Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Morning, Brownie and Dragon, I don't have you know, And
I was on the road for twenty two and a
half years and nearly three million miles all over the
country forty eight states and into Canada, and never once
did I resort.
Speaker 2 (00:15):
To a lot wizard.
Speaker 1 (00:17):
So I guess I don't have any STDs.
Speaker 2 (00:22):
Have a good day. Well, Lottie Doll, aren't we impressed.
Speaker 3 (00:30):
Just because one does not correlate with the other. So
you still could have plenty of STDs and never resorted
to a lot of This is just throwing that out there.
Speaker 2 (00:40):
But you sure, sure, you know I want to go
down a path, but you know, I got a meeting
with the boss afterwards, so I'm not really sure I
go I should go down this path because we might
be on a really good level right now.
Speaker 3 (01:02):
I don't know how nervous we should be about that.
Because I did send that previous talkback to our boss.
Oh yeah, because it promotes the iHeart exactly fantastic.
Speaker 2 (01:12):
All about promoting the company.
Speaker 3 (01:14):
The ross may want to pass that along to his
bosses and say, look at this, people are what what
what did.
Speaker 2 (01:22):
You actually say? What I did I hear you correctly?
What that you pass it on to him, thinking that
he's going to pass it on to anybody else. He
could gotta be freaking kidding me. You think anybody. First
of all, he's been relegated to this row of offices.
He's not up there with the cool kids. He's got leaves.
(01:48):
You think that. Do you think even has their email addresses?
Do you think that he even knows Jojo or Brenda's
email addresses.
Speaker 3 (01:55):
I've seen his boss in his office.
Speaker 2 (02:01):
Well that's just because they wanted to come down and
see how the other half live. Yeah, but I just
wanted to come down and see the other side of
the tracks, is what they wanted to do. But they
stepped down out of their ivory tower to see. Oh,
let's go back and see how the worker bees are doing.
Speaker 3 (02:15):
But I'm not sure if we should be worried or not, because,
like I said, I sent that email with that attached
talkback to our boss and said, hey, you know, we
thought this was really cool. He writes back, I just
heard it live. You guys are awesome. No one uses
talkbacks better. But that has me concerned our boss. Listen, well,
(02:44):
let's be serious.
Speaker 2 (02:45):
Then, let's be serious by going back to the trucker
who twenty two years and three million miles.
Speaker 3 (02:54):
So he said, all forty eight states.
Speaker 2 (02:56):
All forty eight states. Why didn't you make it to Alaska?
I know, come on, come on, are you retired? Get
your ass back in that rig and get back up
to Alaska. And then and one of them talks. Oh,
one says they watch uh ice road truckers or something.
He could have been a part of that. So he
could have been part of that. But he says he's
(03:16):
never used a lot lizard. But what about your hand?
Speaker 3 (03:22):
His forearms are massive, turning the big rigs, the steering wheels.
Speaker 2 (03:27):
There, and think about it. Now, with modern technology, you've
got porn HD high definition right in front of.
Speaker 3 (03:34):
You anywhere you want it, anytime you want it.
Speaker 2 (03:37):
That's right, and you can just be dry. In fact,
you know the other truck driver, that's probably what he's
doing while he's creaning through you know, the parks, he says,
in the church parking lots, that's what he's doing. That's
why he's creening around everywhere. Says he's too busy. Oh,
I got a new porn. You ever thought about porn?
Have you ever really thought seriously thought about porn.
Speaker 3 (04:00):
I'm not sure where you're going with this there, Michael.
Speaker 2 (04:05):
You kind of know what the plot is, there's kind
of you kind of know what the the ending is.
It's it's it's like watching the same cartoon over and
over and over again. It's like, Okay, there's yeah, sometimes
there might be two actors, there might be four actors.
I don't mean sometimes there's twenty actors. But it all
(04:26):
leads to the same conclusion, doesn't it. Or am I
missing something? Maybe I'm you know, maybe all these years,
I'm missing something. Maybe there's something else that I I
didn't know. Oh you can do that. I didn't know that.
I don't know. There's no segue in the one I
want to.
Speaker 4 (04:44):
Talk about, No, because my notes say this a man's wisdom,
No boy, A man's wisdom can truly mature once he
realizes he is not right about every thing.
Speaker 2 (05:00):
And maybe flying blind as to how things really are,
that actually might be a good segue from porn. Maybe
I just think I'm right about porn, and I've been
flying blind all these years, and I think I know
how things really are, and I really don't. Maybe I've
just got the wrong porn channels. Book marked on my laptop.
(05:21):
Maybe I got the wrong porn book marked over here
on the three eighty six. As we're still using maybe
we'll get news about, you know, a new computer. Ooh.
I actually learned that lesson the hard way, a man's
wisdom can truly mature once he realizes he's not right
about everything, and that you might be flying blind as
(05:43):
to how things really are. I mean I discovered that
during Katrina. I thought that, you know, I knew how
bad things were. I just didn't know how bad things were.
I'm sure a lot of you have learned that Lesson
Election day came and went, let's go back. Obama was
reelected with a popular vote majority three hundred and thirty
(06:05):
two electoral votes, losing ground from two thousand and eight,
but still commanding the most important battleground states Pennsylvania, Michigan, Florida, Ohio,
and Iowa. Think about that list, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Florida, Ohio,
and Iowa. And I want you to think about that
(06:26):
list and remember just how far the Trump Revolution has
come in bringing parody to the national election calculus. So
don't let an error in judgment impact how you may
view anybody's comments anything I may say today, because this
(06:50):
was four years ago, and I think I've since figured
out how to properly analyze voter registration by party and
combine those findings with historical president to make an accurate
assessment of what the political terrain really looks like today.
