April 8, 2025 • 34 mins
Rep. Scott Bottoms details the shenanigans of Democrats sneaking their highly controversial HB25-1312 through the house, shutting down debate and forcing a vote, on a SUNDAY. The ramifications of this bill becoming law would be catastrophic for parental rights.
Legal Protections for Transgender Individuals | Colorado General Assembly
Legal Protections for Transgender Individuals | Colorado General Assembly
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Colorado's Democratic Secretary of State, Jenna Griswald, is going to
run for attorney general. Here are three reasons why I
think she'll be tough to be. One, she's a fundraising powerhouse,
thanks in no small part to frequent appearances on MSNBC,
where she's built a national brand as a prominent critic
of Donald Trump, and that shakes the dollars loose from
Democratic donors. Two, she really only has to get through
(00:21):
the Democratic primary to likely win this race because Colorado
Republicans have not been competitive lately at a statewide level,
and Democratic primary voters may be a lot more forgiving
of Griswold's documented history of repeated errors in her time
as Secretary of State and questions about her leadership.
Speaker 2 (00:37):
Now.
Speaker 3 (00:37):
Those questions have come from.
Speaker 1 (00:39):
Democrats and Republicans, namely the county clerks who actually administer
Colorade's elections along with Griswold, but she has responded to
that criticism by saying that it's all sexism. As much
as she criticizes Donald Trump, it really is kind of
a page out of Trump's playbook, in which her response
to any criticism is already baked into the hearts and
minds of her supporters, no matter what the topic is,
(01:00):
no matter what the error is, whether it's tens of
thousands of voter registration mailers going out to non citizens,
or her office telling people that they had not voted
when in fact they had voted, or whether most recently
and most embarrassingly, the public posting the voting machine passwords.
Her defense sexism is already baked in and ready to respond.
And finally, a third reason why I think she'll be
(01:21):
tough to be in this race for AG is the
fact that the current Attorney General, Phil Weiser, Democrat, who's
running for governor, came into that office without proscatorial experience.
Speaker 3 (01:32):
That could be an.
Speaker 1 (01:33):
Attack line against Griswold as she runs for AG, but Democrats,
who are largely happy with how Wiser has performed and
are considering electing him governor are not likely to hold
that lack of courtroom experience against Griswald.
Speaker 2 (01:48):
That's everything we talked about with George Brockler in the
previous hour, and that was Comrade Kyle nine News Kyle Clark,
and Tooy's credit, he is not held back in his
criticism and direct inquiry with Jenna Grizswoll, who I think
was quite taken aback by the fact that a guy
that she considers to be in her back pocket he's not.
Speaker 3 (02:07):
He's not.
Speaker 2 (02:07):
He's pretty much made that obvious, and that was kind
of hilarious. I wanted you to hear it because it's
the most like backhanded I won't even call it a compliment.
But here are three reasons why Jenna Griswold can win
and will be.
Speaker 3 (02:19):
Tough to beat.
Speaker 2 (02:20):
But within it, it's just laden with abject criticisms about
her failures and shortcomings and missteps. And he's not wrong.
I didn't even know about her blaming things on sexism.
Well that's a convenient out. And you know what, I
find that to be incredibly insulting to the many women
who are very capable of performing in leadership positions in
(02:42):
our government. That you would go to that car Oh
your success, Now what if you stink? I don't care
what your gender is. If you're terrible at your job
and what you do and you happen to be female,
you're free from criticism. I mean, that's the point that
Kyle Clark makes, and I thought he made it quite
well there. But this rabid Trump Arrangement syndrome. I think
(03:04):
I underestimated at times just how much not only that
people hate Donald Trump, Okay, so what, but that it
animates them, that they're so irrational with this hatred that
they could get slapped down, as we talked about with g.
Brock in the previous hour in a nine to nothing
Supreme Court decision. Now, that should be embarrassing, that should
be humiliating, that should give a person pausitive what will
(03:25):
wait a minute, maybe even though I hate him and
I think he's, you know, the dreg of society and whatever,
orange man, bad hitler, yea, yeah, am I not really
thinking clearly here as to how to really rationally logically
bring this man down, defeat him, et cetera. And that's
the trap that it wasn't just the left even it
(03:47):
was a lot of the Trump deranged right, including Mary
On Nicholas, who I think was a former Republican, and
Krista Kaefer I don't even know anymore, but that they
would co sign enjoin this lawsuit which was destined for
failure if you know anything about the Constitution, it was
destined for failure.
Speaker 3 (04:04):
And I just mirror this topic as if we had a.
Speaker 2 (04:07):
Crazed, lunatic fringe or the right wing, and there is that.
Speaker 3 (04:10):
I don't deny that, QAnon whatever. I don't even care that.
Speaker 2 (04:14):
They don't control the animus of the party, and if
we allowed them to control it, I'd be out.
Speaker 3 (04:20):
I'd be like, no, no, what are you talking about.
Speaker 2 (04:22):
No. If they were that obsessed with let's just say
Hillary's emails and whatever.
Speaker 3 (04:28):
Candidate fed them the red meat to the.
Speaker 2 (04:30):
Base of I am gonna hunt down Hillary Clinton and
I'll do everything it takes to oppose her and her emails.
Speaker 3 (04:36):
I'm like, that's been played out. Why don't you just
beat her? That's just it.
Speaker 2 (04:40):
I would not want Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, Gavin Newsom,
Jared Poulis, Jenna Griswold. I don't want any of them
taking off the ballot. I think they're horrible. But if
the voters, I don't know, in my view, my estimation,
my analysis, if they're dumb enough to vote for it,
then we deserve what we get.
Speaker 3 (05:01):
Even if the candidate is like in.
Speaker 2 (05:03):
My mind that I could create a horrific monster, like
they've really caricatured Donald Trump to be that still doesn't
give you you narcissists the power to tell me who
I get to vote for or don't get to vote for.
Speaker 3 (05:19):
And you know what, now that you did that, now I'm.
Speaker 2 (05:21):
Going to vote for Trump. Do they understand the power
of persuasion? Here Dale Carnegie courses how to win friends
and influence people. My dad took that course, he had
the book. I've talked to him about it. You don't
do it by cudgeling them and going you can't vote
for Trump because you're too stupid to figure out that
Orange man bad?
Speaker 3 (05:41):
Do you know how ridiculous you sound? Put him on
the ballot.
Speaker 2 (05:45):
If he's as terrible as you say he is, obviously
he'll lose. Oh wait, he didn't lose. He won all
seven swing states and the popular vote.
Speaker 3 (05:54):
How did that happen?
Speaker 2 (05:56):
Are that many Americans by your estimation? Marion Nickols christa
kay for others? Are we that stupid? Are we just
maniacally unintelligent? And you're just smarter than us?
Speaker 3 (06:06):
So you should you should.
Speaker 2 (06:08):
Have gotten to step in and decide for us the
Republican Party of which you're no longer a part.
Speaker 3 (06:13):
By the way, if you're not part of the party,
get out, Just get out. Of here. I'm going to
vote for who I want to vote for, and.
Speaker 2 (06:19):
The listeners in this audience, they're gonna vote for who
they want to vote for. I'll even take it back
a step further. I preferred Ron DeSantis, and I have
for some time I like him a lot. But when
I saw the handwriting on the wall that this was
going to be Donald Trump's time a third time, that
was clear. The base had spoken, the Republican Party, the voters,
(06:40):
and the primaries, the caucuses, they had spoken, and even
Ron de Santis realized.
Speaker 3 (06:44):
That after Iowa, and then I did.
Speaker 2 (06:47):
And then when presented with the choice if it was
either going to be Donald Trump or Nicky Haley, I
don't want Nicky Haley.
Speaker 3 (06:54):
So I mean, I don't know.
Speaker 2 (06:56):
I'm able to detach myself emotionally from all of this
and try my best to view things with clear eyes,
to view Donald Trump for his strengths and his flaws
and his faults and however whatever, but to clearly think
through and go no, we are better off as a
country domestically internationally if Donald Trump is president compared to
(07:18):
Joe Biden or Kamala Harris.
Speaker 3 (07:19):
For me, it's not much of a debate.
Speaker 2 (07:22):
But there are people out there who are these intellectual bullies,
and they try to wield their educations and the paper
they're printed on. These coastal liberal elites for the most part,
or those that want to be accepted by the coast
of liberal elites, but never will be. He'll never be
part of their club because you're not them, and they
know that.
Speaker 3 (07:38):
But they'll use you.
Speaker 2 (07:39):
You'll be a useful idiot for them upon in their game,
their grand scheme.
Speaker 3 (07:44):
But you're never going to please them.
Speaker 2 (07:46):
I mean the Mitt Romney's of the world, John McCain,
if we just make nice with the mainstream liberal media,
they'll treat us well.
