one through twenty
twenty four, referencing how his staff controls him, not the
other way around.
Speaker 1 (09:41):
Cut thirty one.
Speaker 14 (09:42):
I'm sorry, I'm going to get in trouble with staff.
I don't do this the right way. Now, I'm going
to get in trouble with my staff. Yeah, go ahead,
but pretend that you didn't answer you my.
Speaker 10 (09:51):
A lot of taking any questions.
Speaker 15 (09:56):
Anybody here, you know.
Speaker 14 (10:00):
Oh, and I got to be president. I get to
do things that I want to do, but my staff
tells me what I can't do.
Speaker 1 (10:05):
Yeah, wow, yeah exactly.
Speaker 3 (10:09):
By the way, this couldn't be worse if Steve Erkele
was the president. Did I do that? Can I do that? Yeah?
Who sawned this executive order? Can I do that?
Speaker 1 (10:19):
Well? And then he was just he was.
Speaker 2 (10:21):
He stuck his head up out of the basement this
past week and he was in a to do some
memoral day stop up in Delaware and he got caught
in a media scrum and he was asked about his
mental and physical health cut number twelve.
Speaker 9 (10:33):
There's also been a lot of discussion recently about your mental,
mental and physical capabilities while you were in office.
Speaker 14 (10:39):
You can see that I'm mentally incompetent and I can't walk,
and I can beat the hell out of both of them.
Speaker 9 (10:44):
Do you want to reply to any of those reports?
And also to the fact that there are some Democrats
who are now questioning whether you should have run for
reelection in the first place.
Speaker 14 (10:54):
Run against me that.
Speaker 3 (10:57):
Because they'd have beaten it.
Speaker 2 (10:59):
Okay, does any of that make you feel better about
Joe Biden?
Speaker 1 (11:02):
Seriously make you feel bad about Joe Biden in office?
Any of it?
Speaker 2 (11:06):
You know? Oh?
Speaker 1 (11:06):
Yeah, I'm mentally incompetent. Yeah, I could beat them all.
What why didn't they run? It's like, oh my god.
Speaker 3 (11:12):
Yeah, But here's the thing, And of course he did
drop out and eventually Kamala became the candidate. But look,
you got beat I mean not you specifically because you
didn't run directly against Donald Trump, but your whole administration,
your whole everything, your agenda, all the stuff that you
(11:33):
were that got carried over to Kamala for the last
handful of months. You got beat by Donald Trump. Who
cares if you you could have beat some third wing
Democrat who decided to run at the last minute, which,
of course, by the way, we all know damn well,
if any Democrat jumped out of the woodwork and said
I'm gonna run against the incumbent president, that democrat would
(11:55):
have been hung up by his toenails on Capitol Hill.
So nobody was gonna do it. For Joe to say, well,
they should have run against me, they've learned their lesson
over the Nobody was going to run against you because
you don't do that. So it's easy to say after
the fact, will they should have run against me? I
would have beat them? Well, I don't know. Maybe you
(12:15):
wouldn't have. But Kamalak, who was your choice, your right
hand woman, couldn't beat Donald Trump, which, by extension, you
couldn't beat Donald Trump. So who cares what you may
or may not have been able to beat In some
fantasy democratic primary.
Speaker 2 (12:31):
Well, that's a very good point, I have to say.
But you know this, the auto pen thing is going
to turn into a huge scandal, and who was in
control of the White House is becoming a massive question.
And even with that, the Trump administration is a little
busy right now, has focusing on other things. So they've
turned you know, the Department of Justice will look into
(12:52):
the auto pen and President Biden's decline. Meanwhile, the Trump
administration is having to focus on things like Crawt's trying
to make ICE officers the enemy even when they're you know,
trying to bring in a murderer.
Speaker 1 (13:08):
And you heard this in the open.
Speaker 2 (13:11):
This is Bill Millusion of Fox reporting on ICE having
to pull off a surveillance of a murderer.
Speaker 1 (13:17):
Cut one hundred.
Speaker 5 (13:19):
Then in a second incident yesterday, I says they were
surveilling a murderer's home in their car when a crowd
surrounded their vehicle, blew their cover and they had to
pull off the target again a murderer.