(07:12):
The situation I described above is referred to as the
fallacy of consensus. Fallacy of consensus. It's what left wingers
have done for the past decade in underestimating Trump's true
chances of victory twice or maybe three times, depending on
your view of the last the previous election. And they
(07:38):
they underestimate Trump's chances of winning any issue, let alone
an election, primarily because their close network of million unstable
lemmings led to the edge of their mental cliffs by
the liars that exist in the mainstream media, the cabal,
(07:59):
and then that ends up turning into everybody online, everybody
agrees that Trump is Hitler or whatever. The next latest
and greatest emotional plead to the country to vote for
their socialist, fascist, Marxist communist candidates who promised to dig
us deeper into obscurity if they get the keys to power.
I heard George Will was on with I think it
(08:22):
was with Bill Maher, George Will, who's getting up in age.
Not that I can say anything about that, but George Will. Uh.
The last time I saw George Will was in the
green room of ABC News in DC, and he and
I were having this great conversation. And it suddenly struck
(08:44):
me as I sat there listening to the great George
Will pontificating about whatever we are pontificating about that while
he's never really and I don't mean this cruelly or
for joyatively, but he's never really done anything like And
(09:05):
I was thinking this at the time, your insight is
really good, but you haven't lived in the trenches like
I have. Because we were comparing notes about, you know,
kind of how we both ended up in the green
room at the same time. George Will, in commenting to
Bill Maher, said that he actually hopes that Mondani wins
(09:29):
in New York. And Bill Maher was taken aback by
it because and wanted to know why, and he said,
because every once in a while, we need someone like
this to come along and utterly destroy. Now. New York's
a great city, the financial well, it's still the financial
center of the universe, although Dallas and Houston are a
(09:52):
close second behind, because everybody except Jamie Diamond, JP Morgan
Chase are really starting to move Texas. Even j Diamond's
moving a lot of Jamie Diamond is moving a lot
of his people to Texas. And they may be right.
So whatever, these mindless candidates that promised to dig us
deeper into obscurity if handing the keys to power, I
(10:15):
do fear them. But maybe it's good that it's just
that it's not Bernie Sanders running for president. I mean,
even the Democrats knew we can't let Bernie run for
president because he'll destroy the party because he is an
avowed communist. Mandamie, on the other hand, destroys New York.
Maybe it will wake us up. Maybe maybe it's time
(10:37):
to move my examples from across the Atlantic to just
the Eastern seaboard. And once you see what happens on
the Eastern Seaboard and you happen you see what happens
in in New York. Of course we can already see
what's happening in Chicago and Los Angeles, maybe we'll kind
of wake up. You you can tell that I'm cured
(11:00):
from the fallacy of consensus, by the way I freely
talk about all of my past experiences in the sea,
and by the way, I still view the twenty twenty
six midterms as somewhat of a crap shoot, even though
I do believe that we will defy history and we
will retain majorities in the House, and I think we'll
expand simply because of the math, we'll expand our numbers
(11:24):
in the Senate. But we won't know until we get
through the election. But I'm also, as I've told you before,
maybe it's a confession, I am a pain subscriber to
The New York Times. I use it for some content,
and I use it to understand, truly how the other
(11:47):
side is thinking. I'm essentially doing what I've done for
years now in trying to use their arguments and their data,
all of their diatribes to make my points about how
crab crazy they are. Well, I notice that America's most
overrated mayor, Pete Budajig, penned an editorial recently that could
(12:11):
have been written from the inside of any coffee shop
sitting in Martha's Vineyard, or sitting out in the Hamptons,
or sitting out in your deck overlooking the Pacific in Malibu.
Pete Budajig on rebuilding America after Trump. This was written
(12:32):
one week ago. The former Transportation secretary argues Americans need
a new sense of belonging. It's to befuddling to read it,
especially since the content comes from a Biden Cabinet official
who presumably was dealing with real issues facing work in
Americans as Transportation secretary, which I don't do. I have
(12:57):
to point out to you that the government shut down
is exposing just how fragile the air traffic control system is.
The very first quote from Mayor Pete is perhaps the
only one that I might agree with Sooner or later.
He says, one day Donald Trump will not be active
in American politics, and the sooner we spend our energy
(13:20):
thinking about what to do next. I actually think the
sooner that day will come. Now, why would I even
perhaps agree with part of that, because we do need
to be thinking about post Trump. Doesn't mean we need
stop talking about current Trump, but we do need to
be thinking about post Trump. The reason I agree with
this statement also is that Republicans spend every ounce of
(13:42):
energy always criticizing Obama, always criticizing Obama going after threads
of his past, even if true, I don't care, had
no impact on the path of destruction that started with
Barack Obama. He really did when he said that he
(14:03):
you know, they're the ones we've been waiting on. No, actually,
you're not the ones I've been waiting on. Or that
it is time that we fundamentally transform America. Oh, I
believe that one if he had read anything at all
about Barack Obama, you knew what that really meant, transform
us from a constitutional republic into some sort of socialist
(14:25):
Marxist utopia. I think people thought that people were going
to vote for Romney just because we didn't like Obama.
But as Trump showed us, voting for someone is a
lot more powerful than voting against someone. Nobody, including me,
(14:47):
I didn't want Romney. I voted for Romney, said because
he had an R after his name. And I not
only did I have an R after his name, but
the guy that had a D after his name I
knew was a Mars was on a path of destruction
for this country. Tens of millions of people have voted
(15:07):
for Kamala Harris. Didn't vote for her. What were they doing?
They wanted to stop Trump. She spent over a billion
dollars in those one hundred and seven days, and she
was unable to convince enough people to stop Trump. So
let me break down this stupid editorial considering what Buddhajig
(15:30):
and his interviewer have to say, or at least they're
leaning into his, MSNBC would say, is it Trump's fault? Leonhardt,
who is asking questions of Budajig. One of the things
that I think has long distinguished the US relative to
other countries is our optimism. We went west, we went
(15:53):
to the moon, we won World Wars, we invented the airplane,
the Internet, the American dream. Yet we sure don't feel
very optimistic today. President Trump tells this terribly dark story
about crime and violence and the country being ripped off,
and the left can be pretty dark in its own way.
