Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:18):
I hope I'd like to be pope. That would be
my number one judge.
Speaker 2 (00:25):
No, I don't know, I have no preference.
Speaker 3 (00:26):
I must say.
Speaker 1 (00:28):
We have a gardener that happens to be out of
a place called New York who's very good. So we'll
see what happens.
Speaker 4 (00:34):
Ah.
Speaker 3 (00:34):
Yes, the forty seventh President of the United States Donald Trump,
before he was boarding Marine one, referencing Cardinal Timothy Dolan
but suggesting that maybe he could be the next pope
to succeed Pope Francis, who of course passed away over
the last week or so. Joining us now on Ryan
Schuling Live. Honored to be joined by the President of
(00:55):
the United States as he's en route between Harrison Township
and Warren in my homestad to Michigan. President Trump, welcome
back to the program.
Speaker 1 (01:03):
Well, we're very happy to be here. And you know
that if I'm not made pope, maybe Dolan give me
the pope. But I think I'd be a tremendous pope.
I think i'd be a pope that you know a
lot of people would say, it's highly respected and I
would do a tremendous job. You know, you had John
Fetherman really earlier in the year and he wanted to
be the Pope of Greenland. He said that, but we
(01:25):
looked at him and we said, you're not going to
be able to do that. We're not going to do that.
But I think I would be a tremendous pope, probably
the greatest pope in history. And more people would do
what happened with Cookie Joe and the Pope. You know,
they'd probably drop aduce in front of me, because I'm
a scary guy if you're on my bedside, but I'm
also a very nice guy. If you're on my good
side side, it might be a great pope. I think
(01:47):
I'd be a tremendous pope when you look at.
Speaker 3 (01:49):
It, mister President, you were there for the funeral service
for Pope Francis, and there were those in the media
criticizing you because you wore a blue suit instead of
the black suit that the Pope had expressed a preference for.
How do you respond to those criticisms, Well.
Speaker 1 (02:07):
I wore a blue suit and it's a beautiful suit.
And nobody has a beta JEBB. Nobody does a better
jeb when they're dressing. And there were a lot of
people in blue suits. But the fake news has a
problem with blue suits. You know, they have a bigger
problem with blue suits than having an MS thirteen gang
member in our country, which they ought to be ashamed
(02:28):
of themselves. You know, they were wasted away, these people.
Senator Van Allen was wasted away in Killbarrgharitaville. You know
what I'm talking about, right, ket along very well with
Jimmy Buffett, gotta look very well with the parentheads. They're
great people. And they didn't want gang members in our
country either, so they came more about a blue suit
(02:49):
then they care about MS thirteen gang members in our country.
They ought to be ashamed of themselves. And I had
a beautiful suit on. It doesn't matter what color your
suit is, by the way, but I had a beautiful
suit on. And so many other people had beautiful suits on.
And they don't want to talk about it. They don't
want to talk about the blue. They don't care that
(03:10):
Vladimir Zolensky came to the White House in his pajamas, right,
but they care about my suits. These people ought to
be ashamed of themselves.
Speaker 3 (03:17):
Believe me, President Trump joining us here on Ryan Schuling
Live in an exclusive and mister president. You mentioned vladimir' Zelenski,
the president of Ukraine. You were able to meet with
him one on one and really an iconic photo. You're
sitting across from each other in two chairs. It looked
like musical chairs. And that Emmanuel McCrone was trying to
make his way into that conversation from France, and you
(03:39):
told him that he was not to be a part
of that conversation. Can you tell us what went into
that decision that you wanted to meet one on one
with President Zelensky rather than having Macrone there too.
Speaker 1 (03:50):
Well, we didn't want Emmanuel Macron there. You know, she
wasn't invited to the conversation. It was just me and Zelensky.
So he told her to leave as she had to go.
I said to her, man, I'll love to be here.
So she left and she didn't stay, and I was
talking to Zolenski. A lot of people thought it was
a serious conversation. We played softball tonight before he slid
(04:10):
in the first base. Then I said to him, you
don't let her do that, right, You don't slide into
first You don't do that right. You slid in You're
not supposed to cut me off. I said, you don't
do that. I'm talking. I'm the coach, you're the player.
