10-28-25 - 8am - Bill Gates Climate Shift

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Michael.

Speaker 2 (00:00):
After five years, Kansas City to Missouri gave up on
their free bus experiment because they turned into rolling homeless
shelters when it was raining, too hot or too cold.
The homelessness that on the buses and rode them all day,
sleeping and urinating on the buses, which led to a
decline in the overall ridership. What does Mundami think New

(00:21):
York would be any different?

Speaker 1 (00:24):
Because it's New York and because Mondamie says so, and
when the Marxist speaks, you should listen because they would
never lie to you. They tell you the truth. And
this whole stuff about people. Look, I've never in my
life seen on any subway system anywhere in the world,
or any bus system or I don't think of buses
that only haven't been out, but any subway system anywhere

(00:46):
around the world, or light rail around Denver. I've never
seen any photographs or personally witness any homeless person that
would be sleeping on that subway, you know, when it's
cold outside, or just you know, sleep because it's dark outside.

Speaker 3 (00:58):
I've never known a female who ride the bus and
did not have their hand inside their purse clutching a
safety device while riding, you know, the light rail of
the bus. Just I've never heard of that before.

Speaker 1 (01:13):
Right, And so if you make the buses free, the
only people who are caring, loving, you know, model citizens
will get on the free bus to go from or
the free light rail to go from wherever to wherever.
That's what RTD should do. Artis, RTD should just make
everything free in Colorado just you know, somebody asked me

(01:37):
if I let's having several fun conversations justin on the
drive back, and somebody asked me, do you talk? Do
you take the light rail to work? Well? I had
to clean off the dyeing cold coffee inside of my windshield. Yeah,
quickly too. That's the sticky it is, it is. Yeah.

Speaker 4 (01:57):
Uh.

Speaker 1 (01:58):
The New York Times this morning has a story out
with Bill Gates because and I hadn't planned to do this,
but he apparently has gone on CNBC also, so of
course Bill Gates's PR person has managed to put together
some sort of and I don't know why. I don't
know what he's up to. But when you have a

(02:19):
story about you in the New York Times that's released today,
now obviously they not it's going to be released today.
I think it was updated at eight forty Eastern time
this morning. You know, in advanced the story's coming out
because they've clearly talked to him. They've coordinated everything through
his PR pers people, So it's PR people have also coordinated.

(02:41):
Oh listen, New York Times as a story coming up
about you, why don't we fly you to New York
and let's get you on the air with CNBC and
you can talk business. So that's what you're going to
hear in a minute. But here's how the New York
Times story goes. This is not to bury the lead.
This is an indication that well, as Dylan used to

(03:04):
seeing the times, they are a changing And I really
do believe that the times are a change. In here.
Bill Gates, the Microsoft co founder, has spent billions of
his own money to raise the alarm about the dangers
of climate change, is now pushing back against what he
calls a quote doomsday outlook and appears to have shifted

(03:26):
his stance on the risks posed by a warming planet.
No feecis Sherlock. Huh. Now, I don't know. Maybe this
is a broken clock is right twice a day, or
maybe something in his life has changed, Maybe he's but

(03:47):
that the ROI on some of his investments in green
new energy, and he's he's seen the light and it
was red as in deficit, as in broken, as of
not doing too well. In a lengthy memo released Tuesday,
mister Gates sought to tempt down the alarmism. He said

(04:10):
that many people use to describe the effects of rising temperatures. Instead,
he called for redirecting efforts toward improving lives in the
developing world. All the quote, although climate change will have
serious consequences, can't give up completely right, particularly for people

(04:31):
in the poorest countries. It will not lead to humanity's demise.
People will be able to live and thrive in most
places on Earth for the foreseeable future. The Times points
out that this comes just four years after he published
a book that was titled How to Avoid a Climate Disaster,

(04:52):
So the memo appears to be a reframing. Is the
worth that The New York Times wants to use reframing
of how Gates is thinking about the challenges posed by
According to The New York Times, a rapidly warming world.
I thought we debunked that last week or sometime in

(05:15):
the past month or so we debunked the whole idea
that it is a rapidly warming world. Is it warming? Yes?
Is it rapidly warming? Well, it's not rapidly warming, like
I rapidly got back home last night. But then he
does go on CNBC and he does have he's got
a new message.

Speaker 4 (05:34):
Climate is a super important problem.

Speaker 1 (05:40):
It's super important. What is he a valley girl? It's
a super important.

