July 9, 2025 • 39 mins
Listen to The Next-Gen Report live! Sundays at 7:00 p.m. on AM950, KPRC.
For the latest news, follow me on Instagram and X:
@the.ethanbuchanan
@_ethanbuchanan
For the latest news, follow me on Instagram and X:
@the.ethanbuchanan
@_ethanbuchanan
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:03):
From the heart of the Space City to the heart
of gen Z. Welcome to Next Gen Conversation, not Dad's
Talk Radio. Ethan talks to you about the issues and
events that men are to our generation. This is the
Next Gen Report, put Ethan Buchanan.
Speaker 2 (00:24):
Boy, am I fired up. I'm gonna be honest. There's
a lot of stuff in this episode that I am
really pissed about, like really and truly pissed. This is
some of the angriest I've been politically in a long time,
for a lot of reasons, and we've got a whole
hour to talk about it, so buckle in. Usually I
(00:46):
try to be a little bit kind of more calm
and measured in my politics, because you know, God is
in control for one thing, and second of all, things
usually tend to work out. A lot of the alarmism
that you see in politics very often is usually undue,
right I think we saw that with Iran. We bombed Iran,
(01:07):
everybody freaked out, and then everything was fine. It's usually fine.
Everything is normally fine. The status quo usually maintains itself.
But right now I'm pissed for a lot of reasons,
and we'll dig into that first. I want to start
with acknowledging some of the latest news that we have
on the Texas floods. As of yesterday evening, the death
(01:30):
toll in Central Texas was up to one hundred and
nine people. That is a lot. That is quite a bit.
And there's even more missing, one hundred and sixty one
people missing. That is a huge number of people. And again,
most of these people were people who were out by
the river trying to enjoy the Fourth of July. These
(01:51):
were kids at summer camp. These were people in rental
homes that were just trying to hang out by the
river and have a good July fourth weekend. They were
trying to celebrate their liberty and their independence, and they
tragically lost their lives. I'm so sick of people trying
to politicize this. This is not political. This is a
natural disaster. They happened. I don't care what preparation you do.
(02:12):
They will always happen, and they will oftentimes take a
lot of lives. This is the tragic reality of the
world we live in. There's no need for it to
be political. We have good leaders that are stepping up
and taking action as they should. We don't need to
politicize this. We don't and we shouldn't. Here's Greg Abbot,
(02:34):
I believe this was yesterday making the announcement that the
death toll had officially gone up to one hundred and
nine people. He was speaking at a news conference with
a bunch of other officials. Take a listen.
Speaker 3 (02:53):
First, The numbers that I have is that there are
ninety four fatalities. Ninety four fatalities associated with this flooding
event in this area, separate from that in other flooding
events in other parts of the state of Texas, there's
(03:15):
another fifteen fatalities for a total of one hundred and nine.
Speaker 2 (03:20):
To put this into perspective, just.
Speaker 3 (03:23):
In the Kerr and Kendall counties alone, there are far
more fatalities than there were in Hurricane Harvey. That's how
catastrophic this is. I also have some updated numbers on
those who are missing. First from Camp Mystic. My information
is those who are missing is down to now five
(03:48):
campers and one councilor five campers and one councilor missing.
In addition to that, there is another child not associated
with the camp who is missing. So for Kirk County,
that would be a total of seven who are missing.
In other parts of the state, there are twelve who
(04:12):
are missing. I have a new number, however. So one
thing we've been reaching out to the public about is
to get better information about those who were not registered
at a camp, those who were not registered at a hotel,
those who may have been down here who no one
really had any accounting of. And through law enforcement agency
(04:34):
working together, they provided me this number. Just in the
Kerk County area alone, there are one hundred and sixty
one people who were known to be missing, and again
that comes from combined law enforcements. One hundred and sixty one.
Speaker 2 (04:53):
Known people who are missing. Now, normally you would hear
something like that and you would say, oh my god,
what a tragedy these children are. In all likelihood, these
missing children are probably dead, which is tragic. But it's
been several days now it's very doubtful they will be
found alive. And that's on top of all the other
children that we've already found deceased. This is a tragedy.
(05:17):
The immediate response should be, oh my god, this is
how horrible. How can I help? How can I pray
for you? What can be done? But if you're a
sick little freak on TikTok and a former Houston City official.
Your immediate first response is just, well, people actually only
care because these are white children. That's the only reason
(05:37):
people are worried about these kids. They wouldn't care if
they were brown, which is a disgusting and vile response.
You have to be deranged to get there. But that's
what Sadie Perkins, a former Houston City official, said on TikTok.
Take a listen to this.
Speaker 4 (05:54):
I know I'm probably gonna get canceled for this, but can't.
Mystic is a white's own girls Christian camp. They don't
even have a token Asian, they don't have a token
black person. It is a all white, white only conservative
Christian camp. If you ain't white, you ain't right, you
(06:16):
ain't getting in, you ain't going period. And I think
that context needs to be said in this matter.
Speaker 2 (06:25):
No the hell it doesn't. Why would that need to
be said, even if it was true, which it's not.
That's retarded. Why would that need to be said. These
girls are dead, That's what matters. These girls were killed
in a tragic accident. Who cares what the racial policies
of the camp were, which, by the way, there are
(06:45):
no racial policies of the camp. It's just in Central Texas,
which surprise, surprise, happens to be mostly white folks. Look
at a map, look at some population statistics. This isn't controversial.
Speaker 4 (07:00):
Is not to say that we don't want the girls
to be found whatever girls that are missing or whatever
right now, but you best believe, especially in today's political climate,
if this were a group of Hispanic girls, especially with
them being in East Texas, it should be most likely Hispanic.
If this were a group of Hispanic girls out there,
(07:22):
this would not be getting this type of coverage that
they're getting.
Speaker 2 (07:24):
Okay, that's just BS. That's BS. And on top of
being BS, it's coming from somebody who clearly has no
idea what she's talking about. This camp isn't in East Texas,
it's in Central Texas. And the idea that we wouldn't
care if these were brown children is disgusting because what
you're essentially doing is saying, Hey, the entire everybody who's
shown concern about these girls that have died tragically, you're
(07:47):
all racists. That's gross. All right, we'll be right back,
stitchun All right, let's talk about amnesty that's been one
(08:26):
of the two major topics over the last couple of days.
I'll say it. I'll come right out and say it.
Trump has pissed some people off in his base, and
I'm one of them. For the record, I'm one of them.
I'm mad. We'll get into that a little bit more
in the third segment, because that's what I'm really mad on.
But this I'm just kind of mad on. So we're
(08:48):
gonna do this first. That way, I'm cool, calm and collected,
and we can dig through it and be reasonable, because
the last thing I want to be accused of is overreacting.
But there's been a lot of talk about amnesty over
the last couple of days. There has been sort of rumors,
mumbles in the background that maybe some in the Trump
(09:11):
administration are considering some form of amnesty for certain illegal aliens.
They start looking at the sob stories that we've been
hearing from the left. Oh, this father has been a
hard working American in the country for twenty years and
now he's been deported. How horrible he came here illegally.
(09:31):
I don't care. Get him out. I don't care how
long you've been here. Get out. I'm a big believer
in the idea that the statute of limitations shouldn't exist.
If you commit a crime, you should be held accountable
for that crime, even if we don't find out till later.
