10-17-25 - 7am - The True Nature of the Democrat Party

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Fellas, I'm gonna need you to be a little bit
more considerate. You can't spend two days talking about Chick
fil A without at least acknowledging the torture and harm
you're doing to your listeners who live in places without
Chick fil A. It makes me hungry. I just want
to go to Chick fil A. I don't care what fries.

(00:21):
But at the same time, I guess I'm not regularly
getting paid, so probably couldn't afford it.

Speaker 2 (00:27):
Anyways.

Speaker 3 (00:33):
Well, first of all, you're the butthead that got yourself
transferred to Alaska. I mean I thought that you had
maybe a little more influence with the Secretary of I
start to say Secretary of Defense, Oh my gosh, excuse me,
with the Secretary of War. But apparently you have zero
influence for the Secretary of War, and you've done something

(00:53):
to piss off the Secretary of War to get yourself,
you know, and by the way, I m off two
minds about you know, a JAG officer being assigned to Alaska.
Is that because there's nothing going on in Alaska? Or
is it because you're in Alaska and it's dark and

(01:15):
isolated that you've got more cases than you know what
to do with while you're in Alaska.

Speaker 2 (01:20):
So it's one or the other.

Speaker 3 (01:21):
But either way, you got you got your own ass
transferred up to Alaska. Now, if you were really as
smart as we think you are, you would get a
Chick fil A franchise in Anchorage and you'd be making
a bazillion dollars and we never never have to listen
to you again. You could feed that poor hungry child
of yours that is malnourished and you know, under nourished

(01:42):
and everything else, you know, barely getting along. In fact,
in fact, we should call Child Protective Services.

Speaker 4 (01:48):
What we should do Dragon, We should have done that
years ago, years ago.

Speaker 3 (01:53):
That's right, forces forces that poor child and listen to
this program. Let's see what else can we talk about.
Let's see, because I've been Anchorage three or four times,
I'm just trying to think, there really isn't a lot there,
and there there's got to be a McDonald's, so you

(02:13):
can go to McDonald's. But I don't think there's probably
a taco bell that I recall seeing Anchorage. It's not
that I recall going to Anchorage and looking and thinking
to myself, gee, what're like how fast food places are
here that might make girl Dad happy. I never really
you know, no offense, but girl Dad never really crossed my.

Speaker 2 (02:30):
Mind while I was in Alaska.

Speaker 5 (02:32):
Good.

Speaker 3 (02:33):
Now if I go to Alaska, now, I'll have to
make certain that I tell the audience that I'm going
somewhere else, because I don't want you know who to
know that I might be in Alaska.

Speaker 2 (02:45):
Not that we don't love our listeners, but we don't
love our listeners.

Speaker 4 (02:49):
There are certain ones that we just no, no.

Speaker 3 (02:54):
Isn't it funny that, at least I find it funny
that we're half seriously considering organizing a you know, kind
of get together a lunch, a lunch of some sort
in Florence, Colorado. Dragon, I are willing to I would
even drive Dragon with me. I'dn't even let Dragons sit

(03:15):
in the same car with me, and we drive all
the way to Florence just to have dinner with our
lunch or whatever it.

Speaker 2 (03:21):
Turns out to be.

Speaker 4 (03:22):
Probably don't even need to be in the back like
the Lienburgers.

Speaker 5 (03:25):
Maybe you actually let me sit.

Speaker 3 (03:28):
Well, I would have to take the jeep because we
just be too close to each other in the Yeah,
beam right, I just don't like, you know, occasionally our
elbows might touch each other.

Speaker 2 (03:40):
I don't know.

Speaker 3 (03:41):
I can't just I can do that. Yeah, funny because
the guy, I think most guys are like that, like this,
I need more space.

Speaker 5 (03:49):
Keep the buffer zone.

Speaker 3 (03:50):
That's right, you gotta have the buffer zone. So we're
actually thinking about going to Florence and getting a tour
of of the Supermax. So we want to go see
people that are never going to see the lie today.

Speaker 2 (04:01):
Of course he's in the last he barely sees the
light of day right now. But there's no way in
hell we.