Speaker 3 (13:31):
Wow.
Speaker 2 (13:31):
Yeah, And here's an activist who was there, one of
the people that caused that crowd and having them to
let go a murderer. He's a social media post from
an activist telling people to show up and block ICE.
Speaker 1 (13:44):
Cut one hundred a ICE.
Speaker 16 (13:46):
Just tried to abduct a bunch of kids and parents
right here at Somerville High School, and so many community
members showed up that ICE just left. Remember, you are
the major power in your community. If you show up
with people you trust, you can protect kids, You can
protect families. So form information networks, know where ICE is
(14:06):
in your community, and show up.
Speaker 3 (14:08):
They will just leave.
Speaker 16 (14:10):
They are not brave enough to steal kids when an
entire community comes around to protect them.
Speaker 3 (14:16):
So show up for the kids.
Speaker 1 (14:18):
Yeah, here's the thing. Here's what's happening.
Speaker 2 (14:20):
Nobody was showing up to kidnap parents and children. That's
not what happens.
Speaker 1 (14:24):
Here's what happens.
Speaker 2 (14:25):
Sanctuary cities, which you know Somerville is, which Cambridge is,
and many you know Massachusetts is a sanctuary state. They
have these policies whereby if an ICE a law enforcement
officer shows up at the courthouse with a warrant a
detainer for somebody who's been arrested, who's in legal alien,
(14:47):
the courts and with the support of the governor and
the local mayors will not turn that person over to
legal law enforcement who have warrants to arrest that person
for usually a crime.
Speaker 1 (14:59):
So this is what happens.
Speaker 2 (15:00):
So because they're not getting them in a nice, safe
environment where they're already in custody, they're let go by
the courts, they go back into the community, and now
ICE is now forced because of those sanctuary policies, to
go into the community to find them in a much
more dangerous situation. And what happens on top of that
is that if they happen across another illegal alien when
(15:23):
they're not looking for, but one that happens to be
an illegal alien, whether they have a criminal record or not,
they scoop them up too, because they've already told everybody,
if we come across you, even by mistake, and you're illegal,
we're taking you. Whereas if you just give us the
guys we're looking for, we're not in the communities and we're.
Speaker 1 (15:38):
Not going to pick you up by mistake. But they
don't do it.
Speaker 2 (15:41):
So what happened is in Massachusetts, in particular, a eighteen
year old guy was on his way to volleyball high
school volleyball practice. He's a junior at high school. Why
he's a junior at high school and he's eighteen. I
don't know, but he is, and he's going off to
and ICE wants his dad. They have a warrant for
their dad, and instead of turning the dad over, they
(16:01):
had to go looking for him and they see the dad.
The car registered to the dad was being driven by
the son on his way to volleyball practice with some
other kids in the car, so they stop him. They
discover he too is an illegal alien, and they take
him into custody. But all of a sudden, they're kidnapping
this guy. And by the way, the kid is still
in The eighteen year old is still in custody.
Speaker 7 (16:20):
His father knows that the ICE was.
Speaker 1 (16:22):
Looking for him.
Speaker 2 (16:23):
Has the father gone to turn himself in to get
his kid out, No, he hasn't, So the kid is
still still in being held because he too isn't illegal.
This is ICE Acting director Todd Lyons who is who
is asked about this about this particular arrest over the
weekend cut one oh five.
Speaker 17 (16:42):
They made a traffic stop on that vehicle, which was
the father's vehicle. He was driving that vehicle. But like
any local law enforcement officer, if you encounter someone that
has a warrant or like I said, is here illegally,
we will take action on that. It happens every day,
every day, doesn't There are multiple eighteen year olds arrested,
but yet we are focused on this one. And I
will say, his dad hasn't turned himself in yet, and
(17:03):
his dad knows he's the target of it.
Speaker 3 (17:05):
Yeah, so yeah, what I was gonna say is, I mean,
the whole argument, or part of the argument people are
making is well, he was just driving his dad's car.
And right, So here's the thing. Let's just change the
scenario a tiny bit for our brand new movie we're doing.
