Transgenderism in Prisons

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
The worst journalistic failure I think, well, one of the
worst of the last three or four years, I think
is the total failure of coverage really kind of by
both the left and the right. Why it wasn't made,
like the case of the year, why it wasn't made
the most important, most significant, one of the most.

Speaker 2 (00:23):
Important, significant criminal stories of the year is the story
of the prosecution of Nicholas Rosky, whose name you don't
even know.

Speaker 1 (00:33):
You don't even know who the heck I'm talking about
by saying this, which is part of the problems that
you should have known the name of this guy, Nicholas Roski,
is the guy who tried.

Speaker 2 (00:40):
To assassinate Brett Kavanaugh.

Speaker 1 (00:44):
He tried to go to Brett Kavanaugh's house, he tried
to kill him. He had a whole bunch of stuff
in his car that he was going to use to
kidnap and murder Brett Kavanaugh. He says he was thinking
about going to other Supreme Court justices houses, going there

(01:05):
to kill them too, the other conservative justices. He was
explicitly motivated by left wing ideology, specifically his consideration that
at that time, let's remember the timeline. This was in

(01:26):
twenty twenty two, the draft opinion of the Dobbs decision Dobbs,
which was the Supreme Court case that overturned roev Wade.
The draft opinion got leaked to the public, which never Basically,
I can't recall a single other case in which that

(01:46):
has ever happened where a Supreme Court's draft opinion gets
leaked to the press. The draft opinion was leaked, everyone
thought that it was written in the style of a
majority opinion.

Speaker 2 (02:06):
Everyone guessed that it was.

Speaker 1 (02:09):
Everyone completely accurately guessed everything that it was written by
Justice Alito. Well, they knew it was written by Justice Alito,
I believe, and they all everyone guessed accurately who had
signed on to it. It was Alito, joined by Thomas Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Barrett.

(02:35):
People were unsure about Roberts. Turned out Roberts did not
really go with the controlling opinion in Tops. Okay, So
this guy did the math. Nicholas Rosky did the math
and realized, well, if I can murder one Supreme Court justice,
then this opinion only has if I can murder this

(02:56):
person before the opinions released, which he figured was probably
going to be in late June. If I can murder
someone before this is released, then only four justices will
sign on to it, and Roe v. Wade won't be
totally overturned, which is precisely what would have happened. So

(03:16):
he goes to Brett Kavanaugh's house, which, by the way,
all of the Supreme Court justices, all the conservative Supreme
Court justices anyway, had been having consistent protests right outside
their houses from left wing activists. Left wing activists were
publishing where the Supreme Court justices live online and going

(03:40):
to their houses to protest on the street. The Biden
administration was refusing to enforce federal law that strictly prohibits
people protesting outside judges' houses. Biden administration wouldn't enforce the law.
This guy goes to Brett Kavanaugh's house with open knives

(04:01):
on all kinds of stuff, ready to kill Brett Kavanaugh. Thankfully,
I think that there because there had been some heightened
level of security at Kavanaugh's house. They catch the guy,
he admits he was there to murder Kavanaugh. They charge
him with attempted murder, and the case gets buried. It

(04:24):
barely gets discussed as a national news item, because which
is insane for a number of reasons.

Speaker 2 (04:32):
First of all, it cast the whole.

Speaker 1 (04:36):
Leaking of the draft Supreme Court opinion into a far
more sinister light. Is that precisely what the leaker wanted
was to leak the document have that result in physical
intimidation of the justices, which is what happened. People protested
right outside their houses, and this guy wanted to take a.

Speaker 2 (05:01):
Justice out like everything.

Speaker 1 (05:03):
People like I had heard conversations from serious lawyers about
the justices should now that the draft's been leaked, the
justices should release their actual opinion.

Speaker 2 (05:14):
Now.

