September 3, 2023 • 31 mins
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
The DOJ. And this is another shocking move here. One
of the other things that we know is that the
DOJ had no problem with people coming from Hunter Biden's
law firm that was representing him to the DJ and
then back there taking I mean, I can't even describe
how valuable that intel would be. Imagine there's someone prosecuting you,
(00:24):
and then you get to go and defend the person
that you're prosecuting and know everything that the defense team
is trying to do to prosecute you. That is incredibly valuable.
It's incredibly unethical as well. Now I want you to
hear what Jim Jordan had to say recently about all
of this. It's shocking. Take a listen what actually happened
at this meeting.
Speaker 2 (00:44):
Who were they talking about.
Speaker 3 (00:46):
What took place? That's what we want to know.
Speaker 4 (00:48):
More importantly, I think that's what the American people want
to know.
Speaker 5 (00:50):
The Department of Justice informed the House Judiciary Committee it
would not cooperate with subpoenas for two FBI agents involved
in the Department's investigation of Hunter Biden because of the
committee's stipulations for their depositions. Carlos Uryarctde, the DOJ Assistant
Attorney General claimed in a letter obtained by Washington Examiner
to Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, his subpoenas to the two
(01:11):
agents quote lack legal effect and cannot constitutionally be enforced
because Jordan had prohibited DOJ lawyers at their depositions. Ur
yard Day wrote, the subpoenas issued by the Committee prohibit
the attendance of Agency Council at appearances by two FBI
employees where the Committee has indicated it will ask questions
regarding information they learned, including regarding the ongoing criminal investigation.
(01:36):
He also noted compelling testimony from the pair of FBI officials,
special Agents Thomas Sobachinski and Raisha Hawley of the FBI's
Baltimore Field Office, was premature because of the DOJ was
open to continuing discussions with Jordan. Jordan's deposition rule aligns
with House rules which do not permit Department Council at depositions.
(01:56):
The DOJ and the Committee could, however, negotiate to have Sovichi, Shechinsky,
and Holly appear voluntarily with DOJ lawyers instead of appearing
in the form of a deposition. Griarte indicated negotiations were plausible.
While he was differential to the committee's oversight authority. Throughout
the letter, he also continuously warrant the DOJ's Biden investigation,
led by newly appointed Special Counsel David Weiss, was ongoing
(02:20):
an information flow would be limited during that time.
Speaker 2 (02:23):
Wow.
Speaker 1 (02:24):
This coming on top of the emails that I mentioned,
and in those emails, we had more shocking information that
came out. Those emails now prove that not only did
Joe Biden have Burner email accounts, but with those email accounts,
he was sharing government information intel the US government's policies
(02:49):
towards Ukraine and quite possibly other countries that the Bidens
were making money off of.
Speaker 6 (02:56):
Emails from Delaware US Attorney David Weiss's office show that
the Justice Department took the lead on answering questions from
Congress that were meant for Weiss. Released earlier this week,
the emails are just the latest signs that Weiss did
not have the independence as a US attorney that the
DOJ claimed he did. Weiss is now a special counsel
leading the investigation into Hunter Biden. The emails show that
(03:19):
Weiss and his team discussed multiple Congressional inquiries including one
about Nicholas McQuaid, a DOJ official during the crucial months
of the Hunter Biden probe who has since returned to
work at the firm defending Hunter Biden. House Republicans have
been heavily critical of Weiss ever since two IRS whistleblowers
revealed allegations of preferential treatment toward the Bidens in his office.
(03:41):
They said a lenient plea deal that Hunter Biden received
in June proved the whistleblower's claims.
Speaker 4 (03:46):
But for these whistleblowers, that sweetheart deal would have been
even sweeter. They weren't even going to require Hunter Biden
plead guilty to anything.
Speaker 6 (03:56):
A judge rejected that plea deal in late July, and
Weiss has since formally withdrawn it. Now, House Republicans are
seeking interviews with people involved in the investigation before Weiss
became a special counsel. The Justice Department is trying to
block those from taking place. They're also looking for emails
on which then Vice President Joe Biden used a fake name.
Speaker 4 (04:17):
We have requested the unredacted documents, and it's very important
because we believe there may be some redactions as to
who was copied on those emails where Joe Biden was
using a pseudonym, particularly in the case of Ukrainian policy.
Speaker 6 (04:31):
The National Archives said this week that it has more
than five thousand emails, including Joe Biden's pseudonyms, but it
has not yet handed them over all. This comes as
House Republicans grow frustrated with the level of stonewalling from
the Biden administration. They say they may have no choice
but to proceed with an impeachment inquiry if the government
doesn't start cooperating. Sarah Bedford for the Washington Examiner.
Speaker 1 (04:54):
Center Ron Johnson has now come out saying Barack Obama
needs to allow archives because it would be his call.
And now the question is how much is Barack Obama
involved in the cover up of the Biden crime family.
Because Barack Obama has to be the one that says
yes to releasing the archives on Biden's five thousand plus
(05:18):
ALIAS emails that he was using while he was the
vice president. Former President Barack Obama is now involved in this,
whether he likes it or not, because he's the one
that can say yes or he's the one that says
no to allow the National Archives to release President Joe
Biden's emails and records linked to his alias email address accounts.
(05:40):
Joe Biden can't even do it. It has to come from
the former president Barack Obama. What we do know is
this Joe Biden used a global cell phone paid for
by Hunter Biden. We also know that he used three
different email alien so that's a total of four that
(06:01):
we know of now to share government information and discuss
business with Hunter Biden and associates. This according to the
Southeastern Legal Foundation known as s LF. SLF was the
first to file the Freedom of Information Act requests and
(06:22):
is afoy you to the Archives for Biden's emails in
twenty twenty one. Two years later, it renewed the requests,
but the Archives failed quote unquote to produce a single
one of these emails. The Foundation is not reported. The
Archives did, however, and this is the most important thing.
(06:43):
They acknowledged the emails and records exist after the SLF
filed a lawsuit to compel the agency to turn over
those emails. The Archives' refusal to provide emails and records
appear to be politically driven. This according to the NAR,
(07:04):
the agency notifies the White House Council's Office of the
requests for records of the former presidents that are currently
unopened to the public or that are proposed for public disclosure.
