10-25-25 The Weekend Hour 3: Ronald Reagan on Tariffs. East Wing Stories Are Pure Insanity.

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Good night.

Speaker 2 (00:01):
Michael Brown joins me here, the former FEMA director of talk.

Speaker 3 (00:03):
Show host Michael Brown. Brownie, No, Brownie, You're doing a
heck of a job.

Speaker 2 (00:07):
The Weekend with Michael Brown broadcasting Life from Denver, Colorado.
It's the Weekend with Michael Brown. Glad to have you
joining the program today. A couple of rules of engagement.
If you want to send me a message, ask me anything,
tell me anything, the number on your messy JAP is
three three one zero three three three one zero three,
use the keyword Mike or Michael, and then do me
a favor. Go follow me over on x formerly Twitter.

(00:30):
It's at Michael Brown USA, at Michael Brown USA. So,
just as Major League Baseball started their World Series last
night and the Toronto Blue Jays pulled it out in
the ninth inning, Donald Trump cut off all trade negotiations
with our British subject friends to the North Canada. And

(00:51):
the reason it seems that the President is royally pissed
off about an ad run by Mark Carney's government, which
reflectively edits a speech given by Ronaldus Magnus Ronald Reagan
in which probably the greatest president of the twentieth century
expressed his regret over having to levy a tariff on

(01:13):
Japan in response to its own extremely aggressive trade practices. Well,
as it turns out, the Ronald Reagan Foundation was pretty
pissed off about the whole thing too. The Ronald Reagan
Foundation alleges that Ontario Prime Minister Ford from Ontario use

(01:34):
the video one without asking me its permission in advance,
which is a no.

Speaker 3 (01:38):
No.

Speaker 2 (01:39):
Seems like a acolyte idiot that Carnie would have known
better than to do that. It's okay for me to
use it because I have fair use. I'm not using
it in an advertisement. I'm not using it. In fact,
the other thing I'm not doing it is I'm not
altering it so that you think it says one thing

(02:00):
when it really says another. The Reagan Foundation issued this
statement that Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation. The Institute learned that
the Government of Ontario created an ad campaign using selective
audio and video of President Ronald Reagan delivering his radio
address to the Nation on Free Trade and Fair Trade
David's April twenty five, nineteen eighty seven. The ad misrepresents

(02:24):
the presidential radio address and the Government Ontario did not
seek nor receive permission to use or added the remarks.
The Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation and Institute is reviewing its
legal opinions in this matter. We encourage you to watch
President Reagan's unedited video on our YouTube channel. Of course,

(02:45):
a presidente got in on the act too, He said,
over on truth social eventually over on acts. The Reagan
Foundation has just announced that Canada has fraudulently used an
advertisement which is fake, featuring Ronald Reagan speaking negatively about tariffs.
The ad was for seventy five million dollars. They only
did this to interfere with the decision of the US

(03:07):
Supreme Court and other courts. Tariffs are very important to
the national security and economy of the United States. Based
on their egregious behavior, all trade negotiations with Canada are
hereby terminated. And of course his new signature, thank you
for your attention to this matter, Donald J. Trump. So

(03:31):
what did Reagan say? Well, it's pretty interesting, because Reagan
they did very selectively added the radio address. Here is
the pertinent part.

Speaker 3 (03:45):
When someone says, let's impose tariffs on foreign imports, it
looks like they're doing the patriotic thing by protecting American
products and jobs, and sometimes for a short wire it works,
but only for a short time. But over the long run,
such trade barriers hurt every American worker and consume. High

(04:08):
tariffs inevitably lead to retaliation by foreign countries and the
triggering of fierce tradements. Then the worst happenings. Market shrink
and collapse, businesses and industry shut down, and millions of
people lose their jobs. Throughout the world, there's a growing
realization that the weight of prosperity for all nations is

(04:30):
rejecting protectionist legislation and promoting fair and free competition. America's
jobs and growth are at state. Throughout the world, there's
a growing realization that the weight of prosperity for all
nations is rejecting protectionist legislation and promoting fair and free competition.