I'll bench you.
Speaker 3 (04:23):
Right.
Speaker 1 (04:25):
No, he slid into first and you're not supposed to
do that, very stupid. I said, we're not under crooked, Joe.
We don't do stupid anymore. You're doing a stupid thing
by sliding into first base. You're not supposed to do that.
We also talked about Russia, right, and you look at
Russia and they're ready to make a deal. They're ready
to make a piece deal. So we are ready to go.
(04:46):
And we had to tell Macron she had to leave.
Macron she had to go. She wasn't invited, so we
told her to leave. And we had a great conversation
Vladimir Zelenski and I and they want to make.
Speaker 3 (04:59):
A deal, mister President. The Canadian elections were last night
and it was a catastrophic result for Conservatives, specifically Pierre Pollio,
who lost not only in the race for prime minister
that's not a direct election his party lost, but he
also lost in the race for his own seat. Victory
(05:19):
speech from Liberal leader Mark Carney last night, who will
now be the next Prime Minister of Canada, I want
you to hear this, and then we'll have you respond.
On the other side.
Speaker 5 (05:27):
We are once again at one of those hinge moments
of history. Our old relationship with the United States, a
relationship base on steadily increasing integration, is over the system
of open global trade anchored by the United States, a
system that Canada has relied on since the Second World War,
(05:50):
A system that will not perfect, has helped deliver prosperity
for a country for decades.
Speaker 3 (05:57):
Is over.
Speaker 5 (06:00):
Our tragedies, but it's also our new reality. We are
over we are over the shock of the American betrayal,
but we should never forget the lessons. We have to
look out for ourselves and above all, we have to
take care of each other.
Speaker 3 (06:20):
Mister President, calling it an American betrayal, how do you
respond to that.
Speaker 1 (06:26):
Well, we're not betraying anybody, right. It's my job to
do the best that I can do for my country.
And Canada was ripping us off and now they're not
going to rip us off anymore. And he's not happy
about it. And you look at Pierre. He should have won.
He had an easier as to when he had a
very easier US. He should have won and he lost
because he's a stupid guy. He decided to come after me.
(06:49):
I'm not in his country right in some people's minds.
You know, you need to look at it the case
that we made. He's in my country to get a
fifty first state. I'm not in his country, right, So
he shouldn't have been focused on me. But he was
focused on me, and he ordered to yell at me,
say bad things, nasty things. A lot of his voters
like me. You know, why are you not talking about
(07:11):
the liberals in your country. You're talking about Trump. What
a stupid guy. So he lost, and he lost not
once but twice, right, he lost the parliament, he lost
the prime minister. So he lost not once but two times,
and he did a horrible job. And now you have Carni.
He wants to play games. Who's to play hard boy.
He's not gonna play hardball very long. We're gonna get them,
(07:31):
and it's going to be very easy to do. But
we'll make a fair deal with Canada and maybe there'll
be a fifty first state. Maybe not, you know, you
look at the election. Maybe we don't want them, but
we'll do something with Canada and we'll have a beautiful deal.
He wants to treat us like the enemy. They are
the enemy with us. They are not treating us sally.
(07:51):
They're ripping us off. They're hitting us very hard, and
that's not going to happen anymore.
Speaker 3 (07:56):
Mister president. There are critics that are citing your calling
Canada the fifty first state, imposing these tariffs on Canada
as helping submarine the Conservatives who were favored to win,
going back just a couple of months ago, what would
you say to that criticism that had you just stood
pat kind of kept your hands out of their election,
(08:17):
that Pierre Pollio had, the Conservatives made very well have won.
Speaker 1 (08:20):
Well, if Pierre at a high IQ, he would have won. Right,
if he had a high IQ, he would have won
like nobody's ever seen before. But he's a stupid person
who decided to attack Trump. He decided. Did they call
it Tylon? You know, the left in Canada made it
all about Trump, and the right in Canada should have
made it all about the left. You look at it
(08:42):
justin Trudeau, who sits down when he peas. I know
all about it. He's a stupid guy, a weak person,
and Canada is a weak country, and he could have
focused on that, it said, he focused on me and
the United States, and the left made him do it,
and the media made him do it. He was dog
they call it walked and we love dogs. I love dogs.
