Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Hello, Chilly Nash, Good morning. It's tomorrow's show today. Thank God,
tomorrow's Friday. If you're working today and you're off tomorrow,
then your weekend's already gonna be started. But otherwise, everybody's
gonna be trying to get out of the office early,
get on the four day weekend. And a lot of
people not going out of town that would typically go
out of town because you got hooting and the Blowfish tonight,
(00:20):
we gave away a last tickets for tomorrow night, and
you got the kickoff with Old Dominion Saturday of four
point fifteen. Everybody's going to be staying a lot of
people staying in town.
Speaker 2 (00:29):
I wonder how many Clemson fans are going to be
going down to Atlanta for the sure.
Speaker 1 (00:33):
Georgia Lee's going down there.
Speaker 2 (00:35):
That game is I don't want to say it's like
make or break time, because but I'm just looking at
the ACC as a football conference, and with Florida State's
loss last week, they're they're going to drop, I would think,
rather significantly losing to unranked Georgia Tech. So they were
number ten, that was the best highest ranked team in
the ACC. And then there's only two other teams ranked
(00:57):
in the whole conference Miami and Clemson. And if Clemson,
which is I think fifteenth right now, loses, they're probably
gonna have to fall a little bit.
Speaker 1 (01:07):
Georgia test is not going to climb in the top
twenty five after beating Florida's.
Speaker 2 (01:10):
Stay well, I'm saying top twenty. No, they're not, so
you won't have if they lose. There is no other
ranked opponents for them to play this year. So there's
no way for Clemson to get back into the top
ten because the.
Speaker 1 (01:26):
Prospects look so bad. GABO is not going to be
taking live phone callers on this call in show. It's
gonna be a text in show. Tyler, you ruined it
for everyone. But yeah, I mean, I don't want to
say good luck to Clemson. But for the ACC, this
is this is a disaster to have the two especially
I don't know, maybe for the AEC they look at
it and go the two teams that were suing us
(01:47):
to get out of here, right, Clemson and Georgia or
Florida State, this could be good news. Maybe it'll force
them to eat a little humble pie and be better
better at being neighbors in the ACC.
Speaker 2 (02:01):
You know, Jonathan. The thing about DNA testing which is
freaking me out is that so many people are learning
unusual things about their families or whatever.
Speaker 1 (02:11):
John wants to do this because he's a huge history buff,
so he wants to study his own history.
Speaker 2 (02:17):
Well. And for example, identical twins. These are identical twins
born minutes apart. Don't have the same heritage. What According
to this when they got their things back, the one
(02:38):
twin had thirteen percent broadly European, the other one three
percent broadly European.
Speaker 1 (02:46):
See that just proves it. This whole thing is bull crap.
Speaker 2 (02:50):
No, but they but they went and did it with
other DNA companies and they all came back with the
exact same results. You are not identical twins. You're pretty
stinking close, but you're not identical. You don't have the
same heritage. Interesting, and so I don't know, I don't
have the brain to explain it or understand it. And
then you find out things like you wouldn't have expected
(03:10):
about well, you know, it's like, who was it. I'm
trying to remember it was. It was an African American
who was at the I think he was like one
of the hosts on NPR or something. I just remember
this being done like ten fifteen years ago. And then
he went on the show where they revealed these things
and it turned out he was had like five percent
(03:34):
African in him. It was like ninety percent like white
European or something like that. And he was just stunned.
Speaker 1 (03:42):
Has that happened?
Speaker 2 (03:43):
He was like, most of my ancestors are from Scotland
and Ireland and England, and they're like, yeah, you're I mean,
just it was only like the last two generations that
had some African American animal.
Speaker 1 (03:53):
Can't remember this now. I remember laughing my ass off.
Speaker 2 (03:56):
Then and then or perhaps you can find out in
some instances you're relating to somebody famous, which I think
you said that John is related to.
Speaker 1 (04:06):
Was it Wyatt earp He No, No, no, Doc Holliday,
Doc Holliday. Yeah. John Holliday lived in the upstate of
South Carolina for a while. You know, he was a
traveling man. He was Johnny Appleseed. He spread his seat everywhere.