(04:55):
Now there are sound historical reasons for this. For those
of us who lived through the Great de Depression, the
memory of the suffering it caused is deep and searing,
and today many economic analysts and historians argue that high
tariff legislation passed back in that period, called the Smoot
Hawley Tariff, greatly deepened the depression and prevented economic recovery.

(05:17):
You see, at first, when someone says, let's impose tariffs
on foreign imports, it looks like they're doing the patriotic
thing by protecting American products and jobs, and sometimes for
a short while it works, but only for a short time.
What eventually occurs is first homegrown industries start relying on
government protection in the form of high tariffs. They stop

(05:40):
competing and stop making the innovative management and technological changes
they need to succeed in world markets. And then while
all this is going on, something even worse occurs. High
tariffs inevitably lead to retaliation by foreign countries and the
triggering of fierce trade wars. The result is more and
more tariffs, higher and higher trade barriers, in less and

(06:03):
less competition. So soon, because of the prices made artificially
high by tariffs that subsidize inefficiency and poor management, people
stop buying. Then the worst happens. Market shrink and collapse,
businesses and industry shut down, and millions of people lose
their jobs. The memory of all this occurring back in
the thirties made me determined when I came to Washington

(06:25):
to spare the American people. The protectionist legislation that destroys prosperity. Now,
it hasn't always been easy. There are those in the Congress,
just as there we're back in the thirties, who want
to go for the quick political advantage, will risk America's
prosperity for the sake of a short term appeal to
some special interest group, who forget that more than five

(06:46):
million American jobs are directly tied to the foreign export
business and additional millions are tied to imports. But I've
never forgotten those jobs. And on trade issues, by and large,
we've done.

Speaker 2 (07:02):
Now. Some will say that foreign governments advertise all the time,
and they do, but there's a difference between general country branding,
you know, come and visit the United Kingdom, and intervention
into a live dispute between those two countries. So the
Ford government in Ontario didn't run some generic tourism spot.
It placed an argument into the American conversation about tariffs

(07:24):
and trade, and it did so by selectively quoting one
of the most belovant, respected presidents in our history. That
is an attempt to set the priors of American voters
and lawmakers while in negotiation with Canada. Is underway. The
policy question is not whether Ontario has free speech. The
question is whether the United States should proceed with high

(07:47):
level trade talks while a Canadian provincial government tries to
define the American terms of the debate, and the answer
should be no. Now, Reagan's rhetoric was clear. He praises
open markets, He embraces competition. He believes a trade when
fair promotes jobs, innovation, prosperity, all of that which I

(08:08):
believe too. He said that our trade policy rests on
free and open markets, which it does free trade. But
in the same breath he warned that if trade is
not fair for all, then trade is free in name only,
and he pledged that he would not stand by and watch,
in particular, in this case japan American businesses fail because

(08:29):
of unfair practices abroad. He promised then to take all
action necessary, including tariffs, to see that other nations live
up to their obligations and their agreements with US. That
is not the language of fair trade at any price.
It is the language of rules reciprocity enforcement. The Ontario

(08:54):
government edit carved away that structure and just left behind
a slogan See a slogan's easy The policy is hard.
Removing the conditions that removes the policies, and Reagan's practice
matched his words. He supported liberalization when partners played fair,
and he launched multilateral talks to reduce the barriers. He

(09:17):
signed bilateral free trade agreements with Canada that set the
stage for broader North American integration. But when Japan in autos,
he pressed Japan into export restraint in nineteen eighty one
that limited shipments to roughly one point six to eight
million units a year later raised as Detroit regained its footing,

(09:39):
and he kept him place the long standing twenty five
percent light truck tariff that had shielded workers in an
American segment where Japanese firms were attacking by way of
many trucks. He's doing what Trump's doing. Reagan did Ontario,
you lied East Wing. Next, Hey, welcome back to the

(10:08):
Weekend with Michael Brian. Glad to have you with me.
I appreciate you tuning in some What else is going on?
We've got Ontario lying to the American public and an
ad played in the United States misquoting in selectively editing
Ronald Reagan. What's the other big news? Donald Trump is

(10:28):
destroying the East Wing. Let's go to MSNBC John Meacham
and Joe Scarborough.