Speaker 3 (07:52):
They accuse Mitt Romney of putting a dog.
Speaker 2 (07:54):
And a carrier and putting it on the roof of
his car and going on vacation. They said that Mitt
Romney uncle Mitten's. He's gonna put you all back in chains.
They called John McCain a racist in two thousand and
eight because he voted against MLK as a holiday. He
had his reasons. You know, it goes back now into
the early eighties for that. But they don't keep their
(08:16):
powder dry for anybody. This is why Trump happened. This
is why Trump won. It's not that hard to figure out,
because if we're gonna lose with losers and mediocre casper
milk toast, middle of the road mushmouths like John McCain
and Mitt Romney, both of whom, especially McCain, Rush Limbaugh
(08:37):
warned us about, if we're just gonna serve up these
losers anyway, then let's at least go down swinging with
our guy, with the man in the arena who's gonna
deliver some offense Donald Trump. I totally understand why Donald
Trump happened. Why do you think that there are two
younger Republicans jd Vance and Ron De Santis in particular,
who are probably the two front runners for twenty twenty
(08:58):
eight and why because they followed Trump's lead an example
of how to fight, how to fight well, and how
to fight smart, and how to tap into the hearts
and minds of those people in the overlooked portions of
Middle America, the working class. And that is exactly where
this tariff debate is taking us, because Wall Street doesn't
(09:21):
like it at all. The markets were volatile again today.
They were up really big early. They finished down a
little bit. They're still reacting to what Trump's trying to
do here. But are we going to make decisions based
entirely on the wealth and success of the investor class.
That's what Democrats are telling us now, this former party
of the working class, people of the blue collar, of
the unwashed masses. No, we have to do what's best
(09:44):
for Wall Street and for the uh billionaire. Wait in
a minute, you don't like billionaires. You told us, what
do you pick a side? Pick a side here? But
I'm telling you, by and large, the more video audio
I see from the states from which I hail, in
the Upper Midwest, the rust belt, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan, Wisconsin,
(10:06):
the rank and file working class, they like that Trump
is taking this tariff war on offense. These countries are
now clamoring calling to the White House wanting to make
a deal. This is what I keep trying to press
through into the sphere of conversation here is that Ben
Shapiro is a brilliant guy, and I listened to him
(10:27):
almost daily, but on this topic, he's not thinking it
through to the logical next step that the four moves
ahead on the chessboard. Donald Trump has to give the
appearance that these tariffs will stay put until or unless
countries come to us and want to strike a deal.
He has said he is open to that. But what
he cannot do, and this is where I totally disagree
(10:50):
with Ben Shapiro, is show his hand and go like,
these tariffs aren't real.
Speaker 3 (10:54):
It's just a bluff.
Speaker 2 (10:56):
It's just a tactic to get you guys to come
to the table. They were never going to stick the
first place. Then they lose their teeth, Then you lose
your negotiating power. It doesn't take reading the Art of
the deal to know this, but it might take living
the art of the deal that Donald Trump has to
recognize this. There is a method to his madness. I've
always known that. I haven't just thought that.
Speaker 3 (11:16):
I've known that. Many of you have known that.
Speaker 2 (11:18):
You're watching what is transpiring right now, what is playing out,
and you.
Speaker 3 (11:22):
Recognize it for what it is.
Speaker 2 (11:24):
This is Trump doing Trump things, and they're not always
going to be convenient or comfortable or normal according to
whatever the status quo had been. But that's why he won,
that's why he won twice, is that he goes against
these conventions, conventional wisdom, and where has that gotten us.
(11:45):
Let's try it Donald Trump's way. If he's wrong, He's
going to pay the political price because he has bet
all of his political capital on this move, on this move,
and he will take the Republican Party down with it.
There will be massive losses in the midterm elections of
twenty twenty six if this doesn't work.
Speaker 3 (12:00):
But that's how much Trump is willing to bet on it.
Speaker 2 (12:03):
You think he's gonna go all in on a losing
hand if he sees it that way? Is he's so
misguided that he's in on a hand that he thinks
is winning, but he's gonna have the rug pulled out
from under him and completely go backwards on it. I
don't believe that in the least Trump has been able
to calculate risk over his entire professional career in real
(12:25):
estate as a mogul, in acquisitions and mergers, in deals
that he's made internationally and domestically. It's not this guy's
first rodeo. And yet the liberal left, the mainstream media,
I'm sorry, even ros Kaminsky yesterday with Dan Kaplis, what
have you believe? But Trump is a complete and income pooh,
has no idea what he's doing he's just firing wildly
into the sky and doesn't know what's going to happen.
Speaker 3 (12:47):
I don't buy that. I don't buy it for a second.
Speaker 2 (12:52):
And of your thoughts at five seven, seven thirty nine,
lots of texts coming in. Let's get to some of those.
Stephen Littleton, retired law enforcement office. I'd like a call
out for my house District twenty five Rep. Tammy's story,
who has voted lockstep with every outrageous bill the Dems
have put forth.
Speaker 3 (13:07):
Yeah, Steve, here's the point.
Speaker 2 (13:09):
Any Democrat that's pretending, and that's the key word here
to be a moderate anymore can no longer claim that
if these bills all go through without their objection to it,
they're vote against it, some kind of statement on the
record saying, Okay, maybe we want to go part way here,
but not all the way. None of them are brave
enough to stand up to their own party and the
(13:30):
madness within it. And this is where I firmly disagree
with Dan kamplis. If you're a so called old school
traditional liberal, center left Democrat and you don't do anything here,
you're as much a part of it as the looney
bin lefties who are putting this out there in the
first place, it is your job to regulate against it,
to represent the interests of the people you serve in
(13:52):
the district, whether you're a member of the House or
member of the Senate, to normalize those views, to present
them in a public forum for debate, to go on
the record with it, and at some point vote against
this stuff. If you don't and you had the power
to do so, you are just as responsible for it.
It's like Jared Polis trying to claim I didn't I'm
(14:12):
going to sign this bill to ban semi automatic weapons
and put restrictions on our Second Amendment. They've been unprecedented
in American history and will likely be struck down by
the Supreme Court in a decision similar to Heller. My
name's not on I didn't sign it, but you didn't
veto it, and you allowed it to become law with
full knowledge that if.
Speaker 3 (14:29):
You don't sign it, that's what would happen.
Speaker 2 (14:31):
So you're not getting off the hook on this Polis pilot,
and the same thing with this trans the Kid's Bill.
Speaker 3 (14:37):
Nope, Nope, you don't get.
Speaker 2 (14:39):
To not sign it and wash your hands of it
and say that the people chose to kill Jesus instead
of Barabus. No, you don't get to be in that
stake out that political ground. We're not buying it. We're
not gonna let it happen. You own it, Governor Polis.
If these bills become law without you vetoing them, you
own them.
Speaker 3 (14:58):
They're yours.
Speaker 2 (14:59):
Congrat Ryan Well said, stay angry, leave the children alone.
Parental rights need to be respected, just another power grab
by the Colorado Dems.
Speaker 3 (15:10):
That is absolutely true.
Speaker 2 (15:12):
And it's not just that I'm angry, It's that I'm
sick of this crap. And I'm kind of where Jarvis
Caldwell is, and he'll join Dan Caplis coming up at
five point thirty six, the representative in the state House.
They've pushed and they pushed the left as on this issue,
and it's become more and more extreme, and more and
more ridiculous, and more and more relentless, and more and
more fascistic. You will believe what we believe, or there
(15:34):
will be consequences and punishment. We will take your children
from you parents if you don't affirm the gender that
your adolescent child has declared.
Speaker 3 (15:42):
Are you mad man? Are you insane? Yes? The answer, yess,
I know that.
Speaker 2 (15:48):
Let's go back to some audio here too, And if
I you're able to do so and go back and
watch out Numbered to Day on Fox News, I highly
recommend you do so.
Speaker 3 (15:56):
It's about one of the I want to.
Speaker 2 (15:58):
Say, around the twenty minute mark of the show, about
a third of the way through, that all of this
came to bear and Kaylee mcanenny. It's just it's enlightening
to see the national reaction to this and what the
sound of Erazokayi and hobbyer Maybrey, what it sounds like
(16:20):
when let's say somebody in Nebraska hears this and they're
hanging up for the first time. We're living in on
a first hand basis here in Colorado, we're ground zero
for this.
Speaker 3 (16:29):
But when somebody in an.
Speaker 2 (16:29):
Outlying say let's say a purple state like Wisconsin or
Arizona or Georgia, say they're watching this for the first time,
what do you think they're gonna believe?
