April 23, 2025 • 33 mins
In the second hour of today's edition of Ryan Schuiling Live, Ryan discusses why you need to keep voting for Republicans to prevent PC Culture from encroaching further on your life.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Stephanie Rule MSNBC with Rain Wilson, also known as Dwight
Shreut from the Office.
Speaker 2 (00:06):
I actually thought he did a really nice job.
Speaker 1 (00:08):
In this podcast of posing some pretty pointed and directed
questions at her. But she dodged, and she dipped, and
she dove, and she followed all the rules of dodgeball,
not admitting any responsibility, not taking any accountability, not owning
why the mainstream media has lost its luster and appeal
(00:31):
with the average American voter and viewer. They don't own
any of it. According to her, there's a plot against
them that Steve Bannon led, that Elon Musk is spearheading
to direct people away from mainstream media.
Speaker 2 (00:44):
And toward X.
Speaker 1 (00:46):
She does not say that there's anything mainstream media is
doing wrong. They're just doing their jobs. I mean, this
is so laughable on its face that when you dig
down deeper, and we're gonna do that. Just like my
old class at Central Michigan University critiquing mass media was
a five h three level class, you are all going
(01:07):
to be students in the classroom as we break that down.
And what I've got to tell you is it's so
much worse now than it was thirty years ago.
Speaker 2 (01:16):
Wow, when I was in college and learning all of this.
There was media.
Speaker 1 (01:19):
Bias back then, and El rushbow Maha Rushi opened our
eyes to it.
Speaker 2 (01:26):
He certainly did. But we're Rush alive today, and he only.
Speaker 1 (01:31):
Died a few years ago, so it had gotten plenty worse,
especially during the Trump years, and he was around for those.
But I can only imagine what he would be saying
in response and reaction to Stephanie rule.
Speaker 2 (01:43):
They don't get it.
Speaker 1 (01:45):
They are so high on their own supply, They are
so reverberating in their own echo chambers. They don't step
outside to go look, wait a minute, what could we
do better? What are we doing wrong? Where are we
falling short? Let's look within. Nope, nope, no pointing the
finger to everybody else. It's people that want to disconnect
(02:07):
that are subject to misinformation. Every analysis should get gives
is practically warped and wrong. But we'll get into more
of that in just a little bit, because I want
to get to your text. Five seven, seven thirty nine,
David says, I rooted for the Lions once the Broncos
were out. I agree they should go back to being
the Redskins. You know, this is one of those issues
(02:30):
where it's the whole Frank Sinatra Sinatra group sketch Phil
Hartman SNL that I love so much.
Speaker 2 (02:35):
You had me, then you lost me.
Speaker 1 (02:38):
I was willing. Maybe looking back, this was stupid of me.
I should have known better. I looked at the Redskins. Well,
I can see that's offensive. Maybe we give on that one.
But nope, they didn't stop there. They wouldn't stop there.
Now the Cleveland Indians are the Guardians. And how dumb
is that. My dad, who voted for Biden, doesn't realize, Dad,
(02:59):
you voted for that.
Speaker 2 (03:01):
Well, I don't like Trump.
Speaker 1 (03:03):
You voted for whatever. This is this crap, that's what
you voted for. There's nothing, in my mind offensive about Indians.
You can say the Chief Wahoo logo is a caricature
that's offensive. You could say that the Redskins logo I
just looked this up was based on the Buffalo nickel
(03:24):
design and was redesigned in nineteen seventy two by Walter Wetzel,
who was a leader of the Blackfoot Confederacy. This was
a tribute to Native Americans, and even Native Americans themselves.
Tribes have come out in the aftermath of going to
the very banal and bland Washington Commanders. I mean, oh,
these names are guardians Commanders.
Speaker 2 (03:48):
Now, now i've my pendulum has swung all the way back.
You know.
Speaker 1 (03:54):
I love the I hate the Chiefs, but I love
that they have the name the Chiefs. I love that
it's Arrowhead Stadium. I love that they do a tomahawk chop,
and I love that they do it in Atlanta for
the Braves, and God help us if we lose the Braves.
This is a tribute to Native Americans. You don't name
your team after a mascot or whatever. A team name
(04:14):
that's denigrating. You want your team to be awesome. My
teams are named after cats, the lions, the tigers. They
are fierce animals in the jungle. I love them. The
Cowboys the opposite, it would be the Native Americans, the Indians,
the Redskins, the Braves, the Chiefs. They were named after
(04:35):
Native Americans to honor them. The one that really gets
me riled up the most was our former rival of mine.
Now where I come from, Central Michigan University is working
hand in hand with the neighboring Saginaw Chippewa Indian tribe
of Michigan.
Speaker 2 (04:54):
They are the Chippewas. We fire up as chippiwas.
Speaker 1 (04:59):
We work in conjunct with the tribe with the Casino
is a sponsor of athletics there. The tribe loves it.
Ojibwa is taught on Central Michigan's campus. The legacy and
the pride of the Chippewa tribe is taught at Central
Michigan University. It is perpetuated and how it is presented
(05:20):
in the athletic department. They don't use a lot of
the imagery that you'll see at Florida State University with
the Seminoles, with the Native American riding out on the
horse and the flaming spear and all that. But the
Seminole tribe.
Speaker 2 (05:32):
Loves it, loves it. So who's making these decisions and
for whom? The one that bothers me that I.
Speaker 1 (05:40):
Just referenced Eastern Michigan University and former rival of my
Central Michigan Chippewas, and they, the Eastern Michigan Hurons, changed
their name to the lame and played out and everybody
has it Eagles. They were the Hurons.
Speaker 2 (05:56):
What is offensive.
Speaker 1 (05:57):
There's a lake called Lake Huron Huron is a tribe
just like the Chippewa tribe, just like the Seminole tribe.
But what happened was Eastern Michigan is located in a
town called Ipsilani. It neighbors and Arbor, and Arbor is horrible,
and Arbor is the equivalent in Michigan of what boulder
(06:20):
is here. And you know what I'm talking about. These
liberal they are smarter than you, they are better than you,
and they know more than you, and they know what's
better for you. And they made this decision in Washington
County where both universities reside, Eastern Michigan and the University
of Michigan are next door neighbors. And these ann Arborites
(06:43):
had no connection to the Huron tribe, had no conversations
with the Huron tribe, but made that decision because it
was at a time where we're just going to root
out all of these offensive Native American references to names,
and we're gonna slap eagles on there.
Speaker 2 (06:57):
Get this.
Speaker 1 (06:59):
Members that descend from the Huron tribe in southeastern Lower
Michigan tried to band together to fight against this. But
unlike the Chippewa tribe, which remains largely intact. The Huron
tribe had split off. There's a lot of different tribes,
as you know, across the United States, but even within
the state of Michigan. You have the Huron Tribe, you
have the Potawatamie Tribe, you have the Chippewa tribe, you
(07:21):
have the Ottawa tribe.
Speaker 2 (07:23):
And there was no.
Speaker 1 (07:24):
Leadership left of the Huron tribe as it had once
existed to express an opinion on the matter. So they
went right ahead and bulldozed through with it. Who is
that good for? Who does it help to remove the
Native American woman from the Land of Lakes logo? Who's
that help? It's a raisure of a culture? And why
(07:45):
would we do that? And I asked a question again,
why would a team, professional, college, high school, otherwise name
their team to mock a group.
Speaker 2 (07:55):
You don't do that.
Speaker 1 (07:56):
You want to root your team on, You want to
think they're awesome, soaring birds like eagles and falcons, cats
of the jungle, light lions and tigers, the bears. Oh my,
in Chicago, this is one I have been pushed way
to the opposite side now because the leftists took this
and they took it too far, and I just love
(08:18):
that the Seminole tribe down in Florida. I mean they
are all about it. They're like put on the war paying,
put on the headdress, throw the spear, have it be
on fire, ride a horse into the stadium.
Speaker 2 (08:29):
They love it. So who are we to go? Well,
you know, with my coastal.