So I'm curious, why is it that you, Pete, think
(16:14):
that these dark narratives seem to have really taken over?
Listen to this well, I think part of it is
based on very real things, and part of it's based
on the way we get our information. The very real part,
I would say, is mostly about our economy. It's a
simple fact that if you were born the year that
my mother was born, you had roughly a ninety percent
chance of being able to expect that you would materially
(16:36):
live better than your parents did, that you'd economically be
better off by the time you were an adult than
the family you were born into. Oh so yes, fall
back to tone optimism, rainbows and lollipops butterflies, just like
when Trump inaugurated this year, how his tone was supposedly
(16:57):
dark and pessimistic because it focused on immediate action rather
than platitudes. Trump's trying to clean up the very mess
that Pete Buddhajig and his boss and his predecessor, Barack Obama,
set this country on the path toward Pete. The reasons
(17:19):
that Trump tells the story about crime and violence for
the country being ripped off is simple, and that's because
of decades of maladministration, because the borders overflowed to the
tunes of tens of millions of illegal aliens and now
their children living here, their entire portions of cities that
are uninhabitable by working class Americans. Because of the chaotic
(17:42):
conditions brought about by your horrible failures to do the
most basic task of any government guarantee the security of
the people. Touch myself? Uh huh, and I don't know. Okay,
I don't know, but you got y when the time
is nine fourteen. I tuned in about three minutes ago.
What the hell is going on in there? Well, it's
(18:08):
a snaffoo.
Speaker 3 (18:09):
First of all, you must be new here, right, You
think you could just randomly tune in and get something
normal from either of us.
Speaker 2 (18:18):
Right, It's that's why I say it's a snaffoo. It's
a situation normal, it's all left up. So that's in fact,
we should just change the name of this program to
The Snaffoo with Michael Brown and Dragon writ The Snaffhoo
with Michael Brown corrupted by Dragon red Beard. Oh, screwed
up by Dragon Redbeard? About that? Back back to Pete Budhajig.
(18:43):
By the way, thanks for the text message about the
Gelman amnesia effect. That's I've got to go read more
about that. But that's exactly what's going on here. Let's
go back to Pete Boudajig for a second. So Pete
(19:05):
says that it's it's wrong for Trump to be talking
about what he's going to do immediately. Well, that's why
we voted for him. Now I voted obviously, I guess
the logic would art be that by voting for Trump,
I voted against Biden. Honestly, I would have voted against
(19:29):
the corpse, because if I voted for Biden, I was
already voting for a corpse. Might as well have been
a corpse. We end up Bernie's but for him to
sit there and talk about, oh, you know, the platitudes
about positivity and everything else. Where were you, what did
you fix? Did you fix anything? I'm always amazed and
(19:54):
kind of perplexed and also disappointed by the fact that
we always have things to fix in this country in
order to secure a more perfect union. We're always trying
to be more perfect. We're always trying to that's our
aspirational goal, to be the best that we can be.
So you have to fix things, well, things in this
(20:14):
country need to be fixed. Aurora, Denver, Chicago, Los Angeles,
New York. I mean, any other blue hellholes that prioritizes
the interests of foreigners, misplaces their priorities for spending over
citizens and overdoing actual true government functions is an example
(20:38):
of how we've gone off the rails. So here's Budajig
in the New York Times of all places, of course,
hailing himself as this sort of moderate voice, because he's, Oh,
I'm from the Midwest, so I must be moderate. Really,
I know some crazy yes, you know, Marxist fascist communists
from the Midwest. If you're from the Midwest, you think
(21:02):
that he would understand firsthand the damage that was brought
about by reckless trade policies. For example, where do you
think the word or the phrase rust belt came from.
Russ Belt is not a term of endearment. The russ
belt reflects the damage done to working class areas of
New York, Pennsylvania and the rest of the Midwest, extending
(21:22):
through southern Illinois in which jobs were sent overseas and
working people but they were just cast overboard. But he's
oblivious to that. Mayor Pete, how do you expect people
left to the mercy of cartels and the globalization of
the American economy to react as we should. I'm preparing
a story for either tomorrow or Friday about Trump's deal
(21:48):
with Argentina, in which we're going to buy Argentina Argentine
beef and ranchers in this country upset about it. You
know how much I support to the point that I
buy my beef directly from people that raise cattle. There's
a meat cartel, there's a meat packing cartel. The ranchers
(22:11):
are upset. I mean, I get there, I get why
they're upset at Trump, but they're really upset the wrong person.
Do you think Pete Budajigg would understand anything about how
a side of beef, well not even a side of beef,
about how a cow gets from a ranch or a
farm to a meat packer that eventually gets to a
(22:32):
distributor that eventually gets to your grocery store. And you're
bitching at the farmers and the ranchers because of the
price of meat. You're some kind of stupid. But back
to Pete, is it Trump's fault? Is the are the
(22:54):
things that Trump's trying to fix? Trump's fault? Here's what
he writes. I actually think there are projects like that
waiting for us as a country. I long believe that
climate could be one. It's an example of something bigger
than any of us. I also think, paradoxically that all
of the damage that Trump administration has done to our
(23:15):
institutions actually creates a very important potential future moment where
even if we bitterly disagree on how those institutions were destroyed,
we can come together on what we should build in
their place. Now. For that to happen, he writes, it
means a Republican party needs to evolve into being more
(23:35):
about building than destroying. And it means the Democrat Party
needs to get more interested in what we can do
next than in preserving the status quo that's being smashed
to pieces. Those are Buddhajig's words. In response to what
must be done to bring Americans together. He says there
(23:56):
hasn't been enough national project demanding national uth unity and
reminds readers of World War Two before saying he hopes
there isn't a war. A fundamental difference arises here in
that progressives will rush to defend institutions they have curated
to work for them, at the same time opposing those
(24:18):
they lack control over, such as the current immigration enforcement
arms of the federal government. No matter how much he
tries in this stupid article to connect with the people
of the Midwest over geography, he doesn't understand them, because
that's how leftists are. That's how democratic. That's how the
(24:40):
I the more I watch the Democrat Party fall apart
and try to understand why and how it's falling apart
and who's filling that vacuum. The Democrat Party really is
a party of Marxism and communism. It truly is. I've
watched Clomo in his and for that matter of Curtis too,
(25:02):
in their race against Mondamie in New York sly was
not so much because he's just that kind of personality.