Speaker 4 (16:38):
And if they would have actually spoken with parent groups,
they might have gotten a dose of common sense. But Harris,
listen to this. This is one of the grossest sound
bites I think I have ever heard. This is Democrat
lawmakers being asked, did you speak to the parents' groups
listen to how they talk about parents?
Speaker 5 (16:55):
We'd heard from multiple witnesses that this bill has been
worked on.
Speaker 3 (16:59):
For over a year.
Speaker 5 (17:00):
I will say I learned about this bill yesterday. It
was introduced Friday evening. I really am curious about how
much stakeholdering went on both sides of the issue, and
if parent groups that are not a part of the
LGBT community, if they were involved.
Speaker 1 (17:18):
A well stakeholded bill does not need to be discussed
with hate groups, and we.
Speaker 6 (17:23):
Don't ask someone passing civil rights legislation to go ask.
Speaker 3 (17:27):
The KKK their opinion.
Speaker 7 (17:29):
I agree, there's no reason to go to the table
with people who are echoing the hateful rhetoric going around
about the trans community.
Speaker 3 (17:41):
You know a question.
Speaker 2 (17:42):
I'm going to have a Representative Brandy Bradley coming up
here in about ten minutes. Do either Representative Yarazukai or
Hobby or Maybury have children of their own? First of all,
I hope they don't. I sincerely hope they don't for
the good of children in general. But if they don't,
where do they get off?
Speaker 3 (18:02):
Where did they.
Speaker 2 (18:02):
Get off taking those kind of shots at parents, likening
them to the KKK hate groups just because they don't
line up with your view on transgenderism. That's a bit insane.
Harris Faukner had some comments.
Speaker 8 (18:20):
So the one lawmaker there when she calls parents groups
anybody who's not an LGBT parent group.
Speaker 3 (18:30):
Wow, So I.
Speaker 8 (18:32):
Guess we're the enemy in her book and so or
in her case, we're all the rest of us are
white supremacists, like that was her example. I mean, this
is more than just offensive. This comes under that umbrella
of why does the government want to take our children?
Why in the state of Illinois were school choice They
want to send in a Democrat led bill right now
(18:53):
wants to send in investigators to figure out whether or
not you're homeschooling correctly. This is like that, are you
calling your child by the right name?
Speaker 2 (19:05):
And this all goes down to a threshold of where's
the bar? Where's the bar for a definition of so
called abuse? My parents, parents who have to play the
bad guy so often and discipline their children and have
a home where these children must abide by certain rules, expectations, etc.
Speaker 3 (19:23):
Is that abuse? Where's that structure?
Speaker 2 (19:26):
Is that giving a child purpose, giving them boundaries to me.
That's all part of being a parent. Those of the
parents I had, I had coaches that were tough on
me too, who didn't enable my fantasies or delusions and
in fact tried to rain me in from those Those
were the adults in my life who truly cared about me,
(19:47):
not the ones who tried to carry on these fantasies
that I might have invented.
Speaker 3 (19:50):
In my own mind.
Speaker 2 (19:51):
And we'll talk more about this represented Brandy Bradley joins
us next here on Ryan Schuling Live, helping guide us
through this voyage and some turbulent waters with some behind
the scenes goings on which I will let you in
on right now. So I've been texting feverishly with one
(20:12):
Representative Brandy Bradley as well as Representative Scott Bottoms, both
Republicans Colorado State House, and Scott's doing another interview elsewhere.
Brandy's got to buy herself a few minutes here, so
we're going to fill that time with your text at
five seven seven, three nine, inviting those along, and then
she will join us to close out the show. This
from Kevin Colorado is now super far left in anti
(20:35):
Trump a pedophile could run as a Trump hater in
Colorado and win too many potsmokers and other people dependent
on government for a Republican who ever win here at
least for now, and enjoying your show as always, Kevin, Kevin,
You're not wrong, and I think George Brockler stated so
in our number one as well, that it's going to
take some doing to get us back on our feet
(20:56):
as a party in this state. I'm hopeful that Britta
Horn can help lead. That Rome wasn't built in a day.
It won't happen overnight. We did have Corey Gardner happen,
he won a Senate seat.
Speaker 3 (21:07):
That happened.
Speaker 2 (21:08):
Granted that was over ten years ago now, but it
can happen. I think it will happen. It should happen.
We already know that part. But the Democrats are they're
living high in the hog right now. It is high
tide for them. They're making hay while the sun shining,
and nothing can go wrong. They can do the most
crazy stuff imaginable and nobody's going to hold them accountable.
(21:30):
And until or unless they do, You're absolutely right, they're
going to continue to do it. What disincentive is there Nationally,
Democrats have been put back in check. With Donald Trump
winning and the Republicans controlling the House and the Senate,
the Democrats now are scrambling.
Speaker 3 (21:44):
They have to recalibrate.
Speaker 2 (21:46):
Gavin Newsom has moved away from the transcenity that stuff,
and he's talking normal or trying to appear that way
because he is a chameleon and he is Patrick Bateman
from American Psycho.
Speaker 3 (22:00):
You've seen that movie, and if you haven't, please watch it.
You'll watch Gavin Newsom. It's Christian Bale as Patrick Bateman.
But he gets it.
Speaker 2 (22:07):
In the sense that if he's gonna survive politically. And
this is where I don't understand Jared Polis, because you
would think he is so invested in himself that's really
the only person. He cares about his family too, but
not you, not the Plabians beneath him. Color Rodden's as
Dan puts it a gum on the bottom of his shoe.
But you would think out of a sheerly selfish motives
(22:30):
and political survival, he would see the forest for the
trees and go, oh my.
Speaker 3 (22:33):
God, this gun grab bill. That's not good.
Speaker 2 (22:36):
That's not good for business. Jared polis Inc. This trans
the kids bill. That's not good for business. Jared polis Inc.
Speaker 3 (22:44):
I got a website for crying out loud, I'm gonna
run for president.
Speaker 2 (22:47):
Then why are you allowing Gavin Newsome of all people,
to outflank you to the right. Gavin goes on with
Bill Maher and he starts sounding like a sane person, like, eh,
it happened to a Wow, but I see the light now,
and you know, biological male should not be participating in
women's sports. It's an issue of fairness.
Speaker 3 (23:08):
Wow.
Speaker 2 (23:10):
Has Jared Polus ever said that, No, no, no, he's
gonna go down the convenient John Hickenlooper route of it's
not happening. And if it is so wide and it's
only ten kids, that's ten spots, that's ten scholarships, that's
ten medals, that's ten places on a team.
Speaker 3 (23:24):
If that happened to your.
Speaker 2 (23:26):
Daughter, selfish person, John Hickenlooper, whoever else makes that specious argument,
would you be okay with that?
Speaker 3 (23:33):
I'm gonna Garren Blank and tea you would not be
okay with that.
Speaker 2 (23:38):
But because it's somebody else's kid and not on your
watch and not your concern, you're okay with throwing your
hands up and looking the other way. One case is
one too many. It shouldn't be happening at all, not once.
And even Gavin Newsome acknowledged that in his own podcast
with Charlie Kirk, citing a track and field event, and
(23:58):
we talked about yesterday this Billiard's event where the two
finalists in the women's championship, we're both biological men. Okay,
have it out amongst yourselves then no women included. Ryan
just wondering how much money the state has spent on losing.
It's got to be substantial. That's why they need to
(24:19):
take our Tabor. That's a great point and accurate. Yeah,
and here we go with KBB talking about the fact
they're trying to sue the state of Colorado over Tabor,
so we both need taxpayer funds. Is so ironic to
both prosecute this case in a lawsuit and challenge it
in the courts, and we need taxpayer funds as well
on the other side to defend TABOR against those that
(24:42):
would dispatch it. Ryan I tried to call the Dems
in Colorado Democrats dom dumb and autocorrect keeps changing it
to x Ray even autocorrect won't criticize Democrats. Who's running
your phone? Is that an Apple thing? What kind of
operating system are you running on there? What kind of
download did you get? Go back to the original? Can
(25:04):
you do that?
Speaker 3 (25:05):
Maybe?
Speaker 2 (25:06):
Alexa wanted me to ask George Brockler if he thinks Budwiser. Oh,
that's good, Phil Wiser, Budweiser. I call him Phil none
the Wiser. Dan won't give me credit for that. I
don't think that's fair. I came up with it. Nobody
called him that before I did. I'm gonna pull a
Trump here.
Speaker 3 (25:19):
I called him that. Nobody else did. Phil none the Wiser.
He wasn't wise. He's not wise.
Speaker 9 (25:25):
He's never been wise. He'll never be wise. He'll none
the wiser. Come on, that's mine, Dan, give me some credit. No, Now,
he says I owe him like seventeen Tomahawks stakes too.
That's terrible, that's not that's fake news anyway.
