December 5, 2024 • 36 mins
Ryan exposes the fraudulent panacea of 'gender-affirming care' for confused children suffering from gender dysphoria, as offered by proponents of the trans ideology. It never delivers, it always disappoints, and it sets up for pure misery and despair at the expense of those preyed upon by an industry hell-bent on selling hope in the form of gender reassignment surgeries and hormone blockers that mutilate the bodies of adolescents.
We are entering a new age of common sense, shedding the remnants of woke cancel culture - and we on the political right have the winning hand on this issue. So let's play it, not fold it.
We are entering a new age of common sense, shedding the remnants of woke cancel culture - and we on the political right have the winning hand on this issue. So let's play it, not fold it.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
What do you say to physicians who are sensitive and
supportive of trans kids obviously don't want suicidal ideation, etc.
But wonder if there.
Speaker 2 (00:11):
Is enough data as of now to prove that it
is beneficial to allow these sort of treatments before the.
Speaker 1 (00:19):
Age of eighteen.
Speaker 3 (00:20):
So I would say three things. And the first is,
we have decades of both clinical experience and research data
showing that this is medical treatment that provides critical benefits
to adolescents who need it. And so this is not new,
This is not new medication.
Speaker 1 (00:36):
And so we have that information. We have long term.
Speaker 3 (00:38):
Studies that track people for five six years. The Supreme
Court this week are arguments for in an FDA case
which the FDA referred to long term as being six
months of follow up. Here we have years of follow up.
And so that's the first thing.
Speaker 1 (00:51):
It's the first thing. And Chase Strangio again saying with
great conviction there with Jake Tapper of CNN, welcome to
our two of Ryan Schuling Live. However, or Strangio seemed
to fold under the argument presented by Justice Samuel Alito
asking about the cast report from the United Kingdom showing
no evidence the trans treatment actually reduce the numbers of suicides.
Speaker 4 (01:20):
But on page one ninety five for the CAST report,
it says there is no evidence that gender affirmative treatments
reduce suicide.
Speaker 5 (01:31):
What I think that is referring to is there is
no evidence in the studies that this treatment reduces completed suicide.
And the reason for that completed suicide, Thankfully, and admittedly
it is rare, and we're talking about a very small
population of individuals with studies that don't necessarily have completed
suicides within them.
Speaker 1 (01:52):
So what about a suicide that goes halfway? Like you
only cut one risk? I mean, not trying to make
light of this other than to say, what now, were
changing the lingo, the terminology, the nomenclature a completed suicide.
So we go from the idea of a suicide to
the carrying out of a suicide to cutting to get attention,
(02:12):
which wasn't really a suicide. Well where are we drawing
the line here? Why is it moving completed suicide? I mean,
Chase Strangel loses all credibility with this.
Speaker 6 (02:22):
However, there are multiple studies, long term, longitudinal studies that
do show that there is a reduction in suicidality, which
I think is a positive outcome to this treatment.
Speaker 1 (02:35):
That's not what you told Jake Tapper. You backtracked when
faced with what justice Samuel Ledo came to the table with,
which was scientific proof and evidence. Suicide idality, suicide ideation,
I think is what Chase strangel is referring here. I mean,
that's a vague thing. Did I think about committing suicide?
(02:57):
Well now I'm not. I was, but now I'm not.
That is not a tangible, measurable thing about how you feel. Plus,
we've got to push pause here. This is all running
under the assumption that we can just switch out our parts,
like we're automobiles, like the transmission. We just take it
out and we put in a new V eight and
(03:19):
we run on that engine. God created us. And I
think we're getting away from God. And I don't mean
it just in a religious sense. I meet it in
a truly like creator sense. Whatever you believe in created
us the way that we are, Evolution, Mother Nature, whoever
you want to bow down to in all of this.
I have male parts, I would prostate I have things
(03:41):
that you cannot replicate, you cannot recreate, and even more convoluted,
someone that wants to become female. Let's just walk down
that path for a moment. There are phillopian tubes, there
are ovaries, there's a uterus, there's a unurin lining, there
are aids that come from the ovaries. I mean, I
took basic health by allology through my middle school, high school,
(04:02):
college years. That cannot be replicated, that cannot be duplicated,
that process. It is a mockery of science to suggest
that's even possible. It's not possible. You can present as
the opposite sex. You could maybe even have outer hardware
or an orifice that resembles the opposite sex. But again,
(04:26):
if you watch What Is a Woman Matt Walsh's powerful
breakthrough documentary, he doesn't just cast aspersions at trans people.
There is a genuine concern and I believe empathy when
he interviews a biological female who wanted a transition to
becoming a man. Made these promises, kind of like when
(04:47):
Pinocchio goes off to the land of you know, he
has all the candy and stall of you know, there's
all these wafty promises about what can be, what's possible
if you just transition, and it's all based on a lie,
and it falls flat. On its face, and it leads
to disappointment and despair. In large part, you cannot replicate
(05:08):
the human male penis and all of the nerve endings
and everything that goes into making that organ function sexually
and as an organ to excrete liquid waste. They grow
these things on forearms, on inner thighs. It is a convoluted,
very Frankenstein like process of medieval type medicine. And it's
(05:29):
based on a false premise. It's based on a lie
that people are told to try to assuage them, to
try to bring them comfort, but they're in a state
of shock and fear with their gender dysphoria, and they're
being sold a bill of goods that will never deliver.
It won't, it can't. Strangel continues, This is from his
(05:52):
interview with Jake Tapper on CNN.
Speaker 3 (05:55):
And then the second thing I would say is nobody
has to provide this medication to adolescents. These are not
doctors being forced to provide this medication. These are doctors
who are wanting to treat their patients in the best
way that they know how, based on the best available
evidence to us. And these are young people who may
have known since they were two years old exactly who
they are, who suffered for six seven years before they
(06:16):
had any relief. And what's happening here. It's not the
kids who are consenting to this treatment, it's the parents
who are consenting to the treatment. And as a parent,
I would say, we when our children are suffering, we
are suffering. And these are parents who love their children,
who are listening to the advice of their doctors, of
the mainstream medical community, and doing what's right for their kids.
In the state of Tennessee has displaced their judgment.
Speaker 1 (06:38):
Nobody who would do this to a child has a
judgment that should be trusted, whether that be a doctor
or a parent. This is child abuse. I'm done tiptoeing
around the tulips here. This is abusing and dismembering and
disfiguring a child. That's what this is. Now. I let
that play in its entirety because I wanted you to
hear it in full context. But did you hear the
(07:00):
pull away quote there? Let's go back to that Chase Strange.
Speaker 3 (07:02):
You these are young people who may have known since
they were two years old exactly who they are.
Speaker 1 (07:11):
Did you know anything at two years old? Are you
aware of anything at two years old. Do you have
any memories of being two years old? I don't. I
do not, let alone.
Speaker 3 (07:26):
These are young people who may have known since they
were two years old exactly who they are.
Speaker 1 (07:31):
You know exactly who you are at two. I didn't
know exactly who I was at twelve, at fifteen, at eighteen,
at twenty five, even I still in some ways maybe
don't know exactly who I am. You have a sense,
you have a notion, you have an understanding. You develop,
you gain experience and wisdom over time, and you think
(07:53):
you have an understanding. But when you think you have
it all figured out, life has a funny way of
humbling you and making you questions and everything and everybody
out there knows what I'm talking about. This is silly,
but it's dangerous to suggest that a two year old
knows exactly who they are. A two year old doesn't
know what to eat. You have to tell a two
(08:14):
year old not to put certain things in its mouth.
