May 21, 2025 • 39 mins
Listen to The Next-Gen Report live! Sundays at 7:00 p.m. on AM950, KPRC.
A Mexican Navy sailboat crashed into the Brooklyn Bridge recently. We still don't know what exactly happened, but Democrats are already blaming Trump.
After years of political prosecutions against Republicans, a number of Democratic officials are starting to realize the "no one is above the law" principle applies to judges from Wisconsin, mayors from Chicago, and Congresswomen from New Jersey.
Former President Joe Biden has been diagnosed with severe prostate cancer. How long has he had it, and why was it hidden from the American people?
For the latest news, follow me on Instagram, and X:
@the.ethanbuchanan
@_ethanbuchanan
A Mexican Navy sailboat crashed into the Brooklyn Bridge recently. We still don't know what exactly happened, but Democrats are already blaming Trump.
After years of political prosecutions against Republicans, a number of Democratic officials are starting to realize the "no one is above the law" principle applies to judges from Wisconsin, mayors from Chicago, and Congresswomen from New Jersey.
Former President Joe Biden has been diagnosed with severe prostate cancer. How long has he had it, and why was it hidden from the American people?
For the latest news, follow me on Instagram, and X:
@the.ethanbuchanan
@_ethanbuchanan
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:02):
From the heart of the Space City to the heart
of gen Z. Welcome to Next Gen Conversation, not Dad's
Talk Radio.
Speaker 2 (00:13):
Ethan talks to you about the issues and events that
men are to our generation.
Speaker 1 (00:18):
This is the Next Gen Report with Ethan Buchanan that Hey, everybody, welcome,
good to be back with you. Listen at Underscore Ethan
Buchanan on X check it out. I am very active there,
definitely more active than I should be. I spend way
too much time on X, but hey, what are you
(00:39):
gonna do. I'm already addicted, I'm already terminally online, So
why don't you benefit from that? I post a lot
of great information there. X really has become one of
my go to sources. And I will say there's a
lot of bad information on X, almost as much bad
information as there is good information. So you do have
to be very careful. But I can kind of to
(01:00):
help you with that. I post a lot of the
good information, or at least I hope I do, so
I would encourage you to check me out there, stay
in touch there. If you are following me on X,
then you would have already seen probably the issue that
we had in New York with a sailing ship, a
tall ship hitting the Brooklyn Bridge. I believe it was
(01:22):
on Saturday. Now, normally I wouldn't talk about this because, frankly,
this involved the Mexican Navy, which is a navy that
I'm not a member of and of a country that
I'm not a citizen of. So what Mexico and their
military does, as long as it's not a direct attack
on the United States, really doesn't bother me. And it
also happened in New York, which I'm not a citizen
(01:45):
of New York. I don't live in New York. I
live very far away in New York. And as a
general rule, I don't really care what happens in New York.
But due to circumstances beyond my control, this situation has
become relevant to me, and so I'm going to talk
a little bit about it. So here's the background. We
have this tall ship, a sailing ship, you know. And
when I say sailing ship, I mean it's a ship
(02:06):
with sails, like in Pirates of the Caribbean. If you're
not familiar with boats, most ship these days have engines.
This one had sails. It tried to go under the
Brooklyn Bridge. I don't know if it tried to go
under the Brooklyn Bridge on purpose, or if that was
an accident, or if the wind caught it or some
goober in a tugboat was pulling it. I don't know
what happened, but it crashed into the Brooklyn Bridge and
(02:29):
smashed one of the sails. And of course, because it
is a sailboat, there were members of the Mexican Navy
on that sailboat, and tragically, two of those people died.
I didn't really plan on covering this story because, unfortunately,
the harsh reality is two people die all the time.
That really doesn't make it newsworthy. It didn't happen anywhere
near me, It didn't happen anywhere near you. It really
(02:50):
wouldn't affect you at all. So why am I talking
about it now? Well, because, like everything else, this for
some reason had to be politicized by the Democrats. Now
you might think, okay, well, this is a tragic accident.
How in the world could this possibly be political? I mean,
maybe if it was our navy, we could say, okay, well,
our political leadership that oversees the military made some sort
(03:11):
of error here, and maybe that's how it becomes political
But this is the Mexican Navy, which is run by
Mexican officials in the Mexican government. So how in the
world does this have anything at all to do with us?
And therein lies the point, because the fact of the
matter is it doesn't. This really shouldn't matter at all,
except New York Senator Chuck Schumer decided that, like any
(03:34):
other unfortunate instance, he was going to turn this into
somehow an opportunity to attack Donald Trump. Now again, I
don't understand how he got here. Donald Trump has no
authority over the Mexican Navy and how they recruit and
staff their ships. This doesn't appear to be some sort
of act of war they I mean, this ship is
(03:55):
to the Mexican Navy what the USS Constitution is to
our navy. It's just a sailing ship that we float
around to show off sometimes. It's not an active military vessel.
It's at best a training ship. And of course Mexico
is an ally of ours to a certain extent, so
it's not really as surprise that it was there. It
seemed to be there for ceremonial purposes. It had a big,
fancy Mexican flag flying on it, it was all lit
(04:17):
up and pretty, So it's not like Mexico attacked us.
This was just their navy sent one of their pretty
little sailing ships over and a tragedy occurred. Right, So
this really has nothing to do with Donald Trump. But
Chuck Schumer decided that this was a good opportunity for
him to go out and try to attack Donald Trump,
so he released probably the most ridiculous political statement that
(04:38):
I have ever seen, and I've seen a lot. He
said after being fully briefed on last night's Brooklyn Bridge accident.
One thing is predominantly clear. There are more questions than
answers as it relates to exactly how this accident occurred.
That's fair. How did this accident occurred? We need to
get to the bottom of that. We should be able
to have other ships come visit our harbor and not
crash into our major bridges. To say that bridges serve
(05:01):
as critical transportation arteries for commerce, emergency response, and daily travel,
and many span key waterways that are vulnerable to both
natural and man made threats, that's obviously true. The Coast
Guard plays a crucial role in monitoring and securing these areas,
deterring potential terrorist attacks, preventing illegal activities, and responding quickly
to emergencies. At the same time, maintaining the structural integrity
(05:24):
and safety of America's bridges is critical to the economy
and the well being of communities. That's obviously true. A
failure or attack on a major bridge could disrupt supply,
trains and danger lives and cause massive economic loss. That's correct.
It is unacceptable that the Trump administration is potentially jeopardizing
our national and economic security, as well as American lives.
(05:48):
Slow your role, brother, What in the world does this
have to do with any of that? He essentially went
on to blame the DOGE team for this because they
implemented a big hiring freeze and the coast, who I
guess is responsible for running traffic in the Hudson River,
similar to how the FAA is responsible for running air traffic.
(06:08):
Apparently they just couldn't manage one extra sail boat because
of the DOGE hiring cuts, which is patently ridiculous. Patently ridiculous.
I mean, if you watch the video, you can clearly
see that this is something that went wrong with the boat, right,
and the video is all over X I encourage you
to go watch it. I believe I've reposted it, but
that was several days ago at this point, so I
(06:30):
don't remember exactly. I know I've commented on a lot
of videos about it, So if you watch the video,
it's very difficult to make the case that more people
being hired by the Coastguard would have stopped this problem.
It's even harder to make that case when you realize
that the federal hiring freeze that DOGE implemented did not
apply to the Coast Guard. Homeland Security DHS dot gov
(06:51):
tweeted out a response to this. I Say tweeted. They
posted a response to this, saying Minority Leader Schumer's accusations
that a hiring freeze led to the U the US
Coast Guard's vessel traffic systems not being adequately staffed are false.
The US Coast Guard has been fully supported and has
been exempt from hiring freezes. Additionally, this incident had nothing
(07:12):
to do with vessel traffic services. When a ship loses
propulsion in high current areas, the vessel needs to engage
all capabilities to stop, and ideally tugs are nearby to support.
We encourage Minority Leader Schumer to get his facts straight
before he misleads the American people. But that's just the point, right,
I mean, the Democrats never do bother to do that.
They never do get their facts straight before they start
(07:33):
misleading the American people. I mean, a tragedy happens, that's
no one's fault except probably the Mexican Navy, and Schruck
Schumer immediately jumps down Donald Trump's throat about it. Make
that make sense. He doesn't even bother to say, hey,
was the Coastguard dealing with a hiring freeze, because the
answer is no, they weren't. All right, stay tuned, we've
got a racial coming up. We'll be right back. Hey, y'all.
(08:24):
Ethan Buchanan here at Underscore, Ethan Buchanan on X check
me out there. Listen, do y'all remember way back in
the day circa twenty fifteen, when the argument for the
left in cases of things like gay marriage and gender
(08:44):
identity and all that good stuff, The argument used to be,
just leave us alone. We just want to do whatever
we do in the privacy of our own homes. It
shouldn't be that big of a deal to you. Just
kind of let us mind our own business and we'll yours.