Speaker 2 (25:37):
Alexa wants to know if Wiser will put George on
the ticket as lieutenant companor Ah, yes, a team of rivals.
I don't see that happening, Alexa now or in any lifetime.
Eric Manning, if Paulus just leaves the bills on his desk.
Of course, the bill passes automatically. You know that my
brother black man ha ha ha, Eric, if you bestow
(25:59):
upon me the honorary title, I will gladly accept it.
Speaker 3 (26:02):
I know I'm not.
Speaker 2 (26:02):
Black, but we talked about this earlier. If you can
imagine your own gender. I don't know why it stops there.
Maybe Rachel Dolezal had a point. She got the frizzy hair,
she went tanning, she identified as a black person. Now
that sounds outrageous, and it is, But why is it
any less outrageous.
Speaker 3 (26:22):
To put on woman face or man face? It doesn't
bother me. It does in the sense that they're going
after the.
Speaker 2 (26:28):
Kids on this Now, now you have awakened the beast,
you have poked the bear, you have kicked the hornet's nest.
Speaker 3 (26:38):
Why it was because it's no longer.
Speaker 2 (26:42):
About libertarianism, an individual just pursuing his or her dream,
no matter how they define it, no matter how they identify.
But no, now you want to trans the kids and
cut their body parts off. And I'm not going there
now wherever it ain't happening. Sorry, Jack, That's another good question.
Some great texts today applause for you five seven, seven
(27:04):
thirty nine, and I'm very impressed with this line of thought.
Are the recent bills changeable via voter initiatives? I want
to go back to KBB on that and I'll text
her during the break. I believe in most cases the
answer is yes, and that is, if you can collect
enough signatures to get an issue on the ballot and
have that be legally recognized, then the voters of the
(27:24):
state can decide and can overturn a state law or
can reinforce the state law. For instance, as the Democrats
the left, did you know, tip of the cap to
them on codifying the right to abortion in the state constitution.
They did that and that was through voter initiative Amendment
seventy nine.
Speaker 3 (27:41):
A break, we're back.
Speaker 2 (27:42):
Representative Brandy Bradley joins us next to close out the
show here on Ryan Schuling Live.
Speaker 10 (27:53):
And that's just the tip of the iceberg. It represents
how far this legislature is willing to go. And I
want to point out exactly how they're doing this. So
in custody battles and issues of custody before the court's there,
then there's something that you can assess which is a
coercive control. And so what this bill does specifically is
insert the dead naming which we all had to look
up and miss gendering.
Speaker 3 (28:14):
As falling under the coercive control.
Speaker 10 (28:17):
And it also, by the way, adds it to a
form of discrimination under the Anti Discriminatory Act. So you
can indeed be prosecuted for calling someone by their birth name.
And as a parent, if you refuse to call your
child by the whim of the name that they want,
you could lose custody in that way.
Speaker 2 (28:34):
She's not just a former Raiders cheerleader, which she is,
she's also a practicing attorney. Emily Campagno from Fox News
breaking it down very well there, and I just might
add she's more qualified to be attorney general here in
this state than Jenna Griswold is, but that might not matter.
Joining us now, he will be a candidate for governor
on your ballot on the Republican side. Currently in the
(28:55):
State House. Representative Scott Bottoms, our guest on Ryan Schuling Live.
Representative Bottoms, thank you for your.
Speaker 6 (29:00):
Time, Yeah, sir, thanks for having me.
Speaker 3 (29:02):
We heard what Emily just said.
Speaker 2 (29:04):
We know what you guys are dealing with it's coming
from all directions. It seems house built twenty fivesh thirteen twelve, Scott,
just your thoughts on it passing through the house.
Speaker 3 (29:14):
What happened on Sunday?
Speaker 6 (29:16):
Yeah, this is the height of egregious. The good thing
that is going to come out of this is we
are starting to get some national exposure. Have been on
a couple of national shows. We've been laboring under this
stuff for the last three years and it's just now
starting to catch national attention. The leftist Marxist controlled House
(29:37):
does not care about parents or children. They say they do,
but they do not. This is Let me just throw
this out here so people understand how I think. There
is no such thing as dead naming, and there is
no such thing as mis gendering. Those are little, fake
imagination things that people come up with because of deep
mental health issues that should be dealt with. And to
(29:59):
actually put this in, it's the laws.
Speaker 3 (30:00):
You're going to use.
Speaker 6 (30:01):
Lose your kids over this. This is crazy stuff.
Speaker 2 (30:04):
Why would Democrats not want a young person experiencing gender
dysphoria to at least go through the safer process and
step of counseling. To your point that this is a
real condition that young people have. Rather than jumping right
to the step of Frankenstein like surgery, hormone blockers and supplements,
(30:24):
why do they have to go all the way to
point Z.
Speaker 6 (30:28):
Because it's a control issue. There's two things. One, it's
an ideology. A lot of people may not understand this,
but LGB is a sexual preference. T Q plus is
an ideology. They are two completely different things. And the
t Q plus is rooted in a Marxist mentality. It's
about control. And do not forget that the transition specifically
(30:52):
transitioned surgery industry in the United States is multi billion
dollar industry. So that's why they don't care about kids
and parents. This is their ideology and they'll die on
this hill and they're getting paid a lot of money.
Speaker 3 (31:07):
To do it.
Speaker 2 (31:08):
Representative Scott Bobham's also Republican candidate for governor in twenty
twenty six.
Speaker 3 (31:12):
Our guest representatives yar Azokai.
Speaker 2 (31:15):
I don't know if I'm getting that pronunciation right, but
Javier Maybray as well. I mean getting on board with
likening parents groups to hate groups. The KKK question, Scott,
and I don't know how I'm going to feel about
the answer either way.
Speaker 3 (31:27):
Do either of those two have children of their own?
Speaker 6 (31:32):
I don't think either one of them do. I know
Zakai doesn't. Actually I may be wrong about that, but
I no, I don't think they do. But here's the
thing that gets me because I understand your understand the
direction of your thought there. But we have representatives in
the House that have children that are okay with this
kind of stuff. We had a representative last year that
(31:52):
got up in the at the podium in the well
and said, I can't wait until my little girl can
have an abortion. We had another representative last year say
that your children do not belong to you, they belong
to the state. Well, no, this is still America, and
they do belong to us.
Speaker 3 (32:09):
Scott. Where are the moderate Democrats?
Speaker 6 (32:12):
You know there actually is a few. You think there
would be more, and probably ten years ago there was
quite a few moderate Democrats. There may be three, maybe
four moderate Democrats, but they are not allowed to speak up.
They are told very strongly, if you speak up, you
will not get reelected. And we'll make sure of that.
And Governor Polos has a lot of push in this area.
(32:33):
He can make sure which ones actually get to the
through the primary and are electable, and so it's a fight.
It's a fight even with them. They have to stay quiet.
But I don't see that as an excuse. No, these
are our children, don't You don't have the right to
stay quiet. In my opinion, Nope.
Speaker 2 (32:51):
Representative Scott Bottoms our guests in the final minute that
we have left Scott as best as you can kind
of prognosticate.
Speaker 3 (32:56):
Will this pass through the Senate? Does it go to
Governor Poulos's death, will he sign it?
Speaker 6 (33:01):
In your view, if it gets through the Senate, Governor
Polis will sign it. Governor Polis is behind this kind
of stuff. He actually like to act like he's this
moderate libertarian kind of He is the most liberal governor
in the United States. I think it will probably get
through the Senate, but if there's a possibility of getting stopped,
(33:22):
it will be in the Senate, but it won't be
by Governor Poulis he'll sign it.
Speaker 3 (33:25):
Wow. Just incredible.
Speaker 2 (33:26):
This guy's considering a run for president and yet Gavin
Newsom now I'll flanks him to his right politically on
this issue.
Speaker 3 (33:33):
Staggering to think about that.
Speaker 2 (33:34):
Representative Scott Bottoms Bizaar's bizarre. We thank you for your
time to day. We wish you the best of luck
in this continuing fight. It'll no doubt be sorted out
in the courts constitutionally as well.
Speaker 3 (33:44):
But we thank you for your time today.
Speaker 2 (33:46):
Thanks sir, Representative Scott Bottoms there closing out today's program.