A two year old doesn't know its name a lot
of the time. A two year old cannot talk in
complete sentences. This is absolute insanity. Thank God for somebody
like Justice Samuel Alito.
Speaker 4 (08:33):
A question about the state of medical evidence at the
present time. In your petition you made a sweeping statement
which I will quote, overwhelming evidence establishes that the appropriate
gender affirming treatment with puberty blockers and hormones directly and
substantially improves the physical psychological well being of transgender adolescence
(08:57):
with gender dysphoria.
Speaker 1 (08:59):
That was in November twenty twenty three.
Speaker 4 (09:02):
Now, even before then, the Swedish National Board of Health
and Welfare wrote the phone they currently assess quote that
the risks of puberty blockers and gender affirming treatment are
likely to outweigh the expected benefits of these treatments, which
is directly contrary to the sweeping statement in your petition.
Speaker 1 (09:25):
The point he's making there is the point that I'm making,
which is the juice isn't worth the squeeze. In other words,
the end result what was being promised is this complete
and total panacea, a paradise where you can completely change
your gender and become the opposite gender, no strings attached.
(09:46):
That's not what happens here. The disappointment of having that
promise fall short, in addition to the mutilation to the
body that cannot be undone that cannot be reversed leads
again to despair and depression. And here to testify about
it is somebody who has gone through it. Katie Lennon,
(10:09):
unfortunately from Lowell, Massachusetts, where it doesn't surprise me, one
of the bluest states in the nation, expressing this regret
and telling her harrowing tale about de transitioning now still
with a voice that sounds masculine, a.
Speaker 7 (10:24):
D transitioner, and I live in Lowell, but I work,
worship and do business in Nashua, and so I'm an
active community member of the six oh three, and I'm
here in support of SB two seventy two today. So,
like many children and teens today, I identified myself as
transgender for years, and when I started to feel confused
and ashamed about my developing body, I asked everyone in
my life to call me by a new name and
(10:45):
use male pronouns to refer to me. So, in other words,
I went through a social transition from female to male.
Everyone in my life immediately affirmed my new identity, either
out of full support for it or just to stay
neutral and not cause any issues. The constant affirmation both
at if I passive, solidified me in my transgender identity.
No one meant to lock me into an identity that
(11:05):
would later leave me broken or shamed and more confused
than before.
Speaker 1 (11:08):
They were really all just being nice.
Speaker 7 (11:10):
But the social transition eventually wasn't enough, and I soon
felt I needed to take testosterone, and when that wasn't enough,
I had a double missectomy, And when that still wasn't enough,
I had a total hysterectomy, including the removal of my uterus, cervix,
fallopian tubes, and both ovaries. There's no point of contentment
during a gender transition.
Speaker 1 (11:29):
We get fleeting.
Speaker 7 (11:29):
Moments of euphoria, but ultimately one step leads straight into
the next.
Speaker 1 (11:33):
And I thought that in the end I.
Speaker 7 (11:34):
Could really become a man, but all I became was
a mutilated and abused version of my old self. Social
transition is a big deal, and we're lying when we
say that any of this is reversible one percent.
Speaker 1 (11:45):
And my heart breaks for Katie Lennon, and I wish
Katie the very best in her life going forward. But
it's a point of no return, and Katie speaks to
that this enabling and affirming of what is gender dysphoria
is damaging in and of itself. You were enabling a fantasy.
You are trying to affirm a fantasy that cannot be realized.
(12:07):
Not really, not truly, not fully. The mutilation just led
to more mutilation for Katie. Another key scientific fact here, Katie,
a biological female, was never going to naturally produce testosterone
in her own body. Therefore, she would become addicted to
(12:28):
the treatments of testosterone and moreover, addicted to the payments
for those treatments of testosterone from the medical community. That
is taking full advantage of people who have a mental
illness gender dysphoria, that needs to be treated, that needs
to be counseled, There needs to be therapy, And it
(12:49):
might be that as an adult one concludes, I'm just
more comfortable living my life and presenting as the opposite gender,
and I'm going to go through all this. But you
make that decision as an adult, fully aware of the
concert quench's and fully aware of the point of no return.
But that's not what Katie Lendon was promised. Katie was
promised that if you just have this one more surgery,
if you just keep taking testosterone, you will really be
(13:10):
a man. You'll be a real man. And it always
fell short, and the disappointment led to bleak despair. As
far as these parents who affirm, and many of them
are Hollywood nuts from the land of fruit and Nuts, California,
that Chase Strangio references here, how about a nut betting
(13:31):
And listen to what she says in referring to a
transgender child of her own.
Speaker 8 (13:37):
I think the greatest gift of my life is to
have kids, and to have a transgender child has made
me so much more interesting, so much more wise. And
for the Supreme Court justices, I encourage them to talk
(13:59):
to their kids, their grandkids, their nieces and nephews, because
I'll bet if they really sit down and ask them,
do you know trans kids around you? Do you have
any non binary friends? They're gonna say yes.
Speaker 1 (14:14):
Why do all those children tend to congregate in deep
blue urban areas and specifically on the coasts. This is
an observation that Bill Maher made, and he's right, You're
not seeing a lot of these in rural Indiana, Kentucky, Arkansas, Kansas.
Why would there be more a disproportionate, astronomically disproportionate number
(14:36):
in urban centers where this would be considered. Yes, a
social contagion, or an empty vessel, a vapid, awful person,
an idiot like Annett Benning has the gall and just
the lilt in her voice, the condescension and arrogance that
(14:58):
a transgender child made her or more interesting? Is the
transgender child there to make you more interesting to everyone else?
Is a transgender child there for your amusement? Is a
transgender child your trophy to show off? Because you have
overcome adversity? Aren't you a brave woman, a brave new
(15:18):
world with a trans child? You are so brave, so stunning.
You have this transchild? How did you do it?
Speaker 3 (15:25):
On net?
Speaker 1 (15:26):
Benning? How did you make it through? Aren't you wonderful?
That is called Munchausen by proxy. It is a mental
disorder in which predominantly women. And I don't know why,
and you have to get to the science behind that,
but it's almost always women. Mothers, sisters, daughters use the
(15:48):
illness of a loved one, a family member whoever, as
a badge of honor in their own plight, and through
a misplaced sense of empathy, they feel like they're a
hero to this person, and by proxy, they have this
delusion of grandeur that they are more important than they are.
(16:12):
They do not have a place in this universe because
they do not believe in a God. And most of
these people are atheistic. That's just a simple fact of
the matter. And I am not a deeply religious person
at times. And I talked about this with Dan Kaplis yesterday.
I wish I was more religious. I wish I prayed more.
I wish I went to church more. I wish I
remembered the reason for the season and Christmas coming up
(16:32):
more in twenty days. I fall short there, But I
do believe in God. And I think that's fundamentally important
for anyone in a society, whether it be the United
States of America or anywhere else, to realize that you
fall short of the glory of God. You are not God.
You cannot become God. Science is not a God. There
is something beyond our understanding, our comprehension, our realm here
(16:56):
that makes us less than we have gotten so far,
carried away with our ego, our sense of self and
self affirmation and self importance, the simple arrogance of being
a human to think that we matter when we don't.
We're aspecting the dust of the universe here and that's
not to diminish your demean our lives or to not
(17:16):
give them value. But what gives your life value is
having faith in something that's greater than you or anything
that you can do on this physical planet. But a
lot of these people on the left, they are empty.