Speaker 1 (10:38):
So John take us through the history of presidents changing,
altering the White House. The National Review is a written
an editorial saying come on, get over. Presidents have done
this in the past. Liberals, the White House doesn't belong to.

Speaker 4 (10:54):
You, right, you know, the British burned it. So there's that,
or try to.

Speaker 2 (11:04):
Start there, you know.

Speaker 4 (11:07):
The most significant, the two most significant, i'd say, would
be the nineteen oh three construction of the West Wing,
which was the Oval Office. The Oval Office was based
on what's called the Oval Study in the main House.
That was the reason for the echo of the design.

(11:28):
One of the metaphors that you can't make up was
in I think it was Christmas Eve nineteen thirty one,
the West Wing caught fire under Herbert Hoover, right, so
the country sort of descending into chaos and the house
itself catches fire. The other is the Truman the renovation

(11:52):
that happened under President Truman. He and Missus Truman moved
to Blair House across the way for several years.

Speaker 5 (12:01):
But you know, as ever with President Trump, you know
you do have to step back and say, well, what
is he trying to do? What is the you know,
let's let's not bang on our high chairs here.

Speaker 2 (12:16):
But they are. They're all banging on their high chairs. Now.
Notice so far into this sound bite he hasn't mentioned
all the other major renovations, like the actual construction of
the East wing itself or the building of a swimming
pool for the personal use of FDR because of his

(12:40):
polio at taxpayer expense, both very significant changes. By the way,
the West wing, the West Wing, which is not that
old in terms of the history of the White House
built by Theodore Roosevelt, an add on, complete add on,

(13:01):
just like the East Wing was also an add on.

Speaker 4 (13:07):
And to me, one of the issues here is so
much of the I haven't seen the National Review piece,
but so much of the controversy here might be settled if,
for instance, he actually paid attention to norms, to the
customs of having You know, Congress was very much involved

(13:30):
in the nineteen forties version of this bring in the
National truck.

Speaker 2 (13:36):
Wait a minute, Congress is involved in the nineteen forties.
Congress wasn't involved at all when the West Wing was
added on, not at all. Theodore Roosevelt. You think Theodore Roosevelt,
the rough rider himself, would have said, yeah, I think
I'm going to add on to the west Wing. I

(13:56):
think I'll run to Congress and for permission to do that. No,
Theodore Roosevelt, just like Donald Trump, would be like, yeah,
you know what, I need an office building over here.
I mean, let's do this, Let's build, let's build this
West week.

Speaker 4 (14:09):
Christ bring in the White House Historical Association, a wonderful
group founded in the Kennedy administration. Terrific people who who
care deeply about the House. You know, you do this
with some sensitivity to the fact that you're not a king.

Speaker 2 (14:29):
Oh oh, I get it now. You see. The problem
is he's a king. I keep forgetting that because I
don't know. Nobody's told me what I can or cannot
say here today. The Gestapo hasn't come in to shut
me down. I don't get it. Miranda Devine over at
the New York Post has an incredible editorial about this.