Cuomo looks like he's been beat to death. He just
he doesn't even know where he Cuomo a legacy name
in New York Democrat politics, and he looks like he's
(25:25):
been beaten to death and has no understanding of where
he places or sits inside the Democrat Party. He can't win.
I mean, I'll be shocked if he does, but I
just don't see how he wins. He should be winning,
even over my friend Curtis. He should be winning, but
he won't. And Pete Boudhajig will never win either, because
(25:47):
no matter how much he tries to connect with people,
he simply cannot do it. The projects of the day
that we see going on are projects of tearing down
corrupt infrastructure and corrupt institutions, which a real estate developer
(26:08):
like Donald Trump knows has to happen before lasting beauty
can be created. You go back and look at the
pictures of the White House. Yes, it is jarring. As
someone who spent a lot of time in the White House,
looking at those pictures of the East Wing being demolished
is jarring to me. But I understand that's what needs
(26:30):
to be done. I fully comprehend that. I've internalized that. Yeah,
while that picture is jarring, what's coming afterwards. Being able
to see the future, being able to actually imagine what
it's going to look like, gives me like, Oh, this
is going to be great. Meanwhile it's ugly. Oh goes
(26:52):
back to creative destruction Ecclesiastes three. I'm not going to
start preaching. Reminds us that there is a time to
tear down and a time to build. Trump's legacy is
to gut those who have sold out the national interests,
not to continue to build institutions, courts, agencies, and infrastructure
(27:15):
that's based on the foundation of corruption. That's what he
was elected for. We saw when when Biden went to
sleep and the Barack Obama people took over the West wing.
We saw the actual opening of the kimono of the
progressive left and how bad it was, and we acted
(27:37):
viscerally to it and said no. Pete Budhajig doesn't get it.
Is it Trump's fault? Number three? This is what he says.
Speaker 5 (27:44):
Next, don't forget to vote no in November. Remember November
is no vote no, just vote no on everything.
Speaker 2 (27:56):
So Pete is asking this New York Times article, how
do you diagnose how the Democrat Party came to be
seen as defenders of the status quo? I think, if
we're being honest, in some real ways, they are actual
defenders of the status quo. And peace reply is in
part because we saw attacks on institutions and systems that
(28:18):
we cared about and that really do deserve to be defended,
like Social Security. Who's attacking social Security? It fascinates me
how brainwashed we are that we know that social Security
is insolvent, and we know that something needs to be done,
and we know that we're going to grandfather everybody in
(28:39):
that's already on. But for new people, we've got to
have a different system. But you can't even talk about
that because Democrats will tell you that your throwing grandmother
call off the cliff. The Democrats continue down their journey,
focusing on their team, the Democrat Party, and what they
(29:01):
do is they never realized that they're the ones that
sent jobs to other countries. They replaced those people, those
jobs and those people that got displaced in the workforce
with illegal aliens. They wouldn't let us watch football without
you know, or any sports, or for that matter, any
program without getting propagandized. We were told we were racist
(29:24):
and bigots for opposing anything. Racism just inculcated. Racism, just
permeated every single thing, every aspect of life. It didn't
make any difference whether you were in a mixed marriage,
how many black friends or Asian friends, or white friends
or whatever it did. It didn't make any difference how
colorblind you were, If you were a Republican or a conservative,
(29:47):
you were racist. And then they decided to vote for
the guy who called them the forgotten man and woman
and promised to reorient our trade policy in our favor.
Their party is increasingly made up of resentful and angry,
scorned women who can't speak English to even decipher media lie.
(30:12):
Hardcore leftist Indeed, I think Trump won the rest the
Rust Belt because two time Obama voters turned out and
voted for Trump, not for Kamala Harris, and they weren't
going to vote for Biden either, whereas they did not
cross over and vote for Romney, who, by the way,
it was also called the worst type of racist in
(30:33):
the books when he ran against Obama. So I'll leave
some things here to the imagination. But Boudhajig is big
on how Republicans exclude others, but leaves out Trump's massive
demographic improvements last year while running on supposedly what were
taboo topics. Reagan was right to say that Democrats know
(30:59):
so much much that is not so. A two party system,
even if your side is dominant, can be counterproductive if
there isn't healthy competition between the two sides. And when
I say that, I mean both sides must have a
real fear of losing to keep them accountable. Democrats in California,
where the elections are rigged, Conservatives have been moving out
(31:21):
to other states where the machine controls everything. I mean,
the entire state of California has become the Cook County
of the twenty twenty five, where the party apparatus controls everything,
so there's no accountability, and they're turning that state into
Venezuela with very little effort, very little effort, and we're
(31:44):
walking in front of our eyes and Pete Boudajet keeps
blaming us for everything. Little mayor Pete, go back to
your little town, shut up and sit down, because I
think we know what we're doing, and we know what
the problems are. And the cabal beginning to recognize that
Cabald is trying to filter everything that we see. They're propagandi,
(32:04):
propagandizing us, and we know it
Morning, Brownie and Dragon, I don't have you know, And
I was on the road for twenty two and a
half years and nearly three million miles all over the
country forty eight states and into Canada, and never once
did I resort.
Speaker 2 (00:15):
To a lot wizard.
