In the first hour of today's show, journalist, lawyer and political commentator Gordon Chang joins the show to discuss his new book "Plan Red: China's Project To Destroy America" and how the presidential election impacts the relationship between the two countries.
Then, the Republican Candidate for Colorado's 1st Congressional District, Valdamar Archuleta, joins the program to discuss the final days of his campaign against Diana DeGette, and why he's the right choice for Colorado and CO-1.
Finally, Ryan Schuiling closes the hour by enjoying some, "Deep Thoughts with Kamala Harris"
Read Gordon Chang's book: https://www.amazon.com/Plan-Red-Chinas-Destroy-America/dp/1630062804
Support Archuleta's Campaign: https://www.archuletaforcolorado.com/
Then, the Republican Candidate for Colorado's 1st Congressional District, Valdamar Archuleta, joins the program to discuss the final days of his campaign against Diana DeGette, and why he's the right choice for Colorado and CO-1.
Finally, Ryan Schuiling closes the hour by enjoying some, "Deep Thoughts with Kamala Harris"
Read Gordon Chang's book: https://www.amazon.com/Plan-Red-Chinas-Destroy-America/dp/1630062804
Support Archuleta's Campaign: https://www.archuletaforcolorado.com/
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Look about the rock yr world.
Speaker 2 (00:03):
For those we need to talk about, to talk, we talk.
Speaker 3 (00:11):
This.
Speaker 4 (00:11):
He is Ryan Shueling live on Denver's Talk station at
six point thirty kow.
Speaker 3 (00:18):
Here we are.
Speaker 4 (00:19):
It's November, four days to go until election Day twenty
twenty four. Ryan shuling with you, Zack Segers alongside Ice
Station z and Kelly Couchera also helping along through this
live broadcast. We can take your text throughout At five seven, seven,
three nine we are loaded for bear with guests coming
(00:40):
up in just a little bit Stephen L. Miller, host
of the Versus Media podcast. We'll be commenting on all
the misinformation disinformation coming from the left regarding comments made
by Donald Trump over these last couple of days. It
is brutal, it is stark, it is sick, it is twisted,
it is desperate, it is Valtimore. Archiletta is happy and
(01:02):
he'll be joining me to start hour number two. He
of course, is the Republican nominee for the first congressional district,
going head to head against Representative Diana to get It's
a tough race, but he has run it well. He'll
make his closing argument coming up during the second hour
and then coming up at the bottom of the second hour.
Floyd Serulei, former chair of the Democratic Party in Colorado
(01:23):
going back to the mid nineteen eighties, one of the
top consultant's most respected minds in politics in this state.
He'll be joining me for his preview of election night,
and he'll be joining me on Election Night over on
KOA for our live coverage. Join us Tuesday, starting at
six pm. I'm gonna sprint over there as soon as
the Dan Kaplis show is over and will carry live
(01:44):
coverage for you from six pm Mountain Time until eleven pm,
or possibly later if there are still newsworthy developments happening
with regard to the vote. But joining us now, you
can follow him on ex at Gordon g.
Speaker 3 (01:57):
Chang.
Speaker 4 (01:58):
He is the author of the already best selling number
one on Amazon plan Read China's Project to Destroy America,
and he's a frequent guest on this program. We always
appreciate his time. Gordon Chang joins us. Gordon, thank you
so much.
Speaker 2 (02:11):
Well, thank you, Brian, I really appreciate it absolutely.
Speaker 4 (02:14):
Let's start with the book and we'll work from there.
I mentioned last time the timing of this book and
why you wrote it when you wrote it, but as
you're kind of exploring more about what China presents as
a threat and a challenge to the United States, you
take it a step further by saying they have a
project to destroy America.
Speaker 3 (02:33):
What do you mean with that title?
Speaker 2 (02:35):
I mean that China wants to make sure that the
American Republic no longer exists. But Communist Party believes it
is in an existential struggle with the US. And it's
not because of anything that we say or do, Bryan,
but it's because of who we are. You have an
insecure regime in Beijing is worried about the inspirational impact
of our values and form of governmance on the Chinese people,
(02:58):
which means that the Party believes it will never be
safe as long as there is freedom and democracy in
the US. So the Party has made it very clear
is only going to be one survivor. It's either going
to be the People's Republic of China or the United
States of America, not both.
Speaker 4 (03:14):
Gordon, as the Chinese no doubt anxiously await the results
of our election, this could go one of two very
different divergent ways as it pertains to China, and Jijiping
and the leadership there in the Communist Party. Can you
articulate in bullet point fashion exactly what those differences would be,
what China might do their actions in the wake of
(03:36):
a Kamala Harris victory as opposed to a Donald Trump victory.
Speaker 2 (03:41):
Well, any new American president and regardless of party, regarded
regardless of ideology, will give China a his period, because
every new president thinks that he or in maybe this case,
she can do better than his or her predecessor. This
is a problem because not so much Kamala Harris, but
because right now China is pressing us and our friends
(04:02):
and allies really hard, and we do not have time
to give China any sort of leeway. The other thing
is we know that Kamala Harris is not that interested
in foreign policy. There's actually Seymour Hirsch reporting that she
actually ordered the Director of the Office of National Intelligence
not to send her the President's Daily Brief, which is
(04:23):
the collection of US intelligence in the preceding twenty four hours,
comes in every morning. So this is going to be
learning on the job, and I think China will try
to take advantage of her. On the other hand, you've
got Trump, Trump's already been president, probably less of a
grace period, also because Trump is probably pretty pissed about
what China did in twenty twenty to help Joe Biden win,
(04:44):
And so I suspect that Trump is going to be
sort of roaring out of the gate, guns blazing.
Speaker 4 (04:50):
Gordon Change joining us, and again you can find his
book on Amazon, Plan Red China's Project to Destroy America.
As we count down now four days left until the election, Gordon,
as you analyze it from a foreign policy standpoint, what
differences do you see? And you just kind of touched
on one of those in a second Trump administration versus
(05:12):
a first one.
Speaker 3 (05:13):
Should the former president win on Tuesday Night, Yeah.
Speaker 2 (05:17):
My guess is that siegm Ping and Vladimir Putin will
probably be more circumspect. And the reason is it's not
because of Trump's policies. I mean, they don't like Biden's policies,
which means they probably wouldn't like a continuation of his
administration with Kamala Harris, it's more just the temperament of
the two individuals. They are really scared of Donald Trump
(05:41):
returning to the Oval office because he's unpredictable, I mean
he can do things which take them by surprise. Siejemping
was taken by surprise, in fact in April twenty seventeen
when he was at Mara Lago and Trump stood up
at dinner and said he had just ordered a missile
strike on a Chinese friend, which was Syria. Were pretty
well behaved for their even because they're pretty bad. They
(06:05):
were pretty well behaved during Trump's four years because they
just did not want to take Trump on. So I
think that that's going to be the defining difference. They
look at Kamala Harris. They may not like what she does,
but they probably think they can control her, or at
least predict her, and that makes them comfortable. And we
we certainly don't want the bad actors in the world
feeling comfortable about the United States.
Speaker 4 (06:26):
Speaking of those bad actors, Gordon, I follow you on
X and your many interviews on national media because you
tend to be one step ahead of the curve when
it comes to matters abroad, specifically regarding China. But this
one in particular, I've seen you commenting on at length
over these last several hours. Donald Trump just posting the
following on X formerly known as Twitter quote, I strongly
(06:48):
condemned the barbaric violence against Hindus, Christians and other minorities
who are getting attacked and looted by mobs in Bangladesh,
which remains in a total state of chaos, continuing quote.
Speaker 3 (06:58):
It would have never happened my watch.
Speaker 4 (07:01):
Kamala and Joe have ignored Hindus across the world and
in America. They have been a disaster from Israel to
Ukraine to our southern border. But we will make America
strong again and bring back peace through strength. Gordon, can
you articulate to our listeners about the situation in Bangladesh
and why there hasn't been an immediate response to it
from the Biden administration.
Speaker 2 (07:22):
I think the Biden administration wants to give the new
government in Bangladesh a grace period for want of a
better term. They according to India, Biden really tipped the
scales against the existing prime minister who is now out
and who was a friend of India. The new Prime
minister has presided over or has not been able to
(07:45):
control the violence, and that's why there is this continuing
disruption and chaos in Bangladesh right now. And I think
it favors the Chinese certainly doesn't favor India, certainly doesn't
favor US. You know, I don't think that Biden owns
the problem. Biden contributed a lot to the problem, so
I think he bears a large amount of responsibility for
(08:06):
what's going on there, and none of it is good
for the people of Bangladesh, and it's certainly not good
for the US and for the democracies in the region.
