Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
So do you think set shark tanks.
Speaker 2 (00:02):
Kevin O'Leary is really going to buy a TikTok that
would blow the left's mind, especially given things he's been
saying the last six months.
Speaker 3 (00:16):
It was on the way in today. By the way,
it's it's January seventh, excuse me, thirteen days away from
the inauguration. It's January. In January in the northern hemisphere,
in Colorado, it's wintertime, and sometimes it snows in the
(00:37):
don't look at me shocked, Like.
Speaker 4 (00:38):
That news to me, Michael.
Speaker 3 (00:40):
Well, and sometimes it snows, and there are unlike you
know the old days, like you know nineteen eighty five,
there are even weather apps. You don't even have to
have a TV to know what the weather is. You
don't need to know weather Man. You don't need to
(01:00):
know whether man to know which way the wind blows
at all. And I'm utterly fascinated dragon saw the typical
let's drive in the left lane on the freeway with
our flashers going because it's snowy.
Speaker 5 (01:18):
And you're going thirty five on the highway. Thirty five
yeah great, Yeah, So.
Speaker 3 (01:27):
I get on the on the freeway and it's the
only thing I could think about was on four seventy.
You know, we have the big thing going on in
Colorado right now about we have these express lanes, and
the express lanes unlike the express lanes, say in Arizona,
which you can move in and out of where else
(01:50):
there's other places I've driven, but the express lanes are
like that. Oh there's actually one on Santa Fe. On
Santa Fe, you can move in and out of that
wrest lane. But in Colorado, we want to generate as
much revenue and we went to control people's lives as
much as possible. That we say, you know, they have
the stupid PSA going about, you know, across the double line,
(02:12):
pay the fine. Well, all I can think about today
driving in was I could not see the double line.
And you know how people start driving and they're not
quite sure which lane or where the lane is. So
pretty soon just lanes are created because of the traffic,
and so those tires as traffic just follows other traffic
in front of them. Eventually you have you know, maybe
(02:35):
on a three lane or a four lane highway, you
might have three lanes and they're all kind of you know,
jiggered somewhere. They're not really actually on where the light
the stripes are, well four seventies that way this morning,
you cannot see the double white line, and I don't
know whether the cameras flash or not. I wasn't paying
much attention, and I didn't cross because I was in
(02:56):
the right lane until I moved into the left lane.
But when I moved into the left lane, I kept
thinking to myself, but am I gonna get a ticket
because there's no there is no sign because I'm just
in the beaten pathway of the other cars that have
you know, been on the highway before me, that have
(03:17):
you know, cleared the roadway through there by their driving,
and you know, the the friction of the tires on
the on the pavement whatever the pavement might be. I
think it's concrete on four seventy uh. And so that
these lanes just naturally appear, Well, what if they're inside
the double white line or what if they kind of veer,
you know, because they're not. I mean it's snow and
(03:40):
it's January.
Speaker 4 (03:40):
I'd say, yes, you'll still get the ticket.
Speaker 3 (03:42):
I think you'll still get the ticket too.
Speaker 5 (03:43):
Because the camera is locked in that position. It knows
where the lines are right so it's like, you know,
you're watching a football game and they put on those
first down markers, right, Yeah, so that's what they're gonna
do to the that the.
Speaker 3 (03:57):
Cameras will the cameras will take the photo regardless. Yes,
So then it raises the question of can you can
you avoid the fine?
Speaker 6 (04:11):
Bye?
Speaker 3 (04:11):
But but then you have to have.
Speaker 4 (04:13):
No, you can't avoid the photo.
Speaker 3 (04:15):
You'd have to have a dash cam or something or
the photo they send you. Uh, if you can see
the double white line in the photo or not. These
are things that bother me in the morning. Plus the
people driving in the left lane with the flashers going
thirty five miles an hour because it's snowy.
Speaker 5 (04:33):
And I'm sure with that photo that they send you
it'll be super imposed like the NFL does with that
first down marker with their double white line going.
Speaker 4 (04:40):
Hey see it was right there.
Speaker 3 (04:42):
Oh if anybody, if anybody has if that's the case.
Speaker 4 (04:46):
I don't know for certain.
Speaker 5 (04:47):
I'm just saying today if it's a money grab to
begin with, so why not continue with the money grab?
Speaker 3 (04:53):
So just superimposed on the photograph, here's where the double white.
Speaker 4 (04:56):
Lines are, where they normally are, and you're.
Speaker 3 (04:59):
You're left, tire is slightly over there.
Speaker 5 (05:02):
Yep uh, and so boom you get you get it
to enjoy your fine, enjoy your fine.
Speaker 3 (05:08):
Golly. If anybody has any experience with that, send me
a text message or an email Michael Brown Atiheartmedia dot com.
The text line three three one zero three. You know
what that is. I'd really be curious about it, because
it truly is just it's nothing more than just a
simple money grab. So when I you know, I do
(05:30):
these Michael Brown minutes every day, and yesterday I'm doing
one and I come across a story that I did
use because I wanted to see if it stayed up.
And it's sure enough, it's still here. Let me just
walk you through the story. This is from Peak. Peak's
(05:50):
got it over on their website today. This is dated yesterday.
I don't watch nine News, so I don't know. Kyle
Clark over at nine News, kicked off the new year
with a bizarre new tactic to villainize Republican lawmakers. Just
hours after the new congressional session convened on Friday, Kyle
(06:14):
Clark attacked newly elected Congressman Gave Evans for so called
ducking questions about a piece of legislation that doesn't exist. Huh.
Speaker 4 (06:26):
Well.
Speaker 3 (06:27):
Clark then went on to claim that Evans was asked
if he supported quote a bill that would strip federal
funding from the state of Colorado over its immigration related policies.
Close quote now, and I looked too. Peake says that
(06:48):
no such bill exists. And I looked, and I couldn't
find any pending legislation that exists, or any bills that
have been introduced. Now, I could have missed it, but
I didn't see it. Peak also says, nor did Clark
say which member of Congress is even thinking of targeting
(07:09):
Colorado in such a manner. Clark claims that the bill
is already teed up for a vote soon, and yet
Trump won't even be sworn in as president until well
thirteen days from today. Fourteen days from yesterday, then, they write.
Clark goes on to claim that Evans is lying about
Colorado state laws that limit the cooperation between local law
(07:31):
enforcement and federal immigration officers, which in fact it does.
Now Peake asks this question, which I think is a
legitimate question, What in the world prompted Clark to produce
such a twisted report with Gabe Evans as an innocent bystander,
just so Clark could ultimately claim loopholes in the state's
(07:52):
immigration law. And their theory is probably to calm his
own progressively liberal base, many of whom Almighty miffed that
Aurora Popo cooperated with the FEDS to make arrests in
that horrific December home invasion. You know, trender Rodwin the
(08:13):
Vinds wedding game, and some people have actually been over arrested.