There is a void where there should be some measure
of faith in something, belief in something greater and better
and bigger than themselves. But they don't have that, so
(17:38):
they have to fill that with this crap. They have
these disorders Munchausen by proxy. They believe that through this
heroism of being a steward for a transgender person, that
they will be viewed in a certain light, they will
be accepted in certain social circles, and not only that,
(17:58):
they'll be embraced and exalted for being better than everybody else.
It's this addiction to fame and fortune and notoriety that
the celebrities have, especially it has been like a net
Benning who at one time maybe got a sense of euphoria,
like we heard from Katie Lennon that was fleeting from
her fame, from starring in movies, from being popular, from
(18:21):
getting awards at the Oscars or whatnot, and then that fades,
and then what happens? You're a fading, aging actress in Hollywood.
You're not getting work anymore, You're not getting roles anymore.
What makes your life have a sense of purpose? A
net Benning apparently chose this path, and I think it
just leads to emptiness and a hollow sense of what
(18:44):
a person wishes he or she was, but will never
be a timeout. We're back with more based Fetterman installment
number two. When we return Ryan Schuling live right here
on six point thirty k out and now everybody's favorite
(19:06):
Democratic Congress with another edition of Based Fetterman.
Speaker 4 (19:16):
What do you think is this much to do about nothing?
Speaker 3 (19:19):
It is his son, after all, and people do have sympathy.
Speaker 1 (19:23):
For that, but a lot of people are angry.
Speaker 3 (19:25):
With him of that.
Speaker 1 (19:26):
And what do you say, Well, I.
Speaker 9 (19:29):
Think it's undeniable that the case against Hunter Biden was
really politically motivated.
Speaker 1 (19:37):
But I also think it's.
Speaker 9 (19:38):
A truth that the trial in New York for Trump
that was political as well too. Now is that in
both cases, I think a pardon is appropriate. And I
really think collectively, you know, America's confidence and these kinds
of institutions have been damaged by these kinds of cases,
and we cannot allow the these kinds of institutions to
(20:01):
be weaponized against our political opponents. And it's very clear
both trials were politically motivated and weaponized that on the
other side.
Speaker 1 (20:13):
Well, he might agree, you might disagree, but I don't
think he can help. But like Senator John Fetterman, he's
one of my favorites in Congress because he's an honest broker.
I don't think he answers to anybody or kaw taos
to anybody except the voters that will hold him responsible
the next election that he'll be up for. But he
has been such a pleasant surprise, a breath of fresh
(20:35):
air as an authentic person on Capitol Hill that is
all too rare. And I disagree with him on portion
of that. The Hunter Biden part. Hunter Biden committed these crimes,
and in the prosecution, prosecutor Weiss was looking to cut
a sweetheart deal with Hunter Biden that nobody else would
(20:56):
have gotten. That was unprecedented, it would appear legal history,
and the judge pointed that out, so they had to
go back to the drawing board, and then they ended
up prosecuting him for the gun charge and then later
the tax evasion charges, which I believe came out of California. Now,
whether or not Joe Biden pardon Hunter, there's two things there.
(21:18):
One for those actual crimes for which he was convicted,
I wouldn't really have a big problem with it. But
there's two things. One, Joe Biden said he was not
going to do it, and he ran on that, and
the Democrats ran on that, and the media ran with
that in the campaign in an election year against Donald Trump,
saying Donald Trump doesn't respect the rule of all law.
(21:40):
And over here Joe Biden, and this paragon of virtue
does respect the rule of law. Even with his only
surviving son. The rule of law must stand, and he
will not get in the way, and he will not
pardon his son. Had he never done that, except that
he did. Had he never done that, but he did,
and there would have been room, I think, for Joe
(22:01):
Biden to pardon his son for those specific convictions. But
what happened, and there is going to be a legal
challenge to this, I believe there already is. It was
a blanket pardon of Hunter Biden for any and all
crimes he may or may not have done, was convicted with,
or could be was connected with, or might possibly be
(22:23):
any investigation that dates back to January twenty fourteen, a
very specific date in a very specific year, through December
of this year. Carte blanche, everything's waived, all is good,
all is pardoned. I don't know that you can do that.
The pardon was, in my view, and there might be
differing opinions on this, the presidential pardon was to erase
(22:47):
a person's convicted crime or criminal record as it stands
in that moment, not for any crime you might commit
or any crime you might have committed in the past
but haven't been charged with yet. I don't see that
there's a legal or constitutional basis for that, much like
we've seen with the preemptive pardons being floated, and I
(23:08):
guess this is being bandied about and discussed and debated
within the Biden administration closest advisor walls. Do we give
a preemptive pardon to Senator elect Adam Schiff or how
about former Congresswoman Liz Cheney for what they haven't been
charged with anything yet. And further to that point, Adam
(23:29):
Schiff has already issued a public statement saying wha I
don't want you to issue me a pardon that gives
an appearance of impropriety that I have something to be
pardoned for. Now. He might indeed have that. Biden might
be correct in that assertion, but he hasn't been charged
or prosecuted for anything, or investigated for anything yet. I
don't know that you can have like this get out
(23:51):
of jail free card when they're not even in jail yet,
or they haven't been charged yet. So we'll see where
this goes. But it's very odd, to say the least,
very strange, and I think it's admission that the Biden
administration knows they bit off more than they could chew.
They try to throw all this lawfare at Donald Trump.
They thought it would work and bring him down, or
at the very least damage in politically so that he
would lose. And it all blew up in their face
(24:14):
and boomerang back on them. Let's get to the text
five seven, seven, three nine. Some really good ones here,
and I want to make sure to get to all
of them. Ryan, I predicted that if this is allowed
to stand, the twenty years from now, you will see
that people who are committing suicide at a higher rate
because they have changed their gender and they are no
happier with the new gender than they were before. A texter,
(24:34):
I think we're seeing that right now. The immediate sense
of regret and remorse spires remorse. A young woman named Chloe.
She was testifying, I believe, not only on Capitol Hill
throughout this week, but earlier this year, who wanted a detransition, who,
in much the same way as we heard from this
Katie Lennon, was sold to Bill of Goods, was promised
(24:57):
and affirmed, Oh you don't feel comfortab and your gender,
your body's changing, Well let's just eradicate it. Let's go
full bore and chop everything off. How about no, even
if it turns out This is just my view, but
we're talking about children here, adolescents. They don't know any better.
They don't have the wisdom or experience to make these
(25:18):
kind of grave, life changing decisions that are permanent. They
cannot be undone, they cannot be truly reversed. Cut out
breast tissue, you can put fake breasts in. Those aren't
the same thing. Apples and origes literally pun intended. But
with these young people, I don't think they understand or
(25:38):
congrasp the gravity of this decision in that moment, and
I don't think that the parents or the physicians care
enough in that moment. We need longer term solutions that
are based on psychological counseling therapy. And this goes to
a next texture here, Ryan, I am a therapist and
a parent in Boulder County. Oh God, love you for
(26:00):
doing that. There. It's rampant here, surprise. And while I
agree kids could benefit from therapy, however, very important to
vet the therapist because they are generally just as bad
as Hollywood and could do real damage. That is a
fantastic point. If you're a parent and you have a
child who's experiencing some form of gender dysphoria, the first
(26:22):
step And I don't mean this is the joke, but
I have many gay friends and one of them will
be joining me tomorrow on this program, and it's part
of Gays against Groomers. Maybe your kid is just gay
and that's okay, and that's totally fine. You don't have
to distort your body to be gay. Just be gay.
That's fine. That's an outcome, that's a possibility. But what
(26:43):
I was told from somebody that I interviewed. This was
like a year or two ago somebody that was on
X and I've since lost touch with who had transitioned.