They're beautiful, beautiful and talented. Right, But he was still
(09:05):
walked into it and he lost the race. It was
a worst campaign than Mitt Romney. And that's saying a lot.
So you look at him, and you look at what
they do. They want to blame Trump. Now you blame
these stupid people in Canada for running a horrible campaign.
They had it on a silver platter and they gave
it away. It was horrible.
Speaker 3 (09:25):
President Trump joining us from the border state of Michigan
with Canada, my home state, and now in transit between
Harrison Township and Warren where he will be speaking about
the one hundred days of his presidency. Mister President, how
would you assess your own performance one hundred days in
and why did you select Michigan as the place where
(09:46):
you would commemorate those one hundred days?
Speaker 1 (09:49):
Well, I don't think we've ever seen one hundred days
like this in history. Right, this is the greatest hundred days.
They're beautiful hundred days. They huge, sit tremendous, they're phenomenal.
Nobody's ever seen days like this before. So we're having
beautiful days. It's been one hundred and we're doing very well,
and we love Michigan. We won Michigan may a lot
and we're very happy about it. Well, we won my
(10:11):
a lot and we want to go in there and
celebrate with a beautiful people in Michigan, Michigans and Michiganians
and great people. You know that they're fantastic people. And
the state looks like a mitten. We love that, right,
We love that beautiful thumb that it has there. It's
a beautiful thumb. It's Michigan. So we're doing very well
and we're going to rally their first hundred days, the
(10:33):
greatest hundred days the world has ever seen. A tremendous
hundred days, and we're looking forward to having a great
time with our people in Michigan.
Speaker 3 (10:41):
Mister President, you have been steadfast on the tariffs and
that they would work ultimately even if there was short
term pain. We saw a very interesting one hundred and
eighty by Amazon earlier today that they were going to
post on their site exactly how the terraffs would be
impacting pricing for consumers, and then they reverse course on
(11:03):
this in the following statement, the team that runs our
ultra low cost Amazon Hall store has considered listing import
charges on certain products. This was never a consideration for
the main Amazon site and nothing has been implemented on
any Amazon properties. Amazon News then came out with the
following response to the morning's news reports, the team that
(11:23):
runs our ultra low cost Amazon hallstore considered the idea
of listing import charges on certain products. This was never
approved and is not going to happen. You gave this
update just outside the White House before you boarded Marine one.
Speaker 1 (11:37):
Jeff Bezos was very nice, He was terrific.
Speaker 2 (11:40):
He solved the problem very quickly, and he did the
right thing, and it's a good guy.
Speaker 3 (11:47):
So my question for you, mister President, is what changed
in that phone conversation with Jeff Bezos.
Speaker 1 (11:53):
Well, I tell them, if they didn't remove their fake
news because it's fake news, we were going to make
them deal with Katy Perry again. We said they're gonna
have to send her the space again. And they said
to me, sir, please anything but that, because she's a
crazy parent. She's a lunatic. And they told me, you
know that, they were hoping she got stuck. Believe it
(12:14):
or not, they were hoping she went all the way
to Pluto, which isn't the planet, right They replaced Pluto
with Stacy Abrams. She's a planet. They called her a
gas giant. That's a big lady right there. We called
her the Beasts of the Southeast. And from what I understand,
you're not supposed to say that, but we say it
all the time. But you see that. We said, dibase us.
(12:34):
We're giving you Katy Perry again, or we'll talk to
Ireland and they'll send you Rosio o' donald. You just
said her the space. They said, sir, we'll take the
tariffs down. So they took it down. But it was close.
We were very close. We almost did it, but they
decided at the last second they want to do that.
And I don't blame them. Nobody blames them. You don't
want to deal with Katy Perry and Rosia and Donald.
(12:56):
You don't want to deal with those people.
Speaker 3 (12:57):
Certainly, not prompting the following question from my colleague Ross
Kominski on ko A, mister president, that is, if you
were to travel to space, would you do that with
Jeff Bezos and Amazon or would you feel obligated to
do that with SpaceX and Elon Musk, your good friend.
