Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Brian schuling with you six point thirty k how DJ
Jazzy Jeff on the other side of the glass your
text throughout the program five seven seven three nine joining
us from Real Clear Politics. Her reporting is front end center.
You may be listening or watching on Rumble, the Dan
Bongino radio program, and it's her reporting on the Secret
(00:21):
Service that is really driving the news cycle those of
us that are paying close attention anyway, as it regards
both the assassination attempt against former President Donald Trump, the
January sixth committee and the deleted texts they're in, and
the cocaine found in the White House. There are whistleblower
sources coming forward to her, and I'm so glad to
(00:43):
have her joining us right now. Susan Crabtree our guest. Susan,
thank you so much for taking the time.
Speaker 2 (00:49):
Oh it's my pleasure. Thanks for having me.
Speaker 1 (00:51):
I don't even know where to begin with you, but
I guess the most important thing would be the assassination
attempt against Donald Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania. Secret Service sources
coming to you directly, When did that start following the incident?
And approximately how many have come forward to you?
Speaker 2 (01:09):
Well, I don't get into how many people I'm talking
to at any given day in the Secret Service, but
and in CICCA service community. But I've been cultivating these
sources since for twelve years now, since the problems during
the above administration with the Secret Service, lots of scandals
(01:30):
during that time period. It's almost deja vu all over
again for me, only this time we're dealing with an
assassination attempt and the murder in front of his family
of poor comparatory, which is just to me horrific because
these problems in the Sacred Service have been going on
(01:50):
for as I mentioned, four years now, and no one
has held the Secret Service fee to the fire and
demanded changes there.
Speaker 1 (02:01):
Ron Rowe we know is the interim director. He has
testified in front of the Senate. The one interrogation that
I found to be the most compelling was Senator Josh Hawley, Republican, Missouri,
who was also in contact with sources that are coming
forward to him about the day in question and who
was in charge. He seemed to insinuate one that it
was a female in charge. We don't know her name
(02:23):
as of yet. Is there a reason why her name
has not been publicized? There has not been maybe a
pressure campaign for this person to step down, because Rose
seemed to insinuate that she was still active duty in
carrying on with the details of her job as if
nothing had happened.
Speaker 2 (02:39):
Yes, I know the woman's name. I reported in the
first forty eight hours after the assassination attempt that she
was considered in experience in this realm, not in experience overall,
butt in the planning of such an event, in the
security details of that, and that she that it was
(03:01):
a problem that the Pittsburgh Field office boss there uh
decided to delegate that to this individual. I am withholding
her name because I am deeply concerned. There's a lot
have been a lot of suicides in the Secret Service,
and these Secret Service agents are not public figures. Uh.
(03:22):
They If I put out her name, then she could
be easily docs and I have to talk about whether
I'm going to do that clearly with my editor and
make a decision. UH. So that those conversations are ongoing.
But the fact that it is a woman, we know that,
(03:42):
and there's a lot of problems with her competence in
this in this domain, not overall I'm hearing, but in
this particular domain it's a serious problem and the fact
that there have been numerous suicides that they have covered
up in the Secret Services, and I certainly don't want
(04:02):
to contribute to another one.
Speaker 1 (04:04):
Susan Crabtree real clear politics joining us with her reporting
on the problems within the Secret Service, their protocols, their standards.
Just along those lines, Susan, I may be asking for
an opinion here, but I might not be. And that
is we know that she is a woman, and we
know that Kim Cheatle said that making the force of
the Secret Service about thirty percent female was a target
(04:27):
goal of theirs, not based on merit, but based on gender.
Do we have any knowledge as to whether her appointment
in this role, where you say maybe she wasn't ready,
was done because she was a female and in other words,
kind of a DEI type appointment.
Speaker 2 (04:42):
That's a very good point that you're making, a very
good question, certainly under Cheadle's leadership. And she had lied
about this during her testimony before the House Oversight Committee
two weeks ago, and I pointed out to the committee
that she like because there's proof that is open source
proof I can get into that that she lied about
(05:04):
her She depended she didn't know about this initiative that
she spearheaded and signed documents for in the Secret Service
that they would it's called the thirty by thirty initiative,
that they would have thirty percent of the Secret Service
as women, and they were in key positions, not just
(05:24):
desk jobs, full special agents and officers in the uniform division.
They would make that by twenty thirty, you would have
thirty percent. And what I understand is Tudah was already
planning to leave the Secret Service by December of this year,
go back to the private sector and make more money.
And she had already reached the twenty four percent range.
(05:47):
And you may know that there have been other recent
problems with women in the Secret Service. There was a
there's a warning signs that this has been a lowering
of the standards across the board when it comes to
promoting some women. Some women can make it, make the cut,
and some women are better than some mens in the
(06:08):
Secret Service. I've had. It's not disparaging against women, but
pushing for a certain percentage. If they're not that percentage
is not fully qualified, then that's a problem. And when
it comes in the issue with this woman in May
there was an incident in late April, came out in
early May. I broke part of that story that this
(06:30):
woman had a mental breakdown at Joint Base Andrews and
she was fighting her superior when she had a gun
on her in the holster and they had to wrestle
her to the ground. This is right before Kamala Harris,
about an hour before Kama Harris was supposed to leave
for event. That particular incident, there was cited that there
were DEI issues that people were complaining about because this
(06:54):
particular woman. When Director Cheetle was head of the training
center where the Secret Services most of its training, she
passed this woman even though she didn't meet the standards
to pass certain training exercises. So that has been established
and it's a concern. So that so the same concerns
(07:18):
are irrelevant when we ask whether this woman should have
been in the position she was then to just make
all those very decisions for the rally, the Butler Rally
that everything went awry with, especially leaving that American Glass
Research building out of the official perimeter and not stationing
(07:40):
anyone on the roof. We don't know the full answer
to that question, but we do know that there were
local law enforcement inside the building, and they were they
they purport not to have a clear line of sight
to the top of the other building. Well that's a
problem too, So why were they insign instead of on top.
Speaker 1 (07:59):
Of that reporting so important front and center in all
of the Secret Service and the botches and protocol and
standards that were enacted for that day in Butler, Pennsylvania,
in which President Trump was almost assassinated. One attendee did
lose his life, Corey Competore, and two others were shot.
(08:22):
Susan Crabtree our guests from real clear politics. Another thing
that kind of stood out and had my ears buzzing
from the testimony of Acting Director Ron Rowe was that
he conceded that this was the first event in which
there were counter sniper shooters assigned to President Trump's detail.
This seems to be a galling kind of set of
(08:43):
circumstances here that this would have been the first time
that had been enacted. And this goes to your reporting, Susan,
about that the acting chief, whether it was Roe or
Cheatle above him, has cut back on security assets that
were assigned. Let's say to the former president, what more
can you tell us about that and why it was
so inadequate in terms of the staffing Secret Service wise
(09:04):
for Donald Trump at this rally in previous ones.
Speaker 2 (09:07):
Yeah, that is a key point that counter sniper was.
This is the first time that that rally that a
Trump event when he was running for reelection has had
counter snipers. And they were added late, I'll tell you,
because they weren't even able to do the full site
review of vulnerabilities at the site that they usually do.
(09:30):
They usually given two to three days to do that,
the very detailed survey of a site the counter snipers
and they only had one day the day before because
they were assigned to the event late and.
Speaker 3 (09:44):
Because they this is just unbelievable.
