April 30, 2025 • 39 mins
Listen to The Next-Gen Report live! Sundays at 7:00 p.m. on AM950, KPRC.
- The 2026 midterms are heating up. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton challenging incumbent John Cornyn for his Senate seat could be the biggest race of the season, so who will Trump endorse?
- The Trump administration, and the American Right as a whole, are all celebrating the first 100 days of Trump's second term. Meanwhile, the left continues to be desperate for both leadership and attention.
For the latest news, follow me on Instagram, and X:
@the.ethanbuchanan
@_ethanbuchanan
- The 2026 midterms are heating up. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton challenging incumbent John Cornyn for his Senate seat could be the biggest race of the season, so who will Trump endorse?
- The Trump administration, and the American Right as a whole, are all celebrating the first 100 days of Trump's second term. Meanwhile, the left continues to be desperate for both leadership and attention.
For the latest news, follow me on Instagram, and X:
@the.ethanbuchanan
@_ethanbuchanan
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:28):
Hey, everybody, welcome back to the next general port. What
do y'all think of the new intro? I thought it
was time we spice things up a little bit. I
wanted something new, So we're trying it out. We're trying
it out. We may not stick with it. We might.
Hope you managed to tune in on Sunday. That was
a great show. I'm actually, uh, I'm really proud of
that one. I had a good time doing that one.
I hope you listened. I hope you had a good
(00:50):
time listening. Listen. We talked a little bit about the
upcoming midterms. Those are right up on us. We've talked
about this in the past. There's really no any sort
of off season in politics. It's pretty much go go, go,
go go all the time. And we're kind of kicking
off the next election season right now. We're waiting for
(01:11):
Donald Trump to weigh in on the Texas Senate race.
John Cornyn and Ken Paxon are both vying for his
seat there. Cornyn obviously holds that seat right now. He
is somebody that the grass roots, the GOP bass does
not like anymore. He's been in office there in the
Senate since two thousand and two. People are getting sick
(01:33):
of him. He's kind of viewed as a uniparty establishment candidate.
I don't think that's necessarily completely wrong. So he's in trouble.
He's got some problems. And then of course there is
Ken Paxton. The GOP base really loves Ken Paxson. As
we've talked about in the past. He made a name
for himself as the Attorney General of Texas under the
(01:53):
Biden administration. He just really did go in there and
just make a lot of really good headlines for himself.
Was a brilliant piece of politicking. People have been predicting
that he will take a shot at this Senate seat
for a long time, and that time has finally come.
He is, of course running against John Cornyan. Now this
is right about where things start to get really really complicated,
(02:15):
because obviously Trump making an endorsement in this race is
going to end the race. Right Whoever wins this endorsement
from Donald Trump is going to win the GOP primary.
There's just no two ways about this. And this is
of course a very important primary because listen, we have
a fifty three I think seat majority in the Senate
right now. The GOP does that is a slim majority.
(02:36):
It is you need every single one of those votes
when it comes to big legislation. So this puts Donald
Trump in a weird position. We know that he's going
to make an endorsement. He's already said this, he says,
I will make an endorsement. So who is he going
to pick. There's John Cornyan, who a lot of Donald
Trump's base doesn't like, and Ken Paxton, who has been
(02:58):
a very close ally of TRUP for a long time.
He's been very openly, very pro Trump for basically his
entire time as Attorney General of Texas. That may very
well be one of the reasons that he was impeached
because Trump ticked off the Bush family, who of course
is really powerful in Texas politics and they have a
lot of friends and connections. And Ken Paxton also ticked
(03:19):
off the Bush family and then lined himself up really
closely with Trump. So the Bush family, who have their
tentacles all over the Texas House, they don't like either
of those two people. So maybe that's one of the
reasons that he got targeted for impeachment for no reason.
I see that argument. I think that's not without merit.
So you might sit there and think, Okay, well, then
of course Ken Paxson is going to get the endorsement.
(03:41):
Well not necessarily, not so fast. Remember, John Cornyn is
in the Senate right now. Donald Trump has some big
agenda items coming up. Obviously the big beautiful bill, the
budget bill, that has most of Trump's big agenda items
in it. He's going to need every single vote, including
John Cornyn. So you don't want to go out and
(04:03):
endorse John Cornan's opponent right now, because that's going to
piss him off, and he might vote against you just
to spite you, because he knows at that point he's
no longer going to be a senator, so he may
very well decide to spend the next year and a
half just pissing off Donald Trump. So do I think
that Donald Trump is going to endorse John Cornan? Honestly
at this point, I don't know, but I would lean
(04:23):
towards probably not. I think Trump knows that his base
doesn't like Cornan. I'm sure Trump has his own personal
quibbles with Cornyn. And Paxton, on the other hand, has
been very very buddy buddy with Trump for a very
long time. They get along great So if I had
to guess, if I was a betting man, I would
put my money on Ken Paxton getting that Trump endorsement.
But Donald Trump knows that he has to get Cornan
(04:45):
to play nice playball. So what I think happens is
Donald Trump is just gonna wait as long as possible
before he announces that he's putting his support behind Ken Paxon.
If I was Trump, that's what I would do. I
would just dangle the endorsement over John Cornyn's head and say, hey,
you're gonna vote for all my stuff. Here, here it is,
You're gonna vote. And then once I've already got John
(05:06):
Cornan's votes and he's useless to me, then I endorse
Ken Packson because I was gonna do it anyway. That's
my prediction. That's what I would do. Take it with
a grain of salt. I'm not Donald Trump, I'm not
in his ear, I'm not in his inner circle. I
have no idea what he may or may not do.
But just looking at things from the outside in, that's
what makes sense to me. Now, that's just one side
of the aisle. That's the Republicans. They've gotten an early
(05:28):
jump on this as I think they should. I think
it's good. Get out campaign early, establish yourself as a candidate.
That way, no matter who you're up against in the
general election, people already know who you are. Great plan,
good idea. What are the Democrats doing? Well, As we
already know, the Democrats don't really have any big figures
(05:48):
right now. This is a big problem for them on
the national level. They have no one to take the
mantle of leadership from Joe Biden, and I guess Kamala
Harris is called dead hands. Last year, they had to
run somebody against Ted Cruz. They just kind of picked
a name out of the basket and we got Colin Alright,
who ran a horrible campaign and got blown out by
Ted Cruz. He didn't have enough name recognition to run
(06:09):
a campaign like that, and so Ted Cruz was able
to just slack him on the transgender issue and just
establish him as a pro men in women's sports candidate.
Colin Alredd never escaped that identity and he lost bigly
in that election. So what do the Democrats do now? Well, shoot,
they go back to all reliable. Who's all reliable? You
know him? Veto o' rourke. That's right, good Old Robert
(06:32):
Francis O'Rourke is hinting that he might take another swing
at a Senate seat. Now you might ask yourself, hey,
didn't he already do this and lose? Didn't he run
for governor and lose, and then Senate and lose, and
then president and lose. Is he really going to run again?
Apparently he's thinking about it, and at this point I
wouldn't put it past him. The man seems to run
for basically any political office he can get his hands on. Basically,
(06:54):
if his seats open, he'll run for it. I think
he actually is living in the Vatican right now, hoping
he'll become the pope. But yeah, he's said at a
town hall in North Texas recently, if it comes to
pass that this is what the people of Texas want,
that it's the highest and best use of what I
can give to you, then yes I will to cheers
and applause. Let me just stop you right there. The
people don't want that, we don't. I mean, he should
(07:16):
have learned that lesson the first, second, and third time
he ran for major political offices and failed. How many
times do we have to keep teaching you this lesson?
Old man, we don't want you here, but I think
this really does do a good job of kind of
demonstrating the fact that, once again, as we've made clear,
the Democrats have nothing going on. They don't have candidates,
(07:37):
they don't have anything popular to run on. So as
much as they tell you everybody hates the Republicans, they
hate the Democrats more. They are completely screwed. So you
know what, go ahead, run Beta over war and see
what happens. All right, stay tuned, we'll be right back.
(08:22):
All right, We've got more bad news for Wisconsin judge
Hannah Dugan. You remember her. We talked about her again
at length in the Sunday broadcast Again, take a listen
to it. You're missing out if you're not. Sunday's at
seven on AM nine to fifty KPRC. We went into
great detail about this case Hannah Dugan. She's a judge
(08:43):
in Wisconsin, I believe Milwaukee. She is accused of helping
an illegal alien evade ice. She actually got arrested by
the Trump administration for this, and the left is losing
their mind over it. They are insisting, they're sparing up
and down that this is an example of fashion coming
to America. The only reason Hannah Dugan got arrested is
(09:04):
because she opposed the Trump agenda and had nothing to
do with the fact that she probably broke the law
in aiding and abetting this illegal alien. It's all just
because Trump is a fascist, evil dictator, Nazi. That's the
line that we've heard. Well, the Supreme Court of Wisconsin
appears to disagree. That's the way this looks to me.