Speaker 1 (13:13):
No, we would do that with Elon because they actually
go to space. You know, you look at Blue Origin
and the rocket looks like a very funny thing. You know,
it's supposed to talk about it. Minds all, I'm bigger,
I could say that. But you look at SpaceX and
much better and much more successful, and they actually go
into orbit. They don't just go up and down. They
go into orbit. So we would go with Elon and
(13:34):
his beautiful people and SpaceX before we went with Bezos.
You know, everything you buy an Amazon like a lot
of times, lots of breaking things, right. They break a
lot of maid in China. So I'd rather use SpaceX
right instead of potential junk. We call it junk, even
though it's a tremendous website. We call it junk. And
(13:56):
we would rather go up with SpaceX that much. I
can tell you to know.
Speaker 3 (14:00):
The answer to that one, mister President, several appearances on
this program, you have lobbed considerable rips on Stacy Abrams.
You just did calling her, comparing her to the planet Pluto.
You've done so with Rosie O'Donnell. You've done so as
well with Chris Christi, who used to consider himself an
advisor to you. And I know that JB. Prisker has
often been a target of your ire as well. He
(14:23):
had this comment to say the other day and it
seemed to be extremely provocative and encouraging Democrats the left
to engage in acts of civil disobedience that might be
bordering on violence. Why don't you hear it word for
word and then we'll get your response. Never before in
my life.
Speaker 2 (14:38):
Have I called for mass protests, for mobilization, for disruption.
But I am now he cannot.
Speaker 1 (14:47):
Know them of peace.
Speaker 3 (14:50):
They have, don't understand that we will to fight their
poylty with every megaphone and microphone.
Speaker 1 (14:55):
That we have.
Speaker 2 (14:56):
We must fascinate them on the soapbox and then all.
Speaker 3 (15:01):
Box really reminiscent when he says that Republicans cannot know
a moment of peace, mister president of Maxine Waters saying
the same of getting up in people's faces. Sarah Huckabee
Sanders being run out of a restaurant in Metro DC,
what do you make of these comments from Governor Pritzker.
Speaker 1 (15:20):
Well, these are very violent comments, right, They're very violent
and they're not nice. And you look at him, JB. Pritsker, Right.
JB stands for jiggily belly. Right, You look at that guy.
He looks like he ate a few bowling balls. What
a big beautiful If he was ever sent out of office,
he would have worked every December as a mall Santa
although he looks like he ate Santa Claus, which is
(15:42):
very sad. You look at that guy, jiggily belly Pritzker,
that's what I call him. But he's a slob. I'll
call him a slab. I'll call him disgusting. And he's
making very violent plans that we're not going to know peace.
And I believe that he should probably keep his mouth shut,
not even what he's talking, but what he's thinking about eating.
(16:02):
He doesn't need to do it anymore. So he should
keep his lamp shut because every time he opens it,
it's like a gravitational pull. Everything goes towards that hull.
So you don't want to do that, right, you should
keep your map shut. If GJB.
Speaker 3 (16:16):
Pritz here, Finally, mister President we know what's on tap
next kind of in the on deck circle, and that
is the Reconciliation Bill that is working its way through
the House. Speaker Johnson talking about that earlier today and
had these words to say about you as president.
Speaker 6 (16:32):
He is the most consequential American leader of the twenty
first century. And that's an understatement a president Trump has.
Speaker 3 (16:39):
Here's a list.
Speaker 6 (16:40):
Remove men from women's sports into dei in the federal government,
in the US military, expanded oil and gas extraction to
lower prices, taking steps to end unfair trade practices, secure
trillions of dollars in new investments in American manufacturing, deported
criminal illegal aliens, stood up for religious liberty and rooted
out anti Christian bias, combated virulent anti semitism on college campuses.
Speaker 3 (17:03):
The list goes on and on and on.
Speaker 6 (17:05):
That's just barely scratching the service that's in one hundred days.