Speaker 2 (09:47):
Certainly Ron Roe had had everything to do with not
providing the counter surveillance units. These are different units that
usually are part of what they call the full package.
If a individual, if a protect team, president, vice president,
first lady, et cetera. If they get the full package,
(10:08):
they get counter sniper teams, they get a CAT team
it's the counter assault team. They get a counter surveillance units.
Counter surveillance units go roaming throughout the event looking for
people just like Thomas Crooks the shooter and they if
he had poked up a put a rane finder, if
he had used a rangefinder, that the whistleblowers tell me
(10:32):
that they the counter sniper surveillance unit would have found him,
interviewed him, and got him out of there very quickly,
so this all could have been avoided. And Ron Rowe's responsible,
according to whistleblowers for reducing the counter surveillance units by
twenty percent across the board and certainly not assigning this
(10:55):
to this event would be the leite side agent, the
woman I spoke of early. That was her decision, and
then the decision and that gets signed off by the
head of the Pittsford Field Office, who also know the
identity of But the Pittsford Field Offices is in an
(11:17):
obviously depressed state and it is there. I hope they're
still not on the job. Rose says that this person
was still on the job. I still like just stress
of this, of having been responsible for the lapse of
the egregious lapses and security. They should be on an
(11:37):
administrative leave or medical leave for mental health.
Speaker 1 (11:41):
Susan Crabtree, our guest Real clear politics, working her sources
within the Secret Service that are coming forward to her
at this very important time in our history after the
assassination attempt against former President Donald Trump and Butler Pennsylvania.
What Dan Bongino is hinted at as well, you kind
of touch down at to Susan, Rail has to be
at an all time low, I imagine for those that
(12:02):
are coming forward to you, and that they are notifying
you of a cultural rot from within a leadership really
that is inept, incompetent, and just incapable of really doing
what the Secret Service needs to do. So of those
that are coming forward to you, the whistleblowers from the
Secret Service, Susan, what are some of the most urgent
(12:24):
things that they point to about what's happening within the
Secret Service.
Speaker 2 (12:30):
Well, they're saying that there is this lowering of standards
across the board. The issue it's been resolved now unfortunately
a little too late for Corey COMPARATOI and his I
might be mispronouncing, and his family who had to witness
his murder in front of their very own eyes. And
(12:53):
it's just appalling to me that that's going to this
event is going to affect our democracy and that weeople
who cannot go to a rally and feel safe right now.
And people are still going so to their credit, but
it's a deep concern in mind because a whistleblower has
come forward and said it doesn't it's not gonna The
(13:14):
Secret Service doesn't just shift. It's like an aircraft carrier.
It's going to take a while to turn this around
for them to have enough resources. But certainly Donald Trump's
events are getting far more resources now, thankfully. But why
did it have to take this? The issue is that
the leaders have a what you what you were getting at?
Speaker 3 (13:37):
Uh.
Speaker 2 (13:38):
I used to call it the culture of corruption. There's
a lot of correct behavior at the leadership level and
it feeds down from there. Uh in the siccret service
retaliation for people who don't you know, play the game,
go along with the flow. If they see you know,
mouth seasons or misconduct, they report it and then they
(14:01):
are retaliated against, not the people that were engaged in
this conduct. And many times it's gone on for i
mean just decades, decades of problems on that level in
the Secret Service. So just need to clean out the
top floor, it's called the eighth floor. Just need to
get rid of everybody who has served in a leadership position.
(14:25):
Of course that was be traumatizing right now to the agency,
But certainly there are people that could move into the
positions who've had thirty years of experience at the Secret
Service who could readily take command. It needs a full
house cleaning and they need more resources in terms of
(14:45):
people that serve on the ground. They do all kinds
of functions, They serve all kinds of functions. They have
offices all over the world, which you know, we need
to rethink that even though it's their his I know,
but what purposes is it serving for counterfeiting? For instance?
(15:06):
Do we really need that fighting counterfeiting within the Secret Service?
Or should we be focusing the Secret Service be focusing
on its core mission of protecting the president, former presidents,
and their families, et cetera.
Speaker 1 (15:21):
Susan Crabtree, Real Clear Politics with us. A couple of
bullet point items that you've been reporting on, Susan, that
I want to cover for our audience, the first of
which having to do with the deleted texts from the
January sixth committee and what happened to those, what role
the Secret Service played in that, what they knew and
when they knew it about the bomb threat outside the
DNC where then Vice President elect Kamala Harris, Senator Harris
(15:46):
was stationed, and if those texts, if deleted, would be
retrievable using modern forensics.
Speaker 3 (15:54):
Yes, I am told by a source, several sources, but
one source in particular, that they were asked they worked
on January sixth, They had their This person had their
cell phone was full of texts from January six regarding the.
Speaker 2 (16:19):
Garden, the Kamila Harris incident. I'm speaking slowly because I'm
trying to be careful about disclosing sourcing, but that they
were asked for by the management to turn in their phone.
Several months later, when the FBI and the congressional agencies
and that Inspector General of the Department Homeland Security started
(16:41):
investigating those incidents and their role in it, they were
asked for their phones and they knew that it was
because they were going to delete them. It wasn't because
of this software migration that it's been a regular practice
at the Secret Service to do that. What I call
it culture of CYA. Actually my whistle the whistle blower
(17:03):
who emailed the whole Uniform Division in a very upset
manner angry manner right before the Senate committee hearing that's
what the counter sniper who wrote that email, internal email,
how he described it the culture of cya. And we
saw that again with the cocaine incident. They tried to cheatle.
(17:27):
My sources tell me, tried to get that destroyed, the
cocaine that was found in the White House complex last year,
last summer. It just goes on and on. They do
cover up the hide behind, the secret part of the
Secret Service in their name, and all kinds of shenanigans
(17:48):
take place, and some with devastating results.
Speaker 1 (17:53):
Following up on her most recent story here, which you
can find at Real Clear Politics, Susan Crabtree, our guest,
it's entitled Formacy Service chief wanted to destroy cocaine evidence.
That was the cocaine that was found in the White House.
There were a lot of jokes made about it as
to who it would belong to, the obvious assumption being
that it would be the former drug addict Hunter Biden himself,
(18:13):
son of the president. But you mentioned and you kind
of refer to this Susan about Kim Cheedle and kind
of the process as to why she would want to
destroy that evidence there was a partial DNA match. This
is what I'm reading from your reporting and from others,
and that they wanted to scuttle this is this is
what I'm always trying to dig into. You're a journalist,
I'm a show host. But if they know this information,
(18:35):
if there could be a leak about exactly whose it was,
regardless of whether or not Kim cheadle wanted to destroy
the evidence, what was the question say, if we know
whose cocaine it was already, that knowledge is had by
people that are on the inside, and whether there might
be a way or somebody that could leak that information
(18:56):
regardless of whether Kim cheadle wanted to destroy the actual evidence.