Speaker 1 (05:14):
They should get their final opinion done and release it asap,
because now they've got the conservative justices have a target
on their back. People will realize if they kill one
of the justices, they can change the outcome of the case. Clearly,
the Court decided not to alter anything about the timeline

(05:35):
of their decision on the basis of the leak and decided, no,
we're going to release it at our normal time, which
I guess is kind of an admirable position for them
to take. But clearly the people who said this is
putting a target on your back were correct. Someone almost
assassinated Brett Kavanaugh, all right, So the relevance of this

(05:57):
attempted murder of Brett Kavanaugh to the leak story. Who
leaked it? Why did they leak it? The damage that
resulted from leaking it, I e. A Supreme Court justice
almost got assassinated. That was barely discussed as a news item.

(06:19):
In fact, like the Washington Post covering that story treated
it like a local crime case, an attempted assassination of
a Supreme Court justice, and they make it a local
crime case. That's not a local crime issue. That's a
national news story. And you know, of course, and you

(06:42):
know obvious, it's completely obvious if the situation's reversed if
it had been Ruth Bader Ginsburg or Sonya Sonami or
or someone like that targeted for assassination for signing after
she signs on to a draft opinion that somehow inappropriately
gets leaked. It was in the trial of the century,

(07:02):
and nobody talked about it, no one dealt with it. Well, now,
Nicholas Rosky, he who pleads guilty to attempted murder, All right,

(07:22):
guilty of attempted murder of a Supreme Court justice. Okay,
so attempted murder is already bad. I'm sure attempted murder
of a federal official of some sort. That's that's even
worse as far as the severity of the punishment. The
max sentence you can get for an attempted murder for

(07:45):
attempted murder is life. The prosecutors wanted thirty years for
this guy.

Speaker 2 (07:53):
What happens.

Speaker 1 (07:57):
The guy claims now that he is transgender, claims he's transgender.

Speaker 2 (08:09):
So as a result, the federal judge in the DC.

Speaker 1 (08:11):
District judge Boardman, Actually, I'm not sure if this is
DC district. Hold on one second, but the federal judge,
I'm sorry, she's in Maryland, Okay, Not in the DC
District District of Maryland, okay.

Speaker 2 (08:28):
Deborah Boardman.

Speaker 1 (08:31):
Boardman is a Biden appointee, total whacked out, crazy lefty.
She gives this Nicholas Rosky character, not life, which is
the max, not thirty years, which is what the DOJ wanted.
She gives him eight eight years for trying to kill

(08:53):
a Supreme Court justice. Why well, she concerned about President
Trump's executive order requiring transgender inmates to be detained in
prisons that correspond to their sex at birth, i e.
Their sex, their biological I mean there's no other sense

(09:15):
other than biological to actually put males into male prisons
and females into female prisons. So she's concerned about this
and gives them a lesser sentence as a result, and
the whole courtroom scene turns into this maudlin thing of
the mom talking about how she finally came to accept

(09:39):
Rosky for who he, she them whatever is, and the
judge like talking about, you know, obviously the circumstances are bad,
but how a good thing it is that this family
could have been brought together, could have been brought together,
you know, as a result of this, Like.

Speaker 2 (10:02):
What are we doing? This is an attempted murder case. Stop.
This is not a low This is not a drug
low level drug case.

Speaker 1 (10:12):
This is not a guy with an addiction problem down
on his luck who the judge is helping with, you know,
with some sort of sentence that's kind of correctional and
rehabilitative in its nature, and you know, getting the family
on board to help a guy Like.

Speaker 2 (10:31):
Okay, you want to do that for a low level case.

Speaker 1 (10:35):
Fine, this guy tried to murder a Supreme Court justice
to change the country's laws, and you're acting, we're talking
about the heartwarming nature of the parents accepting his gender idea.

Speaker 2 (10:56):
What the what the heck are we doing?

Speaker 1 (11:02):
You knock his sentence from thirty years to eight because
you're mad at Donald Trump's like gender whatever for federal prisons.

Speaker 2 (11:14):
Thirty to eight. This should have like again, not to
put the shoe on the other foot. If this whole scenario.

