November 20, 2025 • 31 mins
In the second hour of today's show, Ryan breaks down what will happen next now that the Epstein files are set to be released.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
You talked about Republicans taking money from a Jeffrey Epstein.
Speaker 2 (00:03):
Here's what you said, who also took money from somebody
named Jeffrey Epstein. As I had my team digg in
very quickly met Romney, the NRCC, Lee Zelden, George bush Win,
d McCain, palin Rick Lazio.
Speaker 1 (00:24):
You mentioned de Leizelden there, he's now a cabinet secretary.
He responded and said it was actually a doctor Jeffrey Epstein,
who's a doctor that doesn't have any relation to the
convicted sex trucker. Unfortunate for that doctor, but that is
who do it into a prior campaign of his? Do
you want to correct the record on the people deed?
Speaker 2 (00:39):
And I never said that it was that Jeffrey Epstein,
just so other people understand when you make a donation,
your picture is not there. And because they decided to
spring this on us in real time, I wanted the
Republicans to think about what could potentially happen because I
knew that they didn't even try to go through the FEC.
So my team what they did is they googled. And
that is specifically why I said a Jeffrey Epstein unlike Republicans.
Speaker 3 (01:01):
I at least don't go out and just tell lies
they googled your staff that you relied on Google. Why
do they use look it up on Wikipedia, that they
use chat GBT, Just do an AI search. I kind
of trust that. Now she tries to explain this further.
But that's representative Jasmine Crockett, a mental midget. I don't
(01:21):
say that lightly, but it's true, and if it's true,
I'm sorry. I'm not gonna apologize for Democrat Texas Caitlyn Collins,
even giving her the opportunity, like you want to watch
that one back? No, I said, because you know, I
said a Jeffrey Epstein, not the Jeffrey Epstein. Just let's
sub in a name for Epstein and just see how
well this plays another Jeffrey. How about Dahmer. I didn't
(01:42):
mean the Jeffrey Dahmer. You know, a Jeffrey Dahmer. It
could be any Jeffrey Dahmer. She's expecting you to buy
this load of bs. I got to slow myself down.
Jesse knows. And it's because people like Jazz Crockett. You
probably know if you in your life, and hopefully you
(02:02):
keep them far away from your inner circle. Remember we
had this discussion. Jesse was part of it. Keep your
circle small, Gordon Lightfoot style. There's a song about it.
You think about it like in terms of a bull's eye, Right,
who do you keep in that innermost circle, the bullseye
of your life? Right? It's a handful of people, if
that many. And then there's a layer like that that
line the zone outside of the bulls eye, Like, Okay,
(02:25):
these are my friends, fairly close acquaintances, but I wouldn't
necessarily tell them everything. I wouldn't trust them with, like
my deepest, darkest seekers. And then you have, you know,
a ring outside of that where it's like, well, their
work associates might not socialize with them, but they're okay,
and that's okay, and I'll make nice of them at
work about it. And then there's people at Jasmine Crockett.
You want to keep them at an arm's length, preferably
(02:48):
further than that. But the reason being, in this case,
she has such a small intellect that she doesn't realize
she has a small intellect, So she assumes, because her
baseline is dumb, that everyone around her must be dumber
than her. And I hate to break it to her,
that's not the case. In fact, quite the opposite. There
(03:11):
are a lot of people on this planet, even in
that congress where we have, you know, a lot of
consternation and criticism, that are much more intelligent than she is.
But she is expecting you to be dumb enough to believe, well,
as she gaslights you into oblivion, that I just did
a quick search. Let's give her another chance here. She's
(03:32):
got more to say, and we'll just kind of see
if she remedies the issue.
Speaker 2 (03:35):
Because it was not the same one, that's fine. But
when Lee Zelden had something to say, all he had
to say was it was a different Jeffrey Epstein. He
admitted that he did receive donations from a Jeffrey Epstein.
So at least I wasn't trying to mislead people. H
Have I dug in to find out who this doctor is?
Speaker 3 (03:52):
I have not, So I.
Speaker 2 (03:53):
Will trust and take what he says is that it
wasn't that Jeffrey Epstein. But I was not attempting to mislead.
I literally had maybe twenty minutes before I had.
Speaker 4 (04:04):
To do that.
Speaker 1 (04:05):
Yeah, but people might see that and say, well, you're
trying to make it sound like he took money from
I did not registered sex offender.
Speaker 2 (04:11):
No, but I literally did not know when you search
FEC files, and that's what I had my team to do.
I text them and I say, listen, we're going up
there saying that she took donators, right.
Speaker 1 (04:20):
But someone might say, well, your team shouted, don't the
homework to make sure it wasn't.
Speaker 2 (04:23):
The etic within twenty minutes, you could not find that out,
not from just doing a quick search on FEC. So
number one, I made sure that I was clear that
it was a Jeffrey Epstein, but I never said that
it was specifically that Jeffrey Epstein, because.
Speaker 3 (04:38):
I knew that we would we would need more time
to really dig a nefarious, dangerous idiot Jasmine Crockett. If
you don't know, then keep your yapper shut. You couldn't
get it done in twenty minutes with quick search, then
don't do it. Then you don't have the time did
the proper vetting of information to maintain the integrity of
(05:00):
whatever you're trying to sell out there? You got out
in front of it a little too ahead of your skis,
and now your entire credibility is shot. Does that not
matter to you. I know that's a rhetorical question. No
it doesn't. That's not the point of the exercise. Remember
what el Rushbo used to say, and he is so
right today as he was back then. For the left,
(05:25):
symbolism over substance doesn't matter what the substance is, doesn't
matter if the information's accurate or true. The truthiness of
it is. Stephen Colbert might say he coined the term
it was back when he was funny, But that doesn't matter.
They will label you on the right as being a
(05:45):
purveyor of misinformation, disinformation, mail information. You should be banned.
Scary Poppins is coming. She's going to deplatform you from Twitter,
from Facebook if you dare engage in the dissemination of
false information. This was false under false pretenses. And she
(06:09):
if she didn't know, then she should have known. But
she did know that they couldn't do the research, so
shut up. But no, no, that wasn't the point. The
point was just to smear a bunch of people, obviously
with the Jeffrey Epstein name and the insinuation being that
he was connected to all these Republican types, which I
have a very hard time believing because Epstein himself seemed
(06:31):
to be a pretty fervent supporter of Democrats, of Barack Obama,
of Bill Clinton. Of course Clinton, I mean they were
real tight those two would appear, and we're going to
find out more as these Epstein files are revealed. Both
the former President Bill Clinton and the former First Lady
Hillary Clinton, they have kind of stalled on testifying before Congress.
(06:52):
Regarding Epstein, I wonder why then, there was this day
to day between Representative James Comer Republic in Kentucky and
the minority leader in the House, Representative Akim Jeffries, Democrat
New York. It started with Comer and this verbal rhetorical
shot across the ball.
Speaker 5 (07:13):
Another email shows Democrat fundraisers invited Epstein to an event
or to meet privately with the Keem Jeffries.