Speaker 1 (00:17):
So I guess I don't have any STDs.
Speaker 2 (00:22):
Have a good day. Well, Lottie Doll, aren't we impressed.
Speaker 3 (00:30):
Just because one does not correlate with the other. So
you still could have plenty of STDs and never resorted
to a lot of This is just throwing that out there.
Speaker 2 (00:40):
But you sure, sure, you know I want to go
down a path, but you know, I got a meeting
with the boss afterwards, so I'm not really sure I
go I should go down this path because we might
be on a really good level right now.
Speaker 3 (01:02):
I don't know how nervous we should be about that.
Because I did send that previous talkback to our boss.
Oh yeah, because it promotes the iHeart exactly fantastic.
Speaker 2 (01:12):
All about promoting the company.
Speaker 3 (01:14):
The ross may want to pass that along to his
bosses and say, look at this, people are what what
what did.
Speaker 2 (01:22):
You actually say? What I did I hear you correctly?
What that you pass it on to him, thinking that
he's going to pass it on to anybody else. He
could gotta be freaking kidding me. You think anybody. First
of all, he's been relegated to this row of offices.
He's not up there with the cool kids. He's got leaves.
(01:48):
You think that. Do you think even has their email addresses?
Do you think that he even knows Jojo or Brenda's
email addresses.
Speaker 3 (01:55):
I've seen his boss in his office.
Speaker 2 (02:01):
Well that's just because they wanted to come down and
see how the other half live. Yeah, but I just
wanted to come down and see the other side of
the tracks, is what they wanted to do. But they
stepped down out of their ivory tower to see. Oh,
let's go back and see how the worker bees are doing.
Speaker 3 (02:15):
But I'm not sure if we should be worried or not, because,
like I said, I sent that email with that attached
talkback to our boss and said, hey, you know, we
thought this was really cool. He writes back, I just
heard it live. You guys are awesome. No one uses
talkbacks better. But that has me concerned our boss. Listen, well,
(02:44):
let's be serious.
Speaker 2 (02:45):
Then, let's be serious by going back to the trucker
who twenty two years and three million miles.
Speaker 3 (02:54):
So he said, all forty eight states.
Speaker 2 (02:56):
All forty eight states. Why didn't you make it to Alaska?
I know, come on, come on, are you retired? Get
your ass back in that rig and get back up
to Alaska. And then and one of them talks. Oh,
one says they watch uh ice road truckers or something.
He could have been a part of that. So he
could have been part of that. But he says he's
(03:16):
never used a lot lizard. But what about your hand?
Speaker 3 (03:22):
His forearms are massive, turning the big rigs, the steering wheels.
Speaker 2 (03:27):
There, and think about it. Now, with modern technology, you've
got porn HD high definition right in front of.
Speaker 3 (03:34):
You anywhere you want it, anytime you want it.
Speaker 2 (03:37):
That's right, and you can just be dry. In fact,
you know the other truck driver, that's probably what he's
doing while he's creaning through you know, the parks, he says,
in the church parking lots, that's what he's doing. That's
why he's creening around everywhere. Says he's too busy. Oh,
I got a new porn. You ever thought about porn?
Have you ever really thought seriously thought about porn.
Speaker 3 (04:00):
I'm not sure where you're going with this there, Michael.
Speaker 2 (04:05):
You kind of know what the plot is, there's kind
of you kind of know what the the ending is.
It's it's it's like watching the same cartoon over and
over and over again. It's like, Okay, there's yeah, sometimes
there might be two actors, there might be four actors.
I don't mean sometimes there's twenty actors. But it all
(04:26):
leads to the same conclusion, doesn't it. Or am I
missing something? Maybe I'm you know, maybe all these years,
I'm missing something. Maybe there's something else that I I
didn't know. Oh you can do that. I didn't know that.
I don't know. There's no segue in the one I
want to.
Speaker 4 (04:44):
Talk about, No, because my notes say this a man's wisdom,
No boy, A man's wisdom can truly mature once he
realizes he is not right about every thing.
Speaker 2 (05:00):
And maybe flying blind as to how things really are,
that actually might be a good segue from porn. Maybe
I just think I'm right about porn, and I've been
flying blind all these years, and I think I know
how things really are, and I really don't. Maybe I've
just got the wrong porn channels. Book marked on my laptop.
(05:21):
Maybe I got the wrong porn book marked over here
on the three eighty six. As we're still using maybe
we'll get news about, you know, a new computer. Ooh.
I actually learned that lesson the hard way, a man's
wisdom can truly mature once he realizes he's not right
about everything, and that you might be flying blind as
(05:43):
to how things really are. I mean I discovered that
during Katrina. I thought that, you know, I knew how
bad things were. I just didn't know how bad things were.
I'm sure a lot of you have learned that Lesson
Election day came and went, let's go back. Obama was
reelected with a popular vote majority three hundred and thirty
(06:05):
two electoral votes, losing ground from two thousand and eight,
but still commanding the most important battleground states Pennsylvania, Michigan, Florida, Ohio,
and Iowa. Think about that list, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Florida, Ohio,
and Iowa. And I want you to think about that
(06:26):
list and remember just how far the Trump Revolution has
come in bringing parody to the national election calculus. So
don't let an error in judgment impact how you may
view anybody's comments anything I may say today, because this
(06:50):
was four years ago, and I think I've since figured
out how to properly analyze voter registration by party and
combine those findings with historical president to make an accurate
assessment of what the political terrain really looks like today.
(07:12):
The situation I described above is referred to as the
fallacy of consensus. Fallacy of consensus. It's what left wingers
have done for the past decade in underestimating Trump's true
chances of victory twice or maybe three times, depending on
your view of the last the previous election. And they
(07:38):
they underestimate Trump's chances of winning any issue, let alone
an election, primarily because their close network of million unstable
lemmings led to the edge of their mental cliffs by
the liars that exist in the mainstream media, the cabal,
(07:59):
and then that ends up turning into everybody online, everybody
agrees that Trump is Hitler or whatever. The next latest
and greatest emotional plead to the country to vote for
their socialist, fascist, Marxist communist candidates who promised to dig
us deeper into obscurity if they get the keys to power.