Speaker 1 (11:29):
Were being played out against someone who attempted to murder
Sonya Soda Mayor, this person would get not eight years,
not thirty years. They would get this same judge in
Maryland would try to all of a sudden she would say,
you know, the death penalty is really you know, I
usually don't like it, but for cases like that, I

(11:51):
mean that I'm almost not kidding.

Speaker 2 (11:54):
This judge would be looking at life for this person.

Speaker 1 (11:57):
If this person had tried to assassinate Sonya so Mayor
in order to I don't know, keep Roe v.

Speaker 2 (12:03):
Wade on the books or something.

Speaker 1 (12:04):
Like that, like it it is, this guy's act would
have been one of the most nationally destabilizing things ever
if he had pulled it off. If he had pulled
this off and murdered Brett Kavanaugh to alter the outcome
of a Supreme Court decision. It would have demonstrated that

(12:29):
political violence works and you should do it. It would
have been one of the most horrific, destabilizing events in
the history of American government. And this gal gives him
eight years when DJ was asking for thirty and they
could have, you know, could have been life sentence. I

(12:57):
don't understand why this story isn't like at every stage
of it, I mean, at every stage of it, I
don't understand why it wasn't front page news. Well, I say,
I don't understand. I do understand why. The reason why
is because it looks terrible for liberals. The reason why
is because if this story were plastered everywhere, it turns

(13:22):
into a wow, look at this horrible liberal who did
this completely horrible thing to try to murder a Supreme
Court justice, to do this completely democratically illegitimate thing to
alter the outcome of a Supreme Court decision that the
left doesn't like, and it just would have looked terrible
for liberals, the same way that liberals were forced to have,

(13:43):
you know, a mirror put to their faces over Charlie
Kirk's killer, and they tried to you know, they tried
to say that black is white and deny it.

Speaker 2 (13:50):
Deny.

Speaker 1 (13:51):
Oh well, we don't exactly know the motivation of the
killer who murdered Charlie Kirk in cold blood while he
was talking with like stop hate etched onto the bullet casing.

Speaker 2 (14:01):
I mean, like you could.

Speaker 1 (14:02):
Practice it's practically impossible to find someone whose motivations would
be clearer than the guy who shot Charlie Kirk. And
they're still trying to act like either, oh well, we
don't exactly know. Maybe he was a right wing critic
of Charlie Kirk. Yeah, like a Nick Flentes person hates

(14:25):
Charlie Kirk so much that he's gonna go assassinate him
with stop the hate. No, ultra right people don't write, yo,
Charlie Kirk is just so full of hate. That's not
a thing that ultra right people would say. It's ridiculous.
So that's the reason why it's not a story. It's
because the left refuses to make it a story. They

(14:47):
don't want to have that mirror held up to the
wackos and looney tunes within their ranks. And it's why
January sixth was the dominant in the view of the left,
the most important political event of the last decade. Why

(15:08):
it sho shone a light on some of our wackos,
and so the Left light putting every magnifying glass humanly
possible on it, but not putting every magnifying glass humanly
possible on this guy, Nicholas Roski, who tried to assassinate

(15:28):
Brett Kavanaugh, the guy who shot the Republicans before the
congressional baseball game in twenty seventeen and almost killed Steve Scalise,
the House Republican whip. Not on the political motivations of
the guys who killed who tried to assassinate Donald Trump.

(15:54):
They were forced to look at the obvious political affinity
of Tyler Robinson and the guy who killed Charlie Kirk.
They were forced to. And I don't like it, but
that's what's going on. I don't understand why, at every
stage of things, this Nicholas Rosky case, the man who

(16:15):
tried to kill Breck Kavanaugh, it should have been front
page national news every step of the way. And the
only reason it's not is because Left doesn't want to
put more magnifying glasses on their looney tunes. All right,
when we return, I want to talk about just how
corrections worked and how guys in jail work and the
horrible precedent this sets with giving someone a lesser sentence

(16:38):
because they're allegedly transgender.

Speaker 2 (16:40):
Next on the John Girardi Show, I don't.