Speaker 2 (19:01):
Well, they probably have a pretty good idea of who
it was, but they purposely did not investigate it. The
FBI sent the substance to the FBI after they confirmed
it with cocaine, and there was DNA found, and they
even admitted that partial DNA found on the baggie, But
(19:24):
that DNA it's subjective because some of them, my sources
are telling me that they very well could have. They
already did get a partial hit, meaning they did find
out a relative, a blood relative. So they run it
through to crime databases across the country and if there
(19:47):
was anybody who had their DNA to collective for a
crime from a crime scene or from the fingerprints. They
didn't find fingerprints on it or useful fingerprints, but they
did find partial DNA. They got a partial DNA hit,
and they could have narrowed that down pretty easily because
it was a sleepy Sunday before July fourth when this
(20:08):
cocaine baggy was found, and there was only a certain
amount of people in the White House, and you keep
track of who was in the White House at all
times by waves records, you had a pool of people
that you could interview and try to match from that
DNA partial hit. But they chose not to. They chose
not to further investigate, and they put that statement out
(20:30):
saying that they didn't want to interview all five hundred
people in the what that go to the White House
they are employed by the White House, because they didn't
want to infringe on civil liberties. But there was a
smaller subset of people that were there that weekend. It
was not that many because it was a slow weekend.
They could have definitely investigated this further well that's why
(20:51):
we have.
Speaker 1 (20:51):
To leave it to Susan Crabtree to do the investigating
as a journalist and doing such great work again on
the front lines of all of this for Real Clear Politics.
Be sure to follow her on ex at Susan Crabtree
all of this news coming out about corruption within the
leadership of the Secret Service. Susan, you're doing a fantastic
job and a great service, I might add for the
American people for all of our listeners here as well,
(21:14):
thank you so much for doing that, and thank you
so much for doing this with your time today.
Speaker 2 (21:19):
I certainly appreciate your interested in and it's really critical
that we get to the bottom of it. So thank
you so much for having me.
Speaker 1 (21:25):
On Susan Crabtree, Real Clear Politics, Your thoughts five seven
seven three nine textos along to Ryan back with more
after this on six point thirty k ho Master Services.
You won't need anybody else. Just cut to the chase.
Shortest distance between two points is a straight line, and
(21:47):
that straight line is the following phone number for Master
Services seven to two oh four thirty four thirty four
oh six Tom Martinez referral list. They've been there, They've
stayed there for over twenty years seven to two oh
four thirty four thirty four six. When you call them
and you ask them, you know what do you need?
Describe your problem, they'll diagnose it. They'll send somebody on site,
(22:09):
a master technician who knows what he or she is doing,
certified and qualified to do the best job possible with
the highest quality products and for the guaranteed lowest price.
That's it, bottom line right there. Master router dot Plumbing
is where you can find out more online. A lot
of questions answered there, but you can still give them
a call again. Start that experience online at master router
(22:33):
dot plumbing for Master Services and tell them Ryan sent you.
And now deep thoughts by Vice President Kamala Harris.
Speaker 4 (22:53):
I am here standing here on the Northern Flank, on
the Eastern Flank, talking about what we have in terms
of the Eastern Flank and our NATO allies and what
is that stake at this very moment. What is that
stake this very moment are some of the guiding principles
(23:13):
around the NATO Alliance and in particular the issue and
the importance of defending sovereignty and territorial integrity in this
case of.
Speaker 1 (23:23):
Ukraine, and you wonder why her campaign is hiding her
away basement style like Joe Biden was for so long
and so often during the twenty twenty campaign. Can she
get away with it? Though? Ryan schulingbank with you six
p'int thirty K how we'll get to your text in
the final segment of this hour five seven seven thirty
nine start them, Ryan, I anticipate you may have a
(23:45):
lot of reaction and thoughts to the conversation I just
had with Susan Crabtree of Real Clear Politics. I mean,
Jazzy was saying himself. He was on the edge of
his seat. Obviously as an interviewer, what my style would
be is to try to get as much information as
we can out of Susan, and we know that she's
got to kind of walk a line in protecting her sources.
I just thought that was a question that all of
(24:06):
you may have had when you're watching that hearing and
you see Senator Hawley tell Ron Rowe, the acting Director
of the Secret Service, that he knows that the agent
super supervising the site in Butler, Pennsylvania was a woman.
We know that I'm not trying to pick on her,
but for the reasons I explained and outlined and what
Susan gave me the answer to it shouldn't be a
(24:29):
matter of qualification at that point. But when we're told
that there's a DEI goal, a fixed number, not based
on merit at all, but just we have to get
to thirty percent women, no matter who those women are,
that's an artificial imposition of a quota. And when you
work by quotas, you're no longer hiring for merit. I
(24:49):
given the example and Susan did too, about if a
woman is qualified and can meet the standard and meet
it or exceed it compared to her male counterparts, then
absolutely women should have the same kind of oppportunities and
access to such positions. But if they don't, you can't
lower the standard just to fill the quota, if that
makes sense. I can't get behind that, not in a
(25:10):
position that is so important, lives depend on it, A
life was lost because of it, that somebody would be
appointed for DEI reasons. And then when you turn around
Greg Gutfeld has made this point and call them out
on it and say so and so is a DEI
higher or so and so is a DEI appointment. Oh,
They get all offended because they know it's wrong, because
(25:32):
they know when you're appointing somebody to be a brain
surgeon or a pilot, or a member of the Secret Service,
when you're going into surgery, when you're boarding a plane,
if you have Secret Service protection, what do you care about?
You want to live, You want to live, you want
to survive that experience. Do you care that they check
(25:54):
a DEI box? Does that matter to you? It shouldn't.
I want the best brains surgeon available. If it's doctor
Ben Carson who happens to be black, that's awesome. He's
the best in his field, in his craft. If it's
a pilot who happens to be a woman and meets
the qualification certifications, that's great. But when you get into
(26:15):
this habit, this mindset of I've got to hire X
number of Asians and then why number of Hispanics Z
number of Black America shouldn't matter. Again, I come at
this maybe it's a lot simpler for me because I
come from the world of sports, and no matter what
sport it is, you don't care who it is, what
color they are. Can they do the job? Are they
(26:37):
the best at what they do? Do they give you
the best chance to win? That's it. I don't care
if X percent or black, white, Hispanic, Asian, doesn't matter.
I want the Detroit Lions to win a super Bowl.
That's all I care about. Jared Gof's white, Okay, I'm
on Ross Saint Brown's black, great, fantastic. It's not because
(26:59):
there's a certain that they're successful. It's the stupidest thing
I've ever heard of anyway. One more cut before we
go to break here, and that's jd. Vance. He is
a baller. The more I hear from him, the more
I like him, and the more important I think he's
going to be in this campaign because he puts a
voice to things that need to be talked about. He
(27:19):
needs to make himself accessible to the mainstream media that
is running cover right now for Kamala Harris. They're not
asking questions. I haven't heard them anyway, or I haven't
seen them. Why isn't Kamala Harris seventeen days later now
conducting any interviews or press conferences, interacting with reporters whatsoever? Well,
you just heard why in the deep thoughts by Vice
President Harris? JD Vance lak A g Walking on the
(27:44):
tarmac and Auclaire, Wisconsin, where Air Force two is. But
Harris is running for the hills trying to avoid reporters.
What does jd. Vance do? He walks over to the
gaggle of reporters and says this.
Speaker 2 (27:55):
I figured I'd come by and more interesting to be
put on the.
Speaker 1 (27:59):
Plane if it's going to be my plane in a
few months. But I also thought you guys might get
lonely because the vice president doesn't answer questions for reporters.
It hasn't for seventeen days. I can give you guys
an explanation for why she won't take questions for rewards.
Speaker 2 (28:14):
I know.