So apparently I don't know how we found this, but
he's already doing some of that ancestry tracking stuff. Okay,
(04:28):
but there's John Holliday in his family in Sally's side
of the family tree. So he has convinced himself that's
Doc Holiday because it was about the same time that
Doc Holliday would have been living in the Upstate. Wow,
so they claimed that they are direct descendants of Doc Holliday.
Speaker 2 (04:43):
It'd be interesting. Do they offer that as a thing
where you can say, these are DNA of famous people
that are now deceased and you're related to them in
some way. It'd be interesting. According to this though, ninety
nine point nine percent of DNA all human beings have
that in common. So when we start talking about differentials,
(05:06):
we're just talking about a very very small percent.
Speaker 1 (05:10):
And are we all ancestors of Pocahontas? Now I don't
think Warrant the original Pokemon.
Speaker 2 (05:17):
Yeah, I don't think of Pocahontas. But like I said,
ninety nine point one percent of all DNA is identical,
so yes we have we're all descendants of if you
believe the Bible, Noah. That's right, right, everybody has to
have been a descendant from Noah. So interesting how that'll
play out. And would be loving to hear some of
your surprise DNA stories.
Speaker 1 (05:39):
That's good. I remember when my cousin told me when
he before he graduated, they started studying DNA. I guess
this is right after the O. J. Simpson draw. We
started hearing about DNA and he they took a DNA
test as part of their studies at MUSC and the
professor said, oh, that's interesting. And my cousin Chris have
(06:00):
what he said, No, never mind.
Speaker 2 (06:03):
That's the case.
Speaker 1 (06:04):
Say never mind of that.
Speaker 2 (06:05):
That's probably one of those you're not related to your
father type of things. But you know, and think about it.
That's so weird. I mean, that was what nineteen ninety
four was the OJ SILF I remember, right, So ninety
four to twenty twenty four we're thirty years down the road.
But in nineteen ninety four they were able to legitimately
(06:26):
say that the jury didn't believe the DNA testing. Yes,
and didn't it's too it's too new. You possibly know that, Yeah,
And wouldn't it change if you know, somebody stepped on
it or something. No, that's not how any of that works.
But we didn't believe that or understand it at the time. Today,
all of that stuff would have just been it would
have totally overwhelmingly given Mistoja.
Speaker 1 (06:48):
Oh, totally. Now, convintent. We have so much evidence of
it being evidence no, pun intended. We have so much
evidence of it through the court system, now that it's
been tried and true and testified, investigated and measured.
Speaker 2 (07:01):
No.
Speaker 1 (07:02):
And I'm sure it's like the fax machine. I mean,
DNA testing has been around for years. We sit and
hear about it to the OJ Simpson trial.
Speaker 2 (07:10):
Yeah, I don't know that I had even heard the
phrase DNA.
Speaker 1 (07:13):
Yeah, I'm sure I've been studying it for decades. But
it was the Oz Simpson trial it shoved it into
the spotlight.
Speaker 2 (07:19):
You pulled out your poppycock new technology.
Speaker 1 (07:22):
I don't even know if you knew this, but the
fax machine actually predates the telephone.
Speaker 2 (07:26):
You had talked about that like last week.
Speaker 1 (07:29):
That was the original phone. The communication over wire was
at least certainly it was the telegraph. Then it was
the fax machine. Yeah.
Speaker 2 (07:39):
We're still trying to figure out how people before like
nineteen sixty had phone numbers that were like Beechwood seven too.
I don't understand that.
Speaker 1 (07:48):
But anyway, I'm going to see my dad today all
ask him about that.
Speaker 2 (07:51):
We got a guy in La Joya who has been
issued a summons because for something that he didn't know
was a lead and I certainly never heard of this.
He got a ticket for quote fluid littering, which sounds
as if he was urinating somewhere.
Speaker 1 (08:09):
But it's not.