Speaker 1 (08:34):
Liberal elite education and the higher realms of the IVY League,
I have determined it's not good for you. Think about
how crazy this is. The Seminole tribe thinks it's remarkably
terrific that Florida State University embraces their tribe, their culture,
(08:55):
their name, everything about it. So if they like it
and you don't, liberal person ann Arbor, Boulder, wherever, I
don't care your opinion means nothing. That's their tribe. This
is I'm totally lost on this one. Sorry I went
(09:16):
off on a tangent. Patty asked Ryan thoughts on Sanders
in the draft talking about Shaduer. I have seen varying
accounts he could go anywhere from number three overall to
the New York Giants or slip all the way into
the second round. There are concerns I think about his
durability long term, his overall skill level, arm strength. He's
(09:38):
a talented guy, he's a smart guy, but will his
game translate to the NFL level. Here's my cursory knowledge
of what I observed with Shadur Sanders and what I
was frustrated by on behalf of all you Colorado fans,
and maybe Zach has an opinion here too, but what
I noticed about first of all, he had terrible offensive
lines here.
Speaker 2 (09:55):
For the most part at Colorado.
Speaker 1 (09:58):
Dion was able to improve it offensive line dramatically from
year one to year two, but year.
Speaker 2 (10:03):
One was abysmal. But I think what should do.
Speaker 1 (10:07):
Or had was he had kind of happy feet because
of that, and he was lost in the pocket and
he was chased around, and he was used to fighting
for his life. And what he does is he tries
to keep a play alive for far too long, Like
it's second down to thirteen and you roll out of
the pocket, and sometimes just for the short term, you
take the l throw it out of bounds, live to
(10:29):
fight another play.
Speaker 2 (10:30):
But he'll ramble and scramble.
Speaker 1 (10:32):
And back up twenty yards and chuck it down the
field and either it's intercepted or then he gets sacked
for like a twenty five yard loss or something that
happened way more often than it shows.
Speaker 2 (10:41):
Zach, you know what I'm talking about with that.
Speaker 3 (10:43):
Yeah, absolutely, I think he just doesn't have the high
end athleticism to be able to create after I guess,
create off script once the play breaks down. You know,
he doesn't play like you might expect Dion Sanders kid
at quarterback to play.
Speaker 2 (10:59):
You know, you might.
Speaker 3 (10:59):
Expect a crazy athlete, super fascin. He's not that guy.
Speaker 2 (11:03):
And I think the.
Speaker 3 (11:04):
Problem really arises where he tries to write checks. His
body just can't catch off him where it's bailing out
the back of the pocket, which is a big no no,
even if you are an elite athlete. And he'll try
and throw past his fading away and he has a
good arm, but it's definitely not a great arm, as
we can't afford to take anything off it.
Speaker 1 (11:23):
Here's the thing about Shadoor. Though he only needs one
team to believe in him in the draft from three
on down, he won't be taken top two. But my
experience in watching the NFL draft, and we'll talk about
this with Ryan Edwards tomorrow, quarterback stock almost always goes up,
especially late right before the teams get a little antsy
they really need a quarterback.
Speaker 2 (11:44):
And even if they at the.
Speaker 1 (11:45):
Reach, you'll see these quarterbacks like Will Levis remember him
from the Tennessee Titans. Well, Tennessee looks like they're going
to be replacing him at the top of the draft.
But they get nervous and antsy and kind of itchy
trigger finger to get a quarterback. But he sir, he's
a rand as a third rounder on our board. Take
(12:05):
the quarterback, take sure or Sanders. I think that might
happen tomorrow.
Speaker 3 (12:08):
I think it could be especially bad this time around
because recency bias, which GM's fall victim to. You look
at last year, what were the two reaches at quarterback,
Michael Pennox and bow Knicks. Both those franchises are now
very happy they reached on those quarterbacks. I think it
will lead to some team going out, who cares we
have a second third round grade on this guy.
Speaker 2 (12:26):
That's what everyone said about bo Nicks.
Speaker 1 (12:29):
I got to be honest, and I'm not just kind
of crowing about myself here. I liked the bo Nicks
pick when it was made. I'm like, you know, this
is a sneaky, kind of savvy pick. I liked what
he did at Oregon. He had the flick to your point,
the frame, the athleticism, the arm, and the fact that
he felt to Denver. It made sense to take him there.
And boy are the Broncos glad they did. He transformed
(12:50):
the franchise. I love watching him.
Speaker 2 (12:52):
He's only going to get better too.
Speaker 1 (12:53):
There's a reason to be very optimistic for Broncos fans
with him when they struck gold with bo Nicks in
so many ways.
Speaker 2 (13:00):
So to most.
Speaker 1 (13:01):
Some more texts full of the year talking about Cecilia.
Speaker 4 (13:06):
You're breaking my heart, you're shaking my confidence daily Espinoza. Yeah,
little Simon and Garfunkle for you what Zach doesn't even know.
Speaker 2 (13:17):
Who this is. I know, my Simon.
Speaker 1 (13:21):
I think you made me feel better there. But that's yeah,
she doesn't even deserve that song reference. Good golly, what
has happened to Colorado? They're not sending their best. That
was Russ Waldman's point in a text to me in
the fourth District. And otherwise, I mean, you see some
of these bills presented and how they're written and who
wrote them. I used to think, Oh, I would never
(13:41):
be in Congress or the state legislature. I mean those people,
they have Ivy League degrees and their lawyers.
Speaker 2 (13:47):
And they're so much smarter than me.
Speaker 1 (13:49):
When it comes to the now, I'm like, uh, okay, no, no,
they are not. They're not smarter than me. They're not
smarter than you. They're not smarter than Zach. I would
vote for Zach no matter what race he ran in
against some of these absolute fools. And the word is
not strong enough Ryan. Don't they say the state has
no authority to end child mutilation as in Florida, to
(14:13):
end it the state are you talking about, like states
like Florida, Colorado, Texas, or the state as in the
nation federal law. Trump's already done an executive order on
along these lines, but you're ride until it's codified in
the Constitution Act of Congress, passing through both the House
(14:34):
and the Senate, signed into law by President Trump. Then
they wouldn't have that kind of binding effect like we
saw in the United Kingdom where it's been banned. You
cannot do transgender surgeries anymore, hormone therapies on youth.
Speaker 2 (14:48):
Stephen Littleton.
Speaker 1 (14:49):
Just when we were wondering what the Colorado Dems would
do next, Yeah, there's no bottom.
Speaker 2 (14:55):
There's a representative Scott.
Speaker 1 (14:56):
Bottoms, and he can't join us say just let me
know via text, but we hope to have him on
the show shortly. But there's no bottom of the depths
that the Democrats are sinking to with these horrible ideas.
Speaker 2 (15:06):
But until they're.
Speaker 1 (15:07):
Checked, you know the how the old song go check
yourself before you wreck yourself. They're not gonna wreck themselves
because they keep winning elections. So as long as they win,
they're getting like very fat cat syndrome high.
Speaker 2 (15:18):
On the hog, just veering violently to the left.
Speaker 1 (15:22):
But unless they're until there are any consequences politically, they're
just gonna keep doing it.
Speaker 2 (15:26):
Why wouldn't they?
Speaker 1 (15:28):
I mean, this is like the bizarro Handmaid's Tale pendulum
swing to the left, which I was talking about this
with my fiance Kelsey. She likes that show. I've watched
it bits and pieces because she watched I'm like, why
do you watch this, honey, you're a conservative? But her
now'll hear me out. Her contention is the reason the
(15:48):
Handmaid's Tail happened. That that kind of dystopian universe of
you know, misogyny and patriarchy, etc. Was that was a
reaction apparently to a violent shift way to the left,
and it just overcorrected. That was her explanation to me, Patty,
Now do Hunter in the draft? Travis Hunter is going
(16:09):
number two. I think that's pretty much etched in stone Zach.
Would you agree with that?
Speaker 3 (16:14):
Yes, he's minus three hundred right now to go there
to Cleveland.
Speaker 1 (16:17):
The Browns, poor Travis. Oh, you know, the Lions are bad.
But you know, I grew up in southeastern Michigan. So
when I watched the Lions on the NFC feed, this
was a CDs back in the day, the Browns were
on the NBC feed out of Toledo.
Speaker 2 (16:32):
So I'm like, well, I like the Browns.
Speaker 1 (16:34):
And then what happened was they got their heads kicked
in repeatedly by the Denver Broncos. And that was when
they were good. The Browns in the eighties some of the.
Speaker 3 (16:43):
Most heart breaking AFC Championship losses ever.
Speaker 2 (16:46):
I mean, everyone remembers to Drive. I think the fumble
is worse.
Speaker 3 (16:50):
He would have walked in and bought they game for them.
If the wall doesn't pop out right there on like
the one two yard line.
Speaker 1 (16:55):
Could you imagine poor Erners biner. First of all, he fumbled.
He lives in infamy in Cleveland. But had that happened
in this age with social media and the cable networks ESPN.