We got this headline out yesterday. The Wisconsin Supreme Court
(09:25):
issued an administrative order on Tuesday calling for Milwaukee Circuit
Court Judge Hannah Dugan to be quote temporarily relieved of
her official duties. Dugan was arrested in charge with obstruction
of an official proceeding on Friday after evidence came to
light that she had shielded the migrant from ICE agents,
according to a criminal complaint. Okay, so what do we
(09:45):
know about the Wisconsin Supreme Court. They're not a bunch
of far right extremists, right, They're not the type of
people to go and assist Donald Trump in a fascist
takeover of the United States. This is an elected body, right,
And I know that Wisconsin is a somewhat blue state.
It's kind of a purple ish. Donald Trump did win it,
(10:05):
I believe, in November, so there is that, but overall,
it's not an overly Republican state, right, it's moderate at best.
Not to mention, just a few weeks ago, at the
beginning of April, Wisconsin had another big Supreme Court election.
So what they do is they'll have one judge at
a time run for the Supreme Court, and then that
(10:27):
person is elected to a ten year term. So Susan Crawford,
who was widely considered to be the very far left
liberal candidate, she's the one that won that seat. So
that tells you where Wisconsin's at with their Supreme Court,
and even they're stepping in and saying, yeah, there's at
least some cause for concern here, so for the time being,
at least, we're going to take this lady off the bench.
(10:48):
If this was just Trump being a fascist dictator, they
would not have done that. They just wouldn't have. They
would have left her alone at least until things played out.
But they didn't, So get what you want out of that.
It is very weird to me that this is who
the left is rallying behind, and of course it's it's
her this, Hanna Dugan Lady, and of course aoc Jasmine Crockett.
(11:09):
These are the new quote unquote fresh faces of the
Democrat Party. These are the people they're putting forward. They're
radically left, they're probably crazy, but the Democrats are going
all in on these people, and they really don't have
anything else. And I think this goes a long way
towards why they keep losing on a national level like this,
I really do. They don't have anything going on. And
(11:30):
the more and more that they dig farther and farther left,
the more people they lose, the more people they cut off.
It's the Overton window shifting farther and farther, and enough
people are saying, Okay, I'm comfortable just being on the
right now, since y'all have gone so far to their
left and you've left me behind, I'll just be over here,
and they keep doubling down on this. I think completely
(11:51):
unchained leftism is probably the worst possible thing for the
left electorally, because people can clearly see the fact that
if you don't have repuebl stepping in, conservatives stepping in
and saying hey, no, this is a terrible idea, It's
stupid we're not gonna allow it to any number of
their policies. They just go completely nuts. I found a
video that kind of perfectly exemplified this. It's this guy
(12:13):
who used to live in Pittsburgh and he moved to Portland, Oregon,
which we all know. Portland, Oregon is like as left
as you could possibly be. It's crazy town over there.
And he is talking about the fact that, like, listen,
when I lived in Pittsburgh, I considered myself a good liberal.
I was left wing Lottie Dotty Do and that was fun.
And then I moved to Portland, Oregon, where I saw complete,
(12:36):
unabashed leftism and it's a disaster. And now I'm a Republican.
Take a listen to this guy, all righty, y'all.
Speaker 2 (12:43):
I'm moved to Portland, Oregon about four years ago from Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Speaker 1 (12:46):
Before I left Pittsburgh, I considered.
Speaker 2 (12:48):
Myself pretty far left, and then like COVID happened, and
then I moved to Portland and sow what part left
really looked like. And I just I feel like the
left has lost all common sense at this point. But
all that being said, like being in Portland, I truly
feel like I'm in a twilight zone every day. Like
it really exposes like how ugly the far left can
really be because it's what I'm surrounded by on a
(13:08):
daily basis. Like they're totally fine with walking past homeless
people that are intense, that are having like mental breakdowns
right in the middle of the street and acting like, oh,
that's normal. This happens in every city. Like I just
happened to walk by it every day to go get
my latte, no big deal. And it's like, dude, I
thought the left was supposed to be empathetic. I thought
the left cared about the environment, because if you look
at what the homeless population out here alone just does,
(13:29):
so the environment is pretty insane. But all that being said,
like I feel like all the morals have went out
the window. All like the things that like y'all truly
fought for went out the window. Now it's all about
like protesting TESLA.
Speaker 1 (13:40):
Hating Trump, and like fighting for men to.
Speaker 2 (13:42):
Have babies or something.
Speaker 1 (13:43):
Like it's literally crazy out here.
Speaker 2 (13:45):
And I know, like I should have known this moving
out here, but I really thought, like, you know, we'd
have some common ground considering like I used to be
like one of you. But if anything, it just turns
me further to the right seeing how people act out here,
seeing like the point of everybody has too. It's literally insane,
Like if you don't believe what they believe, then your
piece is like it's just a total loll in. And
(14:08):
it's crazy to me that it's been normalized. And I
think like Portland is a perfect example of why things
shouldn't be far left and why we need to like
kind of come back to common ground somewhere so you
can see me all you want, But you know I'm right,
and you know there's plenty of people that think the
same way as me, And Portland's just becoming a hub
of mental illness and a place for people to go
(14:30):
to just be weird. And it's not the good kind
of weird. It's the type of weird that needs like
medical attention. Let's talk about it.
Speaker 1 (14:38):
Oh don't worry, guy, we are going to talk about it.
And he's completely exactly right. He mentioned the homeless. This
is a big one for the left, and it's been
a big one for a long time. We've had homeless
problems in this country for as long as we've had
a country, and the left has always been very big
on hey, we need the government to step in and
give these people things. We need the government to give
(15:00):
these people housing. We need the government to give these
people money so they can't be homeless. We even had
people in Portland and you know, parts of California say
we need the government to give these people drugs because
they're addicted and they're gonna shoot up, so we need
to make sure they can do that safely. Now, the
conservatives this entire time has said, wait a minute. If
(15:22):
you do that, what you're gonna wind up doing is
incentivizing this bad behavior. Because honestly, most people would look
at homelessness and say, this is a bad thing. You
don't want this. It's going to be a difficult, uncomfortable,
dangerous life. So work hard, be productive so you can
avoid it. That's been the conservative argument. The moment you
say no, you don't have to worry about working hard,
(15:44):
you don't have to worry about being productive, the government
is going to step in and take care of you. Well,
that creates exactly what we've seen in Portland. We have
people lining the streets shooting up drugs because they know,
no matter what, I'm gonna get a little bit of
money from the government. I'm gonna get a little of
drugs from the government. The government isn't gonna come and
tell me to get off of these street corners. The
(16:05):
government isn't gonna push me out of these businesses that
I'm loitering around and occupying. In some cases, they can
just sort of set up shop wherever they want, and
we've seen that happen. I mean, it's not difficult to
get on Twitter or any social media platform really and
find videos of people just walking through the streets of Portland,
(16:27):
Los Angeles, San Francisco, and they're just walking through crowds
of zombies. It does look like a zombie movie. People
drugged out, passed out, not thinking, not focusing, not doing anything.
And even in the cases where the government says, oh,
we won't give you, you know, just cold hard cash,
well give you a place to live, those places are
even worse. They're creating slums, terrible places that no one
(16:51):
would want to live in. There's stories about how people
overdose and their government funded apartments that are already torn
up and painted over and have just become cracked in
that the taxpayers have to pay for and they shoot
up in there, and they overdose and they die and
nobody finds them, and these places all stink. It really
is the perfect example of the fact that listen, if
you try to make the government the answer to everybody's problems,
(17:13):
you actually just make the problem worse. More often than not.
If you really want to fix the homelessness issue, you
don't give people handouts, you incentivize people to work. The
government should be making it more difficult to be homeless,
despite what the left will tell you. I mean, this
really should be common sense. If you have a significant
portion of the population that says, I don't have to
(17:34):
work and the government will take care of me. I
don't have to worry about how big of an inconvenience
I am to an entire city. The government will have
my back. You're gonna incentivize that bad behavior, and when
you incentivize bad behavior, you get more of it. All right,
stay tuned, We're going to be talking about Trump's one
hundred day mark right after this next break. Stay tuned,
will be right back Alrighty Trump's first one hundred days.
(18:18):
We did it. We made it. I think it's been
pretty great so far. I've been following it closely. You,
if you've been listening, have also been following closely. Tell
me what you think. Are you happy with Trump's first
one hundred days? Is there something you wish he had
done that he didn't. Is there something that he did
do that you wish he hadn't. I think for me
that one thing would be I wish he had appointed
(18:40):
somebody other than Pam Bondi to the attorney general position.
I don't think she's done a good job in that.
I think somebody else could have done better. But that's
one thing out of a million. I think other than that,
it's been pretty good so far, and I'm fairly happy
with it. But reach out to me. Let me know
you know where to find me x Instagram. They were linked. Oh,
you can access it there. So I'd love to hear
(19:02):
from you. I'd love to talk about what you think
Trump has done so far. I will tell you one
guy that is not happy with Trump's first one hundred days.