Speaker 3 (17:08):
We're just getting started, mister President. The Speaker saying that
he hopes that the big beautiful bill, as you call it,
will be passed by Memorial Day. The Senate hoping to
get their version across the finish line by the fourth
of July. What is your read on this situation. Do
you feel as strongly about your alliance with John Thune
in the Senate as you do with Speaker Johnson in
the House, Well, I did.
Speaker 1 (17:29):
The Senate's going to do a great job. And you
look at Mike Johnson, it looks like Harry Potter. You
look at him and those glasses right, he's missing is
the scar and you know you're looking. You can talking
about a lot of people, right, You can talk about
a lot of people. He who shall not be named,
you can talk about a lot of peoples. Voldemort, I
got to look very well with him, you know. Suppose
a lot of people said, Sarah, you don't want to
(17:50):
get along with that guys, and I get along with
him because we have peace, right baudemort But Harry Potter,
you know, Mike Johnson, he's a wizard. He calls himself
a wizard. Sometimes be sometimes he's not. But now that
the Congress is off of the fifth vacation of the year,
you know, these people they're not working very hard. It's
time to start working hard and we'll see what happens
(18:11):
with the Senate. But July fourth will be a great
day if we can get that done by July fourth.
It would be a great day because we can celebrate
our independence by passing a big, beautiful bill. It'll be
a big, beautiful bill, and nothing bigger and nothing as
beautiful as this bill will be a tremendous bill. I'm
just a bill, remember that Schoolhouse rock, and only a bill.
(18:31):
And we're sitting on Capitol Hill and along well with
that bill. And now he's a beautiful bill and a
big bill, and we're going to have him passed, and
he's going to do a tremendous job. And we're going
to later foundation to make America great again. So we're
very excited about it. I think food will be fine.
I think Johnson, Harry Potter, he'll be fine, and we
will have a beautiful bill on Independence Day.
Speaker 3 (18:53):
President Trump joining us. We appreciate your time on this
momentous day, one hundred days into your presidency and in
my home state of Michigan. Mister President, enjoy your time there.
We'll talk to you again soon.
Speaker 1 (19:05):
Thank you so much, your beautiful people.
Speaker 3 (19:08):
President Trump. Also known as Sean Ferrish and you can
follow him on x at Sean That's Shawn Underscore Farish fash.
He is the host of the Ungoverned podcast as well,
and we enjoy each and every time he comes on.
As you can hear Kelly laughing in the background. Back
with Representative Scott Bottoms, candidate for governor and rallying against
(19:32):
House Built twenty five thirteen twelve tomorrow on the steps
of the Capitol. More on that after this on Ryan
Schuling Live. Well, we're one hundred days into the Trump
presidency and it's a snapshot of where his entire four
years might go. But for retirement planning, for where you're
looking to go, it could be much longer term than that,
(19:54):
and he don't want a snapshot to define the decisions
that you make, even one hundred days into the core
of a Trump presidency. The tariffs have had their effects
on the markets. Those seem to be recovering. But I
only have cursory knowledge of this subject. I'm waiting into
the shallow end of the pool. You need to dive
into the deep end of the pool with Trajan Wealth Today.
(20:16):
Find them online trajanwealth dot com that's t r a
ja nwealth dot com, or set up your personal one
on one consultation absolutely free by phone seven two oh
four zero five thirty three hundred, and where you can
do that are three locations in the Denver metro area,
including Broomfield, Loveland and right here in the DTC Denver
(20:37):
Tech Center, Greenwood Village, seven two oh four zero five
thirty three hundred. Now, the simple truth is that there
is no more important thing for you, your family, your legacy,
and what you leave behind than your retirement planning and
your wealth building. And when you get into that planning,
you can calculate your expenses, but that's simply not enough.
(20:57):
Trajan Wealth can help you design a strategy, a game
plan going into retirement based on realistic options that align
with your goals, your circumstances, and your comfort level with
risk tolerance. So call Trajing Wealth today, get that financial
portfolio set up, get your retirement plans. If you have
some kind of cobbled together from previous employers, get that
(21:19):
all organized on one page, and do it with one phone.
Call seven two oh four zero five thirty three hundred.