So Dad is a wanted rapist, murderer, whatever. Dad's gonna
(17:29):
warrant out for some some crime he did. So Junior
borrows the car. Junior is driving down the street. Junior
gets stopped and has a bunch of cocaine and a
couple of guns on him. Junior's gonna get arrested even
though they weren't looking for Junior, because they were looking
for Dad. Dad wasn't there and Junior was breaking the law.
So you know, take the immigration icing on the cake, right, Well,
(17:53):
take all the immigration stuff out of it, and just
imagine they were looking for a murderer and they found
a kid who was the murderer's son, and he had
all kinds of guns and weapons and drugs on him.
They're going to arrest him. Nobody's going to I wouldn't
see a protest going. He wasn't the target. Let him
go with his guns and his drugs. So this is
(18:14):
we're looking for one criminal. We weren't looking for this guy.
But oh, by the way, he was here I legally,
so we're taking him. So I don't I don't get well,
there is a valuable lesson here by the way you
write this down. Don't borrow your dad's car. Yeah, that's it.
Speaker 1 (18:29):
Yeah, absolutely positively.
Speaker 2 (18:31):
And the other thing is, you know, if you live
in a city with sanctuary policies, I think you need
to start standing up and saying stop this when you're
creating a public safety issue. One people who don't have
a criminal warrant, who may be here illegally, are going
to get scooped up while they look for the ones
to too, because you are hiding them in the middle
of It's kind of like the terrorists in the Middle
(18:52):
East to hide among civilians and then everybody's horrified when
the civilians get killed. I am horrified too. But here's
a problem. It's not the fault of the people who
drop the bombs. It is the fault of the people
who hit among them. And that's what you have here.
You have basically the bad guys hiding among people who
aren't so bad, and everybody's getting caught up in him.
And this is explained a little bit by the Ice
(19:15):
Field director Patricia Hyde. This is about that Milford team
cut one oh six.
Speaker 15 (19:19):
He was not the target of the investigation, but, like
we have repeatedly said, sanctuary policies put us in a
position to go out into communities. Unfortunately, we had to
go to Milford to look for someone else and we
came across him and he was arrested.
Speaker 8 (19:32):
He's eighteen years old.
Speaker 15 (19:33):
He's unlawfully in this country.
Speaker 2 (19:35):
So what is the order of the Democrats response to this?
Instead of saying, Okay, we'll help you get the bad
guys so we can we can at least protect the
people who are haven't done anything wrong except they're here illegally,
so maybe we can try to find a way to
legalize them.
Speaker 1 (19:48):
But will help you get the bad guys out? Do
they do that? No? You know what they do.
Speaker 2 (19:51):
This is Hakeem Jeffries, Minority Leader, House Minority Leader, Hakim Jeffries.
He has a press conference and he vows to what
get the bag uh huh, identify I e. Docs every
single ICE agent that is on the streets. In other words,
put them in fear of their life and in danger
cut eighteen.
Speaker 18 (20:11):
Every single ICE agent who's engaged in this aggressive overreach
and am trying to hide their identities from the American
people will be unsuccessful in doing that. This is America,
so not the Soviet Union. We're not behind the Iron curtain.
(20:34):
This is not the nineteen thirties. And every single one
of them, no matter what it takes, no matter how
long it takes, will of course be identified.
Speaker 3 (20:43):
That in fact is the law.
Speaker 7 (20:46):
These are undercover agents.
Speaker 18 (20:50):
We're gonna make sure that the American people have the
transparency necessary to hold people accountable when they're folks who
cross the line here in America.
Speaker 9 (21:07):
That's what's going to happen.
Speaker 1 (21:09):
It's rich to hear a Democrat talking about transparency enforced.
Speaker 3 (21:12):
People could insist on doing your job, We're going to
have to have you killed.
Speaker 1 (21:16):
Yeah, basically that's what he did.
Speaker 3 (21:17):
The hell is that, you know what, you know what
he said, it's not the nineteen thirties. But you know,
the first thing I thought is, of course, back in
the day, back in Prohibition and back when al Capone
was running the world and everything else, right, a lot
of these organizations and it still happens today, but a
lot of these organizations back then, they were paying off everybody, right,
the judges, the cops, the whoever. If you were a
(21:38):
cop and you didn't want to take the payment and
you wanted to be a cop, you were going to
end up dead in the Chicago River. And this is
kind of that, Hey you don't want to play our game,
We're coming for you. That come on.