Speaker 2 (17:08):
Yeah, that was not good.
Speaker 1 (17:10):
This is interesting and this should open it up for
more conversation. From a text to Ryan as a plumber,
women's restrooms are far worse than guys. Okay, let me
open this up because I have done this, chivalrous, says
I am.
Speaker 2 (17:27):
Sometimes you go to a bar or a.
Speaker 1 (17:28):
Big event, sporting event, outdoor event, and the line for
the women's room is invariably longer than the guys. Sometimes
there's no line for the guys. Sometimes there's nobody in
the guy's restroom. And I have, on occasion had a
young lady come up to me and this is my
way of flirting, maybe, but in ask and then I
kind of watch out for them as they use the
(17:50):
men's restroom.
Speaker 2 (17:51):
So, ladies, I.
Speaker 1 (17:53):
Know you've done this, don't pretend like you haven't, and
don't lie. Just tell the truth. But in those experiences
you compare a men's restroom if you have observed it,
and I know the urinals will freak you out.
Speaker 2 (18:04):
Because what do I oh, can't use that.
Speaker 1 (18:08):
Is it cleaner and better in a men's restroom than
a women's. This plumber contends the women's are worse. I
can think of reasons, and I won't get into scant
detail on this as to why.
Speaker 2 (18:19):
That might be.
Speaker 1 (18:20):
But guys are guys, and we're a lot sloppier, and
we're a lot less hygienic, and we just kind of oh,
that's literally, the noise are bague.
Speaker 2 (18:31):
I wash my hands every time. I want you to
know that five seven seven three nine. Send your text along.
More Brian schuling live after this.
Speaker 5 (18:43):
Under English common law it was recognized that the care
of all infants is lodged in the king as parents
patriari and by the king this care is delegated to
the court of chancery. In protecting neglected and dependent children,
chancery courts use what are called equitable powers, the essentral
ideas of which our flexibility, guardianship and the balancing of
(19:04):
interest in the general welfare, with a view to getting
a fair result than could be obtained by applying applying
older and more rigid roles. So the notion that parents
have rights have always reigned supreme is not in our
English Sex and history, but rather that there was always
a recognition that the state had an interest in protecting
the rights of.
Speaker 2 (19:24):
Children English Sex, and that was balanced.
Speaker 5 (19:27):
By the best interest of the child doctrine which we
see in much of the case which my colleague from
Denver referred to, which balances the rights of the parents
and the child. In this other context of issues, and
in light of all of that, and my knowledge of
the history of how those rights of children have been
balanced over time, I would just I will have to
say that I will be a known tonight.
Speaker 1 (19:48):
I love my father. I grew up respecting my father.
I didn't fear him, but I think I would tell
you I had a healthy fear of him, like you,
didn't want to piss him off. It took a lot,
but when he was mad, okay, now it's time to
settle down.
Speaker 2 (20:05):
If he was presented with this notion.
Speaker 1 (20:07):
That we need to balance the rights of children with
the rights of parents, so you go, I got your
balance right here, and he take.
Speaker 2 (20:13):
His belt off and snap. You feel balanced right now?
Speaker 6 (20:16):
Right?
Speaker 1 (20:17):
Like all right, yes, very much so, sir, I am
balanced and gonna sit down and pipe down. No, children
do not have nor should they have equal rights to
their parents. That's madness. You're a kid. Shut up, you're
a dumb kid. I mean, you're always be dumb.
Speaker 2 (20:37):
I was a dumb kid. We all were dumb kids.
Speaker 1 (20:41):
We needed our parents to guide us, to reprimand us
and yes, to punish us when we stepped out of
line and did wrong.
Speaker 2 (20:50):
There's nothing wrong with that. There is a scene in
Step Brothers.
Speaker 1 (20:57):
Yes I'm referencing that movie, but go back and watch
it where the father explains to John c Riley and
Will Ferrell that they can't just be whatever they want
to be. That when he was a kid, he wanted
to be a dinosaur, and he thought he was a dinosaur.
But it's not up to a parent to go you
know what, what do you want to be a Bronosaurus
or a Torontosaurus rex. No, you're a kid, dummy. This
(21:21):
is just like the whole furry crap. Oh, well, you
have to put a litter box in the restroom with
the second grade class. So this kid thinks they're a cat. No, okay,
the best thing for that kid in that instance, You're
not a cat. Stop being stupid. You're a little girl
or a little boy. Knock it off. You're trying to
get attention. We're not going to give it to you.
Speaker 2 (21:43):
Does that sound harsh?
Speaker 1 (21:46):
That sounds like what I would have been told when
I was in second and third grade. You're not a cat.
End of story, end of discussion. We're not playing into
your fantasy. That's stupid.
Speaker 2 (21:57):
But now that's.
Speaker 1 (21:58):
Being like green lighted, validated. Oh, Kyle Clark, this is
where he goes full comrade, Kyle. Oh, it's marginalizing kids
that are already that they're out of phase, maybe they're
maybe they have problems.
Speaker 2 (22:10):
Doesn't make them a cat, doesn't make them a dog.
Doesn't mean we.
Speaker 1 (22:13):
Need to acknowledge or affirm that. Ever, it's madness I
had to get. I'm sorry I didn't have this for you,
but I'm gonna I'm gonna do it tomorrow. I'm gonna
dedicate myself to you in this cause the scene from
Billy Madison where he gives this long answer about the
dog in the debate, the puppy, the puppy who found
(22:38):
its home, and.
Speaker 2 (22:41):
You're thinking you're watching it. Oh, that's an inspirational answer. Yeah,
it makes a lot of sense. Okay, life is like that.
Speaker 1 (22:47):
No, no, it was rejected and he was told that's
the most insanely idiotic thing I have ever heard. I
reward you no points, and may God have mercy on
your soul. That's what Cecilia Espinoza deserves after that outlandish
comment citing the example of the patriarchal British monarchy. Everything
(23:09):
we're supposed to be against. But no, that is the
gold standard for children's rights, that the king had the
rights and the parents parents here, you're just parents.
Speaker 2 (23:19):
What do you think you made the kids?
Speaker 7 (23:20):
So?
Speaker 2 (23:20):
What this war on parents?
Speaker 1 (23:23):
I'm telling you, democrats, I hate to do you any favors,
but you keep going down this road. You saw what
happened in Virginia with Glenn Youngkin. Let's wait and see
what happens here. You keep going down this road of
attacking parents, of declaring them the enemy, of declaring war
on them.
Speaker 2 (23:43):
It will not end well for you politically. It just won't.
Speaker 1 (23:47):
Here's another great one five seven, seven, three nine. Ryan
in the south Park show, Randy turned himself into a
dolphin because he thought he wanted to be a dolphin.
Speaker 2 (23:54):
Yees.
Speaker 1 (23:55):
South Park handles this whole issue very well. They had
another excellent episode in which it's obviously Randy macho man savage,
this is who this character that they portrays and tribute to,
and macho man with a beard.
Speaker 6 (24:09):
And Oh Year the sunglasses, Oh Year a here to
Wan all the women's events, participates and destroys every woman
in his path, and the whole episode is about this.
Speaker 1 (24:23):
You're right then, that's was South Park's take on it.
But now it's become real life. We have to validate this. No, no,
we don't.
Speaker 2 (24:35):
Some of their nine and I'm not gonna make sure
we got to this too.
Speaker 1 (24:38):
They're talking about it on Fox News right now on
the five, which here airs at the three because there's
a Mountain time, not Eastern time. But Stephanie Rule gets
so many things wrong here and just has no level
of self awareness none. And here's her take on why
people have lost faith in the mainstream media news.
Speaker 8 (24:57):
You know what I want people to do?
Speaker 2 (24:59):
No, I don't.
Speaker 8 (24:59):
I just really want people to be informed and engaged.
Speaker 7 (25:03):
I'm not asking people to go out and rally or protest,
but like even this idea of like I'm disconnecting.
Speaker 8 (25:10):
I don't want to be part of the news on that.
Speaker 9 (25:11):
It's right, that's one of my that's one of my things.
Speaker 8 (25:15):
And I'm saying, don't disconnection. That's what they want you
to do.
Speaker 2 (25:18):
Is a big movement towards that turn off the news.
Speaker 7 (25:20):
Yeah, a big move towards being uninformed.
Speaker 1 (25:23):
No, no, you inform us with crap, Stephanie Rule. You
have an agenda, you have a political predisposition. What I
would challenge you as the class for critiquing mass media
five O three is to have a piece of paper.
