February 26, 2025 • 36 mins
In the first hour of today's edition of Ryan Schuiling Live, Ryan looks at Jake Tapper's new book about Joe Biden's decline, and points out inconsistencies between Tapper's current reporting and his reporting from early 2024, including the left's big lie about Joe Biden's stutter.
Ryan then closes the hour with two editions of "Trump's Hot Takes"
Ryan then closes the hour with two editions of "Trump's Hot Takes"
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
How do you think it makes little kids with stutters
feel when they see you make a comment like that.
Speaker 2 (00:06):
First and foremost, I had no idea that Joe Biden
ever suffered from a stutter. I think what we see
on stage with Joe Biden Jake is very clearly a
cognitive decline. That's what I'm referring to. It makes me
uncomfortable you are.
Speaker 3 (00:22):
I think it's so amazing.
Speaker 1 (00:23):
It's so amazing to me that try and figure out
an answer cognitive decline.
Speaker 3 (00:27):
You're trying to.
Speaker 2 (00:28):
Tell me that what I was suggesting was I think.
Speaker 1 (00:30):
That you were mocking his stutter. Yeah, I think you
were mocking his stutter. And I think you have absolutely
no standing to diagnose somebody's cognitive decline. I would think
that somebody in the Pump family would be more sensitive
to people who do do not have medical licenses diagnosing
politicians from Afar. Plenty of people have diagnosed your father
(00:51):
from Afar, and I'm sure it defends you. Your father
in law from a farm, I'm sure it defends you.
You don't have any standing to.
Speaker 2 (00:57):
Say noticing now what I'm saying.
Speaker 3 (00:59):
You just talk that a cognitive the cluse. I have
one last question for.
Speaker 2 (01:03):
You are times on stage, and it's very concerning to
a lot of people that this could be the leader
of the free world. That is all I'm saying, I Jennus,
sorry for Joe Bennett.
Speaker 3 (01:14):
I appreciate it. You know, we have three installments of
Trump's hot takes coming up throughout today's program. But right there,
what you just heard here on Ryan Schuling Live Welcome
to It on this Wednesday was an extremely frigidly frozen
cold take by Jake Tapper, that is, if it was
coming from an earnest place to begin with, which I
(01:36):
don't believe that it was. At further evidence to that point,
I'm going to tackle this in two parts, and it's
an outline once again your daily course here in critiquing
mass media, which I am open offer to see you Boulder.
I will teach that course on your campus. It'll be
a diversity higher because I'll be the only conservative on
the entire staff there. I know that probably for a fact,
(02:00):
but this needs to be done. You need to view
and consume and listen to your media critically, and I
would include this very show, the Dan Kaplis Show, any
podcasts that you listen to on the right, Joe Rogan,
any of them, vet them yourselves, do your own research.
If they say something that may or may not be true,
(02:21):
check it out, google it yourself, go down that rabbit hole,
find out your own facts, determine the truth for yourself.
Don't take anything anyone says as gospel. That includes me.
I'm going to give you my opinion. I'm gonna do
my best to make sure that's an informed opinion. And
especially when I'm taking down members of the mainstream media,
(02:42):
which is my a number one focus on this show,
I do that work so that you don't have to
and believe me, it feels like work a lot of
the time, especially when I'm tackling soundbites from the view
things of that nature. But Jake Tapper is supposed to
be a credible, responsible, legitimate journalist. I know many of
you are laughing right now, but he's supposed to be
(03:04):
one of the good ones on CNN. And in that
clip right there with Laura Trump, he scoffs at the
notion that Joe Biden's incognitive decline. He excoriates Laura Trump
for suggesting that he brings up the fact that Joe
Biden has a stutter, which I'll get to in a moment,
because that is a myth, that is fake news, that
(03:28):
is simply not true. And to arm you with information
so that you can steadfastly, steadily and smoothly Rebut anybody
in your orbit who's a mine numbed lib with Trump
derangement syndrome, who still contends to this day that somehow
Joe Biden had a stutter, Folks, I'm fifty years old.
(03:50):
Joe Biden, up until this past January, had served in
public life my entire life, going back to nineteen seventy four,
and even before then a little bit. He got elected
at age twenty nine to the Senate. You have to
be thirty to serve, so he barely made it in.
He has been in public life ever since. And I've
(04:12):
got the receipts, I've got the audio archives that I
have compiled since the fall of twenty eighteen, and I
sincerely looked for any instances on video or audio or
anywhere else where Joe Biden was stuttering. He may have
had a stutter as a young boy, he did not
have a stutter as of age twenty nine or at
(04:34):
any point thereafter. He started slipping later in his life,
but for most of his public life, Joe Biden was
a nit wit. He was a mediocre intellect. He was
a dufist, he was sophomreic, he was all of those things.
But he did not have a stutter in public speaking.
He simply didn't. That's a lie. And Jake Tapper and
(04:56):
a lot of the mainstream media, they were soft pedaling
this up as fact. Well, you know he has stutter. No,
he doesn't recheck the premise out of hand. In ask
your liberal friend or family member, cite a specific example
on the public record of any era, of any decade
of Joe Biden in public service as a senator, as
(05:17):
vice president where he exhibited a stutter. Show it to me,
show me the evidence of that. You can't just say
it and speak it into existence. You need proof of
things in order for them to be true. So Tapper
went down this primrose path of defending Joe Biden. I
believe that was right after the debate where Joe Biden
(05:38):
showed up as a half baked corpse and could barely
articulate words, let alone sentences, and he got smoked into
debate and he got blown out of the nomination by
his own party because they let it get to that point,
and the mainstream media stenographers and water carriers for Joe
Biden tried to assist him and prop him up, just
(05:59):
like you heard with Jake Tapper. But then we get
today's announcement from Jake Tapper in a post on x
Original Sin now available for pre order at Original sin
book dot com from Penguin Press. Been working hard on
this with Alex Thompson for interviews with more than two
hundred White House insiders, dem leaders and more. Well, let's
(06:22):
get into this subheader of this original Sin book due
for publication here and distribution. You can buy it on
Amazon or wherever I anticipate. May twentieth, twenty twenty five.
Original Sin President Biden's decline, its cover up, and his
(06:43):
disastrous choice to run again. Jake Tapper, who wanted Joe
Biden to win, who wanted Kamala Harris to win, who
wanted any Democrat to win, who wanted Donald Trump to lose,
had every opportunity he as a member of the media
if he did his damn job. I'm the one doing
(07:04):
my job. You must be the other guy. One of
my favorite drops it's right here. I'm a guy who
does his job. He must be the other guy from
the departed. If an objective, credible, neutral journalist who his
sole purpose was seeking fact and no matter where that led,
(07:25):
wherever the truth leads me. If it's Donald Trump's benefit,
if it's the Joe Biden's detriment, let the chips fall
where they may, because I am a CNN talk show host, reporter, journalist,
and I have to get to the truth without fear
or favor. That's not what he did. That's not what
anybody in the mainstream media did. How did Joe Biden's
(07:46):
candidacy get to the point where they only had one
hundred days for Kamala Harris to jump headfirst into the
race without a primary. Had they honestly covered Biden the
way we have here, the way we have on the
Dan Kaplis Show from Jump Street from day one, then
obviously we would have known that Joe Biden was in
cognitive decline. I see this, Chiron, It's been on CNN
(08:08):
for the last ten minutes. Elon Musk dominates first Trump
cabinet meeting. Okay, who was dominating Joe Biden's cabinet meetings.
Who was running them? At one point it was the
first Lady doctor Jill Bogada's Biden. She has no business
running those meetings. So I don't understand what CN I'm
(08:30):
so concerned about. Joe Biden wasn't in charge of his
own presidency for at least half of it, and probably
most of it, and perhaps all of it. So Jake
Tapper seeks to profit off this book with two hundred
White House insiders working hard, he says, doing interviews, where
was this coverage, this dedication, this due diligence in reporting
(08:52):
during the campaign, Jake, I mean, if I were a Democrat,
leftist committed wanted Trump to lose, I would be furious
at the mainstream media, at the handlers around Joe Biden
who tried to prop him up and protect him from
the mainstream media themselves from having to answer questions, from
having to conduct press conferences, from having to lead cabinet meetings,
(09:13):
from having to do any public interactions of any kind.