Speaker 2 (21:49):
Yeah, So the Democrats have set up a system where
it's those that enforce the law that are to blame
as opposed to those that break the law. And we
saw that actually on another level, not with immigration, but
with Elon musk In in heading up Doge. You know
that's it was. It was pretty bad. And he says
(22:12):
that and he's now left. He has left now. He
says that it was time to go because he was only.
Speaker 1 (22:20):
There as a as a what is it, a.
Speaker 2 (22:23):
Short term guy? You know, they he's independent contractors.
Speaker 3 (22:28):
With the government, temporary employee.
Speaker 2 (22:30):
Well, yeah, independent contractors, temporary employees can only uh, with
the federal government can only do a four month stint
because after that you have to hire them as a
full time So he's he's basically done his his four
month stint stint. So that's you know, that's where he is.
But he talks about how he felt that people were
(22:51):
turning Doge into the whipping boy for all of their frustrations,
all of their and particularly he means the Democrats for
their frustrations about losing power and so forth.
Speaker 1 (23:01):
Cut fourteen.
Speaker 19 (23:02):
You've spoken about how much of a grind in the
stress it was on you, and you know, Tesla's reputation
took a hit. Your reputation took a hit. People are
very upset about security and national parks and air traffic
and food safety and cancer research all the time of
the research. Now that you've had a chance to look
at it, Yeah, might there have been a different approach.
Speaker 10 (23:28):
Yeah, I think the I mean what was saying to
happen was that, like, uh, it's a bit unfair because
like Doge became the whooping boy for everything. So if
there was some cut real or imagined. Everyone would blame
those I've had people think that like somehow doge is
going to stop them from getting their Social Security check,
which is completely untrue.
Speaker 2 (23:48):
Yeah, among other things. And it's gone so far that
Chuck Schumer, Senator Schumer from New York, he's here, He's
going to be on MSNBC. He demands that Musk apologize
to the American people for finding fraud Cut thirteen A.
Speaker 20 (24:02):
He says he's in a bind. The American people are
in a bind because of what Musk did his DOGE,
which you know, didn't go It didn't do as much
as he wanted it to do, but still did huge
amounts of damage in terms of the firing of employees,
the decimation of agencies like health care, like going after
(24:26):
making sure drugs and food is safe, nuclear energy is safe,
the FAA we need to bolster, and he I believe
they put a freeze on it. They didn't hire new people.
Over and over again. What Musk did with his DOGE
is going to cause lasting damage to the American people.
And just saying now he's out of the administration and
(24:46):
he's in a bind.
Speaker 3 (24:48):
That's ridiculous.
Speaker 20 (24:48):
He ought to be apologizing to the American people for
what he has done, if for some reason he sees
the light. I don't know if he does or not,
but that's what we need. An apology and him to
tell Trump to undo the damage that he has done.
Speaker 2 (25:02):
We need an apology from Schumer for lying about Joe
Biden for four years?
Speaker 1 (25:05):
How about that?
Speaker 2 (25:06):
And to say that the administration agencies were decimated is
bizarre because less than one percent of employees were fired. Nobody,
nobody decimated any of the agencies.
Speaker 7 (25:18):
He ferreted out.
Speaker 2 (25:18):
Fraud, for God's sakes, and for that, humor is domating
that he apologized. Meanwhile, they're not just attacking him for
what they the lies that they're saying. They're now making
up crap about Hey, did you know that Elon Musk
was a drug user? Cut number six?
Speaker 1 (25:34):
Please?
Speaker 16 (25:35):
Were you aware of Elon Mussin's regular drug use?
Speaker 6 (25:39):
No?
Speaker 14 (25:39):
I was.
Speaker 21 (25:40):
I think he's fantastic. I think Elon is a fantastic guy.
And I hold by these support not troubled.
Speaker 3 (25:47):
By anything with Elon.
Speaker 21 (25:48):
I think he's fantastic. Did a great job, and you know,
doge continues and by the time it's finished, you will
have numbers that will knock the shops off.