I stand by that statement. I will always stand by
(09:52):
that statement. This is a perfect example of that. So
there's been a lot of rumors going around. Of course,
the media, the METI immediately went to the what about
the farmers. Who's gonna pick our food, Who's gonna pick
our cotton? That's the line that they've been using. Who's
gonna pick your vegetables, that's mostly Hispanic workers. Who's gonna
pick your cotton? That's the same line they use with slavery.
(10:15):
And I'll give Trump credit on this. I think this
is born out of a legitimate sense of concern for
the well being of the United States, because obviously we
do need food, and we do want that food to
be reasonably priced. And so the idea has been floated that, well,
maybe we'll give some amnesty for you know, the farm workers,
(10:36):
that we need to just keep food on the table. No,
don't do that. Don't give amnesty for everybody. Mass deportations
to everyone, And that's what the base has been very
fired up about. They have been very angry at Trump
for even suggesting this. Charlie Kirk correctly pointed out that
this isn't the first time that we've danced this dance.
(10:58):
We got a big amnesty bill in nineteen eighty six
under Ronald Reagan, and the line was, you give this
amnesty to these illegal aliens that are in the country working,
trying to become good Americans right now, and then in return,
we'll do strong border security. We won't let any more in.
But these ones are clearly hard workers and deserve to
(11:21):
be here, even if they came here the wrong way.
So just let them sign, let them stay here, sign
the bill. And Ronald Reagan signed the bill, and that
was the bargain. And we got screwed on that bargain
because we never got the border security we got the amnesty.
We got a bunch of people staying here, primarily in
states like California, which have then in turn been wrecked.
(11:43):
And there is a direct correlation, and we never got
the border security we were promised. We cannot make that
mistake again. We must deport all of these illegal aliens,
all of them, without exception. I don't care what your
sob store is. I don't care how much you really
want to be here. I don't care how much of
(12:03):
a crap hole your home country is. You didn't come
here legally, Get the hell out. Thankfully, people have spoken
up in a big way. Obviously, Charlie Kirk has been
speaking up. He's a big name on the right, Josh Hammer.
He's someone that I've had the pleasure of talking to
a couple of times in my work in the KTRH newsroom.
(12:25):
You may or may not have heard of him. He
does a lot of really good work. Even Ronda Santis
came out and said, hey, no amnesty, no debate, no compromise.
That's good. A lot of high profile conservatives are coming
out big and saying no, we don't want this. We
want you to deport all of them. That's why you
(12:46):
were elected. That was the bargain. We make you the president,
you get these people out of our country. That's the deal.
Hold up your end of the bargain. We did our bit.
And everybody on the right has been saying this. And
this is why, I'll tell you the single best thing
you can do right now, outside of researching candidates and
getting ready to vote next spring. If you want to
(13:08):
make a difference politically, get on X. Get connected with
voices that will tell you the truth that you care about,
and when issues arise that you care about, speak up
about them on X because people are watching. They are
We've seen this on a number of occasions. We had
all this outrage about the idea of amnesty on X
(13:33):
and that immediately began to be back walked or walked back,
whatever the correct terminology is. And so here's Brooke Rawlins
now turning around, she's the Agriculture secretary, and she's saying no, no, no,
never mind, there's no amnesty. There will never be mass amnesty.
Mass deportations will continue. We'll be doing that strategically. We're
getting these people out. And all of that came from
(13:56):
people speaking out vocally and saying no, this is not
what we want. I will give Trump credit, the Trump
administration credit at least on this. They have listened to
their voters. Take a listen to Brooke Rawlins here at
this press conference saying no, we are continuing mass deportations,
there will not be amnesty.
Speaker 5 (14:13):
I think I answered the second question, where we are
on farm labor a little bit earlier. But what I
will say is that Lori Chavez Drimmer is our Secretary
of Labor, and the H TWOA visa program, all of
the programs that are newer to moving in seasonal ag
workers are under a secretary Chavesdrimmer. She has been working
(14:33):
around the clock with her team. I think we'll probably
hear a little bit more about this today and the
conversations will continue. But I can't underscore enough. There will
be no amnesty. The mass deportations continue, but in a
strategic way, and we move the workforce towards automation and
one hundred percent American participation, which again, with thirty four
million people able bodied adults on Medicaid, we should be
(14:55):
able to do that fairly quickly.
Speaker 2 (14:57):
Thank you. Okay, So it seems like the idea here is,
you know, if we want to have legal temporary workers
come into the country, we will let that happen. We
have visa programs for things like this. You can get
your visa, you can come in and do farm work
on a seasonal basis. That's fine. I have no problem
with that. Vet These people, we know who they are,
(15:20):
they have a visa. Let them into do seasonal farm labor.
I won't fight you on that. And then yeah, if
we want to move towards automating the workforce or shoehorning
more of the able bodied Americans that are on medicare
into that workforce, great, I see that as a good transition,
because there is a good point to be made. We
do have to have some sort of a transition. The
(15:40):
fact of the matter is there is a reliance on
illegal immigration and the labor that comes along with that.
That's a result of people not doing their jobs and
enforcing the law throughout the last I don't know, thirty
forty years, and so we've gotten to a point where
our economy does, to a certain extent rely on illegal
alien labor and we are going to have to wean
(16:01):
ourselves off of that. That is going to be a process.
So saying, hey, we're doing targeted mass deportations that are
focused first on the violent criminals, right the ms thirteens
of the world. We're focused on them. If we sweep
up extra illegal aliens in the process, great, we'll deport
them too. And then once we get all of them out,
then we'll start targeting the more quote unquote peaceful illegal aliens,
(16:25):
and then we'll get them out, and in the meantime,
we'll start working on visa programs so that people can
temporarily come into the United States work on our farms,
and then go back home. And hey, while we're at it,
let's tax those remittances on top of that. I don't
hate that idea. That is significantly different than turning around
(16:46):
and saying, hey, you've been working on this farm as
an illegal alien for five, ten, fifteen years, so you
get to stay. No, that's essentially saying, hey, you broke
the law. You got away with it long enough, so
now there will be no consequence. That's wrong. That's morally wrong.
Consequences have actions. That's natural law. That's a natural law
(17:09):
because God wrote it that way, And you don't have
to be religious to agree. I think most people understand
that your actions do have consequences, and if you do
something wrong, there should be consequences for that. I believe
that because I believe that's what Scripture tells me. But
you can believe that for any number of reasons. So
regardless of all that, I'm getting sidetracked here, But the
(17:30):
fact of the matter is, speak up on things like
this do not allow the Trump administration to push mass amnesty,
and they won't if you speak up and say no,
that we don't want this. This is not what you
voted for. I don't care about the crying kids on
TV just because you deported some illegal aliens. Deport them all,
get them out, and chances are the Trump administration will
(17:51):
do it because at least on this they're listening. All right,
say to them, we're gonna be talking about Jeffrey Ebstein
in just a second. We'll bear a bag, all right.
(18:18):
This is the segment where I get really mad. You're
going to hear me very pissed off here. I can
already feel I'm already getting mad just looking at the
document that I'm about to read to you. I am
pissed the hell off about this, and I'm gonna I'm
gonna go through this as thoroughly as possible, because I
believe you do that this may very well leak into
(18:40):
the second segment. I haven't decided yet. We'll see how
we are at the end of the segment. I'm pissed,
I really am, and all of you should be too,
every single one of you should be livid because how
many times on the campaign trail did we hear if
we elect Donald Trump, the people involved in Jeffrey Epstein's operation,
what he was doing and who he was doing it to.
(19:02):
We were going to find out who the criminals were
and they were going to be prosecuted. We were promised that,
and we should demand it. We should expect nothing left.