The agency also notifies the representatives of the former president
and the vice president who created the records. Now, Senator
(07:27):
Johnson said that Obama should demand the release of emails
and records to clear any appearance of wrongdoing specifically by
his administration. He said Obama should allow the NARA NAR
to release the five thy one hundred plus email messages
and more than two hundred pages of records. Lawmakers began
(07:52):
scrutinizing Joe Biden's alias email addresses in twenty twenty one,
but now we've found more of them and more names,
more burner accounts. Senator Johnson and Senator Chuck Grassley have
teamed up. They are actually the authors of a twenty
twenty Senate report. Remember that the Democrats said was basically
(08:13):
Russian collusion, not joking. They were the authors of that
twenty twenty Senate report. In the Biden family, they issued
letters to the White House and there requesting the contents
of email addresses on three separate occasions. This has all
become public now. Quote Senator Johnson said, I've been researching
Joe Biden's use of private email since twenty twenty one.
(08:36):
Three letters to the Biden White House have gone unanswered,
and NARA provided the usual non response response. House Oversight
Committee Chairman James Comer, who's the Republican as you know,
investigating from Kentucky Joe Biden. The Biden crime family, has
officially requested the Archives hand over all the documents now
(09:01):
and communications in which then Vice President Joe Biden used
his aliases. And we know what some of these aliases were,
and there's a good chance or maybe others that we
don't know about the names and the aliases, And I'd
be interested to understand exactly why these names were chosen.
Were Robert Peters, Robin Ware and j rb Ware. James
(09:28):
Comer said this, the Archives need to be transparent and
provide these unredacted records to the GOP House Oversight. The
Republicans concern about the email and the aliases also come
as one alias, Robert Peters, contains an at PCI dot
(09:53):
gov domain name. Now PCI represents the Executive Office of
the President and, according to James Rosen, is connected to
a Department of Defense network. The Robert L. Peters alias
received an email about Ukraine. We now can confirm in
(10:15):
twenty sixteen that c seed Hunter Biden. That's when Biden
was making millions as the big guy, and so was Hunter.
More than ten million in payoffs from Barisma that went down,
and we know that email was that Robert L.
Speaker 3 (10:30):
Peters.
Speaker 1 (10:31):
This is again a burner email account of the vice
president at the time. The now president received an email
about Ukraine in sixteen, and then he seesed Hunter Biden
for a guy that promised he never talked about business
with his son. It does seem like he's lying when
he's got a burner email account and he's emailing information
directly to Hunter Biden about Ukraine. Now, this email, which
(10:54):
Comer says the committee has seen, includes an attachment with
the Vice president's skeete indicating that he had spoken by
phone to then Ukrainian President Porshenko. I want to tell
you about an amazing trip that we as Verdict listeners
are going to be taking to the Holy Land Israel.
(11:15):
Israel is the cradle of Judaism, Christianity and many of
the principles that we hold dear as Americans, and I
want you to join me and many other listeners as
we visit sites like the Armageddon Battlefield, Nazareth, Jericho, Jerusalem, Bethlehem.
You're also on this trip going to set sail on
the Sea of Galilee and you're going to float on
the Dead Sea. We're going to walk in the footsteps
(11:37):
of Biblical figures like King David and Jesus Christ, and
you're going to do it all together with other listeners
from around the country. Now, I'm going to meet up
with you in Jerusalem and you're going to experience the
city and some of the most amazing sites like the
Western Wall, the Temple mount The trip is going to
deepen your understanding of the Bible and of Western civilization.
(11:58):
We're also going to have with us a spiritual advisor
pastor who's going to talk at each site about the
significance in the Bible. With this trip, it is going
to be incredible. Now you've got time to plan because
the trip's going to take place May the sixth through
the fifteenth of twenty twenty four. Now, the good news
is this is trip is amazing and it's signing. People
(12:20):
are signing up fast, so you need to find out
and book your spot now before it's too late. You
can go right now to Christianexpedition dot com slash ben.
It's Christian Expedition dot com slash ben. You can also
call them and get the information got and find out
everything you need to know about this once in a
lifetime trip to Israel. Eight seven seven two three four
(12:43):
three zero zero two. That's eight seven seven two three
four three zero zero two or online it Christianexpedition dot
com slash ben. I want you to hear. Also, James
Comer had to say on Fox Business about all of
the Listen.
Speaker 7 (13:00):
Chatman of the House Overside Committee is James Coma and
he joins me, Now, Colston, why would Biden use pseudonyms
any idea?
Speaker 3 (13:09):
That's a great question.
Speaker 4 (13:10):
Why would he set up with his family twenty shell companies?
Why would they be receiving payments from foreign nationals from Romania, China,
Ukraine and Russia. You know, these are questions that every
American should have, and that's what our investigation of Joe
Biden's all about.
Speaker 7 (13:26):
Have you got access to the unredacted documents from the
National Archives showing these pseudonyms?
Speaker 4 (13:34):
We have requested the unredacted documents and It's very important
because we believe there may be some redactions as to
who was copied on those emails where Joe Biden was
using a pseudonym, particularly in the case of Ukrainian policy Stuart.
So this is the utmost importance to our national security.
Not only was Joe Biden using pseudonyms, he was copying
(13:55):
his son on some of those emails that pertain to Ukraine.
When we had, prior to the pseudonyms becoming public, a
transcribed interview with Devin Archer, who was on the board
of Barisma, the corrupt Ukrainian energy company, along with the
president's son. He testified that the owners of Barisma were
(14:17):
squeezing Hunter Biden to call Washington to get help to
fire the prosecutor Choken who was investigating Barisma for corruption.
So along this same time period we found a pseudonym
where he copied Hunter Biden, and it would leave one
to believe that this was Joe Biden's way of copying
(14:38):
Hunter Biden to say, okay, send it to the Barisma
owners and tell him help is on the way. And
five days later, Joe Biden flew to Ukraine to begin
the process of firing the prosecutor in exchange for American
tax dollars in the former Foreign eight.
Speaker 7 (14:53):
You have a wealth of information right there. But look,
it seems likely, certainly seems possible that they will be
a government shutdown. Will that interfere with your investigations.
Speaker 4 (15:06):
Well, I don't think there'll be a government shutdown. Obviously,
we're having lots of internal discussions now with respect to
how to fund the budget over the next twelve months.
I hope that we can agree on some cuts. I
hope that we can agree on holding certain bad actors
within our federal government accountable. But at the end of
the day, that's a decision that it looks like the
(15:26):
Republicans are gonna have to make as a whole because
we're not getting any help from the Democrats. They want
to continue to spend in oblivion. So but I'm optimistic
there won't be a shutdown, But any type of shutdown
would Stewart interfere with our investigation. Any excuse the Biden
administration can give not to be transparent with the House
Oversight Committee, they're going to take that call.
Speaker 7 (15:47):
Saint James Coma, thank you very much for being with
us today.
