June 23, 2025 • 39 mins
Listen to The Next-Gen Report live! Sundays at 7:00 p.m. on AM950, KPRC.
The United States has officially entered the war with Iran. On Saturday, the U.S. bombed 3 key nuclear facilities in Iran. So where do we go from here?
Some members of the GOP base are once again upset with President Trump, and Rep. Mike Lee, after legislation was proposed to sell some Federal Land to build housing.
For the latest news, follow me on Instagram and X:
@the.ethanbuchanan
@_ethanbuchanan
The United States has officially entered the war with Iran. On Saturday, the U.S. bombed 3 key nuclear facilities in Iran. So where do we go from here?
Some members of the GOP base are once again upset with President Trump, and Rep. Mike Lee, after legislation was proposed to sell some Federal Land to build housing.
For the latest news, follow me on Instagram and X:
@the.ethanbuchanan
@_ethanbuchanan
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:02):
From the heart of the Space City to the heart
of gen Z. Welcome to Next Gen Conversation, not Dad's
Talk Radio.
Speaker 2 (00:12):
Ethan talks to you about the issues and events that
mat are to our generation.
Speaker 1 (00:18):
This is the Next Gen Report, put Ethan Buchanan.
Speaker 3 (00:23):
Hey, good Sunday evening, everybody.
Speaker 4 (00:26):
So how about that.
Speaker 3 (00:27):
That's a big, crazy news that broke yesterday. If you
missed a surprise, we bombed Iran. Wow, I did not
see that coming. I'll admit it. I didn't see it coming.
I really did think that we were just gonna let
Israel handle this one.
Speaker 4 (00:42):
But we didn't. We bombed Iran.
Speaker 3 (00:45):
Donald Trump put out on a truth social yesterday evening.
We have completed our very successful attack on three nuclear
sites in Iran, including four dough Natanz and s Fahan.
All planes are now outside of Iran airspace. A full
payload of bombs all caps was dropped fro on the
(01:05):
primary site four to h All planes are now safely
in it on their way home. Congratulations to our American warriors.
There's not another military in the world that could have
done this. Now is the time for peace. So essentially
what happened is the Air Force went in with bunker
buster bombs and turned Irene's nuclear enrichment sites basically into
(01:27):
massive craters, which, hey, I mean, if you gotta do it,
you gotta do it. And that's the point I want
to make on this. If this was completely necessary, the
Trump administration should explain to the American people exactly why
leave no doubt in our minds, show us exactly the
intelligence that said, this is how we know Iran is
(01:49):
about to have a nuclear bomb, and not only they're
just gonna have one, this is how we know they're
about to try to use it. Once I see that data,
I will be completely on board with this. As of
right now, I kind of wish we hadn't done it,
just because I don't think it was necessarily necessary. If
it was necessary, and they have info that I'm not
privy to, which very well could be the case. Fair enough,
(02:11):
fair enough, Here is a tidbit of Trump's press conference
right after we bombed Iran.
Speaker 5 (02:18):
With all of that being said, this cannot continue. There
will be either peace or there will be tragedy for Iran,
far greater than we have witnessed over the last eight days. Remember,
there are many targets left. The night's was the most
difficult of them all by far, and perhaps the most lethal.
(02:38):
But if peace does not come quickly, we will go
after those other targets with precision, speed, and skill. Most
of them can be taken out in a matter of minutes.
There's no military in the world that could have done
what we did tonight, not even close. There has never
been a military that could do what took place just
(02:59):
a little while ago.
Speaker 3 (03:01):
So that's basically him warning Iran listen, there is more
where that came from, so less negotiat and I will
remind you Trump has been very vocally trying to negotiate
with Iran for a long time. On this, he has,
and it hasn't been a secret. He's been very, very
open and consistent about the fact that he wants a
(03:21):
peaceful negotiation.
Speaker 4 (03:23):
He wants everybody to get along.
Speaker 3 (03:25):
He doesn't want to bomb Iran, but he will if
he has to, if he felt like he had to.
Speaker 4 (03:30):
I want to see why. I think that's fair.
Speaker 3 (03:34):
The good news is this does not appear, or at
least it doesn't look like the administration is interested in
a long drawn out war, and that's what a lot
of people's concerns are. They don't want America to get
in another long sandbox fight. And I think that's completely fair,
and I agree with that. I don't want us to
get in a long drawn out war in the Middle
(03:54):
East again either. And I'll remind you in his first term,
President Trump was able to carry out military operations against
Iran and Iranian officials without getting US involved in another
long drawn out, open conflict with Iran. And it appears
like this was in that same vein we knocked out
their nuclear sites.
Speaker 4 (04:14):
We don't want to go into a long drawn out war.
Speaker 3 (04:17):
Here's jd Vance on NBC News this morning saying that
can you rule out.
Speaker 2 (04:22):
That getting involved in this conflict won't eventually lead to
US boots on the ground. Well, the President's been very clear, Kristin,
we have no interest in a protracted conflict. We have
no interest in booths on the ground. That President has
actually been one of the fiercest critics of twenty five
years of failed foreign policy in the Middle East, which
(04:43):
is why he did what he did, a very precise,
a very surgical strike tailored to an American national interest,
and that national interest is Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon.
It would be a disaster for US and for our
allies in the region. So I don't fear that this
is going to become a protracted conflict because I think
that we have a president who knows what's in America's
interest and is willing to do the things necessary to
(05:06):
accomplish that interest.
Speaker 3 (05:08):
And hey, I have no problem with that, And in concept,
I think everybody kind of universally agrees that we don't
want Iran to have a nuclear bomb. I agree in
concept with that as well. But again, as I've said,
I don't necessarily think that them just having one is
caused to go to war, even though I don't want
them to have one. All that being said, the big
(05:30):
concern here from people in the magabase is that now
we're gonna go try to do a regime change like
we did in Afghanistan. Now we're gonna have another twenty
years in the sandbox like we did in Afghanistan.
Speaker 4 (05:40):
Lotty Dotty Dotty Dotti.
Speaker 3 (05:41):
Dom I cannot stress this enough.
Speaker 4 (05:45):
I am with you on not wanting that.
Speaker 3 (05:48):
As of right now, it looks like everybody else in
the Trump administration doesn't want that either, which means it
probably won't happen all right, here's Secretary of Defense Pete
Hegseth also saying, hey, we're not interested in doing a
regime change. We're not trying to out the Ayatola. We're
just trying to get him to not have a nuclear bomb.
Take a listen to this from Secretary of Defense Pete
(06:10):
Hegseth this morning at the Pentagon.
Speaker 6 (06:13):
This mission was not and has not been about regime change.
The President authorized a precision operation to neutralize the threats
to our national interests posed by the Iranian nuclear program
and the collective self defense of our troops and our
ally Israel.
Speaker 3 (06:32):
The question now is where do we go from here? Right,
we've shown I ran our force. We hit them with
the stick. Now we need to offer them a carrot.
That's what has to happen here. This is negotiation. It
seems like Trump is trying to do that. He's trying
to say, hey, we're not gonna try anything else. Unless
you try anything else. Don't touch our troops. We won't
touch you. Let's have some peace talks. Let's have some negotiation.
(06:56):
I do still truly believe that Trump wants to negotiate
rather than bomb the crap out of the Iyatolas. So
let's cross our fingers and hope for that. Right, here's
what I want.
Speaker 4 (07:07):
To warn you all about.
Speaker 3 (07:08):
Remember, we had four years of completely wide open border.
We know terrorists got into this country. It's safe to
assume that some of those terrorists that got in are
connected to the Iranian regime. So I want to warn
you to be careful out there. Keep your head on
a swivel. If you have a firearm and know how
to use it, carry it with you, be ready to
(07:29):
defend yourself. That's why we have a second Amendment. Keep
an eye out there. I'm not saying live your entire
life and fear because there's going to be.
Speaker 4 (07:35):
A terror attack.
Speaker 3 (07:36):
There probably won't be, but there might be because we
just pissed off a big state sponsor of terror.
Speaker 4 (07:41):
So be ready.
Speaker 3 (07:42):
All right, we've got a great show coming up for you.
We will be right back after this break. I'm Methan
Buchanan and this is the next General Report on AM
nine fifty KPRC. All right, we've got more controversy inside
(08:23):
the GOP base.