That's seven to two oh four zero five thirty three
hundred for Trajing Wealth or online at tradingwealth dot com.
Trading Wealth, a proud sponsor of Ryan Shuling Life advisory
service is offered through Trajan Wealth LLC at SEC registered
investment advisor, paid advertisement.
Speaker 2 (21:43):
This is directly tied in with the bill that the
House is passing that just went into the Senate last night.
They've been delaying this because they're scared of the the
population out here that are that is completely against this.
And basically, this bill is going to take children away
from parents. It is now going to be illegal to
do anything but affirm a transgender ideology with your children.
(22:07):
If your twelve year old boy comes home and says
I'm a girl, if a parent even hints, well, maybe
you're not, they can have their children.
Speaker 3 (22:14):
Taken away from them.
Speaker 2 (22:15):
This bill is one of the most egregious things I've
ever seen. Remember, LGB is a sexual preference. TQ plus
is a Marxist ideology to crush and destroy. That's the
point of it. It is a control thing.
Speaker 4 (22:31):
It is.
Speaker 2 (22:31):
It is horrible what is happening. And I've experienced this myself.
I've got video after video to prove this that anytime
I deal with transgender issues in the well of the House,
which is my responsibility, I represent almost one hundred thousand people.
And when I deal with this and I say no,
I do not accept this transgender ideology. I do not
(22:52):
accept that things called dead naming and misgendering, those are
creations of this Marxist control. I do not accept them
just because somebody said, oh, you dead name somebody. No,
you're wrong, that's craziness. Those are mental health issues that
we need to deal with, and we bring them into
the House and we control this same speaker that has
gabbled me down for saying those things are now trying
(23:13):
to destroy three young ladies' lives that have come out
and said enough is enough, enough is enough. We must
stop this stuff and reclaim Colorado.
Speaker 3 (23:24):
Strong words from Representative Scott Bottoms, and this was from
last week Republican District fifteen, also a candidate for governor,
as he was not only battling on one hand against
House Built twenty five thirteen twelve, which sadly and unfortunately
predictably made it through the House and now stands before
the Senate Judiciary Committee at ahering tomorrow, and Representative Bottoms
(23:48):
will be there along with Aaron Lee, parental rights advocate,
on the steps of the Capitol, holding a press conference
there as well. He joins us on Ryan Schuling live.
Representative Bottoms, thank you for your time.
Speaker 4 (24:00):
Yes, sir, thank you for having me.
Speaker 3 (24:02):
Now, a lot of people might hear those words, let's
say five years ago, and they would say, wow, that
sounds pretty harsh. But we've gotten to the point where
we are today because of the relentless efforts of the
left to erase women, to cancel sports for women by
invading women's sports and spaces. And what you mentioned in
this video Representative Bottoms a week ago was that that
(24:25):
was hit happening right there in the state capitol. Can
you give us a brief recap for our listeners exactly
what happened?
Speaker 4 (24:32):
Well, this has been a long time coming. This isn't
just a moment to sit in just this build. There
has been In fact, I had a senator, a previous
senator from around seventeen eighteen, that called me a couple
days ago and just said, hey, this has been happening.
This was building back in those days. But basically, it's
a speech control thing. It's not about people, it's not
(24:56):
about somebody's rights or something like this. This is a
control And then we've seen multiple, multiple bills that have
come along that are trying to protect a transgender ideology
over free speech. These are two different subjects. And uh
and I've mentioned this and I said that in the
in the little video that I did. But but LGB
(25:19):
is a sexual preference. T Q plus is an ideology.
They are two complete different things. And this ideology is
about control, taking your free speech away, and you have
to use a pronoun, you have to do something else.
Now we've got this bill that says they're going to
control it all the way into the house of an
individual and take their children away if they if the
(25:41):
parents don't affirm this ideology. And this is this is egregious.
And now they're bullying these girls. In fact, I'm going
to talk more about this tomorrow, but these aids that
have come forward, they are bullying. They're they're doing it
right now. Just in the last hour, they even bully
them even more. And then they're trying to come after
(26:02):
me and say, because I'm running for a governor, I'm
not allowed to get out there on the steps and
talk about this and do all this. But these people
are egregious, and they are taking professional women and saying
you no longer have any rights. You will sit down
and shut up and know your place. And this is
disgusting to.