Speaker 1 (25:57):
It's gonna be uh.
Speaker 21 (25:58):
He did a fantastic yeah, and he didn't need it.
Speaker 2 (26:01):
He didn't need to do it. He didn't need it.
He didn't need And so the question becomes was he
leaving because his four month tenure was up at DOGE
or was he just sick of the bleep? And one
could hardly blame him. He was asked about that by
Peter Doocey when he was in the Oval Office with
President Trump.
Speaker 1 (26:18):
Cut three please.
Speaker 12 (26:19):
The President mentioned that you had to deal with all
the slings and arrows during your time at DOGE.
Speaker 4 (26:23):
There's this other people, you know, some of the media
reporganizations in this room with the slingers.
Speaker 3 (26:28):
Well, so.
Speaker 12 (26:30):
There is a New York Times before today that accuses
you of blurring way between.
Speaker 10 (26:35):
Is the New York Times?
Speaker 4 (26:36):
Is that the same publication that got a Pulitzer Prize
for a false recording on the Russia Gate? Is it
the same organization?
Speaker 3 (26:46):
Blitzer?
Speaker 4 (26:47):
What Bulletzer counter is?
Speaker 6 (26:50):
So?
Speaker 4 (26:50):
I think they I think the judge just ruled against
New York Times for their lies about the Russia Gate
hoax and that they might have to give back that
Fulitzer Prize that New York Times.
Speaker 1 (27:00):
Let's move on a little snarky. I don't blame him.
He's getting a little snarky there.
Speaker 3 (27:06):
I think you can well, you know, it's pretty good.
I'm gonna have to work on my lines because I
would like a Pulitzer and I just probably haven't lied enough.
Speaker 1 (27:13):
No, I think that's right. I think that's right.
Speaker 3 (27:15):
Don't they have awards for for fiction writing. I'm sure
that's maybe what they should have got. I don't know
what's called because I don't read, so how would I know,
But uh, yeah, it's god.
Speaker 2 (27:26):
Yeah, I think I think Elon's, you know, working on
his last nerve right here after everybody's attacking.
Speaker 3 (27:31):
And by the way, if he wasn't on drugs, he
should be there. Yeah, I would be on drugs.
Speaker 2 (27:35):
Well, what he is doing, unfortunately, is that you know.
And now that he's escaped DC, he's getting a little
nasty in tweets regarding things that Congress is doing.
Speaker 1 (27:46):
Like he called the.
Speaker 2 (27:47):
Big Beautiful Bill, which has gone through the House and
is now it's now in the Senate, an abomination because
it didn't go far enough as far as he's concerned,
and it there's still a lot of spending in it,
and so that's a little bit of a divergence for
him from President Trump. In fact, again Peter Doocy, who's
(28:08):
been on fire this week, was asking Caroline Lovett about
it cut twelve.
Speaker 12 (28:12):
See how mad do you think President Trump is going
to be when he finds out that Elon Musk said,
I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous,
pork filled congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame
on those who voted for it. You know you did wrong.
Speaker 14 (28:26):
You know it.
Speaker 13 (28:28):
Look, the President already knows where Elon Musk stood on
this bill. It doesn't change the president's opinion. This is
one big, beautiful bill and he's sticking to it.
Speaker 2 (28:36):
Yeah, but you know, there's a little bit so people
are thinking, is there is the honeymoon over? I don't know.
Speaker 3 (28:42):
I think I think Elon Musk will still get a
Christmas card from the White House.
Speaker 1 (28:48):
I think you will. So, I think you will.
Speaker 3 (28:49):
It's okay everybody, So I think so.
Speaker 2 (28:52):
But I think there was also an example this week
of a cut that just reminded us what we could
have almost had last November. This is Tim Way on
a Grounded podcast saying his son told him that the
reason why young men didn't vote Democrat this past election is,
you know, for giggles cut sixteen A.
Speaker 22 (29:10):
I say this because I'm proud to say it looks
like as of next Tuesday, I'm going to have a
high school graduate with my son, Gus, and he's pretty
in tune to this. But when he said this, he said, Dad,
a lot of these young guys especially, said that they're
not voting on the policy issues, and he wasn't dissing them.