Here is what he posted on x This is dated
January third, eight, twenty five pm new in all caps
the word new. He writes House Republicans planned to fast
track a bill that could remove federal funding from Colorado
(08:37):
over immigration policy. Newly sworn in at Rep. Gabe Evans
parentheses are repeatedly declined to say if he backs defunding
Colorado and made a false claim about Colorado's immigration policies.
And here's what he posted two.
Speaker 7 (08:58):
X deft questions today about whether he will support one
of his party's top priorities, a bill that would strip
federal funding from the state of Colorado over its immigration
related policies. Evans is the first Republican to represent Yeah.
Speaker 3 (09:14):
I've heard stories but I've not seen legislation. I've heard
stories that say that, you know, Trump would like to
perhaps withhold federal funding from sanctuary cities or sanctuary states.
So it's it's one thing to think about a policy
(09:35):
or to float an idea that, you know, if you're
going to be a sanctuary city or you're going to
be a sanctuary state, then we're going to withhold funds
from you. It's an entirely different thing for a member
of Congress or for someone in the White House to
draft that legislation and then offer that legislation to a
(09:57):
member of Congress who would then introduce and proceed to
get some co sponsors on the bill so they could
eventually have a hearing on it and see whether or
not they could pass it. But that's not what he says.
Speaker 7 (10:11):
Whether he will support one of his party's top priorities,
a bill that would strip federal a.
Speaker 3 (10:15):
Bill a bill I don't know that there's a.
Speaker 7 (10:20):
Bill funding from the state of Colorado over its immigration
related policies. Evans is the first Republican to represent the
two year old eighth Congressional District, which stretches from Thornton
up to Well County. He's a former law enforcement officer
who made immigration his top campaign issue. That aligns with
the priorities of president like Donald Trump and the Republican
(10:40):
majority in the House, which is tied up a vote
soon on a bill that would strip federal funding from
the state of Colorado because Colorado limits cooperation between local
law enforcement and federal immigration agents. I asked Evans today
how stripping federal funding would impact his district and whether
he supported the idea.
Speaker 6 (10:58):
He said this again, I think we need to make
sure that American tax payer dollars are going to American
taxpayers and of those folks that are committed to lawfully
following our laws first.
Speaker 3 (11:08):
Now you'll hear Clark's response to that in a minute,
but here's what Peak writes, which I think is a
really salient point. Clark says he asked Evans how stripping
money from his district was a good idea. That's what
you just heard, but the video does not reveal whether
that's what Evans was actually asked. But his answer is
(11:32):
that American tax dollars should go to American taxpayers who
follow the law. I agree with Peke that by itself
is a standalone statement that I think that, well, probably
most reasonable Americans would probably agree with So back it
up and in that context.
Speaker 6 (11:52):
Listen again the idea He said this again, I think
we need to make sure that American tax payer dollars
are going to American taxpayers and of those folks that
are committed to lawfully following our laws first.
Speaker 3 (12:05):
How can you disagree with that? But we don't know
what the context is, We don't know what the question
actually was. So the follow on from Kyle Clark is this.
Speaker 7 (12:17):
When pressed again on whether he's going to vote for
this bill?
Speaker 4 (12:20):
What bill port?
Speaker 7 (12:22):
Pulling federal funding from Colorado over immigration policy, Evans falsely
claimed that Colorado law bans all cooperation between local police
and federal immigration agents.
Speaker 6 (12:33):
In Colorado, it is illegal for anybody any state or
local law enforcement, regardless of the level of infraction, whether
it's a headlight out or whether it's somebody that's committing
crimes and taking over apartment complexes and aurora.
Speaker 4 (12:47):
None of that is.
Speaker 6 (12:48):
There's no coordination that's allowed between state and local law
enforcement and federal authorities.
Speaker 7 (12:53):
Evans is claimed that there's no coordination is false Colorado law.
Speaker 3 (13:00):
Did he say that there was no coordination or did
he say that there is a law that sanctuary cities
have that prohibit cooperation.
Speaker 6 (13:10):
Listen again, whether it's a headlight out or whether it's
somebody that's committing crimes and you know, taking over apartment
complexes and Aurora, none of that is. There's no coordination
that's allowed between state and local law enforcement and federal authorities.
Speaker 3 (13:26):
That's what sanctuary cities and sanctuary states do. They prohibit cooperation.
Now they may actually cooperate, but if you're a sanctuary city,
asked Denver, you can't cooperate with ice. We don't want
you to do that.
Speaker 7 (13:41):
Evans has claimed that there's no coordination is false. Colorado
law does block local law enforcement from detaining or holding
somebody just because of their immigration status, but cooperation between
the locals and the Feds does happen. Evans referenced Venezuelan
gang members in Aurora. Some of them are in federal custody.
They were arrested by local law enforcement exactly because of
(14:03):
the cooperation that happens in Colorado.
Speaker 3 (14:09):
I don't think it's any secret that Republicans have Tom
Homan said it. I have said it that I think
one of the things that we ought to do is indeed,
withhold federal funding from sanctuary cities that refuse to cooperate
with federal immigration officials, whether that's ICE or CBP or
anybody else from DHS. But as Peak writes, Clark's pretense
(14:37):
that any such bill has been drafted filed for introduction
past subcommittees and committees in the first few hours of
the congressional session on Friday, targeting Colorado in order to
be teed up for a vote is just blatantly fake news,
Peak says, and I would agree that Evans deserves an
apology for being used by nine News in such a
(15:00):
manner I would. I would also suggest that Gabe Evans
recognized that when you when you walk into the lions
den of the cabal Uh, you don't have any editorial
control over what is being edited and then eventually aired
(15:21):
on television or for that matter, even radio, unless it's live.
You have no control over that. None of this appeared
to be live. In fact, all of the verbs and
everything else appeared to be that this was an interview
done prior to his presentation of this of this piece
on nine News. It's it's fascinating to me that we
(15:50):
continue to have. You know, Kyle also did an interview
with with Caldera in which they talked about, you know,
media bias and everything, but how they continue to do
this on a so called news program which obviously this
is not a news program. I make no bones about it.
I'm not a journalist. I don't even pretend to be one.