Speaker 2 (25:36):
Yeah, we still have paper and maybe a.
Speaker 1 (25:38):
Pen and draw a quadrant so like across on the
whole piece of paper, so there's an upper left and
upper right, a lower left and lower right.
Speaker 2 (25:47):
And go through and watch Stephanie Rules program.
Speaker 1 (25:49):
Watch hers and she's the one bringing this up on MSNBC,
And tell me how many stories that she presents to
the audience. Use your own judgment, however you think it's presented.
Is pro Trump, anti Trump, or pro dem antidem and
marvel at the graph that you create. She is biased,
(26:11):
she is slanted, she has an agenda, she has an
opinion that she injects into.
Speaker 2 (26:15):
Her news coverage.
Speaker 1 (26:16):
It's the same criticism I offer up of comrade Kyle.
Kyle Clark is a leftist, a dedicated leftist. That's fine,
but be honest with your audience and just come right
out and say it like I tell you every day.
You know, I support Donald Trump. I have a collage
of conservative, libertarian, populist viewpoints on most issues.
Speaker 2 (26:37):
And I'm going to tell you what I think. And
I'm going to tell you that I have, yes.
Speaker 1 (26:41):
A political predisposition and opinion as a show host. But
they Stephanie Rule, Kyle Clark, and so many others are
trying to tell you sell you this bill of goods
that they're calling it balls and strikes. They're shooting right
down the middle. They don't even just admitted that the
coverage of Donald Trump on MSNBC is overwhelmingly negative. Doesn't
(27:05):
mean you have to go all the way in the
other direction like a lot of Fox News hosts do,
and I do. I mostly approve of Donald Trump's policies
and his way of getting there. That's why I voted
for him. That's why I supported him. But I'm telling
you that I'm telling you that they're not. Rain Wilson again,
Dwight Shrut from the office confronts her again on this
(27:30):
distrust in.
Speaker 2 (27:31):
The media, the institutions of.
Speaker 9 (27:33):
Our day of Americans don't trust mainstream media.
Speaker 2 (27:38):
Why is that? How did we get here?
Speaker 7 (27:39):
Listen, we are seeing a huge loss in trust of all.
Speaker 8 (27:42):
Of our institutions.
Speaker 7 (27:43):
It's the media, it's medicine, it's banking. It's a huge
problem because when you think about democracy and all of
these pillars, they need to stand tall, they need to
stand strong, and sort of losing that trust is not
by accident, it's by design by who. If you remember
when President Trump was running the first time, Steve Bannon
(28:05):
once said, the goal is to blow the whole thing up.
Speaker 8 (28:08):
And so I think that you've got.
Speaker 7 (28:11):
Mistakes made or things starting to slip, while at the
same time there's a concerted effort to destroy the media,
because the media, that the news media is, in my opinion,
the last slide of defense.
Speaker 8 (28:23):
Oh of holding power accountable.
Speaker 1 (28:26):
You don't hold power accountable when it's on the left.
That's my whole criticism. Be as rigid and adversarial as
you want to be against the Orange Man on Trump,
that's fine.
Speaker 2 (28:36):
That is the role of the mainstream media.
Speaker 1 (28:38):
You are correct, but you don't do it against Nancy Pelosi,
Chuck Schumer, a Keen, Jeffries Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, you
don't do it, it's not done, and that you ascribe all
this power and influence to Steve Bannon, that somehow he
turned all of America. Do you how many people know
(28:59):
who Steve Bannon is? That's like a list high information
voters who are very conservative that pay attention to him,
or are very liberal and hate him. The average voter,
I could tell you, does not know or care who
Steve Bannon is.
Speaker 8 (29:17):
And you had a bit of.
Speaker 7 (29:18):
A perfect storm, right President Trump won and tons of
people were shocked or angry or frustrated, and they're tuning out.
And at the same time you have the Elon Musk
media machine because they want you to leave traditional media
and they want you to go to x which is
a bastion of misinformation or there is no fact checking.
Speaker 8 (29:37):
So it's a perfect storm of.
Speaker 7 (29:39):
People saying, I'm angry, I'm frustrated, I'm tuning out, I'm disconnecting.
Speaker 1 (29:45):
Okay, misinformation from which direction? For her, it all comes
from the right, none of it comes from the left.
The lift doesn't engage in or traffic in misinformation. Fact
checkers who do they fact check? Where do those fact
checks always come down. It's against the right and for
the left.
Speaker 8 (30:01):
And then you have a force, yeah, pushing it.
Speaker 7 (30:04):
And but even in the last two weeks, what we
need to do is just cover what's.
Speaker 8 (30:10):
Happening in America.
Speaker 2 (30:11):
You don't do that right.
Speaker 7 (30:13):
We have to cover Democrats trying to figure out what
their lane is and how they're going to get back
on their feet, and we have to simply cover what
this White House is doing. And I think if we
do that right, there's that saying, you know, trust is
gained in rain drops, and it's lost in buckets.
Speaker 1 (30:29):
Oh, you lost a lot of buckets, and even rain
Wilson says, well, well, hold on.
Speaker 9 (30:33):
This is where I would push back when I see
this kind of insight and passion being directed at the
current administration and the lack of this kind of insight
and passion being directed at the previous administration, and.
Speaker 2 (30:47):
Go where again.
Speaker 9 (30:48):
I'm not talking about you, I'm talking about left leaning
news media organizations.
Speaker 2 (30:52):
Yeah, we're kind of like la la la la la.
Evening's fine. Look the environments, I mean.
Speaker 9 (30:57):
Look, the economy's great, la la la, immigrations that much
of a problem, and really being Cleopatra Queen of denial.
Speaker 2 (31:05):
Thank you boom.
Speaker 1 (31:06):
Yeah, but wait, she admits nothing I would put back
on immigration.
Speaker 7 (31:11):
I can specifically remember when Greg Abbott of Pastis and
Ron DeSantis of Florida sent those buses of migrants to
different cities, different parts of the country, which ended up
being politically genius for both of them. The media regularly
talked about the fact that Biden was not doing enough
(31:32):
in his first two and a half years on immigration,
even though in the last year and a half you're
seeing the numbers go down. He just wasn't doing enough,
and you saw it in how people voted. You had
places like the Bronx, you had places like New Jersey,
people who said I'm not happy with immigration in this country,
and that's why Democrats are scrambling to recalibrate now.
Speaker 8 (31:50):
But I do think that was covered, was it.
Speaker 2 (31:54):
And how was it covered?
Speaker 1 (31:55):
MSNBC Land baseded abb and DeSantis for that stunt, and
it was more more than a stunt. It proved a point,
and she's right, it was politically genius. A timeout wrapping
it all up, Ryan Schuling Live when we come back
after this and Sheriff Steve Reems filling in for Dan
Kaplis once again. Today's got some great guests on tap,
(32:17):
including Britta Horn. I believe I studio chair of the
Colorado Republican Party, so you'll want to stay tuned for that.
To the text we go five seven, seven thirty nine.
This one says, Ryan, you nailed it in the comrade,
Kyle Rant. Maybe they have problems, fix the blank and
problem and don't make it a problem for everyone else.
That every individual deserves that attention and mental health is
(32:39):
the greatest crisis we have in this country that not
only kids but adults don't have somebody to talk to
to talk through issues, problems, they're having thoughts that are
obsessing them. And I think that can do a whole
heck of a lot of good. You're absolutely right.
Speaker 2 (32:55):
Kimberly says.
Speaker 1 (32:55):
Unfortunately, our generation gen X have created two more generations
of pan that were never smacked around enough because they
didn't uphold the discipline we grew up with. I've never
understood that, Kimberly. And yeah, I think there are some
gen X parents who are at fault here. Not all
of us, though, And if I am a parent, and
there's a chance I might be, I'll be a similar
dad to my own father. And like I said, this
(33:17):
is very important. I was never afraid of my father.
I didn't live in fear of him shaking in my boots.
But I was afraid to make it a mad and
that's a healthy fear. He don't want kids just rolling
over their parents willie nilly hither and yon telling them
what to do.
Speaker 2 (33:33):
No, kids only have.
Speaker 1 (33:35):
Rights so far as the parents who care about them
allow them to have rights. And that's not infringing on
the rights of kids. That's making sure they stay alive,
including me when I was a young one.
Speaker 2 (33:48):
Stay tuned.