Nobody's gonna force anything you disagree with on your children.
(09:04):
This is just what we enjoy and what we believe
in what we do, and it shouldn't affect you at all. Right,
Remember that that was the argument from the left on
things like all the LGBT stuff. Right, That was the line,
and a lot of people kind of bought it. We
sort of figured, okay, fair enough, you do you in
your own home whatever. The government shouldn't be involved in this.
(09:26):
That was sort of the libertarian stance for a long time. Well,
lo and behold, that was a lie. They do want
to force LGBT gender ideology nonsense on you and your kids,
and if you don't support it, if you don't go
along with it, they will go out of your way
to shut you down. We saw this, of course in
Colorado with that one baker. He's been making headlines for
(09:47):
years because he keeps saying, I'm a baker, I'm a
Christian man. I believe that marriage is between a man
and a woman, not two men or two women. And
so because I hold that belief, I am not going
to bake wedding cakes for marriage because I don't believe
that's right. And I don't want to participate in that.
Now you might say, okay, well that's his own religious opinion.
He's more than willing to have that opinion. We have
(10:09):
freedom of religion. He can practice that fair enough. No,
this guy got sued up and down by LGBT activist groups,
ended up going all the way to the Supreme Court
just for them to say yes, he is allowed to
say I don't want to do business with you. That's
his right as a business owner and religious Christian. And
to this day he's still facing lawsuits, I believe, because
every time one gets settled, somebody else comes and throws
(10:31):
another stick at him. Basically, well, it turns out that's
actually just the beginning. This apparently happens a lot in Colorado.
There is now a Christian summer camp that is suing
the state of Colorado over the state's new transgender rule.
This is a seventy five year old camp, camp E
de Rajaje, which I hope I'm pronouncing that right. They
(10:52):
risk losing their license after the state denied their religious
exemption request for the new gender identity requirements that Colorado
has just begun implementing. So here's the background for you.
Colorado has a new law that requires children's resident camps
to permit campers access to bathing, dressing, and sleeping facilities
(11:13):
that align with the camper's gender identity. So this is
a seventy five year old Christian camp. The name I
believe means I'd rather have Jesus. It's a Christian children's
camp for kids sixteen to seventeen, all right, So they
should be completely allowed to say we're not doing that
(11:33):
because one on the grounds of religion, and two can
we be practical for a minute here, This is up
to seventeen year olds that are at this camp. Does
any single person anywhere legitimately think it's a good idea
to have fourteen, fifteen, sixteen seventeen year old guys and
girls cohabitating in spaces like bathrooms and changing rooms and
(11:55):
dressing and sleeping facilities. Does anybody really honestly think that
that's a good idea? Do you really need me to
explain why it's not? What do we know about fourteen, fifteen,
sixteen seventeen year old guys. First of all, I'm gonna
try not to be too crude, because I do want
this to be a family show. But come on, you
guys know who we're talking about here. Let's use our
(12:16):
brains for just a minute. This is obviously not a
good idea to have, period, and a religious group or
organization should be able to say, hey, we have problems
with this on a religious grounds. We don't think this
is a good idea because obviously the practical result of
this is going to be teenagers getting pregnant, and it
doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure that out. And
(12:37):
our religion clearly teaches us that a bunch of teenagers
getting pregnant is not a good idea. It's bad and
it's wrong, and we shouldn't allow it or facilitate it.
But no, you're not allowed to do that. Their religious
exemption was denied by the state of Colorado, and now
they're suing in federal court. This is ridiculous that it
gets this far, and it's also the perfect example of
the fact that this has never been about equality. That
(12:59):
was the line that they they told you to make
it palatable. What this has always been about is forcing
their ideology their beliefs down on you, which is exactly
the thing, ironically enough, that they have accused the right
of they're saying we're not Christians, we don't hold these
religious beliefs. You have no right to force them on us.
Fair enough, you can go start your own camp and
(13:21):
you do your creepy garbage stuff over there, and we
won't because we're a religious camp. And that's exactly what happened.
There are a number of quote unquote LGBTQIA plus whatever
the hell friendly camps in Colorado. There's dozens of them.
I did a quick Google search just to verify that.
I'm not gonna give you the names because I don't
(13:42):
want to promote these garbage institutions, but they're out there.
They're not hard to find. I found them very quickly.
But no, that's not enough for the left. It's not
enough for them to have their LGBTQIA plus whatever the
hell friendly camps and religious camps that don't subscribe to
this ridiculous gender nonsense. They have to have only the
LGBTQ camps. They have to take your religious camp and
(14:05):
force you by law to either accept this harmful garbage
gender nonsense, or they will shut you down. They will
take away your license to operate and force you to close.
It really is worth asking why it's so important to
the people that hold to this ideology that it be
pushed on your children, And it really is. It's being
(14:25):
pushed on your children everywhere up to including the public schools.
And that's not slowing down at all. Even though you think, Okay,
we have the right president in office, Well, that doesn't
automatically solve the problem. You still have to stay on
this issue because it is still to this day being
pushed on kids in classrooms. Now, the argument is, not
only is this happening, not only should you force religious
(14:48):
institutions to accept this nonsense, but you should force everybody
to accept it because it's necessary to learn math. I'm
not kidding. That's their argument. Take a listen to this
leftist trans te Sure I believe this is a man
who identifies as a woman. It looks like a man,
it kind of sounds like a man. And here he
is making the case that he has got to have
(15:09):
a pride flag up in his classroom so that his
students can learn math. I'm not kidding. He literally says that,
take a listen.
Speaker 3 (15:16):
Hi.
Speaker 4 (15:17):
For those of you who don't know me, I'm a
high school math teacher and I have a pride flag
in my classroom. My job is to teach students math,
but it's significantly more than just that.
Speaker 1 (15:28):
Some of the students that I teach might not have liked.
Speaker 4 (15:30):
Their previous math teachers, might not know how to learn math,
may have never even passed a math class before. So
so much of my job is building an atmosphere in
a persona that the students feel comfortable learning from me.
Because with everyone, especially high school students, learning is scary,
Failure is tough, and failure is required to learn. I'm
(15:53):
asking my students to be vulnerable with their failures, and
in order for them to be vulnerable, they have to
feel safe. The pride flag is one of the many
ways that I show my kids, regardless of who they are,
that you are safe in my class that no matter
who you are, who you love, where you come from,
you're welcome here.
Speaker 1 (16:14):
So yeah, I think that makes sense. So yeah, I
think that makes sense. Well, you should stop thinking, because
you're clearly not very good about it. It's not your
job to make students feel comfortable. It's not your job
to make sure all your students like you. My math
teacher was my mother, and I still didn't like learning math.
From her. I love my mother. I hate math. That
has never changed to this day. But I still learned math,
(16:37):
or at least I learned it enough to finish high school. Right,
I'm still not very good at it, and that's not
gonna change, and it never was, no matter how many
different concessions my mother made to me over the course
of my time homeschooling learning math, and that's not going
to change for these kids either. It doesn't matter how
many pride flags you put up in your classroom. Kids
who are bad at math are still going to be
(16:58):
bad at math, and they're either going to figure it
out enough to pass high school or they're not. What
they definitely don't need in order to learn math is Hey, kids,
guess how great it is to be gay in trans
Now let's sit down and do some calculus. It's ridiculous
on its face, The whole ideology, the whole gender ideology
is ridiculous on his face, but they keep pushing it,
(17:19):
and they keep insisting you pretend it's not ridiculous. One
more thing that I want to really quick point out
just in that video that I don't know if you noticed,
it's very easy to skip past it. Notice how this
guy says my kids. He doesn't say my students, he
says my kids. I just want you to be aware
of that. I want you to know that that is
how the people who subscribe to this ridiculous ideology, that's
(17:41):
how they think, that's how they operate. These aren't your
kids that you have delegated the responsibility of teaching to.
These are their kids, and they're going to push whatever
ideology they want on your children. It's sick here you
kids out of public school, home school them for this
exact reason. All right, state to them. We'll be right
back after this. All right, I want to talk about
(18:26):
actually several different things in this segment. You're gonna kind
of split this up. We're gonna talk about some legal
stuff that's going on that I think is interesting, and
then we're also going to talk about this really good
clip that I saw of a Senate hearing involving Marco
Rubio and Chris van Holland. He's the Democrat senator from
(18:46):
Maryland who traveled to El Salvador to go have a
meeting with Kilmar Abrago Garcia, who of course is the
MS thirteen gang member that the Left has been on
a crusade for ever since the Biden administration rightfully deported him,
and just a great response from Secretary of State Mark
or Rubio when they were just kind of butting heads.