Consequences be damned. But it seems like they've already begun
to try to bury this again, just like the previous
administration did. So this memo a couple of days ago
(19:26):
got leaked. This is an internal Department of Justice FBI
investigation that got leaked. This wasn't supposed to be released.
They didn't want you to know about this, but somebody
leaked it and now we know. As part of our
commitment to transparency, the Department of Justice and the Federal
Bureau of Investigation have conducted an exhaustive review of investigative
(19:51):
holdings related to Jeffrey Epstein. And then they go on
to talk about all the child porn that they have found.
They went on to talk about all the images and
videos of Epstein with his victims that he found, and
they went on to talk about how much analysis, and
how many teams of agents have been working on this,
(20:12):
combing through this material, just like the Trump administration promise,
just like Pambondy promised. And don't you worry, I'm about
to lay into Pambondy. God Almighty, I have grown to
truly hate her. But we'll get into that in a minute.
The important part of this memo is a paragraph that says,
(20:33):
this systematic review revealed no incriminating quote unquote client list.
There was also no credible evidence found that Jeffrey Epstein
blackmailed prominent individuals as part of his actions. We did
not uncover evidence that could predicate an investigation against uncharged
third parties. Bullshit, bullshit, And forgive my French, but this
(20:59):
is the podcast. This won't air on KPRC, so I
can say that. And that's how I feel. You are
so full of crap. I remind you Gishline Maxwell, Jeffrey
Epstein's longtime girlfriend and accomplice, is currently doing twenty years
(21:22):
for sex trafficking miners. And yet you mean to tell
me in this memo that there are no third parties
we can charge because there's no evidence. Get the hell
out of here. How retarded do you think we are
What the hell is Gishline Maxwell doing in prison? Free
(21:44):
her today? Either somebody wrote this memo and deliberately lied,
or Gishline Maxwell should be walking out of prison today
because see, either sex trafficked miners to nobody, just sex
trafficked to them the void, or you're lying to me.
On top of that, we have been told that there
(22:07):
was a client list. We have been told that we
had all the evidence of Epstein and all of it
and who was involved was going to be released. We
just had to comb through the data so that we
could make sure that we identify who all the victims
are and make sure we scrub their names because their
privacy is important, and I'll allow for that. I'll say, hey,
(22:29):
you know what, take your time if you need to
spend extra time making sure you don't compromise the lives
of young women who have already had traumatic lives in
order to properly prosecute the people who committed these vile crimes.
Fair enough, take all the time you need. Take six months,
(22:50):
Take two years, hell take three if you need it.
This could be the very last act of the Trump administration.
If that's how long it takes. You to make sure
that these people get prosecuted properly. But if you're going
to turn around and say, oh, nope, there's no third
person to prosecute. Jeffrey Epstein killed himself. Gishline. Maxwell's in prison,
(23:11):
closed the books. That's it. We're done. Bullshit. You are
full of crap. And I know you're full of crap
because you told me. You told me in February that
we had these people. Here is Pambondi or dumbass Attorney
General saying in February, we have all the evidence on
(23:33):
my desk. I'm just going to review it. It'll take time,
and then we'll get it out. We will put these
people in prison.
Speaker 6 (23:38):
The DOJ may be releasing the list of Jeffrey Epstein's clients.
Speaker 2 (23:42):
Will that really happen.
Speaker 6 (23:44):
It's sitting on my desk right now to review. That's
been a directive by President Trump. I'm reviewing that. I'm
reviewing JFK files, MLK files. That's all in the process
of being reviewed because that was done at the directive
of the President from all of these agencies. So have
you see anything that you said, Oh my gosh, not yet.
Speaker 2 (24:05):
Okay, Well, she is so full of crap, and I
hate her. She is truly a vile woman because at
the very least she is complicit in whatever's going on.
We know for a fact that at least one person,
Prince Andrew, was involved in all of this. We know that,
we know that he's part of this global elite. That
(24:25):
this isn't a silly conspiracy theorist anymore. This isn't just
Alex Jones. Oh look at that right wing goober and
his conspiracy theorist. We know this, We know the evidence.
We've seen Gislaine Maxwell be sentenced for sex trafficking miners.
There's no way in God's green Earth that they don't
know who she was sex trafficking miners to. You're full
(24:46):
of crap. You can't tell me there's no third person.
That's nonsense, and it's not just me saying it. That's
the crazy part. As recently as December, even Pam Bondy
was saying the exact same thing that I'm saying to
you right now on Fox. She got on Fox News
(25:08):
and told the entire country exactly what I'm telling you
now on this podcast, and then turned around in six
months later just changed her mind. Never mind, we don't.
We don't have all this stuff we thought we did.
Here she is in December on Fox saying the exact
same thing I'm saying now.
Speaker 6 (25:27):
I want to know why ag Garland and the Justice
Department are so quiet on this tonight. You know they're
out there labeling parents domestic terrorists, yet they're saying nothing
about this. And these documents were so slow to come out.
Human trafficking is a multi billion dollar business in this country,
and Jeffrey Epstein is dead and Gerlaine Maxwell is in
(25:50):
prison for twenty years where she belongs. And if people
in that report are still fighting to keep their names private, Sean,
they have no legal basis to do so unless they're
a child, a victim, or a cooperating defendant by some
chance against some potential case against Gerlaine Maxwell. And I
think Mark Garagus has a great criminal defense attorney.
Speaker 2 (26:12):
I'll back that up as well. Okay, So which is it, PAM.
Is there a list that people have no right to
keep their names private because they're on it? Or is
there no list? And I will allow that maybe there's not,
like an expressly written out list. I'm sure there's probably
a slim to zero chance that Jeffrey Epstein and Giselaine
(26:33):
Maxwell had some book where they wrote down, Hey, this
is all the people we sex traffick miners to. But
I know we collected evidence from his New York apartment
or his New York home of all the people he
was sex trafficking miners to. Because we've seen the pictures
of the boxes of evidence and the safe they're floating
around online. They're not hard to find. I know we
have that evidence. I know you know who he was
(26:56):
sex trafficking miners to. So why aren't you releasing it.
I'm sure there wasn't any particular list. Sure, but you
know who's involved and you could prosecute them. So why
do we have a memo saying there's no evidence that
anyone else was involved. You're full of shit. We don't
believe you. Thankfully people are speaking out about this to
(27:19):
the point it had to be addressed at a cabinet meeting,
and the answer was god awful? Was god awful? Take
a listen to Pambondi trying to explain this away.
Speaker 6 (27:28):
Sure, first to back up on that, in February, I
did an interview on Fox and it's been getting a
lot of attention because I said, I was asked a
question about the client list, and my response was it's
sitting on my desk to be reviewed, meaning the file
along with the JFK MLK files as well. That's what
(27:52):
I meant by.
Speaker 2 (27:52):
That bull crap? So why didn't you say that she
specifically was asked about a list, laid you the clip
that's the clips she was talking about. The host specifically
said list, and she specifically said it's on my desk
waiting for review. How stupid do you think we are?
(28:13):
How stupid do you think the American people are? Thankfully
people are not letting this slide. People are speaking out
about it, and you should continue to speak out about it.
If you haven't done so, create an account on X
and start tweeting into the void about how pissed off
you are about this. And by the way, I'm not
paid by Elon Musk to say you do that. I
legitimately feel like that's the best thing that you can
(28:35):
do right now is vocally speak out on a place
where your voice can get some attention. I happen to
think from personal experience that place is X, but any
social media you like, pick your favorite. Speak out about this.