Speaker 1 (33:48):
Sheriff Steve Raims Weld County next filling in for Dan Caplis,
I'll talk to you tomorrow on Ryan Schrewling Live
Stephanie Rule MSNBC with Rain Wilson, also known as Dwight
Shreut from the Office.
Speaker 2 (00:06):
I actually thought he did a really nice job.
Speaker 1 (00:08):
In this podcast of posing some pretty pointed and directed
questions at her. But she dodged, and she dipped, and
she dove, and she followed all the rules of dodgeball,
not admitting any responsibility, not taking any accountability, not owning
why the mainstream media has lost its luster and appeal
(00:31):
with the average American voter and viewer. They don't own
any of it. According to her, there's a plot against
them that Steve Bannon led, that Elon Musk is spearheading
to direct people away from mainstream media.
Speaker 2 (00:44):
And toward X.
Speaker 1 (00:46):
She does not say that there's anything mainstream media is
doing wrong. They're just doing their jobs. I mean, this
is so laughable on its face that when you dig
down deeper, and we're gonna do that. Just like my
old class at Central Michigan University critiquing mass media was
a five h three level class, you are all going
(01:07):
to be students in the classroom as we break that down.
And what I've got to tell you is it's so
much worse now than it was thirty years ago.
Speaker 2 (01:16):
Wow, when I was in college and learning all of this.
There was media.
Speaker 1 (01:19):
Bias back then, and El rushbow Maha Rushi opened our
eyes to it.
Speaker 2 (01:26):
He certainly did. But we're Rush alive today, and he only.
Speaker 1 (01:31):
Died a few years ago, so it had gotten plenty worse,
especially during the Trump years, and he was around for those.
But I can only imagine what he would be saying
in response and reaction to Stephanie rule.
Speaker 2 (01:43):
They don't get it.
Speaker 1 (01:45):
They are so high on their own supply, They are
so reverberating in their own echo chambers. They don't step
outside to go look, wait a minute, what could we
do better? What are we doing wrong? Where are we
falling short? Let's look within. Nope, nope, no pointing the
finger to everybody else. It's people that want to disconnect
(02:07):
that are subject to misinformation. Every analysis should get gives
is practically warped and wrong. But we'll get into more
of that in just a little bit, because I want
to get to your text. Five seven, seven thirty nine,
David says, I rooted for the Lions once the Broncos
were out. I agree they should go back to being
the Redskins. You know, this is one of those issues
(02:30):
where it's the whole Frank Sinatra Sinatra group sketch Phil
Hartman SNL that I love so much.
Speaker 2 (02:35):
You had me, then you lost me.
Speaker 1 (02:38):
I was willing. Maybe looking back, this was stupid of me.
I should have known better. I looked at the Redskins. Well,
I can see that's offensive. Maybe we give on that one.
But nope, they didn't stop there. They wouldn't stop there.
Now the Cleveland Indians are the Guardians. And how dumb
is that. My dad, who voted for Biden, doesn't realize, Dad,
(02:59):
you voted for that.
Speaker 2 (03:01):
Well, I don't like Trump.
Speaker 1 (03:03):
You voted for whatever. This is this crap, that's what
you voted for. There's nothing, in my mind offensive about Indians.
You can say the Chief Wahoo logo is a caricature
that's offensive. You could say that the Redskins logo I
just looked this up was based on the Buffalo nickel
(03:24):
design and was redesigned in nineteen seventy two by Walter Wetzel,
who was a leader of the Blackfoot Confederacy. This was
a tribute to Native Americans, and even Native Americans themselves.
Tribes have come out in the aftermath of going to
the very banal and bland Washington Commanders. I mean, oh,
these names are guardians Commanders.
Speaker 2 (03:48):
Now, now i've my pendulum has swung all the way back.
You know.
Speaker 1 (03:54):
I love the I hate the Chiefs, but I love
that they have the name the Chiefs. I love that
it's Arrowhead Stadium. I love that they do a tomahawk chop,
and I love that they do it in Atlanta for
the Braves, and God help us if we lose the Braves.
This is a tribute to Native Americans. You don't name
your team after a mascot or whatever. A team name
(04:14):
that's denigrating. You want your team to be awesome. My
teams are named after cats, the lions, the tigers. They
are fierce animals in the jungle. I love them. The
Cowboys the opposite, it would be the Native Americans, the Indians,
the Redskins, the Braves, the Chiefs. They were named after
(04:35):
Native Americans to honor them. The one that really gets
me riled up the most was our former rival of mine.
Now where I come from, Central Michigan University is working
hand in hand with the neighboring Saginaw Chippewa Indian tribe
of Michigan.
Speaker 2 (04:54):
They are the Chippewas. We fire up as chippiwas.
Speaker 1 (04:59):
We work in conjunct with the tribe with the Casino
is a sponsor of athletics there. The tribe loves it.
Ojibwa is taught on Central Michigan's campus. The legacy and
the pride of the Chippewa tribe is taught at Central
Michigan University. It is perpetuated and how it is presented
(05:20):
in the athletic department. They don't use a lot of
the imagery that you'll see at Florida State University with
the Seminoles, with the Native American riding out on the
horse and the flaming spear and all that. But the
Seminole tribe.
Speaker 2 (05:32):
Loves it, loves it. So who's making these decisions and
for whom? The one that bothers me that I.
Speaker 1 (05:40):
Just referenced Eastern Michigan University and former rival of my
Central Michigan Chippewas, and they, the Eastern Michigan Hurons, changed
their name to the lame and played out and everybody
has it Eagles. They were the Hurons.
Speaker 2 (05:56):
What is offensive.
Speaker 1 (05:57):
There's a lake called Lake Huron Huron is a tribe
just like the Chippewa tribe, just like the Seminole tribe.
But what happened was Eastern Michigan is located in a
town called Ipsilani. It neighbors and Arbor, and Arbor is horrible,
and Arbor is the equivalent in Michigan of what boulder
(06:20):
is here. And you know what I'm talking about. These
liberal they are smarter than you, they are better than you,
and they know more than you, and they know what's
better for you. And they made this decision in Washington
County where both universities reside, Eastern Michigan and the University
of Michigan are next door neighbors. And these ann Arborites
(06:43):
had no connection to the Huron tribe, had no conversations
with the Huron tribe, but made that decision because it
was at a time where we're just going to root
out all of these offensive Native American references to names,
and we're gonna slap eagles on there.
Speaker 2 (06:57):
Get this.
Speaker 1 (06:59):
Members that descend from the Huron tribe in southeastern Lower
Michigan tried to band together to fight against this. But
unlike the Chippewa tribe, which remains largely intact. The Huron
tribe had split off. There's a lot of different tribes,
as you know, across the United States, but even within
the state of Michigan. You have the Huron Tribe, you
have the Potawatamie Tribe, you have the Chippewa tribe, you
(07:21):
have the Ottawa tribe.
Speaker 2 (07:23):
And there was no.
Speaker 1 (07:24):
Leadership left of the Huron tribe as it had once
existed to express an opinion on the matter. So they
went right ahead and bulldozed through with it. Who is
that good for? Who does it help to remove the
Native American woman from the Land of Lakes logo? Who's
that help? It's a raisure of a culture? And why
(07:45):
would we do that? And I asked a question again,
why would a team, professional, college, high school, otherwise name
their team to mock a group.
Speaker 2 (07:55):
You don't do that.
Speaker 1 (07:56):
You want to root your team on, You want to
think they're awesome, soaring birds like eagles and falcons, cats
of the jungle, light lions and tigers, the bears. Oh my,
in Chicago, this is one I have been pushed way
to the opposite side now because the leftists took this
and they took it too far, and I just love
(08:18):
that the Seminole tribe down in Florida. I mean they
are all about it. They're like put on the war paying,
put on the headdress, throw the spear, have it be
on fire, ride a horse into the stadium.
Speaker 2 (08:29):
They love it. So who are we to go? Well,
you know, with my coastal.
Speaker 1 (08:34):
Liberal elite education and the higher realms of the IVY League,
I have determined it's not good for you. Think about
how crazy this is. The Seminole tribe thinks it's remarkably
terrific that Florida State University embraces their tribe, their culture,
(08:55):
their name, everything about it. So if they like it
and you don't, liberal person ann Arbor, Boulder, wherever, I
don't care your opinion means nothing. That's their tribe. This
is I'm totally lost on this one. Sorry I went
(09:16):
off on a tangent. Patty asked Ryan thoughts on Sanders
in the draft talking about Shaduer. I have seen varying
accounts he could go anywhere from number three overall to
the New York Giants or slip all the way into
the second round. There are concerns I think about his
durability long term, his overall skill level, arm strength. He's
(09:38):
a talented guy, he's a smart guy, but will his
game translate to the NFL level. Here's my cursory knowledge
of what I observed with Shadur Sanders and what I
was frustrated by on behalf of all you Colorado fans,
and maybe Zach has an opinion here too, but what
I noticed about first of all, he had terrible offensive
lines here.