Speaker 1 (28:16):
Everybody, okay, great, Well, I hope that you can through
your mind because it would be good for the American people,
and I think it'd be good for you all. She
actually ran a real campaign instead of one from the basement.
Would you tell a proper so how good guys to
see it? What would you like to hear from hers
answer the questions. I'd love her to just answer what
she wants to do and also explain why every single
(28:36):
position she has has changed.
Speaker 2 (28:38):
She pretends to.
Speaker 1 (28:39):
Be a prosecutor, yet she's she pretends to be a
tough on prime prosecutor, and yet here she is wanted
to on the plane. She's the wars there are, yet
she's opened up for the American telling war. This is
a person who has to answer no questions from the media,
and it's disgraceful that she wants to us. It's also
insulting from the American media. But anyway, we're gonna go
to our event. I appreciate you guys getting here. I
(29:01):
wish she made you some more attentions. Yeah, yeah, what
he says there. Of course there's the noise of the
airplane that disrupts it, but that it's a disgrace to
the American reporters. It's insulting to them and their craft
that she's avoiding them, and more importantly, it's insulting and
disrespectful to the American people, to the audience of these
reporters in the media who are supposed to be asking
the questions as a means of vetting Kamala Harris. Is
(29:24):
she competent enough to do this job?
Speaker 3 (29:26):
No?
Speaker 1 (29:27):
And why, let's come full circle. She's a DEI higher
and there's no doubting that. A timeout, we're back with
your text five seven seven three nine, Please start those Ryan,
This is six point thirty k how Frank durand the
real estate man. I always look forward to our weekly
conversations because I learned so much. If you're gonna get
(29:50):
out there and pursue buying a home or you need
to sell your home, we're coming up on crunch time
here before Labor Day and back to school specials, all
that sort of thing. You're not gonna mess the nearly
find a back to school special when it comes to
buying or selling a home. But Frank Duran can put
you in the right place at the right time. He
knows the market, he knows how to read the market.
(30:10):
He knows how to anticipate the market, like a quarterback
of the line of scrimmage calling an audible sees a
blitz coming. And you can find him online at Frank
Durant Holmes dot com. What you'll get when you go
there a couple of tabs you can choose. Buyers start here,
sellers start here. You might be a little bit of
column A, you might be a little bit of column B.
He's also got Team Duran around him. But you'll deal
(30:30):
with Frank directly and personally throughout every step of the process.
He adds that personal touch and he can give you
that kind of local plugin that's going to do much
better than you would find anywhere else online or anywhere
else in general. And that's at Frank Duran Holmes dot com.
That's Frank Duran Holmes dot com for Frank Duran, the
real estate man. Tell him Ryan sent you.
Speaker 5 (30:55):
When I see liberals get upset when you point out
the liberalism of their allies, It's like, why would Pelosi
be upset when you mentioned that Walls is a liberal?
Isn't it weird when you describe a better version of
your politics as something that is less what your politics are.
That makes no sense to me to say that Walls
(31:18):
is great because he's.
Speaker 1 (31:19):
Middle of the road.
Speaker 5 (31:20):
You're actually tell you're actually telling on.
Speaker 6 (31:22):
Yourself that you're a whack job.
Speaker 5 (31:25):
It's like, oh, no, he's not as crazy as I am.
But you also realize that it is a lie. It
is a complete lie because if he was middle of the.
Speaker 1 (31:32):
Road, the squad wouldn't be all over him.
Speaker 5 (31:35):
So they're actually lying to your face with they that's
why they're saying midwestern, That's why they're saying middle of
the road.
Speaker 1 (31:41):
That's why they're saying moderate.
Speaker 5 (31:43):
Because they have to cover up that incredible flaw that
we all know.
Speaker 1 (31:48):
Such great wisdom and logic from Greg Guttfeld there as
a close out the first hour. If Tim Walls is
such a moderate Midwestern voice of reason, then why is
he a moderate Midwestern voice of reason? And if liberals
are so great as far left as they can go,
why do they hedge their bets and say that they're
(32:09):
not so liberal. I don't see really conservatives doing this.
I mean Ted Cruz, I think proudly would say that
he is staunchly conservative. But for whatever reason, Nancy Pelosi
these other leftists, oh he's not as liberal as I am.
That'd be crazy. Get to your text in just a moment.
But first, my in studio guests. They host a weekly
podcast called Humanity Against Tyranny. They've got a lot of names.
(32:33):
P K Stein, Mark Stevenson. That's just one person, and
then Mindy Debor Scott that's another. And they're both here
with me and they're going to spend the next hour.
I got a couple of guests coming up, But Mindy,
your thoughts on the pick of Tim Walls as the
vice presidential nominee.
Speaker 6 (32:49):
He's great if you want to lose, Well, that's.
Speaker 1 (32:51):
What I'm saying as somebody that's on our side of
the equation where you pleased with the pick.
Speaker 6 (32:55):
Absolutely, pick the worst you can get.
Speaker 1 (32:57):
Now you're a messianic Jew, I am. What you think
about the Democrats passing on Josh Shapiro.
Speaker 6 (33:03):
I think that was a mistake.
Speaker 1 (33:05):
It was, but the reasons behind it were they just
blatantly anti Semitic.
Speaker 6 (33:08):
Do you think, oh, of course, Oh my gosh, isn't it.
I'm getting a goosebumps because I know I'm true, I'm
true to the telling you the truth.
Speaker 1 (33:16):
Doesn't that bother you?
Speaker 2 (33:16):
Then?
Speaker 1 (33:17):
Now, why doesn't it bother you?
Speaker 6 (33:18):
Because we're gonna do some annihilation.
Speaker 1 (33:20):
You know what we're gonna do. But yeah, PK. When
we have a party, a major party, that is so
blatantly and openly anti Semitic to the point they would
pass on a clearly more qualified candidate, I would say,
and Josh Shapiro for this Tim Wall's character, What does
that say about the state of our politics?
Speaker 6 (33:37):
It says our politics are in a mess, a big
fat mess.
Speaker 1 (33:42):
What did you think of the Walls pick by Kamala Harris.
Speaker 6 (33:44):
It didn't surprise me at all.
Speaker 1 (33:46):
She needed somebody like that, somebody like what though.
Speaker 6 (33:50):
Somebody that's so woke.
Speaker 1 (33:53):
He's a woker, he really is.
Speaker 6 (33:55):
Oh, he's so woke it's nauseating.
Speaker 1 (33:57):
Well, I think he might even be to the left
of her, which is hard to do.
Speaker 6 (34:00):
Tampons in the male bathrooms, sampon, Tim, that was trending
deep however you want to say.
Speaker 1 (34:06):
It well, And that's the thing is, they can't run
and hide forever, right, I mean, at some point, either
Tim Walls or Kamal Airas has to do an interview
appearance where they're gonna be asked about this, right, or
they're gonna be asked about a lot more too. And
both p K and Mindy will be sticking around for
the next hour, Saraj Hashmi. They'll be joining me after
the top of the hour time out here. He's the
(34:26):
co host of the Habibi Brothers Power Hour podcast. And
there's the reason he's joining me. It's kind of a
joke and it's kind of not. The US government is
trying to pin a assassination plot on a Pakistani man
who had ties to Iran. Stick and stay for that
on six point thirty K
Brian schuling with you six point thirty k how DJ
Jazzy Jeff on the other side of the glass your
text throughout the program five seven seven three nine joining
us from Real Clear Politics. Her reporting is front end center.