(14:54):
Trump treats the White House with reverence, and he's rebuilding
our nation's pride with historic renovation. Here's an excerpt. The
President says, the sound of bulldozers at the East Wing
is music. To my ears. You probably hear the beautiful
sound of construction to the back, Donald Trump told the
reporters Tuesday from a podium. You hear that sound, he said,

(15:15):
raising his hand to his ear as if to savor
the clamor from the construction of the new White House
ballroom that began a week ago. Ah, that's music to
my ears. I love that sound. Other people don't like it.
I love it. It was a rye jab, she writes
at Trump deranged critics like John Meacham, critics of his big,
beautiful ballroom, who are losing their minds over his beautification

(15:39):
of the White House. It's pretty hilarious, right, But it
isn't beautiful to Joe Scarborough, or to John Meacham, who
slammed Trump and the project on Morning Joe Snarl, the
renown as the MSNBC's Morning Joe Scarborough. It's just grotesque

(16:00):
history being torn to shreds. Do you think it's history?
What is historic about the east wing? Have you ever
thought about that? What's historic about it?

Speaker 5 (16:13):
Now?

Speaker 2 (16:13):
Trump's critics have been waiting about the loss of the
east Wing as if it were part of the original
White House built in the early nineteenth century, and as
if all sorts of important historic events have taken place
there over the last two hundred years. The truth, of course,
is a lot different than that. The first, fairly small
part of what has been called the East Wing was

(16:35):
also added by Theodore Roosevelt as part of his major
White House renovation back in nineteen oh two. What was
Theodore Roosevelt trying to do besides adding the executive offices
for the Executive Office of the President. He was adding
some more office space to what had become overcrowded in
the main part of the building. But the biggest part

(16:57):
was added in nineteen forty two by his cousin Franklin Roosevelt,
who required much more office editions as he led the
nation through World War Two. Both projects were needed, both
projects were funded by the taxpayers. You know what was
in the East Wing because I've been there, spent a

(17:20):
lot of time there, in both the West Wing and
the East Wing. And in fact I've been down to
the secret Presidential Emergency Operations Center in the bottom in
the basement that is under part of the original White
House and part of the East Wing. You know what's there, Offices,
offices that are old and small by modern standards, dusty

(17:44):
old offices. It's not the Lincoln Bedroom, it's not the
situation Room, it's not the White House press room. It's
not the cabinet room, not the Oval office, it's not
any part of the White House complex. I'll tell you
what's next next tonight. Michael Brown joins me here, the.

Speaker 3 (18:05):
Former FEMA director of talk show host Michael Brown.

Speaker 1 (18:07):
Brownie, No, Brownie, you're doing a heck of a job
the weekend with Michael Brown.

Speaker 2 (18:13):
Hey, so we came with Michael Brown. Thanks for joining.
We're talking about the East Wing. This story amazes me.
It truly amazes me, because renovating, remodeling the White House
is not unusual. It's been done dozens and dozens of times,

(18:34):
inside and outside. Why did nobody get upset? For example,
when I think it was Obama that completely redid the
White House Situation Room, Oh, I know, because you couldn't
see it. That's why the White House Situation Room was
and still is a relatively compact, small area, obviously very

(18:58):
secure in the basement below the West Wing. And it's
I remember the I mean the last time I was
in it, it was I would say it's it's like
a house you might live in where you think it's
probably time to remodel, but now it's waiting to do it
next year. But and again I'm not sure, but I

(19:20):
think it was Obama who came in and just completely
redid it and the Rose garden. Everybody's all upset about
the Rose garden. What you know what Trump did to
the Rose Garden. He took Jacqueline Kennedy's plans and redid
because from the time that Jackie Kennedy left the White

(19:44):
House in November of nineteen sixty three and Johnson took over,
subsequent presidents let it kind of go to crap. They
didn't really maintain it the way they should. It became overgrown,
and then they started, you know, putting different plans and
doing different things to it and changing it and moving around,
and it just gradually got smaller and smaller and smaller.

(20:06):
And so Trump came in and had the White House
architect actually pull out all of the original plans that
Jackie Kennedy had and restored it to what she had done.
Nobody's complained about Jackie Kennedy redoing the Rose garden.

Speaker 3 (20:23):
Huh.