Speaker 3 (04:06):
Go to ask him to, you know, have lunch with him,
in fact, but he comes here. When he was here,
I think we were both I was gone or busy
or something. We couldn't even see him. So we say
something came up, something came up. I suddenly had a
root canal. But trust well, we love the rest of you. Oh,

(04:30):
we really do love the rest of you. We love
the rest of you. Like before I get back to
the serious stuff, I've got to get to this email
because it cracked me up last night. I'm sorry, but
it did. Let's see. Oh no, she sent it to

(04:51):
it came through the website. So I get an email
at five point thirty five last night, right, please three
exclamation points. Don't ever talk about Kiss again. You guys
did today and one of them died. I'm afraid it's
bad luck. Stick to talking about Chick fil a waffle fries.

(05:14):
Much love a goober. A goober doesn't put her name
on But what goober doesn't realize is that she has
her name on her email. So, Tina, that's a clever
goober right there. That's a typical goober right there. She's
about as smart as you and I are. We just

(05:36):
don't think about that.

Speaker 2 (05:38):
Don't use I'm anonymous, okay, Dina, here we are.

Speaker 4 (05:43):
We did also get a text message come in early
this morning from eighty nine to forty four, Mike. Isn't
it strange that Dragon taught us that Kiss is a
Jewish band? And sadly, Ace Freely died last night, So
sad rest in peace.

Speaker 2 (05:55):
Ace.

Speaker 3 (05:57):
I think you and I might have a power that
we could put to you make a little change on
the side and improve the world. And that is if
there are people that need to like go to the
other side because they're just you know, they're bad for
humanity for small fee. We you know, cash, cashier's check,

(06:20):
go boolly on whatever it is.

Speaker 2 (06:23):
That and their name and we'll mention them on the air.

Speaker 4 (06:26):
Four six South Monica Street, Denver, eight O two three
seven Michael Brown, Dragon Redby.

Speaker 3 (06:33):
That's right, and we would prefer the cash. And we're
pretty so desperate for cash because again we worked for
iHeart that we're not letting go n to set a price.
It's just what you think it's worth to you to
eliminate someone that you know, we'll just and we're not
doing anything. We're just you know, we're gonna give them

(06:54):
a shout out.

Speaker 5 (06:54):
If we're not gonna be greedy, you don't be greedy.

Speaker 2 (06:57):
That's right.

Speaker 5 (06:58):
One name that's.

Speaker 4 (06:59):
Right on a list, not twenty or thirty, because we
know that some people got a list.

Speaker 5 (07:04):
Yes, yes, one name, but.

Speaker 3 (07:06):
If you have a list, it's got to be the
most important on your list. And again, we're not doing
anything wrong or evil here. We're just doing what everybody loves.
Everybody loves to hear their name on the radio, right,
So we're just doing shout outs as a public service.
Of course, the problem is if Dragon I participate in

(07:27):
our own program they'll have to hire a new producer
and a new host because dragons at the top of
my list, and he's at the top of my list. True,
whatever that is. I'm at the top of his list.
He's at the top of my list.

Speaker 6 (07:41):
Yeah, we got you.

Speaker 3 (07:42):
That's where the that's where. The mouth hasn't caught up
with the brain yet.

Speaker 5 (07:46):
It's Friday. It's fine. At least you haven't double clicked
incorrectly yet today.

Speaker 3 (07:50):
Well, we haven't gotten there yet. So far, it's all been.
It's all been on my laptop, which does work.

Speaker 2 (07:56):
By the way.

Speaker 3 (07:56):
I'm coming in this morning and I hear Koa's doing
a news story about Windows ten. I think it is
he is no longer supported by Microsoft. And if you
want any sort of support, or you have bugs that
you need to be fixed, or whatever it might be,
you're going to have to upgrade. And I'm hearing this,

(08:18):
I'm walking into a studio that is operating on what
is it.

Speaker 4 (08:22):
Now, Windows seven, correct, Yeah, that's the operating system that
we have.

Speaker 5 (08:26):
But they are like Windows ninety eight machines.

Speaker 3 (08:28):
Windows ninety eight machines running Windows seven as the operating system.
And so if we have I guess what dominates the
bug fixer now is that.

Speaker 5 (08:41):
No, I always has been. We just don't fix the bugs.
I mean ever since Eric you he's.

Speaker 2 (08:47):
Gone, and Jeff.

Speaker 5 (08:53):
I miss Jeff.

Speaker 2 (08:54):
I do too.

Speaker 5 (08:55):
He was crabby as hell, but he was cool.