This was an Asian American biological male who had transitioned
to female but was constantly affirmed and sped up in
the process and told yoan, what you're feeling is right,
(27:04):
We're going to go with it. Don't think to question it.
We want to make sure that you feel affirmed, that
you feel supported, that you feel loved, that you feel embraced,
and logic would follow that, Okay, well this is the
path that I'm taking and I'm feeling supported. What if
you're supported in a way that forces you to ask
some tough questions like well, maybe you're just not comfortable
(27:24):
with your sexuality. And what this person revealed to me
in that interview was all along he was a gay man,
but he thought by transitioning to a woman, he could
be a heterosexual woman. I know this might sound far
fetched to a lot of us who don't struggle with
gender dysphoria, but it is a real struggle. Trans people
(27:46):
do exist, It can happen. But if there's any way
to prevent or avoid somebody having to go down the
road of surgical transition and hormone therapy. And again, whichever
way you go, I will never naturally produce estrogen in
the way that a woman does. I would have to
(28:06):
have those treatments and guess what money from the physicians
who prescribed those. And yes, it is that crass, craven,
and cynical. Yes it's all of those things. And conversely,
a woman like Kelly, who just walked in the door,
she will never naturally produce testosterone in the way that
(28:26):
a biological male like yours truly does, because that's how
biology works, and you cannot thwart that. You cannot make
exceptions to it. You can't just wave a magic wand
or a surgical method and say it's over. You're no
longer a dude, You're a lady. Now, you're not Stop
lying to people, stop promising a lie, because you're exactly
(28:51):
right to the earlier Texters point. This sets up for
devastation and disappointment. When that heralded panacea and valhalla offered
in the sky for the transition at the end, if
you just get to the end of the rainbow, you're
gonna be fine. Then you're not fine, And then what
a time out. More of your text would come back,
(29:12):
wrapping up the second hour of Ryan Schuling Live in
a preview of what's to come on Friday's edition after this.
(29:40):
Oh the trickery there from Detroit z own Shannon Scott,
you're out.
Speaker 6 (29:46):
Clip you do?
Speaker 1 (29:48):
I did, like I said, you're out numbered. Go Lions tonight,
Lions packers, bait shop there. You don't know that I
Jordan Love sparkles against the Lions. Oh, I know. I
think he's going to be good tonight. I know I will.
I will very much harm Shannon tomorrow in many ways.
(30:13):
Well you better not because guess what he might be
making a cameo appearance tonight at j D's and joining us.
Oh really, yes, he did say that. Oh lord, I'm
going to hold him to it. Oh, there'll be more
fun if he's there. That's not going to happen. Christian
Toto is going to be there. That will happen, and
we'll Adam Kuchera. It's a cast of stars and I'm
(30:34):
looking forward to it. And Deborah Flora will be joining
me tomorrow. Usually Christian Toto will be proud of that
as well. Hollywood on the right will be featuring that
each and every Friday during the two pm hour, but
joining me in the three pm hour. This gentleman, doctor
Rich Guggenheimer prominent engage against groomers. Now, just reading his
ex handle, I don't want to offend anybody, but this
(30:54):
is what it is. At fifty two eighty based Homo,
he calls himself that okay, I think he's okay with it.
He's joining me tomorrow on the show because he was
in Washington, d C. Part of this entire case in Tennessee,
which is trying to uphold a ban in the state
(31:15):
against prescribing transgender reassignment surgeries and hormone blockers for minors,
and this was his impassioned plea. Feels like these are.
Speaker 10 (31:28):
Not hateful and they are not anti LGBTQ or even
about the nine children needed medical services. However, if the
LGBTQ plus community seeks to repair.
Speaker 2 (31:42):
The damage they caused themselves.
Speaker 11 (31:45):
For halt children, they need to stop supporting TRANSI children.
It is in their best interest to advocate for policies
that ensure that the treatments provided are appropriate, evidence base
and in the.
Speaker 1 (32:01):
Best interests of the child. We remain committed to.
Speaker 2 (32:06):
This cause of advocating for the protection and well being
of children, and we encourage you to get involved.
Speaker 10 (32:13):
Testify at your school boards.
Speaker 2 (32:15):
Testify at your city council, and show up to your
state capitals to fight for the protection of children. Our
future depends on you getting involved in this fight today.
Speaker 1 (32:28):
Thank you doctor Rich Guggenheimer joining me tomorrow during the
three o'clock hour, you won't want to miss it. And
if you are a gay Republican out there LGBT member
of that community, but you see things more from the
right side of the political spectrum, there are a lot
more than you think out there, and I highly recommend
you check in with the log Cabin Republicans and my
(32:50):
good friend Valdemar Archiletta, great guy, great group. I watched
a couple of debates with them, and we need a
lot of voices to come from that community, like doctor
Rich Guggenheimer's against harming children and prominent in Gaze against groomors.
It's such a great organization and we're proud to have
them on the program tomorrow, so stay tuned for that
(33:11):
at three six texts coming in South Park. Ryan brought
this up over a decade and a half ago when
one of the characters wanted to turn themselves into a
dolphin because that's how they identified. I remember that episode.
I believe that was Randy Stan's father, and also the
whole character arc of mister Garrison, missus Garrison going to
(33:33):
the lesbian bar. I mean, it's a riot, but it's
there's an ounce of truth. Of course, in every great
comedy show or stand up routine, there's got to be
an ounce of truth as his basis, and I think
that you'll find that in watching those episodes. Ryan, I
have long said that America's problems are spiritual as much
as political. Kudos, I agree wholeheartedly, and I feel even
(33:55):
more strongly about that now than I did. What we're
seeing now is a path towards sodom. And I'm not
saying this is a Bible thumper. I am not overly religious.
I'm not evangelical, I'm not Catholic, I'm not any of that. However,
the path to destruction of despair is the one that
people like a Net Benning, who you heard earlier this hour,
would have us on. There are examples of civilizations that
(34:17):
turned away from God, that turned towards secular ideals that
thought that man was the end all be all, that
we had all the answers we don't. And once you
start thinking that, you have these delusions of grandeur like
we saw with a net Benning. You see the end
of civilizations. Rome is burning, Ancient Greece fell. Why did
the founders of the United States of America they were
(34:39):
so tuned in, they were so knowledgeable about history, particularly
Thomas Jefferson, but all of them John Adams, when they
were getting together and crafting this nation, they knew that
having a basis and a foundation in God, in faith,
in spirituality was important to the survival of any nation
because it puts you in perspective the universe and our
(35:01):
place in it, and the powers that we have as
human beings and those that we don't that we cannot explain.
And it's that which is ascribed to the Constitution of
the United States and is mentioned in the Declaration of Independence.
This country was very much based on faith in Judeo
Christian work, ethic, and values. And to try to scrap
(35:22):
that and set it aside and say no, we're a
secular nation, separation a church and state. All that ever
meant in the first Amendment was that everybody had the
right to practice their religion as they saw fit, or
if they didn't want to practice religion at all, the
state could not force that upon them, and there have
been legal battles about this. I understand that, but it
(35:43):
is not the freedom from religion. You can respect someone's
religion or for a business like Jack Phillips and Masterpiece
Cake Shop, who made me a wonderful fiftieth birthday cake.