(19:09):
It's a really good clip. So I'll play for you.
We'll talk about it, but first I want to give
you some legal updates. First of all, Mayor Brandon Johnson,
he's the mayor of Chicago. He has got himself in
some hot water. First of all, let me play you
a cut of Brandon Johnson talking and I want to
see if you can guess why he got in hot water.
Before I tell you why he got in hot water.
(19:32):
Take a listen to this.
Speaker 5 (19:33):
Some detractors that will push back on me and say,
you know, the only thing that the mayor talks about
is the hiring of black people. Know what I'm saying
is when you hire our people, we always look out
for everybody else. We are the most generous people on
the planet. I don't know so many cultures that have
(19:55):
play cousins. That's how generous we are. We just make
somebody a family man, right, This is how we are.
And so business and economic neighborhood development. The Deputy Mayor
is a black woman. Department of Planning Development, it's a
black woman. Infrastructure Deputy mayor is a black woman. Chief
(20:18):
Operations officer is a black man. Budget director, it's a
black woman. Senior advisor is a black man.
Speaker 1 (20:27):
Okay, So there he is talking about some of his
senior staff in the City of Chicago, and he's very
proud of the fact that they're all black. And there's
nothing inherently wrong with that, right, I think we can
all agree. If they're the best people for the job,
absolutely go for it. Hire them. Give the Chicago taxpayers
the best bang for their buck. Of course, hire the
(20:48):
best of the best. And if those people happen to
be black, that's completely fine. There's nothing wrong with that
at all, and you'd be a fool to say that
there is. However, it is a weird coincidence that every
single senior member of Brandon Johnson's staff is black. That
doesn't just happen, right, I Mean, if you're truly going
out and seeking the best of the best, and that's
(21:10):
who you're hiring, the best of the best of the best,
it's just not statistically likely that every single person is
gonna be black. That's true of any race any race.
If you're going out and searching for the best of
the best of the best of the best, they're not
all gonna be white, They're not all gonna be Hispanic,
they're not all gonna be Asian or any other race
(21:30):
you want to throw in there. There's gonna be a mix.
So when every single person is the same race at
the top level of this city government and the mayor,
who presumably played a significant role in hiring these people,
is going out and openly bragging about the fact that
I did this intentionally, I hired these black people, Well,
(21:51):
that kind of looks to me like racial bias right now.
I'm not saying that's definitely what happened, because I don't know. However,
this doesn't exactly pass the sniff test. And you know
who agrees with me on this, the Department of Justice
Civil Rights Division, which has opened up an investigation into
Mayor Johnson's hiring practices. According to a Department of Justice memo,
(22:14):
Dear Mayor Johnson, the Department of Justice is opening an
investigation to determine whether the City of Chicago, Illinois, is
engaged in a pattern or practice of discriminating based on race.
In violation of a Title five, sixty seven of the
Civil Rights Act of nineteen sixty four, as amended forty
two USC. Two hundred cisl l L. It is the
(22:35):
responsibility of the Attorney General of the United States to
enforce the provisions of Title seven with respect to state
and local government employers. The Attorney General has delegated the
authority to investigate compliance with these provisions to the Assistant
Attorney General of the Civil Rights Division. So, in short,
it looks like he's getting in trouble for this. I mean,
we'll see if anything comes of this. This is just
(22:57):
an investigation at this point, all right. Secondly, I told
you we'd watched that Wisconsin case, and we watched it.
Hannah Dugan. She is the judge in Wisconsin who got
in trouble for basically helping allegedly an illegal alien escape
Ice custody by tricking Ice into going down the hall
(23:18):
to like a more senior judge, and then while they
were down there distracted, she snuck the illegal alien that
was supposed to go into custody out the back door.
So here's your update on that case. It is progressing.
She has officially been charged. She pleaded not guilty to
federal obstruction charges stemming from her alleged helping of a
man evade immigration authorities during a federal law enforcement operation
(23:40):
at her courthouse. That's according to CBS News. We told
you at the time that she had been I think
like technically suspended from being a judge or given a break.
I don't know what the technical term is, but she's
I guess we'll say she's on an unconsensual vacation until
this is all resolved. So her trial is set to
begin the week of July twenty first. So that's underway,
(24:04):
all right. I told you we'd watch it. We're watching it.
There's your update. Sorry it took me so long to
get to it. I've just had so many other things
that have been going on. It's difficult to work everything in. Secondly,
I wanted to give you an update on that situation
that we saw in New Jersey with a bunch of
Democrats going and basically breaking into an ice facility. One
of those Democrats one of the ones who was kind
(24:26):
of pushing and maybe based on the video, I could
kind of see her slapping at an ice agent. She
has officially been charged by US attorney for the District
of New Jersey, Elena Hubbah, the misdemeanor trustpassed charge that
the mayor of that town was facing. Those have been dropped.
But that congresswoman is getting charged. I think that's a
good thing. She It looks like she assaulted a cop
(24:47):
on video. That's worthy of some charges. If the evidence
bears out throughout the course of the trial that that
didn't happen, then good on her. That's why we have
a justice system. But as of right now, it looks
like she slapped that guy. She needs to go to
court for that. All right. Anyway, all that aside, let's
now talk about this video of Marco Rubio. I want
to play you a little bit of this and listen
to Chris van Holland just absolutely lose it at Marco Rubio.
(25:10):
And listen to Marco Rubio's responses here. They're very calm,
they're very collected, they're very to the point. He's very
good at this.
Speaker 2 (25:17):
Take a listen, and I have to tell you directly
and personally that I regret voting for you for Secretary
of State.
Speaker 1 (25:24):
I yield back.
Speaker 3 (25:25):
I respond you may well, first of all, your regret
for voting for me confirms I'm doing a good job
based on what I'm going that's just direc clipping statement. Secretary,
can I respond, Mister chairman, you mean.
Speaker 2 (25:35):
I didn't have Senator, Please let the secretary.
Speaker 1 (25:38):
I'd be happy to, but then I can respond.
Speaker 2 (25:40):
To his Your time's up, Senator, and willfully used. I
might add, well, your remindsmen to not represent the view
of this committee.
Speaker 1 (25:47):
Well, mister Secretary, please, well, i'd like to.
Speaker 3 (25:49):
I can't respond to everything he said because much of
these are untrue, but i'll go through a few. First
of all, I'm actually very proud of the work we've
done with USAID. For example, I don't regret cutting ten
million dollars from male circumcisions in Mozambique. I don't know
how that makes a stronger and more prosperous as a nation.
Psychosocial support services I raised.
Speaker 2 (26:11):
Senator, i'd ask you to suspend. You had seven straight minutes.
I chose to use my time that way, Mister Chairman,
that's my right to.
Speaker 1 (26:18):
Please suspend that way. Secretary Rubio, Well, I can go on.
Speaker 3 (26:21):
I mean, there's other things here. We spent two hundred
and twenty seven thousand dollars for Big Cat's YouTube channel
from USA. I d we spent fourteen million dollars for
social cohesion and mally whatever the hell that means. So
I can go on and on. I got the list here,
and there's more that I didn't even bring the whole list.
In the case of El Salvador, absolutely absolutely we deported
gang members, gang members, including the one that you had
(26:42):
a margarita with, and that guy is a human trafficker,
and that guy is a gang banger, and that and
the evidence is going to be clear in the days of.
Speaker 1 (26:53):
Rubio has the floor Chairman.
Speaker 2 (26:54):
He can't make unsubstantiated like that Secretary Rubio has the floor.
You've had your Rutio should take that testimony the Federal
Fedator United States, because hasn't done it under oath.
Speaker 3 (27:04):
Here's another point, Okay, there is a division in our
government between the federal branch and the judicial branch. No
judge and the judicial branch cannot tell me or the
president how to conduct foreign policy. No judge can tell
me how I have to outreach to a foreign partner,
what I need to say to them. And if I
do reach the foreign partner and talk to them, I
haven't under no obligation to share that with a judiciary branch.
(27:26):
Just like a judge cannot order me to negotiate with
a foreign minister of Russia, they cannot order me to
negotiate with a foreign minister or the president of El Salvador.
And if I did negotiate with them, which we have
responded to them, and we've told them we've had communications
with the President of El Salvador, I am under no
obligation under our division of powers in this country and
to share with the LED the judicial branch how I
(27:47):
conducted diplomacy of the United States.
Speaker 1 (27:49):
All right, there's about another minute and a half of
that video, but I don't have time to play at all,
so i'd encourage you to go listen to it. I
reposted it yesterday on my ex page. Listen. This is
a very good response from Marco Rubio's addressing the points
that the left has been hitting forever. Right, the separation
of powers is a real thing. The judges in this country,
these federal judges that are all left disappointed, need to
(28:10):
take a step back and understand those separations of powers,
like Marco Rubio clearly does. Second, of all, conservatives should
not be apologizing at all for any of the USAID
cuts because they're gonna keep trying to throw us these
sob stories. Listen, I don't care. This is our taxpayer money.