Speaker 3 (07:19):
That's that's true.
Speaker 5 (07:20):
As part of their twenty thirteen effort to win a majority,
so Hakeem Jeffries campaign solicited money from Jeffrey Epstein got true.
That's what we found in the last document batch. The
files underscore why former President Trump must appear for his deposition.
Speaker 6 (07:37):
We've subpeeded him. To date, the.
Speaker 5 (07:39):
Democrats have done nothing to help us secure his appearance.
Speaker 6 (07:43):
I support full transparency.
Speaker 5 (07:45):
The Oversight Committee will continue to work to get the
truth to the American people and to get justice for
the victims. That's our goal of this investigation.
Speaker 6 (07:54):
With that, I yielbe.
Speaker 3 (07:56):
So that was right after the House voted to approve
the release of the Stein files, was sent over to
the Senate, where they unanimously voted for it, and then
to the President's desk where Donald Trump promptly signed it.
So here we go. Representative mackem Jeffries and light of
what you just heard, was asked about it, and this
was his response. It's a terrifying follow.
Speaker 7 (08:14):
Up question on the James Comer accusations.
Speaker 3 (08:18):
Are you saying that your fundraisers.
Speaker 4 (08:20):
Never solicited money from Jeffrey Epstein in the exchange for
a meet and greed, because as he's saying that there's
emails for I.
Speaker 8 (08:28):
Have no idea what James Comer is talking about in
terms of anything that any prior consultant may.
Speaker 3 (08:34):
Have sent consultant. He's trying to distance himself. So it's
not even like his campaign, his team, his comms director,
his campaign manager. It's just a consultant. There's somebody over
here on an Island could be Epstein Island. They're just
over there and they were maybe hired to consultant. It's
like way way far away from me.
Speaker 8 (08:55):
I had no idea about that either. But James Comer
apparently made the representation on the floor of the house
that I sat down with Jeffrey Epstein, had dinner with
Jeffrey Epstein, have contributions from Jeffrey Epstein. He's a stone
cold liar.
Speaker 3 (09:10):
Okay, that's a technic. That's the technique. Let me walk
you through it. You know what it's called. It's a
straw man fallacy, which is what do you do? You
exaggerate or caricature the argument being made against you to
an extreme level. That's easier to refute. I didn't sit
down and have dinner with the guy. I mean, if
he's accusing that, well then he's a stone cold liar.
(09:33):
He knows, Jeffries knows, and you know, and I know,
and Jesse knows. That's not what Representative Comber said. He
may never had dinner with Jeffrey Epstein. What the claim
was was there was a solicitation made on behalf of
a keen Jeffries in his campaign for a donation from
Jeffrey in Epstein and an invitation to dinner with the
(09:58):
keen Jeffries where he could get to know, oh, the
congressman better. But as Jeffries just tried to do in
very sly and slick fashion, he exaggerates what the accusation was, Oh,
I didn't do that, and then he's kind of opening
the door calling him a stone cold liar. So what
is Representative James comer to be careful what you wish
(10:19):
for a keen because he's got receipts, does comber, So.
Speaker 6 (10:22):
Let's rate it to make sure to Jeffrey Epstein.
Speaker 5 (10:27):
And that's the real Jeffrey Eptee, not Gaysman Crockett's Jeffrey Epe.
Speaker 6 (10:32):
This is the real Jeffrey Eptee.
Speaker 5 (10:34):
From Hakeem Jeffries campaign, Dear Jeffrey, we are thrilled that
we were working with Congressman Haqueen Jeffries, one of the
rising stars of the New York delegation, sometimes referred to
as Brooklyn's Barack. Haquem Pukl is committeed to electing a
Democrat majority in twenty fourteen and is encouraging his friends
to participate in the d Triple C fundraising dinner with
(10:56):
President Obama.
Speaker 6 (10:58):
And Hakeem Jeffries.
Speaker 5 (11:01):
It ends with the number for Jeffrey Epstey to call
to go to the dinner and quote get an opportunity
to get to know Haquen better get to know me.
Here's the evidence. The email speaks for itself. The only
stole cold liar in this debate is Hackeen. Jeffrey boom, So,
(11:24):
mister minority leader, take a deep breath, chill out, stop lying,
stop with the juvenile name calling, and own up to
the fact that your campaign soliciting campaign cash from Jeffrey Epstein.
Speaker 3 (11:40):
Oh hey, look, it's the consequences of my own actions.
This is like an ice cream headache moment. Did the
Democrats not see it? It's like a football team that
doesn't look beyond ten yards down the field. I'm gonna
get this one. We're gonna do right what's right in
front of us. We're gonna get these Epstein files out.
Do you not think long game? Do you not plot
(12:03):
out where this might lead? Do you not kind of
map out what the permutations, combinations, consequences might be if
this plays out. They're so bad at this, they're so
diluted and consumed by Trump arrangement syndrome. It occupies their thoughts,
(12:24):
it eats away at their brains. It's like a virus
that just won't stop. And what we're finding is that
every single Epstein connection that we found out so far
comes back to a Democrat, as we talked about in
the previous hour with Representative Gabe Evans and the Democratic
(12:47):
delegate from the Virgin Islands making the claim, and this
was a hilarious one. If you missed it from yesterday,
I guess we should revisit it. It's Delegate Stacy Plaskett
explaining why she was texting with Jeffrey Epstein, and as
evidence will show, she ended up in this congressional hearing
(13:07):
getting texts from Epstein and then parroting questions with the
exact wording that Epstein prompted her with. So, who was
Jeffrey Epstein to Delegate Stacy Plaskett, Democrat, Virgin Islands, she explains,
And I got a.
Speaker 7 (13:24):
Text, okay from Jeffrey Epstein.
Speaker 3 (13:27):
Of course we all do. Who at the.
Speaker 7 (13:28):
Time was my constituent, who was not public knowledge at
that time that he was under federal investigation, and who
was sharing information with me?
Speaker 3 (13:44):
Why would you have a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein on
any level that's that intimate where you would be texting
in real time during a congressional hearing, and that he
would have the credibility pull with you to suggest that, Hey,
make sure you ask Michael this, and then you go
ahead and you ask Michael Cohen that. Why did he
(14:05):
have that stature with you personally? What was the nature
of that relationship? Delegate Stacy Plaskett. And while he might
not have been under federal investigation charges, et cetera, at
that point, he certainly had been on the state level
charged with sex crimes. That was known to be a
habitual sex offender. So that was all known. There's a
(14:27):
lot more that needs splain in here, and it's all
coming from one side, a King Jeffreys, Bill Clinton. Epstein
was an avowed Democrat. Trump cut ties with him entirely
once he found out what he was up to with
young female staffers that Trump had at mar A Lago,
and that Epstein was looking to lurk and poach and
(14:50):
steal and procure and manipulate these young women, take them
out of mar A Lago, bring them into his web
of deceit and evil, Trump warned him. Then Trump banned him,
and that was it. Now, why Trump was so resistant
to just come and clean on all of this and
releasing the files, and who cares? Come? What may? The
only explanation I have is that there may be friends
(15:13):
of his that he didn't want to implicate or embarrass,
or there may be names in there. And this is
a point that's been made on other radio shows, that
there might be names that aren't directly implicated, but the
mere mention of these names will be guilt by association,
and therefore there could be lawsuits in the wake of that. Well,
then let that come, just let it all hang out
(15:34):
and we'll see what happens. Well, we got some more
texts to get too, as you might imagine at five seven,
seven thirty nine, we need to go after these scumbags,
like Crow says, this texter hit them with sedition. And
it's the literal definition, is it not. You were calling
for our military to disregard the orders of their commander
in chief, point blank, and you're not specific. Therefore, you're
(15:58):
giving them that blanket advice that they should only pick
and choose, like from a cafeteria menu, the orders which
they like, and they should observe and they should follow.