(16:12):
Mister t who is on x is at Government's the problem,
somebody that you should be following. Ask in a tweet
or a post that he posted on Sunday January or
Saturday January five at eight thirteen am, why isn't Kyle
Clark asking Colorado Democrats in Congress why they voted against
(16:33):
illegal immigrant sex offenders being deported? Since he's asking Colorado
Republicans if they will vote to defend sanctuary states and all,
why not ask that question? Why not ask why did
Democrats in Congress? Why did they vote against illegal immigrant
sex offenders being deported? And he cites a Larrimer County
Republican Party post. This says that the following Colorado Congressional
(16:58):
Democrats voted again supporting sex offenders, Jason Crow, Diana Yet,
Britney Peterson, and Joe no Goose and I think it's
a great question. It's a question that had I been
Kyle Clark, I would have, you know, asked those four
Democrats why they voted back in September against a real
bill to ensure undocuted undocumented immigrants convicted of sex offenses
(17:21):
are indeed deported or deemed it admissible in the country. Now,
that's according to Newsweek. No, not me, but Newsweek, a
so called legitimate establishment, a newsort a legitimate card carrying
member of the cabal, which printed the names of all
(17:41):
one hundred and fifty eight Democrats who voted against the
Violence Against Women by Illegal Aliens Act. Newsweek reported this
the bill would also deport or deem inadmissible to the
country undocumented immigrants who have been convicted of, or admit
to having committed sex offenses, domestic view and stalking, child
abuseer violating a protection order. Why was the duck question
(18:07):
asked of Democrats the whole point. By the way, if
you don't follow Colorado Peak Politics, you should be doing
that coloradopeakpolitics dot com. You can follow them on x
also at co Peak Politics. Great questions. Congratulations to Peak.
Speaker 4 (18:26):
Once again asking me the questions.
Speaker 3 (18:28):
That need to be asked.
Speaker 1 (18:33):
When an ice storm comes in and I see the
cars in Michigan and Kansas that sat on the highway
for many hours, my first thought is what percentage of
those are electric vehicles? And how are they going to
get them off the roads? Because electric vehicles do not
do well and cold, and they've probably run out of battery,
(18:54):
so you either have to recharge them for hours or
use a tow truck. Makes a lot of sense to
go all electric at this point.
Speaker 3 (19:03):
Dragon. You know, sometimes when we say things and then
we're called out on them on the text line for
either mispronouncing something or completely missing a point about something.
Speaker 4 (19:12):
Nuclear nuclear new clear new cucular nuculear cue nucular nuclear
ever happened before? But go ahead?
Speaker 3 (19:24):
Zero nine three eight Mike hazards are on to warn
others that they're the hazard. Oh see. And then yesterday,
do you remember the I think it was near the
end of the program when we had the discussion about oh,
what was the stupid thing about Biden? And uh Jim
(19:48):
Crow two point oh is now Jim Eagle?
Speaker 4 (19:51):
Yeah?
Speaker 3 (19:52):
Well, Greg who lives in Missouri send me several emails
with several stories. Uh, let's see. So after I explained that,
you know, I went through the story that he sent
and that Biden Eagle is there, but there's no reference
in the story about what he meant meant by Biden Eagle,
(20:13):
I didn't get this email. This is at nine fifty
five in the morning. So so we're still we're just leaving,
We're just wrapping up. Uh he said, he says he meaning,
but Biden says it in his own words in this video, right,
what are you rambling on about? And he has the
video where Biden talks about Jim Crow two point zero.
Speaker 5 (20:36):
You know that, well, arguing that fact that he said it.
Do what we were not arguing the fact that Biden
had said it.
Speaker 3 (20:43):
No, we're trying to understand, like what did he mean
by it?
Speaker 4 (20:47):
Who the hell is? Well?
Speaker 3 (20:50):
So then we finally and then at ten am we
get a third email, beautiful from Greg. How do you understand?
See I love it start out that way? How do
you not understand that Biden was trying to refer to
Jim Crow as Jim Eagle to elevate its racism narrative
(21:13):
over Jim Crow laws it's worse because it's Eagle, which
is bigger and deadlier compared to crow. What are you
missing here? Or what am I missing? With a laughing emoji.
Speaker 5 (21:27):
I mean that was kind of our thought, but there
are no real references to that anywhere, and no one.
Speaker 3 (21:41):
I think. The other thing is no one referenced that
that was a flub, like he miss just misspoke, like yeah,
you know Jim Crow two point Oh it's Jim Eagle.
Speaker 4 (21:55):
You know everybody's oh yeah, Jimmy, yeah, yeah yeah.
Speaker 3 (22:00):
Or or that oh he's he means that it's worse
because an eagle's bigger than a crow, right, yeah, yeah,
here's I think the problem that Greg has, I think
the problem you have and the problem that I had,
is that it's Biden trying to make We're trying to
make sense out of crazy dementia, old fart. I think
(22:25):
that's what's going on. Yeah, yeah, but I just found
it hilarious that some people get so wrapped up. And
what problem me to think about that is on Saturday,
I was talking about the ballards that were not used
in Orleans on Bourbon at Bourbon and Canal and uh
that you know, post nine to eleven, we started using
(22:47):
jersey barriers as we were designing and putting together. You
know these hydraulic lift ballards that you now see around
federal bill like courthouses. Well, in response to that, there's
a text message from Guber number seventy one oh five, Michael,
(23:08):
let's talk. Let's talk bollards. You talked about ballards today
or Saturday. Your concept on ballards is so off. The
hydraulic ballards are only useful for crowd control. They're like turnstiles.
The only way a ballard can stop a car a
small one is if it's quarter inch steel pipe or
thicker filled with concrete piled down to a two to
(23:30):
one ratio every foot high above the ground twice that
needs to be underground. I laugh when you were talking
about them because you're a lawyer talking about engineering. No,
I'm a lawyer who's the former under secretary of Homeland
Security who spent hours being briefed about how we were
going to protect perimeters, particularly around facilities that needed protecting,
(23:55):
and engineers lecturing us about the design of ballards that
they could put underground hydraulically to be lifted when necessary
for crowd control and for vehicle control. And that's exactly
what you et. It's you can find them everywhere. Look,
they had.
Speaker 7 (24:11):
Them on.
Speaker 3 (24:14):
They actually I wouldn't call these ballards, but they had
they had the barriers, the hydraulic barriers on Bourbon Street
that you can find any go find any picture or
if he happened to be in New Orleans, go down
to the French Quarter and go to Canal and Bourbon
Street and you'll see in the you'll see in the asphalt,
(24:37):
you will see the metal. The oh, I don't know.
It's probably six at a minimum six inches wide. I
don't know how long it is. It makes me be
twenty feet long, and it's down in the ground and
it's hydraulically lifted up, and it can stop. It can
probably stop a maybe be able to stop an APC.
(25:00):
He could certainly stop a cyber truck, and it could
certainly stop vehicles. Ballards are also used, but these are
different kinds of ballards. Ballards that are just placed on
top of the surface, say a sidewalk or a street.
Those are for crowd control. That's just to limit the
(25:20):
you know, to kind of slow down the foot traffic
and kind of direct the foot traffic. But those are
different than what I was talking about on Saturday.
Speaker 5 (25:29):
So So, since we're getting things off our chest here,
can I do a little bit session as well?
Speaker 3 (25:35):
Of course? Sure?
Speaker 4 (25:37):
What is with the reporting on the healthcare shooter? He
went to a gun range? Yeah, I've been to a
gun range. You've been to a gun range.