Speaker 4 (05:45):
Problem here to avoid super bad outcomes.

Speaker 1 (05:49):
Oh, it's a super bad problem. We got to avoid
some super bad outcomes. It's super duper.

Speaker 4 (05:56):
We won't achieve our best goal, the one point five
or even the two degrees. And as we go about
trying to minimize that, we have to frame it in
terms of overall human wealthfare, not just everything should be
solely for climate.

Speaker 5 (06:15):
How much of your own view is a function of
just contextually what's happening in the world versus what I
think you've fought for a long time about the climate.

Speaker 4 (06:25):
Well, if the aid budgets to poor countries were continuing
to go up the way they did over the last
twenty five years, and then the trade offs between climate
action and saving children's lives wouldn't be as acute as
it is now that these budgets are going down and
going down quite a bit. And so the plea here

(06:47):
is to say, okay, let's take that very limited money
and not have some partitioned off per particular causes. Let's
measure it all in terms of the human welfare. How
do how do you help those countries?

Speaker 1 (07:04):
What does they may want to offer an interpretation of that,
I'm not really quite sure what he I think I
know what's in his head, I'm not sure it came
out of his mouth. And that is I think I've
come to the realization that there are poor people that
if we keep doing all of the Green New Deal
bull craft that we're doing, those people in third world

(07:26):
craphole countries are never going to have electricity. They're never
going to they're never going to have clean running water,
They're never going to have medicines. They're they're never going
to have anything other than you know, a thatched hunt
or a dirt hut that they're they're never going to
be able to, you know, grow and prosper and become,
you know, living a decent life. I'm not saying living

(07:49):
a Bill Gates life or even a Michael Brown life,
they're gonna, you know, maybe just have a roof over
their head and have you know, a job. Maybe it's
an agriculture. Maybe they're growing their own crops. They maybe
maybe they're buying and selling cattle. They're doing something. But
they're never going to have that if we keep spending
all of this money on Green New Deal and climate change.

(08:12):
Remember when Obama said that, you know those to those
African college kids that look, you can't have air conditioning
because the world's going to burn up. I think they've
so far overreached. They've gone so far overboard with the
climate bull craft that the Church of the climate activists
have exposed the falsehood of their own gospel. And in

(08:37):
so doing, people like Bill Gates are beginning to realize,
you know what, maybe we realize to focus on trying
to improve their lives, and maybe this one and a
half to two degrees celsius is not that big of
a deal after all. Maybe he's action, maybe some of
this over reaction and some of the doomsday languages that

(08:59):
everybody use, Oh my god, the world is coming to
an end. Rogman have burned to death. Maybe he's heard
about the gives that truly have climate anxiety, and maybe
he's starting to feel, you know, in the darken night
when he's laying in bed with his girlfriend or whatever
he's sleeping with right now, that he's thinking to himself
that maybe maybe some of this is my fault. Maybe
this is some of my fault. I say that because

(09:23):
in twenty fifteen he found a Breakthrough Energy that was
a venture capital fund that was promising new glean, new
clean green energy startups that morphed into a climate policy
advocacy group in d C trying to find ways to

(09:44):
promote the cutting of greenhouse gas e missions. Maybe he
studies some basic you know, he's a computer geek, but
maybe he read some basic biology and understood that oh
CO two is necessary for the for humanities who survive
the times. Then says this climate he's they're quoting him.

(10:08):
This is from an essay in twenty twenty three Gates Rights.
Climate change is already affecting most people's lives, and when
we think about the impact on our families and future generations,
it can feel overwhelming. Really, I've never felt overwhelmed by
in my entire life. In my entire life. Now I'm

(10:29):
an old fart, so Bill who you talking about. Oh,
maybe you're talking about the congregants in the church of
the climate activists, or when they go out proselytizing and
they find a bunch of idiot, mush brain kids that
they can convince that the world's coming to an end
and we're all going to burn to death. Maybe that's
what you're talking about, But I think most Americans are

(10:49):
more concerned about, Hey, are the planes going to stay
in the air They're gonna crash into one another? Is
beef going to continue to increase in prices? Can I
actually buy the car that I want to buy as
opposed to car that I'm forced to buy. Can I
choose liver or I want to live? Do if I
don't want electric? Can I actually use natural gas, which
is more efficient? Can I do that? Maybe you're starting

(11:10):
to realize that the world's passed you and we're not
all panic stricken like you. I believe pretended to be,
because I never really think that you. It's I intellectually
understand what birthing is. I intellect and I've witnessed live

(11:36):
birth human and animal, but I've never experienced it. So
I intellectually understand that some people are really scared and
worried about climate change. But I'm old enough now that
I've experienced climate change and it wasn't earth shattering. It

(11:57):
didn't change my life much. Did It may be changed,
you know, I'm cooling less in the summer or heating
more in the winter, or vice versa. Yeah, that could be,
but it didn't and it didn't drastically change my life.
And I don't spend days and days worrying about it.
I actually spend days and days trying to debunk it.