You may be listening or watching on Rumble, the Dan
Bongino radio program, and it's her reporting on the Secret
(00:21):
Service that is really driving the news cycle those of
us that are paying close attention anyway, as it regards
both the assassination attempt against former President Donald Trump, the
January sixth committee and the deleted texts they're in, and
the cocaine found in the White House. There are whistleblower
sources coming forward to her, and I'm so glad to
(00:43):
have her joining us right now. Susan Crabtree our guest. Susan,
thank you so much for taking the time.
Speaker 2 (00:49):
Oh it's my pleasure. Thanks for having me.
Speaker 1 (00:51):
I don't even know where to begin with you, but
I guess the most important thing would be the assassination
attempt against Donald Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania. Secret Service sources
coming to you directly, When did that start following the incident?
And approximately how many have come forward to you?
Speaker 2 (01:09):
Well, I don't get into how many people I'm talking
to at any given day in the Secret Service, but
and in CICCA service community. But I've been cultivating these
sources since for twelve years now, since the problems during
the above administration with the Secret Service, lots of scandals
(01:30):
during that time period. It's almost deja vu all over
again for me, only this time we're dealing with an
assassination attempt and the murder in front of his family
of poor comparatory, which is just to me horrific because
these problems in the Sacred Service have been going on
(01:50):
for as I mentioned, four years now, and no one
has held the Secret Service fee to the fire and
demanded changes there.
Speaker 1 (02:01):
Ron Rowe we know is the interim director. He has
testified in front of the Senate. The one interrogation that
I found to be the most compelling was Senator Josh Hawley, Republican, Missouri,
who was also in contact with sources that are coming
forward to him about the day in question and who
was in charge. He seemed to insinuate one that it
was a female in charge. We don't know her name
(02:23):
as of yet. Is there a reason why her name
has not been publicized? There has not been maybe a
pressure campaign for this person to step down, because Rose
seemed to insinuate that she was still active duty in
carrying on with the details of her job as if
nothing had happened.
Speaker 2 (02:39):
Yes, I know the woman's name. I reported in the
first forty eight hours after the assassination attempt that she
was considered in experience in this realm, not in experience overall,
butt in the planning of such an event, in the
security details of that, and that she that it was
(03:01):
a problem that the Pittsburgh Field office boss there uh
decided to delegate that to this individual. I am withholding
her name because I am deeply concerned. There's a lot
have been a lot of suicides in the Secret Service,
and these Secret Service agents are not public figures. Uh.
(03:22):
They If I put out her name, then she could
be easily docs and I have to talk about whether
I'm going to do that clearly with my editor and
make a decision. UH. So that those conversations are ongoing.
But the fact that it is a woman, we know that,
(03:42):
and there's a lot of problems with her competence in
this in this domain, not overall I'm hearing, but in
this particular domain it's a serious problem and the fact
that there have been numerous suicides that they have covered
up in the Secret Services, and I certainly don't want
(04:02):
to contribute to another one.
Speaker 1 (04:04):
Susan Crabtree real clear politics joining us with her reporting
on the problems within the Secret Service, their protocols, their standards.
Just along those lines, Susan, I may be asking for
an opinion here, but I might not be. And that
is we know that she is a woman, and we
know that Kim Cheatle said that making the force of
the Secret Service about thirty percent female was a target
(04:27):
goal of theirs, not based on merit, but based on gender.
Do we have any knowledge as to whether her appointment
in this role, where you say maybe she wasn't ready,
was done because she was a female and in other words,
kind of a DEI type appointment.
Speaker 2 (04:42):
That's a very good point that you're making, a very
good question, certainly under Cheadle's leadership. And she had lied
about this during her testimony before the House Oversight Committee
two weeks ago, and I pointed out to the committee
that she like because there's proof that is open source
proof I can get into that that she lied about
(05:04):
her She depended she didn't know about this initiative that
she spearheaded and signed documents for in the Secret Service
that they would it's called the thirty by thirty initiative,
that they would have thirty percent of the Secret Service
as women, and they were in key positions, not just
(05:24):
desk jobs, full special agents and officers in the uniform division.
They would make that by twenty thirty, you would have
thirty percent. And what I understand is Tudah was already
planning to leave the Secret Service by December of this year,
go back to the private sector and make more money.
And she had already reached the twenty four percent range.
(05:47):
And you may know that there have been other recent
problems with women in the Secret Service. There was a
there's a warning signs that this has been a lowering
of the standards across the board when it comes to
promoting some women. Some women can make it, make the cut,
and some women are better than some mens in the
(06:08):
Secret Service. I've had. It's not disparaging against women, but
pushing for a certain percentage. If they're not that percentage
is not fully qualified, then that's a problem. And when
it comes in the issue with this woman in May
there was an incident in late April, came out in
early May. I broke part of that story that this
(06:30):
woman had a mental breakdown at Joint Base Andrews and
she was fighting her superior when she had a gun
on her in the holster and they had to wrestle
her to the ground. This is right before Kamala Harris,
about an hour before Kama Harris was supposed to leave
for event. That particular incident, there was cited that there
were DEI issues that people were complaining about because this
(06:54):
particular woman. When Director Cheetle was head of the training
center where the Secret Services most of its training, she
passed this woman even though she didn't meet the standards
to pass certain training exercises. So that has been established
and it's a concern. So that so the same concerns
(07:18):
are irrelevant when we ask whether this woman should have
been in the position she was then to just make
all those very decisions for the rally, the Butler Rally
that everything went awry with, especially leaving that American Glass
Research building out of the official perimeter and not stationing
(07:40):
anyone on the roof. We don't know the full answer
to that question, but we do know that there were
local law enforcement inside the building, and they were they
they purport not to have a clear line of sight
to the top of the other building. Well that's a
problem too, So why were they insign instead of on top.
Speaker 1 (07:59):
Of that reporting so important front and center in all
of the Secret Service and the botches and protocol and
standards that were enacted for that day in Butler, Pennsylvania,
in which President Trump was almost assassinated. One attendee did
lose his life, Corey Competore, and two others were shot.
(08:22):
Susan Crabtree our guests from real clear politics. Another thing
that kind of stood out and had my ears buzzing
from the testimony of Acting Director Ron Rowe was that
he conceded that this was the first event in which
there were counter sniper shooters assigned to President Trump's detail.
This seems to be a galling kind of set of
(08:43):
circumstances here that this would have been the first time
that had been enacted. And this goes to your reporting, Susan,
about that the acting chief, whether it was Roe or
Cheatle above him, has cut back on security assets that
were assigned. Let's say to the former president, what more
can you tell us about that and why it was
so inadequate in terms of the staffing Secret Service wise
(09:04):
for Donald Trump at this rally in previous ones.
Speaker 2 (09:07):
Yeah, that is a key point that counter sniper was.
This is the first time that that rally that a
Trump event when he was running for reelection has had
counter snipers. And they were added late, I'll tell you,
because they weren't even able to do the full site
review of vulnerabilities at the site that they usually do.
(09:30):
They usually given two to three days to do that,
the very detailed survey of a site the counter snipers
and they only had one day the day before because
they were assigned to the event late and.
Speaker 3 (09:44):
Because they this is just unbelievable.
Speaker 2 (09:47):
Certainly Ron Roe had had everything to do with not
providing the counter surveillance units. These are different units that
usually are part of what they call the full package.