Speaker 5 (25:45):
I'm sure many members of our audience have gone to
a gun range. What is the significance of reporting that
similar to the Ford truck guy driving through New Orleans
he visited Bourbon Street months before, you know.
Speaker 8 (25:58):
A tourist visited at tourist attraction.
Speaker 4 (26:01):
I am shocked.
Speaker 8 (26:02):
You know what, It hasn't been reported yet, but I
would bet that the Tesla guy in front of the
Vegas Hotel probably had gone to Vegas before a tourist
visiting tourist traps. Stop it with this kind of reporting.
It's completely stupid.
Speaker 3 (26:18):
Okay, all right, If we're gonna go down this path now,
not do the story I wanted to do next, then
can I get something else off my chest?
Speaker 1 (26:24):
Sure?
Speaker 3 (26:25):
So why is it that we now have he You know,
my kids got me a pair of those Meta ray
Banta smart brasses. Yeah, and they really are pretty cool.
You can record video and take pictures and stuff, and
it's pretty cool So we now know from the FBI
that the the Nolans, the Bourbon Street bomber, we'll call it,
(26:48):
we'll call him the the BSB, the Bourbon Street bomber,
that he walked around the French Quarter videoing with his
metaglasses places. Then we have video actual, you know, like
streetcam videos of him placing the Now I don't know
(27:10):
which word to use here, ice, chess, boxes, containers, coolers, coolers,
IEDs inside the coolers, the boxes, the whatever. How come
we know absolutely nothing about those bombs? How come we
don't know anything? Or have you seen a picture of them?
Speaker 4 (27:33):
Yep?
Speaker 3 (27:33):
Have you seen? Have you seen? Did you see the
bomb squad show up? Did you see any video of
the butx? Did they did they evacuate all of them?
They eventually did evacuate all the Bourbon Street, but it
naturally evacuated on its own. But then where's the bomb
squad to go check out all the coolers, the boxes?
(27:54):
What was then them? What was there?
Speaker 1 (27:59):
Why?
Speaker 3 (27:59):
Why is that no? And why is nobody.
Speaker 4 (28:01):
Asking nothing to see here?
Speaker 3 (28:03):
Why anybody tells me there's nothing to see here? Immediately?
Look really, let me look, let me let me see
from my own eyes. What are we hiding?
Speaker 6 (28:12):
What?
Speaker 3 (28:16):
What are we happening about?
Speaker 7 (28:17):
That?
Speaker 3 (28:19):
Now, as long as we're on this kick, let me
do this. I'll do it real quickly. Google number twelve
thirty one. Michael Ree Real ID Kentucky. We talked about
real ID yesterday. Real i D Kentucky is way behind
in issuing real ID, partly because it is a hassle
to schedule with the DMV and bring the required documents.
To apply for a real ID in Kentucky, you'll need
(28:42):
to provide the following documents. One valid proof of identity,
one valid proof of social security number, two valid proofs
of residency, proof of any legal identity changes such as
a marriage license or a divorce degree. Well, I guess
you know twelve thirty one. I guess people that live
in Kentucky come a May seventh or something, you just
(29:02):
won't be able to fly and the country will be
so much safer because you don't have real ID and
you can't get past security in an airport. So terrorism
will die because all those Kentuckians that refuse to go
get their real ID must be terrorists.
Speaker 4 (29:21):
I feel relieved, don't you, Randy?
Speaker 3 (29:25):
I want to get something off my chest too.
Speaker 4 (29:27):
Okay, suck dragging your cool? Thanks?
Speaker 3 (29:32):
Did he say that I suck you sick?
Speaker 6 (29:35):
Sack?
Speaker 3 (29:36):
You's sack. I'm so happy to announce, and I know
that all of you will share in the excitement that
I share. But Colorado has once again exceeded national averages. Yes, now,
I don't know where we rank, but we are all
(30:00):
almost almost double the national average. A count of homeless
people in Colorado indicates that homelessness last year the year
twenty twenty four, increased by thirty percent three zero percent. Now,
(30:24):
the Department of Housing and Urban Development released the findings
of their January twenty twenty four point end time count,
which indicated an average increase across the country of eighteen percent.
We came in at thirty percent. Isn't that fantastic in Colorado?
(30:48):
According to the full findings, more than four thousand people
were counted in twenty twenty four, then were counted in
twenty twenty three, with the total number of people experiencing
either Now, this is just directly from the story experiencing
either sheltered or unsheltered homelessness or as I heard on
(31:13):
the news report about this story, the unhoused the number
in Colorado now stands at eighteen thousand, seven hundred and fifteen.
That's like a small town. That's a small town of
homelessness in Colorado. Now, this is really sad. The largest
(31:34):
increase was among people in families. That was one hundred
thirty four percent increase in twenty twenty four over twenty
twenty three. Now, the Colorado Coalition for the Homeless, in
a press release that they issued yesterday, said this that
(31:55):
the jump is reflective of an increase in me what's
in common about all of these things? Uh, illegal immigration,
the high costs, the high cost of housing, inflation, and
the lack of consistency for emergency voucher dispersal methods. So
(32:20):
if all of those things, at least according to the
Colorado Coalition for the Homeless, if that is the reason
for the jump in homelessness, what could you say when
you put all those three things together? Are four things?
Illegal immigration, higher housing costs, inflation, and some sort of
(32:41):
discombobulation in the distribution of emergency voucher dispersal methods. Democrat policies.
Democrats are responsible for the increase in illegal immigration, They're
responsible for the skyrocketing housing costs because of their green
energy policies, among other things, inflation the Democrats exorbitant spending,
(33:07):
and of course if they have a discombobulated emergency voucher
dispersal method, who's in control of that in Colorado? Well
the Democrats, Yes, So all of that is the responsibility
of the Democrats. The Department of Hudds said that immigration
significantly affected nationwide family homelessness count that rose thirty nine
(33:31):
percent in twenty twenty four. Now remember in Colorado it
was one hundred and thirty four percent, so wow, almost
three times. The thirteen communities affected by illegal immigration, including Denver,
saw family homelessness more than double, while the rest of
(33:51):
the country saw an increase of less than eight percent.
If you really want to effect significant change in this country,
you made a dramatic first step back in November five
when you elected the majority of Republicans to the House
the Senate, and you put a Republican back in the
(34:13):
White House. But I hate to burst your bubble, and
I hate to be so negative this early in the morning,
But until you change who resides in well, nobody resides
in the Governor's mansion, but whoever resides in the governor's seat,
in the governor's office, whoever controls the Colorado Poloit Bureau
(34:35):
or whatever state you live in. Until you change that,
nothing else is going to change. So congratulations Colorado. You're
above the national average on homelessness, and according to the
Colorado Coalition for the Homeless, every single reason is a
Democrat reason.