Speaker 4 (08:14):
Gordon Chang, author of Plan Red, China's project to Destroy America,
joining us here on this four days before election day
twenty twenty four. Gordon, you and I have spoken at
length as well about the border crisis, and many people
automatically jumped to the Mexican drug cartels or the Venezuelan
gangs pouring over. That's been a big topic, an issue
(08:35):
here locally in Aurora.
Speaker 3 (08:37):
That's become national news.
Speaker 4 (08:38):
But there's the Chinese element to this as well, in
particular as it applies to the fentanyl issue. And I
saw you quote this following tweet in Mexico, Ji Dang Xiang,
a Chinese citizen linked to both the Cartel de Sinaloa
and the Cartel Jalisco Nueva Generacion was arrested in Mexico
City on October thirty. First, can you walk us through
(08:59):
the exis of the drug trade, the cartels in Mexico,
the producers of the base elements of fentanyl in China,
and how those drugs are getting across the border.
Speaker 2 (09:09):
Yeah, those two cartels are the ones that primarily control
the fentanyl trade coming into the United States. They buy
precursor chemicals and pill presses from China and then they
employ Chinese technicians in Mexico to mix the precursors into fentanyl,
and then the gangs they sneak it across. They don't
even have to sneak it across, but it comes across
(09:31):
the open southern border. So China's very much involved in this. China.
These fentanyl gangs in China, they're large, they're well organized,
their international scope. They couldn't operate without the knowledge and
approval of the Communist Party. But we also know the
party fully supports the fentanyl gangs. Some of them are
actually state owned companies. But also we know that Chinese
diplomats give covered to the gangs. Chinese officials they expect
(09:54):
every container that leaves China and the fentanyl producers. They
run their money through the Chinese state banking system in
Chinese owned TikTok, which Beijing uses to promote its narratives.
It promotes illegal drug use in the United States. So
backing up the Chinese regime is one hundred percent for
what's going on, and that's seventy to seventy five thousand
(10:15):
Americans each year die from doses of elusic Chinese fentanyl.
Speaker 3 (10:19):
Gordon.
Speaker 4 (10:19):
We've seen the evolution of sympathies for China in specific
form from Governor Tim Walls being very open about his
admiration for China, his many trips to China while he
was a younger man, and kind of the nefarious overlap
there may be between the Chinese Communist Party in Walls
and maybe his interests. But this one really jumps off
(10:41):
the page to me as well. About a Chinese Red
Army parade in which two members holding US flags Representative
Grace Meng Democrat New York and New York City's own
Mayor Eric Adams.
Speaker 3 (10:52):
What was this event and what's going on here?
Speaker 2 (10:56):
Yeah, this is one of a series of events that
take place in New York's where you have the Chinese
Consulate in New York participate in these events as there
was this one, and this one was particularly despicable because
you had people dress up in People's Liberation Army uniforms.
They were singing Chinese songs, carrying Chinese flags. This shows
(11:19):
that there are some Chinese Americans who are disloyal to
our country, and this is a growing problem we have
in New York. The Linda's Son indictment, Linda Son was
a senior advisor to to New York governors Andrew Pomo
and the current one, Kathy Hockel. She's being charged with
being an agent for China, and from the looks of things,
(11:43):
she certainly was deeply involved in helping the Communist Party
promote its policies in New York State. The reason is
that the New York Democratic Party looks to Chinese Americans
for votes, and Chinese Americans throughout New York State, but
especially in New York City, have the very disturbing connections
to the Communist Party.
Speaker 4 (12:04):
Gordon a couple final questions here. First one is a
quick hitter, and that is if Donald Trump is victorious
on Tuesdays, I hope and I believe that he will
be have there been any talks about you joining a
Trump administration and would you.
Speaker 2 (12:17):
Yeah, No, No, no talks about that at all. I'm
not really an official. If you want to be an
official in any administration, you've got to fight for it,
and I'm certainly not going to do that.
Speaker 4 (12:29):
Following up on that, then this is a post from
you that I could not agree with more. We must
rely on China for nothing. You and I have spoken
many times in the past. I agree with Governor Ron
DeSantis his strong stance on China.
Speaker 3 (12:40):
That we need to decouple. We are too reliant.
Speaker 4 (12:42):
We are basically slaves to their slave labor for so
many of our products and services and drugs, et cetera.
If you were to profer advice then to a Trump
administration about the first step and taking a step back
from China from being less reliant on China, what was
he The first thing you would advise on day one,
January twenty, twenty twenty five.
Speaker 2 (13:04):
Raise the tariffs. Trump, in his talk with Maria Bartiromo
in February said he imposed at least sixty percent across
the board tariffs, and the other thing is just enforce
the Teriff Act of nineteen thirty which prohibits the importation
into the United States of goods made with forced labor.
Almost all of China's green products are made with slightly
(13:25):
weaker labor. Can't come into the US if we enforce
our laws, and many other Chinese products are also made
with prohibited labor. Enforce the law with the the second thing,
I'd say, first thing raised the tariffs.
Speaker 4 (13:39):
And our first step in easing ourselves from the addiction
to China, and one of the best advocates for that
in his book Plan Read China's Project and Destroy America.
It's a bestseller on Amazon. I highly recommend that you
check it out and purchase it online. You can also
follow him on x at Gordon g Chang Gordon always
thankful for your time and insights.
Speaker 3 (14:00):
We'll see what happens Tuesday night.
Speaker 2 (14:02):
Yeah, and thank you so much, Brian. As I said,
I really appreciate being on your era.
Speaker 4 (14:07):
Absolutely we appreciate him being on your reaction at five
seven seven three nine.
Speaker 3 (14:11):
You can send your text there.
Speaker 4 (14:13):
There is so much to sort through fake news at
its very nay dear, both yesterday and today, and I
want to start with this deceptive edit of Donald Trump
and something that he said about protecting women. This was
the Team Harris edit, and they made it sound like
he was going to take abortion rights away whether the
(14:36):
women like it or not.
Speaker 5 (14:38):
They said, Sir, I just think it's inappropriate for you
to say.
Speaker 1 (14:41):
I said, well, I'm going to do it whether the
women like it or not. I'm going to do it
whether the women like it or not, whether the women
like it or not, whether the women like it or not,
whether the women like it or not, whether the women
like it or not.
Speaker 2 (14:55):
I'm going to do it whether the women like it
or not.
Speaker 4 (14:57):
Okay, that's ridiculous as it sounds. We'll get to the
full context of the entire quote in a moment. But
of course Kamala Harris got to use the left's terms
for what they say. We do.
Speaker 3 (15:06):
We pounced, we seese, she pounced.
Speaker 4 (15:09):
And sees on these comments in the context that you
just heard them, and this is what she made them about.
Speaker 6 (15:15):
I will comment on the former president Donald Trump's remark
about women and whether they like it or not, and listen,
it's just it actually is very offensive to women in
terms of not understanding their agency, their authority, their right,
(15:39):
and their ability to make decisions about their own lives,
including their own bodies.
Speaker 4 (15:44):
Okay, either she is a complete buffoon. Fact check true,
or she is an absolute liar. Fact check true as well.
What he said had absolutely nothing to do with the
topic of abortion, but rather the criminal illegal aliens who
were spilled across our border and killed our young women,
wives and daughters and mothers, and that he was going
(16:09):
to stop it, that the border crisis would be solved
on his watch, that had exploded on her watch, and
that she is the reason and the reason alone why
women like Lake and Riley and Rachel Morin are dead.
Speaker 7 (16:24):
Kamala has imported criminal migrants from prisons, in jails, from
insane asylums and mental institutions all over the world, from
Venezuela to the Congo, including savage criminals who assault, rape,
and murder our women and girls.
Speaker 1 (16:42):
Anyone who would.
Speaker 8 (16:43):
Let monsters kidnap and kill our children does not belong
anywhere near the Oval office. And my people told me
about four weeks ago, I always say no, I want
to protect the people.
Speaker 5 (16:54):
I want to protect the women of our country. I
want to protect the women, sir, please don't say that.
Why they said, we think it's I think it's very
inappropriate for you to say.
Speaker 1 (17:04):
I said, why I'm president, I want to protect the.
Speaker 2 (17:06):
Women of our country.
Speaker 5 (17:08):
They said, They said, Sir, I just think it's inappropriate
for you to say, pay these guys a lot of money.
Speaker 2 (17:21):
Can you believe it?
Speaker 1 (17:23):
I said, well, I'm going to do it, whether the
women like it or not. I'm going to protect them.
Speaker 4 (17:29):
For our female voters out there who support Donald Trump
or don't what he just said. Are you offended by that?
Are you put out by the fact that Donald Trump
wants to protect women from being raped and murdered by criminal,
illegal aliens?