It should be spent on us, not foreign nations. Right,
This is our money. It shouldn't be wasted on ridiculous
(28:32):
programs like the ones that the Secretary listed out there.
And when you hit back at these ridiculous leftist talking
points as well as Marco Rubio did, the left, as
you saw from Chris van Holland, can't help but just
absolutely lose their mind. This is not a good look
for the Democrats. It's not gonna win them votes. Marco
Rubio is calm, collected and hitting the points, and Chris
(28:53):
van Holland is just pissed about it the entire time.
All Right, we got one more segment coming up. Stay
to and we'll be right back.
Speaker 2 (29:23):
All right.
Speaker 1 (29:23):
I know you were all wondering when I was going
to mention it. I didn't forget. Of course I'm going
to talk about it. I just wanted to wait. I
didn't want to be basic and talk about it first.
All right, So let's stick into it. Joe Biden, we
talked about his health problems quite a bit in the
(29:45):
Sunday broadcast. If you didn't listen to it and go
check it out just on the podcast and tune in
on Sundays at seven on AM nine fifty KPRC. I
can't say this enough. It's a great show every week.
And there's nothing like just cruising down the highways listening
to traditional AM radio in your car and getting smarter
while you do it because you're listening to me. So anyway,
we talked about Joe Biden's health issues because the Robert
(30:08):
Her tapes were released, and those tapes very clearly demonstrated
that Joe Biden had significant lacking mental capacity and had
for some time while he was president. It made it
abundantly clear. We talked about that in detail on the
Sunday show. Go back and listen to it on the
podcast for all the details. But I'm not going to
rehash it right now. It's just because I don't have
(30:30):
the time now. For whatever reason, the Biden family or
I guess his people, decided it was still important to
try to preserve his image. I feel like that's why
this information got released, and so in order to distract,
I think from the fact that everybody could clearly see
he was mentally deficient, they decided to try to garner
some sympathy points by announcing that he had really bad
(30:51):
prostate cancer. And let me just open with this, because
I know a number of people and have known number
of people that have had cancer and suffered from it.
Two of my grandparents, who I loved very much, both
died from cancer. Is very very tragic. My father had
cancer at one point. Thankfully he was able to recover.
Cancer is obviously a very tragic and very difficult thing,
(31:11):
and those who have it deserve sympathy. That being said,
Joe Biden was the President of the United States. He
has made a deliberate choice throughout his life to put
himself in the public eye and be a public figure.
And with that comes discussions of your health, especially when
you were the President of the United States and probably
had severe cancer during that time and lied about it.
(31:33):
All Right, So here's what we know, officially a statement
from the personal office of former President Joe Biden. Last week,
President Joe Biden was seeing for a new finding of
a prostate nodule after experiencing increasing urinary symptoms. On Friday,
he was diagnosed with prostate cancer characterized by a Gleason
score of nine grade group five with metastasists to the bones.
(31:54):
While this represents a more aggressive form of the disease,
the cancer appears to be hormone sensitive, which allows for
effective management. The president and his family are reviewing treatment
options with his physicians. Okay, I am, by no means
an oncologist. I have never claimed to be. I will
never claim to be. I will never pursue that career path.
That being said, I am not an expert on cancer. However,
(32:15):
I know the very basics, and I know that this
is serious late stage prostate cancer. This cancer has metastasized
to Joe Biden's bones. That means it is spreading through
his body, all right. It takes a long time for
prostate cancer to do that. Prostate cancer is traditionally one
of the slowest moving cancers. That's why you only have
(32:35):
to really get checked for it every year or so,
because you can have a year old prostate cancer and
not know, and you still have plenty of time to
look at it and treat it, and it will still
progress very slowly, and you can kind of manage it
and still have a decently long life and maybe even
get some remission. That's obviously the goal for anyone who
has cancer is for it to go away. So this
(32:56):
is essentially a stage four prostate cancer. Prostate cancer according
to what I'm seeing on Google right now, just from
a quick surge, so take it with a grain of salt.
It can take up to fifteen years for cancer to
spread it from the prostate. Fifteen years. They claim that
they just found out about this days ago. There is
(33:16):
just no way in the world that the singular person
who has probably had the best medical care, that's the
president of the United States. Supposedly that person has the
best treatment from the best physicians all over the world
all the time. Right, that's what we want for our president.
We want him to be healthy all the time, and
if something happens to him, we want to be able
(33:37):
to fix it because he runs our country. That's important.
There's no way that this guy who was the vice
president for years, was the president for years after that,
and a relatively high level senator before that. There's no
way that this guy just now got staged four prostate
cancer and nobody noticed until just a minute ago. I
(33:59):
just don't believe that at all now. Obviously we want
the best for him. We want him to be able
to recover. If for no other reason, then you want
to see him truly accept Christ before he dies. And
it seems like he's on death's doorstep right now, so
that clock is running out. But either one of two
things is happening right now. Either we are being lied to,
and if that's the case, we deserve to know why.
(34:21):
Or the doctors that have been treating the president of
the United States for the last four years and the
vice president for a good bit of time before that,
are just completely stupid and terrible. One of those situations
is more likely to me than the other. Considering the
fact that we already know the Biden team is more
than happy to lie about the president's health, I see
(34:43):
no reason to not think that Jill Biden or the
people pulling Joe Biden's strings. I don't know who it is,
but it seems like maybe right now it's Jill. There's
no reason for me to believe they wouldn't lie for
years about a cancer diagnosis that is probably very very
old by now and has been kept hidden for political purposes.
That's what it looks like. Happens. And you know, at
(35:04):
some point you've got to wonder who's making these decisions
for Joe Biden, right, because we know he's not making
the decisions for himself. The longer this goes on, the
more it starts to look like elder abuse. He clearly
has some form of mental disability, be that dementia or
Alzheimer's or anything else, and he deserves sympathy and care
for that. Right he obviously has very severe cancer. He
(35:28):
deserves sympathy and care for that as well. So the
question has to be asked if he's had these issues
for such a long time. And remember, even back in
twenty nineteen twenty twenty, when Joe Biden was running for president,
there were concerns about his mental health being raised. Why
was he being trotted out as a public figure in
that time. This is an old man that should be
(35:49):
with his family, receiving love and care and ministry probably
as he goes to die. And I'm not saying that
to be cruel. I'm not saying that to mock him.
I'm being one hundred percent honest. That's what any person
deserves as they start to age and enter failing health.
That kind of late stage of life where your body
starts to break down. You don't deserve to be put
(36:09):
out in front of cameras, shuffled all over the country,
all over the world, and made a mockery of. If
you're the president of the United States and you're a
complete fool, absolutely you deserve to be made a mockery of.
But it the more and more I look at this,
the more I honestly have to feel bad for Joe Biden,
because it honestly looks like somebody has been doing this
to Joe Biden for the last four years, just as
(36:31):
much as Joe Biden has been doing this to the
American people for the last four years. I have to
assume this is maybe Joe Biden that's been doing this
to him his wife. And if that's the case, she's
a truly evil woman, truly, because she, of all people,
should have been going and saying, Joe, don't run for
president in twenty twenty you just can't handle it. Joe,
(36:52):
don't even try to run for reelection in twenty twenty
four into twenty twenty five. That's a disaster waiting to happen.
But as far as I can tell, it looks like
she's been pushing him along this entire time, which is
really sick and depraved. I hope to god my wife
never does that to me. Baby, if you're listening, never
do that to me. The answer is no, I will
(37:12):
not run for president. Request denied. And just for you,
the listener, so that you know I'm not completely making
all of this crap up, I want to direct you
back to a clip from back in twenty twenty two.
This is Joe Biden talking about how windshield wipers get
literally all the oils like off the window, and because
(37:33):
there's so much oil slick and whatnot, that's why I
and so many damn other people have cancer. He's admitting
to this in twenty twenty two that he has cancer
on camera. Take a listen.
Speaker 6 (37:44):
And because it was a four lane highway that was accessible,
my mother drove us and rather than us be able
to walk and guess what the first frost, you know
what was happening. You had to put on your windshield
wipers to get literally the oil slick off the window.
That's why I have so damn many other people I
(38:04):
grew up have cancer. And why camp for the longest
time Delaware had the highest cancer rate in the nation.
Speaker 1 (38:11):
Remember that was two years ago. At the time, we
were told by his team, oh no, he didn't mean
to say that. It was a slip of the tongue.
