10-18-25 The Weekend Hour 1: Who and What Is Behind the No Kings Protests?

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
The night Michael Brown joins me. Here the former FEMA
director talk.

Speaker 2 (00:03):
Show host Michael Brown. Brownie, No, Brownie, You're doing a
heck of a job.

Speaker 1 (00:07):
The Weekend with Michael Brown broadcasting live from Denver, Colorado.
It's The Weekend with Michael Brown. Glad to have you
joining the program today. You know that we have rules
of engagement, and you gotta follow the rules of engagement
or you can't participate in the program. So the first
and the easiest rule to remember is you can always
text me. You can tell me anything, ask me anything
on your messy japp. The numbers three three, one zero three.

(00:30):
I read these messages all the time, all the time.
I don't always respond to everyone, but I read every
single message that comes in anyway. The messy Japp number
is three three one zero three. Keyword Mike or Michael.
Tell me anything, ask me anything. Then the second rule is, well,
we've got several rules, but the segment I'll give you
is go follow me on X or Instagram. On X

(00:50):
it's at Michael Brown USA at Michael Brown USA and
Instagram at Michael D. Brown. I let me look at
the time, get my phone. This This came in at
on Thursday. Now, this came into my personal cell phone,
which quite frankly, I don't like to give it out

(01:11):
most of the time. But you know, you have to
sign up for something, I'll use a fake number, or
I've got a Google number that I use just you
know some Google you know, you can get a Google number.
Anybody can get a Google number. And so if I
have to sign up for something and they're wanting a
they're wanting a cell phone number, I'll give them that
Google number and I'll and I do that simply because

(01:31):
I don't want the marketing messages I don't want. I
don't want spam. You know, I get enough you know,
bull crap calls that are meaningless that you know, unknown caller.
You know you we've approved your loan. Really, I didn't
apply for a loan. So this came in on my
personal cell phone number Thursday at seven to fifteen pm.

(01:52):
I have no idea who this person is. I've I've
done one of those you know, check numbers. Things I
didn't pay for because I don't want to pay for it.
But I did as doug as much as I could.
Because it came from the three to zero three area
code which is the original primary area code for Denver
and I can't find so I have no idea where

(02:13):
this came from. But they got my number. In fact,
they know my name because the message is Michael. Hmm,
that's me. Hope you're going to the No King assembly
on Saturday today. This was Thursday at almost eight o'clock.
I hope one million people show up in Denver alone,

(02:34):
do your part to save our democracy. And then it's
signed by this guy whom I have no idea who
it is really. I guess Michael, can you just plug
in some music? Because I feel like in order to
save the democracy, I probably should just pack up my
stuff and get to downtown Denver and participate in the

(02:55):
No King's protest, the so called these so called no
King protests, they're just sweeping across the nation, which is
organizing nationwide demonstrations today. Is not spontaneous, and it's not
a spontaneous cry for democracy. In fact, if they are

(03:18):
truly crying and screaming for democracy, that would just give
me one more reason to oppose it. I know that
the word democracy has been depastardized so badly that it
means whatever you want to. You know, whatever you want
to plaster on to the word, you can plaster on
to the word. And you know, many people believe that

(03:39):
we are a democracy. No, we are not a democracy.
We might be called a democratic republic. I would accept
that phrase, a constitutional republic, whatever phrase, but we are
not a democracy. A democracy is anarchy. A democracy is
where everybody decides every single issue you could possibly imagine,

(04:03):
and the majority prevails. There are no minority rights, and
all it takes is, you know, if there are a
thousand people deciding something, all it takes is five hundred
and one people to make that decision. So we're not
a democracy. All of this is it's an orchestrated campaign

(04:24):
by something called Indivisible. It's kind of curious because what
they're actually trying to do is divide us. But they're
called indivisible. That is a network that is built by
former congressional staffers. These are people that worked on Capitol Hill.