Speaker 2 (09:55):
For the most part at Colorado.
Speaker 1 (09:58):
Dion was able to improve it offensive line dramatically from
year one to year two, but year.
Speaker 2 (10:03):
One was abysmal. But I think what should do.
Speaker 1 (10:07):
Or had was he had kind of happy feet because
of that, and he was lost in the pocket and
he was chased around, and he was used to fighting
for his life. And what he does is he tries
to keep a play alive for far too long, Like
it's second down to thirteen and you roll out of
the pocket, and sometimes just for the short term, you
take the l throw it out of bounds, live to
(10:29):
fight another play.
Speaker 2 (10:30):
But he'll ramble and scramble.
Speaker 1 (10:32):
And back up twenty yards and chuck it down the
field and either it's intercepted or then he gets sacked
for like a twenty five yard loss or something that
happened way more often than it shows.
Speaker 2 (10:41):
Zach, you know what I'm talking about with that.
Speaker 3 (10:43):
Yeah, absolutely, I think he just doesn't have the high
end athleticism to be able to create after I guess,
create off script once the play breaks down. You know,
he doesn't play like you might expect Dion Sanders kid
at quarterback to play.
Speaker 2 (10:59):
You know, you might.
Speaker 3 (10:59):
Expect a crazy athlete, super fascin. He's not that guy.
Speaker 2 (11:03):
And I think the.
Speaker 3 (11:04):
Problem really arises where he tries to write checks. His
body just can't catch off him where it's bailing out
the back of the pocket, which is a big no no,
even if you are an elite athlete. And he'll try
and throw past his fading away and he has a
good arm, but it's definitely not a great arm, as
we can't afford to take anything off it.
Speaker 1 (11:23):
Here's the thing about Shadoor. Though he only needs one
team to believe in him in the draft from three
on down, he won't be taken top two. But my
experience in watching the NFL draft, and we'll talk about
this with Ryan Edwards tomorrow, quarterback stock almost always goes up,
especially late right before the teams get a little antsy
they really need a quarterback.
Speaker 2 (11:44):
And even if they at the.
Speaker 1 (11:45):
Reach, you'll see these quarterbacks like Will Levis remember him
from the Tennessee Titans. Well, Tennessee looks like they're going
to be replacing him at the top of the draft.
But they get nervous and antsy and kind of itchy
trigger finger to get a quarterback. But he sir, he's
a rand as a third rounder on our board. Take
(12:05):
the quarterback, take sure or Sanders. I think that might
happen tomorrow.
Speaker 3 (12:08):
I think it could be especially bad this time around
because recency bias, which GM's fall victim to. You look
at last year, what were the two reaches at quarterback,
Michael Pennox and bow Knicks. Both those franchises are now
very happy they reached on those quarterbacks. I think it
will lead to some team going out, who cares we
have a second third round grade on this guy.
Speaker 2 (12:26):
That's what everyone said about bo Nicks.
Speaker 1 (12:29):
I got to be honest, and I'm not just kind
of crowing about myself here. I liked the bo Nicks
pick when it was made. I'm like, you know, this
is a sneaky, kind of savvy pick. I liked what
he did at Oregon. He had the flick to your point,
the frame, the athleticism, the arm, and the fact that
he felt to Denver. It made sense to take him there.
And boy are the Broncos glad they did. He transformed
(12:50):
the franchise. I love watching him.
Speaker 2 (12:52):
He's only going to get better too.
Speaker 1 (12:53):
There's a reason to be very optimistic for Broncos fans
with him when they struck gold with bo Nicks in
so many ways.
Speaker 2 (13:00):
So to most.
Speaker 1 (13:01):
Some more texts full of the year talking about Cecilia.
Speaker 4 (13:06):
You're breaking my heart, you're shaking my confidence daily Espinoza. Yeah,
little Simon and Garfunkle for you what Zach doesn't even know.
Speaker 2 (13:17):
Who this is. I know, my Simon.
Speaker 1 (13:21):
I think you made me feel better there. But that's yeah,
she doesn't even deserve that song reference. Good golly, what
has happened to Colorado? They're not sending their best. That
was Russ Waldman's point in a text to me in
the fourth District. And otherwise, I mean, you see some
of these bills presented and how they're written and who
wrote them. I used to think, Oh, I would never
(13:41):
be in Congress or the state legislature. I mean those people,
they have Ivy League degrees and their lawyers.
Speaker 2 (13:47):
And they're so much smarter than me.
Speaker 1 (13:49):
When it comes to the now, I'm like, uh, okay, no, no,
they are not. They're not smarter than me. They're not
smarter than you. They're not smarter than Zach. I would
vote for Zach no matter what race he ran in
against some of these absolute fools. And the word is
not strong enough Ryan. Don't they say the state has
no authority to end child mutilation as in Florida, to
(14:13):
end it the state are you talking about, like states
like Florida, Colorado, Texas, or the state as in the
nation federal law. Trump's already done an executive order on
along these lines, but you're ride until it's codified in
the Constitution Act of Congress, passing through both the House
(14:34):
and the Senate, signed into law by President Trump. Then
they wouldn't have that kind of binding effect like we
saw in the United Kingdom where it's been banned. You
cannot do transgender surgeries anymore, hormone therapies on youth.
Speaker 2 (14:48):
Stephen Littleton.
Speaker 1 (14:49):
Just when we were wondering what the Colorado Dems would
do next, Yeah, there's no bottom.
Speaker 2 (14:55):
There's a representative Scott.
Speaker 1 (14:56):
Bottoms, and he can't join us say just let me
know via text, but we hope to have him on
the show shortly. But there's no bottom of the depths
that the Democrats are sinking to with these horrible ideas.
Speaker 2 (15:06):
But until they're.
Speaker 1 (15:07):
Checked, you know the how the old song go check
yourself before you wreck yourself. They're not gonna wreck themselves
because they keep winning elections. So as long as they win,
they're getting like very fat cat syndrome high.
Speaker 2 (15:18):
On the hog, just veering violently to the left.
Speaker 1 (15:22):
But unless they're until there are any consequences politically, they're
just gonna keep doing it.
Speaker 2 (15:26):
Why wouldn't they?
Speaker 1 (15:28):
I mean, this is like the bizarro Handmaid's Tale pendulum
swing to the left, which I was talking about this
with my fiance Kelsey. She likes that show. I've watched
it bits and pieces because she watched I'm like, why
do you watch this, honey, you're a conservative? But her
now'll hear me out. Her contention is the reason the
(15:48):
Handmaid's Tail happened. That that kind of dystopian universe of
you know, misogyny and patriarchy, etc. Was that was a
reaction apparently to a violent shift way to the left,
and it just overcorrected. That was her explanation to me, Patty,
Now do Hunter in the draft? Travis Hunter is going
(16:09):
number two. I think that's pretty much etched in stone Zach.
Would you agree with that?
Speaker 3 (16:14):
Yes, he's minus three hundred right now to go there
to Cleveland.
Speaker 1 (16:17):
The Browns, poor Travis. Oh, you know, the Lions are bad.
But you know, I grew up in southeastern Michigan. So
when I watched the Lions on the NFC feed, this
was a CDs back in the day, the Browns were
on the NBC feed out of Toledo.
Speaker 2 (16:32):
So I'm like, well, I like the Browns.
Speaker 1 (16:34):
And then what happened was they got their heads kicked
in repeatedly by the Denver Broncos. And that was when
they were good. The Browns in the eighties some of the.
Speaker 3 (16:43):
Most heart breaking AFC Championship losses ever.
Speaker 2 (16:46):
I mean, everyone remembers to Drive. I think the fumble
is worse.
Speaker 3 (16:50):
He would have walked in and bought they game for them.
If the wall doesn't pop out right there on like
the one two yard line.
Speaker 1 (16:55):
Could you imagine poor Erners biner. First of all, he fumbled.
He lives in infamy in Cleveland. But had that happened
in this age with social media and the cable networks ESPN.
Speaker 2 (17:08):
Yeah, that was not good.