Speaker 2 (08:11):
To make matters. Whereas this is a beloved figure in
the community. His name is Sandy Snakeberg, but Sandy goes
by the name of the pie. What does he call
himself again, the bubble pirate, Okay, And he's a homeless veteran,
served for twenty five years in the Navy, and he
(08:31):
was disabled and now he lives in his van and
his only interest in life is amusing families with his
incredible bubble blowing skills. He actually lives in the van
down by the river, well down by the ocean. Here
by the ocean, and he goes to parks and you know,
he put out a little thing if people want to
give him donations, and he dresses up like a pirate
(08:54):
and then he makes like these big saleska and the
sale like it's like I mean when I say it's
a big sale. He can get these things like ten
feet fifteen feet high, these bubbles, and it looks like
he's like building a thing for a pirate ship.
Speaker 1 (09:07):
Wow.
Speaker 2 (09:08):
And the kids are amazed, and the moms and dads
are amazed. And he'll just do it in the middle
of a park, and he makes a six gallon jug
every time he's going to go do it. And that's
what they got him on. They quote the city of
La Joya says that this individual uses six gallons of
liquid per day, with the residual chemicals ending up on
the lawns, which ken cause damage to the grass, and
(09:32):
that's why he's been given the ticket. He says, ay,
most of this stuff, I do make a six gallon jug,
but most of that doesn't end up on the lawn
And I also use something that is so safe you
can drink it. It's a twenty five to one ratio
of diluted detergent. So even if I dumped all six
gallons right in one little area, it wouldn't hurt the grass.
Speaker 1 (09:53):
Got it.
Speaker 2 (09:54):
But he got a fluid littering ticket.
Speaker 1 (09:56):
That's funny.
Speaker 2 (09:57):
I've never heard of such a thing. So did you
ever get a ticket for something you didn't know you
were doing wrong? I never heard of that.
Speaker 1 (10:06):
I remember the first time I got a I think
it the first ticket I ever got. When I was
involved in an accident. I was charged with contributory something,
and I asked the compliment, what well you contributed to
the accident? That's a thing.
Speaker 2 (10:27):
I'm like, that's a thing. Would you do wink at
him or something sent him into the guardrail.
Speaker 1 (10:35):
That's the only one I think of the rest of them.
I knew speeding plainly. I knew what I was doing it,
and I knew it was against the law.
Speaker 2 (10:41):
Maybe you didn't know that the first because I know
you've collected many since then. But the first time you
got a ticket for not wearing your seatbelt, maybe you
didn't know that time. You could try to plead it now.
Ignorance of the law has no excuses. We've all heard.
Speaker 1 (10:53):
I went over to Casey yesterday to pick up it
to go order. As soon as you hit the bridge,
click You gotta click it before you cross over a
Casey will. I don't know how much money they'll make
it off of seatbelt violations, but they will stop you
in a second.
Speaker 2 (11:07):
This is for your own good, sir. A new survey
of two thousand parents with school age kids says they
are overwhelmed by emails about their kids from the school.
It average, The average answer is eighty emails a month.
That's for a day. Every day they get four emails
(11:29):
regarding their kids. And they're at the point now not
only are they overwhelmed, but they don't know which ones
I'm supposed to read, Like I can't read all of these.
Speaker 1 (11:42):
Yeah, that's guaranteeing people aren't going to read your emails.
Speaker 2 (11:45):
You send me that many emails, So seventy six percent
of the emails say that they just delete them. I
don't read any of them now, and of those, fifty
percent feel that that makes them a bad parent. But
they don't know what else to do because I can't
devote an hour a day to reading emails. So, I mean,
(12:08):
eighty emails a month is unbelievable. What are you absolutely
talking about with my kid? I mean, how if you
got a letter sent home when we were kids, if
you got a letter sent home, that was a lot
and it was probably bad.
Speaker 1 (12:23):
Yep, But I can't.
Speaker 2 (12:26):
I mean, when my kid was in school, it was
not that long ago. It was like ten ten years ago,
ten twelve years ago. I think maybe I got like
two emails a month about them, just some sort of
progress up there or something like that.
Speaker 1 (12:40):
That's that's not good. That's that guarantees parents. Maybe there's
got to be a reason. It's got to be a
legal reason of sending them out. They know the parents
aren't going to read them this way. But there's a problem,
he said, well, we sent you an email.
Speaker 2 (12:53):
I guess, Well, then just say if it's a problem.
But I mean, that's that's one thing. But if every
parent is getting four emails a day, that's not a problem.
That's your kid chewed all their food today.