Speaker 4 (08:25):
This is fine, this is actually a good thing.
Speaker 3 (08:27):
Actually, I like the fact that we actually have public
discussions and debates and arguments inside the GOP base. The
left flix to paint this every time to Republicans disagree
on something that like, oh my god, you guys can't
agree on anything, you can't govern.
Speaker 4 (08:45):
No, we are actually just not a monolith.
Speaker 3 (08:47):
We accept people with different ideas and different philosophies into
our coalition and then we actually debate and discuss those
ideas and try to figure out which one is best,
and then vote and do politics accordingly.
Speaker 4 (09:00):
That's how all of government should work.
Speaker 3 (09:02):
But because the Democrat Party is just a top down
you have to agree with us or will kick you
out of the party, the GOP by comparison, looks a
whole lot more splintered and unorganized. I don't think we're
as unorganized as we are. We just actually have discussions
and disagree on things, which is a good thing.
Speaker 4 (09:23):
That's what you want.
Speaker 3 (09:25):
So we're gonna talk a little bit about housing in
this segment, and that is because that is kind of
the root issue in the latest controversy that erupted over
the last couple of days inside the GOP. SO Senator
Mike Lee has proposed a bill to sell some federal
land so that we can build housing on it. I
(09:47):
don't necessarily hate this idea. I don't necessarily love this idea.
A lot of people are attacking Mike Lee for this.
I remind you this is not solely Mike Lee's idea.
Donald Trump actually brought this up and sort of campaigned
on this a little bit back in twenty twenty four.
Speaker 4 (10:05):
Here's Trump in twenty.
Speaker 3 (10:06):
Twenty four suggesting the idea of saying, Hey, let's sell
some federal land so that we can build some housing
on it.
Speaker 4 (10:12):
Take a listen, an.
Speaker 2 (10:14):
Issue here in Solva availability and cli plenty your policy
saying we're seeing more federal lands pulling a house.
Speaker 1 (10:21):
Ye have that here?
Speaker 5 (10:23):
A issue here, Well, well, we want to have land
so we can have housing built. In certain areas like
this area, they don't have the housing, and we have
so much land.
Speaker 1 (10:36):
And we want to put it to you.
Speaker 5 (10:37):
So we're gonna have land release and on that land
we're gonna build housing.
Speaker 1 (10:41):
We're gonna have housing built.
Speaker 4 (10:43):
Okay, So he's addressing an important problem.
Speaker 3 (10:47):
We do have a significant housing deficit in the United States,
and anyone who's even gone apartment hunting recently can can
easily tell this real estate is super expensive right now,
buying homes is super expensive. Right now, This isn't controversial
to say. Everybody knows this to be true. This is
objectively a fact. Go on, Zillo and tell me we
(11:08):
don't have a housing problem in this country.
Speaker 4 (11:10):
We clearly do. We clearly do.
Speaker 3 (11:13):
So, just to run some numbers for you, the housing deficit,
the amount of housing we have versus the amount of
housing we need, according to some estimates, can be upwards
of seven point three million units, as in, we have
seven point three million fewer houses than what we need.
(11:36):
Essentially seven point three million people need houses and they're
not available.
Speaker 4 (11:40):
What does that do to the price.
Speaker 3 (11:41):
Obviously we know that price is the intersection of supply
and demand. If your supply is way down seven point
three million units lower than it needs to be, obviously
that's going to shoot up your price because demand isn't
going anywhere. We keep making more people, and those people
eventually need somewhere to live, and on top of that
bringing in imported people.
Speaker 4 (12:02):
Those people in need places to live too.
Speaker 3 (12:03):
So obviously this problem gets worse if you don't address
it quickly significantly. So this is one plan to do that.
I don't hate the idea. A lot of Republicans got
all up in arms because you know, we like nature, right,
that's not controversial. We love our national parks, our national monuments.
I'm a big believer in the national monuments as well.
(12:25):
I'm a big believer in preserving particularly war history. I
love Gettysburg. I visited to Gettysburg. That's I believe a
national park or a national monument. I don't know which specifically,
but obviously that's a beautiful piece of federally owned land
that is obviously incredibly important to our culture and our
history as Americans and should not be sold. Clearly, that
(12:48):
is true. And of course the Grand Canyon. You know,
you can list important pieces of federal land that you
don't want to be sold for days on end. Obviously
those should not be touched. And a lot of conservatives
people inside the base immediately got upset over this, saying, hey,
we don't want these beautiful pieces of land to be sold.
(13:11):
So that's that's true, that's true. I want to give
you guys some important data here. About six hundred and
forty million acres of land in the United States is
owned by the federal government. That is a big number.
That is a huge number. For context, only about eighty
(13:34):
million acres. Of that land includes things like national parks,
national monuments, and various other historical sites. The numbers there,
that's twelve point five percent of the total six hundred
and forty million acres of land owned by the United States.
So we can afford to sell off quite a bit
(13:55):
of federal land before we get anywhere near the the
you know, national parks, national monuments, any of those historic sites,
any of the federal land people actually care about. We
can sell a lot of land before we get into
sort of that area. People are very upset over Senator
(14:16):
Mike Lee for his bill, and for the record, his
bill proposes selling less than one percent of the total
federal land. Less than thirteen percent of the total federal
land is parks, monuments and things like that. And Mike
Lee wants to sell less than one percent, and that's
still millions of acres that you then open up for development.
(14:39):
So I think the attacks against Mike Lee and the
attacks against his bill are misguided. However, I do agree
that it shouldn't be necessary. We should not have to
sell this land. And let me explain to you why
I told you we have roughly seven point five depending
on the estimate roughly seven point five million fewer homes
(15:02):
than what we need. We have, according to the estimates
that I kind of trust a little bit more, roughly
twenty million illegal aliens in the United States. All of
those illegal aliens in the United States are living somewhere, right,
even if they're homeless where some of them are. That
(15:23):
still let's say ten million half the illegal aliens are
completely homeless, which is not the case. But even then,
we could deport half of those and we'd have all
the housing that we need, because that would leave us
with ten million illegal aliens that have homes. And if
we deport those, that clears the deficit. Right there, the
(15:43):
housing deficit is gone. But we have twenty million illegal aliens.
Most of them are in some form of housing. Maybe
that's like a charitable homeless shelter or what have you.
But so so, if we deport those twenty million illegal aliens,
our housing deficit disappears overnight like that.
Speaker 4 (16:00):
It's gone.
Speaker 3 (16:01):
So if you want a good reason to support deporting
every single illegal alien, there you go.
Speaker 4 (16:06):
It'll bring down your.
Speaker 3 (16:06):
Housing costs significantly pretty quickly.
Speaker 1 (16:10):
Too.
Speaker 3 (16:11):
Another issue that was pointed out to me by my
friend Chris Johnson. He's a GOP strategist. You may have
seen him on Fox. He's on there a lot. One
of the bigger issues isn't that we don't have land
to build housing on. It's that we have land that
we can't build housing on. We have a lot of
red tape that basically blocks developers or makes it prohibitively
(16:35):
expensive to build new housing inside a lot of places
where people actually want to live. It's incredibly difficult to
build a new housing unit in a lot of these
left wing cities that a lot of people want to
live in. And I say left wing cities, what I
really mean is just any city. But you have to
go through so much paperwork, so much red tape. It
(16:55):
takes so long, and it's so expensive because remember it's
not just filing paperwork. You have to pay somebody to
file that paperwork. That's extra cost on you, the developer.
So we could do two.
Speaker 4 (17:07):
Things right now.
Speaker 3 (17:08):
We could all start saying, at the state, federal, and
local levels, we're going to clear out some of this
paperwork and make it easier and cheaper for people to
build houses. And at the same time, we're going to
deport all of the illegal aliens that are sucking up
our housing resources, and that would completely negate the need
for all this federal land being sold off to build
(17:29):
more houses. That I believe is the better strategy. Let's
do that before we start worrying about selling federal land.
And then once we get to the point where, hey,
we do need to sell some federal land. We have
federal land to spare guys. We can sell that and
be fine. We don't have to touch the national parks.