So do you think set shark tanks.
Speaker 2 (00:02):
Kevin O'Leary is really going to buy a TikTok that
would blow the left's mind, especially given things he's been
saying the last six months.
Speaker 3 (00:16):
It was on the way in today. By the way,
it's it's January seventh, excuse me, thirteen days away from
the inauguration. It's January. In January in the northern hemisphere,
in Colorado, it's wintertime, and sometimes it snows in the
(00:37):
don't look at me shocked, Like.
Speaker 4 (00:38):
That news to me, Michael.
Speaker 3 (00:40):
Well, and sometimes it snows, and there are unlike you
know the old days, like you know nineteen eighty five,
there are even weather apps. You don't even have to
have a TV to know what the weather is. You
don't need to know weather Man. You don't need to
(01:00):
know whether man to know which way the wind blows
at all. And I'm utterly fascinated dragon saw the typical
let's drive in the left lane on the freeway with
our flashers going because it's snowy.
Speaker 5 (01:18):
And you're going thirty five on the highway. Thirty five
yeah great, Yeah, So.
Speaker 3 (01:27):
I get on the on the freeway and it's the
only thing I could think about was on four seventy.
You know, we have the big thing going on in
Colorado right now about we have these express lanes, and
the express lanes unlike the express lanes, say in Arizona,
which you can move in and out of where else
(01:50):
there's other places I've driven, but the express lanes are
like that. Oh there's actually one on Santa Fe. On
Santa Fe, you can move in and out of that
wrest lane. But in Colorado, we want to generate as
much revenue and we went to control people's lives as
much as possible. That we say, you know, they have
the stupid PSA going about, you know, across the double line,
(02:12):
pay the fine. Well, all I can think about today
driving in was I could not see the double line.
And you know how people start driving and they're not
quite sure which lane or where the lane is. So
pretty soon just lanes are created because of the traffic,
and so those tires as traffic just follows other traffic
in front of them. Eventually you have you know, maybe
(02:35):
on a three lane or a four lane highway, you
might have three lanes and they're all kind of you know,
jiggered somewhere. They're not really actually on where the light
the stripes are, well four seventies that way this morning,
you cannot see the double white line, and I don't
know whether the cameras flash or not. I wasn't paying
much attention, and I didn't cross because I was in
(02:56):
the right lane until I moved into the left lane.
But when I moved into the left lane, I kept
thinking to myself, but am I gonna get a ticket
because there's no there is no sign because I'm just
in the beaten pathway of the other cars that have
you know, been on the highway before me, that have
(03:17):
you know, cleared the roadway through there by their driving,
and you know, the the friction of the tires on
the on the pavement whatever the pavement might be. I
think it's concrete on four seventy uh. And so that
these lanes just naturally appear, Well, what if they're inside
the double white line or what if they kind of veer,
you know, because they're not. I mean it's snow and
(03:40):
it's January.
Speaker 4 (03:40):
I'd say, yes, you'll still get the ticket.
Speaker 3 (03:42):
I think you'll still get the ticket too.
Speaker 5 (03:43):
Because the camera is locked in that position. It knows
where the lines are right so it's like, you know,
you're watching a football game and they put on those
first down markers, right, Yeah, so that's what they're gonna
do to the that the.
Speaker 3 (03:57):
Cameras will the cameras will take the photo regardless. Yes,
So then it raises the question of can you can
you avoid the fine?
Speaker 6 (04:11):
Bye?
Speaker 3 (04:11):
But but then you have to have.
Speaker 4 (04:13):
No, you can't avoid the photo.
Speaker 3 (04:15):
You'd have to have a dash cam or something or
the photo they send you. Uh, if you can see
the double white line in the photo or not. These
are things that bother me in the morning. Plus the
people driving in the left lane with the flashers going
thirty five miles an hour because it's snowy.
Speaker 5 (04:33):
And I'm sure with that photo that they send you
it'll be super imposed like the NFL does with that
first down marker with their double white line going.
Speaker 4 (04:40):
Hey see it was right there.
Speaker 3 (04:42):
Oh if anybody, if anybody has if that's the case.
Speaker 4 (04:46):
I don't know for certain.
Speaker 5 (04:47):
I'm just saying today if it's a money grab to
begin with, so why not continue with the money grab?
Speaker 3 (04:53):
So just superimposed on the photograph, here's where the double white.
Speaker 4 (04:56):
Lines are, where they normally are, and you're.
Speaker 3 (04:59):
You're left, tire is slightly over there.
Speaker 5 (05:02):
Yep uh, and so boom you get you get it
to enjoy your fine, enjoy your fine.
Speaker 3 (05:08):
Golly. If anybody has any experience with that, send me
a text message or an email Michael Brown Atiheartmedia dot com.
The text line three three one zero three. You know
what that is. I'd really be curious about it, because
it truly is just it's nothing more than just a
simple money grab. So when I you know, I do
(05:30):
these Michael Brown minutes every day, and yesterday I'm doing
one and I come across a story that I did
use because I wanted to see if it stayed up.
And it's sure enough, it's still here. Let me just
walk you through the story. This is from Peak. Peak's
(05:50):
got it over on their website today. This is dated yesterday.
I don't watch nine News, so I don't know. Kyle
Clark over at nine News, kicked off the new year
with a bizarre new tactic to villainize Republican lawmakers. Just
hours after the new congressional session convened on Friday, Kyle
(06:14):
Clark attacked newly elected Congressman Gave Evans for so called
ducking questions about a piece of legislation that doesn't exist. Huh.
Speaker 4 (06:26):
Well.
Speaker 3 (06:27):
Clark then went on to claim that Evans was asked
if he supported quote a bill that would strip federal
funding from the state of Colorado over its immigration related policies.
Close quote now, and I looked too. Peake says that
(06:48):
no such bill exists. And I looked, and I couldn't
find any pending legislation that exists, or any bills that
have been introduced. Now, I could have missed it, but
I didn't see it. Peak also says, nor did Clark
say which member of Congress is even thinking of targeting
(07:09):
Colorado in such a manner. Clark claims that the bill
is already teed up for a vote soon, and yet
Trump won't even be sworn in as president until well
thirteen days from today. Fourteen days from yesterday, then, they write.
Clark goes on to claim that Evans is lying about
Colorado state laws that limit the cooperation between local law
(07:31):
enforcement and federal immigration officers, which in fact it does.
Now Peake asks this question, which I think is a
legitimate question, What in the world prompted Clark to produce
such a twisted report with Gabe Evans as an innocent bystander,
just so Clark could ultimately claim loopholes in the state's
(07:52):
immigration law. And their theory is probably to calm his
own progressively liberal base, many of whom Almighty miffed that
Aurora Popo cooperated with the FEDS to make arrests in
that horrific December home invasion. You know, trender Rodwin the
(08:13):
Vinds wedding game, and some people have actually been over arrested.