Speaker 1 (13:06):
Hey, they're sending me information that is worthless.
Speaker 2 (13:09):
Yeah, I don't need to hear all this, So I
prefer you give me the answer that my kid gives
me when I say would you do today at school? Nothing?
That's what That's what I need from you exactly. So
if something big happens, let me know. But who's getting overwhelmed?
And maybe that's just a national thing, and maybe the
schools here in the Midlands are doing a better job
(13:30):
of monitoring how many emails are going to send out,
limiting themselves, because that is unbelievable for a day anyway,
And we're supposed to talk to Mark Brian. We'll see
if that comes together where he's supposed to be calling
in here in a little bit, and well, if that happens,
I'm not sure when we're going to run that interview.
Perhaps we'll bump the seven o'clock hour and run in there.
Speaker 1 (13:49):
We'll probably run that in the seven. I'm going to
replay the Shane Biemer interview tomorrow in.
Speaker 2 (13:54):
The five oh five am if you want to hear that.
Speaker 1 (13:57):
So we're going to do that. Then we're going to
talk tomorrow Brian in the seven. We've got a busy
day tomorrow. Then we're going to be off on Monday.
Speaker 2 (14:05):
We're going to be off for a while.
Speaker 1 (14:07):
Yeah, you know that because you're listening to the podcast
otherwise at the salent we're here. Yeah, all right, Hey,
what's going on in your neighborhood. We should be talking
about it. Let us know. We'll reach out to us
on social media. Can also email us. I'm Rush at
ninety seven five WCS dot com.
Speaker 2 (14:22):
And I'm Nash at ninety seven five WUS dot com.
Speaker 1 (14:25):
Hey, and tomorrow we start talking.
Speaker 2 (14:27):
You dial it up.
Speaker 1 (14:27):
Go Cox, Go, Tigers, Run, Hose run, Go Chanda Clears
yay hoody, we're doing all that. Eight oh three ninety seven,
eight ninet two six seven on the morning rush
Hello, Chilly Nash, Good morning. It's tomorrow's show today. Thank God,
tomorrow's Friday. If you're working today and you're off tomorrow,
then your weekend's already gonna be started. But otherwise, everybody's
gonna be trying to get out of the office early,
get on the four day weekend. And a lot of
people not going out of town that would typically go
out of town because you got hooting and the Blowfish tonight,
(00:20):
we gave away a last tickets for tomorrow night, and
you got the kickoff with Old Dominion Saturday of four
point fifteen. Everybody's going to be staying a lot of
people staying in town.
Speaker 2 (00:29):
I wonder how many Clemson fans are going to be
going down to Atlanta for the sure.
Speaker 1 (00:33):
Georgia Lee's going down there.
Speaker 2 (00:35):
That game is I don't want to say it's like
make or break time, because but I'm just looking at
the ACC as a football conference, and with Florida State's
loss last week, they're they're going to drop, I would think,
rather significantly losing to unranked Georgia Tech. So they were
number ten, that was the best highest ranked team in
the ACC. And then there's only two other teams ranked
(00:57):
in the whole conference Miami and Clemson. And if Clemson,
which is I think fifteenth right now, loses, they're probably
gonna have to fall a little bit.
Speaker 1 (01:07):
Georgia test is not going to climb in the top
twenty five after beating Florida's.
Speaker 2 (01:10):
Stay well, I'm saying top twenty. No, they're not, so
you won't have if they lose. There is no other
ranked opponents for them to play this year. So there's
no way for Clemson to get back into the top
ten because the.
Speaker 1 (01:26):
Prospects look so bad. GABO is not going to be
taking live phone callers on this call in show. It's
gonna be a text in show. Tyler, you ruined it
for everyone. But yeah, I mean, I don't want to
say good luck to Clemson. But for the ACC, this
is this is a disaster to have the two especially
I don't know, maybe for the AEC they look at
it and go the two teams that were suing us
(01:47):
to get out of here, right, Clemson and Georgia or
Florida State, this could be good news. Maybe it'll force
them to eat a little humble pie and be better
better at being neighbors in the ACC.
Speaker 2 (02:01):
You know, Jonathan. The thing about DNA testing which is
freaking me out is that so many people are learning
unusual things about their families or whatever.