That is Congressman shre Fanadar. He represents Michigan's thirteenth congressional district,
and he is so upset with Donald Trump that he
went all the way to filing articles of impeachment. Now
(19:24):
we knew this was coming. Obviously the left. This is
their favorite move when it comes to Donald Trump is
file articles of impeachment. They did it twice in his
last term. It stands to reason they take another shot
at it. Thankfully, they don't actually control either Chamber of Congress,
so this is dead on arrival. But tre Fanadar did
it anyway, as is his right, as is his right.
I don't know why you would bother taking the time.
(19:47):
You know this isn't gonna work. You know, this isn't
going to go anywhere. All this is going to do
is draw attention to you, and I guess that's what
he wants. So here he is announcing his articles of
impeachment against Donald Trump.
Speaker 3 (19:58):
This is Congressman Tanadar. Donald Trump has already done real
damage to our democracy, but defining a unanimous nine to
zero Supreme Court ruling that has to be the final straw,
is time we impeach j Trump. The quote said the
wrongfully deported kilmer Garcia must be allowed to return and
(20:21):
receive due process. Trump ignored it. He ignored the Constitution.
He ignored the very checks and balances that keep our
democracy intact. This isn't an isolated incident. It's part of
a dangerous, deliberate pattern. That's why today I introduced a
(20:41):
resolution to impeach Jay Trump, outlining seven articles of impeachment.
Speaker 1 (20:50):
All right, let me start you right there, because I
don't want to subject my listeners to your nonsense anymore.
I will tell you what the seven articles of impeachment are.
This is directly quoting. If you want to hear from
his mouth, you can find the video on Twitter. It's
not hard to find. Just search Shreathanadar and it's like
the first or third thing up there. So here are
his seven articles of impeachment. Article number one, Obstruction of
(21:11):
justice and abuse of power. That's the kill maar A
Brago Garcia thing, taking away Congress's power of the purse.
That's Article two. That's the whole you know, shutting down
different portions of the federal government, cutting off things like
USAID stuff like that. That's that's what that is, Abuse
of trade powers and international aggression. Article three that's the tariffs, which,
(21:36):
by the way, Donald Trump, the President of the United States,
has the complete authority to do that. That's completely allowed
for him to do. That's never been disputed before, So
that's just ridiculous violation of First Amendment rights. That's his
Article four. That's referencing the fact that, you know, he's
kicked certain people out of the press room, certain outlets
that he doesn't like, out of the White House press room.
(21:57):
Nobody has a right to be in the White House
press room. That's something that the president does just to
be nice. He doesn't have to do that. That's not
mandated anywhere. It's also a reference to the fact that
he's revoked certain visas for people and had them deported
student visas. We've talked about this in the past and
previous episodes. This is a good thing. We don't want
(22:17):
people who hate America in this country. So if people
who hate America and are vocal about that are here
in the country on a student visa, we can revoke
that visa and deport people. That's completely legal. Nobody has
ever argued against that before. Creation of an unlawful office.
That's Doze. He's upset about Doge. Who is and why not?
Bribery and corruption? He just made that up. I don't
(22:39):
know what he's even complaining about. I listened to the video.
He never explains that he just says Trump did it
and didn't elaborate any further and then tyrannical overreach. So
that's basically everything bald into one. Trump is hitler, so
we're impeaching him. Obviously, this is going to go nowhere.
It's really not even worth the time of day. But
I thought it was, frankly kind of funny. I got
(23:01):
a good chuckle out of this, just because I know
that it will go nowhere. So anyway, that's the left's
reaction to Trump's one hundred day mark. What is the
right doing. Well, I'll tell you what the right's doing.
We're freaking partying. I'm not even kidding. Trump held another rally.
I love this. I am so happy that campaign Trump
(23:21):
didn't die with his victory, because that was my concern.
I talked about this at the time. I was worried
that because Trump had won and he can now no
longer run for office again, we will never see campaign Trump.
I was very sad about that. I was, but Trump
heard me, he heard my tears, he heard me crying,
and so he brought back Campaign Trump to celebrate his
(23:42):
one hundred day mark. And I'm very excited about that
because yesterday he held his big rally. And so now
we've got some cuts of campaign Trump that I get
to play for you, just to sort of celebrate the
fact that we have had one hundred days of the
best presidential administration of my life. So let's dig into it.
So the first clip that really kind of jumped out
(24:02):
at me something that you know, I think we've all
been kind of upset about for a long time, and
we didn't really know what exactly it was that was
upsetting us. We never really were able to kind of
put our finger on Yes, this is what's wrong with
the government. This is why I'm so unhappy all the time,
no matter who wins with the federal government. Well, it's
the freaking bureaucrats. It always has been. It's been the
(24:24):
deep state. It is real. They are out there and
they are screwing things up. Donald Trump, for the first
time ever, is coming in and saying, hey, I recognize
that this is a problem, that I'm going to do
something about it. And here he is saying that, listen,
we're getting these bureaucrats that have been you know, running
things really for the last however long forty fifty years.
We're getting them out of here, and the crowd explodes
(24:45):
in cheers. Take a listen.
Speaker 4 (24:47):
After a lifetime of unelected bureaucrats stealing your paychecks, attacking
your values, and trampling your freedoms, we are stopping their gravy,
trained ending their power trip, and telling thousands of corrupt
and competent and unnecessary deep state bureaucrats you're fired.
Speaker 1 (25:07):
Get the hell out of here.
Speaker 4 (25:08):
You're fired, Get out of here.
Speaker 1 (25:14):
That's awesome, that's great. Everybody wants that. Cut the bureaucrats.
We don't need the bureaucrats. What do they do? I
don't know nothing. They make life difficult, and like he says,
they're stealing your paychecks, they really are. Every time that
all these useless bureaucrats that are working in Washington, DC,
sucking up money, taking paychecks that come from your tax dollars,
and using that money to fight against your values. We're
(25:37):
sick of that. And I think even the leftists that
are willing to be honest, if you ask them, they'll say, yeah,
I'm glad this is happening too, because this works both ways.
If we cut out the bureaucrats now, if Trump does,
that means the next time a Democrat gets back in office,
he'll be the one running the show. I think the
American people want the person they vote for to be
the person running the government. And for the longest time
(25:57):
that hasn't been what's been happening. It's been state bureaucrats
and people on both sides of the aisle, if they're
answering honestly, will tell you they're sick of that. Trump
is speaking to that. That's popular. That's good. He should
keep doing that full steam ahead there. Second of all,
another point that he hit is something that should be
kind of universally popular, is ending DEI in every situation,
(26:18):
you should want the best of the best, regardless of
what race or sex they are, right, you should want
the very best of the best. DEI is the exact
opposite of that. We're saying we're going to put having
the best of the best secondary to making sure we
represent every different group of people. That's bad. Most people, again,
(26:39):
if they're being honest, agree that that's bad. That's why
we don't have a fifty to fifty white and black NBA.
Black people are just better at basketball on average than
white people. That's why seventy five percent of the NBA
is black. There's nothing wrong with it. That's a good thing.
These teams are winning, they're doing a great job. That's
true of the Houston Rockets. I love the Houston Rockets.
This should be kind of common sense, universally agreed on,
(26:59):
but for the longest time it wasn't. Donald Trump is
coming back in and he's saying, Okay, yeah, this is
wrong that we're prioritizing people based off of the color
of their skin and off the content of their character.
We're going to get rid of that. Here he is
talking about that, and again the crowd goes nuts.
Speaker 5 (27:13):
I ended all of the lawless so called Diversity, Equity
and Inclusion Bill all across the entire federal government and
the private sector, and I made it the official policy
of the United States government that.
Speaker 4 (27:27):
There are only two genders, male and female.
Speaker 1 (27:33):
I like these clips because they really demonstrate the fact
that he's having a good time. You can see how
much he enjoys being around these crowds, and it's really
fun and he's good at it. He really is. He's
a great campaigner. He's great just out there giving speeches
off the cuff, messing around. It's funny, it's fun to watch.
I found a clip that really demonstrates that pretty well.
There was this heckler. I don't have the details of
(27:55):
who was heckling or why, but basically, somebody starts protest
in the crowd and Donald Trump confuses the gender of
this person. Take a listen, he did so great. What's
the problem over there?
Speaker 4 (28:09):
What's the problem is that a radical left lunatic?
Speaker 1 (28:15):
He's just a child, all right? Get about Yeah.
Speaker 5 (28:19):
Oh, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, ma'am.
Speaker 1 (28:22):
I thought it was a guy.
Speaker 5 (28:25):
Thank you. I'm sorry, I said he, and it's a she.
Speaker 6 (28:30):
I'm sorry.
Speaker 1 (28:33):
Oh, come on, that's just funny. That's just good old
fashioned fun. He's up there, he's having a good time.
The people in the crowd are having a good time.
And hey, listen, the entire American right is having a
good good time right now. We're winning and we're happy
about it, no matter how pissed off the left is.
We're enjoying ourselves. We couldn't be enjoying ourselves more. And
you know, I don't know how they're going to counter that.