If a individual, if a protect team, president, vice president,
first lady, et cetera. If they get the full package,
(10:08):
they get counter sniper teams, they get a CAT team
it's the counter assault team. They get a counter surveillance units.
Counter surveillance units go roaming throughout the event looking for
people just like Thomas Crooks the shooter and they if
he had poked up a put a rane finder, if
he had used a rangefinder, that the whistleblowers tell me
(10:32):
that they the counter sniper surveillance unit would have found him,
interviewed him, and got him out of there very quickly,
so this all could have been avoided. And Ron Rowe's responsible,
according to whistleblowers for reducing the counter surveillance units by
twenty percent across the board and certainly not assigning this
(10:55):
to this event would be the leite side agent, the
woman I spoke of early. That was her decision, and
then the decision and that gets signed off by the
head of the Pittsford Field Office, who also know the
identity of But the Pittsford Field Offices is in an
(11:17):
obviously depressed state and it is there. I hope they're
still not on the job. Rose says that this person
was still on the job. I still like just stress
of this, of having been responsible for the lapse of
the egregious lapses and security. They should be on an
(11:37):
administrative leave or medical leave for mental health.
Speaker 1 (11:41):
Susan Crabtree, our guest Real clear politics, working her sources
within the Secret Service that are coming forward to her
at this very important time in our history after the
assassination attempt against former President Donald Trump and Butler Pennsylvania.
What Dan Bongino is hinted at as well, you kind
of touch down at to Susan, Rail has to be
at an all time low, I imagine for those that
(12:02):
are coming forward to you, and that they are notifying
you of a cultural rot from within a leadership really
that is inept, incompetent, and just incapable of really doing
what the Secret Service needs to do. So of those
that are coming forward to you, the whistleblowers from the
Secret Service, Susan, what are some of the most urgent
(12:24):
things that they point to about what's happening within the
Secret Service.
Speaker 2 (12:30):
Well, they're saying that there is this lowering of standards
across the board. The issue it's been resolved now unfortunately
a little too late for Corey COMPARATOI and his I
might be mispronouncing, and his family who had to witness
his murder in front of their very own eyes. And
(12:53):
it's just appalling to me that that's going to this
event is going to affect our democracy and that weeople
who cannot go to a rally and feel safe right now.
And people are still going so to their credit, but
it's a deep concern in mind because a whistleblower has
come forward and said it doesn't it's not gonna The
(13:14):
Secret Service doesn't just shift. It's like an aircraft carrier.
It's going to take a while to turn this around
for them to have enough resources. But certainly Donald Trump's
events are getting far more resources now, thankfully. But why
did it have to take this? The issue is that
the leaders have a what you what you were getting at?
Speaker 3 (13:37):
Uh.
Speaker 2 (13:38):
I used to call it the culture of corruption. There's
a lot of correct behavior at the leadership level and
it feeds down from there. Uh in the siccret service
retaliation for people who don't you know, play the game,
go along with the flow. If they see you know,
mouth seasons or misconduct, they report it and then they
(14:01):
are retaliated against, not the people that were engaged in
this conduct. And many times it's gone on for i
mean just decades, decades of problems on that level in
the Secret Service. So just need to clean out the
top floor, it's called the eighth floor. Just need to
get rid of everybody who has served in a leadership position.
(14:25):
Of course that was be traumatizing right now to the agency,
But certainly there are people that could move into the
positions who've had thirty years of experience at the Secret
Service who could readily take command. It needs a full
house cleaning and they need more resources in terms of
(14:45):
people that serve on the ground. They do all kinds
of functions, They serve all kinds of functions. They have
offices all over the world, which you know, we need
to rethink that even though it's their his I know,
but what purposes is it serving for counterfeiting? For instance?
(15:06):
Do we really need that fighting counterfeiting within the Secret Service?
Or should we be focusing the Secret Service be focusing
on its core mission of protecting the president, former presidents,
and their families, et cetera.
Speaker 1 (15:21):
Susan Crabtree, Real Clear Politics with us. A couple of
bullet point items that you've been reporting on, Susan, that
I want to cover for our audience, the first of
which having to do with the deleted texts from the
January sixth committee and what happened to those, what role
the Secret Service played in that, what they knew and
when they knew it about the bomb threat outside the
DNC where then Vice President elect Kamala Harris, Senator Harris
(15:46):
was stationed, and if those texts, if deleted, would be
retrievable using modern forensics.
Speaker 3 (15:54):
Yes, I am told by a source, several sources, but
one source in particular, that they were asked they worked
on January sixth, They had their This person had their
cell phone was full of texts from January six regarding the.
Speaker 2 (16:19):
Garden, the Kamila Harris incident. I'm speaking slowly because I'm
trying to be careful about disclosing sourcing, but that they
were asked for by the management to turn in their phone.
Several months later, when the FBI and the congressional agencies
and that Inspector General of the Department Homeland Security started
(16:41):
investigating those incidents and their role in it, they were
asked for their phones and they knew that it was
because they were going to delete them. It wasn't because
of this software migration that it's been a regular practice
at the Secret Service to do that. What I call
it culture of CYA. Actually my whistle the whistle blower
(17:03):
who emailed the whole Uniform Division in a very upset
manner angry manner right before the Senate committee hearing that's
what the counter sniper who wrote that email, internal email,
how he described it the culture of cya. And we
saw that again with the cocaine incident. They tried to cheatle.
(17:27):
My sources tell me, tried to get that destroyed, the
cocaine that was found in the White House complex last year,
last summer. It just goes on and on. They do
cover up the hide behind, the secret part of the
Secret Service in their name, and all kinds of shenanigans
(17:48):
take place, and some with devastating results.
Speaker 1 (17:53):
Following up on her most recent story here, which you
can find at Real Clear Politics, Susan Crabtree, our guest,
it's entitled Formacy Service chief wanted to destroy cocaine evidence.
That was the cocaine that was found in the White House.
There were a lot of jokes made about it as
to who it would belong to, the obvious assumption being
that it would be the former drug addict Hunter Biden himself,
(18:13):
son of the president. But you mentioned and you kind
of refer to this Susan about Kim Cheedle and kind
of the process as to why she would want to
destroy that evidence there was a partial DNA match. This
is what I'm reading from your reporting and from others,
and that they wanted to scuttle this is this is
what I'm always trying to dig into. You're a journalist,
I'm a show host. But if they know this information,
(18:35):
if there could be a leak about exactly whose it was,
regardless of whether or not Kim cheadle wanted to destroy
the evidence, what was the question say, if we know
whose cocaine it was already, that knowledge is had by
people that are on the inside, and whether there might
be a way or somebody that could leak that information
(18:56):
regardless of whether Kim cheadle wanted to destroy the actual evidence.