Speaker 1 (16:44):
Think you need a deep familiarity with corrections, with prisons
with jails to understand this concept. I myself never worked
in corrections for jails, but I did lawyer for a
sheriff's department for a couple of years. The law firm
I was at when I was right out of law school,
one of our big clients was a local county sheriff

(17:06):
and we handled a lot of their litigation. Anytime the
jail system would be sued, we would handle it. So
I got to see a lot about jail and what
jail's like and how jailbirds behave and act and operate.
These are bad dudes, and they're bad dudes with a

(17:27):
lot of time on their hands. And one of the
things about guys in the correction system, they're schemers. They
got a lot of time. They're not nice guys, and
they have a lot of time to think about how
they will do not good things and they will take
any opportunity they can get to figure out how to

(17:51):
do non nice things. Okay, this is why jailbirds will
find these ingenious ways of taking like toilet paper and
doing something to harden it. And all of a sudden,
you've got to shift to stab somebody with like I'll
do some weird way of communicating with some I'll snake
a cell phone up my butt into.

Speaker 2 (18:08):
The jail like that. They do insane stuff.

Speaker 1 (18:13):
They have a lot of time to think about scheme
about how they're gonna do bad things.

Speaker 2 (18:21):
Given that this is a common trait of people in
the American correction system.

Speaker 1 (18:26):
More broadly, it always made it insane to me that
proponents of transgender ideology would always hand wave away the
argument of okay, so your concept of transgenderism is that
if someone says they are trans, you can't challenge it,

(18:47):
you can't dispute it on the basis of you haven't
had a surgery, you haven't had a hormone change.

Speaker 2 (18:52):
Literally, all you're doing is saying it.

Speaker 1 (19:00):
Be just kind of dressing a little fancy and wanting
a different wanting someone to call you a different name.
That's all you gotta do. And bingo bengo boingo, you're
trans and we can't question that. We can't test that.
There's no test, there's no measurement of it. There's no
objective standard to ensure whether you're faking it or not.

(19:22):
And that's that is the case with a transgender identification.
You're you're in fact, transphobic if you dare to try
to assess whether this guy's faking.

Speaker 2 (19:38):
It or not.

Speaker 1 (19:40):
So you're gonna tell me that Guys who are in jail,
guys who are convicted, you know, for some guys, guys
in prisons who are convicted felons, they're gonna figure out.
Wait a minute, if I say that I'm a woman

(20:01):
and I don't need to get hormones and I don't
need to have a surgery, and I don't need to
do anything, I can be housed in a women's prison.
Uh okay, fast forward. Tremaine Carroll is an inmate, a
man biological man. Still has a goateee, still goes by it,

(20:23):
still has the name Tremaine. No requested name change. He
is currently being charged with raping three female inmates in
the Chowchilla Women's Facility in the Derrick County, one of
whom got pregnant. The whole theory of the case is
that the guy was faking a transgender identity in order

(20:45):
to rape all these women, and in the course of
her prosecution, the DA Sally Moreno in the Derek County
has gotten into this conflict with the judge who is
insisting that the prosecutors and the witnesses, the alleged.

Speaker 2 (20:59):
Victims of this man, use female pronouns.

Speaker 1 (21:05):
To refer to him, the guy who's being indicted for rape,
for raping them, the witnesses, and we're gonna police their pronouns. Now,
that's not the only case of it. There are tons
of examples that There are lots of other examples in

(21:26):
the media of men identifying as women so they can
go into women's prisons and start trying to have sex
with women.

Speaker 2 (21:36):
Why because that's what inmates will do. If you give
them an inch, they'll take a mile if you give them.

Speaker 1 (21:41):
The upper Hey, you realize you can like rape some
women and have some sex with women if you just
say you're a woman and get a signed Oh okay,
sign me up. Guys are gonna do that. And it
was insane ever to think that they wouldn't. Now here's
this Nicholas Rosky guy saying I'm transgender, and all of

(22:05):
a sudden, his sentence goes down from the DJ recommends
thirty it gets knocked down twenty two years. He's only
getting eight years for attempting to murder Brett Kavanaugh, a
Supreme Court justice.

Speaker 2 (22:20):
Again, inmates are schemers.