Speaker 1 (15:51):
If you hear James Comber. I got to I got
to give a lot of credit to James, because what
James Comer is clearly decided to do is be methi
about this investigation, be very focused about this investigation, take
time to explain it the way that he just did.
(16:15):
And this is what we need to explain this to
the country because this can sound like a complicated issue.
Speaker 3 (16:24):
It can.
Speaker 1 (16:25):
It doesn't have to. It doesn't have to be a
complicated issue, but it can sound like a complicated issue.
And what he's done is simplified it to explain it
to you. Now, there's also something else that's happened. Top
GOP lawmakers now are demanding all info link to David
(16:47):
Weiss's special council appointment, and this is significant. Top Republican
committee chairs this week demanded every document and every communication
from the depart Government of Justice referring or relating to
Attorney General Merrick Garland's appointment of the prosecutor. Now quote
(17:07):
special prosecutor who gave him the sweetheart deal, David Weiss
to that special counsel in the Hunter Biden case. Remember,
David Weiss is the one that wrote the sweetheart deal
that gave the sweetheart deal to Hunter Biden. So the
guy who gave him the deal that the judge said
was ridiculous and said no to is the same guy
that now is a special counsel to somehow then do
something different. We all know that's not going to happen.
(17:31):
We also know the law says that Garland is supposed
to appoint someone from outside of the DOJ. He didn't
do that. We also know that the Special Council is
supposed to be someone who's unbiased from outside of the DOJ.
We know that David Weiss is clearly biased and within
the DOJ, and a special counsel is worthless if it
(17:52):
doesn't have those characteristics. We also know it's technically illegal,
but guess what. The person who you appeal to when
the Special Council as illegal is the Attorney General, Merrit Garland.
And then Merrick Garland is the guy who just gave
this intel and gave all of the records and gave
everything to protect the Biden's too, David Weiss, and that's
(18:14):
exactly why he appointed David Weis's special counsel. Now, Garland
appointed Weiss earlier this month, only after Hunter Biden's sweetheart
plea deal fell apart that Weiss put together. Weiss investigated
Hunter Biden in theory was investigating him for more than
five years. In reality, what he was doing is protecting
(18:34):
the Biden crime family. David Weiss made sure that the
biggest crimes committed by Hunter Biden he could no longer
prosecute him for. And the reason why was simple because
the statue of limitations ran out on the biggest felonies
against Hunter Biden Hunter Biden. Weiss investigated Hunter Biden for
(18:56):
five years before working out the plea deal with the
president's son. One reports indicate the pledia was only pushed
through due to IRS whistle blowers allegations, and that's what
made it fall apart. It's not clear why you have
only now, after the investigation has been going on for
five years, opted to appoint mister Weiss's special counsel, especially
(19:21):
after you in the Department represented that mister Weiss already
had quote ultimate authority over the case. That's what House
Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan wrote in a letter this week,
also signed by the House Ways and Means Committee Chairman
Jason Smith and the House Oversight Committee Chairman James comer.
This also Jim Jordan. They work really well together, as
(19:41):
you can clearly see. The lawmakers noted that alleged special
treatment that hunter Biden received, specifically from the Department of Justice,
including the agency actually tipping off hunter Biden's council, allowing
the statue of limitations to lapse on tax charges, and
suggestions to remove hunter Biden's name from documents such as subpoenas,
(20:06):
and prohibiting IRS and FBI investigators from asking about or
referring to the big guy quote unquote or Dad in
witness interviews. I think it's pretty clear we know what
was going on here. Since the early days of its
investigation concerning hunter Biden, the DOJ has deviated from its
(20:27):
standard investigative procedure and afforded hunter Biden's special privileges not
afforded to other Americans. The letter reads. For instance, according
to whistleblowers, the Department of Justice tipped off the subject
of the investigation, Hunter Biden, and hunter Biden's counsel that
investigators would search a storage unit hunter Biden owned before
(20:50):
investigators could conduct the search. In another instance, the Department
also allowed the statue of limitations to lapse on charges
for the twenty fourteen twenty fifteen tax years, including felony
charges of tax evasion and filing a false or fraudulent
tax return for the twenty fourteen tax year, despite defense
(21:15):
counsel's willingness to consent to an extension, So even Hunter
Biden's own team was saying, no, no, no, we will agree
to while you guys are investigating, so you don't hurry
up in charge us with something while you're doing your investigation,
we will consent to an extension of those statue of limitations.
And you know what happened, David Weiss and the DOJ
(21:36):
said no, no, no, we don't want to get we don't
need an extension. We'll just let it run out. If
you're investigating tax crimes and you know that tax crimes exist,
and you're going through all of this, and the Defense Council,
Hunter Biden's counsel is willing to consent to an extension
of those statue of limitations, why would you not take
(21:56):
it unless you're actually covering for the president's son and
protecting the Biden crime family. Quote. These deviations took place
while mister Weiss with a full support and backing of
the Department of Justice oversaw the Hunter by investigations the
US Attorney prior to receiving Special Council status. So what
(22:17):
they're saying is he had full of authority autonomy to
do whatever he wanted to do. And the question they're
asking is, Okay, if he had full authority to do
whatever it is that he wanted to do, now, what
would be any different that he has been named special counsel.
He could have done everything he now has the ability
to do. Then, based on what we've been told, now,
the Department of Justice has until September the eleventh to
(22:38):
respond to this letter that has come from Jim Jordan,
James Comer, etc. The agency, by the way, confirm received
the letter but declined to comment. The Hill newspaper is
now reporting, So this is becoming a bigger problem for them.
Now now they can just say, here's the middle finger
in Pound Sand in Washington, d C. They can do that.
There's a very good chance that they might do that.
(23:01):
That wouldn't actually surprise me at all if they did that.
But these five thousand plus emails using Biden's you know,
burner accounts are in possession of the National Archives. The
question is why do they have them right? What's because
he was using email addresses that were important within the
government that we didn't know about. That is not normal.
(23:23):
Here's a little bit more of what James Comer had
to say in another interview National Report on Newsmax about
what they're finding.
Speaker 2 (23:30):
I just want to get your reaction there to Kilmeny's
report the National Archives admitting it has thousands of emails
and electronic records related to pseudonyms allegedly used by then
Vice President Joe Biden. Where are you in the process
of coming through those emails and is there more to this?
Speaker 3 (23:49):
Well?