Speaker 3 (17:43):
Dost thou offend?
Speaker 4 (17:45):
Even Jake Tapper defended Trump, if so lightly.
Speaker 9 (17:48):
When Trump said he was going to do something for women,
whether they like it or not, whether the women like
it or not, he was talking about protecting women, protecting women,
whether they like it or not. Certainly you can take
it with the language, but it wasn't. He wasn't saying
he was just going to do whatever he wanted, regardless
of you know, anyway.
Speaker 3 (18:06):
Why we take an issue with the language.
Speaker 4 (18:08):
Well anyway, but let's let's let let's talk.
Speaker 3 (18:10):
I mean, but you take my point.
Speaker 9 (18:14):
I'm saying, I'm going to protect them, whether that women
want me to protect them, whether right.
Speaker 10 (18:18):
Some would say that's misogynists, but.
Speaker 9 (18:20):
It's not as as she presented it.
Speaker 10 (18:23):
I think, look, ultimately, I think we have to be
careful in these last days. We did this in twenty sixteen.
He's going to say something horrible, ridiculous quoted accurately. No,
that's not my point. I just don't think we need
to was horrible and ridiculous every update, because the point
is what she where she wanted to, which is we
(18:44):
know who this guy is. This is not someone who
respects women. That being said, I think the Puerto Rico
ad or General Kelly's comments, it's.
Speaker 3 (18:55):
Just a shell game.
Speaker 4 (18:55):
They're throwing spaghetti against the wall and hoping it's.
Speaker 3 (18:58):
Stick to something, stick to Donald Trump, that'll bring him down.
Speaker 4 (19:02):
They keep trying, they keep failing, and they will fail
again on Tuesday night, joining us next Stephen L. Miller,
host of the Versus Media podcast. That's not the only
hopes that will debunk today, the other one involving Liz Cheney.
When we come back, did Trump call for her to
be executed by firing squad?
Speaker 2 (19:20):
Question mark?
Speaker 11 (19:34):
I see one of the big stories this week continues
to be the fallout from Trump's disastrous Madison Square Garden rally,
where one of the speakers called Puerto Rico a floating
island of garbage. Well, on Tuesday night, Joe Biden responded,
and he did not help doing garbage.
Speaker 2 (19:51):
I see floating down there as his supporters, his his
his demonizational team is unconscionable.
Speaker 3 (19:58):
Thank you, Jill.
Speaker 11 (20:00):
I understand you didn't mean everybody, just the guy who
said the one thing. But yeah, okay, And if there
are any aids of his watching right now, if he
attempts to talk in the next four days, please deploy
some tactical soft.
Speaker 3 (20:12):
Serve to this area.
Speaker 11 (20:14):
Okay, every time, Joe go, you frow you.
Speaker 2 (20:19):
Love him, Love the man.
Speaker 4 (20:26):
Stephen Colbert with his highly partisan opening monologue and that
joke referring to Tony Hinchcliff, and he called the entire
Madison Square Garden rally disastrous.
Speaker 3 (20:37):
Hinchcliff spoke like.
Speaker 4 (20:38):
Many hours before Donald Trump did, and I'm a whole
the event was a raging success. I don't know what
he's talking about there, but it does appear that to
a certain degree of this last week, it's a battle
of attrition he had Hinchcliff with that own goal. Then
you had Joe Biden saying that all of Trump's supporters
were garbage. Then you have this misinterpreted, to put it kindly,
(20:59):
quotete about Donald Trump of protecting women from illegal criminal
aliens who would rape and murder them, taken totally out
of context by Harris, by the media, etc. And then
you have Mark Cuban who gets skewered and lamb basted
for saying there are no intelligent women who would be
(21:20):
around Donald Trump, and that sparked a controversy. And we'll
get into the Liz Cheney stuff in just a moment.
But to his point on X, he says, this is
the jobs report that just came out today, which was abysmal.
It was supposed to be in the six figures, like
one hundred thousand jobs created for the month of October.
This just in twelve thousand jobs only nationally created last month.
Speaker 3 (21:44):
And Steven L.
Speaker 4 (21:45):
Miller, our next guest posts quote and now you understand
the hyperventilation over Liz Cheney and imaginary apostrophes. Steven, welcome
back to Ryan shuling Life.
Speaker 2 (21:57):
Oh hey, Ryan, Hey, are you your cue?
Speaker 12 (22:00):
I was on muting, I was unmuting.
Speaker 2 (22:02):
And I thought I panicked.
Speaker 12 (22:03):
I thought I hit I hung up, which I've done before,
and I just my brain justpy.
Speaker 2 (22:07):
I just had a Biden moment.
Speaker 3 (22:08):
Yeah, well, there we go.
Speaker 4 (22:09):
And speaking of let's get inside Joe Biden's brain, I
know it's a dangerous journey.
Speaker 3 (22:13):
Yeah, can we not? But on this issue of the
apostrophe in there.
Speaker 4 (22:18):
Well, this issue of the apostrophe and whether or not
it happened, and the transcript, and now we're hearing that
the stenographer, the literal stenographer, and not the press that
covers in which are often accurately called stenographers, didn't want
to put the apostrophe in, but the Biden White House
coaxed this person to do it. Take us through that
from your perspective and what your call is on it,
(22:39):
balls and strikes.
Speaker 12 (22:42):
It's if we're talking about no one is above the law.
This is actually a violation of.
Speaker 3 (22:54):
Sounds like we lost them.
Speaker 4 (22:54):
They're going to put him back on hold, see if
we can reconnect or fix that. Can And in the meantime,
while he ponders on the meaning of an apostrophe, sounds
like we're good, Okay, we'll go back to ready.
Speaker 12 (23:08):
Go ahead it Stephen, Yeah, you can tell where four
days from an election, that's right, Rain is gone. Apologies
for that. Basically what happened. Biden called Trump supporters garbage.
The White House stenographers, the actual federal employees, not the
Washington Post or Politico, put it into the public record
that way before releasing it to the public. The White
(23:31):
House comm Shop, including Andrew Bates and Koine. John Pierre
added the apostrophe that you can quibble if that was
at the behest of other journalists or if that was
how that direction went. But before we knew it, there
was the narrative that there was an imaginary apostrophe, which
is the top five thing I've ever seen in my
life is the American media trying to will an imaginary
(23:53):
apostrophe into existence because they know how bad this looks
for Joe Biden and came out last night. And then,
of course, like you mentioned, we had the job support incoming,
which reporters would have had a heads up to. So
today is the hyperventilating over this hitty and the honor
of her family.
Speaker 4 (24:11):
And let's get to that. Because the Harris campaign, as
they are, wont to do completely deceptively edited this, and
I'm going to play this in order so that you
get the evolution of fake news as Donald Trump accurately
describes it.
Speaker 5 (24:25):
But his daughter is a very dumb individual, very dumb.
She's a radical warhawk. Let's put her with a rifle,
standy there with nine barrel shooting at her. Okay, let's
see how she feels about it. You know, when the
guns are trained in her face.
Speaker 4 (24:41):
Now they stop it. There, we won't. We'll continue in
a moment. But this is the pattern. Donald Trump says something,
it's taken out of context in a deceptive edit by
Team Harris and or the Democrat media. But I repeat myself,
and then Kamala Harris swoops in to comment on it.
Speaker 6 (24:58):
And then even worse, he has increased his violent rhetoric.
Donald Trump has about political opponents and in great details,
in great details, suggested rifles should be trained on former Representative.
Speaker 4 (25:16):
Liz Cheney so she should be the target of a
firing squad. And Jim Acosta is even trying to dismiss
those who he says want to dance on the head
of a pin about Trump's comments because they're bad.
Speaker 3 (25:28):
We got to make them bad.
Speaker 4 (25:29):
We got to make sure that this sticks to him,
and we got to carry water for the Harris campaign
because they're behind.
Speaker 13 (25:33):
I mean, you and I both though at Lance. You
know this doing things happened late in the camp. I
mean I covered the two thousand and four presidential campaign.
I covered John Kerry, and there was an Osama bin
Laden video that came out the weekend before the election,
and there was a lot of analysis that said that
that moved votes at the very end. So Donald Trump
talking about executing Liz Cheney, and let's just be clear,
(25:54):
when you talk about nine barrels, I'm sorry for all
the folks out there who want to dance on the
head of a That is what he is talking about,
an execution fantasy. But Karen, your thoughts on how this
could move the race, He's absolutely wrong, a liar and
an idiot, or all of the above. Here is the
complete Donald Trump quote surrounding Liz Cheney taking a gun
(26:15):
and heading into battle because she is such a warmongering neocon.
Speaker 5 (26:20):
But his daughter is a very dumb individual, very dumb.