And if you were duped as a lib out there,
you done plagued yourself, because if you were honest with yourself,
and you believe your lying eyes, you would know that
the media was lying to you. The Rachel Maddows of
the world, Joy read Jake Tapper, Wolf Blitzer, go down
the list. And for some reason, I've had this conversation
(09:37):
with conservative friends of mine. Why do liberals those in
the left like being lied to? Like being made promises
that never come true? Doesn't that piss you off? Doesn't
that get you agitated? Aren't you insulted by the lying
to your face? No, they just forget about it and
then move on with their day because they have so
much trunked arrangement syndrome. They got to feed the beast,
(10:00):
They got to feed the addictional trump O Nazis orange man.
But everything they've been reporting on him is fake news.
It's false. It doesn't matter. Give me, give me bad
Trump news. I need to cling to it for my
own existence, all right, Jake, let's test your theory out here.
(10:20):
Bud nineteen seventy two. Joe Biden, aged twenty nine, comparing
himself to the token black or token woman prostituting himself
for politics. So who we got started early with the
kind of off color speech here.
Speaker 4 (10:34):
Whether or not you can run for public off So
it costs a great deal of money to run into
the United States senatey for a small state like Delaware,
you have to go to those people who have money,
and they always want something. We were tall that we politicians,
as the young kids say, rip off the American public.
I think the American public in a way rips off
we politicians by forcing.
Speaker 3 (10:53):
Us to run the way they do.
Speaker 4 (10:54):
To raise three hundred thousand dollars.
Speaker 3 (10:57):
Is no mean fee.
Speaker 4 (10:59):
And unless you happen to be some sort of anomaly
like myself being a twenty nine year old candidate, and
can attract some attention beyond your own state, it's very
difficult to raise that money from a large group of people.
I am a twenty nine year old odd ball. The
only reason I was able to raise the money is
I was able to have a national constituency to run
for office because I was twenty nine.
Speaker 3 (11:17):
I'm like the token black or the token woman. I
was a token young person.
Speaker 5 (11:21):
See.
Speaker 3 (11:21):
I went to the big guys for the money.
Speaker 4 (11:23):
I was ready to prostitute myself and the man in
which I talk about it. But what happened was they
said come back when you're forty son.
Speaker 3 (11:31):
But one minute there of twenty nine year old Joe
Biden nineteen seventy two, Jake Tapper, where was the stutter?
Where was the stutter? Pointed out specifically. Fast forward nineteen
seventy four, Joe Biden, now thirty one years of age,
in an interview Senator Biden.
Speaker 6 (11:48):
It's nice to have you here as the youngest member
of the Senate, the one therefore who may expect the
longest career there. I wonder if you'd say to us,
since it's clear that you're not corrupt and you got elected,
why should people think that the producers corrupt results when
there you are.
Speaker 4 (12:03):
Well, I'm not sure you should assume I'm not corrupt,
but I'm thank you for that. Though the system does
produce corruption, and I think implicit in the system is
corruption when in fact, whether or not you can run
for public office, it costs a great deal of money
to run to the United States Senate. Ev a small
state like Delaware, you have to go to those people
who have money, and they always want something.
Speaker 3 (12:25):
Where was the stutter? Jake nineteen seventy four. He admits
to being corrupt in that clip. By the way, as well,
we'll go forward now twelve more years to nineteen eighty six.
At this point, Joe Biden born in November nineteen forty two,
would be approximately forty four years of age. Let's see
if we find a stutter here.
Speaker 4 (12:43):
Nineteen eighty six, there is an overwhelming universal criticism by
proponents of pro choice and opponents of vote of.
Speaker 3 (12:51):
Pro choice that Roe v.
Speaker 4 (12:53):
Wade was not a very well reasoned decision. Most constitutional
scholars do not offer that as an example of whether
they're four or again abortion a decision that is well
written in well reasoned, not the conclusions, but you know,
if it's not offered as a way.
Speaker 3 (13:09):
To write a decision, and he stumbles there a little bit,
but there's no evidence of a stutter something that really
is an obstruction to him delivering his ideas and thoughts
and speech. There's no stutter there. I mean, you don't
have to be a speech therapist to point out that, well,
there's not really a stutter there, nothing of any note.
September nineteen eighty seven, Joe Biden caught red handed plagiarizing
(13:31):
John F. Kennedy and Neil kinnick over in England, decides
to drop out of the race for president in the
nineteen eighty eight campaign.
Speaker 7 (13:39):
There will be other presidential campaigns and I'll be there, Oliphant,
I'll be there. There will be other opportunities, There'll be
other battles in other places, other times, and I'll be there,
and I'll be there, seeking to share with all Americans
(14:00):
and those who will stand with me the promise proclaimed
in the communion him. You heard me recite all across
this country, and he will lift you up on eagles
wings and bear you on the breath of dawn, and
make the sun to shine on you. This country's going
to be lifted up, and I'm going to play a
big part in doing it.
Speaker 3 (14:20):
Not quite forty five years old, no stutter detected. Four
more years will forward to nineteen ninety one. He was
the chairman of the Judiciary Committee who was conducting the
hearings for Clarence Thomas. In the documentary Created Equal Clarence
Thomas in his own words, I could not more strongly
recommend it. It's fantastic you finally get Supreme Court Justice
(14:40):
Clarence Thomas. In his own words. He doesn't give many interviews,
he doesn't speak out often. He was hilarious in this
Joe Biden, then Senator, of course, attempting to put himself
on the same level. From a legal mind perspective as
Clarence Thomas himself, Biden would be just shy of fifty
years old. Here, see if you can detect a stutter.
Speaker 7 (15:00):
Good morning, Judge, Welcome to the blinding lights.
Speaker 5 (15:04):
Finding out what you mean when you say that you
would apply the natural law philosophy to the Constitution is,
in my view, the single most important task of this committee.
Speaker 3 (15:16):
Senator Biden was very focused on natural law. How did
that go? Who knows? And I have no idea what
he was talking about.
Speaker 4 (15:25):
I just want to make sure we all know what
we're talking about here, That you and I know at
least what we're talking about here.
Speaker 3 (15:31):
There's a fervent and aggressive school of thought that wishes
to see.
Speaker 4 (15:38):
Natural law further inform the Constitution than it does now,
argued against by the positivists, fled by Judge burg Now again,
that may be lost on all the people.
Speaker 3 (15:49):
You know, and I know what we're talking about. A
complete buffoon, but no stutter. November nineteen ninety three, Joe
Biden years of age here, and he was the author.
This is one of the few Acts of Congress he
actually wrote himself, and it was one of the darkest
chapters in the nineteen nineties. From a legislative standpoint, it
(16:11):
was a racist, anti crime bill, and the way he
articulated this was especially dark. But again, see if you
pick up on a stutter at all.
Speaker 4 (16:21):
If we don't, they will or a portion of them,
will become the predators. Fifteen years from now, and Madam President,
we have predators on our streets that society.
Speaker 8 (16:33):
Has, in fact, in part because of us neglect created. Again,
it does not mean because we created them that we
somehow forgive them or do not take them out of
society to protect my family and yours from them.
Speaker 9 (16:48):
They are beyond the pale. Many of those people predators. Well,
but where was the stutter? Jake Okay, no stutter in
the seventies, during his thirties, and no stutter in the eighties,
no stutter in the nineties.
Speaker 3 (17:00):
Let's flash forward all the way to two thousand and six.
He goes on with Chris Matthews and does he stutter
there two thousand and six, he would be sixty two
years old. Here, can you scare.
Speaker 10 (17:12):
An employer in this country, whether he's an agriculture work
or a housewife into not hiring an illegal because the
punishment's so high that if you get caught, it's a
huge embarrassment to your family, and you may just get
hit with a fine.
Speaker 3 (17:24):
It'll kill you.
Speaker 4 (17:24):
The absolutely you can't do and that's what we should do.
Speaker 3 (17:26):
Well, I think we should do that because you can't
catch you Canady.
Speaker 4 (17:29):
No, no, no, you can't. And the last part of
this is that the Democratic position also recognized you got
eleven million illegal aliens here. They have to have a
way to earn their way into the deal. This is
an amnesty. They're required to take eleven year's worth.
Speaker 5 (17:43):
They pay a fine.
Speaker 4 (17:44):
They got to learn to speak English, they got to pass.
Speaker 3 (17:47):
That's first part.
Speaker 10 (17:47):
Yeah, if we want the problems of Canada right now,
to keep encouraging people to keep their foreign language, English
is going to unite this country potentially.
Speaker 3 (17:56):
It always.
Speaker 4 (17:57):
I can't think of a country that as two languages
as they're accepted languages that is doing all that well,
including Switzerland and or.