Speaker 4 (23:49):
There we have copies of several of those emails, certainly
not five thousand, four hundred like what is estimated that
he used. But many of these emails that we have
copies to are redacted, and we want the unredacted version
because we already know of at least one email pertaining
the Ukrainian policy at a time that fits when Devin
(24:12):
Archer's testimony was said that the owners of Barisma were
squeezing Hunter to call Washington for help in getting choken.
Speaker 3 (24:22):
The Ukrainian prosecutor.
Speaker 4 (24:24):
Fired who was investigating the president's son's corrupt energy company
in Ukraine, and we all know that days later Joe
Biden went to Ukraine and withheld foreign tax dollars in
the form of four and aid in exchange for terminating
Victor Schokin, the prosecutor who's.
Speaker 3 (24:42):
Investigating his son.
Speaker 4 (24:42):
So we're very concerned now that Joe Biden was using
pseudonyms to hide the fact that he was working with
his son to pedal access to our enemies around the
world in exchange for wire transfers that we've already to
covered that went to shell companies or fake companies while
(25:04):
he was vice president.
Speaker 3 (25:05):
So let's just think about this.
Speaker 4 (25:06):
The vice president at the time, Joe Biden was using
fake names in emails, and he also was working with
his family that set up fake companies to receive wires
from foreign nationals that were then laundered into at least
nine family members bank accounts.
Speaker 3 (25:25):
I mean, this is one of the worst.
Speaker 4 (25:26):
Stories that I've ever heard with respect to any type
of leader in the history of our country.
Speaker 8 (25:33):
It would obviously, you know, lead you, I'm sure to
question where the money is and where did it ultimately
end up. Could you share an update on sort of
the process of tracking down alleged payments to folks with
the last name Biden.
Speaker 3 (25:48):
Yeah.
Speaker 4 (25:49):
I mean that we've got twenty one million dollars thus
far in bank accounts that were the part of wire
transfers from foreign nationals to shell companies. And again, I
can't reemphasize this enough. Shell companies are fake companies, just
like a pseudonym. A pseudonym is a fake name. The
same thing with these companies that were receiving the initial
(26:10):
wires from these foreign nationals. And again, these were bad
people in bad countries that were paying the bidens tens
of millions.
Speaker 3 (26:16):
Of dollars for reasons we don't know.
Speaker 4 (26:18):
All we know is, according to Devid Archer, they were
selling the brand, and the brand was Joe Widen. We
know that one of the instances of a potential policy
decision that was made was Joe Biden has already admitted
that he flew to Ukrainian with held tax dollars to
fire a prosecutor who was investigating his son's corrupt energy company.
I mean, this is really bad stuff. And every week
(26:40):
we find more information, more pseudonyms, more communication between Joe
Biden's family, more shell companies, more wire treans.
Speaker 3 (26:47):
First so this is getting worse by the day. And
what we want to know, we want to know.
Speaker 4 (26:53):
A couple of more bank accounts that we believe that
the president's son was using to pay for things of
value you for Joe Biden. So this is where we
are in this investigation. We're at the point to where
we're probably going to head to court to try to
get some more bank records. But this is an investigation
of Joe Biden. And I don't think the Democrats. You know,
they defended Joe Biden for nearly a year. Now can
(27:17):
they defend the pseudonyms? Can they defend the payments going
to things of value for Joe Biden. That's where the
Democrats are going to have to have a come to
Jesus moment and decide how much longer they could defend
the indefensible with respect to Joe Biden.
Speaker 2 (27:33):
With respect of the emails, I know that you said
that you had copies on and some of them were redacted.
We actually have one I believe that is not redacted
that we've got our hands on here and this is
just kind of a zoom in here, and this is
from one of the alleged pseudonyms Robert L. Peters CC
Hunter Biden on that and it says boss eight forty
five am prep for nine am phone call with the
President Porshenko. This is just one Where does your mind
(27:58):
go when you see that?
Speaker 3 (27:59):
Well?
Speaker 4 (27:59):
I see that that connects Hunter Biden to Joe Biden
at the time when Devin Archer said he was being
squeezed by Barisma by the owners to call Washington for help. Now,
remember we already found an FBI ten twenty three form
that alleged Joe Biden and Hunter Biden both took bridges
from this guy who was squeezing Hunter Biden to call Washington,
DC for help. Then Joe Biden, using a pseudonym, copies
(28:21):
his son right before he leaves to go to Ukraine
at the same time he was being pressured to call
Washington for help. It looks to me like Joe Biden
was saying, okay, son, you send that to the owner
of Barisma and telling help is on the way. Tell
him Daddy's coming. Daddy's coming, and he's gonna save us all.
And that's what it looks like has happened. And they
(28:42):
used a pseudonym to disguise it. That's why I tell
people when they say why is it taking so long
in this investigation.
Speaker 3 (28:48):
The pseudonyms are just an example.
Speaker 4 (28:50):
They have done everything in their ability to block and
obstruct this investigation. Joe Biden wants to say he's the
most transparent president of the United States. That's bullcrap. He's
the least transparent press in the United States. If he
were innocent, he would be cooperating with this committee and
trying to save his good name. But he continues to
act like there's nothing to see here. When that email
(29:10):
on the screen, he's a government email where Joe Biden
was using a pseudonym and he copied his son about
a shady, shady transaction where Joe Biden was going to
leverage American tax dollars to save his son's button, probably
his own bud.
Speaker 3 (29:26):
If that FBI form's right that he took obribe.
Speaker 1 (29:30):
I think the easiest part for the Democrats on this
really is this. They know he did it, They've accepted it.
They know that Joe Biden's compromised. They've accepted it. They
know there's massive corruption, They've accepted it. They know that
(29:50):
he is a president that is incapacitated, which means in
a weird way. Those in the House and the Senate
that are Democrats actually have more power to get stuff done.
That's the trade off here. The incompetency is the trade off, right.
The incompetency is actually to their advantage. Without that incompetency
(30:16):
that we just mentioned here, then you're screwed.
Speaker 4 (30:20):
Right.
Speaker 1 (30:22):
They need the payoff to keep supporting him, and the
payoff is they can run this government because you have
a present that's not That's why they've clearly been willing
to accept everything else. This is why it's not just impeachment.
This is why Republicans better get their act together and
(30:43):
go all in to make sure we actually get to
the bottom of all of this. Please take everything I
just told you, share it with your family and friends,
take our podcast, share it wherever you can on social media,
because I promise you what I just told you is
(31:04):
not and will not be covered by the mainstream media.
They are not going to do it.