Here is what he posted on x This is dated
January third, eight, twenty five pm new in all caps
the word new. He writes House Republicans planned to fast
track a bill that could remove federal funding from Colorado
(08:37):
over immigration policy. Newly sworn in at Rep. Gabe Evans
parentheses are repeatedly declined to say if he backs defunding
Colorado and made a false claim about Colorado's immigration policies.
And here's what he posted two.
Speaker 7 (08:58):
X deft questions today about whether he will support one
of his party's top priorities, a bill that would strip
federal funding from the state of Colorado over its immigration
related policies. Evans is the first Republican to represent Yeah.
Speaker 3 (09:14):
I've heard stories but I've not seen legislation. I've heard
stories that say that, you know, Trump would like to
perhaps withhold federal funding from sanctuary cities or sanctuary states.
So it's it's one thing to think about a policy
(09:35):
or to float an idea that, you know, if you're
going to be a sanctuary city or you're going to
be a sanctuary state, then we're going to withhold funds
from you. It's an entirely different thing for a member
of Congress or for someone in the White House to
draft that legislation and then offer that legislation to a
(09:57):
member of Congress who would then introduce and proceed to
get some co sponsors on the bill so they could
eventually have a hearing on it and see whether or
not they could pass it. But that's not what he says.
Speaker 7 (10:11):
Whether he will support one of his party's top priorities,
a bill that would strip federal a.
Speaker 3 (10:15):
Bill a bill I don't know that there's a.
Speaker 7 (10:20):
Bill funding from the state of Colorado over its immigration
related policies. Evans is the first Republican to represent the
two year old eighth Congressional District, which stretches from Thornton
up to Well County. He's a former law enforcement officer
who made immigration his top campaign issue. That aligns with
the priorities of president like Donald Trump and the Republican
(10:40):
majority in the House, which is tied up a vote
soon on a bill that would strip federal funding from
the state of Colorado because Colorado limits cooperation between local
law enforcement and federal immigration agents. I asked Evans today
how stripping federal funding would impact his district and whether
he supported the idea.
Speaker 6 (10:58):
He said this again, I think we need to make
sure that American tax payer dollars are going to American
taxpayers and of those folks that are committed to lawfully
following our laws first.
Speaker 3 (11:08):
Now you'll hear Clark's response to that in a minute,
but here's what Peak writes, which I think is a
really salient point. Clark says he asked Evans how stripping
money from his district was a good idea. That's what
you just heard, but the video does not reveal whether
that's what Evans was actually asked. But his answer is
(11:32):
that American tax dollars should go to American taxpayers who
follow the law. I agree with Peke that by itself
is a standalone statement that I think that, well, probably
most reasonable Americans would probably agree with So back it
up and in that context.
Speaker 6 (11:52):
Listen again the idea He said this again, I think
we need to make sure that American tax payer dollars
are going to American taxpayers and of those folks that
are committed to lawfully following our laws first.
Speaker 3 (12:05):
How can you disagree with that? But we don't know
what the context is, We don't know what the question
actually was. So the follow on from Kyle Clark is this.
Speaker 7 (12:17):
When pressed again on whether he's going to vote for
this bill?
Speaker 4 (12:20):
What bill port?
Speaker 7 (12:22):
Pulling federal funding from Colorado over immigration policy, Evans falsely
claimed that Colorado law bans all cooperation between local police
and federal immigration agents.
Speaker 6 (12:33):
In Colorado, it is illegal for anybody any state or
local law enforcement, regardless of the level of infraction, whether
it's a headlight out or whether it's somebody that's committing
crimes and taking over apartment complexes and aurora.
Speaker 4 (12:47):
None of that is.
Speaker 6 (12:48):
There's no coordination that's allowed between state and local law
enforcement and federal authorities.
Speaker 7 (12:53):
Evans is claimed that there's no coordination is false Colorado law.
Speaker 3 (13:00):
Did he say that there was no coordination or did
he say that there is a law that sanctuary cities
have that prohibit cooperation.
Speaker 6 (13:10):
Listen again, whether it's a headlight out or whether it's
somebody that's committing crimes and you know, taking over apartment
complexes and Aurora, none of that is. There's no coordination
that's allowed between state and local law enforcement and federal authorities.
Speaker 3 (13:26):
That's what sanctuary cities and sanctuary states do. They prohibit cooperation.
Now they may actually cooperate, but if you're a sanctuary city,
asked Denver, you can't cooperate with ice. We don't want
you to do that.
Speaker 7 (13:41):
Evans has claimed that there's no coordination is false. Colorado
law does block local law enforcement from detaining or holding
somebody just because of their immigration status, but cooperation between
the locals and the Feds does happen. Evans referenced Venezuelan
gang members in Aurora. Some of them are in federal custody.
They were arrested by local law enforcement exactly because of
(14:03):
the cooperation that happens in Colorado.
Speaker 3 (14:09):
I don't think it's any secret that Republicans have Tom
Homan said it. I have said it that I think
one of the things that we ought to do is indeed,
withhold federal funding from sanctuary cities that refuse to cooperate
with federal immigration officials, whether that's ICE or CBP or
anybody else from DHS. But as Peak writes, Clark's pretense
(14:37):
that any such bill has been drafted filed for introduction
past subcommittees and committees in the first few hours of
the congressional session on Friday, targeting Colorado in order to
be teed up for a vote is just blatantly fake news,
Peak says, and I would agree that Evans deserves an
apology for being used by nine News in such a
(15:00):
manner I would. I would also suggest that Gabe Evans
recognized that when you when you walk into the lions
den of the cabal Uh, you don't have any editorial
control over what is being edited and then eventually aired
(15:21):
on television or for that matter, even radio, unless it's live.
You have no control over that. None of this appeared
to be live. In fact, all of the verbs and
everything else appeared to be that this was an interview
done prior to his presentation of this of this piece
on nine News. It's it's fascinating to me that we
(15:50):
continue to have. You know, Kyle also did an interview
with with Caldera in which they talked about, you know,
media bias and everything, but how they continue to do
this on a so called news program which obviously this
is not a news program. I make no bones about it.
I'm not a journalist. I don't even pretend to be one.