Speaker 3 (26:20):
Me representative bottom of what would be a workable and
reasonable solution. It seems like there's almost a standoff here
between those are the capital that might identify as being
trans wanting to use a women's restroom and the potential
possibility of implementing a third space, a gender neutral restroom,
(26:40):
changing room, etc. Would that be an acceptable alternative for
those trans individuals or do you think that this is
not about that. What you're citing here is that it's
simply about power intimidation of these young women.
Speaker 4 (26:53):
Well, we know for sure it's not about that, because
there are already spaces in the Capitol where there are
individual bathrooms. It's a multi person bathroom. Anybody can that
wants who can go in there and you lock the
door and you're by yourself in that bathroom. Those are
all over the capital. So that's my question is why
do we have men don't care what they call themselves.
That is literally irrelevant to me. They are a biological male,
(27:16):
and I stand on the side of truth, not make believe.
And when they want to go into the woman's bathroom,
that's not okay. It's just not okay. They can go
somewhere else, and even if there are no other spaces
in the building, but there are. Even if there's no
other spaces, there are still men's restrooms and they can
go in there.
Speaker 3 (27:35):
Representative Scott Bottom's joining us from the fifteenth District of
the House. Representative, I know that you tried valiantly, but
your numbers are small to try to submarine this house
built twenty five thirteen twelve, which is so insidious in
its language and orwellian in the nature of what it's
trying to accomplish. In my view, we've seen sponsors of
(27:56):
this bill refer to the children in question is our children,
meaning that they're going to co opt. As you mentioned,
go into the households, go into the bedrooms, go into
the bathrooms of families, and tell parents whether or not
they can parent their child as they see fit. And
to me, this is a line a rubicon if you
will that once it is crossed, good luck uncrossing it.
(28:20):
What are your hopes that you can help stop this
bill in the Senate, because I cannot believe that this
will stand the test of court scrutiny. Would it be
challenged there? But God forbid this becomes law in the
state of Colorado. What is your forecast for where this
goes from here?
Speaker 4 (28:37):
Well, we've had representatives stand in the chamber at the
podium in the House and say, your children do not
belong to you, They belong to the state. We've got
that on video. And they don't care about parental rights.
That means nothing to them. These are bloodsuckers. They just
do not like the idea of a mother, father, and
(28:58):
a child having a family together. And I know that's
probably because of their background and issues. But the problem
is is we're voting in people with serious mental health
issues and then they legislate from that. Is there the
possibility that the Senate can stop this? There is that possibility.
In fact, the pressure is getting more and more. There's
(29:18):
going to probably be about a thousand plus people here
tomorrow that are just going to be saying this, you
can't do this. There's already three hundred and something people
registered to sign up to testify in the Senate committee.
This is going to be the big issue of the year.
This is going to and it's going to is crazy
(29:38):
because it's even going to be bigger than the gun bill.
But I am praying and believing that some of these
Senators are either going to open their eyes and see
truth and reality or they're just going to cave to
the pressure. Either way works for me. This can this
bill cannot go forward. The Senate has to shut it
down in this committee tomorrow, and if they don't, then
(30:00):
I guess they have to shut it down on the floor.
But that becomes a little more challenging. But we've got
a lot of people that are believing in praying and
speaking and testifying will be up here prayer, walking around
the Capital tomorrow. A bunch of stuff that's going on,
So we'll just.
Speaker 3 (30:15):
See Representative Bottoms always appreciate your time. Final note here,
I know there are a lot of people in this
listening audience who are up in arms about this particular
bill and they want to do something. They want their
voice to matter, to be heard, to congregate at the
Capitol tomorrow as you are planning to do. I mentioned
Aaron Lee as well. What time will that take place?
(30:37):
What can people do to contribute and help?
Speaker 4 (30:41):
Well, the start off of some of this is with
Aaron Lee and a couple of different groups. SPAM is
going to be heavily involved in this, and they're starting
at ten thirty with a press conference. I have my
press conference that includes representatives and some other people that
are very closely engaged to the attack on these young ads.