The DOJ. And this is another shocking move here. One
of the other things that we know is that the
DOJ had no problem with people coming from Hunter Biden's
law firm that was representing him to the DJ and
then back there taking I mean, I can't even describe
how valuable that intel would be. Imagine there's someone prosecuting you,
(00:24):
and then you get to go and defend the person
that you're prosecuting and know everything that the defense team
is trying to do to prosecute you. That is incredibly valuable.
It's incredibly unethical as well. Now I want you to
hear what Jim Jordan had to say recently about all
of this. It's shocking. Take a listen what actually happened
at this meeting.
Speaker 2 (00:44):
Who were they talking about.
Speaker 3 (00:46):
What took place? That's what we want to know.
Speaker 4 (00:48):
More importantly, I think that's what the American people want
to know.
Speaker 5 (00:50):
The Department of Justice informed the House Judiciary Committee it
would not cooperate with subpoenas for two FBI agents involved
in the Department's investigation of Hunter Biden because of the
committee's stipulations for their depositions. Carlos Uryarctde, the DOJ Assistant
Attorney General claimed in a letter obtained by Washington Examiner
to Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, his subpoenas to the two
(01:11):
agents quote lack legal effect and cannot constitutionally be enforced
because Jordan had prohibited DOJ lawyers at their depositions. Ur
yard Day wrote, the subpoenas issued by the Committee prohibit
the attendance of Agency Council at appearances by two FBI
employees where the Committee has indicated it will ask questions
regarding information they learned, including regarding the ongoing criminal investigation.
(01:36):
He also noted compelling testimony from the pair of FBI officials,
special Agents Thomas Sobachinski and Raisha Hawley of the FBI's
Baltimore Field Office, was premature because of the DOJ was
open to continuing discussions with Jordan. Jordan's deposition rule aligns
with House rules which do not permit Department Council at depositions.
(01:56):
The DOJ and the Committee could, however, negotiate to have Sovichi, Shechinsky,
and Holly appear voluntarily with DOJ lawyers instead of appearing
in the form of a deposition. Griarte indicated negotiations were plausible.
While he was differential to the committee's oversight authority. Throughout
the letter, he also continuously warrant the DOJ's Biden investigation,
led by newly appointed Special Counsel David Weiss, was ongoing
(02:20):
an information flow would be limited during that time.
Speaker 2 (02:23):
Wow.
Speaker 1 (02:24):
This coming on top of the emails that I mentioned,
and in those emails, we had more shocking information that
came out. Those emails now prove that not only did
Joe Biden have Burner email accounts, but with those email accounts,
he was sharing government information intel the US government's policies
(02:49):
towards Ukraine and quite possibly other countries that the Bidens
were making money off of.
Speaker 6 (02:56):
Emails from Delaware US Attorney David Weiss's office show that
the Justice Department took the lead on answering questions from
Congress that were meant for Weiss. Released earlier this week,
the emails are just the latest signs that Weiss did
not have the independence as a US attorney that the
DOJ claimed he did. Weiss is now a special counsel
leading the investigation into Hunter Biden. The emails show that
(03:19):
Weiss and his team discussed multiple Congressional inquiries including one
about Nicholas McQuaid, a DOJ official during the crucial months
of the Hunter Biden probe who has since returned to
work at the firm defending Hunter Biden. House Republicans have
been heavily critical of Weiss ever since two IRS whistleblowers
revealed allegations of preferential treatment toward the Bidens in his office.
(03:41):
They said a lenient plea deal that Hunter Biden received
in June proved the whistleblower's claims.
Speaker 4 (03:46):
But for these whistleblowers, that sweetheart deal would have been
even sweeter. They weren't even going to require Hunter Biden
plead guilty to anything.
Speaker 6 (03:56):
A judge rejected that plea deal in late July, and
Weiss has since formally withdrawn it. Now, House Republicans are
seeking interviews with people involved in the investigation before Weiss
became a special counsel. The Justice Department is trying to
block those from taking place. They're also looking for emails
on which then Vice President Joe Biden used a fake name.
Speaker 4 (04:17):
We have requested the unredacted documents, and it's very important
because we believe there may be some redactions as to
who was copied on those emails where Joe Biden was
using a pseudonym, particularly in the case of Ukrainian policy.
Speaker 6 (04:31):
The National Archives said this week that it has more
than five thousand emails, including Joe Biden's pseudonyms, but it
has not yet handed them over all. This comes as
House Republicans grow frustrated with the level of stonewalling from
the Biden administration. They say they may have no choice
but to proceed with an impeachment inquiry if the government
doesn't start cooperating. Sarah Bedford for the Washington Examiner.
Speaker 1 (04:54):
Center Ron Johnson has now come out saying Barack Obama
needs to allow archives because it would be his call.
And now the question is how much is Barack Obama
involved in the cover up of the Biden crime family.
Because Barack Obama has to be the one that says
yes to releasing the archives on Biden's five thousand plus
(05:18):
ALIAS emails that he was using while he was the
vice president. Former President Barack Obama is now involved in this,
whether he likes it or not, because he's the one
that can say yes or he's the one that says
no to allow the National Archives to release President Joe
Biden's emails and records linked to his alias email address accounts.
(05:40):
Joe Biden can't even do it. It has to come from
the former president Barack Obama. What we do know is
this Joe Biden used a global cell phone paid for
by Hunter Biden. We also know that he used three
different email alien so that's a total of four that
(06:01):
we know of now to share government information and discuss
business with Hunter Biden and associates. This according to the
Southeastern Legal Foundation known as s LF. SLF was the
first to file the Freedom of Information Act requests and
(06:22):
is afoy you to the Archives for Biden's emails in
twenty twenty one. Two years later, it renewed the requests,
but the Archives failed quote unquote to produce a single
one of these emails. The Foundation is not reported. The
Archives did, however, and this is the most important thing.
(06:43):
They acknowledged the emails and records exist after the SLF
filed a lawsuit to compel the agency to turn over
those emails. The Archives' refusal to provide emails and records
appear to be politically driven. This according to the NAR,
(07:04):
the agency notifies the White House Council's Office of the
requests for records of the former presidents that are currently
unopened to the public or that are proposed for public disclosure.
The agency also notifies the representatives of the former president
and the vice president who created the records. Now, Senator
(07:27):
Johnson said that Obama should demand the release of emails
and records to clear any appearance of wrongdoing specifically by
his administration. He said Obama should allow the NARA NAR
to release the five thy one hundred plus email messages
and more than two hundred pages of records. Lawmakers began
(07:52):
scrutinizing Joe Biden's alias email addresses in twenty twenty one,
but now we've found more of them and more names,
more burner accounts. Senator Johnson and Senator Chuck Grassley have
teamed up. They are actually the authors of a twenty
twenty Senate report. Remember that the Democrats said was basically
(08:13):
Russian collusion, not joking. They were the authors of that
twenty twenty Senate report. In the Biden family, they issued
letters to the White House and there requesting the contents
of email addresses on three separate occasions. This has all
become public now. Quote Senator Johnson said, I've been researching
Joe Biden's use of private email since twenty twenty one.