We want the people on that list, whether or not
it's a literal quote unquote list, to be identified and prosecuted.
And we know you can do it, and we don't
(28:56):
believe you when you say you can't. All right, we'll
be right back. All right, We're gonna talk for just
(29:18):
a little bit longer about Jeffrey Epstein at Pinky Promise.
I'm not gonna get quite as animated in this segment,
and then we're gonna talk about some immigration stuff because
some interesting stuff has been happening there. I want to
turn your memories back a little bit to about three
ish months ago, give her take. I don't remember exactly
when this was, but you'll remember it. It made a lot
(29:40):
of headlines. The Trump administration, Pam Bondi and some of
the top dogs there. I believe the Donald was involved
in this as well. Invited a lot of influencers over
to the White House and they said, hey, we're gonna
give you, guys, these influencers with these big followings, documents
(30:01):
and it's going to be your job to disseminate these
Epstein documents. This is all the secret information that nobody's
seen before, and we're giving it to you these independent
media figures to disseminate amongst your followers because we're the
transparent administration. And we thought, oh my god, this is great.
(30:24):
We're finally going to get the accountability. These people don't
work for anybody but themselves. They have huge followings, will
all know the truth. And then we got those Epstein
files and they were bull crap. There was nothing in
them that we hadn't seen before. And now, on top
of everything we've just now seen from the administration, those
(30:49):
influencers that got those documents have been receiving a lot
of hate. DC Draino is one of them, Jack Posobiek,
he's with America's voice. He's gotten uh some pushback. Everybody says, okay,
well what were y'all doing that whole time? And most
(31:12):
of them, from what I've seen, are also rightly pissed
off about all of this. And I'll remind you these
guys got the wool pulled over their eyes too. And
we got those documents back in February or whenever it was.
It wasn't February, it was probably more like March or April,
and we wrote to the Ligne immediately after we saw
those documents. Was that's just the beginning. There's a second
(31:35):
phase of this coming, and so we said, okay, we'll
wait for the second phase. And we didn't get a
second phase. We got this leaked memo saying there was
no second phase. And so now Jack Prosobiac, who also
got some of those documents, he's speaking out and he's saying, Hey,
I'm pissed off too. I was one of the people
that y'all duped. You told me I was getting special documents.
(31:58):
I wasn't. You told me that I was going to
get more documents later, and now you're saying those documents
aren't coming. So what's going on here? He is saying, Hey,
we all deserve better, All of Americans deserve better. Take
a listen to this.
Speaker 7 (32:17):
The United States Attorney General that the Epstein case is closed.
There's no more information on Jeffrey Epstein. Why do you
guys keep asking about Jeffrey Epstein. She says that we
don't need to hear about Jeffrey Epstein ever. Again, you
know what.
Speaker 2 (32:33):
This sounds like.
Speaker 7 (32:34):
I'm going to say exactly what this sounds like him
BONDI sounds like Hillary Clinton right now saying at this point,
what does it even matter when she was talking about
ben Ghazzi. All right, this is not how you treat
the American people. This is not how you treat basic communications.
This is not how you treat your voters and your supporters.
(32:56):
And certainly, by the way myself personally, I feel very angry, upset,
used all everywhere you want to yet know, from having
gone to the White House and receiving this binder full
of bologne that was completely publicly available information already that
we were told was new information on Epstein, it wasn't.
(33:17):
We were told that more information was coming. There wasn't
you claim that you had the list on your desk.
You didn't, and none of it came out. And now
when people have the obvious, the obvious response of asking
a question about it, you get in their faces and
you tell them to stop asking. No, you sound like
Hillary Clinton right now, and this isn't what you promised
(33:39):
the American people.
Speaker 2 (33:41):
That's exactly right. That is one thousand percent the right
take here. The American people right now feel lied to
about this. We need answers, We need to know what
exactly you do and don't have why we were told
you have the list you say you're not having now
and what information is going to be released later, Because
(34:04):
the American people, regardless of what national security implications this
might have, even if this hurts our allies, even if
this hurts officials in the United States or even in
the Trump administration, we deserve to know the truth about this,
and every single American should be actively vocally demanding the
truth about this. All right, let's talk about illegal immigration
(34:27):
because we need to get off this topic before I
have a heart attack. Active shooter killed in attempt to
ambush Border patrol agents in Texas. This is a direct result,
I'm telling you right now of Democrat Rhetorican narratives. It
is how many of you have heard the line that
this is Nazis, this is fascism, They're disappearing people, they're
(34:49):
kidnapping illegal aliens, or they're kidnapping legal immigrants. Think back
to that episode I did right after the No Kings protest.
I talked to that gentleman that I had interviewed at
the protests, and he truly believed that they had been
kidnapping legal American citizens because he had been lied to.
(35:10):
And now we have somebody who's taking action and Again,
if what the left was saying about ICE was true,
there's almost a case to be made that this is
justified action. If there are truly American citizens that are
being kidnapped by the government and mistreated, there's an argument
(35:31):
to be made that force would be justified in resisting that.
That's why we have a Second Amendment. That's why the
Second Amendment was written. It was written by men who
had just gotten done using force to resist their government
because it was justified. And so if that's actually what's
going on, that's justified. But it's not. That's not what's
going on. The Democrats have been actively lying to people
(35:52):
about what's happening, and then of course that predictably leads
to violence. So essentially what had happened was in McAllen, Texas.
This crackhead showed up at a border patrol facility and
was just waiting for ICE agents to show up, and
when they got there ready to clock in for their
day's work, he just opened fired on them. Thank god,
(36:16):
they were able to kill him before he killed them.
But at least three people were injured in this, not
counting the shooter who was killed. And I guarantee you
this is a direct result of Democrat narratives. If you
tell people, hey, Adolf Hitler is coming for you and
your family, even when you know full well that that's
(36:39):
a lie, the predictable result is obviously violence. Obviously, and
this isn't an isolated incident. Ten other people were arrested
for doing the same thing at a nice detention facility.
They've now been arrested in charge. Thankfully, it doesn't appear
that anyone was or hurt in that in But here's
(37:01):
the US Attorney's Office announcing the charges against the people
involved in that incident.
Speaker 8 (37:05):
We're here to tell you that late at night on
July fourth, Friday night, at approximately ten thirty seven pm,
at the Prairie Land Ice Detention Center in Alvaredo, Texas,
ten to twelve individuals dressed in black military style clothing
began shooting fireworks and engaging in acts of vandalism at
(37:28):
the facility. And this was part of an organized attack. Today,
my office has charged ten individuals with three counts of
attempted murder of a federal officer. Each of the ten
are also charged with three counts of discharging a firearm
in relation to a crime of violence. Each of these
(37:49):
defendants basis a mandatory prison term of ten years and
up to life in prison. An additional co conspirator was
charged with obstruction of justice and conspiracy for attempting to
conceal and destroy evidence in relation to the attack, and
he faces up to ten years in prison. Let's discuss
(38:10):
the incident. It was a planned ambush with the intent
to kill ice corrections officers. Make no mistake. This was
not a so called peaceful protest. It was indeed an ambush.
Speaker 2 (38:28):
And I would be willing to bet that this will
not be the last one that we've seen. Listen, if
you want like a hot, all out war with radical
leftist militia going out and attacking law enforcement here in
the United States, this is how you get it. We
have got to adjust our rhetoric here because it's costing lives.