Speaker 3 (18:07):
Canada, and that it divides us. Wow, sounds a lot
like a Republican exchange of today. That was two thousand
and six, not quite twenty years ago. It seems like
two hundred years ago illegal alien Biden used that term
then was good enough for him, then wanted to curb
illegal immigration. Then a year later, this is Joe Biden again.
Here he would be about sixty five years old. Two
(18:29):
thousand and seven, you said that.
Speaker 10 (18:31):
The president United States had launched an attack on I
ran without congressional approval. That would have been an impeachable offense.
Do you want to review that comment you made? Well,
how do you stand on that new.
Speaker 3 (18:40):
Do you think I want to stand by that comment
I made. The reason I made the comment was as
a warning. The reason I.
Speaker 4 (18:46):
Made I don't say those things lightly. Chris, You've known
me for a long time. I was chairman of the
Judiciary Committee for seventeen years, or its ranking member. I
teach separation of powers in conscious law.
Speaker 3 (18:56):
This is something I know.
Speaker 4 (18:57):
So I got together and brought a group of conscious
scholars together to write a piece that I'm going to
deliver to the whole United States senateed, pointing out, the
president has no construction.
Speaker 8 (19:07):
Authority to take this nation to war against.
Speaker 4 (19:10):
The country of seventy million people unless we're attacked, or unless.
Speaker 3 (19:14):
There is proof that we are about to be attacked.
Where was the stutter? Jake asked, your liberal friends and
family members who constantly use that as an excuse. So
maybe they're not using it anymore because providing cover for
Biden led to his demise politically and the Democrats losing
on November fifth to Donald Trump. A break, and we're
(19:35):
back your text five seven, seven thirty nine right here
on Ryan Schuling Live and for another edition of Trump's
hot takes, churning the forty seventh president's epic interactions with
a fake news media. We are going to be.
Speaker 11 (19:51):
Now calling those shots. As you know, we won that
list of right they see the go from America, which
is a beautiful name. Most people, I don't know it's
you know, AP has been terrible. I think they're radical left.
I think their third rate reporters. I know the specific
young lady that works on the account is terrible.
Speaker 3 (20:10):
She's a.
Speaker 11 (20:12):
Radical left lunatic. As far as I'm concerned, they don't
treat us fairly. That's number one, and number two they
had no right to do that.
Speaker 3 (20:19):
This is the Gulf of America and if you.
Speaker 11 (20:22):
Look at that shoreline, look at that shoreline, look from Florida,
well most of it is it's cooled America and vast
majority like big numbers. So I'm just admiring it. As
I look at it, I'm getting teary eyed. But I
don't want you to say Trump broke down and started crying.
Speaker 3 (20:46):
How beautiful is that?
Speaker 11 (20:47):
Look at the shoreline, look at that, Well, that's America.
Speaker 3 (20:51):
I genuinely feel that Donald Trump has this sense of
wonder that I talk about a lot, whether it's living
your life out loud, or the observations you used to
maybe take for granted that you don't do that. I
don't think Donald Trump takes our country for granted. I
think it's a big driving force in what led him
to run for president in the first place, led him
(21:13):
to endure these last four years before he reattained office,
endured all the political persecutions, prosecutions, weaponization of the Justice
Department against him, the assassination attempts. This man has a
love of country. He also has a working knowledge of
the history of this country that I think might surprise some.
And when it comes to the Gulf of America, the
(21:35):
Gulf of Mexico, I was thinking about that, Well, it
seems like kind of a random, obscure thing to pick
a fight over, or we're going to call a Gulf
of America, and if AP doesn't do it too well,
then they're going to be banned from the press room.
But then I always think back to how the left
is when they are in power, and the cudgel that
(21:55):
they use to force out, box out members of the
media that they don't like. We have spoken many times.
If you are a loyal listener to this program, first
of all, thank you for that. But even if you
only tune in occasionally, you have heard me interview the
likes of Simon Attiba from Today News Africa, James Rosen
from Newsmax. These two, just for a couple of examples,
(22:17):
and there are probably more. Those are just the two
that I know personally and have interviewed on the show.
Were effectively blacklisted, sidelined, boxed out, unable to ask questions
and press conferences of Kareein, Jean Pierre let alone, Joe Biden.
And for what Because the Biden administration didn't like how
they asked questions, what they asked, and they decided to
(22:41):
make that kind of a policy going forward from there.
So why is it good for the goose but not
for the gander? The New York Times up in arms
over this sort of behavior from the Trump administration clutching
their pearls. Here's Peter Baker, he's the White House correspondent
for the New York Times.
Speaker 12 (22:59):
I remember or during the Obama White House when they
try to keep Fox out of a press pool event,
and the other reporters, all of us said no, that's
not right, and basically forced the obol people to back down.
Speaker 3 (23:11):
And say, if you're going to invite.
Speaker 12 (23:14):
All of us, and you have to invite all of us,
you can't make a distinction based on.
Speaker 3 (23:18):
An organization that you just don't like. And so I
think you're right.
Speaker 12 (23:22):
They don't seem to understand that they want to be
able to pick who asked the president questions. That goes
against decades and decades of tradition.
Speaker 3 (23:31):
Tradition, But is it proper? Is it right? Is it correct?
Is it just? Who are the White House Correspondence Association?
Who leads them? Who made them the arbiters of journalism?
In this forum? There's no doubt that a vast majority
of the correspondents who cover the White House are left leaning,
(23:51):
if not outright leftists looking to further that agenda. And
it goes to this text from Kimberly, and she's not
wrong here, And with all due respect, Democrats and Republicans
both glue themselves to lies and mistruths. The old saying is,
how can you tell when a politician is lying when
they open their mouth? So sad is almost all news
(24:11):
networks are just as bad, Kimberly. I don't disagree. You know,
I watch Fox News. I think that's the one that
I kind of respect the most when it comes to
Brett Bharr, Martha McCallum. Their actual news anchoring and the
reporters in the field, the jobs that they do, and
they have opinion hosts. But there's a clear delineation on
Fox News between Okay, got these folks, Aisha Hastni, Peter Doucey.
(24:36):
They're out in the field, Jackie Heinrich. They're doing their job,
and they're doing it well, and I think they're objective
journalists for the most part. Peter Deucy asked tough questions
in the Trump White House press room as well. But
the problem is, you know the difference between that and
then Laura Ingram, Jesse Waters, Sean Hannity, even Greg Gutfeld.
(24:57):
You know that their opinion hosts who are the opinion
hosts in the news reporters as CNN, those lines are
incredibly blurred. What is Anderson Cooper? What is Jake Tapper?
What is Wolf Flitzer? What is John King? Those are
just CNN? And we know MSNBC's probably even worse than they.
Just fire Joy Reid and they're a mess. But CNN
was supposed to be this. Well, you got MSNBC on
(25:19):
the left, and you got Fox News on the right,
and we're CNN and we're down the middle and this
is CNN, and well it's not not anymore. They become
a shell of their former selves because they're deluded with
hate for Trump and Kimberly to your point, Hey, I
get it. I'm not a Pollyanna here. I'm not naive.
The lion comes from all sides, including our own. And
even when I say that I am a Republican, but
(25:39):
that doesn't mean I agree with all Republicans or everything
they say or do. I just think they're a lot
less bad than the Democrats. And the choice is made
for me, and there it is. I'll call out my
side when I feel it's necessary, but it's being done
enough by the mainstream media that only goes in one direction.
It's my job on this program, I believe a duty
to you are listen listeners out there to swim upstream
(26:03):
to push back against all these mainstream media narratives that
all seem to be going in the same direction. They
all collect their talking points. You hear the same exact
verbiage from all of the different outlets. How is that?
Why is that? Why would they pigeonhole themselves like that?
A question that you should be asking yourselves. And Caroline
Levi gets to the meat of the matter here. I
(26:24):
think she does a good job of explaining. In this
White House Correspondence Association, I mean, who died and made
them key? Nobody elected them. I understand you want a
free press to push back against those in power. I agree.
I've said that for years on this show. I want
an adversarial press to challenge President Trump, have confrontational interactions
(26:44):
in press conferences and interviews. The problem is they don't
do that to Democrats pulled both of their feet to
the fire. Be as hard on Joe Biden as you
are on Donald Trump. I'm not saying, oh, because you're
not hard on Joe Biden. You shouldn't be hard on
Donald Trump. No, bring it, throw fastballs, be a jerk,
(27:06):
be that media that the people don't like, but that
you do the job that they need you to do.