(28:55):
I really don't. They're in trouble, they really are, electorally speaking.
But hey, we'll see what they can. I'm up with
all right, We'll be right back. Okay, let's talk a
(29:18):
little bit about the border. You know, we've had one
hundred days of amazing border reform. Donald Trump has completely
changed the game. I've said it before and I'll say
it again. Donald Trump has done in a very short
amount of time, weeks, if not months, what I thought
it would take him probably two or three years to do.
I was not under the impression, and I'll be brutally
(29:39):
honest about this, I was not under the impression that
Donald Trump would be able to secure the border inside
of a year. I was not under the impression that
Donald Trump would be able to secure the border inside
of two years. I was kind of thinking Donald Trump
would be able to step in and you know, patch
things up here and there, kind of correct some of
the sism, and then maybe after another midterm we get
(30:03):
another big red wave maybe, and then Donald Trump really
goes in and reforms. I was wrong. I was mistaken.
I'll admit that Donald Trump blew my expectations out of
the water. He has completely shut down the border. These
are the lowest levels of crossings probably ever, and he's
done it in one hundred days. That's amazing. Everyone should
be happy about this. But I want to give some
(30:24):
credit where credit is due, and mainly because this is
a person that I'm about to give credit to that
you'll hear in this video that I'm about to play
he'll deny that he deserves credit. I really do think
he does. Tom Moman is someone that I have had
the pleasure of speaking to a couple of different times.
I've interviewed him probably two or three times. When he
was working at the Heritage Foundation. I was able to
(30:46):
speak with him about border issues over on k TRH
News seven forty am great station, Historic I love. It
couldn't be happier to be there. I talked to Tom
Momon a couple of times about this, kind of before
the election, before things really kick off. This would have
been early twenty twenty four, before he really got tapped
to be Trump's borders are and it's because of people
(31:08):
like Tom Homan that we have been able to go
in so hard and so fast and clean up the
border situation. So really, what's important here is for people
to say, listen, what we have had under Joe Biden
is a problem. It's unacceptable. We are going to go
to any lengths possible to correct that issue. And that's
(31:28):
what Tom Homan has done as borders are in Trump's
yer kind of assisting Christy Nome at DHS leading the
border patrol, what have you. Whatever it is he's been doing,
it's been working.
Speaker 5 (31:40):
Here.
Speaker 1 (31:40):
He is at a press conference on Monday talking about
the fact that listen, I don't care if you don't
like me. I don't care if you don't like what
the administration is doing. It's important work that has to
get done on behalf of the American people, and gosh darnett,
we're going to do it. Take a listen to this.
Speaker 7 (31:57):
I hear it all the time. There's a lot of
people in this country don't like me. I don't care.
But when I walk to an airport, I have many
people walking up to me and thank me for what
I'm doing. And I'm not taking credit for anything. The
success of the border and immigration enforcements President Trump and
the men and women wearing that uniform. God blessings she
(32:18):
every one of them. But I take a pleasure in
seeing it because in forty years of doing this, yeah,
people always want to say, why are you so emotional?
And when he testified, why are you so emotional on a network?
Because they wore my shoes for forty years, they understand
why emotional. I've talked to the little girls as young
as nine years older, multiple times by the cartel members.
And when you get to your knees and you talk
(32:39):
that little girl and everything innocent and pure.
Speaker 1 (32:41):
Has been ripped from her.
Speaker 7 (32:43):
When you listen to the lake and arriety seventeen, men's
that young lady fight for her life. Don't just think okay,
a young woman died. Think of how she died, the
terror that she went through. And these children are sexual assaulted.
I still mback attract each other and LinkedIn dead people
at my feet. That baked it. Yet, illegal imigration is
(33:04):
not a Victimus crime. And so every sick person we
take off the streets, especially child rapists, it makes us
country much safer. And when we arrest public safety threat
one at a time, makes us country safer.
Speaker 1 (33:17):
This is exactly right, and it's exactly the attitude that
we need more from our public servants. We need people
that are willing to come into government and say, listen,
this is what we need to do. I'm going to
do it. I don't care if you don't like me,
I don't care if me doing this actually costs me
my position. It needs to be done, so I'm going
(33:39):
to do it. Consequences be damned. The Democrats, believe it
or not, actually have a grip on this concept. I mean,
they've passed Obamacare and it costs them control of the House,
but that was their agenda and they were willing to
kind of sacrifice each other to get that done, and
they did. Republicans are sort of notorious for having this problem.
They'll get them majority, but they're scared to do anything
(34:01):
with it because then they won't have the majority anymore.
People will get mad at them and they might lose
an election. It's the definition of having your cake and
eat it too. You have the cake, eat it, and
then go get another cake a few elections down the line,
when you've actually fixed the country. This is the first
time in a long time I feel like we have
a presidential administration that's not necessarily worried about that. That's
a good thing. Tom Holman's attitude here is the right
(34:24):
attitude to have shut the border down, get these people
out of here, and when the left loses their mind
about it, just tell them. Listen, I don't care. All right,
since we're on the topic of deportation, I want to
dig into some other big news. Of course, we had
the kill Maar Obrego Garcia case. That's the latest deportation
that the left lost their mind about. I want to
(34:44):
remind you real quick, we talked about this at the time.
During the campaign. Somebody asked Tom Holman about, Hey, is
there a way to deport illegal aliens that have children
in the United States that, because of birthright citizen are citizens.
And he kind of said jokingly, well, yeah, of course
children can be deported with their families, deport the whole
(35:06):
family together. And of course, at that time finally came
somebody who had had children in the United States. I
believe they had like some under ten year old children
that were citizens because they had been born in the
United States. The parent got deported, and so the government said, hey,
do you want to leave these children here in the
United States with a you know, friend, relative, family, somebody
that can care for them, or do you just want
(35:26):
to take them with you back to your home country.
And of course the parents said, I want to take
my kids with you, And of course the left lost
their mind about it and said, oh my god, the
Trump administration is deporting American citizen kids. And what they're
hoping you'll do is not look into this at all
and just assume that the Trump administration grabbed a couple
of brown children and threw them out of the country.
(35:49):
That's not what happened. This is a parent that said,
I want to take my children with me to my
home country. Here's Marco Rubio absolutely blowing this ridiculous narrative
out of the water.
Speaker 8 (35:58):
On the headline. That's a miss leading headline. Okay, three
US citizens ages four, seven and two were not deported.
Their mothers, who are legally in this country, were deported.
The children went with their mothers. If those children are
US citizens, they can come back into the United States
and there's their father or someone here who wants to
assume them. But ultimately who was deported was their mother.
Who's their mothers who were here illegally. The children just
(36:20):
went with their mothers. But they wasn't like you guys
make it sound like ice agents kick down the door
and grabbed the two year old and threw them on
an airplane. That's misleading. That's just not true.
Speaker 6 (36:30):
Just to be clear, because I do want to get
to the overhaul at the State Department. Is it the
US policy to deport children, even US citizens with their families,
and I hear what you're saying without due process, Just
to be very clear there, well.
Speaker 8 (36:45):
No, no, no, no, no again. If someone's in this country unlawfully, illegally,
that person gets deported. If that person is with a
two year old child or has a two year old
child and says, I want to take my child with
you with me, well, then what.
Speaker 1 (36:57):
You have two choices. You can say yes, of course.
Speaker 8 (36:59):
You can take your child, whether they're a citizen or not,
because it's your child. Or you can say yes, you
can go, but your child must stay behind. And then
your headlines would read US holding hostage two year old,
four year old, seven year old while mother deported. So
the mother, the parents make that choice. I imagine those
three US citizen children have fathers here in the United States.
They can stay with their father. That's up to their
(37:20):
family to decide where the children go. Children go with
their parents, parents decide where their children go. The US
deported their mothers who were illegally in America.
Speaker 1 (37:28):
I love this. Marco Rubio just blows this lady out
of the water. I don't know who this is exactly,
Kristen Welker with MSNBC I think, or maybe it's NBC,
I'm not sure, but she tries to double down on
this point. Did you deport these children, these American citizens?
Did you deport them without due process? No, we didn't.
(37:49):
We took these kids and we sent them with their
parents because that's what their parents wanted. The parent was
an illegal alien, they had a child. We deported the parent,
and we left it up to the parent. Do you
want to take your kid or do you want to
leave it here? And hey, credit to these parents for saying, hey,
I'm gonna take my kid with me. That's that's good
parenting right there. But I've said this before and I'll
(38:10):
say it again. Having a child in the United States
does not exempt you from the law. Just because you
had a kid in America doesn't mean you get to
stay in America. You're an illegal alien. You broke the
law to get here. There are punishments for that. Get
the hell out. If your child wants to come back later,
that's fine, they're a citizen. This really just goes to
show you that Trump and the Trump administration cannot do
(38:31):
anything right in the eyes of the media. I mean
you remember during Donald Trump's first term when they said
Donald Trump was separating families and putting kids in cages. Okay,
fair enough, We'll let parents take their kids with them
out of the country. This is what you guys wanted.