Speaker 2 (20:25):
Now, of course we've got the controversy of oh do
you see a pattern here. Let's see, we had Nancy
Reagan replace the White House china because the White House
butler said, oh yeah, it's kind of embarrassing. We don't
have enough of the same set of china to serve
at a state dinner, so everybody has, you know, people
have different settings at different places. And she said, oh,

(20:46):
never mind, all take care of that. And she did
at the request of the White House butler. But no,
because she's a Republican married Ronald Reagan, she took all
sorts of crap for it. But let's go back to
the East Wing. If you've never been in that part
of the White House, which I assume most people have not,
probably the only thing that you would say is substantial

(21:10):
in the East Wing is the East Room, and that's
where you often see, for example, when Obama, let's use
Obama as an example again, when he made the announcement
that we got in Osama bin Laden, you saw him
walking down a hallway which is part of the East Wing,
into the East Room where the reporters were gathered for

(21:33):
him to hold the press conference. But the East Wing
is offices, offices old by modern standards. As I said earlier,
the most historic thing that has ever apparently happened in
the East Wing is that it serves as the main

(21:56):
entrance to the main White House for visitors who don't
have a appointments. Not even the left wing activists who
put out all the wolk propaganda on Wikipedia have managed
to find anything actually his historic about that part of
the building. I would encourage you go google it, go
dut dut, go it, go bing it and search for

(22:18):
his historic events in the East Wing, his historic you know,
American iconic happenings in the East Wing. Nothing.

Speaker 1 (22:29):
Nothing.

Speaker 2 (22:30):
Let's go back to Miranda divines up ed irony of
all irony, she writes Joe Biden's former de I press secretary,
Kareem Jean Pierre, as I like to call her, Kream
abdul jabbar, declare the ballroom, which is being funded by
Trump and other private donors as a gift to the nation,
is quote corruption at its core. Really this from a

(22:53):
woman she writes, who gas lit America on Biden family drifting,
not to mention her boss's cognitiate thief collapse. There's no
greater metaphor. This is cream. Jean Pierre, There's no greater
metaphor for what's happening right now in this country than
watching Donald Trump taking a wrecking ball to the White House.

(23:14):
Spare me. The ballroom is a historic and well overdue
enhancement of the White House, and it is not costing
the taxpayers a dime. Now, I don't know this for
a fact, but from everything that I've read, which is
why I don't know it for a fact, because who

(23:35):
knows whether the papers or the websites are telling me
the truth or not. It's most likely that this new ballroom,
in this renovation of the East Wing, will not be
completed in time for Donald Trump to use it. Subsequent
presidents will Democrat, Republican, independent communists, I guess, depending on

(23:58):
which direction the country goes. So please cream, Jean Pierre,
Spare me your idiotic gas lighting. We had more than
enough of that when you were so well undeservedly employed.
But the last sentence by Miranda Devine and her ed
I think is the key point, and that is none

(24:19):
of this is costing the taxpayers a dime. Unlike every
single previous White House expansion or renovation project conducted by
the Roosevelts, Jackie Kennedy, Harry Truman, Barack Obama his own self,
who spent three hundred and seventy six million dollars on
a project that kept the White House grounds torn to

(24:41):
shreds for well over a year during his presidency. And
notice I didn't mention Nancy Reagan because Nancy Reagan, like
Donald Trump, said yeah, we need what new White House China,
and let's just buy a whole new set. I forget
the cost. What was it maybe a one hundred thousand
dollars or something two hundred thousand. I don't I don't care.

(25:04):
She raised the money for it. Over on Next Yesterday
Byron York, a conservative writer did some gaslighting of his own,
citing a CNN story claiming that Obama's renovation simply involved
redoing the plumbing in the electric of the Right House.
Byan rart Yorke wrote yesterday, in reference to the East

(25:26):
Wing demolition story, you've probably seen clips from CNN from
twenty ten suggesting that Obama did equally massive work at
the White House. Here's the whole CNN story. It was
replacement of water and utility lines, which required a lot
of excavation. Really you expect us to believe that Obama
spent three hundred and seventy six million dollars on plumbing

(25:48):
and electric Come on, Byron House, stupid. Do you think
we are in actuality? It is an open secret in
DC that most of that money was poured into the
installation of a new fortified underground bunker complex designed to
keep the president and the cabinet safe during a national emergency.