Speaker 3 (26:25):
She's a radical warhawk.
Speaker 5 (26:27):
Let's put her with a rifle, standy there with nine
barrel shooting at her. Okay, let's see how she feels
about it. You know, when the guns are trained on
her face.
Speaker 3 (26:37):
You know, there are warhawks when.
Speaker 5 (26:38):
They're sitting in Washington in a nice building saying, oh, gee,
will let's send let's send ten thousand troops right into
the mouth of the enemy.
Speaker 4 (26:47):
What strikes me here, Stephen is this was a regular
criticism of her father, Dick Cheney, the neocons of the
two thousand republic Republican Party that were war hungry and
going overseas and fighting these battles of misadventure about you know,
let's send your sons and daughters off to war.
Speaker 3 (27:03):
That's what Trump was saying.
Speaker 4 (27:04):
But the media is completely distorting it, as is Team Harris,
as is Liz Cheney herself.
Speaker 12 (27:12):
Yeah. I mean, this is a boiler play argument that
has been made about every single politician since the Vietnam War.
And that's even before my time. And so if you
were around for two thousand and eight, this was a
criticism of John McCain coming off the heels of the
Bush presidency. And so yeah, I say here, I'm just like,
welcome to code Pink, Donald Trump, I guess, and yeah,
(27:35):
I look at this and I just say this is
the reflexive position of our media, which is, if Donald
Trump is seen to be on their side of an issue,
which they haven't for twenty five years. On this issue,
they theonetically and reflexively have to jump to the opposite
side of it because of how bad or wrong that
they think he is, and it exposes a lot of hypocrisy.
And the thing I guess I'm asking is where is
(27:57):
Kamala Harris. For the last three weeks, We've had the
media versus Elon Musk, and then we had Trump versus McDonald's,
and then we had Trump versus Puerto Rico. Now we
have Trump versus Liz Cheney, and Kamala Harris has been
the smallest part of all of this, just simply offering
miniature sound bites and touring the country with celebrities who
(28:18):
haven't had to steal the impact of inflation for the
past three or four years. This is the smallest candidate
in the smallest campaign that I've ever seen. And maybe
the strategy is just let Donald Trump's say stuff and
the country won't go for this again. Well, you need
to pay attention to Hillary Clinton's campaign, which had the
very same philosophy. I'm completely bewildered, and it's mainly because
(28:40):
that there is no Harris campaign. Really, this is all
about let Trump go out there and say cookie stuff
and I'm going to die on the defend Liz Cheney
at all costs. And meanwhile, Donald Trump is courting muddlim
vote in Dearborn, Michigan.
Speaker 3 (28:53):
That's a great point, Steve, and I want to follow
up on with you.
Speaker 4 (28:55):
This will be the third election cycle with Donald Trump
in it for president.
Speaker 3 (28:59):
In the first one, only two more left. All Right.
Speaker 4 (29:04):
Hillary Clinton was a very known quantity both on in
terms of her name recognition, where she stood on issues.
Speaker 3 (29:11):
She was viewed as maybe.
Speaker 4 (29:11):
A moderate Democrat, and so she didn't really have to
make that case as much. Joe Biden has been a
known quantity in Washington, and when he ran for president,
that was going over forty years or so. Kamala Harris
is a much more unknown quantity, and to your point,
I think it was much more important for her to
close the deal here down the stretch, to affirm the
people who were on the fence exactly who she was
(29:33):
and what she stood for. She bails on Joe Rogan
trying to dictate terms to him. That was a catastrophic
error in my judgment. And like you said, she's in
the background here, she's not even at the forefront of
her own campaign. She's not giving people out there a
reason to vote for her. Is that a fatal flaw
and mistake?
Speaker 12 (29:53):
He's pulling close? And I have some thoughts about the
election that I don't know. If it's state, I don't know.
Speaker 2 (29:57):
Hope she's gonna win or lose this.
Speaker 12 (30:00):
If she does lose, there's going to be five or
six things we can point to and say, yep, it
was right there, right there, right there, and right there.
And so somebody who has decided she's been an office
for three and a half years and can't tell voters
what she's going to do different than a job's report
that comes back with twelve thousand jobs. And that's really
all this was. This was a gimmed up controversy to
(30:21):
get to avoid having to ask her about a job
support because when she answered questions on an airport tarmac today,
it wasn't about twelve thousand jobs. It was about Liz cheeing.
And so, as an unknown quantity that is going to
be her biggest flaw that she doesn't have any plans
to move the economy floor beyond what she has said
with Joe Biden. And again you have a media who's
(30:43):
just decided that we're going to go all in and
try to drag this woman cackling across the finish line.
Speaker 4 (30:49):
I had to put twelve thousand jobs in perspective for
fifty states. That would be an average of only two
hundred and forty jobs per state. It is a knemic
and that it is a bad number. But like Steven's,
she was able to dodge around that one. Because everybody's
talking about Liz Cheney right now. What will happen We'll
find out Tuesday night. Mike talk to him between now
and then, but definitely after, and you can listen to
(31:10):
his own podcasts, The Versus Media Podcasts on his substack.
Follow him on x formerly known as Twitter at red
Ste's ste Z Stephen L. Miller always a pleasure, Thank
you for your time, and enjoy election night.
Speaker 12 (31:23):
Yeah, we'll see so I'll get my year clones figure
it out before next.
Speaker 4 (31:27):
Fair enough technology is going to be the downfall of us,
all including yours. Truly A timeout will come back your
text five seven, seven thirty nine, another edition, a new
one of Deep Thoughts by Vice President Kamala Harris and
a new ad from Julia Roberts that really paints a
bastardized picture of what husbands and wives, how they interact
(31:50):
with each other. Do they have to lie to each other?
But how they vote? According to her, the answer is yes.
Back with that and more after this, I'm ryan schuling
live and now Deep Thoughts by Vice President Kamala Harris.
Speaker 6 (32:15):
And I have fought for many who have harmed other
human beings. You know what, let me say something about
this here because we're fighting for a democracy.
Speaker 7 (32:28):
Fighting for a democracy, and understand the difference here.
Speaker 3 (32:37):
Understand the difference here.
Speaker 6 (32:39):
I'm moving forward, moving forward, Understand the difference here.
Speaker 10 (32:46):
What we are looking at is.
Speaker 6 (32:48):
A difference in this election. Let's move forward and see
where we are.
Speaker 4 (32:54):
Well. I'm a little dizzy after that rendition sounds like
her prompter froze again. Moving forward because we're fighting for democracy.
Understand the difference in fighting for democracy when we.
Speaker 3 (33:08):
Are moving forward.
Speaker 4 (33:10):
Because we are fighting for democracy, you need to understand
the difference.
Speaker 3 (33:15):
Seriously, when you heard that she repeated those three phrases.
Speaker 4 (33:18):
How many times each. My good lord, she was not
made for this. She's in over her head. We all
know that. Can she close the deal somehow? It's within
the realm of outcomes that she can win. I don't
think that's going to happen. I'll give you further evidence
of that as we go along. Valdemore Archer. Let us
still to join us in our number two along with
(33:39):
Floyd Cerulei, getting a little local with our Colorado politics.
Right now, Donald Trump is in Warren, Michigan. Now that
is north of Detroit. It is in Macomb County. It
is where a lot of autoworkers live. This is a
really good place for him to be. And he is
closing with a flourish as he did in twenty sixteen,
and really as he did in twenty twenty, because he
(33:59):
was really far behind Joe Biden, at least as the
polls told us eight points. It said in the last
poll of polls, he ended up losing by four and
a half points. Nationally wanted to play this ad though
Julia Roberts voiced it, produced it, distribute it paid for it.
Speaker 3 (34:15):
Let me know what you think.
Speaker 12 (34:19):
You're current, honey, in the one place in America, where
women still have a right to choose.
Speaker 10 (34:27):
You can vote any way you want.
Speaker 2 (34:31):
And no one will ever know.
Speaker 6 (34:36):
Did you make your right?
Speaker 2 (34:37):
Jory?
Speaker 6 (34:37):
Share it in, Honey, Remember what happens in the booth
stays in the booth.
Speaker 10 (34:42):
Vote Harris, well, vote coming Good.
Speaker 6 (34:45):
Is responsible for the contents of this ad.
Speaker 4 (34:47):
It is such a patronizing, condescending, and fanalizing ad. It's
as if it were written by somebody who's never been
in a relationship with somebody of the opposite sex. In
this case, they are assuming that men and women they
hide things from each each other. They lie to each
other about how they're going to vote. They have to
lie to each other, or else she's going to be
to the moon, Alice when we get home. What kind
(35:09):
of picture are they painting here about what they think
of American couples that they can't disagree and have that
be out.