Don't complain now, all right, That's all I've got. We'll
be back on Wednesday, seven pm AM nine point fifty
KPRC in Houston or the free iHeartRadio app. Tune in.
(38:53):
I'll be glad to speak with you once again there.
Thank you very much
Speaker 7 (39:01):
To be
Hey, everybody, welcome back to the next general port. What
do y'all think of the new intro? I thought it
was time we spice things up a little bit. I
wanted something new, So we're trying it out. We're trying
it out. We may not stick with it. We might.
Hope you managed to tune in on Sunday. That was
a great show. I'm actually, uh, I'm really proud of
that one. I had a good time doing that one.
I hope you listened. I hope you had a good
(00:50):
time listening. Listen. We talked a little bit about the
upcoming midterms. Those are right up on us. We've talked
about this in the past. There's really no any sort
of off season in politics. It's pretty much go go, go,
go go all the time. And we're kind of kicking
off the next election season right now. We're waiting for
(01:11):
Donald Trump to weigh in on the Texas Senate race.
John Cornyn and Ken Paxon are both vying for his
seat there. Cornyn obviously holds that seat right now. He
is somebody that the grass roots, the GOP bass does
not like anymore. He's been in office there in the
Senate since two thousand and two. People are getting sick
(01:33):
of him. He's kind of viewed as a uniparty establishment candidate.
I don't think that's necessarily completely wrong. So he's in trouble.
He's got some problems. And then of course there is
Ken Paxton. The GOP base really loves Ken Paxson. As
we've talked about in the past. He made a name
for himself as the Attorney General of Texas under the
(01:53):
Biden administration. He just really did go in there and
just make a lot of really good headlines for himself.
Was a brilliant piece of politicking. People have been predicting
that he will take a shot at this Senate seat
for a long time, and that time has finally come.
He is, of course running against John Cornyan. Now this
is right about where things start to get really really complicated,
(02:15):
because obviously Trump making an endorsement in this race is
going to end the race. Right Whoever wins this endorsement
from Donald Trump is going to win the GOP primary.
There's just no two ways about this. And this is
of course a very important primary because listen, we have
a fifty three I think seat majority in the Senate
right now. The GOP does that is a slim majority.
(02:36):
It is you need every single one of those votes
when it comes to big legislation. So this puts Donald
Trump in a weird position. We know that he's going
to make an endorsement. He's already said this, he says,
I will make an endorsement. So who is he going
to pick. There's John Cornyan, who a lot of Donald
Trump's base doesn't like, and Ken Paxton, who has been
(02:58):
a very close ally of TRUP for a long time.
He's been very openly, very pro Trump for basically his
entire time as Attorney General of Texas. That may very
well be one of the reasons that he was impeached
because Trump ticked off the Bush family, who of course
is really powerful in Texas politics and they have a
lot of friends and connections. And Ken Paxton also ticked
(03:19):
off the Bush family and then lined himself up really
closely with Trump. So the Bush family, who have their
tentacles all over the Texas House, they don't like either
of those two people. So maybe that's one of the
reasons that he got targeted for impeachment for no reason.
I see that argument. I think that's not without merit.
So you might sit there and think, Okay, well, then
of course Ken Paxson is going to get the endorsement.
(03:41):
Well not necessarily, not so fast. Remember, John Cornyn is
in the Senate right now. Donald Trump has some big
agenda items coming up. Obviously the big beautiful bill, the
budget bill, that has most of Trump's big agenda items
in it. He's going to need every single vote, including
John Cornyn. So you don't want to go out and
(04:03):
endorse John Cornan's opponent right now, because that's going to
piss him off, and he might vote against you just
to spite you, because he knows at that point he's
no longer going to be a senator, so he may
very well decide to spend the next year and a
half just pissing off Donald Trump. So do I think
that Donald Trump is going to endorse John Cornan? Honestly
at this point, I don't know, but I would lean
(04:23):
towards probably not. I think Trump knows that his base
doesn't like Cornan. I'm sure Trump has his own personal
quibbles with Cornyn. And Paxton, on the other hand, has
been very very buddy buddy with Trump for a very
long time. They get along great So if I had
to guess, if I was a betting man, I would
put my money on Ken Paxton getting that Trump endorsement.
But Donald Trump knows that he has to get Cornan
(04:45):
to play nice playball. So what I think happens is
Donald Trump is just gonna wait as long as possible
before he announces that he's putting his support behind Ken Paxon.
If I was Trump, that's what I would do. I
would just dangle the endorsement over John Cornyn's head and say, hey,
you're gonna vote for all my stuff. Here, here it is,
You're gonna vote. And then once I've already got John
(05:06):
Cornan's votes and he's useless to me, then I endorse
Ken Packson because I was gonna do it anyway. That's
my prediction. That's what I would do. Take it with
a grain of salt. I'm not Donald Trump, I'm not
in his ear, I'm not in his inner circle. I
have no idea what he may or may not do.
But just looking at things from the outside in, that's
what makes sense to me. Now, that's just one side
of the aisle. That's the Republicans. They've gotten an early
(05:28):
jump on this as I think they should. I think
it's good. Get out campaign early, establish yourself as a candidate.
That way, no matter who you're up against in the
general election, people already know who you are. Great plan,
good idea. What are the Democrats doing? Well, As we
already know, the Democrats don't really have any big figures
(05:48):
right now. This is a big problem for them on
the national level. They have no one to take the
mantle of leadership from Joe Biden, and I guess Kamala
Harris is called dead hands. Last year, they had to
run somebody against Ted Cruz. They just kind of picked
a name out of the basket and we got Colin Alright,
who ran a horrible campaign and got blown out by
Ted Cruz. He didn't have enough name recognition to run
(06:09):
a campaign like that, and so Ted Cruz was able
to just slack him on the transgender issue and just
establish him as a pro men in women's sports candidate.
Colin Alredd never escaped that identity and he lost bigly
in that election. So what do the Democrats do now? Well, shoot,
they go back to all reliable. Who's all reliable? You
know him? Veto o' rourke. That's right, good Old Robert
(06:32):
Francis O'Rourke is hinting that he might take another swing
at a Senate seat. Now you might ask yourself, hey,
didn't he already do this and lose? Didn't he run
for governor and lose, and then Senate and lose, and
then president and lose. Is he really going to run again?
Apparently he's thinking about it, and at this point I
wouldn't put it past him. The man seems to run
for basically any political office he can get his hands on. Basically,
(06:54):
if his seats open, he'll run for it. I think
he actually is living in the Vatican right now, hoping
he'll become the pope. But yeah, he's said at a
town hall in North Texas recently, if it comes to
pass that this is what the people of Texas want,
that it's the highest and best use of what I
can give to you, then yes I will to cheers
and applause. Let me just stop you right there. The
people don't want that, we don't. I mean, he should
(07:16):
have learned that lesson the first, second, and third time
he ran for major political offices and failed. How many
times do we have to keep teaching you this lesson?
Old man, we don't want you here, but I think
this really does do a good job of kind of
demonstrating the fact that, once again, as we've made clear,
the Democrats have nothing going on. They don't have candidates,
(07:37):
they don't have anything popular to run on. So as
much as they tell you everybody hates the Republicans, they
hate the Democrats more. They are completely screwed. So you
know what, go ahead, run Beta over war and see
what happens. All right, stay tuned, we'll be right back.
(08:22):
All right, We've got more bad news for Wisconsin judge
Hannah Dugan. You remember her. We talked about her again
at length in the Sunday broadcast Again, take a listen
to it. You're missing out if you're not. Sunday's at
seven on AM nine to fifty KPRC. We went into
great detail about this case Hannah Dugan. She's a judge
(08:43):
in Wisconsin, I believe Milwaukee. She is accused of helping
an illegal alien evade ice. She actually got arrested by
the Trump administration for this, and the left is losing
their mind over it. They are insisting, they're sparing up
and down that this is an example of fashion coming
to America. The only reason Hannah Dugan got arrested is
(09:04):
because she opposed the Trump agenda and had nothing to
do with the fact that she probably broke the law
in aiding and abetting this illegal alien. It's all just
because Trump is a fascist, evil dictator, Nazi. That's the
line that we've heard. Well, the Supreme Court of Wisconsin
appears to disagree. That's the way this looks to me.
We got this headline out yesterday. The Wisconsin Supreme Court
(09:25):
issued an administrative order on Tuesday calling for Milwaukee Circuit
Court Judge Hannah Dugan to be quote temporarily relieved of
her official duties. Dugan was arrested in charge with obstruction
of an official proceeding on Friday after evidence came to
light that she had shielded the migrant from ICE agents,
according to a criminal complaint. Okay, so what do we
(09:45):
know about the Wisconsin Supreme Court. They're not a bunch
of far right extremists, right, They're not the type of
people to go and assist Donald Trump in a fascist
takeover of the United States. This is an elected body, right,
And I know that Wisconsin is a somewhat blue state.