Speaker 1 (22:23):
They sit around think about all kinds of ways of
how can they get out, how can they do bad
stuff in jail? So you're now going to broadcast to
these guys that, hey, you get some you know, Democrat
appointee judge and you say that you're transgender, Hey, they'll
knock your sentence down by twenty two years. You don't

(22:44):
think someone's gonna fake being transgender to get twenty two
years off a thirty year sentence. Yeah, I mean, are
you kidding me? If I was going to jail for
thirty years, I'm attack I'd consider it thirty years down
to eight. Me up, get me a dressed and call
me Joanna. So, I mean, it's insane how the Left

(23:12):
refuses to accept this basic idea that guys in jail
do bad stuff, the idea that they weren't going to
abuse transgender ideology to facilitate their ability to do bad
stuff is nuts. It was always one of the most

(23:33):
bat bleep insane aspects of transgenderism. When we returned some
more thoughts about transgenderism in jails and prisons.

Speaker 2 (23:43):
And more broadly within society.

Speaker 1 (23:46):
That's next on the John Jrburdy Show, I want to
think through some more transgenderism stuff and some thoughts I've
had on the topic for a long time. I discussed
this a bit in the last segment that I used
to be a lawyer for the law firm I worked
for right out of law school. One of our big
clients was a sheriff's department in Massachusetts, and the sheriff's

(24:10):
department ran all the county jails, like many counties do.
The counties run the jails, and just for lingo differences,
jail is usually a more local entity run thing, often
run by counties in America. Jail is where you have
pre sentenced people, so they're arrested, they haven't gone through

(24:35):
trial yet, or they haven't been convicted yet, and it's
often where you have people who are sentenced for misdemeanors. Okay,
so a misdemeanor is a lower level crime that gets
you less than a year in jail. In California, though,
our prisons were so packed that they started offloading lots

(24:58):
of prison in mates off onto local jails.

Speaker 2 (25:05):
California's whole thing.

Speaker 1 (25:06):
With prisons is ridiculous, but part of it, a lot
of it stems from this case that made it all
the way to the Supreme Court that Anthony Kennedy signed
on to, where Anthony Kennedy said that prisons in California
were so crowded that it constituted a violation of the
Eighth Amendment against cruel and Unusual punishment, which I think
was a ridiculous case, but the impact of that on

(25:30):
the California correction system was pretty significant. It meant, like
the Supreme Court was taling California, you have to lessen
your prison population. So what happens. It became this huge impetus,
this huge incentive for California to make felonies not felonies anymore,
you know, reduce the number of felonies, reduced the number

(25:50):
of sentences for felonies, reduced sentences across the board, shove
people who should be in prisons into jails. It had
this massive impact across the board. So I know a
thing or two about jails and corrections. I'm not saying
I'm the world's greatest expert, but I know a thing

(26:13):
or two. I got to learn about a couple of
different things with regards to jails and corrections and different
kinds of theories of corrections. The guy who was the
sheriff in the county where I was lawyering, he was
actually the guy who invented the whole concept of the
ankle bracelet, all right, His county correction system invented it.

(26:35):
And he was sort of viewed as a very liberal
sheriff in a lot of ways and very big on rehabilitation.
He was one of the big time like corrections officials
in the United States who is super super big into
the idea of rehabilitation as a policy, as a goal

(26:59):
of corrections, and especially for you know, this is we're
talking about the context of a county sheriff, not a
prison overseer, a guy who's overseeing people sentenced for multi
year sentences for committing felonies. This is a guy overseeing
jails with again, guys convicted of misdemeanors and people who've

(27:24):
been accused and are awaiting their.

Speaker 2 (27:26):
Trial or they're pleading whatever.

Speaker 1 (27:28):
So I think his approach to things, having a more
rehabilitative approach to things, I think it was kind of positive.
And I actually had a lot of sort of experiences
of that for up close sort of seeing how they worked.

Speaker 2 (27:41):
That I thought, you know, as much as a lot of.