Speaker 3 (35:17):
In the open.
Speaker 4 (35:17):
Don't worry. You can vote however you want to. Women,
That bad man can't tell you what to do, just
their view, their cartoonish view of men, continues throughout this
election cycle, and it's a big reason why Kamala Harris
stands to lose by the largest margin of any Democrat
candidate with men ever, including Hillary Clinton. I'm calling that.
(35:40):
That's when my bold predictions for Tuesday Night. We'll see
if it holds, and if it does, Donald Trump will
be your winner. Valtimore, Archiletta Next, and Ryan Schuling Live
Look about the rock yr world.
Speaker 2 (00:03):
For those we need to talk about, to talk, we talk.
Speaker 3 (00:11):
This.
Speaker 4 (00:11):
He is Ryan Shueling live on Denver's Talk station at
six point thirty kow.
Speaker 3 (00:18):
Here we are.
Speaker 4 (00:19):
It's November, four days to go until election Day twenty
twenty four. Ryan shuling with you, Zack Segers alongside Ice
Station z and Kelly Couchera also helping along through this
live broadcast. We can take your text throughout At five seven, seven,
three nine we are loaded for bear with guests coming
(00:40):
up in just a little bit Stephen L. Miller, host
of the Versus Media podcast. We'll be commenting on all
the misinformation disinformation coming from the left regarding comments made
by Donald Trump over these last couple of days. It
is brutal, it is stark, it is sick, it is twisted,
it is desperate, it is Valtimore. Archiletta is happy and
(01:02):
he'll be joining me to start hour number two. He
of course, is the Republican nominee for the first congressional district,
going head to head against Representative Diana to get It's
a tough race, but he has run it well. He'll
make his closing argument coming up during the second hour
and then coming up at the bottom of the second hour.
Floyd Serulei, former chair of the Democratic Party in Colorado
(01:23):
going back to the mid nineteen eighties, one of the
top consultant's most respected minds in politics in this state.
He'll be joining me for his preview of election night,
and he'll be joining me on Election Night over on
KOA for our live coverage. Join us Tuesday, starting at
six pm. I'm gonna sprint over there as soon as
the Dan Kaplis show is over and will carry live
(01:44):
coverage for you from six pm Mountain Time until eleven pm,
or possibly later if there are still newsworthy developments happening
with regard to the vote. But joining us now, you
can follow him on ex at Gordon g.
Speaker 3 (01:57):
Chang.
Speaker 4 (01:58):
He is the author of the already best selling number
one on Amazon plan Read China's Project to Destroy America,
and he's a frequent guest on this program. We always
appreciate his time. Gordon Chang joins us. Gordon, thank you
so much.
Speaker 2 (02:11):
Well, thank you, Brian, I really appreciate it absolutely.
Speaker 4 (02:14):
Let's start with the book and we'll work from there.
I mentioned last time the timing of this book and
why you wrote it when you wrote it, but as
you're kind of exploring more about what China presents as
a threat and a challenge to the United States, you
take it a step further by saying they have a
project to destroy America.
Speaker 3 (02:33):
What do you mean with that title?
Speaker 2 (02:35):
I mean that China wants to make sure that the
American Republic no longer exists. But Communist Party believes it
is in an existential struggle with the US. And it's
not because of anything that we say or do, Bryan,
but it's because of who we are. You have an
insecure regime in Beijing is worried about the inspirational impact
of our values and form of governmance on the Chinese people,
(02:58):
which means that the Party believes it will never be
safe as long as there is freedom and democracy in
the US. So the Party has made it very clear
is only going to be one survivor. It's either going
to be the People's Republic of China or the United
States of America, not both.
Speaker 4 (03:14):
Gordon, as the Chinese no doubt anxiously await the results
of our election, this could go one of two very
different divergent ways as it pertains to China, and Jijiping
and the leadership there in the Communist Party. Can you
articulate in bullet point fashion exactly what those differences would be,
what China might do their actions in the wake of
(03:36):
a Kamala Harris victory as opposed to a Donald Trump victory.
Speaker 2 (03:41):
Well, any new American president and regardless of party, regarded
regardless of ideology, will give China a his period, because
every new president thinks that he or in maybe this case,
she can do better than his or her predecessor. This
is a problem because not so much Kamala Harris, but
because right now China is pressing us and our friends
(04:02):
and allies really hard, and we do not have time
to give China any sort of leeway. The other thing
is we know that Kamala Harris is not that interested
in foreign policy. There's actually Seymour Hirsch reporting that she
actually ordered the Director of the Office of National Intelligence
not to send her the President's Daily Brief, which is
(04:23):
the collection of US intelligence in the preceding twenty four hours,
comes in every morning. So this is going to be
learning on the job, and I think China will try
to take advantage of her. On the other hand, you've
got Trump, Trump's already been president, probably less of a
grace period, also because Trump is probably pretty pissed about
what China did in twenty twenty to help Joe Biden win,
(04:44):
And so I suspect that Trump is going to be
sort of roaring out of the gate, guns blazing.
Speaker 4 (04:50):
Gordon Change joining us, and again you can find his
book on Amazon, Plan Red China's Project to Destroy America.
As we count down now four days left until the election, Gordon,
as you analyze it from a foreign policy standpoint, what
differences do you see? And you just kind of touched
on one of those in a second Trump administration versus
(05:12):
a first one.
Speaker 3 (05:13):
Should the former president win on Tuesday Night, Yeah.
Speaker 2 (05:17):
My guess is that siegm Ping and Vladimir Putin will
probably be more circumspect. And the reason is it's not
because of Trump's policies. I mean, they don't like Biden's policies,
which means they probably wouldn't like a continuation of his
administration with Kamala Harris, it's more just the temperament of
the two individuals. They are really scared of Donald Trump
(05:41):
returning to the Oval office because he's unpredictable, I mean
he can do things which take them by surprise. Siejemping
was taken by surprise, in fact in April twenty seventeen
when he was at Mara Lago and Trump stood up
at dinner and said he had just ordered a missile
strike on a Chinese friend, which was Syria. Were pretty
well behaved for their even because they're pretty bad. They
(06:05):
were pretty well behaved during Trump's four years because they
just did not want to take Trump on. So I
think that that's going to be the defining difference. They
look at Kamala Harris. They may not like what she does,
but they probably think they can control her, or at
least predict her, and that makes them comfortable. And we
we certainly don't want the bad actors in the world
feeling comfortable about the United States.
Speaker 4 (06:26):
Speaking of those bad actors, Gordon, I follow you on
X and your many interviews on national media because you
tend to be one step ahead of the curve when
it comes to matters abroad, specifically regarding China. But this
one in particular, I've seen you commenting on at length
over these last several hours. Donald Trump just posting the
following on X formerly known as Twitter quote, I strongly
(06:48):
condemned the barbaric violence against Hindus, Christians and other minorities
who are getting attacked and looted by mobs in Bangladesh,
which remains in a total state of chaos, continuing quote.
Speaker 3 (06:58):
It would have never happened my watch.
Speaker 4 (07:01):
Kamala and Joe have ignored Hindus across the world and
in America. They have been a disaster from Israel to
Ukraine to our southern border. But we will make America
strong again and bring back peace through strength. Gordon, can
you articulate to our listeners about the situation in Bangladesh
and why there hasn't been an immediate response to it
from the Biden administration.
Speaker 2 (07:22):
I think the Biden administration wants to give the new
government in Bangladesh a grace period for want of a
better term. They according to India, Biden really tipped the
scales against the existing prime minister who is now out
and who was a friend of India. The new Prime
minister has presided over or has not been able to
(07:45):
control the violence, and that's why there is this continuing
disruption and chaos in Bangladesh right now. And I think
it favors the Chinese certainly doesn't favor India, certainly doesn't
favor US. You know, I don't think that Biden owns
the problem. Biden contributed a lot to the problem, so
I think he bears a large amount of responsibility for
(08:06):
what's going on there, and none of it is good
for the people of Bangladesh, and it's certainly not good
for the US and for the democracies in the region.
Speaker 4 (08:14):
Gordon Chang, author of Plan Red, China's project to Destroy America,
joining us here on this four days before election day
twenty twenty four. Gordon, you and I have spoken at
length as well about the border crisis, and many people
automatically jumped to the Mexican drug cartels or the Venezuelan
gangs pouring over. That's been a big topic, an issue
(08:35):
here locally in Aurora.
Speaker 3 (08:37):
That's become national news.