We appreciate each and every one of you tuning in
texting and I got a lot of these to get
to and they'll be in the queue for tomorrow at
five seven seven three nine. If you're just joining us
in this common versation, feel free to send those texts along,
send them my attention at Ryan and stay tuned for
Dan Kaplis coming up next. Representative Jarvis Caldwell. This story
(34:08):
has gotten national traction, to Scott's point, and they covered
it on Fox News Outnumbered today. Jarvis Caldwell, a big
part of that. Will join Dan coming up at five
point thirty six. I'll talk to you tomorrow. Aaron Ryan
Shooing Live
Colorado's Democratic Secretary of State, Jenna Griswald, is going to
run for attorney general. Here are three reasons why I
think she'll be tough to be. One, she's a fundraising powerhouse,
thanks in no small part to frequent appearances on MSNBC,
where she's built a national brand as a prominent critic
of Donald Trump, and that shakes the dollars loose from
Democratic donors. Two, she really only has to get through
(00:21):
the Democratic primary to likely win this race because Colorado
Republicans have not been competitive lately at a statewide level,
and Democratic primary voters may be a lot more forgiving
of Griswold's documented history of repeated errors in her time
as Secretary of State and questions about her leadership.
Speaker 2 (00:37):
Now.
Speaker 3 (00:37):
Those questions have come from.
Speaker 1 (00:39):
Democrats and Republicans, namely the county clerks who actually administer
Colorade's elections along with Griswold, but she has responded to
that criticism by saying that it's all sexism. As much
as she criticizes Donald Trump, it really is kind of
a page out of Trump's playbook, in which her response
to any criticism is already baked into the hearts and
minds of her supporters, no matter what the topic is,
(01:00):
no matter what the error is, whether it's tens of
thousands of voter registration mailers going out to non citizens,
or her office telling people that they had not voted
when in fact they had voted, or whether most recently
and most embarrassingly, the public posting the voting machine passwords.
Her defense sexism is already baked in and ready to respond.
And finally, a third reason why I think she'll be
(01:21):
tough to be in this race for AG is the
fact that the current Attorney General, Phil Weiser, Democrat, who's
running for governor, came into that office without proscatorial experience.
Speaker 3 (01:32):
That could be an.
Speaker 1 (01:33):
Attack line against Griswold as she runs for AG, but Democrats,
who are largely happy with how Wiser has performed and
are considering electing him governor are not likely to hold
that lack of courtroom experience against Griswald.
Speaker 2 (01:48):
That's everything we talked about with George Brockler in the
previous hour, and that was Comrade Kyle nine News Kyle Clark,
and Tooy's credit, he is not held back in his
criticism and direct inquiry with Jenna Grizswoll, who I think
was quite taken aback by the fact that a guy
that she considers to be in her back pocket he's not.
Speaker 3 (02:07):
He's not.
Speaker 2 (02:07):
He's pretty much made that obvious, and that was kind
of hilarious. I wanted you to hear it because it's
the most like backhanded I won't even call it a compliment.
But here are three reasons why Jenna Griswold can win
and will be.
Speaker 3 (02:19):
Tough to beat.
Speaker 2 (02:20):
But within it, it's just laden with abject criticisms about
her failures and shortcomings and missteps. And he's not wrong.
I didn't even know about her blaming things on sexism.
Well that's a convenient out. And you know what, I
find that to be incredibly insulting to the many women
who are very capable of performing in leadership positions in
(02:42):
our government. That you would go to that car Oh
your success, Now what if you stink? I don't care
what your gender is. If you're terrible at your job
and what you do and you happen to be female,
you're free from criticism. I mean, that's the point that
Kyle Clark makes, and I thought he made it quite
well there. But this rabid Trump Arrangement syndrome. I think
(03:04):
I underestimated at times just how much not only that
people hate Donald Trump, Okay, so what, but that it
animates them, that they're so irrational with this hatred that
they could get slapped down, as we talked about with g.
Brock in the previous hour in a nine to nothing
Supreme Court decision. Now, that should be embarrassing, that should
be humiliating, that should give a person pausitive what will
(03:25):
wait a minute, maybe even though I hate him and
I think he's, you know, the dreg of society and whatever,
orange man, bad hitler, yea, yeah, am I not really
thinking clearly here as to how to really rationally logically
bring this man down, defeat him, et cetera. And that's
the trap that it wasn't just the left even it
(03:47):
was a lot of the Trump deranged right, including Mary
On Nicholas, who I think was a former Republican, and
Krista Kaefer I don't even know anymore, but that they
would co sign enjoin this lawsuit which was destined for
failure if you know anything about the Constitution, it was
destined for failure.
Speaker 3 (04:04):
And I just mirror this topic as if we had a.
Speaker 2 (04:07):
Crazed, lunatic fringe or the right wing, and there is that.
Speaker 3 (04:10):
I don't deny that, QAnon whatever. I don't even care that.
Speaker 2 (04:14):
They don't control the animus of the party, and if
we allowed them to control it, I'd be out.
Speaker 3 (04:20):
I'd be like, no, no, what are you talking about.
Speaker 2 (04:22):
No. If they were that obsessed with let's just say
Hillary's emails and whatever.
Speaker 3 (04:28):
Candidate fed them the red meat to the.
Speaker 2 (04:30):
Base of I am gonna hunt down Hillary Clinton and
I'll do everything it takes to oppose her and her emails.
Speaker 3 (04:36):
I'm like, that's been played out. Why don't you just
beat her? That's just it.
Speaker 2 (04:40):
I would not want Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, Gavin Newsom,
Jared Poulis, Jenna Griswold. I don't want any of them
taking off the ballot. I think they're horrible. But if
the voters, I don't know, in my view, my estimation,
my analysis, if they're dumb enough to vote for it,
then we deserve what we get.
Speaker 3 (05:01):
Even if the candidate is like in.
Speaker 2 (05:03):
My mind that I could create a horrific monster, like
they've really caricatured Donald Trump to be that still doesn't
give you you narcissists the power to tell me who
I get to vote for or don't get to vote for.
Speaker 3 (05:19):
And you know what, now that you did that, now I'm.
Speaker 2 (05:21):
Going to vote for Trump. Do they understand the power
of persuasion? Here Dale Carnegie courses how to win friends
and influence people. My dad took that course, he had
the book. I've talked to him about it. You don't
do it by cudgeling them and going you can't vote
for Trump because you're too stupid to figure out that
Orange man bad?
Speaker 3 (05:41):
Do you know how ridiculous you sound? Put him on
the ballot.
Speaker 2 (05:45):
If he's as terrible as you say he is, obviously
he'll lose. Oh wait, he didn't lose. He won all
seven swing states and the popular vote.
Speaker 3 (05:54):
How did that happen?
Speaker 2 (05:56):
Are that many Americans by your estimation? Marion Nickols christa
kay for others? Are we that stupid? Are we just
maniacally unintelligent? And you're just smarter than us?
Speaker 3 (06:06):
So you should you should.
Speaker 2 (06:08):
Have gotten to step in and decide for us the
Republican Party of which you're no longer a part.
Speaker 3 (06:13):
By the way, if you're not part of the party,
get out, Just get out. Of here. I'm going to
vote for who I want to vote for, and.
Speaker 2 (06:19):
The listeners in this audience, they're gonna vote for who
they want to vote for. I'll even take it back
a step further. I preferred Ron DeSantis, and I have
for some time I like him a lot. But when
I saw the handwriting on the wall that this was
going to be Donald Trump's time a third time, that
was clear. The base had spoken, the Republican Party, the voters,
(06:40):
and the primaries, the caucuses, they had spoken, and even
Ron de Santis realized.
Speaker 3 (06:44):
That after Iowa, and then I did.
Speaker 2 (06:47):
And then when presented with the choice if it was
either going to be Donald Trump or Nicky Haley, I
don't want Nicky Haley.
Speaker 3 (06:54):
So I mean, I don't know.
Speaker 2 (06:56):
I'm able to detach myself emotionally from all of this
and try my best to view things with clear eyes,
to view Donald Trump for his strengths and his flaws
and his faults and however whatever, but to clearly think
through and go no, we are better off as a
country domestically internationally if Donald Trump is president compared to
(07:18):
Joe Biden or Kamala Harris.
Speaker 3 (07:19):
For me, it's not much of a debate.
Speaker 2 (07:22):
But there are people out there who are these intellectual bullies,
and they try to wield their educations and the paper
they're printed on. These coastal liberal elites for the most part,
or those that want to be accepted by the coast
of liberal elites, but never will be. He'll never be
part of their club because you're not them, and they
know that.
Speaker 3 (07:38):
But they'll use you.
Speaker 2 (07:39):
You'll be a useful idiot for them upon in their game,
their grand scheme.
Speaker 3 (07:44):
But you're never going to please them.
Speaker 2 (07:46):
I mean the Mitt Romney's of the world, John McCain,
if we just make nice with the mainstream liberal media,
they'll treat us well.
Speaker 3 (07:52):
They accuse Mitt Romney of putting a dog.
Speaker 2 (07:54):
And a carrier and putting it on the roof of
his car and going on vacation. They said that Mitt
Romney uncle Mitten's. He's gonna put you all back in chains.