Fact finding, truth finding wherever that leads you. That Kimberly,
I'm telling you, having worked in this industry now for
over twenty five years, it just isn't the case. They
are not fair arbiters. They're not honest brokers reporting on
(27:27):
anything newsworthy. They water it down, They try to distill it,
they try to massage it, they try to polish a turd.
When it comes to Joe Biden or virtually any Democrat,
Democrat stance, Democrat policy, Democrat politician, they runcover, they carry water,
and then when it's on the right, all of a
sudden they find their journalism caps again. They get their
derbies with that press pass. Like the old tiny guys
(27:48):
in the movies. They go, Ah, I'm a journalist, I'm
gonna ask tough questions. Now I got my saying. I'm
chopping on it. Don't you say? Where was this person
during the Biden years? Where is this person? Jeff Zeleeny
do you feel inspired? Are you inspiring? President Obama? What
are you most marveling at these first days in office?
Go back and find that Jeff Selleni clip. Maybe I'll
do it during the break here at the top of
(28:09):
the hour. It's comical the difference. You shouldn't be different
if you are a member of the ostensibly mainstream media
journalistic faction, that world, that sphere. Kyle Clark would be
a local example. I come on this show and I
occasionally do some news anchoring over there on KOA for
election coverage and such. But I draw a clear line
(28:31):
and distinction between. On this show, I'm expressing my opinions.
I'm putting them out there. I'm being very forthright and
telling you these are my views. This is my opinion
based on my lived experience, based on my observations, based
on my expertise in following and critiquing the media. And
I will give you that. But when I'm over there
and I'm anchoring election coverage, that's not my job. And
(28:52):
I know that, and people know when I go over
there and fill it on KOA, especially when I'm on
Roster Mandy that well, here's Ryan. He's a Trump guy.
You know, he's a conservative, or he's a libertarian or
he's a populist. Yes, I plead guilty to all three
of those things. I'm some combination there up. But I
tell you where I stand. You know where I am.
Politically oriented. Kyle Clark, we know he's a lib. We
(29:13):
know he's a Communis's why I call him comrade Kyle.
We know that, but he claims otherwise. He makes this
to kind of joke of a claim that he can
report honestly and doesn't even offer up like, look, here
is my opinion, here's my commentary. And I'm Kyle Clark,
and I'm of the left, and I support Democrats mostly.
I think he is tough on some Democrat. He's actually
(29:34):
better than a lot out there. He'll be tough on
Polis here and there, just enough to kind of keep
his street cred a little bit with us, the way
he would moderate a debate, so to speak. But he
was just salivating when it was a Republican primary debate
for the fourth Congressional District and Lauren Bobert was on
the stage and he went ham in on her. You
don't know who that means, and then he ended up
(29:56):
on Jimmy Kimmel. He's a national celebrity well, good for him,
but just you know, for the sake of everyone and
our sanity and respect for your audience, I think he
owes it to you to say, look, I have left
wing views and philosophies. I don't agree with a lot
of the conservative but he honeycombs that into his actual
(30:16):
news presentation and coverage. Is an anchor. And he's not
upfront or clear about where his editorial opinion is, and
when is he giving his editorial opinion, and when is
he's shifting back over into news, and where is that
gray area in between. That's what they get away with.
That is what they try to fool you with. And
people of the left, I'm sorry to say, that want
(30:37):
to believe lies, seek him out for confirmation bias and
view Kyle Clark and other leftists CNN uncritically. They don't
think to question. They don't take a step back and go,
wait a minute, that doesn't make sense, that doesn't add up.
And you said this about Trump, but you did this
for Joe Biden. A fair minded, objective, independently minded person
(30:57):
should be questioning everything at all time. Don't be spoon
fed what the media gives you. Oh, I guess that's true. No,
it's not. Assume default position. It's not true. And then
it's up to myself or anybody else reporting out there
to present facts to you and convince you that it's true,
not that you just take it whole hog and go
will it was on the news. I guess it was true.
(31:20):
We'll take this time out. We'll come back more your
text five seven seven, three nine, another installment of Trump's
hot takes. We got three today, a trifecta if you will,
sex seegers alongside, appreciative of his help, and we're back
after this. I'm Ryan Schuling live once again for another
edition of Trump's hot takes, charting the forty seven president's
(31:41):
epic interactions with a fake news media.
Speaker 4 (31:52):
I don't know.
Speaker 12 (31:56):
Who you it. I'm the one.
Speaker 3 (32:01):
I thought. I thought they died. Have they still around?
Speaker 11 (32:04):
I haven't read them in years.
Speaker 3 (32:05):
I thought they'd died. That was the bored Air Force
one a couple of weeks ago. S V datte I
think is how he churches up his name for Huffington Post.
I thought they died. I thought they were dead. They
were on the table, they flatlined. I watched them die.
How are they still alive. I mean, he's just on fire.
(32:31):
He's shooting from the hip, zero fs to give, and
it's glorious. The thing about too, all this hand ringing
and pearl clutching and the sky is falling from the
likes of Peter Baker the New York Times, Oh, Donald
Trumphy is not giving access to the mainstream associated press
reiters and New York Times Washington Posts. Through one month
(32:53):
of his presidency, Joe Biden had answered just over one
hundred questions through over one month. In his second term
as president, Donald Trump has answered over one thousand questions
from the media. Access is not a problem with the
Orange Man. He provides greater access to the White House,
to the Presidency, to himself really than any president in
(33:15):
modern times. You got to go back to like Teddy
Roosevelt doing the whistle test stop tours and speaking on
stumps and stuff like that to get a president that
was more accessible to the people, that was more man
of the people, who wanted to communicate his message and
was willing to have those pugilistic interactions with members of
the media, and if you ask them in their honest moments,
(33:36):
maybe after a few cocktails, these reporters love it. They
live for it. It's good for publication numbers, it's good
for ratings. They actually get to have a give and
take with Donald Trump that they never got to have
with Joe Biden. And that's just the simple fact of
the matter. She presents herself as a moderate. Congresswoman Angie
(33:58):
Craig out of Minnesota. The bill pending before the House.
Speaker 13 (34:03):
Let me be clear, the budget proposal my Republican colleagues
just pass will gut Medicate and increase the cost of
health care for tens of thousands of Minnesotans.
Speaker 3 (34:14):
That's just false. That's again fake news. Speaker Johnson's doing
his level best to get one big, beautiful bill through
the House, so it's signed in the Senate and signed
into law by President Trump. You got to get a
big victory here. You got to get it in paper.
You got to get it through legislation. You can't just
do it by executive order. And Donald Trump was asked about,
(34:37):
you know, whether or not he was going to gut Medicaid,
and he, to his credit, said this is not going
to be this will not be a read my lips moment.
And you know who that was. It was w's dad,
Can you guarantee.
Speaker 2 (34:49):
Medicare medicate social Security going off the touch?
Speaker 11 (34:52):
Yeah, I mean I have said it so many times.
You shouldn't be asking me that question. Okay, this will.
Speaker 3 (34:58):
Not be read my lips.
Speaker 11 (35:00):
It won't be read my lips anymore.
Speaker 3 (35:03):
We're not going to touch it. Now. We all got
to look for fraud.
Speaker 11 (35:06):
I'm sure you're okay with that, like people that shouldn't
be on people that are illegal aliens and others criminals
in many cases, and that's with Social Security.
Speaker 3 (35:16):
We have a lot of people.
Speaker 11 (35:17):
You see that immediately. When you see people that are
two hundred years old that are being said checks for
Social Security, some of them are actually being said checks.
So we're tracing that down and I have a feeling
that Pam is going to do a very good job
with that.
Speaker 3 (35:31):
But you have a lot of fraud. But no, we're
not doing anything on that. He point blink says again,
repeats himself. He said up many times during the campaign.
Much of this regrin of fiscal conservatives that might like
to retool the entitlement program social Security, medicare medicate. Trump
doesn't want to do that. I don't necessarily agree with
(35:51):
him entirely on that. But he's a man of his word,
and he said this many times, and who doesn't want
to cut out fraud and abuse of Medicare and Medicaid.
If Representative Angie Craig, Democrat Minnesota, really cared about the
Minnesotans who are American citizens that are entitled to that coverage,
you would not want it be siphoned off for illegal
(36:11):
alien residents of this country that are not entitled those
benefits or should not be, And the money saved from
not paying illegals could be redistributed to actual, legal, tax
paying Americans who paid into Medicare and Medicaid and have
it coming. It's simple, but the Democrats are trying to
complicate it,
How do you think it makes little kids with stutters
feel when they see you make a comment like that.