Speaker 4 (08:38):
But there's the Chinese element to this as well, in
particular as it applies to the fentanyl issue. And I
saw you quote this following tweet in Mexico, Ji Dang Xiang,
a Chinese citizen linked to both the Cartel de Sinaloa
and the Cartel Jalisco Nueva Generacion was arrested in Mexico
City on October thirty. First, can you walk us through
(08:59):
the exis of the drug trade, the cartels in Mexico,
the producers of the base elements of fentanyl in China,
and how those drugs are getting across the border.
Speaker 2 (09:09):
Yeah, those two cartels are the ones that primarily control
the fentanyl trade coming into the United States. They buy
precursor chemicals and pill presses from China and then they
employ Chinese technicians in Mexico to mix the precursors into fentanyl,
and then the gangs they sneak it across. They don't
even have to sneak it across, but it comes across
(09:31):
the open southern border. So China's very much involved in this. China.
These fentanyl gangs in China, they're large, they're well organized,
their international scope. They couldn't operate without the knowledge and
approval of the Communist Party. But we also know the
party fully supports the fentanyl gangs. Some of them are
actually state owned companies. But also we know that Chinese
diplomats give covered to the gangs. Chinese officials they expect
(09:54):
every container that leaves China and the fentanyl producers. They
run their money through the Chinese state banking system in
Chinese owned TikTok, which Beijing uses to promote its narratives.
It promotes illegal drug use in the United States. So
backing up the Chinese regime is one hundred percent for
what's going on, and that's seventy to seventy five thousand
(10:15):
Americans each year die from doses of elusic Chinese fentanyl.
Speaker 3 (10:19):
Gordon.
Speaker 4 (10:19):
We've seen the evolution of sympathies for China in specific
form from Governor Tim Walls being very open about his
admiration for China, his many trips to China while he
was a younger man, and kind of the nefarious overlap
there may be between the Chinese Communist Party in Walls
and maybe his interests. But this one really jumps off
(10:41):
the page to me as well. About a Chinese Red
Army parade in which two members holding US flags Representative
Grace Meng Democrat New York and New York City's own
Mayor Eric Adams.
Speaker 3 (10:52):
What was this event and what's going on here?
Speaker 2 (10:56):
Yeah, this is one of a series of events that
take place in New York's where you have the Chinese
Consulate in New York participate in these events as there
was this one, and this one was particularly despicable because
you had people dress up in People's Liberation Army uniforms.
They were singing Chinese songs, carrying Chinese flags. This shows
(11:19):
that there are some Chinese Americans who are disloyal to
our country, and this is a growing problem we have
in New York. The Linda's Son indictment, Linda Son was
a senior advisor to to New York governors Andrew Pomo
and the current one, Kathy Hockel. She's being charged with
being an agent for China, and from the looks of things,
(11:43):
she certainly was deeply involved in helping the Communist Party
promote its policies in New York State. The reason is
that the New York Democratic Party looks to Chinese Americans
for votes, and Chinese Americans throughout New York State, but
especially in New York City, have the very disturbing connections
to the Communist Party.
Speaker 4 (12:04):
Gordon a couple final questions here. First one is a
quick hitter, and that is if Donald Trump is victorious
on Tuesdays, I hope and I believe that he will
be have there been any talks about you joining a
Trump administration and would you.
Speaker 2 (12:17):
Yeah, No, No, no talks about that at all. I'm
not really an official. If you want to be an
official in any administration, you've got to fight for it,
and I'm certainly not going to do that.
Speaker 4 (12:29):
Following up on that, then this is a post from
you that I could not agree with more. We must
rely on China for nothing. You and I have spoken
many times in the past. I agree with Governor Ron
DeSantis his strong stance on China.
Speaker 3 (12:40):
That we need to decouple. We are too reliant.
Speaker 4 (12:42):
We are basically slaves to their slave labor for so
many of our products and services and drugs, et cetera.
If you were to profer advice then to a Trump
administration about the first step and taking a step back
from China from being less reliant on China, what was
he The first thing you would advise on day one,
January twenty, twenty twenty five.
Speaker 2 (13:04):
Raise the tariffs. Trump, in his talk with Maria Bartiromo
in February said he imposed at least sixty percent across
the board tariffs, and the other thing is just enforce
the Teriff Act of nineteen thirty which prohibits the importation
into the United States of goods made with forced labor.
Almost all of China's green products are made with slightly
(13:25):
weaker labor. Can't come into the US if we enforce
our laws, and many other Chinese products are also made
with prohibited labor. Enforce the law with the the second thing,
I'd say, first thing raised the tariffs.
Speaker 4 (13:39):
And our first step in easing ourselves from the addiction
to China, and one of the best advocates for that
in his book Plan Read China's Project and Destroy America.
It's a bestseller on Amazon. I highly recommend that you
check it out and purchase it online. You can also
follow him on x at Gordon g Chang Gordon always
thankful for your time and insights.
Speaker 3 (14:00):
We'll see what happens Tuesday night.
Speaker 2 (14:02):
Yeah, and thank you so much, Brian. As I said,
I really appreciate being on your era.
Speaker 4 (14:07):
Absolutely we appreciate him being on your reaction at five
seven seven three nine.
Speaker 3 (14:11):
You can send your text there.
Speaker 4 (14:13):
There is so much to sort through fake news at
its very nay dear, both yesterday and today, and I
want to start with this deceptive edit of Donald Trump
and something that he said about protecting women. This was
the Team Harris edit, and they made it sound like
he was going to take abortion rights away whether the
(14:36):
women like it or not.
Speaker 5 (14:38):
They said, Sir, I just think it's inappropriate for you
to say.
Speaker 1 (14:41):
I said, well, I'm going to do it whether the
women like it or not. I'm going to do it
whether the women like it or not, whether the women
like it or not, whether the women like it or not,
whether the women like it or not, whether the women
like it or not.
Speaker 2 (14:55):
I'm going to do it whether the women like it
or not.
Speaker 4 (14:57):
Okay, that's ridiculous as it sounds. We'll get to the
full context of the entire quote in a moment. But
of course Kamala Harris got to use the left's terms
for what they say. We do.
Speaker 3 (15:06):
We pounced, we seese, she pounced.
Speaker 4 (15:09):
And sees on these comments in the context that you
just heard them, and this is what she made them about.
Speaker 6 (15:15):
I will comment on the former president Donald Trump's remark
about women and whether they like it or not, and listen,
it's just it actually is very offensive to women in
terms of not understanding their agency, their authority, their right,
(15:39):
and their ability to make decisions about their own lives,
including their own bodies.
Speaker 4 (15:44):
Okay, either she is a complete buffoon. Fact check true,
or she is an absolute liar. Fact check true as well.
What he said had absolutely nothing to do with the
topic of abortion, but rather the criminal illegal aliens who
were spilled across our border and killed our young women,
wives and daughters and mothers, and that he was going
(16:09):
to stop it, that the border crisis would be solved
on his watch, that had exploded on her watch, and
that she is the reason and the reason alone why
women like Lake and Riley and Rachel Morin are dead.
Speaker 7 (16:24):
Kamala has imported criminal migrants from prisons, in jails, from
insane asylums and mental institutions all over the world, from
Venezuela to the Congo, including savage criminals who assault, rape,
and murder our women and girls.
Speaker 1 (16:42):
Anyone who would.
Speaker 8 (16:43):
Let monsters kidnap and kill our children does not belong
anywhere near the Oval office. And my people told me
about four weeks ago, I always say no, I want
to protect the people.
Speaker 5 (16:54):
I want to protect the women of our country. I
want to protect the women, sir, please don't say that.
Why they said, we think it's I think it's very
inappropriate for you to say.
Speaker 1 (17:04):
I said, why I'm president, I want to protect the.
Speaker 2 (17:06):
Women of our country.
Speaker 5 (17:08):
They said, They said, Sir, I just think it's inappropriate
for you to say, pay these guys a lot of money.
Speaker 2 (17:21):
Can you believe it?
Speaker 1 (17:23):
I said, well, I'm going to do it, whether the
women like it or not. I'm going to protect them.
Speaker 4 (17:29):
For our female voters out there who support Donald Trump
or don't what he just said. Are you offended by that?
Are you put out by the fact that Donald Trump
wants to protect women from being raped and murdered by criminal,
illegal aliens?
Speaker 3 (17:43):
Dost thou offend?
Speaker 4 (17:45):
Even Jake Tapper defended Trump, if so lightly.
Speaker 9 (17:48):
When Trump said he was going to do something for women,
whether they like it or not, whether the women like
it or not, he was talking about protecting women, protecting women,
whether they like it or not. Certainly you can take
it with the language, but it wasn't. He wasn't saying
he was just going to do whatever he wanted, regardless
of you know, anyway.
Speaker 3 (18:06):
Why we take an issue with the language.
Speaker 4 (18:08):
Well anyway, but let's let's let let's talk.