(16:12):
Mister t who is on x is at Government's the problem,
somebody that you should be following. Ask in a tweet
or a post that he posted on Sunday January or
Saturday January five at eight thirteen am, why isn't Kyle
Clark asking Colorado Democrats in Congress why they voted against
(16:33):
illegal immigrant sex offenders being deported? Since he's asking Colorado
Republicans if they will vote to defend sanctuary states and all,
why not ask that question? Why not ask why did
Democrats in Congress? Why did they vote against illegal immigrant
sex offenders being deported? And he cites a Larrimer County
Republican Party post. This says that the following Colorado Congressional
(16:58):
Democrats voted again supporting sex offenders, Jason Crow, Diana Yet,
Britney Peterson, and Joe no Goose and I think it's
a great question. It's a question that had I been
Kyle Clark, I would have, you know, asked those four
Democrats why they voted back in September against a real
bill to ensure undocuted undocumented immigrants convicted of sex offenses
(17:21):
are indeed deported or deemed it admissible in the country. Now,
that's according to Newsweek. No, not me, but Newsweek, a
so called legitimate establishment, a newsort a legitimate card carrying
member of the cabal, which printed the names of all
(17:41):
one hundred and fifty eight Democrats who voted against the
Violence Against Women by Illegal Aliens Act. Newsweek reported this
the bill would also deport or deem inadmissible to the
country undocumented immigrants who have been convicted of, or admit
to having committed sex offenses, domestic view and stalking, child
abuseer violating a protection order. Why was the duck question
(18:07):
asked of Democrats the whole point. By the way, if
you don't follow Colorado Peak Politics, you should be doing
that coloradopeakpolitics dot com. You can follow them on x
also at co Peak Politics. Great questions. Congratulations to Peak.
Speaker 4 (18:26):
Once again asking me the questions.
Speaker 3 (18:28):
That need to be asked.
Speaker 1 (18:33):
When an ice storm comes in and I see the
cars in Michigan and Kansas that sat on the highway
for many hours, my first thought is what percentage of
those are electric vehicles? And how are they going to
get them off the roads? Because electric vehicles do not
do well and cold, and they've probably run out of battery,
(18:54):
so you either have to recharge them for hours or
use a tow truck. Makes a lot of sense to
go all electric at this point.
Speaker 3 (19:03):
Dragon. You know, sometimes when we say things and then
we're called out on them on the text line for
either mispronouncing something or completely missing a point about something.
Speaker 4 (19:12):
Nuclear nuclear new clear new cucular nuculear cue nucular nuclear
ever happened before? But go ahead?
Speaker 3 (19:24):
Zero nine three eight Mike hazards are on to warn
others that they're the hazard. Oh see. And then yesterday,
do you remember the I think it was near the
end of the program when we had the discussion about oh,
what was the stupid thing about Biden? And uh Jim
(19:48):
Crow two point oh is now Jim Eagle?
Speaker 4 (19:51):
Yeah?
Speaker 3 (19:52):
Well, Greg who lives in Missouri send me several emails
with several stories. Uh, let's see. So after I explained that,
you know, I went through the story that he sent
and that Biden Eagle is there, but there's no reference
in the story about what he meant meant by Biden Eagle,
(20:13):
I didn't get this email. This is at nine fifty
five in the morning. So so we're still we're just leaving,
We're just wrapping up. Uh he said, he says he meaning,
but Biden says it in his own words in this video, right,
what are you rambling on about? And he has the
video where Biden talks about Jim Crow two point zero.
Speaker 5 (20:36):
You know that, well, arguing that fact that he said it.
Do what we were not arguing the fact that Biden
had said it.
Speaker 3 (20:43):
No, we're trying to understand, like what did he mean
by it?
Speaker 4 (20:47):
Who the hell is? Well?
Speaker 3 (20:50):
So then we finally and then at ten am we
get a third email, beautiful from Greg. How do you understand?
See I love it start out that way? How do
you not understand that Biden was trying to refer to
Jim Crow as Jim Eagle to elevate its racism narrative
(21:13):
over Jim Crow laws it's worse because it's Eagle, which
is bigger and deadlier compared to crow. What are you
missing here? Or what am I missing? With a laughing emoji.
Speaker 5 (21:27):
I mean that was kind of our thought, but there
are no real references to that anywhere, and no one.
Speaker 3 (21:41):
I think. The other thing is no one referenced that
that was a flub, like he miss just misspoke, like yeah,
you know Jim Crow two point Oh it's Jim Eagle.
Speaker 4 (21:55):
You know everybody's oh yeah, Jimmy, yeah, yeah yeah.
Speaker 3 (22:00):
Or or that oh he's he means that it's worse
because an eagle's bigger than a crow, right, yeah, yeah,
here's I think the problem that Greg has, I think
the problem you have and the problem that I had,
is that it's Biden trying to make We're trying to
make sense out of crazy dementia, old fart. I think
(22:25):
that's what's going on. Yeah, yeah, but I just found
it hilarious that some people get so wrapped up. And
what problem me to think about that is on Saturday,
I was talking about the ballards that were not used
in Orleans on Bourbon at Bourbon and Canal and uh
that you know, post nine to eleven, we started using
(22:47):
jersey barriers as we were designing and putting together. You
know these hydraulic lift ballards that you now see around
federal bill like courthouses. Well, in response to that, there's
a text message from Guber number seventy one oh five, Michael,
(23:08):
let's talk. Let's talk bollards. You talked about ballards today
or Saturday. Your concept on ballards is so off. The
hydraulic ballards are only useful for crowd control. They're like turnstiles.
The only way a ballard can stop a car a
small one is if it's quarter inch steel pipe or
thicker filled with concrete piled down to a two to
(23:30):
one ratio every foot high above the ground twice that
needs to be underground. I laugh when you were talking
about them because you're a lawyer talking about engineering. No,
I'm a lawyer who's the former under secretary of Homeland
Security who spent hours being briefed about how we were
going to protect perimeters, particularly around facilities that needed protecting,
(23:55):
and engineers lecturing us about the design of ballards that
they could put underground hydraulically to be lifted when necessary
for crowd control and for vehicle control. And that's exactly
what you et. It's you can find them everywhere. Look,
they had.
Speaker 7 (24:11):
Them on.
Speaker 3 (24:14):
They actually I wouldn't call these ballards, but they had
they had the barriers, the hydraulic barriers on Bourbon Street
that you can find any go find any picture or
if he happened to be in New Orleans, go down
to the French Quarter and go to Canal and Bourbon
Street and you'll see in the you'll see in the asphalt,
(24:37):
you will see the metal. The oh, I don't know.
It's probably six at a minimum six inches wide. I
don't know how long it is. It makes me be
twenty feet long, and it's down in the ground and
it's hydraulically lifted up, and it can stop. It can
probably stop a maybe be able to stop an APC.
(25:00):
He could certainly stop a cyber truck, and it could
certainly stop vehicles. Ballards are also used, but these are
different kinds of ballards. Ballards that are just placed on
top of the surface, say a sidewalk or a street.
Those are for crowd control. That's just to limit the
(25:20):
you know, to kind of slow down the foot traffic
and kind of direct the foot traffic. But those are
different than what I was talking about on Saturday.
Speaker 5 (25:29):
So So, since we're getting things off our chest here,
can I do a little bit session as well?
Speaker 3 (25:35):
Of course? Sure?
Speaker 4 (25:37):
What is with the reporting on the healthcare shooter? He
went to a gun range? Yeah, I've been to a
gun range. You've been to a gun range.