Speaker 2 (00:06):
First and foremost, I had no idea that Joe Biden
ever suffered from a stutter. I think what we see
on stage with Joe Biden Jake is very clearly a
cognitive decline. That's what I'm referring to. It makes me
uncomfortable you are.
Speaker 3 (00:22):
I think it's so amazing.
Speaker 1 (00:23):
It's so amazing to me that try and figure out
an answer cognitive decline.
Speaker 3 (00:27):
You're trying to.
Speaker 2 (00:28):
Tell me that what I was suggesting was I think.
Speaker 1 (00:30):
That you were mocking his stutter. Yeah, I think you
were mocking his stutter. And I think you have absolutely
no standing to diagnose somebody's cognitive decline. I would think
that somebody in the Pump family would be more sensitive
to people who do do not have medical licenses diagnosing
politicians from Afar. Plenty of people have diagnosed your father
(00:51):
from Afar, and I'm sure it defends you. Your father
in law from a farm, I'm sure it defends you.
You don't have any standing to.
Speaker 2 (00:57):
Say noticing now what I'm saying.
Speaker 3 (00:59):
You just talk that a cognitive the cluse. I have
one last question for.
Speaker 2 (01:03):
You are times on stage, and it's very concerning to
a lot of people that this could be the leader
of the free world. That is all I'm saying, I Jennus,
sorry for Joe Bennett.
Speaker 3 (01:14):
I appreciate it. You know, we have three installments of
Trump's hot takes coming up throughout today's program. But right there,
what you just heard here on Ryan Schuling Live Welcome
to It on this Wednesday was an extremely frigidly frozen
cold take by Jake Tapper, that is, if it was
coming from an earnest place to begin with, which I
(01:36):
don't believe that it was. At further evidence to that point,
I'm going to tackle this in two parts, and it's
an outline once again your daily course here in critiquing
mass media, which I am open offer to see you Boulder.
I will teach that course on your campus. It'll be
a diversity higher because I'll be the only conservative on
the entire staff there. I know that probably for a fact,
(02:00):
but this needs to be done. You need to view
and consume and listen to your media critically, and I
would include this very show, the Dan Kaplis Show, any
podcasts that you listen to on the right, Joe Rogan,
any of them, vet them yourselves, do your own research.
If they say something that may or may not be true,
(02:21):
check it out, google it yourself, go down that rabbit hole,
find out your own facts, determine the truth for yourself.
Don't take anything anyone says as gospel. That includes me.
I'm going to give you my opinion. I'm gonna do
my best to make sure that's an informed opinion. And
especially when I'm taking down members of the mainstream media,
(02:42):
which is my a number one focus on this show,
I do that work so that you don't have to
and believe me, it feels like work a lot of
the time, especially when I'm tackling soundbites from the view
things of that nature. But Jake Tapper is supposed to
be a credible, responsible, legitimate journalist. I know many of
you are laughing right now, but he's supposed to be
(03:04):
one of the good ones on CNN. And in that
clip right there with Laura Trump, he scoffs at the
notion that Joe Biden's incognitive decline. He excoriates Laura Trump
for suggesting that he brings up the fact that Joe
Biden has a stutter, which I'll get to in a moment,
because that is a myth, that is fake news, that
(03:28):
is simply not true. And to arm you with information
so that you can steadfastly, steadily and smoothly Rebut anybody
in your orbit who's a mine numbed lib with Trump
derangement syndrome, who still contends to this day that somehow
Joe Biden had a stutter, Folks, I'm fifty years old.
(03:50):
Joe Biden, up until this past January, had served in
public life my entire life, going back to nineteen seventy four,
and even before then a little bit. He got elected
at age twenty nine to the Senate. You have to
be thirty to serve, so he barely made it in.
He has been in public life ever since. And I've
(04:12):
got the receipts, I've got the audio archives that I
have compiled since the fall of twenty eighteen, and I
sincerely looked for any instances on video or audio or
anywhere else where Joe Biden was stuttering. He may have
had a stutter as a young boy, he did not
have a stutter as of age twenty nine or at
(04:34):
any point thereafter. He started slipping later in his life,
but for most of his public life, Joe Biden was
a nit wit. He was a mediocre intellect. He was
a dufist, he was sophomreic, he was all of those things.
But he did not have a stutter in public speaking.
He simply didn't. That's a lie. And Jake Tapper and
(04:56):
a lot of the mainstream media, they were soft pedaling
this up as fact. Well, you know he has stutter. No,
he doesn't recheck the premise out of hand. In ask
your liberal friend or family member, cite a specific example
on the public record of any era, of any decade
of Joe Biden in public service as a senator, as
(05:17):
vice president where he exhibited a stutter. Show it to me,
show me the evidence of that. You can't just say
it and speak it into existence. You need proof of
things in order for them to be true. So Tapper
went down this primrose path of defending Joe Biden. I
believe that was right after the debate where Joe Biden
(05:38):
showed up as a half baked corpse and could barely
articulate words, let alone sentences, and he got smoked into
debate and he got blown out of the nomination by
his own party because they let it get to that point,
and the mainstream media stenographers and water carriers for Joe
Biden tried to assist him and prop him up, just
(05:59):
like you heard with Jake Tapper. But then we get
today's announcement from Jake Tapper in a post on x
Original Sin now available for pre order at Original sin
book dot com from Penguin Press. Been working hard on
this with Alex Thompson for interviews with more than two
hundred White House insiders, dem leaders and more. Well, let's
(06:22):
get into this subheader of this original Sin book due
for publication here and distribution. You can buy it on
Amazon or wherever I anticipate. May twentieth, twenty twenty five.
Original Sin President Biden's decline, its cover up, and his
(06:43):
disastrous choice to run again. Jake Tapper, who wanted Joe
Biden to win, who wanted Kamala Harris to win, who
wanted any Democrat to win, who wanted Donald Trump to lose,
had every opportunity he as a member of the media
if he did his damn job. I'm the one doing
(07:04):
my job. You must be the other guy. One of
my favorite drops it's right here. I'm a guy who
does his job. He must be the other guy from
the departed. If an objective, credible, neutral journalist who his
sole purpose was seeking fact and no matter where that led,
(07:25):
wherever the truth leads me. If it's Donald Trump's benefit,
if it's the Joe Biden's detriment, let the chips fall
where they may, because I am a CNN talk show host, reporter, journalist,
and I have to get to the truth without fear
or favor. That's not what he did. That's not what
anybody in the mainstream media did. How did Joe Biden's
(07:46):
candidacy get to the point where they only had one
hundred days for Kamala Harris to jump headfirst into the
race without a primary. Had they honestly covered Biden the
way we have here, the way we have on the
Dan Kaplis Show from Jump Street from day one, then
obviously we would have known that Joe Biden was in
cognitive decline. I see this, Chiron, It's been on CNN
(08:08):
for the last ten minutes. Elon Musk dominates first Trump
cabinet meeting. Okay, who was dominating Joe Biden's cabinet meetings.
Who was running them? At one point it was the
first Lady doctor Jill Bogada's Biden. She has no business
running those meetings. So I don't understand what CN I'm
(08:30):
so concerned about. Joe Biden wasn't in charge of his
own presidency for at least half of it, and probably
most of it, and perhaps all of it. So Jake
Tapper seeks to profit off this book with two hundred
White House insiders working hard, he says, doing interviews, where
was this coverage, this dedication, this due diligence in reporting
(08:52):
during the campaign, Jake, I mean, if I were a Democrat,
leftist committed wanted Trump to lose, I would be furious
at the mainstream media, at the handlers around Joe Biden
who tried to prop him up and protect him from
the mainstream media themselves from having to answer questions, from
having to conduct press conferences, from having to lead cabinet meetings,
(09:13):
from having to do any public interactions of any kind.
And if you were duped as a lib out there,
you done plagued yourself, because if you were honest with yourself,
and you believe your lying eyes, you would know that
the media was lying to you. The Rachel Maddows of
the world, Joy read Jake Tapper, Wolf Blitzer, go down
the list. And for some reason, I've had this conversation
(09:37):
with conservative friends of mine. Why do liberals those in
the left like being lied to? Like being made promises
that never come true? Doesn't that piss you off? Doesn't
that get you agitated? Aren't you insulted by the lying
to your face? No, they just forget about it and
then move on with their day because they have so
much trunked arrangement syndrome. They got to feed the beast,
(10:00):
They got to feed the addictional trump O Nazis orange man.