Speaker 3 (18:10):
I mean, but you take my point.
Speaker 9 (18:14):
I'm saying, I'm going to protect them, whether that women
want me to protect them, whether right.
Speaker 10 (18:18):
Some would say that's misogynists, but.
Speaker 9 (18:20):
It's not as as she presented it.
Speaker 10 (18:23):
I think, look, ultimately, I think we have to be
careful in these last days. We did this in twenty sixteen.
He's going to say something horrible, ridiculous quoted accurately. No,
that's not my point. I just don't think we need
to was horrible and ridiculous every update, because the point
is what she where she wanted to, which is we
(18:44):
know who this guy is. This is not someone who
respects women. That being said, I think the Puerto Rico
ad or General Kelly's comments, it's.
Speaker 3 (18:55):
Just a shell game.
Speaker 4 (18:55):
They're throwing spaghetti against the wall and hoping it's.
Speaker 3 (18:58):
Stick to something, stick to Donald Trump, that'll bring him down.
Speaker 4 (19:02):
They keep trying, they keep failing, and they will fail
again on Tuesday night, joining us next Stephen L. Miller,
host of the Versus Media podcast. That's not the only
hopes that will debunk today, the other one involving Liz Cheney.
When we come back, did Trump call for her to
be executed by firing squad?
Speaker 2 (19:20):
Question mark?
Speaker 11 (19:34):
I see one of the big stories this week continues
to be the fallout from Trump's disastrous Madison Square Garden rally,
where one of the speakers called Puerto Rico a floating
island of garbage. Well, on Tuesday night, Joe Biden responded,
and he did not help doing garbage.
Speaker 2 (19:51):
I see floating down there as his supporters, his his
his demonizational team is unconscionable.
Speaker 3 (19:58):
Thank you, Jill.
Speaker 11 (20:00):
I understand you didn't mean everybody, just the guy who
said the one thing. But yeah, okay, And if there
are any aids of his watching right now, if he
attempts to talk in the next four days, please deploy
some tactical soft.
Speaker 3 (20:12):
Serve to this area.
Speaker 11 (20:14):
Okay, every time, Joe go, you frow you.
Speaker 2 (20:19):
Love him, Love the man.
Speaker 4 (20:26):
Stephen Colbert with his highly partisan opening monologue and that
joke referring to Tony Hinchcliff, and he called the entire
Madison Square Garden rally disastrous.
Speaker 3 (20:37):
Hinchcliff spoke like.
Speaker 4 (20:38):
Many hours before Donald Trump did, and I'm a whole
the event was a raging success. I don't know what
he's talking about there, but it does appear that to
a certain degree of this last week, it's a battle
of attrition he had Hinchcliff with that own goal. Then
you had Joe Biden saying that all of Trump's supporters
were garbage. Then you have this misinterpreted, to put it kindly,
(20:59):
quotete about Donald Trump of protecting women from illegal criminal
aliens who would rape and murder them, taken totally out
of context by Harris, by the media, etc. And then
you have Mark Cuban who gets skewered and lamb basted
for saying there are no intelligent women who would be
(21:20):
around Donald Trump, and that sparked a controversy. And we'll
get into the Liz Cheney stuff in just a moment.
But to his point on X, he says, this is
the jobs report that just came out today, which was abysmal.
It was supposed to be in the six figures, like
one hundred thousand jobs created for the month of October.
This just in twelve thousand jobs only nationally created last month.
Speaker 3 (21:44):
And Steven L.
Speaker 4 (21:45):
Miller, our next guest posts quote and now you understand
the hyperventilation over Liz Cheney and imaginary apostrophes. Steven, welcome
back to Ryan shuling Life.
Speaker 2 (21:57):
Oh hey, Ryan, Hey, are you your cue?
Speaker 12 (22:00):
I was on muting, I was unmuting.
Speaker 2 (22:02):
And I thought I panicked.
Speaker 12 (22:03):
I thought I hit I hung up, which I've done before,
and I just my brain justpy.
Speaker 2 (22:07):
I just had a Biden moment.
Speaker 3 (22:08):
Yeah, well, there we go.
Speaker 4 (22:09):
And speaking of let's get inside Joe Biden's brain, I
know it's a dangerous journey.
Speaker 3 (22:13):
Yeah, can we not? But on this issue of the
apostrophe in there.
Speaker 4 (22:18):
Well, this issue of the apostrophe and whether or not
it happened, and the transcript, and now we're hearing that
the stenographer, the literal stenographer, and not the press that
covers in which are often accurately called stenographers, didn't want
to put the apostrophe in, but the Biden White House
coaxed this person to do it. Take us through that
from your perspective and what your call is on it,
(22:39):
balls and strikes.
Speaker 12 (22:42):
It's if we're talking about no one is above the law.
This is actually a violation of.
Speaker 3 (22:54):
Sounds like we lost them.
Speaker 4 (22:54):
They're going to put him back on hold, see if
we can reconnect or fix that. Can And in the meantime,
while he ponders on the meaning of an apostrophe, sounds
like we're good, Okay, we'll go back to ready.
Speaker 12 (23:08):
Go ahead it Stephen, Yeah, you can tell where four
days from an election, that's right, Rain is gone. Apologies
for that. Basically what happened. Biden called Trump supporters garbage.
The White House stenographers, the actual federal employees, not the
Washington Post or Politico, put it into the public record
that way before releasing it to the public. The White
(23:31):
House comm Shop, including Andrew Bates and Koine. John Pierre
added the apostrophe that you can quibble if that was
at the behest of other journalists or if that was
how that direction went. But before we knew it, there
was the narrative that there was an imaginary apostrophe, which
is the top five thing I've ever seen in my
life is the American media trying to will an imaginary
(23:53):
apostrophe into existence because they know how bad this looks
for Joe Biden and came out last night. And then,
of course, like you mentioned, we had the job support incoming,
which reporters would have had a heads up to. So
today is the hyperventilating over this hitty and the honor
of her family.
Speaker 4 (24:11):
And let's get to that. Because the Harris campaign, as
they are, wont to do completely deceptively edited this, and
I'm going to play this in order so that you
get the evolution of fake news as Donald Trump accurately
describes it.
Speaker 5 (24:25):
But his daughter is a very dumb individual, very dumb.
She's a radical warhawk. Let's put her with a rifle,
standy there with nine barrel shooting at her. Okay, let's
see how she feels about it. You know, when the
guns are trained in her face.
Speaker 4 (24:41):
Now they stop it. There, we won't. We'll continue in
a moment. But this is the pattern. Donald Trump says something,
it's taken out of context in a deceptive edit by
Team Harris and or the Democrat media. But I repeat myself,
and then Kamala Harris swoops in to comment on it.
Speaker 6 (24:58):
And then even worse, he has increased his violent rhetoric.
Donald Trump has about political opponents and in great details,
in great details, suggested rifles should be trained on former Representative.
Speaker 4 (25:16):
Liz Cheney so she should be the target of a
firing squad. And Jim Acosta is even trying to dismiss
those who he says want to dance on the head
of a pin about Trump's comments because they're bad.
Speaker 3 (25:28):
We got to make them bad.
Speaker 4 (25:29):
We got to make sure that this sticks to him,
and we got to carry water for the Harris campaign
because they're behind.
Speaker 13 (25:33):
I mean, you and I both though at Lance. You
know this doing things happened late in the camp. I
mean I covered the two thousand and four presidential campaign.
I covered John Kerry, and there was an Osama bin
Laden video that came out the weekend before the election,
and there was a lot of analysis that said that
that moved votes at the very end. So Donald Trump
talking about executing Liz Cheney, and let's just be clear,
(25:54):
when you talk about nine barrels, I'm sorry for all
the folks out there who want to dance on the
head of a That is what he is talking about,
an execution fantasy. But Karen, your thoughts on how this
could move the race, He's absolutely wrong, a liar and
an idiot, or all of the above. Here is the
complete Donald Trump quote surrounding Liz Cheney taking a gun
(26:15):
and heading into battle because she is such a warmongering neocon.
Speaker 5 (26:20):
But his daughter is a very dumb individual, very dumb.
Speaker 3 (26:25):
She's a radical warhawk.
Speaker 5 (26:27):
Let's put her with a rifle, standy there with nine
barrel shooting at her. Okay, let's see how she feels
about it. You know, when the guns are trained on
her face.
Speaker 3 (26:37):
You know, there are warhawks when.
Speaker 5 (26:38):
They're sitting in Washington in a nice building saying, oh, gee,
will let's send let's send ten thousand troops right into
the mouth of the enemy.
Speaker 4 (26:47):
What strikes me here, Stephen is this was a regular
criticism of her father, Dick Cheney, the neocons of the
two thousand republic Republican Party that were war hungry and
going overseas and fighting these battles of misadventure about you know,
let's send your sons and daughters off to war.