He said, they may know the policy issues, but most
of them don't. They're doing it because there's a sense
of excitement, a sense of thrill in this. It's entertainment
(29:32):
or whatever. We all dismiss that Donald Trump's a clown.
You know, Donald Trump's rallies are a clown. This mma
fighting stuff and this, you know, and look, you start
veering into the Andrew Tate stuff, which is is dangerous
misogyny and you know, assault issues and all of that,
but there's a peripheral side of that that that is
not criminal, but is still going down the same road
(29:53):
of saying you've got a place to belong And I
think this is me just pontificating for what it's worth.
Social media and other things have disc connected people more
than they were.
Speaker 3 (30:01):
We were more connected in my generation.
Speaker 22 (30:03):
It was easier to be a kid when I was
growing up. And I've always said this as a teacher,
if you don't give a kid a place to belong,
they'll go find one.
Speaker 2 (30:10):
Yeah, I think more along lines of people looked at
Kamala Harris and Tim Wilson realized that stupidity was the
name of the game, right. I just didn't want to
go there.
Speaker 3 (30:17):
Well, there's two there's two sides of that. There's that.
But I do agree with Tim Walls. Look, social media
has obviously changed the world that we live in. The
one that yeah, that was stupid.
Speaker 2 (30:27):
Part of his comments, part of his comment is that
people voted for Forgivebs.
Speaker 3 (30:30):
Well that's what I'm saying. I mean, like, I can
disagree with Tim Walls and also agree with him when
he says something that I agree with, which was there
at the end. But here's the here's the thing. I
the thing that I picked up because I pick up
stupid things out of people people commenting should we should
Kamlo Harris have done some m m A, maybe some
some mixed martial arts to pick up the some support
(30:52):
he was talking about m m A. Right, Yeah, So
I just wondered if would that would that have helped her?
Should she have I don't know.
Speaker 1 (30:58):
I don't think so.
Speaker 3 (30:59):
Should she have m made.
Speaker 1 (31:01):
Anything she could have done.
Speaker 2 (31:03):
I appreciate you being creative and thinking outside the box.
I try to do that, but I think I think
she's like, well, she was done.
Speaker 3 (31:09):
She was damaged goods out of the gate.
Speaker 2 (31:11):
Because she's never won an election that was anything bigger
than her state election for.
Speaker 3 (31:16):
Whatever it is, even a private and I know, I
know the race issue played into like why people wanted
her in, the gender issue and all that, but the
reality is she came. First of all, she was pushed
out of the gate because Joe Biden couldn't get out
of the gate, and then she had a very short
period of time, which does affect this. I mean, I'm
not saying they would have voted for Kamala Harris if
she had three years to prepare, but you know, look
(31:36):
they looked at her and went, what the heck is this?
I don't think it was so much what Tim Walls
was basically alluding to her record one no look she
it was bad from start to finish. And you can
throw in in the middle of that whole story of Kamala,
Kamala Wall's, Kamala Walls, Kamala Harris's failure to win the
White House. In that big story of Kamala Harris, there
(31:58):
are so many sub lots you can put in about
why people didn't vote for her, aside from the fact
that they just didn't like her. I mean that, I
think that right there is part of the reason she
didn't win, on top of the three hundred and seventy
three thousand other reasons they didn't vote for her.
Speaker 1 (32:14):
I agree with you.
Speaker 2 (32:16):
So we end every week with a truth or troll
these days, and we have yet again President Trump, because
let's face it, he is the king of the trolls.
Ande Well, yes, in this particular cut, he's in the
Oval office and he's asked by again Peter Doocey, who
asked President Trump if he has some marital advice for
(32:37):
French President Emmanuel lacrou after he was bitch slapped by
his wife in public and publicly humidiated, humiliated, and it
gave an interesting response cut for this week, there.
Speaker 12 (32:48):
Was a video on morda Plane that showed the First
Lady of France slapping her husband Emmanuel mccron. Do you
have any world leaders, world leader marital life.
Speaker 23 (33:03):
Make sure the door remains close. I spoke to him
and he's he's fine. They're fine. They're two really good people.