It's kind of a purple ish. Donald Trump did win it,
(10:05):
I believe, in November, so there is that, but overall,
it's not an overly Republican state, right, it's moderate at best.
Not to mention, just a few weeks ago, at the
beginning of April, Wisconsin had another big Supreme Court election.
So what they do is they'll have one judge at
a time run for the Supreme Court, and then that
(10:27):
person is elected to a ten year term. So Susan Crawford,
who was widely considered to be the very far left
liberal candidate, she's the one that won that seat. So
that tells you where Wisconsin's at with their Supreme Court,
and even they're stepping in and saying, yeah, there's at
least some cause for concern here, so for the time being,
at least, we're going to take this lady off the bench.
(10:48):
If this was just Trump being a fascist dictator, they
would not have done that. They just wouldn't have. They
would have left her alone at least until things played out.
But they didn't, So get what you want out of that.
It is very weird to me that this is who
the left is rallying behind, and of course it's it's
her this, Hanna Dugan Lady, and of course aoc Jasmine Crockett.
(11:09):
These are the new quote unquote fresh faces of the
Democrat Party. These are the people they're putting forward. They're
radically left, they're probably crazy, but the Democrats are going
all in on these people, and they really don't have
anything else. And I think this goes a long way
towards why they keep losing on a national level like this,
I really do. They don't have anything going on. And
(11:30):
the more and more that they dig farther and farther left,
the more people they lose, the more people they cut off.
It's the Overton window shifting farther and farther, and enough
people are saying, Okay, I'm comfortable just being on the
right now, since y'all have gone so far to their
left and you've left me behind, I'll just be over here,
and they keep doubling down on this. I think completely
(11:51):
unchained leftism is probably the worst possible thing for the
left electorally, because people can clearly see the fact that
if you don't have repuebl stepping in, conservatives stepping in
and saying hey, no, this is a terrible idea, It's
stupid we're not gonna allow it to any number of
their policies. They just go completely nuts. I found a
video that kind of perfectly exemplified this. It's this guy
(12:13):
who used to live in Pittsburgh and he moved to Portland, Oregon,
which we all know. Portland, Oregon is like as left
as you could possibly be. It's crazy town over there.
And he is talking about the fact that, like, listen,
when I lived in Pittsburgh, I considered myself a good liberal.
I was left wing Lottie Dotty Do and that was fun.
And then I moved to Portland, Oregon, where I saw complete,
(12:36):
unabashed leftism and it's a disaster. And now I'm a Republican.
Take a listen to this guy, all righty, y'all.
Speaker 2 (12:43):
I'm moved to Portland, Oregon about four years ago from Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Speaker 1 (12:46):
Before I left Pittsburgh, I considered.
Speaker 2 (12:48):
Myself pretty far left, and then like COVID happened, and
then I moved to Portland and sow what part left
really looked like. And I just I feel like the
left has lost all common sense at this point. But
all that being said, like being in Portland, I truly
feel like I'm in a twilight zone every day. Like
it really exposes like how ugly the far left can
really be because it's what I'm surrounded by on a
(13:08):
daily basis. Like they're totally fine with walking past homeless
people that are intense, that are having like mental breakdowns
right in the middle of the street and acting like, oh,
that's normal. This happens in every city. Like I just
happened to walk by it every day to go get
my latte, no big deal. And it's like, dude, I
thought the left was supposed to be empathetic. I thought
the left cared about the environment, because if you look
at what the homeless population out here alone just does,
(13:29):
so the environment is pretty insane. But all that being said,
like I feel like all the morals have went out
the window. All like the things that like y'all truly
fought for went out the window. Now it's all about
like protesting TESLA.
Speaker 1 (13:40):
Hating Trump, and like fighting for men to.
Speaker 2 (13:42):
Have babies or something.
Speaker 1 (13:43):
Like it's literally crazy out here.
Speaker 2 (13:45):
And I know, like I should have known this moving
out here, but I really thought, like, you know, we'd
have some common ground considering like I used to be
like one of you. But if anything, it just turns
me further to the right seeing how people act out here,
seeing like the point of everybody has too. It's literally insane,
Like if you don't believe what they believe, then your
piece is like it's just a total loll in. And
(14:08):
it's crazy to me that it's been normalized. And I
think like Portland is a perfect example of why things
shouldn't be far left and why we need to like
kind of come back to common ground somewhere so you
can see me all you want, But you know I'm right,
and you know there's plenty of people that think the
same way as me, And Portland's just becoming a hub
of mental illness and a place for people to go
(14:30):
to just be weird. And it's not the good kind
of weird. It's the type of weird that needs like
medical attention. Let's talk about it.
Speaker 1 (14:38):
Oh don't worry, guy, we are going to talk about it.
And he's completely exactly right. He mentioned the homeless. This
is a big one for the left, and it's been
a big one for a long time. We've had homeless
problems in this country for as long as we've had
a country, and the left has always been very big
on hey, we need the government to step in and
give these people things. We need the government to give
(15:00):
these people housing. We need the government to give these
people money so they can't be homeless. We even had
people in Portland and you know, parts of California say
we need the government to give these people drugs because
they're addicted and they're gonna shoot up, so we need
to make sure they can do that safely. Now, the
conservatives this entire time has said, wait a minute. If
(15:22):
you do that, what you're gonna wind up doing is
incentivizing this bad behavior. Because honestly, most people would look
at homelessness and say, this is a bad thing. You
don't want this. It's going to be a difficult, uncomfortable,
dangerous life. So work hard, be productive so you can
avoid it. That's been the conservative argument. The moment you
say no, you don't have to worry about working hard,
(15:44):
you don't have to worry about being productive, the government
is going to step in and take care of you. Well,
that creates exactly what we've seen in Portland. We have
people lining the streets shooting up drugs because they know,
no matter what, I'm gonna get a little bit of
money from the government. I'm gonna get a little of
drugs from the government. The government isn't gonna come and
tell me to get off of these street corners. The
(16:05):
government isn't gonna push me out of these businesses that
I'm loitering around and occupying. In some cases, they can
just sort of set up shop wherever they want, and
we've seen that happen. I mean, it's not difficult to
get on Twitter or any social media platform really and
find videos of people just walking through the streets of Portland,
(16:27):
Los Angeles, San Francisco, and they're just walking through crowds
of zombies. It does look like a zombie movie. People
drugged out, passed out, not thinking, not focusing, not doing anything.
And even in the cases where the government says, oh,
we won't give you, you know, just cold hard cash,
well give you a place to live, those places are
even worse. They're creating slums, terrible places that no one
(16:51):
would want to live in. There's stories about how people
overdose and their government funded apartments that are already torn
up and painted over and have just become cracked in
that the taxpayers have to pay for and they shoot
up in there, and they overdose and they die and
nobody finds them, and these places all stink. It really
is the perfect example of the fact that listen, if
you try to make the government the answer to everybody's problems,
(17:13):
you actually just make the problem worse. More often than not.
If you really want to fix the homelessness issue, you
don't give people handouts, you incentivize people to work. The
government should be making it more difficult to be homeless,
despite what the left will tell you. I mean, this
really should be common sense. If you have a significant
portion of the population that says, I don't have to
(17:34):
work and the government will take care of me. I
don't have to worry about how big of an inconvenience
I am to an entire city. The government will have
my back. You're gonna incentivize that bad behavior, and when
you incentivize bad behavior, you get more of it. All right,
stay tuned, We're going to be talking about Trump's one
hundred day mark right after this next break. Stay tuned,
will be right back Alrighty Trump's first one hundred days.
(18:18):
We did it. We made it. I think it's been
pretty great so far. I've been following it closely. You,
if you've been listening, have also been following closely. Tell
me what you think. Are you happy with Trump's first
one hundred days? Is there something you wish he had
done that he didn't. Is there something that he did
do that you wish he hadn't. I think for me
that one thing would be I wish he had appointed
(18:40):
somebody other than Pam Bondi to the attorney general position.
I don't think she's done a good job in that.
I think somebody else could have done better. But that's
one thing out of a million. I think other than that,
it's been pretty good so far, and I'm fairly happy
with it. But reach out to me. Let me know
you know where to find me x Instagram. They were linked. Oh,
you can access it there. So I'd love to hear
(19:02):
from you. I'd love to talk about what you think
Trump has done so far. I will tell you one
guy that is not happy with Trump's first one hundred days.
That is Congressman shre Fanadar. He represents Michigan's thirteenth congressional district,
and he is so upset with Donald Trump that he
went all the way to filing articles of impeachment. Now
(19:24):
we knew this was coming. Obviously the left. This is
their favorite move when it comes to Donald Trump is
file articles of impeachment. They did it twice in his
last term. It stands to reason they take another shot
at it. Thankfully, they don't actually control either Chamber of Congress,
so this is dead on arrival. But tre Fanadar did
it anyway, as is his right, as is his right.
I don't know why you would bother taking the time.
(19:47):
You know this isn't gonna work. You know, this isn't
going to go anywhere. All this is going to do
is draw attention to you, and I guess that's what
he wants. So here he is announcing his articles of
impeachment against Donald Trump.