(38:49):
It is. That's a fact, all right. Listen, we'll be
back on Sunday seven pm and nine fifty KPRC. Tune
in live listen on the free iHeartRadio app, and of
course you can find me on ext linked down below.
Thank you very much for listening into the next ten
report
From the heart of the Space City to the heart
of gen Z. Welcome to Next Gen Conversation, not Dad's
Talk Radio. Ethan talks to you about the issues and
events that men are to our generation. This is the
Next Gen Report, put Ethan Buchanan.
Speaker 2 (00:24):
Boy, am I fired up. I'm gonna be honest. There's
a lot of stuff in this episode that I am
really pissed about, like really and truly pissed. This is
some of the angriest I've been politically in a long time,
for a lot of reasons, and we've got a whole
hour to talk about it, so buckle in. Usually I
(00:46):
try to be a little bit kind of more calm
and measured in my politics, because you know, God is
in control for one thing, and second of all, things
usually tend to work out. A lot of the alarmism
that you see in politics very often is usually undue,
right I think we saw that with Iran. We bombed Iran,
(01:07):
everybody freaked out, and then everything was fine. It's usually fine.
Everything is normally fine. The status quo usually maintains itself.
But right now I'm pissed for a lot of reasons,
and we'll dig into that first. I want to start
with acknowledging some of the latest news that we have
on the Texas floods. As of yesterday evening, the death
(01:30):
toll in Central Texas was up to one hundred and
nine people. That is a lot. That is quite a bit.
And there's even more missing, one hundred and sixty one
people missing. That is a huge number of people. And again,
most of these people were people who were out by
the river trying to enjoy the Fourth of July. These
(01:51):
were kids at summer camp. These were people in rental
homes that were just trying to hang out by the
river and have a good July fourth weekend. They were
trying to celebrate their liberty and their independence, and they
tragically lost their lives. I'm so sick of people trying
to politicize this. This is not political. This is a
natural disaster. They happened. I don't care what preparation you do.
(02:12):
They will always happen, and they will oftentimes take a
lot of lives. This is the tragic reality of the
world we live in. There's no need for it to
be political. We have good leaders that are stepping up
and taking action as they should. We don't need to
politicize this. We don't and we shouldn't. Here's Greg Abbot,
(02:34):
I believe this was yesterday making the announcement that the
death toll had officially gone up to one hundred and
nine people. He was speaking at a news conference with
a bunch of other officials. Take a listen.
Speaker 3 (02:53):
First, The numbers that I have is that there are
ninety four fatalities. Ninety four fatalities associated with this flooding
event in this area, separate from that in other flooding
events in other parts of the state of Texas, there's
(03:15):
another fifteen fatalities for a total of one hundred and nine.
Speaker 2 (03:20):
To put this into perspective, just.
Speaker 3 (03:23):
In the Kerr and Kendall counties alone, there are far
more fatalities than there were in Hurricane Harvey. That's how
catastrophic this is. I also have some updated numbers on
those who are missing. First from Camp Mystic. My information
is those who are missing is down to now five
(03:48):
campers and one councilor five campers and one councilor missing.
In addition to that, there is another child not associated
with the camp who is missing. So for Kirk County,
that would be a total of seven who are missing.
In other parts of the state, there are twelve who
(04:12):
are missing. I have a new number, however. So one
thing we've been reaching out to the public about is
to get better information about those who were not registered
at a camp, those who were not registered at a hotel,
those who may have been down here who no one
really had any accounting of. And through law enforcement agency
(04:34):
working together, they provided me this number. Just in the
Kerk County area alone, there are one hundred and sixty
one people who were known to be missing, and again
that comes from combined law enforcements. One hundred and sixty one.
Speaker 2 (04:53):
Known people who are missing. Now, normally you would hear
something like that and you would say, oh my god,
what a tragedy these children are. In all likelihood, these
missing children are probably dead, which is tragic. But it's
been several days now it's very doubtful they will be
found alive. And that's on top of all the other
children that we've already found deceased. This is a tragedy.
(05:17):
The immediate response should be, oh my god, this is
how horrible. How can I help? How can I pray
for you? What can be done? But if you're a
sick little freak on TikTok and a former Houston City official.
Your immediate first response is just, well, people actually only
care because these are white children. That's the only reason
(05:37):
people are worried about these kids. They wouldn't care if
they were brown, which is a disgusting and vile response.
You have to be deranged to get there. But that's
what Sadie Perkins, a former Houston City official, said on TikTok.
Take a listen to this.
Speaker 4 (05:54):
I know I'm probably gonna get canceled for this, but can't.
Mystic is a white's own girls Christian camp. They don't
even have a token Asian, they don't have a token
black person. It is a all white, white only conservative
Christian camp. If you ain't white, you ain't right, you
(06:16):
ain't getting in, you ain't going period. And I think
that context needs to be said in this matter.
Speaker 2 (06:25):
No the hell it doesn't. Why would that need to
be said, even if it was true, which it's not.
That's retarded. Why would that need to be said. These
girls are dead, That's what matters. These girls were killed
in a tragic accident. Who cares what the racial policies
of the camp were, which, by the way, there are
(06:45):
no racial policies of the camp. It's just in Central Texas,
which surprise, surprise, happens to be mostly white folks. Look
at a map, look at some population statistics. This isn't controversial.
Speaker 4 (07:00):
Is not to say that we don't want the girls
to be found whatever girls that are missing or whatever
right now, but you best believe, especially in today's political climate,
if this were a group of Hispanic girls, especially with
them being in East Texas, it should be most likely Hispanic.
If this were a group of Hispanic girls out there,
(07:22):
this would not be getting this type of coverage that
they're getting.
Speaker 2 (07:24):
Okay, that's just BS. That's BS. And on top of
being BS, it's coming from somebody who clearly has no
idea what she's talking about. This camp isn't in East Texas,
it's in Central Texas. And the idea that we wouldn't
care if these were brown children is disgusting because what
you're essentially doing is saying, Hey, the entire everybody who's
shown concern about these girls that have died tragically, you're
(07:47):
all racists. That's gross. All right, we'll be right back,
stitchun All right, let's talk about amnesty that's been one
(08:26):
of the two major topics over the last couple of days.
I'll say it. I'll come right out and say it.
Trump has pissed some people off in his base, and
I'm one of them. For the record, I'm one of them.
I'm mad. We'll get into that a little bit more
in the third segment, because that's what I'm really mad on.
But this I'm just kind of mad on. So we're
(08:48):
gonna do this first. That way, I'm cool, calm and collected,
and we can dig through it and be reasonable, because
the last thing I want to be accused of is overreacting.
But there's been a lot of talk about amnesty over
the last couple of days. There has been sort of rumors,
mumbles in the background that maybe some in the Trump
(09:11):
administration are considering some form of amnesty for certain illegal aliens.
They start looking at the sob stories that we've been
hearing from the left. Oh, this father has been a
hard working American in the country for twenty years and
now he's been deported. How horrible he came here illegally.
(09:31):
I don't care. Get him out. I don't care how
long you've been here. Get out. I'm a big believer
in the idea that the statute of limitations shouldn't exist.
If you commit a crime, you should be held accountable
for that crime, even if we don't find out till later.
I stand by that statement. I will always stand by
(09:52):
that statement. This is a perfect example of that. So
there's been a lot of rumors going around. Of course,
the media, the METI immediately went to the what about
the farmers. Who's gonna pick our food, Who's gonna pick
our cotton? That's the line that they've been using. Who's
gonna pick your vegetables, that's mostly Hispanic workers. Who's gonna
pick your cotton? That's the same line they use with slavery.