Speaker 1 (17:10):
This is interesting and this should open it up for
more conversation. From a text to Ryan as a plumber,
women's restrooms are far worse than guys. Okay, let me
open this up because I have done this, chivalrous, says
I am.
Speaker 2 (17:27):
Sometimes you go to a bar or a.
Speaker 1 (17:28):
Big event, sporting event, outdoor event, and the line for
the women's room is invariably longer than the guys. Sometimes
there's no line for the guys. Sometimes there's nobody in
the guy's restroom. And I have, on occasion had a
young lady come up to me and this is my
way of flirting, maybe, but in ask and then I
kind of watch out for them as they use the
(17:50):
men's restroom.
Speaker 2 (17:51):
So, ladies, I.
Speaker 1 (17:53):
Know you've done this, don't pretend like you haven't, and
don't lie. Just tell the truth. But in those experiences
you compare a men's restroom if you have observed it,
and I know the urinals will freak you out.
Speaker 2 (18:04):
Because what do I oh, can't use that.
Speaker 1 (18:08):
Is it cleaner and better in a men's restroom than
a women's. This plumber contends the women's are worse. I
can think of reasons, and I won't get into scant
detail on this as to why.
Speaker 2 (18:19):
That might be.
Speaker 1 (18:20):
But guys are guys, and we're a lot sloppier, and
we're a lot less hygienic, and we just kind of oh,
that's literally, the noise are bague.
Speaker 2 (18:31):
I wash my hands every time. I want you to
know that five seven seven three nine. Send your text along.
More Brian schuling live after this.
Speaker 5 (18:43):
Under English common law it was recognized that the care
of all infants is lodged in the king as parents
patriari and by the king this care is delegated to
the court of chancery. In protecting neglected and dependent children,
chancery courts use what are called equitable powers, the essentral
ideas of which our flexibility, guardianship and the balancing of
(19:04):
interest in the general welfare, with a view to getting
a fair result than could be obtained by applying applying
older and more rigid roles. So the notion that parents
have rights have always reigned supreme is not in our
English Sex and history, but rather that there was always
a recognition that the state had an interest in protecting
the rights of.
Speaker 2 (19:24):
Children English Sex, and that was balanced.
Speaker 5 (19:27):
By the best interest of the child doctrine which we
see in much of the case which my colleague from
Denver referred to, which balances the rights of the parents
and the child. In this other context of issues, and
in light of all of that, and my knowledge of
the history of how those rights of children have been
balanced over time, I would just I will have to
say that I will be a known tonight.
Speaker 1 (19:48):
I love my father. I grew up respecting my father.
I didn't fear him, but I think I would tell
you I had a healthy fear of him, like you,
didn't want to piss him off. It took a lot,
but when he was mad, okay, now it's time to
settle down.
Speaker 2 (20:05):
If he was presented with this notion.
Speaker 1 (20:07):
That we need to balance the rights of children with
the rights of parents, so you go, I got your
balance right here, and he take.
Speaker 2 (20:13):
His belt off and snap. You feel balanced right now?
Speaker 6 (20:16):
Right?
Speaker 1 (20:17):
Like all right, yes, very much so, sir, I am
balanced and gonna sit down and pipe down. No, children
do not have nor should they have equal rights to
their parents. That's madness. You're a kid. Shut up, you're
a dumb kid. I mean, you're always be dumb.
Speaker 2 (20:37):
I was a dumb kid. We all were dumb kids.
Speaker 1 (20:41):
We needed our parents to guide us, to reprimand us
and yes, to punish us when we stepped out of
line and did wrong.
Speaker 2 (20:50):
There's nothing wrong with that. There is a scene in
Step Brothers.
Speaker 1 (20:57):
Yes I'm referencing that movie, but go back and watch
it where the father explains to John c Riley and
Will Ferrell that they can't just be whatever they want
to be. That when he was a kid, he wanted
to be a dinosaur, and he thought he was a dinosaur.
But it's not up to a parent to go you
know what, what do you want to be a Bronosaurus
or a Torontosaurus rex. No, you're a kid, dummy. This
(21:21):
is just like the whole furry crap. Oh, well, you
have to put a litter box in the restroom with
the second grade class. So this kid thinks they're a cat. No, okay,
the best thing for that kid in that instance, You're
not a cat. Stop being stupid. You're a little girl
or a little boy. Knock it off. You're trying to
get attention. We're not going to give it to you.
Speaker 2 (21:43):
Does that sound harsh?
Speaker 1 (21:46):
That sounds like what I would have been told when
I was in second and third grade. You're not a cat.
End of story, end of discussion. We're not playing into
your fantasy. That's stupid.
Speaker 2 (21:57):
But now that's.
Speaker 1 (21:58):
Being like green lighted, validated. Oh, Kyle Clark, this is
where he goes full comrade, Kyle. Oh, it's marginalizing kids
that are already that they're out of phase, maybe they're
maybe they have problems.
Speaker 2 (22:10):
Doesn't make them a cat, doesn't make them a dog.
Doesn't mean we.
Speaker 1 (22:13):
Need to acknowledge or affirm that. Ever, it's madness I
had to get. I'm sorry I didn't have this for you,
but I'm gonna I'm gonna do it tomorrow. I'm gonna
dedicate myself to you in this cause the scene from
Billy Madison where he gives this long answer about the
dog in the debate, the puppy, the puppy who found
(22:38):
its home, and.
Speaker 2 (22:41):
You're thinking you're watching it. Oh, that's an inspirational answer. Yeah,
it makes a lot of sense. Okay, life is like that.
Speaker 1 (22:47):
No, no, it was rejected and he was told that's
the most insanely idiotic thing I have ever heard. I
reward you no points, and may God have mercy on
your soul. That's what Cecilia Espinoza deserves after that outlandish
comment citing the example of the patriarchal British monarchy. Everything
(23:09):
we're supposed to be against. But no, that is the
gold standard for children's rights, that the king had the
rights and the parents parents here, you're just parents.
Speaker 2 (23:19):
What do you think you made the kids?
Speaker 7 (23:20):
So?
Speaker 2 (23:20):
What this war on parents?
Speaker 1 (23:23):
I'm telling you, democrats, I hate to do you any favors,
but you keep going down this road. You saw what
happened in Virginia with Glenn Youngkin. Let's wait and see
what happens here. You keep going down this road of
attacking parents, of declaring them the enemy, of declaring war
on them.
Speaker 2 (23:43):
It will not end well for you politically. It just won't.
Speaker 1 (23:47):
Here's another great one five seven, seven, three nine. Ryan
in the south Park show, Randy turned himself into a
dolphin because he thought he wanted to be a dolphin.
Speaker 2 (23:54):
Yees.
Speaker 1 (23:55):
South Park handles this whole issue very well. They had
another excellent episode in which it's obviously Randy macho man savage,
this is who this character that they portrays and tribute to,
and macho man with a beard.
Speaker 6 (24:09):
And Oh Year the sunglasses, Oh Year a here to
Wan all the women's events, participates and destroys every woman
in his path, and the whole episode is about this.
Speaker 1 (24:23):
You're right then, that's was South Park's take on it.
But now it's become real life. We have to validate this. No, no,
we don't.
Speaker 2 (24:35):
Some of their nine and I'm not gonna make sure
we got to this too.
Speaker 1 (24:38):
They're talking about it on Fox News right now on
the five, which here airs at the three because there's
a Mountain time, not Eastern time. But Stephanie Rule gets
so many things wrong here and just has no level
of self awareness none. And here's her take on why
people have lost faith in the mainstream media news.
Speaker 8 (24:57):
You know what I want people to do?
Speaker 2 (24:59):
No, I don't.
Speaker 8 (24:59):
I just really want people to be informed and engaged.
Speaker 7 (25:03):
I'm not asking people to go out and rally or protest,
but like even this idea of like I'm disconnecting.
Speaker 8 (25:10):
I don't want to be part of the news on that.
Speaker 9 (25:11):
It's right, that's one of my that's one of my things.
Speaker 8 (25:15):
And I'm saying, don't disconnection. That's what they want you
to do.
Speaker 2 (25:18):
Is a big movement towards that turn off the news.
Speaker 7 (25:20):
Yeah, a big move towards being uninformed.
Speaker 1 (25:23):
No, no, you inform us with crap, Stephanie Rule. You
have an agenda, you have a political predisposition. What I
would challenge you as the class for critiquing mass media
five O three is to have a piece of paper.
Speaker 2 (25:36):
Yeah, we still have paper and maybe a.