Speaker 3 (19:58):
This is Congressman Tanadar. Donald Trump has already done real
damage to our democracy, but defining a unanimous nine to
zero Supreme Court ruling that has to be the final straw,
is time we impeach j Trump. The quote said the
wrongfully deported kilmer Garcia must be allowed to return and
(20:21):
receive due process. Trump ignored it. He ignored the Constitution.
He ignored the very checks and balances that keep our
democracy intact. This isn't an isolated incident. It's part of
a dangerous, deliberate pattern. That's why today I introduced a
(20:41):
resolution to impeach Jay Trump, outlining seven articles of impeachment.
Speaker 1 (20:50):
All right, let me start you right there, because I
don't want to subject my listeners to your nonsense anymore.
I will tell you what the seven articles of impeachment are.
This is directly quoting. If you want to hear from
his mouth, you can find the video on Twitter. It's
not hard to find. Just search Shreathanadar and it's like
the first or third thing up there. So here are
his seven articles of impeachment. Article number one, Obstruction of
(21:11):
justice and abuse of power. That's the kill maar A
Brago Garcia thing, taking away Congress's power of the purse.
That's Article two. That's the whole you know, shutting down
different portions of the federal government, cutting off things like
USAID stuff like that. That's that's what that is, Abuse
of trade powers and international aggression. Article three that's the tariffs, which,
(21:36):
by the way, Donald Trump, the President of the United States,
has the complete authority to do that. That's completely allowed
for him to do. That's never been disputed before, So
that's just ridiculous violation of First Amendment rights. That's his
Article four. That's referencing the fact that, you know, he's
kicked certain people out of the press room, certain outlets
that he doesn't like, out of the White House press room.
(21:57):
Nobody has a right to be in the White House
press room. That's something that the president does just to
be nice. He doesn't have to do that. That's not
mandated anywhere. It's also a reference to the fact that
he's revoked certain visas for people and had them deported
student visas. We've talked about this in the past and
previous episodes. This is a good thing. We don't want
(22:17):
people who hate America in this country. So if people
who hate America and are vocal about that are here
in the country on a student visa, we can revoke
that visa and deport people. That's completely legal. Nobody has
ever argued against that before. Creation of an unlawful office.
That's Doze. He's upset about Doge. Who is and why not?
Bribery and corruption? He just made that up. I don't
(22:39):
know what he's even complaining about. I listened to the video.
He never explains that he just says Trump did it
and didn't elaborate any further and then tyrannical overreach. So
that's basically everything bald into one. Trump is hitler, so
we're impeaching him. Obviously, this is going to go nowhere.
It's really not even worth the time of day. But
I thought it was, frankly kind of funny. I got
(23:01):
a good chuckle out of this, just because I know
that it will go nowhere. So anyway, that's the left's
reaction to Trump's one hundred day mark. What is the
right doing. Well, I'll tell you what the right's doing.
We're freaking partying. I'm not even kidding. Trump held another rally.
I love this. I am so happy that campaign Trump
(23:21):
didn't die with his victory, because that was my concern.
I talked about this at the time. I was worried
that because Trump had won and he can now no
longer run for office again, we will never see campaign Trump.
I was very sad about that. I was, but Trump
heard me, he heard my tears, he heard me crying,
and so he brought back Campaign Trump to celebrate his
(23:42):
one hundred day mark. And I'm very excited about that
because yesterday he held his big rally. And so now
we've got some cuts of campaign Trump that I get
to play for you, just to sort of celebrate the
fact that we have had one hundred days of the
best presidential administration of my life. So let's dig into it.
So the first clip that really kind of jumped out
(24:02):
at me something that you know, I think we've all
been kind of upset about for a long time, and
we didn't really know what exactly it was that was
upsetting us. We never really were able to kind of
put our finger on Yes, this is what's wrong with
the government. This is why I'm so unhappy all the time,
no matter who wins with the federal government. Well, it's
the freaking bureaucrats. It always has been. It's been the
(24:24):
deep state. It is real. They are out there and
they are screwing things up. Donald Trump, for the first
time ever, is coming in and saying, hey, I recognize
that this is a problem, that I'm going to do
something about it. And here he is saying that, listen,
we're getting these bureaucrats that have been you know, running
things really for the last however long forty fifty years.
We're getting them out of here, and the crowd explodes
(24:45):
in cheers. Take a listen.
Speaker 4 (24:47):
After a lifetime of unelected bureaucrats stealing your paychecks, attacking
your values, and trampling your freedoms, we are stopping their gravy,
trained ending their power trip, and telling thousands of corrupt
and competent and unnecessary deep state bureaucrats you're fired.
Speaker 1 (25:07):
Get the hell out of here.
Speaker 4 (25:08):
You're fired, Get out of here.
Speaker 1 (25:14):
That's awesome, that's great. Everybody wants that. Cut the bureaucrats.
We don't need the bureaucrats. What do they do? I
don't know nothing. They make life difficult, and like he says,
they're stealing your paychecks, they really are. Every time that
all these useless bureaucrats that are working in Washington, DC,
sucking up money, taking paychecks that come from your tax dollars,
and using that money to fight against your values. We're
(25:37):
sick of that. And I think even the leftists that
are willing to be honest, if you ask them, they'll say, yeah,
I'm glad this is happening too, because this works both ways.
If we cut out the bureaucrats now, if Trump does,
that means the next time a Democrat gets back in office,
he'll be the one running the show. I think the
American people want the person they vote for to be
the person running the government. And for the longest time
(25:57):
that hasn't been what's been happening. It's been state bureaucrats
and people on both sides of the aisle, if they're
answering honestly, will tell you they're sick of that. Trump
is speaking to that. That's popular. That's good. He should
keep doing that full steam ahead there. Second of all,
another point that he hit is something that should be
kind of universally popular, is ending DEI in every situation,
(26:18):
you should want the best of the best, regardless of
what race or sex they are, right, you should want
the very best of the best. DEI is the exact
opposite of that. We're saying we're going to put having
the best of the best secondary to making sure we
represent every different group of people. That's bad. Most people, again,
(26:39):
if they're being honest, agree that that's bad. That's why
we don't have a fifty to fifty white and black NBA.
Black people are just better at basketball on average than
white people. That's why seventy five percent of the NBA
is black. There's nothing wrong with it. That's a good thing.
These teams are winning, they're doing a great job. That's
true of the Houston Rockets. I love the Houston Rockets.
This should be kind of common sense, universally agreed on,
(26:59):
but for the longest time it wasn't. Donald Trump is
coming back in and he's saying, Okay, yeah, this is
wrong that we're prioritizing people based off of the color
of their skin and off the content of their character.
We're going to get rid of that. Here he is
talking about that, and again the crowd goes nuts.
Speaker 5 (27:13):
I ended all of the lawless so called Diversity, Equity
and Inclusion Bill all across the entire federal government and
the private sector, and I made it the official policy
of the United States government that.
Speaker 4 (27:27):
There are only two genders, male and female.
Speaker 1 (27:33):
I like these clips because they really demonstrate the fact
that he's having a good time. You can see how
much he enjoys being around these crowds, and it's really
fun and he's good at it. He really is. He's
a great campaigner. He's great just out there giving speeches
off the cuff, messing around. It's funny, it's fun to watch.
I found a clip that really demonstrates that pretty well.
There was this heckler. I don't have the details of
(27:55):
who was heckling or why, but basically, somebody starts protest
in the crowd and Donald Trump confuses the gender of
this person. Take a listen, he did so great. What's
the problem over there?
Speaker 4 (28:09):
What's the problem is that a radical left lunatic?
Speaker 1 (28:15):
He's just a child, all right? Get about Yeah.
Speaker 5 (28:19):
Oh, I'm sorry, I'm sorry, ma'am.
Speaker 1 (28:22):
I thought it was a guy.
Speaker 5 (28:25):
Thank you. I'm sorry, I said he, and it's a she.
Speaker 6 (28:30):
I'm sorry.
Speaker 1 (28:33):
Oh, come on, that's just funny. That's just good old
fashioned fun. He's up there, he's having a good time.
The people in the crowd are having a good time.
And hey, listen, the entire American right is having a
good good time right now. We're winning and we're happy
about it, no matter how pissed off the left is.
We're enjoying ourselves. We couldn't be enjoying ourselves more. And
you know, I don't know how they're going to counter that.
(28:55):
I really don't. They're in trouble, they really are, electorally speaking.
But hey, we'll see what they can. I'm up with
all right, We'll be right back. Okay, let's talk a
(29:18):
little bit about the border. You know, we've had one
hundred days of amazing border reform. Donald Trump has completely
changed the game. I've said it before and I'll say
it again. Donald Trump has done in a very short
amount of time, weeks, if not months, what I thought
it would take him probably two or three years to do.