Speaker 3 (27:03):
That's what Trump was saying.
Speaker 4 (27:04):
But the media is completely distorting it, as is Team Harris,
as is Liz Cheney herself.
Speaker 12 (27:12):
Yeah. I mean, this is a boiler play argument that
has been made about every single politician since the Vietnam War.
And that's even before my time. And so if you
were around for two thousand and eight, this was a
criticism of John McCain coming off the heels of the
Bush presidency. And so yeah, I say here, I'm just like,
welcome to code Pink, Donald Trump, I guess, and yeah,
(27:35):
I look at this and I just say this is
the reflexive position of our media, which is, if Donald
Trump is seen to be on their side of an issue,
which they haven't for twenty five years. On this issue,
they theonetically and reflexively have to jump to the opposite
side of it because of how bad or wrong that
they think he is, and it exposes a lot of hypocrisy.
And the thing I guess I'm asking is where is
(27:57):
Kamala Harris. For the last three weeks, We've had the
media versus Elon Musk, and then we had Trump versus McDonald's,
and then we had Trump versus Puerto Rico. Now we
have Trump versus Liz Cheney, and Kamala Harris has been
the smallest part of all of this, just simply offering
miniature sound bites and touring the country with celebrities who
(28:18):
haven't had to steal the impact of inflation for the
past three or four years. This is the smallest candidate
in the smallest campaign that I've ever seen. And maybe
the strategy is just let Donald Trump's say stuff and
the country won't go for this again. Well, you need
to pay attention to Hillary Clinton's campaign, which had the
very same philosophy. I'm completely bewildered, and it's mainly because
(28:40):
that there is no Harris campaign. Really, this is all
about let Trump go out there and say cookie stuff
and I'm going to die on the defend Liz Cheney
at all costs. And meanwhile, Donald Trump is courting muddlim
vote in Dearborn, Michigan.
Speaker 3 (28:53):
That's a great point, Steve, and I want to follow
up on with you.
Speaker 4 (28:55):
This will be the third election cycle with Donald Trump
in it for president.
Speaker 3 (28:59):
In the first one, only two more left. All Right.
Speaker 4 (29:04):
Hillary Clinton was a very known quantity both on in
terms of her name recognition, where she stood on issues.
Speaker 3 (29:11):
She was viewed as maybe.
Speaker 4 (29:11):
A moderate Democrat, and so she didn't really have to
make that case as much. Joe Biden has been a
known quantity in Washington, and when he ran for president,
that was going over forty years or so. Kamala Harris
is a much more unknown quantity, and to your point,
I think it was much more important for her to
close the deal here down the stretch, to affirm the
people who were on the fence exactly who she was
(29:33):
and what she stood for. She bails on Joe Rogan
trying to dictate terms to him. That was a catastrophic
error in my judgment. And like you said, she's in
the background here, she's not even at the forefront of
her own campaign. She's not giving people out there a
reason to vote for her. Is that a fatal flaw
and mistake?
Speaker 12 (29:53):
He's pulling close? And I have some thoughts about the
election that I don't know. If it's state, I don't know.
Speaker 2 (29:57):
Hope she's gonna win or lose this.
Speaker 12 (30:00):
If she does lose, there's going to be five or
six things we can point to and say, yep, it
was right there, right there, right there, and right there.
And so somebody who has decided she's been an office
for three and a half years and can't tell voters
what she's going to do different than a job's report
that comes back with twelve thousand jobs. And that's really
all this was. This was a gimmed up controversy to
(30:21):
get to avoid having to ask her about a job
support because when she answered questions on an airport tarmac today,
it wasn't about twelve thousand jobs. It was about Liz cheeing.
And so, as an unknown quantity that is going to
be her biggest flaw that she doesn't have any plans
to move the economy floor beyond what she has said
with Joe Biden. And again you have a media who's
(30:43):
just decided that we're going to go all in and
try to drag this woman cackling across the finish line.
Speaker 4 (30:49):
I had to put twelve thousand jobs in perspective for
fifty states. That would be an average of only two
hundred and forty jobs per state. It is a knemic
and that it is a bad number. But like Steven's,
she was able to dodge around that one. Because everybody's
talking about Liz Cheney right now. What will happen We'll
find out Tuesday night. Mike talk to him between now
and then, but definitely after, and you can listen to
(31:10):
his own podcasts, The Versus Media Podcasts on his substack.
Follow him on x formerly known as Twitter at red
Ste's ste Z Stephen L. Miller always a pleasure, Thank
you for your time, and enjoy election night.
Speaker 12 (31:23):
Yeah, we'll see so I'll get my year clones figure
it out before next.
Speaker 4 (31:27):
Fair enough technology is going to be the downfall of us,
all including yours. Truly A timeout will come back your
text five seven, seven thirty nine, another edition, a new
one of Deep Thoughts by Vice President Kamala Harris and
a new ad from Julia Roberts that really paints a
bastardized picture of what husbands and wives, how they interact
(31:50):
with each other. Do they have to lie to each other?
But how they vote? According to her, the answer is yes.
Back with that and more after this, I'm ryan schuling
live and now Deep Thoughts by Vice President Kamala Harris.
Speaker 6 (32:15):
And I have fought for many who have harmed other
human beings. You know what, let me say something about
this here because we're fighting for a democracy.
Speaker 7 (32:28):
Fighting for a democracy, and understand the difference here.
Speaker 3 (32:37):
Understand the difference here.
Speaker 6 (32:39):
I'm moving forward, moving forward, Understand the difference here.
Speaker 10 (32:46):
What we are looking at is.
Speaker 6 (32:48):
A difference in this election. Let's move forward and see
where we are.
Speaker 4 (32:54):
Well. I'm a little dizzy after that rendition sounds like
her prompter froze again. Moving forward because we're fighting for democracy.
Understand the difference in fighting for democracy when we.
Speaker 3 (33:08):
Are moving forward.
Speaker 4 (33:10):
Because we are fighting for democracy, you need to understand
the difference.
Speaker 3 (33:15):
Seriously, when you heard that she repeated those three phrases.
Speaker 4 (33:18):
How many times each. My good lord, she was not
made for this. She's in over her head. We all
know that. Can she close the deal somehow? It's within
the realm of outcomes that she can win. I don't
think that's going to happen. I'll give you further evidence
of that as we go along. Valdemore Archer. Let us
still to join us in our number two along with
(33:39):
Floyd Cerulei, getting a little local with our Colorado politics.
Right now, Donald Trump is in Warren, Michigan. Now that
is north of Detroit. It is in Macomb County. It
is where a lot of autoworkers live. This is a
really good place for him to be. And he is
closing with a flourish as he did in twenty sixteen,
and really as he did in twenty twenty, because he
(33:59):
was really far behind Joe Biden, at least as the
polls told us eight points. It said in the last
poll of polls, he ended up losing by four and
a half points. Nationally wanted to play this ad though
Julia Roberts voiced it, produced it, distribute it paid for it.
Speaker 3 (34:15):
Let me know what you think.
Speaker 12 (34:19):
You're current, honey, in the one place in America, where
women still have a right to choose.
Speaker 10 (34:27):
You can vote any way you want.
Speaker 2 (34:31):
And no one will ever know.
Speaker 6 (34:36):
Did you make your right?
Speaker 2 (34:37):
Jory?
Speaker 6 (34:37):
Share it in, Honey, Remember what happens in the booth
stays in the booth.
Speaker 10 (34:42):
Vote Harris, well, vote coming Good.
Speaker 6 (34:45):
Is responsible for the contents of this ad.
Speaker 4 (34:47):
It is such a patronizing, condescending, and fanalizing ad. It's
as if it were written by somebody who's never been
in a relationship with somebody of the opposite sex. In
this case, they are assuming that men and women they
hide things from each each other. They lie to each
other about how they're going to vote. They have to
lie to each other, or else she's going to be
to the moon, Alice when we get home. What kind
(35:09):
of picture are they painting here about what they think
of American couples that they can't disagree and have that
be out.
Speaker 3 (35:17):
In the open.
Speaker 4 (35:17):
Don't worry. You can vote however you want to. Women,
That bad man can't tell you what to do, just
their view, their cartoonish view of men, continues throughout this
election cycle, and it's a big reason why Kamala Harris
stands to lose by the largest margin of any Democrat
candidate with men ever, including Hillary Clinton. I'm calling that.
(35:40):
That's when my bold predictions for Tuesday Night. We'll see
if it holds, and if it does, Donald Trump will
be your winner. Valtimore, Archiletta Next, and Ryan Schuling Live
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
The Joe Rogan Experience
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.