(04:46):
These are people that may have worked for your congressman
or your senator. Where do they get their money? The
George Soros Open Society empire. I use that phrase haltingly
simply because it's easy to demonize George Soros. But what

(05:07):
I want you to understand is, you know, George Soros
himself is not writing a check to Indivisible. George Soros
and his son who is never really taking taking over
the business of destroying mankind. They have this huge network,
this network of these tentacle tentacles of networks that just

(05:30):
spread out like a deformed octopus that's got, you know,
a bazillion tentacles, not just eight or sixteen or whatever.
And they fund all of those organizations, which in turn
fund or other organizations, which in turn fund other organizations.
And the money just keeps getting filtered down and down

(05:52):
and down and down until it finally reaches a group
like here in Denver who's trying to organize a no
King's protest. This group, Indivisible was founded back in twenty
sixteen Leo Greenberg and ezra At eleven. It began as
a viral Google doc, a Google doc, and the whole

(06:12):
purpose of this Google doc Google document was to teach
progressives how to resist Donald Trump. Now, within just a
few weeks, the founders transformed this simple Google doc into
a professionalized operation with a staff, an organization, a hierarchy,

(06:34):
everything that you need to run an organization flush with
money from all the same sources that have been quietly
shaping the left wing activism for decades. And I think
one of the reasons they were successful is congressional staffers
have an amazing network. There's every kind of group represented

(06:58):
by congressional staffers. If you want to take Democrat identity politics,
and let's just say, we have a shelf over here,
and we have a Mason jar for every single possible
identity politic vertical you can imagine. And then over here,
I've got all these current and former congressional staffers lined up.

(07:20):
I can pick them up, you know, pick them up
by their hair, and drop them into these different Mason jars,
and pretty soon every I may still have a group
of staffers left over here, but I can fill those
Mason jars with a third or a half of the
staffers of current and former staffers, and I can feel
every identity politic you can possibly imagine. So at first glance,

(07:50):
this group, this movement appears to be a grassroots like
me getting a text message. That's pretty damn good grassroots ticking,
that's pretty good, damn good rest roots organizing, And it
appears to be on the surface. It's this idea of

(08:10):
we've got to fight against unchecked executive power. That Donald
Trump is acting like a king, he's acting like a tyrant,
and he's doing all of these things, which is an
anathema to Americans because we don't believe in kings. In fact,
we don't even like it when we get you know,
families that tend to be kind of monarchical. They you know,

(08:35):
the Bushes or the Kennedys, or for that matter, and
John Quincy Adams. We just don't like that. So how
did this organization get as far as it has and
what are they really up to? Well that's coming up next.
It's a Weekend with Michael Brown. You know, be sure
and follows subscribe to the podcast. The podcast is called

(08:57):
The Situation with Michael Brown. That's what you search for
in your app. Once you find that, you hit that
subscribe button, leave a five star review that helps us
in the ratings, and then that will download all five
days of the weekday program plus the Weekend with Michael Brown.
I'll be right back. Hey, So the Weekend with Michael Brown.

(09:19):
Glad to have you with me. I appreciate you tuning,
and I really do. I love doing this program. I
love talking to all of you all across the country,
and you know, it's great to have such a wide
variety of people listening in talking about the No Kings movement.
I was just talking to Michael who's out in Los Angeles,
out in Sherman Oaks, and he's identified several close to him.

(09:40):
So I'm trying to encourage my LA producer to get
off his button, go out and you know, throw a
few mall to off cocktails, throw a couple of bricks somewhere.
You know, then some frustrations. You know, he has to
work with me every Saturday, so I know he leaves here,
you know when we finish, you know, after three hours,
and he's got to do the podcast and do all
of that. So when he finishes all of that, just

(10:01):
get rid of the frustrations by going out and throwing
a few Molotov cocktails. And then and then don't call
me for bail money, call somebody else. Call our boss.
Call our boss. Is Bill even in town this weekends?
Ye out somewhere? Call Bill? Is he in town? Okay?
Well call Bill. Then when you think about this organization,

(10:26):
they want you to believe that this is all spontaneous
that it's just it's this grassroots just people are just
mad everywhere, and so this is like spontaneous combustion. Yet
you realize that when you look closer, it is it's
very architecturally structured. It's organizationally structured. It's a well oiled

(10:50):
political machine. It operates with great precision and amazing discipline.
Now only a substantial institutional backing someone that is almost
like an angel investor who is saying to a startup company,
I'll give you a million dollars, but I need to

(11:12):
make sure that you know you've got the right people
in a management structure, and that you have your strategy
in place, you have your tactics in place, and you
know how to go implement those. So behind the chance
of their big chance is no one is above the
law is actually this coordinated effort to do the opposite,

(11:37):
to delegitimize a duly elected president and then extend the
influence of a very perverted communistic, Marxist elitist ideological class
of people who see themselves as the guardians of democracy. Well, okay,
if you want to go guard democracy, go do that

(11:59):
somewhere else, because that's not what we are if you
want to, you know, I would even accept, not that
would approve of what they're doing, but if you would
just get your language right. You want to be the
guardians of the constitution. No, they want to be the
guardians of democracy because that just sounds easier, sounds better.