But everything they've been reporting on him is fake news.
It's false. It doesn't matter. Give me, give me bad
Trump news. I need to cling to it for my
own existence, all right, Jake, let's test your theory out here.
(10:20):
Bud nineteen seventy two. Joe Biden, aged twenty nine, comparing
himself to the token black or token woman prostituting himself
for politics. So who we got started early with the
kind of off color speech here.
Speaker 4 (10:34):
Whether or not you can run for public off So
it costs a great deal of money to run into
the United States senatey for a small state like Delaware,
you have to go to those people who have money,
and they always want something. We were tall that we politicians,
as the young kids say, rip off the American public.
I think the American public in a way rips off
we politicians by forcing.
Speaker 3 (10:53):
Us to run the way they do.
Speaker 4 (10:54):
To raise three hundred thousand dollars.
Speaker 3 (10:57):
Is no mean fee.
Speaker 4 (10:59):
And unless you happen to be some sort of anomaly
like myself being a twenty nine year old candidate, and
can attract some attention beyond your own state, it's very
difficult to raise that money from a large group of people.
I am a twenty nine year old odd ball. The
only reason I was able to raise the money is
I was able to have a national constituency to run
for office because I was twenty nine.
Speaker 3 (11:17):
I'm like the token black or the token woman. I
was a token young person.
Speaker 5 (11:21):
See.
Speaker 3 (11:21):
I went to the big guys for the money.
Speaker 4 (11:23):
I was ready to prostitute myself and the man in
which I talk about it. But what happened was they
said come back when you're forty son.
Speaker 3 (11:31):
But one minute there of twenty nine year old Joe
Biden nineteen seventy two, Jake Tapper, where was the stutter?
Where was the stutter? Pointed out specifically. Fast forward nineteen
seventy four, Joe Biden, now thirty one years of age,
in an interview Senator Biden.
Speaker 6 (11:48):
It's nice to have you here as the youngest member
of the Senate, the one therefore who may expect the
longest career there. I wonder if you'd say to us,
since it's clear that you're not corrupt and you got elected,
why should people think that the producers corrupt results when
there you are.
Speaker 4 (12:03):
Well, I'm not sure you should assume I'm not corrupt,
but I'm thank you for that. Though the system does
produce corruption, and I think implicit in the system is
corruption when in fact, whether or not you can run
for public office, it costs a great deal of money
to run to the United States Senate. Ev a small
state like Delaware, you have to go to those people
who have money, and they always want something.
Speaker 3 (12:25):
Where was the stutter? Jake nineteen seventy four. He admits
to being corrupt in that clip. By the way, as well,
we'll go forward now twelve more years to nineteen eighty six.
At this point, Joe Biden born in November nineteen forty two,
would be approximately forty four years of age. Let's see
if we find a stutter here.
Speaker 4 (12:43):
Nineteen eighty six, there is an overwhelming universal criticism by
proponents of pro choice and opponents of vote of.
Speaker 3 (12:51):
Pro choice that Roe v.
Speaker 4 (12:53):
Wade was not a very well reasoned decision. Most constitutional
scholars do not offer that as an example of whether
they're four or again abortion a decision that is well
written in well reasoned, not the conclusions, but you know,
if it's not offered as a way.
Speaker 3 (13:09):
To write a decision, and he stumbles there a little bit,
but there's no evidence of a stutter something that really
is an obstruction to him delivering his ideas and thoughts
and speech. There's no stutter there. I mean, you don't
have to be a speech therapist to point out that, well,
there's not really a stutter there, nothing of any note.
September nineteen eighty seven, Joe Biden caught red handed plagiarizing
(13:31):
John F. Kennedy and Neil kinnick over in England, decides
to drop out of the race for president in the
nineteen eighty eight campaign.
Speaker 7 (13:39):
There will be other presidential campaigns and I'll be there, Oliphant,
I'll be there. There will be other opportunities, There'll be
other battles in other places, other times, and I'll be there,
and I'll be there, seeking to share with all Americans
(14:00):
and those who will stand with me the promise proclaimed
in the communion him. You heard me recite all across
this country, and he will lift you up on eagles
wings and bear you on the breath of dawn, and
make the sun to shine on you. This country's going
to be lifted up, and I'm going to play a
big part in doing it.
Speaker 3 (14:20):
Not quite forty five years old, no stutter detected. Four
more years will forward to nineteen ninety one. He was
the chairman of the Judiciary Committee who was conducting the
hearings for Clarence Thomas. In the documentary Created Equal Clarence
Thomas in his own words, I could not more strongly
recommend it. It's fantastic you finally get Supreme Court Justice
(14:40):
Clarence Thomas. In his own words. He doesn't give many interviews,
he doesn't speak out often. He was hilarious in this
Joe Biden, then Senator, of course, attempting to put himself
on the same level. From a legal mind perspective as
Clarence Thomas himself, Biden would be just shy of fifty
years old. Here, see if you can detect a stutter.
Speaker 7 (15:00):
Good morning, Judge, Welcome to the blinding lights.
Speaker 5 (15:04):
Finding out what you mean when you say that you
would apply the natural law philosophy to the Constitution is,
in my view, the single most important task of this committee.
Speaker 3 (15:16):
Senator Biden was very focused on natural law. How did
that go? Who knows? And I have no idea what
he was talking about.
Speaker 4 (15:25):
I just want to make sure we all know what
we're talking about here, That you and I know at
least what we're talking about here.
Speaker 3 (15:31):
There's a fervent and aggressive school of thought that wishes
to see.
Speaker 4 (15:38):
Natural law further inform the Constitution than it does now,
argued against by the positivists, fled by Judge burg Now again,
that may be lost on all the people.
Speaker 3 (15:49):
You know, and I know what we're talking about. A
complete buffoon, but no stutter. November nineteen ninety three, Joe
Biden years of age here, and he was the author.
This is one of the few Acts of Congress he
actually wrote himself, and it was one of the darkest
chapters in the nineteen nineties. From a legislative standpoint, it
(16:11):
was a racist, anti crime bill, and the way he
articulated this was especially dark. But again, see if you
pick up on a stutter at all.
Speaker 4 (16:21):
If we don't, they will or a portion of them,
will become the predators. Fifteen years from now, and Madam President,
we have predators on our streets that society.
Speaker 8 (16:33):
Has, in fact, in part because of us neglect created. Again,
it does not mean because we created them that we
somehow forgive them or do not take them out of
society to protect my family and yours from them.
Speaker 9 (16:48):
They are beyond the pale. Many of those people predators. Well,
but where was the stutter? Jake Okay, no stutter in
the seventies, during his thirties, and no stutter in the eighties,
no stutter in the nineties.
Speaker 3 (17:00):
Let's flash forward all the way to two thousand and six.
He goes on with Chris Matthews and does he stutter
there two thousand and six, he would be sixty two
years old. Here, can you scare.
Speaker 10 (17:12):
An employer in this country, whether he's an agriculture work
or a housewife into not hiring an illegal because the
punishment's so high that if you get caught, it's a
huge embarrassment to your family, and you may just get
hit with a fine.
Speaker 3 (17:24):
It'll kill you.
Speaker 4 (17:24):
The absolutely you can't do and that's what we should do.
Speaker 3 (17:26):
Well, I think we should do that because you can't
catch you Canady.
Speaker 4 (17:29):
No, no, no, you can't. And the last part of
this is that the Democratic position also recognized you got
eleven million illegal aliens here. They have to have a
way to earn their way into the deal. This is
an amnesty. They're required to take eleven year's worth.
Speaker 5 (17:43):
They pay a fine.
Speaker 4 (17:44):
They got to learn to speak English, they got to pass.
Speaker 3 (17:47):
That's first part.
Speaker 10 (17:47):
Yeah, if we want the problems of Canada right now,
to keep encouraging people to keep their foreign language, English
is going to unite this country potentially.
Speaker 3 (17:56):
It always.
Speaker 4 (17:57):
I can't think of a country that as two languages
as they're accepted languages that is doing all that well,
including Switzerland and or.
Speaker 3 (18:07):
Canada, and that it divides us. Wow, sounds a lot
like a Republican exchange of today. That was two thousand
and six, not quite twenty years ago. It seems like
two hundred years ago illegal alien Biden used that term
then was good enough for him, then wanted to curb
illegal immigration. Then a year later, this is Joe Biden again.
Here he would be about sixty five years old. Two
(18:29):
thousand and seven, you said that.
Speaker 10 (18:31):
The president United States had launched an attack on I
ran without congressional approval. That would have been an impeachable offense.