(12:17):
Because what we ought to be doing, if as I
firmly believe, the climate does change and always will change,
what we ought to be recognizing is, hey, God created
this vast universe and something called the sun which is
starting to come up and blind me over here with
the with the broken blinds. That is has more effect

(12:38):
because that affects water, vapor, and those are all things
that we really don't have any control over unless we
want to put the world in a gigantic dehumidifier of
some sort. But that ain't gonna work. So why are
we all panic stricken about He goes on, and you were.

Speaker 5 (12:53):
A huge supporter of the Paris Climate Accord at the time.
And I wonder, now, when you book back, given that
you're changing sort of the metric with which you use,
do you say to yourself that the Paris Climate Accord
and its.

Speaker 4 (13:07):
Goals were misplaced.

Speaker 1 (13:10):
No, not at all.

Speaker 4 (13:11):
That was a key milestone because the countries of the
world said, hey, this is a mutual problem the temperaturize.
The entire world will experience the temperatize from the emissions
from all these countries. So getting countries to commit was very,
very important. The one thing about that accord that turned

(13:34):
out not to be realistic was the ambitious goal of
staying to one point five degrees. We won't be able
to do that, knowing will you not.

Speaker 1 (13:43):
Be able to do it? But have you ever seen
any study that correlates let me rephrase it, have you
ever seen any study that proves or demonstrates a causal
link between reduction of Now, remember they use the term
missions because they don't want to focus on CO two,
although that was there. That was their tipping point when

(14:06):
they finally got CO two designated as a greenhouse gas emission.
So now they can just say emissions without focusing on
CO two, which is obviously necessary for life and We
also know that CO two has been in terms of
parts per million much much magnitude greater than it is today.
And yet well we're having a fairly typical October day today,

(14:30):
suns out blinding me. Right now, it's gonna be cool morning,
be a warm afternoon, be a cold night again. Yeah, weather, climate,
nothing's changing. And admitting that you can't reach it is
also an emission that you can't prove it.

Speaker 4 (14:50):
Even if you took all the money away from health,
you wouldn't be able to do that. So now you know,
the question is, Okay, what temperature level are We're going
to end up that very important to minimize that, but
not at the expense of everything else.

Speaker 1 (15:07):
Okay, oh, still I have to focus on that temperature,
but not at the expense of oh, maybe people's lives,
getting people out of poverty, giving them a government system
that allows free markets to flourish, rule of law to persist,
so you can enter into contracts and do all the
things that this country has proven can be done. Maybe

(15:30):
he's you know, maybe finally, and I hope so, I mean,
I truly hope so that as he's gotten older, gotten divorced,
these kids, you know, moving away whatever the I don't
think he even has kids. But as he gets older,
maybe he's realizing that he's been pursuing this false god

(15:51):
and that, oh, we really need to focus on humanity
and not this thing that is beyond our control. I
truly want to believe that, but it's Bill Gates, so
I don't. I just want to.

Speaker 5 (16:06):
In the content of not at the expense of everything else.
So many businesses, companies including Microsoft, made pledges around being
net zero, trying to get in some cases negative net zero,
I mean going back and paying for their carbon production
from earlier. Was that a mistake?

Speaker 4 (16:24):
Now, not at all?

Speaker 5 (16:25):
That is, that's not the message that you're trying.

Speaker 1 (16:27):
To Suggitt, No, not at all.

Speaker 4 (16:29):
I mean, why have we been able to lower the
future missions? It's because companies like Microsoft and many others
focused on this initiative, and it's very important that those
companies help advance these new technologies. By being the early

(16:50):
customers for things like nuclear fission, fusion, clean cement, they're
driving the prices down.

Speaker 1 (16:58):
And he didn't talk about wind or solar. Now that interesting.
He went nuclear and he went clean clean cement. We all, Yeah,
he totally ignored the main focus of all the congregates
in the Church of the climate activists, wind and solar.