(31:04):
And then after that it is going to be a
large group of people that as pastors and church people,
and this is a great thing to pay attention to.
The Church is starting to wake up because of this.
The church has been very silent about a lot of
issues for a long time, and this one, I think
this was finally the bridge too far and the church
(31:25):
is actually stepping up and they're going to be out
in mass tomorrow and then just come testify, Come walk
around the cap on prey, Come be a part of
the group of people that's going to be out here tomorrow.
Do a lot of praying at home if you can,
but really coming and testifying is a big thing. They're
going to do something to stop that or squelt it,
(31:48):
because they always do. But we'll see, we'll see what
happens tomorrow. But I just believe we can break this thing, and.
Speaker 3 (31:55):
God willing you will. Representative of Scott Bottom's Republican District
fifteen known Scott that for time and all eternity, you're
on the right side of this issue and in my view,
the right side of history, and will judge you kindly
many many years from now. So thank you for engaging
in this all important fight on the front lines.
Speaker 4 (32:14):
Yes, sir, thank you the present of Scott.
Speaker 3 (32:15):
Bottoms your thoughts this issue, of course, of main focus
on this program with so many guests that we've had.
I am a strong supporter of parental rights. The fact
that the Democrats would dismiss that out of hand, pretend
they don't exist, contend that children are wards of the
state absolutely unconscionable to me. A parent should not have
(32:37):
their rights to be a parent of their child taken away,
but for the most egregious examples of abuse. Short of that,
a parent has a right to lead a household, to
be a father and a mother to their child the
way that they see fit. They might be more strict,
they might have more boundaries, they might have more consequences.
(32:59):
That does not make it a cauldron of abuse. And
once again I told this to Representive Bottoms just a
few moments ago. Once you go down this primrose path,
there's no going back, and there's no line that can
be drawn, because they're erasing the line and they're taking
kids away from parents. That is not an extreme statement.
That's where this is headed, and that is where that
(33:20):
these people who are proponents of this bill HB twenty five,
thirteen twelve, that is where they want this to go.
Final time out. We're back to wrap it all up,
Ryan Schulding Live on a Tuesday after these back here
wrapping up. Ryan Shulding Live on a Tuesday along with
Kelly Kuchera and Your Tax five seven seven three nine. Ryan,
(33:41):
you troll? Yeah, I get a lot of that when
I have Sean Ferrishawn as President. Trump caused quite a
stir last week when he filled in on a Monday
with Me for Ross Kaminski. Ross actually got a kick
out of it, so he was out on Monday and
jury duty. And then Kathy Walker comes storming into the
k away A control room with Dragon and asking do
(34:03):
you really have President Trump on now? He says certain things.
Mandy Connell was texting me too buy listening you think
it could be him? And then she said she was
tipped off by the Harry Potter comment about Speaker Jadson,
And I always think back to the first time I
heard Sean. He was on with Clay and back and
was just Buck sext and they were at mar A Lago,
(34:23):
and Buck was pretending he was just like I was
having a conversation with the President and it's a few
minutes in before I go, wait a minute, I don't
is that really President Trump? I thought it was Cally.
Do you remember the first time you heard Sean Ferrish,
Yes as President Trump? Yes, I was completely fooled.
Speaker 1 (34:39):
And he's kind of become a little Ryan showing live exclusive,
love it.
Speaker 3 (34:44):
Love it. We'll more of it, yes, of course, President
for real. Speaking of Warren Michigan tonight, so we'll have
highlights from that on tomorrow's program. One hundred days in
tomorrow will be one hundred one. Final text here. What
I find sad and extremely frustrating is Colorado once a
great state to live in, but these Democrats have us
on a path to destruction and becoming worse than Commie Fournia.
(35:07):
I'll tell you this, Jared Polus right now, right now
is worse than Gavin Newsom. And that's saying a whole
heck of a lot. I have a whole heck of
a lot more to say, but I'll save it for tomorrow.
Stay tuned. That Dan Caplis Show US Next. Thanks for
tuning in today to Ryan Schuling Live