Do you want to review that comment you made? Well,
how do you stand on that new.
Speaker 3 (18:40):
Do you think I want to stand by that comment
I made. The reason I made the comment was as
a warning. The reason I.
Speaker 4 (18:46):
Made I don't say those things lightly. Chris, You've known
me for a long time. I was chairman of the
Judiciary Committee for seventeen years, or its ranking member. I
teach separation of powers in conscious law.
Speaker 3 (18:56):
This is something I know.
Speaker 4 (18:57):
So I got together and brought a group of conscious
scholars together to write a piece that I'm going to
deliver to the whole United States senateed, pointing out, the
president has no construction.
Speaker 8 (19:07):
Authority to take this nation to war against.
Speaker 4 (19:10):
The country of seventy million people unless we're attacked, or unless.
Speaker 3 (19:14):
There is proof that we are about to be attacked.
Where was the stutter? Jake asked, your liberal friends and
family members who constantly use that as an excuse. So
maybe they're not using it anymore because providing cover for
Biden led to his demise politically and the Democrats losing
on November fifth to Donald Trump. A break, and we're
(19:35):
back your text five seven, seven thirty nine right here
on Ryan Schuling Live and for another edition of Trump's
hot takes, churning the forty seventh president's epic interactions with
a fake news media. We are going to be.
Speaker 11 (19:51):
Now calling those shots. As you know, we won that
list of right they see the go from America, which
is a beautiful name. Most people, I don't know it's
you know, AP has been terrible. I think they're radical left.
I think their third rate reporters. I know the specific
young lady that works on the account is terrible.
Speaker 3 (20:10):
She's a.
Speaker 11 (20:12):
Radical left lunatic. As far as I'm concerned, they don't
treat us fairly. That's number one, and number two they
had no right to do that.
Speaker 3 (20:19):
This is the Gulf of America and if you.
Speaker 11 (20:22):
Look at that shoreline, look at that shoreline, look from Florida,
well most of it is it's cooled America and vast
majority like big numbers. So I'm just admiring it. As
I look at it, I'm getting teary eyed. But I
don't want you to say Trump broke down and started crying.
Speaker 3 (20:46):
How beautiful is that?
Speaker 11 (20:47):
Look at the shoreline, look at that, Well, that's America.
Speaker 3 (20:51):
I genuinely feel that Donald Trump has this sense of
wonder that I talk about a lot, whether it's living
your life out loud, or the observations you used to
maybe take for granted that you don't do that. I
don't think Donald Trump takes our country for granted. I
think it's a big driving force in what led him
to run for president in the first place, led him
(21:13):
to endure these last four years before he reattained office,
endured all the political persecutions, prosecutions, weaponization of the Justice
Department against him, the assassination attempts. This man has a
love of country. He also has a working knowledge of
the history of this country that I think might surprise some.
And when it comes to the Gulf of America, the
(21:35):
Gulf of Mexico, I was thinking about that, Well, it
seems like kind of a random, obscure thing to pick
a fight over, or we're going to call a Gulf
of America, and if AP doesn't do it too well,
then they're going to be banned from the press room.
But then I always think back to how the left
is when they are in power, and the cudgel that
(21:55):
they use to force out, box out members of the
media that they don't like. We have spoken many times.
If you are a loyal listener to this program, first
of all, thank you for that. But even if you
only tune in occasionally, you have heard me interview the
likes of Simon Attiba from Today News Africa, James Rosen
from Newsmax. These two, just for a couple of examples,
(22:17):
and there are probably more. Those are just the two
that I know personally and have interviewed on the show.
Were effectively blacklisted, sidelined, boxed out, unable to ask questions
and press conferences of Kareein, Jean Pierre let alone, Joe Biden.
And for what Because the Biden administration didn't like how
they asked questions, what they asked, and they decided to
(22:41):
make that kind of a policy going forward from there.
So why is it good for the goose but not
for the gander? The New York Times up in arms
over this sort of behavior from the Trump administration clutching
their pearls. Here's Peter Baker, he's the White House correspondent
for the New York Times.
Speaker 12 (22:59):
I remember or during the Obama White House when they
try to keep Fox out of a press pool event,
and the other reporters, all of us said no, that's
not right, and basically forced the obol people to back down.
Speaker 3 (23:11):
And say, if you're going to invite.
Speaker 12 (23:14):
All of us, and you have to invite all of us,
you can't make a distinction based on.
Speaker 3 (23:18):
An organization that you just don't like. And so I
think you're right.
Speaker 12 (23:22):
They don't seem to understand that they want to be
able to pick who asked the president questions. That goes
against decades and decades of tradition.
Speaker 3 (23:31):
Tradition, But is it proper? Is it right? Is it correct?
Is it just? Who are the White House Correspondence Association?
Who leads them? Who made them the arbiters of journalism?
In this forum? There's no doubt that a vast majority
of the correspondents who cover the White House are left leaning,
(23:51):
if not outright leftists looking to further that agenda. And
it goes to this text from Kimberly, and she's not
wrong here, And with all due respect, Democrats and Republicans
both glue themselves to lies and mistruths. The old saying is,
how can you tell when a politician is lying when
they open their mouth? So sad is almost all news
(24:11):
networks are just as bad, Kimberly. I don't disagree. You know,
I watch Fox News. I think that's the one that
I kind of respect the most when it comes to
Brett Bharr, Martha McCallum. Their actual news anchoring and the
reporters in the field, the jobs that they do, and
they have opinion hosts. But there's a clear delineation on
Fox News between Okay, got these folks, Aisha Hastni, Peter Doucey.
(24:36):
They're out in the field, Jackie Heinrich. They're doing their job,
and they're doing it well, and I think they're objective
journalists for the most part. Peter Deucy asked tough questions
in the Trump White House press room as well. But
the problem is, you know the difference between that and
then Laura Ingram, Jesse Waters, Sean Hannity, even Greg Gutfeld.
(24:57):
You know that their opinion hosts who are the opinion
hosts in the news reporters as CNN, those lines are
incredibly blurred. What is Anderson Cooper? What is Jake Tapper?
What is Wolf Flitzer? What is John King? Those are
just CNN? And we know MSNBC's probably even worse than they.
Just fire Joy Reid and they're a mess. But CNN
was supposed to be this. Well, you got MSNBC on
(25:19):
the left, and you got Fox News on the right,
and we're CNN and we're down the middle and this
is CNN, and well it's not not anymore. They become
a shell of their former selves because they're deluded with
hate for Trump and Kimberly to your point, Hey, I
get it. I'm not a Pollyanna here. I'm not naive.
The lion comes from all sides, including our own. And
even when I say that I am a Republican, but
(25:39):
that doesn't mean I agree with all Republicans or everything
they say or do. I just think they're a lot
less bad than the Democrats. And the choice is made
for me, and there it is. I'll call out my
side when I feel it's necessary, but it's being done
enough by the mainstream media that only goes in one direction.
It's my job on this program, I believe a duty
to you are listen listeners out there to swim upstream
(26:03):
to push back against all these mainstream media narratives that
all seem to be going in the same direction. They
all collect their talking points. You hear the same exact
verbiage from all of the different outlets. How is that?
Why is that? Why would they pigeonhole themselves like that?
A question that you should be asking yourselves. And Caroline
Levi gets to the meat of the matter here. I
(26:24):
think she does a good job of explaining. In this
White House Correspondence Association, I mean, who died and made
them key? Nobody elected them. I understand you want a
free press to push back against those in power. I agree.
I've said that for years on this show. I want
an adversarial press to challenge President Trump, have confrontational interactions
(26:44):
in press conferences and interviews. The problem is they don't
do that to Democrats pulled both of their feet to
the fire. Be as hard on Joe Biden as you
are on Donald Trump. I'm not saying, oh, because you're
not hard on Joe Biden. You shouldn't be hard on
Donald Trump. No, bring it, throw fastballs, be a jerk,
(27:06):
be that media that the people don't like, but that
you do the job that they need you to do.
Fact finding, truth finding wherever that leads you. That Kimberly,
I'm telling you, having worked in this industry now for
over twenty five years, it just isn't the case. They
are not fair arbiters. They're not honest brokers reporting on
(27:27):
anything newsworthy. They water it down, They try to distill it,
they try to massage it, they try to polish a turd.