They called John McCain a racist in two thousand and
eight because he voted against MLK as a holiday. He
had his reasons. You know, it goes back now into
the early eighties for that. But they don't keep their
(08:16):
powder dry for anybody. This is why Trump happened. This
is why Trump won. It's not that hard to figure out,
because if we're gonna lose with losers and mediocre casper
milk toast, middle of the road mushmouths like John McCain
and Mitt Romney, both of whom, especially McCain, Rush Limbaugh
(08:37):
warned us about, if we're just gonna serve up these
losers anyway, then let's at least go down swinging with
our guy, with the man in the arena who's gonna
deliver some offense Donald Trump. I totally understand why Donald
Trump happened. Why do you think that there are two
younger Republicans jd Vance and Ron De Santis in particular,
who are probably the two front runners for twenty twenty
(08:58):
eight and why because they followed Trump's lead an example
of how to fight, how to fight well, and how
to fight smart, and how to tap into the hearts
and minds of those people in the overlooked portions of
Middle America, the working class. And that is exactly where
this tariff debate is taking us, because Wall Street doesn't
(09:21):
like it at all. The markets were volatile again today.
They were up really big early. They finished down a
little bit. They're still reacting to what Trump's trying to
do here. But are we going to make decisions based
entirely on the wealth and success of the investor class.
That's what Democrats are telling us now, this former party
of the working class, people of the blue collar, of
the unwashed masses. No, we have to do what's best
(09:44):
for Wall Street and for the uh billionaire. Wait in
a minute, you don't like billionaires. You told us, what
do you pick a side? Pick a side here? But
I'm telling you, by and large, the more video audio
I see from the states from which I hail, in
the Upper Midwest, the rust belt, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan, Wisconsin,
(10:06):
the rank and file working class, they like that Trump
is taking this tariff war on offense. These countries are
now clamoring calling to the White House wanting to make
a deal. This is what I keep trying to press
through into the sphere of conversation here is that Ben
Shapiro is a brilliant guy, and I listened to him
(10:27):
almost daily, but on this topic, he's not thinking it
through to the logical next step that the four moves
ahead on the chessboard. Donald Trump has to give the
appearance that these tariffs will stay put until or unless
countries come to us and want to strike a deal.
He has said he is open to that. But what
he cannot do, and this is where I totally disagree
(10:50):
with Ben Shapiro, is show his hand and go like,
these tariffs aren't real.
Speaker 3 (10:54):
It's just a bluff.
Speaker 2 (10:56):
It's just a tactic to get you guys to come
to the table. They were never going to stick the
first place. Then they lose their teeth, Then you lose
your negotiating power. It doesn't take reading the Art of
the deal to know this, but it might take living
the art of the deal that Donald Trump has to
recognize this. There is a method to his madness. I've
always known that. I haven't just thought that.
Speaker 3 (11:16):
I've known that. Many of you have known that.
Speaker 2 (11:18):
You're watching what is transpiring right now, what is playing out,
and you.
Speaker 3 (11:22):
Recognize it for what it is.
Speaker 2 (11:24):
This is Trump doing Trump things, and they're not always
going to be convenient or comfortable or normal according to
whatever the status quo had been. But that's why he won,
that's why he won twice, is that he goes against
these conventions, conventional wisdom, and where has that gotten us.
(11:45):
Let's try it Donald Trump's way. If he's wrong, He's
going to pay the political price because he has bet
all of his political capital on this move, on this move,
and he will take the Republican Party down with it.
There will be massive losses in the midterm elections of
twenty twenty six if this doesn't work.
Speaker 3 (12:00):
But that's how much Trump is willing to bet on it.
Speaker 2 (12:03):
You think he's gonna go all in on a losing
hand if he sees it that way? Is he's so
misguided that he's in on a hand that he thinks
is winning, but he's gonna have the rug pulled out
from under him and completely go backwards on it. I
don't believe that in the least Trump has been able
to calculate risk over his entire professional career in real
(12:25):
estate as a mogul, in acquisitions and mergers, in deals
that he's made internationally and domestically. It's not this guy's
first rodeo. And yet the liberal left, the mainstream media,
I'm sorry, even ros Kaminsky yesterday with Dan Kaplis, what
have you believe? But Trump is a complete and income pooh,
has no idea what he's doing he's just firing wildly
into the sky and doesn't know what's going to happen.
Speaker 3 (12:47):
I don't buy that. I don't buy it for a second.
Speaker 2 (12:52):
And of your thoughts at five seven, seven thirty nine,
lots of texts coming in. Let's get to some of those.
Stephen Littleton, retired law enforcement office. I'd like a call
out for my house District twenty five Rep. Tammy's story,
who has voted lockstep with every outrageous bill the Dems
have put forth.
Speaker 3 (13:07):
Yeah, Steve, here's the point.
Speaker 2 (13:09):
Any Democrat that's pretending, and that's the key word here
to be a moderate anymore can no longer claim that
if these bills all go through without their objection to it,
they're vote against it, some kind of statement on the
record saying, Okay, maybe we want to go part way here,
but not all the way. None of them are brave
enough to stand up to their own party and the
(13:30):
madness within it. And this is where I firmly disagree
with Dan kamplis. If you're a so called old school
traditional liberal, center left Democrat and you don't do anything here,
you're as much a part of it as the looney
bin lefties who are putting this out there in the
first place, it is your job to regulate against it,
to represent the interests of the people you serve in
(13:52):
the district, whether you're a member of the House or
member of the Senate, to normalize those views, to present
them in a public forum for debate, to go on
the record with it, and at some point vote against
this stuff. If you don't and you had the power
to do so, you are just as responsible for it.
It's like Jared Polis trying to claim I didn't I'm
(14:12):
going to sign this bill to ban semi automatic weapons
and put restrictions on our Second Amendment. They've been unprecedented
in American history and will likely be struck down by
the Supreme Court in a decision similar to Heller. My
name's not on I didn't sign it, but you didn't
veto it, and you allowed it to become law with
full knowledge that if.
Speaker 3 (14:29):
You don't sign it, that's what would happen.
Speaker 2 (14:31):
So you're not getting off the hook on this Polis pilot,
and the same thing with this trans the Kid's Bill.
Speaker 3 (14:37):
Nope, Nope, you don't get.
Speaker 2 (14:39):
To not sign it and wash your hands of it
and say that the people chose to kill Jesus instead
of Barabus. No, you don't get to be in that
stake out that political ground. We're not buying it. We're
not gonna let it happen. You own it, Governor Polis.
If these bills become law without you vetoing them, you
own them.
Speaker 3 (14:58):
They're yours.
Speaker 2 (14:59):
Congrat Ryan Well said, stay angry, leave the children alone.
Parental rights need to be respected, just another power grab
by the Colorado Dems.
Speaker 3 (15:10):
That is absolutely true.
Speaker 2 (15:12):
And it's not just that I'm angry, It's that I'm
sick of this crap. And I'm kind of where Jarvis
Caldwell is, and he'll join Dan Caplis coming up at
five point thirty six, the representative in the state House.
They've pushed and they pushed the left as on this issue,
and it's become more and more extreme, and more and
more ridiculous, and more and more relentless, and more and
more fascistic. You will believe what we believe, or there
(15:34):
will be consequences and punishment. We will take your children
from you parents if you don't affirm the gender that
your adolescent child has declared.
Speaker 3 (15:42):
Are you mad man? Are you insane? Yes? The answer, yess,
I know that.
Speaker 2 (15:48):
Let's go back to some audio here too, And if
I you're able to do so and go back and
watch out Numbered to Day on Fox News, I highly
recommend you do so.
Speaker 3 (15:56):
It's about one of the I want to.
Speaker 2 (15:58):
Say, around the twenty minute mark of the show, about
a third of the way through, that all of this
came to bear and Kaylee mcanenny. It's just it's enlightening
to see the national reaction to this and what the
sound of Erazokayi and hobbyer Maybrey, what it sounds like
(16:20):
when let's say somebody in Nebraska hears this and they're
hanging up for the first time. We're living in on
a first hand basis here in Colorado, we're ground zero
for this.
Speaker 3 (16:29):
But when somebody in an.
Speaker 2 (16:29):
Outlying say let's say a purple state like Wisconsin or
Arizona or Georgia, say they're watching this for the first time,
what do you think they're gonna believe?
Speaker 4 (16:38):
And if they would have actually spoken with parent groups,
they might have gotten a dose of common sense. But Harris,
listen to this. This is one of the grossest sound
bites I think I have ever heard. This is Democrat
lawmakers being asked, did you speak to the parents' groups
listen to how they talk about parents?
Speaker 5 (16:55):
We'd heard from multiple witnesses that this bill has been
worked on.
Speaker 3 (16:59):
For over a year.