Speaker 4 (17:17):
And that's the magic thing. When you get the clean
stuff to be cheaper than the dirty stuff, then you
can take that whole air of emissions and saying, okay,
just normal market economics.

Speaker 1 (17:28):
Works there really interestingly breakthrough energy, which is where he
funds most of his climate activism, including true activism. I'm
talking about lobbying and activism. They've announced deep cuts that
include dismantling the Climate Policy Group entirely, and then the

(17:51):
Time says, and in May, Gates announced plans to wind
down the Gates Foundation, which has spent billions on climate
related issues, including the one point four billion dollar commitment
to help farmers in poor countries adapt to a hotter planet. Well,
isn't that in contradiction to what you're just saying earlier?
You actually want to help them, those farmers to adapt

(18:14):
so that they can actually gross and crops. Oh yeah,
maybe you do, but pre energy is not going to solve.

Speaker 3 (18:21):
That, Michael.

Speaker 2 (18:28):
The Democrats would never lie to us, but they might
tell us five different ways, but never lie.

Speaker 1 (18:36):
Good day. They're children. They like children. So back to
the whole heat thing. One of the major chapters, one
of the major gospels in the Church of the climate activists,

(18:57):
is not just a slight rise in the temperature itself,
but it's also the add on effect that that warning,
that that warning would trigger. Now, the proponents of that view,
people like Bill Gates, at least until the New York
Times this morning, Bill Gates or al Gore, or report
from the Intergovernmental Panel and Climate Change the IPCC, they've

(19:20):
been warning us forever that even modest increases in average
temperatures will make vast regions of this planet too hot
for human habitation. Their claim is that this is going
to force billions of people to then start migrating in
search of cooler climates, and that will then internally to
massive disruptions in societies, disruptions and economies in our ecosystems.

(19:44):
And that's the that's the apocalyptic into the world scenario.
So this idea that Bill Gates has been pushing all
this time, that heat waves will become so intense and
so frequent that entire areas, particularly in the tropical and
sub tropical areas of the planet, that they will become unlivable.

(20:05):
And he claims that sparks what he calls the climate
migration crisis, and that it will be on this unprecedented scale.
The only so called migrant crisis that I see right
now is caused by multiculturalism. Think Europe or open borders,
think us. But what if that doom's detail that he

(20:26):
kept telling us, as he now is starting to backtrack
a little bit is not only over hyped, but what
if it's dead wrong, flipped on its head by the
very data that the alarmists themselves ignore. What if the
data shows that it's cold, not heat, that poses the
far greater threat to our lives, and that a warmer

(20:49):
world might actually save lives and not endanger lives. So
why push the heat hysteria when cold is the silent
killer that claims millions of every single year. Now I've
talked I don't know ten times I feel like incessantly
about how the cabal and the climate activists they sensationalize heat. Actually,

(21:15):
you know, a more accurate way to phrase it is
they sensationalized temperatures to push the agenda, but they ignore
the real story behind temperature trends. So that's why we
get oh my god, it's a record heat today? Now, well,
when it was the record broke? You know, the record
was broken today. What was the original record that was

(21:37):
broke today? Oh it was in nineteen twelve, or it
was in eighteen thirty two. Oh okay, So why are
you telling me this? I guess because we'd like to
hear that. You know, I think that everything has to
be the extreme in order to get the attention, to
get the eyeballs, to get the ears, to get whatever. Now,

(22:00):
what if again? As I've tried to explain before, that
the real story is not the sensationalizing the heat, it's
other trends behind temperature. Every year, the press, the cabal

(22:21):
will ramp up stories about urban heat spikes, and they
blame them, always on that there's a causal link between
greenhouse gases from human activities like driving cars, using energy
and breathing because CO two is produced by our breathing.
And I've pointed out that those spikes are often due
because of the heat urban heat island effect, and that's

(22:43):
where the concrete, the asphalt, the buildings all trap the
heat in the cities and it makes them warmer than
the surrounding areas. Regardless of what's going on in terms
of any other global climate trend. It's a local phenomenon,
and it's caused by development. It's not some sign of
some disastrous planetary crisis that is beyond our control. We're

(23:04):
just all going to die. I hate it when when
I hear about kids that truly have climate anxiety. How
pervert of us, perverted of us to do that to kids.
I've delve into the historical records to show that heat
waves are more likely the result of expanding urban areas