Speaker 2 (19:01):
Well, they probably have a pretty good idea of who
it was, but they purposely did not investigate it. The
FBI sent the substance to the FBI after they confirmed
it with cocaine, and there was DNA found, and they
even admitted that partial DNA found on the baggie, But
(19:24):
that DNA it's subjective because some of them, my sources
are telling me that they very well could have. They
already did get a partial hit, meaning they did find
out a relative, a blood relative. So they run it
through to crime databases across the country and if there
(19:47):
was anybody who had their DNA to collective for a
crime from a crime scene or from the fingerprints. They
didn't find fingerprints on it or useful fingerprints, but they
did find partial DNA. They got a partial DNA hit,
and they could have narrowed that down pretty easily because
it was a sleepy Sunday before July fourth when this
(20:08):
cocaine baggy was found, and there was only a certain
amount of people in the White House, and you keep
track of who was in the White House at all
times by waves records, you had a pool of people
that you could interview and try to match from that
DNA partial hit. But they chose not to. They chose
not to further investigate, and they put that statement out
(20:30):
saying that they didn't want to interview all five hundred
people in the what that go to the White House
they are employed by the White House, because they didn't
want to infringe on civil liberties. But there was a
smaller subset of people that were there that weekend. It
was not that many because it was a slow weekend.
They could have definitely investigated this further well that's why
(20:51):
we have.
Speaker 1 (20:51):
To leave it to Susan Crabtree to do the investigating
as a journalist and doing such great work again on
the front lines of all of this for Real Clear Politics.
Be sure to follow her on ex at Susan Crabtree
all of this news coming out about corruption within the
leadership of the Secret Service. Susan, you're doing a fantastic
job and a great service, I might add for the
American people for all of our listeners here as well,
(21:14):
thank you so much for doing that, and thank you
so much for doing this with your time today.
Speaker 2 (21:19):
I certainly appreciate your interested in and it's really critical
that we get to the bottom of it. So thank
you so much for having me.
Speaker 1 (21:25):
On Susan Crabtree, Real Clear Politics, Your thoughts five seven
seven three nine textos along to Ryan back with more
after this on six point thirty k ho Master Services.
You won't need anybody else. Just cut to the chase.
Shortest distance between two points is a straight line, and
(21:47):
that straight line is the following phone number for Master
Services seven to two oh four thirty four thirty four
oh six Tom Martinez referral list. They've been there, They've
stayed there for over twenty years seven to two oh
four thirty four thirty four six. When you call them
and you ask them, you know what do you need?
Describe your problem, they'll diagnose it. They'll send somebody on site,
(22:09):
a master technician who knows what he or she is doing,
certified and qualified to do the best job possible with
the highest quality products and for the guaranteed lowest price.
That's it, bottom line right there. Master router dot Plumbing
is where you can find out more online. A lot
of questions answered there, but you can still give them
a call again. Start that experience online at master router
(22:33):
dot plumbing for Master Services and tell them Ryan sent you.
And now deep thoughts by Vice President Kamala Harris.
Speaker 4 (22:53):
I am here standing here on the Northern Flank, on
the Eastern Flank, talking about what we have in terms
of the Eastern Flank and our NATO allies and what
is that stake at this very moment. What is that
stake this very moment are some of the guiding principles
(23:13):
around the NATO Alliance and in particular the issue and
the importance of defending sovereignty and territorial integrity in this
case of.
Speaker 1 (23:23):
Ukraine, and you wonder why her campaign is hiding her
away basement style like Joe Biden was for so long
and so often during the twenty twenty campaign. Can she
get away with it? Though? Ryan schulingbank with you six
p'int thirty K how we'll get to your text in
the final segment of this hour five seven seven thirty
nine start them, Ryan, I anticipate you may have a
(23:45):
lot of reaction and thoughts to the conversation I just
had with Susan Crabtree of Real Clear Politics. I mean,
Jazzy was saying himself. He was on the edge of
his seat. Obviously as an interviewer, what my style would
be is to try to get as much information as
we can out of Susan, and we know that she's
got to kind of walk a line in protecting her sources.
I just thought that was a question that all of
(24:06):
you may have had when you're watching that hearing and
you see Senator Hawley tell Ron Rowe, the acting Director
of the Secret Service, that he knows that the agent
super supervising the site in Butler, Pennsylvania was a woman.
We know that I'm not trying to pick on her,
but for the reasons I explained and outlined and what
Susan gave me the answer to it shouldn't be a
(24:29):
matter of qualification at that point. But when we're told
that there's a DEI goal, a fixed number, not based
on merit at all, but just we have to get
to thirty percent women, no matter who those women are,
that's an artificial imposition of a quota. And when you
work by quotas, you're no longer hiring for merit. I
(24:49):
given the example and Susan did too, about if a
woman is qualified and can meet the standard and meet
it or exceed it compared to her male counterparts, then
absolutely women should have the same kind of oppportunities and
access to such positions. But if they don't, you can't
lower the standard just to fill the quota, if that
makes sense. I can't get behind that, not in a
(25:10):
position that is so important, lives depend on it, A
life was lost because of it, that somebody would be
appointed for DEI reasons. And then when you turn around
Greg Gutfeld has made this point and call them out
on it and say so and so is a DEI
higher or so and so is a DEI appointment. Oh,
They get all offended because they know it's wrong, because
(25:32):
they know when you're appointing somebody to be a brain
surgeon or a pilot, or a member of the Secret Service,
when you're going into surgery, when you're boarding a plane,
if you have Secret Service protection, what do you care about?
You want to live, You want to live, you want
to survive that experience. Do you care that they check
(25:54):
a DEI box? Does that matter to you? It shouldn't.
I want the best brains surgeon available. If it's doctor
Ben Carson who happens to be black, that's awesome. He's
the best in his field, in his craft. If it's
a pilot who happens to be a woman and meets
the qualification certifications, that's great. But when you get into
(26:15):
this habit, this mindset of I've got to hire X
number of Asians and then why number of Hispanics Z
number of Black America shouldn't matter. Again, I come at
this maybe it's a lot simpler for me because I
come from the world of sports, and no matter what
sport it is, you don't care who it is, what
color they are. Can they do the job? Are they
(26:37):
the best at what they do? Do they give you
the best chance to win? That's it. I don't care
if X percent or black, white, Hispanic, Asian, doesn't matter.
I want the Detroit Lions to win a super Bowl.
That's all I care about. Jared Gof's white, Okay, I'm
on Ross Saint Brown's black, great, fantastic. It's not because
(26:59):
there's a certain that they're successful. It's the stupidest thing
I've ever heard of anyway. One more cut before we
go to break here, and that's jd. Vance. He is
a baller. The more I hear from him, the more
I like him, and the more important I think he's
going to be in this campaign because he puts a
voice to things that need to be talked about. He
(27:19):
needs to make himself accessible to the mainstream media that
is running cover right now for Kamala Harris. They're not
asking questions. I haven't heard them anyway, or I haven't
seen them. Why isn't Kamala Harris seventeen days later now
conducting any interviews or press conferences, interacting with reporters whatsoever? Well,
you just heard why in the deep thoughts by Vice
President Harris? JD Vance lak A g Walking on the
(27:44):
tarmac and Auclaire, Wisconsin, where Air Force two is. But
Harris is running for the hills trying to avoid reporters.
What does jd. Vance do? He walks over to the
gaggle of reporters and says this.
Speaker 2 (27:55):
I figured I'd come by and more interesting to be
put on the.
Speaker 1 (27:59):
Plane if it's going to be my plane in a
few months. But I also thought you guys might get
lonely because the vice president doesn't answer questions for reporters.
It hasn't for seventeen days. I can give you guys
an explanation for why she won't take questions for rewards.
Speaker 2 (28:14):
I know.
Speaker 1 (28:16):
Everybody, okay, great, Well, I hope that you can through
your mind because it would be good for the American people,
and I think it'd be good for you all. She
actually ran a real campaign instead of one from the basement.