(10:15):
And I'll give Trump credit on this. I think this
is born out of a legitimate sense of concern for
the well being of the United States, because obviously we
do need food, and we do want that food to
be reasonably priced. And so the idea has been floated that, well,
maybe we'll give some amnesty for you know, the farm workers,
(10:36):
that we need to just keep food on the table. No,
don't do that. Don't give amnesty for everybody. Mass deportations
to everyone, And that's what the base has been very
fired up about. They have been very angry at Trump
for even suggesting this. Charlie Kirk correctly pointed out that
this isn't the first time that we've danced this dance.
(10:58):
We got a big amnesty bill in nineteen eighty six
under Ronald Reagan, and the line was, you give this
amnesty to these illegal aliens that are in the country working,
trying to become good Americans right now, and then in return,
we'll do strong border security. We won't let any more in.
But these ones are clearly hard workers and deserve to
(11:21):
be here, even if they came here the wrong way.
So just let them sign, let them stay here, sign
the bill. And Ronald Reagan signed the bill, and that
was the bargain. And we got screwed on that bargain
because we never got the border security we got the amnesty.
We got a bunch of people staying here, primarily in
states like California, which have then in turn been wrecked.
(11:43):
And there is a direct correlation, and we never got
the border security we were promised. We cannot make that
mistake again. We must deport all of these illegal aliens,
all of them, without exception. I don't care what your
sob store is. I don't care how much you really
want to be here. I don't care how much of
(12:03):
a crap hole your home country is. You didn't come
here legally, Get the hell out. Thankfully, people have spoken
up in a big way. Obviously, Charlie Kirk has been
speaking up. He's a big name on the right, Josh Hammer.
He's someone that I've had the pleasure of talking to
a couple of times in my work in the KTRH newsroom.
(12:25):
You may or may not have heard of him. He
does a lot of really good work. Even Ronda Santis
came out and said, hey, no amnesty, no debate, no compromise.
That's good. A lot of high profile conservatives are coming
out big and saying no, we don't want this. We
want you to deport all of them. That's why you
(12:46):
were elected. That was the bargain. We make you the president,
you get these people out of our country. That's the deal.
Hold up your end of the bargain. We did our bit.
And everybody on the right has been saying this. And
this is why, I'll tell you the single best thing
you can do right now, outside of researching candidates and
getting ready to vote next spring. If you want to
(13:08):
make a difference politically, get on X. Get connected with
voices that will tell you the truth that you care about,
and when issues arise that you care about, speak up
about them on X because people are watching. They are
We've seen this on a number of occasions. We had
all this outrage about the idea of amnesty on X
(13:33):
and that immediately began to be back walked or walked back,
whatever the correct terminology is. And so here's Brooke Rawlins
now turning around, she's the Agriculture secretary, and she's saying no, no, no,
never mind, there's no amnesty. There will never be mass amnesty.
Mass deportations will continue. We'll be doing that strategically. We're
getting these people out. And all of that came from
(13:56):
people speaking out vocally and saying no, this is not
what we want. I will give Trump credit, the Trump
administration credit at least on this. They have listened to
their voters. Take a listen to Brooke Rawlins here at
this press conference saying no, we are continuing mass deportations,
there will not be amnesty.
Speaker 5 (14:13):
I think I answered the second question, where we are
on farm labor a little bit earlier. But what I
will say is that Lori Chavez Drimmer is our Secretary
of Labor, and the H TWOA visa program, all of
the programs that are newer to moving in seasonal ag
workers are under a secretary Chavesdrimmer. She has been working
(14:33):
around the clock with her team. I think we'll probably
hear a little bit more about this today and the
conversations will continue. But I can't underscore enough. There will
be no amnesty. The mass deportations continue, but in a
strategic way, and we move the workforce towards automation and
one hundred percent American participation, which again, with thirty four
million people able bodied adults on Medicaid, we should be
(14:55):
able to do that fairly quickly.
Speaker 2 (14:57):
Thank you. Okay, So it seems like the idea here is,
you know, if we want to have legal temporary workers
come into the country, we will let that happen. We
have visa programs for things like this. You can get
your visa, you can come in and do farm work
on a seasonal basis. That's fine. I have no problem
with that. Vet These people, we know who they are,
(15:20):
they have a visa. Let them into do seasonal farm labor.
I won't fight you on that. And then yeah, if
we want to move towards automating the workforce or shoehorning
more of the able bodied Americans that are on medicare
into that workforce, great, I see that as a good transition,
because there is a good point to be made. We
do have to have some sort of a transition. The
(15:40):
fact of the matter is there is a reliance on
illegal immigration and the labor that comes along with that.
That's a result of people not doing their jobs and
enforcing the law throughout the last I don't know, thirty
forty years, and so we've gotten to a point where
our economy does, to a certain extent rely on illegal
alien labor and we are going to have to wean
(16:01):
ourselves off of that. That is going to be a process.
So saying, hey, we're doing targeted mass deportations that are
focused first on the violent criminals, right the ms thirteens
of the world. We're focused on them. If we sweep
up extra illegal aliens in the process, great, we'll deport
them too. And then once we get all of them out,
then we'll start targeting the more quote unquote peaceful illegal aliens,
(16:25):
and then we'll get them out, and in the meantime,
we'll start working on visa programs so that people can
temporarily come into the United States work on our farms,
and then go back home. And hey, while we're at it,
let's tax those remittances on top of that. I don't
hate that idea. That is significantly different than turning around
(16:46):
and saying, hey, you've been working on this farm as
an illegal alien for five, ten, fifteen years, so you
get to stay. No, that's essentially saying, hey, you broke
the law. You got away with it long enough, so
now there will be no consequence. That's wrong. That's morally wrong.
Consequences have actions. That's natural law. That's a natural law
(17:09):
because God wrote it that way, And you don't have
to be religious to agree. I think most people understand
that your actions do have consequences, and if you do
something wrong, there should be consequences for that. I believe
that because I believe that's what Scripture tells me. But
you can believe that for any number of reasons. So
regardless of all that, I'm getting sidetracked here, But the
(17:30):
fact of the matter is, speak up on things like
this do not allow the Trump administration to push mass amnesty,
and they won't if you speak up and say no,
that we don't want this. This is not what you
voted for. I don't care about the crying kids on
TV just because you deported some illegal aliens. Deport them all,
get them out, and chances are the Trump administration will
(17:51):
do it because at least on this they're listening. All right,
say to them, we're gonna be talking about Jeffrey Ebstein
in just a second. We'll bear a bag, all right.
(18:18):
This is the segment where I get really mad. You're
going to hear me very pissed off here. I can
already feel I'm already getting mad just looking at the
document that I'm about to read to you. I am
pissed the hell off about this, and I'm gonna I'm
gonna go through this as thoroughly as possible, because I
believe you do that this may very well leak into
(18:40):
the second segment. I haven't decided yet. We'll see how
we are at the end of the segment. I'm pissed,
I really am, and all of you should be too,
every single one of you should be livid because how
many times on the campaign trail did we hear if
we elect Donald Trump, the people involved in Jeffrey Epstein's operation,
what he was doing and who he was doing it to.
(19:02):
We were going to find out who the criminals were
and they were going to be prosecuted. We were promised that,
and we should demand it. We should expect nothing left.
Consequences be damned. But it seems like they've already begun
to try to bury this again, just like the previous
administration did. So this memo a couple of days ago
(19:26):
got leaked. This is an internal Department of Justice FBI
investigation that got leaked. This wasn't supposed to be released.