Speaker 3 (08:57):
He was crabby as hell, but you know what, he
and I became the best friends because I needed something
done and everybody said, Jeff's the only one that can
do it. But good luck, because Jeff just doesn't want to.
He just doesn't like to do it. That doesn't want
to deal with that. So I found out from Eric

(09:17):
or somebody else, does Jeff drink by chance? Oh yeah,
he loves and not forget what it was, maybe bourbon
or whiskey or something. So what do I do?

Speaker 5 (09:28):
Bottom something?

Speaker 3 (09:29):
I came in with a bottle of whatever it was,
set it on the desk and said, you know what
I need? And he looked at and says, what I
got it done? Got it done. Don't you get any ideas,
because that's not going to happen with you. It's not
going to happen with you. Fortunately, you don't drink, and
now you don't eat as much either, so you just

(09:50):
want the cash. It's all you want to cash. So
we were talking in the last hour because this whole
lawfair thing is really it's it's driving me, Baddy, is
driving me Betty, because it's such a double standard, and
it's become a cudgel for those on the left that
want you to believe, which is why I'm spending so
much time on him, because I don't want you to
believe this that somehow Trump is engaging in selective prosecution

(10:18):
and that he's over prosecuting. He's just he's targeting these people,
and it's just simply not true. The facts just do
not support that. So far, only James Comby and Latisia
James have been put under the microscope of federal criminal charges. Now,
James Comy is extraordinarily wealthy as a result of various

(10:43):
professional endeavors over the past twenty years. He's spent three
years in government since two thousand and five. I mean,
everybody thinks of James Comy as what just this FBI director. No,
he's spent three years in government since two thousand and five.

Speaker 2 (10:59):
He's a post ly has now.

Speaker 3 (11:02):
I can't verify this, but different places tell me that's true,
that he has a ten million dollar legal defense fund
at his disposal, Kurt no see no, no, no, I'm
talking Letitia James a ten million dollars legal defense fund
at her disposal, curtsy of the taxpayers of New York.

(11:25):
So nobody's gonna be waving a ten cup. And Jim
Comy only you know, three years over the past twenty years,
so he's been out in the private sector inside the Beltway,
collecting you know, multi million dollar salaries every year. Now,
let's think about that just in terms of the decision

(11:47):
making of the Department of Justice in proceeding with the
Comby and James against the backdrop of opinions about whether
they can be won. I disagree with many people I
respect who claim it was a violation of Department of
Justice policy to have filed weak cases. When you look

(12:11):
at the Department of Justice manual, there's a certain provision,
section nine twenty seven point two two zero that deals
with the issue of when a case should be presented
to a grand jury. Here's what the Department of Justice
policy says, quote. Both as a matter of fundamental fairness

(12:33):
and in the interest of the efficient administration of justice,
no prosecution should be initiated against any person unless the
attorney for the government believes that the admissible evidence is
sufficient to obtain and sustain a guilty verdict by an

(12:54):
unbiased trier of fact. Continuing policy, where the law and
the facts create a sound prosecutable case, the likelihood of
an acquittal due to unpopularity of some aspect of the
prosecution or because of the overwhelming popularity of the defendant

(13:17):
or his or her cause, is not a factor prohibiting prosecution. Now,
the fact that the cases might face some legal headwinds
in the Eastern District of Virginia because of the jury
pool that you're going to find in that district, that's
not a basis for the charging decision. The evaluation is

(13:41):
supposed to be made based on the assumption that the
jury will be unbiased by politics. Now, the extent of
which Night is true is irrelevant. If it were otherwise,
then the charging decisions would be made in part based
on the politics of the defendant and the degree to

(14:02):
which the politics of the community are in line with
our contrary to the politics of the defendant. None of
that is supposed to be taken into consideration. I've always
read the manual provision as not requiring if I were
a prosecutor, to presume that the defendant will testify, or
what that testimony might be, or that the defense will

(14:26):
present any evidence at all. You know, that's something that
it's something I probably shouldn't gloss over. The burden is
on the government to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that
you committed the crime. You are not required to testify.
And in fact, and I know of a few cases

(14:48):
where this has actually happened, the government has presented its case,
the defense lawyers have looked at it, they've talked to
their client, and they've said, we're convinced that they did
not meet their burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt.
And as we've observed the jury, the jury seems very