But if they personally disagree and they feel, in my
estimation as an enlisted man, I don't want to follow
that order, I think it's illegal. Again, this is counter
to any and all training that an individual receives, bootcamp,
(16:23):
basic training. The whole chain of command thing is a
thing because it has to be in place in order
for the military to work to function. You can't have
at every level subordinate officers going you know what, I
think the sergeant's full of crap. I'm not gonna listen
to him. Could you imagine a military trying to operate
(16:44):
on that basis, because that's what this Pandora's box opens
it up to. No, you are in a chain of command.
You do as you're told, as you're ordered, if you
don't like it, if you dispute it, if you think
you're being given a wrong order. There is a remedy
for that, a process for that, but it's not in
the moment. You just choose. I shall not fight, sir.
(17:06):
I don't agree with the cause. This is madness. But
Jason Crow signed up for it, and so did Alyssa Slackin,
and so did Mark Kelly and a few other names
that we don't know, but those are the three big ones.
This is in all caps, Ryan. The only people getting
killed and shot are GOP. Well, it sure seems like
that side of the ledgers getting filled up pretty quick,
(17:28):
Charlie Kirk being most notable. Donald Trump. There was two
attempts on his life, one which clipped his ear with
a bullet the fields of Butler, Pennsylvania. Hello, many more
techs coming in. This from Bob in Ravada. Basic training
in the army used to include info concerning illegal orders.
You cannot be given an illegal order by a person
(17:49):
in charge. The reasons are obvious. I had basic training
in nineteen sixty Bob, You're obviously exactly right. No, I
have not gone through it. I only go on the
stories that I've had, and they're very colorful stories. For
my buddy Hutch in Florida and one time, this is
a little bit personal, but he was strange from his mom.
(18:09):
His mom abandoned him and his dad raised him in
the seventies when it wasn't a time there were a
lot of single dans out there, and eventually his mom
was passing away from cancers. He was in boot camp
and his commanding officers asked him, did you want to
go to Texas and visit your mom before she dies?
And he said no, Ho did he pay a heavy
price for that? You won't even go visit your own
mother who's dying. Get down to give me twenty And
(18:31):
he got all this kind of latrine duty and everything
else from it. But a lot of the other soldiers
marines in that case respected Hutch for that. And that's
what you get. That's basic training time out back with
Marryin Schueling live after these words.
Speaker 4 (18:51):
Now Trump threatened to have me arrested and executed simply
for reminding our service members so they're odes to follow
the constitution and to defend.
Speaker 3 (19:01):
The rule of law.
Speaker 4 (19:02):
I've taken many oaths throughout my life as a combat veteran,
a paratrooper, and Army ranger, and now as a member
of Congress. That is a lifetime oath for me. I
will never stop defending it and upholding that sacred obligation.
It's very telling that President Trump and those around him
think it's criminal simply for asking people to follow the law.
(19:24):
This moment requires moral clarity. Every American, regardless of your background,
should unite and reject his calls for political violence. This
is a moment that requires leadership. I intend to uphold
my obligation, my oath, and to lead.
Speaker 3 (19:41):
Don't give up the ship. You have contradicted that oath,
Representative Jason Crow by calling on members of our military
and intelligence community to disregard orders from the commander in
chief of the United States. Save me the SOBS story
Here and again, there was no following of the constitution
(20:03):
making clear which orders he viewed Jason Crow to be
illegal or unethical, even or immoral that Trump is issued,
either now so far, during the president's second term in
office as forty seven, or during all four years of
his presidency prior to that as forty five. This just in.
(20:29):
Jason Crow had another chance, after getting walloped by Martha
McCallum on Fox News, to be specific and crystal clear
and clarify exactly which orders he claims Trump is giving
that should be ignored disobeyed, this time with Elizabeth Vargas
(20:50):
of News Nation. She does a good job here. He
does not.
Speaker 9 (20:56):
You're a former paratrooper, army ranger. You know better than
most crucial to the chain of command is you say you
can refuse illegal orders, you must refuse illegal orders. What
exactly are you telling the soldiers to do? Stand up
and say no or quit No.
Speaker 4 (21:12):
We're telling the soldiers exactly what they're trained to do
in basic training.
Speaker 3 (21:15):
Like I just said, you.
Speaker 4 (21:17):
Have to follow the law, right, what does that mean?
It's really important, but above the change, it means you
follow the law. It means that if there's an unlawful order,
if you're asked to violate the constitution, you're not obligated
to do that.
Speaker 3 (21:29):
And let's use some.
Speaker 4 (21:30):
Examples, by the way, So Abu Gharab prison, right, there
were privates and junior enlisted who were ordered to do
things that were unlawful, and eleven of them ended up
being criminally prosecuted.
Speaker 3 (21:42):
Which administration did abu grad happen under? That was George W. Bush,
not Donald J. Trump.
Speaker 4 (21:50):
The Melai massacre in Vietnam where you had private Durst
and a warrant officer refused to massacre civilians. They were
the heroes of that moment, but they're commander, their lieutenant
Kelly actually ordered it and he went to prison. So
there are example after example in US military history.
Speaker 3 (22:08):
Of people that are.
Speaker 4 (22:10):
Asked to do things that are unlawful, usually almost always
involving committing violence or crimes against civilians.
Speaker 3 (22:19):
The Meli massacre took place on March sixteenth, nineteen sixty eight.
That would have been during the presidency of Lyndon Baines Johnson,
not Donald John Trump.
Speaker 4 (22:31):
That uniform personnel are obligated to refuse if it's out
in order to do. And we're concerned about this, Elizabeth.
We're concerned about this because of the rhetoric of this president.
Right that the President actually said, hey, can you shoot
these people in the leg during the Lafayette Square protests.
Speaker 3 (22:47):
That wasn't in order.
Speaker 4 (22:48):
We're going to go to show, right, And here this
president has a long history of saying nefarious and obvious things. Right,
But you don't ever wait until an order is actually
given to train people and tell them what their obligations.
Speaker 9 (23:05):
Are, so to be clear for to be clear cut.
Speaker 6 (23:09):
Right.
Speaker 9 (23:09):
But to be clear, congressman, you're not saying President Trump
has already given any illegal orders, are you.