Speaker 1 (02:11):
John wants to do this because he's a huge history buff,
so he wants to study his own history.
Speaker 2 (02:17):
Well. And for example, identical twins. These are identical twins
born minutes apart. Don't have the same heritage. What According
to this when they got their things back, the one
(02:38):
twin had thirteen percent broadly European, the other one three
percent broadly European.
Speaker 1 (02:46):
See that just proves it. This whole thing is bull crap.
Speaker 2 (02:50):
No, but they but they went and did it with
other DNA companies and they all came back with the
exact same results. You are not identical twins. You're pretty
stinking close, but you're not identical. You don't have the
same heritage. Interesting, and so I don't know, I don't
have the brain to explain it or understand it. And
then you find out things like you wouldn't have expected
(03:10):
about well, you know, it's like, who was it. I'm
trying to remember it was. It was an African American
who was at the I think he was like one
of the hosts on NPR or something. I just remember
this being done like ten fifteen years ago. And then
he went on the show where they revealed these things
and it turned out he was had like five percent
(03:34):
African in him. It was like ninety percent like white
European or something like that. And he was just stunned.
Speaker 1 (03:42):
Has that happened?
Speaker 2 (03:43):
He was like, most of my ancestors are from Scotland
and Ireland and England, and they're like, yeah, you're I mean,
just it was only like the last two generations that
had some African American animal.
Speaker 1 (03:53):
Can't remember this now. I remember laughing my ass off.
Speaker 2 (03:56):
Then and then or perhaps you can find out in
some instances you're relating to somebody famous, which I think
you said that John is related to.
Speaker 1 (04:06):
Was it Wyatt earp He No, No, no, Doc Holliday,
Doc Holliday. Yeah. John Holliday lived in the upstate of
South Carolina for a while. You know, he was a
traveling man. He was Johnny Appleseed. He spread his seat everywhere.
So apparently I don't know how we found this, but
he's already doing some of that ancestry tracking stuff. Okay,
(04:28):
but there's John Holliday in his family in Sally's side
of the family tree. So he has convinced himself that's
Doc Holiday because it was about the same time that
Doc Holliday would have been living in the Upstate. Wow,
so they claimed that they are direct descendants of Doc Holliday.
Speaker 2 (04:43):
It'd be interesting. Do they offer that as a thing
where you can say, these are DNA of famous people
that are now deceased and you're related to them in
some way. It'd be interesting. According to this though, ninety
nine point nine percent of DNA all human beings have
that in common. So when we start talking about differentials,
(05:06):
we're just talking about a very very small percent.
Speaker 1 (05:10):
And are we all ancestors of Pocahontas? Now I don't
think Warrant the original Pokemon.
Speaker 2 (05:17):
Yeah, I don't think of Pocahontas. But like I said,
ninety nine point one percent of all DNA is identical,
so yes we have we're all descendants of if you
believe the Bible, Noah. That's right, right, everybody has to
have been a descendant from Noah. So interesting how that'll
play out. And would be loving to hear some of
your surprise DNA stories.
Speaker 1 (05:39):
That's good. I remember when my cousin told me when
he before he graduated, they started studying DNA. I guess
this is right after the O. J. Simpson draw. We
started hearing about DNA and he they took a DNA
test as part of their studies at MUSC and the
professor said, oh, that's interesting. And my cousin Chris have
(06:00):
what he said, No, never mind.
Speaker 2 (06:03):
That's the case.
Speaker 1 (06:04):
Say never mind of that.
Speaker 2 (06:05):
That's probably one of those you're not related to your
father type of things. But you know, and think about it.
That's so weird. I mean, that was what nineteen ninety
four was the OJ SILF I remember, right, So ninety
four to twenty twenty four we're thirty years down the road.
But in nineteen ninety four they were able to legitimately
(06:26):
say that the jury didn't believe the DNA testing. Yes,
and didn't it's too it's too new. You possibly know that, Yeah,
And wouldn't it change if you know, somebody stepped on
it or something. No, that's not how any of that works.
But we didn't believe that or understand it at the time. Today,
all of that stuff would have just been it would
have totally overwhelmingly given Mistoja.