(15:09):
skeptical that they've proven it beyond a reasonable doubt. I
think we should rest. We should just say you, honor,
we're done. Let the jury decide. And sometimes that's worked out. Now,
sometimes it hasn't worked out. There are lots of times,
in fact, I'd say it's more often than not that

(15:30):
the defendant never testifies. Think about John Bolton, for example,
John Bolten is out there having said that you heard
it earlier, that you know Oh my gosh, these people
that keep you know, classified documents and everything else. I
you just shouldn't do that. You know, it's it's kind
of common to keep a diary. But if you do
keep documents, why you should be you know, shame when

(15:51):
you should you should you should keep you know, you
should never keep those documents. Well, now that statement by itself,
and that clip that audio of him saying that, is
probably not admissible by the prosecution. However, if John Bolton

(16:12):
were to testify in his own behalf, that statement would
then become admissible as a rebuttal for anything he might
testify to. So John Bolton is probably never going to testify.
The point being if the prosecutor's only interest was predicting
whether I might win or lose, then all those kinds

(16:35):
of considerations I just outlined would be totally relevant.

Speaker 2 (16:38):
But they are not.

Speaker 3 (16:40):
Likewise, the policy says that the unpopularity of some aspect
of the prosecution is not to be a consideration in
the decision to take a case to a grand jury,
or even to an indictment or to a charge. For
my opinion, predictions of winning or lose that keep getting

(17:01):
made in advance is not part of the calculation about
weather case ought to be presented, and the evidence is
such that an unbiased jury could conclude that you're guilty.

Speaker 7 (17:11):
Here is Michael's diary entry from last night. Dear Diary,
Dragon and I just had a great show yesterday. Yeah,
he did have to tell me to take a break
six times and to double click four times, but we
were laughing so much, and he promised me he was

(17:34):
going to go to Chick fil A and ask for
extra crispy fries. Can't wait for the report.

Speaker 4 (17:45):
I think it was only taking a break four times,
but everything else sounds pretty accurate.

Speaker 2 (17:50):
Can't you just see me, like sitting on a bed
like a little schoolgirl.

Speaker 3 (17:54):
My knees, you know, come up near my neck, and
you know, I got a little light on, and you know,
the dogs are laying next to me, and I'm hand
I'm handwriting in my diary today today Dragon was so wonderful. Instead,

(18:14):
I'm downstairs in my office in my studio, banging away
on my desktop.

Speaker 5 (18:20):
Dragon must die, written in blood, written in.

Speaker 3 (18:24):
Blood, And and I'm like that idiot that researches, you
know what, every kind of blood or horse medicine. It
was that he could use to kill his wife, whatever
that case was. Amazon Google how to find you know,
how to find poison that I can detectable.

Speaker 5 (18:45):
So there's two versions.

Speaker 3 (18:46):
Of me doing a diary. I'm either in the office
or I'm the schoolgirl up in bed. Oh, Dragon made
me so happy today. You figure out which one it
really was. I think Alexa has a very vivid imagination
if she thinks that.

Speaker 2 (19:02):
It was the first one.

Speaker 3 (19:07):
First of all, you know, the sad part is actually
Dragon does pop up in my head occasionally during the day.
That's the really scary part is I might be out
seeing something, observing something, doing something, and I think, oh,
I gotta remember to tell Dragon about that. That's the
pathetic part of my life. That's the very pathetic part

(19:27):
of my life. I've got lots of friends, but I
never think to myself, oh, I got to make sure
i'd be sure and tell Chris that.

Speaker 2 (19:33):
No, I gotta tell Dragon that other.

Speaker 4 (19:35):
Than going to Chick fil A yesterday. I don't think
I thought about you once.

Speaker 3 (19:39):
No, but I know missus Redbeard did, so that's all
that matters. So a bunch of Democrats, who I should
say top democrats would be more precise in Pennsylvania and
in DC are apparently trying to sideline Senator John Fetterman.

Speaker 6 (19:56):
Hmmm.