Speaker 3 (23:18):
We're not talking about specific orders. That's exactly what we're
talking about, you fool. That's the only thing we're talking about.
What are you talking about I gotta hear that again,
are you nuts?
Speaker 7 (23:32):
Man?
Speaker 9 (23:32):
To be clear cut, right, But to be clear Congressman,
you're not saying President Trump has already given any illegal orders,
are you.
Speaker 3 (23:42):
We're not talking about specific orders. He can't possibly be
this stupid, but maybe he is. We're talking exactly about
specific illegal orders. Representative Crow. That is incumbent upon your position.
That is central to your argument as to why an
(24:04):
enlisted man or woman should think in every single moment,
this is what you're calling for. Play it out every
single moment. I got to think on my own is
this an illegal order? Is this constitutional? Now? All due respect,
but when David Tyson again, my buddy huts you I
know best enlisted into service for the United States Marine Corps.
(24:27):
He was not a college educated man. He enlisted at
the age of eighteen, He went through basic training, he
served his four years. Does he have a thorough knowledge
at that point in his educational development of the Constitution
in the United States and every amendment, every clause? Did
(24:48):
he take con law? Did he go through that? Well? No,
no he did not, nor should he be expected to.
An enlisted marine is given an order, and what your
saying representative Crow is that each and everyone should be
questioned in real time. Well, I don't know, is that
one illegal or legal? We don't have time for that crap.
(25:11):
Jason Crow, as a veteran Army ranger, should know better
than anybody. The Army Rangers are an elite force, like
the Navy Seals are. They're supposed to be the best
of the best, the smartest of the smart. This man's
a fool, and there's just no two ways around it.
(25:31):
Either that or he is so nefarious in his intent here,
which I am keeping in play that again, the end
justifies the means. It doesn't matter. It doesn't matter if
this is sound logic, principle, morality, ethics, law. It's simply
about undermining the authority and power of the President of
(25:53):
the United States and our commander in chief period. It's
a power grab by Democrats who are out of power,
and this is the only way that they can flail
their way back into it is by muddying the waters,
putting out this nebulous argument about well, he might say something.
That's another thing. What Donald Trump says in his capacity
(26:14):
as president has nothing to do with the orders he
gives to our military personnel as commander in chief, and
how that follows down the chain of command. There are
two entirely separate things. Whatever Donald Trump says out on
the campaign stump, whatever he says in a press conference,
that has no bearing on an order he may give
(26:35):
in a military capacity, like the attacks on the Iranian
nuclear facilities that were so successful, totally separate thing. Jason
Crow would have you believe that those things are conflated.
That when President Trump asks in a private meeting, why
can't we just shoot them in the legs? Now, that
(26:55):
might seem insane and you might disagree with it. He
did not give that order. The order would have been
shoot them in the lakes. I am telling you this.
I'm giving you an order as commander in chief. I
want you to shoot those protesters. Those demonstrators in the
lakes didn't do that. That didn't happen. That didn't happen.
Him pontificating or asking about it or theorizing about it
(27:17):
is not the same thing as giving an order. I
can't believe I have to explain this to an army ranger.
But again, I don't think he needs that explanation because
that doesn't matter to him. Oh, boy talk to George
Brockler about this yesterday. Would love to hear what g
brock has to say about what we just heard there,
final timeout, wrapping it all up, Ryan Shulding Live on
(27:40):
this Thursday edition. After this coming up here in a
few minutes, I'll be on the road heading up to
this special event in Fort Collins at day Spring Christian Church,
inviting you to join me along with Jennifer Say and
Aaron Lee and Aaron Friday and James Lindsey and doctor
Travis Morrell from Heartbreak to Hope protecting kids from irreversible
(28:04):
sex changes. There will be three petitions you can sign
there to put matters on the ballot, protecting kids from
those irreversible procedures and protecting girls and women sports and spaces. Again.
That's Dayspring Christian Church.
Speaker 6 (28:18):
Six to eight p m.
Speaker 3 (28:19):
Tonight, and I'll be heading out there in mirror moments
back here on Ryan Schuling Live. Lots of texts coming
in and along those lines. How about this one? Five, seven, seven,
three nine. Did you see another Pewter School district female
advisor got arrested today? How many is that? Now? I'm
so glad you brought that up Texter, because I'm going
to bring that up with Aaron Lee when I see
(28:40):
her in about two hours. Ryan Action encourage listeners to
call Crow and share thoughts. Yeah, you know, you can
find this number easily online through a Google search. Pretend
your Jasmin Crocketer or staff, but actually get the phone
number for Congressman Crow's office. Be politely, respectful, be forceful, though,
and let him know what you think of the video
(29:02):
that he contributed to calling on our enlisted members and
military personnel and intelligence personnel to disregard orders they think
are illegal or unconstitutional one by one. Benedict Arnold was
one of the greatest generals the American Revolution ever had,
but he was also a traitor to his country. Very
good point and historically accurate. Ryan, was Crow in a
(29:25):
arranger battalion or just another officer with a short tab
Ooh that's a little inside baseball. I got to ask
my friends who are in the know that are a
lot more informed on that than I am. I'm not
going to denigratee or question Representative Crow's military service. I
want to keep that separate. I just know he's behaving
like a buffoon right now. That much I do know
(29:48):
so you needed a little bit more research as to
what his actual role was. I believe he was in combat.
I have no reason to question that, Ryan. So the
crow is full of bs when caught. Yes, in this case,
very much so. Ryan loved the video. Have you ever
seen a few good men? You're damn right. I ordered
the code read Yeah, come on, Santiago, don't follow that order.
(30:13):
But that's not what he said. He wasn't. He mentioned
these two specific historical examples Abu Grab from the war
in Iraq, like twenty odd years ago during the Bush administration,
and then this other atrocity that took place in Vietnam
in nineteen sixty eight that would have been under LBJ.
So nothing having to do with Trump, just the warning
that it might. Trump says some mean things, and you
(30:35):
know you might have to question it. Now, what specific order,
Representative Crowe are you saying was illegal? It was not
about specific orders. I don't know what you're talking about.
Back to the Epstein topic from petty petty Ryan, I
think the congresswoman Stacey thought she was texting with her physician,
doctor Jeffrey. Well, he most certainly was not a physician.
(30:59):
But point taken, Ryan, maybe they wanted to wait until
timing would do damage the Democrats. The most who who
wanted to wait until then the Democrats themselves? This one again? Yep,
how did he have her cell number?
Speaker 6 (31:14):
Well?
Speaker 3 (31:15):
He was one of her constituents for Plasket, don't you know,
just another constituent like you or I might be if
we lived in the Virgin Islands. Good buying that. I
got some swamp land in Michigan to sell you. I
am off to Fort Collins, Dan Kaplis show his next
My thanks to Jesse Thomas for filming in for me
on the board there. I'll talk to you tomorrow right
(31:35):
side of Hollywood and Ryan Shuling live right here on
six point thirty kout
You talked about Republicans taking money from a Jeffrey Epstein.