There's a lot of land that the US government just
has and doesn't do anything with, and we could be
(17:52):
making some money off of that. I don't necessarily hate
that idea. All right, we'll be right Backstay tuned, hey,
(18:16):
all the next Gen report. I'm Ethan Buchanan at Underscore
Ethan Buchanan on X. All right, So the Homeland Security
Twitter page X page is one of my favorite pages
on X right now, and I'll tell you why. Despite
the big No King's protests and all the leftists throwing
(18:38):
this unbelievable temper tantrum, deportations have continued to pace as
they should. Praise the Lord. Get these people out of here.
They do not belong in our country. Get them all out,
and that's exactly what the Trump administration is doing. And
of course the Democrats and their allies in the mainstream
(18:59):
media continue to absolutely lose their mind over it.
Speaker 4 (19:05):
I'll give you an example.
Speaker 3 (19:06):
Actually, I'll give you a handful of examples, because this
has been fun for me to watch. So this is
from WKRN. I don't know that's I believe some local
Tennessee TV station. I'm not familiar WKRN dot com. You
can go do the research on your own. I don't
frankly care what mainstream outlet this comes from. What's important.
(19:27):
Here is the headline. Father deported after traffic stop in
Robertson County. Family torn apart. Oh my god, how could they?
How could the evil, vile, fascist dictator Trump administration do
this a minor traffic violation and they deport this guy,
(19:52):
tearing apart and destroying his family.
Speaker 4 (19:56):
How did you do this?
Speaker 3 (19:59):
It's evil and viol right, I mean that headline tells
you the whole story, doesn't it.
Speaker 4 (20:04):
No, it doesn't.
Speaker 3 (20:06):
Thankfully, the Homeland Security Twitter is here to give us
the facts. DHS dot gov on ext responded with a
picture of the headline and it says, why does the
media continue to do the bidding of these violent, criminal
illegal aliens. Hilario Martinez Garcia is a criminal, illegal alien
(20:27):
whose rap sheet includes domestic violence, felony, burglary charges, attempts
to cast him as a sympathetic figure, ignore the facts,
and insult the victims of his crimes. He was deported
and is no longer a threat to the safety of Americans.
I mean, this guy is not the type of guy
(20:48):
that we want in the country, right, I mean, do
you want a bunch of you know, burglary folks. What's
the burglar? Is that the term burglar? And you know
wife beater in this country? Is that what you want?
And here's the mainstream media saying, Oh, he's he's just
a father. They just supported him for a traffic stop. No,
(21:10):
he was an illegal alien and a criminal and we
got him the hell out of the country. Why is
the mainstream media covering for him. I still can't make
heads or tails of that. I understand why the Democrats
want these illegal aliens here. I don't understand what these
media outlets have to gain from lying about it.
Speaker 4 (21:28):
That's what confuses me.
Speaker 3 (21:32):
The Los Angeles Dodgers are also doing their part here.
To just outright lie about what's going on with border enforcement.
And again, the Dodgers are an interesting franchise to me
because for no particular reason, they have taken it upon
themselves to be the most obnoxiously left wing organization in
(21:56):
all of professional sports.
Speaker 4 (21:58):
And I get that.
Speaker 3 (22:00):
They're in LA and most of their fan base are
woke liberals. I understand that, but I mean, the Lakers
don't do this the what is it the Chargers, the
LA Chargers, they don't do this either. What is it
about the Dodgers that just makes them so ridiculously woke?
Speaker 4 (22:19):
I don't know.
Speaker 3 (22:20):
They've taken it upon themselves to just start outright lying
about what's going on in Los Angeles. As we know,
that has been kind of ground zero for a lot
of ice enforcement because it is a sanctuary city. By
the way, I voted for that put pressure on sanctuary cities.
Speaker 4 (22:38):
Send all of the federal law enforcement.
Speaker 3 (22:40):
You can to these sanctuary cities to enforce our immigration laws.
Punish the sanctuary cities for attempting to obstruct the enforcement
of our immigration laws, make it difficult for them to
do that. I support that, But anyway, the Los Angeles
Dodgers on the nineteenth tweeted out this morning, ICE agents
(23:01):
came to Dodger Stadium and requested permission to access the
parking lots. They were denied entry to the grounds by
the organization. Tonight's game will be played as scheduled. So
this is a lie. This didn't happen, not even a
little bit. Homeland SECURITYDHS dot gov on X went and
(23:22):
took the time to refute this. CBP vehicles were in
the stadium parking lot very briefly unrelated to any operation
or enforcement, as in, like some officer in a CBP
vehicle was just parking their car real quickly to pull
out their phone and check a map for directions or
see where the quickest place to go get a quick bite.
Speaker 4 (23:43):
To eat would be a drive through.
Speaker 3 (23:46):
They weren't even doing enforcement, and it wasn't even ICE,
it was just Customs and Border patrol, and they were
just parking there for just a second, not even to
actually enforce any immigration laws. They just happened to find
a parking lot and they parked there.
Speaker 4 (24:00):
And yet the.
Speaker 3 (24:01):
Dodgers go and try to jump up a bunch of
faux outrage on X.
Speaker 4 (24:07):
By just outright line, Why what do they have to
gain here?
Speaker 3 (24:13):
US Immigration and Customs Enforcement ICE dot gov actually on
their Twitter also refuted this.
Speaker 4 (24:19):
They just tweeted it out false. We were never there. Again,
what do these people have to gain?
Speaker 3 (24:29):
And of course some leftists I'm sorry about my mic,
some leftists on Twitter.
Speaker 4 (24:34):
This is just awful.
Speaker 3 (24:35):
People can't go to work, they can't get groceries or
even enjoy a baseball game without the threat of getting
detained and or deported. Oh how horrible, Oh how horrible.
Illegal aliens who committed crimes can't go through their daily
life without the fear of the consequences of their actions
coming back to haunt them. This is so difficult and horrible.
(24:57):
I have no sympathy. I don't I just don't care.
It's ridiculous. It is ridiculous. I think part of the
reason is they know that if people get angry enough,
they will be you know, retribution on these ICE agents.
Speaker 4 (25:15):
We've already seen that. I mean, it's it's very clear.
Speaker 3 (25:19):
According to government data, assaults of ICE agents are up
five hundred percent since this sort of ramping up of
deportations began. So I guess that would be like January twentieth,
when Trump took office or twenty first, I don't remember
which one it was. Here's Jerry Nadler. He's confused by
(25:40):
all of this. Obviously, if you're an ICE agent right now,
you're a little bit worried about, you know, people doxing
your family doxing you. And of course that's on top
of all the concerns you already have with the cartels,
because remember, these are violent terrorist organizations that will act
on you if you're trying to hurt their operation. I mean,
this is a cartel, this is a gang. If you
(26:02):
make it more difficult for them to make money, they
will attack you. So if you're an ICE agent, obviously
you're wearing a mask, you're hiding your identity. You're clearly
identifying yourself as law enforcement. But hey, you know, you're
probably going to be in a viral clip of some
illegal alien, maybe a cartel member, getting arrested and deported.
As so the cartels are going to want to get you. Obviously,
(26:24):
the Left is going to want to get you because
the mainstream media and the Dodgers are spreading false narratives
about how terrible and evil you are. So you cover
your face because you have a family This isn't complicated,
This isn't confusing. Jerry Nabbler is confused. Take a listen
to this.
Speaker 7 (26:38):
But these people are wearing masks, are and are total
and are totally unidentified. And the question is why. The
question is why. It's completely improper. And again one has
to assume they're hiding something or they're hiding misbehavior, because otherwise,
why would they be wearing masks and denying their identities.
Speaker 3 (26:57):
Because you people are crazy and are attacked them. This
isn't confusing, This isn't controversial. Again, isations are facing a
five hundred percent increase in assaults thanks to rhetoric like this.
That's via Rapid Response forty seven the official White House
or a official white House X account. That's why they're
covering their faces. These people that know that if these
(27:19):
crazy psychopath leftists identify me in one of these viral
videos of me just doing my job enforcing our country's
laws and making America safer, some ridiculous leftist on Facebook
or Instagram or X is going to go searching and
find my identity. Because your identity is available. If you
(27:40):
are a public employee, you can be found, and your
home where you live can be found. Your social media's
who you bank with can be found, and they will
find it, and they will make it public. They will
dox you, they will come after your wife and family. Again,
these are the same leftists who have no problem burning
down cop cars, attacking federal buildings, lighting police stations on
(28:04):
fire back in twenty twenty.