He misspoke. They tried to walk it back, and now
we say, okay, was that a Freudian slip? Did he
accidentally tell us the truth? Because now he's got stage
four prostate cancer and that doesn't just happen overnight. It
(38:31):
takes several years for that to happen. And listen, obviously,
my sympathies to the former president. My sympathy is to
his family. But why were they lying about this? Right?
That's a question worth asking. It's one that I think
we deserve an answer to. That's important to know. This
guy was the president of the United States. This isn't nothing,
all right, This stuff matters. This guy was the most
(38:53):
important person in the world for years. All right, listen,
we'll be back on Sunday. Reach out to me on
X you know where to find me. Underscore Ethan Buchanan,
thank you very much for listening to the Next Gen Report.
From the heart of the Space City to the heart
of gen Z. Welcome to Next Gen Conversation, not Dad's
Talk Radio.
Speaker 2 (00:13):
Ethan talks to you about the issues and events that
men are to our generation.
Speaker 1 (00:18):
This is the Next Gen Report with Ethan Buchanan that Hey, everybody, welcome,
good to be back with you. Listen at Underscore Ethan
Buchanan on X check it out. I am very active there,
definitely more active than I should be. I spend way
too much time on X, but hey, what are you
(00:39):
gonna do. I'm already addicted, I'm already terminally online, So
why don't you benefit from that? I post a lot
of great information there. X really has become one of
my go to sources. And I will say there's a
lot of bad information on X, almost as much bad
information as there is good information. So you do have
to be very careful. But I can kind of to
(01:00):
help you with that. I post a lot of the
good information, or at least I hope I do, so
I would encourage you to check me out there, stay
in touch there. If you are following me on X,
then you would have already seen probably the issue that
we had in New York with a sailing ship, a
tall ship hitting the Brooklyn Bridge. I believe it was
(01:22):
on Saturday. Now, normally I wouldn't talk about this because, frankly,
this involved the Mexican Navy, which is a navy that
I'm not a member of and of a country that
I'm not a citizen of. So what Mexico and their
military does, as long as it's not a direct attack
on the United States, really doesn't bother me. And it
also happened in New York, which I'm not a citizen
(01:45):
of New York. I don't live in New York. I
live very far away in New York. And as a
general rule, I don't really care what happens in New York.
But due to circumstances beyond my control, this situation has
become relevant to me, and so I'm going to talk
a little bit about it. So here's the background. We
have this tall ship, a sailing ship, you know. And
when I say sailing ship, I mean it's a ship
(02:06):
with sails, like in Pirates of the Caribbean. If you're
not familiar with boats, most ship these days have engines.
This one had sails. It tried to go under the
Brooklyn Bridge. I don't know if it tried to go
under the Brooklyn Bridge on purpose, or if that was
an accident, or if the wind caught it or some
goober in a tugboat was pulling it. I don't know
what happened, but it crashed into the Brooklyn Bridge and
(02:29):
smashed one of the sails. And of course, because it
is a sailboat, there were members of the Mexican Navy
on that sailboat, and tragically, two of those people died.
I didn't really plan on covering this story because, unfortunately,
the harsh reality is two people die all the time.
That really doesn't make it newsworthy. It didn't happen anywhere
near me, It didn't happen anywhere near you. It really
(02:50):
wouldn't affect you at all. So why am I talking
about it now? Well, because, like everything else, this for
some reason had to be politicized by the Democrats. Now
you might think, okay, well, this is a tragic accident.
How in the world could this possibly be political? I mean,
maybe if it was our navy, we could say, okay, well,
our political leadership that oversees the military made some sort
(03:11):
of error here, and maybe that's how it becomes political
But this is the Mexican Navy, which is run by
Mexican officials in the Mexican government. So how in the
world does this have anything at all to do with us?
And therein lies the point, because the fact of the
matter is it doesn't. This really shouldn't matter at all,
except New York Senator Chuck Schumer decided that, like any
(03:34):
other unfortunate instance, he was going to turn this into
somehow an opportunity to attack Donald Trump. Now again, I
don't understand how he got here. Donald Trump has no
authority over the Mexican Navy and how they recruit and
staff their ships. This doesn't appear to be some sort
of act of war they I mean, this ship is
(03:55):
to the Mexican Navy what the USS Constitution is to
our navy. It's just a sailing ship that we float
around to show off sometimes. It's not an active military vessel.
It's at best a training ship. And of course Mexico
is an ally of ours to a certain extent, so
it's not really as surprise that it was there. It
seemed to be there for ceremonial purposes. It had a big,
fancy Mexican flag flying on it, it was all lit
(04:17):
up and pretty, So it's not like Mexico attacked us.
This was just their navy sent one of their pretty
little sailing ships over and a tragedy occurred. Right, So
this really has nothing to do with Donald Trump. But
Chuck Schumer decided that this was a good opportunity for
him to go out and try to attack Donald Trump,
so he released probably the most ridiculous political statement that
(04:38):
I have ever seen, and I've seen a lot. He
said after being fully briefed on last night's Brooklyn Bridge accident.
One thing is predominantly clear. There are more questions than
answers as it relates to exactly how this accident occurred.
That's fair. How did this accident occurred? We need to
get to the bottom of that. We should be able
to have other ships come visit our harbor and not
crash into our major bridges. To say that bridges serve
(05:01):
as critical transportation arteries for commerce, emergency response, and daily travel,
and many span key waterways that are vulnerable to both
natural and man made threats, that's obviously true. The Coast
Guard plays a crucial role in monitoring and securing these areas,
deterring potential terrorist attacks, preventing illegal activities, and responding quickly
to emergencies. At the same time, maintaining the structural integrity
(05:24):
and safety of America's bridges is critical to the economy
and the well being of communities. That's obviously true. A
failure or attack on a major bridge could disrupt supply,
trains and danger lives and cause massive economic loss. That's correct.
It is unacceptable that the Trump administration is potentially jeopardizing
our national and economic security, as well as American lives.
(05:48):
Slow your role, brother, What in the world does this
have to do with any of that? He essentially went
on to blame the DOGE team for this because they
implemented a big hiring freeze and the coast, who I
guess is responsible for running traffic in the Hudson River,
similar to how the FAA is responsible for running air traffic.
(06:08):
Apparently they just couldn't manage one extra sail boat because
of the DOGE hiring cuts, which is patently ridiculous. Patently ridiculous.
I mean, if you watch the video, you can clearly
see that this is something that went wrong with the boat, right,
and the video is all over X I encourage you
to go watch it. I believe I've reposted it, but
that was several days ago at this point, so I
(06:30):
don't remember exactly. I know I've commented on a lot
of videos about it, So if you watch the video,
it's very difficult to make the case that more people
being hired by the Coastguard would have stopped this problem.
It's even harder to make that case when you realize
that the federal hiring freeze that DOGE implemented did not
apply to the Coast Guard. Homeland Security DHS dot gov
(06:51):
tweeted out a response to this. I Say tweeted. They
posted a response to this, saying Minority Leader Schumer's accusations
that a hiring freeze led to the U the US
Coast Guard's vessel traffic systems not being adequately staffed are false.
The US Coast Guard has been fully supported and has
been exempt from hiring freezes. Additionally, this incident had nothing
(07:12):
to do with vessel traffic services. When a ship loses
propulsion in high current areas, the vessel needs to engage
all capabilities to stop, and ideally tugs are nearby to support.
We encourage Minority Leader Schumer to get his facts straight
before he misleads the American people. But that's just the point, right,
I mean, the Democrats never do bother to do that.
They never do get their facts straight before they start
(07:33):
misleading the American people. I mean, a tragedy happens, that's
no one's fault except probably the Mexican Navy, and Schruck
Schumer immediately jumps down Donald Trump's throat about it. Make
that make sense. He doesn't even bother to say, hey,
was the Coastguard dealing with a hiring freeze, because the
answer is no, they weren't. All right, stay tuned, we've
got a racial coming up. We'll be right back. Hey, y'all.
(08:24):
Ethan Buchanan here at Underscore, Ethan Buchanan on X check
me out there. Listen, do y'all remember way back in
the day circa twenty fifteen, when the argument for the
left in cases of things like gay marriage and gender
(08:44):
identity and all that good stuff, The argument used to be,
just leave us alone. We just want to do whatever
we do in the privacy of our own homes. It
shouldn't be that big of a deal to you. Just
kind of let us mind our own business and we'll yours.
Nobody's gonna force anything you disagree with on your children.
(09:04):
This is just what we enjoy and what we believe
in what we do, and it shouldn't affect you at all. Right,
Remember that that was the argument from the left on
things like all the LGBT stuff. Right, That was the line,
and a lot of people kind of bought it. We
sort of figured, okay, fair enough, you do you in
your own home whatever. The government shouldn't be involved in this.