Speaker 1 (06:48):
Oh, totally. Now, convintent. We have so much evidence of
it being evidence no, pun intended. We have so much
evidence of it through the court system, now that it's
been tried and true and testified, investigated and measured.
Speaker 2 (07:01):
No.
Speaker 1 (07:02):
And I'm sure it's like the fax machine. I mean,
DNA testing has been around for years. We sit and
hear about it to the OJ Simpson trial.
Speaker 2 (07:10):
Yeah, I don't know that I had even heard the
phrase DNA.
Speaker 1 (07:13):
Yeah, I'm sure I've been studying it for decades. But
it was the Oz Simpson trial it shoved it into
the spotlight.
Speaker 2 (07:19):
You pulled out your poppycock new technology.
Speaker 1 (07:22):
I don't even know if you knew this, but the
fax machine actually predates the telephone.
Speaker 2 (07:26):
You had talked about that like last week.
Speaker 1 (07:29):
That was the original phone. The communication over wire was
at least certainly it was the telegraph. Then it was
the fax machine. Yeah.
Speaker 2 (07:39):
We're still trying to figure out how people before like
nineteen sixty had phone numbers that were like Beechwood seven too.
I don't understand that.
Speaker 1 (07:48):
But anyway, I'm going to see my dad today all
ask him about that.
Speaker 2 (07:51):
We got a guy in La Joya who has been
issued a summons because for something that he didn't know
was a lead and I certainly never heard of this.
He got a ticket for quote fluid littering, which sounds
as if he was urinating somewhere.
Speaker 1 (08:09):
But it's not.
Speaker 2 (08:11):
To make matters. Whereas this is a beloved figure in
the community. His name is Sandy Snakeberg, but Sandy goes
by the name of the pie. What does he call
himself again, the bubble pirate, Okay, And he's a homeless veteran,
served for twenty five years in the Navy, and he
(08:31):
was disabled and now he lives in his van and
his only interest in life is amusing families with his
incredible bubble blowing skills. He actually lives in the van
down by the river, well down by the ocean. Here
by the ocean, and he goes to parks and you know,
he put out a little thing if people want to
give him donations, and he dresses up like a pirate
(08:54):
and then he makes like these big saleska and the
sale like it's like I mean when I say it's
a big sale. He can get these things like ten
feet fifteen feet high, these bubbles, and it looks like
he's like building a thing for a pirate ship.
Speaker 1 (09:07):
Wow.
Speaker 2 (09:08):
And the kids are amazed, and the moms and dads
are amazed. And he'll just do it in the middle
of a park, and he makes a six gallon jug
every time he's going to go do it. And that's
what they got him on. They quote the city of
La Joya says that this individual uses six gallons of
liquid per day, with the residual chemicals ending up on
the lawns, which ken cause damage to the grass, and
(09:32):
that's why he's been given the ticket. He says, ay,
most of this stuff, I do make a six gallon jug,
but most of that doesn't end up on the lawn
And I also use something that is so safe you
can drink it. It's a twenty five to one ratio
of diluted detergent. So even if I dumped all six
gallons right in one little area, it wouldn't hurt the grass.
Speaker 1 (09:53):
Got it.
Speaker 2 (09:54):
But he got a fluid littering ticket.
Speaker 1 (09:56):
That's funny.
Speaker 2 (09:57):
I've never heard of such a thing. So did you
ever get a ticket for something you didn't know you
were doing wrong? I never heard of that.
Speaker 1 (10:06):
I remember the first time I got a I think
it the first ticket I ever got. When I was
involved in an accident. I was charged with contributory something,
and I asked the compliment, what well you contributed to
the accident? That's a thing.
Speaker 2 (10:27):
I'm like, that's a thing. Would you do wink at
him or something sent him into the guardrail.
Speaker 1 (10:35):
That's the only one I think of the rest of them.
I knew speeding plainly. I knew what I was doing it,
and I knew it was against the law.
Speaker 2 (10:41):
Maybe you didn't know that the first because I know
you've collected many since then. But the first time you
got a ticket for not wearing your seatbelt, maybe you
didn't know that time. You could try to plead it now.
Ignorance of the law has no excuses. We've all heard.