Speaker 4 (28:06):
If you remember that.
Speaker 3 (28:08):
You really think they're gonna have an issue with saying, hey,
this guy's a Nazi and he's where his family lives.
Speaker 4 (28:14):
And again, what happened to the punch the Nazi narrative? Right?
Speaker 3 (28:19):
You really don't think it's plausible that these people are
worried about their families being attacked because they're just doing
their jobs. They're being constantly lied about and smeared. What's
really sad about this is the fact that these people
really are heroes. They should be able to not wear
a mask, be identified, get a heroes, welcome wherever they go,
and know that their federal government, the law enforcement, the
(28:41):
military will have their back against the cartels and the citizen.
We will treat them as the heroes they are for
making our country safer. But instead they have to worry about, Hey,
if I do my job and protect this country. Is
my family going to pay the price for it? That's
why they're wearing masks. Jerry Nadler, you jackass. All right,
stay two, we'll be right back, all right. I need
(29:22):
to make you all aware of a disturbing trend that
I have noticed.
Speaker 4 (29:30):
I'm Ethan Buchannan. This is the Next Gen Report.
Speaker 3 (29:31):
By the way, if you're just tuning in at underscore
Ethan Buchannan on XBU C H A N A N
have you noticed that, for whatever reason, the Democrats always
and by Democrats, I'm just being kind of leftists in general,
always try really hard to incorporate music into their protests,
(29:55):
their activism.
Speaker 4 (29:56):
Lottie Dottie Doll.
Speaker 3 (29:58):
And that's fine in principle, in concept, I mean protest songs,
and you know, music has always been a part of
a political protest to a certain extent, or just culture
in general, anything going on. I mean, every time there's
a war, there's a bunch of songs written about wars.
Anytime there's a big movement, there's songs written about it.
Songs that you know, our song at Chance and protests
(30:21):
and money United. Also it's not necessarily anything new, but
it's definitely getting worse. And by worse, I mean the
Left keeps trying to do this and they're not good
at it. It used to be only the really good
kind of protests, anthems and marches. Those would be the
ones that kind of make it into the public view.
(30:43):
Thanks to the Internet largely now every single terrible protest
song written by a ridiculous Democrat becomes some viral sensation.
I bring to you now the latest example of this Democrat, Rep.
Hank Johnson, who got out his electric guitar in his
office and decided to sing.
Speaker 4 (31:03):
A protest song.
Speaker 3 (31:05):
And I have posted a number of these on my
ex page in the past. This is by no means
the first. Unfortunately, he won't be the last. Take a
listen to Representative Hank Johnson and his amazing guitar and
vocal skills. Quite the lyricist I might have had as well.
Take a listen.
Speaker 8 (31:24):
Just recently picked it up, thought I would try it out.
I hate to hurt your ears and everything, but I'm
just learning to play guitar.
Speaker 4 (31:32):
Okay, before we get into it. I gotta give him
a pat on the.
Speaker 3 (31:37):
Back for at least his self awareness. He knows what
he's about to do should be classified as a war crime,
but he's gonna do it anyway.
Speaker 4 (31:46):
But at least he knows and gives us a warning.
Speaker 3 (31:48):
I can I can appreciate that to a certain extent,
all right, with no further ado, take it away, Representative
Hank Johnson.
Speaker 8 (31:54):
And so I'm compelled with a new guitar and with
some thoughts about that old song. Hey Joe, you know,
to give some commentary on where we are now, And
if y'all don't mind, I'm gonna just strum a little bit.
Speaker 1 (32:15):
Hey Trump, Where you going with that gun in your hand?
Hey Trump? Where you going with that gun in your hand?
Speaker 4 (32:42):
Okay?
Speaker 3 (32:42):
It is at this point that I would like to
reach out to any guitar players out there and let
me know is it supposed to sound like that? Because
I'm not a guitar expert. I'm not a stringed instrument expert.
The only music I've ever really dabbled in his vocals,
I was in a choir and percussion, so I'm not
(33:06):
familiar with stringed instruments. I know there is particular styles
where you kind of want it slightly out of tune.
Speaker 4 (33:13):
I don't know if this song that.
Speaker 3 (33:15):
I guess he's doing a parody of a song called
Hey Joe, and he's replacing the name Joe with Trump,
which is just brilliant lyricist. Right there, Way to go.
But I'm almost positive that that guitar is out of
tune and it shouldn't be.
Speaker 4 (33:32):
I could be wrong. That could be just the style
or what have you. I don't know.
Speaker 3 (33:36):
If you're a guitar person and you know, please reach
out to me at Ethan Buchanan on x Underscore Ethan
Buchanan and tell me, because I'm a thousand percent sure
that guitar is attitude.
Speaker 1 (33:50):
I'm going down the street shoot down democracy. You know,
I want to be a kink some day. I'm going
down and shut Themcracy down. You know, I want to
be the king someday. Hey Donald Trump, we won't let
(34:26):
you take out the Mcracy down.
Speaker 8 (34:29):
Take it down to the ground, Hey.
Speaker 3 (34:38):
Trump, Okay, I can't deal with this anymore. This is terrible.
I'm sorry I played it for that long. What are
you doing?
Speaker 4 (34:47):
Dude? Hey, his voice isn't great.
Speaker 3 (34:54):
His guitar playing, I guess, is completely average. But again,
the darn thing sounds out of tune. I'm almost positive
it's out of tune. I just why do they do this?
Why do they do it so badly? If you want
to write a good protest song, if you want to
write a good anti Trump anthem, write a good one, man.
(35:16):
Come on, it can't be that hard. It can't be
that hard. I mean, we got some really good pro
Trump music out there from a number of different artists.
It can't be that hard to write a song about
how bad he is. All right, here's another video of
some leftist lady who just she doesn't understand how in
the world we're so bothered by illegal immigration. I was
(35:39):
gonna talk about this one. I talked about housing, but
I ran out of time in that segment. So we're
gonna play this video now because I need to cleanse
my palette of that music. So we need to we
need to cleanse our minds of the terrible Democrat music
with just terrible democrat whining about enforcement of immigration laws.
Speaker 4 (35:56):
Take a listen to this.
Speaker 9 (35:56):
Lady can somewhat smarter than me, help me very genuinely
understand why I'm supposed to care if people immigrate to
the US illegally, Like obviously, some people are just racist,
and some people are just stupid, right of course, But
even like left leaning people say, you know, well, you
got to do something about the border. Why could I
(36:22):
don't understand why this should bother me in any way
if as many people as want to come here, So
if somebody could help me understand that, that would be great,
because right now I just don't know why I should
give a shit.
Speaker 3 (36:38):
All right, So normally i'd say this is radical leftism,
but actually I'm gonna just chalk this one up to
this lady is completely stupid, That's what I'm gonna say.
And she asked for somebody smarter than her to explain
to her. And I try not to make myself out
to be some sort of super genius, because pride cometh
before the fall, and I'm really not all that bright.
I just have some common sense, et cetera, et cetera.
(36:58):
But I'm confident in claiming the title of smarter than
this lady. Excuse me, why should as many people as
want to not just come here? I'll give you three
reasonsons the murder of Lake and Riley, the murder of
Justin Nongray, the murder of Rachel Morin.
Speaker 4 (37:21):
Whether she actually truly believes it or not.
Speaker 3 (37:24):
The point she just made here is any single person
should be able to just walk across the border into
the United States and we shouldn't have any problem with that. Okay,
these people's killers did exactly that. I just gave you
three names, just three, and these are three high profile cases.
There are tons of other ones that didn't get the
(37:46):
same media attention of people being killed by illegal aliens
who just walked across the border. That's why we should
care who comes across. That's why we need to have
control over our borders. On top of that, if you
just let twenty million illegal aliens walk across the border
over four years, you can let twenty million people in
(38:07):
way faster than it takes you to build twenty million
units of housing.
Speaker 4 (38:11):
The price goes up. I guarantee you.
Speaker 3 (38:14):
At some point this same lady has gone and complained
about how expensive it is for her to find a home.