(09:26):
That was sort of the libertarian stance for a long time. Well,
lo and behold, that was a lie. They do want
to force LGBT gender ideology nonsense on you and your kids,
and if you don't support it, if you don't go
along with it, they will go out of your way
to shut you down. We saw this, of course in
Colorado with that one baker. He's been making headlines for
(09:47):
years because he keeps saying, I'm a baker, I'm a
Christian man. I believe that marriage is between a man
and a woman, not two men or two women. And
so because I hold that belief, I am not going
to bake wedding cakes for marriage because I don't believe
that's right. And I don't want to participate in that.
Now you might say, okay, well that's his own religious opinion.
He's more than willing to have that opinion. We have
(10:09):
freedom of religion. He can practice that fair enough. No,
this guy got sued up and down by LGBT activist groups,
ended up going all the way to the Supreme Court
just for them to say yes, he is allowed to
say I don't want to do business with you. That's
his right as a business owner and religious Christian. And
to this day he's still facing lawsuits, I believe, because
every time one gets settled, somebody else comes and throws
(10:31):
another stick at him. Basically, well, it turns out that's
actually just the beginning. This apparently happens a lot in Colorado.
There is now a Christian summer camp that is suing
the state of Colorado over the state's new transgender rule.
This is a seventy five year old camp, camp E
de Rajaje, which I hope I'm pronouncing that right. They
(10:52):
risk losing their license after the state denied their religious
exemption request for the new gender identity requirements that Colorado
has just begun implementing. So here's the background for you.
Colorado has a new law that requires children's resident camps
to permit campers access to bathing, dressing, and sleeping facilities
(11:13):
that align with the camper's gender identity. So this is
a seventy five year old Christian camp. The name I
believe means I'd rather have Jesus. It's a Christian children's
camp for kids sixteen to seventeen, all right, So they
should be completely allowed to say we're not doing that
(11:33):
because one on the grounds of religion, and two can
we be practical for a minute here, This is up
to seventeen year olds that are at this camp. Does
any single person anywhere legitimately think it's a good idea
to have fourteen, fifteen, sixteen seventeen year old guys and
girls cohabitating in spaces like bathrooms and changing rooms and
(11:55):
dressing and sleeping facilities. Does anybody really honestly think that
that's a good idea? Do you really need me to
explain why it's not? What do we know about fourteen, fifteen,
sixteen seventeen year old guys. First of all, I'm gonna
try not to be too crude, because I do want
this to be a family show. But come on, you
guys know who we're talking about here. Let's use our
(12:16):
brains for just a minute. This is obviously not a
good idea to have, period, and a religious group or
organization should be able to say, hey, we have problems
with this on a religious grounds. We don't think this
is a good idea because obviously the practical result of
this is going to be teenagers getting pregnant, and it
doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure that out. And
(12:37):
our religion clearly teaches us that a bunch of teenagers
getting pregnant is not a good idea. It's bad and
it's wrong, and we shouldn't allow it or facilitate it.
But no, you're not allowed to do that. Their religious
exemption was denied by the state of Colorado, and now
they're suing in federal court. This is ridiculous that it
gets this far, and it's also the perfect example of
the fact that this has never been about equality. That
(12:59):
was the line that they they told you to make
it palatable. What this has always been about is forcing
their ideology their beliefs down on you, which is exactly
the thing, ironically enough, that they have accused the right
of they're saying we're not Christians, we don't hold these
religious beliefs. You have no right to force them on us.
Fair enough, you can go start your own camp and
(13:21):
you do your creepy garbage stuff over there, and we
won't because we're a religious camp. And that's exactly what happened.
There are a number of quote unquote LGBTQIA plus whatever
the hell friendly camps in Colorado. There's dozens of them.
I did a quick Google search just to verify that.
I'm not gonna give you the names because I don't
(13:42):
want to promote these garbage institutions, but they're out there.
They're not hard to find. I found them very quickly.
But no, that's not enough for the left. It's not
enough for them to have their LGBTQIA plus whatever the
hell friendly camps and religious camps that don't subscribe to
this ridiculous gender nonsense. They have to have only the
LGBTQ camps. They have to take your religious camp and
(14:05):
force you by law to either accept this harmful garbage
gender nonsense, or they will shut you down. They will
take away your license to operate and force you to close.
It really is worth asking why it's so important to
the people that hold to this ideology that it be
pushed on your children, And it really is. It's being
(14:25):
pushed on your children everywhere up to including the public schools.
And that's not slowing down at all. Even though you think, Okay,
we have the right president in office, Well, that doesn't
automatically solve the problem. You still have to stay on
this issue because it is still to this day being
pushed on kids in classrooms. Now, the argument is, not
only is this happening, not only should you force religious
(14:48):
institutions to accept this nonsense, but you should force everybody
to accept it because it's necessary to learn math. I'm
not kidding. That's their argument. Take a listen to this
leftist trans te Sure I believe this is a man
who identifies as a woman. It looks like a man,
it kind of sounds like a man. And here he
is making the case that he has got to have
(15:09):
a pride flag up in his classroom so that his
students can learn math. I'm not kidding. He literally says that,
take a listen.
Speaker 3 (15:16):
Hi.
Speaker 4 (15:17):
For those of you who don't know me, I'm a
high school math teacher and I have a pride flag
in my classroom. My job is to teach students math,
but it's significantly more than just that.
Speaker 1 (15:28):
Some of the students that I teach might not have liked.
Speaker 4 (15:30):
Their previous math teachers, might not know how to learn math,
may have never even passed a math class before. So
so much of my job is building an atmosphere in
a persona that the students feel comfortable learning from me.
Because with everyone, especially high school students, learning is scary,
Failure is tough, and failure is required to learn. I'm
(15:53):
asking my students to be vulnerable with their failures, and
in order for them to be vulnerable, they have to
feel safe. The pride flag is one of the many
ways that I show my kids, regardless of who they are,
that you are safe in my class that no matter
who you are, who you love, where you come from,
you're welcome here.
Speaker 1 (16:14):
So yeah, I think that makes sense. So yeah, I
think that makes sense. Well, you should stop thinking, because
you're clearly not very good about it. It's not your
job to make students feel comfortable. It's not your job
to make sure all your students like you. My math
teacher was my mother, and I still didn't like learning math.
From her. I love my mother. I hate math. That
has never changed to this day. But I still learned math,
(16:37):
or at least I learned it enough to finish high school. Right,
I'm still not very good at it, and that's not
gonna change, and it never was, no matter how many
different concessions my mother made to me over the course
of my time homeschooling learning math, and that's not going
to change for these kids either. It doesn't matter how
many pride flags you put up in your classroom. Kids
who are bad at math are still going to be
(16:58):
bad at math, and they're either going to figure it
out enough to pass high school or they're not. What
they definitely don't need in order to learn math is Hey, kids,
guess how great it is to be gay in trans
Now let's sit down and do some calculus. It's ridiculous
on its face, The whole ideology, the whole gender ideology
is ridiculous on his face, but they keep pushing it,
(17:19):
and they keep insisting you pretend it's not ridiculous. One
more thing that I want to really quick point out
just in that video that I don't know if you noticed,
it's very easy to skip past it. Notice how this
guy says my kids. He doesn't say my students, he
says my kids. I just want you to be aware
of that. I want you to know that that is
how the people who subscribe to this ridiculous ideology, that's
(17:41):
how they think, that's how they operate. These aren't your
kids that you have delegated the responsibility of teaching to.
These are their kids, and they're going to push whatever
ideology they want on your children. It's sick here you
kids out of public school, home school them for this
exact reason. All right, state to them. We'll be right
back after this. All right, I want to talk about
(18:26):
actually several different things in this segment. You're gonna kind
of split this up. We're gonna talk about some legal
stuff that's going on that I think is interesting, and
then we're also going to talk about this really good
clip that I saw of a Senate hearing involving Marco
Rubio and Chris van Holland. He's the Democrat senator from
(18:46):
Maryland who traveled to El Salvador to go have a
meeting with Kilmar Abrago Garcia, who of course is the
MS thirteen gang member that the Left has been on
a crusade for ever since the Biden administration rightfully deported him,
and just a great response from Secretary of State Mark
or Rubio when they were just kind of butting heads.
(19:09):
It's a really good clip. So I'll play for you.
We'll talk about it, but first I want to give
you some legal updates. First of all, Mayor Brandon Johnson,
he's the mayor of Chicago. He has got himself in
some hot water. First of all, let me play you
a cut of Brandon Johnson talking and I want to
see if you can guess why he got in hot water.
Before I tell you why he got in hot water.
(19:32):
Take a listen to this.
Speaker 5 (19:33):
Some detractors that will push back on me and say,
you know, the only thing that the mayor talks about
is the hiring of black people. Know what I'm saying
is when you hire our people, we always look out
for everybody else. We are the most generous people on
the planet. I don't know so many cultures that have
(19:55):
play cousins. That's how generous we are. We just make
somebody a family man, right, This is how we are.