I know him very well, and I don't know what
that was all about. But I know him very well
and they're fine.
Speaker 1 (33:23):
So close the door. No, was he was?
Speaker 17 (33:26):
He?
Speaker 1 (33:26):
Really? Was he trolling me? Crow there? Do you think?
Speaker 6 (33:29):
Well?
Speaker 3 (33:29):
I think I think closing the door is a good idea,
but I don't know. And a lot of times I
do think I know, but I don't know. Look, here's
the thing about the whole slap anyway, And any guy
who's been married for any amount of time, if you're
deeply in love with your wife, I mean, if she
hates you, then hitting you is probably a part of
(33:50):
her agenda. But like my wife, for example, we have
a relationship. I make fun of her, I poke fun
at her, I say stupid things, I do stupid things,
kind of like on the show, and occasionally she'll give
me a whack, like not get off kind.
Speaker 1 (34:01):
Of thing, and he'll give you a whack well.
Speaker 3 (34:04):
You know, on the shoulder or the arm. I mean,
she's not punching me the face.
Speaker 1 (34:07):
Well, I think that's different than slapping somebody in the face.
Speaker 3 (34:09):
No, I understand, but I'm just saying, you know, maybe
it was for show.
Speaker 2 (34:13):
I think that you don't slap somebody in the face
for show. That's you may you may knock him in
the arm, just like you were talking about for that's
that's different. That's not giving somebody a whack. That's tapping you,
slapping them in the face when there's.
Speaker 1 (34:24):
A press corps outside.
Speaker 3 (34:25):
That was either that's dumb.
Speaker 7 (34:27):
That's either stupid or very calculated.
Speaker 2 (34:30):
Because she was so angry with him, she wanted to
hurt him and so but I think Trump going, you know, yeah,
close the door.
Speaker 3 (34:36):
Or maybe she didn't. Maybe she didn't want to hurt
him as much as she she wanted to put on
a show.
Speaker 2 (34:41):
Well, I don't think she was many was hauling off
to give him stitches.
Speaker 3 (34:44):
I think she was.
Speaker 2 (34:45):
I don't think she's giving him a show because he
had a lot of backpedaling to do after that. It
was I think I think she was really angry, and
I can honestly say I've been very angry with my husband.
I've never hit him, not ever, nor has he ever
hit me. I mean, you don't hit somebody even the
I mean, obviously ever, you don't hit them period. So
it's I don't care if it's in the face or
whatever else. What you were talking about was tapping.
Speaker 6 (35:06):
You call the.
Speaker 2 (35:07):
Wapping, Yeah, but it's but no, you don't hit people ever.
And it's and in this particular case, I think Donald
Trump was trolling my wells.
Speaker 1 (35:17):
My guess, well, I do.
Speaker 3 (35:18):
I do too, I guess you know, at that level,
and you know from listening to the show, I'll make
funny comments that I'm not really one hundred percent serious about,
just just just for for showmanship. I think him saying
you should shut the door is kind of a control. Yeah.
Speaker 1 (35:34):
Well, you can agree with this or not agree with this.
You can.
Speaker 2 (35:37):
You can tell Ben and I on X if you
think we're right it's a troll. You can contact us
at uh at news Byte three that's where our handle
is on X or on Facebook at news Byte. We
upload a new episode every single.
Speaker 3 (35:51):
By the way, I got to interrupted here, who's got
news Bite, news Byte one and news Byte two.
Speaker 1 (35:56):
I don't know. I don't know the answer to that question,
but we don't. We have him for years, So there
you go.
Speaker 2 (36:02):
We upload a new episode every single Monday, so you
can check back next week and see what new offerings
we have and we'll have a great week. And whatever
you do, you know, don't hit your wife or a
husband in front of a press corps.
Speaker 1 (36:13):
Hit him anywhere else, then you'll get trolled by Donald Trump.
I'm Nancy Shack. This is news Bite
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
Ridiculous History
History is beautiful, brutal and, often, ridiculous. Join Ben Bowlin and Noel Brown as they dive into some of the weirdest stories from across the span of human civilization in Ridiculous History, a podcast by iHeartRadio.