This is why the cost of living goes up. I
hate to break it to you, but the Left really
is just stupid. That's all it really is here. And
I'm not saying that to be mean. I'm saying that
to point out a real fact. These people need to
(38:34):
be educated. That's it, all right, listen, That's all I've
got for you today this week. Stay tuned. We'll be
back on Wednesday again. If you want to reach out
to me to talk about any of these topics, you
can find me on social media, specifically on x Underscore
Ethan Buchanan. Reach out to me there. I'd love to
hear from you. Thank you very much for listening to
the Next gener Report right here on AM nine fifty KPRC.
Speaker 1 (39:00):
The point of seat is top
From the heart of the Space City to the heart
of gen Z. Welcome to Next Gen Conversation, not Dad's
Talk Radio.
Speaker 2 (00:12):
Ethan talks to you about the issues and events that
mat are to our generation.
Speaker 1 (00:18):
This is the Next Gen Report, put Ethan Buchanan.
Speaker 3 (00:23):
Hey, good Sunday evening, everybody.
Speaker 4 (00:26):
So how about that.
Speaker 3 (00:27):
That's a big, crazy news that broke yesterday. If you
missed a surprise, we bombed Iran. Wow, I did not
see that coming. I'll admit it. I didn't see it coming.
I really did think that we were just gonna let
Israel handle this one.
Speaker 4 (00:42):
But we didn't. We bombed Iran.
Speaker 3 (00:45):
Donald Trump put out on a truth social yesterday evening.
We have completed our very successful attack on three nuclear
sites in Iran, including four dough Natanz and s Fahan.
All planes are now outside of Iran airspace. A full
payload of bombs all caps was dropped fro on the
(01:05):
primary site four to h All planes are now safely
in it on their way home. Congratulations to our American warriors.
There's not another military in the world that could have
done this. Now is the time for peace. So essentially
what happened is the Air Force went in with bunker
buster bombs and turned Irene's nuclear enrichment sites basically into
(01:27):
massive craters, which, hey, I mean, if you gotta do it,
you gotta do it. And that's the point I want
to make on this. If this was completely necessary, the
Trump administration should explain to the American people exactly why
leave no doubt in our minds, show us exactly the
intelligence that said, this is how we know Iran is
(01:49):
about to have a nuclear bomb, and not only they're
just gonna have one, this is how we know they're
about to try to use it. Once I see that data,
I will be completely on board with this. As of
right now, I kind of wish we hadn't done it,
just because I don't think it was necessarily necessary. If
it was necessary, and they have info that I'm not
privy to, which very well could be the case. Fair enough,
(02:11):
fair enough, Here is a tidbit of Trump's press conference
right after we bombed Iran.
Speaker 5 (02:18):
With all of that being said, this cannot continue. There
will be either peace or there will be tragedy for Iran,
far greater than we have witnessed over the last eight days. Remember,
there are many targets left. The night's was the most
difficult of them all by far, and perhaps the most lethal.
(02:38):
But if peace does not come quickly, we will go
after those other targets with precision, speed, and skill. Most
of them can be taken out in a matter of minutes.
There's no military in the world that could have done
what we did tonight, not even close. There has never
been a military that could do what took place just
(02:59):
a little while ago.
Speaker 3 (03:01):
So that's basically him warning Iran listen, there is more
where that came from, so less negotiat and I will
remind you Trump has been very vocally trying to negotiate
with Iran for a long time. On this, he has,
and it hasn't been a secret. He's been very, very
open and consistent about the fact that he wants a
(03:21):
peaceful negotiation.
Speaker 4 (03:23):
He wants everybody to get along.
Speaker 3 (03:25):
He doesn't want to bomb Iran, but he will if
he has to, if he felt like he had to.
Speaker 4 (03:30):
I want to see why. I think that's fair.
Speaker 3 (03:34):
The good news is this does not appear, or at
least it doesn't look like the administration is interested in
a long drawn out war, and that's what a lot
of people's concerns are. They don't want America to get
in another long sandbox fight. And I think that's completely fair,
and I agree with that. I don't want us to
get in a long drawn out war in the Middle
(03:54):
East again either. And I'll remind you in his first term,
President Trump was able to carry out military operations against
Iran and Iranian officials without getting US involved in another
long drawn out, open conflict with Iran. And it appears
like this was in that same vein we knocked out
their nuclear sites.
Speaker 4 (04:14):
We don't want to go into a long drawn out war.
Speaker 3 (04:17):
Here's jd Vance on NBC News this morning saying that
can you rule out.
Speaker 2 (04:22):
That getting involved in this conflict won't eventually lead to
US boots on the ground. Well, the President's been very clear, Kristin,
we have no interest in a protracted conflict. We have
no interest in booths on the ground. That President has
actually been one of the fiercest critics of twenty five
years of failed foreign policy in the Middle East, which
(04:43):
is why he did what he did, a very precise,
a very surgical strike tailored to an American national interest,
and that national interest is Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon.
It would be a disaster for US and for our
allies in the region. So I don't fear that this
is going to become a protracted conflict because I think
that we have a president who knows what's in America's
interest and is willing to do the things necessary to
(05:06):
accomplish that interest.
Speaker 3 (05:08):
And hey, I have no problem with that, And in concept,
I think everybody kind of universally agrees that we don't
want Iran to have a nuclear bomb. I agree in
concept with that as well. But again, as I've said,
I don't necessarily think that them just having one is
caused to go to war, even though I don't want
them to have one. All that being said, the big
(05:30):
concern here from people in the magabase is that now
we're gonna go try to do a regime change like
we did in Afghanistan. Now we're gonna have another twenty
years in the sandbox like we did in Afghanistan.
Speaker 4 (05:40):
Lotty Dotty Dotty Dotti.
Speaker 3 (05:41):
Dom I cannot stress this enough.
Speaker 4 (05:45):
I am with you on not wanting that.
Speaker 3 (05:48):
As of right now, it looks like everybody else in
the Trump administration doesn't want that either, which means it
probably won't happen all right, here's Secretary of Defense Pete
Hegseth also saying, hey, we're not interested in doing a
regime change. We're not trying to out the Ayatola. We're
just trying to get him to not have a nuclear bomb.
Take a listen to this from Secretary of Defense Pete
(06:10):
Hegseth this morning at the Pentagon.
Speaker 6 (06:13):
This mission was not and has not been about regime change.
The President authorized a precision operation to neutralize the threats
to our national interests posed by the Iranian nuclear program
and the collective self defense of our troops and our
ally Israel.
Speaker 3 (06:32):
The question now is where do we go from here? Right,
we've shown I ran our force. We hit them with
the stick. Now we need to offer them a carrot.
That's what has to happen here. This is negotiation. It
seems like Trump is trying to do that. He's trying
to say, hey, we're not gonna try anything else. Unless
you try anything else. Don't touch our troops. We won't
touch you. Let's have some peace talks. Let's have some negotiation.
(06:56):
I do still truly believe that Trump wants to negotiate
rather than bomb the crap out of the Iyatolas. So
let's cross our fingers and hope for that. Right, here's
what I want.
Speaker 4 (07:07):
To warn you all about.
Speaker 3 (07:08):
Remember, we had four years of completely wide open border.
We know terrorists got into this country. It's safe to
assume that some of those terrorists that got in are
connected to the Iranian regime. So I want to warn
you to be careful out there. Keep your head on
a swivel. If you have a firearm and know how
to use it, carry it with you, be ready to
(07:29):
defend yourself. That's why we have a second Amendment. Keep
an eye out there. I'm not saying live your entire
life and fear because there's going to be.
Speaker 4 (07:35):
A terror attack.
Speaker 3 (07:36):
There probably won't be, but there might be because we
just pissed off a big state sponsor of terror.
Speaker 4 (07:41):
So be ready.
Speaker 3 (07:42):
All right, we've got a great show coming up for you.
We will be right back after this break. I'm Methan
Buchanan and this is the next General Report on AM
nine fifty KPRC. All right, we've got more controversy inside
(08:23):
the GOP base.
Speaker 4 (08:25):
This is fine, this is actually a good thing.
Speaker 3 (08:27):
Actually, I like the fact that we actually have public
discussions and debates and arguments inside the GOP base. The
left flix to paint this every time to Republicans disagree
on something that like, oh my god, you guys can't
agree on anything, you can't govern.
Speaker 4 (08:45):
No, we are actually just not a monolith.