Speaker 1 (27:43):
The rehabilitation coded idea within corrections, it's kind of gives
this vibe of being very left wing. I actually thought
a lot of it was really sensible, and especially when
you're talking about now I don't know so much about
you know, guy who are sentenced to multiple year felony sentences,

(28:03):
but for low level offenders, I think having that kind
of a mindset is a good idea. And yeah, give
them programs, give them the ability to get their high
school diploma done, give them something productive to do while
they're in the clink, and allow them to hopefully transition
better out of jail into a more productive lifestyle.

Speaker 2 (28:23):
All Right, I thought that was I thought a lot
of that was swell.

Speaker 1 (28:32):
But it did allow me to learn a lot about jails,
and it's produced in me kind of this, I don't know,
not a fondness for jail birds, but.

Speaker 2 (28:44):
A sense that there's a lot of bad stuff.

Speaker 1 (28:47):
That can happen in jails in prisons, and sexual assault
being one of them. I think anytime you talk about,
especially among conservatives, there's this sort of sense of it, Oh,
he's going to go to the slammer, and then you know,
hopefully somebody will raise having seen a lot of these
people and seen kind of what they're going through and whatnot.

(29:11):
This is one of my more liberal coded things. I
think the idea of a jail like either tacitly permitting
rape to happen within prisons and jails is an incredibly
ugly and horrific thing, and I don't think it's true
actually of every jail system, of every prison system I know.

(29:33):
Actually the county I represented what took a very firm
stance on stopping it and preventing it and not allowing
sexual contact between inmates.

Speaker 2 (29:43):
Blah blah blah. You know. I think if you're sentenced
ten years, you're not senced to ten.

Speaker 1 (29:49):
Years and to being raped, okay, And I don't think
any civilized society should allow that. I think that is
or it could be certainly an Eighth Amendment Violet thing
for prisons to allow such a thing as in that
that's cruel and unusual punishment. So it is a thing

(30:09):
where I think, I don't know, maybe sometimes people joke
about it, but if you're actually seriously thinking about it
as a policy matter, it's something really.

Speaker 2 (30:16):
Serious and it is a real serious problem. You know,
I really, sincerely.

Speaker 1 (30:24):
Do not think people should be subjected to that while
they're incarcerated, and that while you know, it's very hard
to get people to cry big alligator tears, especially conservatives,
for the rights of inmates while they're in jail or
in prison, they're under difficult conditions where they could be
extremely vulnerable, and they, yes, their rights are severely attenuated

(30:50):
because of their own actions, because of their own conduct.
I'm not saying don't have tough sentences for guys. I'm
not saying don't give them long sentences you should give.
I think we should give people longer sentences, but there
should be some defense for basic civil and human rights
that these guys should have, one of which is that

(31:11):
they should not be subjected to sexual violence by other inmates,
by corrections, officials, et cetera. Now, one of the areas
where I did a lot of work was we had
a couple of big lawsuits emanating out of the women's jail.
When I was lawyering for this Sheriff's Department, the women's

(31:32):
jail had a lot of issues. There were accusations of
impropriety on the part of corrections officers. I was defending
our the corrections officers, and I don't think they did
anything inappropriate.

Speaker 2 (31:47):
But when you've got when you've got.

Speaker 1 (31:51):
Male guards with female inmates, it can get dicey, especially
given the kinds of stuff you have to do within
jails and prisons. You got a strips or to people.
You have to strip search people often. One of the
things we dealt with was if there had been a
fight and we need and you needed to put someone

(32:14):
into solitary if there had been a fight, or if
someone was having a psychotic episode or something, you needed
to put someone into a solitary confinement because they were
a risk to other inmates or staff whatever. You know,
you had to do a strip search of them. Why
they're going into solitary confinement, if they're bringing a weapon
with them. If they bring a weapon with them, they're

(32:37):
going to hurt themselves and we don't want that.

Speaker 2 (32:40):
So we got a strip search to these people.