Speaker 5 (17:00):
I will say I learned about this bill yesterday. It
was introduced Friday evening. I really am curious about how
much stakeholdering went on both sides of the issue, and
if parent groups that are not a part of the
LGBT community, if they were involved.
Speaker 1 (17:18):
A well stakeholded bill does not need to be discussed
with hate groups, and we.
Speaker 6 (17:23):
Don't ask someone passing civil rights legislation to go ask.
Speaker 3 (17:27):
The KKK their opinion.
Speaker 7 (17:29):
I agree, there's no reason to go to the table
with people who are echoing the hateful rhetoric going around
about the trans community.
Speaker 3 (17:41):
You know a question.
Speaker 2 (17:42):
I'm going to have a Representative Brandy Bradley coming up
here in about ten minutes. Do either Representative Yarazukai or
Hobby or Maybury have children of their own? First of all,
I hope they don't. I sincerely hope they don't for
the good of children in general. But if they don't,
where do they get off?
Speaker 3 (18:02):
Where did they.
Speaker 2 (18:02):
Get off taking those kind of shots at parents, likening
them to the KKK hate groups just because they don't
line up with your view on transgenderism. That's a bit insane.
Harris Faukner had some comments.
Speaker 8 (18:20):
So the one lawmaker there when she calls parents groups
anybody who's not an LGBT parent group.
Speaker 3 (18:30):
Wow, So I.
Speaker 8 (18:32):
Guess we're the enemy in her book and so or
in her case, we're all the rest of us are
white supremacists, like that was her example. I mean, this
is more than just offensive. This comes under that umbrella
of why does the government want to take our children?
Why in the state of Illinois were school choice They
want to send in a Democrat led bill right now
(18:53):
wants to send in investigators to figure out whether or
not you're homeschooling correctly. This is like that, are you
calling your child by the right name?
Speaker 2 (19:05):
And this all goes down to a threshold of where's
the bar? Where's the bar for a definition of so
called abuse? My parents, parents who have to play the
bad guy so often and discipline their children and have
a home where these children must abide by certain rules, expectations, etc.
Speaker 3 (19:23):
Is that abuse? Where's that structure?
Speaker 2 (19:26):
Is that giving a child purpose, giving them boundaries to me.
That's all part of being a parent. Those of the
parents I had, I had coaches that were tough on
me too, who didn't enable my fantasies or delusions and
in fact tried to rain me in from those Those
were the adults in my life who truly cared about me,
(19:47):
not the ones who tried to carry on these fantasies
that I might have invented.
Speaker 3 (19:50):
In my own mind.
Speaker 2 (19:51):
And we'll talk more about this represented Brandy Bradley joins
us next here on Ryan Schuling Live, helping guide us
through this voyage and some turbulent waters with some behind
the scenes goings on which I will let you in
on right now. So I've been texting feverishly with one
(20:12):
Representative Brandy Bradley as well as Representative Scott Bottoms, both
Republicans Colorado State House, and Scott's doing another interview elsewhere.
Brandy's got to buy herself a few minutes here, so
we're going to fill that time with your text at
five seven seven, three nine, inviting those along, and then
she will join us to close out the show. This
from Kevin Colorado is now super far left in anti
(20:35):
Trump a pedophile could run as a Trump hater in
Colorado and win too many potsmokers and other people dependent
on government for a Republican who ever win here at
least for now, and enjoying your show as always, Kevin, Kevin,
You're not wrong, and I think George Brockler stated so
in our number one as well, that it's going to
take some doing to get us back on our feet
(20:56):
as a party in this state. I'm hopeful that Britta
Horn can help lead. That Rome wasn't built in a day.
It won't happen overnight. We did have Corey Gardner happen,
he won a Senate seat.
Speaker 3 (21:07):
That happened.
Speaker 2 (21:08):
Granted that was over ten years ago now, but it
can happen. I think it will happen. It should happen.
We already know that part. But the Democrats are they're
living high in the hog right now. It is high
tide for them. They're making hay while the sun shining,
and nothing can go wrong. They can do the most
crazy stuff imaginable and nobody's going to hold them accountable.
(21:30):
And until or unless they do, You're absolutely right, they're
going to continue to do it. What disincentive is there Nationally,
Democrats have been put back in check. With Donald Trump
winning and the Republicans controlling the House and the Senate,
the Democrats now are scrambling.
Speaker 3 (21:44):
They have to recalibrate.
Speaker 2 (21:46):
Gavin Newsom has moved away from the transcenity that stuff,
and he's talking normal or trying to appear that way
because he is a chameleon and he is Patrick Bateman
from American Psycho.
Speaker 3 (22:00):
You've seen that movie, and if you haven't, please watch it.
You'll watch Gavin Newsom. It's Christian Bale as Patrick Bateman.
But he gets it.
Speaker 2 (22:07):
In the sense that if he's gonna survive politically. And
this is where I don't understand Jared Polis, because you
would think he is so invested in himself that's really
the only person. He cares about his family too, but
not you, not the Plabians beneath him. Color Rodden's as
Dan puts it a gum on the bottom of his shoe.
But you would think out of a sheerly selfish motives
(22:30):
and political survival, he would see the forest for the
trees and go, oh my.
Speaker 3 (22:33):
God, this gun grab bill. That's not good.
Speaker 2 (22:36):
That's not good for business. Jared polis Inc. This trans
the kids bill. That's not good for business. Jared polis Inc.
Speaker 3 (22:44):
I got a website for crying out loud, I'm gonna
run for president.
Speaker 2 (22:47):
Then why are you allowing Gavin Newsome of all people,
to outflank you to the right. Gavin goes on with
Bill Maher and he starts sounding like a sane person, like, eh,
it happened to a Wow, but I see the light now,
and you know, biological male should not be participating in
women's sports. It's an issue of fairness.
Speaker 3 (23:08):
Wow.
Speaker 2 (23:10):
Has Jared Polus ever said that, No, no, no, he's
gonna go down the convenient John Hickenlooper route of it's
not happening. And if it is so wide and it's
only ten kids, that's ten spots, that's ten scholarships, that's
ten medals, that's ten places on a team.
Speaker 3 (23:24):
If that happened to your.
Speaker 2 (23:26):
Daughter, selfish person, John Hickenlooper, whoever else makes that specious argument,
would you be okay with that?
Speaker 3 (23:33):
I'm gonna Garren Blank and tea you would not be
okay with that.
Speaker 2 (23:38):
But because it's somebody else's kid and not on your
watch and not your concern, you're okay with throwing your
hands up and looking the other way. One case is
one too many. It shouldn't be happening at all, not once.
And even Gavin Newsome acknowledged that in his own podcast
with Charlie Kirk, citing a track and field event, and
(23:58):
we talked about yesterday this Billiard's event where the two
finalists in the women's championship, we're both biological men. Okay,
have it out amongst yourselves then no women included. Ryan
just wondering how much money the state has spent on losing.
It's got to be substantial. That's why they need to
(24:19):
take our Tabor. That's a great point and accurate. Yeah,
and here we go with KBB talking about the fact
they're trying to sue the state of Colorado over Tabor,
so we both need taxpayer funds. Is so ironic to
both prosecute this case in a lawsuit and challenge it
in the courts, and we need taxpayer funds as well
on the other side to defend TABOR against those that
(24:42):
would dispatch it. Ryan I tried to call the Dems
in Colorado Democrats dom dumb and autocorrect keeps changing it
to x Ray even autocorrect won't criticize Democrats. Who's running
your phone? Is that an Apple thing? What kind of
operating system are you running on there? What kind of
download did you get? Go back to the original? Can
(25:04):
you do that?
Speaker 3 (25:05):
Maybe?
Speaker 2 (25:06):
Alexa wanted me to ask George Brockler if he thinks Budwiser. Oh,
that's good, Phil Wiser, Budweiser. I call him Phil none
the Wiser. Dan won't give me credit for that. I
don't think that's fair. I came up with it. Nobody
called him that before I did. I'm gonna pull a
Trump here.
Speaker 3 (25:19):
I called him that. Nobody else did. Phil none the Wiser.
He wasn't wise. He's not wise.
Speaker 9 (25:25):
He's never been wise. He'll never be wise. He'll none
the wiser. Come on, that's mine, Dan, give me some credit. No, Now,
he says I owe him like seventeen Tomahawks stakes too.
That's terrible, that's not that's fake news anyway.
Speaker 2 (25:37):
Alexa wants to know if Wiser will put George on
the ticket as lieutenant companor Ah, yes, a team of rivals.
I don't see that happening, Alexa now or in any lifetime.
Eric Manning, if Paulus just leaves the bills on his desk.
Of course, the bill passes automatically. You know that my
brother black man ha ha ha, Eric, if you bestow
(25:59):
upon me the honorary title, I will gladly accept it.