Speaker 3 (08:47):
We accept people with different ideas and different philosophies into
our coalition and then we actually debate and discuss those
ideas and try to figure out which one is best,
and then vote and do politics accordingly.
Speaker 4 (09:00):
That's how all of government should work.
Speaker 3 (09:02):
But because the Democrat Party is just a top down
you have to agree with us or will kick you
out of the party, the GOP by comparison, looks a
whole lot more splintered and unorganized. I don't think we're
as unorganized as we are. We just actually have discussions
and disagree on things, which is a good thing.
Speaker 4 (09:23):
That's what you want.
Speaker 3 (09:25):
So we're gonna talk a little bit about housing in
this segment, and that is because that is kind of
the root issue in the latest controversy that erupted over
the last couple of days inside the GOP. SO Senator
Mike Lee has proposed a bill to sell some federal
land so that we can build housing on it. I
(09:47):
don't necessarily hate this idea. I don't necessarily love this idea.
A lot of people are attacking Mike Lee for this.
I remind you this is not solely Mike Lee's idea.
Donald Trump actually brought this up and sort of campaigned
on this a little bit back in twenty twenty four.
Speaker 4 (10:05):
Here's Trump in twenty.
Speaker 3 (10:06):
Twenty four suggesting the idea of saying, Hey, let's sell
some federal land so that we can build some housing
on it.
Speaker 4 (10:12):
Take a listen, an.
Speaker 2 (10:14):
Issue here in Solva availability and cli plenty your policy
saying we're seeing more federal lands pulling a house.
Speaker 1 (10:21):
Ye have that here?
Speaker 5 (10:23):
A issue here, Well, well, we want to have land
so we can have housing built. In certain areas like
this area, they don't have the housing, and we have
so much land.
Speaker 1 (10:36):
And we want to put it to you.
Speaker 5 (10:37):
So we're gonna have land release and on that land
we're gonna build housing.
Speaker 1 (10:41):
We're gonna have housing built.
Speaker 4 (10:43):
Okay, So he's addressing an important problem.
Speaker 3 (10:47):
We do have a significant housing deficit in the United States,
and anyone who's even gone apartment hunting recently can can
easily tell this real estate is super expensive right now,
buying homes is super expensive. Right now, This isn't controversial
to say. Everybody knows this to be true. This is
objectively a fact. Go on, Zillo and tell me we
(11:08):
don't have a housing problem in this country.
Speaker 4 (11:10):
We clearly do. We clearly do.
Speaker 3 (11:13):
So, just to run some numbers for you, the housing deficit,
the amount of housing we have versus the amount of
housing we need, according to some estimates, can be upwards
of seven point three million units, as in, we have
seven point three million fewer houses than what we need.
(11:36):
Essentially seven point three million people need houses and they're
not available.
Speaker 4 (11:40):
What does that do to the price.
Speaker 3 (11:41):
Obviously we know that price is the intersection of supply
and demand. If your supply is way down seven point
three million units lower than it needs to be, obviously
that's going to shoot up your price because demand isn't
going anywhere. We keep making more people, and those people
eventually need somewhere to live, and on top of that
bringing in imported people.
Speaker 4 (12:02):
Those people in need places to live too.
Speaker 3 (12:03):
So obviously this problem gets worse if you don't address
it quickly significantly. So this is one plan to do that.
I don't hate the idea. A lot of Republicans got
all up in arms because you know, we like nature, right,
that's not controversial. We love our national parks, our national monuments.
I'm a big believer in the national monuments as well.
(12:25):
I'm a big believer in preserving particularly war history. I
love Gettysburg. I visited to Gettysburg. That's I believe a
national park or a national monument. I don't know which specifically,
but obviously that's a beautiful piece of federally owned land
that is obviously incredibly important to our culture and our
history as Americans and should not be sold. Clearly, that
(12:48):
is true. And of course the Grand Canyon. You know,
you can list important pieces of federal land that you
don't want to be sold for days on end. Obviously
those should not be touched. And a lot of conservatives
people inside the base immediately got upset over this, saying, hey,
we don't want these beautiful pieces of land to be sold.
(13:11):
So that's that's true, that's true. I want to give
you guys some important data here. About six hundred and
forty million acres of land in the United States is
owned by the federal government. That is a big number.
That is a huge number. For context, only about eighty
(13:34):
million acres. Of that land includes things like national parks,
national monuments, and various other historical sites. The numbers there,
that's twelve point five percent of the total six hundred
and forty million acres of land owned by the United States.
So we can afford to sell off quite a bit
(13:55):
of federal land before we get anywhere near the the
you know, national parks, national monuments, any of those historic sites,
any of the federal land people actually care about. We
can sell a lot of land before we get into
sort of that area. People are very upset over Senator
(14:16):
Mike Lee for his bill, and for the record, his
bill proposes selling less than one percent of the total
federal land. Less than thirteen percent of the total federal
land is parks, monuments and things like that. And Mike
Lee wants to sell less than one percent, and that's
still millions of acres that you then open up for development.
(14:39):
So I think the attacks against Mike Lee and the
attacks against his bill are misguided. However, I do agree
that it shouldn't be necessary. We should not have to
sell this land. And let me explain to you why
I told you we have roughly seven point five depending
on the estimate roughly seven point five million fewer homes
(15:02):
than what we need. We have, according to the estimates
that I kind of trust a little bit more, roughly
twenty million illegal aliens in the United States. All of
those illegal aliens in the United States are living somewhere, right,
even if they're homeless where some of them are. That
(15:23):
still let's say ten million half the illegal aliens are
completely homeless, which is not the case. But even then,
we could deport half of those and we'd have all
the housing that we need, because that would leave us
with ten million illegal aliens that have homes. And if
we deport those, that clears the deficit. Right there, the
(15:43):
housing deficit is gone. But we have twenty million illegal aliens.
Most of them are in some form of housing. Maybe
that's like a charitable homeless shelter or what have you.
But so so, if we deport those twenty million illegal aliens,
our housing deficit disappears overnight like that.
Speaker 4 (16:00):
It's gone.
Speaker 3 (16:01):
So if you want a good reason to support deporting
every single illegal alien, there you go.
Speaker 4 (16:06):
It'll bring down your.
Speaker 3 (16:06):
Housing costs significantly pretty quickly.
Speaker 1 (16:10):
Too.
Speaker 3 (16:11):
Another issue that was pointed out to me by my
friend Chris Johnson. He's a GOP strategist. You may have
seen him on Fox. He's on there a lot. One
of the bigger issues isn't that we don't have land
to build housing on. It's that we have land that
we can't build housing on. We have a lot of
red tape that basically blocks developers or makes it prohibitively
(16:35):
expensive to build new housing inside a lot of places
where people actually want to live. It's incredibly difficult to
build a new housing unit in a lot of these
left wing cities that a lot of people want to
live in. And I say left wing cities, what I
really mean is just any city. But you have to
go through so much paperwork, so much red tape. It
(16:55):
takes so long, and it's so expensive because remember it's
not just filing paperwork. You have to pay somebody to
file that paperwork. That's extra cost on you, the developer.
So we could do two.
Speaker 4 (17:07):
Things right now.
Speaker 3 (17:08):
We could all start saying, at the state, federal, and
local levels, we're going to clear out some of this
paperwork and make it easier and cheaper for people to
build houses. And at the same time, we're going to
deport all of the illegal aliens that are sucking up
our housing resources, and that would completely negate the need
for all this federal land being sold off to build
(17:29):
more houses. That I believe is the better strategy. Let's
do that before we start worrying about selling federal land.
And then once we get to the point where, hey,
we do need to sell some federal land. We have
federal land to spare guys. We can sell that and
be fine. We don't have to touch the national parks.
There's a lot of land that the US government just
has and doesn't do anything with, and we could be
(17:52):
making some money off of that. I don't necessarily hate
that idea. All right, we'll be right Backstay tuned, hey,
(18:16):
all the next Gen report. I'm Ethan Buchanan at Underscore
Ethan Buchanan on X. All right, So the Homeland Security
Twitter page X page is one of my favorite pages
on X right now, and I'll tell you why. Despite
the big No King's protests and all the leftists throwing
(18:38):
this unbelievable temper tantrum, deportations have continued to pace as
they should. Praise the Lord. Get these people out of here.