Speaker 1 (32:43):
And the law on the books at the time when
I was doing this lawyering, which was, you know, twenty thirteen,
twenty fourteen, twenty fifteen, all the federal law was really
clear about what are the rights of inmates in this regard,
and the Supreme Court and the other lower federal courts
I've been looking at this, well, our male guards are
allowed to strip search female inmates, and the courts had

(33:07):
basically come to the or what about female guards strip
searching male inmates? You know what if you you know,
there were cases arising from Muslim inmates were saying, look,
this is violative of my beliefs to have a.

Speaker 2 (33:20):
Woman be.

Speaker 1 (33:22):
You know, strip searching me while I'm butt naked, Like
I don't want this. This, I think this violates my
my First Amendment rights again for free exercise, religion, blah
blah blah. So where the cults where the courts had
ultimately landed with all of this was pretty straightforward. Outside
of exigent circumstances like a full on prison riot or

(33:43):
something like that, male guards strip search male inmates, female
guards strip search female inmates.

Speaker 2 (33:56):
That's it, end of story. It was very straightforward.

Speaker 1 (34:02):
It was based very purely on a binary conception of sex.
And it makes sense, okay, I mean you can if
you google male guard sex female inmates. There are way
too many stories that then you're going to be comfortable
seeing it happens. It's bad, all right. If you look

(34:24):
up male guard rapes female inmates, too many stories one
story would be too many. And this just gives a
greater degree of security to everybody involves. It's probably better
for the guards, you know, the fewer allegations of you know, mamby,

(34:45):
pamby whatever. Now, the idea that transgenderism was going to
work in that context was insane, and it's this real
rubber meets the row. Of all the issues where transgenderism
impacted culture, it seems like boys playing girls' sports is

(35:09):
the most dominant one. It's the most relatable everyone. You know,
most people played some kind of sport growing up. Most
parents have a kid who's playing some kind of sport.
Sports is fun. People like sports. It's a very visible thing.
And I do think there's genuine injustice there. I think

(35:31):
every boy who takes a spot away from a girl
there's injustice there. There.

Speaker 2 (35:35):
There are physical risks too, when.

Speaker 1 (35:37):
You've got a big, a biological male who's on on average, bigger, taller, stronger,
playing against female competitors, there's more risk of injury. But
I do genuinely think that the correctional context, where you
have people locked up, they're vulnerable, they're in close quarters together.

(36:02):
Some of them are violent, many of them are violent.
Pretty much we put all of our most violent people there.
And the idea of allowing that, particularly for women's correctional facilities,
to allow biological men to go in there and live
there when we don't even let guards witness a strip

(36:26):
search of a female inmate, we're gonna say we can
have a biologically male convicted felon bunk up with a
female inmate.

Speaker 2 (36:36):
Are you nuts?

Speaker 1 (36:39):
And again, no one's gonna shed big alligator tears for
a gallon a woman's prison. I get it, like she
made bad choices, but whatever she was sentenced to, it
was that many years, not that many years plus being
raped by a man.

Speaker 2 (36:54):
That's not what she was sentenced to.

Speaker 1 (36:57):
And I think a civilized country would ever allows such
a thing. And it is a thing I feel really
strongly about that of all the injustices of transgenderism, the
assault on female inmates that it produces is maybe the
worst of all the injustices. Now we're talking about flat

(37:18):
out raping women and being okay with that happening to
satisfy some insane ideological urge.

Speaker 2 (37:27):
Closing thoughts.

Speaker 1 (37:28):
Right after this on The John Girardi Show, Harvard University
has made it an interesting hire as a visiting professor.
So you've heard of the city Lahore, Pakistan. Lahore is
the capital of Pakistan. This is a drag queen whose
first name sounds like the name of the capital city
of Pakistan. And this drag queen his last name is

(37:51):
not Pakistan, but instead of the Pak replace it with
a vag.

Speaker 2 (37:59):
Yeah. Yeah, we're really doing enlightened.

Speaker 1 (38:02):
High level academic learning here at Harvard University when we're
hiring drag queens named whatever.

Speaker 2 (38:09):
I feel uncomfortable even saying it for FCC stuff. That'll
do it. Johns'rolready show see you next time on Power
Talk