I heard George Will was on with I think it
(08:22):
was with Bill Maher, George Will, who's getting up in age.
Not that I can say anything about that, but George Will. Uh.
The last time I saw George Will was in the
green room of ABC News in DC, and he and
I were having this great conversation. And it suddenly struck
(08:44):
me as I sat there listening to the great George
Will pontificating about whatever we are pontificating about that while
he's never really and I don't mean this cruelly or
for joyatively, but he's never really done anything like And
(09:05):
I was thinking this at the time, your insight is
really good, but you haven't lived in the trenches like
I have. Because we were comparing notes about, you know,
kind of how we both ended up in the green
room at the same time. George Will, in commenting to
Bill Maher, said that he actually hopes that Mondani wins
(09:29):
in New York. And Bill Maher was taken aback by
it because and wanted to know why, and he said,
because every once in a while, we need someone like
this to come along and utterly destroy. Now. New York's
a great city, the financial well, it's still the financial
center of the universe, although Dallas and Houston are a
(09:52):
close second behind, because everybody except Jamie Diamond, JP Morgan
Chase are really starting to move Texas. Even j Diamond's
moving a lot of Jamie Diamond is moving a lot
of his people to Texas. And they may be right.
So whatever, these mindless candidates that promised to dig us
deeper into obscurity if handing the keys to power, I
(10:15):
do fear them. But maybe it's good that it's just
that it's not Bernie Sanders running for president. I mean,
even the Democrats knew we can't let Bernie run for
president because he'll destroy the party because he is an
avowed communist. Mandamie, on the other hand, destroys New York.
Maybe it will wake us up. Maybe maybe it's time
(10:37):
to move my examples from across the Atlantic to just
the Eastern seaboard. And once you see what happens on
the Eastern Seaboard and you happen you see what happens
in in New York. Of course we can already see
what's happening in Chicago and Los Angeles, maybe we'll kind
of wake up. You you can tell that I'm cured
(11:00):
from the fallacy of consensus, by the way I freely
talk about all of my past experiences in the sea,
and by the way, I still view the twenty twenty
six midterms as somewhat of a crap shoot, even though
I do believe that we will defy history and we
will retain majorities in the House, and I think we'll
expand simply because of the math, we'll expand our numbers
(11:24):
in the Senate. But we won't know until we get
through the election. But I'm also, as I've told you before,
maybe it's a confession, I am a pain subscriber to
The New York Times. I use it for some content,
and I use it to understand, truly how the other
(11:47):
side is thinking. I'm essentially doing what I've done for
years now in trying to use their arguments and their data,
all of their diatribes to make my points about how
crab crazy they are. Well, I notice that America's most
overrated mayor, Pete Budajig, penned an editorial recently that could
(12:11):
have been written from the inside of any coffee shop
sitting in Martha's Vineyard, or sitting out in the Hamptons,
or sitting out in your deck overlooking the Pacific in Malibu.
Pete Budajig on rebuilding America after Trump. This was written
(12:32):
one week ago. The former Transportation secretary argues Americans need
a new sense of belonging. It's to befuddling to read it,
especially since the content comes from a Biden Cabinet official
who presumably was dealing with real issues facing work in
Americans as Transportation secretary, which I don't do. I have
(12:57):
to point out to you that the government shut down
is exposing just how fragile the air traffic control system is.
The very first quote from Mayor Pete is perhaps the
only one that I might agree with Sooner or later.
He says, one day Donald Trump will not be active
in American politics, and the sooner we spend our energy
(13:20):
thinking about what to do next. I actually think the
sooner that day will come. Now, why would I even
perhaps agree with part of that, because we do need
to be thinking about post Trump. Doesn't mean we need
stop talking about current Trump, but we do need to
be thinking about post Trump. The reason I agree with
this statement also is that Republicans spend every ounce of
(13:42):
energy always criticizing Obama, always criticizing Obama going after threads
of his past, even if true, I don't care, had
no impact on the path of destruction that started with
Barack Obama. He really did when he said that he
(14:03):
you know, they're the ones we've been waiting on. No, actually,
you're not the ones I've been waiting on. Or that
it is time that we fundamentally transform America. Oh, I
believe that one if he had read anything at all
about Barack Obama, you knew what that really meant, transform
us from a constitutional republic into some sort of socialist
(14:25):
Marxist utopia. I think people thought that people were going
to vote for Romney just because we didn't like Obama.
But as Trump showed us, voting for someone is a
lot more powerful than voting against someone. Nobody, including me,
(14:47):
I didn't want Romney. I voted for Romney, said because
he had an R after his name. And I not
only did I have an R after his name, but
the guy that had a D after his name I
knew was a Mars was on a path of destruction
for this country. Tens of millions of people have voted
(15:07):
for Kamala Harris. Didn't vote for her. What were they doing?
They wanted to stop Trump. She spent over a billion
dollars in those one hundred and seven days, and she
was unable to convince enough people to stop Trump. So
let me break down this stupid editorial considering what Buddhajig
(15:30):
and his interviewer have to say, or at least they're
leaning into his, MSNBC would say, is it Trump's fault? Leonhardt,
who is asking questions of Budajig. One of the things
that I think has long distinguished the US relative to
other countries is our optimism. We went west, we went
(15:53):
to the moon, we won World Wars, we invented the airplane,
the Internet, the American dream. Yet we sure don't feel
very optimistic today. President Trump tells this terribly dark story
about crime and violence and the country being ripped off,
and the left can be pretty dark in its own way.
So I'm curious, why is it that you, Pete, think
(16:14):
that these dark narratives seem to have really taken over?