I'll never forget thanks to Kelly in large part for that,
and to Jack himself. We should respect his faith, even
if we don't agree with it or share it. And
to force him to make a cake demonstrating something that
(36:05):
is not within his faith or belief system is selfish,
so you go to another cake shop. I don't never
I've never seen the problem in this or why there
was any legal standing given whatsoever. Much more on this,
we'll talk about the cultural shift with Deborah Flora tomorrow
Hollywood on the Right. That'll be to start the show
and your text at five seven seven three nine. Thanks
(36:27):
for tuning in today, Ryan Shulding live around six point
thirty K. How
What do you say to physicians who are sensitive and
supportive of trans kids obviously don't want suicidal ideation, etc.
But wonder if there.
Speaker 2 (00:11):
Is enough data as of now to prove that it
is beneficial to allow these sort of treatments before the.
Speaker 1 (00:19):
Age of eighteen.
Speaker 3 (00:20):
So I would say three things. And the first is,
we have decades of both clinical experience and research data
showing that this is medical treatment that provides critical benefits
to adolescents who need it. And so this is not new,
This is not new medication.
Speaker 1 (00:36):
And so we have that information. We have long term.
Speaker 3 (00:38):
Studies that track people for five six years. The Supreme
Court this week are arguments for in an FDA case
which the FDA referred to long term as being six
months of follow up. Here we have years of follow up.
And so that's the first thing.
Speaker 1 (00:51):
It's the first thing. And Chase Strangio again saying with
great conviction there with Jake Tapper of CNN, welcome to
our two of Ryan Schuling Live. However, or Strangio seemed
to fold under the argument presented by Justice Samuel Alito
asking about the cast report from the United Kingdom showing
no evidence the trans treatment actually reduce the numbers of suicides.
Speaker 4 (01:20):
But on page one ninety five for the CAST report,
it says there is no evidence that gender affirmative treatments
reduce suicide.
Speaker 5 (01:31):
What I think that is referring to is there is
no evidence in the studies that this treatment reduces completed suicide.
And the reason for that completed suicide, Thankfully, and admittedly
it is rare, and we're talking about a very small
population of individuals with studies that don't necessarily have completed
suicides within them.
Speaker 1 (01:52):
So what about a suicide that goes halfway? Like you
only cut one risk? I mean, not trying to make
light of this other than to say, what now, were
changing the lingo, the terminology, the nomenclature a completed suicide.
So we go from the idea of a suicide to
the carrying out of a suicide to cutting to get attention,
(02:12):
which wasn't really a suicide. Well where are we drawing
the line here? Why is it moving completed suicide? I mean,
Chase Strangel loses all credibility with this.
Speaker 6 (02:22):
However, there are multiple studies, long term, longitudinal studies that
do show that there is a reduction in suicidality, which
I think is a positive outcome to this treatment.
Speaker 1 (02:35):
That's not what you told Jake Tapper. You backtracked when
faced with what justice Samuel Ledo came to the table with,
which was scientific proof and evidence. Suicide idality, suicide ideation,
I think is what Chase strangel is referring here. I mean,
that's a vague thing. Did I think about committing suicide?
(02:57):
Well now I'm not. I was, but now I'm not.
That is not a tangible, measurable thing about how you feel. Plus,
we've got to push pause here. This is all running
under the assumption that we can just switch out our parts,
like we're automobiles, like the transmission. We just take it
out and we put in a new V eight and
(03:19):
we run on that engine. God created us. And I
think we're getting away from God. And I don't mean
it just in a religious sense. I meet it in
a truly like creator sense. Whatever you believe in created
us the way that we are, Evolution, Mother Nature, whoever
you want to bow down to in all of this.
I have male parts, I would prostate I have things
(03:41):
that you cannot replicate, you cannot recreate, and even more convoluted,
someone that wants to become female. Let's just walk down
that path for a moment. There are phillopian tubes, there
are ovaries, there's a uterus, there's a unurin lining, there
are aids that come from the ovaries. I mean, I
took basic health by allology through my middle school, high school,
(04:02):
college years. That cannot be replicated, that cannot be duplicated,
that process. It is a mockery of science to suggest
that's even possible. It's not possible. You can present as
the opposite sex. You could maybe even have outer hardware
or an orifice that resembles the opposite sex. But again,
(04:26):
if you watch What Is a Woman Matt Walsh's powerful
breakthrough documentary, he doesn't just cast aspersions at trans people.
There is a genuine concern and I believe empathy when
he interviews a biological female who wanted a transition to
becoming a man. Made these promises, kind of like when
(04:47):
Pinocchio goes off to the land of you know, he
has all the candy and stall of you know, there's
all these wafty promises about what can be, what's possible
if you just transition, and it's all based on a lie,
and it falls flat. On its face, and it leads
to disappointment and despair. In large part, you cannot replicate
(05:08):
the human male penis and all of the nerve endings
and everything that goes into making that organ function sexually
and as an organ to excrete liquid waste. They grow
these things on forearms, on inner thighs. It is a convoluted,
very Frankenstein like process of medieval type medicine. And it's
(05:29):
based on a false premise. It's based on a lie
that people are told to try to assuage them, to
try to bring them comfort, but they're in a state
of shock and fear with their gender dysphoria, and they're
being sold a bill of goods that will never deliver.
It won't, it can't. Strangel continues, This is from his
(05:52):
interview with Jake Tapper on CNN.
Speaker 3 (05:55):
And then the second thing I would say is nobody
has to provide this medication to adolescents. These are not
doctors being forced to provide this medication. These are doctors
who are wanting to treat their patients in the best
way that they know how, based on the best available
evidence to us. And these are young people who may
have known since they were two years old exactly who
they are, who suffered for six seven years before they
(06:16):
had any relief. And what's happening here. It's not the
kids who are consenting to this treatment, it's the parents
who are consenting to the treatment. And as a parent,
I would say, we when our children are suffering, we
are suffering. And these are parents who love their children,
who are listening to the advice of their doctors, of
the mainstream medical community, and doing what's right for their kids.
In the state of Tennessee has displaced their judgment.
Speaker 1 (06:38):
Nobody who would do this to a child has a
judgment that should be trusted, whether that be a doctor
or a parent. This is child abuse. I'm done tiptoeing
around the tulips here. This is abusing and dismembering and
disfiguring a child. That's what this is. Now. I let
that play in its entirety because I wanted you to
hear it in full context. But did you hear the
(07:00):
pull away quote there? Let's go back to that Chase Strange.
Speaker 3 (07:02):
You these are young people who may have known since
they were two years old exactly who they are.
Speaker 1 (07:11):
Did you know anything at two years old? Are you
aware of anything at two years old. Do you have
any memories of being two years old? I don't. I
do not, let alone.
Speaker 3 (07:26):
These are young people who may have known since they
were two years old exactly who they are.
Speaker 1 (07:31):
You know exactly who you are at two. I didn't
know exactly who I was at twelve, at fifteen, at eighteen,
at twenty five, even I still in some ways maybe
don't know exactly who I am. You have a sense,
you have a notion, you have an understanding. You develop,
you gain experience and wisdom over time, and you think
(07:53):
you have an understanding. But when you think you have
it all figured out, life has a funny way of
humbling you and making you questions and everything and everybody
out there knows what I'm talking about. This is silly,
but it's dangerous to suggest that a two year old
knows exactly who they are. A two year old doesn't
know what to eat. You have to tell a two
(08:14):
year old not to put certain things in its mouth.
A two year old doesn't know its name a lot
of the time. A two year old cannot talk in
complete sentences. This is absolute insanity. Thank God for somebody
like Justice Samuel Alito.
Speaker 4 (08:33):
A question about the state of medical evidence at the
present time. In your petition you made a sweeping statement
which I will quote, overwhelming evidence establishes that the appropriate
gender affirming treatment with puberty blockers and hormones directly and
substantially improves the physical psychological well being of transgender adolescence
(08:57):
with gender dysphoria.