(08:36):
Three letters to the Biden White House have gone unanswered,
and NARA provided the usual non response response. House Oversight
Committee Chairman James Comer, who's the Republican as you know,
investigating from Kentucky Joe Biden. The Biden crime family, has
officially requested the Archives hand over all the documents now
(09:01):
and communications in which then Vice President Joe Biden used
his aliases. And we know what some of these aliases were,
and there's a good chance or maybe others that we
don't know about the names and the aliases, And I'd
be interested to understand exactly why these names were chosen.
Were Robert Peters, Robin Ware and j rb Ware. James
(09:28):
Comer said this, the Archives need to be transparent and
provide these unredacted records to the GOP House Oversight. The
Republicans concern about the email and the aliases also come
as one alias, Robert Peters, contains an at PCI dot
(09:53):
gov domain name. Now PCI represents the Executive Office of
the President and, according to James Rosen, is connected to
a Department of Defense network. The Robert L. Peters alias
received an email about Ukraine. We now can confirm in
(10:15):
twenty sixteen that c seed Hunter Biden. That's when Biden
was making millions as the big guy, and so was Hunter.
More than ten million in payoffs from Barisma that went down,
and we know that email was that Robert L.
Speaker 3 (10:30):
Peters.
Speaker 1 (10:31):
This is again a burner email account of the vice
president at the time. The now president received an email
about Ukraine in sixteen, and then he seesed Hunter Biden
for a guy that promised he never talked about business
with his son. It does seem like he's lying when
he's got a burner email account and he's emailing information
directly to Hunter Biden about Ukraine. Now, this email, which
(10:54):
Comer says the committee has seen, includes an attachment with
the Vice president's skeete indicating that he had spoken by
phone to then Ukrainian President Porshenko. I want to tell
you about an amazing trip that we as Verdict listeners
are going to be taking to the Holy Land Israel.
(11:15):
Israel is the cradle of Judaism, Christianity and many of
the principles that we hold dear as Americans, and I
want you to join me and many other listeners as
we visit sites like the Armageddon Battlefield, Nazareth, Jericho, Jerusalem, Bethlehem.
You're also on this trip going to set sail on
the Sea of Galilee and you're going to float on
the Dead Sea. We're going to walk in the footsteps
(11:37):
of Biblical figures like King David and Jesus Christ, and
you're going to do it all together with other listeners
from around the country. Now, I'm going to meet up
with you in Jerusalem and you're going to experience the
city and some of the most amazing sites like the
Western Wall, the Temple mount The trip is going to
deepen your understanding of the Bible and of Western civilization.
(11:58):
We're also going to have with us a spiritual advisor
pastor who's going to talk at each site about the
significance in the Bible. With this trip, it is going
to be incredible. Now you've got time to plan because
the trip's going to take place May the sixth through
the fifteenth of twenty twenty four. Now, the good news
is this is trip is amazing and it's signing. People
(12:20):
are signing up fast, so you need to find out
and book your spot now before it's too late. You
can go right now to Christianexpedition dot com slash ben.
It's Christian Expedition dot com slash ben. You can also
call them and get the information got and find out
everything you need to know about this once in a
lifetime trip to Israel. Eight seven seven two three four
(12:43):
three zero zero two. That's eight seven seven two three
four three zero zero two or online it Christianexpedition dot
com slash ben. I want you to hear. Also, James
Comer had to say on Fox Business about all of
the Listen.
Speaker 7 (13:00):
Chatman of the House Overside Committee is James Coma and
he joins me, Now, Colston, why would Biden use pseudonyms
any idea?
Speaker 3 (13:09):
That's a great question.
Speaker 4 (13:10):
Why would he set up with his family twenty shell companies?
Why would they be receiving payments from foreign nationals from Romania, China,
Ukraine and Russia. You know, these are questions that every
American should have, and that's what our investigation of Joe
Biden's all about.
Speaker 7 (13:26):
Have you got access to the unredacted documents from the
National Archives showing these pseudonyms?
Speaker 4 (13:34):
We have requested the unredacted documents and It's very important
because we believe there may be some redactions as to
who was copied on those emails where Joe Biden was
using a pseudonym, particularly in the case of Ukrainian policy Stuart.
So this is the utmost importance to our national security.
Not only was Joe Biden using pseudonyms, he was copying
(13:55):
his son on some of those emails that pertain to Ukraine.
When we had, prior to the pseudonyms becoming public, a
transcribed interview with Devin Archer, who was on the board
of Barisma, the corrupt Ukrainian energy company, along with the
president's son. He testified that the owners of Barisma were
(14:17):
squeezing Hunter Biden to call Washington to get help to
fire the prosecutor Choken who was investigating Barisma for corruption.
So along this same time period we found a pseudonym
where he copied Hunter Biden, and it would leave one
to believe that this was Joe Biden's way of copying
(14:38):
Hunter Biden to say, okay, send it to the Barisma
owners and tell him help is on the way. And
five days later, Joe Biden flew to Ukraine to begin
the process of firing the prosecutor in exchange for American
tax dollars in the former Foreign eight.
Speaker 7 (14:53):
You have a wealth of information right there. But look,
it seems likely, certainly seems possible that they will be
a government shutdown. Will that interfere with your investigations.
Speaker 4 (15:06):
Well, I don't think there'll be a government shutdown. Obviously,
we're having lots of internal discussions now with respect to
how to fund the budget over the next twelve months.
I hope that we can agree on some cuts. I
hope that we can agree on holding certain bad actors
within our federal government accountable. But at the end of
the day, that's a decision that it looks like the
(15:26):
Republicans are gonna have to make as a whole because
we're not getting any help from the Democrats. They want
to continue to spend in oblivion. So but I'm optimistic
there won't be a shutdown, But any type of shutdown
would Stewart interfere with our investigation. Any excuse the Biden
administration can give not to be transparent with the House
Oversight Committee, they're going to take that call.
Speaker 7 (15:47):
Saint James Coma, thank you very much for being with
us today.
Speaker 1 (15:51):
If you hear James Comber. I got to I got
to give a lot of credit to James, because what
James Comer is clearly decided to do is be methi
about this investigation, be very focused about this investigation, take
time to explain it the way that he just did.