Speaker 2 (00:03):
Here's what you said, who also took money from somebody
named Jeffrey Epstein. As I had my team digg in
very quickly met Romney, the NRCC, Lee Zelden, George bush Win,
d McCain, palin Rick Lazio.
Speaker 1 (00:24):
You mentioned de Leizelden there, he's now a cabinet secretary.
He responded and said it was actually a doctor Jeffrey Epstein,
who's a doctor that doesn't have any relation to the
convicted sex trucker. Unfortunate for that doctor, but that is
who do it into a prior campaign of his? Do
you want to correct the record on the people deed?
Speaker 2 (00:39):
And I never said that it was that Jeffrey Epstein,
just so other people understand when you make a donation,
your picture is not there. And because they decided to
spring this on us in real time, I wanted the
Republicans to think about what could potentially happen because I
knew that they didn't even try to go through the FEC.
So my team what they did is they googled. And
that is specifically why I said a Jeffrey Epstein unlike Republicans.
Speaker 3 (01:01):
I at least don't go out and just tell lies
they googled your staff that you relied on Google. Why
do they use look it up on Wikipedia, that they
use chat GBT, Just do an AI search. I kind
of trust that. Now she tries to explain this further.
But that's representative Jasmine Crockett, a mental midget. I don't
(01:21):
say that lightly, but it's true, and if it's true,
I'm sorry. I'm not gonna apologize for Democrat Texas Caitlyn Collins,
even giving her the opportunity, like you want to watch
that one back? No, I said, because you know, I
said a Jeffrey Epstein, not the Jeffrey Epstein. Just let's
sub in a name for Epstein and just see how
well this plays another Jeffrey. How about Dahmer. I didn't
(01:42):
mean the Jeffrey Dahmer. You know, a Jeffrey Dahmer. It
could be any Jeffrey Dahmer. She's expecting you to buy
this load of bs. I got to slow myself down.
Jesse knows. And it's because people like Jazz Crockett. You
probably know if you in your life, and hopefully you
(02:02):
keep them far away from your inner circle. Remember we
had this discussion. Jesse was part of it. Keep your
circle small, Gordon Lightfoot style. There's a song about it.
You think about it like in terms of a bull's eye, Right,
who do you keep in that innermost circle, the bullseye
of your life? Right? It's a handful of people, if
that many. And then there's a layer like that that
line the zone outside of the bulls eye, Like, Okay,
(02:25):
these are my friends, fairly close acquaintances, but I wouldn't
necessarily tell them everything. I wouldn't trust them with, like
my deepest, darkest seekers. And then you have, you know,
a ring outside of that where it's like, well, their
work associates might not socialize with them, but they're okay,
and that's okay, and I'll make nice of them at
work about it. And then there's people at Jasmine Crockett.
You want to keep them at an arm's length, preferably
(02:48):
further than that. But the reason being, in this case,
she has such a small intellect that she doesn't realize
she has a small intellect, So she assumes, because her
baseline is dumb, that everyone around her must be dumber
than her. And I hate to break it to her,
that's not the case. In fact, quite the opposite. There
(03:11):
are a lot of people on this planet, even in
that congress where we have, you know, a lot of
consternation and criticism, that are much more intelligent than she is.
But she is expecting you to be dumb enough to believe, well,
as she gaslights you into oblivion, that I just did
a quick search. Let's give her another chance here. She's
(03:32):
got more to say, and we'll just kind of see
if she remedies the issue.
Speaker 2 (03:35):
Because it was not the same one, that's fine. But
when Lee Zelden had something to say, all he had
to say was it was a different Jeffrey Epstein. He
admitted that he did receive donations from a Jeffrey Epstein.
So at least I wasn't trying to mislead people. H
Have I dug in to find out who this doctor is?
Speaker 3 (03:52):
I have not, So I.
Speaker 2 (03:53):
Will trust and take what he says is that it
wasn't that Jeffrey Epstein. But I was not attempting to mislead.
I literally had maybe twenty minutes before I had.
Speaker 4 (04:04):
To do that.
Speaker 1 (04:05):
Yeah, but people might see that and say, well, you're
trying to make it sound like he took money from
I did not registered sex offender.
Speaker 2 (04:11):
No, but I literally did not know when you search
FEC files, and that's what I had my team to do.
I text them and I say, listen, we're going up
there saying that she took donators, right.
Speaker 1 (04:20):
But someone might say, well, your team shouted, don't the
homework to make sure it wasn't.
Speaker 2 (04:23):
The etic within twenty minutes, you could not find that out,
not from just doing a quick search on FEC. So
number one, I made sure that I was clear that
it was a Jeffrey Epstein, but I never said that
it was specifically that Jeffrey Epstein, because.
Speaker 3 (04:38):
I knew that we would we would need more time
to really dig a nefarious, dangerous idiot Jasmine Crockett. If
you don't know, then keep your yapper shut. You couldn't
get it done in twenty minutes with quick search, then
don't do it. Then you don't have the time did
the proper vetting of information to maintain the integrity of
(05:00):
whatever you're trying to sell out there? You got out
in front of it a little too ahead of your skis,
and now your entire credibility is shot. Does that not
matter to you. I know that's a rhetorical question. No
it doesn't. That's not the point of the exercise. Remember
what el Rushbo used to say, and he is so
right today as he was back then. For the left,
(05:25):
symbolism over substance doesn't matter what the substance is, doesn't
matter if the information's accurate or true. The truthiness of
it is. Stephen Colbert might say he coined the term
it was back when he was funny, But that doesn't matter.
They will label you on the right as being a
(05:45):
purveyor of misinformation, disinformation, mail information. You should be banned.
Scary Poppins is coming. She's going to deplatform you from Twitter,
from Facebook if you dare engage in the dissemination of
false information. This was false under false pretenses. And she
(06:09):
if she didn't know, then she should have known. But
she did know that they couldn't do the research, so
shut up. But no, no, that wasn't the point. The
point was just to smear a bunch of people, obviously
with the Jeffrey Epstein name and the insinuation being that
he was connected to all these Republican types, which I
have a very hard time believing because Epstein himself seemed
(06:31):
to be a pretty fervent supporter of Democrats, of Barack Obama,
of Bill Clinton. Of course Clinton, I mean they were
real tight those two would appear, and we're going to
find out more as these Epstein files are revealed. Both
the former President Bill Clinton and the former First Lady
Hillary Clinton, they have kind of stalled on testifying before Congress.
(06:52):
Regarding Epstein, I wonder why then, there was this day
to day between Representative James Comer Republic in Kentucky and
the minority leader in the House, Representative Akim Jeffries, Democrat
New York. It started with Comer and this verbal rhetorical
shot across the ball.
Speaker 5 (07:13):
Another email shows Democrat fundraisers invited Epstein to an event
or to meet privately with the Keem Jeffries.
Speaker 3 (07:19):
That's that's true.
Speaker 5 (07:20):
As part of their twenty thirteen effort to win a majority,
so Hakeem Jeffries campaign solicited money from Jeffrey Epstein got true.