Speaker 1 (08:59):
That was in November twenty twenty three.
Speaker 4 (09:02):
Now, even before then, the Swedish National Board of Health
and Welfare wrote the phone they currently assess quote that
the risks of puberty blockers and gender affirming treatment are
likely to outweigh the expected benefits of these treatments, which
is directly contrary to the sweeping statement in your petition.
Speaker 1 (09:25):
The point he's making there is the point that I'm making,
which is the juice isn't worth the squeeze. In other words,
the end result what was being promised is this complete
and total panacea, a paradise where you can completely change
your gender and become the opposite gender, no strings attached.
(09:46):
That's not what happens here. The disappointment of having that
promise fall short, in addition to the mutilation to the
body that cannot be undone that cannot be reversed leads
again to despair and depression. And here to testify about
it is somebody who has gone through it. Katie Lennon,
(10:09):
unfortunately from Lowell, Massachusetts, where it doesn't surprise me, one
of the bluest states in the nation, expressing this regret
and telling her harrowing tale about de transitioning now still
with a voice that sounds masculine, a.
Speaker 7 (10:24):
D transitioner, and I live in Lowell, but I work,
worship and do business in Nashua, and so I'm an
active community member of the six oh three, and I'm
here in support of SB two seventy two today. So,
like many children and teens today, I identified myself as
transgender for years, and when I started to feel confused
and ashamed about my developing body, I asked everyone in
my life to call me by a new name and
(10:45):
use male pronouns to refer to me. So, in other words,
I went through a social transition from female to male.
Everyone in my life immediately affirmed my new identity, either
out of full support for it or just to stay
neutral and not cause any issues. The constant affirmation both
at if I passive, solidified me in my transgender identity.
No one meant to lock me into an identity that
(11:05):
would later leave me broken or shamed and more confused
than before.
Speaker 1 (11:08):
They were really all just being nice.
Speaker 7 (11:10):
But the social transition eventually wasn't enough, and I soon
felt I needed to take testosterone, and when that wasn't enough,
I had a double missectomy, And when that still wasn't enough,
I had a total hysterectomy, including the removal of my uterus, cervix,
fallopian tubes, and both ovaries. There's no point of contentment
during a gender transition.
Speaker 1 (11:29):
We get fleeting.
Speaker 7 (11:29):
Moments of euphoria, but ultimately one step leads straight into
the next.
Speaker 1 (11:33):
And I thought that in the end I.
Speaker 7 (11:34):
Could really become a man, but all I became was
a mutilated and abused version of my old self. Social
transition is a big deal, and we're lying when we
say that any of this is reversible one percent.
Speaker 1 (11:45):
And my heart breaks for Katie Lennon, and I wish
Katie the very best in her life going forward. But
it's a point of no return, and Katie speaks to
that this enabling and affirming of what is gender dysphoria
is damaging in and of itself. You were enabling a fantasy.
You are trying to affirm a fantasy that cannot be realized.
(12:07):
Not really, not truly, not fully. The mutilation just led
to more mutilation for Katie. Another key scientific fact here, Katie,
a biological female, was never going to naturally produce testosterone
in her own body. Therefore, she would become addicted to
(12:28):
the treatments of testosterone and moreover, addicted to the payments
for those treatments of testosterone from the medical community. That
is taking full advantage of people who have a mental
illness gender dysphoria, that needs to be treated, that needs
to be counseled, There needs to be therapy, And it
(12:49):
might be that as an adult one concludes, I'm just
more comfortable living my life and presenting as the opposite gender,
and I'm going to go through all this. But you
make that decision as an adult, fully aware of the
concert quench's and fully aware of the point of no return.
But that's not what Katie Lendon was promised. Katie was
promised that if you just have this one more surgery,
if you just keep taking testosterone, you will really be
(13:10):
a man. You'll be a real man. And it always
fell short, and the disappointment led to bleak despair. As
far as these parents who affirm, and many of them
are Hollywood nuts from the land of fruit and Nuts, California,
that Chase Strangio references here, how about a nut betting
(13:31):
And listen to what she says in referring to a
transgender child of her own.
Speaker 8 (13:37):
I think the greatest gift of my life is to
have kids, and to have a transgender child has made
me so much more interesting, so much more wise. And
for the Supreme Court justices, I encourage them to talk
(13:59):
to their kids, their grandkids, their nieces and nephews, because
I'll bet if they really sit down and ask them,
do you know trans kids around you? Do you have
any non binary friends? They're gonna say yes.
Speaker 1 (14:14):
Why do all those children tend to congregate in deep
blue urban areas and specifically on the coasts. This is
an observation that Bill Maher made, and he's right, You're
not seeing a lot of these in rural Indiana, Kentucky, Arkansas, Kansas.
Why would there be more a disproportionate, astronomically disproportionate number
(14:36):
in urban centers where this would be considered. Yes, a
social contagion, or an empty vessel, a vapid, awful person,
an idiot like Annett Benning has the gall and just
the lilt in her voice, the condescension and arrogance that
(14:58):
a transgender child made her or more interesting? Is the
transgender child there to make you more interesting to everyone else?
Is a transgender child there for your amusement? Is a
transgender child your trophy to show off? Because you have
overcome adversity? Aren't you a brave woman, a brave new
(15:18):
world with a trans child? You are so brave, so stunning.
You have this transchild? How did you do it?
Speaker 3 (15:25):
On net?
Speaker 1 (15:26):
Benning? How did you make it through? Aren't you wonderful?
That is called Munchausen by proxy. It is a mental
disorder in which predominantly women. And I don't know why,
and you have to get to the science behind that,
but it's almost always women. Mothers, sisters, daughters use the
(15:48):
illness of a loved one, a family member whoever, as
a badge of honor in their own plight, and through
a misplaced sense of empathy, they feel like they're a
hero to this person, and by proxy, they have this
delusion of grandeur that they are more important than they are.
(16:12):
They do not have a place in this universe because
they do not believe in a God. And most of
these people are atheistic. That's just a simple fact of
the matter. And I am not a deeply religious person
at times. And I talked about this with Dan Kaplis yesterday.
I wish I was more religious. I wish I prayed more.
I wish I went to church more. I wish I
remembered the reason for the season and Christmas coming up
(16:32):
more in twenty days. I fall short there, But I
do believe in God. And I think that's fundamentally important
for anyone in a society, whether it be the United
States of America or anywhere else, to realize that you
fall short of the glory of God. You are not God.
You cannot become God. Science is not a God. There
is something beyond our understanding, our comprehension, our realm here
(16:56):
that makes us less than we have gotten so far,
carried away with our ego, our sense of self and
self affirmation and self importance, the simple arrogance of being
a human to think that we matter when we don't.
We're aspecting the dust of the universe here and that's
not to diminish your demean our lives or to not
(17:16):
give them value. But what gives your life value is
having faith in something that's greater than you or anything
that you can do on this physical planet. But a
lot of these people on the left, they are empty.
There is a void where there should be some measure
of faith in something, belief in something greater and better
and bigger than themselves. But they don't have that, so
(17:38):
they have to fill that with this crap. They have
these disorders Munchausen by proxy. They believe that through this
heroism of being a steward for a transgender person, that
they will be viewed in a certain light, they will
be accepted in certain social circles, and not only that,
(17:58):
they'll be embraced and exalted for being better than everybody else.