(16:15):
And this is what we need to explain this to
the country because this can sound like a complicated issue.
Speaker 3 (16:24):
It can.
Speaker 1 (16:25):
It doesn't have to. It doesn't have to be a
complicated issue, but it can sound like a complicated issue.
And what he's done is simplified it to explain it
to you. Now, there's also something else that's happened. Top
GOP lawmakers now are demanding all info link to David
(16:47):
Weiss's special council appointment, and this is significant. Top Republican
committee chairs this week demanded every document and every communication
from the depart Government of Justice referring or relating to
Attorney General Merrick Garland's appointment of the prosecutor. Now quote
(17:07):
special prosecutor who gave him the sweetheart deal, David Weiss
to that special counsel in the Hunter Biden case. Remember,
David Weiss is the one that wrote the sweetheart deal
that gave the sweetheart deal to Hunter Biden. So the
guy who gave him the deal that the judge said
was ridiculous and said no to is the same guy
that now is a special counsel to somehow then do
something different. We all know that's not going to happen.
(17:31):
We also know the law says that Garland is supposed
to appoint someone from outside of the DOJ. He didn't
do that. We also know that the Special Council is
supposed to be someone who's unbiased from outside of the DOJ.
We know that David Weiss is clearly biased and within
the DOJ, and a special counsel is worthless if it
(17:52):
doesn't have those characteristics. We also know it's technically illegal,
but guess what. The person who you appeal to when
the Special Council as illegal is the Attorney General, Merrit Garland.
And then Merrick Garland is the guy who just gave
this intel and gave all of the records and gave
everything to protect the Biden's too, David Weiss, and that's
(18:14):
exactly why he appointed David Weis's special counsel. Now, Garland
appointed Weiss earlier this month, only after Hunter Biden's sweetheart
plea deal fell apart that Weiss put together. Weiss investigated
Hunter Biden in theory was investigating him for more than
five years. In reality, what he was doing is protecting
(18:34):
the Biden crime family. David Weiss made sure that the
biggest crimes committed by Hunter Biden he could no longer
prosecute him for. And the reason why was simple because
the statue of limitations ran out on the biggest felonies
against Hunter Biden Hunter Biden. Weiss investigated Hunter Biden for
(18:56):
five years before working out the plea deal with the
president's son. One reports indicate the pledia was only pushed
through due to IRS whistle blowers allegations, and that's what
made it fall apart. It's not clear why you have
only now, after the investigation has been going on for
five years, opted to appoint mister Weiss's special counsel, especially
(19:21):
after you in the Department represented that mister Weiss already
had quote ultimate authority over the case. That's what House
Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan wrote in a letter this week,
also signed by the House Ways and Means Committee Chairman
Jason Smith and the House Oversight Committee Chairman James comer.
This also Jim Jordan. They work really well together, as
(19:41):
you can clearly see. The lawmakers noted that alleged special
treatment that hunter Biden received, specifically from the Department of Justice,
including the agency actually tipping off hunter Biden's council, allowing
the statue of limitations to lapse on tax charges, and
suggestions to remove hunter Biden's name from documents such as subpoenas,
(20:06):
and prohibiting IRS and FBI investigators from asking about or
referring to the big guy quote unquote or Dad in
witness interviews. I think it's pretty clear we know what
was going on here. Since the early days of its
investigation concerning hunter Biden, the DOJ has deviated from its
(20:27):
standard investigative procedure and afforded hunter Biden's special privileges not
afforded to other Americans. The letter reads. For instance, according
to whistleblowers, the Department of Justice tipped off the subject
of the investigation, Hunter Biden, and hunter Biden's counsel that
investigators would search a storage unit hunter Biden owned before
(20:50):
investigators could conduct the search. In another instance, the Department
also allowed the statue of limitations to lapse on charges
for the twenty fourteen twenty fifteen tax years, including felony
charges of tax evasion and filing a false or fraudulent
tax return for the twenty fourteen tax year, despite defense
(21:15):
counsel's willingness to consent to an extension, So even Hunter
Biden's own team was saying, no, no, no, we will agree
to while you guys are investigating, so you don't hurry
up in charge us with something while you're doing your investigation,
we will consent to an extension of those statue of limitations.
And you know what happened, David Weiss and the DOJ
(21:36):
said no, no, no, we don't want to get we don't
need an extension. We'll just let it run out. If
you're investigating tax crimes and you know that tax crimes exist,
and you're going through all of this, and the Defense Council,
Hunter Biden's counsel is willing to consent to an extension
of those statue of limitations, why would you not take
(21:56):
it unless you're actually covering for the president's son and
protecting the Biden crime family. Quote. These deviations took place
while mister Weiss with a full support and backing of
the Department of Justice oversaw the Hunter by investigations the
US Attorney prior to receiving Special Council status. So what
(22:17):
they're saying is he had full of authority autonomy to
do whatever he wanted to do. And the question they're
asking is, Okay, if he had full authority to do
whatever it is that he wanted to do, now, what
would be any different that he has been named special counsel.
He could have done everything he now has the ability
to do. Then, based on what we've been told, now,
the Department of Justice has until September the eleventh to
(22:38):
respond to this letter that has come from Jim Jordan,
James Comer, etc. The agency, by the way, confirm received
the letter but declined to comment. The Hill newspaper is
now reporting, So this is becoming a bigger problem for them.
Now now they can just say, here's the middle finger
in Pound Sand in Washington, d C. They can do that.
There's a very good chance that they might do that.
(23:01):
That wouldn't actually surprise me at all if they did that.
But these five thousand plus emails using Biden's you know,
burner accounts are in possession of the National Archives. The
question is why do they have them right? What's because
he was using email addresses that were important within the
government that we didn't know about. That is not normal.
(23:23):
Here's a little bit more of what James Comer had
to say in another interview National Report on Newsmax about
what they're finding.
Speaker 2 (23:30):
I just want to get your reaction there to Kilmeny's
report the National Archives admitting it has thousands of emails
and electronic records related to pseudonyms allegedly used by then
Vice President Joe Biden. Where are you in the process
of coming through those emails and is there more to this?
Speaker 3 (23:49):
Well?
Speaker 4 (23:49):
There we have copies of several of those emails, certainly
not five thousand, four hundred like what is estimated that
he used. But many of these emails that we have
copies to are redacted, and we want the unredacted version
because we already know of at least one email pertaining
the Ukrainian policy at a time that fits when Devin
(24:12):
Archer's testimony was said that the owners of Barisma were
squeezing Hunter to call Washington for help in getting choken.