Speaker 5 (25:45):
I'm sure many members of our audience have gone to
a gun range. What is the significance of reporting that
similar to the Ford truck guy driving through New Orleans
he visited Bourbon Street months before, you know.
Speaker 8 (25:58):
A tourist visited at tourist attraction.
Speaker 4 (26:01):
I am shocked.
Speaker 8 (26:02):
You know what, It hasn't been reported yet, but I
would bet that the Tesla guy in front of the
Vegas Hotel probably had gone to Vegas before a tourist
visiting tourist traps. Stop it with this kind of reporting.
It's completely stupid.
Speaker 3 (26:18):
Okay, all right, If we're gonna go down this path now,
not do the story I wanted to do next, then
can I get something else off my chest?
Speaker 1 (26:24):
Sure?
Speaker 3 (26:25):
So why is it that we now have he You know,
my kids got me a pair of those Meta ray
Banta smart brasses. Yeah, and they really are pretty cool.
You can record video and take pictures and stuff, and
it's pretty cool So we now know from the FBI
that the the Nolans, the Bourbon Street bomber, we'll call it,
(26:48):
we'll call him the the BSB, the Bourbon Street bomber,
that he walked around the French Quarter videoing with his
metaglasses places. Then we have video actual, you know, like
streetcam videos of him placing the Now I don't know
(27:10):
which word to use here, ice, chess, boxes, containers, coolers, coolers,
IEDs inside the coolers, the boxes, the whatever. How come
we know absolutely nothing about those bombs? How come we
don't know anything? Or have you seen a picture of them?
Speaker 4 (27:33):
Yep?
Speaker 3 (27:33):
Have you seen? Have you seen? Did you see the
bomb squad show up? Did you see any video of
the butx? Did they did they evacuate all of them?
They eventually did evacuate all the Bourbon Street, but it
naturally evacuated on its own. But then where's the bomb
squad to go check out all the coolers, the boxes?
(27:54):
What was then them? What was there?
Speaker 1 (27:59):
Why?
Speaker 3 (27:59):
Why is that no? And why is nobody.
Speaker 4 (28:01):
Asking nothing to see here?
Speaker 3 (28:03):
Why anybody tells me there's nothing to see here? Immediately?
Look really, let me look, let me let me see
from my own eyes. What are we hiding?
Speaker 6 (28:12):
What?
Speaker 3 (28:16):
What are we happening about?
Speaker 7 (28:17):
That?
Speaker 3 (28:19):
Now, as long as we're on this kick, let me
do this. I'll do it real quickly. Google number twelve
thirty one. Michael Ree Real ID Kentucky. We talked about
real ID yesterday. Real i D Kentucky is way behind
in issuing real ID, partly because it is a hassle
to schedule with the DMV and bring the required documents.
To apply for a real ID in Kentucky, you'll need
(28:42):
to provide the following documents. One valid proof of identity,
one valid proof of social security number, two valid proofs
of residency, proof of any legal identity changes such as
a marriage license or a divorce degree. Well, I guess
you know twelve thirty one. I guess people that live
in Kentucky come a May seventh or something, you just
(29:02):
won't be able to fly and the country will be
so much safer because you don't have real ID and
you can't get past security in an airport. So terrorism
will die because all those Kentuckians that refuse to go
get their real ID must be terrorists.
Speaker 4 (29:21):
I feel relieved, don't you, Randy?
Speaker 3 (29:25):
I want to get something off my chest too.
Speaker 4 (29:27):
Okay, suck dragging your cool? Thanks?
Speaker 3 (29:32):
Did he say that I suck you sick?
Speaker 6 (29:35):
Sack?
Speaker 3 (29:36):
You's sack. I'm so happy to announce, and I know
that all of you will share in the excitement that
I share. But Colorado has once again exceeded national averages. Yes, now,
I don't know where we rank, but we are all
(30:00):
almost almost double the national average. A count of homeless
people in Colorado indicates that homelessness last year the year
twenty twenty four, increased by thirty percent three zero percent. Now,
(30:24):
the Department of Housing and Urban Development released the findings
of their January twenty twenty four point end time count,
which indicated an average increase across the country of eighteen percent.
We came in at thirty percent. Isn't that fantastic in Colorado?
(30:48):
According to the full findings, more than four thousand people
were counted in twenty twenty four, then were counted in
twenty twenty three, with the total number of people experiencing
either Now, this is just directly from the story experiencing
either sheltered or unsheltered homelessness or as I heard on
(31:13):
the news report about this story, the unhoused the number
in Colorado now stands at eighteen thousand, seven hundred and fifteen.
That's like a small town. That's a small town of
homelessness in Colorado. Now, this is really sad. The largest
(31:34):
increase was among people in families. That was one hundred
thirty four percent increase in twenty twenty four over twenty
twenty three. Now, the Colorado Coalition for the Homeless, in
a press release that they issued yesterday, said this that
(31:55):
the jump is reflective of an increase in me what's
in common about all of these things? Uh, illegal immigration,
the high costs, the high cost of housing, inflation, and
the lack of consistency for emergency voucher dispersal methods. So
(32:20):
if all of those things, at least according to the
Colorado Coalition for the Homeless, if that is the reason
for the jump in homelessness, what could you say when
you put all those three things together? Are four things?
Illegal immigration, higher housing costs, inflation, and some sort of
(32:41):
discombobulation in the distribution of emergency voucher dispersal methods. Democrat policies.
Democrats are responsible for the increase in illegal immigration, They're
responsible for the skyrocketing housing costs because of their green
energy policies, among other things, inflation the Democrats exorbitant spending,
(33:07):
and of course if they have a discombobulated emergency voucher
dispersal method, who's in control of that in Colorado? Well
the Democrats, Yes, So all of that is the responsibility
of the Democrats. The Department of Hudds said that immigration
significantly affected nationwide family homelessness count that rose thirty nine
(33:31):
percent in twenty twenty four. Now remember in Colorado it
was one hundred and thirty four percent, so wow, almost
three times. The thirteen communities affected by illegal immigration, including Denver,
saw family homelessness more than double, while the rest of
(33:51):
the country saw an increase of less than eight percent.
If you really want to effect significant change in this country,
you made a dramatic first step back in November five
when you elected the majority of Republicans to the House
the Senate, and you put a Republican back in the
(34:13):
White House. But I hate to burst your bubble, and
I hate to be so negative this early in the morning,
But until you change who resides in well, nobody resides
in the Governor's mansion, but whoever resides in the governor's seat,
in the governor's office, whoever controls the Colorado Poloit Bureau
(34:35):
or whatever state you live in. Until you change that,
nothing else is going to change. So congratulations Colorado. You're
above the national average on homelessness, and according to the
Colorado Coalition for the Homeless, every single reason is a
Democrat reason.
Popular Podcasts
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.