Speaker 1 (10:53):
I went over to Casey yesterday to pick up it
to go order. As soon as you hit the bridge,
click You gotta click it before you cross over a
Casey will. I don't know how much money they'll make
it off of seatbelt violations, but they will stop you
in a second.
Speaker 2 (11:07):
This is for your own good, sir. A new survey
of two thousand parents with school age kids says they
are overwhelmed by emails about their kids from the school.
It average, The average answer is eighty emails a month.
That's for a day. Every day they get four emails
(11:29):
regarding their kids. And they're at the point now not
only are they overwhelmed, but they don't know which ones
I'm supposed to read, Like I can't read all of these.
Speaker 1 (11:42):
Yeah, that's guaranteeing people aren't going to read your emails.
Speaker 2 (11:45):
You send me that many emails, So seventy six percent
of the emails say that they just delete them. I
don't read any of them now, and of those, fifty
percent feel that that makes them a bad parent. But
they don't know what else to do because I can't
devote an hour a day to reading emails. So, I mean,
(12:08):
eighty emails a month is unbelievable. What are you absolutely
talking about with my kid? I mean, how if you
got a letter sent home when we were kids, if
you got a letter sent home, that was a lot
and it was probably bad.
Speaker 1 (12:23):
Yep, But I can't.
Speaker 2 (12:26):
I mean, when my kid was in school, it was
not that long ago. It was like ten ten years ago,
ten twelve years ago. I think maybe I got like
two emails a month about them, just some sort of
progress up there or something like that.
Speaker 1 (12:40):
That's that's not good. That's that guarantees parents. Maybe there's
got to be a reason. It's got to be a
legal reason of sending them out. They know the parents
aren't going to read them this way. But there's a problem,
he said, well, we sent you an email.
Speaker 2 (12:53):
I guess, Well, then just say if it's a problem.
But I mean, that's that's one thing. But if every
parent is getting four emails a day, that's not a problem.
That's your kid chewed all their food today.
Speaker 1 (13:06):
Hey, they're sending me information that is worthless.
Speaker 2 (13:09):
Yeah, I don't need to hear all this, So I
prefer you give me the answer that my kid gives
me when I say would you do today at school? Nothing?
That's what That's what I need from you exactly. So
if something big happens, let me know. But who's getting overwhelmed?
And maybe that's just a national thing, and maybe the
schools here in the Midlands are doing a better job
(13:30):
of monitoring how many emails are going to send out,
limiting themselves, because that is unbelievable for a day anyway,
And we're supposed to talk to Mark Brian. We'll see
if that comes together where he's supposed to be calling
in here in a little bit, and well, if that happens,
I'm not sure when we're going to run that interview.
Perhaps we'll bump the seven o'clock hour and run in there.
Speaker 1 (13:49):
We'll probably run that in the seven. I'm going to
replay the Shane Biemer interview tomorrow in.
Speaker 2 (13:54):
The five oh five am if you want to hear that.
Speaker 1 (13:57):
So we're going to do that. Then we're going to
talk tomorrow Brian in the seven. We've got a busy
day tomorrow. Then we're going to be off on Monday.
Speaker 2 (14:05):
We're going to be off for a while.
Speaker 1 (14:07):
Yeah, you know that because you're listening to the podcast
otherwise at the salent we're here. Yeah, all right, Hey,
what's going on in your neighborhood. We should be talking
about it. Let us know. We'll reach out to us
on social media. Can also email us. I'm Rush at
ninety seven five WCS dot com.
Speaker 2 (14:22):
And I'm Nash at ninety seven five WUS dot com.
Speaker 1 (14:25):
Hey, and tomorrow we start talking.
Speaker 2 (14:27):
You dial it up.
Speaker 1 (14:27):
Go Cox, Go, Tigers, Run, Hose run, Go Chanda Clears
yay hoody, we're doing all that. Eight oh three ninety seven,
eight ninet two six seven on the morning rush
Popular Podcasts
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show
The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show. Clay Travis and Buck Sexton tackle the biggest stories in news, politics and current events with intelligence and humor. From the border crisis, to the madness of cancel culture and far-left missteps, Clay and Buck guide listeners through the latest headlines and hot topics with fun and entertaining conversations and opinions.