It's this addiction to fame and fortune and notoriety that
the celebrities have, especially it has been like a net
Benning who at one time maybe got a sense of euphoria,
like we heard from Katie Lennon that was fleeting from
her fame, from starring in movies, from being popular, from
(18:21):
getting awards at the Oscars or whatnot, and then that fades,
and then what happens? You're a fading, aging actress in Hollywood.
You're not getting work anymore, You're not getting roles anymore.
What makes your life have a sense of purpose? A
net Benning apparently chose this path, and I think it
just leads to emptiness and a hollow sense of what
(18:44):
a person wishes he or she was, but will never
be a timeout. We're back with more based Fetterman installment
number two. When we return Ryan Schuling live right here
on six point thirty k out and now everybody's favorite
(19:06):
Democratic Congress with another edition of Based Fetterman.
Speaker 4 (19:16):
What do you think is this much to do about nothing?
Speaker 3 (19:19):
It is his son, after all, and people do have sympathy.
Speaker 1 (19:23):
For that, but a lot of people are angry.
Speaker 3 (19:25):
With him of that.
Speaker 1 (19:26):
And what do you say, Well, I.
Speaker 9 (19:29):
Think it's undeniable that the case against Hunter Biden was
really politically motivated.
Speaker 1 (19:37):
But I also think it's.
Speaker 9 (19:38):
A truth that the trial in New York for Trump
that was political as well too. Now is that in
both cases, I think a pardon is appropriate. And I
really think collectively, you know, America's confidence and these kinds
of institutions have been damaged by these kinds of cases,
and we cannot allow the these kinds of institutions to
(20:01):
be weaponized against our political opponents. And it's very clear
both trials were politically motivated and weaponized that on the
other side.
Speaker 1 (20:13):
Well, he might agree, you might disagree, but I don't
think he can help. But like Senator John Fetterman, he's
one of my favorites in Congress because he's an honest broker.
I don't think he answers to anybody or kaw taos
to anybody except the voters that will hold him responsible
the next election that he'll be up for. But he
has been such a pleasant surprise, a breath of fresh
(20:35):
air as an authentic person on Capitol Hill that is
all too rare. And I disagree with him on portion
of that. The Hunter Biden part. Hunter Biden committed these crimes,
and in the prosecution, prosecutor Weiss was looking to cut
a sweetheart deal with Hunter Biden that nobody else would
(20:56):
have gotten. That was unprecedented, it would appear legal history,
and the judge pointed that out, so they had to
go back to the drawing board, and then they ended
up prosecuting him for the gun charge and then later
the tax evasion charges, which I believe came out of California. Now,
whether or not Joe Biden pardon Hunter, there's two things there.
(21:18):
One for those actual crimes for which he was convicted,
I wouldn't really have a big problem with it. But
there's two things. One, Joe Biden said he was not
going to do it, and he ran on that, and
the Democrats ran on that, and the media ran with
that in the campaign in an election year against Donald Trump,
saying Donald Trump doesn't respect the rule of all law.
(21:40):
And over here Joe Biden, and this paragon of virtue
does respect the rule of law. Even with his only
surviving son. The rule of law must stand, and he
will not get in the way, and he will not
pardon his son. Had he never done that, except that
he did. Had he never done that, but he did,
and there would have been room, I think, for Joe
(22:01):
Biden to pardon his son for those specific convictions. But
what happened, and there is going to be a legal
challenge to this, I believe there already is. It was
a blanket pardon of Hunter Biden for any and all
crimes he may or may not have done, was convicted with,
or could be was connected with, or might possibly be
(22:23):
any investigation that dates back to January twenty fourteen, a
very specific date in a very specific year, through December
of this year. Carte blanche, everything's waived, all is good,
all is pardoned. I don't know that you can do that.
The pardon was, in my view, and there might be
differing opinions on this, the presidential pardon was to erase
(22:47):
a person's convicted crime or criminal record as it stands
in that moment, not for any crime you might commit
or any crime you might have committed in the past
but haven't been charged with yet. I don't see that
there's a legal or constitutional basis for that, much like
we've seen with the preemptive pardons being floated, and I
(23:08):
guess this is being bandied about and discussed and debated
within the Biden administration closest advisor walls. Do we give
a preemptive pardon to Senator elect Adam Schiff or how
about former Congresswoman Liz Cheney for what they haven't been
charged with anything yet. And further to that point, Adam
(23:29):
Schiff has already issued a public statement saying wha I
don't want you to issue me a pardon that gives
an appearance of impropriety that I have something to be
pardoned for. Now. He might indeed have that. Biden might
be correct in that assertion, but he hasn't been charged
or prosecuted for anything, or investigated for anything yet. I
don't know that you can have like this get out
(23:51):
of jail free card when they're not even in jail yet,
or they haven't been charged yet. So we'll see where
this goes. But it's very odd, to say the least,
very strange, and I think it's admission that the Biden
administration knows they bit off more than they could chew.
They try to throw all this lawfare at Donald Trump.
They thought it would work and bring him down, or
at the very least damage in politically so that he
would lose. And it all blew up in their face
(24:14):
and boomerang back on them. Let's get to the text
five seven, seven, three nine. Some really good ones here,
and I want to make sure to get to all
of them. Ryan, I predicted that if this is allowed
to stand, the twenty years from now, you will see
that people who are committing suicide at a higher rate
because they have changed their gender and they are no
happier with the new gender than they were before. A texter,
(24:34):
I think we're seeing that right now. The immediate sense
of regret and remorse spires remorse. A young woman named Chloe.
She was testifying, I believe, not only on Capitol Hill
throughout this week, but earlier this year, who wanted a detransition, who,
in much the same way as we heard from this
Katie Lennon, was sold to Bill of Goods, was promised
(24:57):
and affirmed, Oh you don't feel comfortab and your gender,
your body's changing, Well let's just eradicate it. Let's go
full bore and chop everything off. How about no, even
if it turns out This is just my view, but
we're talking about children here, adolescents. They don't know any better.
They don't have the wisdom or experience to make these
(25:18):
kind of grave, life changing decisions that are permanent. They
cannot be undone, they cannot be truly reversed. Cut out
breast tissue, you can put fake breasts in. Those aren't
the same thing. Apples and origes literally pun intended. But
with these young people, I don't think they understand or
(25:38):
congrasp the gravity of this decision in that moment, and
I don't think that the parents or the physicians care
enough in that moment. We need longer term solutions that
are based on psychological counseling therapy. And this goes to
a next texture here, Ryan, I am a therapist and
a parent in Boulder County. Oh God, love you for
(26:00):
doing that. There. It's rampant here, surprise. And while I
agree kids could benefit from therapy, however, very important to
vet the therapist because they are generally just as bad
as Hollywood and could do real damage. That is a
fantastic point. If you're a parent and you have a
child who's experiencing some form of gender dysphoria, the first
(26:22):
step And I don't mean this is the joke, but
I have many gay friends and one of them will
be joining me tomorrow on this program, and it's part
of Gays against Groomers. Maybe your kid is just gay
and that's okay, and that's totally fine. You don't have
to distort your body to be gay. Just be gay.
That's fine. That's an outcome, that's a possibility. But what
(26:43):
I was told from somebody that I interviewed. This was
like a year or two ago somebody that was on
X and I've since lost touch with who had transitioned.
This was an Asian American biological male who had transitioned
to female but was constantly affirmed and sped up in
the process and told yoan, what you're feeling is right,
(27:04):
We're going to go with it. Don't think to question it.