Speaker 3 (26:02):
I know I'm not.
Speaker 2 (26:02):
Black, but we talked about this earlier. If you can
imagine your own gender. I don't know why it stops there.
Maybe Rachel Dolezal had a point. She got the frizzy hair,
she went tanning, she identified as a black person. Now
that sounds outrageous, and it is, But why is it
any less outrageous.
Speaker 3 (26:22):
To put on woman face or man face? It doesn't
bother me. It does in the sense that they're going
after the.
Speaker 2 (26:28):
Kids on this Now, now you have awakened the beast,
you have poked the bear, you have kicked the hornet's nest.
Speaker 3 (26:38):
Why it was because it's no longer.
Speaker 2 (26:42):
About libertarianism, an individual just pursuing his or her dream,
no matter how they define it, no matter how they identify.
But no, now you want to trans the kids and
cut their body parts off. And I'm not going there
now wherever it ain't happening. Sorry, Jack, That's another good question.
Some great texts today applause for you five seven, seven
(27:04):
thirty nine, and I'm very impressed with this line of thought.
Are the recent bills changeable via voter initiatives? I want
to go back to KBB on that and I'll text
her during the break. I believe in most cases the
answer is yes, and that is, if you can collect
enough signatures to get an issue on the ballot and
have that be legally recognized, then the voters of the
(27:24):
state can decide and can overturn a state law or
can reinforce the state law. For instance, as the Democrats
the left, did you know, tip of the cap to
them on codifying the right to abortion in the state constitution.
They did that and that was through voter initiative Amendment
seventy nine.
Speaker 3 (27:41):
A break, we're back.
Speaker 2 (27:42):
Representative Brandy Bradley joins us next to close out the
show here on Ryan Schuling Live.
Speaker 10 (27:53):
And that's just the tip of the iceberg. It represents
how far this legislature is willing to go. And I
want to point out exactly how they're doing this. So
in custody battles and issues of custody before the court's there,
then there's something that you can assess which is a
coercive control. And so what this bill does specifically is
insert the dead naming which we all had to look
up and miss gendering.
Speaker 3 (28:14):
As falling under the coercive control.
Speaker 10 (28:17):
And it also, by the way, adds it to a
form of discrimination under the Anti Discriminatory Act. So you
can indeed be prosecuted for calling someone by their birth name.
And as a parent, if you refuse to call your
child by the whim of the name that they want,
you could lose custody in that way.
Speaker 2 (28:34):
She's not just a former Raiders cheerleader, which she is,
she's also a practicing attorney. Emily Campagno from Fox News
breaking it down very well there, and I just might
add she's more qualified to be attorney general here in
this state than Jenna Griswold is, but that might not matter.
Joining us now, he will be a candidate for governor
on your ballot on the Republican side. Currently in the
(28:55):
State House. Representative Scott Bottoms, our guest on Ryan Schuling Live.
Representative Bottoms, thank you for your.
Speaker 6 (29:00):
Time, Yeah, sir, thanks for having me.
Speaker 3 (29:02):
We heard what Emily just said.
Speaker 2 (29:04):
We know what you guys are dealing with it's coming
from all directions. It seems house built twenty fivesh thirteen twelve, Scott,
just your thoughts on it passing through the house.
Speaker 3 (29:14):
What happened on Sunday?
Speaker 6 (29:16):
Yeah, this is the height of egregious. The good thing
that is going to come out of this is we
are starting to get some national exposure. Have been on
a couple of national shows. We've been laboring under this
stuff for the last three years and it's just now
starting to catch national attention. The leftist Marxist controlled House
(29:37):
does not care about parents or children. They say they do,
but they do not. This is Let me just throw
this out here so people understand how I think. There
is no such thing as dead naming, and there is
no such thing as mis gendering. Those are little, fake
imagination things that people come up with because of deep
mental health issues that should be dealt with. And to
(29:59):
actually put this in, it's the laws.
Speaker 3 (30:00):
You're going to use.
Speaker 6 (30:01):
Lose your kids over this. This is crazy stuff.
Speaker 2 (30:04):
Why would Democrats not want a young person experiencing gender
dysphoria to at least go through the safer process and
step of counseling. To your point that this is a
real condition that young people have. Rather than jumping right
to the step of Frankenstein like surgery, hormone blockers and supplements,
(30:24):
why do they have to go all the way to
point Z.
Speaker 6 (30:28):
Because it's a control issue. There's two things. One, it's
an ideology. A lot of people may not understand this,
but LGB is a sexual preference. T Q plus is
an ideology. They are two completely different things. And the
t Q plus is rooted in a Marxist mentality. It's
about control. And do not forget that the transition specifically
(30:52):
transitioned surgery industry in the United States is multi billion
dollar industry. So that's why they don't care about kids
and parents. This is their ideology and they'll die on
this hill and they're getting paid a lot of money.
Speaker 3 (31:07):
To do it.
Speaker 2 (31:08):
Representative Scott Bobham's also Republican candidate for governor in twenty
twenty six.
Speaker 3 (31:12):
Our guest representatives yar Azokai.
Speaker 2 (31:15):
I don't know if I'm getting that pronunciation right, but
Javier Maybray as well. I mean getting on board with
likening parents groups to hate groups. The KKK question, Scott,
and I don't know how I'm going to feel about
the answer either way.
Speaker 3 (31:27):
Do either of those two have children of their own?
Speaker 6 (31:32):
I don't think either one of them do. I know
Zakai doesn't. Actually I may be wrong about that, but
I no, I don't think they do. But here's the
thing that gets me because I understand your understand the
direction of your thought there. But we have representatives in
the House that have children that are okay with this
kind of stuff. We had a representative last year that
(31:52):
got up in the at the podium in the well
and said, I can't wait until my little girl can
have an abortion. We had another representative last year say
that your children do not belong to you, they belong
to the state. Well, no, this is still America, and
they do belong to us.
Speaker 3 (32:09):
Scott. Where are the moderate Democrats?
Speaker 6 (32:12):
You know there actually is a few. You think there
would be more, and probably ten years ago there was
quite a few moderate Democrats. There may be three, maybe
four moderate Democrats, but they are not allowed to speak up.
They are told very strongly, if you speak up, you
will not get reelected. And we'll make sure of that.
And Governor Polos has a lot of push in this area.
(32:33):
He can make sure which ones actually get to the
through the primary and are electable, and so it's a fight.
It's a fight even with them. They have to stay quiet.
But I don't see that as an excuse. No, these
are our children, don't You don't have the right to
stay quiet. In my opinion, Nope.
Speaker 2 (32:51):
Representative Scott Bottoms our guests in the final minute that
we have left Scott as best as you can kind
of prognosticate.
Speaker 3 (32:56):
Will this pass through the Senate? Does it go to
Governor Poulos's death, will he sign it?
Speaker 6 (33:01):
In your view, if it gets through the Senate, Governor
Polis will sign it. Governor Polis is behind this kind
of stuff. He actually like to act like he's this
moderate libertarian kind of He is the most liberal governor
in the United States. I think it will probably get
through the Senate, but if there's a possibility of getting stopped,
(33:22):
it will be in the Senate, but it won't be
by Governor Poulis he'll sign it.
Speaker 3 (33:25):
Wow. Just incredible.
Speaker 2 (33:26):
This guy's considering a run for president and yet Gavin
Newsom now I'll flanks him to his right politically on
this issue.
Speaker 3 (33:33):
Staggering to think about that.
Speaker 2 (33:34):
Representative Scott Bottoms Bizaar's bizarre. We thank you for your
time to day. We wish you the best of luck
in this continuing fight. It'll no doubt be sorted out
in the courts constitutionally as well.
Speaker 3 (33:44):
But we thank you for your time today.
Speaker 2 (33:46):
Thanks sir, Representative Scott Bottoms there closing out today's program.
We appreciate each and every one of you tuning in
texting and I got a lot of these to get
to and they'll be in the queue for tomorrow at
five seven seven three nine. If you're just joining us
in this common versation, feel free to send those texts along,
send them my attention at Ryan and stay tuned for
Dan Kaplis coming up next. Representative Jarvis Caldwell. This story
(34:08):
has gotten national traction, to Scott's point, and they covered
it on Fox News Outnumbered today. Jarvis Caldwell, a big
part of that. Will join Dan coming up at five
point thirty six. I'll talk to you tomorrow. Aaron Ryan
Shooing Live
Popular Podcasts
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Therapy Gecko
An unlicensed lizard psychologist travels the universe talking to strangers about absolutely nothing. TO CALL THE GECKO: follow me on https://www.twitch.tv/lyleforever to get a notification for when I am taking calls. I am usually live Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays but lately a lot of other times too. I am a gecko.