Would you tell a proper so how good guys to
see it? What would you like to hear from hers
answer the questions. I'd love her to just answer what
she wants to do and also explain why every single
(28:36):
position she has has changed.
Speaker 2 (28:38):
She pretends to.
Speaker 1 (28:39):
Be a prosecutor, yet she's she pretends to be a
tough on prime prosecutor, and yet here she is wanted
to on the plane. She's the wars there are, yet
she's opened up for the American telling war. This is
a person who has to answer no questions from the media,
and it's disgraceful that she wants to us. It's also
insulting from the American media. But anyway, we're gonna go
to our event. I appreciate you guys getting here. I
(29:01):
wish she made you some more attentions. Yeah, yeah, what
he says there. Of course there's the noise of the
airplane that disrupts it, but that it's a disgrace to
the American reporters. It's insulting to them and their craft
that she's avoiding them, and more importantly, it's insulting and
disrespectful to the American people, to the audience of these
reporters in the media who are supposed to be asking
the questions as a means of vetting Kamala Harris. Is
(29:24):
she competent enough to do this job?
Speaker 3 (29:26):
No?
Speaker 1 (29:27):
And why, let's come full circle. She's a DEI higher
and there's no doubting that. A timeout, we're back with
your text five seven seven three nine, Please start those Ryan,
This is six point thirty k how Frank durand the
real estate man. I always look forward to our weekly
conversations because I learned so much. If you're gonna get
(29:50):
out there and pursue buying a home or you need
to sell your home, we're coming up on crunch time
here before Labor Day and back to school specials, all
that sort of thing. You're not gonna mess the nearly
find a back to school special when it comes to
buying or selling a home. But Frank Duran can put
you in the right place at the right time. He
knows the market, he knows how to read the market.
(30:10):
He knows how to anticipate the market, like a quarterback
of the line of scrimmage calling an audible sees a
blitz coming. And you can find him online at Frank
Durant Holmes dot com. What you'll get when you go
there a couple of tabs you can choose. Buyers start here,
sellers start here. You might be a little bit of
column A, you might be a little bit of column B.
He's also got Team Duran around him. But you'll deal
(30:30):
with Frank directly and personally throughout every step of the process.
He adds that personal touch and he can give you
that kind of local plugin that's going to do much
better than you would find anywhere else online or anywhere
else in general. And that's at Frank Duran Holmes dot com.
That's Frank Duran Holmes dot com for Frank Duran, the
real estate man. Tell him Ryan sent you.
Speaker 5 (30:55):
When I see liberals get upset when you point out
the liberalism of their allies, It's like, why would Pelosi
be upset when you mentioned that Walls is a liberal?
Isn't it weird when you describe a better version of
your politics as something that is less what your politics are.
That makes no sense to me to say that Walls
(31:18):
is great because he's.
Speaker 1 (31:19):
Middle of the road.
Speaker 5 (31:20):
You're actually tell you're actually telling on.
Speaker 6 (31:22):
Yourself that you're a whack job.
Speaker 5 (31:25):
It's like, oh, no, he's not as crazy as I am.
But you also realize that it is a lie. It
is a complete lie because if he was middle of the.
Speaker 1 (31:32):
Road, the squad wouldn't be all over him.
Speaker 5 (31:35):
So they're actually lying to your face with they that's
why they're saying midwestern, That's why they're saying middle of
the road.
Speaker 1 (31:41):
That's why they're saying moderate.
Speaker 5 (31:43):
Because they have to cover up that incredible flaw that
we all know.
Speaker 1 (31:48):
Such great wisdom and logic from Greg Guttfeld there as
a close out the first hour. If Tim Walls is
such a moderate Midwestern voice of reason, then why is
he a moderate Midwestern voice of reason? And if liberals
are so great as far left as they can go,
why do they hedge their bets and say that they're
(32:09):
not so liberal. I don't see really conservatives doing this.
I mean Ted Cruz, I think proudly would say that
he is staunchly conservative. But for whatever reason, Nancy Pelosi
these other leftists, oh he's not as liberal as I am.
That'd be crazy. Get to your text in just a moment.
But first, my in studio guests. They host a weekly
podcast called Humanity Against Tyranny. They've got a lot of names.
(32:33):
P K Stein, Mark Stevenson. That's just one person, and
then Mindy Debor Scott that's another. And they're both here
with me and they're going to spend the next hour.
I got a couple of guests coming up, But Mindy,
your thoughts on the pick of Tim Walls as the
vice presidential nominee.
Speaker 6 (32:49):
He's great if you want to lose, Well, that's.
Speaker 1 (32:51):
What I'm saying as somebody that's on our side of
the equation where you pleased with the pick.
Speaker 6 (32:55):
Absolutely, pick the worst you can get.
Speaker 1 (32:57):
Now you're a messianic Jew, I am. What you think
about the Democrats passing on Josh Shapiro.
Speaker 6 (33:03):
I think that was a mistake.
Speaker 1 (33:05):
It was, but the reasons behind it were they just
blatantly anti Semitic.
Speaker 6 (33:08):
Do you think, oh, of course, Oh my gosh, isn't it.
I'm getting a goosebumps because I know I'm true, I'm
true to the telling you the truth.
Speaker 1 (33:16):
Doesn't that bother you?
Speaker 2 (33:16):
Then?
Speaker 1 (33:17):
Now, why doesn't it bother you?
Speaker 6 (33:18):
Because we're gonna do some annihilation.
Speaker 1 (33:20):
You know what we're gonna do. But yeah, PK. When
we have a party, a major party, that is so
blatantly and openly anti Semitic to the point they would
pass on a clearly more qualified candidate, I would say,
and Josh Shapiro for this Tim Wall's character, What does
that say about the state of our politics?
Speaker 6 (33:37):
It says our politics are in a mess, a big
fat mess.
Speaker 1 (33:42):
What did you think of the Walls pick by Kamala Harris.
Speaker 6 (33:44):
It didn't surprise me at all.
Speaker 1 (33:46):
She needed somebody like that, somebody like what though.
Speaker 6 (33:50):
Somebody that's so woke.
Speaker 1 (33:53):
He's a woker, he really is.
Speaker 6 (33:55):
Oh, he's so woke it's nauseating.
Speaker 1 (33:57):
Well, I think he might even be to the left
of her, which is hard to do.
Speaker 6 (34:00):
Tampons in the male bathrooms, sampon, Tim, that was trending
deep however you want to say.
Speaker 1 (34:06):
It well, And that's the thing is, they can't run
and hide forever, right, I mean, at some point, either
Tim Walls or Kamal Airas has to do an interview
appearance where they're gonna be asked about this, right, or
they're gonna be asked about a lot more too. And
both p K and Mindy will be sticking around for
the next hour, Saraj Hashmi. They'll be joining me after
the top of the hour time out here. He's the
(34:26):
co host of the Habibi Brothers Power Hour podcast. And
there's the reason he's joining me. It's kind of a
joke and it's kind of not. The US government is
trying to pin a assassination plot on a Pakistani man
who had ties to Iran. Stick and stay for that
on six point thirty K
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
The Joe Rogan Experience
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Special Summer Offer: Exclusively on Apple Podcasts, try our Dateline Premium subscription completely free for one month! With Dateline Premium, you get every episode ad-free plus exclusive bonus content.