Speaker 1 (25:38):
Pen and draw a quadrant so like across on the
whole piece of paper, so there's an upper left and
upper right, a lower left and lower right.
Speaker 2 (25:47):
And go through and watch Stephanie Rules program.
Speaker 1 (25:49):
Watch hers and she's the one bringing this up on MSNBC,
And tell me how many stories that she presents to
the audience. Use your own judgment, however you think it's presented.
Is pro Trump, anti Trump, or pro dem antidem and
marvel at the graph that you create. She is biased,
(26:11):
she is slanted, she has an agenda, she has an
opinion that she injects into.
Speaker 2 (26:15):
Her news coverage.
Speaker 1 (26:16):
It's the same criticism I offer up of comrade Kyle.
Kyle Clark is a leftist, a dedicated leftist. That's fine,
but be honest with your audience and just come right
out and say it like I tell you every day.
You know, I support Donald Trump. I have a collage
of conservative, libertarian, populist viewpoints on most issues.
Speaker 2 (26:37):
And I'm going to tell you what I think. And
I'm going to tell you that I have, yes.
Speaker 1 (26:41):
A political predisposition and opinion as a show host. But
they Stephanie Rule, Kyle Clark, and so many others are
trying to tell you sell you this bill of goods
that they're calling it balls and strikes. They're shooting right
down the middle. They don't even just admitted that the
coverage of Donald Trump on MSNBC is overwhelmingly negative. Doesn't
(27:05):
mean you have to go all the way in the
other direction like a lot of Fox News hosts do,
and I do. I mostly approve of Donald Trump's policies
and his way of getting there. That's why I voted
for him. That's why I supported him. But I'm telling
you that I'm telling you that they're not. Rain Wilson again,
Dwight Shrut from the office confronts her again on this
(27:30):
distrust in.
Speaker 2 (27:31):
The media, the institutions of.
Speaker 9 (27:33):
Our day of Americans don't trust mainstream media.
Speaker 2 (27:38):
Why is that? How did we get here?
Speaker 7 (27:39):
Listen, we are seeing a huge loss in trust of all.
Speaker 8 (27:42):
Of our institutions.
Speaker 7 (27:43):
It's the media, it's medicine, it's banking. It's a huge
problem because when you think about democracy and all of
these pillars, they need to stand tall, they need to
stand strong, and sort of losing that trust is not
by accident, it's by design by who. If you remember
when President Trump was running the first time, Steve Bannon
(28:05):
once said, the goal is to blow the whole thing up.
Speaker 8 (28:08):
And so I think that you've got.
Speaker 7 (28:11):
Mistakes made or things starting to slip, while at the
same time there's a concerted effort to destroy the media,
because the media, that the news media is, in my opinion,
the last slide of defense.
Speaker 8 (28:23):
Oh of holding power accountable.
Speaker 1 (28:26):
You don't hold power accountable when it's on the left.
That's my whole criticism. Be as rigid and adversarial as
you want to be against the Orange Man on Trump,
that's fine.
Speaker 2 (28:36):
That is the role of the mainstream media.
Speaker 1 (28:38):
You are correct, but you don't do it against Nancy Pelosi,
Chuck Schumer, a Keen, Jeffries Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, you
don't do it, it's not done, and that you ascribe all
this power and influence to Steve Bannon, that somehow he
turned all of America. Do you how many people know
(28:59):
who Steve Bannon is? That's like a list high information
voters who are very conservative that pay attention to him,
or are very liberal and hate him. The average voter,
I could tell you, does not know or care who
Steve Bannon is.
Speaker 8 (29:17):
And you had a bit of.
Speaker 7 (29:18):
A perfect storm, right President Trump won and tons of
people were shocked or angry or frustrated, and they're tuning out.
And at the same time you have the Elon Musk
media machine because they want you to leave traditional media
and they want you to go to x which is
a bastion of misinformation or there is no fact checking.
Speaker 8 (29:37):
So it's a perfect storm of.
Speaker 7 (29:39):
People saying, I'm angry, I'm frustrated, I'm tuning out, I'm disconnecting.
Speaker 1 (29:45):
Okay, misinformation from which direction? For her, it all comes
from the right, none of it comes from the left.
The lift doesn't engage in or traffic in misinformation. Fact
checkers who do they fact check? Where do those fact
checks always come down. It's against the right and for
the left.
Speaker 8 (30:01):
And then you have a force, yeah, pushing it.
Speaker 7 (30:04):
And but even in the last two weeks, what we
need to do is just cover what's.
Speaker 8 (30:10):
Happening in America.
Speaker 2 (30:11):
You don't do that right.
Speaker 7 (30:13):
We have to cover Democrats trying to figure out what
their lane is and how they're going to get back
on their feet, and we have to simply cover what
this White House is doing. And I think if we
do that right, there's that saying, you know, trust is
gained in rain drops, and it's lost in buckets.
Speaker 1 (30:29):
Oh, you lost a lot of buckets, and even rain
Wilson says, well, well, hold on.
Speaker 9 (30:33):
This is where I would push back when I see
this kind of insight and passion being directed at the
current administration and the lack of this kind of insight
and passion being directed at the previous administration, and.
Speaker 2 (30:47):
Go where again.
Speaker 9 (30:48):
I'm not talking about you, I'm talking about left leaning
news media organizations.
Speaker 2 (30:52):
Yeah, we're kind of like la la la la la.
Evening's fine. Look the environments, I mean.
Speaker 9 (30:57):
Look, the economy's great, la la la, immigrations that much
of a problem, and really being Cleopatra Queen of denial.
Speaker 2 (31:05):
Thank you boom.
Speaker 1 (31:06):
Yeah, but wait, she admits nothing I would put back
on immigration.
Speaker 7 (31:11):
I can specifically remember when Greg Abbott of Pastis and
Ron DeSantis of Florida sent those buses of migrants to
different cities, different parts of the country, which ended up
being politically genius for both of them. The media regularly
talked about the fact that Biden was not doing enough
(31:32):
in his first two and a half years on immigration,
even though in the last year and a half you're
seeing the numbers go down. He just wasn't doing enough,
and you saw it in how people voted. You had
places like the Bronx, you had places like New Jersey,
people who said I'm not happy with immigration in this country,
and that's why Democrats are scrambling to recalibrate now.
Speaker 8 (31:50):
But I do think that was covered, was it.
Speaker 2 (31:54):
And how was it covered?
Speaker 1 (31:55):
MSNBC Land baseded abb and DeSantis for that stunt, and
it was more more than a stunt. It proved a point,
and she's right, it was politically genius. A timeout wrapping
it all up, Ryan Schuling Live when we come back
after this and Sheriff Steve Reems filling in for Dan
Kaplis once again. Today's got some great guests on tap,
(32:17):
including Britta Horn. I believe I studio chair of the
Colorado Republican Party, so you'll want to stay tuned for that.
To the text we go five seven, seven thirty nine.
This one says, Ryan, you nailed it in the comrade,
Kyle Rant. Maybe they have problems, fix the blank and
problem and don't make it a problem for everyone else.
That every individual deserves that attention and mental health is
(32:39):
the greatest crisis we have in this country that not
only kids but adults don't have somebody to talk to
to talk through issues, problems, they're having thoughts that are
obsessing them. And I think that can do a whole
heck of a lot of good. You're absolutely right.
Speaker 2 (32:55):
Kimberly says.
Speaker 1 (32:55):
Unfortunately, our generation gen X have created two more generations
of pan that were never smacked around enough because they
didn't uphold the discipline we grew up with. I've never
understood that, Kimberly. And yeah, I think there are some
gen X parents who are at fault here. Not all
of us, though, And if I am a parent, and
there's a chance I might be, I'll be a similar
dad to my own father. And like I said, this
(33:17):
is very important. I was never afraid of my father.
I didn't live in fear of him shaking in my boots.
But I was afraid to make it a mad and
that's a healthy fear. He don't want kids just rolling
over their parents willie nilly hither and yon telling them
what to do.
Speaker 2 (33:33):
No, kids only have.
Speaker 1 (33:35):
Rights so far as the parents who care about them
allow them to have rights. And that's not infringing on
the rights of kids. That's making sure they stay alive,
including me when I was a young one.
Speaker 2 (33:48):
Stay tuned.
Speaker 1 (33:48):
Sheriff Steve Raims Weld County next filling in for Dan Caplis,
I'll talk to you tomorrow on Ryan Schrewling Live
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com