(12:21):
But most importantly, when I say guardians of democracy, what
does that do well? That plays to what Rush used
to refer to as the low information voter, That place
to the people of low IQs. That plays to the
people that don't really understand how this country operates or
the history of this country, which is a sad commentary

(12:43):
on this country too. There are two people at the
center of this organization. As I said, it's Leah Greenberg
and Ezra Levin, and they're anything but amateurs. Let's take
Leah Greenberg for example. Her career church is like a
blueprint for putting together a color revolution in this country.

(13:08):
She earned her degree in international relations. She had an
advisory position in the US State Department. She was a
Rosenthal Thaw Fellow, so she was trained and groomed within
a pipeline funded by both the Michael Bloomberg's and their
foundations and the Ford Foundation through something called the Partnership

(13:31):
for Public Service. That very same network a philanthropic influence
has been intertwined with the Rockefeller originated a trilateral commission.
And this is not coincidental. It represents a very specific
and well intentioned integration of bureaucratic expertise coupled with activist

(13:54):
energy so that they can convert public institutions into training
ground for political agitation. Now you understand why when I
say that these are former congressional staffers talked about influencing
what goes on in Capitol Hill. Let me just give
you a little inside baseball. Long before I became the undersecretary,

(14:20):
I knew just in my political life dealing with you know,
my congressional delegation or my senators, or having to represent
clients in DC or whatever it might be, I knew
that the key figure was not the senator. It was
not the congressman. He was the congressman of the senator's

(14:41):
chief of staff, or it might be their legislative director
or their communications director. Those are the people that hold
the real power. And then you need to understand that
not only are those staffers in place, but you take
all of the one hundreds and hundreds of hundreds of
committees that exist. Each of those committees has a separate

(15:05):
and distinct staff of its own. So you take, for example,
let's let's just take the Homeland the Househomeland Security Committee member.
Every member of every member of Congress that's on the
House Homeland Security Committee has their own staffers for their
congressional office. Then they have staffers that don't really belong

(15:29):
to them, but belong to the committee. So on the committee,
they also have there's a chief of staff for that committee.
There's legislative directors, there's researchers, there are there are people
that do all of the grunt work everything you can
imagine for the Househomeland Security Committee. So if I had
a client that had dealings with the Householdland Security Househomeland

(15:51):
Security Committee issues, I would be more effective as a
lobbyist or an influencer by going to the committee's staff
that I would beg by going to the member of Congress. Now,
sometimes the reverse would be true, and maybe I couldn't
get the staff to do what I wanted to do,
but I knew that a member of Congress wanted to
do what I wanted to do, so I had to

(16:12):
go to the member of Congress to convince the staff. Yeah,
and that's how powerful they are. So when I say,
this is an integration of bureaucratic expertise coupled with activist energy,
so they can convert public institutions like Congress and the
committees of Congress, or the State Department or Homeland Security

(16:34):
or anything else. So they can convert those public institutions
and then all of the non government organizations, all the
charitable organizations, into training grounds for political agitation. That is
precisely what is going on. Greenberg's mentor, Tom Perello, was

(16:55):
a congressman because you know what else he was. He
was also I'm an executive director at Soros's Open Society Foundation.
They had an overlapping tenure at the State Department. Parrella
served as special representative for the Quadrenial Diplomacy and Development Review. Yeah,
you go figure that out. You go google that one,

(17:17):
while Greenberg, his protege, held an advisory post. That connection
is critical. Parello went on to run the Open Society
Foundation's US operations an individual soon after got generous funding
from that very same network. There's a shift going on

(17:39):
here that I'll explain. Coming up next, it's the Weekend
with Michael Brown. Don't forget to send me a text
text line numbers three three, one zero three, keyword Micha
or Michael. How does this all work together? Don't go
away tonight. Michael Brown joins me here, the former FEMA

(18:01):
director of.

Speaker 2 (18:01):
Talk show host Michael Brown.