That's what we found in the last document batch. The
files underscore why former President Trump must appear for his deposition.
Speaker 6 (07:37):
We've subpeeded him. To date, the.
Speaker 5 (07:39):
Democrats have done nothing to help us secure his appearance.
Speaker 6 (07:43):
I support full transparency.
Speaker 5 (07:45):
The Oversight Committee will continue to work to get the
truth to the American people and to get justice for
the victims. That's our goal of this investigation.
Speaker 6 (07:54):
With that, I yielbe.
Speaker 3 (07:56):
So that was right after the House voted to approve
the release of the Stein files, was sent over to
the Senate, where they unanimously voted for it, and then
to the President's desk where Donald Trump promptly signed it.
So here we go. Representative mackem Jeffries and light of
what you just heard, was asked about it, and this
was his response. It's a terrifying follow.
Speaker 7 (08:14):
Up question on the James Comer accusations.
Speaker 3 (08:18):
Are you saying that your fundraisers.
Speaker 4 (08:20):
Never solicited money from Jeffrey Epstein in the exchange for
a meet and greed, because as he's saying that there's
emails for I.
Speaker 8 (08:28):
Have no idea what James Comer is talking about in
terms of anything that any prior consultant may.
Speaker 3 (08:34):
Have sent consultant. He's trying to distance himself. So it's
not even like his campaign, his team, his comms director,
his campaign manager. It's just a consultant. There's somebody over
here on an Island could be Epstein Island. They're just
over there and they were maybe hired to consultant. It's
like way way far away from me.
Speaker 8 (08:55):
I had no idea about that either. But James Comer
apparently made the representation on the floor of the house
that I sat down with Jeffrey Epstein, had dinner with
Jeffrey Epstein, have contributions from Jeffrey Epstein. He's a stone
cold liar.
Speaker 3 (09:10):
Okay, that's a technic. That's the technique. Let me walk
you through it. You know what it's called. It's a
straw man fallacy, which is what do you do? You
exaggerate or caricature the argument being made against you to
an extreme level. That's easier to refute. I didn't sit
down and have dinner with the guy. I mean, if
he's accusing that, well then he's a stone cold liar.
(09:33):
He knows, Jeffries knows, and you know, and I know,
and Jesse knows. That's not what Representative Comber said. He
may never had dinner with Jeffrey Epstein. What the claim
was was there was a solicitation made on behalf of
a keen Jeffries in his campaign for a donation from
Jeffrey in Epstein and an invitation to dinner with the
(09:58):
keen Jeffries where he could get to know, oh, the
congressman better. But as Jeffries just tried to do in
very sly and slick fashion, he exaggerates what the accusation was, Oh,
I didn't do that, and then he's kind of opening
the door calling him a stone cold liar. So what
is Representative James comer to be careful what you wish
(10:19):
for a keen because he's got receipts, does comber, So.
Speaker 6 (10:22):
Let's rate it to make sure to Jeffrey Epstein.
Speaker 5 (10:27):
And that's the real Jeffrey Eptee, not Gaysman Crockett's Jeffrey Epe.
Speaker 6 (10:32):
This is the real Jeffrey Eptee.
Speaker 5 (10:34):
From Hakeem Jeffries campaign, Dear Jeffrey, we are thrilled that
we were working with Congressman Haqueen Jeffries, one of the
rising stars of the New York delegation, sometimes referred to
as Brooklyn's Barack. Haquem Pukl is committeed to electing a
Democrat majority in twenty fourteen and is encouraging his friends
to participate in the d Triple C fundraising dinner with
(10:56):
President Obama.
Speaker 6 (10:58):
And Hakeem Jeffries.
Speaker 5 (11:01):
It ends with the number for Jeffrey Epstey to call
to go to the dinner and quote get an opportunity
to get to know Haquen better get to know me.
Here's the evidence. The email speaks for itself. The only
stole cold liar in this debate is Hackeen. Jeffrey boom, So,
(11:24):
mister minority leader, take a deep breath, chill out, stop lying,
stop with the juvenile name calling, and own up to
the fact that your campaign soliciting campaign cash from Jeffrey Epstein.
Speaker 3 (11:40):
Oh hey, look, it's the consequences of my own actions.
This is like an ice cream headache moment. Did the
Democrats not see it? It's like a football team that
doesn't look beyond ten yards down the field. I'm gonna
get this one. We're gonna do right what's right in
front of us. We're gonna get these Epstein files out.
Do you not think long game? Do you not plot
(12:03):
out where this might lead? Do you not kind of
map out what the permutations, combinations, consequences might be if
this plays out. They're so bad at this, they're so
diluted and consumed by Trump arrangement syndrome. It occupies their thoughts,
(12:24):
it eats away at their brains. It's like a virus
that just won't stop. And what we're finding is that
every single Epstein connection that we found out so far
comes back to a Democrat, as we talked about in
the previous hour with Representative Gabe Evans and the Democratic
(12:47):
delegate from the Virgin Islands making the claim, and this
was a hilarious one. If you missed it from yesterday,
I guess we should revisit it. It's Delegate Stacy Plaskett
explaining why she was texting with Jeffrey Epstein, and as
evidence will show, she ended up in this congressional hearing
(13:07):
getting texts from Epstein and then parroting questions with the
exact wording that Epstein prompted her with. So, who was
Jeffrey Epstein to Delegate Stacy Plaskett, Democrat, Virgin Islands, she explains,
And I got a.
Speaker 7 (13:24):
Text, okay from Jeffrey Epstein.
Speaker 3 (13:27):
Of course we all do. Who at the.
Speaker 7 (13:28):
Time was my constituent, who was not public knowledge at
that time that he was under federal investigation, and who
was sharing information with me?
Speaker 3 (13:44):
Why would you have a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein on
any level that's that intimate where you would be texting
in real time during a congressional hearing, and that he
would have the credibility pull with you to suggest that, Hey,
make sure you ask Michael this, and then you go
ahead and you ask Michael Cohen that. Why did he
(14:05):
have that stature with you personally? What was the nature
of that relationship? Delegate Stacy Plaskett. And while he might
not have been under federal investigation charges, et cetera, at
that point, he certainly had been on the state level
charged with sex crimes. That was known to be a
habitual sex offender. So that was all known. There's a
(14:27):
lot more that needs splain in here, and it's all
coming from one side, a King Jeffreys, Bill Clinton. Epstein
was an avowed Democrat. Trump cut ties with him entirely
once he found out what he was up to with
young female staffers that Trump had at mar A Lago,
and that Epstein was looking to lurk and poach and
(14:50):
steal and procure and manipulate these young women, take them
out of mar A Lago, bring them into his web
of deceit and evil, Trump warned him. Then Trump banned him,
and that was it. Now, why Trump was so resistant
to just come and clean on all of this and
releasing the files, and who cares? Come? What may? The
only explanation I have is that there may be friends
(15:13):
of his that he didn't want to implicate or embarrass,
or there may be names in there. And this is
a point that's been made on other radio shows, that
there might be names that aren't directly implicated, but the
mere mention of these names will be guilt by association,
and therefore there could be lawsuits in the wake of that. Well,
then let that come, just let it all hang out
(15:34):
and we'll see what happens. Well, we got some more
texts to get too, as you might imagine at five seven,
seven thirty nine, we need to go after these scumbags,
like Crow says, this texter hit them with sedition. And
it's the literal definition, is it not. You were calling
for our military to disregard the orders of their commander
in chief, point blank, and you're not specific. Therefore, you're
(15:58):
giving them that blanket advice that they should only pick
and choose, like from a cafeteria menu, the orders which
they like, and they should observe and they should follow.