Speaker 3 (19:58):
I think this is a sign of the growing ideological
shifts that are going on in the Democrat Party. So
there are reports from Axios, the Hill, the Daily Beest,
all sorts of the typical members of the cabal are
reporting this party figures that, at least from what I
can tell, that are behind the effort include a couple

(20:20):
of Congressmen from Pennsylvania, Brendan Boyle and Chris Deluzio, along
with former Congressman Connor Lamb, all of whom are publicly
out there way possible twenty twenty eight primary bids to
challenge Fetterman. Boyle has sharply attacked Fetterman as Trump's favorite Democrat. Wow,

(20:48):
for everybody who keeps screaming about, you know, the countries
too divided, we need define areas of you know, commonalty
or you know, you got to find common grand whatever
bull crap you want to use. Wow, Fetterman strikes me
as the one rational, logical Democrat. He doesn't agree with

(21:09):
everything about Trump, but he's also not afraid to say, hey, listen,
we lost the election. We don't have the votes we
need to keep the government open. I'm going to vote
to open the government. Trump's favorite Democrat. See if you're
a Democrat. So see, didn't Bill Margo tomorrow igo and

(21:32):
have dinner with Trump?

Speaker 5 (21:33):
Yes?

Speaker 3 (21:34):
And I think some others have too. Why don't we
excoriate them? Why don't we excommunicate them from the Democrat Party.
And then you've got the same two congressmen to Lusia
and Lamb. They're courting support from these different progressive activists
because they're frustrated with not just Fetterman's populist kind of positions,

(21:57):
but they are opposed to his pro is Raley stances.
So if you're if you're pro Israel, you can't be
in the Democrat Party. They're going to try.

Speaker 2 (22:10):
To oust you.

Speaker 3 (22:12):
So the movement to aus Fetterman appears to be less
about compulsion from the Senate than it is an organized
push to actually deny him renomination. In twenty twenty eight,
Democrats strategist Democrat donors, they're all quietly fundraising, they're all networking,

(22:32):
they're all doing this with challengers while questioning.

Speaker 2 (22:36):
This is exactly the way DC works.

Speaker 3 (22:40):
So they're in the background organizing, raising money, doing that quietly,
but then publicly they start the rumor mil oh is
Fetterment even going to seek re election or he might
amount he might mount an independent or presidential run that

(23:00):
could splinter the party.

Speaker 2 (23:03):
That's how nasty it is, even with the.

Speaker 3 (23:07):
Internet sine, even the intra party fighting that goes on. Now,
don't get me wrong, Republicans do the same day, same
damn thing. I just find it hilarious here because what
they're revealing is the true nature of the current Democrat party.
This is not the Democrat Party of perhaps even when

(23:28):
I was a teenager, or perhaps you know my parents,
my grandparents were great grandparents, even though they weren't Democrats.
But it shows that Democrats at one time were just
kind of liberal. They weren't Marxists. Fetterman strikes me as
a Democrat of say the JFK era, and oh my gosh,

(23:54):
that it's blasphemous. Now, Fetterman's done interviews town halls, and
he has defended crossing party lines on issues like border security.
Remember earlier this week, well earlier this week had to
be Wednesday or Thursday, I played the SoundBite of Barbara Jordan,

(24:14):
the Black congresswoman that was succeeded by all people, Sheila
Jackson Lee now deceased, and I don't even know who
the congressman that district is. I need to go look
that up. I hope she's brighter than Sheila Jackson Lee was.
But I don't think anybody's gonna be as smart as
Barbara Jordan was, and Barbara Jordan has did most Democrats
at the time, including Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi, Bill Clinton,

(24:37):
they all opposed unfettered open borders, you know, just people
coming in. Well, that's Fetterman's position too. He is for
border security. He thinks we need to reduce federal spending.
He supports Israel's war against Hamas. He has railed against

(24:59):
identity driven politics, which is a touchstone for the Democrats,
and he says that he follows country then party.

Speaker 2 (25:07):
Oh my gosh, we got to get rid of this guy. Now.

Speaker 3 (25:13):
The conflict has unfolded, mostly visible in Pennsylvania because he
got progressive groups like Indivisible Pa, the No Kings group,
and then you got the challengers that are touring the
state in what political analyty is a soft relaunch of

(25:33):
their political brands. So why are the Democrats turning against Fetterman.
Why is it that suddenly Fetterman is such a bad guy. Well,
i'll tell you sex.

Speaker 8 (25:45):
For those of you wondering, here's Michael's diary entry number two.
Still can't sleep. Every time I close my eyes, all
I can hear is Ryan Shuling's back cackle. I fear
I may never be the same man. I sure wonder
how those waffle prizes are.

Speaker 3 (26:07):
We should just do a day of just people just
telling us what my diary entries are and we make
a compilation. That'd be the best. STU Sometime when I,
you know, I just don't want to come in and
just take a day off.