(26:15):
It replaced the original bunker called the PEOC, which was
secretly installed by FDR nineteen forty two beneath his own
expanded east wing. See all this works. At least Trump's
being upfront and Trump's being fully transparent about what he's doing. Now,

(26:35):
I've seen different renderings. I'm not sure which rendering is correct.
I saw a report yesterday about some architect. It was
supposed by a liberal friend of mine on Facebook. Not
an architect who has looked at the drawings they're publicly available.
He has calculated his own construction costs and compared that

(26:57):
to the Trump estimation of three hundred million dollars and said, oh,
per square foot, this is outrageous. Does no one ever
take into consideration that part of the renovation that Trump
might be involved in doing here might be an expansion
of the bunker, or it might be providing some additional skiffs,

(27:21):
secure compartment, compartmentalized information facilities where you can actually have
top secret conversations. That's just not drywall. You just don't
do drywall. Maybe is fortifying part of it. The obvious
truth here, of course, is that if this exact same

(27:41):
project was being undertaken by a Democrat president, everybody in
the cabal would be singing his or her praises, calling
it visionary, even historic probably, and you know I'm right
about that. So to even try to argue the point,
because that's the exactly what would be going on, and

(28:03):
why they continue to pound pound pound this story I
find fascinating because just like the West Wing, just like
the Oval Office, just like the President's Emergency Operations Center,
just like the White House Situation Room, ten years, fifteen years,
Hell's bells, maybe three years from now this will be

(28:25):
an absolute non story, which then begs the question, why
do you think the cabal keeps feeding this story to
us over and over and over because it's Donald Trump.
I'll be right back, Welcome back to the Weekend with

(28:49):
Michael Brown. So glad to have you with me. I
appreciate everybody tuning in. As always, I want to thank
the audience for tuning in and listening to me. Be
sure and subscribe to the podcast. The name of the
podcast on your podcast app to search four is the
Situation with Michael Brown. The Situation with Michael Brown. Once
you find that, hit subscribe, give a five star review
so we can stay up in the rankings, and then

(29:09):
that way it will download all five days of the
weekday program plus the weekend program. So if you like
what we do on Saturday, I think you'll like what
we do on Monday through Friday also, And then be
sure and follow me on x at Michael Brown USA.
But I really do appreciate you tuning in, and I
hope you'll spread the word to help us keep the
affiliates and the listeners growing. I'm gonna talk skeletons for

(29:32):
a moment.

Speaker 5 (29:34):
Now.

Speaker 2 (29:34):
I know that you know there seems to be this
drop off in the number of kids that are claiming
to be gender dysphoric or they're wanting to transition or whatever.
And that's despite the fact that schools in general continue
to push this ideology. I don't think I think it

(29:54):
truly is an ideology, and the ideology is you don't
really know whether you're a boy or a girl. You
don't know whether you're male or female. So I wonder
what's gonna happen with archaeologists in the future. Will they
be able to determine by examining our skeletons our bones
because biological facts are impervious to radical ideology. Now, freedom

(30:20):
of speech is not impervious to radical ideology, As a
guy by the name of Emmanuel Brugeoltz of Switzerland is
finding out the hard way. Rugiolds is reportedly about to
start a ten day prison stent because of his voicing
skepticism about claims that skeletons are transgender. Now, I don't know,

(30:45):
maybe these people believe this. Skeletons can be polysexual too.
Might be kind of scary thought before Halloween. Back in
twenty twenty two, he responded to a Facebook post by
the Swiss National Council member Andreas Larner about this controversy.