They didn't want you to know about this, but somebody
leaked it and now we know. As part of our
commitment to transparency, the Department of Justice and the Federal
Bureau of Investigation have conducted an exhaustive review of investigative
(19:51):
holdings related to Jeffrey Epstein. And then they go on
to talk about all the child porn that they have found.
They went on to talk about all the images and
videos of Epstein with his victims that he found, and
they went on to talk about how much analysis, and
how many teams of agents have been working on this,
(20:12):
combing through this material, just like the Trump administration promise,
just like Pambondy promised. And don't you worry, I'm about
to lay into Pambondy. God Almighty, I have grown to
truly hate her. But we'll get into that in a minute.
The important part of this memo is a paragraph that says,
(20:33):
this systematic review revealed no incriminating quote unquote client list.
There was also no credible evidence found that Jeffrey Epstein
blackmailed prominent individuals as part of his actions. We did
not uncover evidence that could predicate an investigation against uncharged
third parties. Bullshit, bullshit, And forgive my French, but this
(20:59):
is the podcast. This won't air on KPRC, so I
can say that. And that's how I feel. You are
so full of crap. I remind you Gishline Maxwell, Jeffrey
Epstein's longtime girlfriend and accomplice, is currently doing twenty years
(21:22):
for sex trafficking miners. And yet you mean to tell
me in this memo that there are no third parties
we can charge because there's no evidence. Get the hell
out of here. How retarded do you think we are
What the hell is Gishline Maxwell doing in prison? Free
(21:44):
her today? Either somebody wrote this memo and deliberately lied,
or Gishline Maxwell should be walking out of prison today
because see, either sex trafficked miners to nobody, just sex
trafficked to them the void, or you're lying to me.
On top of that, we have been told that there
(22:07):
was a client list. We have been told that we
had all the evidence of Epstein and all of it
and who was involved was going to be released. We
just had to comb through the data so that we
could make sure that we identify who all the victims
are and make sure we scrub their names because their
privacy is important, and I'll allow for that. I'll say, hey,
(22:29):
you know what, take your time if you need to
spend extra time making sure you don't compromise the lives
of young women who have already had traumatic lives in
order to properly prosecute the people who committed these vile crimes.
Fair enough, take all the time you need. Take six months,
(22:50):
Take two years, hell take three if you need it.
This could be the very last act of the Trump administration.
If that's how long it takes. You to make sure
that these people get prosecuted properly. But if you're going
to turn around and say, oh, nope, there's no third
person to prosecute. Jeffrey Epstein killed himself. Gishline. Maxwell's in prison,
(23:11):
closed the books. That's it. We're done. Bullshit. You are
full of crap. And I know you're full of crap
because you told me. You told me in February that
we had these people. Here is Pambondi or dumbass Attorney
General saying in February, we have all the evidence on
(23:33):
my desk. I'm just going to review it. It'll take time,
and then we'll get it out. We will put these
people in prison.
Speaker 6 (23:38):
The DOJ may be releasing the list of Jeffrey Epstein's clients.
Speaker 2 (23:42):
Will that really happen.
Speaker 6 (23:44):
It's sitting on my desk right now to review. That's
been a directive by President Trump. I'm reviewing that. I'm
reviewing JFK files, MLK files. That's all in the process
of being reviewed because that was done at the directive
of the President from all of these agencies. So have
you see anything that you said, Oh my gosh, not yet.
Speaker 2 (24:05):
Okay, Well, she is so full of crap, and I
hate her. She is truly a vile woman because at
the very least she is complicit in whatever's going on.
We know for a fact that at least one person,
Prince Andrew, was involved in all of this. We know that,
we know that he's part of this global elite. That
(24:25):
this isn't a silly conspiracy theorist anymore. This isn't just
Alex Jones. Oh look at that right wing goober and
his conspiracy theorist. We know this, We know the evidence.
We've seen Gislaine Maxwell be sentenced for sex trafficking miners.
There's no way in God's green Earth that they don't
know who she was sex trafficking miners to. You're full
(24:46):
of crap. You can't tell me there's no third person.
That's nonsense, and it's not just me saying it. That's
the crazy part. As recently as December, even Pam Bondy
was saying the exact same thing that I'm saying to
you right now on Fox. She got on Fox News
(25:08):
and told the entire country exactly what I'm telling you
now on this podcast, and then turned around in six
months later just changed her mind. Never mind, we don't.
We don't have all this stuff we thought we did.
Here she is in December on Fox saying the exact
same thing I'm saying now.
Speaker 6 (25:27):
I want to know why ag Garland and the Justice
Department are so quiet on this tonight. You know they're
out there labeling parents domestic terrorists, yet they're saying nothing
about this. And these documents were so slow to come out.
Human trafficking is a multi billion dollar business in this country,
and Jeffrey Epstein is dead and Gerlaine Maxwell is in
(25:50):
prison for twenty years where she belongs. And if people
in that report are still fighting to keep their names private, Sean,
they have no legal basis to do so unless they're
a child, a victim, or a cooperating defendant by some
chance against some potential case against Gerlaine Maxwell. And I
think Mark Garagus has a great criminal defense attorney.
Speaker 2 (26:12):
I'll back that up as well. Okay, So which is it, PAM.
Is there a list that people have no right to
keep their names private because they're on it? Or is
there no list? And I will allow that maybe there's not,
like an expressly written out list. I'm sure there's probably
a slim to zero chance that Jeffrey Epstein and Giselaine
(26:33):
Maxwell had some book where they wrote down, Hey, this
is all the people we sex traffick miners to. But
I know we collected evidence from his New York apartment
or his New York home of all the people he
was sex trafficking miners to. Because we've seen the pictures
of the boxes of evidence and the safe they're floating
around online. They're not hard to find. I know we
have that evidence. I know you know who he was
(26:56):
sex trafficking miners to. So why aren't you releasing it.
I'm sure there wasn't any particular list. Sure, but you
know who's involved and you could prosecute them. So why
do we have a memo saying there's no evidence that
anyone else was involved. You're full of shit. We don't
believe you. Thankfully people are speaking out about this to
(27:19):
the point it had to be addressed at a cabinet meeting,
and the answer was god awful? Was god awful? Take
a listen to Pambondi trying to explain this away.
Speaker 6 (27:28):
Sure, first to back up on that, in February, I
did an interview on Fox and it's been getting a
lot of attention because I said, I was asked a
question about the client list, and my response was it's
sitting on my desk to be reviewed, meaning the file
along with the JFK MLK files as well. That's what
(27:52):
I meant by.
Speaker 2 (27:52):
That bull crap? So why didn't you say that she
specifically was asked about a list, laid you the clip
that's the clips she was talking about. The host specifically
said list, and she specifically said it's on my desk
waiting for review. How stupid do you think we are?
(28:13):
How stupid do you think the American people are? Thankfully
people are not letting this slide. People are speaking out
about it, and you should continue to speak out about it.
If you haven't done so, create an account on X
and start tweeting into the void about how pissed off
you are about this. And by the way, I'm not
paid by Elon Musk to say you do that. I
legitimately feel like that's the best thing that you can
(28:35):
do right now is vocally speak out on a place
where your voice can get some attention. I happen to
think from personal experience that place is X, but any
social media you like, pick your favorite. Speak out about this.
We want the people on that list, whether or not
it's a literal quote unquote list, to be identified and prosecuted.