They do not belong in our country. Get them all out,
and that's exactly what the Trump administration is doing. And
of course the Democrats and their allies in the mainstream
(18:59):
media continue to absolutely lose their mind over it.
Speaker 4 (19:05):
I'll give you an example.
Speaker 3 (19:06):
Actually, I'll give you a handful of examples, because this
has been fun for me to watch. So this is
from WKRN. I don't know that's I believe some local
Tennessee TV station. I'm not familiar WKRN dot com. You
can go do the research on your own. I don't
frankly care what mainstream outlet this comes from. What's important.
(19:27):
Here is the headline. Father deported after traffic stop in
Robertson County. Family torn apart. Oh my god, how could they?
How could the evil, vile, fascist dictator Trump administration do
this a minor traffic violation and they deport this guy,
(19:52):
tearing apart and destroying his family.
Speaker 4 (19:56):
How did you do this?
Speaker 3 (19:59):
It's evil and viol right, I mean that headline tells
you the whole story, doesn't it.
Speaker 4 (20:04):
No, it doesn't.
Speaker 3 (20:06):
Thankfully, the Homeland Security Twitter is here to give us
the facts. DHS dot gov on ext responded with a
picture of the headline and it says, why does the
media continue to do the bidding of these violent, criminal
illegal aliens. Hilario Martinez Garcia is a criminal, illegal alien
(20:27):
whose rap sheet includes domestic violence, felony, burglary charges, attempts
to cast him as a sympathetic figure, ignore the facts,
and insult the victims of his crimes. He was deported
and is no longer a threat to the safety of Americans.
I mean, this guy is not the type of guy
(20:48):
that we want in the country, right, I mean, do
you want a bunch of you know, burglary folks. What's
the burglar? Is that the term burglar? And you know
wife beater in this country? Is that what you want?
And here's the mainstream media saying, Oh, he's he's just
a father. They just supported him for a traffic stop. No,
(21:10):
he was an illegal alien and a criminal and we
got him the hell out of the country. Why is
the mainstream media covering for him. I still can't make
heads or tails of that. I understand why the Democrats
want these illegal aliens here. I don't understand what these
media outlets have to gain from lying about it.
Speaker 4 (21:28):
That's what confuses me.
Speaker 3 (21:32):
The Los Angeles Dodgers are also doing their part here.
To just outright lie about what's going on with border enforcement.
And again, the Dodgers are an interesting franchise to me
because for no particular reason, they have taken it upon
themselves to be the most obnoxiously left wing organization in
(21:56):
all of professional sports.
Speaker 4 (21:58):
And I get that.
Speaker 3 (22:00):
They're in LA and most of their fan base are
woke liberals. I understand that, but I mean, the Lakers
don't do this the what is it the Chargers, the
LA Chargers, they don't do this either. What is it
about the Dodgers that just makes them so ridiculously woke?
Speaker 4 (22:19):
I don't know.
Speaker 3 (22:20):
They've taken it upon themselves to just start outright lying
about what's going on in Los Angeles. As we know,
that has been kind of ground zero for a lot
of ice enforcement because it is a sanctuary city. By
the way, I voted for that put pressure on sanctuary cities.
Speaker 4 (22:38):
Send all of the federal law enforcement.
Speaker 3 (22:40):
You can to these sanctuary cities to enforce our immigration laws.
Punish the sanctuary cities for attempting to obstruct the enforcement
of our immigration laws, make it difficult for them to
do that. I support that, But anyway, the Los Angeles
Dodgers on the nineteenth tweeted out this morning, ICE agents
(23:01):
came to Dodger Stadium and requested permission to access the
parking lots. They were denied entry to the grounds by
the organization. Tonight's game will be played as scheduled. So
this is a lie. This didn't happen, not even a
little bit. Homeland SECURITYDHS dot gov on X went and
(23:22):
took the time to refute this. CBP vehicles were in
the stadium parking lot very briefly unrelated to any operation
or enforcement, as in, like some officer in a CBP
vehicle was just parking their car real quickly to pull
out their phone and check a map for directions or
see where the quickest place to go get a quick bite.
Speaker 4 (23:43):
To eat would be a drive through.
Speaker 3 (23:46):
They weren't even doing enforcement, and it wasn't even ICE,
it was just Customs and Border patrol, and they were
just parking there for just a second, not even to
actually enforce any immigration laws. They just happened to find
a parking lot and they parked there.
Speaker 4 (24:00):
And yet the.
Speaker 3 (24:01):
Dodgers go and try to jump up a bunch of
faux outrage on X.
Speaker 4 (24:07):
By just outright line, Why what do they have to
gain here?
Speaker 3 (24:13):
US Immigration and Customs Enforcement ICE dot gov actually on
their Twitter also refuted this.
Speaker 4 (24:19):
They just tweeted it out false. We were never there. Again,
what do these people have to gain?
Speaker 3 (24:29):
And of course some leftists I'm sorry about my mic,
some leftists on Twitter.
Speaker 4 (24:34):
This is just awful.
Speaker 3 (24:35):
People can't go to work, they can't get groceries or
even enjoy a baseball game without the threat of getting
detained and or deported. Oh how horrible, Oh how horrible.
Illegal aliens who committed crimes can't go through their daily
life without the fear of the consequences of their actions
coming back to haunt them. This is so difficult and horrible.
(24:57):
I have no sympathy. I don't I just don't care.
It's ridiculous. It is ridiculous. I think part of the
reason is they know that if people get angry enough,
they will be you know, retribution on these ICE agents.
Speaker 4 (25:15):
We've already seen that. I mean, it's it's very clear.
Speaker 3 (25:19):
According to government data, assaults of ICE agents are up
five hundred percent since this sort of ramping up of
deportations began. So I guess that would be like January twentieth,
when Trump took office or twenty first, I don't remember
which one it was. Here's Jerry Nadler. He's confused by
(25:40):
all of this. Obviously, if you're an ICE agent right now,
you're a little bit worried about, you know, people doxing
your family doxing you. And of course that's on top
of all the concerns you already have with the cartels,
because remember, these are violent terrorist organizations that will act
on you if you're trying to hurt their operation. I mean,
this is a cartel, this is a gang. If you
(26:02):
make it more difficult for them to make money, they
will attack you. So if you're an ICE agent, obviously
you're wearing a mask, you're hiding your identity. You're clearly
identifying yourself as law enforcement. But hey, you know, you're
probably going to be in a viral clip of some
illegal alien, maybe a cartel member, getting arrested and deported.
As so the cartels are going to want to get you. Obviously,
(26:24):
the Left is going to want to get you because
the mainstream media and the Dodgers are spreading false narratives
about how terrible and evil you are. So you cover
your face because you have a family This isn't complicated,
This isn't confusing. Jerry Nabbler is confused. Take a listen
to this.
Speaker 7 (26:38):
But these people are wearing masks, are and are total
and are totally unidentified. And the question is why. The
question is why. It's completely improper. And again one has
to assume they're hiding something or they're hiding misbehavior, because otherwise,
why would they be wearing masks and denying their identities.
Speaker 3 (26:57):
Because you people are crazy and are attacked them. This
isn't confusing, This isn't controversial. Again, isations are facing a
five hundred percent increase in assaults thanks to rhetoric like this.
That's via Rapid Response forty seven the official White House
or a official white House X account. That's why they're
covering their faces. These people that know that if these
(27:19):
crazy psychopath leftists identify me in one of these viral
videos of me just doing my job enforcing our country's
laws and making America safer, some ridiculous leftist on Facebook
or Instagram or X is going to go searching and
find my identity. Because your identity is available. If you
(27:40):
are a public employee, you can be found, and your
home where you live can be found. Your social media's
who you bank with can be found, and they will
find it, and they will make it public. They will
dox you, they will come after your wife and family. Again,
these are the same leftists who have no problem burning
down cop cars, attacking federal buildings, lighting police stations on
(28:04):
fire back in twenty twenty.
Speaker 4 (28:06):
If you remember that.
Speaker 3 (28:08):
You really think they're gonna have an issue with saying, hey,
this guy's a Nazi and he's where his family lives.
Speaker 4 (28:14):
And again, what happened to the punch the Nazi narrative? Right?