(31:06):
The wind instrument repairman thought that such claims were unfounded
and posted a comment that said, quote, if you dig
up LGBTQI people after two hundred years you'll only find
men and women based on their skeletons. Everything else is
a mental illness promoted through the curriculum. Now, I would

(31:30):
note that's a factual observation, but Bruce Holt has been
charged with hate speech and public belittling, offending legally favored
sexual deviance. I guess he was convicted, sentenced to though
what was it ten days in prison and a five
indred Swiss Frank Fine. I didn't do the conversion to

(31:53):
see how much money that is. Don't really care. Now
he refused to pay on principle, and that's why he's
going to serve time as a political prisoner in supposedly
the most neutral, free country in the world. Have you
thought about how insane this is? Utterly insane because it's
biologically true. Scientists, archaeologists can tell whether a skeltsness male

(32:17):
or female based on the structure on the bone structure.
But what he says, everything else is a mental illness
promoted through the curriculum. I just had to laugh because
it is just being promoted through the curriculum. And to
point out that he was being fined and imprisoned for

(32:42):
public belittling, man, I'd be spending the rest of my
life in jail, and so would you. You know, that's
one of the great things about the First Amendment is
we can belittle public officials. We can belittle the people
that work for us. Just as your body, your boss

(33:02):
probably shouldn't, you know, poor management. But just as your
boss could be little you for doing some you know,
making some dumb ass mistake, we can belittle our people
that work for us for making dumb ass mistake. Is
dumb ass mistakes also. But in Switzerland, yeah, not so much.
Can't do that, absolutely can't do do that. To show

(33:26):
you how crazy things are the people that are present,
speaking of Europe, the progressive socialist Marxists that are really
kind of ruling over Europe right now, are going to
really absurd links to side with important Africans against the
women and the children that they rape. The case of

(33:48):
an Eritrean refugee convicted of raping the sixteen year old
Sweden girls pretty typical. Yah z Ed Muhammad allegedly sexually
assaulted the teenager back on September one, twenty four while
she was walking home from her shift at McDonald's after
missing the bus. So for his contribution, to Swedish multicultural tapestry.

(34:09):
This colonist received the customary wrist slab. Muhammad was sentenced
to three years in prison for raping a sixteen year
old girl. I don't think we'd accept that in this country,
but the Alto Norland Court of Appeals reportedly ruled the
rape did not last long enough. That's a quote, did

(34:30):
not last long enough to be classified as quote, an
exceptionally serious crime, so it did not necessitate deportation. I
guess I've got a different baseline understanding of how serious
of a crime rape of a child is, because, well,

(34:52):
for those of you listened to me during the weekday,
we do something called taxpayer relief shots, in which people
are celebrated for exercising their god given right of self defense.
If this girl had pulled a gun, which obviously in
Sweden she wouldn't be able to do, and killed her attacker,
that might end up in my audio file of the

(35:14):
taxpayer relief shot and one which we might actually celebrate
the death of the thug because he raped a sixteen
year old girl. Yet the Court of Appeal says, oh,
the rape didn't last long enough, so it's not really
classified as an exceptionally serious crime. Whether the rape lasted
one second, five minutes, or continued for an hour is

(35:38):
immaterial to me. There is nothing exceptionally serious about raping
my you know, children. I guess if the illegal alien
does it, just ask the United Nations the court. This
is a quote. The court was referring to United Nations
nineteen fifty one rule on the Status of Refugees, which

(35:59):
states that Mohammed and other refugees have their status protected
except in extreme cases. So the court ruled there was
no current threat to the public order, so Mohammad will
stay in Sweden following his sentence. No threat to the
public I think we all know that men who rape women,

(36:20):
particularly children, are more inclined to repeat that offense than
they are to not repeat that offense. If he were
to receive the sentence he has coming, there would be
nothing to deport but probably his ashes. What a society tolerates,

(36:40):
a society deserves. Now, the girl did not deserve it,
Miss Sweden, Perhaps you deserve that. Unbelievable It shows there
is a big difference between us and the rest of
the world. Everybody, have a great weekend, and guess what
I'll see you next. Weekend,