Speaker 1 (18:03):
Brownie, no, Brownie, You're doing a heck of a job
the Weekend with Michael Brown. Welcome back to the Weekend
with Michael Brown. Glad to have you with me. I
appreciate you tuning in. You know, if you like what
we do on the weekend program, you got to listen
to the weekday program too. That's pretty easy to do
on your iHeart app. Just set this station as a
preset six thirty khow in Denver, six thirty khow in Denver.

(18:27):
Once you said it as a preset, then you can
listen to me Monday through Friday from six to ten
Mountain time, and you'll get the weekday program. So go
get that done. Right now, we're talking about the No
Kings movement and what's really behind this. We not we.
I don't think all of you do, and I certainly don't,

(18:50):
but I think the vast majority of Americans watch these
movements and just think that they're spontaneous, and they don't
realize how insidious of an organization there is behind these movements,
all of which are designed to fundamentally transform America. This

(19:11):
is the Marxist movement, funded by people like George Soros,
encouraged by people like Barack Obama, and then get funded
and go out, and of course the cabal, even sometimes innocently,
sometimes and mostly not innocently, local media picks up. I'm
sure tonight I can you know, I can watch the

(19:33):
local news in Denver tonight and there'll be some story
about the no Kings protests down the State Capitol building
or wherever they hell they're having it, and they'll interview
a few people, and I'm sure they'll talk about how
you they're there because they're trying to say democracy and
Trump's a tyrant and Trump's doing all these horrible things,
and you know, people just kind of half assed listen

(19:55):
to the evening news and think, oh, yeah, you know,
sometimes Trump does seem to be going that's how get
things done. So let's go back. I told you there's
two people. Leah Greenberg and then this guy named Ezra.
But before I want to finish with Greenberg for a moment,
because this shows you how these people work inside the Beltway.

(20:19):
So her mentor, as I said, was this Congressman Tom Perello,
who at the time he was a congressman, was also
the executive director of the Open Society Foundation. He goes on,
he stays a congressman, he gets her a job as
a special advisor at the State Department, and then he
serves as the special representative for the Quadrinial Diplomacy and

(20:42):
Development Review. The connection is critical because Prerelo, the congressman,
when he leaves Congress, goes on to actually run the
Open Society Foundation's operations in this country. And that's when
Indivisible started getting funding from the same network. Pre shift

(21:04):
from a public office a congressman, to a private influencer
mirrors the very trajectory that defines the modern activist elites.
So what began is a movement of a bunch of
congressional aids opposing Trump has now become a well oiled

(21:27):
machine for a broader campaign to reshape the entire American
political order. Now let me rephrase the let me state
that again. They want to reshape the American order. They
would just assume, abolish the Constitution, impose some sort of
Marxist utopia because they believe that they're Ladists and they

(21:49):
believe that they know better how to you know, how
to organize our lives than the Constitution does, or how
you and I do on an individual basis. So that's
her now. Ezra Levin Greenberg's husband and co founder, Oh
husband and wifeteam. They play the role of the public face.

(22:13):
Ezra worked as the deputy policy director under Congressman Lloyd
Doggett of Texas. He had incredible charm and communication skills
needed to sell this movement to the media. He has
a tone of being very earnest, very smart. He's disarming, charming.

(22:35):
He was the perfect He was just perfect for a
generation of journalists within the cabal that were wanting to
frame this new organization, Indivisible as the opposite of the
Tea Party. But unlike the Tea Party, Indivisible was never

(22:57):
a grassroots organization. It's law unch. Its origin was accompanied
by the rapid influx of funds from the Open Society,
grants from elitists you know on Wall Street and other places.
You know de tech giants. Oh, they were all writing
checks like crazy. So millions of dollars starts flowing in
from entities such as the Fund for a Better Future. Oh,

(23:22):
I should get some money to the Fund for a
Better Future. Until you figure out, oh, that's a Marxist future.
They want a nonprofit connected to Sergey Brinn, Google that
bankrolled the Build Back Better campaign in twenty twenty. You
get my drift. Indivisible is not a citizens movement. It's

(23:46):
actually an NGO driven campaign arm of the Democrat Party,
funded by elitist Marxists that want to fundamentally transform this country.
So Indivisible if you want to know what's really going
on with the No Kings marches or protests in your community,
don't think No Kings, think Indivisible, because the No King's

(24:08):
protest is simply the latest manifestation of that organization. Now
I want you to listen. Here's a list of the
partners that they have proudly published on their website. It
reads like a directory of souros or elitist funded Marxist