Speaker 3 (28:19):
You really don't think it's plausible that these people are
worried about their families being attacked because they're just doing
their jobs. They're being constantly lied about and smeared. What's
really sad about this is the fact that these people
really are heroes. They should be able to not wear
a mask, be identified, get a heroes, welcome wherever they go,
and know that their federal government, the law enforcement, the
(28:41):
military will have their back against the cartels and the citizen.
We will treat them as the heroes they are for
making our country safer. But instead they have to worry about, Hey,
if I do my job and protect this country. Is
my family going to pay the price for it? That's
why they're wearing masks. Jerry Nadler, you jackass. All right,
stay two, we'll be right back, all right. I need
(29:22):
to make you all aware of a disturbing trend that
I have noticed.
Speaker 4 (29:30):
I'm Ethan Buchannan. This is the Next Gen Report.
Speaker 3 (29:31):
By the way, if you're just tuning in at underscore
Ethan Buchannan on XBU C H A N A N
have you noticed that, for whatever reason, the Democrats always
and by Democrats, I'm just being kind of leftists in general,
always try really hard to incorporate music into their protests,
(29:55):
their activism.
Speaker 4 (29:56):
Lottie Dottie Doll.
Speaker 3 (29:58):
And that's fine in principle, in concept, I mean protest songs,
and you know, music has always been a part of
a political protest to a certain extent, or just culture
in general, anything going on. I mean, every time there's
a war, there's a bunch of songs written about wars.
Anytime there's a big movement, there's songs written about it.
Songs that you know, our song at Chance and protests
(30:21):
and money United. Also it's not necessarily anything new, but
it's definitely getting worse. And by worse, I mean the
Left keeps trying to do this and they're not good
at it. It used to be only the really good
kind of protests, anthems and marches. Those would be the
ones that kind of make it into the public view.
(30:43):
Thanks to the Internet largely now every single terrible protest
song written by a ridiculous Democrat becomes some viral sensation.
I bring to you now the latest example of this Democrat, Rep.
Hank Johnson, who got out his electric guitar in his
office and decided to sing.
Speaker 4 (31:03):
A protest song.
Speaker 3 (31:05):
And I have posted a number of these on my
ex page in the past. This is by no means
the first. Unfortunately, he won't be the last. Take a
listen to Representative Hank Johnson and his amazing guitar and
vocal skills. Quite the lyricist I might have had as well.
Take a listen.
Speaker 8 (31:24):
Just recently picked it up, thought I would try it out.
I hate to hurt your ears and everything, but I'm
just learning to play guitar.
Speaker 4 (31:32):
Okay, before we get into it. I gotta give him
a pat on the.
Speaker 3 (31:37):
Back for at least his self awareness. He knows what
he's about to do should be classified as a war crime,
but he's gonna do it anyway.
Speaker 4 (31:46):
But at least he knows and gives us a warning.
Speaker 3 (31:48):
I can I can appreciate that to a certain extent,
all right, with no further ado, take it away, Representative
Hank Johnson.
Speaker 8 (31:54):
And so I'm compelled with a new guitar and with
some thoughts about that old song. Hey Joe, you know,
to give some commentary on where we are now, And
if y'all don't mind, I'm gonna just strum a little bit.
Speaker 1 (32:15):
Hey Trump, Where you going with that gun in your hand?
Hey Trump? Where you going with that gun in your hand?
Speaker 4 (32:42):
Okay?
Speaker 3 (32:42):
It is at this point that I would like to
reach out to any guitar players out there and let
me know is it supposed to sound like that? Because
I'm not a guitar expert. I'm not a stringed instrument expert.
The only music I've ever really dabbled in his vocals,
I was in a choir and percussion, so I'm not
(33:06):
familiar with stringed instruments. I know there is particular styles
where you kind of want it slightly out of tune.
Speaker 4 (33:13):
I don't know if this song that.
Speaker 3 (33:15):
I guess he's doing a parody of a song called
Hey Joe, and he's replacing the name Joe with Trump,
which is just brilliant lyricist. Right there, Way to go.
But I'm almost positive that that guitar is out of
tune and it shouldn't be.
Speaker 4 (33:32):
I could be wrong. That could be just the style
or what have you. I don't know.
Speaker 3 (33:36):
If you're a guitar person and you know, please reach
out to me at Ethan Buchanan on x Underscore Ethan
Buchanan and tell me, because I'm a thousand percent sure
that guitar is attitude.
Speaker 1 (33:50):
I'm going down the street shoot down democracy. You know,
I want to be a kink some day. I'm going
down and shut Themcracy down. You know, I want to
be the king someday. Hey Donald Trump, we won't let
(34:26):
you take out the Mcracy down.
Speaker 8 (34:29):
Take it down to the ground, Hey.
Speaker 3 (34:38):
Trump, Okay, I can't deal with this anymore. This is terrible.
I'm sorry I played it for that long. What are
you doing?
Speaker 4 (34:47):
Dude? Hey, his voice isn't great.
Speaker 3 (34:54):
His guitar playing, I guess, is completely average. But again,
the darn thing sounds out of tune. I'm almost positive
it's out of tune. I just why do they do this?
Why do they do it so badly? If you want
to write a good protest song, if you want to
write a good anti Trump anthem, write a good one, man.
(35:16):
Come on, it can't be that hard. It can't be
that hard. I mean, we got some really good pro
Trump music out there from a number of different artists.
It can't be that hard to write a song about
how bad he is. All right, here's another video of
some leftist lady who just she doesn't understand how in
the world we're so bothered by illegal immigration. I was
(35:39):
gonna talk about this one. I talked about housing, but
I ran out of time in that segment. So we're
gonna play this video now because I need to cleanse
my palette of that music. So we need to we
need to cleanse our minds of the terrible Democrat music
with just terrible democrat whining about enforcement of immigration laws.
Speaker 4 (35:56):
Take a listen to this.
Speaker 9 (35:56):
Lady can somewhat smarter than me, help me very genuinely
understand why I'm supposed to care if people immigrate to
the US illegally, Like obviously, some people are just racist,
and some people are just stupid, right of course, But
even like left leaning people say, you know, well, you
got to do something about the border. Why could I
(36:22):
don't understand why this should bother me in any way
if as many people as want to come here, So
if somebody could help me understand that, that would be great,
because right now I just don't know why I should
give a shit.
Speaker 3 (36:38):
All right, So normally i'd say this is radical leftism,
but actually I'm gonna just chalk this one up to
this lady is completely stupid, That's what I'm gonna say.
And she asked for somebody smarter than her to explain
to her. And I try not to make myself out
to be some sort of super genius, because pride cometh
before the fall, and I'm really not all that bright.
I just have some common sense, et cetera, et cetera.
(36:58):
But I'm confident in claiming the title of smarter than
this lady. Excuse me, why should as many people as
want to not just come here? I'll give you three
reasonsons the murder of Lake and Riley, the murder of
Justin Nongray, the murder of Rachel Morin.
Speaker 4 (37:21):
Whether she actually truly believes it or not.
Speaker 3 (37:24):
The point she just made here is any single person
should be able to just walk across the border into
the United States and we shouldn't have any problem with that. Okay,
these people's killers did exactly that. I just gave you
three names, just three, and these are three high profile cases.
There are tons of other ones that didn't get the
(37:46):
same media attention of people being killed by illegal aliens
who just walked across the border. That's why we should
care who comes across. That's why we need to have
control over our borders. On top of that, if you
just let twenty million illegal aliens walk across the border
over four years, you can let twenty million people in
(38:07):
way faster than it takes you to build twenty million
units of housing.
Speaker 4 (38:11):
The price goes up. I guarantee you.
Speaker 3 (38:14):
At some point this same lady has gone and complained
about how expensive it is for her to find a home.
This is why the cost of living goes up. I
hate to break it to you, but the Left really
is just stupid. That's all it really is here. And
I'm not saying that to be mean. I'm saying that
to point out a real fact. These people need to
(38:34):
be educated. That's it, all right, listen, That's all I've
got for you today this week. Stay tuned. We'll be
back on Wednesday again. If you want to reach out
to me to talk about any of these topics, you
can find me on social media, specifically on x Underscore
Ethan Buchanan. Reach out to me there. I'd love to
hear from you. Thank you very much for listening to
the Next gener Report right here on AM nine fifty KPRC.
Speaker 1 (39:00):
The point of seat is top
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.