I was not under the impression, and I'll be brutally
(29:39):
honest about this, I was not under the impression that
Donald Trump would be able to secure the border inside
of a year. I was not under the impression that
Donald Trump would be able to secure the border inside
of two years. I was kind of thinking Donald Trump
would be able to step in and you know, patch
things up here and there, kind of correct some of
the sism, and then maybe after another midterm we get
(30:03):
another big red wave maybe, and then Donald Trump really
goes in and reforms. I was wrong. I was mistaken.
I'll admit that Donald Trump blew my expectations out of
the water. He has completely shut down the border. These
are the lowest levels of crossings probably ever, and he's
done it in one hundred days. That's amazing. Everyone should
be happy about this. But I want to give some
(30:24):
credit where credit is due, and mainly because this is
a person that I'm about to give credit to that
you'll hear in this video that I'm about to play
he'll deny that he deserves credit. I really do think
he does. Tom Moman is someone that I have had
the pleasure of speaking to a couple of different times.
I've interviewed him probably two or three times. When he
was working at the Heritage Foundation. I was able to
(30:46):
speak with him about border issues over on k TRH
News seven forty am great station, Historic I love. It
couldn't be happier to be there. I talked to Tom
Momon a couple of times about this, kind of before
the election, before things really kick off. This would have
been early twenty twenty four, before he really got tapped
to be Trump's borders are and it's because of people
(31:08):
like Tom Homan that we have been able to go
in so hard and so fast and clean up the
border situation. So really, what's important here is for people
to say, listen, what we have had under Joe Biden
is a problem. It's unacceptable. We are going to go
to any lengths possible to correct that issue. And that's
(31:28):
what Tom Homan has done as borders are in Trump's
yer kind of assisting Christy Nome at DHS leading the
border patrol, what have you. Whatever it is he's been doing,
it's been working.
Speaker 5 (31:40):
Here.
Speaker 1 (31:40):
He is at a press conference on Monday talking about
the fact that listen, I don't care if you don't
like me. I don't care if you don't like what
the administration is doing. It's important work that has to
get done on behalf of the American people, and gosh darnett,
we're going to do it. Take a listen to this.
Speaker 7 (31:57):
I hear it all the time. There's a lot of
people in this country don't like me. I don't care.
But when I walk to an airport, I have many
people walking up to me and thank me for what
I'm doing. And I'm not taking credit for anything. The
success of the border and immigration enforcements President Trump and
the men and women wearing that uniform. God blessings she
(32:18):
every one of them. But I take a pleasure in
seeing it because in forty years of doing this, yeah,
people always want to say, why are you so emotional?
And when he testified, why are you so emotional on a network?
Because they wore my shoes for forty years, they understand
why emotional. I've talked to the little girls as young
as nine years older, multiple times by the cartel members.
And when you get to your knees and you talk
(32:39):
that little girl and everything innocent and pure.
Speaker 1 (32:41):
Has been ripped from her.
Speaker 7 (32:43):
When you listen to the lake and arriety seventeen, men's
that young lady fight for her life. Don't just think okay,
a young woman died. Think of how she died, the
terror that she went through. And these children are sexual assaulted.
I still mback attract each other and LinkedIn dead people
at my feet. That baked it. Yet, illegal imigration is
(33:04):
not a Victimus crime. And so every sick person we
take off the streets, especially child rapists, it makes us
country much safer. And when we arrest public safety threat
one at a time, makes us country safer.
Speaker 1 (33:17):
This is exactly right, and it's exactly the attitude that
we need more from our public servants. We need people
that are willing to come into government and say, listen,
this is what we need to do. I'm going to
do it. I don't care if you don't like me,
I don't care if me doing this actually costs me
my position. It needs to be done, so I'm going
(33:39):
to do it. Consequences be damned. The Democrats, believe it
or not, actually have a grip on this concept. I mean,
they've passed Obamacare and it costs them control of the House,
but that was their agenda and they were willing to
kind of sacrifice each other to get that done, and
they did. Republicans are sort of notorious for having this problem.
They'll get them majority, but they're scared to do anything
(34:01):
with it because then they won't have the majority anymore.
People will get mad at them and they might lose
an election. It's the definition of having your cake and
eat it too. You have the cake, eat it, and
then go get another cake a few elections down the line,
when you've actually fixed the country. This is the first
time in a long time I feel like we have
a presidential administration that's not necessarily worried about that. That's
a good thing. Tom Holman's attitude here is the right
(34:24):
attitude to have shut the border down, get these people
out of here, and when the left loses their mind
about it, just tell them. Listen, I don't care. All right,
since we're on the topic of deportation, I want to
dig into some other big news. Of course, we had
the kill Maar Obrego Garcia case. That's the latest deportation
that the left lost their mind about. I want to
(34:44):
remind you real quick, we talked about this at the time.
During the campaign. Somebody asked Tom Holman about, Hey, is
there a way to deport illegal aliens that have children
in the United States that, because of birthright citizen are citizens.
And he kind of said jokingly, well, yeah, of course
children can be deported with their families, deport the whole
(35:06):
family together. And of course, at that time finally came
somebody who had had children in the United States. I
believe they had like some under ten year old children
that were citizens because they had been born in the
United States. The parent got deported, and so the government said, hey,
do you want to leave these children here in the
United States with a you know, friend, relative, family, somebody
that can care for them, or do you just want
(35:26):
to take them with you back to your home country.
And of course the parents said, I want to take
my kids with you, And of course the left lost
their mind about it and said, oh my god, the
Trump administration is deporting American citizen kids. And what they're
hoping you'll do is not look into this at all
and just assume that the Trump administration grabbed a couple
of brown children and threw them out of the country.
(35:49):
That's not what happened. This is a parent that said,
I want to take my children with me to my
home country. Here's Marco Rubio absolutely blowing this ridiculous narrative
out of the water.
Speaker 8 (35:58):
On the headline. That's a miss leading headline. Okay, three
US citizens ages four, seven and two were not deported.
Their mothers, who are legally in this country, were deported.
The children went with their mothers. If those children are
US citizens, they can come back into the United States
and there's their father or someone here who wants to
assume them. But ultimately who was deported was their mother.
Who's their mothers who were here illegally. The children just
(36:20):
went with their mothers. But they wasn't like you guys
make it sound like ice agents kick down the door
and grabbed the two year old and threw them on
an airplane. That's misleading. That's just not true.
Speaker 6 (36:30):
Just to be clear, because I do want to get
to the overhaul at the State Department. Is it the
US policy to deport children, even US citizens with their families,
and I hear what you're saying without due process, Just
to be very clear there, well.
Speaker 8 (36:45):
No, no, no, no, no again. If someone's in this country unlawfully, illegally,
that person gets deported. If that person is with a
two year old child or has a two year old
child and says, I want to take my child with
you with me, well, then what.
Speaker 1 (36:57):
You have two choices. You can say yes, of course.
Speaker 8 (36:59):
You can take your child, whether they're a citizen or not,
because it's your child. Or you can say yes, you
can go, but your child must stay behind. And then
your headlines would read US holding hostage two year old,
four year old, seven year old while mother deported. So
the mother, the parents make that choice. I imagine those
three US citizen children have fathers here in the United States.
They can stay with their father. That's up to their
(37:20):
family to decide where the children go. Children go with
their parents, parents decide where their children go. The US
deported their mothers who were illegally in America.
Speaker 1 (37:28):
I love this. Marco Rubio just blows this lady out
of the water. I don't know who this is exactly,
Kristen Welker with MSNBC I think, or maybe it's NBC,
I'm not sure, but she tries to double down on
this point. Did you deport these children, these American citizens?
Did you deport them without due process? No, we didn't.
(37:49):
We took these kids and we sent them with their
parents because that's what their parents wanted. The parent was
an illegal alien, they had a child. We deported the parent,
and we left it up to the parent. Do you
want to take your kid or do you want to
leave it here? And hey, credit to these parents for saying, hey,
I'm gonna take my kid with me. That's that's good
parenting right there. But I've said this before and I'll
(38:10):
say it again. Having a child in the United States
does not exempt you from the law. Just because you
had a kid in America doesn't mean you get to
stay in America. You're an illegal alien. You broke the
law to get here. There are punishments for that. Get
the hell out. If your child wants to come back later,
that's fine, they're a citizen. This really just goes to
show you that Trump and the Trump administration cannot do
(38:31):
anything right in the eyes of the media. I mean
you remember during Donald Trump's first term when they said
Donald Trump was separating families and putting kids in cages. Okay,
fair enough, We'll let parents take their kids with them
out of the country. This is what you guys wanted.
Don't complain now, all right, That's all I've got. We'll
be back on Wednesday, seven pm AM nine point fifty
KPRC in Houston or the free iHeartRadio app. Tune in.
(38:53):
I'll be glad to speak with you once again there.
Thank you very much
Speaker 7 (39:01):
To be
Popular Podcasts
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Therapy Gecko
An unlicensed lizard psychologist travels the universe talking to strangers about absolutely nothing. TO CALL THE GECKO: follow me on https://www.twitch.tv/lyleforever to get a notification for when I am taking calls. I am usually live Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays but lately a lot of other times too. I am a gecko.
The Joe Rogan Experience
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.