Speaker 3 (24:22):
The Ukrainian prosecutor.
Speaker 4 (24:24):
Fired who was investigating the president's son's corrupt energy company
in Ukraine, and we all know that days later Joe
Biden went to Ukraine and withheld foreign tax dollars in
the form of four and aid in exchange for terminating
Victor Schokin, the prosecutor who's.
Speaker 3 (24:42):
Investigating his son.
Speaker 4 (24:42):
So we're very concerned now that Joe Biden was using
pseudonyms to hide the fact that he was working with
his son to pedal access to our enemies around the
world in exchange for wire transfers that we've already to
covered that went to shell companies or fake companies while
(25:04):
he was vice president.
Speaker 3 (25:05):
So let's just think about this.
Speaker 4 (25:06):
The vice president at the time, Joe Biden was using
fake names in emails, and he also was working with
his family that set up fake companies to receive wires
from foreign nationals that were then laundered into at least
nine family members bank accounts.
Speaker 3 (25:25):
I mean, this is one of the worst.
Speaker 4 (25:26):
Stories that I've ever heard with respect to any type
of leader in the history of our country.
Speaker 8 (25:33):
It would obviously, you know, lead you, I'm sure to
question where the money is and where did it ultimately
end up. Could you share an update on sort of
the process of tracking down alleged payments to folks with
the last name Biden.
Speaker 3 (25:48):
Yeah.
Speaker 4 (25:49):
I mean that we've got twenty one million dollars thus
far in bank accounts that were the part of wire
transfers from foreign nationals to shell companies. And again, I
can't reemphasize this enough. Shell companies are fake companies, just
like a pseudonym. A pseudonym is a fake name. The
same thing with these companies that were receiving the initial
(26:10):
wires from these foreign nationals. And again, these were bad
people in bad countries that were paying the bidens tens
of millions.
Speaker 3 (26:16):
Of dollars for reasons we don't know.
Speaker 4 (26:18):
All we know is, according to Devid Archer, they were
selling the brand, and the brand was Joe Widen. We
know that one of the instances of a potential policy
decision that was made was Joe Biden has already admitted
that he flew to Ukrainian with held tax dollars to
fire a prosecutor who was investigating his son's corrupt energy company.
I mean, this is really bad stuff. And every week
(26:40):
we find more information, more pseudonyms, more communication between Joe
Biden's family, more shell companies, more wire treans.
Speaker 3 (26:47):
First so this is getting worse by the day. And
what we want to know, we want to know.
Speaker 4 (26:53):
A couple of more bank accounts that we believe that
the president's son was using to pay for things of
value you for Joe Biden. So this is where we
are in this investigation. We're at the point to where
we're probably going to head to court to try to
get some more bank records. But this is an investigation
of Joe Biden. And I don't think the Democrats. You know,
they defended Joe Biden for nearly a year. Now can
(27:17):
they defend the pseudonyms? Can they defend the payments going
to things of value for Joe Biden. That's where the
Democrats are going to have to have a come to
Jesus moment and decide how much longer they could defend
the indefensible with respect to Joe Biden.
Speaker 2 (27:33):
With respect of the emails, I know that you said
that you had copies on and some of them were redacted.
We actually have one I believe that is not redacted
that we've got our hands on here and this is
just kind of a zoom in here, and this is
from one of the alleged pseudonyms Robert L. Peters CC
Hunter Biden on that and it says boss eight forty
five am prep for nine am phone call with the
President Porshenko. This is just one Where does your mind
(27:58):
go when you see that?
Speaker 3 (27:59):
Well?
Speaker 4 (27:59):
I see that that connects Hunter Biden to Joe Biden
at the time when Devin Archer said he was being
squeezed by Barisma by the owners to call Washington for help. Now,
remember we already found an FBI ten twenty three form
that alleged Joe Biden and Hunter Biden both took bridges
from this guy who was squeezing Hunter Biden to call Washington,
DC for help. Then Joe Biden, using a pseudonym, copies
(28:21):
his son right before he leaves to go to Ukraine
at the same time he was being pressured to call
Washington for help. It looks to me like Joe Biden
was saying, okay, son, you send that to the owner
of Barisma and telling help is on the way. Tell
him Daddy's coming. Daddy's coming, and he's gonna save us all.
And that's what it looks like has happened. And they
(28:42):
used a pseudonym to disguise it. That's why I tell
people when they say why is it taking so long
in this investigation.
Speaker 3 (28:48):
The pseudonyms are just an example.
Speaker 4 (28:50):
They have done everything in their ability to block and
obstruct this investigation. Joe Biden wants to say he's the
most transparent president of the United States. That's bullcrap. He's
the least transparent press in the United States. If he
were innocent, he would be cooperating with this committee and
trying to save his good name. But he continues to
act like there's nothing to see here. When that email
(29:10):
on the screen, he's a government email where Joe Biden
was using a pseudonym and he copied his son about
a shady, shady transaction where Joe Biden was going to
leverage American tax dollars to save his son's button, probably
his own bud.
Speaker 3 (29:26):
If that FBI form's right that he took obribe.
Speaker 1 (29:30):
I think the easiest part for the Democrats on this
really is this. They know he did it, They've accepted it.
They know that Joe Biden's compromised. They've accepted it. They
know there's massive corruption, They've accepted it. They know that
(29:50):
he is a president that is incapacitated, which means in
a weird way. Those in the House and the Senate
that are Democrats actually have more power to get stuff done.
That's the trade off here. The incompetency is the trade off, right.
The incompetency is actually to their advantage. Without that incompetency
(30:16):
that we just mentioned here, then you're screwed.
Speaker 4 (30:20):
Right.
Speaker 1 (30:22):
They need the payoff to keep supporting him, and the
payoff is they can run this government because you have
a present that's not That's why they've clearly been willing
to accept everything else. This is why it's not just impeachment.
This is why Republicans better get their act together and
(30:43):
go all in to make sure we actually get to
the bottom of all of this. Please take everything I
just told you, share it with your family and friends,
take our podcast, share it wherever you can on social media,
because I promise you what I just told you is
(31:04):
not and will not be covered by the mainstream media.
They are not going to do it.
Host
Ben Ferguson
Popular Podcasts
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Therapy Gecko
An unlicensed lizard psychologist travels the universe talking to strangers about absolutely nothing. TO CALL THE GECKO: follow me on https://www.twitch.tv/lyleforever to get a notification for when I am taking calls. I am usually live Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays but lately a lot of other times too. I am a gecko.