Listen to this well, I think part of it is
based on very real things, and part of it's based
on the way we get our information. The very real part,
I would say, is mostly about our economy. It's a
simple fact that if you were born the year that
my mother was born, you had roughly a ninety percent
chance of being able to expect that you would materially
(16:36):
live better than your parents did, that you'd economically be
better off by the time you were an adult than
the family you were born into. Oh so yes, fall
back to tone optimism, rainbows and lollipops butterflies, just like
when Trump inaugurated this year, how his tone was supposedly
(16:57):
dark and pessimistic because it focused on immediate action rather
than platitudes. Trump's trying to clean up the very mess
that Pete Buddhajig and his boss and his predecessor, Barack Obama,
set this country on the path toward Pete. The reasons
(17:19):
that Trump tells the story about crime and violence for
the country being ripped off is simple, and that's because
of decades of maladministration, because the borders overflowed to the
tunes of tens of millions of illegal aliens and now
their children living here, their entire portions of cities that
are uninhabitable by working class Americans. Because of the chaotic
(17:42):
conditions brought about by your horrible failures to do the
most basic task of any government guarantee the security of
the people. Touch myself? Uh huh, and I don't know. Okay,
I don't know, but you got y when the time
is nine fourteen. I tuned in about three minutes ago.
What the hell is going on in there? Well, it's
(18:08):
a snaffoo.
Speaker 3 (18:09):
First of all, you must be new here, right, You
think you could just randomly tune in and get something
normal from either of us.
Speaker 2 (18:18):
Right, It's that's why I say it's a snaffoo. It's
a situation normal, it's all left up. So that's in fact,
we should just change the name of this program to
The Snaffoo with Michael Brown and Dragon writ The Snaffhoo
with Michael Brown corrupted by Dragon red Beard. Oh, screwed
up by Dragon Redbeard? About that? Back back to Pete Budhajig.
(18:43):
By the way, thanks for the text message about the
Gelman amnesia effect. That's I've got to go read more
about that. But that's exactly what's going on here. Let's
go back to Pete Boudajig for a second. So Pete
(19:05):
says that it's it's wrong for Trump to be talking
about what he's going to do immediately. Well, that's why
we voted for him. Now I voted obviously, I guess
the logic would art be that by voting for Trump,
I voted against Biden. Honestly, I would have voted against
(19:29):
the corpse, because if I voted for Biden, I was
already voting for a corpse. Might as well have been
a corpse. We end up Bernie's but for him to
sit there and talk about, oh, you know, the platitudes
about positivity and everything else. Where were you, what did
you fix? Did you fix anything? I'm always amazed and
(19:54):
kind of perplexed and also disappointed by the fact that
we always have things to fix in this country in
order to secure a more perfect union. We're always trying
to be more perfect. We're always trying to that's our
aspirational goal, to be the best that we can be.
So you have to fix things, well, things in this
(20:14):
country need to be fixed. Aurora, Denver, Chicago, Los Angeles,
New York. I mean, any other blue hellholes that prioritizes
the interests of foreigners, misplaces their priorities for spending over
citizens and overdoing actual true government functions is an example
(20:38):
of how we've gone off the rails. So here's Budajig
in the New York Times of all places, of course,
hailing himself as this sort of moderate voice, because he's, Oh,
I'm from the Midwest, so I must be moderate. Really,
I know some crazy yes, you know, Marxist fascist communists
from the Midwest. If you're from the Midwest, you think
(21:02):
that he would understand firsthand the damage that was brought
about by reckless trade policies. For example, where do you
think the word or the phrase rust belt came from.
Russ Belt is not a term of endearment. The russ
belt reflects the damage done to working class areas of
New York, Pennsylvania and the rest of the Midwest, extending
(21:22):
through southern Illinois in which jobs were sent overseas and
working people but they were just cast overboard. But he's
oblivious to that. Mayor Pete, how do you expect people
left to the mercy of cartels and the globalization of
the American economy to react as we should. I'm preparing
a story for either tomorrow or Friday about Trump's deal
(21:48):
with Argentina, in which we're going to buy Argentina Argentine
beef and ranchers in this country upset about it. You
know how much I support to the point that I
buy my beef directly from people that raise cattle. There's
a meat cartel, there's a meat packing cartel. The ranchers
(22:11):
are upset. I mean, I get there, I get why
they're upset at Trump, but they're really upset the wrong person.
Do you think Pete Budajigg would understand anything about how
a side of beef, well not even a side of beef,
about how a cow gets from a ranch or a
farm to a meat packer that eventually gets to a
(22:32):
distributor that eventually gets to your grocery store. And you're
bitching at the farmers and the ranchers because of the
price of meat. You're some kind of stupid. But back
to Pete, is it Trump's fault? Is the are the
(22:54):
things that Trump's trying to fix? Trump's fault? Here's what
he writes. I actually think there are projects like that
waiting for us as a country. I long believe that
climate could be one. It's an example of something bigger
than any of us. I also think, paradoxically that all
of the damage that Trump administration has done to our
(23:15):
institutions actually creates a very important potential future moment where
even if we bitterly disagree on how those institutions were destroyed,
we can come together on what we should build in
their place. Now. For that to happen, he writes, it
means a Republican party needs to evolve into being more
(23:35):
about building than destroying. And it means the Democrat Party
needs to get more interested in what we can do
next than in preserving the status quo that's being smashed
to pieces. Those are Buddhajig's words. In response to what
must be done to bring Americans together. He says there
(23:56):
hasn't been enough national project demanding national uth unity and
reminds readers of World War Two before saying he hopes
there isn't a war. A fundamental difference arises here in
that progressives will rush to defend institutions they have curated
to work for them, at the same time opposing those
(24:18):
they lack control over, such as the current immigration enforcement
arms of the federal government. No matter how much he
tries in this stupid article to connect with the people
of the Midwest over geography, he doesn't understand them, because
that's how leftists are. That's how democratic. That's how the
(24:40):
I the more I watch the Democrat Party fall apart
and try to understand why and how it's falling apart
and who's filling that vacuum. The Democrat Party really is
a party of Marxism and communism. It truly is. I've
watched Clomo in his and for that matter of Curtis too,
(25:02):
in their race against Mondamie in New York sly was
not so much because he's just that kind of personality.