(24:28):
organizations that want to fundamentally transform this country. Are you
ready the ACLU move on Common Cause, Democracy Forward Public Citizen,
the League of Women Voters, those, every single one of
those is an inherent component of the Democrat Party's institutional

(24:54):
left machinery. Now, others like Greenpeace USA, National Versus United
Voto Latino are those are long standing allies and progressive
coalition politics. But the others like Stand Up America, Our Revolution,
Next Gen America, you can directly trace their origins to
figures like Tom Steyer, Bernie Sanders. So if you're going

(25:18):
to try to feed me full of bull crap and
tell me this is a group of a coalition of
independent voices, you're being disingenuous. It is an orchestra, It
is a symphony. It is a choir of organizations, and
they all rely on overlapping funding pipelines. They share data

(25:39):
through their infrastructures, and they have a unified messaging strategy.
This is what we are up against. This is why
sometimes I just want to just choke the Republican Party
because you just don't understand that you're up against machine
politics here and sometimes in and I get you know,

(26:01):
I understand why I don't approve of it. I understand
why because the Republican Party stands for individual individualism, free markets,
blah blah blah blah. But you know what, we could
get organized and still maintain those beliefs, but we failed
to do it. Well, here's the other thing. It's just
like this text message that I talked that I told
you I got Thursday night at almost eight o'clock, in

(26:25):
which they said, hope you're going to the No King
Assembly on Saturday. I hope one million people show up
in Denver alone. Do your part to save our democracy,
signed Dan. That's to create an illusion of spontaneity. That
is that that single text message. I almost think they

(26:46):
sent this to me on purpose. Maybe they're listening to
me today to see how I'm gonna tear this apart.
Because they want to create an illusion of spontaneity, an
illusion of grassroots organization. But the group individual indivisible behind
this group No Kings. They learned early that unize as

(27:11):
Americans distrust top down movements. So the organization brands every
campaign is well, we're decentralized, we want local volunteers to
form local chapters. We want everybody had the appearance of autonomy.
Yet when you step back and you analyze it, you'll
see some commonality the branding, the talking points, the coordination.

(27:36):
It's all directed from the Great Oz standing behind the curtain,
behind the machine, pulling the levers. As with no kings,
all their major policy themes, such as defending democracy, holding
our leaders accountable, that is carefully crafted. It's then carefully

(28:00):
attributed through digital toolkits, media, parent appearances, online organizing platforms,
and in that way, Indivisible achieves the scale of a
mass movement while maintaining the control of a political organization.

(28:20):
You have to give them credit, and I want us
to wake up that what we are up against here
is a mafia like organization. It is. It's like the mob.
They have rules, they have their own set of ethics,

(28:43):
they have their own marketing machines, they have their own
communication machines, and they have willing volunteers to help them
disseminate all of that in the dumb ass media. That
really is just an arm of the Democrat Party. But
you want to know how it's even worse. You know,

(29:04):
I mentioned that she was that Leah Greenberg was a
special advisor with the State Department. Hmm, that's not coincidental.
I'll explain next. It's the weekend with Michael Brown. Text
lines open three three one zero three, keyword Mike or
Michael the State Department, foggy bottom. Yeah, she just bulldoze

(29:27):
it and start over. I'll be right back. Hey, So
weekend with Michael Brown. Glad to have you with me.
Appreciate you tuning in. We're talking about the No King's movement.
I suppose my numbers are gonna be way down today
because everybody's out marching and you know, trying to protect democracy.

(29:48):
Maybe you've gone out and you've joined up with Oh
I don't know, Adam Shifty shifty amazing, honor and pleasure
to interces.

Speaker 2 (30:05):
I do you know today, Well, it is wonderful to
see so many of you out here today. Thank you
for coming out. I was just thinking as I was
listening to Bill, and isn't Bill wonderful? I was thinking
about visiting this mall with my father, who passed last year.

Speaker 1 (30:21):
At ninety six.

Speaker 2 (30:23):
He joined the service at the end.

Speaker 1 (30:24):
Of World War Two and was stationed.

Speaker 2 (30:26):
In Virginia, and that generation and all that followed have
lived in a world that was ever expanding into freedoms.
We saw new democracies being born, we saw walls coming down,
we saw our freedoms expand we saw our ability to
associate with whom we would, to speak our peace, to

(30:47):
love whom we would love. And we thought that somehow, this,
this democratization was inevitable, It was inexorable. It was like
Martin Luther King's moralock, with the universe always bending towards justice.