(23:25):
and the urban heat island effect, more so than any
sort of increase in carbon dioxide levels. Ambient temperature refers
to the air temperature in a given environment, but greenhouse
gases are compounds like carbon dioxide and methae that traps
heat in the atmosphere. Yet data from the US reveals

(23:46):
that the highest heat index, which combines temperature and humidity
to measure how hot it feels to the body, that
occur back in the nineteen thirties, long before modern emissions peat.
So that challenges the idea. I think it directly challenges
the idea that more greenhouse gases automatically mean more deadly

(24:09):
heat waves, and then fossil fuels the energy sources derive
from ancient organic matter like coal, oil, or natural gas
that plays a critical role in combating heat waves. Access
to reliable energy from those sources enables something that husband

(24:30):
and wives fight over all the time, air conditioning. It
allows refrigeration. It allows us to go to the grocery
store and buy foods and keep them fresh and keep them,
you know, usable for weeks, if not months at a time. Refrigeration.
We have all sorts of technologies that protect us from

(24:54):
extreme temperatures, and without those technologies, societies would be far
more or vulnerable to both heat and cold. Consider a
comparison from that from from the before before widespread falsely
feel fuel use people just I've often thought about this
because of the book The Worst Hard Times about the

(25:15):
Dust Boat, which includes my hometown, how people, including my grandparents,
how they endured heat waves and they really had limited,
if any options, like even seeking. You ever been to
the Okluma Panhandle, I'll give I'll give you for in
certain areas, I give you a dollar for every tree,
and you get me five for every tree that doesn't exist.

(25:37):
You'd owe me more money than I owe you. They
lit they endured those heat waves with very limited options.
They couldn't seek shade, there wasn't fans, and what little
water they would do maybe to put on cloth to
hang over windows. They had to really preserve that water
because water was scarce. What did that result in higher

(26:01):
mortality rates? And then comes along modern infrastructure that cool
buildings and that dramatically reduces those risks. It can be
sub zero outside and I'm all comfy in here, or
it can be like it is this morning, it can
be a little chilly and I'm comfortable in here. I

(26:24):
you know, sorry, I said, you know. I often, not often,
but I occasionally think about this, this particular building. I
think dragging my right. I don't think there are any
windows in this building that open. I can't think of.

Speaker 3 (26:41):
Any I don't believe windows because we have a couple
of the patio doors.

Speaker 1 (26:43):
But no, you can prop patio doors open, right, But
there are if this If this building's HVAC system goes
down in the middle of the summer this and it's
happened before, not for the significant lengths of time, or
in the dead of winter and sub zero out and
there's there's no heat, there's no alternative, there's no window

(27:07):
for me to open in the studio. At home, I
can at least open the windows, or I could shut
all the windows, you know, and why Frank, I could
turn on a gas burning fireplace. But we we've created
these modern structures that protect us from the outside. You
go to Minneapolis, you can go lots of cities, you

(27:28):
can do this. You can go around downtown and never
go outside. So add on to that, when when traditional
temperature data does not support the alarmist story, the alarmist view,
then what do they do? Will they find new metrics
to introduce to muddy the waters to keep you confused

(27:49):
so that their their alarmism overtakes your confusion. The heat
index accounts for human For example, the heat index outs
for humidity's impact on perceived temperature, and the wet bulb
global globe temperature measures heat stress in direct sunlight, factoring

(28:10):
in temperature, humidity, windspeed, solar radiation. Now, those are useful
for very specific contexts like outdoor work, but they're often
used by the alarmists to claim unprecedented heat when playing
temperature records show oh, and there's no such thing. For instance,
while temperatures today are not surpassing those from decades ago.

(28:34):
In most places, these alternative measures are hyped so that
in your mind you think it's otherwise. And then you
add to that all the reported heat waves. They're not
as natural as they see. A record high temperature in Tampa, Floorida.
I don't know whether I told this story locally or nationally.

(28:58):
A record high temperature and floor there was measured at
a weather station located near an airport runway where a
jet engine was idling, artificially boosting the reading with all
the heat from the exhaust. Weather stations are devices that
record environmental data like temperature, and the urban heat island
effect can skew those readings when they're placed near a

(29:20):
heat source like a pavement or I'll want to know
a blasting jet engine that is sitting there idling, waiting
for ground control to tell them you're cleared for takeoff.
That Tampa example shows how poor station placement creates fabricated
records that is then used by meteorologists, not blaming them all,

(29:40):
but some local meteorologists and then all the activists in
the Church of the Climate, the congrets and the Church
of the Climate activists. That fuels the media panic. That's
what gets fed to your eyeballs and earballs, and that's
what causes your eyeballs and your ears. That's what causes
everybody to then panic. It's almost happened to Bill Gay.