And we know you can do it, and we don't
(28:56):
believe you when you say you can't. All right, we'll
be right back. All right, We're gonna talk for just
(29:18):
a little bit longer about Jeffrey Epstein at Pinky Promise.
I'm not gonna get quite as animated in this segment,
and then we're gonna talk about some immigration stuff because
some interesting stuff has been happening there. I want to
turn your memories back a little bit to about three
ish months ago, give her take. I don't remember exactly
when this was, but you'll remember it. It made a lot
(29:40):
of headlines. The Trump administration, Pam Bondi and some of
the top dogs there. I believe the Donald was involved
in this as well. Invited a lot of influencers over
to the White House and they said, hey, we're gonna
give you, guys, these influencers with these big followings, documents
(30:01):
and it's going to be your job to disseminate these
Epstein documents. This is all the secret information that nobody's
seen before, and we're giving it to you these independent
media figures to disseminate amongst your followers because we're the
transparent administration. And we thought, oh my god, this is great.
(30:24):
We're finally going to get the accountability. These people don't
work for anybody but themselves. They have huge followings, will
all know the truth. And then we got those Epstein
files and they were bull crap. There was nothing in
them that we hadn't seen before. And now, on top
of everything we've just now seen from the administration, those
(30:49):
influencers that got those documents have been receiving a lot
of hate. DC Draino is one of them, Jack Posobiek,
he's with America's voice. He's gotten uh some pushback. Everybody says, okay,
well what were y'all doing that whole time? And most
(31:12):
of them, from what I've seen, are also rightly pissed
off about all of this. And I'll remind you these
guys got the wool pulled over their eyes too. And
we got those documents back in February or whenever it was.
It wasn't February, it was probably more like March or April,
and we wrote to the Ligne immediately after we saw
those documents. Was that's just the beginning. There's a second
(31:35):
phase of this coming, and so we said, okay, we'll
wait for the second phase. And we didn't get a
second phase. We got this leaked memo saying there was
no second phase. And so now Jack Prosobiac, who also
got some of those documents, he's speaking out and he's saying, Hey,
I'm pissed off too. I was one of the people
that y'all duped. You told me I was getting special documents.
(31:58):
I wasn't. You told me that I was going to
get more documents later, and now you're saying those documents
aren't coming. So what's going on here? He is saying, Hey,
we all deserve better, All of Americans deserve better. Take
a listen to this.
Speaker 7 (32:17):
The United States Attorney General that the Epstein case is closed.
There's no more information on Jeffrey Epstein. Why do you
guys keep asking about Jeffrey Epstein. She says that we
don't need to hear about Jeffrey Epstein ever. Again, you
know what.
Speaker 2 (32:33):
This sounds like.
Speaker 7 (32:34):
I'm going to say exactly what this sounds like him
BONDI sounds like Hillary Clinton right now saying at this point,
what does it even matter when she was talking about
ben Ghazzi. All right, this is not how you treat
the American people. This is not how you treat basic communications.
This is not how you treat your voters and your supporters.
(32:56):
And certainly, by the way myself personally, I feel very angry, upset,
used all everywhere you want to yet know, from having
gone to the White House and receiving this binder full
of bologne that was completely publicly available information already that
we were told was new information on Epstein, it wasn't.
(33:17):
We were told that more information was coming. There wasn't
you claim that you had the list on your desk.
You didn't, and none of it came out. And now
when people have the obvious, the obvious response of asking
a question about it, you get in their faces and
you tell them to stop asking. No, you sound like
Hillary Clinton right now, and this isn't what you promised
(33:39):
the American people.
Speaker 2 (33:41):
That's exactly right. That is one thousand percent the right
take here. The American people right now feel lied to
about this. We need answers, We need to know what
exactly you do and don't have why we were told
you have the list you say you're not having now
and what information is going to be released later, Because
(34:04):
the American people, regardless of what national security implications this
might have, even if this hurts our allies, even if
this hurts officials in the United States or even in
the Trump administration, we deserve to know the truth about this,
and every single American should be actively vocally demanding the
truth about this. All right, let's talk about illegal immigration
(34:27):
because we need to get off this topic before I
have a heart attack. Active shooter killed in attempt to
ambush Border patrol agents in Texas. This is a direct result,
I'm telling you right now of Democrat Rhetorican narratives. It
is how many of you have heard the line that
this is Nazis, this is fascism, They're disappearing people, they're
(34:49):
kidnapping illegal aliens, or they're kidnapping legal immigrants. Think back
to that episode I did right after the No Kings protest.
I talked to that gentleman that I had interviewed at
the protests, and he truly believed that they had been
kidnapping legal American citizens because he had been lied to.
(35:10):
And now we have somebody who's taking action and Again,
if what the left was saying about ICE was true,
there's almost a case to be made that this is
justified action. If there are truly American citizens that are
being kidnapped by the government and mistreated, there's an argument
(35:31):
to be made that force would be justified in resisting that.
That's why we have a Second Amendment. That's why the
Second Amendment was written. It was written by men who
had just gotten done using force to resist their government
because it was justified. And so if that's actually what's
going on, that's justified. But it's not. That's not what's
going on. The Democrats have been actively lying to people
(35:52):
about what's happening, and then of course that predictably leads
to violence. So essentially what had happened was in McAllen, Texas.
This crackhead showed up at a border patrol facility and
was just waiting for ICE agents to show up, and
when they got there ready to clock in for their
day's work, he just opened fired on them. Thank god,
(36:16):
they were able to kill him before he killed them.
But at least three people were injured in this, not
counting the shooter who was killed. And I guarantee you
this is a direct result of Democrat narratives. If you
tell people, hey, Adolf Hitler is coming for you and
your family, even when you know full well that that's
(36:39):
a lie, the predictable result is obviously violence. Obviously, and
this isn't an isolated incident. Ten other people were arrested
for doing the same thing at a nice detention facility.
They've now been arrested in charge. Thankfully, it doesn't appear
that anyone was or hurt in that in But here's
(37:01):
the US Attorney's Office announcing the charges against the people
involved in that incident.
Speaker 8 (37:05):
We're here to tell you that late at night on
July fourth, Friday night, at approximately ten thirty seven pm,
at the Prairie Land Ice Detention Center in Alvaredo, Texas,
ten to twelve individuals dressed in black military style clothing
began shooting fireworks and engaging in acts of vandalism at
(37:28):
the facility. And this was part of an organized attack. Today,
my office has charged ten individuals with three counts of
attempted murder of a federal officer. Each of the ten
are also charged with three counts of discharging a firearm
in relation to a crime of violence. Each of these
(37:49):
defendants basis a mandatory prison term of ten years and
up to life in prison. An additional co conspirator was
charged with obstruction of justice and conspiracy for attempting to
conceal and destroy evidence in relation to the attack, and
he faces up to ten years in prison. Let's discuss
(38:10):
the incident. It was a planned ambush with the intent
to kill ice corrections officers. Make no mistake. This was
not a so called peaceful protest. It was indeed an ambush.
Speaker 2 (38:28):
And I would be willing to bet that this will
not be the last one that we've seen. Listen, if
you want like a hot, all out war with radical
leftist militia going out and attacking law enforcement here in
the United States, this is how you get it. We
have got to adjust our rhetoric here because it's costing lives.
(38:49):
It is. That's a fact, all right. Listen, we'll be
back on Sunday seven pm and nine fifty KPRC. Tune
in live listen on the free iHeartRadio app, and of
course you can find me on ext linked down below.
Thank you very much for listening into the next ten
report
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.