We want to make sure that you feel affirmed, that
you feel supported, that you feel loved, that you feel embraced,
and logic would follow that, Okay, well this is the
path that I'm taking and I'm feeling supported. What if
you're supported in a way that forces you to ask
some tough questions like well, maybe you're just not comfortable
(27:24):
with your sexuality. And what this person revealed to me
in that interview was all along he was a gay man,
but he thought by transitioning to a woman, he could
be a heterosexual woman. I know this might sound far
fetched to a lot of us who don't struggle with
gender dysphoria, but it is a real struggle. Trans people
(27:46):
do exist, It can happen. But if there's any way
to prevent or avoid somebody having to go down the
road of surgical transition and hormone therapy. And again, whichever
way you go, I will never naturally produce estrogen in
the way that a woman does. I would have to
(28:06):
have those treatments and guess what money from the physicians
who prescribed those. And yes, it is that crass, craven,
and cynical. Yes it's all of those things. And conversely,
a woman like Kelly, who just walked in the door,
she will never naturally produce testosterone in the way that
(28:26):
a biological male like yours truly does, because that's how
biology works, and you cannot thwart that. You cannot make
exceptions to it. You can't just wave a magic wand
or a surgical method and say it's over. You're no
longer a dude, You're a lady. Now, you're not Stop
lying to people, stop promising a lie, because you're exactly
(28:51):
right to the earlier Texters point. This sets up for
devastation and disappointment. When that heralded panacea and valhalla offered
in the sky for the transition at the end, if
you just get to the end of the rainbow, you're
gonna be fine. Then you're not fine, And then what
a time out. More of your text would come back,
(29:12):
wrapping up the second hour of Ryan Schuling Live in
a preview of what's to come on Friday's edition after this.
(29:40):
Oh the trickery there from Detroit z own Shannon Scott,
you're out.
Speaker 6 (29:46):
Clip you do?
Speaker 1 (29:48):
I did, like I said, you're out numbered. Go Lions tonight,
Lions packers, bait shop there. You don't know that I
Jordan Love sparkles against the Lions. Oh, I know. I
think he's going to be good tonight. I know I will.
I will very much harm Shannon tomorrow in many ways.
(30:13):
Well you better not because guess what he might be
making a cameo appearance tonight at j D's and joining us.
Oh really, yes, he did say that. Oh lord, I'm
going to hold him to it. Oh, there'll be more
fun if he's there. That's not going to happen. Christian
Toto is going to be there. That will happen, and
we'll Adam Kuchera. It's a cast of stars and I'm
(30:34):
looking forward to it. And Deborah Flora will be joining
me tomorrow. Usually Christian Toto will be proud of that
as well. Hollywood on the right will be featuring that
each and every Friday during the two pm hour, but
joining me in the three pm hour. This gentleman, doctor
Rich Guggenheimer prominent engage against groomers. Now, just reading his
ex handle, I don't want to offend anybody, but this
(30:54):
is what it is. At fifty two eighty based Homo,
he calls himself that okay, I think he's okay with it.
He's joining me tomorrow on the show because he was
in Washington, d C. Part of this entire case in Tennessee,
which is trying to uphold a ban in the state
(31:15):
against prescribing transgender reassignment surgeries and hormone blockers for minors,
and this was his impassioned plea. Feels like these are.
Speaker 10 (31:28):
Not hateful and they are not anti LGBTQ or even
about the nine children needed medical services. However, if the
LGBTQ plus community seeks to repair.
Speaker 2 (31:42):
The damage they caused themselves.
Speaker 11 (31:45):
For halt children, they need to stop supporting TRANSI children.
It is in their best interest to advocate for policies
that ensure that the treatments provided are appropriate, evidence base
and in the.
Speaker 1 (32:01):
Best interests of the child. We remain committed to.
Speaker 2 (32:06):
This cause of advocating for the protection and well being
of children, and we encourage you to get involved.
Speaker 10 (32:13):
Testify at your school boards.
Speaker 2 (32:15):
Testify at your city council, and show up to your
state capitals to fight for the protection of children. Our
future depends on you getting involved in this fight today.
Speaker 1 (32:28):
Thank you doctor Rich Guggenheimer joining me tomorrow during the
three o'clock hour, you won't want to miss it. And
if you are a gay Republican out there LGBT member
of that community, but you see things more from the
right side of the political spectrum, there are a lot
more than you think out there, and I highly recommend
you check in with the log Cabin Republicans and my
(32:50):
good friend Valdemar Archiletta, great guy, great group. I watched
a couple of debates with them, and we need a
lot of voices to come from that community, like doctor
Rich Guggenheimer's against harming children and prominent in Gaze against groomors.
It's such a great organization and we're proud to have
them on the program tomorrow, so stay tuned for that
(33:11):
at three six texts coming in South Park. Ryan brought
this up over a decade and a half ago when
one of the characters wanted to turn themselves into a
dolphin because that's how they identified. I remember that episode.
I believe that was Randy Stan's father, and also the
whole character arc of mister Garrison, missus Garrison going to
(33:33):
the lesbian bar. I mean, it's a riot, but it's
there's an ounce of truth. Of course, in every great
comedy show or stand up routine, there's got to be
an ounce of truth as his basis, and I think
that you'll find that in watching those episodes. Ryan, I
have long said that America's problems are spiritual as much
as political. Kudos, I agree wholeheartedly, and I feel even
(33:55):
more strongly about that now than I did. What we're
seeing now is a path towards sodom. And I'm not
saying this is a Bible thumper. I am not overly religious.
I'm not evangelical, I'm not Catholic, I'm not any of that. However,
the path to destruction of despair is the one that
people like a Net Benning, who you heard earlier this hour,
would have us on. There are examples of civilizations that
(34:17):
turned away from God, that turned towards secular ideals that
thought that man was the end all be all, that
we had all the answers we don't. And once you
start thinking that, you have these delusions of grandeur like
we saw with a net Benning. You see the end
of civilizations. Rome is burning, Ancient Greece fell. Why did
the founders of the United States of America they were
(34:39):
so tuned in, they were so knowledgeable about history, particularly
Thomas Jefferson, but all of them John Adams, when they
were getting together and crafting this nation, they knew that
having a basis and a foundation in God, in faith,
in spirituality was important to the survival of any nation
because it puts you in perspective the universe and our
(35:01):
place in it, and the powers that we have as
human beings and those that we don't that we cannot explain.
And it's that which is ascribed to the Constitution of
the United States and is mentioned in the Declaration of Independence.
This country was very much based on faith in Judeo
Christian work, ethic, and values. And to try to scrap
(35:22):
that and set it aside and say no, we're a
secular nation, separation a church and state. All that ever
meant in the first Amendment was that everybody had the
right to practice their religion as they saw fit, or
if they didn't want to practice religion at all, the
state could not force that upon them, and there have
been legal battles about this. I understand that, but it
(35:43):
is not the freedom from religion. You can respect someone's
religion or for a business like Jack Phillips and Masterpiece
Cake Shop, who made me a wonderful fiftieth birthday cake.
I'll never forget thanks to Kelly in large part for that,
and to Jack himself. We should respect his faith, even
if we don't agree with it or share it. And
to force him to make a cake demonstrating something that
(36:05):
is not within his faith or belief system is selfish,
so you go to another cake shop. I don't never
I've never seen the problem in this or why there
was any legal standing given whatsoever. Much more on this,
we'll talk about the cultural shift with Deborah Flora tomorrow
Hollywood on the Right. That'll be to start the show
and your text at five seven seven three nine. Thanks
(36:27):
for tuning in today, Ryan Shulding live around six point
thirty K. How
Popular Podcasts
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.