And so business and economic neighborhood development. The Deputy Mayor
is a black woman. Department of Planning Development, it's a
black woman. Infrastructure Deputy mayor is a black woman. Chief
(20:18):
Operations officer is a black man. Budget director, it's a
black woman. Senior advisor is a black man.
Speaker 1 (20:27):
Okay, So there he is talking about some of his
senior staff in the City of Chicago, and he's very
proud of the fact that they're all black. And there's
nothing inherently wrong with that, right, I think we can
all agree. If they're the best people for the job,
absolutely go for it. Hire them. Give the Chicago taxpayers
the best bang for their buck. Of course, hire the
(20:48):
best of the best. And if those people happen to
be black, that's completely fine. There's nothing wrong with that
at all, and you'd be a fool to say that
there is. However, it is a weird coincidence that every
single senior member of Brandon Johnson's staff is black. That
doesn't just happen, right, I Mean, if you're truly going
out and seeking the best of the best, and that's
(21:10):
who you're hiring, the best of the best of the best,
it's just not statistically likely that every single person is
gonna be black. That's true of any race any race.
If you're going out and searching for the best of
the best of the best of the best, they're not
all gonna be white, They're not all gonna be Hispanic,
they're not all gonna be Asian or any other race
(21:30):
you want to throw in there. There's gonna be a mix.
So when every single person is the same race at
the top level of this city government and the mayor,
who presumably played a significant role in hiring these people,
is going out and openly bragging about the fact that
I did this intentionally, I hired these black people, Well,
(21:51):
that kind of looks to me like racial bias right now.
I'm not saying that's definitely what happened, because I don't know. However,
this doesn't exactly pass the sniff test. And you know
who agrees with me on this, the Department of Justice
Civil Rights Division, which has opened up an investigation into
Mayor Johnson's hiring practices. According to a Department of Justice memo,
(22:14):
Dear Mayor Johnson, the Department of Justice is opening an
investigation to determine whether the City of Chicago, Illinois, is
engaged in a pattern or practice of discriminating based on race.
In violation of a Title five, sixty seven of the
Civil Rights Act of nineteen sixty four, as amended forty
two USC. Two hundred cisl l L. It is the
(22:35):
responsibility of the Attorney General of the United States to
enforce the provisions of Title seven with respect to state
and local government employers. The Attorney General has delegated the
authority to investigate compliance with these provisions to the Assistant
Attorney General of the Civil Rights Division. So, in short,
it looks like he's getting in trouble for this. I mean,
we'll see if anything comes of this. This is just
(22:57):
an investigation at this point, all right. Secondly, I told
you we'd watched that Wisconsin case, and we watched it.
Hannah Dugan. She is the judge in Wisconsin who got
in trouble for basically helping allegedly an illegal alien escape
Ice custody by tricking Ice into going down the hall
(23:18):
to like a more senior judge, and then while they
were down there distracted, she snuck the illegal alien that
was supposed to go into custody out the back door.
So here's your update on that case. It is progressing.
She has officially been charged. She pleaded not guilty to
federal obstruction charges stemming from her alleged helping of a
man evade immigration authorities during a federal law enforcement operation
(23:40):
at her courthouse. That's according to CBS News. We told
you at the time that she had been I think
like technically suspended from being a judge or given a break.
I don't know what the technical term is, but she's
I guess we'll say she's on an unconsensual vacation until
this is all resolved. So her trial is set to
begin the week of July twenty first. So that's underway,
(24:04):
all right. I told you we'd watch it. We're watching it.
There's your update. Sorry it took me so long to
get to it. I've just had so many other things
that have been going on. It's difficult to work everything in. Secondly,
I wanted to give you an update on that situation
that we saw in New Jersey with a bunch of
Democrats going and basically breaking into an ice facility. One
of those Democrats one of the ones who was kind
(24:26):
of pushing and maybe based on the video, I could
kind of see her slapping at an ice agent. She
has officially been charged by US attorney for the District
of New Jersey, Elena Hubbah, the misdemeanor trustpassed charge that
the mayor of that town was facing. Those have been dropped.
But that congresswoman is getting charged. I think that's a
good thing. She It looks like she assaulted a cop
(24:47):
on video. That's worthy of some charges. If the evidence
bears out throughout the course of the trial that that
didn't happen, then good on her. That's why we have
a justice system. But as of right now, it looks
like she slapped that guy. She needs to go to
court for that. All right. Anyway, all that aside, let's
now talk about this video of Marco Rubio. I want
to play you a little bit of this and listen
to Chris van Holland just absolutely lose it at Marco Rubio.
(25:10):
And listen to Marco Rubio's responses here. They're very calm,
they're very collected, they're very to the point. He's very
good at this.
Speaker 2 (25:17):
Take a listen, and I have to tell you directly
and personally that I regret voting for you for Secretary
of State.
Speaker 1 (25:24):
I yield back.
Speaker 3 (25:25):
I respond you may well, first of all, your regret
for voting for me confirms I'm doing a good job
based on what I'm going that's just direc clipping statement. Secretary,
can I respond, Mister chairman, you mean.
Speaker 2 (25:35):
I didn't have Senator, Please let the secretary.
Speaker 1 (25:38):
I'd be happy to, but then I can respond.
Speaker 2 (25:40):
To his Your time's up, Senator, and willfully used. I
might add, well, your remindsmen to not represent the view
of this committee.
Speaker 1 (25:47):
Well, mister Secretary, please, well, i'd like to.
Speaker 3 (25:49):
I can't respond to everything he said because much of
these are untrue, but i'll go through a few. First
of all, I'm actually very proud of the work we've
done with USAID. For example, I don't regret cutting ten
million dollars from male circumcisions in Mozambique. I don't know
how that makes a stronger and more prosperous as a nation.
Psychosocial support services I raised.
Speaker 2 (26:11):
Senator, i'd ask you to suspend. You had seven straight minutes.
I chose to use my time that way, Mister Chairman,
that's my right to.
Speaker 1 (26:18):
Please suspend that way. Secretary Rubio, Well, I can go on.
Speaker 3 (26:21):
I mean, there's other things here. We spent two hundred
and twenty seven thousand dollars for Big Cat's YouTube channel
from USA. I d we spent fourteen million dollars for
social cohesion and mally whatever the hell that means. So
I can go on and on. I got the list here,
and there's more that I didn't even bring the whole list.
In the case of El Salvador, absolutely absolutely we deported
gang members, gang members, including the one that you had
(26:42):
a margarita with, and that guy is a human trafficker,
and that guy is a gang banger, and that and
the evidence is going to be clear in the days of.
Speaker 1 (26:53):
Rubio has the floor Chairman.
Speaker 2 (26:54):
He can't make unsubstantiated like that Secretary Rubio has the floor.
You've had your Rutio should take that testimony the Federal
Fedator United States, because hasn't done it under oath.
Speaker 3 (27:04):
Here's another point, Okay, there is a division in our
government between the federal branch and the judicial branch. No
judge and the judicial branch cannot tell me or the
president how to conduct foreign policy. No judge can tell
me how I have to outreach to a foreign partner,
what I need to say to them. And if I
do reach the foreign partner and talk to them, I
haven't under no obligation to share that with a judiciary branch.
(27:26):
Just like a judge cannot order me to negotiate with
a foreign minister of Russia, they cannot order me to
negotiate with a foreign minister or the president of El Salvador.
And if I did negotiate with them, which we have
responded to them, and we've told them we've had communications
with the President of El Salvador, I am under no
obligation under our division of powers in this country and
to share with the LED the judicial branch how I
(27:47):
conducted diplomacy of the United States.
Speaker 1 (27:49):
All right, there's about another minute and a half of
that video, but I don't have time to play at all,
so i'd encourage you to go listen to it. I
reposted it yesterday on my ex page. Listen. This is
a very good response from Marco Rubio's addressing the points
that the left has been hitting forever. Right, the separation
of powers is a real thing. The judges in this country,
these federal judges that are all left disappointed, need to
(28:10):
take a step back and understand those separations of powers,
like Marco Rubio clearly does. Second, of all, conservatives should
not be apologizing at all for any of the USAID
cuts because they're gonna keep trying to throw us these
sob stories. Listen, I don't care. This is our taxpayer money.
It should be spent on us, not foreign nations. Right,
This is our money. It shouldn't be wasted on ridiculous
(28:32):
programs like the ones that the Secretary listed out there.
And when you hit back at these ridiculous leftist talking
points as well as Marco Rubio did, the left, as
you saw from Chris van Holland, can't help but just
absolutely lose their mind. This is not a good look
for the Democrats. It's not gonna win them votes. Marco
Rubio is calm, collected and hitting the points, and Chris
(28:53):
van Holland is just pissed about it the entire time.