(30:01):
Maybe he's actually starting, maybe he's listening to this program,
maybe he's starting to actually realize that he's pushing a
false narrative.

Speaker 2 (30:11):
If I have earballs but my head is between my ears,
what does that mean?

Speaker 1 (30:21):
Yeah, you shut up and sit down. You go sit here,
and you talk one hundred miles an hour for four hours.
All right, bite me. I caught it. At least I
caught it. I got it, and correcting myself. What's half
the time I don't do? So there's that must start
using that. It's gonna become a thing in the Red

(30:42):
Beard household. Use your earballs, Use your earballs. That's right.
And you know what's funny is the minute you say
something like that, because your mouth's just going right and
the brain's already thinking about the next sentence, but your
ear hears it, and you think that's stupid, that's really stupid.

(31:02):
How did that come out? And so you know, I
corrected myself, But no, this audience that I know, we
despise them, but they should adore us.

Speaker 3 (31:11):
Well, they hang on every word. If they heard earballs,
they used their earballs to.

Speaker 1 (31:18):
Earballs, right and now because they're so damn stupid, they're
trying to figure out where are my earballs? Right there? Yeah,
but don't sit just do this. Don't sit around in
public and play with your earballs, okay, because you do
that at home under the covers, that's right, you do. Well,

(31:39):
why under the covers? Okay?

Speaker 3 (31:41):
Somebody having to look in through the window.

Speaker 1 (31:47):
You beeping toms in your neighborhood. If you got a
problem with people, well, you're playing with your earballs. You
got a problem with your neighbors beaking in your window.

Speaker 3 (31:54):
It's a private thing when you play with your earballs.

Speaker 1 (31:57):
I totally understand that. So why don't you close your on?
Don't you close your blinds? Then you would have to
worry about the sheets over your earballs, because then that
just gets to be well, that gets to be messy
and kind.

Speaker 3 (32:11):
Of upstairs in the dark, under the covers. Then time begins,
and missus.

Speaker 1 (32:17):
Redbeard, dinner's ready. I'll be down in ten seconds. Busy
playing with my earballs. Giv me ten more seconds. By
the way, the WiFi is not working. It may be
a little longer get the wire, reboot the round because
I can't I can't get the stimulation for my earballs.

(32:40):
So please fix that as quickly as possible. Oh my god,
they pay us to do this, can you believe it? Not?

Speaker 3 (32:48):
Well, but they do well.

Speaker 1 (32:50):
Well, it's it's you see, at least keeps us near
the poverty level, right near the not above it, not
on it, but near it, just near it. What the
all of what I've been saying is that it sets
up the idea that the climate crisis narrative desperately tries

(33:11):
to convince people that heats the primary danger and that
adding more heat to the system through greenhouse gases is
going to lead to this widespread death and displacement. What
about Dragon made a great point during the earlier break
about you heard a story or sault story somewhere about.

Speaker 3 (33:27):
Yeah, this story earlier in the year talking about how
the allergy season is now longer because of climate change
because the CO two levels rising means that the plant
spawning season is longer.

Speaker 1 (33:43):
Well, here's my take on that. That's the big big
Pharma is in collusion to create a longer to pollute
the planet to create a longer growing season, because that
means our season will be longer, and they can sell
us more over the counter meds at highly inflated prices,

(34:06):
and if you have serious allergies, then they can sell
you the prescription medication at even higher rate, so they
make more money off the heat.

Speaker 3 (34:15):
All I picked up from the story is more plants,
and that's a bad thing.

Speaker 1 (34:22):
Well, yeah, because it's all because the only plants that
respond to the increased growing season are weeds, not corn, alfalfa, wheat,
you know, flowers, nothing like that, Just just weeds.

Speaker 3 (34:35):
Or the lovely fall foliage that we just up in
the mountains. No, no, none of that.

Speaker 1 (34:39):
It gets you this. Did you go up and see
the foliage?

Speaker 3 (34:43):
No?

Speaker 1 (34:44):
Okay, because mine right now is just on the street.
I love it. I love it when the old leaves
are on the streets. I love that it's all over
the sidewalk, it's everywhere. Correct, cars go driving by, down,
the leaves go flying, except this morning they're all wet.
That all right, ear balls are coming up next. Don't
go away. But we'll explain that for it