Speaker 5 (26:19):
Or when Ryan shows up late.

Speaker 2 (26:24):
So what's this Ryan's cam cackle or whatever it's called.

Speaker 4 (26:28):
So you know, we've got our punishment here on the
situation Michael Brown, you don't send it a talkback, you
will hear the Kamala cackle.

Speaker 2 (26:35):
Yeah.

Speaker 5 (26:36):
So unfortunately, I mean it's how it goes. You have
a substitute teacher in Ryan Schuling.

Speaker 4 (26:41):
You're just not gonna do the work that you normally
would have. So our talkback quantity got so low that
we needed to play the Kamala cackle, and apparently Ryan
had created a mashup of the nineteen eighty nine Batman
the Joker laugh over the Kamala cackle.

Speaker 2 (27:03):
Oh do you have that on the board?

Speaker 5 (27:07):
I do?

Speaker 2 (27:08):
Could I hear it?

Speaker 5 (27:09):
Are you sure?

Speaker 2 (27:10):
Could I hear part of it?

Speaker 5 (27:12):
Are you sure?

Speaker 3 (27:13):
Until I tell you to stop? Because I'm not finished
with the Fetterman story.

Speaker 6 (27:16):
Okay, okay, that's enough.

Speaker 2 (27:29):
That's more. That's actually more than enough.

Speaker 5 (27:31):
It's creepy, It's very creepy.

Speaker 3 (27:34):
You know what's really creepy about it about it is
is not that m P three itself. It's that that
shows what's in his brain, that shows you what Ryan see.
I keep telling you that Ryan is backcrab crazy and
that you need to, like, you know, never turn your

(27:56):
back on him because you know, you never know when
he's going to go off the deep end, so you
gotta be careful around, right.

Speaker 4 (28:01):
It was so bad that people actually started requesting it
for like a ring tone.

Speaker 2 (28:08):
I love it.

Speaker 4 (28:09):
Ye, just shoot me an email and shoot me your
email address on the text line and I'll send you
the MP three.

Speaker 5 (28:16):
Yep.

Speaker 2 (28:17):
Now, what kind of residuals?

Speaker 5 (28:18):
What?

Speaker 3 (28:18):
What kind of royalties is Ryan getting for that because
he needs a new futon.

Speaker 5 (28:22):
Don't think he asked for any He probably should say,
such a dumb ass, Come on, at least a dozen
people that asked for it.

Speaker 3 (28:28):
Look at at a hundred bucks a pop, even you know,
ten bucks a pop.

Speaker 2 (28:33):
Because he could, he could, he could go to I
don't know, maybe you go to you.

Speaker 3 (28:37):
Know, the one of the outlets, one of the I
don't mean outlets like the Castle Rock outlets. I'm talking
about like, you know, a good will or something. And
at five bucks apiece, twelve people request that sixty bucks.
He could have gotten a really nasty used futon to
replace the horribly nasty foton that he has I got.

(29:00):
I think that kid just leading through life. It's just
so sad, so sad, so said back to Fetterman. At
the core of this dispute is Fetterman's defiance of Democrat orthodoxy.
He has publicly called for cooperation about infrastructure on the manufacturing,

(29:24):
bringing new jobs back. He's objected to demonizing Trump voters.
He's urged Democrats to stop and think about, hey, when
did we lose instead of doubling down on these progressive
culture fights. So the critics accused Fetterman of legitimizing Trumpism

(29:44):
at a time when the Democrats are trying to rebuild
from their twenty twenty four widespread losses. His approach populous economics,
cultural centrism is horrifying to Democrats. So if you ever
doubt when I talk about Democrats have moved from you know,
kind of you know, liberal progressives all the way to Marxism.

(30:07):
You look at what they're doing to John Fetterman, and
I rest my case. And what's interesting is Democrats are
so stupid. They don't recognize that Fetterman currently is one
of Pennsylvania's most popular elected officials, and they're worried that
his brand could damage their messaging. Democrats are truly This

(30:29):
is why there's just no compromise here. There is no compromise.
Democrats have become so Marxist communist socialists that I refuse
to compromise with them Fetterman. I could deal with a
guy like Fetterman all day long. I guess that the
entire Democrat party needs to have a stroke, so when
they come out on the other side, they're at least

(30:51):
rational