All Right, we got one more segment coming up. Stay
to and we'll be right back.
Speaker 2 (29:23):
All right.
Speaker 1 (29:23):
I know you were all wondering when I was going
to mention it. I didn't forget. Of course I'm going
to talk about it. I just wanted to wait. I
didn't want to be basic and talk about it first.
All right, So let's stick into it. Joe Biden, we
talked about his health problems quite a bit in the
(29:45):
Sunday broadcast. If you didn't listen to it and go
check it out just on the podcast and tune in
on Sundays at seven on AM nine fifty KPRC. I
can't say this enough. It's a great show every week.
And there's nothing like just cruising down the highways listening
to traditional AM radio in your car and getting smarter
while you do it because you're listening to me. So anyway,
we talked about Joe Biden's health issues because the Robert
(30:08):
Her tapes were released, and those tapes very clearly demonstrated
that Joe Biden had significant lacking mental capacity and had
for some time while he was president. It made it
abundantly clear. We talked about that in detail on the
Sunday show. Go back and listen to it on the
podcast for all the details. But I'm not going to
rehash it right now. It's just because I don't have
(30:30):
the time now. For whatever reason, the Biden family or
I guess his people, decided it was still important to
try to preserve his image. I feel like that's why
this information got released, and so in order to distract,
I think from the fact that everybody could clearly see
he was mentally deficient, they decided to try to garner
some sympathy points by announcing that he had really bad
(30:51):
prostate cancer. And let me just open with this, because
I know a number of people and have known number
of people that have had cancer and suffered from it.
Two of my grandparents, who I loved very much, both
died from cancer. Is very very tragic. My father had
cancer at one point. Thankfully he was able to recover.
Cancer is obviously a very tragic and very difficult thing,
(31:11):
and those who have it deserve sympathy. That being said,
Joe Biden was the President of the United States. He
has made a deliberate choice throughout his life to put
himself in the public eye and be a public figure.
And with that comes discussions of your health, especially when
you were the President of the United States and probably
had severe cancer during that time and lied about it.
(31:33):
All Right, So here's what we know, officially a statement
from the personal office of former President Joe Biden. Last week,
President Joe Biden was seeing for a new finding of
a prostate nodule after experiencing increasing urinary symptoms. On Friday,
he was diagnosed with prostate cancer characterized by a Gleason
score of nine grade group five with metastasists to the bones.
(31:54):
While this represents a more aggressive form of the disease,
the cancer appears to be hormone sensitive, which allows for
effective management. The president and his family are reviewing treatment
options with his physicians. Okay, I am, by no means
an oncologist. I have never claimed to be. I will
never claim to be. I will never pursue that career path.
That being said, I am not an expert on cancer. However,
(32:15):
I know the very basics, and I know that this
is serious late stage prostate cancer. This cancer has metastasized
to Joe Biden's bones. That means it is spreading through
his body, all right. It takes a long time for
prostate cancer to do that. Prostate cancer is traditionally one
of the slowest moving cancers. That's why you only have
(32:35):
to really get checked for it every year or so,
because you can have a year old prostate cancer and
not know, and you still have plenty of time to
look at it and treat it, and it will still
progress very slowly, and you can kind of manage it
and still have a decently long life and maybe even
get some remission. That's obviously the goal for anyone who
has cancer is for it to go away. So this
(32:56):
is essentially a stage four prostate cancer. Prostate cancer according
to what I'm seeing on Google right now, just from
a quick surge, so take it with a grain of salt.
It can take up to fifteen years for cancer to
spread it from the prostate. Fifteen years. They claim that
they just found out about this days ago. There is
(33:16):
just no way in the world that the singular person
who has probably had the best medical care, that's the
president of the United States. Supposedly that person has the
best treatment from the best physicians all over the world
all the time. Right, that's what we want for our president.
We want him to be healthy all the time, and
if something happens to him, we want to be able
(33:37):
to fix it because he runs our country. That's important.
There's no way that this guy who was the vice
president for years, was the president for years after that,
and a relatively high level senator before that. There's no
way that this guy just now got staged four prostate
cancer and nobody noticed until just a minute ago. I
(33:59):
just don't believe that at all now. Obviously we want
the best for him. We want him to be able
to recover. If for no other reason, then you want
to see him truly accept Christ before he dies. And
it seems like he's on death's doorstep right now, so
that clock is running out. But either one of two
things is happening right now. Either we are being lied to,
and if that's the case, we deserve to know why.
(34:21):
Or the doctors that have been treating the president of
the United States for the last four years and the
vice president for a good bit of time before that,
are just completely stupid and terrible. One of those situations
is more likely to me than the other. Considering the
fact that we already know the Biden team is more
than happy to lie about the president's health, I see
(34:43):
no reason to not think that Jill Biden or the
people pulling Joe Biden's strings. I don't know who it is,
but it seems like maybe right now it's Jill. There's
no reason for me to believe they wouldn't lie for
years about a cancer diagnosis that is probably very very
old by now and has been kept hidden for political purposes.
That's what it looks like. Happens. And you know, at
(35:04):
some point you've got to wonder who's making these decisions
for Joe Biden, right, because we know he's not making
the decisions for himself. The longer this goes on, the
more it starts to look like elder abuse. He clearly
has some form of mental disability, be that dementia or
Alzheimer's or anything else, and he deserves sympathy and care
for that. Right he obviously has very severe cancer. He
(35:28):
deserves sympathy and care for that as well. So the
question has to be asked if he's had these issues
for such a long time. And remember, even back in
twenty nineteen twenty twenty, when Joe Biden was running for president,
there were concerns about his mental health being raised. Why
was he being trotted out as a public figure in
that time. This is an old man that should be
(35:49):
with his family, receiving love and care and ministry probably
as he goes to die. And I'm not saying that
to be cruel. I'm not saying that to mock him.
I'm being one hundred percent honest. That's what any person
deserves as they start to age and enter failing health.
That kind of late stage of life where your body
starts to break down. You don't deserve to be put
(36:09):
out in front of cameras, shuffled all over the country,
all over the world, and made a mockery of. If
you're the president of the United States and you're a
complete fool, absolutely you deserve to be made a mockery of.
But it the more and more I look at this,
the more I honestly have to feel bad for Joe Biden,
because it honestly looks like somebody has been doing this
to Joe Biden for the last four years, just as
(36:31):
much as Joe Biden has been doing this to the
American people for the last four years. I have to
assume this is maybe Joe Biden that's been doing this
to him his wife. And if that's the case, she's
a truly evil woman, truly, because she, of all people,
should have been going and saying, Joe, don't run for
president in twenty twenty you just can't handle it. Joe,
(36:52):
don't even try to run for reelection in twenty twenty
four into twenty twenty five. That's a disaster waiting to happen.
But as far as I can tell, it looks like
she's been pushing him along this entire time, which is
really sick and depraved. I hope to god my wife
never does that to me. Baby, if you're listening, never
do that to me. The answer is no, I will
(37:12):
not run for president. Request denied. And just for you,
the listener, so that you know I'm not completely making
all of this crap up, I want to direct you
back to a clip from back in twenty twenty two.
This is Joe Biden talking about how windshield wipers get
literally all the oils like off the window, and because
(37:33):
there's so much oil slick and whatnot, that's why I
and so many damn other people have cancer. He's admitting
to this in twenty twenty two that he has cancer
on camera. Take a listen.
Speaker 6 (37:44):
And because it was a four lane highway that was accessible,
my mother drove us and rather than us be able
to walk and guess what the first frost, you know
what was happening. You had to put on your windshield
wipers to get literally the oil slick off the window.
That's why I have so damn many other people I
(38:04):
grew up have cancer. And why camp for the longest
time Delaware had the highest cancer rate in the nation.
Speaker 1 (38:11):
Remember that was two years ago. At the time, we
were told by his team, oh no, he didn't mean
to say that. It was a slip of the tongue.
He misspoke. They tried to walk it back, and now
we say, okay, was that a Freudian slip? Did he
accidentally tell us the truth? Because now he's got stage
four prostate cancer and that doesn't just happen overnight. It
(38:31):
takes several years for that to happen. And listen, obviously,
my sympathies to the former president. My sympathy is to
his family. But why were they lying about this? Right?
That's a question worth asking. It's one that I think
we deserve an answer to. That's important to know. This
guy was the president of the United States. This isn't nothing,
all right, This stuff matters. This guy was the most
(38:53):
important person in the world for years. All right, listen,
we'll be back on Sunday. Reach out to me on
X you know where to find me. Underscore Ethan Buchanan,
thank you very much for listening to the Next Gen Report.
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.