When it comes to Joe Biden or virtually any Democrat,
Democrat stance, Democrat policy, Democrat politician, they runcover, they carry water,
and then when it's on the right, all of a
sudden they find their journalism caps again. They get their
derbies with that press pass. Like the old tiny guys
(27:48):
in the movies. They go, Ah, I'm a journalist, I'm
gonna ask tough questions. Now I got my saying. I'm
chopping on it. Don't you say? Where was this person
during the Biden years? Where is this person? Jeff Zeleeny
do you feel inspired? Are you inspiring? President Obama? What
are you most marveling at these first days in office?
Go back and find that Jeff Selleni clip. Maybe I'll
do it during the break here at the top of
(28:09):
the hour. It's comical the difference. You shouldn't be different
if you are a member of the ostensibly mainstream media
journalistic faction, that world, that sphere. Kyle Clark would be
a local example. I come on this show and I
occasionally do some news anchoring over there on KOA for
election coverage and such. But I draw a clear line
(28:31):
and distinction between. On this show, I'm expressing my opinions.
I'm putting them out there. I'm being very forthright and
telling you these are my views. This is my opinion
based on my lived experience, based on my observations, based
on my expertise in following and critiquing the media. And
I will give you that. But when I'm over there
and I'm anchoring election coverage, that's not my job. And
(28:52):
I know that, and people know when I go over
there and fill it on KOA, especially when I'm on
Roster Mandy that well, here's Ryan. He's a Trump guy.
You know, he's a conservative, or he's a libertarian or
he's a populist. Yes, I plead guilty to all three
of those things. I'm some combination there up. But I
tell you where I stand. You know where I am.
Politically oriented. Kyle Clark, we know he's a lib. We
(29:13):
know he's a Communis's why I call him comrade Kyle.
We know that, but he claims otherwise. He makes this
to kind of joke of a claim that he can
report honestly and doesn't even offer up like, look, here
is my opinion, here's my commentary. And I'm Kyle Clark,
and I'm of the left, and I support Democrats mostly.
I think he is tough on some Democrat. He's actually
(29:34):
better than a lot out there. He'll be tough on
Polis here and there, just enough to kind of keep
his street cred a little bit with us, the way
he would moderate a debate, so to speak. But he
was just salivating when it was a Republican primary debate
for the fourth Congressional District and Lauren Bobert was on
the stage and he went ham in on her. You
don't know who that means, and then he ended up
(29:56):
on Jimmy Kimmel. He's a national celebrity well, good for him,
but just you know, for the sake of everyone and
our sanity and respect for your audience, I think he
owes it to you to say, look, I have left
wing views and philosophies. I don't agree with a lot
of the conservative but he honeycombs that into his actual
(30:16):
news presentation and coverage. Is an anchor. And he's not
upfront or clear about where his editorial opinion is, and
when is he giving his editorial opinion, and when is
he's shifting back over into news, and where is that
gray area in between. That's what they get away with.
That is what they try to fool you with. And
people of the left, I'm sorry to say, that want
(30:37):
to believe lies, seek him out for confirmation bias and
view Kyle Clark and other leftists CNN uncritically. They don't
think to question. They don't take a step back and go,
wait a minute, that doesn't make sense, that doesn't add up.
And you said this about Trump, but you did this
for Joe Biden. A fair minded, objective, independently minded person
(30:57):
should be questioning everything at all time. Don't be spoon
fed what the media gives you. Oh, I guess that's true. No,
it's not. Assume default position. It's not true. And then
it's up to myself or anybody else reporting out there
to present facts to you and convince you that it's true,
not that you just take it whole hog and go
will it was on the news. I guess it was true.
(31:20):
We'll take this time out. We'll come back more your
text five seven seven, three nine, another installment of Trump's
hot takes. We got three today, a trifecta if you will,
sex seegers alongside, appreciative of his help, and we're back
after this. I'm Ryan Schuling live once again for another
edition of Trump's hot takes, charting the forty seven president's
(31:41):
epic interactions with a fake news media.
Speaker 4 (31:52):
I don't know.
Speaker 12 (31:56):
Who you it. I'm the one.
Speaker 3 (32:01):
I thought. I thought they died. Have they still around?
Speaker 11 (32:04):
I haven't read them in years.
Speaker 3 (32:05):
I thought they'd died. That was the bored Air Force
one a couple of weeks ago. S V datte I
think is how he churches up his name for Huffington Post.
I thought they died. I thought they were dead. They
were on the table, they flatlined. I watched them die.
How are they still alive. I mean, he's just on fire.
(32:31):
He's shooting from the hip, zero fs to give, and
it's glorious. The thing about too, all this hand ringing
and pearl clutching and the sky is falling from the
likes of Peter Baker the New York Times, Oh, Donald
Trumphy is not giving access to the mainstream associated press
reiters and New York Times Washington Posts. Through one month
(32:53):
of his presidency, Joe Biden had answered just over one
hundred questions through over one month. In his second term
as president, Donald Trump has answered over one thousand questions
from the media. Access is not a problem with the
Orange Man. He provides greater access to the White House,
to the Presidency, to himself really than any president in
(33:15):
modern times. You got to go back to like Teddy
Roosevelt doing the whistle test stop tours and speaking on
stumps and stuff like that to get a president that
was more accessible to the people, that was more man
of the people, who wanted to communicate his message and
was willing to have those pugilistic interactions with members of
the media, and if you ask them in their honest moments,
(33:36):
maybe after a few cocktails, these reporters love it. They
live for it. It's good for publication numbers, it's good
for ratings. They actually get to have a give and
take with Donald Trump that they never got to have
with Joe Biden. And that's just the simple fact of
the matter. She presents herself as a moderate. Congresswoman Angie
(33:58):
Craig out of Minnesota. The bill pending before the House.
Speaker 13 (34:03):
Let me be clear, the budget proposal my Republican colleagues
just pass will gut Medicate and increase the cost of
health care for tens of thousands of Minnesotans.
Speaker 3 (34:14):
That's just false. That's again fake news. Speaker Johnson's doing
his level best to get one big, beautiful bill through
the House, so it's signed in the Senate and signed
into law by President Trump. You got to get a
big victory here. You got to get it in paper.
You got to get it through legislation. You can't just
do it by executive order. And Donald Trump was asked about,
(34:37):
you know, whether or not he was going to gut Medicaid,
and he, to his credit, said this is not going
to be this will not be a read my lips moment.
And you know who that was. It was w's dad,
Can you guarantee.
Speaker 2 (34:49):
Medicare medicate social Security going off the touch?
Speaker 11 (34:52):
Yeah, I mean I have said it so many times.
You shouldn't be asking me that question. Okay, this will.
Speaker 3 (34:58):
Not be read my lips.
Speaker 11 (35:00):
It won't be read my lips anymore.
Speaker 3 (35:03):
We're not going to touch it. Now. We all got
to look for fraud.
Speaker 11 (35:06):
I'm sure you're okay with that, like people that shouldn't
be on people that are illegal aliens and others criminals
in many cases, and that's with Social Security.
Speaker 3 (35:16):
We have a lot of people.
Speaker 11 (35:17):
You see that immediately. When you see people that are
two hundred years old that are being said checks for
Social Security, some of them are actually being said checks.
So we're tracing that down and I have a feeling
that Pam is going to do a very good job
with that.
Speaker 3 (35:31):
But you have a lot of fraud. But no, we're
not doing anything on that. He point blink says again,
repeats himself. He said up many times during the campaign.
Much of this regrin of fiscal conservatives that might like
to retool the entitlement program social Security, medicare medicate. Trump
doesn't want to do that. I don't necessarily agree with
(35:51):
him entirely on that. But he's a man of his word,
and he said this many times, and who doesn't want
to cut out fraud and abuse of Medicare and Medicaid.
If Representative Angie Craig, Democrat Minnesota, really cared about the
Minnesotans who are American citizens that are entitled to that coverage,
you would not want it be siphoned off for illegal
(36:11):
alien residents of this country that are not entitled those
benefits or should not be, And the money saved from
not paying illegals could be redistributed to actual, legal, tax
paying Americans who paid into Medicare and Medicaid and have
it coming. It's simple, but the Democrats are trying to
complicate it,
Popular Podcasts
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Intentionally Disturbing
Join me on this podcast as I navigate the murky waters of human behavior, current events, and personal anecdotes through in-depth interviews with incredible people—all served with a generous helping of sarcasm and satire. After years as a forensic and clinical psychologist, I offer a unique interview style and a low tolerance for bullshit, quickly steering conversations toward depth and darkness. I honor the seriousness while also appreciating wit. I’m your guide through the twisted labyrinth of the human psyche, armed with dark humor and biting wit.