But if they personally disagree and they feel, in my
estimation as an enlisted man, I don't want to follow
that order, I think it's illegal. Again, this is counter
to any and all training that an individual receives, bootcamp,
(16:23):
basic training. The whole chain of command thing is a
thing because it has to be in place in order
for the military to work to function. You can't have
at every level subordinate officers going you know what, I
think the sergeant's full of crap. I'm not gonna listen
to him. Could you imagine a military trying to operate
(16:44):
on that basis, because that's what this Pandora's box opens
it up to. No, you are in a chain of command.
You do as you're told, as you're ordered, if you
don't like it, if you dispute it, if you think
you're being given a wrong order. There is a remedy
for that, a process for that, but it's not in
the moment. You just choose. I shall not fight, sir.
(17:06):
I don't agree with the cause. This is madness. But
Jason Crow signed up for it, and so did Alyssa Slackin,
and so did Mark Kelly and a few other names
that we don't know, but those are the three big ones.
This is in all caps, Ryan. The only people getting
killed and shot are GOP. Well, it sure seems like
that side of the ledgers getting filled up pretty quick,
(17:28):
Charlie Kirk being most notable. Donald Trump. There was two
attempts on his life, one which clipped his ear with
a bullet the fields of Butler, Pennsylvania. Hello, many more
techs coming in. This from Bob in Ravada. Basic training
in the army used to include info concerning illegal orders.
You cannot be given an illegal order by a person
(17:49):
in charge. The reasons are obvious. I had basic training
in nineteen sixty Bob, You're obviously exactly right. No, I
have not gone through it. I only go on the
stories that I've had, and they're very colorful stories. For
my buddy Hutch in Florida and one time, this is
a little bit personal, but he was strange from his mom.
(18:09):
His mom abandoned him and his dad raised him in
the seventies when it wasn't a time there were a
lot of single dans out there, and eventually his mom
was passing away from cancers. He was in boot camp
and his commanding officers asked him, did you want to
go to Texas and visit your mom before she dies?
And he said no, Ho did he pay a heavy
price for that? You won't even go visit your own
mother who's dying. Get down to give me twenty And
(18:31):
he got all this kind of latrine duty and everything
else from it. But a lot of the other soldiers
marines in that case respected Hutch for that. And that's
what you get. That's basic training time out back with
Marryin Schueling live after these words.
Speaker 4 (18:51):
Now Trump threatened to have me arrested and executed simply
for reminding our service members so they're odes to follow
the constitution and to defend.
Speaker 3 (19:01):
The rule of law.
Speaker 4 (19:02):
I've taken many oaths throughout my life as a combat veteran,
a paratrooper, and Army ranger, and now as a member
of Congress. That is a lifetime oath for me. I
will never stop defending it and upholding that sacred obligation.
It's very telling that President Trump and those around him
think it's criminal simply for asking people to follow the law.
(19:24):
This moment requires moral clarity. Every American, regardless of your background,
should unite and reject his calls for political violence. This
is a moment that requires leadership. I intend to uphold
my obligation, my oath, and to lead.
Speaker 3 (19:41):
Don't give up the ship. You have contradicted that oath,
Representative Jason Crow by calling on members of our military
and intelligence community to disregard orders from the commander in
chief of the United States. Save me the SOBS story
Here and again, there was no following of the constitution
(20:03):
making clear which orders he viewed Jason Crow to be
illegal or unethical, even or immoral that Trump is issued,
either now so far, during the president's second term in
office as forty seven, or during all four years of
his presidency prior to that as forty five. This just in.
(20:29):
Jason Crow had another chance, after getting walloped by Martha
McCallum on Fox News, to be specific and crystal clear
and clarify exactly which orders he claims Trump is giving
that should be ignored disobeyed, this time with Elizabeth Vargas
(20:50):
of News Nation. She does a good job here. He
does not.
Speaker 9 (20:56):
You're a former paratrooper, army ranger. You know better than
most crucial to the chain of command is you say you
can refuse illegal orders, you must refuse illegal orders. What
exactly are you telling the soldiers to do? Stand up
and say no or quit No.
Speaker 4 (21:12):
We're telling the soldiers exactly what they're trained to do
in basic training.
Speaker 3 (21:15):
Like I just said, you.
Speaker 4 (21:17):
Have to follow the law, right, what does that mean?
It's really important, but above the change, it means you
follow the law. It means that if there's an unlawful order,
if you're asked to violate the constitution, you're not obligated
to do that.
Speaker 3 (21:29):
And let's use some.
Speaker 4 (21:30):
Examples, by the way, So Abu Gharab prison, right, there
were privates and junior enlisted who were ordered to do
things that were unlawful, and eleven of them ended up
being criminally prosecuted.
Speaker 3 (21:42):
Which administration did abu grad happen under? That was George W. Bush,
not Donald J. Trump.
Speaker 4 (21:50):
The Melai massacre in Vietnam where you had private Durst
and a warrant officer refused to massacre civilians. They were
the heroes of that moment, but they're commander, their lieutenant
Kelly actually ordered it and he went to prison. So
there are example after example in US military history.
Speaker 3 (22:08):
Of people that are.
Speaker 4 (22:10):
Asked to do things that are unlawful, usually almost always
involving committing violence or crimes against civilians.
Speaker 3 (22:19):
The Meli massacre took place on March sixteenth, nineteen sixty eight.
That would have been during the presidency of Lyndon Baines Johnson,
not Donald John Trump.
Speaker 4 (22:31):
That uniform personnel are obligated to refuse if it's out
in order to do. And we're concerned about this, Elizabeth.
We're concerned about this because of the rhetoric of this president.
Right that the President actually said, hey, can you shoot
these people in the leg during the Lafayette Square protests.
Speaker 3 (22:47):
That wasn't in order.
Speaker 4 (22:48):
We're going to go to show, right, And here this
president has a long history of saying nefarious and obvious things. Right,
But you don't ever wait until an order is actually
given to train people and tell them what their obligations.
Speaker 9 (23:05):
Are, so to be clear for to be clear cut.
Speaker 6 (23:09):
Right.
Speaker 9 (23:09):
But to be clear, congressman, you're not saying President Trump
has already given any illegal orders, are you.
Speaker 3 (23:18):
We're not talking about specific orders. That's exactly what we're
talking about, you fool. That's the only thing we're talking about.
What are you talking about I gotta hear that again,
are you nuts?
Speaker 7 (23:32):
Man?