Cuomo looks like he's been beat to death. He just
he doesn't even know where he Cuomo a legacy name
in New York Democrat politics, and he looks like he's
(25:25):
been beaten to death and has no understanding of where
he places or sits inside the Democrat Party. He can't win.
I mean, I'll be shocked if he does, but I
just don't see how he wins. He should be winning,
even over my friend Curtis. He should be winning, but
he won't. And Pete Boudhajig will never win either, because
(25:47):
no matter how much he tries to connect with people,
he simply cannot do it. The projects of the day
that we see going on are projects of tearing down
corrupt infrastructure and corrupt institutions, which a real estate developer
(26:08):
like Donald Trump knows has to happen before lasting beauty
can be created. You go back and look at the
pictures of the White House. Yes, it is jarring. As
someone who spent a lot of time in the White House,
looking at those pictures of the East Wing being demolished
is jarring to me. But I understand that's what needs
(26:30):
to be done. I fully comprehend that. I've internalized that. Yeah,
while that picture is jarring, what's coming afterwards. Being able
to see the future, being able to actually imagine what
it's going to look like, gives me like, Oh, this
is going to be great. Meanwhile it's ugly. Oh goes
(26:52):
back to creative destruction Ecclesiastes three. I'm not going to
start preaching. Reminds us that there is a time to
tear down and a time to build. Trump's legacy is
to gut those who have sold out the national interests,
not to continue to build institutions, courts, agencies, and infrastructure
(27:15):
that's based on the foundation of corruption. That's what he
was elected for. We saw when when Biden went to
sleep and the Barack Obama people took over the West wing.
We saw the actual opening of the kimono of the
progressive left and how bad it was, and we acted
(27:37):
viscerally to it and said no. Pete Budhajig doesn't get it.
Is it Trump's fault? Number three? This is what he says.
Speaker 5 (27:44):
Next, don't forget to vote no in November. Remember November
is no vote no, just vote no on everything.
Speaker 2 (27:56):
So Pete is asking this New York Times article, how
do you diagnose how the Democrat Party came to be
seen as defenders of the status quo? I think, if
we're being honest, in some real ways, they are actual
defenders of the status quo. And peace reply is in
part because we saw attacks on institutions and systems that
(28:18):
we cared about and that really do deserve to be defended,
like Social Security. Who's attacking social Security? It fascinates me
how brainwashed we are that we know that social Security
is insolvent, and we know that something needs to be done,
and we know that we're going to grandfather everybody in
(28:39):
that's already on. But for new people, we've got to
have a different system. But you can't even talk about
that because Democrats will tell you that your throwing grandmother
call off the cliff. The Democrats continue down their journey,
focusing on their team, the Democrat Party, and what they
(29:01):
do is they never realized that they're the ones that
sent jobs to other countries. They replaced those people, those
jobs and those people that got displaced in the workforce
with illegal aliens. They wouldn't let us watch football without
you know, or any sports, or for that matter, any
program without getting propagandized. We were told we were racist
(29:24):
and bigots for opposing anything. Racism just inculcated. Racism, just
permeated every single thing, every aspect of life. It didn't
make any difference whether you were in a mixed marriage,
how many black friends or Asian friends, or white friends
or whatever it did. It didn't make any difference how
colorblind you were, If you were a Republican or a conservative,
(29:47):
you were racist. And then they decided to vote for
the guy who called them the forgotten man and woman
and promised to reorient our trade policy in our favor.
Their party is increasingly made up of resentful and angry,
scorned women who can't speak English to even decipher media lie.
(30:12):
Hardcore leftist Indeed, I think Trump won the rest the
Rust Belt because two time Obama voters turned out and
voted for Trump, not for Kamala Harris, and they weren't
going to vote for Biden either, whereas they did not
cross over and vote for Romney, who, by the way,
it was also called the worst type of racist in
(30:33):
the books when he ran against Obama. So I'll leave
some things here to the imagination. But Boudhajig is big
on how Republicans exclude others, but leaves out Trump's massive
demographic improvements last year while running on supposedly what were
taboo topics. Reagan was right to say that Democrats know
(30:59):
so much much that is not so. A two party system,
even if your side is dominant, can be counterproductive if
there isn't healthy competition between the two sides. And when
I say that, I mean both sides must have a
real fear of losing to keep them accountable. Democrats in California,
where the elections are rigged, Conservatives have been moving out
(31:21):
to other states where the machine controls everything. I mean,
the entire state of California has become the Cook County
of the twenty twenty five, where the party apparatus controls everything,
so there's no accountability, and they're turning that state into
Venezuela with very little effort, very little effort, and we're
(31:44):
walking in front of our eyes and Pete Boudajet keeps
blaming us for everything. Little mayor Pete, go back to
your little town, shut up and sit down, because I
think we know what we're doing, and we know what
the problems are. And the cabal beginning to recognize that
Cabald is trying to filter everything that we see. They're propagandi,
(32:04):
propagandizing us, and we know it
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
CrimeLess: Hillbilly Heist
It’s 1996 in rural North Carolina, and an oddball crew makes history when they pull off America’s third largest cash heist. But it’s all downhill from there. Join host Johnny Knoxville as he unspools a wild and woolly tale about a group of regular ‘ol folks who risked it all for a chance at a better life. CrimeLess: Hillbilly Heist answers the question: what would you do with 17.3 million dollars? The answer includes diamond rings, mansions, velvet Elvis paintings, plus a run for the border, murder-for-hire-plots, and FBI busts.