Speaker 1 (31:01):
Isn't it interesting? Because I agree with that? Yes, post
World War Two we saw because what we do. We
stopped the march of Nazism, We stopped the march of tyranny,
We stopped the march of fascism. So how dare he
invoked them and America's greatest generation and what they did

(31:25):
to them?

Speaker 2 (31:26):
Until suddenly we found it not bending towards justice, until suddenly,
until suddenly we found that are not bending towards justice,
until suddenly we found our freedoms contracting instead of expanding.

Speaker 1 (31:45):
You know, I have seen my freedoms, our freedoms begin
to contract, but not doing Trump one point zero and
not during Trump two point Oh. I've seen those freedoms
begin to contract with something as simple as, oh, maybe
the passage of Obamacare. Remember if you like your doctor,

(32:07):
you can keep your doctor. Remember that, Oh you know,
the average healthcare premium for a family of four will
not exceed what was it, fifteen hundred and twenty five
hundred dollars whatever it was. Yeah, uh, that's not happening now. Oh,
I remember the value of my dollar back, you know,
in two thousand, in let's say, nineteen ninety five was

(32:30):
you know, I mean it had lost, say, going back
to the eighties, it had probably lost I don't know,
probably half half of its value or something. But then
they come along and they start spending like crazy, and
the value of my dollar keeps diminishing and diminishing. And
then they imposed the inflation tax on us with all

(32:52):
of that spending, and the value of my dollar gets
even weaker and weaker.

Speaker 2 (32:56):
Well, we came to realize that this incredible legacy of ours,
our democracy, is not inevitable, It is not inexorable, It
is not like gravity. We have to we have to
defend it. We have to come together and defend it.
And that is what we are doing today. We are
gathered on this great ball to defend our democracy.

Speaker 1 (33:17):
Now, let's set aside the word democracy for a moment.
What are they defending and what are we defending? We
do need to stop and think about that, because I
believe that they are defending statism, authoritarianism, They're defending the
very things that they are bitching about, and saying that

(33:40):
you and I, as conservatives, libertarians, Republicans, whatever label you
put on yourself, that we are the ones that are
trying to impose tyranny. You mean, enforcing the law that's
been in the books for years, is somehow tyrannical that
deciding that a organization like Antifa that has been committing

(34:03):
acts of terror, and I do mean that literally acts
of terror because they're trying to create fear, fear, creating
fear and loathing in order to advance a political agenda,
engaging in criminal activity to advance a political agenda, the

(34:24):
very definition of terrorism. And so now we're going to
stop that or beginning as we've asked for decades, hold
those elitists who think they're above the law, hold them
to the law, hold them accountable. Now it may not
be as much as you are right now, but I
at least am able to see from a thirty thousand

(34:47):
point of view that, oh, we are on that track.
So I see that we're actually starting to try to
get our freedoms back. They use the language in order
to make the useful idiots in that crowd think that
what's happening right now is tyrannical, when I see it as, oh,

(35:12):
it's actually constitutional. It's trying to expand and protect our rights.
It's trying to hold those who ad violate the law,
who think they're above the law, to hold them accountable.
And they can't stand that. As I explained to someone
in the past couple of days, that we disrupted. You know,
they thought with the election of Barack Obama that they

(35:34):
could put the pedal to the medal on progressivism, on Marxism,
and then Trump came along and screwed that up with
Trump point zero. So then they had to do everything
they could to keep prevent Trump from getting elected or
even spending a day of freedom, but even in jail
if we can. And whether you think the election was

(35:55):
stolen or nostollar is immaterial to me. But nonetheless, Joe Biden,
they thought going to come in and save them and
give them that return back. That they lost that opportunity
with the loss of Hillary Clinton and then Trump, because
we saw what was going on and said no, no
more that progressives do what progressives always do, they overreach.

(36:18):
And when they overreach, this past time, we recognize what
was going and said, no, I'm not going to do that.
And so now because we've disrupted their march toward Marxism. Oh,
don't get me wrong, they're still moving forward. We're just
trying to pull them back and stop them where we can.

(36:38):
But they use our language to make us think that
they're the ones protecting our rights and freedoms, when just
the opposite is true, Just the opposite is true,