Speaker 9 (23:32):
To be clear cut, right, But to be clear Congressman,
you're not saying President Trump has already given any illegal orders,
are you.
Speaker 3 (23:42):
We're not talking about specific orders. He can't possibly be
this stupid, but maybe he is. We're talking exactly about
specific illegal orders. Representative Crow. That is incumbent upon your position.
That is central to your argument as to why an
(24:04):
enlisted man or woman should think in every single moment,
this is what you're calling for. Play it out every
single moment. I got to think on my own is
this an illegal order? Is this constitutional? Now? All due respect,
but when David Tyson again, my buddy huts you I
know best enlisted into service for the United States Marine Corps.
(24:27):
He was not a college educated man. He enlisted at
the age of eighteen, He went through basic training, he
served his four years. Does he have a thorough knowledge
at that point in his educational development of the Constitution
in the United States and every amendment, every clause? Did
(24:48):
he take con law? Did he go through that? Well? No,
no he did not, nor should he be expected to.
An enlisted marine is given an order, and what your
saying representative Crow is that each and everyone should be
questioned in real time. Well, I don't know, is that
one illegal or legal? We don't have time for that crap.
(25:11):
Jason Crow, as a veteran Army ranger, should know better
than anybody. The Army Rangers are an elite force, like
the Navy Seals are. They're supposed to be the best
of the best, the smartest of the smart. This man's
a fool, and there's just no two ways around it.
(25:31):
Either that or he is so nefarious in his intent here,
which I am keeping in play that again, the end
justifies the means. It doesn't matter. It doesn't matter if
this is sound logic, principle, morality, ethics, law. It's simply
about undermining the authority and power of the President of
(25:53):
the United States and our commander in chief period. It's
a power grab by Democrats who are out of power,
and this is the only way that they can flail
their way back into it is by muddying the waters,
putting out this nebulous argument about well, he might say something.
That's another thing. What Donald Trump says in his capacity
(26:14):
as president has nothing to do with the orders he
gives to our military personnel as commander in chief, and
how that follows down the chain of command. There are
two entirely separate things. Whatever Donald Trump says out on
the campaign stump, whatever he says in a press conference,
that has no bearing on an order he may give
(26:35):
in a military capacity, like the attacks on the Iranian
nuclear facilities that were so successful, totally separate thing. Jason
Crow would have you believe that those things are conflated.
That when President Trump asks in a private meeting, why
can't we just shoot them in the legs? Now, that
(26:55):
might seem insane and you might disagree with it. He
did not give that order. The order would have been
shoot them in the lakes. I am telling you this.
I'm giving you an order as commander in chief. I
want you to shoot those protesters. Those demonstrators in the
lakes didn't do that. That didn't happen. That didn't happen.
Him pontificating or asking about it or theorizing about it
(27:17):
is not the same thing as giving an order. I
can't believe I have to explain this to an army ranger.
But again, I don't think he needs that explanation because
that doesn't matter to him. Oh, boy talk to George
Brockler about this yesterday. Would love to hear what g
brock has to say about what we just heard there,
final timeout, wrapping it all up, Ryan Shulding Live on
(27:40):
this Thursday edition. After this coming up here in a
few minutes, I'll be on the road heading up to
this special event in Fort Collins at day Spring Christian Church,
inviting you to join me along with Jennifer Say and
Aaron Lee and Aaron Friday and James Lindsey and doctor
Travis Morrell from Heartbreak to Hope protecting kids from irreversible
(28:04):
sex changes. There will be three petitions you can sign
there to put matters on the ballot, protecting kids from
those irreversible procedures and protecting girls and women sports and spaces. Again.
That's Dayspring Christian Church.
Speaker 6 (28:18):
Six to eight p m.
Speaker 3 (28:19):
Tonight, and I'll be heading out there in mirror moments
back here on Ryan Schuling Live. Lots of texts coming
in and along those lines. How about this one? Five, seven, seven,
three nine. Did you see another Pewter School district female
advisor got arrested today? How many is that? Now? I'm
so glad you brought that up Texter, because I'm going
to bring that up with Aaron Lee when I see
(28:40):
her in about two hours. Ryan Action encourage listeners to
call Crow and share thoughts. Yeah, you know, you can
find this number easily online through a Google search. Pretend
your Jasmin Crocketer or staff, but actually get the phone
number for Congressman Crow's office. Be politely, respectful, be forceful, though,
and let him know what you think of the video
(29:02):
that he contributed to calling on our enlisted members and
military personnel and intelligence personnel to disregard orders they think
are illegal or unconstitutional one by one. Benedict Arnold was
one of the greatest generals the American Revolution ever had,
but he was also a traitor to his country. Very
good point and historically accurate. Ryan, was Crow in a
(29:25):
arranger battalion or just another officer with a short tab
Ooh that's a little inside baseball. I got to ask
my friends who are in the know that are a
lot more informed on that than I am. I'm not
going to denigratee or question Representative Crow's military service. I
want to keep that separate. I just know he's behaving
like a buffoon right now. That much I do know
(29:48):
so you needed a little bit more research as to
what his actual role was. I believe he was in combat.
I have no reason to question that, Ryan. So the
crow is full of bs when caught. Yes, in this case,
very much so. Ryan loved the video. Have you ever
seen a few good men? You're damn right. I ordered
the code read Yeah, come on, Santiago, don't follow that order.
(30:13):
But that's not what he said. He wasn't. He mentioned
these two specific historical examples Abu Grab from the war
in Iraq, like twenty odd years ago during the Bush administration,
and then this other atrocity that took place in Vietnam
in nineteen sixty eight that would have been under LBJ.
So nothing having to do with Trump, just the warning
that it might. Trump says some mean things, and you
(30:35):
know you might have to question it. Now, what specific order,
Representative Crowe are you saying was illegal? It was not
about specific orders. I don't know what you're talking about.
Back to the Epstein topic from petty petty Ryan, I
think the congresswoman Stacey thought she was texting with her physician,
doctor Jeffrey. Well, he most certainly was not a physician.
(30:59):
But point taken, Ryan, maybe they wanted to wait until
timing would do damage the Democrats. The most who who
wanted to wait until then the Democrats themselves? This one again? Yep,
how did he have her cell number?
Speaker 6 (31:14):
Well?
Speaker 3 (31:15):
He was one of her constituents for Plasket, don't you know,
just another constituent like you or I might be if
we lived in the Virgin Islands. Good buying that. I
got some swamp land in Michigan to sell you. I
am off to Fort Collins, Dan Kaplis show his next
My thanks to Jesse Thomas for filming in for me
on the board there. I'll talk to you tomorrow right
(31:35):
side of Hollywood and Ryan Shuling live right here on
six point thirty kout
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang
Ding dong! Join your culture consultants, Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang, on an unforgettable journey into the beating heart of CULTURE. Alongside sizzling special guests, they GET INTO the hottest pop-culture moments of the day and the formative cultural experiences that turned them into Culturistas. Produced by the Big Money Players Network and iHeartRadio.
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.